Press Release (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lectionary Texts for June 20, 2021 • Fourth Sunday After Pentecost
Lectionary Texts for June 20, 2021 •Fourth Sunday after Pentecost- Year B 1 Samuel 17:(1a, 4-11, 19-23) 32-49 • Psalm 9:9-20 • 2 Corinthians 6:1-13 • Mark 4:35-41 Mark 4:35-41 Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee, 1633, by Rembrandt van Rijn, Dutch, 1606-1669 Oil on canvas Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston, Massachusetts, until stolen on March 18, 1990 Continued Lectionary Texts for the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost• June 20, 2021 • Page 2 In his only painted seascape, Rembrandt dramatically portrays the continuing battle of nature against human frailty, both physical and spiritual. The frightened and overwhelmed disciples struggle to retain control of their fishing boat as huge waves crash over the bow. One disciple is hanging over the side of the boat vomiting. A sail is torn, rope lines are flying loose, disaster is imminent as rocks appear in the left foreground. The dark clouds, the wind, the waves combine to create the terror of the painting and the terror of the disciples. Nature’s upheaval is the cause of, as well as a metaphor for, the fear that grips the disciples. The emotional turbulence is magni- fied by the dramatic impact of the painting, approximately 4’ wide by 5’ high. Jesus, whose face is lightened in the group on the right, remains calm. He woke up and rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, “Peace! Be still!” Then the wind ceased, and there was a dead calm, and he asked the disciples, “Why are you afraid? Have you still no faith?” The face of a 13th disciple looks directly out at the viewer in the horizontal center of the painting. -
Jacob Van Ruisdael Gratis Epub, Ebook
JACOB VAN RUISDAEL GRATIS Auteur: P. Biesboer Aantal pagina's: 168 pagina's Verschijningsdatum: 2002-04-13 Uitgever: Waanders EAN: 9789040096044 Taal: nl Link: Download hier Dutch Painting April 8 - 14 works 95 0. January 20 - 7 works 60 0. Accept No, rather not. Add to my sets. Share it on Facebook. Share on Twitter. Pin it on Pinterest. Back to top. Similarly at this early stage of his career he absorbed some influence of contemporary landscape painters in Haarlem such as Jan van Goyen, Allart van Everdingen, Cornelis Vroom and Jacob van Mosscher. We intend to illustrate this with a selection of eight earlier works by these artists. However, there are already some remarkable differences to be found. Ruisdael developed a more dramatic effect in the rendering of the different textures of the trees, bushes and plants and the bold presentation of one large clump of oak trees leaning over with its gnarled and twisted trunks and branches highlighted against the dark cloudy sky. Strong lighting hits a sandy patch or a sandy road creating dramatic colour contrasts. These elements characterize his early works from till It is our intention to focus on the revolutionary development of Ruisdael as an artist inventing new heroic-dramatic schemes in composition, colour contrast and light effects. Our aim is to follow this deveopment with a selection of early signed and dated paintings which are key works and and show these different aspects in a a series of most splendid examples, f. Petersburg, Leipzig, München and Paris. Rubens en J. Brueghel I. Ruisdael painted once the landscape for a group portrait of De Keyser Giltaij in: Sutton et al. -
Sztuki Piękne)
