Cfip-Prop 40 Project Priority Ranking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cfip-Prop 40 Project Priority Ranking

Prop 40 Project # Project Name Forester Total Score

PROP 40 PARTICIPANT PROJECT PRIORITY RANKING

Factors Priority Rating

1. Ranger Unit Overall Fire Ranking (W.A.F.L.). High 3 Medium 2 Low 1 2. FRAP Watershed Assets at Risk Ranking. High 3 Moderate 2 Low 1 3. Effective reduction in fuel loading. High – 70%+ 3 Medium – 51-70% 2 Low - < 50% 1

4. Adjacent or near other fuel reduction projects. Yes 1 No 0

5. Project part of community shaded fuel break. Yes 1 No 0

6. The project involves a substantial amount of follow-up work. Yes 1 No 0

7. The project or other actions of the landowner would increase recreational opportunities for the public. Yes 1 No 0

8. The forest land to which the project applies is equivalent to site quality III or better. Yes 1 No 0

9. The project would provide relatively more employment opportunities than other proposed projects. Yes 1 No 0

10. The project is located in a county with high unemployment. Yes 1 No 0

11. A small business entity will carry out the proposed project. Yes 1 No 0

Total Ranking Score

Recommended publications