DOCSLIB.ORG

Smoking Cessation: a Report of the Surgeon General, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Smoking Cessation: a Report of the Surgeon General, 2020 Chapter 5 The Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Overall Morbidity, Mortality, and Economic Costs Introduction 439 Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Overall Morbidity 439 Conclusions from Previous Surgeon General’s Reports 439 Description of the Literature Review 440 Assessment of Morbidity 440 Assessment of Smoking Status 440 Epidemiologic Evidence 457 Cross-Sectional Studies 457 Longitudinal Studies 458 Synthesis of the Evidence 460 Summary of the Evidence 460 Benefits of Smoking Cessation on All-Cause Mortality 461 Conclusions from Previous Surgeon General’s Reports 461 Summary of the Evidence 464 Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Economic Costs 465 Economic Costs of Smoking 465 Economics of Smoking Cessation 466 Principles of Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 467 Cost-Effectiveness of Clinical Smoking Cessation Interventions 467 Cost-Effectiveness of Nonclinical Smoking Cessation Interventions 482 Cost-Effectiveness of Tobacco Price Increases Through Taxation 482 Synthesis of the Evidence 482 Summary of the Evidence 485 Conclusions 485 References 486 437 Smoking Cessation Introduction Cigarette smoking causes multiple diseases and mortality, and economic costs. Initially, it considers how reduces the general level of health of smokers (U.S. general indicators of health can change after smoking ces- Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS] sation. This type of information is critical to informing 2004, 2014). These health consequences have been well smokers about the potential benefits of cessation and serves documented in previous Surgeon General’s reports. The as a strong rationale to provide interventions that can 1964 report first summarized results on smoking and all- help increase the success of quitting smoking. Such pro- cause mortality, finding that smoking causes a 70% increase grams may be offered through healthcare organizations, in risk of adverse health consequences (U.S. Department communities, states, and other organizations. Smoking is of Health, Education, and Welfare [USDHEW] 1964). The known to generate healthcare and other economic costs 2004 report found smoking generally diminishes health and to affect the economics of the households of smokers (USDHHS 2004). General measures of health can be infor- (USDHHS 2014). Previous Surgeon General’s reports on mative because they provide an integrative indicator of the tobacco have periodically reviewed the economic costs of health burden placed on smokers and on society overall. smoking, as tracked by the Centers for Disease Control In addition to the direct human costs that smoking places and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Smoking-Attributable Mortality, on persons and society, one general measure with acknowl- Morbidity, and Economic Costs (SAMMEC) model. This edged implications for public health policy and practice is chapter expands on this work by focusing on the most the economic cost of smoking. recently available scientific literature on the economic ben- This chapter considers broad indicators of burden efits of smoking cessation, while also complementing the in relation to smoking cessation, including morbidity, kinds of cost estimates previously provided by SAMMEC. Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Overall Morbidity Chapter 4 of this report (The Health Benefits of used in previous Surgeon General’s reports on smoking, Smoking Cessation) describes the associations between including the 2014 Surgeon General’s report (USDHHS smoking cessation and changes in risk for specific dis- 2014). However, to limit the scope of this review, some of ease outcomes. It also addresses how cessation affects the the many correlates of well-being (e.g., absenteeism from natural history of various disease outcomes, such as by work) are not specifically considered. slowing the progression of underlying pathophysiological processes. In addition to the beneficial impacts on spe- cific disease outcomes, previous reviews of smoking ces- Conclusions from Previous Surgeon sation and morbidity (Goldenberg et al. 2014) have con- General’s Reports cluded that cessation is associated with improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a broad construct Previous Surgeon General’s reports (USDHHS 1990, defined by Healthy People 2020 as “a multi-dimensional 2004) have comprehensively covered the relationship concept that includes domains related to physical, mental, between smoking and general morbidity. The 1990 Surgeon emotional, and social functioning” (Office of Disease General’s report on the health benefits of smoking cessa- Prevention and Health Promotion 2018). In a complemen- tion synthesized scientific evidence about cessation and tary