DOCSLIB.ORG

Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers Edited by Catharine M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers Edited by Catharine M Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers Edited by Catharine M. Sturgeon and Eleftherios Diamandis NACB_LMPG_Ca1cover.indd 1 11/23/09 1:36:03 PM Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page i The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Presents LABORATORY MEDICINE PRACTICE GUIDELINES USE OF TUMOR MARKERS IN TESTICULAR, PROSTATE, COLORECTAL, BREAST, AND OVARIAN CANCERS EDITED BY Catharine M. Sturgeon Eleftherios P. Diamandis Copyright © 2009 The American Association for Clinical Chemistry Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page ii National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Presents LABORATORY MEDICINE PRACTICE GUIDELINES USE OF TUMOR MARKERS IN TESTICULAR, PROSTATE, COLORECTAL, BREAST, AND OVARIAN CANCERS EDITED BY Catharine M. Sturgeon Eleftherios P. Diamandis Catharine M. Sturgeon Robert C. Bast, Jr Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Edinburgh, UK Barry Dowell Michael J. Duffy Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St Vincent’s University Hospital and UCD School of Francisco J. Esteva Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Molecular Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas M. D. College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Ulf-Håkan Stenman Caj Haglund Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland Hospital, Helsinki, Finland Hans Lilja Nadia Harbeck Departments of Clinical Laboratories, Urology, and Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany New York, NY 10021 Daniel F. Hayes Nils Brünner Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Section of Biomedicine, Department of Veterinary Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Mads Holten-Andersen Section of Biomedicine, Department of Veterinary Daniel W. Chan Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Copenhagen, Denmark Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD George G. Klee Richard Babaian Department of Laboratory Medicine and Department of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Rochester, MN Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page iii Rolf Lamerz Paul Sibley Department of Medicine, Klinikum of the University Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Glyn Rhonwy, Munich, Grosshadern, Germany Llanberis, Gwynedd, UK Leendert H. Looijenga György Sölétormos Laboratory of Experimental Patho-Oncology, Erasmus Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hillerød Hospital, MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, and Daniel den Hillerød, Denmark Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Carsten Stephan Rafael Molina Department of Urology, Charité Hospital, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clinico Provincial, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Barcelona, Spain Lori Sokoll Hans Jørgen Nielsen Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD Copenhagen, Denmark Barry R. Hoffman Harry Rittenhouse Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Gen-Probe Inc, San Diego, CA Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Axel Semjonow Ontario, Canada Prostate Center, Department of Urology, University Clinic Muenster, Muenster, Germany Eleftherios P. Diamandis Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ie-Ming Shih Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD Ontario, Canada Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page iv Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc. All rights reserved. Single copies for personal use may be printed from authorized Internet sources such as the NACB’s home page (http://www.aacc.org/members/nacb/LMPG/Pages/default.aspx), provided it is printed in its entirety, including this notice. Printing of selected portions of the document is also permitted for personal use, provided the user also prints and attaches the title page and cover pages to the selected reprint or otherwise clearly identifies the reprint as having been produced by the NACB. Otherwise, this document may not be reproduced in whole or in part, stored in a retrieval system, translated into another language, or transmitted in any form without express written permission of the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Such permission may be requested from NACB, 1850 K Street, Suite 625, Washington, DC, 20006-2213. Permission will ordinarily be granted, provided the NACB logo and the following notice appear prominently at the front of the document: Reproduced (translated) with permission of the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry, Washington, DC. This document (PID 5693) was approved by the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Board of Directors in July 2008. The NACB is the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry. Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page v Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Tumor Markers in Testicular Cancer 3 3. Tumor Markers in Prostate Cancer 15 4. Tumor Markers in Colorectal Malignancy 27 5. Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer 37 6. Tumor Markers in Ovarian Cancer 51 References 61 Acknowledgment 80 Appendix 81 iv Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page vi Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page 1 Chapter 1 Introduction We present to clinical chemists, clinicians, and other practition- the NACB web site (2) and as an Appendix to this document. ers of laboratory and clinical medicine the latest update of the As might be expected, many of the NACB recommendations National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory are similar to those made by other groups, as is made clear from Medicine Practice Guidelines (LPMG) for the use of tumor the tabular comparisons presented for each malignancy (2). In markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian order to prepare these guidelines, the literature relevant to the cancers. These guidelines are intended to encourage more ap- use of tumor markers was reviewed. Particular attention was propriate use