Anextentof3.'L6.00Hectares,Madambakkamvillageoftambaramtaluk' Permitted for a Period of 7O Kancheepuram Dirtrict, Tamil Nadu' the Quarry Is Being

Agenda .No: 134 - 12 (File No. 6947/2019) ProposedtheSavuduquarryleaseatS'F'No:708(P)overanextentof3.16.00Hectares' Tamil Nadu by Thiru' Mandambakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, lGncheePuram Dirtrict, K. Elangovan,- For Environmental Clearance'

(s rA/TN/Ml N/3 9031 / 2O1e)

30'08'2019 The proiect proponent The proposal was placed in the'l34rh SEAC Meeting held on and the environmental impact gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the proiect aiseisment as presented by the proponent are as follows: l. Covernment order/Lease details:

Rc. No.611/Q2/2O18 dated The District collector, Kancheepuram communication letter approved mining plan 06.06.2019 has directed the applicant Mr. K. Elangovan to 8et andEnVironmentalclearancecertificatefromtheStateEnvironmentlmPactAssessment quarry lease in S'F'No: 708 (P) over Authority (SE|AA) for grant of quarrying the Earth anextentof3.'l6.00Hectares,MadambakkamVillageofTambaramTaluk' permitted for a period of 7O Kancheepuram Dirtrict, Tamil Nadu' The quarry is being

days to take Savudu 28314 or 5,000 lorry loads'

2. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details: Director' Geology and Mining' Vide Roc' The mining Plan is aPProved by Assistant a period of 70 daYs. 611/ Q3 / 2018 dated 26.06.2019 for

lorry loads to a depth of 0'90m Total production for 70 days 28314 M3 (or) 5000

shall not exceed 28314 M' (or) 3. As per the Approved Mining Plan Production

5OOO lorry loads(70 days) therefore no overburden or toP soil 4. The product itself a part of overburden and shall be removed from this area' -t.+Chairman' q#,ry; 5. Savudu quarry operation involves in machinery method for loading and transport by Mini Hydraulic excavator of 0.25m3 bucket capacity and tipper ffractor combination. 6' Haurage of minerals wi' be done by trucks\tractor tippers directry carry from mining area to consumer area. 7. Environmental Settings The area is represented by Survey of lndia Toposheet No.66 geographical D/.1 and the coordinates rie between Latitude 12"53,42.62'N - 12"53'42.62'N and Longitude 80"08,40.95,,E -BO"OB,49.4O,E. B' Nearest habitation paduvancheri is west virage .1.5 at a distance of m on Population. s- 2000

9' There is no water bodies within a radius of 500m. seraiyur rake is rocated 2.43KM in NW direction. lO. No quarries are found within 500m radius. l'l' The nearest wirdrife sanctuarieJ and Forest located from the quarry are as forows: a' Forert (conservation) Act lgB0: Nanmangaram Reserved Forert - 3.6km (N) Pallikaranai Marsh Reserved Forest _ 9km (N). b' National parklwirdlife Sanctuary: There is no wird rife sanctuaries invorved around l0 km radius.

12. Water table in this area is 15 m to 2Om in the boreholes. '13. The de silting of the tank will facilitate rain water I water table in the surr< rhere s no mpact," ;:1,::r.*:l "il::: ;i :'; :X::t;H:::) quarry operation because water bodies the away from the rease area.

14. Archaeological / historical__ . . . i , v , monuments:u . , s , , r ) . ThereI nere is rs no archaeological monument found in 5OO m radius. *,-*> quw- JEAC-TN 15.Placesofworship:TheDhenupureeswararTempleislocatedaboutl.3kmaway from eastern side.

l6.ThequarryleaseareafallsunderZone.ll'Lowdamageriskzone(MSKVll)asper 1893-2002 and does not BMTPC, Vulnerability atlas Seismic zone of lndia l5: 2006' attract the general conditions as per EIA Notification'

The SEAC noted the following: '1. The Proponent. Thiru' K Elangovan has applied for Environmental Savudu quarry lease at s'F No: Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed the Mandambakkam Village' 7OB (P) over an extent of 3'16'00 Hectares' Nadu Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District Tamil 2.Theproject/activityiscoveredunderCategory,,B2,'oflteml(a)..Mining Notification' 2006' of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA

Based on the Presentation made by The project proPonent gave detailed presentation' theproponentandthedocumentsfurnished'the5EACdecidedtodirecttheproPonent to furnish the following details: l.FromtheGooglemaP,itwasnoticedthattherearehabitationsandbuildings requested that furnish the following very closer to the mining site' Hence' it is PWD details from the concern Executive Engineer' approved mine lease area a) Availability of the minerals (Savudu) in the in the PWD tank' b) Details of de-silting work carried out c)ThedetailofPresent/pendinglegalissuesregardingthede.silting/miningin the aforesaid PWD Tank' if anY

2. The proPonent shallfurnishtheroadmapfortransportingtruckscomingout tystem for vehicular movement' from mining site along with dust compression ct.-g Chairmani- ( rLIE;'" ?'

3' The project proponent has not furnished the retter obtained from ADIDD in the following mines format in terms of Existing quarcies/ abandone d quarries/ Present Proposed quarries/ Future proposed quarries. Hence, the sEAC decided that the project proponent may get the foilowing information from the Mines, ADIDD

"Letter from the ADIDD Mines about the detairs (Name of the owner, 5 F No, Extent & distance from the boundary of this quarry) of other quarries (proposed/Existing/Abandoned quarries) within a radius of 500 m from the boundary of the proposed quarry site in the following format.

Name th; Name of Viffage "a Distance-from lhis Quarry Owner Survey Number proposed euarry

f . eUanaonea quarries

g. Present eroposea qffies

On receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course the proposal. of action on

Chairman. " SEAC-TN (q^ w Agenda .No: 134 - 08 File No: 6870/2019 Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.84.5Ha in S.F.No. 2O4/1A, 204/18, 2O4/1D, 204/2,204/3, 205/3, 205/4 &. 2O5/5at Vadaalapiranthan Village, Chey'yar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District,Tamil Nadu by Thiru. M.V.Ramamoorthy, Tiruvannamalai- For Environmental Clearance.

(s IA/TN/M tN / 3827 6/2019)

The proposal was placed in the 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

1. Government Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. M.V.Ramamoorthy,

Tiruvannamalai, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector,

Tiruvannamalai vide RC. No. 97lKanimam/2018, dated 28.05.2019 for a period

of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone and Crave'l quarry lease for over an

extent of 4.84.5Ha in s.F.No. 2o4/1A. 204/18, 2o4/1D, 204/2, 204/3, 205/3,

2O5/4 & 2O5/5at Vadaalapiranthan Village, CheyyarTaluk, Tiruvannamalai

District.

2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details:

The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got

approval from the Assistant Director, Department of 6eology and Mining,

Tiruvannama lai District vide Rc. No . 97 /Kanimam/2O|8, dated 12.06.2019.

Ci=-I \ Chairm:n (ffJ. 3'AspertheDepartmentofCeologyandMining.TiruvannamalaiDistrict'Mining Planapprovalforthe5years,theproductionschedulefor5yearlstatesthatthe totalquantityofRoughstoneshouldnotexceedll.T3,62om3andGravelshould not exceed 82,O54m3 For First year - 2.37.375m3 of Rough stone and 30.758m3 of Cravel ForSecondyear.2'o6.45om3ofRoughstoneand23.48om3ofGravel For Third year - 2,32'80Om3 of Rough stone and 27 '816m3 of Gravel For Fourth year - 2.69,950m3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 2,27.O45m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry oPeration is proposed uPto a dePth of 67m (2m gravel and 65m Rough stone). 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width. (2O 6. Rough stone and Cravel are to be transPorted by Tippers of 10 Nos' T CapacitY). 7. The pro.iect i5 locate at 12"37'12.49"N to 12'37'19.02"N latitude and79'35'.59.58"E to 79"36'1 0.85"E Longitude. B. The total Manpower requirement is 53Nos' g.TotalcostoftheProiectsisRs.l'13,60.000/.andEMPcostaboutRs.3.80'000/- l0.TheWatertableisfoundtobeatthedepthofT5minsummerandTOminrainy

5ea50n. region' 11. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA radius of lOkm from the lease area' 12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the Boundary within the radius of lOkm 13. No lnterstate boundary & Western Chats from the lease area. 14.NoNationalPark&WildLifeSanctuarywithintheradiusoflOkmfromthelease

area.

isp.' \ Chairman, H ff'ff'. Control Board 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central Pollution within constituted under water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act 1974 the radius of 1Okm from the lease area' 16.NoProtectedArea,EcoSensitiveZone&EcoSensitiveAreawithintheradiusof

1Okm. lease area' 17. No habitation within the radius of the 3O0m from the Ceology and Mining' 18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of 12'06'2019' it is Tiruvannamalai vide Letter RC. No' 97 /Kanimam/2Ol8 ' dated quarry located informed that there is No Existing / Abandoned and Proposed within500m radius from the proposed quarry'

The SEAC noted the following: 1. The Proponent, Thiru' M V'Ramamoorthy has applied for Environmental lease over an extent of Clearance to SEIAA-TN for stone and 6ravel quarry 205/3' 205/4 4.84.5Ha in 5.F.No' 2O4/1A' 2O4/1B' 204/1D' 204/2'204/3' & 2O5/5al Vadaalapiranthan Village' CheyyarTaluk' Tiruvannamalai Di5trict. 2.Theproject/activityiscoveredunderCategory..B2''oflteml(a)..Mining ofMineralProjects''oftheScheduletotheElANotification,2006. proposal' Based on the Presentation The project proPonent Save presentation about the

the SEAC decided to recommend made by the proponent and the documents furnished'

theproposalforgrantofEnvironmentalClearancetoSEIAAsubjecttothefollowing

condition in addition to normal condition: every Six months and the '1. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted report should be submitted to TNPCB' shall be established like providing Green 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution' Belt along the boundary of the quarrying Ct Chairman' gPtn q4t suitabre working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. 3' The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agricurture activity & water bodies near the project site. 4' Transportation of the quarried materiars shalr not cause any hindrance to the Virage people/Existing Village road. 5' The project proponent sha, compry with the mining and other rerevant rures and regulations where ever applicable. t sharr be itopped ir the entire quantity ;::::il:::r'::::' indicated in the Mining o' the quarry rease period and be monitored ,r,^" ,::J;::i::;l,l, the same sha, 7. The recommendation for the issue of environ outcome of the Hon,bre N6T, principat ,"r.n, (M.A.No.35Ol2016) ,ffi"J;:T::;'J.?;.r":.rJi; and O.A. No.2OO/2O16 (M.A.No.ll8212016) and O.A.No.580/2016 and O.A.No.1O2/2O17 . 7 s 8 / 2 ot 6.M. t A.N o. e 20 / 2 ot 6. M. A.N o.1 1 22 / 2 ot ^ 843/2017) . )i;llx' : rrl and o'A'No.405/2016 and ^i ^.t;1. [ o.A.No.S 20 of 2016 (M.A.No. g81 M.A.No.9B2l2016 /2016. & M.A.No .384/2017). 8' The entire mininS operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC. GOl, New Delhi. 9' To ensure safety measures arong the boundary of the quarry site, security guards to be engaged during the are entire period of mining operation. l0' The mine closure plan submitted by the project- proponunt after shair be strictry forowed the laps of the mine as reported. 11. The project proponent has not furnished the letter obtained terms from AD,zDD mines in of Existing quarries/ abandoned quarries/ p Proposed proposed quarries. quarries/ Future Hence, the SEAC decided anur,n'u'"nt rrom the AD"DD'''"'' "':':'J;::Ii:"Til:l t;' iffifi ;:::mation :i:

I \ '- Lhatrman.-)!- L_.- !.-

Name of the Name of Village & Distance from this proposed Quarry Quarry Owner Survey Number a. Existing quarries

c. Present ProPosed quarries

d. Future ProPosed quarries

Total extent T g th'e subject to SEIAA meeting' 12'TheamountofRs.2'05Lakhs(2o/ooftheprojectcost)shallbeutilizedasaCER Vadaalapiranthan Covernment activities to carried out for carden maintenance in per office Memorandum of MoEF& cc school as committed during SEAC meeting as out before obtaining CTO from dated 01.05.201g the above activity shall be carried TNPCB. *t# qffi" 1

Total extent 2.Theprojectproponentshallclarifyirr,eproposestoqua,ffi

mining plan approval letter obtained from the Department of 6eology and Mining, Cuddalore District indicates only quarrying of Fire Clay. However the FORM 1M and mining plan indicates the proposal for quarrying Red Soil and Fire Clay.

On receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course of action on the proposal.

Agenda No.: 134 - 14 (File No. 6885/2019) Proposed Rough stone quarry tease over an extent of l.Oo.oHa in s.F.No.2l/l (part-l) at Che.Agaram Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District Tamil Nadu by Thiru.M.Mani- For Environmental Clearance.

(s rA/TN/M tN / 37 9 41 /2019) The proposal was placed in the l34th sEAc Meeting held on 30.0g.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Government Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. M. Mani, Tiruvannamalai. Precise Area Communication was issued by the District collector, Tiruvannamalai vide RC'No.o8lKanimam/2o19, Dated: 2o.o5.2019 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.00.0Ha in 5.F.No. 21/1 (Part-l) at Che.Agaram Village, ChengamTaluk, Tiruvannamalai District,

Chairman. SEAC-TN (4/ w 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Assistant Director, DePartment of Geology and Mining. Tiruvannamalai District vide Rc.No. 08/Kanimam/2019' Dated: 12.06.2019. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruvanmmalai District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 70.101m3 and Topsoil should not exceed 2,,lB6m3 For First year - 13,866m3 of Rough itone and 2,186m3 of Topsoil For Second year - 14,095m3 of Rough 5tone For Third year - 14,71Om3 of Rough ttone For Fourth year - 14.44Om3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 12,990m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 31m (lm Topsoil and 30m Rough stone).

5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open catt mechanized minint with 5.0m vertical bench and width. 6. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of I Nos. (20 T Capacity). 7. Topsoil (2,186m3) will be removed and preserved all along the boundary barrier to facilitate the green belt development. There is no proposal for disposal of Topsoil from the lease area. B. The project is locate at l2'13'50.41"N ro12'13'54.16"N latitude and 78'59'06.51"E to 78'59'l l.53"ELongitude.

9. The total Manpower requirement is I3 Nos. l0.Total cost of the projects is Rs.46.65 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 3.80 lakhs. ll. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 55m in summer and 50m in rainy tea50n.

12. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.

uf9+'* 13. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 14. No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area. 15. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area.

16. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board constituted under water (Prevention and control of pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.

17. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive Area within the radius of 1Okm.

