REMPSTONE – QUARRY

APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE PREVIOUS PLANNING PERMISSIONS AND EXTENSION OF EXISTING QUARRY INVOLVING THE EXTRACTION OF SAND AND GRAVEL WITH RESTORATION TO AGRICULTURE AND CONSERVATION WETLAND, RETENTION OF EXISTING AGGREGATE PROCESSING PLANT, SILT LAGOON AND ACCESS / HAUL ROAD Environmental Statement

National Reserves and Development Department Planning Department Rugby/ Oldbury/Thorpe August 2014

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

CEMEX UK OPERATION LTD

APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE PREVIOUS PLANNING PERMISSIONS AND EXTENSION OF EXISTING QUARRY INVOLVING THE EXTRACTION OF SAND AND GRAVEL WITH RESTORATION TO AGRICULTURE AND CONSERVATION WETLAND, RETENTION OF EXISTING AGGREGATE PROCESSING PLANT, SILT LAGOON AND ACCESS / HAUL ROAD

August 2014

VOLUME 2 - ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Submitted to : County Council Trent Bridge House Fox Road NG2 6BJ

Prepared by: CEMEX UK Operations Ltd CEMEX House Evreux Way ……………….. Rugby ……………….. CV21 2DT

1

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Report Prepared by National Reserves Department

Cemex House Evreux Way Rugby CV21 2DT

Report Reference: 00_13_ELE_689_ES_KHH_250214_rempstone Report Status; Final

Approval

SIGNATURE DATE QUARRY MANAGER REGIONAL OPEPERATIONS MANAGER ESTATES MANAGER PLANNER

Revisions Record:

Issue Report Comments Author Approved Date status V1 Final KHH 28/5/2014 V2 Final Description, numbering KHH 02/07/2014 (page 3) Appendix references on pages; Page 10, Page 11 (1.1.27) Page 15 (1.1.43) V3 Final Date on front sheet KHH 21/8/2014 Numbering (page3 ) Insert – 2.7.24-2.7.29 Historic Environment (page 66-68

2

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENT STATEMENT – CONTENTS Part 1 PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 - Introduction - Environmental Impact Assessment - Location - History - Description ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS 18 THE ASSESSMENT TEAM 19 THE SCOPE OF THE DEVELOPMENT 21 ALTERNATIVES 23

PART 2 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 25 ECOLOGY 26 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT 30 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 35 NOISE 44 AIR QUALITY 51 ARCHAEOLOGY 60 TRANSPORT 69 SOIL 74 CUMULATIVE IMPACT 76

PART 3 CONCLUSION 86

TECHNICAL APPENDICES 1 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ASSESSMENT 3 HYDROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT - SURFACE WATER TRENCH 4 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT - NOISE MONITORING SCHEME 5 AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT - DUST MONITORING SCHEME MONITORING LOCATION PLAN (NOISE / DUST) 6 AN ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS 7 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT 8 SOIL AND AGRICULTURAL REPORT 9 STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 10 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIO ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT 11 AERODROME SAFEGUARDING 12 PUBLIC EXHIBITION DOCUMENTATION 3

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

13 CLIMATE CHANGE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY 14 LIST OF RELEVANT GUIDANCE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICIES 15 GLOSSARY

4

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.0 PART ONE (A) – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.1.1 This statement has been prepared to provide information in support of the Company’s planning application to extend East Leake Quarry through the extraction of sand and gravel and interburden clay to assist low level agriculture and conservation restoration and to provide information to assess the environmental effects of the proposal.

1.1.2 The Environmental Statement (ES) comprises this statement and the Technical Appendices contained in this volume 1-2. And a Non-Technical Summary contained in Volume 3. Hard copies of the full submission (Volumes 1 to 3) may be purchased at a cost of £80 from Kirsten Hannaford-Hill, Development Planner, UK Operations, CEMEX House, Evreux Way, Rugby, CV21 2DT. Individual CD and NTS are free.

Environmental Impact Assessment

1.1.3 The proposed development involves the extraction of 1.78 million tonnes of sand and gravel covering an area of approximately 27.5ha. It is considered the proposal constitute “EIA development” within the meaning of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) ( and Wales) Regulations 2011 as it fall under Schedule 1.

1.1.4 The Company has therefore prepared this Environmental Statement in order to address those matters and to provide information to assess the environmental effects of the proposals.

1.1.5 Consideration has been given to the provisions of the 2011 EIA regulations, which implement Council Directive No. 85/337/EEC as amended by Council Directive No. 97/11/EC and they, together with the accompanying Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Circular 2/99 and Statutory Instrument 2011 No. 1824 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011

5

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

provide guidance on the information to be included in environmental statements and the procedures to be followed

1.1.6 The Statement seeks to provide an objective account of possible environmental effects of the development that is the subject of the application.

Location

1.1.7 Cemex UK Materials Ltd operates the existing mineral extraction and processing plant at East Leake Quarry. The quarry is located approximately 1km south east of East Leake Village and 300m west of Rempstone Village. Nottingham City is located approximately 15km to the north, Derby City is located 17km to the north west and Town 4km and Leicester City 14km to the south (Location Plan reference number 13_C007_ELEK_007). The Ordnance survey national grid reference is SK 564 247. The site is located within the County of Nottinghamshire and District of . To the site is located in close proximity to the M1, M42, A46 and A6 all leading off the A6006.

1.1.8 The application site, outlined in red, covers a total of approximately 93ha although the proposed extraction area would cover approximately 27.5ha other land in the company’s control is highlighted in as shown blue on the location plan 13_C007_ELEK_007. The application site consists of one undulating, rectangle shaped agricultural field separated from the existing site by a mature hedgerow which runs north to south.

1.1.9 The field is bound to the south by the A6006 Ashby Road and adjacent residential properties, to the west by previous sand and gravel extraction (known as Jenks Planning Permission 8/12/01488/CMA). Rempstone Church, Beech Tree Lodge, Clifton Lodge and Loughborough Road bound the site to the east. Sheepwash Brook bounds the site to the north in addition to pockets of woodland planting. The southern bound includes mature hedgerow and trees. There are two existing

6

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

agricultural accesses to the proposed extension area known as Rempstone to the south on to the A6006.

1.1.10 The proposed extraction area is located 200m to the north of Lings Farm and 150m from Rempstone Hall (both separated by the A6006). Rempstone Church and Clifton Lodge bounds the site to the south east. Beech Tree Lodge bounds the site to east. There are various properties located to the south opposite the A6006 including Farm Cottage, Rempstone Hall Farm, East Lodge. Oaklands Farm and The Oaklands look down upon the site from the top of the wolds 130m to the north of the extraction area off Loughborough Road.

1.1.11 As stated above the application site is currently in use as agricultural. The extraction area agricultural land classification can generally be classified as Grade 2-3b agricultural land with the majority of the site subgrade 2 and 3a and with small patches of subgrade 3b which complements the surrounding agricultural classification.

1.1.12 The topography of the application area and surrounding landscape is generally flat with a small undulation to the north east typical of the and Nottingham Wolds. Due to the topography and existing hedgerow screening along the A6006 reduces views into the proposed extension area although Oaklands Farm, The Oaklands and Beech Tree Lodge have more prominent views into the site. The main vantage point is the Public Bridleway which runs across the site, Oaklands Farm and The Oaklands due to the topography and also Beech Tree Lodge to the east.

1.1.13 There is one right of way crossing the proposed extraction area which runs north west to south east existing near Rempstone Church on the A6006. There is a bridleway crossing the previous extraction area known as Jenks.

7

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.1.14 The main East Leake Quarry aggregate processing plant, reception offices, silt lagoons and stocking area lies to the west of the proposed extraction area. The internal access road between the extraction area and plant site shall run through previously extraction area known as Jenks’s. A small gap would be made in the mature hedgerow between Jenks and Rempstone providing access from the existing plant site for dumper trucks and earth moving equipment.