of tumor marker tests by primary care physicians, given to reviews including the few relevant systematic reviews hospital physicians and surgeons, specialist oncologists, and and to guidelines issued by expert panels. Where possible, these other health professionals. consensus recommendations of the NACB panels were evidence Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed based. The Tumor Markers: Quality Requirements LMPG pre- statements to assist practitioners and patients to make decisions sents NACB recommendations relating to general quality about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances requirements for tumor measurements, and includes tabulation (1). An explanation of the methodology used when developing of important causes of false positive tumor marker results (eg, these Guidelines appears in the introduction of the Tumor due to heterophilic antibody interference, “high dose hooking”) Markers: Quality Requirements LMPG, which can be found on which must also be taken into account (3). 1 Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page 2 Tumor Markers.qxd 6/22/10 7:51 PM Page 3 Chapter 2 Tumor Markers in Testicular Cancers Ulf-Håkan Stenman, Rolf Lamerz, and Leendert H. Looijenga BACKGROUND delayed until after chemotherapy in individuals with life- threatening metastatic disease. After orchiectomy, additional Approximately 95% of all malignant testicular tumors are of therapy depends on the type and stage of the disease. Surveillance germ cell origin, most of the rest being lymphomas, Leydig or is increasingly used for seminoma patients with stage I disease, Sertoli cell tumors and mesotheliomas. Germ cell tumors of ado- but radiation to the retroperitoneal and ipsilateral pelvic lymph lescents and adults are classified into two main types, semino- nodes, which is standard treatment for stage IIa and IIb disease, mas and nonseminomatous germ cell cancers of the testis is also used, as is short (single) course carboplatin (12). About (NSGCT). Testicular cancers represent about 1% of all malig- 4% to 10% of patients relapse with more than 90% of these cured nancies in males, but they are the most common tumors in men by chemotherapy. About 15% to 20% of stage I seminoma under age 15 to 35 years. They represent a significant cause of death surveillance relapse and need to be treated with chemotherapy. in this age group in spite of the fact that presently more than Patients with stage I nonseminomatous tumors are treated by 90% of the cases are cured (4). Germ cell tumors may also orchiectomy. After orchiectomy, surveillance and nerve-sparing originate in extragonadal sites (eg, the sacrococcygeal region, retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection are accepted treatment mediastinum, and pineal gland (5)). Those of the sacrum are options. About 20% of patients under
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential High-Impact Interventions Report Priority Area 02: Cancer
    AHRQ Healthcare Horizon Scanning System – Potential High-Impact Interventions Report Priority Area 02: Cancer Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA290201000006C Prepared by: ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 December 2012 Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA290201000006C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This report’s content should not be construed as either endorsements or rejections of specific interventions. As topics are entered into the System, individual topic profiles are developed for technologies and programs that appear to be close to diffusion into practice in the United States. Those reports are sent to various experts with clinical, health systems, health administration, and/or research backgrounds for comment and opinions about potential for impact. The comments and opinions received are then considered and synthesized by ECRI Institute to identify interventions that experts deemed, through the comment process, to have potential for high impact. Please see the methods section for more details about this process. This report is produced twice annually and topics included may change depending on expert comments received on interventions issued for comment during the preceding 6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Serum Level of Cathepsin B and Its Density in Men with Prostate Cancer As Novel Markers of Disease Progression
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 24: 2573-2578 (2004) Serum Level of Cathepsin B and its Density in Men with Prostate Cancer as Novel Markers of Disease Progression HIDEAKI MIYAKE1, ISAO HARA2 and HIROSHI ETO1 1Department of Urology, Hyogo Medical Center for Adults, 13-70 Kitaohji-cho, Akashi; 2Department of Urology, Kobe University School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Kobe, Japan Abstract. Background: Cathepsin B has been shown to play in men in Western industrialized countries and is the second an important role in invasion and metastasis of prostate leading cause of cancer-related death (1). Recent cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether progression in the fields of diagnosis and follow-up using serum levels of cathepsin B and its density (cathepsin B-D) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its associated could be used as predictors of disease extension as well as parameters have contributed to early detection and accurate prognosis in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and prediction of prognosis (2, 3). However, despite these Methods: Serum levels of cathepsin B in 60 healthy controls, advances, more than 50% of patients still show evidence of 80 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and 120 advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, and the currently patients with prostate cancer were measured by a sandwich available parameters are not correlated with the clinical enzyme immunoassay. Cathepsin B-D was calculated by course in some patients during progression to hormone- dividing the serum levels of cathepsin B by the prostate refractory disease (4); hence, there is a pressing need to volume, which was measured using transrectal ultra- develop a novel diagnostic and monitoring marker system sonography.
