DOCSLIB.ORG

Border Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Border Security phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page iii Border Security James R. Phelps Jeffrey Dailey Monica Koenigsberg Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page iv Copyright © 2014 Carolina Academic Press All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Phelps, James R. Border security / James R. Phelps, Jeffrey Dailey, Monica Koenigsberg. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-61163-171-5 (alk. paper) 1. Border security. 2. Border security--United States. 3. United States--Emigration and immigration--Government policy. 4. Smuggling--United States--Prevention. 5. Human trafficking--United States--Prevention. I. Title. JV6035.P44 2013 363.28'50973--dc23 2013033434 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page v Contents Preface xiii Acknowledgments xvii Author Biographies xix Part One Defining Borders Chapter 1 · Barriers, Boundaries, and Borders 3 Introduction 3 East and West Germany 4 Geographic Barriers, Boundaries, and Borders 6 The Rio Grande River 9 Political Boundaries, Barriers, and Borders 12 The Law of the Sea 16 Economic Boundaries, Borders, and Barriers 17 Ultimate in Borderless Regions 20 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies 20 Resolving Boundary and Border Disputes 21 Barriers 23 Conclusion 26 Chapter 1 Endnotes 26 Chapter 2 · Border Security in History 29 Introduction 29 The Ancient World 30 The Walled City 31 Hadrian’s Wall 33 The Great Wall of China 36 Overcoming Walls 39 Reverting to Natural Barriers as Borders in Europe 39 The Ever Changing North American Borders 41 The Return to Walls and Fences 42 The Maginot Line 43 The Siegfried Line 45 The Wall to Keep People In 46 The Last Great 20th Century Border Wall 49 Conclusion 51 Chapter 2 Endnotes 52 v phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page vi vi CONTENTS Chapter 3 · Border Security Agency Operations 55 Introduction 56 U.S. Border Security Agencies before the Advent of Homeland Security 56 Border Patrol 56 Prohibition and Tighter Immigration Laws 61 Sign Cutting 64 Border Patrol During World War II 66 Modernizing Strategy 74 U.S. Government Accounting Office Report on the Border Patrol Employer Sanctions 75 Inspection Stations 76 El Paso Sector’s Operation Hold the Line 76 San Diego Sector’s Operation Gatekeeper 77 Tucson Sector’s Operation Safeguard 78 Northern Border 79 Moving Away from Interior Security 79 The New Strategy 80 Capabilities 81 Expansion 82 Special Operations Group 83 BORTAC 83 BORSTAR 84 Other Specialized Border Patrol Programs 85 Border Patrol Organization Today 85 Training 85 Uniforms 86 Weapons 86 Transportation 87 Killed in the Line of Duty 87 Line of Duty Deaths 87 Armed Incursions 88 Death Threats 90 Criticisms 90 Ramos and Compean 90 Death of Sergio Hernandez 91 Allegations of Abuse 91 U.S. Customs 92 Immigration Services 93 Mission 94 Structure 94 U.S. Border Security Agencies after the Advent of Homeland Security 95 Ports of Entry 95 CBP’s 2012 Fiscal Year in Review 95 Operations 97 Customs and Border Protection 97 Immigration and Customs Enforcement 97 Homeland Security Investigations 98 Enforcement and Removal Operations 98 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service 98 phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page vii CONTENTS vii Other Border Security Agencies around the World 99 Border Security Zone of Russia 99 Imperial Russia 99 Modern Period 100 Mission 100 Republic of South Africa 100 Strategic Vision 101 Mission 101 Culture and Behaviors 101 Border Control Stakeholders 101 South African Border Security Issues 102 Conclusion 103 Chapter 3 Endnotes 104 Chapter 4 · Physical Border Security 107 Introduction 107 Physical Borders 108 History of U.S. Immigration 109 Excerpts from Visa Overstays: Can They Be Eliminated? 111 Fences 115 The San Diego Border Primary Fence 116 Excerpts from Border Security: Barriers along the U.S. International Border 116 Operation Gatekeeper 117 Sandia National Laboratory Study 118 Congressional Border Barrier Legislation 118 Section 102 of IIRIRA — Improvement of Barriers at the Border 118 The San Diego Fence and USBP Apprehensions 120 Office of Air and Marine Operations 121 Excerpts from the Fact Sheet: U.S. Customs and Border Protection 121 OAM Accomplishments during Fiscal Year 2010 122 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Systems 122 Predator B Performance and Weight 123 Guardian UAS Maritime Variant Predator B 124 CBP UAS Operating Locations 124 Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Coast Guard Coordination 124 Conclusion 125 Chapter 4 Endnotes 125 Chapter 5 · Maritime Border Security 127 Introduction 127 The Problem of Coastline 128 Maritime Security in History 129 Modern U.S. Naval Policy 130 The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783 132 The U.S. Coast Guard 133 14 USC 1 § 2. Primary Duties 134 phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page viii viii CONTENTS Maritime Security in the Post- 9/11 Era 135 Excerpts from the National Strategy for