NATO Project Societal Security and Environmental Impacts Concerning Mariculture in the Red Sea

NATO S CIENCE FOR PEACE project “Societal security and environmental impacts concerning mariculture in the Red Sea”

Bibliography

1. Aarset, B. & S. Beckmann, J. Binge, M. Beveridge, T. Bjorndal, M.J. Bunting, P. McDonagh, C. Mariojouls, J.F. Muir, A. Prothero, L.A. Reisch, A.P. Smith, R.Tveteras & J.A. Young. Without date. The European Consumers’ Understanding and Perceptions of Organic Salmon Production. http://oregonstate.edu/dept/IIFET/2000/papers/aarset1.pdf 2. Arnold, A. 2004. A review of public attitudes towards marine issues within and beyond New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand. 3. Chopin, T.A. & C. Buschmann, M. Halling, N. Troell, A. Kautsky, G. Neori, J. Kraemer, C. Zertuche-Gonzalez, ?. Yarish & C. Neefus. 2001. Integrating seaweeds into marine aquaculture systems: A key toward sustainability. Journal of Phycology 37:975-986. 4. Collier, L.M. & E.H. Pinn. 1998. An assessment of the acute impact of the sea lice treatment ivermectin on a benthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 230:131-147. 5. Department of Marine Resources, Maine. 2006. Marine Aquaculture website (June 2006). http://www.maine.gov/dmr/aquaculture/index.htm 6. Duke, J.M. & R. Aull-Hyde. 2002. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics 42: 131–145. 7. Elliot, M. 2003. Risk Perception Frames in Environmental Decision Making. Environmental Practice 5-3: 214-222. 8. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2002. State of the world’s fisheries and aquaculture 2002. FAO Fisheries Department, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W9900E/w99))e)3.htm 9. FAO (Halwart, M. & D. Soto & R. Arthur). 2007. Cage aquaculture - Regional reviews and global overview. 10.FAO. 2004. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2004. 11.FAO. 2005. Guidelines for the Eco-Labeling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries. http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0116t/a0116t01.htm 12.FAO. 2006. State of world aquaculture: 2006. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 500. FAO Fisheries Department. 13.Firestone, J. & R. Barber. 2003. Fish as pollutants: limitations of and crosscurrents in law, science, management and policy. Washington Law Review, 78:693-756. 14.Folke, C. & N. Kautsky & M. Troell. 1994. The costs of eutrophication from salmon farming: implications for policy. Journal of Environmental Management 40:173-182. 15.Gross, T. 2001. Consumer Attitudes towards Farmed Seafood. http://www.seafish.org/pdf.pl? file=seafish/Documents/marketing_consumer_farmed_seafood.pdf 16.Guo, L. & Z. Li. 2003. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus from fish-cage culture on the communities of a shallow lake in the middle Yangtze River basin of China. Aquaculture 226: 201-212. 17.Hallerman, E.M. 2000. Genetically modified organism mariculture in the coastal zone. Integrated Coastal Zone Management 1:209-212. 18.Hertrampf, J.W. & F. Piedad-Pascual. 2000. Handbook on Ingredients for Aquaculture Feeds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London. 19.Hopkins, D.D. & R.J. Goldburg & A. Marston. 1997. An environmental critique of governmental regulations and policies for open ocean aquaculture. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 2: 235-260. 20.Howarth, R. & D. Anderson, J. Cloern, C. Elfring, C. Hopkinson, B. Lapointe, T. Malone, N. Marcus, K. McGlathery, A. Sharpley & D. Walker. 2000. Nutrient pollution of coastal rivers, bays and seas. Issues in Ecology (7). Ecological Society of America. Washington, DC. 21.Islam, M.S. 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus budget in coastal and marine cage aquaculture and impacts of effluent loading on ecosystem: review and analysis towards model development. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50:48–61. 22.Loya, Y. & H. Lubinevsky, M. Rosenfeld & E. Kramarsky-Winter. 2004. Nutrient enrichment caused by in situ fish farms at Eilat, Red Sea is detrimental to coral reproduction. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49:344–353. 23.Lupatsch, I. & G. Kissil. 1998. Predicting aquaculture wastes from gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) culture using nutritional approach. Aquatic Living Resources 11(4):265-268. 24.Mardle, S. & S. Pascoe & I. Herrero. 2004. Management objective importance in fisheries: an evaluation using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Environmental Management 33 (1): 1–11. 25.Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). 2006. Marine Stewardship Council website. www.msc.org 26.Mazur, N. & H. Aslin & I. Byron. 2005. Community Perceptions of Aquaculture: Final Report. Australian Government, Bureau of Rural Sciences. 27.Mazur, N. & H. Aslin, A. Curtis, I. Byron & C. Magpantay. 2004. Community perceptions of aquaculture: report on the Eyre Peninsula. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. 28.Mazur, N. & H. Aslin, A. Curtis, I. Byron & C. Magpantay. 2004. Community perceptions of aquaculture: report on the Port Phillip Bay. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. 29.Mazur, N. 2004. Community perceptions of aquaculture: related social research. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. 30.National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Marine Aquaculture: Opportunities for Growth. National Academy Press, Washington DC. 31.Peterson, T.R. 2003. Social Control Frames: Opportunities or Constraints? Environmental Practice 5(3):232–238. 32.Ridler et al. 2007. ??? 33.Rieser, A. 1996. Defining the federal role in offshore aquaculture: should it feature delegation to the states? Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 2:209-233. 34.Robertson, R.A. 2001. Effect of balanced information on attitudes towards open ocean aquaculture development in New England. http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/19680 35.Robinson, B. 2004. Social Aspects of Aquaculture in the Bay of Fundy. University of New Brunswick, Saint John. 36.Secretariat of the Convention on biological diversity. 2004. Solutions for sustainable mariculture avoiding the adverse effects of mariculture on biological diversity. 37.Shindler, B.A. & M. Brunson & G.H. Stankey. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Corvallis, Oregon. 38.Shmueli, D. & M. Ben Gal. 2003. Stakeholder Frames in the Mapping of the Lower Kishon River Basin Conflict, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, January, 21:2, pp.211-238. 39.Shmueli, D. & M. Ben Gal. 2003. Reframing of Protracted Environmental Disputes: The Tool, Conflict Mapping, Organizational Profiles and Environmental Discourse in Israel. Second year final report, Israeli Ministry of Environment, Jerusalem, 205 pp. (in Hebrew). 40.Shmueli, D. and M. Ben Gal. 2005. Creating Environmental Stakeholder Profiles: a tool for dispute management, Environmental Practice 7(3), September, pp. 165-175. 41.Weber, M. 2003. What Price farmed fish: A review of the environmental & social costs of farming carnivorous fish. For the SeaWeb Aquaculture Clearinghouse.http://www.seaweb.org/resources/aquaculturecenter/document s/WhatPriceFarmedFish_low.pdf 42.Whitmarsh, D. & P. Wattage. 2006. Public Attitudes Towards the Environmental Impact of Salmon Aquaculture in Scotland. European Environment 16, 108–121. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) 43.Wilson, D. 2001. Community consultation survey of aquaculture developments in the Bowen Region. Queensland Department of State Development, Brisbane. 44.Wondolleck, J. & B. Gray & T. Bryan. 2003. Us versus Them: How Identities and Characterizations Influence Conflict. Environmental Practice 5(3):207- 213.

Further Internet Sources

45.http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/aquaculture/aquaculture_e.htm 46.http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/misc/focus-aquaculture_e.htm 47.http://www.aquacultureassociation.ca/ac05/abstracts/awareness.htm 48.http://www.slideshare.net/innkblotz/social-aspects-of-sustainable-aquaculture 49.http://www.aquanet.ca/English/research/projects.php 50.http://www.clayoquotalliance.uvic.ca/Research/communityhealth.html