European Latsis Prize 2011, European

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Latsis Prize 2011, European European Latsis Prize 2011 Professor James W. Vaupel “Demography” Presented on the occasion of the Annual Assembly of the European Science Foundation, 23 November 2011 European Latsis Prize 2011 This year’s European Latsis Prize is awarded to Professor James W. Vaupel, of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany, for his contributions to research on ageing and lifespan, and his profound influence on demographic research. The European Latsis Prize, valued at 100,000 Swiss Francs (80 000 Euros) is financed by the Geneva-based Latsis Foundation and awarded by the European Science Foundation to individuals or a group who, in the opinion of their peers, have made the greatest contribution to a particular field of research. Professor James W. Vaupel James Vaupel was born in New York, concerned with protecting lives. He was USA, on 2 May 1945, and lives in puzzled by population differences. Kerteminde in Denmark but works in Rostock, Germany where he is the “Even if you take populations of the founding director of the Max Planck same sex, the same age and the same Institute for Demographic Research. country, some people are frail, some He and his wife have two daughters more robust. I developed a model for and one grandson. He is honoured for understanding population heterogeneity a lifetime of groundbreaking research and I walked over to the Duke’s Center into the biology of ageing, the statistics for Demographic Studies and showed it of senescence and the connection to them.” Colleagues at the centre gave between public health and longevity. him some books to read: these became His key papers on mortality and lifespan his academic introduction to an unfamiliar have each been cited many hundreds of science. “I became a demographer by times, and he has been honoured by the publishing a demography article in the Ipsen Foundation in France and twice by journal called Demography in 1979,” he the Population Association of America. says. He is also Professor of Demography and Epidemiology at the Institute of That paper was the first of more than Public Health, University of Southern 300 publications on population studies Denmark and Research Professor at Duke and ageing and it has been cited University’s Population Research Unit. He more than 600 times. Vaupel became is a member of the US National Academy professor of demography at the University of Sciences and the German National of Minnesota, and established an Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. The interdisciplinary research team to examine European Latsis Prize – announced population research from all aspects. in the month that the planet’s human He pioneered the use of biological data population reached 7 billion – highlights from fruit flies, nematode worms and the importance of both the discipline and yeast cells to enhance understanding of his contribution to it. the dynamics of human population. “To understand why we age, it is necessary His studies began with mathematical to understand whether other species age, statistics at Harvard College and then and how they age, and how we fit into international enterprise at Harvard the tree of life, in terms of senescence. Business School; he completed his The interesting finding is that many doctorate at Harvard’s Kennedy School species like humans suffer from severe of Government. He became interested senescence: mortality goes up rapidly in mortality and demography while an when you get to be quite old. But other assistant professor at Duke University, species – many reptiles, fish and trees, and while working part time in Washington for example – don’t show any signs of DC for the Environmental Protection senescence at all.” Agency and other government bodies European Latsis Prize 2011 He founded the Max Planck Institute increasing at the rate of 2.5 years every in Rostock in 1996 and turned it into decade, an outcome that has profound one of the world’s leading centres consequences for health services, social of demographic research. He and policy, careers, savings and national colleagues have looked for lessons economies. Since 1950, death rates have beyond living species: they have tested fallen substantially even for people over tens of thousands of light bulbs to see if the age of 60. He encapsulated this in a senescence is a property of all complex much-quoted phrase: “Live nine months systems. But perhaps his most dramatic and you get three additional months free.” contribution is in the contention that there seems no innate limit to human lifespan: He and colleagues have begun to compile an argument he put with Jim Oeppen in a database of supercentenarians: those Science in 2002. people aged 110 years or more. This has not been easy: elderly people – or their Periodically, he points out, demographers younger relatives – may exaggerate their and actuaries would argue that human age and every claim must be checked life expectancy was nearing a limit and against birth records. “We have managed would probably never be exceeded. to do this for 800 people. Of course, “These ultimate limits were typically the number is doubling about every fi ve within a few years of life expectancy at years, so fi ve years from now it might be the time – and they were on average 1600 and in another fi ve years it might be broken about fi ve years after publication. 