conclusion, after evaluating a broad range of general its effects on general morbidity, concluding that “former evidence, the 2004 Surgeon General’s report concluded smokers have better health status than current smokers that active smoking is causally associated with diminished as measured in a variety of ways, including days of illness, health status (USDHHS 2004). number of health complaints, and self-reported health This chapter addresses the evidence on smoking status” (USDHHS 1990, p. 9). However, that report also cessation and its relationship to more general mea- found that the reviewed studies were “extremely heteroge- sures of health outcomes, particularly whether cessation neous, with some methodologic shortcomings” (USDHHS improves general QoL compared with continued smoking. 1990, p. 89) and that the “variety of measures used makes This review aligns with and complements the approach direct comparison across studies problematic” (USDHHS The Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Overall Morbidity, Mortality, and Economic Costs 439 A Report of the Surgeon General 1990, p. 87). The 2004 Surgeon General’s report on the Assessment of Morbidity health consequences of active smoking subsequently The general measures of morbidity used in the reviewed studies that included various indicators of gen- 24 identified studies varied but cover three main catego- eral health, concluding that “the evidence is sufficient to ries: general, smoking specific, or disease specific: infer a causal relationship between smoking and dimin- ished health status that may be manifest as increased 1. General. Many studies used general measures of absenteeism from work and increased use of medical care HRQoL, most frequently the Short Form (SF)-36 services” (USDHHS 2004, p. 676). In addition, a major (SF-36) and SF-12 surveys, both the Medical conclusion of the 2004 report was that “quitting smoking Outcomes Study (Ware Jr and Sherbourne 1992) has immediate as well as long-term benefits, reducing and RAND versions (Hays and Morales 2001). One risks for diseases caused by smoking and improving health study (Mitra et al. 2004) adapted the SF-36 for use in general” (USDHHS 2004, p. 25). The present chapter in a population with mobility impairments. The updates these findings on the basis of more recent studies other generic measures of HRQoL included the 15-D of smoking cessation and indicators of general morbidity. (dimensional) (Sintonen 1995), the EuroQoL (The EuroQol Group 1990), the QoL Inventory (Frisch et al. 1992), the World Health Organization’s QOL- Description of the Literature Review BREF (Skevington et al. 2004), CDC’s HRQOL-4 and its Healthy Days Symptoms Module (Moriarty et al. Scientific literature from 1990 to 2017 was system- 2003), and the Functional Status Questionnaire atically reviewed, and reference lists from the identified (Jette et al. 1986). The studies identified in the lit- articles were searched for additional studies. Search terms erature review also assessed dissatisfaction with life included “smoking cessation,” “epidemiology,” “mor- and general health status. bidity,” “health status,” and “quality of life.” Studies were included if they measured the benefit of smoking cessa- 2. Smoking specific. One study (Olufade et al. 1999) tion for general morbidity in former cigarette smokers; used the Smoking Cessation Quality of Life (SCQoL) thus, the appropriate comparison group was continuing questionnaire. cigarette smokers but not never smokers. Accordingly, only studies that specifically and directly compared out- 3. Disease specific. Some studies used disease-specific comes between former cigarette smokers (defined in measures of HRQoL. These measures assess the multiple ways) and current cigarette smokers were con- impact of specific diseases on relevant components sidered. Studies that included former cigarette smokers of QoL. The European Organisation for Research and but used only never smokers as the reference group were Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire not included because such studies were not informative QLQ-C30 (Aaronson et al. 1993) was used, along with for the purpose of this chapter. However, when informa- the LC13 module for lung cancer (Bergman et al. tive comparisons were made in eligible studies that met 1994) and the H&N35 module for head and neck the criterion of comparisons with current smokers, some cancer (Bjordal et al. 1994). Other disease-specific findings for never smokers were included. instruments included the Aquarel questionnaire for Following the systematic review of literature, patients with pacemakers (Stofmeel et al. 2001), the 24 studies published from 1995 to 2016 were identified Clinical COPD Questionnaire (van der Molen et al. that assessed smoking cessation and general morbidity, 2003), and the VascuQoL questionnaire for patients including 7 cross-sectional studies (Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CLINICAL TRIALS Safety and Immunogenicity of a Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine in Current Smokers
