Taxonomic Recommendations for British Birds: Seventh Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taxonomic Recommendations for British Birds: Seventh Report Ibis (2011), 153, 883–892 Taxonomic recommendations for British birds: seventh report GEORGE SANGSTER,1,2* J. MARTIN COLLINSON,3 PIERRE-ANDRE´ CROCHET,4 ALAN G. KNOX,5 DAVID T. PARKIN,6 LARS SVENSSON7 & STEPHEN C. VOTIER8 1Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE–104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE–10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK 4CNRS-UMR 5175 Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 5University Museums, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3SW, UK 6Institute of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK 7S:ta Toras va¨g 28, SE–269 77 Torekov, Sweden 8Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK This paper is the seventh report of the Taxonomic • Bermuda Petrel Pterodroma cahow (monotypic) Sub-Committee (TSC) of the BOU Records Committee (BOURC) relating to the British List. Capped Petrel is in Category A of the British Species-level decisions are based on criteria out- List. lined by Helbig et al. (2002). The sixth report of the Sub-Committee was published by Sangster Water Rail Rallus aquaticus et al. (2010a). The Sub-Committee has been working with the Recent vocal and molecular studies indicate that Association of European Rarities Committees’ Water Rail consists of two distinct lineages (de Taxonomic Advisory Group, which has recently Kroon et al. 2008, Tavares et al. 2010). Two main published recommendations online (Crochet et al. call types have been recorded for Rallus aquaticus 2010). The reports of the BOURC and its TSC, aquaticus: a long and complex call (the ‘pig which are published in Ibis, remain the official squeal’), and a short and simple call, both repeated publications of the BOU. in series, whereas for Rallus aquaticus indicus, only a complex call type has been recorded, which is distinct from that of R. a. aquaticus (de Kroon Capped Petrel [Black-capped Petrel] et al. 2008). Preliminary playback experiments Pterodroma hasitata showed a lack of response of R. a. aquaticus to the Capped Petrel and Bermuda Petrel differ diagnos- complex calls of R. a. indicus, suggesting a biologi- ably in pattern and coloration of crown, hindneck cal significance for these differences (de Kroon et al. and rump, and uppertail-coverts (Brooke 2004, 2008). Phylogeographical analysis of mitochondrial Howell & Patteson 2008). Molecular phylogenetic and nuclear DNA sequences places R. a. indicus analysis further suggests that these are not closely in a separate clade from the clade containing related taxa (Jesus et al. 2009). Capped Petrel and R. a. aquaticus and Rallus aquaticus korejewi, and Bermuda Petrel are therefore best treated as sepa- further showed that these clades are strongly differ- rate species: entiated (Tavares et al. 2010). The two groups also • Capped Petrel Pterodroma hasitata (polytypic) differ in plumage (Cramp & Simmons 1980, de Kroon 1991, Taylor & van Perlo 1998). Water Rail is therefore best treated as two species: *Corresponding author. • Water Rail Rallus aquaticus (polytypic, with Email: [email protected] subspecies aquaticus and korejewi) ª 2011 The Authors Ibis ª 2011 British Ornithologists’ Union 884 Taxonomic recommendations for British birds: seventh report • Brown-cheeked Rail Rallus indicus (mono- Eurasian Whimbrels in Scandinavia (N. p. typic) phaeopus; Johnsen et al. 2010) and Eastern Asia Water Rail is in Category A of the British List. (Numenius phaeopus variegatus; Kerr et al. 2009), comparable with other pairs of sister species. We have combined the datasets of Hebert et al. Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus (2004), Yoo et al. (2006), Kerr et al. (2009) and A recent study has documented morphological, Johnsen et al. (2010) and performed phylogenetic molecular and vocal differences between Kentish analyses to determine how Eurasian Whimbrels in Plover Charadrius alexandrinus alexandrinus and Scandinavia are related to those in Eastern Asia. Snowy Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Mitochondrial DNA sequences of Hudsonian (Küpper et al. 2009). Kentish Plovers have longer Whimbrel clustered with strong support in a clade wings and tarsi than Snowy Plovers, although there that is sister to a clade formed by Eurasian Whim- is overlap of measurements. Female Snowy Plovers brels, but Scandinavian phaeopus and Eastern Asian can have various amounts of black in the head- and variegatus samples were very similar and did not breast-markings, sometimes making them similar form separate clades (Fig. 1). Numenius phaeopus to those of males, whereas in female Kentish alboaxillaris has not been included in any molecu- Plovers these areas are brown. Chicks of Kentish lar analyses but is presumed to be allied to the Plover have a dark central stripe on the upperparts, phaeopus ⁄ variegatus clade on geographical grounds. which is lacking in Snowy Plovers. Mitochondrial It is recommended that hudsonicus is treated as a DNA sequences (ND3 and ATPase) of Kentish separate species. Plover and Snowy Plover differ by 6.1% on average. • Hudsonian Whimbrel Numenius hudsonicus Mitochondrial DNA sequences and CHD-Z geno- (monotypic) types were more divergent between Kentish and • Eurasian Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus (poly- Snowy Plovers than between Kentish and White- typic, including subspecies phaeopus, alboaxil- fronted Plovers Charadrius marginatus. Finally, laris and variegatus) male courtship calls of Kentish and Snowy Plovers Other subspecies of both Eurasian and Hudso- may also differ (Küpper et al. 2009). nian Whimbrel have been proposed by Engelmoer The plumage characters and nomenclature of the and Roselaar (1998) and Tomkovich (2008) which East Asian White-faced Plover Charadrius alexan- may deserve recognition. Eurasian Whimbrel and drinus dealbatus have recently been clarified (Bake- Hudsonian Whimbrel are both in Category A of well & Kennerley 2008, Kennerley et al. 2008). the British List. White-faced Plover is retained here as a subspecies of Kentish Plovers pending ongoing studies. Great Skua Stercorarius skua Kentish Plover is best treated as two species: • Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus (poly- Relationships of Stercorarius skua are uncertain. typic, with subspecies alexandrinus, seebohmi, Mitochondrial DNA analyses have suggested that nihonensis and dealbatus) S. skua is more closely related to Stercorarius • Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosus (polytypic, pomarinus than to taxa breeding in the southern see Funk et al. 2007) hemisphere (Blechschmidt et al. 1993, Cohen Kentish Plover is in Category A of the British et al. 1997, Ritz et al. 2008, but see Braun & List. Brumfield 1998), whereas analyses of morphology and ectoparasites support monophyly of the ‘great skuas’ (Andersson 1999a, 1999b, Chu et al. 2009). Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus As well as genetic differences from southern Hudsonian Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus hudsoni- hemisphere skuas, Great Skua differs from all cus is separable from Eurasian Whimbrel Numenius other skuas in plumage at most ages (Furness phaeopus phaeopus on the basis of diagnostic differ- 1987, Malling-Olsen & Larsson 1997). Among the ences in plumage and mean morphometric differ- southern skuas, Chilean Skua Stercorarius skua chil- ences (Hayman et al. 1986, Engelmoer & Roselaar ensis and South Polar Skua Stercorarius skua mac- 1998). Hudsonian Whimbrel shows marked diver- cormicki are well differentiated on the basis of gence in mitochondrial DNA sequences (around morphology from Brown Skua taxa, Stercorarius 3.6% sequence divergence in the CO1 gene) from skua antarcticus, Stercorarius skua hamiltoni and ª 2011 The Authors Ibis ª 2011 British Ornithologists’ Union Taxonomic recommendations for British birds: seventh report 885 Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships among Whimbrels Numenius phaeopus and other curlews based on maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of 694 bp of cytochrome c oxidase sub-unit 1, using Bartramia longicauda as outgroup. The best-fit model was estimated with MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011) based on the corrected Akaike information criterion. The selected model was HKY + G. To further evalu- ate statistical support for the topology, maximum parsimony (MP) bootstrapping was performed in MEGA5 and Bayesian analysis was performed using MRBAYES version 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). Default priors in MRBAYES were used. Four Metropolis-coupled MCMC chains with incremental heating temperature 0.2 were run for 300 000 generations, and sampled every 100 generations. The first 750 trees were discarded as burn-in and the posterior probability estimated for the remaining sampled generations. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities; numbers below represent bootstrap support (1000 replicates) from MP and ML analyses, respectively. GenBank accession numbers and, for Whimbrels, collecting localities are given. Stercorarius skua lonnbergi (Furness 1987, see also Skuas and differences in arrival time between spe- Hospitaleche et al. 2009). Chilean, Brown and cies and sexes in the contact zone (Parmalee 1988, South Polar Skuas are also significantly differenti- Hahn et al. 2003, Ritz et al. 2006). Mating pat- ated from each other in mitochondrial control terns in a mixed colony of King George Island indi- region sequences (Ritz et al. 2008). In addition, cate that heterospecific pairs are
Recommended publications
  • Rare Birds of California Now Available! Price $54.00 for WFO Members, $59.99 for Nonmembers
    Volume 40, Number 3, 2009 The 33rd Report of the California Bird Records Committee: 2007 Records Daniel S. Singer and Scott B. Terrill .........................158 Distribution, Abundance, and Survival of Nesting American Dippers Near Juneau, Alaska Mary F. Willson, Grey W. Pendleton, and Katherine M. Hocker ........................................................191 Changes in the Winter Distribution of the Rough-legged Hawk in North America Edward R. Pandolfino and Kimberly Suedkamp Wells .....................................................210 Nesting Success of California Least Terns at the Guerrero Negro Saltworks, Baja California Sur, Mexico, 2005 Antonio Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Roberto Carmona, and Andrea Cuellar ..................................... 225 NOTES Sandwich Terns on Isla Rasa, Gulf of California, Mexico Enriqueta Velarde and Marisol Tordesillas ...............................230 Curve-billed Thrasher Reproductive Success after a Wet Winter in the Sonoran Desert of Arizona Carroll D. Littlefield ............234 First North American Records of the Rufous-tailed Robin (Luscinia sibilans) Lucas H. DeCicco, Steven C. Heinl, and David W. Sonneborn ........................................................237 Book Reviews Rich Hoyer and Alan Contreras ...........................242 Featured Photo: Juvenal Plumage of the Aztec Thrush Kurt A. Radamaker .................................................................247 Front cover photo by © Bob Lewis of Berkeley, California: Dusky Warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus), Richmond, Contra Costa County, California, 9 October 2008, discovered by Emilie Strauss. Known in North America including Alaska from over 30 records, the Dusky is the Old World Warbler most frequent in western North America south of Alaska, with 13 records from California and 2 from Baja California. Back cover “Featured Photos” by © Kurt A. Radamaker of Fountain Hills, Arizona: Aztec Thrush (Ridgwayia pinicola), re- cently fledged juvenile, Mesa del Campanero, about 20 km west of Yecora, Sonora, Mexico, 1 September 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Bharatpur – Check List
    BIRDS OF BHARATPUR – CHECK LIST Family PHASIANIDAE: Pheasants, Partridges, Quail Check List BLACK FRANCOLIN GREY FRANCOLIN COMMON QUAIL RAIN QUAIL JUNGLE BUSH QUAIL YELLOW-LEGGED BUTTON QUAIL BARRED BUTTON QUAIL PAINTED SPURFOWL INDIAN PEAFOWL Family ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, Swans GREATER WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE GREYLAG GOOSE BAR-HEADED GOOSE LWSSER WHISTLING-DUCK RUDDY SHELDUCK COMMON SHELDUCK COMB DUCK COTTON PYGMY GOOSE MARBLED DUCK GADWALL FALCATED DUCK EURASIAN WIGEON MALLARD SPOT-BILLED DUCK COMMON TEAL GARGANEY NORTHERN PINTAIL NORTHERN SHOVELER RED-CRESTED POCHARD COMMON POCHARD FERRUGINOUS POCHARD TUFTED DUCK BAIKAL TEAL GREATER SCAUP BAER’S POCHARD Family PICIDAE: Woodpeckers EURASIAN