Hartland Monitoring Annual Report 2017

Parks & Environmental Services Environmental Protection

Prepared by GeoEnvironmental Programs

Capital Regional District 625 Fisgard Street, Victoria, BC V8W 2S6 T: 250-360-3000 www.crd.bc.ca November 2018

HARTLAND LANDFILL – LANDFILL GAS MONITORING 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Hartland landfill provides solid waste disposal services for the Capital Regional District (CRD). The landfill is a multi-purpose facility providing collection services for recyclable materials, household hazardous waste, items covered by product stewardship, and disposal of and Controlled Waste. The site operates under an Operational Certificate under the Environmental Management Act, issued by the BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (MOE), and follows an Operating Plan required under the Operational Certificate.

The operating landfill footprint is approximately 33 hectares with an estimated 7,100,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste landfill, as of the end of 2017. Total annual disposal was 157,638 tonnes of residential, commercial and industrial waste. When the landfill reaches planned final filling elevations it will occupy approximately 48 hectares, with a volume of approximately 14,500,000 m3 of municipal solid waste.

This report fulfills the annual reporting requirements set out in the Landfill Operational Certificate and the Landfill Gas Management Regulation. Landfill gas (LFG) collection/management at Hartland includes collection and utilization infrastructure, generation modelling and monitoring (utilization, perimeter gas probes, hotspot monitoring and speciation).

LFG collection and/or management at Hartland includes the following components:

• Gas collection infrastructure, including cover systems, collection pipes, wells and blowers to facilitate gas collection and utilization.

facility that produces electricity for the BC Hydro grid.

• Landfill gas monitoring system, including collection system, hotspot and subsurface monitoring programs.

production and gas generation modelling rates given landfill waste volumes and decomposition rates.

GAS COLLECTION AND UTILIZATION

In 2017, the gas collection system consisted of 67 vertical wells and 74 horizontal wells, for a total of 141 wells. In 2017, 12 non-productive wells were removed from service, 22 new wells were connected to the system (Phase 2, Cell 2), and 5 horizontal wells were installed in completed lifts in Phase 2, Cell 3. The well field was balanced monthly in 2017, as recommended by the Landfill Gas Management Facilities Design Guidelines.

The CRD continues to progress filling plans consistent with the conceptual designs developed by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (2011). In 2017, LFG collection efficiency was 67.7%, which is within estimated ranges according to the Landfill Gas Management Plan. Total fugitive greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from the landfill for 2017 are estimated at 64,173 tonnes CO2e. A summary of landfill gas production and collection is provided below (based on the LFG generation model). Emissions have been normalized to 50% methane in standard cubic feet per minute (scfm).

Modelled Annual Measured Annual Calculation GHG Emission Year Methane Gas Capture Collection (tonnes/year CO2e) Generated (scfm) (scfm) Efficiency (%) 2017 1,627 1,102 67.7 64,173

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page i Executive Summary

MONITORING

Hartland landfill has several monitoring programs to assess the effectiveness of the LFG collection infrastructure. The following summarizes the components of the program:

Collection and utilization system monitoring to evaluate changes in gas quality over time and to document data for gas collection and gas utilization to assess collection efficiency and total emissions from the landfill.

Monitoring of subsurface perimeter and building foundation probes to assess the potential for subsurface LFG migration at the eastern landfill boundary and at on-site buildings for compliance with BC Landfill Criteria, and for worker and public health and safety.

Surface emissions and hotspot monitoring to verify the effectiveness of cover and the LFG collection system in order to identify health and safety risks associated with fugitive LFG emissions.

Landfill Gas Speciation to assess the composition of gas with regard to volatile organic compounds, sulphur gases and typical landfill gases in order to calculate ambient dilution concentrations for health and safety and infrastructure integrity purposes.

GAS GENERATION

In 2017, Hartland landfill generated 7,957 tonnes of methane, based on the model provided by MOE. The BC Landfill Gas Management Regulation requires that generate greater than 1,000 tonnes of CH4 per year of methane to develop LFG management plans. These plans set out targets for system designs to achieve 75% collection efficiency 4 years after implementation. The Hartland landfill plan was submitted to the MOE in April 2012 with an implementation target of the end of 2016.

An organics diversion program and ban took effect in January 2015. Diversion of a large portion of highly decomposable waste stream from the landfill will result in a decrease in overall gas production.

ADDITIONAL REPORTING FRAMEWORKS

LFG emissions and related data are reported to numerous reporting frameworks throughout the year and include:

• Environment and Climate Change Canada: o Facility GHG Reporting (Final Emissions Reporting) o National Pollutant Release Inventory o Environment & Climate Change Canada Landfill Gas Survey • BC Ministry of Environment o GHG Reporting (Industrial Emissions) • Statistics Canada o Electricity Supply and Disposition Survey (annual and monthly) o Survey of Electric Power Thermal Generating Station Fuel Consumption

COMPLIANCE SUMMARY

Table ES1 has been prepared to summarize the results of LFG monitoring programs, whether the results comply with requirements, actions taken to address non-compliance, and recommendations.

Page ii Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Executive Summary

Table ES1. Landfill Gas Compliance Summary 2017

Compliance Program Criteria Findings Actions Recommendations Location Perimeter Probe Probes GP-1A, 1B, Maximum 1.25% methane in No exceedances. None Continue quarterly Monitoring 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 11A, subsurface soil (MOE Landfill Criteria Low risk of sub-surface gas monitoring. 11B, 12A and 12B for Municipal Solid Waste) migration to adjacent properties. Building Probes GP- 4A, 5A, Maximum 1.25% methane in any on- No exceedances. None Continue quarterly Foundation 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 8A, site facility (MOE Landfill Criteria for monitoring. Probe 9A, 13A, 14A, 17A, Municipal Solid Waste). Monitoring 18A Maximum 1% methane inside buildings Low risk of subsurface gas migration (Landfill Gas Management Facility to adjacent building. Design Guidelines). Ambient Grid N/A 100 ppm THC (CRD internal guideline) 8 grid locations >100 ppm Investigated hot spots Reduce to annual. Monitoring No cover system failures suspected and mitigated where in the closed area of Phase 1. possible. Hot Spot N/A 1,000 ppm THC (CRD internal 5 new hot spots >1,000 ppm Added new locations Reduce to annual. Monitoring guideline). 1 hot spot removed. of hot spots to the Investigate remediation Currently 22 locations for hot spot monitoring program. measures. investigation. Well Field N/A Monitor monthly. Monitoring completed monthly; None Continue monthly Monitoring and <3% - gas optimization and oxygen did not exceed 3%. monitoring at minimum. Balancing reduction of fire potential Gas Speciation N/A N/A Undiluted LFG exceeded None Conduct speciation of (2017) WorkSafeBC criteria for methane, LFG in 2019. , sulphide, vinyl chloride and benzene; however, ambient concentrations are likely well below WorkSafeBC limits due to dilution with ambient air. Siloxane monitoring should continue on a routine basis to better understand trends and engine wear and tear impacts. Gas Collection N/A 75% gas collection efficiency target by Gas collection efficiency was LFGMP submitted to Continue to implement the end of 2016, as per LFGMP. estimated at 67.7%, based on the MOE. the gas management MOE gas generation model and is plan. within the estimated efficiency range specified in the LFGMP.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page iii Executive Summary This page intentionally left blank

HARTLAND LANDFILL – LANDFILL GAS MONITORING 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ...... i 1.0 Introduction ...... 1 2.0 Site description ...... 2 3.0 Regulatory Requirements ...... 3 3.1 Landfill Gas Management Regulation ...... 3 3.2 Health and Safety Regulations ...... 3 3.3 Additional Emissions Reporting ...... 3 4.0 Landfill Gas Generation ...... 6 4.1 Quantity and Sources of Municipal Waste Received ...... 6 4.2 Waste Diversion ...... 7 4.3 Health and Safety ...... 7 5.0 Landfill Gas Collection and monitoring Infrastructure ...... 8 5.1.1 Vertical Gas Extraction Wells...... 8 5.1.2 Horizontal Gas Extraction Wells ...... 9 5.2 Collection and Treatment System Monitoring: Gas Well Field Operation and Data ...... 11 6.0 Landfill Gas Utilization and Collection ...... 14 6.1 Gas Composition ...... 14 6.1.1 Destruction Devices and Usage ...... 20 6.1.2 Landfill Gas Management Plan Implementation Status ...... 20 7.0 Operational Updates ...... 22 7.1 System Performance and Maintenance ...... 22 7.1.1 Generator Emissions ...... 23 8.0 Monitoring Programs ...... 24 8.1 Subsurface Gas Monitoring – Perimeter and Foundation Probes ...... 26 8.2 Surface Emissions and Hotspot Sampling ...... 30 8.3 Landfill Gas Speciation ...... 37 8.3.1 Siloxanes...... 37 9.0 Modelling ...... 40 9.1 Inputs ...... 40 9.2 Modelling: Outputs ...... 41 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ...... 42 11.0 References ...... 43 12.0 Report Signoff ...... 44

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Table of Contents ENVS-126353213-649

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Federal and Provincial Emissions Reporting Frameworks Requiring Hartland LFG Emissions or Related Data ...... 4 Table 2 Number and Type of Gas Wells Installed or Operating (2012-2017) ...... 11 Table 3 Gas Wells with the Highest Collection 2017 ...... 12 Table 4 Landfill Gas System Collection Efficiency 1998-2017 ...... 16 Table 5 Landfill Gas Flows to Destruction Devices (2011-2017) ...... 20 Table 6 Summary of 2017 Blower Downtime by Month ...... 22 Table 7 Generator Performance 2017 ...... 23 Table 8 Generator Emissions Modelled and Stack Tests 2008-2016 ...... 23 Table 9 Summary of Landfill Gas Monitoring Programs ...... 24 Table 10 Average Gas Concentrations in Subsurface Perimeter Probes 2014-2017 ...... 26 Table 11 Maximum Value Gas Concentrations in Perimeter Probes 2017 ...... 27 Table 12 Average Gas Concentrations in Subsurface Foundation Probes 2014-2017 ...... 29 Table 13 Maximum Value Gas Concentrations in Foundation Probes 2017 ...... 29 Table 14 Summary of Grid Sampling Results 2017 ...... 31 Table 15 Summary of Hotspot Results 2017 ...... 31 Table 16 Summary of Gas Speciation Results and Exposure Limits July 2017 ...... 37 Table 17 Siloxane Concentrations in Raw and Treated Gas, 2017 ...... 38 Table 18 Landfill Gas Compliance Summary 2017 ...... 39 Table 19 Methane Generation Potential and Rate Factors Used for the MOE Landfill Gas Generation Model ...... 40 Table 20 Year and Estimated Quantity of Landfill Gas Generated at Hartland Landfill ...... 41

List of Figures

Figure 1 Annual Waste Tonnages Received or Estimated for Hartland Landfill from 1980-2017 ...... 6 Figure 2 Hartland Landfill Gas Collection Infrastructure ...... 10 Figure 3 Gas Collection by Individual Wells ...... 13 Figure 4 Hartland Landfill Gas Plan ...... 15 Figure 5 High/Low Collection Efficiency Estimates from the LFGMP and Current Collection Efficiency ...... 17 Figure 6 Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency at Hartland Landfill 2004-2017 ...... 18 Figure 7 Fugitive Greenhouse Gas Emission at Hartland Landfill 2004-2017 ...... 19 Figure 8 Location of Gas Probes ...... 28 Figure 9 Hartland Landfill Ambient Air Monitoring Results, August 2017 ...... 33 Figure 10 Hartland Landfill Ambient Air Monitoring Results, Mar 2017 ...... 34 Figure 11 Historical Hotspot Locations ...... 35

List of Appendices

Appendix A Gas Generation Information Appendix B Well Field Data Appendix C Gas Collection Data Appendix D Subsurface Perimeter and Foundation Probe Monitoring Appendix E Grid and Hotspot Monitoring Appendix F LFG Speciation and Ambient VOC Data Appendix G Other Landfill Emissions Reports

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Table of Contents ENVS-126353213-649

HARTLAND LANDFILL – LANDFILL GAS MONITORING 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Hartland landfill provides solid waste disposal services for the Capital Regional District (CRD). The landfill is a multi-purpose facility providing collection services for recyclable materials, household hazardous waste, extended producer responsibility products, salvageable items, as well as disposal services for municipal solid waste and Controlled Waste. Landfill operations are guided by the Design, Operations and Closure Plan, the Landfill Operational Certificate issued by the BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (MOE), and the CRD’s Solid Waste Management Plan.

This report fulfills requirements of the Landfill Operational Certificate and the Landfill Gas Management Regulation for annual reporting of gas management/controls. Landfill gas (LFG) collection/management at Hartland includes collection and utilization infrastructure, generation modelling and monitoring (utilization, perimeter gas probes, hotspot monitoring and speciation).

LFG is primarily made up of methane and carbon dioxide with small amounts of vapour, oxygen, and trace gases. Trace gases include hydrogen sulphide, , nitrous oxide, volatile organic compounds and chlorofluorocarbons. Risks associated with LFG include asphyxiation, flammability (between 5% and 15% methane by volume), toxicity, odour and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

The objective of a LFG collection system is to mitigate fugitive emissions and reduce the potential for subsurface, lateral gas migration. Hartland landfill has implemented a LFG collection system to minimize fugitive emissions and a monitoring program is maintained to assess the effectiveness of these controls.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The Hartland landfill is situated on 320 hectares within the District of Saanich. Mount Work Regional Park is located to the west, parkland and the Heal’s Rifle Range lies to the north, residential properties lie to the east, and undeveloped CRD property is located to the south.

The climate in the area is classified as “Cool Mediterranean”, due to warm, dry summers and cool, wet winters. Annual precipitation is around 1,000 mm per year. The site is surrounded by bedrock; discontinuous bedrock fractures have been identified.

The CRD took over operation of the landfill site in 1985. Prior to that, it was privately owned and operated. The landfill currently occupies approximately 33 hectares with an estimated 7,100,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste in place as of the end of 2017. When the landfill reaches final capacity, it will occupy approximately 48 hectares and contain approximately 14,500,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste. The average annual disposal rate for the last 5 years is approximately 137,000 tonnes, which comprises residential, commercial and industrial wastes.

The landfill comprises 2 operational areas: Phase 1 was operational between the 1950s and 1997, and has final cover. Phase 2 comprises the current active area of the landfill, which began in 1997. Phase 1 is unlined and covered with a combination geo-membrane/clay cap. Phase 2 was constructed within a former lake basin (now referred to as the Phase 2 basin); it is partially lined and relies on negative pressure (hydraulic trap) to contain . Development of the Hartland landfill is guided conceptually by the Cell Development Plan from the Hartland Landfill Phase 2 Long Term Leachate Management Plan (Sperling Hansen Associates, June 2007); an updated master filling plan is currently being prepared and is expected by the end of 2018.

Page 2 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

3.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

There are a number of provincial and federal regulations that apply to LFG management, emissions management and reporting. Key regulations are listed below.

3.1 Landfill Gas Management Regulation

In January 2009, the BC Landfill Gas Management Regulation came into effect dictating province-wide criteria for LFG capture with the primary aim to reduce GHG emissions from landfills. The regulation requires that landfills receiving greater than 10,000 tonnes of refuse per year, or have 100,000 tonnes of refuse in place, must calculate (using a specific LFG generation model) the quantity of gas produced for submission to the MOE. Calculated gas generation rates greater than 1,000 tonnes per year requires development of a Landfill Gas Management Plan (LFGMP) by a qualified professional. Implementation must be completed within 4 years and is directed by the Landfill Gas Management Facilities Design Guidelines, 2010 (the Design Guidelines), a guidance document. The LFGMP describes how, what and when gas collection system components should be installed to meet the expected 75% collection efficiency. Collection efficiency must be attained 4 years after implementation of the LFGMP, which was 2016, for the Hartland landfill. The Design Guidelines also require monthly balancing of gas collection well fields.

3.2 Health and Safety Regulations

WorkSafeBC: Many of the compounds in LFG, particularly methane, hydrogen sulphide and individual volatile organic compounds have exposure limits set out within WorkSafeBC regulations. The Hartland landfill must comply with these limits.

The BC Landfill Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste, 2016: dictates that combustible gas must not exceed specific limits at the landfill perimeter, and all on-site buildings. As well, it must be managed to ensure there is no public threat or nuisance, and that provincial and federal air quality objectives are met. Annual reporting and interpretation of this data is a requirement under the Operational Certificate.

3.3 Additional Emissions Reporting

There are additional federal and provincial emissions reporting frameworks requiring Hartland LFG emissions or related data. A summary of these reporting programs is provided in Table 1.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 3

Table 1 Summary of Federal and Provincial Emissions Reporting Frameworks Requiring Hartland LFG Emissions or Related Data

Year Report Report/Survey Reported to reporting Required Reporting Elements Regulatory Framework Frequency began • Quantity and composition of LFG • Quantity LFG (CH4) collected MOE • Quantity LFG (CH4) utilized and flared Annual Landfill Gas BC Landfill Gas Management Electronic Annual 2011 • LFG collection efficiency Report Regulation reporting system • LFG well field balancing/issues • Operational issues and gas plant downtime • LFG Management Plan implementation status Facility GHG ECCC • Fugitive emissions (CH4, N2O) Canadian Environmental Reporting (Final Single-Window Annual 2004 • Flare emissions (CO2) Protection Act & annual Emissions Report)* Reporting System • Generator emissions (CO2) Canada Gazette publication BC Greenhouse Gas BC Greenhouse Gas MOE • Flare emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) Emissions Reporting reporting (Industrial Single-Window Annual 2010 • Vehicle emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) Regulation under the Emissions)* Reporting System • Generator emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Cap and Trade) Act • Energy production and usage summary for LFG utilization facility Electricity Supply and Statistics Canada Monthly 2016 Electricity production Statistics Act Disposition Survey o o Electricity purchased from the grid o Associated revenue/costs • Energy production and usage summary for LFG utilization facility Electricity Supply and Statistics Canada Annual 2016 Electricity production Statistics Act Disposition Survey o o Electricity purchased from the grid o Associated revenue/costs • Reporting of criteria air contaminants (CO2, NOx, PM2.5, PM10, sulphur dioxide, total PM, National Pollutant VOC) for emissions from: Canadian Environmental Release Inventory ECCC Annual 2017 o On-site vehicles Protection Act & annual (NPRI)* o Generator Canada Gazette publication o Flares o Uncontrolled (fugitive)

Page 4 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Table 1, continued Year Report Report/Survey Reported to reporting Required Reporting Elements Regulatory Framework Frequency began • Waste composition and municipal breakdown • Quantity and composition of LFG (%CH4) • Quantity LFG (CH4) collected Voluntary: ECCC Pollutant Landfill Gas Survey ECCC Biennial 2012 • Quantity LFG (CH4) utilized and flared inventories • Instrumentation and measurement details • Gas Plant Downtime • Electricity production Survey of Electric • Electricity Production Power Thermal • Quantity of LFG (CH4) utilized Statistics Canada Annual 2016 Statistics Act Generating Station • Heat content Fuel Consumption • Quantity and volume of fuel used Notes: *Reported data is attached in Appendix G VOC = volatile organic compounds ECCC = Environment & Climate Change Canada

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 5

4.0 LANDFILL GAS GENERATION

Decomposition of refuse creates LFG; the composition and amount of gas generated varies based on factors, such as amount, type and age of waste, as well as environmental conditions, such as moisture content. LFG composition and generation rates are discussed in Section 6.1.

Peak gas generation occurs during the first 1-3 years after disposal. Initially, decomposition of waste is an aerobic process and produces mainly carbon dioxide. As oxygen is depleted, the decomposition occurs under anaerobic conditions. The total waste input and waste composition affects overall gas generation rates. For clarity, it is important to note that gas production is the total amount of gas predicted to be produced by the landfill given waste composition and existing waste in place.

4.1 Quantity and Sources of Municipal Waste Received

Quantity of LFG production is dependent on the amount and type of waste received. In 2017, the Hartland landfill received 157,638 tonnes of waste, which included 144,368 tonnes of general refuse, 10,104 tonnes of Controlled Waste and 3,166 tonnes of asbestos. Waste volumes have increased over the last 2 years, as a result of economic conditions, as well as the closure and transferred ownership of a local private landfill that receives demolition material.

Figure 1 Annual Waste Tonnages Received or Estimated for Hartland Landfill from 1980-2017

Waste composition is used to calculate methane generation rates to determine overall LFG generation; it is discussed in Section 9.0. From 2014-2015, a combination of weigh scale information and the 2010 Waste Stream Composition Study was used. A waste composition study was completed in 2016 and has been used to update waste composition back to the onset of the kitchen scraps diversion program in 2014. For 2014 through 2016, the waste composition is estimated to be 27% relatively inert, 52% moderately decomposable and 21% decomposable. The decrease in the portion of decomposable waste (29% for 2010-2013) can be directly attributed to the implementation of the kitchen scraps ban.

Page 6 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Details of all waste composition studies are included with the gas generation data in Appendix A, including, methane generation potentials, a summary of waste sources and diversion, as required under the Landfill Gas Management Regulation.

Waste composition studies do not quantify Controlled Waste. Controlled Waste is classified by the CRD as wastes that, due to environmental or health and safety considerations, require special handling. Controlled Waste deposited at the site is measured by scale and classified by type. For the purpose of this report, and on consultant recommendation, Controlled Waste is considered relatively inert, with the exception of Controlled Waste classified as ‘Miscellaneous’, which is considered to be decomposable. Controlled Waste totals are incorporated in the quantities for relatively inert and decomposable waste in the model.

4.2 Waste Diversion

The CRD has implemented an organics (kitchen scraps) diversion program and ban that took effect January 1, 2015. However, incentive programs were implemented in 2013 and 2014 to encourage compliance prior to the implementation of the landfill ban. As a result, more than 5,000 tonnes of organics were diverted from the landfill in 2013 and more than 15,000 tonnes in 2014. The termination of the incentive program in 2015 has resulted in difficulties tracking diverted organics; as a result, a conservative estimate of 20,000 tonnes has been used for 2015 through 2017.

Diversion of a portion of highly decomposable waste from the landfill will result in a decrease in overall gas production. The 2016 waste composition study indicated organic material now comprises 20.1% of the waste stream, compared to 30% prior to the kitchen scraps ban. The Hartland Landfill Gas Management Plan predicted a decrease in gas production within the first 1-3 years following the implementation of the diversion program. Annual modelled methane production since the implementation of the diversion program has confirmed peak landfill gas production and a subsequent decline since the implementation of the organics ban in 2015.

4.3 Health and Safety

LFG is flammable, toxic and poses an asphyxiation risk to landfill employees and contractors on site. Specifically:

• LFG can accumulate in confined spaces or low-lying area with poor air circulation, which can pose an asphyxiation risk due to the displacement of oxygen. • Both trace gases and major gas constituents can result in acute toxicity if exposure occurs at high enough concentrations. • Trace gases, usually associated with sulphur compounds, can create odours. • Methane is explosive at concentrations between 5 and 15%. It is also a GHG with 25 times the Global Warming Potential of carbon dioxide. There is also potential for gas to laterally migrate off site. When gas pressure builds up in the landfill, gas migrates via cracks, soil pores, and/or fractures to equalize with the surrounding atmosphere. This includes migrating through permeable cover systems or subsurface migration toward adjacent properties. The main objective of a LFG collection system is to mitigate the above risks and reduce the potential for subsurface, lateral gas migration. However, while lateral movement can be mitigated with LFG collection and control, there will still be fugitive LFG emissions on site. A number of factors influence this, such as atmospheric pressure, groundwater level, the gas pressure in the refuse mass, and permeability of cover systems. Gas collection system operation and utilization is discussed in sections 5.0 and 6.0, and monitoring programs are discussed in Section 8.0.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 7

5.0 LANDFILL GAS COLLECTION AND MONITORING INFRASTRUCTURE

Systems to control and monitor fugitive LFG emissions have been implemented at Hartland landfill. The objective of these controls is to:

• protect employee and public health and safety • prevent migration of gas off-property or into on-site buildings • reduce GHG • capture gas for energy recovery • control odour The LFG management system, originally installed in 1990, was upgraded in 1996 in conjunction with the planned closure of Phase 1. A temporary flare was erected and connected to 12 vertical wells. A permanent blower station, header and lateral collectors, and a groundflare were installed and commissioned in 1998. The blower station consists of three 1,300-scfm blowers, 2 of which have variable frequency drives that offer vacuum control. The vacuum draws gas from connected wells via a series of 150-mm-diameter laterals that connect to a header that ranges from 200-400 mm. The lateral and header pipes are all constructed of high-density polyethylene. Currently, gas is extracted from a network of vertical and horizontal gas collection wells and directed to the generator. Excess gas is directed to a candlestick flare, while the existing groundflare is used during extended generator downtime.

In 2004, Maxim Power Corp., under a contract with the CRD, installed and commenced operation of a 1.6-MW generator to utilize LFG to generate electricity, which is still in operation today. In 2013, the CRD took over ownership and operation of the generator and associated controls. Operation, maintenance and electricity generation has remained the same.

The current LFG management system consists of:

• An extraction well network, including vertical and horizontal wells. • A conveyance system incorporating branch, lateral and header pipes to convey the collected LFG from the extraction network to the LFG utilization facility or flares. • A LFG destruction facility with moisture separators, centrifugal blowers, flares, piping and electrical service. • A 1.6-MW generator for LFG utilization. • A LFG monitoring program. • A subsurface gas migration monitoring network that includes gas monitoring probes located adjacent to the eastern property boundary and the perimeter of on-site building foundations. 5.1.1 Vertical Gas Extraction Wells

The gas system started with 34 vertical wells, many of them dual zone. Seven dual zone vertical wells were added for the West Crest closure project. By the end of 2016, there were 25 dual zone vertical wells and 24 shallow vertical wells operating. Vertical wells are spaced at 50-m intervals. The well design includes a 760-mm borehole with 1 shallow and 1 deep extraction pipe. The dual zone wells are up to 30 m into the waste, while the shallow wells are completed to a depth of 10-16 m. The deep wells are constructed with a 200-mm-diameter slotted section in the deepest zone, a 150-mm-diameter solid middle section and a 100-mm-diameter solid section through to grade. The shallow wells are constructed with a 150-mm- diameter slotted section, with slots terminating between 4-6 m from the surface and a 100-mm-diameter solid section through to grade.

Page 8 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

5.1.2 Horizontal Gas Extraction Wells

Prior to 2012, the horizontal wells were placed every 45-50 m on centre, extending 100-200 m in length, and trenched into the refuse with a vacuum applied only at 1 end. The horizontal wells were laid every 10- 12 m vertically and offset from the layer below. Horizontal wells were installed in trenches 1 m wide and 1.7 m deep trenched in garbage with a 150-mm bed of aggregate. The wells were then covered with aggregate and a layer of geotextile. The terminus of each well is solid pipe with a clay plug. The wells slope at 2-3% when installed.

Installation of new gas collection infrastructure has changed with the implementation of the LFGMP in 2012. The density of horizontal wells has increased from 45-50 m, to 20 m on centre. Wells are placed on each vertical lift, approximately every 4 m, with each offset from the lower trench alignment. The horizontal wells are constructed using 15-m-long slotted pipe sections friction fit, into 3-m-long solid sections of 200-mm high-density polyethylene DR11 pipe. The pipes overlap by 1 m to allow for articulation due to settlement. The piping is then covered with 75-mm x 19-mm clear aggregate and wrapped in geotextile cloth to prevent intrusion of fine sediments. All new horizontal wells over 150 m in length are connected to laterals at both ends. By the end of 2017, 22 new horizontal wells were activated (installed in the 175 and 179 mASL lifts of Cell 2) and 5 new wells were installed in the 150 mASL lift in Cell 3.

See Figure 2 for the general location and layout of the LFG infrastructure.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 9 1 1 95 2 1 5 5 3 5 1 8 0 155 5 1 5 2 1 5 0 15

1 3

0 95 0 0 1 8 150 5

1 2

5

1 1 4 45 5 0 10 E W n il 16 110 tr lis 0 an 0 c Po 1 e in 1 R o t a 5 d 0 1 0 1

6 3

0 1 5

1 1

1 3 0 1 0 5 0 9

0 1 3 1 1 0

1 3 1 0 0 05 0 9 9 4 0 1

9 5

0 13

5

2 1 105

1 210 15

2

0

5

1 9 2 5 2 0 105 05 5 5 20

12 2 0 10

1

9

0

1 8 5

1 Willi tR d 80 s Poin d a o R s s e c c A N North Park R oad h orth Hyd ro R oad rt

o 0

N 6

1 1 10 Lower Lagoon Flow Detec tion Ch am b er 5 6 1 135 Sc ad a and elR oad R oad Lev Elec tric al 11 h Level High 5 Hig ss Build ing 0 UpperLagoon Ac c e 2 Water Tank 1 d 130 oa R 5 l 55 1 e 1 Contrac tor’s 1 v 1 e Work sh op 2 L 30 0 h 1 ig H Pum p Station Storage Sh ed La goon R oa Valve Ch am b er Build ing d 2 135 1 0 North Purge Bioxid e Well Com pressor Tank Build ing 1 Farm 5

0 135 North Purge N o Wel Kiosk r th HLGW0010 w e s 35 t 1 HLGW0011 S lo p e HLGW0001 LHGW0008 R 0 145 o 4 Power Plant a 1 LHGW0007 d 08 VLGW0057 North Toe R oad 00 W G H L 0 2 1 3 3 0 6 1 1 1 5 0 7 6 0 HB20 0 Gas Plant 1 5 0 LHGW0003 7 VLGW0060 0 HB11 0 0 HLGW0013 W W G HLGW0012

G H L 1 H 3 3 HLGW0004 7 L 1 LHGW0013 Gas Flare 5 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 Station 1 0 8 W W HLGW0003 5 G G VLGW0056 H H 3 VLGW031S L L 1 2 R oad 9 1 140 5 0 0 5 VLGW0059 0 LHGW002A VLGW033S 1 W HLGW0014 9 5 G 3 H VLGW034S 1 L 0

2 0

6 2 W 3 LHGW0022 LHGW0004

5 1 0 G 1 4 4 0 LHGW0023 H 0 0 5 2 T L 0 0 1 o 0 HLGW0005 VLGW028S u W 1 2 0 W 1 t G 0 5 l 0 G VLGW047S e H 0 L VLGW0055 2 V L A oad 2 a W H 2 50 R 1 0 l VLGW030S 1 6 2 le G 0 0 2 3 L LHGW0021 0 5 y 2 1 R H W 5 23 0 VLGW0058 5 0 o 0 G VLGW032S a H 2 d W 35 HLGW016B L VLGW022D 2 G 2 5 4 H 2 VLGW0051 5 0 1 0 H L LHGW0020 2 2 0 6 L 4 H 5 5 G W VLGW022S L W G VLGW027D G VLGW0054 0 H 1 Ac tive Fac e 0 W 1 60 R oad 5 L 0 2 LHGW0019 1 27 2 0 5 Oil/Gas Tank 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 HLGW006B VLGW027S 1 2 VLGW029D (Loc ation Varies) W 0 2 0 G 0 5 HLGW017B

5 H 2 W VLGW014D 7 L 15 0 G VLGW029S 0 H VLGW014S H 2 L 6 VLGW0050 L d 0 H a G 160 R o 1 L W 5

G 4 5 H HLGW0018 0 0 W 9 L HLGW006A 0 1 0 G 6 0 0 0 H B W 0 0

W L 1

4 C 1 6 0 W G o 5 2 3 N 0 H G VLGW0053 n 0 A t 0 0 G o 6 n W 0 o H 0 VLGW021D 1 L r W e 0 H HLGW019B 0 t LG c 1 L H 3 G h 7 2 0 t 0 L 0 o 0 W w r VLGW021S W 0 5 5 R VLGW026D W HLGW020B 0 1 e G 70 ad L 5 R o o 0 5 s a G L H 0 d 0 t L

0 H 4 G 1 HLGW022B S

2 H 4 W

W l VLGW026S

280 0 o HLGW008B 2

G 0

8 0 p

5 HLGW021B

L

1 0 e 0 W HLGW0023 P

0 h 1

H a 0 HLGW0024 R VLGW0049 s G VLGW013D

0 7 e o VLGW0052 1

W H a VLGW013S W C L G HLGW0025 d r

2 G HLGW0026

L e 7 H L HLGW027B s

0 H L H t 1

G H L R 6 2 G 7 W W HLGW0036 o 0 5 a 1 0 H 0 d VLGW020D 5 0 0 5 L HLGW028B 5 6 G 1 HLGW0037 HLGW029B HLGW030B VLGW020S W 6 HLGW038B 7 0 1 0 3 6 5 0

0 0 2 3 8 HLGW039B 0 W N HLGW031B G or VLGW025D

4

L t 2 h HLGW040B 2 M VLGW025S 2 8 H

2 0 a 9 5 in

5 0 0 5 H HLGW032B 0 0 2 au 7 W l 1 0 R 6 HLGW041B G 0 o HLGW034B

3 a HLGW033B L HLGW0045 d 0 W VLGW043S VLGW008D

H 0

G HLGW042B 2 9 HLGW043B

L

9 1

W 3

5 0

H HLGW0046

G 2 0 VLGW008S L

0 HLGW050B 0 HLGW047B

W HLGW049B 0

2 H 5 HLGW044B

1 VLGW019D

0 4

G

2 W

0 0 L HLGW048B VLGW019S 0 HLGW051B

0 G

H 0

W L W

G

W H

L G G L

H 6 L H 4 H 0

H 7 0 6 3 L VLGW012S 2 W

G 0 0 0 G

W 0 L W

0 W H

0 G

0 G

A 1 L 1 8

5 L 5

6 9 7 H 3

0

0 3 0 H 0

0 VLGW007D 0 0 0 1

2 0 0

W 7 2 W W

W 0

0

G G W G

0 G L L L

G VLGW007S L

H H L

W H

H VLGW018D Ea

4

H s

G t

2

3

4 H

3

L B 1

3

2 3 y

4

0 d

6 0 3

H

0

4 VLGW018S

0

1

0 r 8 0

0 3 o

R ad io 0

0

0 0

4 0 0 0 0

0 0

0

W 0 4 0 R 0

W Equipm ent W

W

W 0 0 o

G W

W

7 W

G

0 G

W G a

G L

8

2 W Containter G

L

G L

L G L d

G H

2 0 W L

L

L G

H

H

H H L

0

0 H

L

Ac tive Fac e G 0 H H

2 0

2 H 3

L

H W

Sh ed Staff Kiosk 4 VLGW011S

W

H G 0 9

9

G L 0

(Loc ation Varies) 4 8

2

L H 0 4

0 W

H 0 0 0

0

G 7

0 1 W L

W W H G

G L G

L L H

H

H VLGW006D 7 VLGW017D 4 VLGW006S 1 0 7

0 0

5

1 W

0 H 9 VLGW017S 8

0 9 G i 1 g 5 1 8 L h 6

1 1 L H ev 0 el 0 R W o a G HLGW051A d L HLGW050A H VLGW010S HLGW044A

A

8

2 4 HLGW049A HLGW043A

7 0

5 0 1 70 W HLGW048A HLGW042A HLGW033A HLGW034A VLGW005D

G

L VLGW005S 5

H 9 HLGW032A 2 HLGW041A VLGW016D

1

0 8 9 VLGW016S 0 2 Saanic h HLGW031A Water 5 VLGW024D 7 HLGW047A HLGW040A VLGW009D R eservoir

N 1 VLGW042S

o VLGW024S

r

t h HLGW030A VLGW009S

M

28 a HLGW039A 0 i n VLGW004D

H VLGW004S a CR D 2 u HLGW029A Operator's 7 l 5 HLGW028A R HLGW027A VLGW015D Work sh op o

a 0 d VLGW015S

9 5 2 8

2

8 VLGW023D 00 W VLGW023S LG H HLGW008A

VLGW001D

2

8 5 Hartland 5 0 VLGW001S 27 17 Learning Existing Gas Collection Center 2 VLGW002D Water 0 5 R erservoir Gas Plant Perim eterEastR oad 200 VLGW003D VLGW002S Pub lic Park ing Power Plant Lot R est S VLGW003S o R oom s 2 u Well 0 th 0 D i v 65 South Leac h ate Main Offic e WellHeadAssembly e 1 r Und erground Pum p s i Water Hartland Gas Probe o Station n Pum ph ouse R Cleanout o a d Condensate Drain Condensate Trap A 145 Com m erc ial Entry Sc ale Hartland ve Inline Valve Sc ale 2 ad 8 m R o Pub lic House H 0 Ber Exit Sc ale a Drop-off rt Sampling Port 2 la 9 A 195 c ess R oad Staff Kiosk v n 0 Main Ac e d Trench Riser 2 8

5 Header 145 Sou Horizontal Well th Diversio le & n R oa R ec yc d oad 1 b lic R Lateral 95 195 Pu Trench Riser ic R oad Entry Sc ale & Pub l Miscellaneous c yc le R e Hartland Site Boundary Pub lic Kiosk and Structure Footprint Sc ale Wellh ead R ec yc le & House (Ab and oned ) Property Boundary 2 oa 0 Pub lic R d 0 Storage Contours (5m Interval) Oil/Gas Maintenac e Exit Sc ale Tank Build ing Index Salvage Offic e Index-Depression 140 0 Intermediate 28 1 5 HHW Storage 0 Build ing Intermediate-Depression 5 2 5 2 R oad 27 b lic 2 Pu 1 1 e & 0 5 c l 0 c y R e Hartland Landfill HHW R ec eiving 1 5 Build ing 5

Gas Collection Infrastructure Overview 2 R oad 1 South Park 0 d a o R

o 5 r 13 d y H t s 1 a 2 6 E 1 0 210 0 Metres 130 2 3 0 50 100 150 200 2 0 2 5 2 Projection: UTM ZONE 10N, NAD83 20 2 2 19 3 15 5 5 Disclaimer: 2 05 This map is for general information only and may contain inaccuracies. 125 5 2 19 CRD - Facilities Management & Engineering Services - Jun 08, 2018 - Technologist: jpbezeau - Map Document: HartlandInfraLayers42x36_2018GasInfra.mxd 1 2 0 2 0 10 0 200

5.2 Collection and Treatment System Monitoring: Gas Well Field Operation and Data

Table 2 shows the number and type of gas wells installed and operating in 2016. A complete summary of changes to the gas well field is provided in Appendix B. In 2017, 22 new wells were activated and 5 new wells were installed. An additional 9 wells installed in 2016 are not ready for activation, but are being monitored for sufficient LFG production. A complete summary of all gas wells, including installation and deactivation dates, is included in Appendix B. Due to a lack of LFG production, and to improve well inventory and tracking, 12 wells were removed from the monthly monitoring program and labelled as ‘inactive’.

Table 2 Number and Type of Gas Wells Installed or Operating (2012-2017)

Type of Gas Well 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Vertical Gas Wells Operating 73 73 74 74 74 67 Horizontal Gas Wells Operating 20 26 34 38 40 62 Leachate Horizontal Gas Wells 11 11 12 12 12 12 Operating Leachate Gas Trench Operating 5 5 5 5 5 0 Wells Installed But Not Connected1 0 0 0 16 12 5 Total 109 115 125 129 131 141 Notes: 1 Wells installed in a year, but not immediately activated or connected to the system in that same year – this number is not included in the final total.

The use of gravel as interim cover facilitates easy drainage of leachate for maintenance of the hydraulic trap leachate collection system; however, the permeable nature of the gravel is not conducive to gas capture and can promote oxygen intrusion into the waste mass. Introduction of oxygen into a gas well or refuse can lead to subsurface fires. To minimize this potential and maximize gas collection, each gas collection well has a head with a control valve to regulate the vacuum exerted on the individual well. This controls the flow of gas from the well into the gas collection system. Well field balancing is required on a monthly basis to assess and adjust individual wells to optimize overall gas flows and composition.

CRD staff monitor gas wells for methane, carbon dioxide, oxygen, balance gas, static pressure, differential pressure, temperature and flow on a monthly basis. The well field must be measured and balanced at least once per month and more often if there are changes in gas composition, or if there are swings in the system vacuum measured at the gas plant. There are many factors that impact gas generation, so frequent well adjustments are critical to optimize the flow and methane content. Ideally, constant vacuum is applied at a well so that gas is drawn at approximately the same rate that it is being generated (a target of <3% oxygen, and <20% nitrogen/balance gas is desirable).