    CLINICAL TRIALS Safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine in current smokers Immunotherapy is a novel potential treatment for nicotine addiction. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine, NicVAX, and its effects on smoking behavior. were recruited for a noncessation treatment study and assigned to 1 of 3 doses of the (68 ؍ Smokers (N nicotine vaccine (50, 100, or 200 ␮g) or placebo. They were injected on days 0, 28, 56, and 182 and monitored for a period of 38 weeks. Results showed that the nicotine vaccine was safe and well tolerated. Vaccine immunogenicity was dose-related (P < .001), with the highest dose eliciting antibody concentrations within the anticipated range of efficacy. There was no evidence of compensatory smoking or precipitation of nicotine withdrawal with the nicotine vaccine. The 30-day abstinence rate was significantly different across with the highest rate of abstinence occurring with 200 ␮g. The nicotine vaccine appears ,(02. ؍ the 4 doses (P to be a promising medication for tobacco dependence. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:456-67.) Dorothy K. Hatsukami, PhD, Stephen Rennard, MD, Douglas Jorenby, PhD, Michael Fiore, MD, MPH, Joseph Koopmeiners, Arjen de Vos, MD, PhD, Gary Horwith, MD, and Paul R. Pentel, MD Minneapolis, Minn, Omaha, Neb, Madison, Wis, and Rockville, Md Surveys show that, although about 41% of smokers apy, is about 25% on average.2 Moreover, these per- make a quit attempt each year, less than 5% of smokers centages most likely exaggerate the efficacy of are successful at remaining abstinent for 3 months to a intervention because these trials are typically composed year.1 Smokers seeking available behavioral and phar- of subjects who are highly motivated to quit and who macologic therapies can enhance successful quit rates are free of complicating diagnoses such as depression 2 by 2- to 3-fold over control conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Smoking, Environmental Pollution, and Weather Conditions Risk Factors for COVID-19? José Miguel Chatkin1a, Irma Godoy2a
    J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(5):e20200183 https://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20200183 REVIEW ARTICLE Are smoking, environmental pollution, and weather conditions risk factors for COVID-19? José Miguel Chatkin1a, Irma Godoy2a 1. Departamento de Medicina Interna ABSTRACT e Pneumologia, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the highly contagious severe acute Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil. respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is probably systemic, has a major 2. Disciplina de Pneumologia, respiratory component, and is transmitted by person-to-person contact, via airborne Departamento de Clínica Médica, droplets or aerosols. In the respiratory tract, the virus begins to replicate within cells, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, after which the host starts shedding the virus. The individuals recognized as being at risk Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil. for an unfavorable COVID-19 outcome are those > 60 years of age, those with chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, those with hypertension, and those with chronic lung Submitted: 20 April 2020. diseases, as well as those using chemotherapy, corticosteroids, or biological agents. Accepted: 27 May 2020. Some studies have suggested that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with other Study carried out at the Escola de risk factors, such as smoking, external environmental pollution, and certain climatic Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica conditions. The purpose of this narrative review was to perform a critical assessment of do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) the relationship between COVID-19 and these potential risk factors. and at the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Keywords: Coronavirus infections; COVID-19; Air pollution; Smoking; Tobacco use Botucatu (SP) Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Cigarette Smoking Cessation in the United States
