Acta onomastica LIV

OBSAH (Contents)

I . S t a t i ( A r t i c l e s ) Andrea B ö l c s k e i (Budapest), Contrastive Analysis of English and Hungarian Toponym Types (Kontrastivní analýza anglických a ma- ďarských typů toponym) 7 Jaroslav D a v i d – Přemysl M á ch a (Ostrava), Možnosti studia toponym ve vztahu ke krajině, prostoru a identitě (The Possi- bilities for Studying Place Names in Relation to Landscape, Space and Identity) 28 Žaneta D v o ř á k o v á (Praha), O Rodných jménech motivovaných označením rostlin (About First Names Motivated by Designations of Flowers and Plants) 46 Žaneta D v o ř á k o v á (Praha), Pojmenovávací zvyklosti v rodě Vosiků z číhošťské farnosti v letech 1785–1885 (Naming Tradition in the Vosika Family from Číhošť Parish During 1785–1885) 65 Zuzana G e l n a r o v á – Michal G e l n a r (Praha), Několik toponym z okresu Šumperk vztahujících se k dějinám sklářství (Se- veral Toponyms in the Šumperk District Relating to the History of Glassmaking) 101 Jan C h o v a n e c (Brno), Kešonymické hrátky: motivační typy pojmenování keší v českém geocachingu (Cacheonymic Games: Analysing the Motivation of Cache Names in Czech Geocaching) 117 Miroslav K a z í k (Trnava – Moravany nad Váhom), Funkčný člen „individuálna charakteristika“ v modelovej interpretácii živých osobných mien slobodných osôb v Papradi (Functional Element „Individual Characteristics“ in the Model Interpretation of the Li- ving Personal Names of Single Persons in Paprad) 134 Miroslav K a z í k (Trnava – Moravany nad Váhom), Funkčný člen “meno domu” v modelovej interpretácii živých osobných mien v Papradi (Functional Element „Name of the House“ in the Model Interpretation of the Living Personal Names in Paprad) 142 Acta onomastica LIV Barbora K l i m t o v á (Praha), Pomístní jména na území obce Otročiněves (Minor Place Names in the Otročiněves District) 149 Miloslava K n a p p o v á (Praha), Amálka a Bobeš, nebo Amálie a Josef? (K přehodnocování hypokoristik v základní podoby) (Amálka and Bobeš, or Amálie and Josef? /On the Re-Evaluation of Hypoco- ristics into Basic Forms of Given Names/) 162 Agnieszka K o ł o d z i e j (Vratislav), Vývoj polské, české a slovenské zoonomastiky (The Development of the Polish, Czech and Slovak Zoonomastics) 169 Éva K o v á c s (Debrecen), Different Aspects for the Study of Topo- nyms Deriving from Personal Names (Rozdílné aspekty studia topo- nym vzniklých z osobních jmen) 187 Václav L á b u s (Liberec), Kvazideantroponymická a kvazideapela- tivní pomístní jména (Quasi-Deantroponymic and Quasi-Deapella- tive Minor Place-Names) 198 Václav L á b u s (Liberec), Nisa, nebo Nysa? (Nisa, or Nysa?) 207 Zdeněk P e h a l (Golčův Jeníkov), Toponyma ve smlouvě z roku 1347 na Chotěbořsku – problém identifikace (Toponyms in the Deed From the Year 1347 at the Chotěboř Area – A Problem of Identifi-cation) 219 Martina Š m e j k a l o v á (Praha), Vladimír Šmilauer – život ono- mastika (Vladimír Šmilauer – Life of an Onomastician) 237 Marta Š t e f k o v á (Brno), Kámen v pomístních jménech Moravy a Slezska (The Stone in Moravian and Silesian Minor Place Names) 282 Pavel Š t ě p á n (Praha), Nová pražská detoponymická urbanonyma (New Detoponymic Urbanonyms in Prague) 295 Самуела Т о м а с и к (Быдгощ), Наименования московских ново- годних уличных елей 2012 года (Names of Christmas Trees in Moscow in 2012) 308 Silvo T o r k a r (Lublaň), Predoslje a Prelosno (po 45 letech) (Predoslje and Prelosno /45 Years After/) 316 Jana Marie T u š k o v á (Brno), Transonymizace oikonym a její proje- vy v morfologické rovině (Transonymisation of Oikonyms and Its Results in Morphological Level) 323

