Massachusetts Caucus of Women Legislators
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MARCH 19 Layout 1
Focus at MHA on Still no room Congresswoman Clark respect, integrity, sees value of loan repay compassion at the inn VIEWPOINTS: DITORIAL PROVIDER PROFILE: E : PAGE 5 PAGE 4 PAGE 3 Vol. 40 - No. 3 The Newspaper of the Providers’ Council March 2019 Roundtable Federal, state discussion policy work gone to pot in spotlight he Providers’ Council and Massa- Organizations need to chusetts Nonprofit Network sent Ta joint letter to Congressman update policies, train staff Richard Neal (D-Mass.), Chair of the he legalization of marijuana usage Joint Committee on Taxation, urging in Massachusetts – for both medic- the immediate repeal of the new income Tinal and recreational purposes – is tax on expenses incurred by nonprofits creating new challenges and questions for providing employee transportation for human services providers about use benefits, such as parking and transit by both employees and clients. passes. Together, the Council and MNN Nearly 40 people representing 27 represent nearly 1,000 nonprofit or- Providers’ Council member organizations ganizations throughout Massachusetts. attended an HR Roundtable on Mari- The new tax – officially Internal Rev- juana Legalization Policies and Proce- enue Code Section 512(a)(7) – is a part dures hosted by the Council on Feb. 20 of the sweeping tax code reform passed in Needham to discuss their challenges in 2017 and the first payments will be and learn about best practices. due in a matter of weeks. It imposes a A panel – including attorneys Jeffrey 21 percent tax on nonprofits offering Hirsch and Peter Moser from the law firm transportation-related benefits to em- Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP; Senior ployees. -
Protect Your Collective Bargaining Rights!
PROTECT YOUR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHTS! On April 26th, a majority of the members of the Massachusetts of House Representatives voted to dramatically restrict the rights of municipal employees to collectively bargain over the issue of health insurance. It is critically important that you let your Representative know how you feel about their vote. These Representatives voted IN FAVOR of your collective bargaining rights: Democrats: Geraldo Alicea Denise Andrews Bruce Ayers Michael Brady Paul Brodeur Thomas Calter Christine Canavan James Cantwell Tackey Chan Nicholas Collins Edward Coppinger Geraldine Creedon Mark Cusack Marcos Devers James Dwyer Lori Ehrlich Christopher Fallon Robert Fennell John Fresolo Denise Garlick Coleen Garry John Mahoney Paul Mark James Miceli Kevin Murphy Rhonda Nyman James O’Day Thomas Petrolati Denise Provost Kathi-Anne Reinstein Carl Sciortino Joyce Spiliotis Thomas Stanley David Sullivan Walter Timilty Timothy Toomey Cleon Turner Marty Walsh Steven Walsh Alice Wolf Republicans: Bradford Hill Daniel Winslow If your state representative stood up for you, it is important that you call them and thank them for their support. You can say something like this: My name is ____________________ and I live in __________________. I work for the city/town of ___________ as a _____________. I am calling because Rep. ____________ voted in favor of maintaining collective bargaining rights for municipal workers like me. I wanted to thank Rep. ______________ for standing up for my union rights. These Representatives voted AGAINST -
MCSW Annual Report, FY 2020
th Charles F. Hurley Building | 19 Staniford Street, 6 Floor | Boston, MA 02114 | Phone: (617) 626-6520 | Email: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents Remarks from the Chair . 4 Commissioners, Staff, and Interns . 4 Introduction . 5 Charges . 5 Organization . 5 2020 Recommendations to Appointing Authorities. 6 MCSW FY 2020 Budget . 6 Programs, Advocacy, and Education. 8 Public Hearings . 8 International Women’s Day . 8 Advocacy Day . 9 Seventeenth Annual Commonwealth Heroines Program . 9 Girls Initiative . 10 MCSW Internship Program . 10 Priority Legislation . 10 Regional Commissions . 12 Local Women’s Commissions . 13 Regional Commission Annual Reports . 14 Berkshire Regional Commission Annual Report . 14 Cape Cod and Islands Regional Commission Annual Report . 17 Eastern Regional Commission Annual Report . 24 Essex County Regional Commission Annual Report . 27 Hampden County Commission Annual Report . 29 Hampshire-Franklin Regional Commission Annual Report . 31 MetroWest Regional Commission Annual Report . 38 Plymouth County Commission Annual Report . 42 Upper Middlesex Commission Annual Report . 46 Worcester Regional Commission Annual Report . 49 2 Appendix . 53 Cape and Islands Public Hearing Summary . 53 Eastern Regional Commission on the Status of Women and Girls Meeting Agenda(s) . 60 Great Barrington Public Hearing Notes and Testimony . .75 Springfield Public Hearing Notes and Testimony . 78 Weymouth Public Hearing Notes and Testimony . 80 COVID-19 Virtual Public Hearing and Survey Data . 83 Advocacy Day 2020 . 91 Community Meetings: May 13-15, 2020 . 93 3 Remarks from the 2019-2020 Chair On behalf of the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women, it is my pleasure to present a brief summary of our FY20 Annual Report. -