WRYNECK BROWN-CAPPED PYGMY WOODPECKER YELLOW-CROWNED WOODPECKER BLACK-RUMPED FLAMBACK Family CAPITONIDAE: Barbets BROWN-HEADED BARBET COPPERSMITH BARBET Family UPUPIDAE: Hoopoes COMMON HOOPOE Family BUCEROTIDAE: Hornbills INDAIN GREY HORNBILL Family CORACIIDAE: Rollers or Blue Jays EUROPEAN ROLLER INDIAN ROLLER Family ALCEDINIDAE: Kingfisher COMMON KINGFISHER STORK-BILLED KINGFISHER WHITE-THROATED KINGFISHER BLACK-CAPPED KINGFISHER PIED KINGFISHER Family MEROPIDAE: Bee-eaters GREEN BEE-EATER BLUE-CHEEKED BEE-EATER BLUE-TAILED BEE-EATER Family CUCULIDAE: Cuckoos, Crow-pheasants PIED CUCKOO CHESTNUT-WINGED CUCKOO COMMON HAWK CUCKOO INDIAN CUCKOO EURASIAN CUCKOO GREY-BELLIED CUCKOO PLAINTIVE CUCKOO DRONGO CUCKOO ASIAN KOEL SIRKEER MALKOHA GREATER COUCAL LESSER COUCAL Family PSITTACIDAS: Parrots ROSE-RINGED PARAKEET PLUM-HEADED PARKEET Family APODIDAE:
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • OSNZ News Edited by PAUL SAGAR, 21362 Hereford Street, Christchurch, for the Members of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand (Inc.)
    Supplement to Notornis, Vol. 25, Part 3, September 1978 OSNZ news Edited by PAUL SAGAR, 21362 Hereford Street, Christchurch, for the members of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand (Inc.). No. 8 September 1978 NOTE: Next deadline is earlier to try to beat the Christmas and January shut- Deadline for the December issue will be down of printers and have NOTORNIS 20 November. and OSNZ NEWS out early in 1979. DACHICKS Rough estimates: northland 150-200; The 1978 inquiry into the NZ Dabchick has gone remarkably well, with North Island Volcanic Plateau 600-800; South Taranakii members putting in a lot of time, often with meagre results, in order to help form an overall Wanganui 30; ManawatulWairarapa 300; picture of the status and habits of this species. GisborneiHawkes Bay 50. Total 1 150-1400. We began with a series of questions, to which we now have much better answers. If We thus already have a fairly good base members can stand it, we need another year's effort to confirm and clarify these answers. line agalnst which to measure any major changes in the future. Another year's f~eld 1. Is the NZ Dabchick extinct in the South Island? Answer, apparently yes. Was it ever work should cons~derably Improve the strong there? Possibly not (see Oliver). accuracy of our knowledge. 2. Does the North Island population reach a total of 1000? Answer, yes. Est~matedtotal Regional activity (very rough, see below) 1 1 50-1400 birds. We have no up-tb-date report from Far 3. Are Australian grebelets taking over? Answer, in North Island, not yet.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Chile a Photo Guide
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be 88 distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical 89 means without prior written permission of the publisher. WALKING WATERBIRDS unmistakable, elegant wader; no similar species in Chile SHOREBIRDS For ID purposes there are 3 basic types of shorebirds: 6 ‘unmistakable’ species (avocet, stilt, oystercatchers, sheathbill; pp. 89–91); 13 plovers (mainly visual feeders with stop- start feeding actions; pp. 92–98); and 22 sandpipers (mainly tactile feeders, probing and pick- ing as they walk along; pp. 99–109). Most favor open habitats, typically near water. Different species readily associate together, which can help with ID—compare size, shape, and behavior of an unfamiliar species with other species you know (see below); voice can also be useful. 2 1 5 3 3 3 4 4 7 6 6 Andean Avocet Recurvirostra andina 45–48cm N Andes. Fairly common s. to Atacama (3700–4600m); rarely wanders to coast. Shallow saline lakes, At first glance, these shorebirds might seem impossible to ID, but it helps when different species as- adjacent bogs. Feeds by wading, sweeping its bill side to side in shallow water. Calls: ringing, slightly sociate together. The unmistakable White-backed Stilt left of center (1) is one reference point, and nasal wiek wiek…, and wehk. Ages/sexes similar, but female bill more strongly recurved. the large brown sandpiper with a decurved bill at far left is a Hudsonian Whimbrel (2), another reference for size. Thus, the 4 stocky, short-billed, standing shorebirds = Black-bellied Plovers (3).
