2 Type of Comment: Ge = General Te = Technical Ed = Editorial s1

Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: 2003-07-31 Document: ISO DIS 17078-1

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

MB1 Clause No./ Paragraph/ Type Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations Subclause No./ Figure/Table/ of on each comment submitted Annex Note com- (e.g. 3.1) (e.g. Table 1) ment2

BR Table of Item 6.2.4 ed Verb form Delete the term “Allow” or substitute by “Allowing” Accepted. Changed as Contents and (p. iii and 10) requested Headings BR New item Between te This suggestion was not applied nor commented in the Accepted in Principle. The proposal 6.3.4 and CD stage. specification is “performance” 6.3.5 based. It is not appropriate to provide specific The distance between the beginning of the mandrel dimensions. This reasoning pocket and the beginning of the gas-lift valve lodge was provided at the CD should be the same for all supplier mandrels. This stage. The variable D is not reduces the number of used tools and simplify the weel the same for all interventions. A new item between 6.3.4 and 6.3.5 could supplier/manufacturers. This be inserted to define this distance. Also, in the Annex F specification requires that should be defined this distance in a new item. Please see each supplier/manufacturer the figure 1 below for a beter understanding about the prove, through design suggestion. The distance which refers to the suggestion verification testing, that the given above is related to the letter D. side pocket mandrel is compatible with all flow control devices and running/pulling devices for which compatibility is claimed.

Figure 1

BR Several Several te Text still presenting a large number of non ISO ASTM, ASME etc should be changed to ISO Accepted. Wherever the references references task group can find an appropriate ISO reference, we have done so. If there is no appropriate ISO reference, we have used the appropriate ASTM, ASME, etc. reference.

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 1 of 10 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: 2003-07-31 Document: ISO DIS 17078-1

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

FR Title ge Incorrect French translation of title. Replace, in the French title: Accepted. The task group has done its work in English. « Partie 1 : Olives à cavités latérales » We are depending on others by : to translate the International Standard into other « Partie 1 : Raccords à poche latérale » languages, as appropraite. UNI 3 te Terms and definitions Accepted. Changed as requested. With reference to "7.7.8 Magnetic particle examinations" the following terms need to be defined; the proposed definition is in accordance with ISO 13665.

- linear indications: "indications where the length of the indication is equal or more than three times the width of the indication"

- rounded indications: "indications which are circular or elliptical in shape, where the length of the indication is less than three times the width of the indication" UNI 5.7 Design verification grades Change to clause 5.7 Not Accepted. See discussion the following modifications are proposed: below.

- D 2: Intermediate level of design verification Change to annex B, table (FEA analysis). B.1 Not Accepted. See discussion below. - - D 3: Highest level of design verification (D 2 + special wireline operational test + destructive testing with strain gauges).

- Annex B, Table B.1 - Design verification grades the following modifications are proposed for the 4th and 6th row of the table:

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

UNI Annex B Table B.1 |------+------+------+------| Not Accepted. This | | D1 | D2 | D3 | proposed change would |------+------+------+------| change the design | | | | | verification testing |------+------+------+------| requirements as defined in | | | | | table B.1. These |------+------+------+------| requirements are, in the |Burst and |Not required (see|Not required (see|Burst and | opinion of the task group, correct for this application. |collapse pressure|B.2.4) |B.3.4) |collapse (see | |test at ambient | | |B.4.4) | The D3 option allows for |temperature,to | | | | development of a costly, high |failure, with | | | | quality product. We do not |strain gauge | | | | want to require that an extra |------+------+------+------| product be produced for destructive testing. Of | | | | | course, if the user/purchaser |------+------+------+------| wishes to have this test | | | | | performed, he may do so. |------+------+------+------| |Finite Element |Not required (see|Burst and |Burst and | For D3 devices, the |Analysis/strain |B.2.6) |collapse (see |collapse (see | supplier/manufacturer must show, through FEA analysis |gauge | |B.3.7) |B.4.7) | and strain gauge testing, that |------+------+------+------| his design model(s) are applicable. See B.1.4.7.

