In the Hearings Panel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IN THE HEARINGS PANEL TAURANGA
UNDER of the Resource Management Act 1991
IN THE MATTER a resource consent application by the ASTROLABE COMMUNITY TRUST to leave the remains of the MV Rena wreck on the Otaiti/Astrolabe Reef and discharge contaminants from those remains
BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF PETER GRANT October 2 2015
Instructing Solicitor: Counsel Acting Chris Rejthar Kate Barry-Piceno Advocate Legal Limited Barrister PO Box 13033, Tauranga PO Box 5426, Mt Maunganui Ph: 07 577 6565 T: 07 575 7383 2
Email: [email protected] E: [email protected] I, PETER GRANT, state:
1. My name is Peter Grant. I am a member and current Chair of Motiti
Environmental Management Incorporated (“MEMI”) which made a submission
to the Astrolabe Trust application for resource consent in 2014. This
submission is listed as number 153 on the Rena Resource Consent website. My
evidence is given in support of this submission, which states that subject to
suitable conditions to mitigate effects, in particular effects to the Motiti Island
community, MEMI is satisfied consent should be granted to allow the Wreck to
remain on the Otaiti reef.
2. The Motiti Environment Management Incorporated was formed in 2008 with an
objective to restoring Motiti’s environmental resources as well as establishing
and implementing a management plan of the islands infrastructural resources.
It is these resources that the people of Motiti rely on to live their day to day
lives and to provide for their spiritual, cultural and social wellbeing. We have a 4
duty to ensure these resources are left in a better position for our mokopuna
and future generations.
3. My whakapapa lineage back to Motiti Island is through my great grandfather –
Riritahi Ngamanu, who lived and farmed on Motiti in the late 1800’s when
Motiti was a thriving trading place. He and my great grandmother borne and
raised their five children on Motiti. My grandmother is Paretaihinu, one of his
five children. After giving birth to my mother, Te Auhi at Motiti, my
grandmother was unable to raise my mother due to illness therefore that
responsibility was passed to her elder sister – Harata.
4. My mother, being an only child, was entrusted with land interests at Motiti
from both her mother and aunty Harata, Harata never having children of her
own. Since then my mother’s interest on Motiti has passed down to me, my
brothers and sisters, for us to manage for future generations.
5. My parents, having being bought up on Motiti, left Motiti in the early 1950’s
due to a growing family and to provide better education and social
opportunities for us as kids. Motiti became our place where we spent every
school holidays and it was a much loved destination. Our nanny Harata 5
travelled to Whakatane every school holiday period to take us back with her.
Motiti was paradise for our family as we were showered with all the goodies
that children could want, plus we were able to observe and learn the traditional
cultural practises of living on Motiti from the elders living there. We learnt all
of the customary fishing places including the Otaiti reef, as well the waahi tapu
areas around the island and out at sea.
6. Our learning wasn’t only from my nanny but other nanny and koro (reference
to all our older people) who also lived on Motiti, as well as spending time with
other children and residents. We were taught to respect our elders and other
whanau plus respect the property of others. Not only did you respect others,
you also helped where help was required or gave where resources/materials
were needed. It was a case of everybody looking after each other.
7. Another of our learning points was knowing our connections to the Marae’s
and Hapu, the Marae’s on Motiti being arms to the main body Toroa which
resides in Whakatane and Patuwai being our tribe. There was never any
mention or recognition of other Hapu from our elders. 6
8. Recent changes affecting Motiti, i.e. the formation and then various appeals
over establishment of a District plan for Motiti, has seen the formation of
various Maori groups laying claim of ownership/belonging to Motiti, plus even
further groups have emerged with a supposed mandate to speak for the Motiti
community with the Rena grounding. The formation of these different factions
and groups has put a lot of stress, confusion and pressure on whanau, where
tension and unrest is evident at some gatherings.
9. Motiti has always been a time out destination for me and my family. It allows
me to reconnect to the cultural traditions and practises I’ve been taught,
practises I have shared with my children and am currently passing onto my
grandchildren.
10. Unfortunately the long term lack of financial support from any Government
Authority at Motiti has meant that there has been minimal care, management
or planning to protect our natural resources at Motiti. The damage from the
Rena grounding further caused significant damage to our shoreline but this has
now been rectified. Our inability to visit the island or fish in the vicinity after
the wreck prevented past traditional and customary practises to be carried out 7
or passed on. This damage however, has now been remedied, and fishing has
recommenced along the shorelines directly affected, and by boat in the ocean
around Motiti and outskirts of Otaiti reef. MEMI would very much like to see
Otaiti opened up again so it can be available to our community to visit and
fish. If further parts of the Rena are required to be taken off, this will exclude
us from the reefs for years longer.
