Mousetrap Car Peer and self evaluation template Instructions: 1. Use the rubric below to fill in the ratings table on p. 2 for all team members including yourself. Note that the default rating is a “3” or “very good” – if every team member performed at that level on all criteria, the team would be very successful. “Outstanding” ratings are special recognition of extraordinary contributions. 2. Try to keep the ratings for each of the criteria distinct. Just because a team member is horrible or outstanding in one area, do not let it affect your ratings on other areas. The “Overall Contributions Rating” is a summation of how the team member performed throughout the project. 3. Add comments in the space provided that give a clearer picture of the value added by each team member. Ideally, the contents of this report should show how the contributions from different people came together to make the project better/worse.

Criteria Unacceptable Marginal Very good Outstanding 1 2 3 4 Quality of work Work was not Work often had Generally high Amazingly good usable, or flaws and quality of work, output, well beyond regularly needed omissions that only occasional expectations major rework needed fixing fixes needed Quantity of Did hardly any Contributed OK, Worked hard, Considerable extra work work. somewhat less carried their share work, more than than their share. of the load. their share. Initiative, Made practically Mostly passive Significant source Ideas / energy / creativity, no contributions participant, of ideas and energy, leadership provided Expertise, in any of these occasionally had took initiative as were a huge reason leadership areas. interesting & needed. for team success. useful inputs. Dependability Could not be Usually met Conscientious Went out of the way and meeting counted on at all. commitments. about to pick up slack for commitments Needed some commitments. others who miss reminders or Very dependable. commitments. follow-up. Interaction, Was a major Some interaction Interacted well with Went out of the way supporting problem to problems, others, helpful, to help teammates other team interact and work unhelpfulness, or flexible, pleasure to and enable them to members, with. failure to work with. contribute. sharing communicate. information Team meetings: Little Participation Participated fully in Drew out others and participation, participation in spotty: not always all team activities, ensured that use of team discussions and participative, did used the class team everyone time activities, wasted not always use time wisely participated, used the class team class team time and encouraged the time. effectively team to use the class meeting time efficiently Overall Often failed to Sometimes failed Consistently good Did everything well Contributions complete to complete contributions, and added some Rating assigned work, assigned work, valuable member of outstanding was difficult to was often the team, and contributions work with and unprepared, but usually prepared made no real made some contributions to contributions the team. Team members Name1 Name2 Name3 (yourself)

Quality of work Quantity of work Initiative, creativity, Expertise, leadership Dependability and meeting commitments Interaction, supporting other team members, sharing information Team meetings: participation, use of team time Overall Contributions Rating Comments / Feedback (Make sure to identify/appreciat e the positives, as well as pointing out areas for improvement)