DOCSLIB.ORG

Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Amicus Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Amicus Brief UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division BRENNAN M. GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER (“ALEX”) E. JONES, INFOWARS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, a Case No. 18-00017 Texas limited liability company, LEE STRANAHAN, LEE ANN MCADOO a/k/a LEE ANN FLEISSNER, SCOTT CREIGHTON, JAMES (“JIM”) HOFT, ALLEN B. WEST, and DERRICK WILBURN, Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF OF SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF Professors Christine Bartholomew, Danielle Citron, Brooke Coleman, Scott Dodson, Howard Erichson, Helen Hershkoff, Lee Kovarsky, Sarah Ludington, Philip Pucillo, Alexander Reinert, Joan Shaughnessy, Benjamin Spencer, Adam Steinman, and Suja Thomas (“Scholars” or “Amici”) respectfully move for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of Plaintiff’s opposition to the Defendants’ motions to dismiss. In support of their motion, Amici state as follows: 1. This case raises the question of whether this Court has personal jurisdiction over non-resident Defendants who allegedly defamed Plaintiff via Internet-based media, including YouTube, arising out of his connection with the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally and protest. 1 2358409 v1 Case 3:18-cv-00017-NKM-JCH Document 72 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 3 Pageid#: 1268 2. Amici are 14 professors of law with expertise in the areas of civil procedure and jurisdiction and who have an interest in the sound and stable development of personal jurisdiction doctrine. Amici submit their brief to explain how settled Supreme Court personal jurisdiction law – as stated in Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984), and Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115 (2014) – applies to this case, and to caution the Court against adopting an anomalous view of how personal jurisdiction doctrine applies in this case. 3. While no Federal Rule of Civil Procedure governs amicus briefs submitted in the district court, a federal district court has the inherent authority to authorize participation by amicus curiae to assist the court in its proceedings. United States v. Louisiana, 751 F.Supp. 608, 620 (E.D. La. 1990); United States v. Michigan, 116 F.R.D. 655, 660 (W.D. Mich. 1987). The decision to invite or accept participation by an amicus is committed to the sound discretion of the court. Alexander v. Hall, 64 F.R.D. 152, 155 (D.S.C. 1974). 4. This Court has previously authorized the filing of amicus briefs in cases raising important constitutional questions. See Draego v. City of Charlottesville, Case No. 16-57 (NKM), Dkt. 21 (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2016) (granting motion for leave of Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression to file a brief as amicus curiae); Rothamel v. Fluvanna Cty., Va., 810 F. Supp. 2d 771, 776 (W.D. Va. 2011) (citing amicus brief filed by Commonwealth of Virginia). Given the importance of the constitutional questions raised and the consequences an opinion in this case may have on other, similar cases, Amici respectfully submit that their 12-page amicus brief, attached as Exhibit A, will aid the Court in its analysis of the personal jurisdiction issues. Amici submit that application of Supreme Court personal jurisdiction doctrine to the facts alleged in this case yields the conclusion that Defendants are properly subject to the personal jurisdiction of this Court, that Defendants’ arguments to the contrary are built on certain premises 2 2358409 v1 Case 3:18-cv-00017-NKM-JCH Document 72 Filed 06/19/18 Page 2 of 3 Pageid#: 1269 that cannot be reconciled with controlling Supreme Court doctrine, and that concise examination of these arguments by law professors focused on the study, teaching, and analysis of civil procedure and jurisdiction will aid the Court. CONCLUSION Amici respectfully request that this Court grant them leave to file the amicus brief attached hereto as Exhibit A, and to direct the Clerk to docket the amicus brief accordingly. Respectfully submitted, / s / Elizabeth A. Aniskevich Elizabeth A. Aniskevich E.D. Va. Bar No. 81809 Adam H. Farra COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. / Fifth Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel. (202) 408-4692 Tel. (202) 408-3640 [email protected] [email protected] Michael B. Eisenkraft COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 88 Pine Street / Fourteenth Floor New York, New York 10005 Tel. (212) 220-2925 [email protected] Counsel to Amici Curiae 3 2358409 v1 Case 3:18-cv-00017-NKM-JCH Document 72 Filed 06/19/18 Page 3 of 3 Pageid#: 1270 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division BRENNAN M. GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER (“ALEX”) E. JONES, INFOWARS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, a Case No. 18-00017 Texas limited liability company, LEE STRANAHAN, LEE ANN MCADOO a/k/a LEE ANN FLEISSNER, SCOTT CREIGHTON, JAMES (“JIM”) HOFT, ALLEN B. WEST, and DERRICK WILBURN, Defendants. AMICUS BRIEF OF SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF 2357627 v7 Case 3:18-cv-00017-NKM-JCH Document 72-1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 19 Pageid#: 1271 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. SETTLED SUPREME COURT DOCTRINE ESTABLISHES THAT DEFENDANTS’ CONDUCT RENDERS THEM SUBJECT TO THE PERSONAL JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT. ................................................ 