DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Observations During Wind Turbine Operations at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Observations During Wind Turbine Operations at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island OCS Study BOEM 2019-028 Field Observations During Wind Turbine Operations at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs OCS Study BOEM 2019-028 Field Observations During Wind Turbine Operations at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island May 2019 Authors (in alphabetical order): James Elliott Anwar A. Khan Ying-Tsong Lin Timothy Mason James H. Miller Arthur E. Newhall Gopu R. Potty Kathleen J. Vigness-Raposa Prepared under BOEM Award Contract No. M15PC00002, Task Order No. M16PD00025 By HDR 9781 S Meridian Boulevard, Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80112 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs DISCLAIMER Study concept, oversight, and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Contract Number M15PC00002, Task Order No. M16PD00025. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Data and Information Systems webpage (http://www.boem.gov/Environmental- Studies-EnvData/), click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2019-028. The report is also available at the National Technical Reports Library at https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/. CITATION HDR. 2019. Field Observations during Wind Turbine Operations at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island. Final Report to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Office of Renewable Energy Programs. OCS Study BOEM 2019-028. 281pp. ABOUT THE COVER Cover photo: Block Island Wind Farm Facility Wind Turbine 3 Construction (left panel) Wind Turbines 1–5 operating (right panel). Courtesy of HDR RODEO Team. Used with permission. All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The HDR RODEO Team includes the following subcontractors (in alphabetical order): Arthur Popper, Ph.D. Clark Group, LLC EA Engineering Science & Technology, Inc. Fugro Marine GeoServices, Inc. Fugro GB Marine Ltd. H.T. Harvey & Associates Loughine Limited Subacoustech Environmental. Significant additional technical support for the monitoring effort was provided by the following institutions: Marine Acoustics, Inc. University of Rhode Island Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Blue Land Media. Vessel services for visual monitoring were provided by Hula Charters. Assistance and support from all team members is greatly appreciated. Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. vii List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 The RODEO Program ................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 The Block Island Wind Farm ....................................................................................................... 10 1.3 BIWF Operational Phase Monitoring .......................................................................................... 10 1.4 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 10 2 Visual Monitoring .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Observations ............................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Southeast Lighthouse ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Point Judith ........................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 Brenton State Park ............................................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Night-time Offshore Monitoring ............................................................................................ 21 2.2 Discussion and Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 22 3 Airborne Noise Monitoring ............................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Onshore Airborne Noise Monitoring Results .............................................................................. 24 3.2 Offshore Airborne Noise Monitoring Results .............................................................................. 25 3.3 Discussion and Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 26 4 Underwater Sound Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 27 4.1 Survey Methods .......................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Winter 2016 Monitoring Results .................................................................................................. 31 4.2.1 Vertical and Horizontal Line Array Monitoring Data ............................................................. 33 4.2.2 Geosled Monitoring Data...................................................................................................... 34 4.2.3 Conclusions from 2016 Winter Operational Phase Underwater Acoustic Monitoring .......... 37 4.3 Late Summer 2017 Monitoring Results ...................................................................................... 38 4.3.1 Vertical and Horizontal Line Array Monitoring Data ............................................................. 40 4.3.2 Geosled Monitoring Data...................................................................................................... 42 4.3.3 Air/Sea Acoustic Interaction Data ........................................................................................ 45 4.3.4 Conclusions from 2017 Late Summer Operational Phase Underwater Acoustic Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 49 4.4 Extended Summer 2017 Monitoring Results .............................................................................. 49 4.4.1 Survey Methods ................................................................................................................... 49 4.4.2 Results.................................................................................................................................. 50 4.4.3 Key Observations ................................................................................................................. 61 i 4.4.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 65 5 References ......................................................................................................................................... 