Maritime Security 136 Excerpts from the National Plan to Achieve Maritime Domain Awareness 140 Excerpts from the International Outreach and Coordination Strategy 146 Excerpts from the Naval Operations Concept 2010: Implementing the Maritime Strategy 154 Conclusion 162 Chapter 5 Endnotes 163 Part Two Border Security and Transnational Crime Chapter 6 · Trafficking: Contraband, Smuggling, and the Law 167 Introduction 167 Contraband 168 Smuggling 169 The History of Smuggling 170 Baggage Surprises 173 The Law 175 Dumping and Anti- Dumping 177 Smuggling Today 178 Conclusion 186 Chapter 6 Endnotes 187 Chapter 7 · People Movers: Human Trafficking and Population Migrations 189 Introduction 189 Human Trafficking Defined: Trafficking 190 Causes of Human Trafficking 190 Traffickers 192 Slavery 193 Laws 193 Excerpts from the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) 114 STAT. 1467 194 Forced Labor 199 Sex Trafficking 199 Debt Bondage 200 Debt Bondage among Migrant Laborers 200 Domestic Servitude 201 Forced Child Labor 201 Child Soldiers 202 Child Soldiers 202 Child Sex Trafficking 203 Excerpts from the U.S. State Department 2012 TIP Report 204 Trafficking in Europe 208 Trafficking in Asia 209 Trafficking in the United States 210 phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page ix CONTENTS ix Trafficking in Sex in Latin America of Slaves and Serfs: Guatemala’s Sex Trade 212 Conclusion 214 HSI, FBI Dismantle Sex Trafficking Ring in Atlanta 214 Chapter 7 Endnotes 216 Chapter 8 · Borders, Economic Interdependence, and Internet Crime 219 Introduction 219 Globalization 220 Energy Interdependence 224 The Internet and Transnational Crime 228 Transborder Victimization 232 Cross- Border Criminal Networks 235 Law Enforcement Efforts to Overcome Barriers 237 Interagency Cooperation and Information Sharing 238 United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 239 Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime 239 G8 High Tech Crime Subgroup 239 Interagency Agreements 240 Fusion Centers and Task Forces 240 Information Sharing Systems 241 Technology Implementation 242 Conclusion 243 Chapter 8 Endnotes 244 Chapter 9 · Transportation Security 249 Introduction 249 Logistics Transformation 250 Transportation Systems Theory 250 Mobility and Security 252 The Social Contract 254 The National Highway System 256 Hurricane Rita 257 Evacuation Deaths 259 Aviation Security 260 Layers of Aviation Security 260 Maritime Shipping 261 Global Supply Chain Security 262 Pipelines and Power Grids 263 The Transmission Grid and Compressor Stations 264 Railroads 266 Situational Awareness 267 Illegal Immigration and Transportation Security 269 The Loma Prieta Earthquake 270 Effects on Transportation 272 Conclusion 272 Chapter 9 Endnotes 273 phelps et al 00 fmtautoF2 1/6/14 9:10 AM Page x x CONTENTS Part Three U.S. Border Security Today Chapter 10 · The U.S.-Mexico Border 277 Introduction 277 The Southwest Border Today 279 The Mexican-American War 279 The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, February 2, 1848 280 The Gadsden Purchase 281 Ports of Entry 281 Immigration Inspection at Ports of Entry 283 Infectious Disease 284 U.S.-Mexico Commerce and Border Security 284 Security between the Ports of Entry 288 Road Checks Interior to the Southern Border 290 Narcotrafficantes 292 Drugs, Mules and Migrants 294 Green Cards, Guest Workers, and Undocumented Immigrants 295 U.S. Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs, Frequently Asked Questions — Immigrant Visa Interview Medical Examination 296 Border Crossing Card 297 Green Card 298 The DREAM Act and Other Mexican (American) Questions 299 The DREAM Act 303 The Politics of Pregnancy 303 Undocumented Immigrants/Illegal Aliens 304 ¿Plata o Plomo? 308 Conclusion 312 Chapter 10 Endnotes 313 Chapter 11 · The U.S.-Canadian Border 317 Introduction 317 Early Canadian-U.S. Relations 318 Canada-U.S. Border Evolves 318 International Boundary Commission 321 International Boundary Commission 321 Canada Today 322 Facts about the U.S.- Canada Border 322 Current Boundary Disputes 323 Canada- U.S. Border Security Agencies 324 Canadian Border Security Agency 325 Royal Canadian Mounted Police 326 Stopping Terrorists 326 U.S.- Canada Law Enforcement Cooperation 327 Canadian Border Services Agency News Release: Canada and the United States Announce Phase I Pilot Project to Enhance Border Security at Land
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Due Process for Us Permanent