2013-2014 Legislative Scorecard
Legislative Scorecard Votes and Leadership 2013-14 LEGISLATIVE SESSION - 1 - This is the inaugural edition of the Environmental League of Massachusetts legislative scorecard. We produced this scorecard to inform citizens about how their legislators voted on important environmental issues. We are pleased and grateful for the support of so many environmental leaders in the legislature. The scorecard relies first on roll call votes on legislation that deals with environmental and energy issues. Because there are so few roll call votes each session—and often these votes are unanimous—we have scored additional actions by legislators to further distinguish environmental champions. Bonus points were awarded to legislators who introduced bills that were ELM priorities or who introduced important amendments, particularly budget amendments to increase funding for state environmental agencies. In addition, we subtracted points for legislators who introduced legislation or amendments that we opposed. We want to recognize leadership and courage, in addition to votes, and have made every attempt to be fair and transparent in our scoring. Much happens during the legislative process that is impractical to score such as committee redrafts, committee votes to move or hold a bill, and measures that would improve flawed legislation. We have not attempted to include these actions, but we recognize that they greatly influence the process and outcomes. None of the bills or amendments scored here should be a surprise to legislators in terms of ELM’s support or opposition. Going forward, ELM will include votes and other actions that support additional revenues for transportation and promote transit, walking and biking. George Bachrach, President Erica Mattison, Legislative Director Highlights of the Session projects. -
Members Name Base Pay Additional Pay Office Expense Total Timothy R
Members Name Base Pay Additional Pay Office Expense Total Timothy R. Whelan $62,547.97 $0.00 $20,000.00 $82,547.97 William L. Crocker, Jr. $62,547.97 $0.00 $20,000.00 $82,547.97 David T. Vieira $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $97,547.97 Sarah K. Peake $62,547.97 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 $112,547.97 Randy Hunt $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $97,547.97 Dylan A. Fernandes $62,547.97 $0.00 $20,000.00 $82,547.97 Gailanne M. Cariddi $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $97,547.97 deceased 6/17/17 Paul W. Mark $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $97,547.97 Tricia Farley-Bouvier $62,547.97 $5,200.00 $20,000.00 $87,747.97 William "Smitty" Pignatelli $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $97,547.97 Fred Jay Barrows $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $92,547.97 Paul R. Heroux $62,547.97 $0.00 $15,000.00 $77,547.97 Shaunna L. O'Connell $62,547.97 $0.00 $15,000.00 $77,547.97 Steven S. Howitt $62,547.97 $0.00 $15,000.00 $77,547.97 Patricia A. Haddad $62,547.97 $50,000.00 $20,000.00 $132,547.97 Carole A. Fiola $62,547.97 $5,200.00 $15,000.00 $82,747.97 Alan Silvia $62,547.97 $5,200.00 $20,000.00 $87,747.97 Paul Schmid, III $62,547.97 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $97,547.97 Christopher M. -
An Act to Provide Identification to Homeless Youth and Families
________________________________________________________________________________________________ Everyone Needs ID: An Act to Provide Identification to Homeless Youth and Families Senate Bill 2043 and House Bill 3066 Sponsored by Senator Harriette Chandler and Representative Kay Khan Lead Sponsors: Senator Harriette Chandler and Representative Kay Khan Senate Cosponsors: Senators Will Brownsberger, Jo Comerford, Julian Cyr, Sal DiDomenico, Jamie Eldridge, Cindy Friedman, Pat Jehlen, Jason Lewis, Mike Moore, and Becca Rausch House Cosponsors: Representatives Ruth Balser, Natalie Blais, Daniel Carey, Mike Connolly, Dan Donahue, Marjorie Decker, Mindy Domb, Carolyn Dykema, Nika Elugardo, Tricia Farley-Bouvier, Sean Garballey, Carmine Gentile, Carlos González, Tami Gouveia, James Hawkins, Kevin Honan, Mary Keefe, David LeBoeuf, Jack Patrick Lewis, David Linsky, Adrian Madaro, Liz Malia, Paul Mark, Paul McMurtry, Liz Miranda, Jim O’Day, Elizabeth Poirier, Denise Provost, Dave Rogers, Lindsay Sabadosa, Jon Santiago, Tom Stanley, José Tosado, Steve Ultino, Aaron Vega, and Bud Williams Bill History: Both Senate Bill 2043 and House Bill 3066 were refiled in January 2019, and were reported out favorably by the Joint Committee on Transportation in November 2019. S. 2043 was sent to the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, and may come up for a vote by the full Senate soon. H. 3066 was sent to the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing, and is awaiting action. Last session, the bill (Senate Bill 2568) passed the Senate unanimously. Importance of -
Justice Reinvestment