I I . Z d i p l o m o v ý c h a s e m i n á r n í c h p r a c í ( F r o m D i s s e r t a t i o n s a n d S e m i n a r y W o r k s ) Acta onomastica LIV Michaela F i c n a r o v á (Brno), Vlastní jména vlakových spojů (pore- jonyma) na území ČR v letech 1993–2011 (Proper Names of Train Lines in the Czech Republic /1993–2011/) 334 Martina Kloudová (Brno), Farní matriky jako materiálové východisko pro onomastiku (Parish Registers as a Base Material for Onomas- tics) 350 Vojtěch V a s k o (Praha), K distribuci předložek na, v a do u místních jmen v současné češtině (To the Distribution of Prepositions na, v, and do in Oikonyms in Contemporary Czech Language) 360

I I I . R e c e n z e ( R e v i e w s ) Ewa J a k u s – B o r k o w a (Graz – Opole), Inge Bily: Potsdam bis München: Die Ausfahrten der A 9 – ihre Namen kurz erklärt (Potsdam to Munich: The Exits of A 9 – Explains Their Names Briefly) 383 Ewa J a k u s – B o r k o w a (Graz – Opole), Karol i Zofia Zierhofferowie: Nazwy geograficzne Europy w języku polskim (Eu- ropean Geographical Names in Polish) 385 Barbora K l i m t o v á (Praha), Ľuba Sičáková: Propriá v jazykových a mimojazykových súvislostiach (na materiáli hydroným z povodia Slanej) (Proper Names in Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic Relations /On the Material of the Slaná River Basin/) 389 Agnieszka K o ł o d z i e j (Vratislav), Iveta Valentová (ed.): Jazykoved- né štúdie XXIX. Život medzi apelatívami a propriami (Language Studies XXIX. Life between Appellatives and Proper Names) 391 Iveta V a l e n t o v á (Bratislava), Juraj Hladký: Hydronymia povodia Dudváhu (The Hydronymy of the Dudváh River Basin) 394 Radek V o l e j n í k (Praha), Juraj Hladký (ed.): Z hydronymie západného Slovenska. Zborník vedeckých štúdií (From the Hydro- nymy of Western Slovakia. Proceedings of Scientific Studies) 398

IV . K r o n i k a ( C h r o n i c l e ) Jiří M a r t í n e k (Praha), Zemřel doc. Ludvík Mucha (Associate Professor Ludvík Mucha Passed Away) 400 Acta onomastica LIV Rudolf Š r á m e k (Brno), Odešel Ernst Eichler (Ernst Eichler Passed Away) 401 Jana P l e s k a l o v á (Brno), Za profesorem PhDr. Vincentem Blanárem, DrSc., dr. h. c. (Professor PhDr. Vincent Blanár, DrSc., dr. h. c., Passed Away) 406 Petr H a v í ř (Trutnov), Jiří Uhlíř pětasedmdesátiletý (Jiří Uhlíř Aged Seventy-Five) 408

V. Z p r á v y a p o z n á m k y ( N e w s a n d C o m m e n t s ) K o l e k t i v o n o m a s t i k ů (By a Collective of Onomasticians), Onomastické zprávy a poznámky (Onomastic News and Comments) 412

Pokyny pro úpravu rukopisů pro časopis Acta onomastica (Guidelines for the Arrangement of Manuscripts for the Journal Acta onomas- tica) 430 Seznam publikací a časopisů zaslaných v roce 2012 redakci Acta ono- mastica (List of Publications and Journals Received in 2012) 433 Časopisy vydávané a spoluvydávané ústavem pro jazyk český AV ČR, v. v. i. (Journals Published and Co-published by the Institute of the Czech Language of the ASCR, v. v. i.) 435

