Comments on the Draft 2016 Science Framework - Instructional Quality Commission (CA State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comments on the Draft 2016 Science Framework - Instructional Quality Commission (CA State

Instructional Quality Commission IQC-002 (03/2012)

State of California Instructional Quality Commission

MEMORANDUM

DATE: February 5, 2016

TO: Science Subject Matter Committee Members, Instructional Quality Commission Members, Science Draft Framework Writer, State Board Liaisons

VIA: Cynthia Gunderson, Adminstrator Curriculum Frameworks Unit

FROM: Bryan D. Boyd, Consultant Curriculum Frameworks Unit

SUBJECT: Comments on the Draft Science Framework

Enclosed is a flash drive and/or hardcopies (upon request) of all public comments received on the draft Science Framework as of January 29, 2016. These materials will be discussed at the February 19, 2016, meeting of the Science Subject Matter Committee (SMC).

The public comments include e-mails and letters from individuals, county offices of education, and other organizations (Item D), the results of the online survey (Item B), and the results from the California Department of Education’s internal review (Item C). All comments are unedited and numbered so that they will be easily referred to during the February 19th SMC meeting.

Also included are two charts that will help organize the discussion at the SMC meeting. The first chart (Item A1) is a master list of discussion items. The second chart (Item A2) contains line edits and minor edits. However, you should familiarize yourself with the comments in this package and come prepared to the SMC meeting to discuss the public comment.

In general, the process for discussing possible edits and revisions for each chapter to the Science Framework will include: 1. A report on the revisions by the writer; 2. Item A2: SMC consensus on line edits and general edits; 3. Any discussions or comments related to the chapter in the Item A1 chart; 4. Input from any Science SMC, IQC, or SBE members who have any questions or additional comments (based on the attachments from Item D or comments from the survey); and 5. Public Comment.

With the large volume of comments and suggested revisions, we will need to be purposeful in our discussion. Item A1 is to be used as an organizing tool to help guide the discussion and action. Please note that individual items in Item A2 will probably not

be discussed; however, it is appropriate for you to be prepared to bring up any content or comments from any of the public input documents that are not identified in Item A1 or A2..

The following principles should guide decisions regarding edits to the draft science framework based on comments received during the first 60-day public review and comment period. Typographical, punctuation, spelling, syntax, and other grammar-and language-usage kinds of errors that are noted will be fixed.

Changes to the draft framework must:  Be consistent with the State Board’s adopted guidelines  Provide clarification  Add value to the draft chapter  Be consistent with and support the grade level standards  Be supported by research; the research must be properly cited  Eliminate redundancies  Create clear and concise narrative required in the guidelines

Flash Drive Contents

Item A1: Master List of Discussion Items

Item A2: Master List of Line Edits

Item B: First 60-Day Public Review Science Framework Survey Responses

Item C: California Department of Education- Internal Review Responses

Item D: List of Science Framework Public Comment Received

Att 01 Arbogast Comment Att 02 Williamson Comment Att 03 Souza et al Comments Att 04 Freiermuth Comment Att 05 San Diego Review Session Comments Att 06a Contra Costa Review Session Comments 1 Att 06b Contra Costa Review Session Comments 2 Att 07 USC Review Session Comments Att 08 Navarro Comments Att 09 Craze Comment Att 10 Morrissey Comment Att 11 Mayer Comment Att 12 Kraft Comment Att 13 Zyromski Comment Att 14 Bullock Comment Att 15 Giles Comment Att 16 Flammer Comments Att 17 Rialto Review Session Comments Att 18 Harris Comments Att 19 Comfort Comment Att 20 Peters Comment

Att 21 Monroe Comment Att 22 Pringle Comments Att 23 Zettel Comment Att 24 Seebach Comment 1 Att 25 Commons Comments Att 26 Seebach Comment 2 Att 27 Lehnhard Comments Att 28 Gann Comments Att 29 Eby Comments Att 30 Heymann Comment Att 31 Elk Grove USD Comments Att 32 CSU Long Beach Review Session Att 33 Marrs Comments 1 Att 34 Marrs Comments 2 Att 35 Duacsek Comments Att 36 Madera USD Review Session Att 37 Monterey Bay Aquarium Review Session Att 38 LeVier Comment Att 39a Morgan Hill USD Review Session Comments Att 39b Morgan Hill USD Review Session Sign In Att 40 Torrance USD Review Session Comments Att 41a Fresno County Review Session Att 41b Fresno County Review Session Sign In Att 42 Orange County DOE Review Session Att 43 San Joaquin COE Review Session Comments Att 44 Donatella and McDonnell Comments Att 45a Lee Comments - Bio Vignette Att 45b Lee Comments - Physics Vignette Att 45c Lee Comments - ESS Vignette Att 45d Lee Comments - MS Vignette Att 46 Maslowski Comments Att 47 Vélez Comments Att 48 Lawrence Hall of Science Comments Att 49 Deborah LT Comments Att 50 Vine Comments Att 51 Flammer Comments Att 52a Santa Clara COE Comments 1 Att 52b Santa Clara COE Comments 2 Att 52c Santa Clara COE Comments 3 Att 52d Santa Clara COE Comments 4 Att 53 Shimojyo Comments Att 54a Riverside COE Comments Att 54b Riverside COE Sign In Att 55 Wozniak Comments Att 56 Grace Comments Att 57 NatureBridge Comments Att 58 Morgan Hill USD Comments 2 Att 59 Laws Comments Att 60 Lygren Comments Att 61 CODE Comments Att 62 Schmidt Comments Att 63a Children Now Comments 1

Att 63b Children Now Comments 2 Att 63c Children Now Comments 3 Att 63d Children Now Comments 4 Att 63e Children Now Comments 5 Att 63f Children Now Comments 6 Att 64 Galt ESD Comments Att 65a Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 1 Att 65b Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 2 Att 65c Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 3 Att 65d Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 4 Att 65e Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 5 Att 65f Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 6 Att 65g Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 7 Att 65h Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 8 Att 65i Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 9 Att 65j Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 10 Att 65k Lawrence Hall of Science Comments 11 Att 66 Mulholland-Beahrs Comments Att 67 CSTA Comments Att 68 Education Trust-West Comments Att 69 EPIC Comments Att 70a Achieve Comments 1 Att 70b Achieve Comments 2 Att 70c Achieve Comments 3 Att 70d Achieve Comments 4 Att 70e Achieve Comments 5 Att 70f Achieve Comments 6 Att 70g Achieve Comments 7 Att 70h Achieve Comments 8 Att 70i Achieve Comments 9 Att 70j Achieve Comments 10 Att 70k Achieve Comments 11 Att 70l Achieve Comments 12 Att 70m Achieve Comments 13 Att 70n Achieve Comments 14 Att 70o Achieve Comments 15 Att 70p Achieve Comments 16 Att 70q Achieve Comments 17 Att 70r Achieve Comments 18 Att 70s Achieve Comments 19 Att 70t Achieve Comments 20 Att 70u Achieve Comments 21 Att 70v Achieve Comments 22 Att 70w Achieve Comments 23 Att 70x Achieve Comments 24 Att 70y Achieve Comments 25 Att 70z Achieve Comments 26 Att 70z1 Achieve Comments 27 Att 70z2 Achieve Comments 28 Att 70z3 Achieve Comments 29 Att 70z4 Achieve Comments 30 Att 70z5 Achieve Comments 31

Att 70z6 Achieve Comments 32 Att 71 CTA Comments Att 72 ACCESS Comments Att 73 Larocque Comments Att 74 Roque Comments Att 75 NMEA Comments

© California Department of Education, February, 2016

Recommended publications