Data from the well field, including individual well gas flows, is provided in Appendices B2 and B3. The well field was balanced 12 times in 2017, as recommended by the Design Guidelines; however, no data was recorded in February due to a data logging error. The full data set is included in Appendices B4 and B5. Table 3 shows that the 10 most productive wells contribute 41% of the total gas volume. Figure 3 depicts gas collection by well as it contributes to the total gas collected. Reported methane flows for each well appear lower compared to previous years due to 1 month of missing data.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 11

Table 3 Gas Wells with the Highest Collection 2017

Average Average Methane Methane Well Refuse Lift Months in Energy Name Methane Flow Annual Flow Flow Production (mASL) Operation (GJ) (% by vol) (scfm) (scf) (m3) (% of Total) HLGW029B 171 54.3 105.4 11 27,526,795 779,476 27,983 7.02% HLGW016B 163 52.7 104.3 11 26,442,976 748,786 26,881 6.74% HLGW017B 163 49.6 75.0 11 17,909,856 507,153 18,207 4.57% HLGW042B 175 56.5 90.5 8 17,903,049 506,961 18,200 4.57% HLGW021B 165 50.4 57.7 11 14,012,598 396,795 14,245 3.57% HLGW008B 143 43.8 64.0 11 13,484,409 381,838 13,708 3.44% HLGW026B 171 49.7 50.0 11 11,963,981 338,784 12,162 3.05% LHGW0020 159 54.4 45.6 11 11,949,167 338,365 12,147 3.05% HLGW037B 175 52.2 49.3 10 11,259,104 318,824 11,446 2.87% HLGW039B 175 52.8 59.0 7 9,553,718 270,533 9,712 2.44%

If a gas well does not produce enough methane, the valve is often turned down or off. In 2017, 12 wells did not produce adequate amounts of methane and have been labelled as ‘inactive’. It is recommended that non-producing wells be removed from the monitoring program and labelled as ‘inactive’ after 18 months.

Page 12 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Figure 3 Gas Collection by Individual Wells

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 13

6.0 LANDFILL GAS UTILIZATION AND COLLECTION

The volume of collected LFG is measured by flow meters at the LFG plant and recorded on the CRD SCADA system. The data is compiled to determine collection and utilization rates, and then compared to the generation model to estimate the collection efficiency of the system. Utilization of LFG refers only to the gas burned by the generator for electricity production, while collection refers to all gas drawn into the gas plant. Table 4 shows a summary of gas collection, generation, and overall collection efficiency. Figures in the following section illustrate the collection efficiency for the last several years (2004-2016) and the full set of data is provided in Appendix C1.

The LFG utilization facility shown in Figure 4 consists of 6 major components:

1. Conditioning Skid: Receives the LFG from the CRD collection/blower system. The conditioning skid cools the gas and reduces moisture, which drains into the condensate collection system. It also reduces the amount of siloxane, which increases wear and tear on generator components. 2. Refrigeration Plant: Provides coolant to the conditioning skid by circulating it, as required, to maintain the LFG at 2°C. 3. Engine: 20-cylinder, 2,200-HP Caterpillar. The engine runs a direct drive 1,200-rpm, 1.6-MW generator. Electricity produced is fed into the BC Hydro grid. 4. Transformer: The unit converts 600 V to 25 kV. 5. Switch Gear: Monitors stability of the line input to the BC Hydro grid. 6. Master Control Building: Houses the controls that interconnect the utilization facility with the collection system. It also provides system operation controls, such as continuous quality, flow rate and pressure monitoring. The CRD has upgraded its system controls to communicate with the utilization facility. Gas is drawn into the facility by the blowers and passed through the conditioning skid. An automated valve maintains the required gas pressure for the generator while excess gas is fed back to the candlestick flare. Gas is only directed to the groundflare during extended periods of generator downtime, due to maintenance or BC Hydro issues.

6.1 Gas Composition

Gas composition is monitored monthly at each individual well and continuously at the gas plant. A comprehensive summary of gas concentration by well is provided in Appendix C. On average, the LFG at the gas plant was comprised of 51.3% methane and 0.6% oxygen.

Page 14 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Figure 4 Hartland Landfill Gas Plan

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 15

Table 4 Landfill Gas System Collection Efficiency 1998-2017

Modelled Annual1 Measured Annual Calculation GHG Emission Year Methane Gas Capture Collection (tonnes/year CO2e) Generated (scfm)2 (scfm)2 Efficiency (%) 1998 1461 1181 80.8 34,151 1999 1459 937 64.2 63,616 2000 1457 738 50.6 87,762 2001 1461 565 38.7 109,251 2002 1481 499 33.7 119,844 2003 1508 628 41.6 107,391 2004 1536 593 38.6 114,990 2005 1567 517 33.0 128,064 2006 1590 562 35.3 125,449 2007 1616 587 36.3 125,520 2008 1647 504 30.6 139,380 2009 1669 476 28.5 145,569 2010 1687 546 32.4 139,133 2011 1696 581 34.3 136,052 2012 1700 829 48.8 106,201 2013 1697 987 58.2 86,624 2014 1,671 942 56.4 89,474 2015 1,646 1085 65.9 69,330 2016 1,632 1009 61.8 75,939 2017 1,627 1102 67.7 64,173 Notes: 1 Generated using the MOE model; 2 Normalized to 50% methane

Collection efficiency improved beginning in 2012 due to the installation/connection of several horizontal wells in late 2011, as well as the connection of new wells associated with the Phase 2, Cell 1 closure. Further improvements in collection efficiency were observed in 2013, as a result of installation of 6 new horizontal collection wells in Phase 2 and implementation of the LFGMP.

This decrease can be attributed to inconsistencies in well field balancing. In 2016, LFG collection efficiency was 61.8% (Table 4 and Figure 6). In 2017, collection efficiency increased to 67.7%. The increase can be attributed to improved well field balancing and increased gas collection at key wells. Further detail on collection efficiency, and the LFGMP implementation status, is also provided in Section 6.1.2.

Since 2013, collection efficiency has varied around 60% with a maximum of 67.7% in 2017. These rates are within the estimated range predicted by the LFGMP and demonstrate that Hartland landfill is meeting the expectations of the LFGMP (Figure 5).

Total fugitive GHG emissions generated from the landfill for 2017 were estimated at 64,173 tonnes CO2e, which is a 15% decrease from 2016 and a 40% decrease from 2012 (Figure 7). As predicted, GHG emissions continue to decline, as a result of the organics (kitchen scraps) ban at the beginning of 2015, and continued success of the CRD’s waste diversion initiatives.

It should be noted, that the Global Warming Potential for methane was updated to 25 (from 21) in 2014. In addition, certain conversion factors were updated in 2017, resulting in slight differences in previously reported numbers. Overall collection efficiency and GHG emissions remain largely the same.

Page 16 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Figure 5 High/Low Collection Efficiency Estimates from the LFGMP and Current Collection Efficiency

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 17

Figure 6 Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency at Hartland Landfill 2004-2017

Page 18 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Figure 7 Fugitive Greenhouse Gas Emission at Hartland Landfill 2004-2017

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 19

6.1.1 Destruction Devices and Usage

Table 5 shows the average gas collected from 2011-2017 and flows through utilization devices (generator, candlestick or groundflare). Flaring of gas usually occurs when gas collection exceeds generator capacity or during generator downtime. The generator was offline due to repairs from August 2015-June 2016, at which time gas was directed exclusively through the groundflare.

The Design Guidelines specify that a candlestick flare should not be used as a primary combustion device, but can be utilized as a backup combustion device when flows exceed the capacity of other approved devices. As a result, 50% or more of the total LFG collected should be directed through the groundflare or generator. Since 2009, the generator and/or groundflare have been the primary destruction devices. In 2016, 69.3% of the gas was directed through approved destruction devices.

Table 5 Landfill Gas Flows to Destruction Devices (2011-2017)

Year Annual Average 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Gas Collected (scfm)* 581 829 987 953 1,085 1,009 1,102 Destruction by Generator (scfm)* 359 439 488 492 319 269 467 Destruction by Candlestick Flare 131 303 477 427 304 314 461 (scfm)* Destruction by Groundflare (scfm)* 91 87 28 42 464 430 177 Total Gas Flared 38.2% 47.0% 51.2% 49.2% 70.8% 73.8% 57.9% Gas through approved destruction 77.4% 63.5% 51.7% 55.2% 72.1% 69.3% 41.9% devices Notes: *normalized to 50% methane

6.1.2 Landfill Gas Management Plan Implementation Status

The CRD has implemented the conceptual design in the LFGMP. However, since the plan was prepared, some operational changes have occurred, which are summarized below:

• 2012 – Alignment of horizontal wells changed from east-west, as specified in the LFGMP, to north- south due to the master fill plan cell phasing and progression. • 2012/2013 – Relocation and reconfiguration of Controlled Waste disposal areas. Controlled Waste, initially landfilled in clay-lined cells, is now trenched into refuse. Landfilling was conducted over the Controlled Waste area expanding the available footprint for Cell 2. This benefits overall collection in that it allows gas wells to be installed in Controlled Waste areas that would otherwise be inappropriate due to clay. • 2014 – Installation of vertical gas wells has been delayed pending further review of efficacy due to leachate inundation or minimal gas production. Vertical gas wells installed in recently closed areas (2012) were not productive due to density of horizontal wells and overlapping areas-of-influence. • 2014 – Since implementation of the LFGMP, horizontal well installation depths have been reduced (made shallower). The proposed deeper wells were intended to accelerate activation; however, this was not actualized and the deeper wells triggered odour and safety issues during installation. As a result, this part of the LFGMP was revised to allow for shallow wells. The shallow wells have fewer health and safety considerations, are less expensive to install, and can be activated in the same timeframe as deeper wells specified in the plan. • 2015/016 – Filling plan sequencing has changed since the plan was prepared. These changes represent schedule variations rather than whole scale deviations from the LFGMP. Changes include:

o Phase 2, Cell 2 vertical extension by 2 lifts to allow time for completion of the cliff quarry and construction of Cell 3.

Page 20 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

o February 2017 – A bypass line valve was opened at the gas plant to reduce back pressure on the well field and increase gas flows to the plant. As a result, flows increased by 50-100 scfm. The LFG collection system is designed to reach 75% collection efficiency, as per the Design Guidelines. Based on the targeted collection efficiency was expected to be reached by 2016; however, current collection efficiency is 67.7% and within estimated ranges according to the LFGMP (Figure 5).

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 21

7.0 OPERATIONAL UPDATES

Detailed operational updates and changes are outlined in the Hartland Landfill Annual Operations Report. Pertinent changes are detailed below as they relate to LFG.

• Landfilling commenced in Phase 2, Cell 3 in September 2016. • Phase 2 temporary cover (30 mil LLDPE) covering the southeast corner of Phase 2, Cell 2 after final gas well installation in the third quarter of 2017 • A renewal Natural Gas study was initiated, which looked at the possibility of pipeline quality gas to the FortisBC network. The study is ongoing. 7.1 System Performance and Maintenance

The gas collection system operates continuously except when there is a power failure or alarms that result in system shutdown. In the event of a stoppage, the system can be remotely restarted by on-call staff. Table 6 summarizes collection system downtime (i.e., no vacuum applied on the collection system).

Table 6 Summary of 2017 Blower Downtime by Month

Month Downtime (minutes) January 66 February 1,259 March 0 April 1,473 May 68 June 139 July 0 August 127 September 99 October 48 November 581 December 373 Total 4,233 minutes (2.94 Days)

In 2017, the overall collection system downtime was less than 3 days. All downtime can be attributed to power outages, and planned/unplanned maintenance.

Table 7 summarizes the performance of the generator in 2017, including electricity production, which compares actual operating hours to available operating hours for each month. Average energy production for 2017 was 80%.

Page 22 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Table 7 Generator Performance 2017

Electricity Generated Production Month Engine Run Hours (MW-hour)1 (%) January 727 1,095 91.9% February 583 894 83.2% March 742 1,138 95.8% April 617 841 73.0% May 733 1,127 94.7% June 703 803 69.7% July 726 1,075 90.3% August2 591 848 73.6% September 550 814 92.5% October 0 0 0.0% November 395 609 96.5% December 689 1,094 99.3% Notes: 1As reported by BC Hydro

7.1.1 Generator Emissions

Table 8 reports generator emissions results for 2008-2017. A stack test was not completed in 2017. No emissions data is available for 2015 due to generator downtime. The emissions data is compared to a baseline study conducted in 2004 that modelled emissions against applicable limits. The data is reviewed to ensure that current emissions rates are consistent with those used in the model.

Table 8 Generator Emissions Modelled and Stack Tests 2008-2016

Gas Gas Exit NOx Gas Concentration (mg/m3) Date Flow Temp Emission NOx SOx CO VOC PM (m3/s) (ºC) Rate (mg/s) Model 21-Oct-04 1.84 460 715 389 - - - - Test 07-Aug-08 1.83 476 644 351 18.7 845 749 1.8 Test 29-Jan-09 1.88 468 635 337 19.8 999 980 2.5 Test 29-Apr-10 1.8 475 689 384 23.8 1,054 1,011 39.1 Test 23-Feb-11 1.87 484 633 338 22.7 972 867 4.1 Test 03-Apr-12 1.83 476 642 351 18.7 1,052 937 1.1 Test 16-May-13 1.83 473 657 359 24.3 979 884 4 Test 17-Jul-14 1.83 467 750 410 19.4 1,181 851 2.9 Test 29-Jun-16 1.85 469.4 618 334 17.7 963 671 3.1

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 23

8.0 MONITORING PROGRAMS

Each year, monitoring is conducted to evaluate the performance of LFG collection and control systems. This section describes the program monitoring methodology and key findings for data collected in 2017. Table 9 summarizes site monitoring, frequency, criteria and response actions.

Table 9 Summary of Landfill Gas Monitoring Programs

Primary Action If Criteria Monitoring Task & Objectives Frequency Criteria Parameters Exceeded By 1. Perimeter subsurface probe monitoring To detect potential subsurface Quarterly at CH4, CO2, O2, LEL for methane Increase sampling EPro Staff LFG migrating off site perimeter pressure and/or (5.0%) frequency. probes vacuum Initiate off-site sampling Task 7. Evaluate effectiveness of remedial measures. 2. Building foundation probes To detect potential subsurface Quarterly at CH4, CO2, O2, 20% of LEL Initiate appropriate EPro Staff LFG migration into on-site building foundation pressure and/or 10% of LEL – CRD remedial action. foundations probes vacuum internal standard 3. On-site ambient grid sampling To assess on-site LFG 2 times per THC as methane 100 ppm as THC Initiate investigation of EPro Staff concentrations at known grid year and H2S (methane) remedial measures. locations across the landfill surface Identify locations >100 ppm THC for Task 4. 4. On-site ambient hotspot monitoring To identify localized sources of 2 times per THC as methane 12,500 ppm/1.25% Initiate investigation of EPro Staff LFG, or releases that could create year at and H2S THC (25% of the remedial measures. potential health, safety, hotspots LEL) Identify locations with environmental or operational 5 ppm H2S THC >1,000 ppm or H2S problems >5 ppm as Z points (hotspots). Personal gas detectors required in high risk areas.

Page 24 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Table 9, continued Primary Action If Criteria Monitoring Task & Objectives Frequency Criteria Parameters Exceeded By 5. Gas well field monitoring Monitor the concentrations and Minimum of Temperature, Maintain gas flow and Adjust wellhead vacuum. Hartland gas flows from all the wells in the monthly vacuum, flow rate, methane content, Staff landfill connected to the collection CH4, CO2, O2 control oxygen intake system 6. Blower, flare and generator station monitoring Monitor the performance of the Continuous Temperature, Operational Adjust well field if outside Hartland moisture separators, blowers and pressure, gas flow operational criteria. Staff flare and/or generation station rate, CH4, O2 7. Off-site properties To measure concentrations of Task 1 THC and H2S Detectable above air Initiate appropriate Hartland gases in the event of LFG exceedance quality guidelines and remedial action. Staff migrating off site WorkSafeBC criteria 8. On-site building gas monitoring To monitor methane and H2S Task 2 Methane and H2S 10% LEL (5,000 ppm) Initiate appropriate Hartland levels to protect workers in on-site exceedance 5 ppm CRD H2S remedial action. Staff buildings 10 ppm WorkSafeBC H2S 9. Landfill gas speciation To measure concentrations of Once every 2 VOC and H2S WorkSafeBC criteria Initiate Task 10 if EPro Staff compounds in the LFG at the inlet years for individual calculated ambient to the gas conditioning and power compounds in concentrations exceed generation station ambient air WorkSafeBC limits. 10. On-site ambient air quality measurement Measure ambient VOC Task 9 VOC and H2S WorkSafeBC criteria Initiate remedial action. EPro Staff exceedance for individual compounds in ambient air 11. Generator performance evaluation Monitor the performance of the Annual Various MOE Air Quality Initiate remedial action. EPro Staff groundflare (stack test emissions) Objectives and WorkSafeBC criteria Notes: EPro staff = Environmental Protection staff LEL = lower explosive limit

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 25

8.1 Subsurface Gas Monitoring – Perimeter and Foundation Probes

Since 1996, 2 types of monitoring probes, perimeter probes and foundation/trench probes, are installed at Hartland landfill that monitor subsurface gas migration, if any. The 2016 BC Landfill Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste requires that combustible gases in soils at the landfill property boundary must not exceed the lower explosive limit (LEL) and that combustible gas in any on- or off-site structure and/or facility shall not exceed 20% of the LEL. The LEL for methane is 5%. There are 5 perimeter monitoring probes installed (drilled into bedrock) along the eastern property line and 12 trench monitoring probes around on-site buildings (Figure 8). These probes are monitored quarterly.

Through installation and improvement of the LFG collection system, the CRD has reduced the risk of off- site gas migration; however, monitoring continues, as required, to comply with MOE requirements and to confirm worker and public health and safety.

Methodology

The perimeter and foundation probes are monitored using a LANDTEC Gas Analyzer and Extraction Monitor GEM 2000+. Each probe is monitored quarterly for pressure, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and methane, as well as groundwater elevation (where applicable). Atmospheric conditions during each monitoring event are also recorded. A complete monitoring methodology, probe locations, details, and data from the perimeter and building foundation probes are provided in Appendix D.

Results and Recommendations – Perimeter Probes

All probes were monitored according to the standard operating procedures 4 times in 2017; data is presented in Table 10, maximum values are shown in Table 11. There was no detectable methane recorded in 2017. Consistent with historical data, CO2 levels are slightly higher in the shallower ‘B’ probes than the deeper ‘A’ probes. Elevated carbon dioxide levels may give an early indication of the presence of LFG; however, no unusually high CO2 levels were observed. Ongoing monitoring will continue to determine if any trends develop.

Table 10 Average Gas Concentrations in Subsurface Perimeter Probes 2014-2017

CH4 (%) CO2 (%) O2 (%) Probe 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 GP-1A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 19.5 20.6 20.6 20.3 GP-1B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.0 1.5 0.9 17.9 18.7 18.9 19.3 GP-2A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 19.6 20.6 20.4 20.4 GP-2B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.9 3.8 1.6 12.1 15.2 13.2 15.6 GP-3A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.8 14.5 13.5 14.6 12.8 GP-3B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.2 4.3 3.9 14.3 14.8 15.0 16.2 GP-11A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 19.4 20.3 20.6 20.3 GP-11B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.8 1.4 18.1 19.7 19.9 19.2 GP-12A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.2 1.2 2.0 14.0 18.1 15.9 13.4 GP-12B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 4.5 6.1 4.8 14.0 11.4 11.3 12.9

Page 26 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Table 11 Maximum Value Gas Concentrations in Perimeter Probes 2017

Probe CH4 (%) CO2 (%) GP-1A 0.0 0.1 GP-1B 0.0 1.4 GP-2A 0.0 0 GP-2B 0.0 4 GP-3A 0.0 2.3 GP-3B 0.0 8.8 GP-11A 0.0 0.2 GP-11B 0.0 2.2 GP-12A 0.0 3.4 GP-12B 0.0 8.1

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 27

Figure 8 Location of Gas Probes

Page 28 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Results and Recommendations – Foundation Probes

Foundation probes were monitored 4 times in 2017, which is in compliance with MOE requirements (Table 12 and Table 13). Carbon dioxide levels were similar to previous years. There were no recorded exceedances of the MOE limit of 1.0% methane during the reporting period. Monitoring will continue to meet regulatory requirements and to determine if any trends develop.

Table 12 Average Gas Concentrations in Subsurface Foundation Probes 2014-2017

CH4 (%) CO2 (%) O2 (%) Probe 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 GP-4A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.1 8.6 7.4 19.2 19.4 GP-5A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.7 19.1 18.9 19.7 19.8 GP-6A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.0 19.0 19.3 20.0 19.1 GP-6B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.7 19.4 19.4 19.8 19.6 GP-7A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 19.8 19.4 20.5 20.1 GP-7B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 19.9 19.4 20.5 20.3 GP-8A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 19.7 19.3 20.5 20.3 GP-9A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 19.7 19.2 20.5 20.1 GP-13A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 3.9 2.0 3.3 16.4 17.8 17.0 16.8 GP-14A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 3.3 0.9 1.1 19.1 16.8 17.8 19.1 GP-17A1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.7 19.9 19.6 20.4 19.6 GP-18A2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 19.4 18.6 19.8 19.4 Notes: 1 Probe for Hartland Learning Centre (constructed in 2011) 2 Probe for new contractor’s workshop (constructed 2011)

Table 13 Maximum Value Gas Concentrations in Foundation Probes 2017

Probe CH4 (%) CO2 (%) GP-4A 0.0 4.1 GP-5A 0.0 1.3 GP-6A 0.0 2.0 GP-6B 0.0 1.0 GP-7A 0.0 0.3 GP-7B 0.0 0.1 GP-8A 0.0 0.3 GP-9A 0.0 0.3 GP-13A 0.0 6.1 GP-14A 0.0 1.9 GP-17A 0.0 1.9 GP-18A 0 0.5

Conclusions and Recommendations

Perimeter and foundation probe monitoring results for 2017 were in compliance with the MOE requirements. Methane was not detected. The data implies minimal risk of subsurface methane migration to adjacent properties or buildings. Quarterly monitoring should continue to meet regulatory requirements and to evaluate public health and safety risk.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 29

8.2 Surface Emissions and Hotspot Sampling

A program has been established to monitor fugitive emissions from Hartland landfill. Landfill gas can migrate to the atmosphere by advection and/or diffusion via soil pores, gaps and defective cover materials. Surface emissions monitoring is completed at Hartland to assess the effectiveness of the permanent and temporary closure systems in the Phase 1 and Phase 2 areas to:

• support health and safety measures in areas with high concentrations of landfill gas; • inform operational or capital upgrades to landfill gas and closure infrastructure, where degraded or insufficient cover exists; • to confirm the effectiveness of the Phase 1 permanent closure; • support optimal operation of the landfill gas well field by identifying hotspot areas, which may lead to oxygen intrusion, or areas where well vacuum may be increased; and • guide future determination of flux, if desired. Surface emissions monitoring is typically conducted in addition to lateral subsurface monitoring to assess the effectiveness of the LFG collection and controls. This method is a simple and low cost means to assess methane and non-methane. Results and findings are reported to Hartland staff and a map of hotspots is produced to help identify problem areas or system deficiencies.

Z-point locations change over time as closures occur, covers are placed, the location of the active face changes, and monitoring equipment is installed. The majority of Z-points are located at breaks or seams of cover systems and near side slopes in Phase 2 where gas collection is a challenge. The locations of all grid points and hotspots as of the end 2016 are shown in Figure 9.

At the end of 2017, there was a total of 22 Z-points identified. All, but 1 of these points were carried over from previous surveys. Hotspots have decreased significantly since the implementation of the LFGMP in 2012. The number of hotspots peaked at 37 in 2011 prior to the Phase 2, Cell 1 closure in 2011, as well as an increase in gas well installation density, as a result of implementation of the LFGMP.

Methodology

A 50-by-50-m grid of monitoring points has been developed over the surface of the landfill. These monitoring points have been programed into a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit to ensure a consistent sampling network for the measurement of fugitive LFG emissions.

Total Hydrocarbon (THC) levels, reported as methane, are measured at each grid point approximately 10 cm above the ground surface using a flame ionizing detector (FID). levels are measured simultaneously using a Jerome H2S Analyzer. The FID is set to alarm at THC levels of 100 ppm and higher. If at any point during the survey the FID alarm sounds, a more detailed search, between grid points, is conducted to determine the source. Any location that exceeds 1,000 ppm is logged as a hotspot (Z-point) and THC concentration and GPS coordinates are recorded. Any Z-points from previous surveys are also monitored. A Z-point is removed after 3 consecutive monitoring events yield THC results less than 1,000 ppm. Full monitoring methodology is included in Appendix E.

Results

A summary of the results is shown in Table 14, Table 15 and Figure 9. A historical summary of all Z-points is provided in Figure 10.

A total of 8 unique grid points were found to exceed 100 ppm THC in 2017, all clustered within the temporary closure area on the North West slope of Phase 2. There were no elevated hydrogen sulphide concentrations.

Page 30 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

Table 14 Summary of Grid Sampling Results 2017

Survey date March August Grid points Monitored 186 185 #Grid points >100 ppm THC 8 4 Maximum THC (ppm) 21,000 380

Table 15 Summary of Hotspot Results 2017

Survey date March September Total # hotspots1 22 22 New hotspots at end of survey 4 1 Hotspots discontinued2 4 0 Maximum CH4 (ppm) 25,000 23,500 Notes: 1 Total number of hotspots at the end of the survey date 2 Hot-spots discontinued at the end of the survey date

Conclusions and Recommendations

No hotspots were identified in Phase 1 indicating that the cover and gas collection system in the permanent closure is functioning. LFG continues to escape in unclosed portions of Phase 2 and along openings in the tarp of the northwest face temporary closure.

A review of the monitoring program was conducted in 2017 and recommended changes to the monitoring program based on a reassessment of operational and health and safety objectives. Changes will be implemented in 2018 and include the following:

• A reduction in sampling frequency to once per year (during the seasonal peak of gas production). • Removal of grid points over areas without permanent or temporary closure (e.g., Cell 3). • A shift in focus from inventorying/identifying all hot spots to focusing on locations that can be easily mitigated. • Regularly review the objectives of the surface emissions survey and assess the potential for future flux measurements to support methane emissions modelling.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 31 This page intentionally left blank

Figure 9 Hartland Landfill Ambient Air Monitoring Results, August 2017

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 33

Figure 10 Hartland Landfill Ambient Air Monitoring Results, Mar 2017

Page 34 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

CRD - Parks & Environmental Services- May 23, 2018 - Technologist: jpbezeau - Map Document: HartlandGasHistoricalZLocations2018.mxd

b w r I 1

m 9 e

2 y 0

0 5

28 0 i g 2 l 7

p 5 t

l a

h

o

n

r

e 2 1 d r 2 8 o 2 7 5 7 5

t 6

0 i 5 a t C n

R n b g D t e

t

h a

l T i 2 7 e 5 t a h

b a i a s n l c e 280 y m c

u

f

t o a 1 9 r 0 i m a r p

c

a e

y i

n s . 2

5

275

y o 5

f 2

o r 1

d 3 7

r

c

a 5 5 2

o

g m

m 4 e a 5

n 2 p g

e 5 l e

e 0 r a , t

e l l

o n i n s e 28 s

f 0 s

o o s r

r m o

i f n a

t j t u

h i

2 o r 2 i

s

y

n 6

4

m 5 0 r p

e

u a

s

p 2 r u 5 p 2 5

l 7 o t

o 5 i r s n

e t g h s

2 f

e 8 o r

o 5 n s m u l y i

t . t

a h

T P 0

b h e

i 2 r l e

u 0 o i t 5

s y C j e e

a o

p c o

f

i

f t t 1

t 2

i 2 a 9

h 6 t o 0 h 5 l 0 290 e

e n R

m

e

: m

2 g

a U 7

i a

p

o 2

p 0 T 0

n f 5 4 M o o a 0 r l r

a D i Z n n i O f s y o t N

r r p i m c u E t 6 a r

p ( t 1 0 i C o o R 0 1 s n D e

N 5

o . ) 5

n m N T

h t 8 a h A i k s 0 e

D e

m m s

a 8 a n p p o 3

i

1

a s r

e 2

n

0 n

2

2 0 1 p 0

d

6

o 2 0

r 0 0 M 3

e t t

h 0 s f e e e o

n r t m 2

t r n

a 1

e

a a

t 5 p T

i v s o o

i

m g n u

a

s t

a l

t e

o y i

o

r

b V

n

w a

e

. 2

l

a l c 1

H

T e

r

h

0

h y

r

i a S

a g e

n R

n

h

C o g 2

t o

i R e 2

e u a

D L

d 5

s d

t e

h

1

v

6

e 0

D

l

R i

2

v 1

2

o

e 5

0

a 0

r 1

d s 4

i 5 o

n

R

2

o

0

5 a d A A G H H

b c a i i

s s 1 9 t 5 s a t t i

o o v n P e

r r d

r

i i

1 o c c o 5 G 5 a a b n a l l e e

s Z Z

s 2 d

- - 0 W

2

S S 19 0 5 0

o p p 0 e r o o

l I l t t s n

L L

a 195 1 7 o o 0 c P c c t (

i

a a H 1

A

v

3 t t

e N

A

5 i i

C

o o o

r t L

S h

G

T n n

w

a

a e E

s s I s g

V t

s 1

o

S ( ( 8

l 0 2

E o o

I A

W 1

n p

3 n

, e

c

0

a R

F

e C

t R

c o i a l A v d o E

l t

s

N 1

ort a i h M

e ain Ha

ul Road C v

L

6 d

)

N e 0

E

L

o

r 1

R

) t

h

3 )

w

3 o

5 e

s

a

t

C P

S d

l

o

H p L e

O R A o M

a

d

a S S

i

n

U 1 E

R L A A

1 1

A 3

e 8 3

N

o 5

b c

R

c 0 0

2 a c

t o a a

e E i

c r

d v

n t s C

h h

e s s 1

d 9

0 (

a E M R 2

o

G t

o a L

0 e

n

a

a i

n L 1

e d

s C C H 6

d

o

2 P

L a ) S L

l

i R o u l N

n O

O

1

e

1 l

r

8 O o e 8 R P

S

c U 5

C

0 I r

G s o t t n

U

H T

h i a L N

o

R a

H

R d A T O c n O

E o

E t W S

S e S

i R

L v

( 1 E

i S E R U

2 4 e n

T

0 0 o I

S R

e V

2 H 0 a G T s

E

, E d 8

a

F C )

s 1

A ( 7

E

2 L 0 C

i 0 L 1

n 6

E 1 5 L e

1

1 12

s 5 9 1

) 5

C 120

o 1

1 1 4 5 n

0 t

o R I I

u o n n

a

r 1 d d d 3 s

e e 0

( 1 x x

5 5 -

D 0 m

e R

B

p o i e n

r a r e d t m e s

1 s

r R

1 3 1

i

v 2

0 o o 6 0

a a 175 0 n

l d R )

o

a

d

1

5

5 P

1 H 7 W P S P F 0 A i t a r n a r o r S u a t k g e c l E i r

n t r e C u

g 1 s l B r o

s

e

o

L

s

( i

1 s 7 0 v o R d o a d C u e t i r L e s e

C s O

A l 170 o S r s e E

u 1

a 4

D r 5 s e )

A

1 7 r 0 e

a 1

5

s 0

P

e

r

1 i m

e

5 t e r

E 5

a s t

R o a d

H

Ea 1 2

a st Hydro R

oad 5

r 150

t

l a

n 170

1

d

6

0 A

v e

H 1 5 5

1 70 I

S

1

2 5 T

1

1 6 5 5 5 O

L

1

6 O 5 R C

I 180 1

7

5

C

1

8 A 0

1 8 A 1 0 6 1 0 T 60 L

I 145

O

1

6 175

0

Z 1 7 0

1

1 0

6 5 N 0

-

P 1 0 S 0

O

1

2 0 115 I 115 N

1

0

0

T

1

1

1 0

2

5 9 140 5 This page intentionally left blank

8.3 Landfill Gas Speciation

Monitoring for volatile organic compounds is currently conducted once every 2 years to assess changes in gas composition over time. Composition changes can inform LFG infrastructure upgrades and capital plans for alternative utilization options. Sampling was completed in 2017 (see Table 16) and is scheduled again for 2019.

Gas speciation data from 2017 is consistent with previous years. Table 16 summarizes gas speciation results from 2017 with relevant WorkSafeBC exposure criteria. Historical data is included in Appendix F.

The data indicate that undiluted LFG exceeded the WorkSafeBC limits for methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride and benzene. However, exposure to undiluted LFG is unlikely as fugitive emissions mix quickly with air. Ambient air sampling conducted in 1999 and 2001 indicated an average dilution factor greater than 100:1. To further protect worker health and safety, personal gas detectors are set to alarm at levels consistent with 100:1 dilution factor (0.5% or 5,000 ppm methane or 10% of the LEL).

Table 16 Summary of Gas Speciation Results and Exposure Limits July 2017

WorkSafeBC WorkSafeBC Average Exposure Exposure Parameter Value Concern Limit TWA2 Limit STEL3 (ppm)1 (ppm) (ppm) VOC Benzene 0.65 0.5 2.5 skin contact limit, carcinogen Ethylbenzene 3.06 20 n/a carcinogen Methane 470,000 1,000 n/a Toluene 6.98 20 n/a adverse reproductive effect Vinyl Chloride 1.02 1.0 n/a carcinogen Xylenes 6.49 100 150 Other Gases Carbon dioxide 327,000 5,000 15,000 Hydrogen Sulfide 22 n/a 10 Notes: 1 Bold indicates exceedance of WorkSafeBC criteria. 2 8-Hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) - concentration must not be exceeded over a normal 8-hour work period 3 Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL) - the TWA concentration of a substance in air which may not be exceeded over any 15-minute period, limited to no more than 4 such periods in an 8-hour work shift with at least 1 hour between any 2 successive 15-minute excursion periods

In 2017, a post treatment sample was completed after the conditioning skid (refrigeration unit), primarily to evaluate siloxane removal (Section 7.3.1) prior utilization, but also to assess the reduction in other LFG constituents. On average, the majority of volatile/aromatic compounds were reduced by 30%. As expected, the flammable aliphatic compounds (methane, , butane, etc.) were not reduced through refrigeration treatment. Raw data is provided in Appendix F.

8.3.1 Siloxanes

In addition to routine speciation, siloxane sampling was completed in 2017, due to concerns over increased engine wear and silica buildup. Siloxanes are organosilicons, which are added to many personal care products and plastics. Combustion of siloxanes leads to the formation of silica micro-particulates on engine components, such as spark plugs, pistons, valves, sensors, etc., which can reduce engine life.

Current literature on siloxanes indicates that the manufacturer siloxane limits for Caterpillar internal combustion engines is 28 mg/m3. Both pre- and post-treatment levels are significantly below this level (10.43 mg/m3 and 6.92 mg/m3, respectively) and considerably lower than other landfills; however, siloxanes at any concentration may result in silica build up and engine damage. On average, current gas conditioning (chilling) appears to successfully reduce overall siloxane concentrations by 34% (Table 13). It is important

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 37

to note that siloxane concentrations will vary greatly over time. In addition, effects of silica compounds on engine components will vary widely by site making it difficult to develop and apply standard industry practices to reduce silica build-up. More comprehensive sampling should be completed before any firm conclusions can be drawn.

Table 17 Siloxane Concentrations in Raw and Treated Gas, 2017

3 3

Parameter Formal Name Post eduction Units Name R Raw Gas mg Si/m mg Si/m Alternate Alternate % Silicon % Conditioning

D5(CVMS) --- Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane ug/m3 4,320 2,650 37.9 38.7% 1.64 1.00 MD2M(LVMS) L4 decamethytetrasiloxane ug/m3 <170 <170 ------D6(CVMS) --- dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane ug/m3 <170 <170 ------MD3M(LVMS) L5 dodecamethylpentasiloxane ug/m3 <170 <170 ------D3(CVMS) --- Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane ug/m3 <170 210 ------MM(LVMS) L2 hexamethyldisiloxane ug/m3 1,290 1,010 33.4 21.7% 0.45 0.35 D4(CVMS) --- Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane ug/m3 4,820 3,260 37.8 32.4% 1.83 1.23 MDM(LVMS) L3 octamethyltrisiloxane ug/m3 <170 <170 ------Total siloxanes mg/m3 10.43 6.92

Conclusions and Recommendations

Based on 2017 data, the concentrations of individual volatile organic compounds and other constituents are fairly consistent over time; however, as waste composition changes, regular monitoring should continue. All results should continue to be compared to early 1991-2001 baseline data, in order to determine whether any individual volatile has the potential to approach WorkSafeBC exposure limits. Sampling for volatile organic compounds in LFG should be conducted again in 2019.

Siloxane sampling indicates relatively low siloxane concentrations in landfill gas, particularly post-treatment. However, engine maintenance requirements, due to silica fouling, have been increasing. Sampling should continue on a routine basis in order to better understand trends and impacts on the generator.

Page 38 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

A table has been prepared to summarize the results of LFG monitoring programs, whether the results comply with requirements, actions taken to address non- compliance, and recommendations.

Table 18 Landfill Gas Compliance Summary 2017

Compliance Program Criteria Findings Actions Recommendations Location Perimeter Probe Probes GP-1A, 1B, Maximum 1.25% methane in No exceedances. None Continue quarterly Monitoring 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 11A, subsurface soil (MOE Landfill Criteria Low risk of sub-surface gas monitoring. 11B, 12A and 12B for Municipal Solid Waste) migration to adjacent properties. Building Probes GP- 4A, 5A, Maximum 1.25% methane in any on- No exceedances. None Continue quarterly Foundation 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 8A, site facility (MOE Landfill Criteria for monitoring. Probe 9A, 13A, 14A, 17A, Municipal Solid Waste). Monitoring 18A Maximum 1% methane inside buildings Low risk of subsurface gas migration (Landfill Gas Management Facility to adjacent building. Design Guidelines). Ambient Grid N/A 100 ppm THC (CRD internal guideline) 8 grid locations >100 ppm Investigated hot spots Reduce to annual. Monitoring No cover system failures suspected and mitigated where in the closed area of Phase 1. possible. Hot Spot N/A 1,000 ppm THC (CRD internal 5 new hot spots >1,000 ppm Added new locations Reduce to annual. Monitoring guideline). 1 hot spot removed. of hot spots to the Investigate remediation Currently 22 locations for hot spot monitoring program. measures. investigation. Well Field N/A Monitor monthly. Monitoring completed monthly; None Continue monthly Monitoring and Oxygen <3% - gas optimization and oxygen did not exceed 3%. monitoring at minimum. Balancing reduction of fire potential Gas Speciation N/A N/A Undiluted LFG exceeded None Conduct speciation of (2017) WorkSafeBC criteria for methane, LFG in 2019. carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide, vinyl chloride and benzene; however, ambient concentrations are likely well below WorkSafeBC limits due to dilution with ambient air. Siloxane monitoring should continue on a routine basis to better understand trends and engine wear and tear impacts. Gas Collection N/A 75% gas collection efficiency target by Gas collection efficiency was LFGMP submitted to Continue to implement the end of 2016, as per LFGMP. estimated at 67.7%, based on the MOE. the gas management MOE gas generation model and is plan. within the estimated efficiency range specified in the LFGMP.

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 39

9.0 MODELLING

LFG generation rates are typically estimated by a model. These models generally use variations of a first- order decay equation developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency.

9.1 Inputs

Under the BC Landfill Gas Management Regulation, the MOE requires the use of a specific LFG generation model developed by Conestoga-Rovers and Associates. Protocols require the gas generation model input begin at 1980 and run to the present for annual reporting of collection efficiency. The Scholl-Canyon model requires input of site-specific data, which is discussed below. The gas generation model is run on an annual basis with updated waste quantity and composition data to produce current gas generation rates for calculating collection efficiency.

The following input data are required to run the MOE LFG generation model:

• historical tonnage back to 1980 • waste quantity • waste composition (ratio of relatively inert, moderately decomposable and decomposable wastes in place) • methane generation rate factor • methane generation potential factor • water addition factor

The methane generation rates and estimates were calculated by using the annual tonnage amounts and the waste composition data from studies completed in 1990, 1996, 2001, 2005, 2010 and 2016, as well as the most recent quantifiable kitchen scraps diversion data/estimates. Detailed waste composition information is provided in Appendices A2a, A2b and A4. The waste composition data was compared to Appendix A of the Categorized Waste Types in the Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Procedure Guidance Document provided by the MOE, to determine the percentages of waste that are relatively inert, moderately decomposable and decomposable. Each of these categories has a different methane generation potential in the model, as shown in Table 19. In addition, local rainfall amounts are factored into the model.