18. No habitation within the radius of the 3oom from the lease area ar per letter daled 12/06/2019 as obtained from VAO, perupakkam Croup, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

19. Letter obtained from the Arrirtant Director, Department of Ceology and Mining.

Tiruvannamalai vide Letter RC. No. o8lKanimam/2019 dated 12.06.2019. it is informed that there is No Existing / Abandoned and proposed quarry located within 500m radius from the proposed quarry. The SEAC noted the following:

1. The Proponent Thiru. M. Mani. Tiruvannamalai has applied for Environmental

Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent

of 1.OO.OHa in 5.F.No. 21/1 (Part-l) at Che.Agaram Village. ChengamTaluk. Tiruvannamalai District ,.Mining 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem 1(a) of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification. 2006.

The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the sEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition: I c!-^_xL--' Lhatrman. ., . . SEAC-TN \.4: rrn 1. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing 6reen Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adoPted taking wind direction into consideration. 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water bodies near the project site. 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. 6. lt was noted in the Google image that mining activity was already been carried out in the leased area. lt is requested to furnish the following details from AD. mines a) What was the period of the operation and stoppage of the earlier mines? b) Quantity of minerals mined out. c) Depth of mining d) Name of the person already mined in that leases area' in 13. The project proponent has not furnished the letter obtained from AD/DD mines termj of Existing quarries/ abandoned quarries/ Present Proposed quarries/ Future get Proposed quarries. Hence, the SEAC decided that the project ProPonent may the following information from the AD/DD Mines, Tiruvannamalai District in the following format .. & Letter from the AD/DD Mines about the details (Name of the owner, 5 F No, Extent

distance from the boundary of this quarrY) of other quarries

(proposed/Existing/Abandoned quarries) within a radius of 500 m from the boundary of

the proposed quarry site in the following format.

>.- -t-Chairmar(-- (rl9\;" Name of Name of Village Distance from this Quarry Owner Survey Number proposed Quarry k. Existing quarries

l. Abandoned quarries

m. Present Proposed quarries

n. Future Proposed quarries

This detail rnor,O

7' The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 8' The recommendation for the issue of environmentar clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NC,T, Principal Bench, New Delhi in o.A No.l86 of 2016 (M'A'No'3 50/2016) and o.A. No.200l20r6 and o.A.No.58 0/2016 (M'A'No'1182/2016) and o.A.No.r0 2/2017 and o.A.No.4 o4/2o16 (M.A.No. 758/2o16.M.A.No.9 2o/2o16,M.A.No.1 122/2016, M.A.No.r2 /2017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and o.A.No.405/2016 and o.A.N o.52o of 2016 (M.A.No. gB1 g2/2O1 /2016, M.A. No. 9 6 & M.A. No .384/2017). 9' The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & cc, Gor, New Derhi.

. JEAC-TN (.u \n 10. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining oPeration. '11. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. 12. The amount of Rs. 1.01 Lakhs (2o/o of the project cost) shall be utilized as CER activities to carried out for development of solar light facilities in Covt middle School. Che. Agaram Village as committed during SEAC meetinS as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC dated 01.05.2018 the above activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

Agenda No.: 134 - 15 (File No.70l7l2019) Proposed Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.40.5Ha in S'F.No. 77/2 &77/34 at ldaiseval Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District, Tamil Nadu by IWs Railone Projects Private Limited- For Environmental Clearance.

(5 lMrN/M I N/4O7 2 4 / 2O1 9) The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The proiect proPonent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the proiect and the environmental impact assesiment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Covernment Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of lWs Railone Projects Private Limited, Precise Area communication was issued by the District collector, ThoothukudivideNa.Ka.O.M.2'414/2OI9Dated:22/07/2019'ltisafresh lease for Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.4O'5Ha in S'F'No' 77/2 at ldaiseval Village-ll, Kovilpatti Taluk. Thoothukudi District, Tamil

N adu,

2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details:

\__---\a,------... I <_l->a Chairman.L'- f.sc(c-rN kl ln Agenda .No: 134 - 5 (File No. 6837/2019) Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry over an Extent of 3.53.0Ha at S'F'Nos. 16lll' Nadu 16/12, 17 /1 & l8/38 in Thollamur Village, Vanur Taluk, Viluppuram District, Tamil by Thiru. V. Ramesh, Chennai - for Terms of Reference (SlMfN/MlN/3 4916/2019) datedz 17 .O4.2O19 The proposal was placed in the 134rh SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as preJented by the Proponent are as follows:

1. 6overnment order/ Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied of Rough stone and Cravel quarry over an Extent of 3.53.0Ha in 5.F.Nos.l6111 .16/12, 17/1 & 18/38 at Thollamur Village of VanurTaluk, Viluppuram in the name of Thiru. V. Ramesh, chennai,Precile Area communication letterwas issued by the District collector, Viluppuram Disrrict videRc.No. A/6&M/463/2018, Dated: 18.01.2O19for a period of Five

years. lt is a Fresh lease for quarrying District'

2. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details: Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years' The Mining Plan was got approval from the Assistant Director' Department of Ceology and Mining'

Vi luppuram District vide Rc. N o' A/6&M / 463 /2018 dated 07'O2'2019' Mining 3. As per the Department of Ceology and Mining' Viluppuram District' plan approved for 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough rtone should not exceed 4'52'723m3 and Gravel should not exceed 73.352m3(Cravel formation 24.552m3 + Existing Gravel dump 48,800m3) uPto a depth of 42m (2m Gravel + 40m Rough stone)' For First year - Roughstone 88'600 m3 & Cravel-,l1484m3 m3 For Second year - Rough stone - 90,800 m3 & Cravel - 36'560 I q__it-l\, / \ chairman'- 4-- 5EAC.TN

q4/ ).

For Third year - Rough stone - 93,747 m3 & Gravel _ 25,30g m3 For Fourth year - Rough stone _.1,04.216 mr For Fifth year - Rough stone _ 75,36Om3 4. The quarry operation proposed is upto a depth of 42m (2m gravel and 40m Rough stone). 5. The Quarry operation proposed is to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.Om vertical bench and width. 6. Rough stone and Gravel are to be transported by Tippers of 4 Nos. (20 T Capacity).

7. The project ir locate 12O3,1O.49,,N aI to t2.03,20.70,,Nlatitude and 7 9' 40' 08.7 O'E to 29"40,1 6.98,,ELongitude.

8. The total Manpower requirement is 3l Nos. 9. Total cost of the projectj is Rs. 55.73 lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 3,80 lakhs.

l0' The water tabre is found to be at the depth of 55m in summer and 50m in rainy season.

1l. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 12' No Coastar Reguration Zone (cRZ) within the radius of r,km from the ,ease a rea.

13' No rnterstate boundary & western chats Boundary within the radius of r,km from the lease area.

14' No Nationar park & wird Life Sanctuary within the radius of lokm from the lease area.

15' No criticalry poruted area as notified porution by the centrar contror Board constituted under water (prevention and contror of porution) Act 1g74 within the radius of l0km from the lease area. l6' No Protected Area. Eco senJitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of lOkm. **> ErEAc TN q4/ w 17. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area. .l8. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Viluppuram vide Letter RC. No. A/G&M/463/2O18 dated 1O.O4.2O19, it is informed that the following rough Stone / Granite quarries are situated within 500 meters radial distance from the area applied for the grant of Rough stone and Earth Quarry lease.

5. Name of the quarry Ourner Name of Taluk& 5.F.No. Extent Quarry No. the Village Status Mineral 1. Tmt. 5. Nanthini. Rough Vanur. 11/54 0.14.0 Existing W/o. Sankar, Stone Thollamur 11/6 0.17.0 No. 14, 3'd Street. 11/7 0.19.0 Jayapuram, 16/2 0.11.0 TindivanamTaluk 16/3 0.11.0 16/4 0.15.0 16/s o.12.O 16/6 0.16.0 16/7 0.24.O 16/BB o.23.O 16/9 0.08.5 16/10 1.62.0 3.32.5 2. C. Canesan, Rough Thollamur 13/3 1.50.0 Existing S/o. ChinnaiyaCounder, stone Nemili 14/7 0.39.5 168, Mettu Street,Karasanur 1s/1 0.48.5 Village, V. Parangani Post, 118/1 0.56.O VanurTaluk 118/2 0.r8.5 118/3 o.71.O 118/44 0.44.O 4.27.5 3. K. Cnanasekaran. Rough Vanur, 12/4 o.59.5 Existing 5/o. KannadiGounder, Stone Thollamur 12/54 o.65.O Mettu Street, 1.24.5

Gt.-.L- 7-- Lnarrman. ffff. Karasut Village' VanurTaluk, Villupuram District Vanur. 2/1 o.45.5 EXrSilnt 4. Thiru. V. Sankar, Rough Thollamur 2/2 o.22.O 5/o. Vivekanandan. stone 2/3 o.22.O 14, JaYaPuram Colony. 2/4 o.23.5 Tindivanam Town &Taluk. 2/s o.25.O Viluppuram District 3/1 o.32.5 3/2 o.33.5 3/3 0.81.0 3/4 0.20.0 3/s o.22.5 3/6 o.21.O 3/7 0.18.0 3.66.5 Vanur, iofi 12.42.5 lExisting 5. G. Raja, Thollamur 51/11, 5ivaraj Street' Thiruneermalai. TambaramTaluk. KancheePuram District Vanur, 11/4A2 0.16.0 Existing 6. Thiru. K. Balamurugan. Rough Thollamur 15/2 o.44.O 5/o. KuPPusamY. Stone 15/34 0.50.0 Karasanur& Post. 1s/38 0.56.0 VanurTaluk 15/4 o.46.O 2.12.O Existing Rough Vanur, 1/34 0.58.0 7. Thiru. V. SadaiYaPPan' Thollamur 12/3 0.60.5 No. 18, Amai Nagar' Stone 12/581 2.38.5 West Tambaram, 3.57.O Chennai - 600 O45 1- 20.62.5 ffo SfeC noted the following: for Terms of Reference to SEIAA-TN 1. The Proponent, Thiru. V. Ramesh has applied over an Extent of 3'53'OHa at for the Proposed Rough stone and cravel quarry 5.F.Nos'16/11,16/12,17/1&18/38atThollamurVillage'VanurTaluk,Viluppuram Tamil Nadu' District, M I Chairman, ? {-srEc-tN <4" tr" 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "81" of ltem I (a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference [oR) to 5EIAA with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the normal conditions as part of ToR: 1. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished. 2. Details of village map, a reSister and FMB sketch shall be furnished. 3. The proposal for green belt activities shall be furnished. 4. The Socio economic rtudies should be carried out within lOkm buffer zone from the mines. 5. Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project approved by the Ceology of Mining department shall be shall be submitted along with EIA report. 6. lt was noted in the proponent has already carried out the mining activity that in the leased area after obtaining the Environmental clearance vide SEIAA letter dated: O4.1O.2O13. Hence. it is requested that furnish the following details from AD. mines

a) What was the period of the operation and stoppage of the earlier mines? b) Quantity of minerals mined out. c) Depth of mining 7. The spot level and contour level of the proposed quarry site shall be studied and the same shall be furnished to along with ElA. 8. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted. 9. CER activities should be carried out taking in to consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum of MoEF & CC dated 01.05.2018.

=$.*#SEAC.TN W* 10. Obtain a letter /certificate from the Assistant Director of 6eology and Mining standing that there is no other Minerals/resou rces like sand in the quarrying area within the approved depth of mining and below depth of mining and the same shall be furnished in the EIA report. 11. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted for every month and the report shall furnish in the EIA report. 12. EIA report should strictly follow ihe Environmental lmpact Assessment Guidance Manual for Mining of Minerals published February 2010. .l3. Detail plan on rehabilitation and reclamation carried out for the stabilization and restoration of the mined areas.

14. The EIA study report shall include the surrounding mining activity. if any. 15. Modelling study for Air, water and noise shall be carried out and incremental increase in the above study shall be substantiated with mitigation measures. 16. A study on the geological resources available shall be carried out and reported. 17. A specific study on agriculture & livelihood shall be carried out and reported' 18. lmpact on ponds, rivers and other water bodies to be elaborated. 19. lmpact of soil erosion, soil physical chemical and biological property changes may be assumed. 20.The proponent shall clarify whether' the existing Cravel Dump mentioned in the mining approval to be used as product or existing Cravel Dump to be used for mine closure. 21. The recommendation for the issue of Terms of Reference is subject to the final outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench. New Delhi in O'A No. 186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A.No.200/2016 and O A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.11B2l2016) and O.A.No.l0212017 and O.A.No.40412016 (M.A.No.758l2016. M.A.No.920/2O16. M.A.No.1122l2016' M.A.No.12l201 7 & M.A.No.B43/2O17) and O.A.No.4O5/2O16 and O.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No.98ll201 6. M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No. 3841201 7). d-?- Chairman. T DJHC.TN q41 ^ Agenda .No: 134 - 7 File.No.6892l2019 Proposed construction of Multiplex Mall & Hotel at Town Survey No. l' 2' 3/l' S.F.No. 31/1, 31/2, 31/3 part 31/4 (New Ward-T, Block No'15, T.S.No. 1,2'3ff)of Bodinaickenpatti Village, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem District, Tamil Nadu by IWs. SREE VAMLAKSHMI MAHAAL LLP - For Environment Clearance

(slMrN/Mls/l o 8oo3 /2o1 9)

The proposal was placed in the 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019' The pro.iect proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the Proponent are as follows:

L The project is located at latitude 1l'40'4.68'N and longitude 78"7'42.39"E.

2. The project consists of main building with 2 Basements+ Ground floor + 7 floors. The main building comprises of hyper market, cafe, retail , food court

. fun centre, restaurant, theatre and hotel,

3. Total land area is 12998 Sqm.The total built-up area of the proposed commercial building is 56425 Sqm.

4. The green belt area proposed for the project is 2020 Sqm (l5olo of total land

area).

5. The daily fresh water requirement is 342 KLD to be sourced from salem city

municipal corporation.

6. The total water requirement will be 237kLD. The water of fresh water 104 KLD of domestic water and 133 KLD of flushing water will be let into the

sewage treatment plant (3O0 KLD). After sewage treatment Process. 225 KLD st.x Chairman. <-- .TSEAC-TN V-"-' ,l33 of treated water will be generated, out of which will be used for flushing,

7 KLD for gardening, 5 KLD for OSR and 80 KLD for HVAC.

7. The bio degradable solid waste (1790 kg/day) will be treated in OWC machine and the manure generated will be used for landscaping purpose

within project site. The non bio degradable solid waste (1.I90 kglday) will be handed over to Authorized recyclers.

8. About 13 nos. of recharge pit with dia. 1.2 m and depth 3 m will be

provided. Rain water collection sump of 90 KLD is also proposed to be provided for collection of roof top run off.

9. The proponent is proposed to install 2 nos. of l25O kVA and 2 nos of 75O KVA DC sets each with a stack height of 37 m and 36 m.

The SEAC noted the following:

l. The Proponent. M/s. SREE VARALAKSHMI MAHAAL LLp has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed construction of Multiplex

Mall & Hotel at Town Survey No. 1.2.3/1.5.F.No. 3ll1, 31/2,3t/3 part 31/4

(New Ward-T, Block No.l5. T.S.No. 1,2.3/1)of Bodinaickenpatti Village, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem District Tamil Nadu .,buildings 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem B(a) and

construction Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2O06.