Abstracts

Andrea B ö l c s k e i (Budapest) CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND HUNGARIAN TOPONYM TYPES This paper attempts to compare some prototypical semantic and lexical – grammatical structures adopted in English and Hungarian toponyms to discover some closely identical (thus presumably universal) as well as some entirely unique (thus supposedly culture- and language-dependent) trends in the place-naming practices of two genetically unrelated languages. The presence of similar basic geographical entities in Britain and in Hungary seems to have resulted in establishing (i) toponyms of identical semantic and grammatical structure; (ii) toponyms of similar semantic, but distinct grammatical structure; (iii) toponyms of similar semantic and grammatical structure including lexemes of restricted use; (iv) toponyms of similar semantic and/or grammatical structure including strongly culture-dependent lexemes and (v) toponyms Acta onomastica LIV of distinct semantic and lexical – grammatical structure. In the long run, contrastive analysis combined with historical linguistic methods and a cognitive linguistic approach in place-name studies can definitely cast light on the facts of how humans of different mother tongues conceptualise similar geographic entities and in what forms these concepts are conventionalised in their distinct languages.

Jaroslav D a v i d – Přemysl M á ch a (Ostrava) THE POSSIBILITIES FOR STUDYING PLACE NAMES IN RELATION TO LANDSCAPE, SPACE AND IDENTITY Place names have been systematically studied by various disciplines, including linguistics, history, geography, and anthropology. Most of these studies have, however, focused on the historical value of place names in documenting language change, the spread of human settlement, distribution of geomorphological objects and the evolution of legal practices in times past. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to contemporary place-naming practices and the role they play in structuring social relations and reproducing social identities. After reviewing the principal linguistic, geographical and anthropological approaches to place names we propose a multidisciplinary approach which should help us better understand the importance and significance of place names in the perception and construction of every-day landscapes.

Žaneta D v o ř á k o v á (Praha) ABOUT FIRST NAMES MOTIVATED BY DESIGNATIONS OF FLOWERS AND PLANTS Many names motivated by designations of flowers and plants belong to a very archaic layer of anthroponyms. They were created as protecting names (demons should believe that a person with name motivated by designation of flower is a flower itself) and later they had characterization or predestination functions. Flowers had many symbolical meanings (ancient and medieval Christian) which could influence proper names as well (e. g. the name Rose meant not only „rose“ but also „beauty“ and „love“ – i. e. the symbolical meanings of rose). First names motivated by designations of flowers and plants were very popular in the 19th century, in a period of „flowers of speech“ fashion. In English many new names motivated by designations of flowers and plants (especially female) were created at that time. In our country, Czech names motivated by designations of flowers and plants (e. g. Růžena „rose“) were popular in the 1930s and 1940s, then they rapidly fell out of vogue. Acta onomastica LIV Some names motivated by designations of flowers and plants are not used anymore (e. g. Eglantine) but other ones are made up nowadays (e. g. Apple).

Žaneta D v o ř á k o v á (Praha) NAMING TRADITION IN THE VOSIKA FAMILY FROM ČÍHOŠŤ PARISH DURING 1785–1885 My paper is focused on naming in one stem of my family during the 19th century. The Vosika family lived in parish Číhošť in Bohemia. I have tried to analyse names of children in this family and in the whole parish in 1785–1885. We can observe that the most important factor of the choice of the first name was its popularity. Names of parents or godparents had less influence (with the exception of the last generation). Also dates (and festivals of saints) were not important when naming members of the Vosika family.

Zuzana G e l n a r o v á – Michal G e l n a r (Praha) SEVERAL TOPONYMS IN THE ŠUMPERK DISTRICT RELATING TO THE HISTORY OF GLASSMAKING During the historical study of glassmaking in Jeseníky mountains it is necessary not only to work with the written archival sources that rarely occur in middle ages and early modern times but also with regional local history literature and cartographic sources. There were excerpted some toponyms relating to the history of glassmaking in the district in question from these written and cartographic sources. They helped to locate some habitats of extinct glassworks. Collecting of material from these sources has confirmed the legitimacy of these exploring sources. Pottery founded on one of these deposits helped to determinate dating of activities in glassworks and moved the beginning of the glassmaking in this part of northern Moravia already to the middle of the 14th century.