Table 19 Methane Generation Potential and Rate Factors Used for the MOE Landfill Gas Generation Model

Methane Generation Potential Methane Generation Rate (k) Waste Type 3 L0 (m methane/tonne) Values Relatively Inert 20 0.02 Moderately Decomposable 120 0.04 Decomposable 160 0.09

Page 40 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

9.2 Modelling: Outputs

Table 20 shows the estimated annual methane production for Hartland landfill. The years selected for the table coincide with the activation of the LFG collection system in 1998. Gas generation is predicted to have peaked due to the kitchen scraps ban and will slowly decline through to landfill closure.

Table 20 Year and Estimated Quantity of Landfill Gas Generated at Hartland Landfill

Annual Methane1 Year Production (tonnes/yr) 1998 7,129 1999 7,117 2000 7,112 2001 7,127 2002 7,229 2003 7,360 2004 7,493 2005 7,645 2006 7,760 2007 7,885 2008 8,034 2009 8,145 2010 8,230 2011 8,277 2012 8,293 2013 8,282 2014 8,106 2015 8,032 2016 7,979 2017 7,957 Notes: 1Estimates generated using the MOE model

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 41

10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following section presents the key findings and recommendations developed from reviewing the data collected from monitoring programs at the Hartland landfill.

GAS GENERATION

Hartland landfill generates greater than 1,000 tonnes of methane per year and is subject to the Landfill Gas Management Regulation. In 2016, the Hartland landfill is estimated to have generated 7,957 tonnes of methane or the equivalent of 64,173 tonnes CO2.

GAS COLLECTION AND UTILIZATION

In 2017, the gas extraction network consisted of 141 wells that captured an average of 1,102 scfm of LFG. In 2017, 22 new wells were activated and 5 new wells were installed. An additional 9 wells installed in 2016 are not ready for activation, but are being monitored for sufficient LFG production. Well field balancing was completed each month to optimize collection. It is recommended that well field monitoring and balancing continue at least monthly, as recommended by the Design Guidelines.

Target collection efficiency (75%) was expected by 2016, according to the LFGMP. At the end of 2017, the efficiency was 67.7%, which is within the expected ranges of the LFGMP (Figure 5). The CRD continues to follow the LFGMP design specifications for reaching 75% collection efficiency. However, some schedule and well installation delays have occurred as a result of overall waste quantity reductions and filling plan changes. A review of the LFGMP is planned.

MONITORING

Gas Speciation

In 2017, there were no significant changes in the composition of undiluted LFG. The data indicate that undiluted LFG exceeded the WorkSafeBC limits for methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride and benzene. However, ambient dilution and the required use of personal gas detectors at the landfill greatly reduce the risk of exposure above WorkSafeBC limits.

Siloxane sampling was completed in 2017 due to concerns over increased engine wear and tear. Siloxane levels are below the engine manufacturer’s specifications; however, further sampling is required to better understand concentrations and trends.

Perimeter and Building Foundation Probes

No elevated methane readings were observed at any foundation or perimeter probes indicating little risk of lateral LFG migration. It is recommended that quarterly perimeter probe monitoring and quarterly building foundation probe monitoring continue.

Surface Emissions Air Monitoring

In 2017, 8 unique grid points were found to exceed 100 ppm THC. There was 1 new hotspot identified in August, and 4 hotspots discontinued in March. It is recommended that grid monitoring and hotspot monitoring be conducted 2 times per year and that hotspots be mitigated where possible.

Page 42 Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report

11.0 REFERENCES

A. Lanfranco & Associates Inc., 2014, 2016, Hartland Landfill Powerhouse Emission Monitoring Report

BC Ministry of Environment, Conestoga-Rovers and Associates, 2010. Landfill Gas Management Facilities Design Guidelines.

BC Ministry of Environment, 2009. Landfill Management Regulation.

BC Ministry of Environment, 1993. Landfill Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste.

BC Ministry of Environment, Conestoga-Rovers and Associates, 2009. Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Procedures Guidelines.

Envirochem Services Ltd., 2010. Review of the Hartland Landfill Gas Monitoring Program and Gas Collected in 2009.

SCS Engineers, 2010. Assessment of the Landfill Gas Collection System Hartland Landfill.

Sperling Hansen Associates, 2007. Hartland Landfill Phase 2 Long Term Leachate Management Plan.

Capital Regional District, 2000 to 2016. Solid Waste Annual Reports.

Cameron Advisory Services, 1990. Capital Regional District Solid Waste Stream Analysis.

Capital Regional District, Cameron Advisory Services, 1996. Capital Regional District Solid Waste Stream Analysis Final Report.

Sperling Hansen Associates, 2001. Capital Regional District Solid Waste Stream Composition.

Sperling Hansen Associates, 2005. Capital Regional District Solid Waste Stream Composition Study, 2004- 2005.

Sperling Hansen Associates, 2010. Capital Regional District Solid Waste Composition Study 2009-2010 Final Report.

Tetra Tech EBA Inc., 2016, 2016 Solid Waste Stream Composition Study

Ministry of Environment. Operational Certificate 12659 issued to Capital Regional District.

SENES Consultants Ltd., 2004. Air Quality Impact Assessment Hartland Landfill.

Source Test Limited, 2009, 2010, 2011. Hartland Landfill Powerhouse Emission Report.

Source Test Limited, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Hartland Landfill Gas Test Results.

Conestoga-Rovers and Associates, 2011. Hartland Landfill Long Term Landfill Gas Management Plan

Hartland Landfill – Landfill Gas Monitoring 2017 Annual Report Page 43

APPENDIX A

Hartland Landfill Gas Generation Model Inputs

This page intentionally left blank

Appendix A Hartland Landfill Gas Generation Model Inputs

Table 1 Moderately Variables Relatively Inert Decomposable Decomposable Gas Production potential, Lo = 20 120 160 m3 CH4/tonne Waste Composition, 1980 to 1995 0.336923897 0.248984582 0.414091521 Waste Composition, 1996 to 2000 0.338500849 0.405231175 0.256267976 Waste Composition, 2001 to 2004 0.266023927 0.396320081 0.337655992 Waste Composition, 2005 to 2009 0.331510177 0.369502343 0.298987479 Waste Composition, 2010 to 2013 0.314941655 0.391054959 0.294003386 Waste Composition, 2014 to future 0.327 0.427 0.201 lag time before start of gas production, lag = 1 Years Historical Data Used (years) 35 1st Year of Historical Data Used 1981 4 Years after reporting year 2016 methane (by volume) 0.5 carbon dioxide (by volume) 0.5 methane (density) 0.6557 kg/m3 (25°C,1ATM) carbon dioxide (density) 1.7988 kg/m3 (25°C,1ATM)

Table 2 Cumulative Waste Tonnage Methane Generation Rate, k Annual Annual Waste-in- Relatively Moderately Relatively Moderately Methane Landfill Gas GHG Year Tonnage Decomposable Decomposable place Inert Decomposable Inert Decomposable Production Production Emissions (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (year-1) (year-1) (year-1) (tonnes/yr) (m3/hr) (as CO2e/year) 2010 152,062 4,689,889 47,891 59,465 44,707 0.02 0.04 0.09 8,167.00 2,843.50 171,499 2011 144,179 4,834,068 45,408 56,382 42,389 0.02 0.04 0.09 8,218.00 2,861.40 172,578 2012 136,763 4,970,831 43,072 53,482 40,209 0.02 0.04 0.09 8,238.00 2,868.20 172,989 2013 131,472 5,102,303 41,406 51,413 38,653 0.02 0.04 0.09 8,282.00 2,883.60 172,816 2014 128,045 5,229,955 46,736 56,468 24,841 0.02 0.04 0.09 8,106.00 2,822.40 170,227 2015 123,381 5,353,675 45,034 54,411 23,936 0.02 0.04 0.09 7,985.82 2,780.58 167,702 2016 146,704 5,500,379 47,972 69,244 29,488 0.02 0.04 0.09 7,979.45 2,778.36 167,568 2017 157,638 5,658,017 51,548 74,405 31,685 0.02 0.04 0.09 7,957.41 2,770.69 167,106

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 1 Appendix A Appendix A, continued Table 3 Year Annual % Relatively % Moderately % Total Total Refuse Total (tonnes) Inert Decomposable Decomposable CW Waste Average Composition for Period (1986 to 1995) 1986 166,862 33.7 24.9 41.4 610 167,472 1987 177,086 33.7 24.9 41.4 600 177,686 1988 181,454 33.7 24.9 41.4 2,739 184,193 1989 185,409 33.7 24.9 41.4 3,341 188,750 1990 183,590 33.7 24.9 41.4 3,886 187,476 1991 173,634 33.7 24.9 41.4 2,322 175,956 1992 156,399 33.7 24.9 41.4 5,930 162,329 1993 156,255 33.7 24.9 41.4 3,176 159,431 1994 153,614 33.7 24.9 41.4 2,671 156,285 1995 155,305 33.7 24.9 41.4 4,688 159,993 Average Composition for Period (1996 to 2000) 1996 153,351 33.9 40.5 25.6 4,177 157,528 1997 146,442 33.9 40.5 25.6 2,987 149,429 1998 130,604 33.9 40.5 25.6 8,002 138,606 1999 134,257 33.9 40.5 25.6 3,917 138,174 2000 136,654 33.9 40.5 25.6 5,585 142,239 Average Composition for Period (2001 to 2004) 2001 135,425 26.6 39.6 33.8 3,108 138,533 2002 142,940 26.6 39.6 33.8 3,384 146,324 2003 144,043 26.6 39.6 33.8 4,182 148,225 2004 150,787 26.6 39.6 33.8 3,326 154,113 Average Composition for Period (2005 to 2009) 2005 158,848 33.2 37.0 29.9 4,192 163,040 2006 160,260 33.2 37.0 29.9 6,560 166,820 2007 165,381 33.2 37.0 29.9 9,156 174,537 2008 154,881 33.2 37.0 29.9 11,841 166,722 2009 153,263 33.2 37.0 29.9 7,931 161,194 Average Composition for Period (2010 to 2013) 2010 143,669 31.5 39.1 29.4 8,393 152,062 2011 136,414 31.5 39.1 29.4 7,765 144,179 2012 129,280 31.5 39.1 29.4 7,483 136,763 2013 123,210 31.5 39.1 29.4 8,252 131,418 Average Composition for Period (2014 to present) 2014 119,306 36.5 44.1 19.4 8,739 128,045 2015 112,442 36.5 44.1 19.4 10,939 123,381 2016 134,167 32.7 47.2 20.1 12,537 146,704 2017 144,368 32.7 47.2 20.1 13,270 157,638

Page 2 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix A APPENDIX B

Well Field Data

B1 Gas Well Activation Dates

B2 Hartland Landfill Gas Well Field Data

B3 Hartland Landfill Gas Well Field Data Summary

This page intentionally left blank

Appendix B1 Hartland Landfill Gas Well Operation

Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

BLGW0001 2002 2003 2005 x x x IA Deactivated 2005 BLGW0002 2002 2003 2005 x x x IA Deactivated 2005 BLGW0003 2002 2003 2007 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2007 BLGW0004 2002 2003 2007 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2007 BLGW0005 2002 2003 2007 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2007 BLGW0006 2002 2003 2007 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2007 BLGW0007 2002 2003 2007 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2007 BLGW0008 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0009 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0010 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0011 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0012 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0013 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0014 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0015 2002 2003 2004 x x IA Deactivated 2004 BLGW0016 2002 2003 2008 x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2008 BLGW0017 2002 2003 2008 x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2008 BLGW0018 2002 2003 2008 x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2008 BLGW0019 2002 2003 2006 x x x x IA Deactivated 2006 BLGW0020 2002 2003 2006 x x x x IA Deactivated 2006 BLGW0021 2002 2003 2006 x x x x IA Converted to vertical well OLGW0048s

LHGW0001 LHGW0001 1999 2003 2011 x x x x x x x x x IA Abandoned May 2011 LHGW002A LHGW002A 147 1999 2007 x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected in Dec. 2012 LHGW002B LHGW002B 1999 2007 2011 x x x x x x x IA Abandoned in May 2011 LHGW0003 LHGW0003 147 1999 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure reconnected Jan. 2013 LHGW0004 LHGW0004 147 1999 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x LHGW0005 LHGW0006 LHGW0006 143 2008 2009 2014 x x x x x x IA Abandoned May 2014 LHGW0007 LHGW0007 143 2008 2009 x x x x x x x x x LHGW0008 LHGW0008 143 2008 2009 x x x x x x x x x LHGW0009 LHGW0009 143 2012 2012 2014 x x x IA Start Feb. 2012 - abandoned May 2014 LHGW0010 LHGW0010 143 2011 2012 2014 x x x IA Start Feb. 2012, was 11 - abandoned May 2014

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 1 Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

LHGW0013 LHGW0013 151 2012 2011 x x x x x x x Start Sept. 2011 LHGW0017 LHGW0017 163 2014 2012 x x x x x x Start Jan. 2012 LHGW0019 LHGW0019 --- 2014 2014 x x x x Started May 2014 LHGW0020 LHGW0020 159 2014 2014 x x x x Started May 2014 LHGW0021 LHGW0021 159 2014 2014 x x x x Started May 2014 LHGW0022 LHGW0022 159 2014 2014 x x x x Started May 2014 LHGW0023 LHGW0023 159 2011 2011 x x x x x x x Start Sept. 2011, was 21

OHGW0001 HLGW0001 139 1999 2001 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0002 HLGW0002 1999 2001 2011 x x x x x x x x x x x IA Abandoned May 2011 OHGW0003 HLGW0003 139 1999 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0004 HLGW0004 147 1999 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0005 HLGW0005 147 1999 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW006A HLGW006A 159 1999 2005 x x x x x x x x x x x x x OHGW006B HLGW006B 159 1999 2005 x x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0007 HLGW0007 1999 2005 2011 x x x x x x x IA Abandoned in May 2011 OHGW008A HLGW008A 143 1999 2006 x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW008B HLGW008B 143 1999 2006 x x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0009 HLGW0009 139 2007 2008 2014 x x x x x x x x IA Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 - abandoned May 2014 OHGW0010 HLGW0010 139 2007 2008 x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0011 HLGW0011 2007 2008 x x x x x x x x x x x Disconnected for Cell 1 closure - reconnected Jan. 2013 OHGW0012 HLGW0012 147 2010 x x x x x x x x OHGW0013 HLGW0013 147 2010 x x x x x x x x OHGW0014 HLGW0014 155 2011 x x x x x x x OHGW0015 HLGW0015 155 2011 2014 x x x x IA abandoned May 2014 HLGW016A 159 2012 2012 x x x x x x Started Dec. 2012 OHGW0016/ HLGW016B 163 2012 2012 x x x x x x Started Jan. 2012 HLGW0016 HLGW017A 163 2012 2013 x x x x x x Started Dec. 2012 OHGW0017/ HLGW017B 163 2012 2012 x x x x x x Started Jan. 2012 HLGW0017 HLGW0018 165 2012 2013 x x x x x Started Jan. 2013 HLGW019B 165 2013 2013 x x x x x Started Jan. 2013 HLGW019C 165 2012 2012 x x x x x x Started Dec. 2012

Page 2 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

HLGW020B 165 2013 2013 x x x x x Started Jan. 2013 HLGW021B 165 2013 2013 x x x x x Started Jan. 2013 HLGW022B 165 2013 2013 x x x x x Started Jan. 2013 HLGW0023 165 2013 2013 x x x x x Started Jan. 2013 HLGW024B 171 2014 2016 x x Activated 2016 HLGW025B 171 2014 2016 x x Activated 2016 HLGW026B 171 2014 2015 x x x Started Jan. 2015 HLGW027A 171 2014 2017 x Activated 2017 HLGW027B 171 2014 2015 x x x Started Jan. 2015 HLGW028B 171 2014 2015 x x x Activated Jan. 2015 HLGW028A 171 2014 2017 x HLGW029B 171 2014 2015 x x x Activated Jan. 2015 HLGW029A 171 2014 2017 x HLGW030A 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 temp disconnected Jun. 2016 for cell 3/reactivated Oct. 2017 HLGW030B 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 HLGW031A 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 temp disconnected Jun. 2016 for cell 3/reactivated Oct. 2017 HLGW031B 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 HLGW032A 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 temp disconnected Jun. 2016 for cell 3/reactivated Oct. 2017 HLGW032B 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 HLGW033A 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 temp disconnected Jun. 2016 for cell 3/reactivated Oct. 2017 HLGW033B 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 HLGW034A 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 temp disconnected Jun. 2016 for cell 3/reactivated Oct. 2017 HLGW034B 171 2013 2014 x x x x Activated Jan. 2014 HLGW035A ------Wells not installed HLGW035B ------Wells not installed HLGW036B 175 2015 2017 x Installed 2015 - Temp connection Jan. 2017 HLGW037B 175 2015 2017 x HLGW038B 175 2015 2017 x Installed 2015 - Temp connection Jan. 2017 HLGW039A 175 2015 2017 x HLGW039B 175 2015 2017 x Installed 2015 - Temp connection Jan. 2017 HLGW040A 175 2015 2017 x HLGW040B 175 2015 --- HLGW041A 175 2015 2017 x HLGW041B 175 2015 2017 x HLGW042A 175 2015 2017 x

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 3 Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

HLGW042B 175 2015 2017 x Installed 2015 - Temp Activated Jan. 2017 HLGW043A 175 2015 2017 x HLGW043B 175 2015 2017 x Installed 2015 - Temp Activated Jan. 2017 HLGW044A 179 2015 2017 x HLGW044B 179 2015 2017 x Installed 2015 - Temp Activated Jan. 2017 HLGW045A 179 2016 --- I HLGW045B 179 2016 --- I HLGW046A 179 2016 --- I HLGW046B 179 2016 --- I HLGW047A 179 2016 2017 x HLGW047B 179 2016 --- I HLGW048A 179 2016 2017 x HLGW048B 179 2016 --- I HLGW049A 179 2016 2017 x HLGW049B 179 2016 --- I HLGW050A 179 2016 2017 x HLGW050B 179 2016 --- I HLGW051A 179 2016 2017 x HLGW051B 179 2016 --- I HLGW052B 2017 HLGW053B 2017 HLGW054B 2017 HLGW055B 2017 HLGW056B 2017 HLGW057A 2018 HLGW057B 2018 HLGW058A 2018 HLGW058B 2018 HLGW059A 2018 HLGW059B 2018 HLGW060A 2018 HLGW060B 2018 HLGW061A 2018 May-18 HLGW061B 2018 06-Aug-18 HLGW062A 2018

Page 4 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

HLGW062B 2018 HLGW063A 2018 HLGW063B 2018 HLGW064A 2018 HLGW064B 2018

OLGT001A TLGW001A 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGT001B TLGW001B 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGT002A TLGW002A 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGT002B TLGW002B 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGT002C TLGW002C 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGT0003 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0004 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0005 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0006 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0007 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0008 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0009 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0010 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0011 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0012 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0013 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0014 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0015 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0016 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0017 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0018 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGT0019 2002 x x x x x IA Deactivated 2002 OLGW001D VLGW001D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW001S VLGW001S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW002D VLGW002D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW002S VLGW002S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW003D VLGW003D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 5 Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

OLGW003S VLGW003S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW004D VLGW004D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGW004S VLGW004S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW005D VLGW005D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGW005S VLGW005S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW006D VLGW006D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW006S VLGW006S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW007D VLGW007D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW007S VLGW007S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW008D VLGW008D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW008S VLGW008S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW009D VLGW009D --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW009S VLGW009S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW010S VLGW010S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW011S VLGW011S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW012S VLGW012S --- 1996 1996 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW013D VLGW013D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW013S VLGW013S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW014D VLGW014D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGW014S VLGW014S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGW015D VLGW015D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW015S VLGW015S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW016D VLGW016D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW016S VLGW016S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW017D VLGW017D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW017S VLGW017S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW018D VLGW018D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW018S VLGW018S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW019D VLGW019D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW019S VLGW019S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW020D VLGW020D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW020S VLGW020S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW021D VLGW021D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW021S VLGW021S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW022D VLGW022D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Page 6 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

OLGW022S VLGW022S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW023D VLGW023D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW023S VLGW023S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW024D VLGW024D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW024S VLGW024S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGW025D VLGW025D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x IA OLGW025S VLGW025S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW026D VLGW026D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW026S VLGW026S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW027D VLGW027D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW027S VLGW027S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW028S VLGW028S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW029D VLGW029D --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW029S VLGW029S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW030S VLGW030S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW031S VLGW031S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW032S VLGW032S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW033S VLGW033S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW034S VLGW034S --- 1997 1997 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW035S --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW035D --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW036S --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW036D --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW037S --- 1997 1998 2005 x x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2005 OLGW037D --- 1997 1998 2005 x x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2005 OLGW038S --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW038D --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW039S --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW039D --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW040S --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW040D --- 1997 1998 2004 x x x x x x x IA Deactivated 2004 OLGW041D --- 1997 1998 2008 x x x x x x x x x x x Deactivated 2008 OLGW041S --- 1997 1998 2008 x x x x x x x x x x x Deactivated 2008 OLGW042S VLGW042S --- 2002 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OLGW043S VLGW043S --- 2002 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 7 Appendix B

Appendix B1, continued Well Information Gas Well Readings

Old Well New Well Comments Lift Date Date Date Name Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (mASL) Activation Installation Deactivation

OLGW044S VLGW044S --- 2002 2003 2011 x x x x x x x x x IA Abandoned in May 2011 OLGW045S VLGW045S --- 2002 2003 2011 x x x x x x x x x IA Abandoned in May 2011 OLGW046S VLGW046S --- 2002 2003 2011 x x x x x x x x x IA Abandoned in May 2011 OLGW047S VLGW047S --- 2002 2003 x x x x x x x x x x x x x Abandoned in May 2011 - Reactivated May 2014 OLGW048S VLGW048S --- 2002 2002 2011 x x x x x IA Abandoned in May 2011 OLGW049 VLGW0049 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW050 VLGW0050 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW051 VLGW0051 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW052 VLGW0052 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW053 VLGW0053 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW054 VLGW0054 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW055 VLGW0055 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW056 VLGW0056 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW057 VLGW0057 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x IA OLGW058 VLGW0058 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW059 VLGW0059 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x OLGW060 VLGW0060 --- 2011 2011 x x x x x x x 73

Number of wells Active 95 95 95 97 97 113 113 99 97 99 94 92 92 110 108 115 130 129 131 141 New program to identify wells that no longer read or produce gas. These wells have not been formally decommissioned, but do not contribute to the overall LFG Number of Inactive Wells 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 18 4 3 5 3 0 0 8 0 0 5 0 12 volume either because they are old or inundated with leachate. Initiated in 2017

Notes: x indicates active during the year Count 2017 BLGW0001 Buried 0 LHGW0001 LHGW0001 Leachate Horizontal 12 OHGW0001 HLGW0001 Horizontal 62 OLGT001A TLGW001A Trench 0 OLGW001D VLGW001D Vertical 67

Page 8 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2 2017 LFG Well Field Data

Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW0001 ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May 05/24/2017 9:51 31.7 32.3 0.0 36.0 3 1 June ------July ------August ------September 09/28/2017 16:00 38.3 32.1 0.0 29.6 0 0 October ------November ------December 12/19/2017 14:53 8.6 19.1 2.4 69.9 0 1 Average --- 26.2 27.8 0.8 45.2 1 1 HLGW0003 ------January 01/31/2017 15:53 59.2 35.7 1.1 4.0 3 3 February ------March 03/31/2017 10:03 39.1 31.3 0.8 28.8 35 2 April 11/4/17 15:09 63.3 36.6 0.0 0.1 <<>> 4 May 05/24/2017 9:54 46.0 34.8 0.0 19.2 4 2 June 6/30/17 10:21 56.5 36.6 0.0 6.9 8 10 July 7/14/17 15:59 51.6 34.8 0.1 13.5 9 9 August 08/23/2017 11:50 19.5 18.8 9.2 52.5 2 1 September 09/28/2017 16:04 52.9 35.4 0.1 11.6 2 7 October 10/31/2017 17:40 40.5 29.8 2.9 26.8 2 0 November ------December 12/19/2017 14:59 11.4 11.8 12.3 64.5 2 1 Average --- 44.0 30.6 2.7 22.8 7 4

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 9 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW0005 ------January 01/31/2017 15:38 43.4 32.4 0.0 24.2 6 7 February ------March 03/31/2017 10:06 63.6 36.2 0.0 0.2 2 6 April 11/4/17 15:13 49.8 33.4 0.0 16.8 4 10 May 05/24/2017 9:57 43.4 32.7 0.0 23.9 10 3 June 6/30/17 10:26 50.4 34.1 0.0 15.5 4 4 July 7/14/17 16:03 45.1 32.1 0.0 22.8 4 2 August 08/23/2017 11:47 38.6 31.3 0.0 30.1 6 3 September 09/28/2017 15:57 50.6 33.7 0.0 15.7 3 7 October 10/31/2017 17:38 55.3 34.6 0.0 10.1 4 3 November 11/29/17 5:10 PM 45.6 32.6 0.0 21.8 6 7 December 12/19/2017 15:05 28.8 27.9 0.0 43.3 5 5 Average --- 46.8 32.8 0.0 20.4 5 5 HLGW006A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September 09/28/2017 10:15 44.8 34.3 0.0 20.9 2 2 October 10/31/2017 15:37 40.3 33.4 0.0 26.3 0 1 November ------December ------Average --- 42.6 33.9 0.0 23.6 1 2

Page 10 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW006B ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:53 3.5 17.4 3.1 76.0 0 0 April 11/4/17 15:00 6.7 20.4 0.9 72.0 1 1 May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 5.1 18.9 2.0 74.0 1 1 HLGW008A ------January 01/31/2017 11:50 40.4 27.8 4.8 27.0 5 3 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:11 34.4 27.1 3.5 35.0 17 6 April 11/4/17 13:31 48.5 34.1 0.1 17.3 4 3 May 05/24/2017 9:17 42.8 32.9 0.1 24.2 0 3 June 6/30/17 14:35 44.2 33.1 0.0 22.7 19 17 July 7/14/17 10:08 32.4 29.5 0.5 37.6 18 2 August 08/22/2017 10:54 42.3 33.5 0.0 24.2 4 4 September 09/27/2017 12:07 31.5 29.1 0.1 39.3 2 2 October 10/27/2017 13:58 45.5 33.7 0.2 20.6 4 4 November 11/25/17 1:18 PM 55.5 36.4 0.2 7.9 2 4 December 12/16/2017 13:16 61.6 37.4 0.2 0.8 5 6 Average --- 43.6 32.2 0.9 23.3 7 5

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 11 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW008B ------January 01/31/2017 14:25 45.4 34.4 0.1 20.1 56 63 February ------March 03/31/2017 9:13 42.9 32.9 0.1 24.1 64 67 April 11/4/17 13:50 43.0 33.2 0.0 23.8 65 68 May 05/24/2017 11:05 45.5 34.3 0.0 20.2 69 69 June 6/30/17 12:52 45.9 34.5 0.0 19.6 68 68 July 7/14/17 15:15 43.2 33.6 0.0 23.2 68 67 August 08/23/2017 10:42 42.1 33.2 0.0 24.7 70 69 September 09/28/2017 10:03 44.4 34.4 0.0 21.2 72 73 October 10/31/2017 15:27 41.8 33.7 0.0 24.5 80 19 November 11/29/17 4:24 PM 44.1 34.4 0.0 21.5 29 30 December 12/19/2017 14:14 43.0 33.0 0.0 24.0 63 65 Average --- 43.8 33.8 0.0 22.4 64 60 HLGW0012 ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July 7/15/17 10:52 47.4 35.2 0.9 16.5 26 14 August 08/24/2017 17:25 57.2 42.7 0.0 0.1 21 21 September 09/29/2017 14:44 57.9 42.0 0.0 0.1 8 10 October 10/28/2017 14:14 57.3 40.5 0.0 2.2 18 24 November ------December ------Average --- 55.0 40.1 0.2 4.7 18 17

Page 12 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW0013 ------January 01/31/2017 15:20 49.1 36.1 0.4 14.4 34 34 February ------March 03/31/2017 8:33 59.7 40.1 0.0 0.2 6 22 April 11/4/17 10:28 50.4 36.7 0.0 12.9 24 23 May ------June 6/29/17 16:33 52.0 37.0 0.0 11.0 23 23 July 7/15/17 10:54 53.3 37.6 0.0 9.1 26 27 August 08/24/2017 17:28 51.6 37.4 0.0 11.0 36 40 September 09/29/2017 14:48 52.6 36.9 0.0 10.5 28 36 October 10/28/2017 14:09 47.9 36.0 0.0 16.1 42 23 November 11/25/17 4:44 PM 56.6 38.5 0.0 4.9 2 9 December 12/19/2017 14:47 58.2 38.8 0.0 3.0 11 14 Average --- 53.1 37.5 0.0 9.3 23 25 HLGW0014 ------January 01/31/2017 15:03 51.8 38.5 0.2 9.5 6 6 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:59 56.7 38.7 0.1 4.5 6 13 April 11/4/17 10:22 49.9 36.9 0.0 13.2 13 12 May 05/19/2017 16:33 48.4 37.0 0.0 14.6 14 14 June 6/29/17 16:27 47.9 36.3 0.0 15.8 14 12 July 7/15/17 12:32 43.8 35.2 0.0 21.0 14 11 August 08/24/2017 17:21 50.5 38.8 0.0 10.7 9 12 September 09/29/2017 14:41 53.1 39.0 0.0 7.9 8 9 October 10/28/2017 14:16 49.1 37.5 0.0 13.4 10 11 November 11/25/17 4:38 PM 51.8 38.3 0.0 9.9 9 16 December 12/19/2017 14:42 37.5 33.2 0.0 29.3 13 10 Average --- 49.1 37.2 0.0 13.6 11 11

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 13 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW016B ------January 01/31/2017 15:07 52.7 36.5 0.4 10.4 131 133 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:47 58.3 38.2 0.1 3.4 88 106 April 11/4/17 9:40 53.8 37.4 0.1 8.7 102 106 May 05/19/2017 16:27 47.4 34.4 1.5 16.7 88 110 June 6/29/17 16:14 46.7 33.7 1.6 18.0 107 106 July 7/15/17 12:20 46.0 33.3 1.8 18.9 108 70 August 08/24/2017 17:10 50.2 35.8 1.3 12.7 84 85 September 09/29/2017 14:30 53.5 36.7 0.7 9.1 63 75 October 10/28/2017 13:59 55.4 38.2 0.1 6.3 98 108 November 11/25/17 4:27 PM 58.2 38.8 0.0 3.0 136 135 December 12/19/2017 14:32 57.1 38.0 0.0 4.9 142 137 Average --- 52.7 36.5 0.7 10.2 104 106 HLGW017A ------January ------February ------March ------April 11/4/17 13:14 37.9 29.6 2.0 30.5 15 13 May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 37.9 29.6 2.0 30.5 15 13

Page 14 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW017B ------January 01/28/2017 16:05 44.8 32.0 2.9 20.3 <<>> 112 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:42 55.7 36.8 1.5 6.0 54 70 April 11/4/17 9:34 54.9 36.8 1.2 7.1 72 84 May 05/19/2017 16:12 51.4 35.7 1.4 11.5 79 95 June 6/29/17 16:10 49.3 35.0 1.3 14.4 96 97 July 7/15/17 12:14 49.0 34.6 1.4 15.0 96 105 August 08/24/2017 17:06 47.5 34.6 1.9 16.0 98 97 September 09/29/2017 14:26 48.0 34.1 1.5 16.4 85 98 October 10/28/2017 13:55 43.7 31.7 3.2 21.4 100 84 November 11/25/17 4:21 PM 50.9 35.2 2.0 11.9 34 33 December 12/19/2017 14:26 50.3 34.6 2.7 12.4 36 83 Average --- 49.6 34.6 1.9 13.9 75 87 HLGW0018 ------January 01/31/2017 14:54 53.4 37.9 0.3 8.4 6 13 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:26 49.7 36.9 0.4 13.0 9 17 April 11/4/17 9:16 60.3 39.1 0.5 0.1 8 13 May 05/19/2017 16:16 48.6 35.9 0.2 15.3 12 11 June 6/29/17 15:57 46.5 36.2 0.1 17.2 19 12 July 7/15/17 11:59 43.5 34.5 0.3 21.7 22 4 August 08/24/2017 16:50 48.1 36.5 0.4 15.0 4 11 September 09/29/2017 12:52 58.1 38.9 0.3 2.7 3 6 October 10/28/2017 13:46 60.3 39.2 0.3 0.2 8 15 November 11/25/17 4:07 PM 59.5 38.6 0.5 1.4 7 14 December 12/19/2017 13:54 54.7 37.5 0.3 7.5 15 14 Average --- 53.0 37.4 0.3 9.3 10 12

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 15 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW019C ------January ------February ------March 03/30/2017 8:06 34.6 27.1 4.1 34.2 12 3 April ------May 05/24/2017 9:08 49.3 34.6 1.7 14.4 1 8 June 6/30/17 14:28 50.8 35.5 1.3 12.4 2 7 July 7/14/17 10:06 52.6 36.3 0.7 10.4 14 29 August 08/22/2017 10:43 49.7 35.6 1.2 13.5 7 14 September 09/27/2017 11:59 55.0 37.8 0.3 6.9 6 12 October ------November ------December ------Average --- 48.7 34.5 1.6 15.3 7 12 HLGW021B ------January 01/31/2017 14:51 47.0 35.5 1.2 16.3 82 67 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:24 50.6 36.2 0.9 12.3 61 69 April 11/4/17 9:19 48.9 35.5 1.0 14.6 64 68 May 05/19/2017 16:18 50.3 36.1 0.5 13.1 68 73 June 6/29/17 16:01 50.4 36.6 0.4 12.6 70 71 July 7/15/17 12:04 49.6 36.0 0.4 14.0 69 74 August 08/24/2017 16:53 45.4 34.3 1.7 18.6 71 74 September 09/29/2017 12:57 48.5 36.4 0.8 14.3 64 68 October 10/28/2017 13:42 44.7 33.7 2.1 19.5 52 10 November 11/25/17 4:10 PM 59.7 39.8 0.0 0.5 18 30 December 12/19/2017 13:57 59.4 40.5 0.0 0.1 16 39 Average --- 50.4 36.4 0.8 12.4 58 58

Page 16 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW022B ------January 01/31/2017 14:48 52.0 38.8 0.2 9.0 30 35 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:21 59.8 39.9 0.0 0.3 26 31 April 11/4/17 9:26 46.9 36.0 0.7 16.4 22 21 May 05/19/2017 16:20 37.4 31.6 1.5 29.5 36 6 June 6/29/17 16:03 44.0 36.1 0.0 19.9 25 23 July 7/15/17 12:06 42.4 34.8 0.3 22.5 14 5 August 08/24/2017 16:59 39.8 33.2 1.4 25.6 7 4 September 09/29/2017 12:59 54.5 39.1 0.4 6.0 11 15 October 10/28/2017 13:40 51.9 38.0 0.8 9.3 23 26 November 11/25/17 4:11 PM 47.4 36.6 0.4 15.6 30 36 December 12/19/2017 14:00 58.5 39.9 0.2 1.4 24 34 Average --- 48.6 36.7 0.5 14.1 23 21 HLGW0023 ------January 01/31/2017 14:46 53.7 38.6 0.3 7.4 26 32 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:19 52.8 37.5 0.1 9.6 29 33 April 11/4/17 9:28 55.5 38.1 0.1 6.3 20 22 May 05/19/2017 16:22 55.7 38.5 0.0 5.8 35 36 June 6/29/17 16:05 51.6 37.3 0.0 11.1 10 19 July 7/15/17 12:07 49.8 36.7 0.0 13.5 17 18 August 08/24/2017 17:01 60.2 39.5 0.1 0.2 19 30 September 09/29/2017 13:00 47.7 36.7 0.1 15.5 17 24 October ------November ------December ------Average --- 53.4 37.9 0.1 8.7 22 27

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 17 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW024B ------January 01/28/2017 15:46 60.2 39.6 0.1 0.1 <<>> 3 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:12 46.4 34.6 1.3 17.7 48 42 April 7/4/17 10:15 42.1 33.8 0.0 24.1 3 <<>> May ------June 6/29/17 15:46 48.0 36.2 0.9 14.9 36 35 July 7/15/17 11:50 46.3 34.9 0.8 18.0 41 31 August 08/24/2017 16:42 56.2 38.9 0.0 4.9 34 44 September 09/29/2017 12:44 57.0 39.5 0.0 3.5 29 35 October 10/28/2017 13:25 39.0 32.2 1.3 27.5 34 5 November 11/25/17 3:58 PM 58.3 39.3 0.0 2.4 18 19 December 12/19/2017 13:51 59.5 38.2 0.0 2.3 1 9 Average --- 51.3 36.7 0.4 11.5 27 25 HLGW025B ------January 01/28/2017 15:48 50.3 36.0 1.2 12.5 22 24 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:07 47.8 34.6 1.8 15.8 15 17 April 7/4/17 10:17 47.7 35.1 1.5 15.7 24 19 May 05/19/2017 14:37 54.3 38.5 0.0 7.2 23 28 June 6/29/17 15:51 49.0 36.6 0.8 13.6 30 29 July 7/15/17 11:40 46.0 34.4 1.5 18.1 29 28 August 08/24/2017 16:37 39.6 29.0 5.3 26.1 5 18 September 09/29/2017 12:40 51.5 35.7 1.7 11.1 55 51 October 10/28/2017 13:20 64.2 35.7 0.0 0.1 0 10 November 11/25/17 4:02 PM 59.4 40.4 0.0 0.2 10 10 December 12/19/2017 13:48 59.4 40.4 0.0 0.2 9 11 Average --- 51.7 36.0 1.3 11.0 20 22

Page 18 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW026B ------January 01/28/2017 15:50 48.9 35.7 0.8 14.6 48 52 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:09 48.1 35.0 1.2 15.7 56 51 April 7/4/17 10:19 46.9 35.0 0.9 17.2 54 51 May 05/19/2017 14:39 50.2 37.1 0.3 12.4 49 51 June 05/19/2017 14:39 50.2 37.1 0.3 12.4 51 54 July 7/15/17 11:48 49.4 36.3 0.3 14.0 58 51 August 08/24/2017 16:40 48.0 35.9 1.1 15.0 51 51 September 05/19/2017 14:39 48.9 36.8 0.5 13.8 37 52 October 10/28/2017 13:23 48.9 35.9 1.2 14.0 53 33 November 11/25/17 4:00 PM 54.6 37.5 0.9 7.0 44 43 December 12/19/2017 13:46 52.5 36.4 1.3 9.8 49 49 Average --- 49.7 36.2 0.8 13.3 50 49 HLGW027A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:03 58.6 41.2 0.1 0.1 17 19 November 11/25/17 1:21 PM 40.6 31.5 2.3 25.6 36 11 December 12/16/2017 13:19 60.0 39.9 0.0 0.1 7 11 Average --- 53.1 37.5 0.8 8.6 20 14

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 19 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW027B ------January 01/28/2017 15:52 45.3 33.8 1.6 19.3 41 37 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:12 46.4 34.6 1.3 17.7 48 42 April 7/4/17 10:21 47.9 35.6 0.8 15.7 43 40 May 05/19/2017 14:43 47.9 35.9 0.6 15.6 40 43 June 6/29/17 15:46 48.0 36.2 0.9 14.9 36 35 July 7/15/17 11:50 46.3 34.9 0.8 18.0 41 31 August 08/24/2017 16:42 56.2 38.9 0.0 4.9 34 44 September 09/29/2017 12:44 57.0 39.5 0.0 3.5 29 35 October 10/28/2017 13:25 39.0 32.2 1.3 27.5 34 5 November 11/25/17 3:58 PM 58.3 39.3 0.0 2.4 18 19 December 12/19/2017 13:42 58.7 38.8 0.0 2.5 10 25 Average --- 50.1 36.3 0.7 12.9 34 32 HLGW028A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:07 59.6 40.2 0.0 0.2 14 15 November 11/25/17 1:24 PM 48.6 35.0 1.9 14.5 55 34 December 12/16/2017 13:21 59.6 39.6 0.0 0.8 32 40 Average --- 55.9 38.3 0.6 5.2 34 30