After the preientation made by the proponent, the SEAC instruct the project proponent to furnish the following details:

1. The proponent shall furnish proposal for the treatment and disposal of organic solid waste through Bio-methanation plant with design detail. )t. Ct.Chairman. e pEAc"rN 2. The proponent shall allocate the area for Sreen belt all along the boundaries of the project site premises with 3m width . The proponent (jPS should earmark the green belt area in the layout plan with coordinates and dimension and the same shall be submitted for CMDA

/DTCP aPProval. 3. The proponent shall submit the Gross Fixed value include the land value and construction cost as per the PwD guideline value 4. The details of flood management plan shall be furnished considering the project site and the surrounding area' project site 5. The rainwater harvesting plan shall be furnished considering the and the surroundinS area' treated 6. The proponent shall revise the water balance consideration excess proponent shall sewage to be utilized for Avenue plantation. Further the sewage for revise the EMP cost include the budget for utilization of treated Avenue plantation. during emergency' 7. The proponent shall furnish the evacuation plan be furnished as per the 8. The proposal for CER(2olo of project cost) shall office memorandum of MoEF &CC dated 01'05'2018'

Theprojectproponentisrequestedtosubmittheaforesaiddetailsto (Sl.No. 1 8) from the project SEIAA-TN. On receipt of above details to this project and decide the proponent, SEAC would further deliberate on further course of action' *";P SEAC-TN 2 b. Abandoned quarries

2 c. Present Proposed quarries

Total extent

On receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further of action the proposal.

Agenda No.: 134 - 18 (File No. 6897/2019) Proposed Black Granite Quarry lease over an extent of 3.25.3Ha in S.F.Nos.354/2A2, 354/28, 354/3A2, 354/38, 355/1A (Part), 355/18, 355/2A2,355/28, 355/3A2, 355/38, 355/4A, 355/48, 356/1, 369/1, 37lllA(Part), 37l/lB(Part), 371/1C, 371/3A2, 371/38 and

371/3C of Guttur Village, BargurTaluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu by M/s. Om Sri Granites- for Environment Clearance.

(s r A/TN/M tN / 3 83 67 / 2019)

The proposal was placed in the 134th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact

assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Government order/ Lease details: The quarry lease was applied in the name of M/s. Om Sri Granites, Krishnagiri, Precise Area Communication was issued by the Principal Secretary to Government, lndustries Department, Chennai vide Letter No. 2375/MM.2/2O19-1, dated 08.03.2019 for a period of 20 years. lt is a Fresh lease for quarrying of Black 6ranite (Dolerite) for over an extent of 3.25.3Ha s{--3' Chairman, i,Ac-rN in S.F.Nos. 354/2A2, 354/28, 354/3A2, 354/38, 355/1A (Part), 3ss/tB, 3ss/2A.2, 3s5/28, 3ss/3A2. 355/38, 3s5/4A, 355/48, 3s6/1, 369/1. 371llA(Part), 371llB(Part), 371/1C, 371/3A2, 371/38 and 371/3C of Guttur Village, BargurTaluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu. 2. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details:

The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The Mining Plan was approved from the Director of Ceology and Mining, Guindy. Chennai vide letter Rc. No. 9745lMM5 /2018, dated 06.06.2019. 3. As per the Mining plan, production schedule for first five years states that the total volume of recoverable as 25o/o of Multi Coloured Granite should not exceed 15,018m3.

For First Year - 3038 m3

For Second year - 3002 m3

ForThird year - 3022 m3

For Fourth year - 2906 m3

For Fifth year - 3050 m3 4. The Total waste that will be resulting in the quarrying operation for first years will be 45,577m3 (7 5o/o of Granite Waste - 45,057 m3 and Side Burden - 520m3) and Topsoil 19,448m3. The total Waste will be dump -l on the Southern side with dimension of 69m x l6m x 9m (H) and dump-2 on North eastern side with dimension 73m x 28m x l7.4Bm (H). 5. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of l7m for the present Mining plan period.

6. Quarrying Operation will be done by Opencast Semi Mechanised method 7. Granite is to be transported by tippers of 2 Nos. (20 T capacity). 8. The water table is found to be at the depth of 62m from general ground profile. 9. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.

10. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.

:(-- \ Chairman, ? EJEAc-rN ll. No lnterstate boundary & Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area.

12. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area.

13. NOC obtained from the District Forest office for quarrying of Granite. 14. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 15. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of lOkm.

15. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area. 17. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri vide Letter Roc. No. 512/2017lMines dated 17.06.2olg,details of the quarries situated within 500mts. radial distance from the said quarry are furnished

as follows.

s. Name of the s. F. Extent G.O. No. & Lease Status of No Village lessee No. in Hect. Dated period the quarry

1 Om Sri Guttur, 3s4/2 3.25.30 Government 20 years lnstant Granites, 44/6, Bargur B etc., Lr. No. Proposal Railway TK, 237s/MME. precise

Station road, Krishnagi 2/ 2019-1 area Near South ri dated communic

lndian Bank, 08.03.2019 ated. Hosur Town and Taluk

Total 3.25.30 The SEAC noted the following:

=k^+SEAC.TN l. The Proponent, M/s. Om Sri Cranites has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed for Black Cranite quarry from over an extent of 3.25.3Ha in S.F.Nos. 354/2A2, 354/28, 354/3A2, 354/38, 355llA (Part), 355/18, 355/2A2, 355/28, 35s/3A2, 3ss/38, 3ss/4A, 35s/48, 356/1, 369/1, 371llA(Part), 37111B(Part), 371/1C, 371/3A2, 371/38 and 371/3C of Guttur Village. BargurTaluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu.

2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral

Projecti' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished. The SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition: l. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted every month and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level to the surrounding areas shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the water bodies surrounding the project iite. 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. '14. The project proponent has not furnished the letter obtained from AD/DD mines in terms of Existing quarries/ abandoned quarries/ Present Proposed quarries/ Future Proposed quarries. Hence. the SEAC decided that the project proponent may get the

Chairman. P\c-rN following information from the AD/DD Mines, Krishnagairi District in the following format " Letter from the AD/DD Mines about the details (Name of the Owner, 5 F No, Extent & distance from the boundary of this quarry) of other quarries (proposed/Existing/Abandoned quarries) within a radius of 500 m from the boundary of the proposed quarry site in the following format.

5l.No. Name of the Name of Village & Extent in Distance from this Quarry Owner Survey Number Hectare proposed Quarry r. Existing quarries

2 s. Abandoned quarries

2 t. Present Proposed quarries

2 u. Future Proposed quarries

2 Total extent

This detail should be submitted to SEIAA before placing the subject to SEIAA meeting. 6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NC,T, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.l86 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.58O/2O16

Chairman, szEAc-rN - (M.A.No.llB2l2016) and O.A.No.l0212017 and O.A.No.4O4/2O16 (M.A.No. 758/2016,M.A.No.92012016,M.A.No.1122/2016, M.A.No.t2l2017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2O16 and O.A.No.520 of 2Ot6 (M.A.No. gB1 /2016, M.A.No.98212015 & M.A.No.3 84/2012).

8. The entire mining operation should be as per the cuidelines for sustainable sand Mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC, GOl, New Delhi.

Memorandum of MoEF & cC dated 01.05.2018 before placing the subject to SEIAA meeting.

Agenda No.:134-19

(File No. 6905/2019)

Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an Extent of 0.7g.oHect in s.F.No. l/l at Musiri Village' walajah raluk, Vellore Districr, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. 5. Gopinath, Vellore - For Environmental Clearance.

(slA/TN/Mr N/3 69 30 /2019)

The proposal was placed in the l34rh SEAC Meeting held on 30.0g.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact aiieJrment as preJented by the proponent are as follows: l. Government Order / Lease details:

The proponent Thiru.S. Gopinath, Ve ore has been granted quarry rease for quarrying Rough stone quarry lease over an Extent of O.7g.OHect in S.F.No. l/l at Musiri Village, walajah raruk, Veflore District vide proceeding No. Rc.No.

-{--u-Chairman, ,I:Ac-rN 3. ToR was issued by SEIAA-TN vide Letter No. SEIAA -TN/F.No.l621l5EAC-CXVll/

Violation/ToR- 5 51 /2018 datedOT /O2 /2019

4. The proponent has not submitted the compliance report along with the enclosure

for the Part-lll of the ToR issued vide Letter No. SEIAA -TN/F. N o.1621/SEAC-

CXVI l/ Violatio nff oR- 5 51 / 2018 dated)T /O2 /2019

After the presentation made by the proponent, the 5EAC instruct the project proponent to furnish the compliance report along with the neceJsary enclosure for Part-lll of the

ToR issued vide Letter No. SEIAA -TN/F.No. l62IISEAC-CXVII/ Violation/ToR-551/2018 datedOT/02/2019

The project proponent is requested to tubmit the aforesaid detail to SEIAA-TN. On receipt of above details from the project proponent, SEAC decided to make an on - the -

Jpot inspection to assess the present status of the site by the sub-committee constituted by the 5EAC since this project is comes under violation. Based on the inspection report,SEAC would further deliberate on this project and decide the further course of action.

Agenda .No: 134 - 3 File.No.6978,r20l7 Proposed conrtruction of multi storied residential building by IWs. South lndia Shelters Private Limited at Survey No. 259l2AlA(part), 259/2AlB, Old 5.No.259l2(part), 259/241 in Vanagaram Village, survey no. 57/2A, 57/28, 57/2C, 57/2D1, 57/2D2, old s.no.57 /2 in Chettiaragaram Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu- For Environment Clearance ($A/TN/MlS/r O9O9 4/2019) The proposal was placed in this 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent Save detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as preJented by the proponent are as follows: ot.-+= Chairma n. $ sEAC-rN 1. The proposed multi-storeyed residential building having upper basement floor+ Lower basement floorl Ground floor+ 13 floors with lTldwelling units+ swimming pool). 2. The project is located at latitude 13"02'51.1',N and longitude 80"08'56.6'E. building height is 49m. 3. Total land area is 6850.48 Sqm.The total built-up area of the proposed multi- storeyed residential building is 33513 Sqm. 4. The green belt area proposed forthe project is 1027.57 Sqm (15% of total land area). The OSR area developed 6reen belt is 435.345q'm (6 'O3ok of OSR area)' 5. The fresh water requirement is 52.5 KLD to be sourced from CMWSSB' 6. 5O.5 kLD of domestic water, 2kLD for Swimming pool and 74 kLD of flushing water will be let into the sewage treatment plant (13O KLD). After sewage treatment procesr, ll9 kLD of treated water will be generated. out of which 74 will be used for flushing, 3.5 KLD for gardening, 4l.5kLD for excess water to CMWSSB Drain. 7. The bio degradable solid waste (335.88 kg/day) will be treated in owc machine and the manure generated will be used for landscaping purpose within project site. The non bio degradable solid warte (223.92 kglday) will be handed over to Authorized recyclers. STP sludge is lOkg/day' 8. About 13 nos. of recharge pit with dia. 1.8 m and depth 3 m will be provided. Rain water collection sump of 142 cu.m is also proposed to be provided for collection of roof toP run off. 9. The total power requirement 1OO0KW. source TAN6EDCO' of 10. The proponent is proposed to install I nos. of 125 kvA with a stack height 352m AGL m. cars- 11. The Parking details of Upper basement, lower basement. ground floor 383Nos. Two wheelers 162 Nos , the parking area is 15766'335q'm' cJ:. o- Chairman9- SEAC-TN 12. The project cost is 47.12 Crores.

13. Environmental sensitive areas i. Porur lake is located at 1.29 Km in South direction ii. Chembarambakkam lake is located at 8.4 KM in WSW direction iii. Alapakkam tank is located at 1.76 Km in ENE direction iv. Coovum river is located at 1.63 Km in NNE direction v. Ayanambakkam is located at 2.88 Km in NW direction vi. Adyar river is located at 4.88Km in 5E direction

14. EMP cost of operation phase, capital cost Rs.1l1 Lakhs & operation cost Rs.20.6

Lakhs.

The 5EAC noted the following: 1. The Proponent M/s. South lndia Shelters Private Limited has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed construction of multi storied residential building at Survey No. 259l2A1A(part),259/2A18, Old 5.No.25912(part), 259/2A1 in Vanagaram Village' survey no. 57/24. 57/28, 57/2C, 57/2D1. 57/2D2. old s.no.57/2 in Chettiaragaram Village' Maduravoyal Taluk, Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu. 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B" of ltem 8(a) "Buitding and construction projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification' 2OO5'

After the presentation made by the ProPonent, the 5EAC instruct the project proponent to furnish the following details: l. Detail of Solid Waste management plan shall be prepared as per Solid waste management Rules.2016 and same shall be furnished' 2. The proponent shall allocate the land area(at least 15o/o of the total land area) for green belt development all along the boundaries of the project site premises with 3m width . The proponent should earmark CJ-.-+ Chairman, plEac-rN the green belt area in the layout plan with CPS coordinates and dimension and the same shall be submitted for CMDA approval 3. Details of the evacuation plan for 2 proposed basements shall be furnished. 4. The proponent shall submit the 6ross Fixed value include the land value and construction cost aJ per the PWD guideline value 5. The details of flood management plan shall be furnished considering the project site and the surrounding area, with 2015 flood data. 6. The rainwater harvesting plan shall be furnished considering the project site and the surrounding area. 7. The proponent has not allocated OSR area with 10o/o of the land area of the proposed site. Hence the proponent lhall allocate OSR area. 8. The proponent shall revise the water balance consideration the excess treated rewage to be utilized for Avenue plantation. Further the proponent shall revise the EMP cort include the budget for utilization of treated sewage for Avenue plantation. 9. The proponent obtains the concern letter from the competent Authority for the utilization of treated sewage for Avenue plantation.

10. The proposal for CER shall be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.2018.

The project proponent is requested to submit the aforesaid details to SEIAA- TN. On receipt of above details (Sl.No. 1 to l0) from the project proponent,

SEAC would further deliberate on this project and decide the further course

Chairman. f$rc-rn

\ '12. The amount of Rs. 0.30 Lakhs (2olo of the project cost) shall be utilized as CER activities to carried out for development of sports facilities and providing Toilet, RO facilities to Government School, ldaiseval-ll Village in Govt middle School, Che. Agaram Village as committed during SEAC meeting as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC dated O1.05.2018 the above activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

Agenda No.: 134 - 16 (File No.6888/2019) Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2,42.5Ha in 5.F.No.94l28, 95/1 (P), 96/1 (P) &.97/281 (P) at lGnakkampalayam Village, Tiruppur North Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. P.Thangamuthusamy- For Environmental Clearance.