3,200,” he says.” Mortality improvements It is a very sorry saga,” he says. “The result from an intricate interplay of actuaries and demographers couldn’t advances in income, sanitation, nutrition, imagine how we could make any further education, medicine and so on. progress in bringing death rates down. But there were always things they didn’t “Since 1950, death rates have come down think of: penicillin, better treatment substantially for people above 60. It really for tuberculosis, better treatment for has been quite amazing. And how has heart disease; things that they didn’t this progress been made? It has not been anticipate, that led to a further rise in life made by stretching the period of ageing. It expectancy.” has been made by delaying senescence. I like to say – based on our research – This has gone up, in the countries doing that 70 year-olds today are as healthy best, at a rate of about three months per as 60 year-olds were 50 years ago. We year. He has demonstrated with a variety are gaining about two additional years of of data, that human senescence has been healthy life every decade.” delayed by a decade, and that maximum age appears to be plastic: that is, it can be extended. In most countries with long life expectancy, life expectancy now is Biographical details Education Honors Employment 1978 2010 October 1996 – current PhD, Kennedy School Honorary Doctor of Civil Founding Director, Max of Government, Harvard Law, Newcastle, United Planck Institute for University, Cambridge, MA, Kingdom Demographic Research, USA. Dissertation: “Early Rostock, Germany 2009 Death: A Policy Analysis of Seneca Medal, Industrieclub 2007 – current the Prospects for Saving Düsseldorf, Germany Director, Max Planck Lives” International Research 2008 1971 Network on Aging Member of the German Master of Public Policy, Academy of Sciences January 2006 – current Kennedy School of Leopoldina, Germany Research Professor, Sanford Government, Harvard Institute, Duke University, University, Cambridge, MA, Fellow of the American Durham, NC, USA USA Academy of Arts and Sciences, USA 2004 – current 1968 Director, Rostocker Zentrum passed Doctoral Mindel C. Sheps Award for zur Erforschung des Examinations, Harvard Mathematical Demography, Demografi schen Wandels, Business School, Boston, Population Association Germany MA, USA of America, USA [Talk by James W. Vaupel] January 1992 – December 1967 2005 B.A., Harvard University, 2004 Senior Research Scientist, Cambridge, MA, USA, Regular Scientifi c Member Sanford Institute, Duke highest honors in of the National Academy of University, Durham, NC, Mathematical Statistics Sciences, USA USA 2003 June 1991 – 2002, January Longevity prize of the Ipsen 2011 – current Foundation, France Professor of Demography 2001 and Epidemiology, Institute Irene B. Taeuber Award of Public Health, University for Lifetime Achievement, of Southern Denmark, Population Association of Odense, Denmark America, USA September 1985 – 1996 December 1991 Scientifi c Member of Professor of Public Affairs the Max Planck Society, and Planning, Humphrey Germany (to date) Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA European Latsis Prize 2011 September 1988 – Selected professional 2002 – current December 1991 service Member, European also Professor of Ancient Association for Population 2009 – current Studies and Adjunct Studies, Committee on Chairman of the Board Professor of Epidemiology, Training in Population of Trustees of Population University of Minnesota, Studies in Europe, Chair of Europe: The European Minneapolis, MN, USA the Council of EAPS Population Partnership July 1984 – December 2002 – current 2009 – 2010 1985, May – August 1983, Rector, International Max Chair, Advisory Board, and September 1981 – Planck Research School for Centre for Population July 1982 Demography Change, United Kingdom Research Scholar, 2000 – current International Institute for 2008 – current “Honorarprofessor” (Full Applied Systems Analysis, Panel Chair, European professor with all rights and Laxenburg, Austria Research Council Starting privileges but with a reduced Grant, European Union 1979 – 1981 teaching load and without Member, Advisory
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Max-Planck Odense Center, 13 December 2016 I