68 Appendix A: Field Sampling Plan ............................................................................................................ 71 Appendix B: Visual Monitoring Data ....................................................................................................... 72 Appendix C: Airborne Noise Monitoring Report .................................................................................... 80 Appendix D: Late Summer 2017 Underwater Sound Monitoring Data ................................................ 81 ii List of Figures Figure 1. BIWF Project Area. .................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2. Visual Monitoring Locations. .................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3. Sample data log screen from the iPad App. ............................................................................ 13 Figure 4. WTG 3 as seen from the Southeast Lighthouse on a clear day (22 June 2017) (Photograph taken with lowest camera focal length setting of 100 mm). ................................ 14 Figure 5. WTGs 4 and 5 seen from the Southeast Lighthouse on a clear day (22 June 2017) (Photograph taken with lowest camera focal length setting of 100 mm). ................................ 14 Figure 6. View of the turbines from Old Harbor,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy from the Wind Student Guide
    2019-2020 Energy From the Wind Student Guide INTERMEDIATE Introduction to Wind Wind Average Wind Speed at 80 Meters Altitude Wind is moving air. You cannot see air, but it is all around you. You cannot see the wind, but you know it is there. Faster than 9.5 m/s (faster than 21.3 mph) 7.6 to 9.4 m/s (17 to 21.2 mph) You hear leaves rustling in the trees. You see clouds moving 5.6 to 7.5 m/s (12.5 to 16.9 mph) across the sky. You feel cool breezes on your skin. You witness 0 to 5.5 m/s (0 to 12.4 mph) the destruction caused by strong winds such as tornadoes and hurricanes. Wind has energy. Wind resources can be found across the country. Science and technology are providing more tools to accurately predict when and where the wind will blow. This information is allowing people to use wind on small and large scales. Wind is an increasingly important part of the United States’ energy portfolio. Data: National Renewable Energy Laboratory The Beaufort Scale BEAUFORT SCALE OF WIND SPEED BEAUFORT At the age of 12, Francis Beaufort joined the NUMBER NAME OF WIND LAND CONDITIONS WIND SPEED (MPH) British Royal Navy. For more than twenty years 0 Calm Smoke rises vertically Less than 1 he sailed the oceans and studied the wind, Direction of wind shown by smoke drift which was the main power source for the 1 Light air 1 - 3 Navy’s fleet. In 1805, he created a scale to rate but not by wind vanes Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, ordinary the power of the wind based on observations 2 Light breeze 4 - 7 of common things around him rather than wind vane moved by wind Leaves and small twigs in constant instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources
    Ocean Special Area Management Plan Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources Table of Contents 400 Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 410 Historic Contexts and Cultural Landscapes of the Ocean SAMP Area .......................4 410.1 Pre-Contact Geological History............................................................................5 410.2 Narragansett Tribal History.................................................................................6 410.3 European Exploration and Colonial Settlement Landscape Context .............16 410.4 Post-Colonial Cultural Landscape Context.......................................................18 410.5 Military Landscape Context ...............................................................................21 410.6 Fisheries Landscape Context ..............................................................................31 410.6.1 Rhode Island Fisheries.............................................................................31 410.6.2 Fishing and Subsistence on Block Island.................................................33 410.6.3 Historic Shipwrecks of Fishing Vessels ..................................................34 410.6.4 Historic Harbor Features..........................................................................35 410.7 Marine Transportation and Commercial Landscape Context........................35 410.8 Recreation and Tourism Landscape Context....................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey Grybowski
    JEFFREY GRYBOWSKI PROFILE Mr. Grybowski is the Chief Executive Officer of Deepwater Wind, where he manages the company’s portfolio of offshore wind and transmission projects. He has been intimately involved in the development of Deepwater Wind’s path-breaking Block Island Wind Farm since its inception in 2008. Mr. Grybowski has been at the forefront of shaping the commercial structures and government policies necessary to support offshore wind in the U.S. He plays a key role in the development of federal and state policies governing the leasing, permitting, and commercialization of offshore wind and transmission projects. Through the advancement of the Block Island Wind Farm, Mr. Grybowski has been a leader in establishing the commercial framework for standing up a new renewable energy industry in the United States. EXPERIENCE Deepwater Wind, LLC, Providence, RI Chief Executive Officer Hinckley, Allen & Snyder, LLP, Providence, RI • Partner, Corporate and Business Law Group • Chair of the Green Law Group Office of the Governor of the State of Rhode Island Chief of Staff, Deputy Chief of Staff, and Policy Director (2003 - 2007) Sullivan & Cromwell, New York, NY Associate, Complex corporate and business law Chambers of Chief Judge Ronald Lagueux, U.S. District Court for the District of RI Judicial Clerk (1998 – 1999) EDUCATION University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law Juris Doctor with High Honors, 1998 Order of the Coif North Carolina Law Review, Publication Editor Brown University A.B. with Honors in Public Policy, 1993 CHRIS VAN BEEK PROFILE Chris serves as President, where he is responsible for Technology, Operations, Project Management, Construction and Permitting.