(s lMrN/MlN/3 8527 /2019) The proposal was placed in the 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The proiect Proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact asJessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Covernment Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. P.Thangamuthusamy. Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Tiruppur vide Rc. No. 166lKanimam/2018, Dated: 11.06.2018 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone and Gravel quarry over an extent of 2.42.5Ha in 5.F.No. 94l2B, 95/1(P), 96/1(P) & 97/281(P) at Kanakkampalayam Village, Tiruppur North Taluk. Tiruppur District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Deputy Director, Department of 6eology and Mining, Tiruppur District vide 166 /Mines / 2018. Dated: 25.06.2018

Gt-chatrman.?- \ dPcr^ 3' As per the Department of 6eorogy and Mining, Tiruppur District. Mining pran approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 1,42,625m3 and cravel should not exceed 5,922m3

For First year - 2B,7OOn3 of Rough stone and 5,922m3 of Gravel For Second year - 3O,B0Om3 of Rough stone For Third year - 30,250m3 of Rough stone For Fourth year - 28.125m3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 24.75Om3 of Rough stone The quarry 4 operation is proposed upto a depth of 22m (2m graver and 20m Rough stone).

5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench width. 6. Rough stone and Gravel are to be transported by Tippers of 2 Nos. (10/20 f Capacity).

7. The project is locate at 11"10'26.07"N to 1t'10'29.70"Nlatitude and77.22'36.o9"E to 7 7"22'. 46.1O"E Longitude.

8. The total Manpower requirement is 23 Nos. Total 9. cost of the projects is Rs.92.70 lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 3.g0 lakhs. 10. The water table is found to be at the depth of 5om in summer and 45m in rainy seaJon.

11. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of l0km. 13. No lnterstate boundary & western 6hats Boundary within the radius of 1Okm 14. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of 1Okm. 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board .1974 constituted under water (prevention and control of pollution) Act within the radius of lOkm

-SEAC-TN (il \il 16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of

10km.

17. No habitation within the radius of the 30Om from the lease area. lB. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining. Tiruppur vide Letter RC. No. 166lMines/2O18 dated 01.O7.2019, informed that following quarries area situated within a radial distance of 500 meters from the applied fields.

5. No. Name of the lessee 5.F.No. Extent Status

94/28. es/l (P), I P.Thangamuthusamy 2.42.5 Proposed e6/1 (P), e7/281. (P)

2. K.Murugasamy Kalipalaya m. 279 /1, 2, 3 2.27.5 Proposed

3. P.Thangamuthusamy Kalipalaya m, 273/1, 2 2.76.O Expired

4. K.Murugasamy Kalipalayam, 277 /2 2.O4.O Expired

The SEAC noted the following: 1. The Proponent Thiru. P.Thangamuthusamy has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.42.5Ha in 5.F.No.9412B, 95/1 (P), 96/1 (P) & 97/281 (P) at Kanakkampalayam Village, Tiruppur North Taluk, Tiruppur District,Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

The project proponent gave detailed presentation. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to direct the proponent to furnish the following details: l. lt was noted in the proponent has already carried out the mining activity that in the leased area after obtaining the Environmental clearance vide 5EIAA letter

-t--gChairman7 o4r{: dated:16'07'2013' lt is requested furnish to the following details from AD, mines

a) what was the period of the operation and stoppage of the earrier mines? b) Quantity of minerals mined out. c) Depth of mining d) Name of the person arready mined in that reases area. The 3' mining plan was got approval from the Deputy Director, Department of creology and Mining, Tiruppur Districr vide 166 /Mines / 201g, Dated: 25.06.2l1lstated that S. No. Name of the tessee S.F.No. Extent Status 1 P.Thangamuthusamy Nanparayam.2T3/1.2 2.76.O Existing 2. K.Murugasamy r\atrpatayam,277/2 2.O4.O Existing 3. K.Murugasamy Katipatayam, 279/1. 2. 3 2.27.s applied LerrerLetter obtained from the Assistant Direct Tiruppur vide Letter RC. No. 166lMines/2018 dated 01.o7.2019. informed that following quarries area situated within a radial distance of 500 meters from the applied fields.

S. No. I I Name of the lessee S.F.No. I Extent Status l. ,r**,-amy1 @ 2.42.5 e6/1 (P). Proposed I e7/281, (P) 2. K.Murugasamy t,r\cilrPdrayam, 2 /g/1, 2, 3 2.27.5 Proposed 3. P. lhangamuthusamy Ndrrparayam, 2 /3/1, 2 2.76.O Expired 4. K.Murugasamy Ndrrparayam, 217/2 2.O4.O Expired l ne lhe aboveaDove two letterletters from AssisU difference in details of Existing/Expired/ proposed quarries. Hence, the AD mines shall clarify whether which one correct details. on receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further proposal. course of action on the

t (\^\,--=r I Chairman.4-- , SEAC-TN (.U \n 10. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry tite, tecurity guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation.

1 1. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported.

12. The amount of Rs. l.Ol Lakhs (2o/o of the project cost) shall be utilized as CER activities to carried out for development of solar light facilities in Govt middle School, che. Agaram Village as committed during SEAC meeting as per office Memorandum of MoEF& CC dated Ol.O5.2OlB the above activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

Agenda No.: 134 - l5 (File No.7Ol7l2019) Proposed Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.4O.5Ha in S,F.No. 77/2 &77/34 at ldaiseval Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi Dittrict, Tamil Nadu by IWs Railone Projects Private Limited- For Environmental Clearance,

(s rMrN/Ml N/4O7 24/ 2O1 e) The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The Pro.'ect proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient featurer of the project and the environmental impact aJsessment as preJented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Covernment Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of IWs Railone Projects Private Limited. Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector. Thoothukudi vide Na.Ka. 6.M.2-414/2019 Dated: 22/07/2019. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2'4O'5Ha in 5'F'No' 77/2 at ldaiseval Village-ll, Kovilpatti Taluk. Thoothukudi District, Tamil Nadu, 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: c.L. \ Chairman,/," !*{c-rN ({l v4 The a. Mining plan was prepared for the period of 1 year. The mining plan was got approval from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining. Thoothukudi District vide RC. No. 6.M.2/4r 4/2019 dared o1/08/2019. As per b' the Department of Georogy and Mining. Thoothukudi Dirtrict. Mining Plan approval for the 1 year, the production schedule for a years stater that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 3g.66lm:. 3. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 2m below ground level. 4. The project is rocate at 09"06'23.40"N to 09"06'29.34,N latitude and 7 7'47' 52.32" E to 7 Z.47, 57.Z 8,,ELongitude.

5. The total Manpower requirement is 7 Nos. 6. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 15.1g lakhs and EMp cost about Rr.O.67 Iakhs. 7. The water table is found to be at the depth of 25m in rummer and 2om in winter Jeason.

B. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 9. No coastal Reguration Zone (CRZ) within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area. 10' No lnterstate boundary & western chats Boundary within the radius of r.km from the lease area. 'll' No National Park & wird Life sanctuary within the radius of rokm from the rease area.

12. No criticalry pofluted area as notified by the centrar po[ution contror Board constituted under water (prevention and po contror of ution) Act r g74 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. l3' No Protected Area' Eco sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of lOkm.

14' No habitation within the radius of the 3o0m from the lease area as per retter dated o2/o9/20r9 ar obtained from VAo, Idaivasar-r. Koirpatti raruk,

Chairman. (4/- fEAC-TN w ,|5. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Thoothukudi vide Letter RC. No. G&M2/414/2019 dated O1/O8/20'19 stating the following details of quarries located within 500m radius from the proposed

quarry .

5. No. Name of the quarry owner Village & Extent in ha. Distance from 5. F. No. this proposed quarry a. Existing Quarries I Nil Nil Nil Nil b. ,q@ities

I M/s Railone Projects Private 77/2 &.77/34 2.40.5 Ltd., d. Future proposed quarries l. Nil Total Extent 2.40.5

The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent M/s Railone Projects Private Ltd., has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.4O.5Ha in S'F'No' 77/2 &77/3A at ldaiseval' Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification' 2006.

The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition: ql-=-b Chairman, qru^ 1. Ground water quarity monitoring shourd be conducted six month, and the report should be submitted to TNpCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise rever shal be estabrished Iike providing 6reen Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution, suitabre working methodorogy needr to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. 3' The operation of the quarry shourd no way impact the agricurture activity & water bodies near the project site. 4. Safety distance of r5mt shal be reft from the odai rocated in the proiect ,ite. 5' Transportation of the quarried materiars shal not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 6' The Project Proponent sha[ compry with the mining and other rerevant rures and regulations where ever applicable. 7' The quarrying activity sha[ be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry rease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. B' The recommendation for the issue of environmentar crearance iJ subject to the outcome of the Hon'bre principar NGT, Bench. New Derhi in o.A No.rg6 0f 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.2O0l2O16 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1t8212016) and O.A.No.1O2l2017 and O.A.No.4O4/2016 (M.A.No. 758/2Ot6,M.A.No.92Ol2016.M.A.No.1122/2016, M.A.No.1212012 &. M.A. No. 843/2017) and o.A.No.405/2016 and o.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. gB1 /2016. M.A. No.982,1201 6 & M.A.No .3B4/2O17). 9. The entire mining operation shourd be as per the guiderines for sustainabre sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC, 60l, New Delhi. l0' To ensure safety measures arong the boundary of the quarry rite, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 1'l' The mine crosure pran submitted by the project proponent sha, be strictry followed after the laps of the mine as reported.

,^- I L\ a_ Chairman. G SEAC-TN 441 w 12. The amount of Rs. 0.30 Lakhs (2 o/o of the project cost) shall be utilized as CER activities to carried out for development of sports facilities and providing Toilet, RO facilities to Covernment School, ldaiseval-ll Village in Govt middle School, Che. Agaram Village as committed during 5EAC meeting as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC dated 01.05.2018 the above activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

Agenda No.: 134 - 16 (File No.5888/2o19) Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.42.5Ha in S.F.No.94l2B, 95/1 (P), 96/1 (P) &. 97/281 (P) at lGnakkampalayam Village, Tiruppur North Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. P.Thangamuthuramy- For Environmental Clearance.

(slA/TN/Ml N/3 8527 / 2019)

The proposal was placed in the l34ih SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent Save detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assesiment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Government Order / Lease details:

The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. P.Thangamuthusamy, Precise Area Communication was issued by the Diitrict Collector, Tiruppur vide Rc. No.

166lKanimam/2O18, Dated: 11.06.2018 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone and Gravel quarry over an extent of 2.42.5Ha in 5.F.No. 94128, 95/1(P), 96/1(P) & 97/281(P) at Kanakkampatayam Village, Tiruppur North Taluk, Tiruppur District.

2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details:

The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining pran was got approval from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur District vide 166 /Mines / 2018, Dated: 25.06.2019

>L-Lhatrman.4- ?. dry)c+N Agenda .No: 134 - 4

File. No.697412019 Proposed chemical manufacturing unit by IWs. Zenith Flavours and Chemicals at Plot No' 117-120, S.F No. 237/1, SIPCOT Pharmaceutical lndustrial Estate, Alathur Village' Tirupporur Taluk, lGncheepuram district, Tamil Nadu - Category 'Bl"-5(0 Synthetic Organic Chemical lndustry - For Terms of Reference. The Proponent, M/s. Zenith Flavours and Chemicals has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed organic manufacturing unit at PIot No. 117-12O,5.F No' 237/1, SIPCOT Pharmaceutical lndustrial Estate, Alathur Village, Tirupporur Taluk,

Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu .

The proposal was placed in this 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation and furnish the following details,

1. The unit has proposed facility to manufacture the organic chemicals.

2. The total plot area of the project is 14.819 sq.m and it is located in the lndustrial

zone (5lPCOT Pharmaceutical lndustrial Estate).

3. The proposed green belt area is 5146 sq.m (35olo).

4. Products to be manufactured : a. Aromatic Musk Compounds and perfume fixatives- 83 Tonnes/ Month.

b. Mixture of Aromatic Alcohols, Esters, Carbonyl Compounds, Essential Oils.

Resinoids. Terpenes, Aroma speciality chemicals- 20 Tonnes/Month.

5. Proposed manufacturing process involves preparation of aromatic musk components by multistep synthesis involving alkylation. esterfication, purification by fractionation and re-crystallization.

6. The proponent has requested the SEAC for the public hearing exemption since the

project site is located in the industrial eitate. _l (_\_ \ Chairman.L PIEAc-rN The SEAC noted the following:

1. The Proponent. M/s. Zenith Flavours and Chemicals has applied for Terms

of Reference for the proposed organic manufacturing unit at Plot No. l l7- 120, 5.F No. 237l1. SIPCOT Pharmaceutical lndustrial Estate. Alathur

Village, Tirupporur Taluk. Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu . 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "Bl"-5(F) Synthetic Organic Chemical lndustry of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished. the SEAC decided to recommend Terms of Reference to SEIAA subject to additional ToR in addition to the standards ToR prescribed by the MoEF&CC:

1. The details of the green belt already created and proposed to be created should be furnished in terms of the species and the number. 2. The MSDS of all chemicals used in the industry should be furnished with the significance of the chemicals in termr of risk to the public health.

3. The usage of the chemicals and the process involved in the final product to be discussed in detail in the EIA report with appropriate material balance at every

stage. 4. The accidents if any already met within the industry should be described with the details of measures proposed to avoid in such accidents in the future.

5. The details of the rtrengthening of the ETP and Air Pollution control measures should be detailed. 6. The Project proponent shall adopt eco friendly process to ensure reduction in disposable salt generated and in case if disposal salts are generated. shall explore the possibility of recovery & reuse. Gt. C > hairman. EJE c-rN Agenda No.: 134 - 2l (File No.5959l2OI9)

Proposed Rough stone Quarry lease over an extent of 2.31.0Ha in S.F.Nos. 132/4,132/5, 132/6, 132/7 , 132/8, 132/10, 133/9A and 133/98 at Pullalakottai Village, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. N Krishnasamy- For Environmental Clearance. (srA/TN/Mr N/3 8433 /2019) The proposal was placed in the 134fr SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed preJentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact arsersment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

l. Covernment Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. N Krishnasamy. Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Virudhunagar District vide KVl/488/2018-Minerals dated: 10/12/2018 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.3l.OHa in S.F.Nos. 13214, 132/5, 132/6, 132/7,132/8, 132/10, 133/9A and 133/98 at Pullalakottai Village, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District,Tamil Nadu. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Virudhunagar Distri ct vide Roc.No. KVI/4BB/201 8 Dated: 19.12.201 8. 3. As per the Department of Geology and MininB, Virudhunagar District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 1457O0m3 and Cravel should not

exceed 39550 m3 '14250 For First year - 28,850m3 of Rough stone, m3 of Gravel

Chairman, 9 6rdc-rN For Second year -29,25Om3 of Rough stone, 8280 m3 of Gravel For Third year - 29,600m3 of Rough stone, 17020m3 of Gravel For Fourth year - 29,000m3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 29,000m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 35m Rough stone below ground level.

5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining.

6. The project is locate at 9"37'57.35"N to 9.38,07.40,'N latitude and 72"56'24.22,E

to 7 7 " 56' 29.4O"E Longitude.