Page 20 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW028B ------January 01/28/2017 15:54 48.1 33.5 2.9 15.5 25 25 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:14 47.2 34.1 2.4 16.3 41 40 April 7/4/17 10:24 41.3 31.0 3.9 23.8 28 26 May 05/19/2017 14:46 59.1 40.8 0.0 0.1 5 5 June 6/29/17 15:44 58.3 41.4 0.1 0.2 16 27 July 7/15/17 11:52 44.3 33.7 1.7 20.3 13 5 August 08/24/2017 16:44 58.9 41.0 0.0 0.1 30 39 September 09/29/2017 12:46 59.2 40.7 0.0 0.1 4 7 October 10/28/2017 13:29 40.6 31.2 3.3 24.9 5 0 November 11/25/17 3:56 PM 59.0 40.9 0.0 0.1 40 43 December 12/19/2017 13:40 51.2 37.1 0.0 11.7 33 34 Average --- 51.6 36.9 1.3 10.3 22 23 HLGW029A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:18 44.8 35.5 0.1 19.6 5 4 November ------December 12/16/2017 13:23 37.1 30.1 2.2 30.6 <<>> <<>> Average --- 41.0 32.8 1.2 25.1 5 4

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 21 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW029B ------January 01/28/2017 15:56 55.4 38.2 0.4 6.0 121 121 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:16 57.2 38.7 0.5 3.6 102 106 April 7/4/17 10:27 54.8 37.7 1.1 6.4 90 119 May 05/19/2017 14:48 54.1 38.7 0.0 7.2 106 122 June 6/29/17 15:41 54.7 39.1 0.0 6.2 120 122 July 7/15/17 11:54 54.0 38.3 0.0 7.7 103 110 August 08/24/2017 16:47 55.2 39.1 0.0 5.7 111 129 September 09/29/2017 12:49 54.4 39.2 0.0 6.4 131 132 October 10/28/2017 13:31 52.3 37.9 0.3 9.5 103 100 November 11/25/17 3:53 PM 52.4 36.4 1.4 9.8 87 86 December 12/19/2017 13:37 52.3 36.0 1.8 9.9 85 91 Average --- 54.3 38.1 0.5 7.1 105 113 ------HLGW030A January February March April May June July August September October 10/27/2017 15:32 24.8 24.5 3.9 46.8 127 130 11/25/17 1:55 PM 16.0 18.6 5.7 59.7 4 6 November December Average --- 20.4 21.6 4.8 53.3 66 68

Page 22 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW030B ------January 01/28/2017 15:18 54.1 37.2 0.5 8.2 12 25 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:21 54.3 38.1 0.5 7.1 24 38 April 7/4/17 9:42 50.5 36.6 0.4 12.5 42 40 May 05/19/2017 14:13 52.9 37.8 0.3 9.0 28 33 June 6/29/17 15:39 51.8 38.1 0.2 9.9 16 32 July 7/15/17 11:09 48.9 36.3 0.4 14.4 43 44 August 08/24/2017 15:59 50.6 36.9 0.6 11.9 38 32 September 09/29/2017 12:03 52.4 37.5 0.5 9.6 23 33 October 10/28/2017 12:39 49.2 37.4 0.6 12.8 31 35 November 11/29/17 4:07 PM 47.5 35.4 0.9 16.2 29 26 December 12/19/2017 13:34 52.5 37.3 0.3 9.9 26 26 Average --- 51.3 37.1 0.5 11.0 28 33 HLGW031A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:42 27.6 26.7 2.5 43.2 8 8 November 11/25/17 2:00 PM 1.1 3.8 17.4 77.7 1 <<>> December ------Average --- 14.4 15.3 10.0 60.5 5 8

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 23 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW031B ------January 01/28/2017 15:20 49.4 35.1 1.0 14.5 11 12 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:24 58.6 40.5 0.7 0.2 33 35 April 7/4/17 9:45 52.4 37.2 0.1 10.3 33 34 May 05/19/2017 14:15 43.3 34.5 0.2 22.0 20 12 June 6/29/17 15:37 51.7 37.9 0.1 10.3 15 17 July 7/15/17 11:11 47.5 35.9 0.1 16.5 15 11 August 08/24/2017 16:01 57.0 38.8 0.0 4.2 15 16 September 09/29/2017 12:05 60.1 39.6 0.1 0.2 9 14 October 10/28/2017 12:41 54.6 39.3 0.0 6.1 17 18 November 11/29/17 4:09 PM 53.0 37.3 0.4 9.3 16 15 December 12/19/2017 13:32 52.3 37.2 0.1 10.4 13 15 Average --- 52.7 37.6 0.3 9.5 18 18 HLGW032A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:45 29.3 29.1 0.4 41.2 6 5 November 11/25/17 2:07 PM 17.4 23.5 2.5 56.6 6 6 December ------Average --- 23.4 26.3 1.5 48.9 6 6

Page 24 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW032B ------January 01/28/2017 15:22 46.7 34.6 0.9 17.8 49 40 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:27 59.2 40.5 0.1 0.2 59 64 April 7/4/17 9:51 60.1 39.7 0.1 0.1 34 42 May 05/19/2017 14:17 51.7 37.6 0.0 10.7 22 37 June 6/29/17 15:35 50.7 37.7 0.0 11.6 29 34 July 7/15/17 11:13 50.4 37.1 0.0 12.5 24 24 August 08/24/2017 16:03 52.0 37.6 0.0 10.4 26 28 September 09/29/2017 12:07 52.8 37.6 0.1 9.5 32 43 October 10/28/2017 12:43 52.2 38.2 0.2 9.4 26 36 November 11/29/17 4:12 PM 47.4 36.1 0.2 16.3 39 39 December 12/19/2017 13:30 52.0 37.4 0.1 10.5 39 42 Average --- 52.3 37.6 0.2 9.9 34 39 HLGW033A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:49 53.1 37.6 0.0 9.3 4 4 November 11/25/17 2:10 PM 55.5 38.0 0.5 6.0 25 26 December 12/16/2017 14:00 55.2 38.1 0.6 6.1 22 25 Average --- 54.6 37.9 0.4 7.1 17 18

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 25 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW033B ------January 01/28/2017 15:24 49.4 34.5 1.9 14.2 34 34 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:29 54.4 37.5 1.0 7.1 24 33 April 7/4/17 9:54 53.0 36.3 1.3 9.4 43 46 May 05/19/2017 14:18 53.1 36.9 0.9 9.1 39 45 June 6/29/17 15:33 53.3 37.4 0.8 8.5 37 42 July 7/15/17 11:16 52.7 36.7 0.8 9.8 19 30 August 08/24/2017 16:05 54.4 37.4 0.7 7.5 27 22 September 09/29/2017 12:09 54.4 37.6 0.7 7.3 30 36 October 10/28/2017 12:47 48.2 35.6 2.0 14.2 26 21 November ------December 12/19/2017 13:27 28.2 23.8 6.2 41.8 20 20 Average --- 50.1 35.4 1.6 12.9 30 33 HLGW034A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:54 32.6 30.9 0.0 36.5 1 1 November 11/25/17 2:14 PM 39.8 33.4 0.0 26.8 0 1 December ------Average --- 36.2 32.2 0.0 31.6 1 1

Page 26 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW034B ------January 01/28/2017 15:26 49.2 35.4 0.5 14.9 29 29 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:31 52.3 37.2 0.2 10.3 40 44 April 7/4/17 9:56 49.3 36.0 0.3 14.4 37 48 May 05/19/2017 14:20 48.8 36.4 0.3 14.5 32 32 June 6/29/17 15:31 49.5 37.0 0.1 13.4 37 41 July 7/15/17 11:19 49.7 36.4 0.2 13.7 20 26 August 08/24/2017 16:08 51.5 37.0 0.2 11.3 31 41 September 09/29/2017 12:12 51.8 37.2 0.3 10.7 31 32 October 10/28/2017 12:50 47.6 36.2 0.5 15.7 31 23 November 11/29/17 4:17 PM 50.3 36.5 0.4 12.8 22 36 December 12/19/2017 13:19 50.5 35.6 1.3 12.6 8 27 Average --- 50.0 36.4 0.4 13.1 29 34 HLGW036B ------January 01/28/2017 15:43 47.9 36.7 0.6 14.8 25 32 February ------March 03/30/2017 13:00 60.1 39.7 0.1 0.1 53 67 April 7/4/17 10:12 45.2 35.8 0.4 18.6 27 22 May 05/19/2017 14:32 51.8 38.2 0.0 10.0 59 62 June 6/29/17 15:10 50.7 37.6 0.4 11.3 22 23 July 7/15/17 11:36 50.9 38.0 0.0 11.1 20 23 August 08/24/2017 16:26 47.0 37.1 0.1 15.8 28 30 September 09/29/2017 12:31 52.2 39.1 0.0 8.7 10 33 October 10/28/2017 13:15 58.3 41.6 0.0 0.1 17 22 November 09/29/2017 12:31 52.2 39.1 0.0 8.7 10 33 December 09/29/2017 12:31 52.2 39.1 0.0 8.7 10 33 Average --- 51.7 38.4 0.1 9.8 26 35

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 27 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW037B ------January 01/28/2017 15:41 59.2 39.0 0.8 1.0 26 36 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:57 55.4 38.6 0.1 5.9 22 40 April 7/4/17 10:10 59.7 40.2 0.0 0.1 47 79 May 05/19/2017 14:30 44.7 35.7 0.5 19.1 59 58 June 6/29/17 15:12 50.0 37.5 0.1 12.4 44 47 July 7/15/17 11:34 50.4 37.7 0.0 11.9 59 61 August 08/24/2017 16:21 44.3 36.0 0.2 19.5 63 62 September 09/29/2017 12:29 49.8 38.5 0.0 11.7 66 75 October 10/28/2017 13:12 58.4 41.5 0.0 0.1 41 59 November ------December 09/29/2017 12:29 49.8 38.5 0.0 11.7 66 75 Average --- 52.2 38.3 0.2 9.3 49 59 HLGW038B ------January 01/28/2017 15:39 48.3 36.3 0.2 15.2 24 24 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:55 52.3 38.0 0.2 9.5 9 22 April 7/4/17 10:08 58.7 39.7 0.0 1.6 37 63 May 05/19/2017 14:29 54.8 40.0 0.0 5.2 44 59 June 6/29/17 15:15 38.5 30.5 3.9 27.1 61 10 July 7/15/17 11:31 32.2 27.6 3.9 36.3 1 4 August 08/24/2017 16:19 59.3 40.6 0.0 0.1 36 38 September 09/29/2017 12:26 59.6 40.3 0.0 0.1 2 2 October 10/28/2017 13:10 58.5 41.4 0.0 0.1 6 14 November ------December ------Average --- 51.4 37.2 0.9 10.6 24 26

Page 28 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW039A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:23 58.1 41.7 0.0 0.2 15 19 November 11/25/17 1:26 PM 51.5 38.2 0.4 9.9 51 48 December 12/16/2017 13:27 52.4 38.2 0.1 9.3 57 62 Average --- 54.0 39.4 0.2 6.5 41 43 HLGW039B ------January 01/28/2017 15:36 55.7 39.4 0.0 4.9 98 104 February ------March ------April 7/4/17 10:05 51.2 38.3 0.0 10.5 53 63 May ------June 6/29/17 15:18 54.7 40.1 0.2 5.0 56 64 July 7/15/17 11:28 53.2 39.0 0.1 7.7 66 59 August 08/24/2017 16:17 48.1 37.5 0.3 14.1 47 48 September 09/29/2017 12:22 51.3 38.8 0.3 9.6 61 60 October 10/28/2017 13:07 55.7 39.8 0.2 4.3 32 39 November ------December ------Average --- 52.8 39.0 0.2 8.0 59 62

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 29 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW040A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:14 58.7 41.2 0.0 0.1 11 12 November 11/25/17 1:52 PM 49.6 37.7 0.1 12.6 13 13 December 12/16/2017 13:53 50.6 38.0 0.0 11.4 30 34 Average --- 53.0 39.0 0.0 8.0 18 20 HLGW041A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:11 58.4 41.4 0.0 0.2 14 13 November 11/25/17 1:49 PM 46.3 37.1 0.0 16.6 27 29 December 12/16/2017 13:51 49.0 37.9 0.0 13.1 36 35 Average --- 51.2 38.8 0.0 10.0 26 26

Page 30 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW041B ------January ------February ------March 03/30/2017 12:39 59.1 40.8 0.0 0.1 112 113 April ------May 05/19/2017 14:26 58.7 40.2 0.0 1.1 115 117 June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 58.9 40.5 0.0 0.6 114 115 HLGW042A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:07 58.1 40.7 0.0 1.2 4 4 November 11/25/17 1:47 PM 58.8 40.1 0.0 1.1 29 77 December 12/16/2017 13:49 58.0 39.6 0.0 2.4 43 48 Average --- 58.3 40.1 0.0 1.6 25 43

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 31 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW042B ------January ------February ------March 03/30/2017 12:36 51.7 38.1 0.0 10.2 48 53 April 7/4/17 10:03 59.4 40.5 0.0 0.1 112 113 May 05/19/2017 14:24 50.7 37.7 0.0 11.6 54 50 June 6/29/17 15:23 59.1 40.8 0.0 0.1 134 132 July 7/15/17 11:25 58.5 39.9 0.0 1.6 116 117 August 08/24/2017 16:15 59.5 40.4 0.0 0.1 103 101 September 09/29/2017 12:20 58.9 40.2 0.0 0.9 73 63 October 10/28/2017 13:03 54.1 39.1 0.0 6.8 84 82 November ------December ------Average --- 56.5 39.6 0.0 3.9 91 89 HLGW043A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 15:02 37.3 33.5 0.0 29.2 21 22 November 11/25/17 1:45 PM 50.9 37.9 0.0 11.2 25 23 December 12/16/2017 13:47 52.6 38.0 0.0 9.4 26 28 Average --- 46.9 36.5 0.0 16.6 24 24

Page 32 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW043B ------January 01/28/2017 15:31 51.5 37.4 0.3 10.8 101 107 February ------March 03/30/2017 12:35 42.6 31.3 1.0 25.1 4 1 April 7/4/17 10:00 49.6 37.2 0.0 13.2 55 54 May 05/19/2017 14:22 51.8 36.9 0.0 11.3 3 4 June 6/29/17 15:26 50.1 38.4 0.0 11.5 33 31 July 7/15/17 11:23 49.4 37.5 0.0 13.1 51 44 August 08/24/2017 16:13 50.0 37.5 0.0 12.5 48 48 September 09/29/2017 12:16 50.1 37.5 0.0 12.4 27 32 October 10/28/2017 13:01 42.6 35.4 2.0 20.0 49 36 November ------December ------Average --- 48.6 36.6 0.4 14.4 41 40 HLGW044A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:55 60.3 39.5 0.0 0.2 13 12 November 11/25/17 1:43 PM 42.6 34.1 0.8 22.5 1 2 December 12/16/2017 13:42 59.3 39.4 0.0 1.3 28 29 Average --- 54.1 37.7 0.3 8.0 14 14

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 33 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW044B ------January 01/28/2017 15:28 51.1 36.3 0.5 12.1 30 32 February ------March ------April 7/4/17 9:58 42.3 33.6 0.8 23.3 3 8 May ------June 6/29/17 15:28 55.5 38.5 0.0 6.0 17 9 July 7/15/17 11:21 50.0 36.3 0.1 13.6 4 3 August 08/24/2017 16:11 53.2 37.7 0.0 9.1 4 <<>> September 09/29/2017 12:14 52.6 37.5 0.0 9.9 15 16 October 10/28/2017 12:53 8.4 12.8 9.1 69.7 11 6 November ------December ------Average --- 44.7 33.2 1.5 20.5 12 12 HLGW047A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:31 58.5 41.3 0.0 0.2 7 8 November 11/25/17 1:29 PM 45.9 37.1 0.0 17.0 42 22 December 12/16/2017 13:29 50.0 38.1 0.0 11.9 26 27 Average --- 51.5 38.8 0.0 9.7 25 19

Page 34 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW048A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:36 58.2 41.7 0.0 0.1 11 12 November 11/25/17 1:31 PM 49.7 38.8 0.0 11.5 45 42 December 12/16/2017 13:32 41.8 34.9 1.3 22.0 40 21 Average --- 49.9 38.5 0.4 11.2 32 25 HLGW049A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:40 57.9 41.9 0.0 0.2 10 10 November 11/25/17 1:34 PM 55.0 40.5 0.0 4.5 60 69 December 12/16/2017 13:35 56.3 40.3 0.0 3.4 64 69 Average --- 56.4 40.9 0.0 2.7 45 49

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 35 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM HLGW050A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:45 58.9 40.9 0.0 0.2 9 9 November 11/25/17 1:36 PM 45.6 36.6 0.0 17.8 44 26 December 12/16/2017 13:37 52.9 38.6 0.0 8.5 34 39 Average --- 52.5 38.7 0.0 8.8 29 25 HLGW051A ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October 10/27/2017 14:51 58.7 41.1 0.1 0.1 6 6 November 11/25/17 1:38 PM 43.3 36.1 0.0 20.6 23 9 December 12/16/2017 13:39 57.1 39.6 0.0 3.3 10 14 Average --- 53.0 38.9 0.0 8.0 13 10

Page 36 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM LHGW0003 ------January ------February ------March ------April 11/4/17 15:08 63.3 36.6 0.0 0.1 1 2 May ------June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 63.3 36.6 0.0 0.1 1 2 LHGW0004 ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June 6/30/17 10:24 61.4 38.5 0.0 0.1 3 3 July 7/14/17 16:02 46.1 33.9 0.0 20.0 3 2 August 08/23/2017 11:45 32.5 30.4 0.0 37.1 3 3 September 09/28/2017 15:54 44.2 33.1 0.0 22.7 3 4 October 10/31/2017 17:36 41.8 32.4 0.0 25.8 0 <<>> November ------December ------Average --- 45.2 33.7 0.0 21.1 2 3

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 37 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM LHGW0013 ------January 01/31/2017 15:30 52.0 35.7 1.7 10.6 28 26 February ------March 03/31/2017 8:31 42.7 34.5 0.6 22.2 34 27 April 11/4/17 10:26 50.2 36.3 0.0 13.5 27 27 May 05/19/2017 16:37 47.9 36.7 0.2 15.2 28 27 June 6/29/17 16:31 47.1 35.5 0.4 17.0 27 27 July ------August 08/24/2017 17:27 49.6 36.0 0.8 13.6 18 18 September 09/29/2017 14:46 53.7 36.3 0.9 9.1 12 19 October 10/28/2017 14:12 49.6 35.4 0.7 14.3 16 16 November 11/25/17 4:42 PM 51.0 36.8 0.1 12.1 25 32 December 12/19/2017 14:45 44.4 34.9 0.2 20.5 31 31 Average --- 48.8 35.8 0.6 14.8 25 25 LHGW0019 ------January 01/31/2017 15:13 34.6 24.1 5.7 35.6 30 31 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:40 54.6 36.9 0.2 8.3 8 8 April 11/4/17 9:32 47.7 35.5 0.0 16.8 24 28 May 05/19/2017 16:10 40.6 33.0 0.8 25.6 28 27 June 6/29/17 16:08 43.6 34.4 0.2 21.8 41 41 July 7/15/17 12:12 50.3 36.5 0.0 13.2 7 7 August 08/24/2017 17:04 56.3 39.9 0.0 3.8 6 8 September 09/29/2017 14:18 54.7 38.3 0.1 6.9 4 8 October 10/28/2017 13:52 41.8 34.7 0.6 22.9 10 6 November 11/25/17 4:17 PM 61.0 38.7 0.1 0.2 5 7 December 12/19/2017 14:23 60.8 38.9 0.2 0.1 23 13 Average --- 49.6 35.5 0.7 14.1 17 17

Page 38 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM LHGW0020 ------January 01/31/2017 15:09 59.9 37.6 0.1 2.4 162 181 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:44 60.0 36.4 0.0 3.6 <<>> 41 April 11/4/17 9:38 57.9 38.1 0.0 4.0 14 48 May 05/19/2017 16:25 49.9 36.2 0.0 13.9 57 48 June 6/29/17 16:12 41.0 33.6 0.0 25.4 32 <<>> July 7/15/17 12:17 57.2 38.2 0.2 4.4 35 62 August 08/24/2017 17:12 39.9 33.8 0.1 26.2 54 <<>> September 09/29/2017 14:28 56.8 38.2 0.1 4.9 21 39 October 10/28/2017 13:57 54.3 36.3 0.0 9.4 1 7 November 11/25/17 4:25 PM 59.7 38.3 0.1 1.9 49 36 December 12/19/2017 14:28 62.0 37.9 0.0 0.1 31 23 Average --- 54.4 36.8 0.1 8.7 46 54 LHGW0022 ------January 01/31/2017 15:01 41.4 32.4 1.5 24.7 113 19 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:52 54.5 36.4 0.0 9.1 11 14 April 11/4/17 9:43 51.6 34.7 0.0 13.7 18 20 May 05/19/2017 16:29 49.0 35.6 0.0 15.4 21 24 June 6/29/17 16:18 48.2 35.2 0.0 16.6 22 21 July 7/15/17 12:22 48.3 35.1 0.0 16.6 20 25 August 08/24/2017 17:14 44.9 34.6 0.0 20.5 38 21 September 09/29/2017 14:34 55.5 36.9 0.0 7.6 26 28 October 10/28/2017 14:02 53.3 36.8 0.0 9.9 16 27 November 11/25/17 4:30 PM 39.9 31.2 0.9 28.0 14 11 December 12/19/2017 14:34 38.7 30.3 1.4 29.6 9 7 Average --- 47.8 34.5 0.3 17.4 28 20

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 39 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM LHGW0023 ------January 01/31/2017 14:57 49.5 34.3 0.2 16.0 25 24 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:55 29.0 28.3 0.2 42.5 32 7 April 11/4/17 10:16 56.1 35.6 0.1 8.2 3 4 May 05/19/2017 16:31 47.2 34.3 0.0 18.5 19 25 June 6/29/17 16:22 49.3 34.8 0.0 15.9 33 32 July 7/15/17 12:27 52.1 35.5 0.0 12.4 4 4 August 08/24/2017 17:16 47.1 34.8 0.3 17.8 20 19 September 09/29/2017 14:36 48.3 34.5 0.3 16.9 55 57 October 10/28/2017 14:04 40.2 32.1 0.9 26.8 8 7 November 11/25/17 4:33 PM 61.5 38.4 0.0 0.1 4 3 December 12/19/2017 14:37 39.2 30.1 0.1 30.6 1 1 Average --- 47.2 33.9 0.2 18.7 19 17 VLGW003D ------January 01/31/2017 11:55 57.3 14.6 0.1 28.0 3 5 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:17 72.9 13.6 0.3 13.2 4 7 April 11/4/17 13:36 46.4 12.6 0.0 41.0 <<>> 1 May 05/24/2017 9:22 65.1 12.5 0.0 22.4 6 7 June 6/30/17 14:40 52.0 12.4 0.0 35.6 4 7 July 7/14/17 10:12 47.5 13.4 0.0 39.1 7 6 August 08/22/2017 11:10 61.7 17.2 0.0 21.1 5 8 September 09/27/2017 12:23 55.6 13.8 0.1 30.5 4 3 October 10/31/2017 11:35 67.8 20.4 0.0 11.8 6 8 November 11/29/17 5:50 PM 57.1 20.2 0.0 22.7 4 6 December 12/16/2017 13:12 37.6 17.8 0.7 43.9 1 5 Average --- 56.5 15.3 0.1 28.1 4 6

Page 40 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW003S ------January 01/31/2017 11:53 57.9 24.0 0.2 17.9 2 4 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:15 45.7 21.0 0.6 32.7 7 0 April 11/4/17 13:35 57.7 21.9 0.1 20.3 1 6 May 05/24/2017 9:21 48.3 20.4 0.0 31.3 2 4 June 6/30/17 14:39 47.6 20.0 0.0 32.4 3 3 July 7/14/17 10:11 42.9 21.4 0.2 35.5 3 1 August 08/22/2017 11:06 54.4 22.7 0.8 22.1 4 <<>> September 09/27/2017 12:18 59.6 22.9 0.2 17.3 5 3 October 10/31/2017 11:33 56.9 23.7 0.3 19.1 3 5 November 11/29/17 5:49 PM 53.1 22.7 0.1 24.1 3 5 December 12/16/2017 13:10 34.9 21.5 0.6 43.0 5 0 Average --- 50.8 22.0 0.3 26.9 3 3 VLGW004S ------January ------February ------March 03/30/2017 8:38 16.7 10.0 12.9 60.4 13 12 April 11/4/17 15:44 77.6 14.2 1.4 6.8 3 2 May 05/24/2017 14:11 34.6 12.2 7.9 45.3 12 12 June 6/30/17 15:10 28.1 10.4 9.4 52.1 10 10 July 7/14/17 10:30 18.0 8.1 12.9 61.0 2 1 August 08/22/2017 15:18 10.6 4.6 16.6 68.2 3 3 September 09/27/2017 15:37 16.1 6.6 14.9 62.4 4 4 October ------November ------December ------Average --- 28.8 9.4 10.9 50.9 7 6

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 41 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW005S ------January 01/31/2017 16:17 75.1 21.4 0.6 2.9 1 3 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:48 78.1 21.6 0.2 0.1 2 3 April 11/4/17 15:48 45.5 22.2 0.2 32.1 4 4 May 05/24/2017 11:38 40.4 21.9 0.0 37.7 11 10 June 6/30/17 14:54 77.5 18.9 0.0 3.6 7 9 July ------August 08/22/2017 15:43 41.5 23.6 0.2 34.7 3 0 September 09/27/2017 15:55 81.8 18.0 0.1 0.1 7 8 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:28 41.7 23.0 1.1 34.2 1 1 Average --- 60.2 21.3 0.3 18.2 5 5 VLGW006D ------January 01/31/2017 17:02 62.0 20.4 0.0 17.6 6 7 February ------March 03/30/2017 9:58 57.1 19.9 0.2 22.8 4 5 April 11/4/17 15:52 56.7 19.9 0.2 23.2 7 7 May 05/24/2017 11:43 45.0 19.3 0.0 35.7 2 2 June 6/30/17 15:53 48.3 19.1 0.0 32.6 9 9 July 7/14/17 11:25 48.6 19.7 0.1 31.6 3 4 August 08/22/2017 16:00 44.8 19.6 0.0 35.6 2 0 September 09/27/2017 16:14 54.4 19.8 0.2 25.6 3 3 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:41 49.7 20.4 0.2 29.7 8 8 Average --- 51.8 19.8 0.1 28.3 5 5

Page 42 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW006S ------January 01/31/2017 17:00 50.5 20.6 0.2 28.7 0 2 February ------March 03/30/2017 9:56 50.9 19.4 0.7 29.0 4 0 April 11/4/17 15:50 50.3 19.4 0.5 29.8 6 5 May 05/24/2017 11:41 42.7 18.4 0.2 38.7 <<>> 2 June 6/30/17 15:52 44.1 19.1 0.0 36.8 8 7 July 7/14/17 11:23 44.8 17.0 0.1 38.1 3 1 August 08/22/2017 15:57 59.8 14.4 2.2 23.6 2 0 September 09/27/2017 16:11 55.5 14.4 2.6 27.5 3 2 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:39 45.8 19.9 0.4 33.9 2 4 Average --- 49.4 18.1 0.8 31.8 4 3 VLGW007D ------January 01/31/2017 12:05 69.9 23.0 1.9 5.2 19 24 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:50 45.1 17.0 7.1 30.8 2 1 April 11/4/17 16:17 75.3 24.5 0.0 0.2 3 5 May 05/24/2017 11:47 71.0 23.3 0.1 5.6 4 5 June 6/30/17 15:33 71.0 23.2 0.2 5.6 8 6 July 7/14/17 11:38 69.2 23.2 0.2 7.4 4 5 August 08/22/2017 16:22 64.8 21.5 0.5 13.2 10 8 September 09/27/2017 16:33 70.0 22.5 0.7 6.8 3 6 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:36 59.5 21.0 0.9 18.6 7 18 Average --- 66.2 22.1 1.3 10.4 7 9

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 43 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW007S ------January 01/31/2017 12:02 44.6 21.5 0.5 33.4 2 2 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:48 51.5 21.4 0.1 27.0 3 6 April 11/4/17 16:15 56.1 21.1 0.0 22.8 1 4 May 05/24/2017 11:46 47.2 20.6 0.1 32.1 6 4 June 6/30/17 15:31 49.3 20.7 0.3 29.7 4 3 July 7/14/17 11:38 45.0 21.2 0.4 33.4 30 30 August 08/22/2017 16:19 47.9 21.9 0.1 30.1 11 11 September 09/27/2017 16:31 56.4 22.2 0.3 21.1 5 4 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:33 49.3 21.5 0.6 28.6 3 4 Average --- 49.7 21.3 0.3 28.7 7 8 VLGW008D ------January 01/31/2017 12:10 0.4 0.5 20.7 78.4 3 4 February ------March ------April ------May ------June 6/30/17 12:35 76.3 23.6 0.0 0.1 0 5 July 7/14/17 14:57 76.5 23.3 0.0 0.2 10 11 August 08/22/2017 16:36 44.3 18.8 0.0 36.9 0 4 September 09/28/2017 9:22 64.8 20.1 0.5 14.6 6 8 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:24 23.0 9.5 11.6 55.9 <<>> <<>> Average --- 47.6 16.0 5.5 31.0 4 6

Page 44 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW008S ------January 01/31/2017 12:08 47.4 21.9 0.4 30.3 6 6 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:38 47.1 21.2 0.2 31.5 3 3 April 11/4/17 16:27 49.5 21.0 0.0 29.5 0 1 May 05/24/2017 11:53 48.6 20.0 0.0 31.4 7 5 June 6/30/17 12:33 50.2 20.2 0.0 29.6 3 2 July 7/14/17 14:56 49.6 19.8 0.1 30.5 7 10 August 08/22/2017 16:33 47.5 20.2 0.0 32.3 7 6 September 09/28/2017 9:20 52.0 20.1 0.5 27.4 2 3 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:23 60.8 22.5 0.0 16.7 2 4 Average --- 50.3 20.8 0.1 28.8 4 4 VLGW009D ------January ------February ------March 03/30/2017 8:44 47.5 21.4 0.3 30.8 2 3 April 11/4/17 13:45 58.3 21.2 0.0 20.5 2 4 May 05/24/2017 14:14 19.7 19.2 0.5 60.6 <<>> 0 June 6/30/17 14:49 88.8 11.1 0.0 0.1 6 9 July 7/14/17 11:16 24.3 20.1 0.4 55.2 5 2 August 08/22/2017 15:39 19.4 19.8 0.0 60.8 2 0 September 09/27/2017 15:49 88.1 11.6 0.1 0.2 8 8 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:23 88.8 11.0 0.1 0.1 2 0 Average --- 54.4 16.9 0.2 28.5 4 3

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 45 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW009S ------January 01/31/2017 16:23 74.8 25.1 0.0 0.1 14 13 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:42 73.7 25.8 0.4 0.1 5 6 April 11/4/17 13:43 56.6 14.8 4.4 24.2 2 4 May 05/24/2017 14:13 49.7 12.7 5.9 31.7 4 16 June 6/30/17 14:48 42.4 11.1 6.1 40.4 4 1 July 7/14/17 11:15 76.5 23.2 0.1 0.2 2 0 August 08/22/2017 15:36 75.8 24.1 0.0 0.1 2 0 September 09/27/2017 15:46 34.8 9.5 10.1 45.6 3 26 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:21 59.8 16.7 2.0 21.5 2 13 Average --- 60.5 18.1 3.2 18.2 4 9 VLGW010S ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July 7/14/17 10:40 35.5 21.9 0.4 42.2 2 1 August 08/22/2017 15:48 24.2 21.0 0.4 54.4 4 5 September 09/27/2017 16:01 42.4 20.9 0.8 35.9 4 4 October ------November ------December ------Average --- 34.0 21.3 0.5 44.2 3 3

Page 46 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW011S ------January 01/31/2017 12:16 29.0 19.3 0.2 51.5 2 4 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:52 35.2 16.9 0.2 47.7 <<>> 1 April ------May ------June 6/30/17 12:27 60.7 27.2 0.1 12.0 1 3 July 7/14/17 11:20 55.3 27.3 0.0 17.4 3 3 August 08/22/2017 15:53 49.2 29.7 0.0 21.1 40 42 September 09/27/2017 16:06 66.0 32.4 0.0 1.6 6 6 October ------November ------December ------Average --- 49.2 25.5 0.1 25.2 10 10 VLGW012S ------January 01/31/2017 12:13 35.3 20.6 0.7 43.4 9 9 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:44 42.9 20.1 0.2 36.8 1 3 April 11/4/17 16:30 45.2 20.6 0.1 34.1 <<>> 3 May 05/24/2017 11:50 53.0 21.7 0.0 25.3 4 4 June 6/30/17 12:30 45.2 21.1 0.1 33.6 2 1 July 7/14/17 14:52 47.9 22.5 0.1 29.5 3 2 August 08/22/2017 16:26 47.3 24.7 0.0 28.0 6 4 September 09/27/2017 16:36 50.1 24.1 0.0 25.8 2 3 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:29 58.6 21.4 0.1 19.9 2 5 Average --- 47.3 21.9 0.1 30.7 4 4

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 47 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW013D ------January 01/31/2017 13:40 44.7 19.3 0.2 35.8 2 0 February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August ------September 09/28/2017 9:42 61.6 19.9 0.7 17.8 3 0 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:19 53.9 18.9 0.0 27.2 1 3 Average --- 53.4 19.4 0.3 26.9 2 1 VLGW013S ------January 01/31/2017 13:39 42.9 19.2 0.6 37.3 1 0 February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August 08/22/2017 17:13 46.6 20.5 0.0 32.9 3 5 September 09/28/2017 9:38 55.0 18.1 2.1 24.8 0 3 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:17 55.0 18.7 0.0 26.3 0 1 Average --- 49.9 19.1 0.7 30.3 1 2

Page 48 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW015D ------January 01/31/2017 16:36 53.5 15.6 0.8 30.1 15 14 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:35 48.5 14.8 1.2 35.5 30 30 April 11/4/17 16:04 55.8 14.7 0.7 28.8 12 17 May 05/24/2017 14:08 51.3 14.0 0.8 33.9 11 11 June 6/30/17 15:08 50.8 14.4 0.4 34.4 9 10 July 7/14/17 10:27 45.8 14.8 0.9 38.5 2 0 August 08/22/2017 11:43 69.8 17.2 0.6 12.4 0 4 September 09/27/2017 13:03 79.9 19.9 0.0 0.2 6 7 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:52 53.5 14.9 0.9 30.7 6 5 Average --- 56.5 15.6 0.7 27.2 10 11 VLGW015S ------January 01/31/2017 16:35 50.2 26.1 0.0 23.7 16 15 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:32 44.3 25.3 0.4 30.0 6 5 April 11/4/17 16:02 56.4 25.3 0.0 18.3 4 4 May 05/24/2017 14:07 51.4 24.0 0.0 24.6 11 12 June 6/30/17 15:07 49.7 23.8 0.0 26.5 11 11 July 7/14/17 10:24 45.3 24.7 0.1 29.9 5 4 August 08/22/2017 11:38 53.4 25.7 0.0 20.9 3 4 September 09/27/2017 13:00 51.6 24.5 0.1 23.8 3 3 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:51 54.1 25.3 0.0 20.6 4 3 Average --- 50.7 25.0 0.1 24.3 7 7

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 49 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW016D ------January 01/31/2017 16:41 51.4 20.2 0.0 28.4 1 4 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:55 42.7 18.1 0.1 39.1 4 4 April 11/4/17 15:59 72.0 19.0 0.0 9.0 5 6 May 05/24/2017 11:34 36.4 18.0 0.0 45.6 12 6 June 6/30/17 14:58 54.8 18.6 0.0 26.6 9 11 July 7/14/17 10:37 50.8 19.3 0.0 29.9 5 6 August 08/22/2017 15:27 36.0 20.4 0.0 43.6 38 39 September 09/27/2017 12:54 56.9 20.7 0.0 22.4 0 46 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:36 42.1 21.0 0.0 36.9 3 5 Average --- 49.2 19.5 0.0 31.3 9 14 VLGW016S ------January 01/31/2017 16:39 44.3 27.6 0.0 28.1 1 3 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:54 59.1 27.8 0.2 12.9 2 5 April 11/4/17 15:58 49.2 28.1 0.1 22.6 3 4 May 05/24/2017 11:33 43.5 27.8 0.0 28.7 10 10 June 6/30/17 14:56 42.8 27.8 0.0 29.4 8 6 July 7/14/17 10:36 53.0 29.5 0.0 17.5 36 35 August 08/22/2017 15:24 41.9 31.9 0.2 26.0 19 20 September 09/27/2017 12:51 52.1 33.6 0.3 14.0 0 7 October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:34 58.9 30.6 0.1 10.4 1 4 Average --- 49.4 29.4 0.1 21.1 9 10

Page 50 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW017D ------January 01/31/2017 16:46 36.5 21.3 0.6 41.6 1 0 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:02 28.2 20.0 1.1 50.7 7 2 April 11/4/17 15:56 75.1 24.7 0.1 0.1 4 4 May 05/24/2017 11:30 33.8 19.2 0.8 46.2 10 9 June 6/30/17 15:48 76.5 23.4 0.0 0.1 11 14 July 7/14/17 11:30 35.1 18.7 2.1 44.1 5 0 August 08/22/2017 16:07 45.9 21.8 1.0 31.3 0 3 September 09/27/2017 16:21 46.7 19.7 2.8 30.8 6 6 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:47 33.5 20.7 1.0 44.8 1 1 Average --- 45.7 21.1 1.1 32.2 5 4 VLGW017S ------January 01/31/2017 16:44 69.0 30.1 0.8 0.1 16 16 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:00 70.4 29.3 0.2 0.1 6 7 April 11/4/17 15:54 69.9 29.8 0.1 0.2 2 7 May 05/24/2017 11:29 70.5 29.3 0.1 0.1 8 15 June 6/30/17 15:46 70.5 29.3 0.0 0.2 14 13 July 7/14/17 11:28 70.2 29.5 0.1 0.2 12 13 August 08/22/2017 16:03 70.8 28.9 0.2 0.1 9 11 September 09/27/2017 16:18 70.5 29.0 0.3 0.2 8 9 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:44 69.8 29.7 0.4 0.1 3 16 Average --- 70.2 29.4 0.2 0.1 9 12

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 51 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW018D ------January 01/31/2017 16:51 43.2 28.4 0.7 27.7 4 3 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:08 53.7 29.0 0.2 17.1 2 4 April 11/4/17 16:20 42.5 28.0 0.0 29.5 2 2 May 05/24/2017 11:26 65.4 30.4 0.0 4.2 10 10 June 6/30/17 15:43 50.4 28.2 0.0 21.4 9 8 July 7/14/17 11:35 45.9 28.4 0.1 25.6 0 3 August 08/22/2017 16:15 60.5 30.7 0.0 8.8 6 5 September 09/27/2017 16:27 64.0 30.5 0.1 5.4 4 4 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:53 39.6 28.0 0.0 32.4 4 1 Average --- 51.7 29.1 0.1 19.1 5 4 VLGW018S ------January 01/31/2017 16:49 42.5 27.9 0.1 29.5 31 35 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:06 50.1 27.0 0.2 22.7 3 5 April 11/4/17 16:19 37.2 26.3 0.2 36.3 21 4 May 05/24/2017 11:25 64.7 27.7 0.4 7.2 9 10 June 6/30/17 15:42 45.1 26.8 0.0 28.1 9 8 July 7/14/17 11:33 40.1 26.4 0.2 33.3 0 <<>> August 08/22/2017 16:11 40.0 20.3 6.7 33.0 0 1 September 09/27/2017 16:25 37.6 18.0 7.9 36.5 5 5 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:51 37.0 27.8 0.2 35.0 4 2 Average --- 43.8 25.4 1.8 29.1 9 9

Page 52 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW019D ------January 01/31/2017 16:57 52.4 33.6 0.0 14.0 9 3 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:15 47.2 31.3 0.1 21.4 3 2 April 11/4/17 16:24 49.5 31.5 0.0 19.0 4 8 May 05/24/2017 11:21 48.5 31.4 0.0 20.1 7 8 June 6/30/17 15:39 48.8 31.2 0.0 20.0 7 10 July 7/14/17 15:05 48.2 31.3 0.1 20.4 6 4 August 08/22/2017 16:43 52.2 33.3 0.0 14.5 5 5 September 09/28/2017 9:27 51.0 32.4 0.5 16.1 8 7 October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:58 44.0 31.8 0.1 24.1 4 6 Average --- 49.1 32.0 0.1 18.8 6 6 VLGW019S ------January 01/31/2017 16:55 52.2 33.2 0.0 14.6 5 2 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:11 45.7 31.1 0.1 23.1 4 4 April 11/4/17 16:23 49.9 31.8 0.0 18.3 32 31 May 05/24/2017 11:20 49.2 31.4 0.0 19.4 35 35 June 6/30/17 15:38 49.3 31.4 0.0 19.3 9 9 July 7/14/17 15:03 48.5 31.6 0.0 19.9 6 5 August 08/22/2017 16:40 50.9 32.8 0.0 16.3 3 6 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 16:56 43.1 32.2 0.0 24.7 4 7 Average --- 48.6 31.9 0.0 19.5 12 12