Conclusion
11. MEMI’s decision to change from a neutral submission to one of support for this
application to be granted with suitable mitigation conditions, including a Motiti
Project Fund, was not made lightly. It was not a decision that MEMI made
based solely on financial compensation being offered and it is offensive to
suggest “we sold out” for cash from the applicants.
12. MEMI consider the Rena should be left where it is based on the reef being
restored back to a healthy state. MEMI support imposition of conditions to
protect against further adverse effects or risks of potential damage. Most of
the MEMI members have very strong, genuine and longstanding cultural and
ancestral links to Motiti. 8
13. We are very aware we are privileged to be landowners at Motiti, a privilege
passed down to us from our ancestors. Our people sacrificed and fought hard
to retain land and ownership rights affected by both European and various
occupation challenges on the Island. Our members take our obligations as
Kaitiaki guardians over the future of Motiti’s environmental, social and cultural
wellbeing very seriously. This includes both Pakeha and Maori who are
committed to the Motiti community.
14. MEMI came to the decision to support the application after review of the
evidence and consultation with the applicant owners and their experts. We have
also sought our own expert and legal advice. Of great importance for myself
and other Maori members was the expert advice of the Motiti Korowai elders
with respect to cultural values, and how our cultural values are affected by this
proposal.
15. A review of the history and past practises of other Government entities prior to
the Rena highlights decades of neglect and lack of investment in Motiti Island
and its Maori community. There has been no efforts to protect or enhance our
island or the shorelines surrounding Motiti. 9
16. I also have to acknowledge there has been decades of neglect and no financial
investment in Motiti Island by our Iwi or Hapu groups either.
17. Ironically, the only investment in any improvements for the Island that I have
ever witnessed has been works undertaken or paid for by Rena owners/Insurers.
These works include nautical lights put out on rocks near the island for safety,
the recent toilet block and septic tank put in for the Marae, a new tractor and
construction of a new church (after our last church was seriously damaged by
Cyclone Lusi). These works were paid for out of the compensation claim made
against the Costamare Shipping Company by the Motiti Rohe Moana Trust /
Motiti Marae Committee. I am not aware of any of the compensation paid to
Ngati Awa in 2014 from the limitation fund being spent on Motiti Island for its
Te Patuwai community.
18. The applicant and Owner of MV Rena have shown alot of respect and genuine
commitment to consult meaningfully with the Motiti community. MEMI have
considered the issues facing the future of Motiti Island and our island
community. MEMI believe allowing consent to abandon the remaining parts of 10
the wreck on the Otaiti Reef is the best and only realistic course of action. The
owners have made huge efforts over the last four years through salvage and
extensive recovery operations to return our island environment and waters as
close as practicable to their previous state.. The Rena Owners ongoing efforts
and commitment to consult with us and work hard towards recovery of the
Reef has been appreciated.
19. Ngati Awa’s and Te Patuwai Hapu’s evidence has focussed on the sickness of
our people from discord and upset inter-hapu, stating it is due to the Rena
Application. With respect, these conflicts have been there for a long time, at
least since the introduction of a District Plan and Hapu Management Plan.
Environmental degradation issues facing our Island have also been there long
before the Rena and need to be addressed by our people to protect our Island
and our Motiti community’s way of life.
20. I strongly believe a focus on the Island, and more infrastructure and restoration
projects to benefit Motiti and Tangata Whenua, rather than litigation, is a way
to restore our people’s health and reunite us all. I believe Otaiti’s restoration in
its Mauri is reflected in the video footage, which shows how rich in sea life it 11
now is. As stated by some of the experts, the fishing stocks out at Otaiti have
been able to recover from the no fishing exclusion zone.
21. If consent is granted and a Motiti Project Fund is established, we will finally be
able to obtain closure of this ongoing conflict amongst our people and look
positively to the future. MEMI’s positive approach has had increasing support
through the course of this hearing from Motiti Tangata Whenua landowners,
with our membership numbers increasing significantly over the last month. The
Motiti Project fund will help mitigate effects and enable investment in projects
for a better brighter future for all of the Motiti community. MEMI thinks that
the cultural and environmental damage of the wreck either has already been
remedied or can be, though the conditions as offered and set out by the
Applicant.
PETER GRANT 12
nd DATED this 2 day of October 2015