Sebastian Borowicz Rozdział VII W stronę realizmu – wiek XVII (sztuki piękne) „Nikt bardziej nie upodabnia się do szaleńca niż pijany”1079. „Mistrzami malarstwa są ci, którzy najbardziej zbliżają się do życia”1080. Wizualna sekcja starości Wiek XVII to czas rozkwitu nowej, realistycznej sztuki, opartej już nie tyle na perspektywie albertiańskiej, ile kepleriańskiej1081; to również okres malarskiej „sekcji” starości. Nigdy wcześniej i nigdy później w historii europejskiego malarstwa, wyobrażenia starych kobiet nie były tak liczne i tak różnicowane: od portretu realistycznego1082 1079 „NIL. SIMILIVS. INSANO. QVAM. EBRIVS” – inskrypcja umieszczona na kartuszu, w górnej części obrazu Jacoba Jordaensa Król pije, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wiedeń. 1080 Gerbrand Bredero (1585–1618), poeta niderlandzki. Cyt. za: W. Łysiak, Malarstwo białego człowieka, t. 4, Warszawa 2010, s. 353 (tłum. nieco zmienione). 1081 S. Alpers, The Art of Describing – Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century, Chicago 1993; J. Friday, Photography and the Representation of Vision, „The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism” 59:4 (2001), s. 351–362. 1082 Np. barokowy portret trumienny. Zob. także: Rembrandt, Modląca się staruszka lub Matka malarza (1630), Residenzgalerie, Salzburg; Abraham Bloemaert, Głowa starej kobiety (1632), kolekcja prywatna; Michiel Sweerts, Głowa starej kobiety (1654), J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles; Monogramista IS, Stara kobieta (1651), Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wiedeń. 314 Sebastian Borowicz po wyobrażenia alegoryczne1083, postacie biblijne1084, mitologiczne1085 czy sceny rodzajowe1086; od obrazów o charakterze historycznodokumentacyjnym po wyobrażenia należące do sfery historii idei1087, wpisujące się zarówno w pozy tywne1088, jak i negatywne klisze kulturowe; począwszy od Prorokini Anny Rembrandta, przez portrety ubogich staruszek1089, nobliwe portrety zamoż nych, starych kobiet1090, obrazy kobiet zanurzonych w lekturze filozoficznej1091 1083 Bernardo Strozzi, Stara kobieta przed lustrem lub Stara zalotnica (1615), Музей изобразительных искусств им. -
De Bloemschilders Bosschaert Door A
DE BLOEMSCHILDERS BOSSCHAERT DOOR A. B R E D I U S. LAF GRANBERG vestigde in den vierden jaargang van dit tijdschrift voor het eerst de aandacht op de fraaie bloem- stukken, met een uit een A en een B samengesteld mono- gram, die hij met groote waarschijnlijkheid aan AMBROSIUS BOSSCHAERT toeschreef. Inderdaad had hij gelijk. Maar hij dwaalde, toen hij den Amsterdamschen Notaris, die in 1637 van den schilder ABRAHAM BOSSCHAERT sprak, die toen te Am- sterdam woonde, van onnauwkeurigheid beschuldigde. AMBROSIUS had een zoon, die ABRAHAM heette en ook bloemschilder was. (Zie mijne gegevens in het Thieme'sche Allgemeine Künstlerlexicon IV). Een gelukkig toeval deed mij door de welwillendheid van den Heer P. J. KAPTEYN een afschrift verkrijgen van een familieaanteekening van een der kin- deren van AMBROSIUS BOSSCHAERT, die zich in een boekje met meer genealogische gegevens (in particulier bezit) bevindt. Daaruit blijkt dat de beste schilder A. BOSSCHAERT, de meester van Weenen, ' van het Mauritshuis, van de fijne tulpjes in mijn bezit, die ook alleen het oudste karakter dragen, de oude AMBROSIUS BOSSCHAERT is, die te Antwerpen, Middel- 138 burg, Utrecht en Breda woonde en toevallig, op reis zijnde, 1621 in den Haag overleed. Als het waar is wat zijn dochter vertelt, werd zijn werk duur betaald. Maar nu komt de moeielijkheid. De vader overleed 1621 in den Haag (toen de Treves geeindigd waren) nalatende drie zoons, allen bloemschilders! En 66n heette 66k AMBROSIUS, en een andere ABRAHAM! Van wien zijn nu alle na 1621 gedateerde stukken die A. BOSSCHAERT gemerkt zijn, zooals het fraaie bloemstuk vroeger in de Verzameling Weber te Hamburg ? en het 1640 gedateerde stuk bij den Heer Wahlberg te Stockholm? a Daar wij nergens meer van den jongen AMBROSIUS gewag gemaakt vinden, ABRAHAM BoSSCHAERT echter als schilder te Amsterdam in verscheidene notarieele acten genoemd wordt, hel ik er toe over, deze stukken voorloopig aan den laatste toe te schrijven. -
* Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to Enlightenment
Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to enlightenment: European art and culture 1665-1765 Jan van Huysum: the rise and strange demise of the baroque flower piece Richard Beresford 21 / 22 March 2012 Introduction: At his death in 1749 Jan van Huysum was celebrated as the greatest of all flower painters. His biographer Jan van Gool stated that Van Huysum had ‘soared beyond all his predecessors and out of sight’. The pastellist Jean-Etienne Liotard regarded him as having perfected the oil painter’s art. Such was contemporary appreciation of his works that it is thought he was the best paid of any painter in Europe in the 18th century. Van Huysum’s reputation, however, was soon to decline. The Van Eyckian perfection of his technique would be dismissed by a generation learning to appreciate the aesthetic of impressionism. His artistic standing was then blighted by the onset of modernist taste. The 1920s and 30s saw his works removed from public display in public galleries, including both the Rijksmuseum and the Mauritshuis. The critic Just Havelaar was not the only one who wanted to ‘sweep all that flowery rubbish into the garbage’. Echoes of the same sentiment survive even today. It was not until 2006 that the artist received his first serious re-evaluation in the form of a major retrospective exhibition. If we wish to appreciate Van Huysum it is no good looking at his work through the filter an early 20th-century aesthetic prejudice. The purpose of this lecture is to place the artist’s achievement in its true cultural and artistic context. -
DUTCH and ENGLISH PAINTINGS Seascape Gallery 1600 – 1850
DUTCH AND ENGLISH PAINTINGS Seascape Gallery 1600 – 1850 The art and ship models in this station are devoted to the early Dutch and English seascape painters. The historical emphasis here explains the importance of the sea to these nations. Historical Overview: The Dutch: During the 17th century, the Netherlands emerged as one of the great maritime oriented empires. The Dutch Republic was born in 1579 with the signing of the Union of Utrecht by the seven northern provinces of the Netherlands. Two years later the United Provinces of the Netherlands declared their independence from the Spain. They formed a loose confederation as a representative body that met in The Hague where they decided on issues of taxation and defense. During their heyday, the Dutch enjoyed a worldwide empire, dominated international trade and built the strongest economy in Europe on the foundation of a powerful merchant class and a republican form of government. The Dutch economy was based on a mutually supportive industry of agriculture, fishing and international cargo trading. At their command was a huge navy and merchant fleet of fluyts, cargo ships specially designed to sail through the world, which controlled a large percentage of the international trade. In 1595 the first Dutch ships sailed for the East Indies. The Dutch East Indies Company (the VOC as it was known) was established in 1602 and competed directly with Spain and Portugal for the spices of the Far East and the Indian subcontinent. The success of the VOC encouraged the Dutch to expand to the Americas where they established colonies in Brazil, Curacao and the Virgin Islands. -
ABRAHAM BOSSCHAERT (Middelburg 1612/13 – 1643 Utrecht)
CS0253 ABRAHAM BOSSCHAERT (Middelburg 1612/13 – 1643 Utrecht) A Still Life of Flowers laid on a Table Signed on the front edge of the table, lower right: ABosschaert On panel, 10 x 12⅝ ins. (25.5 x 32 cm) PROVENANCE Sale, Sotheby’s, London, 16 March 1966, lot 60, where bought by H. Terry-Engell Gallery, London, 1966 Gebr. Douwes, Amsterdam, 1967 Sale, Amsterdam (Paul Brandt), 20-23 May 1969, lot 3 (illustrated in colour) Kunsthandel P. de Boer, Amsterdam, September 1986 Richard Green, London P. Hoogendijk, Baarn, 1987 Private collection, the Netherlands, until 2014 EXHIBITED London, Terry Engell Gallery, Winter Exhibition, 1966-67, no. II, illustrated Delft, Oude Kunst en Antiekbeurs (Douwes), 1967, (illustrated in guide) Delt, Oude Kunst en Antiekbeurs (Hoogendijk), 1986 Maastricht, Pictura Fine Art Fair (Hoogendijk), 1987, p. 156, (illustrated in colour) LITERATURE Masters of Middelburg: exhibition in honour of Laurens J. Bol, exh. cat. by Sam Segal et. al., Kunsthandel K. & V. Waterman, B.V., Amsterdam, March 1984, p. 75, cat. no. 23 (illustrated) E. Gemar-Koeltzsch, et. al., Holländische Stillebenmaler im 17. Jahrhundert, Lingen, 1995, vol. I, p. 158, no. 50/1 NARRATIVE This still life by Abraham Bosschaert depicts a few cut flowers lying casually on a wooden table. They do not appear to be arranged in any formal sense, rather one gets the impression that they have just been freshly picked and brought indoors. A yellow iris, a red and white striped carnation and a yellow and red flamed tulip, together with a sprig of forget-me-nots, comprise this intimate floral display. -