Jan Ch o v a n e c (Brno) CACHEONYMIC GAMES: ANALYSING THE MOTIVATION OF CACHE NAMES IN CZECH GEOCACHING Based on an analysis of the names of approximately 1500 Czech geocaches, the article outlines the basic naming processes involved in choosing cache names. Since most geocaches are located in the open countryside, it is not surprising that transonymic processes involving transformation of toponyms and other kinds of place names are very frequent. However, due to the diverse character of geocaches, the motivation may Acta onomastica LIV also derive from existing anthroponyms or any other names of man-made, natural or fictional objects. Cache-naming may likewise involve the specification of the founder’s identity, the method of solving a mystery task, the cache function, a mention of the treasure-hunting nature of the game and the serial character of some caches, with names often chosen with an element of humour. It is argued that the special nature of caches as onymic objects allows their names to be conceived of as a special category, namely cacheonyms. The article also discusses several aspects of the formal make-up of cache names and outlines some basic sociolinguistic issues connected with code choice (local code /e.g. Czech/ v. English v. other codes, and their mutual combinations).

Miroslav K a z í k (Trnava – Moravany nad Váhom) FUNCTIONAL ELEMENT “INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS” IN THE MODEL INTERPRETATION OF THE LIVING PERSONAL NAMES OF SINGLE PERSONS IN PAPRAD The article analyses individual characteristics in the living personal names of single persons in part of Paprad: Stará Turá Kopanica (western Slovakia). In this location and class are documented individual characteristics according to properties, occupation, previous owner or inhabitant of the house, origin and abode, nicknames arisen from surnames and individual characteristics with different or unclear motivation which make up to 40 % of functional elements “individual characteristics”. 66,67 % of the individual characteristics are without family motivation, 33,33 % are with family motivation, 66,67 % has family motivation after father and 20 % after mother. One of each characteristic is after grandfather and grandmother. Individual characteristic is the second least frequent functional element of single persons in Paprad.

Miroslav K a z í k (Trnava – Moravany nad Váhom) FUNCTIONAL ELEMENT „NAME OF THE HOUSE“ IN THE MODEL INTERPRETATION OF THE LIVING PERSONAL NAMES IN PAPRAD This article reports the characteristics of the functional element “name of the house” in the living personal names in Stará Turá part of Paprad (western Slovakia). In functional element “name of the house” we distinguish: a) the name of the house with anthropobase of surname, b) the name of the house with anthropobase of name of the family, c) the name of the house according to location, d) the name of the house which is not identical with anthropobase of surname or anthropobase of name of the family and does not express even location. “Name of the house” is the least frequent functional element in Paprad. Acta onomastica LIV

Barbora K l i m t o v á (Praha) MINOR PLACE NAMES IN THE OTROČINĚVES DISTRICT This text discusses the research and collection of minor place names in Otročiněves, one of the villages that belonged to the former court district Křivoklát. Minor places from the whole area will be collected for the purposes of my doctoral study. This text is the first step and it attemps to describe main tendencies and changes that reveal in a complex of minor place names during the time. The collected minor place names were compared with the list of minor place names from survey for the Dictionary of Minor Place Names in Bohemia made in 1963 and with the list called Theresian Cadastre (from 18th century). This text is based on a direct research. Informants who took part on it were divided into three groups according to age and they recorded the minor place names into the blind maps made for this purpose.

Miloslava K n a p p o v á (Praha) AMÁLKA AND BOBEŠ, OR AMÁLIE AND JOSEF? (On the Re-Evaluation of Hypocoristics into Basic Forms of Given Names) In the Czech Republic, the re-evaluation of unofficial forms of names (hypocoristics) into independent, basic, standard forms is realised on the basis of sociolinguistic surveys (carried out in 1970’s, 1990’s and in 2012). The surveys are stimulated by the impulses from the public claiming that some hypocoristics (e.g. Ondráš, Jarek, Amálka) lost their emotional, unofficial symptoms and are regarded as neutral forms. If these forms are linguistically re-evaluated into independent, basic ones on the basis of the results of the survey, they are found suitable for the official registration of Czech citizens according to the Czech registry law.