    DUE PROCESS FOR U.S. PERMANENT RESIDENTS: THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL Sandra E. Bahamonde* I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... ........ 86 A. Immigration Court Proceedings ................. 88 II. LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENTS. ......................... ....... 89 A. StatisticalInformation on LPRs ................. ..... 91 B. LPRs and IIRAIRA ................................. 91 III. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS............................92 A. Life, Liberty and Propertyfor LPRs ........... ........ 93 B. The Gideon Promise........................ 95 C. Padillav. Kentucky ...................... ......... 96 IV. CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS ............................. 97 A. Article I Courts................................... 98 B. ProtectionsAfforded in Criminal Versus Civil Cases.............98 C. Matter of Castro ................................ 100 V. CIRCUIT SPLIT .............................................. 101 VI. CONCLUSION .................................................... 104 In 1945, the U.S. Supreme Court held that deportation is a serious penalty that may result in the loss of "all that makes life worth living."' This statement is as true today as it was nearly seventy years ago. How does the United States, a country founded and built by immigrants, protect immigrants from such peril? The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that, "no person ... shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law."2 The inclusion of "no persons," extends due process protection to aliens and
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gap Between DACA and the DREAM: the BRIDGE Act, What It Means, and Why It Matters
    Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 7 Issue 1 February 2019 Bridging the Gap Between DACA and the DREAM: The BRIDGE Act, What It Means, and Why It Matters Ellen E. Findley Follow this and additional works at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Ellen E. Findley, Bridging the Gap Between DACA and the DREAM: The BRIDGE Act, What It Means, and Why It Matters, 7 PENN. ST. J.L. & INT'L AFF. 304 (2019). Available at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol7/iss1/24 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2019 VOLUME 7 NO. 1 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN DACA AND THE DREAM: THE BRIDGE ACT, WHAT IT MEANS, AND WHY IT MATTERS Ellen E. Findley* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 305 II. WHAT IS THE BRIDGE ACT? .......................................................... 307 A. A Brief History of the DREAM Act ................................... 308 B. The Rise and Fall of DACA ................................................. 311 C. A Possible Revival of DACA ............................................... 317 III. BENEFITS OF THE BRIDGE ACT .................................................. 320 A. Efficiency Concerns .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trumpfronterizo the Influence of Trumpism on Socio-Economic Cross-Border Flows in the San Diego – Tijuana Bi-National Metropolitan Area
    Trumpfronterizo The influence of Trumpism on socio-economic cross-border flows in the San Diego – Tijuana bi-national metropolitan area Nadim van Minnen Radboud University Nijmegen | s4801431 1 Trumpfronterizo The influence of Trumpism on socio-economic cross-border flows in the San Diego – Tijuana bi-national metropolitan area Front page background sources: Autodesk, 2018. Own figure, 2017. Wikimedia Commons, 2017. Master thesis Nadim van Minnen Radboud University Nijmegen | Nijmegen School of Management Department of Geography, Planning and Environment MSc. Programme Human Geography: Globalisation, Migration and Development Thesis supervisor: Dr. Lothar Smith Nadim van Minnen [s4801431] [email protected] 10 July 2018 Radboud University Nijmegen 2 PREFACE This thesis was written as an integral part of the Master program of Human Geography and the track Globalisation, Migration and Development at Radboud University Nijmegen. This master thesis is the final assignment that needed to be completed in order finish this study, and therefore to receive my degree as a Master of Science. As can be seen in the methodology chapter and the conclusion, as well as annex 4, there were some small problems while doing this research, mostly due to the bi-national nature of this research. However, everything turned out alright in the end as I gathered plenty of information in order to make valid and informed statements regarding the issues at play in this thesis. A major thank you therefore goes out to my informants and expert interviewees for sacrificing their valuable time, their expertise and their willingness to participate. Without them and the useful information they provided me, I would not have gotten what I wanted out of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Driver's Licenses, State ID, and Michigan Immigrants