    Tobacco Control 1993; 2 (suppl): S3-S16 S3 SESSION I TRENDS IN CESSATION Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.2.suppl1.S4 on 1 January 1993. Downloaded from Introduction Saul Shiftman I'm happy to welcome you here on behalf of of the National Heart, Lung and Blood the Planning Committee. It's a pleasure to see Institute's Smoking Education Program, this actually happening after almost a year of whose job it is to translate findings from planning, and I'm looking forward to the next intervention research into community action day and a half. and education programmes; he was formerly We have 2454 days left until the year 2000, the director of smoking intervention with the at which point the national goals are to have a American Heart Association. smoking prevalence of 15%. We're now at Dr Ellen Gritz is a long-time colleague of roughly 25 %. Put another way, we are 81 % of mine, although I hesitate to remind her in the way to the year 2000 from 1964, the year of public that she and I first started working the first Surgeon General's report, and we together a little over 20 years ago in Los have cut smoking prevalence roughly by half. Angeles. She is certainly one of the leading So we're doing pretty well but still have a bit experts in smoking and smoking cessation, and further to go. has particular interests in smoking among In this morning's panel, we'll be discussing women and in special populations. where we're going and how we're going to get Our last panellist, Dr Patrick O'Malley is there in terms of smoking cessation.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking Cessation: a Report of the Surgeon General – 2020
    A SUMMARY OF SMOKING CESSATION: A REPORT OF THE SURGEON GENERAL – 2020 Smoking Cessation – The Role of Healthcare Professionals and Health Systems Smoking in the U.S. Key Findings from the 2020 Since the first Surgeon General’s report on smoking and health was Surgeon General’s Report released in 1964, cigarette smoking among U.S. adults has declined from nearly 43% to a low of nearly 14% in 2018. Despite this progress, smoking ` Smoking cessation reduces risk for many adverse health remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the U.S. effects, including poor reproductive health outcomes, Additionally, smoking-related illnesses continue to cost the nation more cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary than $300 billion every year. disease (COPD), and cancer. Quitting smoking is also beneficial to those who have been diagnosed with heart Smoking Cessation Saves Lives disease and COPD. ` More than three out of five U.S. adults who have ever and Money smoked cigarettes have quit. Although a majority of cigarette smokers make a quit attempt each year, less Tobacco dependence is a chronic, relapsing condition driven by than one-third use cessation medications approved addiction to nicotine. But cessation treatment can help people quit. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or The 2020 Surgeon General’s Report highlights the latest evidence on the behavioral counseling to support quit attempts. benefits of smoking cessation. The evidence is clear – one of the most important actions people can take to improve their health is to quit ` Considerable disparities exist in the prevalence of smoking, no matter how old they are or how long they’ve been smoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking Cessation for Persons with Mental Illnesses
    Smoking Cessation for Persons with Mental Illnesses A Toolkit for Mental Health Providers Updated January 2009 Table of Contents Overview 1 Why Address This Issue? 1 2 Alarming Statistics 2 3 About this Toolkit: 2 Who is this toolkit for? How do I use this toolkit? 4 Provider Pull-Out: Quick Facts Tobacco Use and Mental Illness 1 Smoking and Mental Illness: 3 Biological Predispositions, Psychological Considerations, Social Considerations, Stigma 2 Specific Psychiatric and Co-occuring Mental Disorders: 4 Depression, Schizophrenia, Co-occuring Substance Abuse and Dependance, Other Psychiatric Disorders 3 Tobacco Industry Targeting 5 Assessment and Intervention Planning 1 Readiness to Quit and Stages of Change: 6 Stages of Change, The 5 A’s (Flowchart, Actions and Strategies), The 5 R’s (Addressing Tobacco Cessation for Tobacco User Unwilling to Quit) 2 Cultural Considerations: 12 Recommendations for Mental Health Clinicians, Resources 3 Example of a Clinic Screening 4 Example of a Quitline Referral Form 5 Provider Pull-Out: The 5A’s and 2A’s & R Models Smoking Cessation Treatment for Persons with Mental Illness 1 Key Findings 14 2 Components of Successful Intensive Intervention Programs 15 3 Behavioral Interventions for Smoking Cessation: 16 Overview, SANE program, More Elements of Successful Counseling 4 Prescribing Cessation Medications 18 5 Intervening with Specific Mental Disorders: 19 Depression, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Substance Use Disorders 6 Peer-to-Peer Services 21 7 Smoke-Free Policies 22 8 Provider
    [Show full text]
  • Building Capacity for Smoking Cessation and Treatment of Tobacco