UNI B.3.4 Not Accepted. This B.3.4.1 and B.3.4.2 the following modifications are proposed proposed change would change the design B.3.4.1 Burst verification testing requirements as defined in Not required for verification grade D2. table B.1. These requirements are, in the B.3.4.2 Collapse opinion of the task group, correct for this application. Not required for verification grade D2. See above discussion.

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

NL Introduction 2nd ---- item Ed Word missing Insert “with” after first “user/purchaser” Accepted. Changed as requested to add the word “with” after “user/purchaser” on the 2nd line of the Design verification grades paragraph. NL 1 Scope Last para Ed “specification” s/b “part of ISO 17078” Accepted. Changed as requested to change the word “specification” to “International Standard 17078.1.” NL 2 Norm refs Ed Various corrections needed SNT TC-1A s/b ASNT RP SNT-TC-1A. In its title Accepted. Changed as insert in” “after “Certification”. Add issuing requested. Title of SNT addresses of standards organizations except ISO. document changed. The word “in” added after the word “Certification.” Accepted in Principle. Issuing addresses entered for organizations other than ISO. We agree with this, but have not done it in the document. NL 3 Ed Incorrect numbering of some subclauses Renumber 3.4 – 3.12 into 3.5 – 3.13 Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 3.34, 3.35 Ed “for which” s/b “to which” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 5.1 2nd sentence Ed Logic Delete “following”. Insert “listed in 5.2 through Accepted. Changed as 5.10,” after “conditions” requested. NL 5.2 Te A side-pocket mandrel is a rather complex device; but Add for clarity a figure showing a typical side- Accepted. Changed as there is not a single figure in this ISO pocket mandrel requested. We agree with this, but have not done it in the document.

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

NL 5.3.4 6th ---- item Ed For consistency with other hyphenated items Delete “state” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 5.4, 5.5.1 1st sentence Ed For consistency with other subclauses of 5 “mandrels” s/b “mandrel” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 5.5.1 1st sentence Ed Insert space after “diameter,” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 5.5.1 Last sentce Ed For consistency with other subclauses of 5 “mandrels” s/b “mandrel” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 6.2.1 Ge Incorrect cross-ref 6.2.7 s/b 6.2.8 Accepted. Changed as requested. NL Throughout Ed Inconsistent use of “side-pocket mandrel” and “side Should be “side-pocket mandrel” throughout Accepted. Changed as pocket mandrel” requested. NL 6.3.3 3rd para Te Incorrect conversion from inch to mm 1,225 mm s/b 1,27 mm Accepted. Changed as requested. NL Table 1 Lower seal Te Incorrect conversion from inch to mm 37,984 s/b 37,998 Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 6.3.7 Ed “cross section” s/b “cross-section” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 6.3.9 3rd para Ed « pressure containing” s/b “pressure-containing” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 6.4.2 1st–3rd para Ed Text logic Place colon after 1st para; place hyphens before Accepted. Changed as Last para 2nd and 3rd para. Last para: “are to” s/b “shall” requested. We assume that this refers to sub-clause 6.4.1.1, not 6.4.2. The requested changes make sense for this clause. NL 7.2.1 3rd sentence Ed Word missing Insert “a” before “suitable” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.2.2 1st sentence Ge Incorrect cross-ref to Annex D where “product data sheet” Insert “(see Annex F)” after “sheet” and delete Accepted. Changed as

