DOCSLIB.ORG

CPM-9 Report March-April 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CPM-9 Report March-April 2014 REPORT Ninth Session of Rome, Italy 31 March - 4 April 2014 the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures 31 March- 4 April, 2014 Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Revised 2014-09-09 CPM-9 Report March-April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Opening of the Session ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. Adoption of the Agenda ................................................................................................................... 3 3. EU Statement of Competence .......................................................................................................... 3 4. Election of the Rapporteur ............................................................................................................... 3 5. Establishment of the Credentials Committee ................................................................................... 3 6. Report by the Chairperson of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures .................................... 4 7. Report by the IPPC Secretariat ......................................................................................................... 4 8. Governance: Commission on Phytosanitary Measures .................................................................... 4 9. International standard setting ........................................................................................................... 5 10. IPPC Strategic Framework and Resource Mobilisation ................................................................. 11 11. Capacity Development ................................................................................................................... 15 12. National Reporting Obligations ..................................................................................................... 16 13. Communications............................................................................................................................. 17 14. Liaison and Partnership of the IPPC and Cooperation with Relevant Regional and International Organizations ............................................................................................................ 17 15. Adoption of CPM recommendations .............................................................................................. 18 16. Effective Dispute Settlement Systems ........................................................................................... 18 17. Scientific Session ........................................................................................................................... 19 18. Election of the CPM: Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, other Bureau Members and potential replacements ................................................................................................................................... 19 19. Membership and potential replacements for CPM subsidiary bodies ............................................ 20 20. Other business ................................................................................................................................ 20 21. Date and venue of the next session ................................................................................................ 21 22. Adoption of the report .................................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIXES APPENDIX 1 – Detailed Agenda .......................................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX 2 – List of Documents ....................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX 3 – List of Participants ...................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX 4 – Credentials Committee ................................................................................................ 69 APPENDIX 5 – IPPC Secretariat Enhancement Evaluation ................................................................. 70 APPENDIX 6 – CPM Recommendations .............................................................................................. 72 APPENDIX 7 – Adopted International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures by the CPM-9............. 