    Report on the Max-Planck Odense Center, 13 December 2016 I. Overview The Max-Planck Odense Center on the Biodemography of Aging (MaxO) aims to publish pathbreaking, interdisciplinary research—on humans and on species across the tree of life—that advances fundamental understanding of the nature of aging and thereby fosters the development of the nascent discipline of Biodemography. The chart summarizes MaxO’s place in the world of ideas. Demography is a mathematical discipline: demographers prove theorems. Furthermore, demographers have made and continue to make important contributions to mathematical statistics. Large, accurate databases constitute the second pillar on which Demography rests; MaxO’s research is built on analysis of human databases and creation and use of new databases for nonhuman species. Demographers often collaborate with (and have university degrees as) economists and social scientists. The main goal of MaxO is to foster collaboration with Epidemiology and other Health Sciences and with Biology. Demographic findings, including findings about aging, are often relevant to public discussions. MaxO is a joint venture between the Max Planck Society (henceforth MPG, its German abbreviation) and the University of Southern Denmark (henceforth SDU, its Danish abbreviation). Support from MPG comes from the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (henceforth MPIDR) and some of MaxO’s research is carried out at MPIDR. Additional support comes from the central headquarters of MPG in Munich (henceforth MPG Munich or just Munich). Sometimes we will refer to SDU as Odense, especially when we want to emphasize that the research is carried out at the Odense campus of SDU. Sometimes we will refer to MPIDR as Rostock, especially when we want to emphasize research done in collaboration with the University of Rostock.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for the Secrets of the Super Old More and More People Are Living Past 110
    NEWSFOCUS AGING Searching for the Secrets Of the Super Old More and more people are living past 110. Can they show us all how to age gracefully? They were born when the years still started Perls of Boston University with “18.” They survived global traumas such School of Medicine, head as World War I, World War II, and the Great of the New England Cen- Depression. They didn’t succumb to pan- tenarian Study and its new demic flu, polio, AIDS, Alzheimer’s disease, National Institutes of or clogged arteries. Supercentenarians, or Health–funded spinoff, the people who’ve survived to at least age 110, are New England Supercente- longevity champions. narian Study. Researchers suspect that some Living to 100 is unlikely enough. Accord- of the oldsters included in the tally had already he requires three types of verification: proof ing to one estimate, about seven in 1000 peo- died and that others—or their relatives—were of birth, preferably a birth certificate; proof ple reach the century milestone. And at that lying about their ages. Drawing on Medicare of death, if the person is no longer alive; and age, the odds of surviving even one more year enrollment figures, two U.S. government “continuity” documentation, such as a dri- are only 50–50, says James Vaupel, director of actuaries put the number of supercentenarians ver’s license or marriage certificate, that the Max Planck Institute for Demographic in the year 2000 at a mere 105. And in 2002, shows that the putative supercentenarian is Research in Rostock, Germany. Making it 139 people claiming to be at least 110 were the person listed in the birth record.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Upsurge in Life Expectancy
    Population and Development Review, a Journal of the Population Council: Accepted Article Preview Anatomy of a Municipal Triumph: New York City’s Upsurge in Life Expectancy Samuel H. Preston and Irma T. Elo Forthcoming in the March 2014 issue Cite this article as: Samuel H. Preston and Irma T. Elo, “Anatomy of a Municipal Triumph: New York City’s Upsurge in Life Expectancy,” Population and Development Review, accepted article preview 16 December 2013; doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00648.x. This is a PDF file of an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication. PDR is providing this early version of the manuscript as a service to our readers. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and a proof review before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply. Accepted manuscript Population and Development Review seeks to advance knowledge of the relationships between population and social, economic, and environmental change and provides a forum for discussion of related issues of public policy. PDR is published quarterly on behalf of the Population Council by Wiley-Blackwell. The Population Council conducts biomedical, social science, and public health research. We deliver solutions that lead to more effective policies, programs, and technologies that improve lives around the world. www.popcouncil.org Anatomy of a Municipal Triumph: New York City’s Upsurge in Life Expectancy Samuel H. Preston Irma T. Elo Abstract Over the period 1990–2010, the increase in life expectancy for males in New York City was 6.0 years greater than for males in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Heterogeneity Model and the Lee-Carter Method to Estimate Mortality Surface at Old Ages