    Driver’s Licenses, State ID, and Michigan Immigrants DRAFT Introduction Since 2008, Michigan has required applicants for driver’s licenses and state identification to provide proof of U.S. citizenship or immigration status. This change was part of a series of post-9/11 changes, and has had significant consequences for all Michiganders who use the roads. Ten states, plus the District of Columbia, have already changed their laws to permit some form of legal driving without proof of immigration status.1 States have chosen to restore access to driver’s licenses irrespective of immigration status to address significant economic and public safety-related challenges posed by greatly-increased numbers of unlicensed drivers, including reductions the agricultural workforce, exclusion from the insurance market, This report highlights the economic and safety benefits to all Michigan residents of expanding access to driver’s licenses for all otherwise-eligible Michigan drivers. Section One describes the legal background, the federal REAL ID Act and states’ relationship to it; Section Two explores potential benefits to the State of Michigan by allowing more individuals to be eligible for state driver’s licenses and identification cards; and Section Three states specific recommended changes to Michigan law. Section 1: Background A. Background of Michigan Driver’s Licenses & REAL ID Act Compliance Prior to 2008, Michigan law contained no requirement that an applicant for a driver’s license or state ID card needed a specific immigration or citizenship status in order to be eligible. Applicants did have to submit documents that were sufficient to prove identity and establish state residency.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do I Renew Or Replace My Permanent Resident Card?
    I am a permanent resident B2 How do I renew or replace my permanent resident card? A Permanent Resident Card (USCIS Form I-551) What application do I file to replace or renew my is proof of your permanent resident status in the United States. It Permanent Resident Card? also serves as a valid identification document and proof that you To apply to renew or replace your card, use Form I-90, Application are eligible to live and work in the United States. Although some to Replace Permanent Resident Card. Filing instructions and forms Permanent Resident Cards, commonly known as Green Cards, are available on our Web site at www.uscis.gov. contain no expiration date, most are valid for 10 years. If you have been granted conditional permanent resident status, the card is valid for 2 years. How do I file the I-90 to renew or relace my Permanent It is important to keep your card up-to-date. Without a valid card, it Resident Card? may be difficult for you to prove that you are a permanent resident, Please refer to our Web site under Immigration Forms, I-90, for and this could also affect your ability to travel or to prove your specific filing instructions, and then complete the form. You can also eligibility to work in the United States. e-file your I-90 on our Web site at www.uscis.gov. When do I need to renew my Permanent Resident Card? How do I remove conditions on my 2-year conditional You should renew your Permanent Resident Card if you were issued Permanent Resident Card? a card valid for 10 years that has either expired or will expire within Do not use Form I-90 if you are a conditional resident and your the next 6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dream Act: Good for Our Economy, Good for Our Security, Good for Our Nation
    THE DREAM ACT: GOOD FOR OUR ECONOMY, GOOD FOR OUR SECURITY, GOOD FOR OUR NATION The DREAM Act is common-sense legislation drafted by both Republicans and Democrats that would give students who grew up in the United States a chance to contribute to our country’s well-being by serving in the U.S. armed forces or pursuing a higher education. It’s good for our economy, our security, and our nation. That’s why the DREAM Act has long enjoyed bipartisan support. It’s limited, targeted legislation that will allow only the best and brightest young people to earn their legal status after a rigorous and lengthy process, and applies to those brought to the United States as minors through no fault of their own by their parents, and who know no other home. Our country will reap enormous benefits when the DREAM Act is finally enacted: The DREAM Act will contribute to our military’s recruitment efforts and readiness. Secretary of Defense Gates has written to DREAM Act sponsors citing the rich precedent of non-citizens serving in the U.S. military and stating that “the DREAM Act represents an opportunity to expand [the recruiting] pool, to the advantage of military recruiting and readiness.” The DREAM Act is also a part of the Department of Defense's 2010-2012 Strategic Plan to assist the military in its recruiting efforts. The DREAM Act will make our country more competitive in the global economy. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has stated that passing the DREAM Act will allow “these young people to live up to their fullest potential and contribute to the economic growth of our country.” In particular, the DREAM Act will play an important part in the nation’s efforts to have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by 2020,” something vital for America to remain competitive in today’s global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biden Administration IMMIGRATION PRIORITIES
