-a

o qq"il6T ffi 3Tfuo-rt RIGHT TO B INFORMATIOH ffiqqit c-teiq

ARUNACHALPRADESH|NFoRMAT|oNcoMM|ss|oN

COMMISSIONER BEGI' STATE CHIEF INFORMATION BEFORE THE COURT OF DR.JORAM Dated,ltanagar the 20th APril' 2021 No.APlC-2512021

Under Section 19(3) RTI Act, 2005

Respondent Appellant Shri Kalen Saroh, Shri Karto Tao, PIO-cu m-Ci rcle Officer, Liru, , Kangku Circle, Lower , Likabali Division, . Vs Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

Dated of hearing held on:20th April'|021'

ORDER

Whereas,anappealunderSectionlg(3)ofRT|Act,2005hasbeenreceivedfromShr Arunachar pradesh, for non-furnishing o Karto Tao, Liru, Likabari, Lower siang District, pro-cum-circre Kangku circle, Likabali Divisior information by shri Karen saroh, officer, under section 6(1) of Rl District, Arunachal Pradesh, as sought, by the Appellant Lower Siang / Act, 2005 on t9/tolzozo regarding Kangku Circ|e HQ.

Kalen saroh, Plo-cun whereas, the L't hearing was held on 9th March' 2021'. shri Arunachal Pradesh, an circle officer, Kangku circle, Likabali Division, Lower siang District, Appellant informed th the Appellant shri Karto Tao were present during the hearing. The The Plo informed that tl' Commission that the plo has not.furnished any information. Co, Kangl' Application was made on Lgth october'2020 and he has taken over the charge as aft' Circle on 6th Novembe r'2020. So, the Plo had no idea of the application. However, soug receiving the summon notice form the Commission has collected all the information as 2 & 4 are und in the Form- A, except for the Sl.no. 2 & 4. As the information sought at Sl.no. process and may take a week time. The PIO appealed the Commission to give reasonable tin to furnish the information for Sl.no. 2 & 4'

Contd..p -2-

Whereas,theCommission,opinedthattheCOKangkuistheAPIO'.notthePIO'The plo of the DC office, Likabali, Lower Siang uppri"ution ,t ould have u."n ,uf-ltt"d to the the APIO to fumish the information District. However, ut"r rt.uiing both the parties directed of issue of this order' The Commission for the Sl.no. Z & a witirin hftlen days from the date go through and convey his satisfaction or also asked the Appellant io i"."iu. the information, dissatisfaction in the next date ofhearing'

Whereas,there-schedu|ed2ndhearingwasheldon20thApril'202l.ShriKalen Division, Lower Siang District' Saroh, plO-cum-Circle Off..r, Kangku Circti, UtaUali Appellant shri Kanto Tao was found Arunachal pradesh was present durinf the hearing. The his elder brother Shri Bimi Tao' The absent. However, the d;lk-t;"s"represented-by information has been furnished but the representative or tne apiilant-inro*"d that all thi Deputy Commissioner' The PIO Map fumished by the i'tO i, not authenticated by the has not yet authenticated informed that the *o.t i, una.. process so the Deputy Commissioner the Map. whereas,thecommissionafterhearingtheargumentsof_botht.p*yandgoing throughtheForm-AandtheinformationfumishedbythePlo.fou.ngt|"talltherelevant by the PIO to the information at the time of submitting of application have been furnished Appellant.

Therefore, the case is hereby disposed of.

sd/_ (Dr. Joram Begi) State Chief Information Commissioner Arunachal Pradesh Information Commission Itanagar Dated, ltanagar the APril'2021 Memo No.APtc-251202t f 3qq {€ Copy to:

1. Shri Kalen Saroh, PIO-cum-,Circle Officer, Kangku Circle, Likabali Division, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, 2. Shri Karto Tao, Liru, Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, jfomputer Programmer, APIC, ltanagar, to upload irtAPlC Website, 4. Case file.

o,,... n n*oifnffiffiffifltg m i ss i o n