Justice Reinvestment Senate Bill 64 House Bill 1429 An Act to Increase Neighborhood Safety and Opportunity Senator Sonia Chang-Díaz (D-Boston) and Rep. Mary Keefe (D-Worcester) and 55 co-sponsoring legislators have filed an omnibus bill backed by a large coalition of community, religious, and union organizations to improve Massachusetts’ systems of criminal justice, end mass incarceration, and re-invest in our communities through job and educational opportunity. Included in the bill are: I. Criminal Justice Reforms • Repeal Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences – This would restore judicial discretion in sentencing for drug charges, reducing the risk of longer than warranted prison terms; • Reduce Certain Low-Level Felonies to Misdemeanors – Under this scenario certain offenses (such as shoplifting or other petty theft, or low-level drug charges) would be made misdemeanors, with different sanctions that rely less on long and expensive terms of incarceration; • End Collateral Sanctions at the RMV – This would eliminate the current law requiring the Registry of Motor Vehicles to confiscate the license of any person convicted of any drug offense (even where charges are unrelated to the operation of a vehicle) for up to 5 years and charge at least $500 to reinstate it; and • Extraordinary Medical Placement – This would allow a judge to decide whether a person who is permanently incapacitated or terminally ill should be transferred out of prison for treatment, remaining under state custody. II. Jobs and Schools The final sections of the bill establish a Trust fund with the cost savings from these improvements in the criminal justice system. Trust funds will be used to right our unbalanced economy by investing in evidence-based practices including job development efforts for youth, veterans, victims of violence, and other people with significant barriers to employment, and supporting programs that help at-risk youth to stay in school. -
HOUSE ...No. 01423
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 01985 FILED ON: 01/20/2011 HOUSE . No. 01423 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ PRESENTED BY: Kay Khan _______________ To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General Court assembled: The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the passage of the accompanying bill: An Act relative to the civil commitment of women for alcoholism and substance abuse to MCI Framingham. _______________ PETITION OF: NAME: DISTRICT/ADDRESS: Kay Khan 11th Middlesex Tom Sannicandro 7th Middlesex Cory Atkins 14th Middlesex Carolyn C. Dykema 8th Middlesex Kate Hogan 3rd Middlesex Elizabeth A. Malia 11th Suffolk James J. O'Day 14th Worcester Sarah K. Peake 4th Barnstable Denise Provost 27th Middlesex John W. Scibak 2nd Hampshire Carl M. Sciortino, Jr. 34th Middlesex Ellen Story 3rd Hampshire HOUSE . No. 01423 By Ms. Kay Khan of Newton, petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 01423) of Ellen Story and others relative to the civil commitment of women for alcoholism and substance abuse at the Framingham Correctional Institution. Joint Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse. [SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION SEE HOUSE , NO. 1938 OF 2009-2010.] The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ In the Year Two Thousand Eleven _______________ An Act relative to the civil commitment of women for alcoholism and substance abuse to MCI Framingham. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 7 of Chapter 111B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2004 Official 2 Edition, is hereby amended by adding at the end thereof the following: The department shall 3 ensure that no female is committed to the Massachusetts correctional institution, Framingham for 4 rehabilitative purposes pursuant to this section or pursuant to section 35 of chapter 123 of the 5 General Laws. -
The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ............................................................................... -
The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House, Boston, MA 02133-1053