Agnieszka K o ł o d z i e j (Vratislav) THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLISH, CZECH AND SLOVAK ZOO- NOMASTICS The paper presents a survey of the study of animal names in West Slavic languages. Within the scope of the survey were the onomastic works from Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The author of the paper has distinguished four main areas of animal names study: the study of animal names in rural areas, of animal names in literature, of animal names in zoos, and of animal names in cities; and has analyzed all of them. Acta onomastica LIV The survey revealed that there is a significant disproportion in the number of works published on animal names in the three countries. The topic has been investigated most thoroughly by Polish linguists, and a number of valuable papers has been published in Slovakia. The most popular area of the study has been the study of animal names in rural areas.

Éva K o v á c s (Debrecen) DIFFERENT ASPECTS FOR THE STUDY OF TOPONYMS DERIVING FROM PERSONAL NAMES Toponyms of anthroponym origin play an important role in every onomatic system, which is the case also with the Hungarian language. In toponyms, similar semantic content, i.e. the connection between the personal name and the area designated by it (reflecting ownership or usage), can be expressed through different lexical-morpho- logic structures. The paper attempts at presenting how the relationship of these two name categories (personal names and toponyms) developed in the Hungarian name- giving of the last thousand years. In the Hungarian language, toponyms can be created from personal names through different structural formations: a) toponyms can evolve from personal names through metonymy (personal name Péter > toponym Péter); b) toponymic derivatives can be attached to anthroponyms (personal name Márkos > place name Márkosi, personal name Péter > toponym Peterd); and finally, c) anthroponyms may occur in compounds, most frequently with a geographical common name as the second component.

Václav L á b u s (Liberec) QUASI-DEANTROPONYMIC AND QUASI-DEAPELLATIVE MINOR PLACE-NAMES The article focuses on a specific type of minor place-names which we call quasi-dean- troponymic and quasi-deapellative. Such minor place-names are a result of mistransla- tions which are caused by the fact that the name-giver considers onymic components in the former name as apellative ones, and vice versa. The analysis is based on minor place-names of the Jizera Mountains (Jizerské hory / Isergebirge in former Sudeten) where Czech minor place-name system was developing besides the German one from the end of the 19th century. Quasi-deantroponymic and quasi-deapellative names are connected with spontaneous Bohemization of former German minor place-names. Most of such mistranslated names did not survive, only few of them (e.g. Klingerloch – Zvonkové údolí) remain a part of today’s toponymy. Acta onomastica LIV Václav L á b u s (Liberec) NISA, OR NYSA? The article deals with the Czech pronunciation of the river name Nisa, an important river in Northern Bohemia. Besides standard palatalized pronunciation [ňisa], also non-standard non-palatalized pronunciation [nisa] occurs. The main goal of the article is to describe their mutual relation and their distribution. The data come from a) questionnaires, and b) an analysis of chosen Czech Radio (Český rozhlas) programs. The analysis of radio programs was based on a demo version of the platform being developed for automatic transcription and sophisticated access to historical audio archive of the Czech Radio. Palatalized, i.e. standard pronunciation is dominant in broadcasting. Questionnaires show that non-palatalized pronunciation occurs in local every-day speech, especially among people over 30 years. It is therefore a question, whether this pronunciation should be included into the standardization as a local, colloquial variant.

Zdeněk P e h a l (Golčův Jeníkov) TOPONYMS IN THE DEED FROM THE YEAR 1347 AT THE CHOTĚBOŘ AREA – A PROBLEM OF IDENTIFICATION The possibility of settling the country near Chotěboř by ethnic Germans in Middle Ages has not yet been considered. With a detailed analysis of rare documents from 1347 dealed with the mill in today abolished Stavenov where German proper names occur, it seems that the German settlers lived in the area around Nová Ves at Chotěboř for a certain time cultivating the partially desolate country. Excepting one single document only sparsed traces in the form of place names and minor place-names were left after them that we succeeded to identify as originally German. These traces were revealed only by the analysis of the text of the deed, and by the explanation of the then realia, including their location in today’s region. These names outstay here though in Czech forms (one of them – Truncheyn – wholly extinguished). Therefore it seems that the ethnicity of the German settlers who founded new villages and ponds had relatively quickly scattered in the Czech surrounding. Present research shows that the settlers from German speaking countries pursued primarily agriculture, not at all mining silver. In the vicinity of Nová Ves near Chotěboř facing Habry we find more such names, although they became nearly extinct. Similarly they sporadically occur in the environs of Vilémov and Světlá nad Sázavou. They are treated as onomastic traces of the great German colonization of the 13th century.