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of Birds Wintering in the Lhasa River Watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet Autonomous Region, China
    FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 1–11 An annotated list of birds wintering in the Lhasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet Autonomous Region, China AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR The occurrence and distribution of birds in the Lhasa river watershed of Tibet Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China, is not well documented. Here we report on recent observations of birds made during the winter season (November–March). Combining these observations with earlier records shows that at least 115 species occur in the Lhasa river watershed and adjacent Yamzho Yumco lake during the winter. Of these, at least 88 species appear to occur regularly and 29 species are represented by only a few observations. We recorded 18 species not previously noted during winter. Three species noted from Lhasa in the 1940s, Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata, Solitary Snipe Gallinago solitaria and Red-rumped Swallow Hirundo daurica, were not observed during our study. Black-necked Crane Grus nigricollis (Vulnerable) and Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus are among the more visible species in the agricultural habitats which dominate the valley floors. There is still a great deal to be learned about the winter birds of the region, as evidenced by the number of apparently new records from the last 15 years. INTRODUCTION limited from the late 1940s to the early 1980s. By the late 1980s the first joint ventures with foreign companies were The Lhasa river watershed in Tibet Autonomous Region, initiated and some of the first foreign non-governmental People’s Republic of China, is an important wintering organisations were allowed into Tibet, enabling our own area for a number of migratory and resident bird species.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park Custom Tour Trip Report
    SOUTH AFRICA: MAGOEBASKLOOF AND KRUGER NATIONAL PARK CUSTOM TOUR TRIP REPORT 24 February – 2 March 2019 By Jason Boyce This Verreaux’s Eagle-Owl showed nicely one late afternoon, puffing up his throat and neck when calling www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park February 2019 Overview It’s common knowledge that South Africa has very much to offer as a birding destination, and the memory of this trip echoes those sentiments. With an itinerary set in one of South Africa’s premier birding provinces, the Limpopo Province, we were getting ready for a birding extravaganza. The forests of Magoebaskloof would be our first stop, spending a day and a half in the area and targeting forest special after forest special as well as tricky range-restricted species such as Short-clawed Lark and Gurney’s Sugarbird. Afterwards we would descend the eastern escarpment and head into Kruger National Park, where we would make our way to the northern sections. These included Punda Maria, Pafuri, and the Makuleke Concession – a mouthwatering birding itinerary that was sure to deliver. A pair of Woodland Kingfishers in the fever tree forest along the Limpopo River Detailed Report Day 1, 24th February 2019 – Transfer to Magoebaskloof We set out from Johannesburg after breakfast on a clear Sunday morning. The drive to Polokwane took us just over three hours. A number of birds along the way started our trip list; these included Hadada Ibis, Yellow-billed Kite, Southern Black Flycatcher, Village Weaver, and a few brilliant European Bee-eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand Highlights 14Th to 26Th November 2019 (13 Days)
    Thailand Highlights 14th to 26th November 2019 (13 days) Trip Report Siamese Fireback by Forrest Rowland Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Forrest Rowland Trip Report – RBL Thailand - Highlights 2019 2 Tour Summary Thailand has been known as a top tourist destination for quite some time. Foreigners and Ex-pats flock there for the beautiful scenery, great infrastructure, and delicious cuisine among other cultural aspects. For birders, it has recently caught up to big names like Borneo and Malaysia, in terms of respect for the avian delights it holds for visitors. Our twelve-day Highlights Tour to Thailand set out to sample a bit of the best of every major habitat type in the country, with a