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 53 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW020D ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August 08/22/2017 17:00 39.1 31.0 0.0 29.9 4 2 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 39.1 31.0 0.0 29.9 4 2 VLGW020S ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May ------June ------July ------August 08/22/2017 16:56 33.0 28.5 0.2 38.3 4 3 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 33.0 28.5 0.2 38.3 4 3

Page 54 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW021D ------January 01/31/2017 13:45 54.1 22.6 0.5 22.8 6 6 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:35 50.0 20.7 0.2 29.1 26 29 April 11/4/17 15:49 50.3 20.2 0.0 29.5 8 7 May 05/24/2017 10:49 54.3 20.0 0.1 25.6 7 11 June 6/30/17 12:39 55.7 19.9 0.0 24.4 38 53 July 7/14/17 15:32 56.2 19.2 0.1 24.5 71 70 August 08/22/2017 17:22 40.2 20.0 0.0 39.8 7 10 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:13 46.5 22.0 0.3 31.2 0 7 Average --- 50.9 20.6 0.2 28.4 20 24 VLGW021S ------January 01/31/2017 13:43 48.6 22.5 0.1 28.8 6 7 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:33 76.1 23.7 0.1 0.1 2 5 April 11/4/17 15:48 56.7 21.3 0.1 21.9 3 5 May 05/24/2017 10:48 47.2 21.8 0.3 30.7 5 2 June 6/30/17 12:38 47.9 22.1 0.0 30.0 2 4 July 7/14/17 15:31 42.9 21.5 0.0 35.6 2 2 August 08/22/2017 17:19 40.2 22.4 0.0 37.4 5 4 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:10 72.6 23.7 0.0 3.7 2 3 Average --- 54.0 22.4 0.1 23.5 3 4

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 55 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW022D ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:35 5.3 5.7 14.4 74.6 3 <<>> April 11/4/17 15:44 5.1 4.8 13.4 76.7 <<>> 1 May 05/24/2017 10:04 68.2 31.7 0.0 0.1 6 8 June 6/30/17 10:49 60.4 28.3 1.2 10.1 14 14 July 7/14/17 15:48 63.4 25.1 1.2 10.3 3 11 August 08/23/2017 11:19 51.6 25.7 0.6 22.1 4 8 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 18:08 52.1 26.0 0.0 21.9 2 5 Average --- 43.7 21.0 4.4 30.8 5 8 VLGW022S ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:32 37.2 20.6 0.5 41.7 0 <<>> April 11/4/17 15:43 59.5 21.8 0.0 18.7 0 3 May 05/24/2017 10:02 40.9 22.6 0.1 36.4 3 2 June 6/30/17 10:47 39.6 21.9 0.0 38.5 1 0 July 7/14/17 15:47 36.1 20.3 0.7 42.9 1 <<>> August 08/23/2017 11:17 27.5 20.7 1.1 50.7 <<>> 0 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 18:06 45.2 21.8 0.0 33.0 1 2 Average --- 40.9 21.4 0.3 37.4 1 1

Page 56 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW023D ------January 01/31/2017 16:29 56.8 18.8 0.2 24.2 16 16 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:23 44.3 16.6 1.5 37.6 17 13 April 11/4/17 16:11 61.8 15.4 0.0 22.8 1 1 May 05/24/2017 14:02 57.5 14.7 0.2 27.6 5 6 June 6/30/17 15:03 51.6 16.0 0.0 32.4 9 9 July 7/14/17 10:17 45.8 15.9 0.8 37.5 7 7 August 08/22/2017 11:21 56.9 16.2 0.0 26.9 0 1 September ------October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:44 51.3 17.1 0.0 31.6 3 10 Average --- 53.3 16.3 0.3 30.1 7 8 VLGW023S ------January 01/31/2017 16:28 62.2 30.8 0.0 7.0 4 5 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:21 40.5 24.9 0.3 34.3 2 2 April 11/4/17 16:10 61.7 29.1 0.0 9.2 4 5 May 05/24/2017 14:00 50.0 28.1 0.2 21.7 2 3 June 6/30/17 15:02 45.9 28.2 0.0 25.9 9 9 July 7/14/17 10:16 40.0 28.3 0.0 31.7 6 4 August 08/22/2017 11:17 50.5 33.2 0.0 16.3 2 5 September ------October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:42 44.3 29.2 0.1 26.4 0 0 Average --- 49.4 29.0 0.1 21.6 4 4

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 57 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW024D ------January 01/31/2017 16:33 52.8 22.7 0.6 23.9 18 17 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:28 47.2 21.7 0.6 30.5 14 13 April 11/4/17 16:07 51.6 24.3 0.2 23.9 3 1 May 05/24/2017 14:04 46.9 23.6 0.3 29.2 9 8 June 6/30/17 15:00 47.4 23.8 0.4 28.4 9 7 July 7/14/17 10:21 44.0 23.9 0.8 31.3 2 2 August 08/22/2017 11:32 56.3 26.3 0.9 16.5 1 1 September ------October ------November ------December 12/16/2017 17:40 46.4 24.5 0.4 28.7 8 6 Average --- 49.1 23.9 0.5 26.6 8 7 VLGW025S ------January 01/31/2017 14:15 50.6 33.1 0.4 15.9 6 6 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:24 38.9 29.6 0.3 31.2 2 <<>> April ------May 05/24/2017 10:58 56.2 33.5 0.0 10.3 13 14 June 6/30/17 12:47 50.5 32.5 0.0 17.0 7 7 July 7/14/17 15:09 44.3 31.2 0.2 24.3 7 4 August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 48.1 32.0 0.2 19.7 7 8

Page 58 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW026D ------January 01/31/2017 13:49 64.0 35.9 0.0 0.1 6 7 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:30 65.5 32.0 0.4 2.1 <<>> 4 April 11/4/17 15:53 57.0 30.8 0.3 11.9 5 7 May 05/24/2017 10:55 44.2 30.8 0.1 24.9 12 11 June 6/30/17 12:44 55.4 31.7 0.1 12.8 5 8 July 7/14/17 15:28 44.8 30.7 0.1 24.4 3 2 August 08/22/2017 17:29 62.7 37.2 0.0 0.1 7 7 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:06 39.8 27.0 1.4 31.8 5 3 Average --- 54.2 32.0 0.3 13.5 6 6 VLGW026S ------January 01/31/2017 13:47 68.0 31.8 0.0 0.2 7 8 February ------March 03/30/2017 10:28 70.0 29.7 0.2 0.1 1 4 April 11/4/17 15:51 60.4 28.8 0.0 10.8 2 3 May 05/24/2017 10:53 42.9 29.0 0.2 27.9 43 40 June 6/30/17 12:43 55.4 29.7 0.0 14.9 6 7 July 7/14/17 15:27 44.7 29.4 0.0 25.9 3 4 August 08/22/2017 17:27 66.9 33.0 0.0 0.1 5 3 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 17:04 42.0 27.1 0.1 30.8 41 40 Average --- 56.3 29.8 0.1 13.8 14 14

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 59 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW027D ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:30 51.4 23.3 0.8 24.5 4 6 April 11/4/17 15:40 72.5 23.6 0.0 3.9 5 5 May 05/24/2017 10:08 66.7 24.3 0.0 9.0 1 <<>> June 6/30/17 10:45 68.4 24.3 0.0 7.3 0 2 July 7/14/17 15:44 67.8 23.6 0.0 8.6 1 3 August 08/23/2017 11:13 61.9 26.4 0.4 11.3 5 7 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 18:03 49.8 26.6 0.1 23.5 4 4 Average --- 62.6 24.6 0.2 12.6 3 5 VLGW027S ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:28 32.0 22.2 0.3 45.5 1 0 April 11/4/17 15:38 63.8 23.8 0.0 12.4 5 6 May 05/24/2017 10:07 21.5 22.0 0.0 56.5 <<>> <<>> June 6/30/17 10:43 62.2 21.3 0.0 16.5 5 4 July 7/14/17 15:43 14.2 20.0 0.0 65.8 <<>> <<>> August 08/23/2017 11:11 20.5 21.0 0.1 58.4 0 2 September ------October ------November ------December 12/20/2017 18:02 77.1 21.9 0.0 1.0 1 2 Average --- 41.6 21.7 0.1 36.6 2 3

Page 60 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW028S ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:38 66.6 31.9 0.4 1.1 4 5 April 11/4/17 14:49 52.7 29.3 0.3 17.7 1 1 May 05/24/2017 9:34 46.3 28.7 0.0 25.0 4 3 June 6/30/17 10:36 46.2 28.4 0.0 25.4 1 2 July 7/14/17 15:51 42.0 27.1 0.0 30.9 6 3 August 08/23/2017 11:22 47.3 29.6 0.0 23.1 2 1 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 50.2 29.2 0.1 20.5 3 3 VLGW029D ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:26 50.1 26.9 0.3 22.7 2 6 April 11/4/17 15:36 56.6 26.6 0.1 16.7 9 8 May 05/24/2017 10:12 56.2 26.7 0.0 17.1 10 10 June 6/30/17 10:41 59.8 27.1 0.0 13.1 10 10 July 7/14/17 15:40 56.2 26.2 0.1 17.5 4 7 August 08/23/2017 11:09 51.0 26.1 0.8 22.1 15 12 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 55.0 26.6 0.2 18.2 8 9

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 61 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW029S ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:25 57.4 28.7 0.2 13.7 <<>> 2 April 11/4/17 15:34 55.7 27.4 0.0 16.9 3 4 May 05/24/2017 10:10 39.4 25.6 0.0 35.0 <<>> <<>> June 6/30/17 10:40 65.8 34.1 0.0 0.1 4 5 July 7/14/17 15:39 42.1 25.9 0.0 32.0 4 4 August 08/23/2017 11:07 51.3 28.2 0.0 20.5 44 44 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 52.0 28.3 0.0 19.7 14 12 VLGW030S ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:40 39.1 27.0 0.4 33.5 2 3 April 11/4/17 14:52 50.6 28.8 0.1 20.5 7 7 May 05/24/2017 9:36 33.1 26.6 0.0 40.3 3 2 June 6/30/17 10:34 33.6 23.3 2.6 40.5 <<>> 0 July 7/14/17 15:53 28.3 20.0 4.1 47.6 1 1 August 08/23/2017 11:25 35.1 25.9 1.9 37.1 1 0 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 36.6 25.3 1.5 36.6 3 2

Page 62 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW031S ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May 05/24/2017 9:31 33.0 22.1 1.0 43.9 3 2 June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 33.0 22.1 1.0 43.9 3 2 VLGW032S ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:42 44.4 27.8 0.2 27.6 4 3 April 11/4/17 14:53 53.1 28.4 0.0 18.5 8 8 May 05/24/2017 9:38 48.4 27.6 0.0 24.0 3 3 June 6/30/17 10:32 49.9 27.8 0.0 22.3 3 2 July 7/14/17 15:56 47.9 26.3 0.0 25.8 2 2 August 08/23/2017 11:27 47.2 27.9 0.0 24.9 40 40 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 48.5 27.6 0.0 23.9 10 10

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 63 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW033S ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May 05/24/2017 9:29 43.3 32.1 0.0 24.6 3 3 June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 43.3 32.1 0.0 24.6 3 3 VLGW034S ------January ------February ------March ------April ------May 05/24/2017 9:27 41.5 30.0 0.0 28.5 1 1 June ------July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 41.5 30.0 0.0 28.5 1 1

Page 64 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW042S ------January 01/31/2017 16:19 49.6 24.2 0.5 25.7 8 9 February ------March 03/30/2017 8:51 44.3 23.6 0.4 31.7 8 15 April 11/4/17 15:46 75.0 19.6 0.2 5.2 1 7 May 05/24/2017 11:36 62.5 20.5 0.0 17.0 11 12 June 6/30/17 14:52 61.0 20.8 0.1 18.1 6 11 July 7/14/17 10:33 56.3 22.0 0.2 21.5 6 3 August 08/22/2017 15:31 58.9 22.7 0.0 18.4 15 16 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 58.2 21.9 0.2 19.7 8 10 VLGW043S ------January ------February ------March 03/30/2017 10:18 40.2 29.7 0.0 30.1 <<>> <<>> April ------May 05/24/2017 11:16 40.8 30.0 0.0 29.2 3 3 June 6/30/17 15:36 41.0 30.0 0.0 29.0 7 2 July 7/14/17 15:00 42.8 31.1 0.0 26.1 0 0 August 08/22/2017 17:06 49.2 33.2 0.0 17.6 6 6 September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 42.8 30.8 0.0 26.4 4 3

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 65 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW047S ------January 01/31/2017 15:50 45.5 32.2 0.0 22.3 2 3 February ------March ------April ------May 05/24/2017 9:40 45.0 33.0 0.0 22.0 4 3 June 6/30/17 10:08 48.5 33.6 0.2 17.7 <<>> 2 July ------August ------September ------October ------November ------December ------Average --- 46.3 32.9 0.1 20.7 3 3 VLGW0049 ------January 01/31/2017 14:23 64.8 30.6 1.5 3.1 14 12 February ------March 03/31/2017 9:10 66.7 31.3 1.8 0.2 11 16 April 11/4/17 13:48 67.2 32.2 0.4 0.2 6 7 May 05/24/2017 11:03 55.6 28.7 3.1 12.6 16 26 June 6/30/17 12:50 57.7 30.5 2.3 9.5 16 14 July 7/14/17 15:13 56.1 29.4 2.7 11.8 6 11 August 08/23/2017 10:40 61.9 33.0 1.6 3.5 15 17 September 09/28/2017 10:00 52.7 29.5 3.7 14.1 5 19 October 10/31/2017 15:25 62.3 34.1 1.2 2.4 22 25 November 11/29/17 4:21 PM 51.6 28.3 4.4 15.7 5 14 December 12/19/2017 14:18 64.5 30.9 1.6 3.0 28 32 Average --- 60.1 30.8 2.2 6.9 13 18

Page 66 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW0050 ------January ------February ------March 03/31/2017 9:20 45.6 27.3 0.3 26.8 3 3 April 11/4/17 15:32 72.1 27.6 0.1 0.2 0 <<>> May 05/24/2017 10:14 37.5 28.8 0.0 33.7 3 1 June 6/30/17 12:58 46.7 28.7 0.0 24.6 10 10 July 7/14/17 15:22 46.3 29.0 0.0 24.7 6 5 August 08/23/2017 11:04 43.7 28.8 0.0 27.5 1 0 September 09/28/2017 10:12 44.9 29.2 0.0 25.9 2 3 October 10/31/2017 15:35 39.7 28.7 0.0 31.6 1 1 November ------December 12/20/2017 17:56 71.6 28.2 0.0 0.2 4 3 Average --- 49.8 28.5 0.0 21.7 3 3 VLGW0051 ------January 01/31/2017 15:48 52.2 31.9 0.0 15.9 16 17 February ------March 03/31/2017 9:46 50.0 31.0 0.2 18.8 15 18 April 11/4/17 14:56 56.2 31.6 0.0 12.2 15 24 May 05/24/2017 9:42 51.8 32.2 0.0 16.0 18 18 June 6/30/17 10:11 53.8 32.1 0.1 14.0 23 24 July 7/15/17 10:36 50.1 31.9 0.1 17.9 21 19 August 08/23/2017 11:30 47.4 32.2 0.0 20.4 28 12 September 09/28/2017 15:37 50.8 31.9 0.1 17.2 26 25 October 10/31/2017 17:26 48.9 31.6 0.0 19.5 19 11 November 11/29/17 4:57 PM 47.3 31.3 0.0 21.4 21 20 December 12/19/2017 15:11 44.2 30.3 0.0 25.5 19 20 Average --- 50.2 31.6 0.0 18.1 20 19

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 67 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW0052 ------January 01/31/2017 14:27 47.8 34.0 0.1 18.1 8 9 February ------March 03/31/2017 9:16 44.1 32.3 0.3 23.3 35 35 April 11/4/17 13:52 44.5 32.5 0.0 23.0 5 5 May 05/24/2017 11:09 46.4 33.4 0.0 20.2 19 19 June 6/30/17 12:54 47.8 33.8 0.0 18.4 11 12 July 7/14/17 15:17 47.0 33.5 0.0 19.5 6 8 August 08/23/2017 10:58 46.7 34.1 0.1 19.1 12 14 September 09/28/2017 10:05 49.3 34.7 0.0 16.0 3 5 October 10/31/2017 15:30 42.5 33.3 0.0 24.2 35 5 November 11/29/17 4:26 PM 49.8 34.8 0.0 15.4 3 5 December 12/19/2017 14:10 47.0 33.6 0.0 19.4 3 4 Average --- 46.6 33.6 0.0 19.7 13 11 VLGW0053 ------January 01/31/2017 14:29 52.8 35.0 0.0 12.2 40 40 February ------March 03/31/2017 9:18 39.2 30.7 0.3 29.8 40 38 April 11/4/17 13:54 47.3 32.9 0.0 19.8 2 4 May 05/24/2017 11:11 40.0 31.6 0.0 28.4 1 1 June 6/30/17 12:56 43.1 31.7 0.0 25.2 9 9 July 7/14/17 15:19 42.8 31.7 0.0 25.5 5 0 August 08/23/2017 11:00 52.6 34.4 0.0 13.0 1 3 September 09/28/2017 10:09 55.6 34.9 0.0 9.5 2 4 October ------November ------December 12/19/2017 14:07 28.5 27.8 0.1 43.6 4 5 Average --- 44.7 32.3 0.0 23.0 12 12

Page 68 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW0054 ------January 01/31/2017 15:46 43.2 32.7 0.0 24.1 34 2 February ------March 03/31/2017 9:49 51.1 32.0 0.1 16.8 5 6 April 11/4/17 14:58 55.3 32.5 0.0 12.2 8 10 May 05/24/2017 9:44 37.3 30.4 0.0 32.3 4 2 June 6/30/17 10:14 44.1 31.5 0.0 24.4 8 7 July 7/15/17 10:39 44.6 31.7 0.0 23.7 4 4 August 08/23/2017 11:33 45.2 32.4 0.0 22.4 2 0 September 09/28/2017 15:43 48.0 32.3 0.0 19.7 2 2 October ------November ------December 12/19/2017 15:14 33.7 29.4 0.0 36.9 2 1 Average --- 44.7 31.7 0.0 23.6 8 4 VLGW0055 ------January 01/31/2017 15:43 46.0 33.5 0.0 20.5 13 <<>> February ------March 03/31/2017 9:55 49.7 32.9 0.2 17.2 41 39 April 11/4/17 15:02 55.1 34.6 0.0 10.3 4 10 May 05/24/2017 9:46 49.6 34.6 0.0 15.8 32 30 June 6/30/17 10:16 51.3 34.6 0.0 14.1 13 17 July 7/15/17 10:42 47.3 34.2 0.0 18.5 14 14 August 08/23/2017 11:36 36.6 31.9 0.0 31.5 2 1 September 09/28/2017 15:47 46.5 33.7 0.0 19.8 11 13 October ------November ------December 12/19/2017 15:16 43.7 32.5 0.0 23.8 2 3 Average --- 47.3 33.6 0.0 19.1 15 16

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 69 Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW0056 ------January 01/31/2017 15:41 64.0 35.9 0.0 0.1 3 4 February ------March 03/31/2017 10:00 65.4 34.3 0.1 0.2 2 3 April 11/4/17 15:06 56.7 34.0 0.0 9.3 2 3 May 05/24/2017 9:48 51.6 33.8 0.0 14.6 4 5 June 6/30/17 10:18 51.2 33.9 0.0 14.9 10 11 July 7/15/17 10:44 49.4 33.7 0.0 16.9 8 8 August 08/23/2017 11:39 35.5 31.4 0.0 33.1 2 2 September 09/28/2017 15:50 48.3 33.5 0.0 18.2 4 6 October ------November ------December 12/19/2017 14:50 36.8 29.7 0.0 33.5 0 0 Average --- 51.0 33.4 0.0 15.6 4 5 VLGW0058 ------January 01/31/2017 15:06 41.9 33.5 0.2 24.4 <<>> <<>> February ------March 03/31/2017 7:49 48.3 33.9 0.0 17.8 2 4 April ------May ------June 6/29/17 16:16 40.2 32.1 0.2 27.5 <<>> 0 July ------August ------September 09/29/2017 14:32 39.6 32.6 0.3 27.5 1 <<>> October ------November ------December ------Average --- 42.5 33.0 0.2 24.3 2 2

Page 70 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B2, continued Month Date CH4 % CO2 % O2 % Balance % Init. Flow SCFM Adj. Flow SCFM VLGW0059 ------January 01/31/2017 14:59 59.2 40.1 0.3 0.4 <<>> 3 February ------March 03/31/2017 7:56 41.6 34.2 0.2 24.0 2 2 April 11/4/17 10:18 46.5 36.3 0.2 17.0 2 2 May ------June 6/29/17 16:25 46.1 36.0 0.0 17.9 <<>> 0 July 7/15/17 12:29 50.9 37.0 0.0 12.1 2 2 August 08/24/2017 17:18 52.5 38.9 0.0 8.6 2 4 September 09/29/2017 14:38 56.5 39.1 0.0 4.4 0 1 October ------November ------December 12/19/2017 14:39 36.3 32.7 0.0 31.0 1 1 Average --- 48.7 36.8 0.1 14.4 2 2 VLGW0060 ------January 01/31/2017 15:34 60.9 38.9 0.0 0.2 2 2 February ------March 03/31/2017 8:36 61.7 38.0 0.2 0.1 1 2 April 11/4/17 10:31 51.0 33.9 0.1 15.0 2 1 May ------June 6/29/17 16:36 53.2 34.4 0.0 12.4 10 10 July 7/15/17 10:57 53.4 35.1 0.0 11.5 <<>> 0 August ------September 09/29/2017 14:51 58.2 36.7 0.0 5.1 1 3 October ------November ------December ------Average --- 56.4 36.2 0.1 7.4 3 3 Note: <<>> = under or over range of instrument

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 71 Appendix B This page intentionally left blank

Appendix B3 2017 Hartland Landfill Gas Well Field Data Summary

Refuse Lift Average Methane Average Flow Months in Methane Annual Methane Flow Energy Well Production Cumulative Name (mASL) (% by vol) (scfm) Operation Flow (scf) (m3) (GJ) (% of Total) Total (%) HLGW0001 139 26.2 1.0 3 34,408 974 35 0.01% 0.01% HLGW0003 139 44.0 7.4 10 1,433,907 40,604 1,458 0.37% 0.37% HLGW0005 147 46.8 4.9 11 1,105,877 31,315 1,124 0.28% 0.66% HLGW0012 147 55.0 18.3 4 1,756,009 49,725 1,785 0.45% 1.10% HLGW0013 147 53.1 23.2 10 5,396,915 152,824 5,486 1.38% 2.48% HLGW0014 155 49.1 10.5 11 2,495,152 70,655 2,537 0.64% 3.12% HLGW0018 165 53.0 10.3 11 2,620,396 74,202 2,664 0.67% 3.79% HLGW0023 165 53.4 21.6 8 4,042,221 114,464 4,109 1.03% 4.82% HLGW006A 159 42.6 1.0 2 37,253 1,055 38 0.01% 4.83% HLGW006B 159 5.1 0.5 2 2,233 63 2 0.00% 4.83% HLGW008A 143 43.6 7.3 11 1,525,315 43,192 1,551 0.39% 5.22% HLGW008B 143 43.8 64.0 11 13,484,409 381,838 13,708 3.44% 8.65% HLGW016B 163 52.7 104.3 11 26,442,976 748,786 26,881 6.74% 15.40% HLGW017A 163 37.9 15.0 1 248,867 7,047 253 0.06% 15.46% HLGW017B 163 49.6 75.0 11 17,909,856 507,153 18,207 4.57% 20.03% HLGW019C 165 48.7 7.0 6 894,781 25,338 910 0.23% 20.26% HLGW021B 165 50.4 57.7 11 14,012,598 396,795 14,245 3.57% 23.83% HLGW022B 165 48.6 22.5 11 5,276,234 149,407 5,364 1.35% 25.18% HLGW024B 171 51.3 27.1 10 6,088,366 172,404 6,189 1.55% 26.73% HLGW025B 171 51.7 20.2 11 5,028,764 142,400 5,112 1.28% 28.01% HLGW026B 171 49.7 50.0 11 11,963,981 338,784 12,162 3.05% 31.06% HLGW027A 171 53.1 20.0 3 1,393,828 39,469 1,417 0.36% 31.42% HLGW027B 171 50.1 34.0 11 8,200,996 232,228 8,337 2.09% 33.51% HLGW028A 171 55.9 33.7 3 2,473,023 70,029 2,514 0.63% 34.14% HLGW028B 171 51.6 21.8 11 5,417,399 153,404 5,507 1.38% 35.52% HLGW029A 171 41.0 5.0 2 179,263 5,076 182 0.05% 35.57% HLGW029B 171 54.3 105.4 11 27,526,795 779,476 27,983 7.02% 42.59% HLGW030A 171 20.4 65.5 2 1,169,870 33,127 1,189 0.30% 42.88% HLGW030B 171 51.3 28.4 11 7,011,578 198,547 7,128 1.79% 44.67% HLGW031A 171 14.4 4.5 2 56,537 1,601 57 0.01% 44.69% HLGW031B 171 52.7 17.9 11 4,546,349 128,739 4,622 1.16% 45.85% HLGW032A 171 23.4 6.0 2 122,660 3,473 125 0.03% 45.88% HLGW032B 171 52.3 34.5 11 8,675,639 245,668 8,819 2.21% 48.09%

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 73 Appendix B

Appendix B3, continued

Refuse Lift Average Methane Average Flow Months in Methane Annual Methane Flow Energy Well Production Cumulative Name (mASL) (% by vol) (scfm) Operation Flow (scf) (m3) (GJ) (% of Total) Total (%) HLGW033A 171 54.6 17.0 3 1,218,986 34,518 1,239 0.31% 48.40% HLGW033B 171 50.1 29.9 10 6,558,910 185,729 6,668 1.67% 50.07% HLGW034A 171 36.2 0.5 2 15,847 449 16 0.00% 50.08% HLGW034B 171 50.0 28.9 11 6,966,712 197,276 7,082 1.78% 51.85% HLGW036B 175 51.7 25.5 11 6,357,409 180,023 6,463 1.62% 53.48% HLGW037B 175 52.2 49.3 10 11,259,104 318,824 11,446 2.87% 56.35% HLGW038B 175 51.4 24.4 9 4,945,910 140,053 5,028 1.26% 57.61% HLGW039A 175 54.0 41.0 3 2,907,602 82,335 2,956 0.74% 58.35% HLGW039B 175 52.8 59.0 7 9,553,718 270,533 9,712 2.44% 60.79% HLGW040A 175 53.0 18.0 3 1,252,081 35,455 1,273 0.32% 61.11% HLGW041A 175 51.2 25.7 3 1,726,949 48,902 1,756 0.44% 61.55% HLGW041B 175 58.9 113.5 2 5,852,983 165,739 5,950 1.49% 63.04% HLGW042A 175 58.3 25.3 3 1,939,627 54,924 1,972 0.49% 63.53% HLGW042B 175 56.5 90.5 8 17,903,049 506,961 18,200 4.57% 68.10% HLGW043A 175 46.9 24.0 3 1,479,279 41,889 1,504 0.38% 68.48% HLGW043B 175 48.6 41.2 9 7,898,489 223,662 8,029 2.01% 70.49% HLGW044A 179 54.1 14.0 3 994,065 28,149 1,011 0.25% 70.74% HLGW044B 179 44.7 12.0 7 1,644,752 46,574 1,672 0.42% 71.16% HLGW047A 179 51.5 25.0 3 1,689,754 47,849 1,718 0.43% 71.59% HLGW048A 179 49.9 32.0 3 2,097,046 59,382 2,132 0.53% 72.13% HLGW049A 179 56.4 44.7 3 3,308,415 93,684 3,363 0.84% 72.97% HLGW050A 179 52.5 29.0 3 1,998,199 56,583 2,031 0.51% 73.48% HLGW051A 179 53.0 13.0 3 905,419 25,639 920 0.23% 73.71% LHGW0003 147 63.3 1.0 1 27,710 785 28 0.01% 73.72% LHGW0004 147 45.2 2.4 5 237,441 6,724 241 0.06% 73.78% LHGW0013 151 48.8 24.6 10 5,257,375 148,873 5,345 1.34% 75.12% LHGW0019 --- 49.6 16.9 11 4,041,560 114,445 4,109 1.03% 76.15% LHGW0020 159 54.4 45.6 11 11,949,167 338,365 12,147 3.05% 79.20% LHGW0022 159 47.8 28.0 11 6,438,749 182,326 6,546 1.64% 80.84% LHGW0023 159 47.2 18.5 11 4,217,539 119,428 4,287 1.08% 81.92% VLGW003D --- 56.5 4.4 11 1,196,135 33,871 1,216 0.31% 82.22% VLGW003S --- 50.8 3.5 11 845,354 23,938 859 0.22% 82.44% VLGW0049 --- 60.1 13.1 11 3,788,550 107,280 3,851 0.97% 83.40% VLGW004S --- 28.8 6.7 7 592,846 16,788 603 0.15% 83.55% VLGW0050 --- 49.8 3.3 9 653,868 18,516 665 0.17% 83.72%

Page 74 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B

Appendix B3, continued

Refuse Lift Average Methane Average Flow Months in Methane Annual Methane Flow Energy Well Production Cumulative Name (mASL) (% by vol) (scfm) Operation Flow (scf) (m3) (GJ) (% of Total) Total (%) VLGW0051 --- 50.2 20.1 11 4,860,994 137,649 4,942 1.24% 84.96% VLGW0052 --- 46.6 12.7 11 2,857,618 80,919 2,905 0.73% 85.69% VLGW0053 --- 44.7 11.6 9 2,033,035 57,569 2,067 0.52% 86.21% VLGW0054 --- 44.7 7.7 9 1,350,854 38,252 1,373 0.34% 86.55% VLGW0055 --- 47.3 14.7 9 2,733,840 77,414 2,779 0.70% 87.25% VLGW0056 --- 51.0 3.9 9 781,231 22,122 794 0.20% 87.45% VLGW0058 --- 42.5 1.5 4 111,629 3,161 113 0.03% 87.48% VLGW0059 --- 48.7 1.5 8 255,827 7,244 260 0.07% 87.54% VLGW005S --- 60.2 4.5 8 948,713 26,865 964 0.24% 87.78% VLGW0060 --- 56.4 3.2 6 474,042 13,423 482 0.12% 87.91% VLGW006D --- 51.8 4.9 9 998,599 28,277 1,015 0.25% 88.16% VLGW006S --- 49.4 3.5 9 680,892 19,281 692 0.17% 88.33% VLGW007D --- 66.2 6.7 9 1,738,783 49,237 1,768 0.44% 88.78% VLGW007S --- 49.7 7.2 9 1,414,184 40,045 1,438 0.36% 89.14% VLGW008D --- 47.6 3.8 6 474,593 13,439 482 0.12% 89.26% VLGW008S --- 50.3 4.1 9 814,715 23,070 828 0.21% 89.47% VLGW009D --- 54.4 3.9 8 734,330 20,794 747 0.19% 89.65% VLGW009S --- 60.5 4.2 9 1,005,671 28,478 1,022 0.26% 89.91% VLGW010S --- 34.0 3.3 3 148,984 4,219 151 0.04% 89.95% VLGW011S --- 49.2 10.4 6 1,344,869 38,083 1,367 0.34% 90.29% VLGW012S --- 47.3 3.6 9 675,217 19,120 686 0.17% 90.46% VLGW013D --- 53.4 2.0 3 140,258 3,972 143 0.04% 90.50% VLGW013S --- 49.9 1.0 4 87,333 2,473 89 0.02% 90.52% VLGW015D --- 56.5 10.1 9 2,252,514 63,784 2,290 0.57% 91.10% VLGW015S --- 50.7 7.0 9 1,398,556 39,603 1,422 0.36% 91.45% VLGW016D --- 49.2 8.6 9 1,659,534 46,993 1,687 0.42% 91.88% VLGW016S --- 49.4 8.9 9 1,730,806 49,011 1,760 0.44% 92.32% VLGW017D --- 45.7 5.0 9 900,253 25,492 915 0.23% 92.55% VLGW017S --- 70.2 8.7 9 2,396,240 67,854 2,436 0.61% 93.16% VLGW018D --- 51.7 4.6 9 927,720 26,270 943 0.24% 93.39% VLGW018S --- 43.8 9.1 9 1,572,658 44,533 1,599 0.40% 93.80% VLGW019D --- 49.1 5.9 9 1,138,925 32,251 1,158 0.29% 94.09% VLGW019S --- 48.6 12.3 8 2,084,963 59,040 2,120 0.53% 94.62% VLGW020D --- 39.1 4.0 1 68,466 1,939 70 0.02% 94.64% VLGW020S --- 33.0 4.0 1 57,784 1,636 59 0.01% 94.65%

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 75 Appendix B

Appendix B3, continued

Refuse Lift Average Methane Average Flow Months in Methane Annual Methane Flow Energy Well Production Cumulative Name (mASL) (% by vol) (scfm) Operation Flow (scf) (m3) (GJ) (% of Total) Total (%) VLGW021D --- 50.9 20.4 8 3,632,855 102,872 3,693 0.93% 95.58% VLGW021S --- 54.0 3.4 8 638,550 18,082 649 0.16% 95.74% VLGW022D --- 43.7 5.3 7 714,658 20,237 727 0.18% 95.92% VLGW022S --- 40.9 1.0 7 125,199 3,545 127 0.03% 95.95% VLGW023D --- 53.3 7.3 8 1,352,022 38,285 1,374 0.34% 96.30% VLGW023S --- 49.4 3.6 8 626,976 17,754 637 0.16% 96.46% VLGW024D --- 49.1 8.0 8 1,374,917 38,934 1,398 0.35% 96.81% VLGW025S --- 48.1 7.0 5 736,969 20,869 749 0.19% 97.00% VLGW026D --- 54.2 6.1 8 1,165,455 33,002 1,185 0.30% 97.29% VLGW026S --- 56.3 13.5 8 2,661,165 75,356 2,705 0.68% 97.97% VLGW027D --- 62.6 2.9 7 548,451 15,530 558 0.14% 98.11% VLGW027S --- 41.6 2.4 7 306,047 8,666 311 0.08% 98.19% VLGW028S --- 50.2 3.0 6 395,429 11,197 402 0.10% 98.29% VLGW029D --- 55.0 8.3 6 1,203,475 34,079 1,223 0.31% 98.60% VLGW029S --- 52.0 13.8 6 1,876,185 53,128 1,907 0.48% 99.08% VLGW030S --- 36.6 2.8 6 269,415 7,629 274 0.07% 99.15% VLGW031S --- 33.0 3.0 1 43,338 1,227 44 0.01% 99.16% VLGW032S --- 48.5 10.0 6 1,273,444 36,060 1,295 0.32% 99.48% VLGW033S --- 43.3 3.0 1 56,865 1,610 58 0.01% 99.50% VLGW034S --- 41.5 1.0 1 18,167 514 18 0.00% 99.50% VLGW042S --- 58.2 7.9 7 1,401,958 39,699 1,425 0.36% 99.86% VLGW043S --- 42.8 4.0 5 374,723 10,611 381 0.10% 99.95% VLGW047S --- 46.3 3.0 3 182,546 5,169 186 0.05% 100.00%

Page 76 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix B APPENDIX C

2017 Hartland Landfill Gas Collection Data

This page intentionally left blank

Appendix C 2017 Hartland Landfill Gas Collection Data

Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Jan-17 49.62 0.25 -30.43 77.79 322.15 - 845,771 1,546,298 700,527 1,546,298 2-Jan-17 48.81 0.29 -30.58 73.88 418.80 - 815,406 1,531,428 716,022 1,531,428 3-Jan-17 48.30 0.35 -30.06 69.03 533.62 - 780,019 1,503,946 723,927 1,503,946 4-Jan-17 48.49 0.34 -29.34 67.50 531.50 - 789,808 1,466,930 677,122 1,466,930 5-Jan-17 48.94 0.29 -30.30 69.03 410.91 - 779,286 1,470,945 691,659 1,470,945 6-Jan-17 48.20 --- -31.03 72.63 256.94 - 802,958 1,487,804 684,846 1,487,804 7-Jan-17 49.10 0.28 -31.05 78.06 332.22 - 806,617 1,497,706 691,089 1,497,706 8-Jan-17 48.96 0.29 -31.19 76.96 291.06 - 820,798 1,524,579 703,781 1,524,579 9-Jan-17 49.05 0.22 -32.04 78.77 307.58 - 867,353 1,580,409 713,056 1,580,409 10-Jan-17 48.33 0.23 -32.05 79.30 295.18 - 848,880 1,575,556 726,676 1,575,556 11-Jan-17 48.31 0.35 -32.06 70.99 440.34 - 843,787 1,565,597 721,810 1,565,597 12-Jan-17 48.37 0.88 -29.75 107.07 391.82 31,244 844,128 1,439,306 595,178 1,470,550 13-Jan-17 48.12 0.64 -30.06 67.59 292.90 - 768,735 1,481,417 712,682 1,481,417 14-Jan-17 48.26 0.33 -30.05 73.89 326.66 - 780,036 1,490,835 710,799 1,490,835 15-Jan-17 48.84 --- -30.05 71.72 337.56 - 792,114 1,502,684 710,570 1,502,684 16-Jan-17 48.89 0.97 -30.05 75.77 293.20 - 792,861 1,514,221 721,360 1,514,221 17-Jan-17 49.51 1.08 -30.05 80.94 286.95 - 818,518 1,529,407 710,889 1,529,407 18-Jan-17 51.23 0.86 -29.88 396.79 245.20 303,383 659,640 1,194,738 535,098 1,498,121 19-Jan-17 52.03 0.76 -28.70 539.75 231.24 422,486 561,183 1,013,472 452,289 1,435,958 20-Jan-17 49.90 0.93 -29.48 82.13 302.52 - 795,210 1,489,196 693,986 1,489,196 21-Jan-17 50.58 0.83 -28.63 79.95 315.51 - 778,840 1,464,866 686,026 1,464,866 22-Jan-17 49.48 0.50 -30.04 82.17 286.97 - 992,175 1,505,307 513,132 1,505,307 23-Jan-17 49.25 0.11 -30.04 84.32 297.21 - 901,312 1,521,456 620,144 1,521,456 24-Jan-17 48.54 0.18 -30.05 76.34 308.71 - 799,548 1,516,283 716,735 1,516,283 25-Jan-17 48.40 0.23 -30.05 81.77 280.78 - 804,655 1,525,457 720,802 1,525,457 26-Jan-17 48.55 0.18 -30.06 84.67 285.00 - 813,134 1,548,217 735,083 1,548,217 27-Jan-17 48.32 0.17 -30.06 83.66 293.24 - 805,270 1,544,238 738,968 1,544,238 28-Jan-17 48.67 0.14 -30.06 83.07 301.44 - 813,587 1,548,588 735,001 1,548,588 29-Jan-17 49.10 0.24 -30.05 82.34 279.58 - 826,009 1,549,456 723,447 1,549,456 30-Jan-17 49.34 0.66 -30.06 82.07 358.29 - 827,001 1,539,990 712,989 1,539,990 31-Jan-17 49.24 0.84 -30.05 80.56 315.34 - 822,353 1,538,090 715,737 1,538,090