The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House, Boston, MA 02133-1053 April 7, 2020 David L. Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240 Dear Secretary Bernhardt, We are deeply dismayed and disappointed with the Department of the Interior's recent decision to disestablish and take lands out of trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe on March 27, 2020. Not since the mid-twentieth century has an Interior Secretary taken action to disestablish a reservation. This outrageous decision comes as we mark 400 years since the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620 and recognize the People of the First Light who inhabited these shores for centuries before contact. The Department’s capricious action brings shame to your office and to our nation. Your decision was cruel and it was unnecessary. You were under no court order to take the Wampanoag land out of trust. Further, litigation to uphold the Mashpee Wampanoag’s status as a tribe eligible for the benefits of the Indian Reorganization Act is ongoing. Your intervention was without merit and completely unnecessary. The fact that the Department made this announcement on a Friday afternoon in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates a callous disregard for human decency. Mashpee Wampanoag leaders were focused on protecting members of their tribe, mobilizing health care resources, and executing response plans when they received your ill-timed announcement. As you are well aware, the Department of the Interior holds a federal trust responsibility to tribes, which includes the protection of Native American lands. -
For a Breakdown of Your Ward and Precinct, Enter Your Address in the Secretary of the Commonwealth's Ward, Precinct and Polling Place Search
(For a breakdown of your ward and precinct, enter your address in the Secretary of the Commonwealth's Ward, precinct and polling place search ) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A Abington Senator Michael W. Morrissey Representative Allen J. McCarthy Acton Senator James B. Eldridge Representative Cory Atkins :- precincts one, two, and six Representative Jennifer E. Benson :- precincts three, four, and five Acushnet Senator Mark C. Montigny Representative Robert M. Koczera Adams Senator Benjamin B. Downing Representative Daniel E. Bosley Agawam Senator Stephen J. Buoniconti Representative Rosemary Sandlin Alford Senator Benjamin B. Downing Representative William Smitty Pignatelli Amesbury Senator Steven A. Baddour Representative Michael A. Costello Amherst Senator Stanley C. Rosenberg Representative Ellen Story Andover Senator Susan C. Tucker Representative Barry R. Finegold :- precincts two, three, five, four, six, and nine Representative Barbara A. L'Italien :- precincts one, seven, and eight Aquinnah Senator Robert A. O'Leary Representative Timothy R. Madden Arlington Senator Kenneth J. Donnelly Representative William N. Brownsberger :- precincts two and four Representative Sean Garballey :- precincts one, three, five to thirteen, fifteen, sixteen, eighteen, and nineteen Representative Jay R. Kaufman. :- precincts fourteen, seventeen, twenty, and twenty-one Ashburnham Senator Stephen M. Brewer Representative Robert L. Rice, Jr. Ashby Senator Jennifer L. Flanagan Representative Robert L. Rice, Jr. Ashfield Senator Benjamin B. Downing Representative Denis E. Guyer Ashland Senator Karen E. Spilka Representative Tom Sannicandro Athol Senator Stephen M. Brewer Representative Christopher J. Donelan Attleboro Senator Richard J. Ross :-precincts one, two, three A Senator James E. -
MA CCAN 2020 Program FINAL
Source: Ballotpedia Source: Secretary of Commonwealth Massachusetts Senate *Denotes candidate does Candidates not have a website Senate District Democratic Republican Others 1st Bristol and Plymouth District Michael Rodrigues (i)* No candidate 1st Essex District Diana DiZoglio (i) No candidate 1st Essex and Middlesex District No candidate Bruce Tarr (i) 1st Hampden and Hampshire District Eric Lesser (i) No candidate 1st Middlesex District Edward Kennedy (i) No candidate 1st Middlesex and Norfolk District Cynthia Stone Creem (i) No candidate 1st Plymouth and Bristol District Marc Pacheco (i) No candidate 1st Suffolk District Nick Collins (i) No candidate 1st Suffolk and Middlesex District Joseph Boncore (i) No candidate 1st Worcester District Harriette Chandler (i)* No candidate 2nd Bristol and Plymouth District Mark Montigny (i)* No candidate 2nd Essex District Joan Lovely (i) No candidate 2nd Essex and Middlesex District Barry Finegold (i) No candidate 2nd Hampden and Hampshire District John Velis (i) John Cain 2nd Middlesex District Patricia D. Jehlen (i) No candidate 2nd Middlesex and Norfolk District Karen Spilka (i) No candidate 2nd Plymouth and Bristol District Michael Brady (i) No candidate 2nd Suffolk District Sonia Chang-Diaz (i) No candidate 2nd Suffolk and Middlesex District William Brownsberger (i) No candidate 2nd Worcester District Michael Moore (i) No candidate 3rd Essex District Brendan Crighton (i) No candidate 3rd Middlesex District Mike Barrett (i) No candidate 1 Source: Ballotpedia Source: Secretary of Commonwealth