    [Show full text]
  • Position of Respondent Annual Investment Level in the U.S. Renewable Energy Sector
    Position of Respondent Annual Investment Level in the U.S. Renewable Energy Sector Expectations for Renewable Energy Finance in 2021-2024 Energy Expectations for Renewable 33 Financing Vehicles Used for Renewable Energy Developer Survey Position of Respondent Expectations for Renewable Energy Finance in 2021-2024 Energy Expectations for Renewable 34 Total Revenue of U.S. Renewable Energy Business Total Capacity of Company’s Renewable Energy Installations over the Past Three Years Expectations for Renewable Energy Finance in 2021-2024 Energy Expectations for Renewable 35 Renewable Energy Technologies Developed by Each Company Over the Past Three Years Expectations for Renewable Energy Finance in 2021-2024 Energy Expectations for Renewable 36 Authors Maheen Ahmad, Program Manager Lesley Hunter, Vice President of Programs About ACORE The American Council on Renewable Energy is a national nonprofit organization that unites finance, policy and technology to accelerate the transition to a renewable energy economy. For more information, please visit www.acore.org. $1T 2030: The American Renewable Investment Goal On June 19, 2018, ACORE and a coalition of its financial institution members announced the launch of a new campaign that aims to reach $1 trillion in U.S. private sector investment in renewable energy and enabling grid technologies by 2030. Through $1T 2030: The American Renewable Investment Goal, leading energy financiers have now come together in a coordinated effort to accelerate the investment and deployment of renewable power. The campaign leverages the network of ACORE members and supporters, highlighting a combined set of commonsense policy reforms and distinct market drivers that are necessary to reach this ambitious goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Block Island Sound Rhode Island Sound Inner Continental Shelf
    Ecology of the Ocean Special Area Management Plan Area: Block Island Sound Rhode Island Sound Inner Continental Shelf Alan Desbonnet Carrie Byron with help from Elise Desbonnet, Barry Costa-Pierce, Meredith Haas and the PELL LIBRARY STAFF and MANY, MANY Researchers The Ecology of Rhode Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Inner Continental Shelf GEOLOGY 2,500 km2 31 m average 60 m max 1,350 km2 40 m averageAcadian vs. Virginian 100 m maxecoregions The Ecology of Rhode Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Inner Continental Shelf Boothroyd 2008 SLR 2.5-3.0 mm per year (1/10th inch) Glacial Origins--- a key element E. Uchupi, N.W. Driscoll, R.D. Ballard, and S.T. Bolmer, 2000 The Ecology of Rhode Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Inner Continental Shelf Boothroyd 2009 Downwelling – Combined Flow Circulation/currents shaped by the geology Bottom habitats are dynamic/ever changing The Ecology of Rhode Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Inner Continental Shelf Boothroyd 2008 Winter = NW (stronger) Summer = SW (milder) WINDS NOT a major driver of circulation Av.Big Wave implications height for stratification = 1-3 m Max = 7 m (9 m 100 yr. wave) The Ecology of Rhode Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Inner Continental Shelf Spaulding 2007 Most recent Cat3 = Esther in 1961 Most recent = Bob (Cat2) in 1991 No named hurricane 18 years 17 RI hurricanes: 7 Category 1 8 Category 2 2 Category 3 The Ecology of Rhode Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Inner Continental Shelf NOAA Hurricane Center online data 2010 Important
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Field Observations During Wind Turbine Foundation Installation at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island
    OCS Study BOEM 2018-029 Field Observations During Wind Turbine Foundation Installation at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island Appendix A: Field Plan US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs OCS Study BOEM 2018-029 Field Observations During Wind Turbine Foundation Installation at the Block Island Wind Farm, Rhode Island Appendix A: Field Plan May 2018 Authors (in alphabetical order): Jennifer L. Amaral, Robin Beard, R.J. Barham, A.G. Collett, James Elliot, Adam S. Frankel, Dennis Gallien, Carl Hager, Anwar A. Khan, Ying-Tsong Lin, Timothy Mason, James H. Miller, Arthur E. Newhall, Gopu R. Potty, Kevin Smith, and Kathleen J. Vigness-Raposa Prepared under BOEM Award Contract No. M15PC00002, Task Order No. M16PD00031 By HDR 9781 S Meridian Boulevard, Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80112 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs Deepwater Block Island Wind Farm Project Field Data Collection Plan Contract No. M15PC00002, Task Order No. M15PD00016 Prepared for: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs Sterling, VA 20166 Prepared by: HDR Environmental, Operations, and Construction, Inc. 2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 100 Vienna, VA 22180 June 2015 This page is intentionally blank Deepwater Block Island Wind Farm Project Field Data Collection Plan Contract No. M15PC00002, Task Order No. M15PD00016 Prepared for: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs Sterling, VA 20166 Prepared by: HDR Environmental, Operations, and Construction, Inc. 2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 100 Vienna, VA 22180 June 2015 This page is intentionally blank Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    imiF.NT OF Tim BULLETIN UN ITKI) STATKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 115 A (lECKJKAPHIC DKTIOXARY OF KHODK ISLAM; WASHINGTON GOVKRNMKNT PRINTING OFF1OK 181)4 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. i United States. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior | | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | no. 115 | [Seal of the department] | Washington | government printing office | 1894 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Rhode Island | by | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office 11894 8°. 31 pp. Gannett (Henry). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Khode Island | hy | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] Washington | government printing office | 1894 8°. 31 pp. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 115]. 8 United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | * A | geographic dictionary | of | Ehode Island | by | Henry -| Gannett | [Vignette] | . g Washington | government printing office | 1894 JS 8°. 31pp. a* [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (Z7. S. geological survey). ~ . Bulletin 115]. ADVERTISEMENT. [Bulletin No. 115.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by tlie Director, but other­ wise in ordinary octavos.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Block Island Wind Farm on Coastal Resources LESSONS LEARNED
    SPECIAL ISSUE ON UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTS OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON FISHERIES Effects of the Block Island Wind Farm on Coastal Resources LESSONS LEARNED By Drew A. Carey, Dara H. Wilber, Lorraine B. Read, Marisa L. Guarinello, Matthew Griffin, and Steven Sabo 70 Oceanography | Vol.33, No.4 ABSTRACT. The Block Island Wind Farm, the first offshore wind farm in the United ational users, adaptive monitoring based States, attracted intense interest and speculation about the effects of construction and on data and stakeholder feedback, and operation on valuable coastal resources. Four studies designed to address the ques- cooperative research with commercial tions raised were conducted over seven years as a requirement of the lease agreement fishermen. Sampling was based on meth- between the State of Rhode Island and the developer, Deepwater Wind Block Island. ods consistent with regional surveys The objectives of the studies were to separate the effects of construction and operation (e.g., ASMFC, 2015; Bonzek et al., 2017) on hard bottom habitats, demersal fish, lobster and crabs, and recreational boating from and included data on multiple metrics regional changes in conditions. Study elements included: early engagement with stake- to evaluate fish and fisheries resources. holders (fishermen and boaters), adaptive monitoring based on data and stakeholder Statistical considerations included strat- feedback, cooperative research with commercial fishermen, use of methods consistent ified random sampling within a before- with regional surveys, stratified random sampling within a before-after-control-impact after- control- impact (BACI) design, (BACI) design, power analysis (when possible) to determine sample size, and multiple using customized linear contrasts metrics to evaluate fish and fisheries resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Initiatives at the U.S. Department of Energy U.S
    Offshore Wind Initiatives at the U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Offshore Wind Sets Sail Coastal and Great Lakes states account for nearly 80% of U.S. electricity demand, and the winds off the shores of these coastal load centers have a technical resource potential twice as large as the nation’s current electricity use. With the costs of offshore wind energy falling globally and the first U.S. offshore wind farm operational off the coast of Block Island, Rhode Island since 2016, offshore wind has the potential to contribute significantly to a clean, affordable, and secure national energy mix. To support the development of a world-class offshore The Block Island Wind Farm, the first U.S. offshore wind farm, wind industry, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) represents the launch of an industry that has the potential to has been supporting a broad portfolio of offshore contribute contribute significantly to a clean, affordable, and secure energy mix. