*Sociodemographic Data Obtained from the U.S. Census

Online Table 1: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Sociodemographics by Community Partnership* % Africa % Native % Non- Community % American Indian/ % Hispanic % Below State n % Asian Hawaiian/ % Other Race English Partnership Native Alaskan or Latino Poverty Ameri Pacific Islander Speaking can Baldwin Park California 1.2 0.9 14.2 0.1 35.9 80.1 82.9 16.0

Benton County Oregon 0.9 0.7 5.2 0.2 2.3 6.4 11.2 21.0 Boone/Newton Arkansas 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.3 1.8 2.3 16.9 Counties Buffalo New York 38.6 0.8 3.2 0.0 3.9 10.5 14.2 29.9

Caguas Puerto Rico 11.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.5 99.1 89.6 37.1

Central Valley California 5.0 1.5 7.4 0.3 23.2 48.6 42.7 20.8

Charleston West Virginia 15.5 0.2 2.3 0.0 0.1 1.4 4.0 16.4

Chattanooga Tennessee 34.9 0.4 2.0 0.1 2.8 5.5 7.7 22.9

Chicago Illinois 32.9 0.5 5.5 0.0 13.4 28.9 35.5 21.4

Columbia Missouri 11.3 0.3 5.2 0.1 1.1 3.4 10.6 22.9

Cook County Georgia 27.3 0.2 0.7 0.0 3.4 5.9 7.3 23.0

Cuba New Mexico 0.5 24.6 0.8 0.0 19.3 45.8 61.0 28.7

Denver Colorado 10.2 1.4 3.4 0.1 11.9 31.8 27.6 18.8 Desoto/Marshall Mississippi 27.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 2.4 4.3 5.0 13.0 /Tate Counties El Paso Texas 3.4 0.7 1.2 0.1 11.0 80.7 72.2 23.3

Fitchburg Massachusetts 5.1 0.3 3.6 0.0 9.1 21.6 24.0 19.0

Flint Michigan 56.6 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.1 10.5 3.2 38.2

Grant County New Mexico 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.1 9.6 48.3 33.8 16.6

Greenville South Carolina 30.0 0.3 1.4 0.1 2.5 5.9 8.0 18.6

Hamilton County Ohio 25.7 0.2 2.0 0.1 1.1 2.6 6.6 15.9 *Sociodemographic data obtained from the U.S. Census Online Table 1: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Sociodemographics by Community Partnership* (continued) % Africa % Native % Non- Community % American Indian/ % Hispanic % Below State n % Asian Hawaiian/ % Other Race English Partnership Native Alaskan or Latino Poverty Ameri Pacific Islander Speaking can Houghton Michigan 0.5 0.6 2.9 0.0 0.2 1.1 7.2 22.8 County Houston Texas 23.7 0.7 6.0 0.1 15.7 43.8 45.8 21.5

Jackson Mississippi 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.8 1.6 79.4 0.1

Jacksonville Florida 30.7 0.4 4.3 0.1 2.2 7.7 13.1 15.2

Jefferson County Alabama 42.0 0.3 1.4 0.0 2.2 3.9 5.8 16.2

Kane County Illinois 5.7 0.6 3.5 0.0 13.0 30.7 30.7 10.1

Kansas City Missouri 29.4 0.6 2.5 0.2 6.7 14.3 15.0 19.4

Kingston New York 14.6 0.5 1.8 0.0 4.9 13.4 17.1 16.5

Knox County Tennessee 8.8 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.5 3.5 5.6 13.7 Lake Worth/Greenacre Florida 17.1 2.5 2.0 0.1 9.0 41.3 50.1 21.9 s/Palm Springs Louisville Kentucky 22.9 0.3 2.2 0.1 1.8 4.5 7.8 17.5

Milledgeville Georgia 42.2 0.1 1.7 0.1 0.9 2.3 5.1 43.3

Milwaukee Wisconsin 40.0 0.8 3.5 0.0 7.5 17.3 19.1 27.0 Moore/Montgom North Carolina 14.7 0.7 1.1 0.1 4.2 7.9 9.1 16.1 ery Counties Nash/Edgecombe Oregon 44.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 3.2 5.3 6.1 18.4 Counties New Orleans North Carolina 60.2 0.3 2.9 0.0 1.9 5.2 9.7 25.7