    The Biden Administration IMMIGRATION PRIORITIES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BIDEN ADMINISTRATION Twilight Executive Action First 100 Days 300 Days 500 Days Green Card Interviews. Re-prioritize green card interviews Public Charge. Revise document requirements for establishing New Rules. Issue new final DOL wage rule; issue new final New Rules. Suspend implementation of new final rules to focus on fraud data, removing interview requirements for financial capacity. DHS Strengthening H-1B rule (not published); and issue final pending review by Biden administration and withdraw employment-based applications and focusing on marriage- rule on H-1B lottery selection based on wage levels. DHS Strengthening H-1B rule. On January 20, the Biden based applications. Administration placed a temporary, 60-day regulatory On February 4, the Biden Administration announced that the freeze on certain rulemaking, including these new rules. effective date of the H-1B Wage Selection Final Rule will be delayed until December 31, 2021. Travel and Visa Bans. Rescind Proclamation 10052 STEM PhD H Cap Exemption. Exempt recent graduates of Annual EB Quotas. Work with Congress to increase the number Travel and Visa Bans. Extend COVID-related travel suspension of entry for certain H-1B, L-1, J-1, and H-2B PhD programs in STEM fields in the United States from annual of annual employment-based, immigrant visas beyond 140,000 restrictions and nonimmigrant (H-1B, L-1, J-1 and H-2B) visa non-immigrants and Proclamation 10014 suspension of H-1B caps. and create a process for varying the number based on and green card bans. new immigrant visas. contemporary economic circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Immigrant Activism, Secure Communities, and Rawlsian Civil Disobedience Karen J
    Marquette Law Review Volume 100 Article 8 Issue 2 Winter 2016 A Study on Immigrant Activism, Secure Communities, and Rawlsian Civil Disobedience Karen J. Pita Loor Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Immigration Law Commons Repository Citation Karen J. Pita Loor, A Study on Immigrant Activism, Secure Communities, and Rawlsian Civil Disobedience, 100 Marq. L. Rev. 565 (2016). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol100/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized editor of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 38800-mqt_100-2 Sheet No. 140 Side A 02/22/2017 09:25:38 LOOR-P.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/17 12:32 PM A STUDY ON IMMIGRANT ACTIVISM, SECURE COMMUNITIES, AND RAWLSIAN CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE KAREN J. PITA LOOR ABSTRACT This Article explores the immigrant acts of protest during the Obama presidency in opposition to the Secure Communities (SCOMM) immigration enforcement program through the lens of philosopher John Rawls’ theory of civil disobedience and posits that this immigrant resistance contributed to that administration’s dismantling the federal program by progressively moving localities, and eventually whole states, to cease cooperation with SCOMM. The controversial SCOMM program is one of the most powerful tools of immigration enforcement in the new millennium because it transforms any contact with state and local law enforcement into a potential immigration investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • La Gran Marcha: Anti-Racism and Immigrants Rights in Southern California
    La Gran Marcha: Anti-Racism and Immigrants Rights in Southern California Jenna M. Loyd1 Department of Geography, Syracuse University 144 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244-1020 USA Email: [email protected] Andrew Burridge Department of Geography, University of Southern California, 416 Kaprielian Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0255 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract Millions of people across the United States took to the streets in spring 2006 to protest repressive immigration legislation, demand just immigration reform, and seek justice in daily life. This article has two aims. First, we seek to intervene in the popular immigration debate, which denies racism and claims to be concerned only with law-and-order. Second, we analyze (im)migration politics in relation to national racial formations. That is, racialized immigration policies do not exist apart from a racially stratified citizenry. We rely on the concept of social death to trace state policies of immigration and criminalization as key sites of interracial and transnational struggles against racism and for justice and liberation. Thus, we seek to elucidate possibilities for anti-racist alliances and social change. We conclude with a discussion of the ways in which we see the immigrants rights movement connecting with other struggles for social justice, and the implications that 1 © Jenna M. Loyd and Andrew Burridge, 2007 La Gran Marcha: Anti-Racism and Immigrants Rights in Southern California 2 concepts of national racial formation and social death have for the movement against global apartheid. KEY WORDS: immigrants rights, racism, national racial formation, social death, criminalization, militarization, United States “Immigration politics also surfaced in California’s gubernatorial race … with Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Verify Overview for Existing Users