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

is not mentioned last part of sentence as from “as required” requested. NL 7.2.2 18th ---- item Ed Consistency with 7.2.3 “Technical-operations” s/b “Technical/operations” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.2.3 2nd ---- item Ed “annex F” s/b “Annex F” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.4.2 1st sentence Ed Delete comma after “performing” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.4.3 2nd ---- item Ed “providing” s/b “provided” and “criteria” s/b Accepted. Changed as “criterion” requested. NL 7.4.4 2nd ---- item Ed “pressure containing/pressure retaining” s/b Accepted. Changed as “pressure-containing/pressure-retaining” requested. NL 7.4.6 2nd sentence Ed Genitive “it’s” s/b “its” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.4.6 3rd para Te HOW shall acceptance be indicated on the materials? Specify method Accepted. Changed as requested. The acceptance criteria are indicated in the 1st paragraph of 7.4.6. This is now made clear in this 3rd paragraph. NL 7.6.2 2nd sentence Ed Delete comma after “welding” Accepted. Changed as requested. Also, a comma is inserted after the word “storage.” NL 7.6.3.2 2nd sentence Ed “heat affected” s/b “heat-affected”; “cross Accepted. Changed as section” s/b “cross-section” requested. NL 7.6.4 Ed “clause IX” s/b “Section IX” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.7.1 3rd para Ed Conditional statement “When” s/b “If” Accepted. Changed as requested.

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

NL 7.7.6 1st sentence Ed Delete “method”; “requirement” s/b “requirements” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.7.11 2nd para Ge Cross-ref should be more specific Change “clause 7” to “7.7.5” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.8.4 Ed “side -pocket packing” s/b “side-pocket packing” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.8.5 1st sentence Ed “International Standard” s/b “part of ISO 17078” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL 7.8.5 2nd sentence Ed “supplier/manufacturer specified” reads better as “specified by the supplier/manufacturer” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL Table B.1 Ed/Ge Various corrections needed 3rd and 6th row: “Burst and collapse” s/b “Required” Not Accepted. Burst and 6th row: B.2.6 s/b B.2.7; 7th row: B.1.4.8 s/b B.4.8; collapse requirements not 10th row: C.3.4 s/b C.3.5 and C.4.4 s/b C.4.5 changed. See discussion above on page 2 and 3 of this document. Accepted. References in table corrected as requested. NL B.2.4 Title Ed For consistency with B.3.4 and B.4.4 “Burst &” s/b “Burst and” Accepted. Changed as requested. This refers to B.1.2.4. NL B.4.4 Ed “Verification Grade” s/b “verification grade” Accepted. Changed as requested. This refers to B.1.4.4. NL Table D.1 Ed Q3, Documentation ‘plus’ s/b ‘plus superscript c’ (like for Q2) Accepted. Changed as requested. NL D.3.2 1st ---- item Ed Word missing Insert “examination” after “particle” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL D.3.2 All ---- items Ed Logic Delete “tested” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL Annex F Title and text Te Annex F is referenced in 7.2.2 (by inference) and in 7.2.3 Change title of Annex F to “Product data sheet” Accepted. Changed as 1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 7 of 10 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: 2003-07-31 Document: ISO DIS 17078-1

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

sentences as “product data sheet”. For consistency: and in text sentences change “engineering data requested. sheet” to “product data sheet” NL F.1 Footnote b Ed “cross section” s/b “cross-section” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL Annex F Example Ed For clarity/consistency, change sentence “This is an To new title “F.2 Example of a completed product Accepted. Changed as example…” data sheet” requested. NL G.1 Last sentce Ed “envelop” s/b “envelope” and “cross section” s/b Accepted. Changed as and NOTE “cross-section” requested. NL H.1 2nd para Ed “products” s/b “product’s” Accepted in Principle. This is clause H.1.1. Changed products to products’ since the word is plural. NL H.4 Ed “International Standard” s/b “part of ISO 17078” Accepted. Changed as requested. This is clause H.1.4. NL H.5.1 1st sentence Ed “problems” s/b “problem” Accepted. Changed as requested. This is clause H.1.5.1. NL H.7 1st ---- item Ed “manufacture’s” s/b “manufacturer’s” Accepted in Principle. This 3rd ---- item “manufacturers” s/b “manufacturer’s” is clause H.1.7. Changed 4th ---- item “Kpa” s/b “kPa” manufacture’s to supplier/manufacturer’s. Changed Kpa to kPa as requested. NL H.8 Ed “manufacturers” s/b “manufacturer’s” Accepted in Principle. This is clause H.1.8. Changed manufacturers to supplier/manufacturer’s. NL Annex I Title Ed To enhance clarity Should be “Engineering units conversion” Accepted. Changed as requested. NL I.1 Purpose Title Ed Superfluous Delete Accepted. Changed as 1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 8 of 10 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: 2003-07-31 Document: ISO DIS 17078-1