7. The total Manpower requirement is l5Nos.

8. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 85.46 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 2.90 lakhs 9. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 60m. 10. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.

11. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 12. No lnterstate boundary & Western 6hats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.

I3. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of lOkm from the lease

a rea.

14. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board conitituted under water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 15. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of 'l0km.

16. No temples, schools and archaeological sites within the radius of the 500m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Chinnamoopanpatti

vi llage, Vi rudhunagar District dated 20 /12 /2018.

Chairman, k -t.-xu;EAc-rN 17. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director (i,/c), Department of Geology and Mining, Virudhunagar vide Letter RoC. No. KVI/488/2018 dated 11/07/2019 informed that No existing and abandoned quarries within 500m radius from the proposed Rough 5tone quarry.

The SEAC noted the following:

l. The Proponent, Thiru. N Krishnasamy has applied for Environmental Clearance to

SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.3.l.OHa

in S.F.Nos. 132/4, 132/5, 132/6, 132/7, 132/8, 132/"10, 133/9A and 133/98 at

Pullalakottai Village, Virudhunagar Taluk. Virudhunagar District,Tamil Nadu

2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" ol ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to Prevent dust pollution,

suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into

consideration.

3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water

bodies near the Project site.

Chairman, Srilc-rN 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.

5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. 6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining

plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities.

7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NCT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.l86 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.5B0/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.10212017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (M.A.No. 758/2016,M.A.No.92012016,M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.l212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2O16 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 981 /2016, M.A.No.9821201 6 & M.A.No.3 84/2017).

8. The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC, 60l, New Delhi.

facilities to Govt school in Pullakottai Village as committed during SEAC meeting as

per office Memorandum of MoEF& cc dated ol.o5.2olg the above activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNpCB.

CL. \ Chairman, ptEAc-rN - STATE EXPERT APPMISAL COMMIfiEE - TAMIL NADU

Minutes of the 134'h Meeting of the State Expert APPraisal Committee (SEAC) held on

Panagal Maligai. Saidapet. Chennai.

Agenda no: 134 - I (File No. 1621/2018) Proposed residential development "TULIPS" at Survey No: 55511, 555/2,555/4, 556fiD, 556/1E, 557/3 & 560/3 Sowripalayam Village, Coimbatore South Taluk, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu by IWs. Vascon Pricol lnfrastructure Limited - for Environment Clearance under Violation Notification isued by MoEF&CC. (SlMrN/MlN/3 4916/2019) dated: 17.o4.2O19

The S EIAA-TN has issued the Terms of Reference to the Project proponent' M/s. Vascon Pricol lnfrastructure Limited under violation notification dated 08.O3.2018 for the

Residential Development ' TULlPS" at 5.F No.555l1,555/2,555/4,556/1D.556/1E.557/3 &. 560/3 of Sowripalayam Village, coimbatore South Taluk, coimbatore District vide sEIAA Letter No. 5EIAA -TN/F.No.162115EAC-CXVIl/ Violation/ToR-551/2018 dated 09/08/2018.

The proponent has applied along with EIA report for Environmental clearance on 29.07.2019.

The proposal was placed in this 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the

environmental impact assesrment as Pretented by the Proponent are as follows:

cd*- ,q Lhatrman. eSEAC-TN t. The proposed development is proposed in a plot area of 18,247.40 sq.m comprises of TBlocks, in three Phases. Phase -l & ll blocks comprising Blocks 1,2. 3,4 & 5 were already constructed and 'l&2 made operational, though only partial occupancy is achieved. Blocks of Phase -l construction has configuration Stilt + 4 Floors with 48 Dwelling Units &

Total Built-up Area 7868.732Sq.m ; Phase -ll construction has configuration 2 Basement +Stilt +9 Floors with 72 Dwelling units and Block -4 has Cround Floor + 1 Floor for Club house in a total Built-up Area 19,967.9225q. - Proposed Phase-lll comprises Blocks 6 shall have 2 Basements +stilt +14 Floort with 70 Dwelling Units in each block and club house with a combined built-up area @29,121.28 sq.m. Overall Built-up area after Phase -lll construction will be 56,957.93 Sq.m lt. The sewage generated from Phase -l &ll 71 kLD is treated in an in-house STP of

100 kLD ; From the Phase -ll 42 kLD of sewage is generated and it will be treated

in the proposed STP of 50 KLD capacity. After treatment 28 kLD will be recycled

for flushing in Phase -l&ll and l0 kLD will be used for 6reen belt development.

Treated sewage of 29 kLD from Phase -l&ll and 40 kLD from Phase-lll will be

discharged through Coimbatore Corporation tankers.STP shall be based on MBBR technology. iii. Solid waste Seneration shall be 0.86 MT/Day of which 0.52 MT/Day Bio- degradable wastes will be treated through an Organic Waste Converter of 0.5 MT

/Day capacity and 0.34 MT/Day of Non-Biodegradable recyclable wastes will be handed over to authorized recyclers. Organic sludge generation of l4 Kg/day from STP shall be used as manure for in house green belt development.

-d-+-Cha irman. Ji.lEac-rn iv. The power required is 2.90 MW shall be sourced through TANGEDCO. DG sets of

capacities lO0 KVA, 125 KVA and 160 KVA each two numbers are proposed for power back up with exhaust routed to the top of the block through stack of

adequate height and exhausted at an elevation of 2 meters above the roofParking

facility of 3696 sq.m will be provided.

Rainwater harvesting shall be done by harvesting roof top rainwater and collection

of surface run-off. Roof top rainwater directed to B nos. of 5 KL rainwater sumps.

Surface run-off is diverted to the storm water drain with cross- tection@ I m * I m that will be laid all along the boundary. Online percolation pits (28 Nos.) with 250 mm diameter will be made to percolate the water collected at the Storm

Water drain

VI. NBWL Clearance and Forest Clearance are not required. vii. Cort of the project is Rs. 115.50 Crores.

The SEAC noted the following:

1. The Proponent, M/s. Vascon Pricol lnfrastructure Limited has applied under violation notification dated 08.03.2018 for the Residential Development " ]'ULlP5" at S.F No.555/1,555/2,555/4,556/1D,556/1E,557/3 &. 560/3 of Sowripalayam Village, Coimbatore 5outh Taluk, Coimbatore District 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem B(a) "Building and Construction projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. The SEIAA-TN has issued the Terms of Reference to the project proponent, M/s. Vascon Pricol lnfrastructure Limited under violation notification dated 08.03.2018 for the Residential Development " TULIPS" at 5.F No.555/1.555/2.555/4.556/1D.556/1E.557/3 & 560/3 of Sowripalayam Village, aL. F- Chairman. - EiEAc-rN Coimbatore South Taluk. Coimbatore District vide SEIAA Letter No. SEIAA TN/F. No.1 52115EAC-CXVll/ Violation/ToR- 551 /2018 datedOg /08/2018.

After the preJentation made by the proponent, the 5EAC instruct the project proponent to furnish the following details:

1. The SEAC has not accepted the proposal of discharge of treated sewage of 29 kLD from Phase -l&ll and untreated sewage of 40 kLD from Phase-lll will be discharged through Coimbatore Corporation tankers. Further the SEAC direct the proponent to treat the entire quantity of the rewage in the premises itself. Hence the proponent shall revise water balance consideration theexcess treated sewage utilized for Avenue plantation. Further the proponent shall revise the EMP cost include the budget for utilization of treated sewage for Avenue plantation.

2. Details of the evacuation plan for 2 proposed basements shall be furnished.

3. Detail of Solid Waste management plan shall be prepared as per Solid waste management Rules, 2016 and same Jhall be furnished. 4. The proponent shall submit the 6ross Fixed value include the land value and construction cost as per the PWD guideline value.

The project proponent is requested to iubmit the aforesaid details to SEIAA-TN. on receipt of above details (sl.No. I to 5) from the project proponent, sEAC decided to

make an on - the - spot inspection to asseJs the present status of the Jite by the sub- committee constituted by the SEAC since this project comer under Voilation. Based on the inspection report and the data furnished for S.No. I to 5 stated above, sEAC would further deliberate on thii project and decide the further course of action.

ct-g\J. Lnatrman, &tEAc-rN Agenda .No: 134 - g (File.No. 6922/2019) Proposed Rough stone and quarry over an extent of o.61.oHa, Government poramboke land in s'F'No' 4o9 (Part-4) of Thulaiyanur Village, Thirumayam Taluk, pudukottai District' Tamil Nadu by tws. Eswar Enterprises - For Environmental clearance. (s IA/TN/M tN / 3 8828/ 2O1 s)

The proposal was placed in the l34th sEAc Meeting held on 30.og.2o1g. The project proponent gave detailed presentation' The salient features of the project and the environmentar impact assessment as presented by the proponent are a5 follows: 1. Government order/Lease details : The District Collector' Pudukottai directed the proponent, through his retter Rc'No'49/2o18 (6&M) dated 22'o3'2018 to get approved Mining pran and Environment clearance from the concerned authority for Rough stone and quarry over an Extent of 0'67'OHa' Government Poramboke land in 5.F.No. 4og (part-4) ofThulaiyanur Village, Thirumayam Taluk, pudukottai District, Tamil Nadu. 2. Mining plan/Scheme of Mining approval detaits: Mining Plan approved by Assistant Director, Department of c,eorogy and Mining, Pudukottai Rc.No.49 /2o1g (c&M) dated 14.o6.2o1gfor a period of 5 years. The applicant has proposed to quarry 22,43om3 Rough stone at the rate of looo/o recovery up to a depth of 35m (5m above ground lever and 3om berow ground rever) for a period of 5 years.

3. Geologicat and Mineable resources detaits Geological Resources 2.34,500m3 Q-55n f-srac-rN 4il \f Mineable Reserves 72.43Om3 @ound level and 3om below Depth of Mining ground level)

Production 14486m3/annum

14486m3 (for 5 years) 4. As per the Approved Mining Plan Production shall not exceed with (Jackhammer) 5. Mining operation will be by opencast semi mechanized method and tipper drilling and blasting and for loading and transport by Hydraulic excavator combination. 45" from horizontal 6. Mining with 6m vertical bench and slope of bench not exceeding and scientific point of view' during extraction of blocks will be maintained for safety method for loading and 7. Rough stone quarry operation involves in machinery and two tipper of 10 tones transport by Hydraulic excavator of 1.2m3 bucket capacity face to the dumps' capacity for internal transport of rejects from the working of l0tons capacity and B. Transport of Rejects and waste shall be done by Tippers transport of vehicles. 9. Environmental Settings 5U/12 and the The area is represented by Survey of lndia Toposheet No' .l0"12'44"N and geographical coordinates lie between Latitude 10"12'40"N to

Longitude 7 8"42' 37"E to 7 8" 42' 40" E'

lO. The total ManPower requirement is l9 Nos' and EMP cost about Rs' 4'45'OOO/' 11. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 54,00,000 /- l2.TheCroundWatertableisfoundtobeatthedepthof48m. HACA region' 13. Lease applied area is not covered under l4.NoCoastalRegulationZone(CRZ)withintheradiusoflOkmfromtheleasearea. 15'Nolnterstateboundary&Western6hatsBoundarywithintheradiusof]okmfrom the lease area'

-t.-bChairman, uffi. l6' No National Park & wild Life sanctuary. Eco sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 17'No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control constituted Board under water (Prevention and poilution) control of Act 1974 radius within the of lOkm from the lease area. 18. No Reserve forest within the radius of 5OOm. 19. No habitation within the radius of the 30om from the rease area. 20' Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology Puthukottai and Mining, vide Letter RC' No. 4g/2o18/(6&M) dated 03.o7.2019, it is informed that at present the following abandoned existing / / proposed quarries are rocated within 500 mts' radial distance from the periphery of the appried area below. as detaired

Existing euarry Name of aaaress of Lease period Remarks

Valiyanvayal6ffi Kalludaikum 432/2 Thozhilalargal, Thulaiyamur, (Q.No.r; 30.1O.2017 to NalaSangam, Thirumayam 29.10.2022 Valaiyanvayal (Govt. Land)

Thiru.K.Ramaiah Thulaiyanur 30.08.2017 to 29.O8.2022 4oe(O.N-.2) 0.72.0 i 14.11.2018 to (6ovt. Land) 13.11.2023 40e(Q.No-3) l4.ll.20l8 to 13.11.2023 432/2(part) Thiru. K.Subbaiah 02.O1.2017 (Q.No. l)(N.1 to 01.O1.2022 (Covt. Land)

) +rfi*>-- LSEAC_rN ( 4/ tl-\ roPonent in question

Expired & Abandoned Quarry Extent of Address of 5.F.No. & Remarks s. Nlar* 5.F.No. Lease period (in Hects.) No. the lessee Village Taluk to Thulaiyanur 23.O1.2014 543 (Pt) 1.21.5 1 R.M. 5ubbiah 22.01.2019 ThirumaYam 27.11.2009 to Thulaiyanur 42e(Pt) 0.60.0 2. A. ArokiYanathan 26.11.2014 Thirumayam 20.09.2011 to Thulaiyanur 407/2(Pr) 0.70.0 3. Tmt. Chitra 19.O9.2016 Thirumayam 03.02.2012 to Thulaiyanur 399 o.40.5 4. 5. KarupPaiah 02.o2.2017 Thirumayam (Q.No.6) 03.02.2012 to Thulaiyanur 399 o.40.5 5. 5. Anbarasan 02.o2.2017 ThirumaYam (Q.No.2) 409 25.01.2012 to Thulaiyanur (Q.No.3) 0.80.0 6. 5. Nallakumar 24.01.2017 Thirumayam (Part)

399 04.o4.2012 to Thulaiyanur (Q.No. 3) o.40.5 7. R. Renugadevi 03.04.2017 Thirumayam (E)

399 10.04.2012 to Thulaiyanur (Q.No.1) L50.0 V. Harishbabu 09.04.2017 8. ThirumaYam (E) 20.08.2012 to Thulaiyanur 43 3 (Pt) 2.83.O q PeriyasamY 19.O8.2017 ThirumaYam at.-> Chairman' ff# 21. The quarry lease area falls under Zone-ll, Low damage risk zone (MSK Vll) as per BMTPC, Vulnerability atlas Seismic zone of lndia lS: 1BI3_2OO2 and does not attract the general conditions as per EIA Notification, 2006.

The SEAC noted the following: proponent' l' The IMls. Eswar Enterprises has appried for Environmentar Clearance to SEIAA_TN for the proposed Rough Stone and quarry over an extent of 0'67 'oHa' 60vernment poramboke rand in s.F.No . 40g (part-4) of rhuraiyanur Vi[age, Thirumayam Taruk, pudukottai District. 2. The project/activity is covered under .,B2., Category of ltem 1(a) ..Mining projectr., of Mineral of the Schedule to the EIA Notification. 2006.

