Weslaco Independent School District Review and Recommendation of Exit Criteria Student Name ______Student ID# ______DOB ______Grade ______Campus ______

Classification Bilingual /ESL Category: □ English Language Learners (LEP) □ Beginner □ Intermediate □ Parent Denial (PD) □ Advanced □ Advanced High _____ Total no. of years provided special Placement: language services □ Elementary Bilingual/ESL Program □ Middle School Placement: □ ESL □ English □ High School Placement: □ ESOL I □ ESOL II □ English Proposed LEP Exit Criteria: Based on documented IEP evidence, the following was determined: □ YES □ No Due to the nature of the student’s disability, is the student expected to be able to attain English language proficiency in one or more domains? □ YES □ No Does the student appear to benefit from second language acquisition support in English? If both are answered “No”, then it may be permissable to modify the 2012-2013 LEP Exit Criteria.

Please indicate what evidence, both historical formal and informal assessment data to include direct teacher input was utilized in order to make the decision that modification of LEP Exit Criteria is needed. ______

Discuss the state assessment testing expectations for this student as they are outlined in the IEP. Note: Students taking the state assessment are most likely eligible for the Special Exit Criteria. Check the test the student is expected to take and master. State Assessment Reading Expectation Modified Alternate State Assessment Writing Expectation Modified Alternate

Discuss the TELPAS testing expectations for this student as they are outlined in the IEP. Check one. TELPAS Listening Expectation B I A AH TELPAS Speaking Expectation B I A AH TELPAS Reading Expectation B I A AH TELPAS Writing Expectation B I A AH

______Administrator ______Counselor ______Bilingual/ESL Teacher ______Special Ed. Teacher ______Other ______Other DateExit ofDocumentation: Collaboration: ______At the end of the year, key members of the ARD committee and LPAC meet to review the assessment results and subjective teacher evaluation to determine if the student has met exit criteria. If the student has met exit criteria, an additional ARD will need to be scheduled.

Student’s name:

End-of-year ARD meeting date: The assessment results reviewed at the ARD were: State Assessment Reading Modified Alternate State Assessment Writing Modified Alternate Results TELPAS Listening B I A AH TELPAS Speaking B I A AH TELPAS Reading B I A AH TELPAS Writing B I A AH Summarize subjective teacher evaluation and attach documentation.

End-of-year LPAC date: A decision was made to exit from the Bilingual/ESL program based on the comprehensive review of the ARD/LPAC Committee. will be reclassified as Non-LEP and will be monitored for two school years.

 Attach a copy of the documentation to the LPAC folder.  Notify parents of student’s reclassification.  Document on the student’s permanent record folder.

Recommendation: Signatures: □ LEP (student did not meet exit criteria) ______Administrator □ Bilingual Program ______Counselor □ Elementary ESL Program ______Bilingual/ESL Teacher □ Secondary ESL Program ______Special Education Teacher □ Monitored: Exit Bilingual/ESL Program (met exit ______Other criteria ______Other Exit Date: ______(Day after last day of school enrollment for the year) Date of Discussion/Collaboration: ______

Updated 1/12/12