1.1.15 Access to East Leake Quarry from the public highway is via an existing haul road leading onto Rempstone Road. The site has a designated traffic route along the Rempstone Road leading onto the A6006. All traffic is strictly controlled and restricted to this route in order to avoid passing through the village of East Leake.

1.1.16 The quarry is well placed to serve local building suppliers and concrete plants in Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire and .

1.1.17 The site is located within East Midlands Aerodrome consultation area (arrival path and holding area). The site is not located within a National Park or Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The site is not located within 2km of a Special Area of Protection, Site of Special Scientific Interest, Ramsar or Ancient Scheduled Monument. The site is located within 1km of a registered National Park and Gardens – Stanford Hall. Stanford Hall is a grade II listed building and set within 113ha of registered park and gardens. The landscape park dates back to the 18 Centuries with additional features added in the 19 and 20 Centuries.

History

1.1.18 Mineral extraction has been sought in the East Leake area since the mid eighties with the Local Minerals Planning Authority refusing two applications mainly due to the lack of need and being contrary to planning policy. Planning permission was first granted in 1991 after the company appealed the last planning permission (application

8

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

reference number 8/J1/85/1141/P / permission reference 8/89/0472/P). The planning approval was subject to 37 planning condition and low level restoration to agriculture and a lake. The original planning permission included the construction of the existing processing plant and access. This permission is known as Lings.

1.1.19 In 2009 planning permission was issued (reference 8/07/02187/CMA) for an additional three phased extension to the east of the main quarry. The 2009 planning permission was granted contrary to being an un-allocated site due to its small scale, duration and location to the local markets. Planning permission 8/07/02187/CMA has been amend to extend the period of extraction for a further 12months to accommodate increased reserves and slight economic down turn (8/12/01488/CMA). This permission area is known as Jenks.

1.1.20 In 2013 planning permission was issued (reference 8/11/00157/CMA) for an additional 4 phased extension to the south west of the existing plant site. Extraction commenced September 2013 and shall be completed within 3 years (September 2016). This permission is known as Burtons

1.1.21 The existing processing plant, silt lagoons and haul road has the benefit of planning permission until 30 September 2017 (PP8/14/00341/CMA) (Lings).

1.1.22 This planning application to extract material from land known as Rempstone shall seek to continue to utilise the existing plant site and proposes to retain the void within Jenks as a means of silt disposal. The use of the existing plant is considered the most sustainable and environmentally acceptable option as the plant is established and screened. It is proposed that Rempstone would commence during the final phase of Burton’s permission to ensure there is a continuation of mineral extraction at East Leake Quarry.

9

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.1.23 The proposed extension area is not allocated within the Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan as a future mineral site. The proposed extension area has been put forward as part of the emerging Local Development Framework. No formal conclusion has been undertaken determining if the proposed extension area is a suitable allocated site for future mineral working. It is considered that the proposed extension provides a strategic release of sand and gravel to the south of the County and provides opportunity for biodiversity and conservation restoration. The Rempstone extraction area is considered a logical progression of mineral working within the East Leake area ensuring the release of quality reserves prior to quarrying operations ceasing in this area.

1.1.24. The Company, in seeking to continue extraction of sand and gravel and utilise existing infrastructure on site. Plan ref:13_C007_ELEK_004 and 13_C007_ELEK_012 appendix to the Planning Statement illustrates the permission boundaries related to East Leake Quarry.

Description

1.1.25 This proposal is for the extraction of approximately 1.78 million tonnes of sand and gravel from an area of approximately 27.5 hectares split into 6 phases. Following extraction the site will be restored at a lower level incorporating agriculture, lakes and woodland conservation which shall integrate and complement permitted restoration schemes at East Leake Quarry and established wildlife habitats.

1.1.26 The proposal involves the continued use of the existing access to the public highway onto Rempstone Road, reception facilities, aggregate processing plant, and the silt and freshwater lagoons.

Geology

10

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.1.27 Geological investigations have indicated that the proposed extraction area contains approximately 1.78 million tonnes of sand and gravel at an average thickness of 4.96 metres although maximum depth could be over 9m. The Geological Report is located in Appendix 17 within the Planning Statement.

1.1.28 The original geological investigation looked at the whole agricultural field and estimated 2.20 million tonnes over an area of approximately 30ha. The Company has used this geological data as the foundations and starting point of this application. The extraction area has been influenced by the geological data, high clay spots and possible interburden layers, hydrology, noise, dust and ecological data. The final extraction boundary takes into consideration necessary standoff, for example highways 30m from the A6006, electricity line, Sheepwash brook (15m), Planting (root protection areas of 3-10m). The final extraction boundary for Rempstone is identified within the Method of working plan (P5/689/8A).

1.1.29 The final extraction boundary and reserve of 1.78mt would enable extractions to continue at the quarry for an additional 10-12 years. The proposal would be worked in 6 principle phases, as an extension of the existing quarry, at a current rate of approximately 150,000 to180,000 tonnes per annum: ultimately the extraction rate would depend on the strength of the demand from the local market.

1.1.30 East Leake sand and gravel reserve is of a glacial origin and has bedrock of mercia mudstone group of Triassic age which consists of predominantly of mudstone with siltstones and thin limestones. The Geological report summaries two investigations in 1992 and 2007 and takes into consideration workings undertaken on site and it is concluded that the reserve will continue to have a high level of fines of 20% although this could drop to 7% or increase to 30% this is due to a high level of clay and silt within the deposit. The anticipated soil and overburden levels vary over the geological search area from 0.2m to 13m with an average of 3.07m providing an overall figure of approximately 1mt to be removed and used as restoration material. The geological report identified a significantly deep overburden section along the northern boundary towards Sheepwash Brook which also holds high level of silty 11

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

fines. It has been concluded that the northern area and south east corner be excluded as they are economically unviable to work due to high levels of overburden/ clay and silty fines. The overall mineral thickness ranges from 0-9.95m with an average of 4.96m, although reserves in Jenks adjacent did appear to reach nearly 12m in depth. The mineral quality should produce an average of 37.8% gravel, 49.1% sand and 13.1% fines.

Sequence of extraction 1.1.31 The proposed extension would commence during the final phase of extraction within the permitted area known as ‘Burtons’. Access to the proposed extension area would be gained by the internal haul road through a small section of hedgerow along the western boundary with Jenks Land. Internal traffic signs and routing would be introduced ensuring right of way to external HGV vehicle movements and rights of way users. The proposed extension would not increase annual output from the site only increase the duration of mineral extraction at the site by a maximum of 12 years.

Method of Extraction

1.1.32 It is proposed for the site to be dewater via a pump, then excavate the mineral using a 360 degree hydraulic excavator and transporting the mineral to the existing processing plant at the quarry via dumper truck. It is proposed that mineral extraction would be worked in regular campaigns throughout the year to meet demand. Raw material would be stockpiled within the existing plant site stocking area, for processing and sale. The pump for dewatering will be located along the western boundary and kept to the north were possible to reduce noise impact to sensitive receptors located on A6006 and A60, the pipe would travel through the internal access point and buried under the bridleway linking into the existing surface water management system of Jenks and Lings which would be utilised and retained for the life of the processing plant as shown on plan 13_C007_ELEK_006_A.

1.1.33 The general approach to the extraction of sand and gravel within Rempstone would be to peg out the extraction area, fence any hedgerow and Rights of Way as

12

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

necessary. Clear any vegetation, strip soils and overburden which would be principally stored in bunds along the southern and eastern boundary or direct placement to assist restoration. The mounds would provide acoustic and visual screening. Archaeological investigation would be implemented in accordance with an approved WSI during soil stripping. It is proposed each face will be worked to an angle of 1 in 2. A surface water trench shall be created along the southern boundary as necessary to catch water from the soil bunds to prevent water on the A6006.

1.1.34 Overall approximately 1mt of overburden / clay including topsoil’s would be removed as part of the extraction process which would be used as part of the sites reclamation.