Recent Acquisitions (2006–20) at the Mauritshuis, the Hague
Recent acquisitions (2006–20) at the Mauritshuis, The Hague Supplement COVER_NOV20.indd 1 09/11/2020 09:41 Recent acquisitions (2006–20) at the Mauritshuis, The Hague he royal picture gallery mauritshuis in The 1. Paintings by Nicolaes Berchem reunited at the Mauritshuis. Hague is often likened to a jewellery box that contains (Photograph Ivo Hoekstra). nothing but precious diamonds. Over the past fifteen BankGiro Lottery and the Rembrandt Association, as well as individual years the museum has continued to search for outstanding benefactors, notably Mr H.B. van der Ven, who has helped the museum time works that would further enhance its rich collection of and again. That the privatised Mauritshuis – an independent foundation Dutch and Flemish old master paintings. A director who since 1995 – benefits from private generosity is proved by a great many wants to make worthwhile additions to a collection of such quality must gifts, including seventeenth-century Dutch landscapes by Jacob van Geel Taim very high indeed. The acquisitions discussed here were made during (Fig.5) and Cornelis Vroom (Fig.4), as well as works from the eighteenth the directorship of Frits Duparc, who in January 2008 retired as Director century: a still life by Adriaen Coorte (Fig.2) and a portrait of a Dutch after seventeen years at the museum, and his successor, Emilie Gordenker, sitter by the French travelling artist Jean-Baptiste Perronneau (Fig.16). who earlier this year left the Mauritshuis for a position at the Van Gogh New acquisitions are also supported by numerous other foundations and Museum, Amsterdam. The present Director of the Mauritshuis, Martine funds, all mentioned in the credit lines of individual works. -
The Drawings of Cornelis Visscher (1628/9-1658) John Charleton
The Drawings of Cornelis Visscher (1628/9-1658) John Charleton Hawley III Jamaica Plain, MA M.A., History of Art, Institute of Fine Arts – New York University, 2010 B.A., Art History and History, College of William and Mary, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art and Architectural History University of Virginia May, 2015 _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: The Life of Cornelis Visscher .......................................................................................... 3 Early Life and Family .................................................................................................................... 4 Artistic Training and Guild Membership ...................................................................................... 9 Move to Amsterdam ................................................................................................................. -
Print Format
Allaert van Everdingen (Alkmaar 1621 - Amsterdam 1675) Month of August (Virgo): The Harvest brush and grey and brown wash 11.1 x 12.8 cm (4⅜ x 5 in) The Month of August (Virgo): The Harvest has an extended and fascinating provenance. Sold as part of a complete set of the twelve months in 1694 to the famed Amsterdam writer and translator Sybrand I Feitama (1620-1701), it was passed down through the literary Feitama family who were avid collectors of seventeenth-century Dutch works on paper.¹ The present work was separated from the other months after their 1758 sale and most likely stayed in private collections until 1936 when it appeared in Christie’s London saleroom as part of the Henry Oppenheimer sale. Allaert van Everdingen was an exceptional draughtsman who was particularly skilled at making sets of drawings depicting, with appropriate images and activities, the twelve months of the year.