The project proponent gave preJentation about the proposar. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documentr furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposar for grant of Environmental crearance to sErAA subject to the forowing condition in addition to normal condition:

I' Ground water quarity monitoring shourd be conducted every report six months and the should be submitted to TNpCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall b established like providing Bert arong the boundary creen of the quarrying site, et suitable working methodology needs to ," .;,":',":;T:::::.::ff: consideration. 3' The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture bodies activity & water near the project site.

&-5EAC-rN 1tt=t-> w 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 5. The project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. 6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining

shall plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same

be monitored by the District Authorities.

Z. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.3 50/2016)' and o.A. No.200/2016 and o.A.No.S80/2016 (M.A.No.l182/2016) and o.A.No.102/2017 and o.A.No.404/2016 (M.A'No. 758/2016,M.A.No.9 2O/2O16,M.A.No.1122 /2016, M.A.No.12 /2017 & M'A' No' 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No. 981 /2016, M.A.No.9 82/2016 & M'A.No -384/2017). g. The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand

mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC, COI' New Delhi'

g. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 10. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. ll. The amount of Rs. 1.08 Lakhs (2o/o of the project cost) shall be utilized as a CER

activities to carried out for development of Library to Government school

Thulaiyanur Village as committed during SEAC meeting as per Office Memorandum

of MoEF& CC dated 01.05.2018 the above activity shall be carried out before

obtaining CTO from TNpCB.

ct- 2\ , Chairman, |srxc-rN ((/ w Agenda .No: 134 - 13 (File No. 6943/2019) Proposed the Fire Clay quarry in S.F.No: 191/382, 191/482 &191AC2 over an extent of 1.43.08 Hectares, Thazhapattu Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District' Tamil Nadu by Thiru. P Ramakrishnan - For Environmental Clearance. (slMrN/Ml N/3 7 463 / 2019)

The proposal was placed in the 134th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The pro.,ect proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient featureJ of the proiect and the environmental impact assesJment as presented by the Proponent are a5 follows:

l. Government Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. P Ramakrishnan. The Additionol Chief SecretorY io Governmenl, Inusiries (MMC.2) Deportment Secretoriot, Chennoi vide leiter No 9570/MMC.212018-1 doted 0B/10/2018 hos directed the opplicont Thiru. P Ramakrishnan to ge1 opproved mining plon ond Environmentol cleoronce cerlificote from the District Environmeni lmpoci Assessment Authority (DEIAA) for gront of quonying Fire Cloy over an Extent of l.43.OB Ha in 5.F.Nos. 191/382, 191/482&191nC2 atThazhapattu Village' Panruti Taluk. Cuddalore District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 10 years' The mining plan was got approval from the Additional Director of Geology and Mining' District vide Lr No 3235lMM1l/2O\g/FC/CLR dated 09/11/2018' Plan 3. As per the Department of ceology and Mining, cuddalore District. Mining approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of fire clay should not exceed 5O384m3 and Red soil should not exceed 63888m3. \ ct.Chairmat{/ qtr,,ff" a. For First year - 63888m3 of Red Soil b. For Second year - 10066m3 of Fire Clay c. For Third year -lOO66m3 of Fire Clay d. For Fourth year -10066m3 of Fire Clay e. For Fifth year -1O066m3 of Fire Clay 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 16m (6m red soir + 10m fire clay)below ground level 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mtntng. Rough 6. stone are to be transported by Tippers of 6 Nos. (20 T Capacity). 7. The project is rocate at 11"43'31.93"N ratitude and 79"31,27.79,,E Longitude. 8. The total Manpower requirement is lgNos. 9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 45.5o lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 3.5 lakhs 10. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 4Om. 11. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No coastal Reguration Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lokm from the rease area. 13' No lnterrtate boundary & western Ghats Boundary within the radius of lokm from the lease area.

14' No National Park & wird Life sanctuary within the radius of rOkm from the rease a rea.

15' No criticalry pofluted area as notified by the centrar poflution Contror Board constituted under (prevention .rg74 water and Contror of poflution) Act within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 16. No Protected Area, Eco sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive Area within the radius of lOkm.

17. No habitation within the radius of the 500m from the rease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO. Thazhampattu Village. puntroti Taluk dated 14/11/2018.

Chairman. . SEAC.TN q'.4 j v^/ The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent. Thiru. P Ramakrishnan has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed the Fire Clay quarry in 5.F.No: 1g1/382, 191/482 &191/1C2 over an extent of 1.43.08 Hectares, Thazhapattu Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. made by the The project proponent gave detailed presentation. Based on the presentation proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to direct the proponent to furnish the following details: mines in '1. The project proponent has not furnished the letter obtained from AD/DD the following format in terms of Existing quarries/ abandoned quarries/ Present that the Proposed quarries/ Future Proposed quarries. Hence, the sEAC decided Mines' project proPonent may get the following information from the AD/DD 5 F No' ', Letter from the AD/DD Mines about the details (Name of the owner' quarries Extent & distance from the boundary of this quarry) of other from the (proposed/Existing/Abandoned quarries) within a radius of 500 m format' boundary of the proposed quarry site in the following from this Name of the Name of Village & Distance proposed Quarry Quarry Owner Survey Number h. Existing quarries

i. Abandoned quarries

). Present ProPosed quarries

GL-?---Chairman, ? q4fiPfr{" Total extent 2. The project propone the mining plan approval letter obtained from the Department of Geology and Mining, cuddalore District indicates onry quarrying of Fire cray. However the FORM lM and mining plan indicates the proposal for quarrying Red soil and Fire Clay.

on receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course of action the proposal.

Agenda No.: 134 - 14 (File No. 68g1/2}ts) Proposed Rough stone quarry tease over an extent of r.oo.OHa in s.F.No .21/l (Part-l) at che.Agaram Viilage, chengam Tatuk, Tiruvannamatai District Tamil Nadu by Thiru.M.Mani- For Environmental Clearance. (srA/TN/M tN / 37 9 4t /2o1s) The proposal was placed in the l34th sEAc Meeting held on 3o.og.2o1g. The project proponent gave detailed presentation' The salient features of the project and the environmentar impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:

1. Government Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of rhiru. M. Mani. Tiruvannamalai, Precise Area communication war issued by the District collector, Tiruvannamalai vide RC'No'08/Kanimam/2o19, Dated: 20.o5.2019 fora period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.oo.oHa in s.F.No. 21/1 (Part-l) at che'Agaram Village, chengamTaluk, Tiruvannamalai District,

Chairman. SEAC-TN (4/ w Agenda No.:134-20 (File No.696l12019) Proposed Rough stone Quarry lease over an extent of 4.77.OHa in S.F.Nos. 663/1N(P) 663/181(P), 663/lB2(P), 663/183(P), 663/2(P) &. 679/1(P) at Thorapalli Agraharam Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District,Tamil Nadu by M/s. AVS Tech Building Solutions lndia Private Limited- For Environmental Clearance.

(slA/TN/Ml N/3 85 s7 /2019) The proposal was placed in the 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact arsessment as presented by the proponent are as follows: l. Government Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of M/s. AVS Tech Building Solutions lndia Pvt. Ltd, Krishnagiri, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District

Collector, Krishnagiri vide R.c.No. 890/2018(Mines-2), dated 23.O7.2018 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry over an extent of 4.77.5Ha in S.F.No. 663/1A (P), 663/181 (P), 663/182 (P), 663/183 (P), 663/2 (P) &.679/1 (P) at ThorapalliAgraharam Village, HosurTaluk, Krishnagiri District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Deputy Director, Department of 6eology and Mining,

Krishnagi ri Di strict videRc. N o.89O /2018 / Mines-2 Dated: 09. I 1.201 8. 3. As per the Department of Ceology and Mining, Krishnagiri District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total

quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 8,82,511 m3 For First year - 1,70,24Om3 of Rough stone For Second year - l, 96,105m3 of Rough stone For Third year - 1,86,746m3 of Rough stone For Fourth year - 1, 82,945m3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 1, 45,675m3 of Rough stone :t-> Chairman, EjiEAc-rN 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water bodies near the project site.

4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.

5. The Pro,iea Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable.

6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining

plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall

be monitored by the District Authorities.

7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the principal outcome of the Hon'ble Ncr, Bench, New Delhi in o.A No.lg6 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2O16) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2or6 (M.A.No.1lB2l2016) and O.A.No.t0212017 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 758/2016,M.A.No.920l20l6,M.A.No.ll22l2016, M.A.No.l2l2O17 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and o.A.No.405/2o16 and o.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. g}r /2016, M.A.No.98212016 & M.A.No.3 B4/2O17).

8. The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC, COl, New Delht.

9. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 10. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. 11. The amount of Rs. 1.49lakhs (2o/o of the project cort) shall be utilized as cER activities to carried out for development of strengthening of tank bunds in the vicinity of the project area as committed during SEAC meeting as per office Memorandum of MoEF& cc dated ol.o5.2olB the above activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNpCB. d-+ Chairman, ,-rEAc-rN Hect. Dated

I M/s. AVS tech Thorapalli 663/1A(P), 4.77.5

Building Agraharam 663/18(P),

5olutions lndia 663/182(P),

Private Limited 663/183(p).

663/2,

679/1

The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent M/s AVS Tech Building Solutions India Private Limited has applied

for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Rough stone quarry

lease over an extent of 4.77.OHa in S.F'Nos' 663/1A/(P) 663/18l(P)' 663/182(P)'

663/183(p), 663/2(P) 5,679/1(P) at Thorapalli Agraharam Village, Hosur Taluk,

Krishnagiri District,Tamil Nadu

2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B2" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006- The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition: l. 6round water quality monitoring should be conducted every month and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 2. proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. \-. I Chairman, ptEAc-rN the quarries situated within 500mts. radial distance from the said quarry are

furnished as follows. Details of Existing quarries G.O. s. Name of the Extent in Lease Status ofthe Village S. F. No. No. & No. lessee Hect. period quarry Dated

Nil Nil Nil Nit NiI Nit Nil Nit

Details of Abandoned/old quarries

Extent G.O. s. Name of the Village 5. F. No. in No. & Lease period No. lessee Hect. Dated

1 D.Salu, Thorapalli 01.07.2008 to 550(part-1) 5.00.0 5/o. Devassy Agraharam 30.05.20r8

2. D. Shaju. ThorapalliAgrahar 29.05.2008 to 660(Part2) 5.00.0 5/o. Devassy am 28.05.2018

3. D. Shaju, ThorapalliAgrahar 29.05.2008 to 660(Part3) 5.00.0 5/o. Devassy am 28.0s.2018

4. J. Syed Khaium ThorapalliAgrahar 08.08.2005 to 661/2(Part) 0.60.0 5/o. R. S. Jalal am 07.08.2010

5. Salu (Xavier) ThorapalliAgrahar 01.07.2008 to 662 2.90.0 5/o. Devassy am 30.06.2013

Total r8.50

Details of proposed Quarries

s. Name of the Extent G.O. Lease Village S. F. No. No. lessee in No. & period

Chairman,- 5;JrAC-rN 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 57m (lm Top Soil and 56m Rough stone) ('l5m above Ground Level and 42 below Ground level). 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width. 6. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of 3 Nos. (10 T Capacity).

7. Topsoil (24,472m3) will be removed and dumped in all side of the 7.5m & 6Om boundary barriers of the lease area and it will be used for plantation purpores. 8. The projea is locate at 12.41'35.57',N to12.41,46.96,,N latitude and21"54,11.54,E

to 7 7" 5 4'22.89" ELongitude.

9. The total Manpower requirement is 1B Nos.

10. Total cost of the projeas is Rs. 68.00 lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 5.60 lakhs ll. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 65m below ground level. 12. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.

13. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 14. No lnterstate boundary & Western 6hats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area-

15. No National Park & wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of 10km from the lease area. NoC obtained from the District Forest Officer for quarrying of Rough stone. 16' No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board constituted under water (Prevention and Control of pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.

17. No Protected Area, Eco sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of 10km. r)Oorship 18. No habitation, places and archeologically important place within the radius of the 500m from the lease area.

19. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri vide Letter RC. No. B9o/2ol9/Mines dated 26.06.201g,the details of *;_.s o/:Ac-rN Agenda ,No: 134 - l0 File No.5893/2019 Proposed construction of Residential Development in old survey No. 77/6AlA(part) & New Survey No. 77/6A1A2, Pammal village, Pallavaram Taluk, lGncheepuram district, Tamil Nadu by M/s. Radiance Realty Developers lndia Limited - For Environment Clearance

(srAlTN / Mrs/ to9O85/2O19)

The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The details are presented by the proponent as follows:

1. The project is located at latitude 12"58'17.10"N and longitude 80"8'35.15"E.

2. The project involves construction of residential building comprises of 7 blocks:

block A to 6: each block consists of Stilt + 5 floors with total number of 452 dwelling units. proposed 3. Total land area is 22541 Sq.m & The total built-up area of the residential development is 55951 Sq.m

4. The green belt area proposed for the project is 3400 Sqm (15olo of total land

area). Pammal 5. The daily fresh water requirement is 330 KLD to be sourced from MunicipalitY. grey water 6. The total quantity of 184 KLD of grey water will be let into the treatment system (220 KLD). After grey water treatment, 175 KLD of treated water will be generated, out of which 104 will be used for flushing, 12 KLD for gardening, 8 KLD for oSR and remaining 51 KLD will be sent to avenue plantation.

-.1-+Chairman. 6 sEec-rN 7. Black water generated from Flushing (l04 KLD) will let into the sewaSe treatment plant(130 KLD). Treated sewage will be sent to avenue plantation. 8. The bio degradable solid waste (830 kglday) will be treated in OWC machine and the manure generated will be used for landscaping purpose within project site. The non bio degradable solid waste (554 kg/day) will be handed over to

Authorized recyclers. 9. About 41 nos. of recharge pit with dia. 1.2 m and depth 3 m will be provided. Rain water collection sump of 190 KLD is also proposed to be provided for collection of roof top run off.

10. The proponent is proposed to install 4 no. of 250 kVA D6 sets each with a stack

height of 22 m.

The SEAC noted the following:

l. The proponent M/s. Radiance Realty Developers lndia Limited has applied for Proposed construction of Residential Development in old survey No.

77/6A1A(part) & New Survey No.77/6A1A2, Pammal village. Pallavaram Taluk. Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu by 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem 8(a) "Building

and construction projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification. 2006.

After the presentation made by the proponent, the 5EAC instruct the project proponent to furnish the following details:

1. The SEAC noted that there are difference between the data regarding

the water balance furnished in the application and details presented by

the consultant in the SEAC meeting. Hence the proponent shall revise .^.(-.--B f hairman, ,JrAC-rN water balance. Also SEAC advised the proponent to furnish the correct details with regard to Application and presentation pertaining all

aspects of the project.

2. The proponent shall allocate the land area(at leatt 15o/o of the total

land area) for green belt development all along the boundaries of the project site premises with 3m width . The proponent should earmark the green belt area in the layout plan with GPS coordinates and dimension and the same shall be submitted for CMDA approval.