Production Rate 1.1.35 Extraction and processing is dictated by market demand and taking into consideration the last 5 years sales the Company anticipate a production rate of between 150,000 – 180,000tpa.

Equipment Required

Processing Plant

1.1.36 The static aggregate processing plant would be retained within the existing quarry plant site complex for the crushing, washing and grading of the excavated sand and gravel.

1.1.37 The existing fresh and small silt water lagoons would similarly be retained in order to allow for settlement of the silt fraction washed from the sand and gravel, and also to supply fresh re-circulated water to the plant.

1.1.38 The existing finished product stockpile area would also be retained, as will the workshop building, weighbridge, site office/messroom and car park area. 13

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Mobile Plant

1.1.39 A number of elements of mobile plant are required, namely:

i) Soil Stripping and Handling – soil and overburden would be removed using a hydraulic excavator with dump trucks being used to take the material to either create a temporary storage/screen bund to place the soil directly on to a previously worked area for final restoration.

ii) Mineral Extraction / Restoration – this would entail the use of a 360 o excavator and wheeled loading shovel working on a bench set below ground level. The shovel would also be used to load the dumper. A dozer and shovel will place restoration material to achieve permitted contours.

iii) Lorry Loading – a second wheeled shovel would be employed within the plant area to feed the plant with raw material for processing, load lorries with the finished products and general stockpile handling.

All of this plant currently operates in this manner within the existing extraction area.

Soil Handling

1.1.40 A 360 degree back actor excavator and a dumper truck will be used in the soil stripping operations. The storage bund will be formed by the loose placement of stripped soils by the dumper and shaped using a bulldozer with low pressure tracks. Topsoil /overburden/ clay will be stored separately with the bunds being a maximum of 3 and 5m high and seeded maintained upon replacement.

1.1.41 All personnel involved with the soil stripping and restoration of the application site will be given specific instructions from the Quarry Manager with regard to the importance of conserving the soil resource and not causing inadvertent loss or damage. No soils will be moved in wet weather or when ground conditions are not suitable. Details of 14

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

soil handling, machinery and procedures is set out in Appendix 18 of the planning statement.

Hours of Operations

1.1.42 It is proposed to continue to operate the quarry on the same hours and days as currently permitted which are:

07.00 – 19.00 Monday to Friday

07.00 – 13.00 Saturdays

And no such operations shall be carried out on Sundays or Public (bank) Holidays.

Access / Vehicle Movements

1.1.43 As stated above the proposal will continue to use the main site access onto Rempstone Road / A6006. The traffic movements associated with the proposal would continue at approximately 72 movements per day with a maximum of a 100 vehicle movements as previously conditioned. The proposed extension will only result in the continuation of historic production levels. As a result traffic movements associated with these operations will remain the same as currently experienced at the permitted quarry site. The access route to the quarry was designed with this level of traffic in mind and the Company strictly adheres to the designated access route and agreed practices. The type of vehicles which enter the site varies greatly depending on the requirement of each customer. Typically the average vehicle is a two tonne truck with the largest vehicles to visit the site having a twenty tonne capacity. Additional vehicles will be small private vehicles of quarry and company staff.

1.1.44 Existing signs at the quarry entrance instructs all HGV drivers to turn left only out of the site this shall be maintained throughout the life of the development and all drivers of HGVs shall exit the site turning left only . The existing wheelwash facility would be utilised as and when necessary to ensure no mud debris is deposited on the public highway. The wheelwash shall be maintained at all times.

15

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Rights of Way 1.1.45 The proposed development shall affect one right of way and one bridleway. Bridleway Rempstone BW11 and right of Way Rempstone FP1 which leads into East Leake FP1 to the north.

1.1.46 Bridleway Rempstone BW11 has been temporarily diverted round the perimeter of Jenks permission area to enable mineral extraction to be undertaken in this area and shall be restored along the definitive route once restoration has been completed.

1.1.47 The diversion order of Rempstone BW11 was issued on the 18 th March 2011 and is in place until completion of development and restoration of the site. The use of Jenks field for silt disposal related to mineral extraction on adjacent land shall delay reinstatement of the bridleway but shall also ensure the definitive route is reinstated to a suitable condition for its lawful use as a public bridleway. Until this time it is proposed that the existing diversion route continue until restoration works have been completed.

1.1.48 To assist mineral extraction within the proposed extension the Company seek to temporarily divert Rempstone FP1 to follow a southerly then westerly route following the internal field boundary as illustrated on plan ref: 13_COO7_ELEK_005_B. The Company seek to link the existing bridleway diversion with the proposed Rempstone FP1 diversion with a small gate created within the hedgerow between Jenks and Rempstone extraction area, this gate would be removed once restoration has been completed and replanted with species rich hedgerow. The proposed diversion shall be a grassed surface covering a width of 2m and shall be in place until final restoration at which point the original definitive route shall be reinstated.

1.4.49 The Company is committed to maintain the current definitive rights of way Rempstone FP1 as long as possible. In addition to the formal diversion route the Company also propose to provide a route following the eastern and northern permission boundary which is considered to be more interested. During phase 1 and

16

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2 a small diversion would be identified around the proposed extraction area as shown illustrated on plan 13_COO7_ELEK_005_B this route would be fenced to protect public users.

1.1.50 The proposed routes should provide continued access of Rempstone FP1 during extraction and once restoration has been completed the original definitive route shall be reinstated. As the land is privately owned and shall be restored and handed back to the landowner as agriculture and conservation it is not possible to introduce additional access routes.

1.1.51 The Company has continue to provide a new link from bridleway to the Rempstone FP1 as approved through previous planning permissions.

1.1.52 The proposed restoration seeks to complement adjacent restoration details and provide a balance of agriculture and conservation helping to assist the Counties bio- diversity targets. Approved restoration schemes at East Leake Quarry consist of low level agriculture, silt lagoons naturally regeneration to conservation, wetland and landscaped planting. The proposed restoration scheme for Rempstone has been designed to complement the restoration schemes already approved, taking into consideration geological constraints, maintaining the landscape character of the Nottinghamshire Wolds whilst protecting best and most versatile agricultural land and further enhancing conservation and biodiversity. The proposal offers a mix of woodland, agriculture and water conservation.

17

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS

1.2.1. This planning application is being made under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011. The Regulations implement Council Directive No 85.337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment (the EIA Directive) as amended by Council Directive No 97/11/EC.

1.2.2. The application site itself has been assessed internally to determine if an environmental assessment is required. The proposed development is Scheduled 1 development under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011. The development is Schedule 1 as the proposed extraction area shall exceed 25 hectares and shall be in additional to the existing East Leake Quarry. It is therefore concluded that an environmental statement is required under the Town and County Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011.

18

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.3 THE ASSESSMENT TEAM

1.3.1. A number of in-house and external specialist consultants have been engaged to advice on the formulation of the proposals, and its potential environmental effects. Information on these for the relevant subject area is set out in the paragraphs below:

Ecology 1.3.2. Mr Henry Andrews of Andrews Ward Associates was appointed to conduct an ecological assessment of the application site.

Landscape and Visual 1.3.3. David Brittian CMLI MIQ who has experience in preparing LVIA’s, in relation to proposed mineral developments was instructed to undertake a landscape assessment.

Hydrogeology and Flood Risk 1.3.4. Hydrological assisted the analysis of Flood Risk of the proposed extension area and ESI undertook a Hydrological Assessment on behalf of Cemex.

Noise 1.3.5. Walker Beak Mason was appointed to assess the noise impact of the proposed development on nearby residential properties.

Archaeology 1.3.6. Mr Adrian Havercroft – The Guildhouse Consultancy was commissioned to undertake an assessment of the archaeological implications of the proposed development.

Air Quality 1.3.7 Tim Pinder of EA LTD was instructed to assess the impacts of dust nuisance and impacts upon air quality.