Oakland Louisiana 28.0 0.8 16.8 0.6 13.7 25.4 39.6 19.6

Omaha California 13.7 0.8 2.4 0.1 6.9 13.1 13.9 15.5

Philadelphia Nebraska 43.4 0.5 6.3 0.0 5.9 12.3 21.0 25.6 *Sociodemographic data obtained from the U.S. Census Online Table 1: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Sociodemographics by Community Partnership* (continued) % Africa % Native % Non- Community % American Indian/ % Hispanic % Below State n % Asian Hawaiian/ % Other Race English Partnership Native Alaskan or Latino Poverty Ameri Pacific Islander Speaking can Phoenix Pennsylvania 6.5 2.2 3.2 0.2 18.5 40.8 36.8 20.3 Portland/Multno Arizona 5.6 1.1 6.5 0.5 5.1 10.9 19.5 16.5 mah County Rancho California 9.2 0.7 10.4 0.3 12.0 34.9 32.5 5.5 Cucamonga Rochester New York 41.7 0.5 3.1 0.0 6.5 16.4 18.0 31.1

San Antonio Texas 6.9 0.9 2.4 0.1 13.7 63.2 46.1 19.2 Seattle/King Washington 6.2 0.8 14.6 0.8 3.9 8.9 24.8 10.5 County Somerville Massachusetts 6.8 0.3 8.7 0.0 6.7 10.6 32.3 14.9 Spartanburg South Carolina 20.6 0.3 2.0 0.0 3.1 5.9 8.6 16.2 County District of Washington DC 50.7 0.3 3.5 0.1 4.1 9.1 14.5 18.9 Columbia Watsonville/ California 0.4 0.6 3.8 0.1 21.0 81.4 59.5 14.8 Pajaro Valley *Sociodemographic data obtained from the U.S. Census. Online Table 2: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Partners, Assessments, Resources, and Media by Community Partnership Community # of Healthy Eating # of Active Living # of Partners HKHC Funds* Matching Funds* Media Generated Partnership Assessments Assessments Baldwin Park 15 5 3 $402,199.00 $903,594.00 6

Benton County 29 9 9 $317,116.00 $452,811.00 15 Boone/ Newton 13 4 3 $317,978.86 $910,208.28 106 Counties Buffalo 15 7 6 $359,999.00 $456,084.00 74

Caguas 34 4 6 $260,378.20 $289,373.00 51

Central Valley 37 7 7 $402,961.00 $1,798,000.00 2

Charleston 52 1 5 $359,000.00 $563,152.00 85

Chattanooga 35 4 8 $352,024.90 $1,316,533.80 32

Chicago 38 3 4 $404,492.00 $1,036,933.00 4

Columbia 46 6 5 $387,273.72 $993,978.00 213

Cook County 27 6 6 $359,999.28 $250,360.00 32

Cuba 22 2 3 $359,852.40 $199,793.59 12

Denver 50 1 5 $358,342.00 $2,960,533.00 19 Desoto/ 36 8 7 $294,966.00 $605,002.00 Marshall/ Tate 134 Counties El Paso 22 4 8 $269,309.00 $336,680.00 7

Fitchburg 24 12 17 $360,000.00 $431,942.00 52

Flint 26 6 $377,738.77 $326,755.00 6 *Note: These are funds reported as of January 31, 2014. Online Table 2: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Partners, Assessments, Resources, and Media by Community Partnership Community # of Healthy Eating # of Active Living # of Partners HKHC Funds* Matching Funds* Media Generated Partnership Assessments Assessments Grant County 29 7 5 $358,793.00 $343,260.05 33

Greenville 37 24 23 $359,481.00 $1,051,677.16 55

Hamilton County 15 6 11 $347,935.11 $1,020,794.70 9 Houghton 18 3 5 $399,032.00 $567,620.30 27 County Houston 29 9 7 $359,998.00 $434,103.00 7

Jackson 15 9 8 $360,000.00 $253,579.09 7

Jacksonville 25 5 8 $358,124.00 $291,200.00 6

Jefferson County 29 3 5 $360,001.00 $495,302.00 24

Kane County 27 4 4 $383,400.00 $1,003,081.00 143

Kansas City 36 4 4 $359,799.00 $1,337,704.00 29

Kingston 43 13 7 $335,261.16 $713,849.00 77

Knox County 23 8 10 $354,523.51 $464,544.00 91 Lake Worth/ 38 1 4 $348,229.46 $635,155.00 Greenacres/ Palm 7 Springs Louisville 34 5 5 $307,187.80 $1,204,864.00 10

Milledgeville 22 6 6 $363,739.58 $1,045,233.00 55

Milwaukee 34 10 6 $372,742.48 $250,345.36 7 Moore/ 26 5 7 $356,244.00 $1,075,240.00 Montgomery 9 Counties *Note: These are funds reported as of January 31, 2014. Online Table 2: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Partners, Assessments, Resources, and Media by Community Partnership Community # of Healthy Eating # of Active Living # of Partners HKHC Funds* Matching Funds* Media Generated Partnership Assessments Assessments Nash/ 35 6 4 $360,001.00 $1,315,160.00 Edgecombe 14 Counties New Orleans 28 3 $383,364.32 $228,650.00 7

