Supplementary 3

Excluded review articles with reasons Review ID and reference Reasons Country

Bashshur 2015 The review focused on telemonitoring intervention USA Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Smith BR, for improving management of GDM during Woodward MA. The empirical evidence for pregnancy but not on the effectiveness of the telemedicine intervention in diabetes preventing T2DM development. management. Telemedicine Journal & E- Health. 2015; 21(5):321-54. Costi 2012 The review was to focus on the experience of Australia Costi L. Women's experience of diabetes and diabetes and diabetes management among pregnant diabetes management in pregnancy: a women, and how these experiences relate to their systematic review of qualitative evidence understanding of their condition and adherence to (Provisional abstract). The JBI Database treatment regimes. System Rev Implementat Rep. 2012; (2): S325-33. Damon 2011 The review focused on evidence-based nutritional Austria Damon S, Schatzer M, Hofler J, Tomasec G, recommendations in diabetes mellitus in general Hoppichler F. Nutrition and diabetes mellitus: and not specifically focused on intervention for an overview of the current evidence. Wien progression of T2DM in women diagnosed with Med Wochenschr. 2011; 161 (11-12): 282-8. GDM. Feig 2011 A literature summary on reducing risk of Canada Feig DS. Avoiding the slippery slope: developing T2DM in women diagnosed with GDM preventing the development of diabetes in but the methodology was not reported and did not women with a history of gestational diabetes. justify the choice of eligible study designs. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012; 28 (4):317- 20. Garcia-Saez 2014 It is not a systematic review. The article presented Spain Garcia-Saez G, Rigla M, Martinez-Sarriegui I, MobiGuide system guidelines that aimed to help Shalom E, Peleg M, Broens T, et al. Patient- GDM patients to manage their illness by oriented Computerized Clinical Guidelines for monitoring disease parameters. Mobile Decision Support in Gestational Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci and Technol. 2014; 8 (2): 238-46. Jeppesen 2015 The systematic review investigated the effect of Denmark Jeppesen C, Kristensen JK, Ovesen P, reminders for influencing screening rates in Maindal HT. The forgotten risk? A systematic postpartum women with previous GDM but did not review of the effect of reminder systems for investigate direct effect onT2DM development in postpartum screening for type 2 diabetes in women diagnosed with GDM. women with previous gestational diabetes. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):373. Kelly 2011 It is not a systematic review and did not review on USA Kelly JP. Health screenings beyond the interventions to prevent T2DM in women history of gestational diabetes mellitus: A diagnosed with GDM. secondary analysis of the behavioral risk factor surveillance system: University of Texas at Arlington; 2011. Keygan 2013 It is a review of impact of GDM on each of the Australia Keygan J. The impact of gestational diabetes affected parties, her infant, family and midwifery mellitus on the pregnant woman, her infant(s) practice and health care system, and it did not and family, midwifery practice and the health review on intervention effectiveness for preventing care system. Nuritinga. 2013; (12):12-23. T2DM development in women diagnosed with Available from: GDM. http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file /0011/416909/Keygan.pdf Martins 2012 Review on risk factors for T2DM in general Portugal Martins MJR, José HMG. It diminishes the population but did not specifically review on risk factors, prevents the diabetes type 2. J intervention effectiveness for preventing T2DM Nurs UFPE on line. 2012;6:1940-7. Available development in women diagnosed with GDM. from: http://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/1 0141/3/It%20diminishes%20the%20risk %20factors,%20prevents%20the%20diabetes %20type%202.pdf McNamara 2011 The review was on the quantity and Australia McNamara BJ, Sanson-Fisher R, D'Este C, methodological quality of published intervention Eades S. Type 2 diabetes in Indigenous research on Type 2 and gestational diabetes and did populations: quality of intervention research not particularly review on intervention over 20 years. Prev Med. 2011; 52(1):3-9. effectiveness for preventing T2DM development in women diagnosed with GDM. Nielsen 2014 The systematic review investigated determinants Denmark Nielsen KK, Kapur A, Damm P, De Courten and barriers to GDM care from initial screening M, Bygbjerg IC. From screening to and diagnosis to prenatal treatment and postpartum postpartum follow-up–the determinants and follow-up and did not investigate the direct effect barriers for gestational diabetes mellitus on T2DM development in women diagnosed with (GDM) services, a systematic review. BMC GDM Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14 (1):41. Oliveira 2012 This article reviewed guidelines and the latest Portugal Oliveira D, Pereira J, Fernandes R. Metabolic evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis alterations in pregnant women: gestational and classification of GDM. diabetes. Journal Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012; 25 (9-10): 835-42. Rasekaba 2015 The systematic review evaluated the effect of Australia Rasekaba TM, Furler J, Blackberry I, Tacey telemedicine on GDM service and maternal, and M, Gray K, Lim K. Telemedicine foetal outcomes. interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015; 110(1): 1-9. Schmalfuss 2014 The review aimed to identify the nursing care Brazil Schmalfuss JM, Prates LA, de Azevedo M, provided to women with GDM during the prenatal Schneider V. Diabetes Melito gestacional e as care. implicações para o cuidado de enfermagem no pré-natal. Cogitare Enfermagem. 2014;19(4):815-22. Thomaz 2013 The systematic review investigated the Brazil Thomaz de Lima H, Lopes Rosado E, Ribeiro effectiveness of nutritional therapy (traditional Neves PA, Correa Monteiro Machado R, method (TM) and the carbohydrate counting Mello de Oliveira L, Saunders C. Systematic (CCM)) in the treatment of GDM. review; Nutritional therapy in gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28 (6): 1806-14. Van Ryswyk 2014 The systematic review was to examine clinician New Van Ryswyk E, Middleton P, Hague W, views and knowledge regarding postpartum Zealand Crowther C. Clinician views and knowledge healthcare provision for women who have regarding healthcare provision in the experienced (GDM). postpartum period for women with recent gestational diabetes: a systematic review of qualitative/survey studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(3):401-11. Viana 2014 A systematic review and meta-analysis to Brazil Viana LV, Gross JL, Azevedo MJ. Dietary investigate the effectiveness of dietary intervention intervention in patients with gestational as a treatment for GDM or pregnancy with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and hyperglycemia and improve newborn outcomes. meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on maternal and newborn outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(12):3345-55. Wendland 2011 It is a protocol for a review and there was no Brazil Wendland EM, Hilgert JB, Duncan BB, preliminary data reported. Schmidt MI. Interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with previous gestational diabetes (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (8):CD009283. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14 651858.CD009283/full