² This tradition was rooted in medieval manuscript illumination, but became increasingly popular in the context of paintings, drawings and prints in the sixteenth century.³ In the seventeenth century, the popularity of such themed sets of images began to wane, and van Everdingen’s devotion to the concept was strikingly unusual. He seems to have made at least eleven sets of drawings of the months, not as one might have imagined, as designs for prints, but as artistic creations in their own right. Six of these sets remain intact, while Davies (see lit.) has reconstructed the others, on the basis of their stylistic and physical characteristics, and clues from the early provenance of the drawings. -
Rembrandt Harmenszoon Van Rijn – the Storm on the Sea of Galilee
1 Classical Arts Universe - CAU Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn – The Storm on the Sea of Galilee Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, the Dutch painting marvel, always took interest in portraying landscapes, self-portraits and portraits of other artists. His landscape depictions have been never purely about the aesthetics of Nature, but predicted many things about hua life like strife, ager, hope, desire, et. The “tor o the “ea of Galilee or Christ i the Storm on the “ea of Galilee is suh a asterpiee depitig the Bilial see of Jesus and the disciples crossing the sea when there is a raging storm. The painting was completed in the year 1633 and Rembrandt took the maritime theme of the painting to ensure that the theme will be familiar to the people of the age and time. As an effort to establish himself as an artist, he took this subject and it is his only seascape painting. The Storm on the Sea of Galilee depicts the time when the disciples were terrified of the violent storm and are perplexed about their actions. A fierce wave is shown lifting the boat and it is about to engulf the boat into the sea. Christ looks at his disciples and their state of mind from the stern and is about to command the storm to halt. All the distressful renderings in the painting are consoled by a yellow light that is shown to set apart the clouds and create a hope to the members on the boat. The mast shown in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee appears in the form of a Cross, indicating that faith is still there for those who pray the God in times of storming human frailties – be it spiritual or physical. -
JAN JOSEFSZ. VAN GOYEN (Leiden 1596 – 1656 the Hague)
CS0349 JAN JOSEFSZ. VAN GOYEN (Leiden 1596 – 1656 The Hague) The Ferry Signed and dated, lower centre: I V:GO…EN 1625 Oil on panel, 17¾ x 36⅝ ins. (45.1 X 93 cm) PROVENANCE H. Charles Erhardt, 151 Clapham Road, London His deceased sale, Christie’s, London, 19 June 1931, lot 29 (130 gns. to the following) With Julius Singer, Prague Dr. Erwin Langweil (1880-1954), Prague, from whom confiscated in 1943 as Reichseigentum and presented to, Böhmosch-Mährische Landegalerie, Prague, from where recovered in 1950 and placed in the following, Strahov Refectory Collecting Point Národni Galerie, Prague, 1961 (inv. no. D0-6031) Restituted to the heirs of Dr. Erwin Langweil, represented by Mondex Corporation of Toronto, Canada, 29 October 2018 Private collection, United Kingdom, 2019 EXHIBITED Prague, The National Gallery, Sbirka starého uměni, 1960, no. 277. Prague, The National Gallery, Sbirka starého uměni. Seznam vystavených děl, 1971, no. 266. Bratislava, 1981, no. 13. Tokyo, Metropolitan Art Museum; Kyoto, Municipal Museum of Art, Bruegel and Netherlandish Painting from the National Gallery, Prague, 20 March-7 May 1990, no. 48. LITERATURE H. van de Waal, Jan van Goyen, Amsterdam, 1941, p. 11, illustrated. A. Bengtsson, Studies on the Rise of Realistic Landscape Painting in Holland 1610-1625, Stockholm, 1952, p. 72. E. Filla, Jan van Goyen, Prague, 1959, illustrated. J. Šip, Dutch Painting, Prague, 1961, no. 45 J. Šip,’ Úvaha o realism v krajinářstvi tvorbě Nizozemi‘, Výtvarné uměni, XIV, 1964, p. 175. J. Šip, Holandské krajinářské 17. Stoleti, Prague, 1965, no. 44. A. Dobrzycka, Jan van Goyen, Posen, 1966, pp.