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

requested. NL Tables I.1, I.2 Te Various corrections needed All units should start with lower case except Accepted. Changed as Celsius and Fahrenheit. Centigrade s/b Celsius. requested. Pascal-second (Pa-s) s/b pascal second (Pa.s). (cp) s/b (cP). NL Bibliography Ge No reference found to [1] through [4]. Delete these? Add ISO 8402 (referenced in 3). Accepted in Principle. It is our understanding that pertinent documents may be included in the bibliography, even if they are not specifically referenced in the document. Should ISO 8042 be referenced here or in clause 2, Normative or Informative References? ** General ed Pls make sure to use "mass" and not "weight" where Accepted in Principle. appropriate; pls use pascals (or multiple thereof) for Changed where appropriate. pressure units in the SI system We agree with this, but have not done it in the document. ** Intro ed The Introduction is informative only, and cannot contain Rewrite last sentence, second para. Accepted. Changed as requirements requested. ** 2 ed Where possible, ISO documents shall be cited in Pls review when preparing FDIS text Accepted. Wherever the preference to national documents. Note that an ISO doc. task group can find an at DIS or FDIS stage is indeed publicly available and thus appropriate ISO reference, can be cited. we have done so. If there is no appropriate ISO reference, we have used the appropriate ASTM, ASME, etc. reference. We agree with this, but have not done it in the document. ** 3.1 ed Is an acceptance a component and/or assembly? Unclear Review grammar Accepted. Changed as

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)

requested. ** 3 ed Pls give terms (and defs) in the SINGULAR Correct where applicable Accepted. Changed as requested. We agree with this, and have changed ones we have found. There may be others. ** 3.5 ed I assume these three terms are synonyms??? Correct layout in acc. with ISO/IEC Directives Part Accepted. Need advice on 2, Annex C correct format. ** 3.19 ed I assume these two terms are synonyms??? Correct layout in acc. with ISO/IEC Directives Part Accepted. Need advice on 2, Annex C correct format. ** 3.20 ed Are these two terms synonyms?? Correct layout in acc. with ISO/IEC Directives Part Accepted. Need advice on 2, Annex C correct format. ** 3.36 ed Your def. implies that a reconditioned mandrel can be Rewrite to clarify Accepted. Changed as reused without being reconditioned. Is this correct? requested. ** 3.38 ed Does this term differ from "manufacturer" as in 7.3.2 , Clarification requested. Accepted. Changed as 7.4.2 etc.? requested. Clauses 7.3.2 and 7.4.2 corrected to read “supplier/manufacturer.” ** 4 ed Ra is a symbol for surface roughness and should be Correction needed Accepted. Changed as italicized. See ISO 4288:1996. I don't know what is meant requested. We agree with by micro-millimetres (two prefixes??). Do you mean this, but have not done it in micrometre (usual for surface roughness, 10–6 m) or do the document. you mean nanometre, 10–9 m, or ?? ** 6.3.3 ed Note that Ra is a symbol and not a unit. 63 Ra maximum is incorrect and should be written Accepted. Changed as Ra u 1,6 µm (63 µin) requested. ** Annex F ed Pls use "SI units" rather than "metric units" (bar is not an Accepted. Changed as SI unit!) and "US Customary units" rather than "Standard requested. oilfield units"

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 10 of 10 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10