19

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Transport 1.3.8 PT Planners was appointed to undertake a transport assessment of the proposed development and surrounding highway network.

Soils 1.3.9 Adrian Rochford, undertook a soils analysis and agricultural land classification on behalf of Cemex

20

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.4 THE SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT

1.4.1. This statement has been prepared to provide objective environmental information to the Mineral Planning Authority (Nottinghamshire County Council) to enable it, following consultation with a range of technical expertise, to assess the environmental effects of the proposal. Such an assessment will be made by officers of the Council to the members of the Planning Committee and will be a material consideration in the determination of the application by the Council.

1.4.2. Environmental Impact Assessment is a structured procedure which enables the likely effects of a development to be considered, thereby enabling environmental improvements and mitigation measures to be incorporated into the design at the early stage of project planning. The assessment identified all issues of potential environmental and amenity concerns that might arise from the construction and operational aspects of the project.

1.4.3. An internal screening opinion was undertaken to determine the proposed application requires an Environmental Statement. Taking into consideration previous planning permissions it was considered that the following areas should be addressed:

1. The visual effects of the development – An assessment has been carried out. 2. The potential flood risk – An assessment has been carried out. 3. The effects on the quality of groundwater and surface water bodies – An assessment has been carried out. 4. The effects upon ecology and biodiversity – An assessment has been carried out. 5. The effects of noise upon local sensitive receptors - An assessment has been carried out. 6. The effects upon air quality – An assessment has been carried out. 7. The effects upon archaeology – An assessment has been carried out. 8. The effects upon the highway network – An assessment has been carried out.

21

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

9. The effect upon soil quality and agricultural land classification – An assessment has been carried out. 10. Need and the planning policy context – The Applicants steer on both have been set out in the Planning Statement (Vol 1). It is considered more appropriate for it to be included in that volume rather than within the more objective Environmental Statement. However, as some of the assessment refers to planning guidance and policies a policy schedule is attached in Appendix 14 to this statement. 11. Provision for monitoring – Provision for monitoring has been made where it has been concluded that this is necessary in the individual assessments.

1.4.4 The collation of technical data related to this Environmental Statement commenced 2012 at which point production had decrease temporarily and the Company was seeking planning permission on land known as Burton’s which why some details have developed and evolved.

22

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

1.5 ALTERNATIVES

1.5.1. An important element of the Environmental Assessment process is the examination of the main alternatives to the proposed development and the main reasons for the choice taking into account the environmental effects. In this instance it is considered that the following alternatives are available to the Applicant:

• Do nothing at all • Rely on alternative suppliers of mineral either from local sites or through importation to supply local contracts • Bring forward the application at a later stage • Bring forward alternative new sites in the vicinity

1.5.2 The planning statement contained in Volume 1 makes the case that the release of new reserves from the site will contribute to the maintenance of supplies to existing markets served by the current quarry. It is imperative that new reserves of mineral are brought forward at this stage because existing reserves at the quarry shall be depleted within 3 years

Rely on Alternative Suppliers 1.5.3 The release of Rempstone reserves would reduce reliance on alternative primary aggregate which is not a practical proposition as it would lead to supplies either being drawn into the county from elsewhere or excessive transportation of material as East Leake Quarry is one of the only sand and gravel extraction in the south of the County. Alternatively production from other mineral sites in the county might be increased but this would only mean that reserves at such sites would be taken up more quickly accentuating the need for new sites. Nor could the demand be met by ‘alternatives’ such as secondary and recycled aggregate because these materials are simply not of sufficient quality to be able to replace all sands and gravel products from East Leake. The reality is that the shortfall in output resulting from the closure of East Leake Quarry would mean that Nottinghamshire would have a market void in the south of

23

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

the county and may not be able to meet its sub-regional apportionment commitment unless new reserves are permitted to maintain current production levels.

Bring the Application Forward at Later Stage 1.5.4 If the proposed extension were to be brought forward at a later stage there would be pressure on the effectiveness of the site, ability to meet market demand. The quarry would have to close with the resultant loss in employment and infrastructure as existing reserves would have been depleted. In any event it is sustainable practice to maximise the recovery of as much mineral as possible to the highest grade as possible before the closure of a unit takes place and new sites are opened up.

Bring Forward Alternative Sites in the Vicinity 1.5.5 Cemex does not have any alternative site to East Leake within the surrounding 10km to bring forward at this time. The Company does have an existing site at Attenborough which would be in the final stages of production when Rempstone is proposed to commence and is therefore not an economically or viable alternative. The Company has a site over 30km in Derbyshire but the distance would not serve the same market and again has limited life to be considered an alternative to Rempstone – East Leake Quarry.

Do Nothing 1.5.6 The ‘Do Nothing Option’ would simply mean that the quarry would have to close and there would ultimately be increased pressure for new reserves to be identified from elsewhere in the County. As a consequence the delivery of the biodiversity benefits offered as part of the package of proposals could not be realised and recognised and reserves would be sterilised.

24

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.0 PART 2 – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.1 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS

2.1.1 The following section of the Environmental Statement presents an assessment of the environmental effects likely to arise from the development proposal. These include:

(a) An assessment of the existing situation to establish the environmental sensitivity of the area(s) likely to be affected by the proposed development.

(b) An assessment of the development in terms of: • Scale • Cumulative impact with other development • Use of natural resources • Potential to generate waste • Pollution or nuisance • Risk of accidents or injury resulting from the development

(c) A description of the measures envisaged to prevent, reduce and where possible mitigate any significant adverse effects on the environment.

2.1.2. The Environmental Assessment Regulations stipulate that the data required to identify and assess the main effects on the environment should be included in the Environmental Statement. Therefore each chapter in this statement should be read, where appropriate, in conjunction with the Technical Appendices contained in this volume.

2.1.3. A brief Non-Technical Summary of the proposal is set out in Volume 3.

25

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.2 ECOLOGY

Introduction 2.2.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, the direct and indirect effects of the proposal in species and habitats have been assessed. The Minerals Local Plan for Nottinghamshire contains polices and text concerning ecological impact issues in connection with development proposals, in particular M3.17

2.2.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents regard must be taken of impact of the proposal on sites of nature conservation interest as well as on individual species, to minimize the impact and seek opportunities to maintain and enhance interest. In order to assess the level of ecological impact a specific assessment has been undertaken by Andrews Associates Appendix 1 of the ES.

Background 2.2.3 East Leake Quarry was developed in the 1990’s as an operational sand and gravel pit. The earlier sand and gravel excavation was undertaken to the west of the proposed extraction area. The East Leake Quarry including the proposed extraction area, were shown on historic OS maps as consisting of agricultural land.

Ecological Summary 2.2.4 The present ecology of the proposed extraction area is described in the Phase 1 Habitat survey as ‘Arable Tillage’. The proposed extraction area is bound by narrow field margins holding ruderal vegetation, hedgerow, an area of scrub and a stream.

26

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.2.5 The proposed extraction area has historically been used as arable land. The field is an area of chemically enriched agricultural land and not considered significant. The field is of low conservation value and there is no evidence of protected or scheduled species due to unsuitability of existing habitats.

2.2.6 Ecological habitats are poor due to agricultural herbicides. None of the verges, hedgerows or woodland is designated as protected, although the boundary hedgerow qualifies as Biodiversity Action Plan Habitat. No badgers, great crested newts, bats, dormice, otters or water voles have been identified on site. The proposed extraction area could have potential for hedgehogs, priority species brown hare and bird species of conservation.

2.2.7 It is considered that there would be more conservation value during the short term mineral extraction through bare ground for hymenoptera and other insects. It is recommended that consideration be given to the retention of boundary hedgerow and Sheepwash Brook (implementing a 15m standoff) within the working scheme to prevent removal of important habitat and any potential impact upon protected species.