    E-Verify Overview for Existing Users www.dhs.gov/E-Verify Agenda . Form I-9 and E-Verify . Closing a Case . Handling a Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) . Compliance Monitoring . Additional Information E-Verify for Existing Users November 2015 2 Form I-9 and E-Verify When to Complete Form I-9 and Create a Case To comply with the Complete Form I-9 Create a Case in law E-Verify The earliest you may: The employee has The employee has accepted an offer of accepted an employment employment offer and Form I-9 is complete The latest you may: The third business The third business day after the day after the employee started employee started work for pay work for pay and Form I-9 is complete E-Verify for Existing Users November 2015 3 I-9 Process with E-Verify I-9 Process I-9 Process with E-Verify Employee completes -Employee must include SSN when completing Form I-9, Section 1. Form I-9, Section 1. -If the employee has not been issued his SSN, complete Form I-9 as normal and attach a memo to Form I-9 indicating the reason for the delay in creating the case in E-Verify. -If employee provides email address, employer MUST enter it into E-Verify. Employee chooses which -Employee chooses which acceptable document(s) to present. acceptable document(s) -If a List B document is chosen, it MUST contain a photograph. to present. -If an employee chooses to provide a photo matching document, the employer must make a photo copy and retain with the Form I-9.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA DREAM ACT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Parents and Students CA Dream Act Background and Eligibility
    CALIFORNIA DREAM ACT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for parents and students CA Dream Act Background and Eligibility Q. What is the California Dream Act? Q. Who Can Apply for the California Dream Act? The California Dream Act allows undocumented and nonresident Students who live in California and meet the eligibility requirements documented students who meet certain provisions to apply for and of Assembly Bill (AB) 540 or AB 2000, as well as students who have receive private scholarships funded through public universities, state a U Visa or TPS status, can use the California Dream Act application administered financial aid, University grants, community college fee (CADAA). waivers, and Cal Grants. Q. What is the difference between the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and the California Dream Act application? The eligibility requirements based on citizenship are completely different for each of these. See below for more details: 1) You are eligible to complete the FAFSA at https://fafsa.ed.gov/ if 2) You are eligible to complete the Dream Act Application (CADAA) at you are a: www.caldreamact.org if you are a: Person who has a Social Security number who is either: Student who is not eligible to file the FAFSA and you: • A U.S. Citizen • Meet the requirements of AB 540 or AB 2000 and/or • An eligible non-citizen, per the FAFSA definition, or • Reside in California with a U-Visa or • The holder of a T-visa • Reside in California with a Temporary Protected Status (TPS) • A U.S. Citizen, eligible non-citizen or the holder of a T - Visa whose parent is undocumented Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security: the San Diego Fence
    Order Code RS22026 Updated May 23, 2007 Border Security: The San Diego Fence Blas Nuñez-Neto Analyst in Domestic Security Domestic Social Policy Division Michael John Garcia Legislative Attorney American Law Division Summary This report outlines the issues involved with DHS’s construction of the San Diego border fence and highlights some of the major legislative and administrative developments regarding its completion; it will be updated as warranted.1 Congress first authorized the construction of a 14-mile, triple-layered fence along the U.S.-Mexico border near San Diego in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996. By 2004, only nine miles had been completed, and construction was halted because of environmental concerns. The 109th Congress subsequently passed the REAL ID Act (P.L. 109-13, Div. B), which contained provisions to facilitate the completion of the 14-mile fence. These provisions allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive all legal requirements determined necessary to ensure expeditious construction of authorized barriers and roads. In September 2005, the Secretary used this authority to waive a number of mostly environmental and conservation laws. Subsequently, the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-367) removed the specific IIRIRA provisions authorizing the San Diego fence and added provisions authorizing five stretches of two-layered reinforced fencing along the southwest border. While the specific authorization of the San Diego fence was deleted, the project appears permissible under a separate, more general authorization provision of IIRIRA. In the 110th Congress, S.Amdt. 1150, the Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Reform Act of 2007, which has been proposed in the nature of a substitute to S.
    [Show full text]