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 1 Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Feb-17 48.92 0.94 -30.05 72.50 394.81 - 809,141 1,516,838 707,697 1,516,838 2-Feb-17 48.91 0.88 -30.06 72.00 499.50 - 809,378 1,542,240 732,862 1,542,240 3-Feb-17 49.38 0.70 -30.05 74.67 418.38 - 820,297 1,516,320 696,023 1,516,320 4-Feb-17 49.97 0.54 -30.05 76.27 335.19 - 827,806 1,486,080 658,274 1,486,080 5-Feb-17 48.85 0.64 -30.05 74.70 345.03 - 794,395 1,515,370 720,975 1,515,370 6-Feb-17 49.29 0.59 -30.04 75.51 359.13 - 805,563 1,481,760 676,197 1,481,760 7-Feb-17 47.74 --- -28.68 73.81 323.55 - 793,890 1,522,080 728,190 1,522,080 8-Feb-17 35.34 --- -21.99 68.44 264.52 - 584,464 1,501,920 917,456 1,501,920 9-Feb-17 38.86 --- -16.34 69.05 258.99 - 880,468 1,465,920 585,452 1,465,920 10-Feb-17 49.90 --- -21.40 413.70 197.21 331,825 539,467 1,501,920 962,453 1,501,920 11-Feb-17 50.31 0.64 -31.04 78.81 397.89 - 797,147 1,503,360 706,213 1,503,360 12-Feb-17 48.90 0.68 -30.41 76.06 370.48 - 785,829 1,490,400 704,571 1,490,400 13-Feb-17 50.20 0.35 -30.72 74.69 281.26 - 765,136 1,490,400 725,264 1,490,400 14-Feb-17 50.52 0.12 -31.03 73.72 324.54 - 778,526 1,490,400 711,874 1,490,400 15-Feb-17 49.03 --- -18.44 77.67 207.11 - 757,120 1,524,960 767,840 1,524,960 16-Feb-17 53.34 0.13 -25.81 82.17 286.07 - 966,937 1,471,680 504,743 1,471,680 Start of Flow bypass to increase vacuum Conditioning skid flows do not account 17-Feb-17 52.55 0.50 -27.27 86.45 336.03 2,903 953,150 1,558,080 604,930 1,558,080 1022 for all flows to the generator Generator flows not available until April 18-Feb-17 55.05 0.16 -26.17 80.32 315.54 - 971,606 1,604,160 632,554 1,604,160 1082 22 19-Feb-17 54.01 0.52 -30.04 81.17 326.20 - 775,888 1,539,720 763,832 1,539,720 1114 20-Feb-17 53.28 0.66 -30.05 81.63 315.27 - 778,718 1,586,880 808,162 1,586,880 --- All flows estimated using manual 21-Feb-17 52.62 0.72 -30.04 82.15 325.01 - 763,536 1,584,000 820,464 1,584,000 1102 readings 22-Feb-17 52.03 0.79 -30.05 79.18 368.37 - 751,265 1,598,400 847,135 1,598,400 1100 23-Feb-17 51.88 0.73 -30.05 77.23 303.71 - 759,239 1,601,280 842,041 1,601,280 1110 24-Feb-17 52.09 0.68 -30.20 74.77 361.93 - 772,629 1,637,280 864,651 1,637,280 1112 25-Feb-17 51.87 0.69 -30.62 79.25 351.94 - 778,151 1,614,240 836,089 1,614,240 1137 26-Feb-17 52.38 0.53 -30.03 76.99 343.38 - 777,092 1,603,680 826,588 1,603,680 1121 27-Feb-17 52.83 0.50 -30.55 73.81 373.65 - 791,829 1,627,200 835,371 1,627,200 - 28-Feb-17 52.23 0.57 -31.04 74.76 305.58 - 783,896 1,605,600 821,704 1,605,600 1130

Page 2 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Mar-17 51.32 0.67 -30.58 72.98 341.59 - 751,958 1,605,600 853,642 1,605,600 1115 2-Mar-17 51.34 0.64 -30.04 77.68 409.14 - 741,827 1,579,680 837,853 1,579,680 1115 3-Mar-17 52.70 0.49 -30.03 80.09 335.29 - 767,743 1,591,200 823,457 1,591,200 1097 4-Mar-17 53.09 0.54 -30.03 78.48 378.88 - 790,559 1,548,000 757,441 1,548,000 1105 5-Mar-17 53.16 0.47 -30.04 79.88 388.86 - 746,315 1,581,120 834,805 1,581,120 1075 6-Mar-17 53.02 0.54 -30.05 77.02 361.02 - 727,698 1,548,000 820,302 1,548,000 - 7-Mar-17 51.91 0.72 -30.04 72.41 431.70 - 694,353 1,562,400 868,047 1,562,400 1075 8-Mar-17 52.34 0.60 -30.05 83.83 396.03 - 717,480 1,560,960 843,480 1,560,960 1085 9-Mar-17 51.92 0.71 -30.04 88.48 389.55 - 706,261 1,555,200 848,939 1,555,200 1084 10-Mar-17 52.69 0.53 -30.04 91.98 351.88 - 729,931 1,529,280 799,349 1,529,280 1080 11-Mar-17 52.13 0.67 -30.04 87.11 397.18 - 701,117 1,575,360 874,243 1,575,360 1062 12-Mar-17 52.89 0.58 -30.05 93.01 393.24 - 721,680 1,555,200 833,520 1,555,200 1094 13-Mar-17 54.25 0.70 -31.24 89.88 389.96 - 671,394 1,526,400 855,006 1,526,400 - 14-Mar-17 53.12 0.53 -30.04 83.99 322.37 - 718,098 1,512,000 793,902 1,512,000 1060 15-Mar-17 53.53 0.49 -30.04 82.91 370.20 - 713,523 1,507,680 794,157 1,507,680 1050 16-Mar-17 53.11 0.59 -30.03 83.33 401.49 - 695,471 1,504,800 809,329 1,504,800 1047 17-Mar-17 52.02 0.79 -30.03 75.22 452.61 - 668,265 1,512,000 843,735 1,512,000 1045 18-Mar-17 53.23 0.57 -30.02 78.98 336.49 - 703,433 1,539,360 835,927 1,539,360 1050 19-Mar-17 52.82 0.65 -30.03 73.58 388.59 - 704,620 1,517,040 812,420 1,517,040 1069 20-Mar-17 52.08 0.78 -30.03 72.21 397.83 - 713,408 1,559,520 846,112 1,559,520 - 21-Mar-17 52.77 0.72 -30.02 75.26 377.34 - 735,084 1,533,600 798,516 1,533,600 1083 22-Mar-17 53.08 0.65 -30.02 80.05 340.31 - 731,810 1,527,840 796,030 1,527,840 1065 23-Mar-17 52.32 0.76 -30.02 81.66 384.96 - 708,383 1,548,000 839,617 1,548,000 1061 24-Mar-17 52.18 0.79 -30.02 80.70 372.84 - 713,579 1,527,840 814,261 1,527,840 1075 25-Mar-17 52.42 0.79 -30.03 79.47 415.94 - 712,947 1,535,040 822,093 1,535,040 1061 26-Mar-17 51.76 0.88 -30.02 75.92 382.67 - 795,480 1,538,640 743,160 1,538,640 1066 27-Mar-17 52.33 0.77 -30.04 82.23 317.39 - 771,650 1,604,160 832,510 1,604,160 - 28-Mar-17 51.22 0.93 -30.04 80.67 377.01 - 741,001 1,429,920 688,919 1,429,920 1114 29-Mar-17 52.07 0.68 -30.04 82.51 353.94 - 693,273 1,427,040 733,767 1,427,040 993 30-Mar-17 54.31 0.36 -30.03 80.54 446.89 - 634,038 1,404,000 769,962 1,404,000 991 31-Mar-17 53.70 0.49 -30.05 77.30 488.85 - 601,091 1,419,840 818,749 1,419,840 975

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 3 Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Apr-17 53.87 0.51 -30.03 79.26 399.07 - 624,865 1,427,040 802,175 1,427,040 986 2-Apr-17 54.32 0.48 -30.03 80.90 439.51 - 628,018 ------991 3-Apr-17 54.08 0.53 -30.03 75.71 449.24 - 626,725 1,416,960 790,235 1,416,960 --- 4-Apr-17 54.41 0.48 -30.04 74.36 408.32 - 630,534 ------984 5-Apr-17 54.84 0.44 -30.04 82.04 384.15 - 639,189 1,418,400 779,211 1,418,400 --- 6-Apr-17 54.17 0.44 -30.04 81.33 445.39 - 626,611 1,408,320 781,709 1,408,320 985 7-Apr-17 54.21 0.33 -30.03 81.36 405.37 - 636,251 1,434,240 797,989 1,434,240 978 8-Apr-17 51.82 --- -28.46 80.56 400.65 - 705,744 1,522,080 816,336 1,522,080 996 9-Apr-17 52.20 0.65 -30.03 78.12 374.51 - 960,774 ------1057 10-Apr-17 52.35 0.57 -30.04 80.99 368.15 - 781,609 ------11-Apr-17 52.19 0.63 -30.05 80.92 380.29 - 763,041 1,500,480 737,439 1,500,480 --- 12-Apr-17 52.60 0.54 -30.04 78.69 380.02 - 775,301 1,490,400 715,099 1,490,400 1042 13-Apr-17 53.10 0.46 -30.04 81.44 333.76 - 746,719 1,493,280 746,561 1,493,280 1035 14-Apr-17 52.76 0.49 -29.53 80.59 392.63 - 743,382 ------1037 15-Apr-17 41.95 --- -23.77 76.57 316.53 - 639,219 1,533,600 894,381 1,533,600 --- 16-Apr-17 52.65 0.57 -30.04 79.71 324.73 - 780,332 ------1065 17-Apr-17 53.62 0.46 -30.03 78.56 363.47 - 785,802 1,490,400 704,598 1,490,400 --- 18-Apr-17 53.10 0.60 -30.24 82.99 334.43 - 764,023 1,480,320 716,297 1,480,320 1035 19-Apr-17 52.54 0.63 -30.21 82.96 324.66 - 915,785 1,533,600 617,815 1,533,600 1028 20-Apr-17 55.05 0.53 -29.85 984.00 109.75 882,682 513,132 1,839,401 1,839,401 1065 21-Apr-17 51.95 --- -19.42 797.78 103.17 728,190 312,322 1,282,178 1,282,178 1035 22-Apr-17 57.70 --- -16.50 376.14 168.99 328,458 472,734 n/a 38,837 840,029 --- 23-Apr-17 55.00 0.00 -30.01 1,552.05 32.52 1,573,607 - n/a - 1,573,607 24-Apr-17 57.80 0.00 -30.01 1,553.15 31.95 1,548,646 - n/a - 1,548,646 25-Apr-17 57.90 --- -26.53 598.34 225.15 533,350 511,905 n/a 296,872 1,342,127 26-Apr-17 48.72 0.70 -30.01 85.19 370.23 - 717,875 n/a 804,399 1,522,274 27-Apr-17 44.89 0.70 -30.01 81.58 439.09 - 705,002 n/a 820,864 1,525,866 28-Apr-17 48.62 --- -30.03 78.68 394.63 - 707,967 n/a 828,830 1,536,797 29-Apr-17 51.67 0.48 -30.00 79.77 358.12 - 697,901 n/a 843,006 1,540,907 30-Apr-17 52.02 0.40 -30.01 81.38 343.92 - 713,856 n/a 830,442 1,544,298

Page 4 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-May-17 52.14 0.48 -30.01 78.75 458.69 - 698,464 n/a 834,455 1,532,919 2-May-17 52.19 0.39 -30.01 81.40 337.43 - 711,012 n/a 830,228 1,541,240 3-May-17 52.74 0.32 -30.00 81.80 362.92 - 700,459 n/a 825,578 1,526,037 4-May-17 53.44 0.24 -30.00 85.76 380.18 - 699,126 n/a 818,331 1,517,457 5-May-17 55.46 0.18 -30.00 86.08 395.38 - 712,094 n/a 794,755 1,506,849 6-May-17 56.97 0.32 -30.01 86.74 432.54 - 694,686 n/a 808,766 1,503,452 7-May-17 55.87 0.32 -30.01 79.92 407.77 - 689,186 n/a 826,231 1,515,417 8-May-17 56.01 0.28 -30.00 83.25 373.63 - 695,047 n/a 824,896 1,519,943 9-May-17 56.56 0.26 -30.00 85.75 356.52 - 699,648 n/a 819,244 1,518,892 10-May-17 57.33 0.22 -30.00 84.40 374.79 - 706,186 n/a 808,217 1,514,403 11-May-17 57.19 0.25 -30.00 87.52 331.18 - 789,561 n/a 752,291 1,541,852 12-May-17 56.18 0.30 -30.00 85.07 306.61 - 978,461 n/a 564,361 1,542,822 13-May-17 55.96 0.30 -30.00 80.72 351.01 - 731,227 n/a 825,387 1,556,614 14-May-17 55.95 0.29 -30.00 82.33 344.77 - 728,865 n/a 826,077 1,554,942 15-May-17 55.77 0.10 -30.01 84.96 373.14 - 728,939 n/a 828,274 1,557,213 16-May-17 56.19 --- -30.00 82.60 352.85 - 738,475 n/a 818,867 1,557,342 17-May-17 56.54 --- -30.01 81.35 394.73 - 734,057 n/a 813,744 1,547,801 18-May-17 54.97 0.00 -30.01 85.15 333.13 - 709,006 n/a 842,023 1,551,029 19-May-17 55.73 0.01 -30.00 86.01 310.54 - 726,143 n/a 827,694 1,553,837 20-May-17 53.83 --- -30.00 87.54 335.01 - 745,042 n/a 803,273 1,548,315 21-May-17 52.28 1.23 -30.01 88.46 349.99 - 735,183 n/a 824,089 1,559,272 22-May-17 52.35 1.22 -30.00 86.98 361.49 - 741,836 n/a 823,204 1,565,040 23-May-17 53.01 1.20 -30.00 88.98 357.48 - 754,613 n/a 810,049 1,564,662 24-May-17 52.70 1.22 -29.93 86.74 393.42 - 758,045 n/a 809,919 1,567,964 25-May-17 51.79 1.18 -30.00 86.51 375.69 - 763,689 n/a 816,174 1,579,863 26-May-17 50.55 --- -28.52 86.93 310.63 - 772,048 n/a 759,825 1,531,873 27-May-17 52.41 1.20 -30.00 88.73 334.34 - 789,745 n/a 821,047 1,610,792 28-May-17 52.39 1.21 -30.00 89.32 327.55 - 785,460 n/a 822,869 1,608,329 29-May-17 52.78 1.18 -30.00 88.94 307.83 - 792,234 n/a 818,520 1,610,754 30-May-17 53.02 1.15 -30.00 89.26 346.85 - 799,982 n/a 812,012 1,611,994 31-May-17 51.49 1.12 -30.01 88.26 334.80 - 792,146 n/a 822,366 1,614,512

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 5 Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Jun-17 51.76 1.10 -30.00 85.92 326.44 - 792,527 n/a 819,138 1,611,665 2-Jun-17 51.76 1.15 -30.00 88.78 331.72 - 785,939 n/a 822,754 1,608,693 3-Jun-17 51.50 1.14 -30.00 88.68 322.41 - 783,995 n/a 830,193 1,614,188 4-Jun-17 51.65 1.12 -30.00 90.35 346.88 - 787,304 n/a 825,255 1,612,559 5-Jun-17 51.41 1.15 -30.01 86.32 367.88 - 784,076 n/a 830,200 1,614,276 6-Jun-17 51.57 1.16 -30.00 87.03 344.66 - 790,713 n/a 830,361 1,621,074 7-Jun-17 52.68 1.25 -28.65 87.96 294.23 - 867,151 n/a 680,858 1,548,009 8-Jun-17 53.31 1.12 -30.01 87.89 327.09 - 816,880 n/a 807,367 1,624,247 9-Jun-17 51.42 1.14 -30.01 85.82 337.74 - 820,190 n/a 825,814 1,646,004 10-Jun-17 51.47 1.11 -30.00 87.76 344.39 - 825,705 n/a 828,564 1,654,269 11-Jun-17 51.22 1.16 -30.01 85.54 302.77 - 836,984 n/a 834,453 1,671,437 12-Jun-17 51.22 1.20 -30.00 88.92 285.47 - 847,977 n/a 841,601 1,689,578 13-Jun-17 51.33 1.21 -30.01 87.97 358.26 - 850,308 n/a 839,053 1,689,361 14-Jun-17 50.63 1.18 -30.00 85.55 374.62 - 840,384 n/a 847,353 1,687,737 15-Jun-17 50.60 1.11 -30.00 87.25 329.92 - 848,591 n/a 844,957 1,693,548 16-Jun-17 51.17 1.06 -30.01 87.13 284.41 - 928,533 n/a 760,695 1,689,228 17-Jun-17 50.55 1.17 -30.01 85.20 397.26 - 834,519 n/a 854,497 1,689,016 18-Jun-17 50.16 1.14 -30.00 86.61 316.26 - 841,636 n/a 853,158 1,694,794 19-Jun-17 50.26 1.11 -30.00 86.04 284.46 - 841,514 n/a 855,387 1,696,901 20-Jun-17 51.53 1.10 -30.00 88.62 305.94 - 848,889 n/a 840,317 1,689,206 21-Jun-17 51.48 1.17 -30.01 89.89 332.25 - 840,377 n/a 844,058 1,684,435 22-Jun-17 50.68 1.16 -30.01 88.62 337.31 - 839,604 n/a 852,143 1,691,747 23-Jun-17 51.24 1.14 -30.00 87.90 311.44 - 847,407 n/a 846,447 1,693,854 24-Jun-17 51.92 1.14 -30.01 88.28 305.80 - 851,378 n/a 836,074 1,687,452 25-Jun-17 52.72 1.14 -30.00 88.79 328.21 - 851,839 n/a 826,309 1,678,148 26-Jun-17 53.32 1.15 -30.00 87.61 277.78 - 951,649 n/a 708,495 1,660,144 27-Jun-17 52.75 1.19 -30.01 88.85 350.79 - 841,636 n/a 828,898 1,670,534 28-Jun-17 49.01 --- -27.86 330.01 211.08 275,760 764,667 n/a 520,805 1,561,232 29-Jun-17 52.15 0.53 -30.00 89.33 302.73 - 897,497 n/a 782,145 1,679,642 30-Jun-17 53.03 0.52 -30.01 89.01 281.71 - 860,410 n/a 816,702 1,677,112

Page 6 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Jul-17 51.92 0.43 -29.99 88.75 280.99 - 914,186 n/a 782,142 1,696,328 2-Jul-17 50.06 0.46 -30.00 89.26 296.32 - 908,230 n/a 811,270 1,719,500 3-Jul-17 49.91 0.45 -30.00 88.97 304.23 - 905,085 n/a 812,804 1,717,889 4-Jul-17 49.26 0.49 -30.00 90.09 323.54 - 878,163 n/a 841,193 1,719,356 5-Jul-17 49.90 0.43 -30.00 88.87 276.90 - 922,610 n/a 793,831 1,716,441 6-Jul-17 50.40 0.44 -30.00 88.78 279.08 - 907,253 n/a 805,514 1,712,767 7-Jul-17 50.55 0.46 -30.00 89.41 287.83 - 897,067 n/a 815,476 1,712,543 8-Jul-17 50.16 0.49 -30.01 88.57 284.60 - 927,810 n/a 780,791 1,708,601 9-Jul-17 50.38 0.45 -29.99 88.52 281.86 - 935,219 n/a 775,006 1,710,225 10-Jul-17 50.66 0.46 -30.00 88.87 301.87 - 929,780 n/a 776,655 1,706,435 11-Jul-17 50.28 0.47 -30.00 88.21 325.27 - 929,364 n/a 775,037 1,704,401 12-Jul-17 49.99 0.47 -30.00 88.81 290.73 - 934,979 n/a 769,116 1,704,095 13-Jul-17 50.82 0.46 -30.00 88.39 299.43 - 874,516 n/a 832,929 1,707,445 14-Jul-17 49.27 0.51 -30.00 89.05 314.33 - 862,404 n/a 841,579 1,703,983 15-Jul-17 50.06 0.48 -30.01 88.64 298.10 - 848,794 n/a 835,385 1,684,179 16-Jul-17 49.79 0.39 -30.01 87.04 387.35 - 777,127 n/a 823,565 1,600,692 17-Jul-17 49.27 0.29 -30.00 88.66 379.17 - 736,746 n/a 815,304 1,552,050 18-Jul-17 50.06 0.26 -30.00 87.42 349.01 - 744,747 n/a 804,169 1,548,916 19-Jul-17 50.41 0.25 -30.00 87.23 371.75 - 747,045 n/a 800,891 1,547,936 20-Jul-17 50.44 0.25 -30.01 85.78 414.31 - 734,500 n/a 788,924 1,523,424 21-Jul-17 50.19 0.26 -30.00 85.18 404.52 - 704,161 n/a 802,610 1,506,771 22-Jul-17 49.76 0.25 -30.01 88.72 349.14 - 705,088 n/a 805,584 1,510,672 23-Jul-17 50.09 0.24 -30.00 90.02 347.18 - 702,109 n/a 804,643 1,506,752 24-Jul-17 50.62 0.21 -30.00 91.36 309.27 - 995,194 n/a 486,637 1,481,831 25-Jul-17 50.95 0.19 -29.99 87.50 357.37 - 786,013 n/a 717,162 1,503,175 26-Jul-17 51.13 0.20 -30.01 88.19 319.30 - 956,027 n/a 531,675 1,487,702 27-Jul-17 50.94 0.21 -30.01 88.12 352.68 - 761,023 n/a 744,851 1,505,874 28-Jul-17 50.53 0.22 -30.01 88.50 355.19 - 761,779 n/a 745,509 1,507,288 29-Jul-17 50.49 0.22 -30.00 88.39 336.83 - 818,242 n/a 682,120 1,500,362 30-Jul-17 50.68 0.22 -30.01 87.65 371.61 - 752,170 n/a 751,884 1,504,054 31-Jul-17 50.65 0.24 -30.01 87.14 389.74 - 745,864 n/a 758,532 1,504,396

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 7 Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Aug-17 50.93 0.21 -30.01 87.38 343.56 - 752,423 n/a 752,132 1,504,555 2-Aug-17 51.25 0.20 -30.00 88.05 332.12 - 760,029 n/a 744,322 1,504,351 3-Aug-17 51.73 0.17 -30.01 89.16 339.81 - 770,572 n/a 729,004 1,499,576 4-Aug-17 51.90 0.16 -30.01 88.48 349.31 - 758,957 n/a 738,872 1,497,829 5-Aug-17 51.60 0.18 -30.00 88.65 363.52 - 756,706 n/a 740,790 1,497,496 6-Aug-17 51.01 0.20 -30.01 89.13 337.68 - 749,699 n/a 746,954 1,496,653 7-Aug-17 50.88 0.21 -30.01 88.79 355.97 - 748,808 n/a 748,350 1,497,158 8-Aug-17 51.05 0.22 -30.01 88.65 349.14 - 747,434 n/a 751,026 1,498,460 9-Aug-17 51.26 0.21 -30.01 88.32 338.58 - 751,462 n/a 745,167 1,496,629 10-Aug-17 50.49 --- -29.33 88.48 326.89 - 756,435 n/a 711,681 1,468,116 11-Aug-17 51.37 0.21 -30.00 88.69 352.16 - 751,272 n/a 747,376 1,498,648 12-Aug-17 51.24 0.21 -30.01 88.36 345.84 - 751,590 n/a 745,877 1,497,467 13-Aug-17 50.38 0.24 -30.10 88.16 368.89 - 778,527 n/a 716,528 1,495,055 14-Aug-17 49.89 0.30 -30.01 85.28 394.18 - 807,017 n/a 683,448 1,490,465 15-Aug-17 50.00 0.32 -30.00 87.63 335.04 - 834,668 n/a 659,934 1,494,602 16-Aug-17 50.23 0.32 -30.01 87.70 307.56 - 939,592 n/a 541,789 1,481,381 17-Aug-17 50.23 0.33 -30.01 88.51 334.54 - 845,329 n/a 646,557 1,491,886 18-Aug-17 51.80 0.00 -29.30 950.81 121.79 903,847 368,622 n/a 205,682 1,478,151 19-Aug-17 ------30.02 1,552.00 28.95 1,529,515 - n/a - 1,529,515 20-Aug-17 52.50 0.00 -29.86 730.76 195.87 661,296 526,778 n/a 326,826 1,514,900 21-Aug-17 51.40 0.25 -30.00 88.27 360.07 - 757,042 n/a 780,848 1,537,890 22-Aug-17 51.71 0.24 -30.00 87.50 348.77 - 765,197 n/a 770,991 1,536,188 23-Aug-17 52.38 0.22 -30.00 87.37 347.41 - 772,778 n/a 763,593 1,536,371 24-Aug-17 52.00 --- -29.70 581.18 240.41 521,204 498,772 n/a 501,344 1,521,320 25-Aug-17 53.00 0.15 -30.01 1,550.67 28.23 1,517,363 - n/a - 1,517,363 26-Aug-17 52.70 0.20 -29.53 578.62 208.19 500,669 654,812 n/a 316,619 1,472,100 27-Aug-17 52.11 0.24 -30.01 86.90 279.93 - 989,968 n/a 480,629 1,470,597 28-Aug-17 52.70 0.21 -30.01 86.27 336.60 - 798,463 n/a 692,394 1,490,857 29-Aug-17 53.15 0.19 -30.00 86.65 351.02 - 800,800 n/a 683,610 1,484,410 30-Aug-17 52.50 0.40 -26.77 433.24 208.35 373,274 511,810 n/a 497,118 1,382,202 31-Aug-17 52.40 0.50 -29.84 581.44 248.14 509,555 617,221 n/a 376,518 1,503,294

Page 8 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Sep-17 51.99 0.26 -30.00 87.91 328.24 - 789,697 n/a 720,401 1,510,098 2-Sep-17 52.16 0.24 -30.01 85.20 318.16 - 800,552 n/a 716,978 1,517,530 3-Sep-17 52.59 0.25 -30.00 86.14 287.98 - 878,098 n/a 713,843 1,591,941 4-Sep-17 51.78 0.31 -30.01 85.44 288.89 - 902,861 n/a 733,030 1,635,891 5-Sep-17 51.75 0.31 -30.00 85.75 284.75 - 902,310 n/a 730,661 1,632,971 6-Sep-17 51.76 0.33 -30.00 91.10 259.98 - 898,803 n/a 728,888 1,627,691 7-Sep-17 51.18 0.35 -30.01 90.37 274.86 - 897,307 n/a 737,058 1,634,365 8-Sep-17 50.91 0.36 -30.00 89.69 296.57 - 891,260 n/a 738,702 1,629,962 9-Sep-17 50.28 0.39 -30.01 90.62 315.93 - 884,064 n/a 744,027 1,628,091 10-Sep-17 48.97 0.42 -30.01 88.05 306.53 - 875,323 n/a 755,420 1,630,743 11-Sep-17 48.89 0.43 -30.01 83.02 255.20 - 870,587 n/a 761,774 1,632,361 12-Sep-17 50.29 0.22 -29.84 84.31 252.15 - 885,102 n/a 741,937 1,627,039 13-Sep-17 50.90 0.14 -24.84 88.34 243.30 - 658,031 n/a 775,038 1,433,069 14-Sep-17 52.83 0.13 -22.95 78.73 236.66 - 584,830 n/a 780,917 1,365,747 15-Sep-17 51.03 0.14 -28.50 80.16 328.30 - 760,072 n/a 815,990 1,576,062 16-Sep-17 50.85 0.14 -28.45 81.56 271.11 27 902,535 n/a 637,360 1,539,922 17-Sep-17 50.64 0.22 -30.00 84.23 276.02 - 860,592 n/a 765,848 1,626,440 18-Sep-17 49.54 0.24 -30.01 87.78 343.00 - 793,622 n/a 825,789 1,619,411 19-Sep-17 49.11 0.24 -30.01 84.22 356.78 - 780,576 n/a 834,561 1,615,137 20-Sep-17 49.77 0.26 -29.76 188.89 280.85 112,094 834,437 n/a 646,628 1,593,159 21-Sep-17 50.49 0.25 -29.48 134.05 302.66 50,511 773,902 n/a 765,724 1,590,137 22-Sep-17 50.25 0.24 -30.00 81.44 331.87 - 808,073 n/a 799,521 1,607,594 23-Sep-17 50.38 0.23 -30.00 84.72 323.17 - 823,846 n/a 786,192 1,610,038 24-Sep-17 50.51 0.24 -30.01 84.04 330.30 - 798,016 n/a 815,925 1,613,941 25-Sep-17 50.54 0.24 -30.00 85.79 305.94 - 802,019 n/a 813,028 1,615,047 26-Sep-17 49.20 0.70 -29.93 1,025.86 123.39 1,035,608 290,205 n/a 293,922 1,619,735 27-Sep-17 49.70 0.60 -30.01 1,553.99 27.75 1,614,286 - n/a ------28-Sep-17 49.20 0.70 -30.01 1,552.99 25.37 1,620,356 - n/a ------29-Sep-17 49.00 0.70 -30.01 1,552.76 25.31 1,623,102 - n/a ------30-Sep-17 ------30.01 1,551.68 30.14 1,607,304 - n/a ------

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 9 Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Oct-17 ------30.01 1,551.09 31.68 1,599,567 - n/a - 1,599,567 2-Oct-17 ------30.01 1,550.58 27.83 1,603,078 - n/a - 1,603,078 3-Oct-17 48.10 0.80 -30.01 1,546.09 25.98 1,599,169 - n/a - 1,599,169 4-Oct-17 47.90 0.50 -30.01 1,549.32 25.47 1,602,669 - n/a - 1,602,669 5-Oct-17 49.00 0.70 -30.01 1,551.50 26.53 1,577,986 - n/a - 1,577,986 6-Oct-17 49.20 0.70 -30.01 1,550.10 25.95 1,562,928 - n/a - 1,562,928 7-Oct-17 50.70 0.40 -30.01 1,551.40 33.76 1,561,134 - n/a - 1,561,134 8-Oct-17 ------30.01 1,550.83 31.74 1,561,643 - n/a - 1,561,643 9-Oct-17 ------30.01 1,550.60 26.27 1,557,654 - n/a - 1,557,654 10-Oct-17 ------30.00 1,550.25 29.06 1,556,101 - n/a - 1,556,101 11-Oct-17 50.10 0.70 -30.01 1,550.91 29.30 1,545,599 - n/a - 1,545,599 12-Oct-17 49.20 0.80 -30.01 1,550.94 30.33 1,556,809 - n/a - 1,556,809 13-Oct-17 49.60 0.80 -30.01 1,551.69 32.25 1,566,391 - n/a - 1,566,391 14-Oct-17 48.20 0.80 -30.01 1,549.04 28.41 1,556,447 - n/a - 1,556,447 15-Oct-17 ------30.01 1,550.66 33.37 1,561,890 - n/a - 1,561,890 16-Oct-17 ------30.01 1,552.00 26.51 1,563,512 - n/a - 1,563,512 17-Oct-17 52.00 0.40 -29.53 1,532.03 32.92 1,538,346 - n/a - 1,538,346 18-Oct-17 48.50 0.80 -29.77 1,393.58 57.12 1,373,695 152,532 n/a - 1,526,227 19-Oct-17 52.10 0.60 -30.01 1,552.90 33.52 1,521,392 - n/a - 1,521,392 20-Oct-17 51.80 0.70 -30.01 1,550.90 32.44 1,527,884 - n/a - 1,527,884 21-Oct-17 49.80 0.80 -29.62 1,533.76 30.90 1,513,329 - n/a - 1,513,329 22-Oct-17 50.80 0.70 -30.00 1,551.39 33.44 1,536,858 - n/a - 1,536,858 23-Oct-17 ------30.00 1,552.87 31.16 1,526,718 - n/a - 1,526,718 24-Oct-17 48.00 0.90 -30.01 1,550.68 32.22 1,532,205 - n/a - 1,532,205 25-Oct-17 50.40 0.60 -30.01 1,549.21 26.56 1,529,697 - n/a - 1,529,697 26-Oct-17 50.60 0.80 -30.00 1,551.18 31.45 1,512,469 - n/a - 1,512,469 27-Oct-17 49.50 0.80 -30.00 1,548.88 26.81 1,504,548 - n/a - 1,504,548 28-Oct-17 49.00 0.90 -29.97 1,554.33 26.77 1,646,819 - n/a - 1,646,819 29-Oct-17 ------29.95 1,556.36 26.92 1,706,386 - n/a - 1,706,386 30-Oct-17 49.85 0.90 -29.95 1,555.80 28.76 1,654,516 - n/a - 1,654,516 31-Oct-17 50.40 0.50 -29.94 1,553.83 26.99 1,652,841 - n/a - 1,652,841

Page 10 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Nov-17 51.30 0.40 -29.94 1,553.16 29.95 1,632,947 - n/a 51,274 1,684,221 2-Nov-17 ------20.69 1,113.96 33.41 1,098,250 - n/a 77,286 1,175,536 3-Nov-17 53.10 0.40 -29.94 1,551.42 30.32 1,523,664 - n/a 85,227 1,608,891 4-Nov-17 50.30 0.60 -29.93 1,549.00 29.18 1,519,907 - n/a 101,600 1,621,507 5-Nov-17 50.80 0.70 -29.94 1,552.22 33.84 1,523,029 - n/a 111,163 1,634,192 6-Nov-17 ------29.94 1,548.83 28.42 1,554,989 - n/a 80,548 1,635,537 7-Nov-17 49.40 0.80 -29.94 1,548.43 28.87 1,489,001 - n/a 86,657 1,575,658 8-Nov-17 51.20 0.60 -29.94 1,549.70 34.02 1,482,651 - n/a 109,955 1,592,606 9-Nov-17 52.80 0.50 -29.94 1,549.58 33.12 1,461,368 - n/a 101,254 1,562,622 10-Nov-17 52.10 0.60 -29.32 1,370.13 60.27 1,252,244 155,348 n/a 65,550 1,473,142 11-Nov-17 52.30 0.70 -28.40 1,183.88 91.60 1,081,354 242,762 n/a 81,788 1,405,904 12-Nov-17 ------29.94 1,548.86 33.64 1,448,949 - n/a 42,361 1,491,310 13-Nov-17 ------29.94 1,552.61 33.04 1,441,384 - n/a - 1,441,384 14-Nov-17 53.90 0.50 -29.94 1,551.45 32.42 1,417,816 - n/a - 1,417,816 15-Nov-17 53.10 0.60 -29.23 586.68 287.51 474,635 418,592 n/a 480,326 1,373,553 16-Nov-17 52.95 0.60 -29.28 79.76 403.67 - 580,998 n/a 784,830 1,365,828 17-Nov-17 52.53 0.34 -29.17 82.44 390.67 - 685,669 n/a 737,192 1,422,861 18-Nov-17 49.97 0.49 -29.72 79.32 384.91 - 690,332 n/a 880,155 1,570,487 19-Nov-17 50.27 0.64 -29.02 84.69 324.74 - 744,357 n/a 870,222 1,614,579 20-Nov-17 51.05 0.76 -29.20 86.00 303.97 - 772,855 n/a 836,152 1,609,007 21-Nov-17 49.89 0.82 -29.28 80.71 348.98 - 729,404 n/a 865,838 1,595,242 22-Nov-17 49.90 0.75 -29.47 83.20 363.00 - 744,799 n/a 859,702 1,604,501 23-Nov-17 50.92 0.67 -29.46 84.60 357.85 - 741,787 n/a 855,070 1,596,857 24-Nov-17 50.16 0.85 -29.13 85.03 386.86 - 759,838 n/a 860,863 1,620,701 25-Nov-17 49.34 0.85 -29.37 85.29 376.59 - 712,576 n/a 872,522 1,585,098 26-Nov-17 52.04 0.39 -29.31 84.92 367.73 - 630,732 n/a 812,602 1,443,334 27-Nov-17 52.50 0.17 -28.67 84.18 470.47 - 612,522 n/a 801,369 1,413,891 28-Nov-17 50.81 0.26 -29.96 80.93 423.36 - 625,242 n/a 837,196 1,462,438 29-Nov-17 51.29 0.23 -29.94 82.69 415.68 - 636,991 n/a 824,212 1,461,203 30-Nov-17 50.43 0.24 -29.95 82.91 420.07 - 645,903 n/a 845,819 1,491,722

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 11 Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) 1-Dec-17 51.87 0.19 -29.93 84.28 343.59 - 694,676 n/a 825,055 1,519,731 2-Dec-17 52.55 0.18 -29.94 82.54 374.51 - 692,950 n/a 819,145 1,512,095 3-Dec-17 52.63 0.18 -29.96 82.30 364.61 - 691,625 n/a 819,212 1,510,837 4-Dec-17 50.80 0.29 -29.96 80.03 332.40 - 658,807 n/a 858,094 1,516,901 5-Dec-17 50.29 0.30 -29.95 79.28 339.49 - 659,234 n/a 869,432 1,528,666 6-Dec-17 50.64 0.28 -29.95 77.40 395.08 - 661,690 n/a 864,114 1,525,804 7-Dec-17 51.32 0.23 -29.38 202.56 358.68 124,627 685,268 n/a 694,827 1,504,722 8-Dec-17 51.31 0.22 -29.95 76.74 374.49 - 679,899 n/a 853,811 1,533,710 9-Dec-17 50.40 0.25 -29.95 75.92 351.27 - 672,086 n/a 856,898 1,528,984 10-Dec-17 49.03 --- -29.48 76.96 309.95 - 676,118 n/a 831,736 1,507,854 11-Dec-17 50.13 --- -29.78 189.17 334.72 117,165 636,854 n/a 770,009 1,524,028 12-Dec-17 ------29.07 526.01 232.02 457,333 477,079 n/a 564,684 1,499,096 13-Dec-17 49.61 0.48 -29.96 83.55 334.47 - 674,176 n/a 855,315 1,529,491 14-Dec-17 49.90 0.49 -29.97 81.59 330.83 - 793,368 n/a 648,903 1,442,271 15-Dec-17 50.44 0.44 -29.96 81.77 347.02 - 655,086 n/a 834,589 1,489,675 16-Dec-17 50.16 0.47 -29.96 84.18 324.31 - 669,391 n/a 837,360 1,506,751 17-Dec-17 49.94 0.48 -29.96 84.15 321.02 - 684,852 n/a 840,796 1,525,648 18-Dec-17 50.56 0.43 -29.97 82.73 414.46 - 702,398 n/a 828,271 1,530,669 19-Dec-17 50.05 0.49 -29.97 83.57 345.04 - 681,128 n/a 844,078 1,525,206 20-Dec-17 41.36 --- -22.95 74.24 275.98 - 661,169 n/a 532,422 1,193,591 21-Dec-17 48.72 0.74 -29.96 73.15 370.84 - 676,614 n/a 861,670 1,538,284 22-Dec-17 49.30 0.53 -29.79 79.55 315.16 - 670,872 n/a 837,773 1,508,645 23-Dec-17 50.06 0.50 -29.96 77.73 422.25 - 650,502 n/a 840,428 1,490,930 24-Dec-17 49.37 0.57 -29.96 72.32 514.01 - 635,645 n/a 850,701 1,486,346 25-Dec-17 50.04 0.50 -29.95 77.20 420.16 - 646,866 n/a 836,950 1,483,816 26-Dec-17 49.68 0.54 -29.95 77.01 374.92 - 626,188 n/a 848,586 1,474,774 27-Dec-17 49.96 0.50 -29.96 78.78 355.70 - 636,771 n/a 844,609 1,481,380 28-Dec-17 50.09 0.49 -29.95 80.71 311.30 - 635,414 n/a 843,407 1,478,821 29-Dec-17 51.16 0.36 -29.97 81.77 372.93 - 647,867 n/a 822,918 1,470,785 30-Dec-17 50.64 0.51 -29.95 79.98 496.82 - 591,985 n/a 823,876 1,415,861 31-Dec-17 48.21 1.25 -29.89 78.93 468.73 - 607,207 n/a 856,987 1,464,194

Page 12 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix C

Appendix C1, continued Conditioning Field Candlestick Manual Corrected Methane Oxygen Flare 1 Flare 2 Groundflare Skid Flow Total Date Pressure Flare 2 Gen Flow Flows Comments Methane Daily Avg Daily Avg Temp Avg Temp Avg Daily Flow (Total Flow ("H20) Daily Flow (scfm) scf/day) Annual Total 51.2 0.5 -29.6 90,654,138 236,730,409 159,128,009 231,967,515 548,712,890 (scf/yr) Avg/day 248,368 648,576 1,515,505 657,132 1,545,670 (scf/day) Avg scfm 172 450 1,052 456 1,073 Avg scfm 177 461 1,077 467 1,099 (at 50% methane)

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 13 Appendix C APPENDIX D

Subsurface Perimeter and Foundation Probe Monitoring

D1 Subsurface Perimeter and Foundation Probe Monitoring Methodology

D2 Probe Location and Completion Information

D3 Hartland Landfill Gas Monitoring Program 2017 Gas Probe Data

This page intentionally left blank

Appendix D1 Subsurface Perimeter and Foundation Probe Monitoring Methodology

The following is the subsurface probe and foundation monitoring field methodology as outlined in Hartland Landfill Standard Operating Procedures (2012). All monitoring is completed with a LANDTEC Gas Analyzer and Extraction Monitor (GEM) 2000+. Prior to 2011, the GEM 500 model was used.

CALIBRATION

Prior to each monitoring event, the gas analyzer is calibrated using the calibration gases at Hartland. Prior to calibration, the gas monitor is set to Gas Analyzer (GA) mode for ambient measurements.