76 Page 2 of 76 International Plant Protection Convention March- April 2014 CPM-9 Report 1. Opening of the Session [1] The Chairperson of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures (CPM), Mr Stephen Ashby, opened the meeting. [2] The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Assistant-Director-General Mr Ren Wang welcomed CPM members to FAO. Referring to the new Strategic Objectives of the FAO and the expected contributions from the IPPC within the framework, he wished members a successful and productive week. Mr Wang emphasised the accomplishments of the national plant protection organizations (NPPOs) and the IPPC even when faced with decreasing resources and affirmed that increased collaboration will lead to greater efficiency and effectiveness. [3] The Minister of Primary Industries of New Zealand, Mr Nathan Guy, made his remarks via video message. The Minister recognised the importance of the Commission’s work at all levels including in helping developing countries trade and protect their environment through the IPPC standards. He thanked the current and future Chairpersons for their work and wished members a successful meeting. [4] The Secretary of the IPPC thanked those present for their continuous support to the IPPC Secretariat. The Secretary noted that there are still many challenges facing the IPPC and plant protection in general as trade and international movements continue to grow, pests continue to negatively affect plants, and countries still face challenges to prioritize plant protection when working with tight budget constraints. 2. Adoption of the Agenda 2.1 Provisional agenda [5] The Chairperson detailed changes to the agenda and the order in which items would be addressed. [6] The CPM: (1) adopted the Agenda (Appendix 1) and noted the Documents list (Appendix 2) and Participants list (Appendix 3). 3. EU Statement of Competence [7] The CPM: (1) noted the Statement of Competencies and Voting Rights1 submitted by the European Union (EU) and its 28 member states. 4. Election of the Rapporteur [8] The CPM: (1) elected Mr Rajesh Ramarathnam from Canada as Rapporteur. 5. Establishment of the Credentials Committee [9] The IPPC Secretariat explained that a Credentials Committee was needed to conform to FAO rules. It would be composed of seven members, one per FAO region, as well as one CPM Bureau member. The Committee would be assisted by the FAO Legal Office in determining the validity of members’ credentials. [10] The Credentials Committee accepted a total of 125 credentials. The CPM was informed that the Credentials Committee will no longer be maintaining two lists. Given the number to establish a quorum for the Commission was set at 91, the quorum was achieved. 1 CPM 2014/CRP/01 International Plant Protection Convention Page 3 of 76 CPM-9 Report March-April 2014 [11] The CPM: (1) elected a Credentials Committee to conform to FAO rules (Appendix 4); and, (2) elected Ms Vicioso (Dominican Republic) as the Chairperson of the Credentials Committee. 6. Report by the Chairperson of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures 2 [12] The CPM Chairperson referred to his report and presented additional comments. He emphasized the importance of raising awareness about the IPPC, the vital importance of plant health and thanked the Bureau members and Secretariat for their collaborative efforts. [13] The CPM: (1) noted the report from the CPM Chairperson. 7. Report by the IPPC Secretariat 3 [14] The Secretariat introduced the report noting that this year, to enhance communication of IPPC Secretariat activities, a new, modern and improved format was used. [15] The Secretariat highlighted main goals for the coming year and the major achievements from the past year. Some members welcomed the new format and the CPM thanked the Secretariat for its work. [16] The CPM: (1) noted the IPPC Secretariat report. 8. Governance: Commission on Phytosanitary Measures 8.1 Partnerships 4 [17] The Secretariat presented a paper to provide clarity regarding the relationships which the Secretariat maintains with other bodies. The paper focuses on the different types of relationships (partnerships, liaisons, and collaborations) in which the Secretariat is engaged and also provides a proposed procedure for determining whether or not to go forward with a full partnership. [18] The paper proposes a procedure for considering the examination and approval of different levels of agreement with other organizations. This procedure will enhance the development of a pro-active approach to partnerships and therefore effectively contribute to the IPPC’s strategic objectives. [19] The CPM: (1) approved the Secretariat’s proposed flexible system of use of models for partnerships, based on the FAO Strategy for Partnerships; (2) noted the description of the relationships with other organizations outlined in Tables 1 and 2 of CPM 2014/21 Rev.1; and, (3) asked the Secretariat, with input from the Bureau, to examine new proposals for partnerships from the Secretariat or other organizations on a case by case basis, using the criteria and processes provided in CPM2014/21 Rev.1, paying special attention to the resources available to the Secretariat for engaging in any proposed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • <I>Tilletia Indica</I>
    ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 4 ENG DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Standards Committee on behalf of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in January 2014. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra Adopted 2014; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................... 2 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Examination of seeds/grain ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Extraction of teliospores from seeds/grain, size-selective sieve wash test ....................... 3 4. Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Morphology of teliospores ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Morphological
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Whole Genome Sequence Data to Characterize Mating and Rna
    USE OF WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCE DATA TO CHARACTERIZE MATING AND RNA SILENCING GENES IN TILLETIA SPECIES By SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PLANT PATHOLOGY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Plant Pathology DECEMBER 2014 © Copyright by SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER, 2014 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER, 2014 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the thesis of SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Lori M. Carris, Ph.D., Chair Dorrie Main, Ph.D. Patricia Okubara, Ph.D. Lisa A. Castlebury, Ph. D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research presented in this thesis could not have been carried out without the expertise and cooperation of others in the scientific community. Significant contributions were made by colleagues here at Washington State University, at the United States Department of Agriculture and at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. I would like to start by thanking my committee members Dr. Lori Carris, Dr. Lisa Castlebury, Dr. Pat Okubara and Dr. Dorrie Main, who provided guidance on procedure, feedback on my research as well as contacts and laboratory resources. Dr. André Lévesque of AAFC initially alerted me to the prospect of collaboration with other AAFC Tilletia researchers and placed me in contact with Dr. Sarah Hambleton, whose lab sequenced four out of five strains of Tilletia used in this study (CSSP CRTI 09-462RD). Dr. Prasad Kesanakurti and Jeff Cullis coordinated my access to AAFC’s genome and transcriptome data for these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases Affecting Rice in Louisiana Harry Rascoe Fulton
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports LSU AgCenter 1908 Diseases affecting rice in Louisiana Harry Rascoe Fulton Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp Recommended Citation Fulton, Harry Rascoe, "Diseases affecting rice in Louisiana" (1908). LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports. 574. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp/574 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the LSU AgCenter at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Louisiana Buiietin No, 105. April, 1908. Agricultural Experiment Station OF THE Louisiana State University and A. & M. College, BATON ROUGE. Diseases Affecting: Rice IN LOUISIANA. H. R. FULTON, M. S. BATON ROUGE: The Daily State Publishing Company^ State Peinthes. 1908. Louisiana State University and A. 6i n College LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND IMMIGRATION EX-OFFICIO. Governor NEWTON C. BLANCHARD, President. S. M. ROBERTSON, Vice President of Board of Supervisors. CHAS. SCHULER, Commissioner of Agriculture and Immigration. THOMAS D. BOYD, President State University. W. It. DODSON, Director Experiment Stations. MEMBERS. JOHN DYMOND, Belair, La. LUCIEN SONIAT, Camp Parapet, La. La. J. SHAW JONES, Monroe, La. C. A. TIEBOUT, Roseland, FRED SEIP, Alexandria, La. C. A. CELESTIN, Houma, La. H. C. STRINGFELLOW, Howard, La. STATION STAFF. W. R. DODSON^ A.B., B.S., Director, Baton Rouge. R. E. BLOUIN, M.S., Assistant Director, Audubon Park, New Orleans. J G. LEE, B.S., Assistant Director, Calhoun. S. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Neovossia Horrida (Ustilaginales)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Jahr/Year: 1979 Band/Volume: 32 Autor(en)/Author(s): Singh Raghvendra, Whitehead Marvin D., Pavgi M. S. Artikel/Article: Taxonomy of Neovossia horrida (Ustilaginales). 