    Using the heterogeneity model and the Lee-Carter method to estimate mortality surface at old ages Nan Li 1, Population Division, United Nations James W. Vaupel, Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research *Research for this paper was funded by a grant from NIA, R37-AG18444 to James Vaupel Death rates cannot be measured reliably at old ages, yet their values are necessary in studies such as population forecasts. In estimating the true values of death rates at old ages, general smoothing techniques cannot apply to extremely old ages at which there are too few survivors, and they also involve arbitrary choice between smoothness and fitting. To avoid the arbitrariness, we call for the Lee-Carter method that is designed to distinguish persistent trends and disturbances in mortality change. To extend estimates to any age, we utilize the heterogeneity-mortality model. Composing cohorts born in long periods, we obtain the robust estimate of heterogeneity variance, and subsequently the targets are extended from mortality curves to surfaces. Identifying the baseline mortality surface, we eliminate disturbances using the Lee-Carter method and derive estimates of the true values of cohort mortality. We provide examples using data from 17 low- mortality countries. How mortality changes across age is perhaps the oldest issue in demography. Ideally, this issue should be approached on the basis of observation. Mortality studies have been progressing closely along this line, especially in recent decades when data collection improved remarkably. However, no matter how much efforts were paid on collecting data, they could reliably measure mortality only up to some age, older than which there are severe disturbances that include random fluctuation and binomial noise 1 The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the United Nations 1 due to too few survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • MPI-2014-02.Pdf
    MEDICAL PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL Journal, vol.2, No.2, 2014 MEDICAL PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MEDICAL PHYSICS Volume 2, Number 1, March 2013 MEDICAL PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL Journal, vol.2, No.2, 2014 MEDICAL PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL The Journal of the International Organization for Medical Physics Aims and Coverage: Medical Physics International (MPI) is the official IOMP journal. The journal provides a new platform for medical physicists to share their experience, ideas and new information generated from their work of scientific, educational and professional nature. The e- journal is available free of charge to IOMP members. Co-Editors Slavik Tabakov, Vice-President IOMP, UK and Perry Sprawls, Atlanta, USA Editorial Board KY Cheung , IOMP President, Hong Kong, China Madan Rehani, IOMP, Secretary General, IAEA William Hendee , IOMP Scientific Com Chair, Wisconsin, USA Tae Suk Suh , IOMP Publication Com Chair, South Korea Virginia Tsapaki, IOMP MPW Board Chair, Greece Simone Kodlulovich Dias, ALFIM President, Brazil Anchali Krisanachinda, SEAFOMP President, IOMP Treasurer, Thailand Toafeeq Ige, Secretary General of FAMPO, Nigeria Technical Editors: Magdalena Stoeva and Asen Cvetkov, Bulgaria Editorial Assistant: Vassilka Tabakova, UK MPI web address: www.mpijournal.org Published by: The International Organization for Medical Physics (IOMP), web address: www.iomp.org ; post address: IOMP c/o IPEM, 230 Tadcaster Road, York YO24 1ES, UK. Copyright ©2013 International Organisation Medical Physics. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated in any form, or by any means, without prior permission from the Editors-in-Chief of the Journal, to whom all request to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Actuaries Believe in Longevity Deceleration?
    Do actuaries believe in longevity deceleration? Edouard Debonneuil(*), Frédéric Planchet, Stéphane Loisel ISFA, Longevity 11, 2015 (*) [email protected] Do actuaries believe in longevity 1 deceleration? Longevity 11, ISFA 2015 Do actuaries believe in longevity deceleration? • Part I. Extrapolation of the past • Part II. Taking a prudent view Do actuaries believe in longevity deceleration? Longevity 11, ISFA 2015 2 Modeling a neutral view EXAMPLE OF BELIEF In the absence of belief of whether Youth pill life expectancy increase faster in the future (e.g. biomedical discoveries) or not (e.g. pollution) Virus would you, for a central longevity scenario, rather consider same/lower/higher mortality improvements than in the past? mortality improvements Do actuaries believe in longevity deceleration? Longevity 11, ISFA 2015 3 Historical evolutions of life expectancy • « +1 quarter per year » • Piecewise lines +23% Louis Pasteur Jim Oeppen and James Vaupel (2002) : Jacques Vallin and France Meslé (2010) : Espérance de vie: peut-on Broken Limits to Life Expectancy. Science 296 gagner trois mois par an indéfiniment ? Population & Sociétés 473 In a central scenario, and in the absence of country-specific context, should life expectancy rather increase by +{20-25}% year per year? less? more? Do actuaries believe in longevity deceleration? Longevity 11, ISFA 2015 4 Lee Carter uses the same mortality improvements for the future as in the past; does it lead to +23% per year? • Extract from the original paper: • “While many methods assume an upper limit to the human life span (…) our method allows (…) the deceleration of life expectancy (…) without any special additional assumptions.” Lee Ronald and Lawrence Carter (1992) : Journal of the American Statistical Association.