slight focus on the lush montane forests that hold most of the country’s specialty bird species. The tour began in Bangkok, a bustling metropolis of winding narrow roads, flyovers, towering apartment buildings, and seemingly endless people. Despite the density and throng of humanity, many of the participants on the tour were able to enjoy a Crested Goshawk flight by Forrest Rowland lovely day’s visit to the Grand Palace and historic center of Bangkok, including a fun boat ride passing by several temples. A few early arrivals also had time to bird some of the urban park settings, even picking up a species or two we did not see on the Main Tour. For most, the tour began in earnest on November 15th, with our day tour of the salt pans, mudflats, wetlands, and mangroves of the famed Pak Thale Shore bird Project, and Laem Phak Bia mangroves.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management
    Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment for the Use of Wildlife Damage Management Methods by USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services Chapter I Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management MAY 2017 Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services (WS) Program completed Risk Assessments for methods used in wildlife damage management in 1992 (USDA 1997). While those Risk Assessments are still valid, for the most part, the WS Program has expanded programs into different areas of wildlife management and wildlife damage management (WDM) such as work on airports, with feral swine and management of other invasive species, disease surveillance and control. Inherently, these programs have expanded the methods being used. Additionally, research has improved the effectiveness and selectiveness of methods being used and made new tools available. Thus, new methods and strategies will be analyzed in these risk assessments to cover the latest methods being used. The risk assements are being completed in Chapters and will be made available on a website, which can be regularly updated. Similar methods are combined into single risk assessments for efficiency; for example Chapter IV contains all foothold traps being used including standard foothold traps, pole traps, and foot cuffs. The Introduction to Risk Assessments is Chapter I and was completed to give an overall summary of the national WS Program. The methods being used and risks to target and nontarget species, people, pets, and the environment, and the issue of humanenss are discussed in this Chapter. From FY11 to FY15, WS had work tasks associated with 53 different methods being used.
    [Show full text]
  • Lhasa and the Tibetan Plateau Cumulative
    Lhasa and the Tibetan Plateau Cumulative Bird List Column A: Total number of tours (out of 6) that the species was recorded Column B: Total number of days that the species was recorded on the 2016 tour Column C: Maximum daily count for that particular species on the 2016 tour Column D: H = Heard Only; (H) = Heard more than seen Globally threatened species as defined by BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-Rom Cambridge, U.K. BirdLife International are identified as follows: EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near- threatened. A B C D 6 Greylag Goose 2 15 Anser anser 6 Bar-headed Goose 4 300 Anser indicus 3 Whooper Swan 1 2 Cygnus cygnus 1 Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna 6 Ruddy Shelduck 8 700 Tadorna ferruginea 3 Gadwall 2 3 Anas strepera 1 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope 5 Mallard 2 8 Anas platyrhynchos 2 Eastern Spot-billed Duck Anas zonorhyncha 1 Indian or Eastern Spot-billed Duck Anas poecilorhynchos or A. zonorhyncha 1 Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata 1 Northern Pintail Anas acuta 1 Garganey 2 15 Anas querquedula 4 Eurasian Teal 2 50 Anas crecca 6 Red-crested Pochard 3 2000 Netta rufina 6 Common Pochard 2 200 Aythya ferina 3 Ferruginous Duck NT 1 8 Aythya nyroca 6 Tufted Duck 2 200 Aythya fuligula 5 Common Goldeneye 2 11 Bucephala clangula 4 Common Merganser 3 51 Mergus merganser 5 Chinese Grouse NT 2 1 Tetrastes sewerzowi 4 Verreaux's Monal-Partridge 1 1 H Tetraophasis obscurus 5 Tibetan Snowcock 1 5 H Tetraogallus tibetanus 4 Przevalski's Partridge 1 1 Alectoris magna 1 Daurian Partridge Perdix dauurica 6 Tibetan Partridge 2 11 Perdix hodgsoniae ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N.
    [Show full text]