2.2.8 Due to the continued operational use of the silt lagoons and plant site, implementation of existing mitigation measures it is not anticipated that there shall be any significant impact on the existing nature conservation area which lies along Sheepwash Brook and the sites Fresh Water Lagoon.

Ecological Assessment

2.2.9 A baseline ecological assessment was undertaken May 2012 which included an extensive phase 1 survey of the proposed extraction area. The extraction area lies within 2km of two Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC). Sheepwash Brook Wetlands lies within close proximity to the sites northern boundary and hold

27

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

botanical interest and Stanford Park within 1 km to the south west provides wooded parkland.

2.2.10 The site lies within the Trent Valley and Rises Natural Area where farming is the principle land use. Habitats within a 30m of the site include semi-improved grassland, arable land, hedgerows and a pond. The proposed extraction area is a single arable field with limited weed typical of freely draining, sandy slightly acid soils.

2.2.11 The surrounding hedges are predominantly 1-3m in height. The main species of within the hedgerow is Common Hawthorn, Elder, Blackthorn and some Elm. The hedgerow boundary and Sheepwash Brook boundary do not provide any ancient trees or mature species although these features shall be retained as part of the proposed extension.

2.2.12 The existing agricultural land use with cereal crop and trimmed hedgerow provides limited wild plants species and therefore restricted invertebrate fauna like crop pests and common field species. The mature trees along the boundary could provide more diverse habitat value but in isolation and surrounded by intense agricultural operations are unlikely to support viable populations of uncommon species. It is therefore concluded that the proposed extraction area will not support significant invertebrate interest.

2.2.13 The proposed extraction area holds no water and the surround water features of the SINC and existing quarry are not suitable habitats for Great Crested Newts. The proposed extraction as tilled farmland does not support reptiles and there are no field margins to provide a corridor to Sheepwash brook which could hold species it is therefore concluded that no reptiles occur.

2.2.14 The decline in breeding birds of farmland is well documented. The proposed extraction area provides limited value for bird species as there is limited food resource. The hedgerow would support the typical rural farmland birds for example Blackbird, Robin, Wren and Whitethroat. The surrounding trees could provide nesting

28

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

sites for Wood Pigeon, Crows and Blue Tits. It is therefore concluded that with the current land use few birds will be present.

2.2.15 It has been considered that the trees on site could provide cavities utilised by bats. It should be noted that all trees shall remain in situ and be protected thorough out the life of the site. The proposed extraction area has the potential for birds of conservation concern and UK Bap priority species within the arable tillage although none present. The proposed extraction area is to be worked / restored in a phased manner enabling nest bird habitat to be retained and replace within the East Leake Complex to offset any negative impact up a potential priority bird species.

Conclusion

2.2.16 The proposed restoration could enhance the ecological value of the area with improved management of the hedgerow, retention of the existing trees and introduction of a conservation area with some planting that provides food sources to uncommon bird species.

2.2.17 It is therefore considered with appropriate phased working, progressive restoration and standoffs the proposed extension of sand and gravel within this area shall have a limited detrimental impact on the local ecology and a positive long term impact on the local ecology.

29

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.3 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT

Introduction 2.3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, the direct and indirect effects of the proposal on the landscape and visual impact have been assessed. The Minerals Local Plan for Nottinghamshire contains polices and text concerning landscape impact issues in connection with the proposal, in particular M3.3 and M3.4.

2.3.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan principally aim is to protect and enhance the landscape. In terms of development in the Countryside consideration must be given to the potential for material impact upon the landscape and visual amenity. The Company commissioned David Brittain to undertake a Landscape and Visual Assessment of the proposed development Appendix 2 of the ES.

Background

2.3.3 The area surrounding the proposed extraction area is rural in nature and the land use is primarily fields in agricultural use, with small blocks of woodland interspersed throughout the landscape and bound by managed hedgerow. The wider landscape is gently undulating with elevation generally between 65m AOD and 80m AOD. The proposed extraction area its self gently slopes from north south with an undulation within the field identifying a high point centrally in the extraction area with higher levels of 75m AOD. The brook level drops down towards levels of 70m AOD. The nearest water course is Sheepwash Brook which runs west to east within metres of the north boundary of the proposed extraction area.

2.3.4 The proposed extraction area is not located within a National Park or Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). There are no regional or district level landscape 30

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

designations that applies to the site. It is considered that the perception of the proposed extraction area by local people would not be regarded as a particularly special or of an especially high quality. It is considered that the value of the landscape in this context is of a medium sensitivity due to adjacent working, predominant agricultural use, openness and scope of character mitigation through restoration. The proposed restoration could replace that landscape lost and possibly improve the landscape value in relation to nature conservation.

Mitigation

2.3.5 To mitigate the potential landscape and visual impact it is proposed that existing boundary hedgerow by gapped up with locally appropriate species where necessary and maintained at a height of 1.8m. To further mitigate views from the south temporary storage mounds should be erected to a height of 3-5m. The mounds should be seeded and maintained by strimming and spraying as necessary. It is also proposed that restoration is progressive with soils directly replaced whenever possible.

Landscape Summary

2.3.6 Impacts on landscape character can take place both during the working period and following final restoration. It is considered that the proposed extraction area would have a medium sensitivity upon the local landscape during mineral extraction and a large magnitude of change with a moderate – major significant impact. The rational to these classifications is the operational extraction process which will disturb the whole landscape shall fluctuate between commencement of extraction within the 6 phases and progressive restoration. The proposed extraction area is located within an area of reasonably strong character and contains elements which contribute to a gently rolling landform. However the proposed extraction area is located adjacent to an existing quarry operation which has altered the landscape character therefore reducing the sensitivity of the proposed extraction area to similar proposals. It is considered that the existing landscape features within the proposed extraction area

31

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

could be largely replaced or complimented with other land uses without adversely affecting the intrinsic character of the wider surroundings and that the restoration proposals would positively contribute to biodiversity and nature conservation.

2.3.7 Ten years after restoration it is considered that the proposed extraction area would be fully integrated back into the local landscape and characteristics of the rural surroundings reducing sensitivity classification to medium small. The magnitude of landscape change is also considered minor - moderate. Although a large proportion of the land shall be restored to agriculture a significant section would be reclaimed as woodland and water conservation which is different to the original landscape but should complement the surrounding SINC and restored quarry areas. The landscape sensitivity and impact would be medium but the magnitude of change shall decrease from large too small.

Landscape Assessment

2.3.8 There are 10 main view points of the proposed extraction area that vary from being in close range, mid range and long range all predominately having a medium sensitivity. The footpath across the site and along the A6006 and A60 would experience medium sensitivity visual impact during operations which would demise during restoration. Beech Tree Lodge, The Oaklands/ Oaklands Farm would experience high sensitivity to the proposed development with a moderate to Major impact. The impacts decrease as the proposed extraction area is restored and therefore are considered temporary in nature.

2.3.9 Table 7 within the landscape assessment clearly assesses the view point sensitivity and magnitude of visual change and significance of the visual impact. The views from rights of way users will be impacted during operations as is proposed for the footpath to be diverted from a diagonal route across an open agricultural field to a field boundary walk between an established hedgerow and soil bund. Once operations have been completed the footpath shall be reinstated along the definitive line and with views of the new water features, plant, hedgerow formation and agricultural fields which could be considered a positive change upon the local 32

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

landscape. Oaklands Farm which has an elevated view of the proposed extraction area will see the progressive operations and restoration. The impacts of the short term / medium change cannot be mitigated and would form part of a changing landscape. The final restoration scheme would see the return of agricultural land and additional planting. Beech Tree Lodge and Clifton Lodge would notice a large magnitude of change and be a major sensitive receptor due to the proximity of the development. The property does have large conifers to the west but there are current views into the agricultural field. During the operational stage a 4m high mound shall be placed within 100m as a means of acoustic mitigation and shall also screen the property from operations. The mound itself can be construed as a visual impact although it shall be seeded and maintained to reduce visual significance until final restoration. Once the site has been restored the visual impact would be negligible.