    [Show full text]
  • About the European Science Foundation 2009
    About the European Science Foundation 2009 www.esf.org Contents Foreword 4 This is the European Science Foundation 5 ESF’s Science Structure 9 • Standing Committees 9 • Expert Boards and Committees 24 • ESF Science Advisory Board 33 Science Strategy 35 Forward Looks (FL) 35 Member Organisation Fora (MO Fora) 41 Exploratory Workshops (EW) 43 Science Policy Briefings (SPB) 49 Research Infrastructures (RI) 53 Science Synergy 54 ESF Research Conferences 54 EuROCORES Programmes 59 Research Networking Programmes (RNP) 79 Science Management 103 ERA-NET and other EC coordination 103 COST 109 Administration and Finance 112 ESF Governing Bodies 114 • Member Organisations 116 • Governing Council 121 ESF and COST Offices Directory 122 About the European Science Foundation 2009 3 Foreword The landscape of research in Europe is changing. universities are being pushed to renovate their governance, to build on their research strengths, and even into mergers. Some have begun to have their quality evaluated by research assessment exercises. Several countries have developed excellence initiatives and established structured doctoral training programmes. Research performing organisations are undergoing reforms as well. In some countries part of their traditional earmarked funding could potentially be replaced by competitive project funding. universities are establishing novel types of horizontal research institutions that extend across boundaries of departments and faculties, partnering with research performing organisations and the private sector. And the young principal investigators are finally finding themselves centre stage. The European Young Investigator Programme (EuRYI) of ESF financed by the European Heads of Research Councils (EuROHORCs), and recently, the Starting Grants Programme of the European Research Council, are catalysing research organisations to restructure themselves to provide attractive career pathways for young principal investigators.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Roger Thatcher's Contributions to Longevity Research: a Reflexion
    Demographic Research a free, expedited, online journal of peer-reviewed research and commentary in the population sciences published by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Konrad-Zuse Str. 1, D-18057 Rostock · GERMANY www.demographic-research.org DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VOLUME 22, ARTICLE 18, PAGES 539-548 PUBLISHED 30 MARCH 2010 http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol22/18/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.18 Research Article Arthur Roger Thatcher's contributions to longevity research: A Reflexion Jean-Marie Robine Siu Lan K. Cheung Shiro Horiuchi © 2010 Jean-Marie Robine, Siu Lan K. Cheung & Shiro Horiuchi . This open-access work is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 2.0 Germany, which permits use, reproduction & distribution in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author(s) and source are given credit. See http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/de/ Table of Contents 1 Old-age mortality and Kannisto-Thatcher Database 540 2 Centenarian studies 540 3 The logistic model of adult mortality 541 4 M-Project: Thatcher’s last work 543 References 544 Demographic Research: Volume 22, Article 18 Reflexion Arthur Roger Thatcher's contributions to longevity research: A Reflexion Jean-Marie Robine1 Siu Lan K. Cheung2 Shiro Horiuchi3 Arthur Roger Thatcher, CB, died in London on February 13, 2010, at 83 years of age. He was actively engaged in demographic research until his death. One of his last papers, The Compression of Deaths above the Mode, is published in this volume of Demographic Research (Thatcher et al. 2010). Roger signed the copyright agreement for the paper on January 24, just a few weeks before his death.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southern Denmark Exceptional
    University of Southern Denmark Exceptional Lifespans Maier, Heiner; Jeune, Bernard; Vaupel, James W. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49970-9 Publication date: 2021 Document version: Final published version Document license: CC BY Citation for pulished version (APA): Maier, H., Jeune, B., & Vaupel, J. W. (Eds.) (2021). Exceptional Lifespans. Springer. Demographic Research Monographs https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49970-9 Go to publication entry in University of Southern Denmark's Research Portal Terms of use This work is brought to you by the University of Southern Denmark. Unless otherwise specified it has been shared according to the terms for self-archiving. If no other license is stated, these terms apply: • You may download this work for personal use only. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying this open access version If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details and we will investigate your claim. Please direct all enquiries to [email protected] Download date: 10. Oct. 2021 Demographic Research Monographs Heiner Maier Bernard Jeune James W. Vaupel Editors Exceptional Lifespans Demographic Research Monographs Series Editor Mikko Myrskylä Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany The Springer series Demographic Research Monographs publishes refereed monographs under the editorial supervision of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. The scope of the series spans the entire feld of demography, with a view to signifcantly advance research. Key research topics include population health, fertility, migration and aging.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Esof 2004 Programme Book(11 Mib)