305-308 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Taxonomy of Neovossia horrida (Ustilaginales) R. A. SINGH, M. D. WHTTEHEAD and M. S. PAVGI Faculty of Agriculture, Banaras Hindu University, India. Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, U. S. A. Summary. Morphological, cultural and cytological studies on the smut fungus inciting kernel bunt of rice (Oryza sativa L.) indicate that it should be correctly retained in the genus Neovossia as Neovossia horrida (TAKAHASHI) PADWICK & AZMATUXLAH KHAN. In 1879 KÖRNICKE described the genus Neovossia as having sori generally in ovaries, forming a somewhat dusty spore mass; spores simple, produced singly or in the swollen and special fertile threads (sterigmata of MAGNUS), which permanently invest the spores and taper into elongated hyaline appendages of large size; germination by a short promycelium producing numerous terminall}' clustered linear sporidia, which germinate without conjugation and in nutrient solutions give rise to a mycelium producing secondary sporidia of 2 kinds (ZUNDEL 1953). Neovossia horrida (TAKAHASHI) PADWICK & KHAN, the incitant of kernel bunt of rice, was first described by TAKAHASHI (1896) from Japan as Tilletia horrida TAKAHASHI and independently by ANDERSON (1899) from the United States as Tilletia corona SCIB. It was later transferred to the genus Neovossia KÖRNICKE as N. horrida (TAK.) PADWICK & KHAN (1944). TULLIS & JOHNSON (1952) synonimized it to N.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequence-Based Phylogeny and Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Differentiation of Tilletia Walkeri and T
    Mycology Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequence-Based Phylogeny and Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Differentiation of Tilletia walkeri and T. indica Laurene Levy, Lisa A. Castlebury, Lori M. Carris, Robert J. Meyer, and Guillermo Pimentel First and fourth authors: USDA-APHIS PPQ National Plant Germplasm Quarantine Center, Beltsville, MD 20705; second author: USDA- ARS Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705; and third and fifth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164. Accepted for publication 1 June 2001. ABSTRACT Levy, L., Castlebury, L. A., Carris, L. M., Meyer, R. J., and Pimentel, bunt fungus, is described. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of G. 2001. Internal transcribed spacer sequence-based phylogeny and the ribosomal DNA repeat unit was amplified and sequenced for isolates polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism of T. indica, T. walkeri, T. horrida, and a number of other taxa in the differentiation of Tilletia walkeri and T. indica. Phytopathology 91:935- genus Tilletia. A unique restriction digest site in the ITS1 region of T. 940. walkeri was identified that distinguishes it from the other taxa in the genus. Phylogenetic analysis of the taxa based on ITS sequence data re- A polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism vealed a close relationship between T. indica and T. walkeri, but more assay to distinguish Tilleita walkeri, a rye grass bunt fungus that occurs distant relationships between these two species and other morphologi- in the southeastern United States and Oregon, from T. indica, the Karnal cally similar taxa. Tilletia indica Mitra, the causal agent of Karnal bunt of wheat, PCR test was developed (21).
    [Show full text]
  • Nonsystemic Bunt Fungi—Tilletia Indica and T. Horrida: a Review of History, Systematics, and Biology∗
    ANRV283-PY44-05 ARI 7 February 2006 20:39 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Nonsystemic Bunt Fungi—Tilletia indica and T. horrida: A Review of History, Systematics, and Biology∗ Lori M. Carris,1 Lisa A. Castlebury,2 and Blair J. Goates3 1Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6430; email: [email protected] 2USDA ARS Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350; email: [email protected] 3USDA ARS National Small Grains Germplasm Research Facility, Aberdeen, Idaho 82310; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. Key Words 2006. 44:5.1–5.21 Karnal bunt, Neovossia, rice kernel smut, Tilletia walkeri, Tilletiales The Annual Review of Phytopathology is online at phyto.annualreviews.org Abstract doi: 10.1146/ The genus Tilletia is a group of smut fungi that infects grasses either annurev.phyto.44.070505.143402 systemically or locally. Basic differences exist between the systemi- Copyright c 2006 by cally infecting species, such as the common and dwarf bunt fungi, and Annual Reviews. All rights locally infecting species. Tilletia indica, which causes Karnal bunt of reserved wheat, and Tilletia horrida, which causes rice kernel smut, are two ex- 0066-4286/06/0908- amples of locally infecting species on economically important crops. 0001-$20.00 However, even species on noncultivated hosts can become important ∗ The U.S. Government when occurring as contaminants in export grain and seed shipments. has the right to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free In this review, we focus on T. indica and the morphologically similar license in and to any but distantly related T.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista De Plagas Presentes En Nicaragua 2019