3. The proponent shall submit the Cross Fixed value include the land

value and construction cost as Per the PWD guideline value

4. The details of flood management plan shall be furnished considering

the proiect site and the surrounding area, with 2015 flood data'

5. The rainwater harvesting plan shall be furnished considering the

project site and the surrounding area

6. The proponent obtains the concern letter from the competent Authority for the utilization of treated sewage for Avenue plantation'

7. The proposal for CER shall be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.2O18'

the aforesaid details to SEIAA- The project ProPonent is requested to submit proponent' TN. On receiPt of above details (Sl.No. l to 7) from the project the further course 5EAC would further deliberate on this project and decide

C\--->l^ Chairman. w^c-rN Agenda .No: 134 - 2 File No:53832017 Proposed Expansion of Existing Medical College and Research Centre by IWs. SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY at Survey No. 153/5A, 68, 7, 155/34, 4, 156/18,2,3,157,158/1A, lB, 2A, 28 &.2C of Potheri & Vallanchery village, Chengalpat Taluk, lGnchipuram District, Tamilnadu (under violation) - For Environment Clearance.

(slA/TN/MlS/3 5808/2018)

The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed preientation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assesiment a5 pretented by the proponent are as follows: l. The project is located at latitude 12'49'23.32'N and longitude 8O"2'44.83"E. 2. Total land area n 250652.17 m2. The total built up area after expansion is about 2,99,259 Sqm (Hospital component - 1.49,459 Sqm, Non Hospital component - 1,49,800 Sqm) and the total plot area is about 2,50,652.17 Sqm. The built up area of the existing buildings is 245839.32 Sqm (Hospital - 106633.72 Sqm, Non Hospital - 139205.6 Sqm) and the proposed buildings is 53420.O1 Sqm (Hospital - 42825.57 Sqm, Non Hospital - 10594.44 Sqm). 3. The green belt area proposed for the project k 85222 Sqm (34o/o of total land area). 4. The daily fresh water requirement after expansion is 937 KLD to be sourced from the ground water. 5. The total quantity of BI6KLD of waste water from domestic use and 576 kLD of flushing water will be let into the sewage treatment plant (1100 KLD- existing and 400 KLD - proposed). After sewage treatment process, 1322 KLD of treated water will be generated, out of which 576 will be used for flushing' 496 KLD for gardening & OSR, and 250 KLD for HVAC. 30 KLD of effluent will be generated

st- =-- Chairman.c- E rAc'rN from Laundry. C55D and pathology which will be treated in 30 KLD ETP. 29 KLD of treated water generated will be reused in laundry. 6. The bio degradable solid waste of 3456 kg/day - exirting is treated in Biogas plant

of 70 cum and 90 cum capacity. 945 kg/ day of biodegradable solid waste will be generated in Proposed which will be treated in OWC 500. The non bio degradable

solid waste of 2934 kg/day (2.304 T/day - Existing. O.63OT/day - Proposed) is handed over to Authorized recyclers.

7. About 0.375 f/day of Biomedical waste generated is disposed through PCB Authorised Company 6J Multiclave. B. About l0 nos. of recharge pit having the capacity of 25BB Cum is present in the site. Rain water collection sump of 400 Cum is also proposed to be provided for collection of roof top run off. 9. Total Power requirement after expansion is 6500 kVA and the source is TNEB 6rid. Existing DC sets: 600 kVA I No.. 725 kVA - 1 No., 250 kVA 2 Nos., 500 kVA - I No. &125 kVA - I No. The existing D6 sets are provided with lnbuilt Acoustic enclosures. Back-up power supply for the proposed buildings are provided through the D6 sets of following numbers - 600 kVA 1 No., 500 kVA 1 No., 1010 kVA 1 No.. 725 kVA - 3nos. The 5EAC noted the following:

1. The Proponent. M/s. SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOCY has applied

for Environmental Clearance to 5EIAA-TN for the Proposed Expansion of Existing

Medical College and Research Centre in 5.F.No. 15316A. 68,7.155/3A, 4. 156/18,

2, 3, 157, l58llA. 18, 2A, 28 &.2C of Potheri & Vallanchery village, Chengalpat Taluk, Kanchipuram District Tamil Nadu

2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B2" of ltem B(b) "Townships and area development Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2005.

ri-. L'/\ Lharrman. EJEAC-TN 3. ToR was issued by SEIAA-TN vide Letter No. SEIAA -TN/F.No.162\ISEAC-CXV|l/

Violation/ToR- 5 51 /2018 datedOT / 02/2019

4. The proponent has not submitted the compliance rePort along with the enclosure

for the Part-lll of the ToR issued vide Letter No. SEIAA -TN/F.No.1621/SEAC' CXVII/ Violatio nfi oR-551 /2018 datedOT /O2/2O19

After the presentation made by the proponent, the SEAC instruct the project proponent to furnish the compliance report along with the necessary enclosure for Part-lll of the ToR issued vide Letter No. SEIAA TN/F.No.1621l5EAC-CXVll/ ViolationfloR-551/2018 datedOT/O2/2O19

The project proponent is requested to submit the aforesaid detail to SEIAA-TN. On receipt of above details from the project proponent, SEAC decided to make an on'the -

5pot inspection to as5e55 the present Jtatui of the site by the sub-committee constituted by

the SEAC since this project is comes under violation. Based on the inspection report, 5EAC would further deliberate on this Pro.iect and decide the further course of action.

Agenda .No: 134 - 3 File.No.63&)/2019 e.oporffll%nrtruction of multi itoried residential building by IWs. South lndia Shelters Private Limited at Survey No. 259l2AlA(part), 259/2AlB, Old 5.No.259l2(part), 259/2A1 in Vanagaram Village, survey no. 57/2A, 57/28, 57/2C, 57/2D1, 57/2D2, old s.no.57/2 in Chettiaragaram village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Thiruvallur Distria, Tamil Nadu- For Environment Clearance (s rA/TN/MlS^ O9O9 4/2019) The proposal was placed in this'134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30'08'2019' The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the Proponent are as follows:

Chairman, plac-rN Agenda No.l34-ll (Fife No. 6879/2019) Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.2O.O Ha in S.F.No. 2O3/1A(P), 2O3/lC & 203/2 at Kumbalappadi Village of Nallampalli Taluk' Dharmapuri District Tamil Nadu by Thiru.S.Rathinavel, Dharmapuri - For Environmental Clearance. (SIA/TN/MlN/37463/2019) dated 15.06.2019

l. Government Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. S.Rathinavel, Dharmapuri, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Dharmapuri vide R.c.No.28ll2017l(Kanimam), dated 09.O2.2O19f or a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Roush stone quarry over an extent of 2.2O.O Ha in S'F.No. 203llA(P), 2O3/1C & 203/2 at Kumbalappadi Village of Nallampalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District, 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Assistant Director, Department of Ceology and Mining, Dharmapuri District vide Rc.No.28l12017l(Mines) Dated: 07.03.2019.

3. As per the Department of Ceology and Mining, Dharmapuri District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 year5, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 3,68'420m3 and Topsoil should not exceed 16.6O0m3

For First year - 73.150m3 of Rough stone and 7,810m3 of Topsoil For Second year - 73,17Om3 of Rough stone and 8,79Om3 of Topsoil For Third year - 73.480m3 of Rough stone For Fourth year - 73,12Om3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 75.500m3 of Rough stone

4. The quarry operation is proposed up to a depth of 46m (lm Topsoil and 45m Rough stone) (llm above ground level + 35m below ground level). 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mining with 5.Om vertical bench and width. mechanized C.'i:------_- ^ - \ CHAIRMAN LsEAc-rN 6. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of 4 Nos. (10 T Capacity). 7. Topsoil (16,600m3) will be removed and preserved all along the boundary barrier to facilitate the green belt development. 8. The project is locate at l2'05'53.80'N to 12"05'59.52"NIatitude and

7 8"O1', 59.31 "E to 7 8"O2'O8.12"E Longitude. 9. The total Manpower requirement is 34 Nos.

10. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 54.99 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 3.80 lakhs

11. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 55m in summer and 50m in

rainy season.

12. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.

13. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area.

14. No lnterstate boundary & Western Chats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area. 15. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area.

16. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.

17. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of 1Okm.

18. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area. 19. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Dharmapuri vide Letter RC. No. 281/2017(Mines) dated 07.O3.2Otg,it is informed that at present the following abandoned / existing / proposed quarries are Iocated within 500 mts. radial distance from the periphery of the applied area as detailed below. Abandoned Quarry 5.F.No. & Village Taluk Existing Quarry

s. Name of Village Taluk Extent Classification Lease Remarks No. Address of (in of Land period the lessee Hects.)

I Thiru.Durair Lease was aj, 5.F.No.436ll cancelled vide S/o (part) Nekkunthi district collector Covt. 19.08.r0 Annadurai, Village, proceeding 1.17 .5 poramboke to Sogathur Nallampalli Taluk, Roc.287/2014/(Mi land 18.08.20 (Vill & po). Dharmapuri (l'k) nes)dated Dharmapuri & (D0 02.03.2016 (DT)

Total 1.17.5 Heas Proposed Quarry

s. Name of Address of Village Extent (in Lease 5.F.No. Classification No. the lessee &Taluk lakhs) period ------Nil------

The SEAC noted the following:

1. The Proponent, Thiru.s.Rathinavel has applied for Environmental

Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an

extent of 2.2o.o Ha in s.F.No. 2o3/tA(P), 2o3/1c & 203/2 at Kumbalappadi Village of Nallampalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District Tamil Nadu

2. The project/activity is covered under Category "82" of ltem l(a) "Mining

of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

The project proponent Save presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition: I a\^. )--L- CHAIR,\4AN E-5rec-rru .1. Cround water quality monitoring should be conducted every month and the report should be submitted to TN PCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing 6reen Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site' etc' and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the aSriculture activity & water bodies near the proiect Jite. 4. Transportation of the quarried materialJ shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. 6.ThequarryingactivityshallbestoPpediftheentirequantityindicatedinthe Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcomeoftheHon'bleN6T'Principa|Bench'NewDelhiino.ANo.lE6of2ol6 (M.A.No.35Ol2016) and O.A' No.2OOl2016 and O'A'No'58O/2016 (M.A.No.l18212016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O'A'No'404/2016 (M'A'No' 758l20l6,M.A.N o.g2O/2O16,M.A.No.112212016. M.A.No.1212017 & M'A' No' 843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M'A'No' 981 /2016' M.A.No.982l2O16 & M.A.No.384/2017 ). 8. The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC' COI' New Delhi. 9. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation.

10. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. 11. CER activities should be carried out for development of Library, sports facilities, providing toilet Facility and providing drinking water to 6overnment school Kumbalappadi Village ar committed during SEAC meeting as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC dated 01.05.2018 the above activity shall be carried out before obtaininS CTO from TNPCB. G\ -l=-CHAIRTAAN $jitAC-rN (M.A.No.1l8212015) and O.A.No.10212017 and O.A.No.4O4/2016 (M.A.No. 758/2016,M.A.No.92012016,M.A.No.1122/2016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2Ot6 (M.A.No. g}t /2016, M.A.No.98212Ol 5 & M.A.No.3 B4/2O17).

8. The entire mining operation should be as per the cuidelines for sustainable sand Mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF & CC. 6()l, New Delhi.

after the mine activity is lapsed as reported.

11. The proposal for the cER activities should be furnished with time frame as per office Memorandum of MoEF & CC dated 01.05.2018 before placing the subject to SEIM meeting.

Agenda No.:134-19

(File No. 6905/2019)

Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an Extent of 0.78.0Hect in S.F.No. lfl at Musiri Village' walajah raluk, Vellore District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. s. Gopinath, Vellore - For Environmental Clearance,

(srA/rN/Mr N/3 6e 30 /2O1e)

The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 30.0g.2019. The project proponent gave detailed Presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact aiteJrment as presented by the proponent are as followJ: l. Covernment Order / Lease details; The proponent Thiru.s. copinath, Vellore has been granted quarry rease for quarrying Rough stone quarry lease over an Extent of o.7g.0Hect in 5.F.No. r/r at Musiri Village, Walajah Taluk, Vellore District vide proceeding No. Rc.No. jt- 5 Chairman, ,P\c-rN 3312011 (Mines) dated 15.11.2011 for a period of l0 years. The lease deed was executed on l6.ll,20ll and the lease period is valid from 16.11.2011 to 15.11.2021' 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The Mining plan was prepared for the period of three years. The mining plan was got approval from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining' Vellore District vide Rc. No. 33l201'l(mined dated 17.05.2019. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Vellore District. Mining Plan approval for the 3 years, the production schedule for 3 years ttates that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 34'380m3 and topsoil should not exceed 4,520m3 For First year - 13908m3 of Rough stone and 2112m3 of Topsoil For Second year - 10992m3 of Rough stone and 2,408m3 of Topsoil For Third year - 9480m3 of Rough Stone 4. The quarry war not operated from l6.ll.2Oll to till date and letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of 6eology and MininS, Vellore vide letter Rc. No. 3312011(Kanimam), dated 02.07.2019. 5. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of l5m (lm Topsoil and 14m Rough stone) below ground level. 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with oPen cast semi mechanized mining with 5.Om vertical bench and width. 7. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of 3 Nos' (10 T Capacity)' 8.Theprojectislocateat12"56,28.36''Nto12"56.33.57.Nlatitudeand

7 g" 23' 58.69' E to 7 9" 24' O4.7 O" E Longitude. 9. The total Manpower requirement is l8 Nos. lakhs. 10. Total cost of the proiects is Rs. 68,50 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 4,25 55m in 11. The water table is found to be at the depth between 6om in summer and

rainy season.

12. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region'

$JEAC-TN 13. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lokm from the lease area. 14. No Interstate boundary & !?estern chats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.

15. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary within the radius of lOkm from the lease

a rea.

16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of 10km.

17. No habitation within the radius of the 3OOm from the lease area. 18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of ceology and Mining, Vellore vide Letter RC. No. 331201ll(kanimam), dated 24.05.2o19, it is informed

that the following Rough stone quarry in Covernment land sF. No. r/r over an extent of 0.78.0 hectares of Musiri Village, walajahraluk, Vellore District. s. Lessee Name Village 5F. No. Extent (Ha.) No. Status

I Thiru. 5.M. Sugumar Anandalai 1/4 0.80.00 Abandoned (part-10)

2. Thiru. 5. Gopinath Musiri t/1 0.78.00 Proposed Total l.58.OO The SEAC noted the following:

l' The Proponent Thiru. s. 6opinath, Ve[ore has appried for Environmental clearance SEIAA-TN proposed to for the Rough stone quarry rease over an Extent of 0.78.0Hect in S.F.No. 1/1 at Musiri Viilage, warajahraruk, Velore District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered .,Mining under category "82" of rtem r (a) of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. The project proponent gave presentation. detailed Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documentr furnished, the SEAC decided to direct the proponent to furnish the following details:

aJ-- L-7'- Chairman. ,lEec-rN l. lt was noted in the Google image that mining activity was already been carried out in the leased area. lt is requested to furnish the following details from AD, mines a) Quantity of minerals already mined out in the lease approved area. b) Depth of mining already mined out in the lease approved area.

c) Name of the person already mined in that leases area. 2. The project proponent shall furnish EC and CTO from TNPCB obtained along with respective compliance report. 3. The project proponent has to furnish the letter obtained from AD/DD mines in the following format in terms of Existing quarries/ abandoned quarries/ Present Proposed quarries/ Future Proposed quarries. Hence, the SEAC decided that the project proponent may get the following information from the AD/DD Mines,

" Letter from the AD/DD Mines about the details (Name of the Owner, 5 F No, Extent & distance from the boundary of this quarry) of other quarries (proposed/Existing/Abandoned quarries) within a radius of 500 m from the boundary of the proposed quarry site in the following format. 5l.No. Name of the Name of Village & Extent in Distance from this Quarry Owner Survey Number Hectare proposed Quarry d. Existing quarries

1 2 e. Abandoned quarries

1 2 f. Present Proposed quarries

1 2 Total extent On receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course of action on the proposal.