    [Show full text]
  • And Peptide Sequences (>95 % Confidence) in the Non-Raft Fraction
    Supplementary Table 1: Protein identities, their probability scores (protein score and expect score) and peptide sequences (>95 % confidence) in the non-raft fraction. Protein name Protein score Expect score Peptide sequences Glial fibrillary acidic protein 97 0.000058 LALDIEIATYR 0.0000026 LALDIEIATYR Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase 25 0.038 HGDDLR Uveal autoantigen with coiled-coil domains and ankyrin repeats protein 30 0.03 TEELNR ADAM metallopeptidase domain 32 347 0.0072 SGSICDK 0.0059 YTFCPWR 0.00028 CSEVGPYINR 0.0073 DSASVIYAFVR 0.00044 DSASVIYAFVR 0.00047 LICTYPLQTPFLR 0.0039 LICTYPLQTPFLR 0.001 LICTYPLQTPFLR 0.0000038 AYCFDGGCQDIDAR 0.00000043 AYCFDGGCQDIDAR 0.0000042 VNQCSAQCGGNGVCTSR 0.0000048 NAPFACYEEIQSQTDR 0.000019 NAPFACYEEIQSQTDR Alpha-fetoprotein 24 0.0093 YIYEIAR Junction plakoglobin 214 0.011 ATIGLIR 0.0038 LVQLLVK 0.000043 EGLLAIFK 0.00027 QEGLESVLK 0.000085 TMQNTSDLDTAR 0.000046 ALMGSPQLVAAVVR 0.01 LLNQPNQWPLVK 0.01 NEGTATYAAAVLFR 0.004 NLALCPANHAPLQEAAVIPR 0.0007 VLSVCPSNKPAIVEAGGMQALGK 0.00086 ILVNQLSVDDVNVLTCATGTLSNLTCNNSK Catenin beta-1 54 0.000043 EGLLAIFK Lysozyme 89 0.0026 STDYGIFQINSR 0.00051 STDYGIFQINSR 1 0.0000052 STDYGIFQINSR Annexin A2 72 0.0036 QDIAFAYQR 72 0.0000043 TNQELQEINR Actin, cytoplasmic 61 0.023 IIAPPER 0.021 IIAPPER 0.0044 AGFAGDDAPR 0.013 EITALAPSTMK 0.0013 LCYVALDFEQEMATAASSSSLEK 0.023 IIAPPER 0.021 IIAPPER 0.0044 AGFAGDDAPR 0.0013 LCYVALDFEQEMATAASSSSLEK 0.023 IIAPPER 0.021 IIAPPER 0.0044 AGFAGDDAPR 0.013 EITALAPSTMK ACTA2 protein 35 0.0044 AGFAGDDAPR 0.013 EITALAPSTMK Similar to beta actin
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Review Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma John C. Chang 1,* and Madappa Kundranda 2 1 Division of Radiology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ 85234, USA 2 Division of Medical Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ 85234, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-480-256-3334 Academic Editor: Srikumar Chellappan Received: 23 January 2017; Accepted: 10 March 2017; Published: 20 March 2017 Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal disease for a multitude of reasons including very late diagnosis. This in part is due to the lack of understanding of the biological behavior of PDAC and the ineffective screening for this disease. Significant efforts have been dedicated to finding the appropriate serum and imaging biomarkers to help early detection and predict response to treatment of PDAC. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) has been the most validated serum marker and has the highest positive predictive value as a stand-alone marker. When combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125), CA 19-9 can help predict the outcome of patients to surgery and chemotherapy. A slew of novel serum markers including multimarker panels as well as genetic and epigenetic materials have potential for early detection of pancreatic cancer, although these remain to be validated in larger trials. Imaging studies may not correlate with elevated serum markers. Critical features for determining PDAC include the presence of a mass, dilated pancreatic duct, and a duct cut-off sign. Features that are indicative of early metastasis includes neurovascular bundle involvement, duodenal invasion, and greater post contrast enhancement.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Circulating HER-2 More Than Just a Tumor Marker?