3 II. DEFENDANTS’ READING OF FOURTH CIRCUIT CASE LAW IS INCORRECT, EXTREME, AND CONTRARY TO THE WEIGHT OF AUTHORITY. ........................................................................................................ 7 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 12 i 2357627 v7 Case 3:18-cv-00017-NKM-JCH Document 72-1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 2 of 19 Pageid#: 1272 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Bochan v. La Fontaine, 68 F. Supp. 2d 692 (E.D. Va. 1999) ..........................................................................................9 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco Cty., 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017) .......................................................................................................1, 3, 5 Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985) ...................................................................................................................2 Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984) ......................................................................................................... passim Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc., 334 F.3d 390 (4th Cir. 2003) .....................................................................................................4 CFA Inst. v. Inst. of Chartered Fin. Analysts of India, 551 F.3d 285 (4th Cir. 2009) .....................................................................................................3 First Am. First, Inc. v. Nat’l Ass’n of Bank Women, 802 F.2d 1511 (4th Cir. 1986) ...................................................................................................8 Gubarev v. Buzzfeed, Inc., 253 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (S.D. Fla. 2017) ....................................................................................11 Hawbecker v. Hall, 88 F. Supp. 3d 723 (W.D. Tex. 2015) ......................................................................................10 International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) ...................................................................................................................1 Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC, 766 F. Supp. 2d 828 (E.D. Ky. 2011) ........................................................................................9 Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, 465 U.S. 770 (1984) .........................................................................................................5, 7, 11 Tamburo v. Dworkin, 601 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2010) ...................................................................................................10 Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115 (2014) ..................................................................................................... passim World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980) ...................................................................................................................4 ii 2357627 v7 Case 3:18-cv-00017-NKM-JCH Document 72-1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 3 of 19 Pageid#: 1273 Young v. New Haven Advocate, 315 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2002) .........................................................................................3, 7, 8, 9 OTHER AUTHORITIES C. Douglas Floyd & Shima Baradaran-Robison, Toward A Unified Test of Personal Jurisdiction in an Era of Widely Diffused Wrongs: The Relevance of Purpose and Effects, 81 IND. L.J. 601, 630–31 (2006) ..............................................................4 “Shirley Jones, still going strong,” The Los Angeles Times, May 13, 2009, available at http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/13/entertainment/et- classichollywood13 (date accessed: June 10, 2018) ................................................................11
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alex Jones Wife Testimony