    Welcome to EuroScience Open Forum Stockholm 2004 25|28 August The first pan-European General Science Meeting! Highlighting Science,Technology and Innovation in Europe Euroscience European association for the promotion of Science and Technology is a pan-European interdisciplinary organisation which aims to: • Influence science and technology policies in Europe • Strengthen the links between science and society • Contribute to the integration of European science • Provide an open forum for debate on science & technology That is why Euroscience created the first pan-European scientific meeting, ESOF2004! Euroscience is the voice of scholars and scientists, of students as well as professors, of industrial researchers as well as managers, of scientific journalists as well as decision-makers… and of any person interested in the impact of Science and Technology in Europe. Help shape the new Scientific Europe from within: join “The Voice of Science in Europe“ visit our website www.euroscience.org Contact: Euroscience 8 rue des Écrivains F-67000 Strasbourg Tel: +33 3 88 24 11 50 • Fax: +33 3 88 24 75 56 • e-mail: [email protected] « « « Welcome to EuroScience Open Forum 2004 « - the first pan-European General Science Meeting ever! « Highlighting Science, Technology and Innovation in Europe 25-28 AUGUST 2004 • STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN ��������������� ��������� Founding Partner Advertisement Partner Founding ������ ��������������������� ��������������������� ��������������� ��������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    SETTING SCIENCE AGENDAS FOR EUROPE Annual Report 2007 www.esf.org Contents Professor Ian Halliday: President’s Message ................................... 4-5 Dr. John Marks, 2007 Chief Executive: 2007 – Steps to position ESF in the European Research Area .......... 6 The 2007 Assembly ............................................................................... 8 2007 in Review ..................................................................................... 20 - European Science Foundation says farewell to its Chief Executive Bertil Andersson . 20 - ESF names Sir Roderick Floud as the Chair of the Social Sciences ......................... 21 - ESF names Professor Jean-Pierre Swings as New Chair of the Space Sciences Committee .............................................................................................................. 22 - International Review Panel commends ESF’s efforts in EUROCORES ...................... 23 - The ESF and the European Commission sign contract for COST in FP7 .................. 25 - ERA needs full involvement of non-governmental stakeholders, ESF & EUROHORCs comment to EC’s Green Paper ............................................... 27 - Poto nik, 52 countries’ representatives ponder research integrity in Lisbon ............. 29 - EURYI 2007: 20 researchers receive Nobel Prize-sized awards in Helsinki ............... 30 - ESF meeting sets cornerstone for science communication ...................................... 32 - IPCC’s Nobel Peace Prize win underlines International collaboration spirit,
    [Show full text]
  • Aging, Health, and Public Policy: Demographic and Economic Perspectives
    Linda J. Waite Editor Aging, Health, and Public Policy Demographic and Economic Perspectives A Supplement to Vol. 30, 2004 POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Population and Development Review seeks to advance knowledge of the interrelationships between population and socioeconomic development and provides a forum for discussion of related issues of public policy. EDITOR Paul Demeny MANAGING EDITOR Ethel P. Churchill EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Paul Demeny, Chair Geoffrey McNicoll Ethel P. Churchill Michael P. Todaro Susan Greenhalgh EDITORIAL STAFF Robert Heidel, Production Editor Y. Christina Tse, Production/Design Sura Rosenthal / Mike Vosika, Production ADVISORY BOARD John C. Caldwell Akin L. Mabogunje David Coleman Carmen A. Miró Richard A. Easterlin Samuel H. Preston S. Ryan Johansson Vaclav Smil Ronald D. Lee Signed articles are the responsibility of the authors. Views expressed in the Review do not necessarily reflect the views of the Population Council or its publisher, Blackwell Publishing. Direct manuscripts, comments on articles, and correspondence to: Population and Development Review Population Council One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza New York, New York 10017 USA Electronic submissions are encouraged and should be sent to [email protected] Support from the United Nations Population Fund is gratefully acknowledged. Volumes are available on microfilm from UMI, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106. The website for Population and Development Review is www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdr. Subscribers have access to the electronic edition of the journal, which is published simultaneously with the printed issue. The full contents of volumes 1–28 (1975–2002) are available through participating libraries from JSTOR at www.jstor.org/journals/00987921.html Population and Development Review (ISSN 0098-7921) is published quarterly on behalf of the Population Council, One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA by Blackwell Publishing, with offices at 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and P.O.
    [Show full text]