    Vol. 7, 2605–2607, September 2001 Clinical Cancer Research 2605 Editorial Is Circulating HER-2 More Than Just a Tumor Marker? Jose Baselga1 chemotherapy; and the selection patients for trastuzumab ther- Medical Oncology Service, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, apy and the monitoring of response to trastuzumab (8, 9). Barcelona 08035, Spain. In this regard what does the study by Hayes et al. (10) add to our current knowledge? In this study, 242 patients who were enrolled in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) prospec- HER2/neu (also known as neu and as c-erbB-2) is a proto- tive therapeutic trials for metastatic breast cancer were assayed oncogene of the EGF2 receptor family of receptor tyrosine for circulating ECD/HER-2 using a commercially available kinases (1). HER2/neu encodes a M 185,000 transmembrane r sandwich enzyme immunoassay (10). In their study, elevated glycoprotein receptor (HER2, or c-erbB-2) that has partial ho- ECD/HER-2 levels were observed in 37% of patients and were mology with the other members of the EGF receptor family, and associated with a shorter overall survival. However, in a multi- which also includes the EGF receptor (also called HER1), variate analysis, ECD/HER-2 did not independently correlate HER3, and HER4. These receptors are composed of an extra- with survival. Furthermore, ECD/HER-2 levels were not pre- cellular binding domain, a transmembrane lipophilic segment, dictive for time to progression and for response to megestrol and an intracellular protein tyrosine kinase domain with a reg- acetate or chemotherapy, including a subgroup of patients ulatory carboxyl terminal segment (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Glycosylation: Rising Potential for Prostate Cancer Evaluation
    cancers Review Glycosylation: Rising Potential for Prostate Cancer Evaluation Anna Kałuza˙ * , Justyna Szczykutowicz and Mirosława Ferens-Sieczkowska Department of Chemistry and Immunochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Sklodowskiej-Curie 48/50, 50-369 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (M.F.-S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-71-770-30-66 Simple Summary: Aberrant protein glycosylation is a well-known hallmark of cancer and is as- sociated with differential expression of enzymes such as glycosyltransferases and glycosidases. The altered expression of the enzymes triggers cancer cells to produce glycoproteins with specific cancer-related aberrations in glycan structures. Increasing number of data indicate that glycosylation patterns of PSA and other prostate-originated proteins exert a potential to distinguish between benign prostate disease and cancer as well as among different stages of prostate cancer development and aggressiveness. This review summarizes the alterations in glycan sialylation, fucosylation, truncated O-glycans, and LacdiNAc groups outlining their potential applications in non-invasive diagnostic procedures of prostate diseases. Further research is desired to develop more general algorithms exploiting glycobiology data for the improvement of prostate diseases evaluation. Abstract: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among men. Alterations in protein glycosylation are confirmed to be a reliable hallmark of cancer. Prostate-specific antigen is the biomarker that is used most frequently for prostate cancer detection, although its lack of sensitivity and specificity results in many unnecessary biopsies. A wide range of glycosylation alterations in Citation: Kałuza,˙ A.; Szczykutowicz, prostate cancer cells, including increased sialylation and fucosylation, can modify protein function J.; Ferens-Sieczkowska, M.
    [Show full text]
  • POTENTIAL ROLE of MUC1 by Dahlia M. Besmer a Dissertatio
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL THERAPEUTICS IN PANCREATIC AND BREAST CANCERS: POTENTIAL ROLE OF MUC1 by Dahlia M. Besmer A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Charlotte 2013 Approved by: _____________________________ Dr. Pinku Mukherjee _____________________________ Dr. Valery Grdzelishvili _____________________________ Dr. Mark Clemens _____________________________ Dr. Didier Dréau _____________________________ Dr. Craig Ogle ii © 2013 Dahlia M. Besmer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT DAHLIA MARIE BESMER. Development of novel therapeutics in pancreatic and breast cancers: potential role of MUC1. (Under the direction of DR. PINKU MUKHERJEE) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the 4th leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US, and breast cancer (BC) contributes to ~40,000 deaths annually. The development of novel therapeutic agents for improving patient outcome is of paramount importance. Importantly, MUC1 is a mucin glycoprotein expressed on the apical