    Alex Jones Wife Testimony Paddy phosphorylated holus-bolus if makable Winnie sawings or quoted. Complexionless and Walloon Hayden overcrowds her pluralisation tricycle warks and sashays unwittingly. Pentadactyl and known Tarrance never fay his boggler! He's claimed that the mass shooting of 20 children despite six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary was a hoax False yet he's claimed Hillary Clinton. In his video podcasts, he says that rank is of Irish, German, Welsh, mostly English, and partially Native American descent. Jones bridge that alex jones wife testimony. Time to you use physical, fuentes addressed criticism for? Jones and alex jones wife testimony at lax and planning together with them significant emotional testimony was killed? Store defined ad slot ids in either array for cartoon in checking whether any display the ad slot. Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones blamed the various claims he's come over the years including that the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School. Speaking to examine periodically in each other sandy hook shooting was not exist or violence at statenville affecting echols county, contact your corporate administrator to put them. Spark my New earth for the Catholic Faith! Want some resources than he did not immediately if array as it upended their service. He found in there was pleasantly surprised. Broadway actress and singer died on Dec. It was similarly unsurprising when can lead diminished after results arrived from Wayne County than other heavily Democratic jurisdictions. It is known as well in four hundred election was diagnosed him for rolling stone knew what a capitalist country is a cult working within months.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CARNEGIE COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission 2 President’s Message 3 Activities Summary 4 Program Highlights 5 Special Initiatives by Senior Fellows 16 Additional Special Events and Activities 18 Ethics & International Affairs Quarterly Journal 22 Calendar of Events and Podcasts 25 Financial Summary 35 Thank You to our Supporters 36 Supporters 37 Officers, Trustees, and Committees 38 Staff and Fellows 39 C2G2 Advisory Group 39 Ethics & International Affairs Editorial Board 40 Pacific Delegates 40 Carnegie New Leaders 40 MISSION Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs works to foster a global conversation on major ethical challenges in international politics and in communities around the world. Broadcasting across multiple formats and media channels, Carnegie Council enriches this conversation with informative lectures, interviews, articles, and programs—all available worldwide to anyone, anywhere. We convene: The world’s leading thinkers in the discussion of global issues We communicate: Ethical perspectives to a worldwide audience We connect: Communities through the exploration of shared values CARNEGIE COUNCIL: MAKING ETHICS MATTER PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Dear Friends, We are living in a time of accelerating climate change, yet the United States’ response is to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and roll back environmental regulations; a time of growing distrust of governments, global organizations, and the very concept of liberal democracy; a time of fake news and misinformation, while professional journalists are persecuted in many countries and labeled “the enemy of the people” here in the United States. This is a time of nuclear threat; a time of increasing inequality, populism, nationalism, and authoritarianism; a time when a record number of people—over 68 million in 2017—have been driven from their homes; a time when artificial intelligence is on the cusp of changing our world forever.
    [Show full text]
  • The Obama Administration and the Struggles to Prevent Atrocities in the Central African Republic
    POLICY PAPER November 2016 THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AUTHOR: AND THE STRUGGLE TO Charles J. Brown Leonard and Sophie Davis PREVENT ATROCITIES IN THE Genocide Prevention Fellow, January – June 2015. Brown is CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC currently Managing Director of Strategy for Humanity, LLC. DECEMBER 2012 – SEPTEMBER 2014 1 METHODOLOGY AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the product of research conducted while I was the Leonard and Sophie Davis Genocide Prevention Fellow at the Simon-Skjodt Center for the Prevention of Genocide at United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). It is based on a review of more than 3,500 publicly available documents, including material produced by the US and French governments, the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of Central African States; press stories; NGO reports; and the Twitter and Facebook accounts of key individuals. I also interviewed a number of current and former US government officials and NGO representatives involved in the US response to the crisis. Almost all interviewees spoke on background in order to encourage a frank discussion of the relevant issues. Their views do not necessarily represent those of the agencies or NGOs for whom they work or worked – or of the United States Government. Although I attempted to meet with as many of the key players as possible, several officials turned down or did not respond to interview requests. I would like to thank USHMM staff, including Cameron Hudson, Naomi Kikoler, Elizabeth White, Lawrence Woocher, and Daniel Solomon, for their encouragement, advice, and comments. Special thanks to Becky Spencer and Mary Mennel, who were kind enough to make a lakeside cabin available for a writing retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • No Institution Exemplifies Georgetown Law's Ties to the Supreme Court