    BUILDING CAPACITY FOR SMOKING Chapter 5 CESSATION AND TREATMENT OF TOBACCO DEPENDENCE Future needs for capacity-building Considerable progress has been made in the provision of effective treatments for tobacco dependence, both behavioural and pharmacological. For many years, behavioural interventions were the only option. Although a combination of behavioural and pharmacological treatment produces the best outcomes, behavioural treatments alone can also be effective. It is critically important that a wide range of interventions be used both in general to support tobacco cessation and specifically to support those who wish to quit tobacco use even where medication is not available (Lando, 2002). Social support for quitting should be possible in all countries, even those with extremely limited resources (Lando, 2002). Success has proved possible from training lay facilitators to conduct group cessation clinics. Abstinence outcomes for those clinics compare favourably with outcomes obtained by doctoral students in counselling psychology. According to the United States Clinical Practice Guideline (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2000), both social support as part of treatment (intra-treatment social support) and help in securing social support outside of treatment (extra-treatment social support) are especially effective in increasing quitting. All countries have lay persons who can provide informal social support for quitting and who can be trained to conduct more formal interventions. There would appear to be special challenges in countries where there are relatively few ex-smokers and where tobacco prevalence rates are high among health professionals (Lando, 2002). Ex-smokers can serve as role models in encouraging quitting, and can provide social support to individuals who are attempting to quit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teen Smoking Cessation Initial Study in Wuhan, China
    Addictive Behaviors 29 (2004) 1725–1733 Project EX — A teen smoking cessation initial study in Wuhan, China Hong Zhenga,*, Steve Sussmana, Xinguang Chena, Yuanhong Wangb, Jiang Xiab, Jie Gongb, Chunhong Liub, Jianguo Shanb, Jennifer Ungera, C. Anderson Johnsona aInstitute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California, USA bCenters for Disease Control and Prevention of Wuhan, PR China Abstract The increasing smoking prevalence in China indicates a need for effective smoking cessation programs, yet, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the effects of smoking cessation programs among Chinese adolescents. A group of 46 10th-grade-level cigarette smokers from two schools in Wuhan, China, were provided with Project EX, an eight-session school-based clinic smoking cessation program developed in the United States. Efforts of translation of the Project EX curriculum, verification of translation, curriculum modification, and cultural adaptation were made to adapt the curriculum to the local culture. The 46 smokers represented 71% of all the self-reported 30-day smokers among 622 10th graders at these two schools. Only one student dropped out from the clinic program. Four-month follow-up data indicated a 10.5% 30-day quit rate and a 14.3% 7-day quit rate. The students who did not quit smoking reported a 16% reduction in daily cigarette consumption at posttest and a 33% reduction at 4-month follow-up. Use of a 2 1/2-week prebaseline-to-baseline clinic assessment indicated a clinic cohort nonassisted quit rate of 3%. These data provided evidence that Project EX can be adapted in another country, such as China; can be very well received; and can lead to promising results on cessation.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking Cessation Workbook
    My Smoking Cessation Workbook My Smoking Cessation Workbook Acknowledgements The provider manual HIV Provider Smoking Cessation Handbook and the accompanying My Smoking Cessation Workbook were developed by the HIV and Smoking Cessation (HASC) Working Group of the Veterans Affairs Clinical Public Health (CPH). The authors primary goal was to develop materials promoting smoking cessation interventions, based on published principles of evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice, for use by HIV-care providers treating HIV+ patients who smoke. With permission from Dr. Miles McFall and Dr. Andrew Saxon, several materials used in these publications were modified from smoking cessation workbooks they developed for providers of patients with post traumatic stress disorder as part of the Smoking Cessation Project of the Northwest Network Mental Illness Research, Education & Clinical Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System. The Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline (Fiore, 2000) and the treatment model described by Richard Brown (2003) provided the foundation for their work and therefore indirectly ours as well.1 Many thanks to Kim Hamlett-Berry, Director of the Office of Public Health Policy and Prevention of CPH, for supporting this project; Hannah-Cohen Blair and Michelle Allen, research assistants, for their help organizing materials; and Leah Stockett for editing the manual and the workbook. As well, the HASC Working Group: Ann Labriola, Pam Belperio, Maggie Chartier, Tim Chen, Linda Allen, Mai Vu, Hannah Cohen-Blair, Jane Burgess, Maggie Czarnogorski, Scott Johns, and Kim Hamlett-Berry. 1 Brown, R. A. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D.