surface of normal glandular epithelia but is over expressed and aberrantly glycosylated in >80% of human PDA and in >90% of BC. In the present study, we first utilize a model of PDA that is Muc1-null in order to elucidate the oncogenic role of MUC1. We show that lack of Muc1 significantly decreased proliferation, invasion, and mitotic rates both in vivo and in vitro. Next, we evaluated the anticancer efficacy of oncolytic virus (OV) therapy that utilizes viruses to kill tumor cells. The oncolytic potential of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) was analyzed in a panel of human PDA cell lines in vitro and in vivo in immune compromised mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Serum Protein Fingerprinting by PEA Immunoassay Coupled with a Pattern-Recognition Algorithms Distinguishes MGUS and Multiple Myeloma
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 41), pp: 69408-69421 Research Paper Serum protein fingerprinting by PEA immunoassay coupled with a pattern-recognition algorithms distinguishes MGUS and multiple myeloma Petra Schneiderova1,*, Tomas Pika2,*, Petr Gajdos3, Regina Fillerova1, Pavel Kromer3, Milos Kudelka3, Jiri Minarik2, Tomas Papajik2, Vlastimil Scudla2 and Eva Kriegova1 1Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic 2Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic 3Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic *These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Eva Kriegova, email: [email protected] Keywords: serum pattern, cytokines, growth factors, proximity extension immunoassay, post-transplant serum pattern Received: May 04, 2016 Accepted: July 28, 2016 Published: August 12, 2016 Copyright: Schneiderova et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Serum protein fingerprints associated with MGUS and MM and their changes in MM after autologous stem cell transplantation (MM-ASCT, day 100) remain unexplored. Using highly-sensitive Proximity Extension ImmunoAssay on 92 cancer biomarkers (Proseek Multiplex, Olink), enhanced serum levels of Adrenomedullin (ADM, Pcorr= .0004), Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15, Pcorr= .003), and soluble Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (sMICA, Pcorr= .023), all prosurvival and chemoprotective factors for myeloma cells, were detected in MM comparing to MGUS.
    [Show full text]
  • Genitourinary Pathology (Including Renal Tumors)
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION THE BASIC AND TRANSLATIONAL PATHOLOGY RESEARCH JOURNAL LI VOLUME 99 | SUPPLEMENT 1 | MARCH 2019 2019 ABSTRACTS GENITOURINARY PATHOLOGY (INCLUDING RENAL TUMORS) (776-992) MARCH 16-21, 2019 PLATF OR M & 2 01 9 ABSTRACTS P OSTER PRESENTATI ONS EDUCATI ON C O M MITTEE Jason L. Hornick , C h air Ja mes R. Cook R h o n d a K. Y a nti s s, Chair, Abstract Revie w Board S ar a h M. Dr y and Assign ment Co m mittee Willi a m C. F a q ui n Laura W. La mps , Chair, C ME Subco m mittee C ar ol F. F ar v er St e v e n D. Billi n g s , Interactive Microscopy Subco m mittee Y uri F e d ori w Shree G. Shar ma , Infor matics Subco m mittee Meera R. Ha meed R aj a R. S e et h al a , Short Course Coordinator Mi c h ell e S. Hir s c h Il a n W ei nr e b , Subco m mittee for Unique Live Course Offerings Laksh mi Priya Kunju D a vi d B. K a mi n s k y ( Ex- Of ici o) A n n a M ari e M ulli g a n Aleodor ( Doru) Andea Ri s h P ai Zubair Baloch Vi nita Parkas h Olca Bast urk A nil P ar w a ni Gregory R. Bean , Pat h ol o gist-i n- Trai ni n g D e e p a P atil D a ni el J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Ctdna and Metabolites Are Informative
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Cerebrospinal fuid ctDNA and metabolites are informative biomarkers for the evaluation of CNS germ cell tumors Takeshi Takayasu1,2, Mauli Shah1, Antonio Dono3, Yuanqing Yan3, Roshan Borkar4, Nagireddy Putluri4, Jay‑Jiguang Zhu3,5, Seiji Hama2, Fumiyuki Yamasaki2*, Hidetoshi Tahara6, Kazuhiko Sugiyama7, Kaoru Kurisu2, Yoshua Esquenazi3,5,8 & Leomar Y. Ballester1,3,5* Serum and cerebrospinal fuid (CSF) levels of α‑fetoprotein and β‑subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin are used as biomarkers for the management of central nervous system (CNS) germ cell tumors (GCTs). However, additional discriminating biomarkers are required. Especially, biomarkers to diferentiate non‑germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) from germinomas are critical, as these have a distinct prognosis. We investigated CSF samples from 12 patients with CNS‑GCT patients (8 germinomas and 4 NGGCTs). We analyzed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in CSF to detect mutated genes. We also used liquid chromatography‑mass spectrometry to characterize metabolites in CSF. We detected KIT and/or NRAS mutation, known as frequently mutated genes in GCTs, in 3/12 (25%) patients. We also found signifcant diferences in the abundance of 15 metabolites between control and GCT, with unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. Metabolites related to the TCA cycle were increased in GCTs. Urea, ornithine, and short‑chain acylcarnitines were decreased in GCTs. Moreover, we also detected several metabolites (e.g., betaine, guanidine acetic acid, and 2‑aminoheptanoic acid) that displayed signifcant diferences in abundance in patients with germinomas and NGGCTs. Our results suggest that ctDNA and metabolites in CSF can serve as novel biomarkers for CNS‑GCTs and can be useful to diferentiate germinomas from NGGCTs.