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 40389 wind research, development, and demonstration projects since 2011 and released a new National Offshore Wind Strategy jointly with the U.S. offshore wind R&D consortium. Composed of representatives Department of the Interior (DOI) in 2016. from industry, academia, government, and other stakeholders, the consortium’s goal is to advance offshore wind plant Research, Development, and technologies, develop innovative methods for wind resource and site characterization, and develop advanced technology solutions Demonstration Projects solutions to address U.S.-specific installation, operation, DOE has allocated over $250 million to offshore wind research maintenance, and supply chain needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Packet July 31, 2019
    BLOCK ISLAND UTILITY DISTRICT Lineworkers Jim Stockman and Evan Carey performing hot line work; changing a failed fused cut out which caused the Corn Neck outage on the evening of July 4th. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING JULY 31, 2019 Block Island Utility District Wednesday July 31, 2019 Town Hall, Old Town Road 4:00 p.m. 1. Commissioner’s Report 2. Public Input 3. Approve Minutes of June 25, 2019 4. Receive and Act on Treasurers Report a. Review June 2019 Financials b. Provide Feedback on New Financials Format 5. Receive and Act on Presidents Report 6. Review and Act on CFC Letter of Credit to be used for ISO-NE Financial Assurance 7. Review and Act on CFC Restatement of the Original $670,000 Line of Credit (LOC) – Mortgage Supplement to Secure LOC 8. Review and Act on Rate Case Filing 9. Discuss and Act on Annual Meeting Agenda a. Update on Election Schedule 10. Discuss and Act on NRECA Director Election 11. Discuss and Act on President’s Job Description, Performance Review and Salary 12. Discuss and Act on Litigation* *This item may be held in Closed Session pursuant to RIGL 42-46-5(2) (litigation: Sara McGinnes v. Town of New Shoreham & Howell Conant v. Block Island Power Company) Individuals requesting services for the deaf and hard of hearing must call (401) 466-5851 forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting date. TTY: 711 Posted: 7/25/19 Agenda Item 1 Commissioner’s Report (NOTE TAKING SECTION) Agenda Item 2 Public Input (NOTE TAKING SECTION) Page 2 of 32 Agenda Item 3 Approve Minutes of June 25, 2019 Page 3 of 32 Block Island Utility District Tuesday June 25, 2019 Town Hall 4:00 PM Present: Commissioners Mary Jane Balser, Barbara MacMullan, William Penn, Everett Shorey, Jeff Wright, President of BIPCo, Renee Meyers, Block Island Times, Bonnie Biocchi, Northeast Public Power Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Infrastructure Projects Progressing
    Consumer Liaison Group Meeting Summary September 15, 2016 Introduction The Consumer Liaison Group (CLG) is a forum for sharing information between ISO New England (ISO) and electricity consumers in New England. The CLG meets quarterly and attracts a diverse group of 75-100 attendees at each meeting. Meetings are open to the public. Participants generally include consumers and consumer representatives (including state consumer and ratepayer advocates), state business and industry associations, chambers of commerce, individual businesses, trade groups, nonprofit organizations, and other end users. Several New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) members and state regulators are also regular, active participants in CLG discussions.1 The focus of the CLG is on the concerns and needs of commercial, industrial, and nonprofit electricity end users. CLG meetings generally follow the same format: Opening remarks from a keynote speaker—typically, an industry or business executive, policymaker, or regulator—who provides a unique perspective on a particular topic or issue A representative from the ISO, who provides an update on regional energy issues and initiatives that have or will be taking place at NEPOOL and ISO stakeholder meetings that can have an impact on electricity prices A panel discussion, often representing industry, the ISO, regulators, and consumer perspectives, facilitated by a moderator The following is a brief summary of the meeting held on September 15, 2016 in Providence, Rhode Island. The topic, keynote speaker, moderator, and panelists were selected by the Consumer Liaison Group Coordinating Committee (CLGCC). The meeting summary is intended to capture the general discussions that took place at the meeting, but does not necessarily reflect the views of the ISO or the CLGCC.
    [Show full text]