Certificated Teacher Comprehensive Summative Scoring Document Framework: UW-CEL 5D+

Certificated Teacher Comprehensive Summative Scoring Document Framework: UW- CEL 5D+ BLAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

D Grade/ U i Teacher: Subject: n P s s r School: School Year: t a o B i Evaluator: Date: ti f a n sf i s g a c i u c i c i t e s o n h r t e y d Criteria 1: Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement 1 2 3 4

P1 : Connection to standards, broader purpose and transferable skill P4: Communication of learning target(s) P5: Success criteria and performance task(s) SE3: Work of high cognitive demand CEC3: Discussion, collaboration and accountability Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 1 5-9 10-12 13-16 17-20 Score  Criterion 2: Demonstrating effective teaching practices 1 2 3 4

SE1: Quality of questioning SE5: Expectation, support & opportunity for participation & meaning making SE6: Substance of student talk CP6: Scaffolds the task CP7: Gradual release of responsibility Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 2 5-9 10-12 13-16 17-20 Score  Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing 1 2 3 4 strategies to address those needs

P3: Teaching point(s) are based on students' learning needs SE2: Ownership of learning SE4: Strategies that capitalize on learning needs of students CP5: Differentiated instruction

Certificated Teacher Comprehensive EvaluationPAGE 1 OF 5 Rev Date 3/19/15 Certificated Teacher Comprehensive Summative Scoring Document Framework: UW- CEL 5D+ BLAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

A6: Teacher use of formative assessment data 3.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s)

3.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 3 7-12 13-16 17-22 23-28 Score  Criterion 4: Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and 1 2 3 4 curriculum P2: Connection to previous and future lessons CP1: Alignment of instructional materials and tasks CP2: Discipline-specific conceptual understanding CP3: Pedagogical content knowledge CP4: Teacher knowledge of content Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 4 5-9 10-12 13-16 17-20 Score  Criterion 5: Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment 1 2 3 4

CEC1: Arrangement of classroom CEC2: Accessibility and use of materials CEC4: Use of learning time CEC5: Managing student behavior CEC6: Student status CEC7: Norms for learning Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-24 Score  Criterion 6: Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and 1 2 3 4 improve student learning A1: Self assessment of learning connected to the success criteria A2: Demonstration of learning A3: Formative assessment opportunities A4: Collection systems for formative assessment data A5: Student use of assessment data 6.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s)

6.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s)

Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 6 7-12 13-16 17-22 23-28 Score  Criterion 7: Communicating and collaborating with parents and the school 1 2 3 4 community PCC3: Parents and guardians PCC4: Communication within the school community about student progress Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 7 2-3 4-5 6 7-8 Score  Criterion 8: Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focused on 1 2 3 4 improving instructional practice and student learning PCC1: Collaboration with peers and administrators to improve student learning PCC2: Professional and collegial relationships PCC5: Supports school, district, and state curriculum, policy and initiatives PCC6: Ethics and advocacy

Student Growth Criteria 8: Exhibiting 8.1: Establish collaborative and collegial practices Team Student focused on improving instructional Growth Goal(s) practice and student learning

Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Criterion 8 5-9 10-12 13-16 17-20 Score 

Scoring Overall Criterion Teaching Criteria Scores (1, 2, 3, or 4) Criterion 1: Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement

Criterion 2: Demonstrating effective teaching practices Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs Criterion 4: Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum

Criterion 5: Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment

Criterion 6: Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning

Criterion 7: Communicating and collaborating with parents and school community Criterion 8: Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning Summative Teaching Criteria Score

Preliminary Summative Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Rating (State determined scoring bands) 8 – 14 15 – 21 22 – 28 29 - 32

Student Growth Rubric Rating Each Student Growth Element (3.1, 3.2, 6.1, 6.2 & 8.1) must be rated. Any student growth score of “1” will result in an inquiry. Student Growth Impact Rating (Enter scores from 3.1, 3.2, 6.1, 6.2, and 8.1) Goal-Setting Score Student Growth Score Based Total Student Student Growth Based on Rubric on Rubric Growth Score (1, 2, 3, or 4) (1, 2, 3, or 4) Criterion 3 (3.1) (3.2)

Criterion 6 (6.1) (6.2)

Criterion 8 (8.1) N/A

Overall Student Growth Criteria Score (Add student growth scores)

Low Average High Student Growth Impact Rating Scale 5 - 12 13 – 17 18 – 20 Student Growth Inquiry Needed? A “Low” overall student growth score or any student growth element score of “1” will result in an Yes No inquiry. (WAC 392-191A-100) Final Summative Rating It is my judgment that during the evaluation period covered in this report, the certificated employee’s overall performance has been:

Preliminary Summative Rating Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

Student Growth Rating Low Average High

NOTE: A Distinguished preliminary summative rating with a LOW student growth score will result in a final summative rating of Proficient. This is the only time a summative evaluation rating will change. Final Summative Evaluation Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Rating

EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

Both signatures required. Signing of this instrument acknowledges participation in but not necessarily concurrence with the evaluation. (Attach teacher comments if desired.)

Evaluator Name:

Evaluator Signature: Date:

Employee Signature: Date:

Certificated Teacher Comprehensive EvaluationPAGE 5 OF 5 Rev Date 3/19/15