Methane and carbon dioxide gases are used to calibrate the methane and carbon dioxide sensors, and zero the oxygen sensor. Oxygen gas is used to calibrate the oxygen sensor and zero the methane sensor. All calibration values should be recorded on the field sheet.

MONITORING

Weather conditions, including barometric pressure, precipitation and temperature are recorded prior to commencing work.

The following monitoring procedure is followed for each gas probe:

1. Zero pressure. 2. Connect tubing to the gas sample port (ensure pump is off), open valve, wait until pressure reading stabilizes and record value. 3. Turn on pump and wait at least 200 seconds. 4. Watch for any methane or carbon dioxide spikes. 5. At the end of 200 seconds record the gas concentrations and any spikes on the field sheet. 6. Quickly navigate to the pressure screen and record the static pressure reading (this helps determine whether the screen is plugged/open, or water is covering the screen). 7. Disconnect the tubing from the sampling port and close the gas monitoring valve. 8. Open the water level monitoring port (not all wells will have a water level monitoring port). 9. Follow the same procedure (steps 1–8) for gas probe B. 10. Once monitoring for probe B is completed measure the water level for probe A, followed by probe B. 11. Before moving to the next station, ensure that all valves are closed.

At the end of the day, check gas levels using the calibration gas and record on the field sheet.

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 1 Appendix D

Appendix D2 Probe Location and Completion Information

Probe Probe Location Well Information East Property Boundary Perimeter Probes GP-1A 90 m north of main gate Depth: 10.37 m, Screen height: 2.91 m GP-1B 90 m north of main gate Depth: 5.82 m, Screen height: 2.91 m GP-2A 70 m north of GP-1 Depth: 10.61 m, Screen height: 2.91 m GP-2B 70 m north of GP-1 Depth: 6.36 m, Screen height: 2.91 m GP-3A 120 m north of GP-1 Depth: 10.63 m, Screen height: 2.91 m GP-3B 120 m north of GP-1 Depth: 4.83 m, Screen height: unknown 20 m north of main gate in mountain biking GP-11A Depth: 10.72 m, Screen height: unknown parking lot 20 m north of main gate in mountain biking GP-11B Depth: 5.23 m, Screen height: unknown parking lot GP-12A 50 m north of GP-3 along perimeter road Depth: 9.00 m, Screen height: unknown GP-12B 50 m north of GP-3 along perimeter road Depth: 5.72 m, Screen height: unknown Horizontal Subsurface Building Gas Probes 2.4 m from southeast corner of building GP-4A South east corner of workshop in gravel road Admin building parking lot, behind mountain 3 m along west side of mountain bike GP-5A bike washrooms washroom building GP-6A Northeast corner of admin building 15 m west along north side of building GP-6B Northeast corner of admin building 15 m west along north side of building 10 m south toward southeast corner of GP-7A Against north wall of Hartland admin office building Against wall in southwest corner of Hartland Follows 'H' pattern under building GP-7B admin building extension GP-8A Eastside of auto-scale building Unknown GP-9A Westside of auto-scale building Unknown GP-13A 2 m south of Hartland workshop entrance Unknown GP-14A Westside of Hartland workshop 12 m along east side of workshop North corner of Hartland Interpretive Centre GP-17A Follows building perimeter (monitoring initiated January 2011) GP-18A Northwest corner of the contractor’s workshop Follows building perimeter

Page 2 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix D

Appendix D3 Hartland Landfill Gas Monitoring Program 2017 Gas Probe Data

GAS PROBE 01A Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:52 -12.3 3.46 -4 0.0 0.0 20.9 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:45 1.6 7.58 0.12 0.0 0.0 19.3 --- 23/08/2017 2017 11:26 0.0 7.58 0.12 0.0 0.0 20.1 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:15 -2.0 2.93 -4.53 0.0 0.1 20.7 ---

GAS PROBE 01B Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:55 -10.10 3.83 0.92 0.0 1.3 18.8 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:48 -1.05 5.38 2.47 0.0 1.4 18.1 --- 23/08/2017 2017 11:36 -0.01 4.91 2.00 0.0 0.0 20.0 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:20 -5.00 3.01 0.10 0.0 0.8 20.4 ---

GAS PROBE 02A Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:39 -5.10 3.13 -4.57 0.0 0.0 21.0 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:20 1.03 6.50 -1.20 0.0 0.0 19.2 --- 23/08/2017 2017 11:40 -5.31 7.62 -0.08 0.0 0.0 20.6 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:02 -13.00 2.32 -5.38 0.0 0.0 20.7 ---

GAS PROBE 02B

Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:44 -10.70 4.12 0.67 0.0 2.1 13.9 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:26 -0.07 5.76 2.31 0.0 4.0 7.8 --- 23/08/2017 2017 11:45 -5.98 5.94 2.49 0.0 0.0 20.5 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:10 -6.00 2.71 -0.74 0.0 0.3 20.3 ---

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 3 Appendix D Appendix D3, continued

GAS PROBE 03A Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:33 -5.4 8.62 0.90 0.0 1.7 13.7 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:07 6.1 10.63 2.91 0.0 2.3 8.8 --- 23/08/2017 2017 11:56 -6.0 10.63 2.91 0.0 1.4 13.8 --- 21/12/2017 2017 9:40 -17.2 7.73 0.01 0.0 1.8 14.9 ---

GAS PROBE 03B Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:19 -3.5 3.21 1.29 0.0 4.9 14.2 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:12 2.2 4.75 2.83 0.0 8.8 11.9 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:00 -7.2 4.76 2.84 0.0 1.9 17.9 --- 21/12/2017 2017 9:47 -23.0 9.91 7.99 0.0 0.1 20.6 ---

GAS PROBE 04A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 13:05 -39.9 0.0 0.8 19.6 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:15 -5.1 0.0 1.3 17.9 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:35 0.0 0.0 4.1 20.6 --- 21/12/2017 2017 ------Flooded - unable to measure

GAS PROBE 05A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 10:48 -6.4 0.0 0.5 20.5 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:56 --- 0.0 0.5 19.0 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:40 0.0 0.0 1.3 19.4 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:18 -4.0 0.0 0.6 20.3 ---

Page 4 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix D Appendix D3, continued

GAS PROBE 06A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 10:56 -6.6 0.0 0.6 20.6 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:00 --- 0.0 0.6 18.4 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:15 0.0 0.0 2.0 17.6 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:23 -18.0 0.0 0.9 19.9 ---

GAS PROBE 06B Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:01 -22.9 0.0 0.7 20.2 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:12 --- 0.0 0.3 18.7 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:20 --- 0.0 0.7 19.5 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:26 -7.0 0.0 1.0 19.8 ---

GAS PROBE 07A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:07 -15.2 0.0 0.2 20.6 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:25 -5.3 0.0 0.0 19.1 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:28 -9.3 0.0 0.2 20.4 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:33 -5.0 0.0 0.3 20.4 ---

GAS PROBE 7B Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:14 -35.0 0.0 0.2 20.8 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:35 --- 0.0 0.0 19.2 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:34 -11.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:42 -7.0 0.0 0.1 20.7 ---

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 5 Appendix D Appendix D3, continued

GAS PROBE 08A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:20 -0.9 0.0 0.1 20.9 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:42 -6.2 0.0 0.3 19.1 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:09 0.0 0.0 0.2 20.2 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:48 -5.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 ---

GAS PROBE 09A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:27 -3.8 0.0 0.1 20.6 --- 27/06/2017 2017 11:50 1.9 0.0 0.3 19.1 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:15 0.3 0.0 0.3 20.0 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:53 -14.0 0.0 0.1 20.8 ---

GAS PROBE 11A Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:36 -11.9 4.99 -2.82 0.0 0.0 20.8 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:34 1.0 7.99 0.18 0.0 0.0 19.3 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:49 0.0 7.59 -0.22 0.0 0.2 20.3 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:32 -3.0 2.75 -5.06 0.0 0.1 20.6 ---

GAS PROBE 11B Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:40 -4.2 3.44 1.12 0.0 0.6 20.2 --- 27/06/2017 2017 13:39 -23.0 4.69 2.37 0.0 2.2 17.5 --- 23/08/2017 2017 13:55 0.0 5.85 3.53 0.0 1.8 19.0 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:35 -54.0 2.47 0.15 0.0 0.9 19.9 ---

Page 6 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix D Appendix D3, continued

GAS PROBE 12A Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:06 -15.7 5.22 -0.87 0.0 0.2 21.0 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:50 6.2 10.00 3.91 0.0 2.6 6.9 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:16 -12.5 10.53 4.44 0.0 3.4 9.2 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:30 -11.0 4.85 -1.24 0.0 1.9 16.4 ---

GAS PROBE 12B Pressure/Vacuum Static water level Exposed screen above water Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water metres metres percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 12:10 -6.4 4.16 1.35 0.0 3.3 12.2 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:56 0.3 6.53 3.72 0.0 7.2 6.4 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:21 -13.0 6.53 3.72 0.0 8.1 13.3 --- 21/12/2017 2017 14:37 1.4 3.02 0.21 0.0 0.4 19.6 ---

GAS PROBE 13A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 13:10 -3.4 0.0 1.3 19.7 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:20 1.6 0.0 5.1 14.4 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:43 0.0 0.0 6.1 12.8 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:31 -5.0 0.0 0.7 20.3 ---

GAS PROBE 14A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 13:14 -5.5 0.0 0.2 20.6 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:25 2.4 0.0 1.3 18.0 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:50 0.0 0.0 1.9 18.7 --- 21/12/2017 2017 ------Pump error - Vacuum

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 7 Appendix D Appendix D3, continued

GAS PROBE 17A HLC Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 13:20 -7.1 0.0 0.0 20.9 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:30 4.2 0.0 0.0 19.1 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:58 0.0 0.0 1.9 18.7 --- 21/12/2017 2017 15:26 -7.0 0.0 1.0 19.8 ---

GAS PROBE 18A Pressure/Vacuum Methane (CH4) Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Oxygen (O2) Date Reporting Year Time Comment inches of water percent in air percent in air percent in air 30/03/2017 2017 11:57 -35.5 0.0 0.2 20.5 --- 27/06/2017 2017 12:40 2.5 0.0 0.3 18.6 --- 23/08/2017 2017 12:35 -7.5 0.0 0.1 20.2 --- 21/12/2017 2017 9:30 --- 0.0 0.5 18.3 ---

Page 8 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix D APPENDIX E

Grid and Hot Spot Monitoring

E1 Grid and Hot Spot Monitoring Methodology

E2 2017 Grid and Z Point Monitoring Data

E3 Hartland Landfill Historic Z Point Data

This page intentionally left blank

Appendix E1 Grid and Hot Spot Monitoring Methodology

The following is the grid sampling field methodology as outlined in Hartland Landfill Standard Operating Procedures (2012).

Monitoring usually takes 2 full days, beginning at 0730 hours and ending between 1600 and 1630. Prior to each monitoring day the gas analyzer must be calibrated using the calibration gases at Hartland. At the beginning of each field day the fuel cell for the Flame Ionization Detector (FID) is filled with hydrogen gas and the unit is warmed up for at least 30 minutes before calibration. Calibration is conducted with 2 methane span gases (currently 500 ppm and 14,990 ppm methane) as well as a zero gas to generate a proper calibration slope. After successful calibration, as pan check is done whereby the span gases are applied to the FID and the concentration is recorded on the calibration sheet. In addition, the Jerome sensor is regenerated at the beginning and end of each day to remove any residual hydrogen sulphide on the gold sensor.

The Jerome analyzer is factory calibrated and, therefore, doesn’t require field calibration. After regeneration, the instrument is turned on for 30 minutes before zeroing. Once it is zeroed, the zero filter is attached to the unit and a sample is taken.

MONITORING

There is an established walking pattern over the grid points and it denotes 2 distinct monitoring areas (Phase 1 and Phase 2/Active Face). These areas are monitored separately due to the distinct differences in gas concentrations, level of landfilling activity, and placement of litter fences. This results in acquisition of data from a similar area under similar environmental conditions, as monitoring typically takes 2 days. In each area, the grid points are traversed alphabetically (e.g., B1, B2, B3, B4, etc.) where physically possible. In some cases, litter fences, controlled waste trenches or active filling areas limit or restrict access resulting in deviation from the standard protocol. These deviations should be recorded on the field sheet.

Weather conditions dictate when this monitoring can be completed. The FID cannot operate in rainy conditions and monitoring should be delayed until 2 consecutive days of dry weather are predicted. In addition, high to moderate winds blow gases away from their origin and dilute gas concentrations. These conditions are not representative of typical landfill conditions and monitoring does not take place on these days.

The following procedure is used to collect methane and H2S readings at each grid point:

1. Place the hydrogen sulphide (H2S) analyzer on the ground then press the “Sample” button. 2. The second staff person should place the FID intake controller 4 inches from the ground surface for 30 seconds. 3. Once the H2S analyzer has reported a value (approximately 30 seconds), the methane value should be read from the FID and both values recorded on the field sheet. 4. The FID is programmed to alarm if methane levels exceed 100 ppm. If the alarm sounds while walking a traverse, staff must investigate the area for the source of elevated methane by means of a detailed 10-by-10 metre (m) grid. The 10-by-10 m grid should be traversed between all adjacent grid points. Obvious sources of methane include bird poles or a seam/edge of a temporary closure lining. 5. Once the source has been identified, record the source description, methane and H2S values as well as the location coordinates. This data represents a “hot spot” (>1,000 ppm of methane) or “Z-spot” (>12,500 ppm of methane), identified on Figures 5 and 6 as a red, or purple, ‘X’, respectively. 6. If an obvious source cannot be identified, the location and data/observations from the highest localized reading should be recorded. 7. Continue with this method until all grid points, background stations, and pre-existing Z-spots have been monitored. Pre-existing Z-spots can be removed from the monitoring list if methane levels are below 1,000 ppm for three consecutive monitoring events. 8. At the end of each field day a span check is completed on the FID and recorded on the field sheet.

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 1 Appendix E

Appendix E2 2017 Grid and Z Point Monitoring Data

Table 1. Ambient Monitoring Program

FID Calibration Calibration Check Zero Gas Low Span Gas High Span Gas Date Time Warmup 30 minutes Calibrate Span Check Comments Concentration Reading Concentration Reading Concentration Reading 27-Mar-17 9:48    0.00 500.00 15,000 Saved above span 27-Mar-17 10:05    0.00 -2.2 31-Mar-17 10:05    0.00 500.00 15,000 Saved above span 31-Mar-17 10:15    0.00 -1.48 15,000 1.49% 31-Mar-17 13:15    0.00 -1.90 24-Aug-17 9:55    0.00 -0.99 500.00 441.00 15,000 1.49% 24-Aug-17 10:00    0.00 -1.12 500.00 490.00 15,000 1.47% 24-Aug-17 10:03   0.00 -0.75 24-Aug-17 10:05    0.00 -0.64 Re-zeroed 3 times 25-Aug-17 9:45    0.00 -4.60 500.00 550.00 15,000 1.51% 25-Aug-17 9:47    0.00 -3.49 500.00 502.00 15,000 1.52% 25-Aug-17 9:50    0.00 -3.37 25-Aug-17 9:55    0.00 -3.76 Re-zeroed 3 times, could not get any more accurate

Page 2 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix E

Appendix E2, continued

Table 2. Hartland Landfill VOC & TRS Grid Data

APPROX. Mar-17 Aug-17 LOCATION B1 -2.80 0.000 0.96 0.000 B2 -2.70 0.000 1.19 0.000 B3 -2.80 0.000 1.17 0.000 B4 -2.70 0.000 0.96 0.000 B5 -2.80 0.000 1.42 0.000 B6 -2.80 0.000 1.61 0.000 B7 -3.00 0.000 1.24 0.000 B8 -2.90 0.000 1.32 0.000 B9 -2.80 0.000 1.60 0.000 B10 -2.80 0.000 1.25 0.000 C11 -2.80 0.003 1.44 0.000 C10 -2.40 0.000 1.52 0.000 C9 -3.00 0.000 1.71 0.000 C8 -3.10 0.000 1.61 0.000 C7 -3.00 0.000 1.88 0.000 C6 -2.80 0.000 1.97 0.000 C5 -2.60 0.001 1.76 0.000 C4 -2.70 0.000 1.75 0.000 C3 -3.00 0.001 1.37 0.000 C2 -2.90 0.001 1.24 0.000 C1 -2.80 0.000 1.31 0.000 D1 -2.70 0.000 1.41 0.000 D2 -3.00 0.001 1.43 0.000 D3 -2.80 0.000 1.54 0.000 D4 -2.40 0.000 2.20 0.000 D5 -2.70 0.000 1.92 0.000 D6 -2.50 0.001 2.17 0.000 D7 280.00 0.001 1.85 0.000 D8 -2.40 0.002 98.00 0.000 D9 -2.70 0.001 1.96 0.000 D10 -2.70 0.001 1.92 0.000 D11 -2.80 0.002 -0.44 0.000 E11 31.10 0.001 4.67 0.000 E10 -2.70 0.001 3.03 0.000 E9 2.40 0.000 34.94 0.000 E8 22.00 0.001 53.75 0.000 E7 ------8.19 0.000 E6 -2.40 0.001 -0.47 0.000 E5 -2.30 0.002 -0.52 0.000 E4 -2.40 0.001 -0.98 0.000 E3 -2.20 0.001 1.62 0.000 E2 -2.80 0.000 1.80 0.000 E1 -2.70 0.001 1.43 0.000 F1 -2.60 0.000 -0.71 0.000 F2 -2.30 0.001 -1.04 0.000 F3 -2.40 0.000 -1.17 0.000

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 3 Appendix E

Table 2, continued APPROX. Mar-17 Aug-17 LOCATION F4 -2.40 0.000 -0.35 0.000 F5 ------F6 -2.10 0.001 0.33 0.000 F7 350.00 0.001 380.00 0.000 F8 156.00 0.001 16.82 0.000 F9 -2.30 0.002 2.05 0.000 F10 -1.10 0.002 0.94 0.000 F11 -0.33 0.002 14.01 0.000 G13 -2.50 0.002 10.15 0.000 G12 26.80 0.002 12.66 0.000 G11 -1.00 0.002 1.96 0.000 G10 -1.30 0.002 20.90 0.000 G9 57.10 0.001 120.00 0.000 G8 29.00 0.002 90.67 0.000 G7 220.00 0.002 1.81 0.000 G6 5200.00 0.002 136.00 0.000 G5 -2.50 0.001 1.44 0.000 G4 -2.50 0.000 -0.66 0.000 G3 -2.70 0.001 -0.24 0.000 G2 -2.60 0.001 -1.13 0.000 G1 -2.70 0.001 -1.42 0.000 H1 -2.60 0.001 -1.39 0.000 H2 -2.80 0.001 -1.07 0.000 H3 -2.10 0.001 -0.96 0.000 H4 -2.30 0.001 -0.73 0.000 H5 42.40 0.002 -0.72 0.000 H6 41.10 0.002 25.88 0.000 H7 34.70 0.002 134.00 0.001 H8 34.20 0.001 46.11 0.000 H9 21000.00 0.007 54.87 0.000 H10 104.00 0.000 25.24 0.000 H11 -2.50 0.001 ------I12 4.10 0.002 -0.44 0.000 I11 -0.92 0.002 5.23 0.000 I10 4.90 0.004 22.22 0.000 I9 3.40 0.002 30.75 0.000 I8 10.00 0.001 35.02 0.000 I7 20.40 0.002 11.99 0.000 I6 10.10 0.001 10.64 0.000 I5 14.60 0.000 0.43 0.000 I4 6.90 0.002 0.82 0.000 I3 0.50 0.002 -1.09 0.001 I2 -0.72 0.002 -0.86 0.000 I1 -1.40 0.001 -0.64 0.000 J1 -2.50 0.001 -1.34 0.000 J2 -2.10 0.002 -0.98 0.000 J3 13.10 0.002 -0.42 0.000 J4 -2.10 0.001 -0.75 0.000 J5 4.90 0.002 -0.87 0.000 J6 -0.25 0.001 5.66 0.000

Page 4 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix E

Table 2, continued APPROX. Mar-17 Aug-17 LOCATION J7 -0.14 0.000 ------J8 165.00 0.002 -0.79 0.000 J9 15.70 0.001 14.66 0.001 K13 -0.89 0.000 K12 12.10 0.002 -1.06 0.000 K11 10.80 0.002 23.72 0.000 K10 1.70 0.002 8.99 0.000 K9 3.10 0.002 31.65 0.000 K8 30.10 0.002 62.75 0.000 K7 2.90 0.001 ------K6 0.95 0.002 7.17 0.000 K5 2.70 0.002 -0.18 0.000 K4 1.90 0.003 -0.20 0.000 K3 -1.40 0.000 -0.47 0.000 K2 -2.10 0.001 -0.82 0.000 K1 -2.10 0.002 -0.96 0.000 L1 -2.30 0.002 -2.27 0.000 L2 -2.40 0.000 -2.18 0.000 L3 -1.20 0.002 -1.92 0.000 L4 -1.60 0.001 -1.88 0.000 L5 -1.30 0.000 -2.10 0.000 L6 4.00 0.002 -0.88 0.000 L7 5.30 0.000 ------L8 10.82 0.000 ------L9 12.90 0.000 ------L10 29.90 0.000 10.97 0.000 L11 8.60 0.001 -0.02 0.000 L12 54.60 0.001 32.54 0.000 L13 11.76 0.000 L14 4.90 0.002 6.27 0.000 M14 14.60 0.001 -0.98 0.000 M13 16.40 0.002 33.39 0.000 M12 5.01 0.002 3.32 0.000 M11 17.40 0.001 -2.49 0.000 M10 6.54 0.001 ------M9 9.07 0.002 ------M8 4.48 0.001 ------M7 1.14 0.001 ------M6 3.93 0.000 -1.77 0.000 M5 1.06 0.000 -1.82 0.000 M4 -0.06 0.000 -1.96 0.000 M3 -2.60 0.001 1.61 0.000 M2 1.25 0.001 0.89 0.000 M1 -1.30 0.001 -1.54 0.000 N1 0.24 0.002 -2.73 0.000 N2 0.00 0.002 -0.61 0.000 N3 -0.15 0.002 -1.88 0.000 N4 -0.07 0.002 -1.77 0.000 N5 0.32 0.002 -1.74 0.000 N6 -0.09 0.002 -2.00 0.000

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 5 Appendix E

Table 2, continued APPROX. Mar-17 Aug-17 LOCATION N7 1.13 0.002 -1.67 0.000 N8 6.65 0.002 -1.88 0.000 N9 7.38 0.002 ------N10 4.65 0.000 -2.54 0.000 N11 6.81 0.002 -2.45 0.000 N12 1.60 0.002 -1.07 0.000 N13 -2.42 0.000 P4 4.55 0.002 -1.41 0.000 P3 0.96 0.002 -1.41 0.000 P2 2.22 0.002 -1.81 0.001 P1 2.12 0.001 -1.67 0.001

Page 6 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix E

Appendix E2, continued

Table 3. Hartland Landfill VOC & TRS Background Monitoring

Mar-17 Aug-17 WayPoint VOC TRS VOC TRS (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) Back 1 0.04 0.00 -1.27 0.00 Back 7 0.14 0.00 -3.12 0.00 Back 6 0.52 0.01 1.06 0.00 Back 21 0.24 0.00 -1.35 0.00 Back 20 4.66 0.00 -1.33 0.00 Back 10 -0.26 0.00 -1.22 0.00 Back 11 -0.10 0.00 0.95 0.00 Back 13 -0.05 0.00 -1.69 0.00

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 7 Appendix E

Appendix E2, continued

Table 4. Hartland Landfill VOC from Walkabout

Mar-17 Aug-17 Point VOC (ppm) TRS (ppm) VOC (ppm) TRS (ppm) Z80 MISSED MISSED -1.05 0.000 Z87 30.90 0.002 10.27 0.000 Z88 4,700 0.001 10,300 0.001 Z94 14,000 0.002 11,300 0.003 Z100 9.85 0.002 580 0.000 Z101 8,500 0.001 85.81 0.000 Z104 6,600 0.002 172 0.000 Z106 11,000 0.002 1,989 0.000 Z107 4.56 0.002 -1.26 0.000 Z109 13,000 0.002 1,199 0.000 Z111 1,200 0.002 1,127 0.000 Z112 13.60 0.001 4.18 0.000 Z113 25,000 0.000 17,300 0.000 Z114 25,000 0.000 13,100 0.000 Z115 16.4 0.000 MISSED MISSED Z116 25,000 0.001 23,500 0.000 Z117 MISSED MISSED MISSED MISSED Z118 25.40 0.003 1,032 0.000 Z119 6,966 0.004 8,890 0.000 Z120 17,000 -0.66 0.000 Z122 8,500 0.001 7,224 0.000 Z123 8,400 0.002 365 0.000 Z124 6,300 0.015 6,645 0.002 Z125 14,000 0.002 3,002 0.000

Page 8 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix E

Appendix E3 Hartland Landfill Historical Z-Point Data 2012 2017 2011 2012 2015 2016 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018

Sort 2010 2011 2009 2013 2012 2014 ------Northing Easting Point Created - - Source Order Active? Jul Jul Oct Oct Jan Jan Jun Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Dec Dec Sep Sep May Aug

5376376.24 465770.27 Z1 1 Apr-2001 N 5376382.91 465752.09 Z2 2 Apr-2001 N 5376390.19 465731.55 Z3 3 Apr-2001 N 5376404.12 465695.20 Z4 4 Apr-2001 N 5376409.56 465682.96 Z5 5 Apr-2001 N 5376307.82 465646.30 Z6 6 Apr-2001 N 5376379.40 465641.99 Z7 7 Apr-2001 N 5376358.61 465629.59 Z8 8 Apr-2001 N 5376294.56 465571.38 Z9 9 Apr-2001 N 5376288.59 465571.74 Z10 10 Apr-2001 N 5376301.61 465588.85 Z11 11 Apr-2001 N 5376153.49 465921.77 Z12 12 Apr-2001 N 5376069.56 465700.69 Z13 13 Jun-2003 N ------Z14 14 n/a N ------Z15 15 n/a N ------Z16 16 n/a N ------Z17 17 n/a N ------Z18 18 n/a N ------Z19 19 n/a N 5376240.81 465682.72 Z20 20 Dec-2001 N 5376249.22 465672.08 Z21 21 Nov-2002 N 5376140.63 465682.91 Z22 22 Dec-2001 N 5376199.46 465617.53 Z23 23 Dec-2001 N 5376344.34 465719.78 Z24 24 Dec-2001 N 5376341.83 465741.15 Z25 25 Dec-2001 N 5376332.13 465767.23 Z26 26 Dec-2001 N 5376157.75 465907.15 Z27 27 Jun-2003 N 5376127.51 465683.22 Z28 28 Jun-2003 N 5376305.09 465604.31 Z29 29 Nov-2003 N 5376154.49 465756.65 Z30 30 Nov-2003 N 5375849.50 465901.32 Z31 31 Dec-2004 N 5376179.56 465851.44 Z32 32 Dec-2004 N 5376200.63 465818.31 Z33 33 Dec-2004 N 5376157.59 465835.86 Z34 34 Dec-2004 N 5376147.38 465848.08 Z35 35 Dec-2004 N 5376099.41 465792.74 Z36 36 Dec-2004 N 5376298.24 465750.39 Z37 37 Dec-2004 N 15 5376283.62 465801.38 Z38 38 Dec-2004 N 5376322.83 465824.59 Z39 39 Dec-2004 N 5375817.05 465744.70 Z40 40 Mar-2005 N 5376147.36 465850.85 Z41 41 Sep-2005 N DISCON 5376155.19 465838.23 Z42 42 Sep-2005 N 14,400 --- 1,285 1,116 1,442 667 --- 565 --- 4.27 10.56 TINUED 5376256.03 465630.94 Z43 43 Mar-2005 N 5376364.18 465792.37 Z44 44 Mar-2005 N 5376338.64 465774.39 Z45 45 Feb-2006 N 5376322.08 465752.91 Z46 46 Feb-2006 N 5376175.39 465850.23 Z47 47 Feb-2006 N 16,700 5376101.47 465847.01 Z48 48 Feb-2006 N 121 5375901.10 465848.17 Z49 49 Feb-2006 N 13 5375953.93 465888.09 Z50 50 Feb-2006 N 43 5376100.18 465962.24 Z51 51 Feb-2006 N 3 5375975.37 465696.95 Z52 52 Feb-2006 N 18 5376194.67 465817.08 Z53 53 Feb-2006 N 5376112.28 465834.80 Z54 54 Feb-2007 N 56 5376360.04 465590.39 Z55 55 Feb-2007 N 5376230.52 465707.61 Z56 56 Feb-2007 N

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 9 Appendix E

2012 2017 2011 2012 2015 2016 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018

Sort 2010 2011 2009 2013 2012 2014 ------Northing Easting Point Created - - Source Order Active? Jul Jul Oct Oct Jan Jan Jun Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Dec Dec Sep Sep May Aug

5376146.42 465711.45 Z57 57 Feb-2007 N 13,500 5376156.98 465740.43 Z58 58 Feb-2007 N 14 5376179.09 465731.85 Z59 59 Feb-2007 N Z60 60 n/a N 5375826.01 465743.17 Z61 61 Mar-2007 N Z62 62 n/a N 5376202.48 465808.02 Z63 63 Mar-2007 N 432 DISCON 5376222.89 465785.18 Z64 64 Mar-2007 N 61,300 1,020 23,500 467 52 53 34.34 TINUED 5376022.24 465735.25 Z65 65 Mar-2007 N 5376254.13 465648.75 Z66 66 Mar-2007 N 5376200.88 465678.92 Z67 67 Mar-2007 N 10,100 5376231.00 465640.00 Z68 68 Nov-2007 N 17 5376259.00 465772.00 Z69 69 Mar-2008 N 2 5376112.00 465801.00 Z70 70 Nov-2007 N 5376097.00 465704.00 Z71 71 Sep-2008 N 573 5376153.49 465921.77 Z72 72 Sep-2008 N 5376307.59 465739.45 Z73 73 Sep-2008 N 3 5376230.77 465743.00 Z74 74 Sep-2008 N 5375953.74 465849.99 Z75 75 Sep-2008 N 26 5376050.48 465710.00 Z76 76 Feb-2009 N 33 5376051.20 465820.81 Z77 77 Feb-2009 N 13 5376222.29 465772.39 Z78 78 Feb-2009 N 97 5376120.72 465805.84 Z79 79 Feb-2009 N 88 5376199.66 465562.00 Z80 80 Oct-2009 ACTIVE 26,800 13,100 48,600 21,100 15,000 12,500 14 66.1 5,048 326 5032 MISSED MISSED 0 79 5376249.92 465708.55 Z81 81 Oct-2009 N 106 5376240.56 465727.11 Z82 82 Oct-2009 N 5376354.32 465720.64 Z83 83 Oct-2009 N 5 DISCON 5375847.24 465856.80 Z84 84 Jan-2010 N 56 9,890 3,706 12,000 886 12 174 TINUED 5375908.06 465797.51 Z85 85 Jan-2010 N 24 DISCON 5376299.34 465738.10 Z86 86 Jan-2010 N 21,000 11,700 32,200 28,800 2,798 4 38 18,600 3,076 8 35 4.01 TINUED 5376293.64 465535.40 Z87 87 Jan-2010 ACTIVE 60,000 51,700 38,000 11,700 15,000 7,200 29 10,800 20,800 1,326 13 0.7 MISSED 10.27 MISSED 5376317.71 465627.16 Z88 88 Jan-2010 ACTIVE 50,000 0 2,395 15,000 22,000 15,000 10,300 15,000 8,720 3,600 41,700 8,919 10,500 15,400 15700 4,700 10,300 6,370 Infrastructure box near top of N. face closure tarp Z89 89 N 170 Z90 90 N 3,028 Z91 91 N 364 Z92 92 ACTIVE 1,049 15,000 19,200 52 463 Z93 93 N 23 3,791 56 70.9 5376339.03 465598.07 Z94 94 Jan-2011 ACTIVE 12,500 20,000 15,000 15,000 79,700 15,000 12,500 MISSED 23,800 73,200 42,100 41,400 134 14,000 11,300 16,700 Ripped tarp - north closure DISCON Z95 95 N 1,490 34,400 34,400 3 29 12 TINUED DISCON Z96 96 N 927 3,668 423 261 28 TINUED DISCON Z97 97 N 1,750 2,280 2 5 37 TINUED DISCON Z98 98 N 5,364 1,032 7 1 1 TINUED Z99 99 N 3,800 --- 5376298.15 465682.45 Z100 100 ACTIVE 2,300 15,000 15,000 10,800 15,000 12,500 1,088 18,900 314 5,685 11,200 3.21 MISSED MISSED 580 5376283.35 465708.83 Z101 101 Dec-2011 ACTIVE 11,700 23 17,800 30,900 15,000 12,500 127 14,500 17,600 2,803 28,200 52 8,500 85.81 1,400 Side of Bench Road between L11 to M11 DISCON Z102 102 N 9,657 14,700 352 360 13 3 TINUED Z103 103 ACTIVE 13,700 15,000 6,400 2,531 12,500 27 5.4 5376171.21 465831.76 Z104 104 Mar-2012 ACTIVE 32,500 18,000 19,400 5,325 12,500 2,510 36,500 12,300 19,700 1,168 84 6,600 172 4 West face closure - Bench Road by K8 DISCON Z105 105 ACTIVE 6,766 3,865 1,531 360 88 36 TINUED 5376327.32 465654.99 Z106 106 May-2012 ACTIVE 61,300 35,700 42,000 12,500 6,566 2,693 9,300 2,072 8,086 50,300 11,000 1989 0 LFG infrastructure on N. face interim closure 5376291.17 465680.05 Z107 107 ACTIVE 1,600 3,376 25 113 25,000 12,200 83 23,500 8 0

Page 10 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix E

2012 2017 2011 2012 2015 2016 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018

Sort 2010 2011 2009 2013 2012 2014 ------Northing Easting Point Created - - Source Order Active? Jul Jul Oct Oct Jan Jan Jun Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Dec Dec Sep Sep May Aug

Z108 108 ACTIVE 12,500 7 0.31 15,500 3 5376181.69 465671.86 Z109 109 Dec-2012 ACTIVE 1,800 88 52 7,559 13 30,100 3 7,924 13,000 1,199 1 Tarp seam along W. face closure Z110 110 LFG infrastructure (small culvert with a 2" gas line running 5376292.76 465689.88 Z111 111 Dec-2012 ACTIVE 138,900 10,900 4,200 53.2 26,900 385 5,270 84 1,200 1,127 2 through it - W. face closure near gas well Z112 112 ACTIVE 12,500 12 76,800 32 48,400 7,000 105 1 5376254.68 465641.39 Z113 113 Oct-2013 ACTIVE 9,466 5,900 30,000 31,600 MISSED 26,700 25,000 17,300 9 Hole in tarp 5376257.42 465644.69 Z114 114 Oct-2013 ACTIVE 48,400 --- 34,400 11,400 MISSED 185 25,000 13,100 12 Hole in tarp Z115 115 ACTIVE 61,800 --- 6,560 12,900 MISSED 1 MISSED MISSED MISSED 5376251.73 465651.90 Z116 116 Mar-2013 ACTIVE --- MISSED MISSED MISSED MISSED 25,000 23,500 21 Hole in tarp Z117 117 ACTIVE 26,500 MISSED 30,700 MISSED 6 MISSED MISSED 9 5376314.21 465611.88 Z118 118 Jul-2014 ACTIVE 12,600 3600 MISSED 9,639 10 25 1,032 1,407 Hole in tarp 5376296.43 465718.43 Z119 119 Jul-2014 ACTIVE 15,900 15,900 16,200 7,000 4,773 6,966 8,890 3,100 4 holes along LFG pipe 5376250.71 465549.48 Z120 120 Mar-2015 ACTIVE 16,900 MISSED 2 17,000 -0.66 4 3 large holes in tarp, 10 ft west of L14 Z121 121 ACTIVE 1,000 5375693.77 465680.50 Z122 122 Mar-2017 ACTIVE MISSED 8,500 7,224 MISSED Concrete box infrastructure with black lid 5376018.60 465942.74 Z123 123 Mar-2017 ACTIVE MISSED 8,400 365 MISSED Yellow manhole lid, near Z122 5376156.54 465848.29 Z124 124 Mar-2017 ACTIVE MISSED 6,300 6,645 3,288 Concrete box infrastructure with silver lid by road 5376155.12 465848.01 Z125 125 Mar-2017 ACTIVE MISSED 14,000 3,002 5,028 Box adjacent to Z124, slightly South DISCON Z126 126 Mar-2018 100 TINUED Existing hot spots surveyed 0 1 1 2 44 12 19 18 22 25 28 32 25 23 23 28 22 23 23 Missed (m) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 6 6 5 3 4 Active z pts at start 0 1 1 2 44 12 19 18 22 25 28 32 25 23 23 28 26 23 23 Added - new (n) 4 5 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 1 Discontinued at end of survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 Max Methane Concentration 0 50,000 0 12,500 61,300 51,700 61,300 79,700 138,900 12,500 61,800 76,800 73,200 48,400 41,400 50,300 25,000 23,500 16,700

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 11 Appendix E APPENDIX F

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Data

F1 Hartland Landfill Historical VOC Data F2 Hartland Landfill Ambient VOC Data

This page intentionally left blank

Appendix F1 Hartland Landfill Historical VOC Data

99 06 99

98 00 01 05 11 99 00 09 17 00 13 - 15 ------

Parameter Date Jul Jul Oct Mar Mar Mar Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Nov May - Aug Jun (8 hr) hr) (8 STEL (ppm) - Danger 2 27 - 23 - Minimum 18 - Maximum 11 - 29 - 17 - 17 - 20 - 12 - 20 - 13 - 30 - 25 - 11 - WCB LimitWCB

CAS ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Acetone 67-64-1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.59 ND ------6.59 ND 250 ppm 500 ppm Benzene 71-43-2 0.22 0.5 0.28 0.41 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.13 0.82 0.59 0.68 0.68 1.27 0.51 0.65 1.27 0.11 0.5 ppm 2.5 ppm skin; A1, 1 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 ------Bromoform 75-25-2 ------ND ------0.5 Bromomethane (Methyl bromide) 74-83-9 ------ND ND ND ND 1 skin n-butane 106-97-8 ------16.72 4.7 <1 0.01 4.0 16.72 4.70 600 750 2-Butanone 78-93-3 ------5.33 1.33 --- 0.95 --- 5.33 1.33 50 100 Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 ------ND ND ND ND 2 skin; A2, 2B Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.18 0.06 ------0.26 0.13 0.11 0.05 0.03 ND 0.26 0.05 10 Chloroethane (Ethyl chloride) 75-00-3 0.4 0.3 0.31 0.22 0.14 0.15 ------0.36 ------0.40 0.14 100 skin Chloroform 67-66-3 ------ND 0.03 ND 0.03 ND 2 2B; R Chloromethane (methyl chloride) 74-87-3 ------ND ND ND ND 50 100 skin; R Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 ------1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 ------ND ND ND ND 0.5 skin; 2A Dibromomethane 74-95-3 ------0.09 ------0.09 0.09 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 9.7 3.5 26.4 2.06 1.8 0.96 8.62 ------53.25 --- 4.04 0.65 --- 53.25 0.96 1,000 1,2-dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 --- 0.03 ------0.01 0.01 ND 0.03 0.01 25 50 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 ------1,4-dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 0.03 0.4 0.1 ------0.13 --- 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.05 0.40 0.03 10 2B 1-1,dichloroethane 75-34-3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.16 0.06 0.07 0.05 --- 0.36 0.2 --- 0.11 ND 0.07 0.08 0.36 ND 100 1-2,dichloroethane 107-06-2 ------0.03 0.07 0.20 0.09 0.09 0.20 0.03 1 2 2B 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-34-4 ------1,2-dichloroethylene 156-59-2 1 1.4 1 1.3 0.61 0.52 0.34 0.4 1.35 0.89 --- 0.61 1.02 0.52 0.88 1.40 0.34 200 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 ------0.03 ------0.04 --- ND 0.03 0.04 0.03 200 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 ------0.03 --- 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 75 110 S 1,3-Dichloropropene 542-75-6 ------ND --- ND ND 1 skin; 2B Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2.5 5 2.8 5.2 2.21 1.77 3.1 1.05 5.70 5.06 4.11 1.99 3.06 2.28 3.06 5.70 1.05 20 2B n-heptane 142-82-5 ------0.22 ND --- 2.18 2.26 2.18 ND 400 500 n-hexane 110-54-3 ------2.02 2 --- 1.99 1.33 2.02 ND 20 skin 2-Hexanone 591-78-6 ------ND ND ND ND 5 10 skin; R Isopropanol 67-63-0 ------3.44 ND ------3.44 ND 200 400 Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8 ------0.23 ND --- 0.09 0.12 0.23 0.23 25 75 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 123-42-2 ------0.08 ------0.08 0.08 50 Methyl acetate 79-20-9 ------0.32 ND ------0.32 ND 200 250 Methylene Chloride (syn: Dichloromethane) 75-09-2 ------0.16 0.04 --- ND ND 0.16 0.04 25 2B n-nonane 111-84-2 ------1.84 ND ------1.84 ND 200 n-octane 111-65-9 ------0.37 ND ------0.37 ND 300 n-pentane 109-66-0 ------0.17 11.3 --- 0.00345 1.6 11.30 0.17 600 phenol 108-95-2 ------3.03 ND ------3.03 ND 5 skin Styrene 100-42-5 0.1 0.6 0.1 ------0.05 0.09 0.04 ------0.17 0.25 ND 0.0995 0.16 0.60 0.04 50 75 2B 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ------ND ND ND ND 1 skin Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.04 1.20 0.2 0.07 0.09 0.0643 0.08 1.20 0.04 25 100 2A Toluene 108-88-3 4.5 6.5 5.6 7.85 3.07 2.56 3.13 1.08 9.90 5.84 12.67 2.83 4.25 6.14 6.98 12.67 1.08 20 R 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 0.04 0.1 0.04 0.04 ------0.03 0.04 0.02 0.01585 0.02 0.10 0.02 350 450 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 ------ND ND ND ND 10 skin Trichloroethene 79-01-6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.02 --- 0.18 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.07 ------0.18 0.02 10 25 A2, 2A Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 --- 0.18 0.16 --- 0.13 --- 0.121 --- 0.18 0.05 C 1000

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 1 Appendix F Appendix F1, continued

99 06 99

98 00 01 05 11 99 00 09 17 00 13 - 15 ------

Parameter Date Jul Jul Oct Mar Mar Mar Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Nov May - Aug Jun (8 hr) hr) (8 STEL (ppm) - Danger 2 27 - 23 - Minimum 18 - Maximum 11 - 29 - 17 - 17 - 20 - 12 - 20 - 13 - 30 - 25 - 11 - WCB LimitWCB

CAS ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 ------1.52 ND ------1.52 ND Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 2.2 1.4 2.8 4.75 1.57 0.69 1.3 5.98 1.45 ND 1.86 4.40 1.165 1.02 5.98 0.69 1 A1, 1 Xylenes 1330-20-7 4.7 9.9 6.3 20.5 4.38 3.31 6.27 1.26 11.05 10.98 7.87 1 6.47 4.29 6.49 20.50 1.00 100 150 Methane 74-82-8 ------46.3 (%) 47(%) 46(%) 48.1(%) 47 (%) 48.10 46(%) 1000 ppm Carbon dioxide 124-38-9 ------35 (%) 32.3 (%) 27.5(%) 34.5(%) 32.7 (%) 35.00 27.5 (%) 5000 ppm 15000 ppm Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 ------40.33 16.70 41.00 85.00 22.00 85.00 16.70 10 ppm ceiling Aliphatic hydrocarbon gases Ethane 78-84-0 ------Butane 106-97-8 ------16.72 4.70 --- 7.95 4.0 16.72 4.70 600 ppm 750 ppm Butene 9003-28-5 ------ND ND Pentene 646-04-08 ------ND ND Propane 74-98-6 ------28.00 11.00 35.50 30.50 28 35.50 11.00 1000 ppm Ethene 74-85-1 ------2.80 --- <1 3.25 3.0 3.25 2.80 200 ppm Propene 115-07-1 ------3.50 4.30 --- 9.50 10 9.50 3.50 500 ppm Pentane 109-66-0 ------2.60 --- 3.85 3.45 2 3.85 2.60 600 ppm Hexene 592-41-6 ------3.40 --- <1 ------3.40 3.40 50 ppm R Notes: Blank cells =Not analyzed ND = not detected All data taken from the gas plant piping after the blowers The term "Skin" identifies substances that contribute significantly to the overall exposure by the skin route. For more information see OHS Guideline G5.52. ACGIH notations A1 and A2 and IARC notations 1, 2A and 2B indicate substances designated as carcinogens under section 5.57(1) of the OHS Regulation. The different Categories used by the two organizations indicate different levels of certainty of carcinogenic effect, e.g. from confirmed carcinogen to probable or possible. For more Information see OHS Guideline G5.57. The letter "R" means that the substance has an adverse reproductive effect under section 5.57(1) of the OHS Regulation. For more information see OHS Guideline G5.57. The letter "S" indicates that the substance is a sensitizer under section 5.57(1) of the OHS Regulation. For more information see OHS Guideline G5.57. The letter "C" indicates a ceiling limit, which is defined in section 5.1 of the OHS Regulation.