#Ac-rN Agenda No.:134-20 (File No.696ll2019)

Proposed Rough stone Quarry lease over an extent of 4.77.OHa in 5.F.Nos. 663/1A/(P) 663/181(P), 663/182(P), 663/183(P), 663/2(P) &. 679/1(P) at Thorapalli Agraharam Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri Dirtrict,Tamil Nadu by M,/s. AVS Tech Building Solutions lndia Private Limited- For Environmental Clearance. (srA/rN/Mr N/3 8s s7 /2o1e) The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent Save detailed presentation. The salient features of the pro.fect and the environmental impact asressment as presented by the proponent are as follows: 1. Covernment Order / Lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of M/s. AVS Tech Building Jolutions lndia Pvt. Ltd. Krishnagiri, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District

Collector, Krishnagiri vide R.c.No. 890/2018(Mines-2), dated 23.O7.2018 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry over an extent of 4.77.5Ha in S.F.No. 663/1A (P), 663/tBt (P), 663/182 (P), 663/tB3 (p), 663/2 (p) &.579/l (P) at ThorapalliAgraharam Village, HosurTaluk, Krishnagiri District. 2. Mining PIan / Scheme of Mining approved details:

The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Deputy Director, Department of 6eology and Mining,

Krishnagi ri Di strict videRc.N o.890/2018/ Mines-2 Dated: 09. t l.2Ol B. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri District. Mining plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 8,82,511m3

For First year - 1,7O,24Om3 of Rough stone

For Second year - l, 96,105m3 of Rough stone For Third year - 1, 86,7 46m3 of Rough stone For Fourth year - 1,82,945m3 of Rough stone For Fifth year - 1,46,675m3 of Rough stone :L.-> Chairman, E;lac'rN Agenda No.:134-17

(File No. 6895/2019) Proposed Quartz &. Feldspar Quarry lease over an extent of 2.41.5ha in 5.F.No.961l2 at Kambiliyampatti Village of KangeyamTaluk, Tiruppur District the state of Tamil Nadu by Thiru.R.Natarajan, Tiruppur- for Environment Clearance. (SIA/TN/MIN/37155/2019) dated: 03.07.2019

The proposal was placed in the l34th SEAC Meeting held on 3O.08.2O19. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows: 1. Covernment order/ Lease details:

The Proponent Thiru. R. Natarajan, Tiruppur has been granted quarry lease for

quarrying of Quartz & Feldspar for over an extent of 2.41.5ha in s.F.No. 961,12 at Kambiliyampatti Village of KangeyamTaluk, Tiruppur District,Tamil Nadu vide Proceeding Rc.No.l328/MM6/2OO9 dated 05.11.2O09 for a period of Twenty years. The Lease deed was executed on 23.01.2O10, registered on O4.O2.21O and it is valid upto 03.02.2020, The quarry operation was

commenced on 17 .O2.2O1O. 2. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details: a. The Mining plan (2009-lO to 2013-14) was approved by the Indian Bureau of Mines, Chennai vide Letter No. TN/ERD/MP/Q&F-1744- MD5, dated 16.10.2009. b. The First Scheme of Mining (2014-15 to 2018-19) was approved by lndian Bureau of Mines, Chennai vide Letter No. TN/TPVQ&F/M5- ll60.MDS. dated 05.01.2015. c. The Second Scheme of Mining (20'19-20 to 2023-24) was approved by Additional Director of Geology and Mining, Department of Geology and Mining, 6uindy, Chennai vide RC. No. 9423/MMlO/2Ol8ffPRlQ&F/sOM dated 26.12.2018. I o Q\-. \- Lharrman. tsEAc-rN d. The quarrying operation and quantity of material mined are as follows.

Proposal ([onnes) Actual flonnes) Recoverable Quartz Feldspar Mineral Mineral Year ROM ROM Recoverable Quartz Feldspar Reserves (600/o) (4Oo/o) rejects rejects o, cD Reserves Ts Ts Ts (600/o) Ts Ts Ts (4Oo/o) Ts Ts 2014-15 2059 1236 741 494 824 2015-16 1872 1123 674 449 749 2016-17 2153 1292 775 517 861 The Mine was temporarily discontinued from 2017-18 1966 1179 708 472 786 31.05.2011, Hence no production was achieved. 2018-'.t9 1966 1179 708 472 786 TOTAL 100r5 6009 3605 2404 4006 Thelesseehadnotobtainedtransportpermitduringtheviolationperiodffi

had obtained transport permit of 100T of Quartz during the mining the plan period 2010-11 and after that he has not obtained any transport permit.

3. As per the Scheme of Quarrying for the years 2O19-2O to 2023-24, production schedule for year's states that the total volume of Quartz (600/o) should not exceed 1,89,356Ts and Feldspar (40o/o) should not exceed 't,26,231Ts.

Year Quartz (50olo) Ts Feldspar (4Oo/o\ Ts For 2O19-2O 37355 24904 For 2O2O-21 37150 24767 For 2021-22 38182 25455 For 2022-23 3880r 2s867 For 2023-24 37867 25245 4. The waste that will be resulting in the quarrying operation for the 5 years 2O19-2O to 2023-24 will be 3,74,551m3(Mineral rejects + Side burden) and Topsoil - 33,354m3. The total Waste will be temporarily dump on the non- working area and it will be used for backfilling. 5. The proponent has obtained transport permit on 08.05.2010 to transport

100MT of Quartz and Feldspar and thereafter no transport permission has been obtained, the letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur, vide letter Rc. No. 1597/Mines/2018 dated 27.Os.2019. e ChairmarF prfAc-rN 5. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 3lm (lm Topsoil and 30m Quartz & Feldspar) for the present scheme period (2O19-2O to 2023-24). 7. Mining operation will be by Opencast Semi Mechanized Method with (Jackhammer) drilling and blasting. 8. Quartz & Feldspar are to be transported by tippers of 2 Nos. ('10 T capacity). 9. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 40m in summer season and 35m in rainy Season.

'10. The Total Manpower requirement is 25Nos. ll. Total Cost of the project is about Rs. 25,94,OO0/- and EMP Cost about Rs. 3.55.000/- 12. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. I3. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of l0km. 14. No lnterstate boundary & Western Chats Boundary within the radius of lOkm 15. No National Park &Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of lOkm. 16. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under lUater (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of 1Okm 17. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of 1Okm.

18. No habitation within the radius of 300m from the lease area. 19. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur vide Letter Rc. No. 1697lKanimam/2018, dated27.O5.2019, it is informed that No proposed quarry and No existing quarries within the

radius of 500m from this proposed quarry of Thiru. R. Natarajan which lease granted from O4.O2.2010 to 03.02.2030. The SEAC noted the following:

1. The Proponent, Thiru. R.Natarajan, Tiruppur has applied for EC to SEIAA-TN on 02.04.2019 for the Proposed Quartz and Feldspar quarry, over an extent of

Chairman. -- lfAc-rN 2.41.5ha in 5.F.No. 961/2 at Kambiliyampatti Village of KangeyamTaluk, Tiruppur District,Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B1" of ttem 1(a) "Mining of Minor Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

l. lt was noted in the 6oogle image that mining activity was already been carried out in the leased area.lt is requested to furnish the following details from AD, mines

a) Quantity of minerals already mined out in the lease approved area. b) Depth of mining already mined out in the lease approved area.

c) Name of the person already mined in that leases area. 2. The project proponent shall furnish EC and CTO from TNPCB obtained along with respective compliance report.

3. The project proponent has to furnish the letter obtained from AD/DD mines in

the following format in terms of Existing quarries/ abandoned quarries/ Present Proposed quarries/ Future Proposed quarries. Hence, the SEAC decided that the project proponent may get the following information from the AD/DD Mines,

" Letter from the AD/DD Mines about the details (Name of the Owner, S F No, Extent & distance from the boundary of this quarry) of other quarries (proposed/Existing/Abandoned quarries) within a radius of 500 m from the boundary of the proposed quarry site in the following format. Sl.No. Name of the Name of Village & Extent in Distance from this Quarry Owner Survey Number Hectare proposed Quarry a. Existing quarries

Chairman.? D'EAc-rN 2 b. Abandoned quarries

2 c. Present ProPosed quat'ries 'l 2 Total extent On receipt of the above details, SEAC will the further course of action on the proposal.

Agenda No.: 134 - 18

(File No. 6897/2019) S'F'Nos' 354/242' Proposed Black Granite Quarry lease over an extent of 3-25.3Ha in 355/3A2. 355/38' 354/28, 354/3A2, 354/38, 355/1A (Part), 355/18, 355/2A2, 355/28, 371/38 and 355/4A, 355/48, 356/1, 369/1,371llA(Part), 371/18(Part), 371/lC, 371/3A2. M/s' Om sri 3ll/3c of Guttur Village, BargurTaluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu by Granites- for Environment Clearance.

(s I A/rN/M tN / 383 67 / 2O1e) The project proponent The proposal was placed in the 134th SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. environmental impact gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the

assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows: l. Government order/ Lease details: 6ranites' Krishnagiri' The quarry lease was applied in the name of M/s' om Sri Principal secretary to Precise Area communication was issued by the covernment,lndustriesDepartment,ChennaivideLetterNo. 2375/MM.2/201g-l,datedoS.03.2olgforaperiodof20years.ItisaFresh leaseforquarryingofBlackCranite(Dolerite)foroveranextentof3.253HaSL-5 Chairman, fAc-rN Agenda .No: 134 - 06 (File No. 6891/2019)

Proposed the Savudu quarry lease in S.F.No: 352/1 (Part), over an extent of 3.15.00 Hectares, Thirukkandalam Village Uthukottai Taluk, Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru . J. Subramani - for Terms of Reference (s lM[N/Mr N/3 8s91 /2019)

The proposal was placed in the 134'h SEAC Meeting held on 30.08.2019. The project proponent gave detailed prerentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are a5 follows: l. Government order/Lease details:

The District collector, Tiruvallur communication letter Rc.No.463/2013/ Mines.2 dated 01.11.2016 has directed the applicant Mr. J. Subramani 5/o. Mr.Jaganathan to get approved mining plan and Environmental clearance certificate from the State Environment lmpact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) for grant of quarrying the Savudu quarry lease in 5.F.No: 352/1 (ParL), over an extent of 3.15.00 Hectares, Thirukkandalam Village Uthukottai Taluk, Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu for a period of 50 days based on High court order WP No. 28019/2015 dated 20.04.2016.

2. Mining Plan/Scheme of mining approval details:

The mining plan is approved by Assistant Director, Ceology and Mining, Vide Roc. 463/2013/C&M-2 dated 28.11.2016 for a period of 50 days.

The following are the production and developmental works to be carried out for 50 days as given in the table below, Gt.-> Chairman, k:'fr'^ {.{ Saleable Sub grade Ore to Over ore Mineral Pits ROM / ore / overburd Year Burden (m') mineral Rejects Nos mineral en ratio (m') (m') 2835 50 I NIL 28350 0.00 0.00 l:0 days 0

Total production for 50 days 28350 m3 to a depth of 0.9o m (50 3. As per the Approved Mining Plan Production shall not exceed 2835Om3 days) 4. The product itself a part of overburden and therefore no overburden or top soil shall be removed from this area' 5. Savudu quarry operation involves in machinery method for loading and transport by Mini Hydraulic excavator of 0.25m3 bucket capacity and tipper frraclor combination' 6. Haulage of minerals will be done by trucks\tractor tippers directly carry from mining area to consumer area. Z. The area is represented by Survey of lndia Toposheet No. 66C/4 and the geographical coordinates lie between Latitude 13'14'43.83* to 13"14'48.82"and Longitude 80'06'07.34" to 80'06'14.43"8. 8. Nearest habitation is of Thirukkandalam village at a distance of 1 m on E- 14211 Population. Nearest Town is Uthukottai at a distance of 25km on North. g. Nearest water bodies such as Korttalaiyar River 1.1 km on South

10. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.

11. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area. 12. No lnterstate boundary & Western 6hats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area. 13. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of 10km from the lease

area.

eSEAC-TN Qxw 'l4. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area. 15. No Protected Area. Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of lOkm. .l6. No habitation within the radius of the 3o0m from the lease area. 17. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruvallur vide Letter RC. No.463/2013/G&M-2 dated O2.O7.2019, it is informed that the following details a) Details of Existing Mines/Quarries

5. Name of the Owner Village & 5.F.No Extent(in Name of Remarks No. Taluk Hects) Mineral

I Nil

b) Details of abandoned Quarries

5. Name of the Owner Village & 5.F.No Extent(in Name of Remarks No. Hects) Taluk Mineral

Nil

c) Details of Proposes Quarries

5. Name of the Owner Village & 5.F.No Extent(in Name of Remarks No. Taluk Hects) Mineral I Thiru. J. Subramani Uthukottai 3s2/1(P 3.r5.0 5avudu Taluk, WD Thirukkandal Tank) am Village

C:{:.-I \ Chairman, l-- Pe-rN \^/' ( l1 The SEAC noted the following: for Environmental Clearance to 1. The Proponent, Thiru' J'Subramani has applied an Extent of 3'15'0Ha at 5'F'Nos' 35211 SEIAA-TN for the Proposed Savudu over Taluk' Tiruvallur (Part). (PWD Tank) in Thirukkandalam Village Uthukottai

District. Tamil Nadu' "B1" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of 2. The project/activity is covered under Category Notification' 2006' Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA proponent and the documents furnished' the Based on the presentation made by the rubmit the following details: SEAC decided to direct the Proponent to

ltwasnotedintheproponenthasalreadycarriedouttheminingactivitythat clearance vide SEIAA in the leased area after obtaining the Environmental requested that furnish the following letter dated: 16'07 '2013 ' Hence' it is

PWD details from the concern Executive Engineer' mine lease area a) Availability of the minerals (Savudu) in the approved in the PWD tank' b) Details of de-silting work carried out of savudu c) Any legal cases pending against the mining

Onreceiptoftheabovedetail',thefurthercourseofactionmaybetakenbytheSEAC.

^4 *.*=-A tl.-sEec-rN (41 w