2.3.10 It is therefore considered that the proposed development has a margin of change during operations which would have a moderate – major impact at elevated views. The Company propose gap up and maintain the existing hedgerow as a means of improving visual screening and the creation of soil bunds shall diminish visual impact. The period following restoration and aftercare would not have unacceptable impacts on landscape character or visual amenity.

Cumulative Landscape and Visual Impact

2.3.11 As Rempstone shall be the forth proposed extraction area related to the East Leake complex it is important to understand the cumulative landscape impact of the proposed development. When operations commence within Rempstone operations to the west of the processing plant shall be completed and restored, and Burton’s extraction area will be nearing completion. Jenks phase 1a is partially restored and phase 1b and 1c of Jenks shall be utilised as silt lagoons and the existing soil bund along the south boundary of Jenks shall remain in situ until final restoration. Taking the above into consideration it has been assessed that the cumulative magnitude of landscape change during operational / progressive restoration as medium, this would reduce to small once restoration has been completed over the whole site. The

33

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

cumulative impact of significance during operations would be moderate reducing to minor – moderate although beneficial.

Conclusion

2.3.12 It has been identified that the proposed working scheme for the extension area would have some adverse impacts on landscape character although the most significant of these would be of a temporary nature during extraction in a particular phase and would be less when other phases are being worked or progressively restored.

2.3.13 The site is reasonably well screened and adverse viewpoints from sensitive receptors would be of a temporary nature during initial soil stripping and bund construction and restoration placement.

2.3.14 It is concluded that the development proposals, either during the operational stage or following a period of restoration and aftercare would not have unacceptable impacts on landscape character or visual amenity.

34

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.4 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

2.4.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, the direct and indirect effects of the proposal on water have been assessed. Also the interaction that the impact upon the water environment may have upon human beings, flora and fauna will also need to be assessed.

2.4.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents there is an understanding to protect strategic river corridors and promote the sustainable management of water resources and also prevent pollution and the degradation of ground water resources, standing water and river systems. In order to assess the level of hydrological impact a specific assessment has been undertaken by ESI and Flood Risk Assessment by Hydrologic Appendix 3 of the ES.

2.4.3 East Leake Quarry lies adjacent to Sheepwash Brook. Surface water drainage to the extraction area is most likely to occur from the excavation faces.

Surface Water Abstractions

2.4.4 Environment Agency records indicate two abstraction licences within 2km of the extraction area. One of these (number 03/28/58/0030) is licensed to CEMEX UK Materials Ltd. and is located in the current quarry with groundwater used for mineral washing. It is within the quarry and is located about 500 m from the Extraction Area.

Licence number 03/28/57/0103 is located about 270 m to the south of the Extraction Area and is considered to be sufficiently close to be potentially impacted by the proposed extension. Data received from the Environment Agency indicates the source is for production of energy from water power with limits on the licence of 66,553 m 3/annum, 182 m 3/d and 7.7 m 3/hr. The Environment Agency data reports the abstraction is from a spring. It is noted that the location coincides with a well on OS 35

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

mapping. Rempstone spring is located about 100 m away to the south east. The abstraction coincides with discharge consent number T/57/45685/SG.

Discharge Consents

2.4.5 There are 17 discharge consents within 2km of the excavation area, two of which are within 1km of the extraction area. Consent number EPRXP3894VH is consented to CEMEX UK Materials Ltd. for site drainage, mineral washing and dewatering effluent at the current quarry. The consented maximum discharge is 1,512 m 3/d and 17.5 l/s. Records of the discharge rates supplied by CEMEX indicate the average discharge to be 89 m 3/d between December 2011 and July 2012.

Consent number T/57/45685/SG is located about 270 m to the south of the Extraction Area and related to sewage effluent discharge to land at Rempstone Hall via a soakaway. The maximum discharge rate is 7 m 3/d.

Flood Risk

2.4.6 The proposed extraction area is shown as being located within flood zone 1 which outside of the flood plain of the Kingston Brook or the River Trent or River Soar. The report by HydroLogic in Appendix 3 to this Statement clarifies the catchment area / characteristic, flood hazards and flood risk assessment.

Surface Water

2.4.7 The main surface water feature within 1km of the proposed extraction area is Sheepwash Brook which runs along the northern boundary and flows through East Leake Village and joins Kingston Brook. Kingston Brook joins the River Soar near Kegworth which then joins the River Trent near Long Eaton. Kings Brook is located 300m south of the extraction area and A spring named Rempstone Spring is located about 350m to the south of the extraction area. A further stream known as Lings Farm spring lies 200m south of the extraction area and flows through a pond to Kings 36

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Brook to the south. The watershed between the Sheepwash Brook and King’s Brook runs close to the A6006 which defines the southern boundary of the Extraction Area. A manmade lake is located between the extraction area and Sheepwash brook which is also designated a SINC, it is believed this lake is fed by a spring and has an outflow from the lake into Sheepwash Brook the marshy wetland is perched on clay material not affected by groundwater only rainfall.

2.4.8 Sheepwash Brook often dries out during dry summer periods, previous flow monitoring of the brook indicates an estimated flow of 0.81l/s based on an estimated spring catchment of 12 ha and an effective rainfall of 0.2m/a. A Flow of 2.5l/s was estimated on 8 February 2013 during a site visit.

Hydrology

2.4.9 The extraction area is within the Soar and tributaries water resource management unit which has a “water availability” status” (Environment Agency 2006)

Rainfall

2.4.10 The average annual rainfall within the area is 709.4mm (1961-2011) with the highest monthly rainfall occurring in December, with higher rainfall between August to January and lower rainfall occurring between February and July. The effective rainfall is 197mm per year. This is defined as the sum of rainfall less actual evapotranspiration. During periods of high evapotranspiration (April to August), the soil dries out and effective precipitation is low. When rainfall exceeds evapotranspiration and runoff (September onwards) the soil takes in moisture and once wet begins to release water as recharge to the ground (November onwards).

Hydrogeology

37

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Aquifer Characteristics

2.4.11 Shallow perched groundwater is likely to be present in the sand and gravel where they are underlain by less permeable deposits. Ground water levels indicate that the sand and gravel deposit contains significant amounts of ground water and that they are in hydraulic continuity with the Sheepwash Brook. Site investigations confirms that the Mercia Mudstone (secondary B aquifer), The Scunthorpe Mudstone (Secondary A Aquifer) and Glaciofluvial deposits (secondary A aquifer) underlies the proposed extraction area and would have good hydraulic continuity with the sand and gravel aquifer.

Aquifer Vulnerability

2.4.12 The sand and gravel (River Terrace Deposits and Glacial Deposits) would be classified as a major aquifer. These are highly permeable formations usually with a known or probable presence of significant fracturing. It is highly productive and able to support large abstractions for public water supply and other purposes.

2.4.13 Below the sand and gravel is Mercia Mudstone Clay, which is classified as a secondary aquifer. This aquifer designation is considered to represent permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers.

Groundwater Impact and Mitigation

2.4.14. There is a range of potential impact from dewatering activities associated with sand and gravel extraction and subsequent restoration of quarry voids although many can be avoided by good design and standard mitigation as summaried in table 3.1 below

Type of Impact Typical Mitigation Measures

38

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Impacts from dewatering through lower groundwater levels in surrounding Sand and Gravel deposits

Impacts on water levels in nearby abstractions Avoid working near sensitive features, wet working, cut off walls, recharge trenches, discharge of Impacts on habitats sensitive to shallow compensation flows to drains groundwater levels Impacts on water levels in nearby ponds and lakes in connection with the aquifer Impacts on baseflows in drains sourced from Sand and Gravel aquifer Impacts from quarry operation

Impacts on groundwater and surface water Settlement lagoons, standard quality from standard plant operation planning conditions regarding bunding of fuel tanks etc Impacts from discharge of water from de watering operations

Impacts on receiving drain water quality Settlement lagoons, controlled by discharge consents Impacts on receiving drain water flows Covered by flood risk assessment (FRA) Diversion of groundwater or surface water from Relocation of discharge point, one catchment to another discharge of compensation flows to drains Impacts from restoration

Long-term impact on groundwater levels (can be Appropriate design of restoration, either increased or decreased depending on particularly the materials used to details of restoration scheme) restore slopes and the level and location of the overflow point Additional loss of water from open water Reduce areas of open water in evaporation restoration concept Faster runoff from open water SUDS style overflow channels to minimise peak flows (covered by FRA)

2.4.15 The typical mitigation measures include avoid working nearby abstractions, sensitive habitats, implement recharge trenches and compensation flows, ensure a water management system of settlement lagoons, bunding of fuel tanks and appropriate design of restoration particularly the placement of material slopes and levels.