Martina Š m e j k a l o v á (Praha) Acta onomastica LIV VLADIMIR ŠMILAUER – LIFE OF AN ONOMASTICIAN This article aims to be a contribution to our understanding of history of linguistic thinking in Czechoslovakia. It explores historical and scientific framework that was influencing development of onomastic work of Vladimír Šmilauer during the 20th century. Main attention is paid to three periods of Šmilauer’s life: (i.) period of so called First Czechoslovak Republic, (ii.) period of the Nazi Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia and (iii.) 1960’s and post 1968 period. His famous monographs are analyzed from the wider point of view of cultural policy. The scientific disputations and polemics are clarified using newly discovered archival documents.

Marta Š t e f k o v á (Brno) THE STONE IN MORAVIAN AND SILESIAN MINOR PLACE NAMES The stone is a significant part of landscape, hence the common noun stone is used as a base for a plenty of anoikonyms in all languages. This paper deals with Moravian and Silesian minor place names containing Czech noun kámen ‚stone‘, in dialects ‚rock‘ too. In the first part, dialect forms of the respective names are described. Then the autor deals with structural types of the names and frequency of these types. Finally variability and motivation are explored.

Pavel Š t ě p á n (Praha) NEW DETOPONYMIC URBANONYMS IN PRAGUE The paper analyses the motivation and functions of the detoponymic urbanononyms that came into existence between the years 1998 and 2011. The analysed names of streets and other public places in Prague are classified into four basic categories: (1) names with an orientation function, (2) names with a commemorative function, (3) names with a systemic function, (4) names expressing proprietary relationships. Unlike the names formed in the preceding periods, these newer names do not display many deviations from the usual form of detoponymic urbanonyms. This fact enables the author to devote more attention to the motivation of the individual names, though the form is also analysed within the individual motivation categories.

Самуела Т о м а с и к (Быдгощ) NAMES OF CHRISTMAS TREES IN MOSCOW IN 2012 This study discusses the ways of creating names for Christmas trees in Moscow in winter 2011/2012. The analysis demonstrates that the ways of nominalisation are based on onymisation and transonymisation witch are applied to different types Acta onomastica LIV of chrematonyms. The naming of Christmas trees in Moscow reflects cultural phenomena characteristic for the 21th century.

Silvo T o r k a r (Lublaň) PREDOSLJE AND PRELOSNO (45 YEARS AFTER) France Bezlaj first published his account of the Slovene toponyms Predoslje and Prelosno in the journal Zpravodaj Místopisné komise ČSAV in 1967. Based on historical records (Prerassell and other similar forms) as well as geographic characteristics of the locations in question, he claimed that the term *predoselj from folk geographic terminology, denoting a natural bridge over a ravine or perhaps even a ravine as such, contains the lexeme *prěrǫslo, identified as an obsolete appellative form *rǫslo sharing its root with the Russian ruslo ‘riverbed, river or stream’. In this paper, however, we propose to explain the names Predoslje and Prelosno as originating from the geographic appellative *prěraslь, derived from the verb prerasti ‘to overgrow’. Parallels to the obsolete appelative *prerasel can be found in Polish (Przerośl), Western-Ukrainian (Перерiсль), and Serbian (Велика, Maлa Прераст) toponymy.

Jana Marie T u š k o v á (Brno) TRANSONYMISATION OF OIKONYMS AND ITS RESULTS IN MORPHO- LOGICAL LEVEL The contribution deals with the transonymisation of proper names which is explored on Czech oikonyms exemplified in SYN2005 corpus. It proceeds from the current conception of transonymisation, extending it by a type of co-called “multiverbal transonymisation”, which is a frequent case in transonymisation of oikonyms to chrematonyms, e.g. Brno → Kometa Brno. It describes the factors influencing the process of transonymisation of oikonyms which can be divided into an non-language and language categories. Part of the contribution is dedicated to the morphological aspect of chrematonyms. The SYN2005 corpus material was used to describe development trends in the choice of endings in paradigms of chrematonyms created by transonymisation of oikonyms.