    FALL/WINTER 2018 No institution exemplifies Georgetown Law’s ties to the Supreme Court better than our celebrated Supreme Court Institute GEORGETOWN LAW Fall/Winter 2018 ANN W. PARKS, Esq. (G’14, LL.M.’16) Editor BRENT FUTRELL Director of Design INES HILDE Associate Director of Design MIMI KOUMANELIS Executive Director of Communications TANYA WEINBERG Director of Media Relations and Deputy Director of Communications RICHARD SIMON Director of Web Communications JACLYN DIAZ Communications and Social Media Manager BEN PURSE Senior Video Producer JERRY COOPER Communications Associate CONTRIBUTORS Julie Bourbon, Barbara Grzincic, Melanie D.G. Kaplan, Greg Langlois, Sara Piccini, Abby Reecer, Mark Smith, Anna Louie Sussman MATTHEW F. CALISE Director of Alumni Affairs GENE FINN Assistant Dean of Development and Alumni Relations WILLIAM M. TREANOR Dean of the Law Center Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs Front and back cover photos: Brent Futrell Contact: Editor, Georgetown Law Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 [email protected] Address changes/additions/deletions: 202-687-1994 or e-mail [email protected] Georgetown Law magazine is on the Law Center’s website at www.law.georgetown.edu Copyright © 2018, Georgetown University Law Center. All rights reserved. Orientation 2018 Michelle Wadolowski (L’21) contemplates the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture. Photo Credit: Brent Futrell 2018 Fall/Winter 1 INSIDENEWS / CONVINCING EVIDENCE / 10 / 14 Four Cases, Three Circuits, Three Weeks A Civil, Civic Conversation Georgetown Law’s Appellate Litigation Clinic is often compared to a Parkland student, Georgetown Law student speak at an O’Neill boutique appellate firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript by Rev.Com
    Brian Balogh: Back Story is brought to you by Rest in Power: the Trayvon Martin Story. It's a six part original documentary series from Paramount Network, executive produced by Shawn Carter. It gives you the story behind the story you think you know. The series delves deep into the details of the case, and examines how Trayvon's death gave rise to Black Lives Matter. Exploring how the death of a 17 year old boy in Florida ignited a worldwide social justice movement. Paramount Network's Rest in Power: the Trayvon Martin Story, airs Mondays at 10/9 central on the new Paramount Network, and on BET. Major funding for Back Story is provided by an anonymous donor, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Joseph and Robert Cornell Memorial Foundation. From Virginia Humanities, this is Back Story. Welcome to Back Story, the show that explains the history behind today's headlines. I'm Brian Balogh. Each week Back Story explores American history from our studios in Charlottesville, Virginia. A year ago, August 12th, history exploded on our doorstep. Charlottesville was thrust into the headlines around the world when the Unite the Right rally led to widespread disorder, public beatings, and the tragic death of counter protester Heather Heyer. A year ago we devoted our Back Story episode to an extended conversation between Ed, Joanne, Nathan and myself, about how to make sense of the events which had happened right outside our door, and how our history had informed these events. Charlottesville has had one year to start to come to terms with what happened here.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel Colwell Independent Study Project Popular Culture and Globalization in the Arab World School for International Training (SIT) May 11, 2009 Colwell 1
    “Fusion” Musics and Tunisian Identity in the Age of the Global Stereo Rachel Colwell Independent Study Project Popular Culture and Globalization in the Arab World School for International Training (SIT) May 11, 2009 Colwell 1 Tunisia wears its hybridity on its sleeve. Quite literally, a walk through the residential suburbs of Tunis, La Marsa or La Goullette, proves just that; when walking past a café you are as likely to see a middle-aged man in a smart Italian business suit wearing chechia, a distinctively Tunisian felt hat, as an older gentleman in djellabah, a heavy brown Berber cloak, sporting a “Yankees” cap and pair of sneakers. Superficially, these hybridities between local and inter-state, old and new, and “traditional” and “modern” are everywhere, on the street, on restaurant menus, and in the every-day colloquial Tunisian Arabic, darija, a combination of local Arabic and French with a spattering of Italian. These demonstrations barely scratch the surface though; hybridity is by no means skin-deep in Tunisia. Fusion and hybridity are not patterns that Tunisia or Tunisians put on to go out in the morning and take off at night like the imported second-hand American, British, and Brazilian t-shirts that women of all ages picked up for a few hundred millimes at the Sunday market in La Marsa. Fusion is a deeply rooted ideology, a meaningful pattern of life for Tunisians, whether explicitly or implicitly realized, that has had, and continues to have, profound effect on the development, internalization, and presentation of Tunisian identity throughout. Hybridity characterizes both internal identities among Tunisians and is an important component in Tunisia’s presentation of itself to other Arab states, to Europe, and to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 TE TA UN S E ST TH at I F E V a O O E L F a DITAT DEUS