    INSTITUTO DE PROTECCIÓN Y SANIDAD AGROPECUARIA DIRECCIÓN SANIDAD VEGETAL Y SEMILLAS LISTA DE PLAGAS REPORTADAS EN NICARAGUA Versión: 05 El presente trabajo constituye una recopilación de información sobre plagas reportadas en Nicaragua. En el se listan plagas de tipo ácaros, insectos, malezas, nematodos, hongos, bacterias y virus, abarcando su taxonomía, sinonimia y cultivos que afecta. Para la realización de este listado se toman en cuenta resultados de diagnósticos fitosanitarios oficiales, a través de la vigilancia fitosanitaria, muestreo, revisión de literatura y consultas en bases de datos. El IPSA (Instituto de Protección y Sanidad Agropecuaria), pone a disposición la versión V del listado de plagas reportadas en Nicaragua, en cumplimiento a lo establecido en el Capítulo II, numerales 6 y 7 del Artículo 10 de la Ley 291 "Ley Básica de Salud Animal y Sanidad Vegetal y su reglamento; así como lo estipulado en el Nuevo Téxto Revisado de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (CIPF) en el Artículo VIII, numeral 1a. NOMBRE ACTUAL SINONIMOS CULTIVOS ACAROS Brevipalpus californicus (Banks, 1904) Brevipalpus australis (Tucker) Cítricos, Palma Africana Brevipalpus obovatus Donnadieu Brevipalpus inornatus (Banks) Chile, Chiltoma, Cocotero Tenuipalpus inornatus Banks Tenuipalpus obovatus (Donnadieu) Brevipalpus phoenicis ( Geijskes, 1936) Tenuipalpus phoenicis Geijskes, 1939: 23 Cacao, Cítricos, Papaya Dolichotetranychus floridanus (Banks) Algodón, Papaya, Achiote, Aguacate, Mango, Maíz, Yuca, Piña Eotetranychus lewisi (McGregor)
    [Show full text]
  • DP 4: Tilletia Indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD for PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY for STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS
    ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 4 ENG DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Standards Committee on behalf of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in January 2014. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra Adopted 2014; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................... 2 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Examination of seeds/grain ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Extraction of teliospores from seeds/grain, size-selective sieve wash test ....................... 3 4. Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Morphology of teliospores ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Morphological
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Protocol for Tilletia Indica, the Cause of Karnal Bunt
    Diagnostic protocol for Tilletia indica, the cause of karnal bunt The International Diagnostic Protocol for Tilletia indica (ISPM-27 DP04) was released March 2014 https://www.ippc.int/en/publications/2457/ PEST STATUS Not present in Australia PROTOCOL NUMBER NDP 19 VERSION NUMBER V1.3 PROTOCOL STATUS Endorsed ISSUE DATE 2012 REVIEW DATE 2017 ISSUED BY SPHDS Prepared for the Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostic Standards (SPHDS) This version of the National Diagnostic Protocol (NDP) for karnal bunt is current as at the date contained in the version control box on the front of this document. NDPs are updated every 5 years or before this time if required (i.e. when new techniques become available). The most current version of this document is available from the SPHDS website: http://plantbiosecuritydiagnostics.net.au/resource-hub/priority-pest-diagnostic-resources/ Where an IPPC diagnostic protocol exists it should be used in preference to the NDP. NDPs may contain additional information to aid diagnosis. IPPC protocols are available on the IPPC website: https://www.ippc.int/core-activities/standards-setting/ispms Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Host range .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Symptoms ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dirección General De Sanidad Vegetal Centro Nacional De Referencia Fitosanitaria
    DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE SANIDAD VEGETAL CENTRO NACIONAL DE REFERENCIA FITOSANITARIA Área de Diagnóstico Fitosanitario Laboratorio de Micología Protocolo de Diagnóstico: Tilletia indica Mitra (Carbón parcial del trigo) Tecámac, Estado de México, Julio 2018 Versión 1.0 I. ÍNDICE 1. OBJETIVO Y ALCANCE DEL PROTOCOLO ........................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.1. INFORMACIÓN SOBRE LA PLAGA .................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. INFORMACIÓN TAXONÓMICA ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. FLUJO DE TRABAJO ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. DETECCIÓN E IDENTIFICACIÓN ............................................................................................................. 4 3.1. OBSERVACIÓN DIRECTA ................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1.1. Interpretación de resultados ................................................................................................................. 4 3.2. HIDRÓLISIS DEL ENDOSPERMO ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Epitypification of Tilletia Ehrhartae, a Smut Fungus with Potential For
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Eur J Plant Pathol (2015) 143:151–158 DOI 10.1007/s10658-015-0672-1 Epitypification of Tilletia ehrhartae,asmutfungus with potential for nature conservation, biosecurity and biocontrol Marcin Piątek & Matthias Lutz & Adriaana Jacobs & Francis Villablanca & Alan R. Wood Accepted: 1 May 2015 /Published online: 21 May 2015 # The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Tilletia ehrhartae, a smut fungus infecting caused by Tilletia indica (which is absent in Australia), perennial veldtgrass Ehrharta calycina,isepitypified and therefore constituting a potential risk for Australian and characterized using the Consolidated Species Con- wheat export. The current global distribution of Tilletia cept, including morphology, ecology (host plant) and ehrhartae, possible colonization history, and potential rDNA sequences (ITS and LSU). Tilletia ehrhartae is for nature conservation, biosecurity and biocontrol are native and endemic to the Cape Floral Kingdom discussed. The sequences generated in this work could (located entirely in South Africa), but it has also been serve as DNA barcodes to facilitate rapid identification introduced to the alien artificial range of Ehrharta of this important species. calycina in Australia and California. This smut has already caused some biosecurity problems in Australia Keywords Australia . California . Cape Floral as its spores were found to contaminate harvested wheat Kingdom . South Africa . Epitype . Plant pathogens . seeds, leading to confusion with Karnal bunt of wheat DNA barcodes M. Piątek (*) Department of Mycology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Introduction Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Kraków, Poland The plant pathogenic teliosporic smut fungi are predom- e-mail: [email protected] inantly distributed with host plants growing in natural M.
    [Show full text]
  • AR TICLE Nine Draft Genome Sequences of Claviceps Purpurea S
    doi:10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.02.10 IMA FUNGUS · 9(2): 401–418 (2018) IMA Genome-F 10 ARTICLE Nine draft genome sequences of Claviceps purpurea s.lat., including C. arundinis, C. humidiphila, and C. cf. spartinae, pseudomolecules for the pitch canker pathogen Fusarium circinatum, draft genome of Davidsoniella eucalypti, Grosmannia galeiformis, Quambalaria eucalypti, and Teratosphaeria destructans 1 A3B4, Miao Liu D3EF1%#4GB>4, Lieschen De Vos4I> 1 B4E34J4,5>I!K4, Kasia Dadej OB3A4B%1, >D$4,5>$PT=J4>K2PF4U$I1I$G1, Quentin C. Santana4PG1, Nicole Soal4[EG4!EE4>$F4, and Michael JB4 1U\]3$!^%!'*<!$UUP&<!*! 2>\3$!^%!&<&\&<<>>\*>&_! =#%4>@>G!K\`&<+=&q;;< Iq!K\ 43A4>A4>%A@%A@?$I I$A";<DI<<;+Gv^xABz%A@K 53!$[[G?$I$A{&>|*<;G Abstract: EClaviceps purpurea s.lat., including C. Key words: arundinis, C. humidiphila and C. cf. spartinae.E Davidsoniella eucalypti, Quambalaria eucalypti and Teratosphaeria destructans, . The insect associate Grosmannia galeiformis E Fusarium Eucalyptus circinatum } Fusarium fujikuroi"EF. Poaceae circinatum$&;F. circinatumE%%G! ". Article info: Gx;&F$;<&+vx;*F$;<&+vIx&q3;<&+. IMA Genome-F 10A ! Nine draft genome sequences of " Claviceps purpurea s.lat., including # et al. 1986, Miles et al. 1996, Scott 2009). These $[ C. arundinis, C. humidiphila and C. %&'*+! cf. spartinae 1976, Miles et al. &''*34et al. &''+;<<= $ conditions 34et al. &''+!;<<*>et INTRODUCTION al. 2006) ? $ "[ Claviceps purpurea (Clavicipitaceae, Hypocreales) is a plant \ (Poaceae \ @$ $$" © 2018 International Mycological Association You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: [ Non-commercial: No derivative works: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode.
    [Show full text]