    [Show full text]
  • Part III: Training for Primary Care Providers: Brief Tobacco Interventions; Part IV: Training for Future Trainers: Applying Adult Education Skills to Training
    WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Strengthening health systems for treating tobacco dependence in primary care. Contents: Part I: Training for policy-makers: developing and implementing health systems policy to improve the delivery of brief tobacco interventions; Part II: Training for primary care service managers: planning and implementing system changes to support the delivery of brief tobacco interventions; Part III: Training for primary care providers: brief tobacco interventions; Part IV: Training for future trainers: applying adult education skills to training. 1.Tobacco use disorder - prevention and control. 2.Smoking - prevention and control. 3.Smoking cessation. 4.Primary health care. 5.Delivery of health care. 6.Capacity building. 7.Teaching materials. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150541 3 (NLM classification: HD 9130.6) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can I Quit Smoking? (PDF)
    ANSWERS Lifestyle + Risk Reduction by heart Smoking How Can I Quit Smoking? Smoking harms almost every tissue and organ in the body, including your heart and blood vessels. Nicotine, one of the main chemicals in cigarettes, causes your heart to beat faster and your blood pressure to rise. Carbon monoxide from smoking also gets into the blood and robs your body of oxygen. Nonsmokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke are also harmed. If you smoke or vape, you have good reason to worry about its effect on your health and the health of your loved ones and others. Deciding to quit is a big step. Following through is just as important. Quitting tobacco and nicotine addiction isn’t easy, but others have done it, and you can, too. Is it too late to quit smoking or vaping? quit. Some are: It’s never too late to quit. Quitting smoking has both short- • Stopping all at once on your Quit Day. term and long-term benefits for lowering your cardiovascular • Cutting down the number of cigarettes per day or risk. No matter how much or how long you’ve smoked when how many times you vape until you stop completely. you quit, your risk of heart disease and stroke starts to drop. • Smoking only part of each cigarette. If you use this People who quit smoking generally live longer than people method, you need to count how many puffs you take who continue to smoke. from each cigarette and reduce the number every While you may crave tobacco or nicotine after quitting, most two to three days.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hidden Epidemic: Tobacco Use and Mental Illness
    1724 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036 | T 202 454 5555 | F 202 454 5599 | legacyforhealth.org 80220_Cover.indd 3 6/21/11 9:03 AM 80220_Cover.indd 4 6/21/11 9:03 AM A Hidden Epidemic: Tobacco Use and Mental Illness June 2011 80220_book.indd 1 6/21/11 12:40 AM Legacy’s Commitment to Dissemination Legacy® is a national non-profit committed to helping Americans live longer, healthier lives. Its mission is to build a world where young people reject tobacco and anyone can quit. To further this mission, Legacy has engaged in a comprehensive dissemination effort to share lessons learned from the replicable, sustainable tobacco control projects that were implemented across the nation with the assistance of past Legacy funding. In response to the recent financial downturn and to maximize the impact of limited funds, Legacy has shifted its efforts to focus mostly on population-based strategies and suspended its competitive grant-making programs. Legacy no longer solicits or accepts competitive funding requests and all existing grants will be phased out by 2012. A Hidden Epidemic: Tobacco Use and Mental Illness is the tenth publication in Legacy’s dissemination series. This publication seeks to call attention to the issue of the high prevalence of tobacco use and nicotine dependence among people with mental illnesses and to highlight barriers to effective tobacco-cessation efforts to help people with mental illnesses quit. This publication also features examples of five projects that demonstrate how organizations across America are addressing tobacco-related disparities faced by people with mental illnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • My Tobacco Cessation Workbook
    My Tobacco Cessation Workbook A Resource for Veterans This page intentionally left blank. My Tobacco Cessation Workbook A Resource for Veterans Acknowledgements The provider manual Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation and the accompanying My Tobacco Cessation Workbook were developed by Julianne Himstreet, Pharm.D., BCPS. The author’s primary goal was to develop materials promoting tobacco cessation interventions, based on published principles of evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice, for use by primary care providers treating patients who use tobacco. With permission from the HIV and Smoking Cessation (HASC) Working Group, several materials used in the Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation provider manual were modified from HIV Provider Smoking Cessation Handbook. The U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline (Fiore, 2000) and the treatment model described by Richard Brown (2003) provided the foundation for their work and therefore indirectly ours as well.1 Many thanks to Kim Hamlett-Berry, Director of Tobacco & Health Policy in Clinical Public Health, Office of Public Health, for supporting this project and Leah Stockett for editing the manual and the workbook. In addition, much appreciation needs to be given to Dana Christofferson, Kim Hamlett-Berry, Pam Belperio, and Tim Chen for their editing and content contributions.1 1 Brown, R. A. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D. B. Abrams, R. Niaura, R. Brown, K. M. Emmons, M. G. Goldstein, & P. M. Monti, The tobacco dependence treatment handbook: A guide to best practices (pp. 118-177). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fiore, M. C., Bailey, W. C., Cohen, S. J., Dorfman, S. F., Goldstein, M. G., Gritz, E.
    [Show full text]