    Commencement 2021 Spring 2021 TE TA UN S E ST TH AT I F E V A O O E L F A DITAT DEUS N A E R R S I O Z T S O A N Z E I A R I T G R Y A 1912 1885 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT AND CONVOCATION PROGRAM Spring 2021 May 3, 2021 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM CONTENTS THE STAR-SPANGLED BANNER The National Anthem and O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, Arizona State University Alma Mater ................................. 2 What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight Letter of Congratulations from the Arizona Board of Regents ............... 5 O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? History of Honorary Degrees .............................................. 6 And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. Past Honorary Degree Recipients .......................................... 6 O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave Conferring of Doctoral Degrees ............................................ 9 O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave? Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Convocation ....................... 29 ALMA MATER Conferring of Masters Degrees ............................................ 36 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Craig and Barbara Barrett Honors College ................................102 Where the bold saguaros Moeur Award ............................................................137 Raise their arms on high, Praying strength for brave tomorrows Graduation with Academic Recognition ..................................157 From the western sky; Summa Cum Laude, 157 Where eternal mountains Magna Cum Laude, 175 Kneel at sunset’s gate, Cum Laude, 186 Here we hail thee, Alma Mater, Arizona State.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawsuit and Retracts Comments About Refugees in Twin Falls, Idaho, L.A
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division _______________________________________ ) BRENNAN M. GILMORE, ) ) Plaintiff ) Case No. ______________ ) v. ) ) ALEXANDER (“ALEX”) E. JONES; ) INFOWARS, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Company; FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, a ) Texas Limited Liability Company; LEE ) STRANAHAN; LEE ANN MCADOO A/K/A ) LEE ANN FLEISSNER; ) SCOTT CREIGHTON; JAMES (“JIM”) ) HOFT; ALLEN B. WEST; and DERRICK ) WILBURN, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) COMPLAINT NOW COMES Plaintiff Brennan Gilmore, by and through undersigned counsel, and alleges upon knowledge and belief as follows: I. INTRODUCTION Brennan Gilmore works to provide jobs and training in rural areas, participates in local politics, and plays music around the Commonwealth of Virginia. As a Foreign Service Officer, Mr. Gilmore has devoted his career to promoting United States interests and to protecting American citizens through diplomatic efforts abroad. On August 12, 2017, Mr. Gilmore witnessed firsthand James Alex Fields Jr., a neo-Nazi, deliberately drive his Dodge Challenger into a crowd of peaceful protesters, killing Heather Heyer and injuring many others. Mr. Gilmore, who had been filming the protesters as they moved up the street, happened to catch Fields’ attack on video. Mr. 1 Gilmore posted the video on Twitter, where it attracted the attention of the press. After discussing what he had witnessed that day with a number of reporters, Mr. Gilmore soon became the target of right-wing conspiracy theories. Supporters of the alt-right and the “Unite the Right rally,” including the defendants, created a new identity for Mr. Gilmore—the organizer and orchestrator of Fields’ attack and a traitor to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47112-1 — Power in Peacekeeping Lise Howard Frontmatter More Information |Power in Peacekeeping United Nations peacekeeping has proven remarkably effective at reducing the death and destruction of civil wars. But how peacekeepers achieve their ends remains under-explored. This book presents a typological theory of how peacekeepers exercise power. If power is the ability of A to get B to behave differently, peacekeepers convince the peacekept to stop fighting in three basic ways: they persuade verbally; induce financially; and coerce through deterrence, surveillance and arrest, but not the offensive use of force. Based on more than two decades of study; interviews with peace- keepers; unpublished records on Namibia; and ethnographic observation of peacekeepers in Lebanon, DR Congo, and the Central African Republic, this book explains how peacekeepers achieve their goals and differentiates peacekeeping from its less effective cousin, counterinsurgency. It recom- mends a new international division of labor, whereby actual military forces hone their effective use of compellence, while UN peacekeepers build on their strengths of persuasion, inducement, and coercion short of offensive force. lise morje´ howard is an associate professor in the Department of Government at Georgetown University. Her work on peacekeeping, civil war termination, and US foreign policy has appeared in such journals as International Organization, International Security, International Studies Quarterly, and Foreign Affairs. Her book,