2.4.16 Potential impact related to lowering groundwater levels

39

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Nearby Abstraction – Nearest private abstraction is located at Rempstone Hall and Ling Farm from the nearest point of the extension area (phase 1). This is within the calculated radius of 80m, it is considered that mitigation measures may need to be employed to ensure no negative impact upon local abstraction area. In the event of an impact on the abstraction then the owner will be offered the provision of compensatory water. It is recommended that monitoring of the well and spring in this area be carried out to identify any impact, assuming that access is provided by the owner.

Sensitive Site –The Sheepwash Brook is located adjacent to the Extraction Area. It is likely that baseflow to the Sheepwash Brook will be reduced due to dewatering. However it is considered to be mitigated adequately by the continued discharge of excess water to the brook via the discharge consent. If there is concern about the flow up-gradient of the current discharge consent location then the discharge could be moved upstream. Evidence suggests the manmade lake (SINC) is fed by a spring and historical maps show a stream rising in the area shortly before joining the Sheepwash Brook. Therefore it is unlikely that the lake level will be impacted significantly by the proposed development. If lake levels/flow through are observed to fall/reduce then water can be pumped to the lake as a mitigation to maintain levels if this is deemed necessary to maintain ecological value.

Ponds and Lakes in connection with the Aquifer – The dewatering abstraction should not impact on adjacent pool which are sealed or perched (Marshy Area).

Impact on water quality from plant operations – potential impacts could occur on groundwater and surface water quality from spills associated with plant operation on site. These matters shall be address under existing planning conditions, infrastructure and good quarry management.

Impacts on receiving drain water quality and flows - To prevent suspended solids being discharged off site or blocking drains the existing settlement lagoon system shall be utilised which operated effectively and regulated by the Environment Agency.

40

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Diversion of baseflow from one catchment to another – It is not intended for baseflow to be placed in a different catchment as only minor drains shall be impacted between the proposed extension area and the River Soar.

Long Term Impact on Ground Water Levels - post restoration ground levels will be above current groundwater levels and groundwater levels will return to close to pre- quarrying levels after restoration and no significant long term impacts on surface water flows are anticipated.

Additional loss of water from open water evaporation – No large open water is planned for the site illuminating open water evaporation.

Faster run off from open water – Open water allows rapid transfer of water, relative to groundwater bodies where flow is impeded by the rock.

Summary

2.4.17 The private water supply at Lings Farm is located about 250 m from the edge of the existing excavation. It is likely that this source has been impacted from the existing quarry. However CEMEX has provided the source owner with an alternative source by drilling two additional boreholes in the area and no additional mitigation measures are required. Water levels in this well will recover once quarrying has ceased.

2.4.18 It not fully understood as to whether the source for abstraction licence number 03/28/57/0103 is from the Rempstone spring or a well. A potential reduction in groundwater levels at the well of c. 1m has been identified. Water levels at the well will recover once quarrying has ceased. It is estimated that the proposed dewatering could potentially reduce the expected average flow at the spring from 0.8 l/s to 0.4 l/s based on scoping calculations using an estimate of the spring catchment. In the event of an impact on the abstraction licence then the owner will be offered the provision of compensatory water.

41

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.4.19 The baseflow to the Sheepwash Brook may be slightly reduced due to dewatering. However it can be mitigated by the continued discharge of excess water to the brook. The impact on flow in Kings Brook will not be significant.

2.4.20 It is not considered that the marshy area within the SINC will be impacted by dewatering within the Extraction Area. Water levels within the man-made lake in the SINC are unlikely to be impacted significantly by the proposed development. Should an impact be identified then water can be pumped to this area as mitigation.

2.4.21 No significant long term impacts on surface water flows are anticipated.

Flood Risk

2.4.22 It is concluded that the proposed extension should have limited impact upon flood risk as the proposed extraction area is entirely within flood zone 1 and there is no flooding expected at this proposed extraction area from any sources. It is not anticipated that the proposed operations would increase flood risk within the site. Flooding is regarded as a low risk within the site and no special measures are considered necessary.

2.4.23 The proposed operations will remove an existing undulating field creating a zone and reducing surface run off and reducing flood risk for as long as the void is open. On completion of restoration the pre-extraction run-off regime will apply.

2.4.24 The storage bunds would create temporary run-off. This volume of water will primarily be directed into the quarry void if necessary a surface water trench can be installed at the base of the storage bunds to prevent water travelling onto the A6006. Mitigation measures include; grass seeding, regular inspections.

42

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Mitigation measures

2.4.25. Flooding is regarded as a low risk within the site and no special measures are considered necessary. The risk of runoff from the bunds should be minimised by the following actions: • Grass seeding on perimeter slopes • Construction of perimeter trench for interception of runoff and sediment if necessary (A trench 0.3 m deep x 0.8 m wide would have a storage capacity of

0.24 m 3 per metre of trench, giving a factor of safety of 1.5 to contain any runoff from the bund within the infiltration ditch.) • Regular inspection of the bunds with more frequent observations after heavy rainfall, to check on the integrity of the bunds, especially the perimeter slopes. • In order to transport the extracted material to the existing processing plant it is proposed that a haul road will be constructed on to the site of the proposed extension. If necessary is recommended that the haulage roads are bound by ditches to intercept any runoff. • The restored lakes shall not discharge as the water level is expected to be maintained in equilibrium with the surrounding water table and shall include a 0.5- 1m free board which will allow the lake to contain the runoff from the 100y plus climate change design rainstorm.

2.4.26. The restoration material shall be onsite silt, clay and inter-burden which are all native and inert reducing any ground water quality concerns.

2.4.27. The site has also commenced monitoring ground water levels 2013 at a set of periphery monitoring points via boreholes that have been installed as well as at the monitoring points set up for the existing quarry. Monitoring is established for surface water and this should continue to ensure that the level does not drop significantly in the outflow pool and to verify the quality of the discharge water as per the current discharge consent. These recommendations will be implemented and will enable the Company to ensure that there will be no adverse hydrogeological effects from the proposed operations and could be subject to a planning condition. 43

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Conclusion

2.4.28 It is clear that further extraction of mineral extraction shall have an impact upon the local ground water table during extraction although this will be reduced by progressive working and restoration. The Company proposes to monitor the drawdown impact and compensate water levels from the site, Sheepwash Brook water level shall be maintained via existing discharge consent and additional boreholes have been provided at Lings Farm to alleviate any impact on the existing well.

2.4.29 The site should not cause any significant impact upon local flooding and the proposed restoration scheme provides flood capacity for 100 y floods.

2.4.30 It is therefore considered with appropriate monitoring and mitigation measures no significant impact shall be caused from further mineral extraction at East Leake Quarry.

.

44

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.5 NOISE

Introduction 2.5.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, noise has the potential to impact human beings and fauna taking into consideration Policy M3.5 of Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan.

2.5.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents guidance controlling the effects of mineral development and keeping potential impact to a minimum during both noise- sensitive developments and those activities which generate noise. In order to assess the impact of noise a specific assessment has been undertaken by Walker Beak Mason Appendix 4 of the ES.