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Clinical Markers of Pancreas Cancer
    JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2010 Nov 9; 11(6):536-544. EDITORIAL Molecular and Clinical Markers of Pancreas Cancer James L Buxbaum1, Mohamad A Eloubeidi2 1Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2University of Alabama in Birmingham. Birmingham, AL, USA Summary Pancreas cancer has the worst prognosis of any solid tumor but is potentially treatable if it is diagnosed at an early stage. Thus there is critical interest in delineating clinical and molecular markers of incipient disease. The currently available biomarker, CA 19-9, has an inadequate sensitivity and specificity to achieve this objective. Diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, and chronic pancreatitis are associated with pancreas cancer. However, screening is currently only recommended in those with hereditary pancreatitis and genetic syndromes which predispose to cancer. Ongoing work to identify early markers of pancreas cancer consists of high throughput discovery methods including gene arrays and proteomics as well as hypothesis driven methods. While several promising candidates have been identified none has yet been convincingly proven to be better than CA 19-9. New methods including endoscopic ultrasound are improving detection of pancreas cancer and are being used to acquire tissue for biomarker discovery. Pancreas cancer has the darkest prognosis of any poor screening test. At the Samsung Medical Center in gastrointestinal cancer with the mortality approaching South Korea 70,940 asymptomatic patients were the incidence [1]. While the overall five year survival screened using CA 19-9. However, among 1,063 with is less than 4%, those recognized early, with tumor elevated levels only 4 had pancreas cancer and only 2 involving only the pancreas have a 25-30% five-year had resectable disease [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Clinical Testing of Individual Immunoassays for the Quantification of Serum Glycoproteins to Diagnose Prostate Cancer
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Development and clinical testing of individual immunoassays for the quantification of serum glycoproteins to diagnose prostate cancer Kathrin Endt1, Jens Goepfert2, Aurelius Omlin3, Alcibiade Athanasiou1, Pierre Tennstedt4, Anna Guenther2, Maurizio Rainisio5, Daniel S. Engeler3, Thomas Steuber4, Silke Gillessen3, Thomas Joos2, Ralph Schiess1* a1111111111 a1111111111 1 ProteoMediX Inc., Schlieren, Switzerland, 2 NMI TuÈbingen, Reutlingen, Germany, 3 Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 4 Martini-Klinik, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, 5 Abanovus LLC, a1111111111 Sanremo, Italy a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis is currently hampered by the high false-positive rate of Citation: Endt K, Goepfert J, Omlin A, Athanasiou PSA evaluations, which consequently may lead to overtreatment. Non-invasive methods A, Tennstedt P, Guenther A, et al. (2017) with increased specificity and sensitivity are needed to improve diagnosis of significant Development and clinical testing of individual immunoassays for the quantification of serum PCa. We developed and technically validated four individual immunoassays for cathepsin glycoproteins to diagnose prostate cancer. PLoS D (CTSD), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4), and throm- ONE 12(8): e0181557. https://doi.org/10.1371/ bospondin 1 (THBS1). These glycoproteins, previously identified by mass spectrometry journal.pone.0181557 using a Pten mouse model, were measured in clinical serum samples for testing the capabil- Editor: Salvatore V Pizzo, Duke University School ity of discriminating PCa positive and negative samples. The development yielded 4 individ- of Medicine, UNITED STATES ual immunoassays with inter and intra-variability (CV) <15% and linearity on dilution of the Received: March 8, 2017 analytes. In serum, ex vivo protein stability (<15% loss of analyte) was achieved for a dura- Accepted: July 3, 2017 tion of at least 24 hours at room temperature and 2 days at 4ÊC.
    [Show full text]