Oakland 13 1 1 $401,508.00 $6,034,936.00 3

Omaha 26 8 6 $369,460.35 $420,878.72 4

Philadelphia 14 11 10 $380,000.00 $254,688.00 0 K or 27 2 3 $360,001.00 $1,062,846.00 7 360kPhoenix Portland/ 30 7 7 $360,000.00 $533,280.00 Multnomah 11 County Rancho 26 6 6 $274,774.31 $7,394,251.00 101 Cucamonga Rochester 40 2 8 $365,130.00 $244,155.00 5

San Antonio 33 8 9 $358,567.33 $216,327.00 0 Seattle/King 37 12 12 $390,849.69 $3,272,645.72 12 County Somerville 46 5 4 $341,018.00 $88,033,172.00 0 Spartanburg 17 5 5 $385,401.75 $721,303.00 7 County Washington DC 13 7 6 $361,012.62 $268,370.00 4

Watsonville/ 29 11 3 $360,000.00 $642,937.00 21 Pajaro Valley *Note: These are funds reported as of January 31, 2014. Online Table 3: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Intervention Settings and Policy, Practice, and Environmental Changes by Community Partnership Active Parks and Child Care Total Corner Stores Farmers’ Markets Community Transportation Play Spaces Physical Activity Partnership Settings Setti Setti Setting Changes Settings Changes Changes Changes Settings Changes Changes Settings Changes * ngs ngs s Baldwin Park 19 48 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 39 0 0 Benton 9 10 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Boone/Newto 5 14 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 n Counties Buffalo 9 53 4 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Caguas 8 10 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Central 27 42 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 Valley Charleston 71 291 3 9 4 5 16 62 18 183 3 3 1 2

Chattanooga 13 63 4 22 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Chicago 6 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Columbia 17 30 7 14 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8

Cook County 19 22 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8

Cuba 8 22 2 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7

Denver 15 23 5 7 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Desoto/ Marshall 41 48 9 9 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 /Tate Counties El Paso 20 21 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Fitchburg 56 83 29 51 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 *Note: A setting is counted for each strategy that may occur in that setting; therefore, there is some duplication in the total number of settings (e.g., a child care nutrition standard and a child care physical activity standard in the same child care agency). Online Table 3: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Intervention Settings and Policy, Practice, and Environmental Changes by Community Partnership Active Parks and Child Care Total Corner Stores Farmers’ Markets Community Transportation Play Spaces Physical Activity Partnership Settings Setti Setti Setting Changes Settings Changes Changes Changes Settings Changes Changes Settings Changes * ngs ngs s Flint 3 10 1 2 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grant County 16 26 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10

Greenville 99 183 5 8 0 0 76 76 77 77 0 0 3 4 Hamilton 164 180 3 3 0 0 75 75 79 79 0 0 0 0 County Houghton 4 29 3 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Houston 15 23 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9

Jackson 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Jacksonville 5 9 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 Jefferson 20 36 10 15 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 3 9 County Kane County 41 55 14 19 5 5 0 0 2 2 0 0 7 13

Kansas City 43 77 5 11 6 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12

Kingston 29 37 3 5 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 1 3

Knox County 9 24 4 19 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Worth/ Greenacres/ 40 42 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Palm Springs Louisville 22 32 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 15 5 8

Milledgeville 15 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3

Milwaukee 34 59 1 1 1 1 8 14 10 18 0 0 0 0 *Note: A setting is counted for each strategy that may occur in that setting; therefore, there is some duplication in the total number of settings (e.g., a child care nutrition standard and a child care physical activity standard in the same child care agency). Online Table 3: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Intervention Settings and Policy, Practice, and Environmental Changes by Community Partnership Active Parks and Child Care Total Corner Stores Farmers’ Markets Community Transportation Play Spaces Physical Activity Partnership Settings Setti Setti Setting Changes Settings Changes Changes Changes Settings Changes Changes Settings Changes * ngs ngs s Moore/ Montgomery 22 28 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 8 Counties Nash/ Edgecombe 46 67 1 1 3 3 6 8 13 24 0 0 7 17 Counties New Orleans 9 202 9 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Oakland 24 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 56

Omaha 21 33 10 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 14

Philadelphia 360 1800 0 0 0 0 180 720 180 1080 0 0 0 0

Phoenix 15 24 3 9 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Portland/ Multnomah 6 10 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 County Rancho 15 23 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 Cucamonga Rochester 19 25 6 10 4 8 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0

San Antonio 25 42 4 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 Seattle/ King 20 37 1 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 2 9 1 3 County Somerville 20 231 2 141 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15 Spartanburg 16 31 4 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 17 County Washington 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 DC Watsonville/ 8 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 Pajaro Valley *Note: A setting is counted for each strategy that may occur in that setting; therefore, there is some duplication in the total number of settings (e.g., a child care nutrition standard and a child care physical activity standard in the same child care agency).