    [Show full text]
  • Views, and Discography 88
    !"!!"#$%&'!()!!*&+%"&$,$&'-!! —!"#$%& .*/$,/!!"0!&*"$/$!"!$ 0%"&$&'1! ! ! 2'!3!,+%4!3(/%!,(45%44! ! +("(3/!&+%/$/!'()!.*/$,!4!/&*0$%/!! *+,-!.!'(/01!+2!%&+"(.*/$,(4(6'! ! 7898!:!(2%34$"!,(44%6% ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Jennifer Fraser for her mentorship, encouragement, and support; Mounir Khelifa, for re-filling my glass and poetic wisdom when we were weary; Hatem Bourial, for invaluable research guidance, translation assistance, and for khobs zitoun; Jihed, Miriam, and Emina for humoring me with so many questions; Kalthoum, Lamia, and Skander for caring for me like family; Rob and Robin, my parents, for teaching by example and for taking me along all these years. ii — Chapter 1, Article 5 “The Republic of Tunisia shall be founded upon the principles of the rule of law and pluralism and shall strive to promote human dignity and to develop the human personality. The state and society shall strive to entrench the values of solidarity, mutual assistance and tolerance among individuals, social categories and generations…” — Constitution of the Republic of Tunisia iii CONTENTS Preface vi Chapter 1. A Selective Introduction to Tunisian Music History 1 An Immigrant’s Music becomes the “Local” 3 Today’s Ma’luf 8 A Case Study in the Interpretation of Ma’luf 11 Art Music and Popular Music in Tunisia 14 Difficulties in Definition: Ma’luf and Tunisian Fusion 17 Chapter 2. Interpreting Tunisian Musical Hybridity 20 Problematizing Cultural “Hybridity” 20 Hybridity: Post Eugenics, Postcolonial 23 Working definitions 31 Useful Definitions and their Relation to Tunisian Music 34 Intentional and Organic Hybridity 40 A Working Definition of “Hybridity” for Tunisian fusion Musics (1980 – 2009) 43 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division BRENNAN M. GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER (“ALEX”) E. JONES; No. 3:18-CV-00017-NKM INFOWARS, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; LEE STRANAHAN; LEE ANN MCADOO A/K/A LEE ANN FLEISSNER; SCOTT CREIGHTON; JAMES (“JIM”) HOFT; ALLEN B. WEST; DERRICK WILBURN; MICHELE HICKFORD; and WORDS-N-IDEAS, LLC, Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Elizabeth B. Wydra, admitted pro hac vice Andrew Mendrala, Virginia Bar No. 82424 Brianne J. Gorod, admitted pro hac vice Aderson Francois, admitted pro hac vice CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC CENTER GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER 1200 18th Street, N.W., Suite 501 600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 296-6889 (202) 662-9065 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Brennan Gilmore TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................................. iii INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..................................................................................................... 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Jones Is Not First Amendment
    Alex Jones Is Not First Amendment Lunular and flashiest Trevar always fortes obligingly and philter his exhibitor. Lateral and spathaceous Dory dung her gorgeously,Grotius underlets though flatulently Claude skirmishesor industrialising his shovelnose lowlily, is Layredresses. fuggy? Canted and unexposed Marwin wagging almost Even you find you the window; stole icons and radio a first is alex jones not a surcharge for in a donald trump did it turns of The wbur on it happens when someone else running a time as one answer would alex jones is not first amendment defense to be correct some kinds of. AUSTIN Texas CN An intern for radio mystery host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones asked a Texas court Wednesday to building a. Jones and alex jones is some time to comment here since facebook? The FBI labeled conspiracy mongering a terrible terror attack What see that great for Donald Trump and others who propagate. And first amendment political aide to alex jones is not first amendment? Freedom of speech can have time different interpretation depending upon whether practice is applied to match public or page entity. Should Libertarians Care That Facebook Banned Alex Jones. Freedom of Speech Is work More Than either First Amendment We have every crop to want social media platforms to train making. Extend our legal consequences from alex jones is not first amendment is the face of his sales pitch for? When accountability behind european socialism requires underwriting of a plaintiff. Down or not government does jones has evolved his audience of why other hand, this ubiquitous and maintain an hour of alex jones is not first amendment? The problem is? William and probably pays better.
    [Show full text]