Page 2 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix F

Appendix F2 Hartland Landfill Gas Plant Pre- and Post- Condition Skid

Laboratory : Maxxam Report number : B7N0191 Project : HARTLAND LANDFILL GAS[B791194] Date received : 10/18/17 CRD sample identification SF7948-LFG 1 SF7949-LFG 2 Reserved for CRD use Pre - conditioner Post Conditioner Lab sample identification FIU369 FIU370 Lab sample type CAS Reduction Detection Date Time Date Time Parameter Units Method Result 1 Result 3 from Pre to Limit extracted extracted analyzed analyzed Post 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 35 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 117 73 38% 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 44 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 35 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 26 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 321 227 29% 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 39 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 26 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 357 212 41% 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 30 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 133 96 28% 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 39 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 281 102 64% 2-propanol 67-63-0 480 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Benzene 71-43-2 37 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 2070 1400 32% Bromoform 75-25-2 130 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Bromomethane 74-83-9 25 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 41 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 350 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND 134 Chloroethane 75-00-3 51 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 293 201 31% Chloroform 67-66-3 32 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Chloromethane 74-87-3 40 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 26 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 3470 2140 38% cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 29 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Cumene (Isopropylbenzene) 98-82-8 160 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 590 335 43% Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 75-71-8 64 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 1710 1200 30% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 56 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 13300 7030 47% Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 25 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Heptane 142-82-5 80 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 9250 5810 37% Hexane 110-54-3 69 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 4690 3340 29% Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 591-78-6 270 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 3 Appendix F Appendix F2, continued

Laboratory : Maxxam Report number : B7N0191 Project : HARTLAND LANDFILL GAS[B791194] Date received : 10/18/17 CRD sample identification SF7948-LFG 1 SF7949-LFG 2 Reserved for CRD use Pre - conditioner Post Conditioner Lab sample identification FIU369 FIU370 Lab sample type CAS Reduction Detection Date Time Date Time Parameter Units Method Result 1 Result 3 from Pre to Limit extracted extracted analyzed analyzed Post Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 78-93-3 3500 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND 486 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 108-10-1 270 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 75-09-2 180 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND o-Xylene 95-47-6 56 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 5790 2970 49% m+p-Xylenes 100 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 22400 11400 49% Styrene 100-42-5 55 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 666 346 48% Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 44 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 542 397 27% Toluene 108-88-3 98 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 26300 16700 37% Total Xylenes 1330-20-7 170 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 28200 14400 49% trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 26 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 121 ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 542-75-6 29 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 ND ND Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 35 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 412 314 24% Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 75-69-4 73 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 203 149 27% Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 17 ug/m3 VOCCALC-A 19/10/2017 19/10/2017 2620 1750 33% Carbon Dioxide 124-38-9 0.1 % v/v MATRIX GAS 19/10/2017 15:25 19/10/2017 15:25 32.7 32.5 1% Methane 74-82-8 0.1 % v/v MATRIX GAS 19/10/2017 15:25 19/10/2017 15:25 47.0 46.8 0% Hydrogen Sulphide 7783-06-4 1.6 ppmv H2S 18/10/2017 09:15 18/10/2017 09:15 22 23 -5% Ethylene 74-85-1 0.1 ppm LIGHT HHC 19/10/2017 15:24 19/10/2017 15:24 3.0 3.0 0% n-Butane 106-97-8 0.1 ppm LIGHT HHC 19/10/2017 15:24 19/10/2017 15:24 4.0 4.4 -10% n-Pentane 109-66-0 0.1 ppm LIGHT HHC 19/10/2017 15:24 19/10/2017 15:24 1.6 1.8 -13% Propane 74-98-6 0.1 ppm LIGHT HHC 19/10/2017 15:24 19/10/2017 15:24 28 27 4% 115-07-1 0.1 ppm LIGHT HHC 19/10/2017 15:24 19/10/2017 15:24 10 9.7 3% Cumene (Isopropylbenzene) 98-82-8 40 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 120 68 43% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 13 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 15:56 18/10/2017 15:56 3070 1620 47% Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 4.0 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 ND ND Heptane 142-82-5 24 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 2260 1420 37% Hexane 110-54-3 24 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 1330 947 29% o-Xylene 95-47-6 16 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 1330 683 49%

Page 4 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix F Appendix F2, continued

Laboratory : Maxxam Report number : B7N0191 Project : HARTLAND LANDFILL GAS[B791194] Date received : 10/18/17 CRD sample identification SF7948-LFG 1 SF7949-LFG 2 Reserved for CRD use Pre - conditioner Post Conditioner Lab sample identification FIU369 FIU370 Lab sample type CAS Reduction Detection Date Time Date Time Parameter Units Method Result 1 Result 3 from Pre to Limit extracted extracted analyzed analyzed Post m+p-Xylenes 95-47-6 30 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 5170 2640 49% Styrene 100-42-5 16 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 156 81 48% Toluene 108-88-3 16 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 6970 4420 37% Total Xylenes 95-47-6 48 ppbv VOCHYD-A 18/10/2017 11:10 18/10/2017 11:10 6500 3320 49% Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ( 1 ) 29.2 Chloroethane 75-00-3 24 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 111 76 32% Chloroform 67-66-3 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND Chloromethane 74-87-3 24 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 875 539 38% cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 75-71-8 16 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 345 244 29% Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 591-78-6 80 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 78-93-3 1200 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ( 2 ) 165 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 108-10-1 80 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 75-09-2 64 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 79.9 58.6 27% trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 30.5 ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 ND ND Trichloroethylene 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 76.6 58.5 24% Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 16 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 36 26 28% Vinyl Chloride 8.0 ppbv VOCTO15M-A 18/10/2017 09:49 18/10/2017 09:49 1020 684 33% Avg reduction 31% Notes: ( 1 ) Increased DL due to hydrocarbon interference. ( 2 ) Increased DL due to hexane interference. ( 3 ) Please note that the recovery of some compounds are outside control limits however the overall quality control for this analysis meets our acceptability criteria.

Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Page 5 Appendix F

Appendix F3 Hartland Landfill Ambient VOC Data

Date 30-Nov-99 20-Dec-00 19-Dec-01 Site Maint. G-9 J-6 P-5 Background F-8 I-8 D-11 North Toe #5 D-11 J-6 J-7 H-8 Z-9 Z-11 Z-24 Z-26 Parameter (ppm) Shop Total Hydrocarbons 1.1 1849.0 13984.0 10.0 19999.0 2184.0 15354.0 6560.0 11736.0 6028.0 17793.0 ND >20,000 >20,000 >20,000 >20,000 Benezene 0.0 0.0 0.0046* 0.0 0.0 0.0 < 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 < < < < Chlorobenzene < < 0.0 < 0.0 < < 0.0 < 0.0 < 0.0 < < < < Ethylbenzene < < 0.002* 0.0 0.0023* 0.0 < 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 < < < < Tetrachloroethene < 0.0 0.0 < < < < 0.0 < 0.0 0.0 0.0 < < < < Toluene 0.0 0.0087* 0.0076* 0.0 0.009* 0.0058* < < 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 < < < < Xylenes 0.0 0.0 0.004* 0.0 0.0041* 0.0 < 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 < < < < Notes: < Below detection limit * Sample saturated, actual results could be 20 to 100% higher ND Not done

Page 6 Hartland Landfill 2017 Landfill Gas Monitoring Report Appendix F APPENDIX G

Other Landfill Emissions Reports

G1 National Pollutant Release Inventory (ECCC) G2 BC Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report (BC MOE) G3 Facility Greenhouse Gas Report (ECCC) This page intentionally left blank Canada.gc.ca Services Departments Français

National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and Partners

Home Submission Management Help My Profile:Kelly Tradewell Logout Ec.gc.ca

SWIM 2017 Capital Regional District Hartland Landfill Report Preview Report Preview

Report Details

Report Year 2017

Report Type: NPRI

Report Status: Submitted

Modified Date/Time: 14/05/2018 6:33 PM

Company and Facility Details

Company Name: Capital Regional District

Business Number: 121399836

Mailing Address: Delivery Mode: GeneralDelivery PO Box: 1000 Address Line 1: 625 Fisgard Street City, Province/Territory, Postal Code: Victoria BritishColumbia V8W2S6 Country: Canada

Facility Name: Hartland Landfill

NAICS Code: 562210

NPRI ID: 18993

Physical Address: Address Line 1: 1 Hartland Avenue City, Province/Territory, Postal Code: Victoria BritishColumbia V9E1J9 Country: Canada Latitude: 48.5369 Longitude: ­123.46284

Permits

Number or Permit Number: 12659

Government Department, Agency, or Program BC Ministry of Environment ­ Operational Certificate Name:

Number or Permit Number: SC97.001

Government Department, Agency, or Program CRD Regional Source Control Program ­ Sewer Discharge Permit Name:

Contacts Details

Contact Type Technical Contact, Certifying Official

Name: Kelly Tradewell

Position: Environmental Contaminants Officer

Telephone: 2503603154

Email: [email protected]

Contact Type Public Contact Name: Chris Robins

Position: Manager of Operations

Telephone: 2503603219

Email: [email protected]

General Information

Number of employees: 20

Activities for Which the 20,000­Hour Employee None of the above Threshold Does Not Apply:

Activities Relevant to Reporting Dioxins, None of the above Furans and Hexacholorobenzene:

Activities Relevant to Reporting of Polycyclic Wood preservation using creosote: No Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs):

Is this the first time the facility is reporting to No the NPRI (under current or past ownership):

Is the facility controlled by another Canadian No company or companies:

Did the facility report under other Yes environmental regulations or permits:

Is the facility required to report one or more Yes NPRI Part 4 substances (Criteria Air Contaminants):

Was the facility shut down for more than one No week during the year:

Operating Schedule ­ Days of the Week: Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat

Usual Number of Operating Hours per day: 8

Usual Daily Start Time (24h) (hh:mm): 09:00

Substance List

CAS RN Substance Name Releases Releases (Speciated VOCs) Disposals Recycling Unit

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated 135.3970 N/A N/A N/A kg

NA ­ M09 PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns 19.8430 N/A N/A N/A tonnes

NA ­ M10 PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns 13.8580 N/A N/A N/A tonnes

108­88­3 Toluene 1.1710 N/A N/A N/A tonnes

NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter 39.0680 N/A N/A N/A tonnes

Applicable Programs

First report for CAS RN Substance Name NPRI ON MOE TRA ON MOE Reg 127/01 this substance to the ON MOE TRA

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated Yes

NA ­ M09 PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns Yes

NA ­ M10 PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns Yes

108­88­3 Toluene Yes

NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter Yes

General Information about the Substance ­ Releases and Transfers of the Substance

Substance Was the substance The substance will be reported as the sum of releases 1 tonne or more of a Part 5 Substance CAS RN Name released on­site to all media (total of 1 tonne or less) (Speciated VOC) was released to air

PAHs, total NA ­ P/H Yes No No unspeciated

108­88­3 Toluene Yes No No

General Information about the Substance ­ Disposals and Off­site Transfers for Recycling

Was the substance disposed of (on­site or off­ Is the facility required to report on disposals of Was the substance Substance CAS RN site), or transferred for treatment prior to final tailings and waste rock for the selected reporting transferred off­site for Name disposal period recycling

PAHs, total NA ­ P/H No No No unspeciated Was the substance disposed of (on­site or off­ Is the facility required to report on disposals of Was the substance Substance CAS RN site), or transferred for treatment prior to final tailings and waste rock for the selected reporting transferred off­site for Name disposal period recycling

108­88­3 Toluene No No No

General Information about the Substance ­ Nature of Activities

CAS RN Substance Name Manufacture the Substance Process the Substance Otherwise Use of the Substance

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated As a by­product

108­88­3 Toluene As a by­product

On­site Releases ­ Releases to air

CAS RN Substance Name Category Basis of Estimate Detail Code Quantity

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated Stack or Point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 135.397 kg

NA ­ M09 PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns Stack or Point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 13.192 tonnes

NA ­ M09 PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns Other Non­point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 0.004 tonnes

NA ­ M09 PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns Road Dust E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 6.647 tonnes

NA ­ M10 PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns Stack or Point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 13.192 tonnes

NA ­ M10 PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns Other Non­point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 0.001 tonnes

NA ­ M10 PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns Road Dust E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 0.665 tonnes

108­88­3 Toluene Fugitive Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 1.171 tonnes

NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter Stack or Point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 13.192 tonnes

NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter Other Non­point Releases E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 0.008 tonnes

NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter Road Dust E2 ­ Published Emission Factors 25.868 tonnes

On­site Releases ­ Releases to air ­ Total

CAS RN Substance Name Total ­ Releases to Air

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated 135.397 kg

NA ­ M09 PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns 19.843 tonnes

NA ­ M10 PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns 13.858 tonnes

108­88­3 Toluene 1.171 tonnes

NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter 39.068 tonnes

On­site Releases ­ Total

CAS RN Substance Name Total releases

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated 135.397 kg

108­88­3 Toluene 1.171 tonnes

On­site Releases ­ Quarterly Breakdown of Annual Releases

CAS RN Substance Name Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated 25 25 25 25

108­88­3 Toluene 25 25 25 25

On­site Releases ­ Monthly Breakdown of Annual Releases

Substance CAS RN Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Name

PM10 ­ Particulate NA ­ M09 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 Matter <= 10 Microns

PM2.5 ­ Particulate NA ­ M10 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 Matter <= 2.5 Microns

Total NA ­ M08 Particulate 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 8.33 8.33 8.34 Matter

On­site Releases ­ Reasons for Changes in Quantities Released from Previous Year

Reasons for Changes in Quantities from CAS RN Substance Name Comments Previous Year

Other (specify in On­site Releases comment Decrease in toluene emissions (~14%) due to increase landfill gas 108­88­3 Toluene field) collection and destruction.

No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no NA ­ M08 Total Particulate Matter change Reasons for Changes in Quantities from CAS RN Substance Name Comments Previous Year PM10 ­ Particulate Matter <= 10 No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no NA ­ M09 Microns change

PM2.5 ­ Particulate Matter <= No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no NA ­ M10 2.5 Microns change

No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated change

Disposals ­ Reasons and Comments

CAS RN Substance Name Reasons Why Substance Was Disposed Reasons for Changes in Quantities from Previous Year Comments

108­88­3 Toluene No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change

Recycling ­ Reasons and Comments

CAS RN Substance Name Reasons Why Substance Was Recycled Reasons for Changes in Quantities Recycled from Previous Year Comments

108­88­3 Toluene No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change

NA ­ P/H PAHs, total unspeciated No significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change

Pollution Prevention

Does the facility have a documented pollution No prevention plan?

Did the facility complete any pollution No prevention activities in the current NPRI reporting year

Report Submission and Electronic Certification

NPRI ­ Electronic Statement of Certification

Specify the language of correspondence English

Comments (optional)

I hereby certify that I have exercised due diligence to ensure that the submitted information is true and complete. The amounts and values for the facility(ies) identified below are accurate, based on reasonable estimates using available data. The data for the facility(ies) that I represent are hereby submitted to the programs identified below using the Single Window Reporting Application.

I also acknowledge that the data will be made public.

Note: Only the person identified as the Certifying Official or the authorized delegate should submit the report(s) identified below.

Company Name Capital Regional District

Certifying Official (or authorized delegate) Kelly Tradewell

Report Submitted by Kelly Tradewell

I, the Certifying Official or authorized delegate, agree with the statements above and acknowledge that by pressing the "Submit Report(s)" button, I am electronically certifying and submitting the facility report(s) for the identified company to its affiliated programs.

Submitted Report

Period Submission Date Facility Name Province City Programs

2017 14/05/2018 Hartland Landfill British Columbia Victoria NPRI

Note: If there is a change in the contact information for the facility, a change in the owner or operator of the facility, if operations at the facility are terminated, or if information submitted for any previous year was mistaken or inaccurate, please update this information through SWIM or by contacting the National Pollutant Release Inventory directly.

Version: 3.14.0

Terms and Conditions Transparency

About us News Contact us Stay connected

HEALTH TRAVEL SERVICE CANADA JOBS ECONOMY Canada.gc.ca healthycanadians.gc.ca travel.gc.ca servicecanada.gc.ca jobbank.gc.ca actionplan.gc.ca Environment and Climate Change Canada

Report Preview Company Details Name Capital Regional District

Report Details Report Status Submitted

Facility Name Hartland Landfill

Facility Type SFO

Report Type Standard Report

Report Update Comments

Activities SWIM Validation Please verify the following information. Company Information Legal Name * Capital Regional District

English Trade Name

Business Number * 121399836

DUNS Number * 209954346

Mailing Address Street Number ** 625

Street Name ** Fisgard

Street Number Suffix

Street Type Street

Street Direction

Unit Number

Page 1 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

PO Box ** 1000

Rural Route Number **

City * Victoria

Province ** British Columbia

Postal Code ** V8W2S6

Country * Canada

Facility Details Facility Name * Hartland Landfill

NPRI ID 18993

BCGHG ID ** 22211190001 (Assigned by British Columbia MOE)

NAICS Code * 562210

Physical Address Street Number ** 1

Street Name ** Hartland

Street Type ** Avenue

City ** Victoria

Province ** British Columbia

Postal Code ** V9E1J9

Country * Canada

Land Survey Short Description

National Topographic Short Description

Geographical Address Latitude (N) (dd.mmmmm) ** 48.32120

Page 2 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Longitude (E) (ddd.mmmmm) ** -123.27470

Permits BC Ministry of Environment - Operational Certificate Issuing Agency BC Ministry of Environment - Operational Certificate

Permit Number 12659

CRD Regional Source Control Program - Sewer Discharge Permit Issuing Agency CRD Regional Source Control Program - Sewer Discharge Permit

Permit Number SC97.001

Operator Contact Given Name * Chris Robins

Position * Manager of Operations

Email Address * [email protected]

Telephone Number * 2503603219

Ext

Fax 2503603047

Mailing Address Street Number ** 625

Street Name ** Fisgard Street

Street Number Suffix

Street Type Street

Street Direction

Unit Number

PO Box ** 1000

Page 3 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Rural Route Number **

City * Victoria

Province ** British Columbia

Postal Code ** V8W2S6

Country * Canada

Operation Representative Given Name * Chris Robins

Position * Manager of Operations

Email Address * [email protected]

Telephone Number * 2503603219

Ext

Fax

Mailing Address Street Number ** 625

Street Name ** Fisgard Street

Street Number Suffix

Street Type Street

Street Direction

Unit Number

PO Box ** 1000

Rural Route Number **

City * Victoria

Province ** British Columbia

Page 4 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Postal Code ** V8W2S6

Country * Canada

Person Primarily Responsible for Preparing the Report Given Name * Kelly Tradewell

Position * ESO2

Email Address * [email protected]

Telephone Number * 2503603154

Ext

Fax

Mailing Address Street Number ** 625

Street Name ** Fisgard

Street Number Suffix

Street Type Street

Street Direction

Unit Number

PO Box ** 1000

Rural Route Number **

City * Victoria

Province ** British Columbia

Postal Code ** V8W2S6

Country * Canada

Page 5 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Parent Company Information Empty General Stationary Combustion (a) general stationary combustion, useful energy Fuel Groups ** Empty (b) General stationary combustion, no useful energy Fuel Groups ** Flares GSC Unit Name * Flares

Description

Fuels Landfill Gas (Sm^3) Fuel * Landfill Gas (Sm^3)

Fuel Classification biomass not in Schedule C

Fuel Description

Units Sm^3

Annual Fuel Amount * 4607462

Annual Weighted Average High Heating Value (GJ/unit fuel) **

Annual Weighted Average Carbon Content (weight fraction) **

Annual Steam Generation (kg) **

Measured Emission Factor (CO2) **

Measured Emission Factor Unit (CO2) **

Measured Emission Factor (CH4) **

Measured Emission Factor Unit (CH4) **

Page 6 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Measured Emission Factor (N2O) **

Measured Emission Factor Unit (N2O) **

Emissions for Fuel N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 bio-nC Methodology 1 9036.2 9036.2 (default HHV)

CH4 Default HHV/EFc 0.17 4.25

N2O Default HHV/EFc 0.02 5.96

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

Mobile Combustion Emissions from fuel combustion by mobile equipment that is part of the facility Fuel * Diesel (kilolitres) Fuel * Diesel (kilolitres)

Fuel Classification non-biomass

Fuel Description

Units kilolitres

Q1 * Q2 * Q3 * Q4 * Annual Fuel Amount

57.7 57.7 57.7 57.7 230.8

Emissions for Fuel N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 nonbio Default EF 614.46 614.46

Page 7 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:22 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

CH4 Default EF 0.03 0.75

N2O Default EF 0.09 26.82

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

Electricity Generation (a) Emissions from fuel combustion for electricity generation Non-Cogen Units The dropdown 'Navigate to' can be used to navigate directly to a specific Unit/Fuel.Navigate To CAT GeneratorCAT Generator / Landfill Gas (Sm^3) CAT Generator Non-Cogen Unit Name * CAT Generator

Nameplate Capacity (MW) * 1.6

Net Power (MWh) * 36

Fuel Landfill Gas (Sm^3) Fuel * Landfill Gas (Sm^3)

Fuel Classification biomass not in Schedule C

Fuel Description

Units Sm^3

Annual Fuel Amount * 3231763

Annual Weighted Average High Heating Value (GJ/unit fuel) **

Annual Weighted Average Carbon Content (weight fraction) **

Annual Steam Generation (kg) **

Measured Emission Factor (CO2) **

Page 8 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Measured Emission Factor Unit (CO2) **

Measured Emission Factor (CH4) **

Measured Emission Factor Unit (CH4) **

Measured Emission Factor (N2O) **

Measured Emission Factor Unit (N2O) **

Emissions for Fuel N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 bio-nC Methodology 1 6338.2 6338.2 (default HHV)

CH4 Default HHV/EFc 0.01 0.25

N2O Default HHV/EFc 0.12 35.76

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

Cogen Units The dropdown 'Navigate to' can be used to navigate directly to a specific Unit/Fuel.Navigate To Empty (b) Emissions from acid gas scrubbers and acid gas reagents N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 nonbio

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

(c) Emissions from cooling units N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

HFC-23 (CHF3)

Page 9 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

HFC-32 (CH2F2)

HFC-41 (CH3F)

HFC-43-10mee (C5H2F10)

HFC-125 (C2HF5)

HFC-134 (C2H2F4)

HFC-134a (C2H2F4)

HFC-143 (C2H3F3)

HFC-143a (C2H3F3)

HFC-152a (C2H4F2)

HFC-227ea (C3HF7)

HFC-236fa (C3H2F6)

HFC-245ca (C3H3F5)

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

(d) Emissions from geothermal geyser steam or fluids N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 nonbio

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative

Page 10 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

(e) Emissions from installation, maintenance, operation and decommissioning of electrical equipment N/A Gas Methodology ** Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

SF6

Replacement/Alternative Methodology Description (Mandatory if Replacement Methodology or Alternative Parameter Measurement selected as a methodology above. Otherwise, not saved.) **

Non-attributable emissions If the facility has emissions that exceed 100 t CO2e and are not captured by one of the reportable activities, describe them here by detailing the activity, source type, broad Source Category and GHG types that apply. Non-attributable emissions larger than 100 t CO2e Emissions Empty Captured CO2 Total CO2 captured for onsite use or storage, or transferred off-site in the compliance period N/A Gas Emissions (t) ** Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 nonbio

Emissions Summary No input required - GHG totals are calculated automatically. Total GHG Emissions for the Facility, by gas Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 nonbio 614.46 614.46

124-38-9 CO2 bio-nC 15374.4 15374.4

124-38-9 CO2 bio-C 0 0

Page 11 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

74-82-8 CH4 0.21 5.25

10024-97-2 N2O 0.23 68.54

HFCs 0

PFCs 0

2551-62-4 SF6 0 0

Grand Total: 16062.65

CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

CO2 Captured 0 0

Reporting-only Emissions Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 nonbio 614.46 614.46

124-38-9 CO2 bio-nC 0 0

124-38-9 CO2 bio-C 0 0

74-82-8 CH4 0.03 0.75

10024-97-2 N2O 0.09 26.82

Sub Total: 642.03

Total GHG Emissions for the Facility, by Schedule B category

Page 12 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Stationary Fuel Combustion Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 6338.2 6338.2

74-82-8 CH4 0.01 0.25

10024-97-2 N2O 0.12 35.76

Sub Total: 6374.21

Industrial Process Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 0 0

74-82-8 CH4 0 0

10024-97-2 N2O 0 0

HFCs 0

PFCs 0

2551-62-4 SF6 0 0

Sub Total: 0

Flaring Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 0 0

74-82-8 CH4 0 0

Page 13 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

10024-97-2 N2O 0 0

Sub Total: 0

Fugitive Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 0 0

74-82-8 CH4 0 0

10024-97-2 N2O 0 0

HFCs 0

PFCs 0

2551-62-4 SF6 0 0

Sub Total: 0

Venting Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 0 0

74-82-8 CH4 0 0

10024-97-2 N2O 0 0

Sub Total: 0

On-Site Transportation Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

Page 14 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

124-38-9 CO2 614.46 614.46

74-82-8 CH4 0.03 0.75

10024-97-2 N2O 0.09 26.82

Sub Total: 642.03

Waste Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 9036.2 9036.2

74-82-8 CH4 0.17 4.25

10024-97-2 N2O 0.02 5.96

Sub Total: 9046.41

Wastewater Emissions CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

124-38-9 CO2 0 0

74-82-8 CH4 0 0

10024-97-2 N2O 0 0

Sub Total: 0

Breakdown By Species, for HFCs and PFCs Hydrofluorocarbons CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

Page 15 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:23 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

75-46-7 HFC-23 (CHF3) 0 0

75-10-5 HFC-32 (CH2F2) 0 0

593-53-3 HFC-41 (CH3F) 0 0

138495-42-8 HFC-43-10mee 0 0 (C5H2F10)

354-33-6 HFC-125 (C2HF5) 0 0

359-35-3 HFC-134 (C2H2F4) 0 0

811-97-2 HFC-134a (C2H2F4) 0 0

430-66-0 HFC-143 (C2H3F3) 0 0

420-46-2 HFC-143a (C2H3F3) 0 0

75-37-6 HFC-152a (C2H4F2) 0 0

431-89-0 HFC-227ea (C3HF7) 0 0

690-39-1 HFC-236fa (C3H2F6) 0 0

679-86-7 HFC-245ca (C3H3F5) 0 0

Sub Total: 0

Perfluorocarbons CAS Number Gas Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

75-73-0 Perfluoromethane (CF4) 0 0

Page 16 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:24 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

76-16-4 Perfluoroethane (C2F6) 0 0

76-19-7 Perfluoropropane 0 0 (C3F8)

115-25-3 Perfluorocyclobutane 0 0 (c-C4F8)

355-25-9 Perfluorobutane 0 0 (C4F10)

678-26-2 Perfluoropentane 0 0 (C5F12)

355-42-0 Perfluorohexane 0 0 (C6F14)

Sub Total: 0

Note on Reporting to Environment and Climate Change Canada If you also have an obligation to report greenhouse gas emissions to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) for this facility, you will be able to preload applicable data where possible from this report into an ECCC report. This BC GHG report must be successfully submitted first in order to use the data prepopulation feature when filling out your ECCC report for the same facility. In your ECCC report, please ensure that you review and modify, where appropriate, the preloaded information to ensure it meets your reporting obligation to ECCC. Process Flow Diagram A Process Flow Diagram is required for SFO and LFO (Parent) reports. File Name Date

GasPlantFlowDiagram-GHGReporting.docx 11/05/2018 6:23:49 PM

Comments

Comments This section is optional.

Page 17 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:24 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Enter any comments you wish to include related to the information you have reported. Comments provided are not published. For LNG Environmental Incentive Program please provide information on emergency emissions and entrained emissions as described by the program in order to accelerate your application. You may provide additional comments related to the reported GHG emissions data to better explain your information. (e.g. justification of any large changes in emissions from the previous year.) Enter your company or facility website if you wish to provide more information. (e.g. contextual information on environmental activities, etc.) Website

Electricity Consumption (kWh)

Comments: (max 4000 characters)

Changes in emissions for non-useful biomass and electricity generation compared to 2016 as a result of significant generator downtime in 2016. Generator was fully operational in 2017, therefore emissions are higher compared to 2016 (the opposite is true for non-useful biomass combustion emissions in 2016 compared to 2017 as a result of less gas flared).

You may also upload a document File Name Date

Confidentiality Request Confidentiality Request Are you requesting confidentiality of this report under the B.C. Reg. 249/2015 Reporting Regulation? *

No

An operator may claim that disclosure of the information referred to in Section 44(2)(a) to (d) be prohibited under Section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA), and request that the information be kept confidential. A claim must be done in accordance with Section 44(5) of the Regulation. The Ministry of Environment will be in contact with you regarding your request. File Name Date

Report Submission and Electronic Certification

Page 18 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:24 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Electronic Statement of Certification Please note that the Operation Representative retains ultimate responsibility for any and all data submitted into the System, including for certifying and submitting reports. Therefore, the individual physically clicking on the "Submit" button may be the Organization Administrator acting on behalf of the Operation Representative. Reporting Period

2017

Report Type

R1

Operation Type

SFO

Approval I hereby certify that: I have examined this report. The report has been prepared in accordance with the BC Greenhouse Gas Emission Reporting Regulation. The emission amounts detailed in the report are complete and accurate. The information provided in this report has been reviewed and approved by the officer. * Submission Details Report submitted by Timestamp

Kelly Tradewell 11/05/2018 15:37:37 [PM] [PDT]

Page 19 of 19 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:23:24 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Report Preview Company Details Name

Capital Regional District

Report Details Report Status:

Ready to Submit -

Reporting Period:

2017

Facility Name:

Hartland Landfill

Facility Address:

1 Hartland Avenue Victoria (British Columbia) V9E1J9Canada

Report Type:

Report (ECCC only)

Report Update Comments:

Verify Facility Information Please verify the following information. Company Information Legal Name * Capital Regional District

English Trade Name

French Trade Name

Business Number 121399836

DUNS Number 209954346

Page 1 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Facility Details Facility Name * Hartland Landfill

Physical Address * 1 Hartland Avenue Victoria (British Columbia) V9E1J9 Canada 48.32120 -123.27470

Primary NAICS Code * 562210

GHGRP ID G10433 (Assigned by ECCC)

NPRI ID 18993

Alberta Approval Number

Reporter Name * Kelly Tradewell

Position * ESO2

Mailing Address * 625 Fisgard Street Victoria (British Columbia), V8W2S6, Canada, 1000

Physical Address * 625 Fisgard Street Victoria (British Columbia), V8W2S6, Canada

Email Address * [email protected]

Telephone Number * 2503603154

Ext.

Authorized Signing Officer (Certifying Official) Name * Kelly Tradewell

Position * Environmental Contaminants Officer

Mailing Address * 625 Fisgard Street Victoria (British Columbia), V8W2S6, Canada, 1000

Physical Address * 625 Fisgard Street Victoria (British Columbia), V8W1R7, Canada

Email Address * [email protected]

Telephone Number * 2503603154

Page 2 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Ext.

Parent Company Information Empty Facility Activities Activities You must select at least one activity

None of the above

Section A Report the direct greenhouse gas emissions for this facility for the period identified above. Click Validate to check for errors and Save/Continue to save the information. If there are any errors, they will be flagged. If there are no errors, the page will be Complete. N/A = Not ApplicableMDM = Monitoring or Direct MeasurementMB = Mass BalanceEF = Emission FactorsEE = Engineering Estimates Stationary Fuel Combustion Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane 0.116 2.900 (CH4)

Nitrous 0.012 3.576 Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total 6.476

Industrial Process Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane (CH4)

Page 3 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total

Venting Emissions (including vented Formation CO2) N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane (CH4)

Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total

Flaring Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane (CH4)

Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total

Leakage Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Page 4 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane (CH4)

Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total

On-site Transportation Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon 614.46 614.46 Dioxide (CO2)

Methane 0.03 0.75 (CH4)

Nitrous 0.09 26.82 Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total 642.03

Waste Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane 2566.17 64154.25 (CH4)

Nitrous 0.02 5.96 Oxide (N2O)

Page 5 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Sub-total 64160.21

Wastewater Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Methane (CH4)

Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

Sub-total

Section B Report the direct greenhouse gas emissions for this facility for the period identified above.Click Validate to check for errors and Save/Continue to save the information. If there are any errors, they will be flagged. If there are no errors, the page will be Complete. Note: CO2 emissions from biomass combustion are not included in the total reported to Environment and Climate Change Canada. N/A = Not ApplicableMDM = Monitoring or Direct MeasurementMB = Mass BalanceEF = Emission FactorsEE = Engineering Estimates Biomass Combustion Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Carbon 15374.42 15374.42 Dioxide (CO2)

Section C Report the direct emissions of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 from industrial processes and industrial product use only for this facility for the period identified above. Click Validate to check for errors and Save/Continue to save the information. If there are any errors, they will be flagged. If there are no errors, the page will be Complete. N/A = Not ApplicableMDM = Monitoring or Direct MeasurementMB = Mass BalanceEF = Emission FactorsEE = Engineering Estimates

Page 6 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

HFC-23 (CHF3)

HFC-32 (CH2F2)

HFC-41 (CH3F)

HFC-43- 10mee (C5H2F10 )

HFC-125 (C2HF5)

HFC-134 (C2H2F4)

HFC-134a (C2H2F4)

HFC-143 (C2H3F3)

HFC-143a (C2H3F3)

HFC-152a (C2H4F2)

HFC- 227ea (C3HF7)

HFC- 236fa (C3H2F6)

Page 7 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

HFC- 245ca (C3H3F5)

Total

Perfluorocarbon (PFC) Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Perfluoro methane (CF4)

Perfluoroe thane (C2F6)

Perfluorop ropane (C3F8)

Perfluorob utane (C4F10)

Perfluoroc yclobutan e (c- C4F8)

Perfluorop entane (C5F12)

Perfluoroh exane (C6F14)

Total

Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) Emissions N/A Substance MDM ** MB ** EF ** EE ** Emissions Emissions( Name (t) ** t CO2e)

Page 8 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:04 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Sulphur hexafluori de (SF6)

Summary No input required - GHG totals are calculated automatically. Total GHG Emissions for the Facility

Emissions (t) Emissions (t CO2e)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 614.46 614.46

Methane (CH4) 2566.316 64157.900

Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.122 36.356

Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)

Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)

Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)

Facility Total reported to Environment and Climate Change Canada: 64808.716

Carbon dioxide (CO2) from biomass combustion: 15374.42

Comments This section is optional.

Enter any comments you wish to include related to the information you have reported. General Comments will not be published. General Comments Comments: (max 4000 characters)

Reasons for Changes in GHG Emissions from Previous Year

Page 9 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:05 PM Environment and Climate Change Canada

Select the applicable reason or reasons

Other (specify in Additional Information)

Additional Information: **

2017 Stationary Combustion Emissions are higher than the 2015 and 2016 reported emissions due to significant maintenance requirements in 2015/2016. In addition. in 2017, the generator was operational 11/12 months resulting in less flaring requirements and lower overall Waste Emissions.

Confidentiality Request Environment and Climate Change Canada Confidentiality Request

The Canada Gazette Notice indicated that the Minister of the Environment intends to publish GHG emission totals by gas, by facility. Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999), you can request that part or all of the information that you have provided in this report be treated as confidential. You must provide appropriate justification to support this request (see Help for more information). Are you requesting confidentiality of this report under CEPA 1999? *

No

If yes, you must upload a document containing your written request to Environment and Climate Change Canada with your report submission that includes: - Identification of the specific information that you wish to keep confidential - Appropriate justification and supporting documentation

An Environment and Climate Change Canada representative will be in contact with you regarding your request.

Click on the icon located to the right of your screen to upload your Environment and Climate Change Canada Confidentiality Request. File Name Date

Page 10 of 10 Printed on 14/05/2018 2:17:05 PM