Background

2.5.3 The proposed extraction and restoration will be similar to existing operations. The main operations associated with the extraction of sand and gravel and restoration are as follows:-

(a) soil stripping/ overburden stripping and bund formation for typically a total of six to eight weeks per year annually including the formation of soil storage

(b) extraction of sand and gravel with an excavator to dig material and a loading shovel to place into the dump trucks

(c) Transportation of extracted mineral to the processing plant site by dump trucks concurrent with extraction

(d) Procession of material at the processing plant with a loading shovel to place material into lorries for transportation from East Leake Quarry; 45

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

(e) spreading and compaction of restoration material at the working face and

(f) shaping final restoration and spreading soils.

2.5.4 These operations are considered in the Noise Assessment Report which forms Appendix 4 to this Statement.

Noise Assessment

2.5.5 The noise assessment has taken into consideration the plant, machinery and vehicles related to operations to enable mineral extraction and restoration. Section 3.3 within the noise assessment clarifies the DB Lwa of the equipment which have been used in the calculations to predict noise impact and proposed noise levels.

Background Noise Levels

2.5.6 Background noise measurement was undertaken at locations around the proposed extension and existing site. The average background noise levels from five monitoring locations in 2012 were between 43 and 47dBL A90, T, Free Field.

2.5.7 Noise levels without any mitigation measures would be as follows.

Site Noise Calculation Location / Rece iver Noise Level Noise Limit dB L Aeq, T dB L Aeq, T

Lings Farmhouse 67 55 Home Farm Cottage 44 53 Rempstone Church 67 55 4 Loughborough Road 45 53 Beech Tree Lodge 74 54

2.5.8 The proposed noise levels do not include mitigation measures and is on the presumption that all plant is operating simultaneously. Temporary operations shall 46

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

continue at a higher noise level of 70-dB LAeq 1 hour free field for a maximum period of 8 weeks within any calendar year.

2.5.9 With the introduction of soil acoustic barriers of 3m in height along the A6006 within 35m from the carriageway and acoustic barrier 4m in height along the eastern boundary at a distance over 50m and existing barriers of dense foliage noise levels are reduced to as follows.

Si te Noise Calculation Location / Noise Level Noise Limit dB L Aeq, T Receiver dB L Aeq, T

Lings Farmhouse 46 55 Home Farm Cottage 43 53 Rempstone Church 47 55 4 Loughborough Road 43 53 Beech Tree Lodge 44 54

2.5.10 With the implementation of proposed mitigation measures it is presumed that the noise levels could reduce to 55dB LAeq 1 hour free field or below. It is recommended that noise limits be condition to that stated in the noise assessment in addition to a condition regulating the hours of operation to 0700 – 19.00 Monday to Friday and 0700 – 13.00pm on Saturdays with no operations on Sunday, Bank Holiday and National Holidays.

Noise Criteria

2.5.11 As the proposed development is extraction of sand and gravel and restoration via soil replacement the appropriate criteria for noise assessment is NPPF. It should be noted that the previously MPS 2 – “Controlling and Mitigating the Environmental Effects of Mineral Extraction in England”, which replaces Minerals Planning Guidance (MPG) 11, albeit the noise limits in both documents have been carried forward into the New National Planning Policy Framework.

47

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.5.12. For ‘temporary operations’, which include site preparation, construction of earth

screening bunds, bund removal and final restoration, a limit of 70 L Aeq is recommended, with a maximum period of 8 weeks in any 12 month period for such operations at any one property.

2.5.13. The appropriate noise limit for day to day filling operations recommended by NPPF

technical guidance is 55 dB LAeq , unless the background noise level at the receptor is

below 45 dB LA90, when the appropriate criterion limit in L Aeq terms is set at 10 dB(A)

above the background L A90 value.

Noise Modelling

2.5.14. Noise modelling is used to predict the noise impact of proposed development and is carried out by obtaining source noise levels for the significant proposed noise sources and calculating the noise for the relevant receptor locations taking into account distance from the source and any screening or additional attenuation from ground absorption.

2.5.15. It is common nowadays to use computer modelling software to carry out the necessary calculations with the defaults being set to apply the prediction method of BS5228. The location and height of the various sources and receptors are defined in the model, together with any intervening ground or barriers, and source noise levels and duration of activity assigned. This modelling technique has been used to calculate noise limits with and without mitigation as illustrated within the noise assessment.

Noise Assessment

2.5.16 The noise modelling undertaken takes into consideration different activities on site and the results are presented in the report in Appendix 4. The appropriate noise

assessment is based on the criteria set out in NPPF of 70 L Aeq for temporary 48

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

operations and 55 L Aeq for normal operations (or background + 10 dB(A) where the

background is below 45 L A90 ).

2.5.17. The appropriate noise criterion levels based on NPPF recommendations at the site are as follows:-

Location dB L Aeq, T Lings Farmhouse 55 Home Farm Cottage 53 Rempstone Church 55 4 Loughborough Road 53 Beech Tree Lodge 54

2.5.18 The activity associated with extraction and restoration of the application site will mainly take place well below the rim of the extraction face and shall be screened from the views from the Right of Way.

Noise – Conclusions and Mitigation Measures

2.5.19 The Noise Assessment Report in Appendix 4 to this Statement shows that NPPF noise limits can be achieved. For the vast majority of the life of the extraction and restoration including restoration the noise levels from operations within the proposed extraction area and processing plant will be at or below the appropriate criterion limits and will not significantly affect the area. However, towards the end of the restoration, there will be a short period when the screening effect of the extraction edge is reduced or lost completely and at that stage noise levels will be above the appropriate criterion level for normal operations. However the work could still be

completed well within the criterion level for temporary operations of 70 L Aeq.

2.5.20 To keep noise impact as low as possible on site speed limits shall be enforced of between 10-20mph, one way haulage routes to reduce reversing alarms and good maintenance of the site road surface will also help reduce noise. The Company shall

49

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

also where possible remove reserving alarms for alternative reserving safety measures to reduce noise.

2.5.21 As this application includes the whole site it is proposed that previous noise limits to the west of the permission area continue forward. Therefore the proposed limits are proposed for the whole site;

Location Site Noise Limit dB LAeq, 1h (freefield) Lings Farmhouse 55 Home Farm Cottage 53 Rempstone Church 55 4 Loughborough Road 53 Beech Tree Lodge 54 Holy Cross Cottage 55 Rempstone Hall 55 Home Farm 50 The Lings Farm 50

2.5.22 The implementation of proposed noise limits and additional mitigation measures it is not anticipated that the proposed extension shall not cause any further noise impact.

50

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.6 AIR QUALITY

Introduction

2.6.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, dust has the potential to impact human beings, fauna and flora. Any assessment has taken into consideration Policy M3.7 of Nottinghamshire’s Mineral Local Plan.

2.6.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents there is an understanding to protect, control and mitigate or remove at source the potential of dust emissions. In order to assess the impact upon Air Quality a specific assessment has been undertaken by EA Ltd Appendix 5 of the ES.

Background

2.6.3 The potential emissions to the atmosphere from extraction and restoration by the movement of material at the proposed extension to East Leake Quarry are from three main sources:-

(i) dust emissions from large scale earth moving during soil and overburden stripping, bund formation and site preparation and restoration; (ii) dust from extraction / loading /placement of restoration material; and (iii) dust emissions from lorry movements along the haul roads.

Site Preparation

2.6.4 Prior to mineral extraction all soils shall be stripped under appropriate soil handling conditions or directly placed where possible. The soil mounds shall be seeded to prevent erosion and the area becoming a dust source.

51

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Excavation and Restoration Operations

2.6.5 The excavation involves the use of a 360 excavator and wheeled loading shovel. Sand and Gravel at East Leake is damp in nature reducing dust nuisance. The sand and gravel will be directly placed on dumpers and transported via internal haul roads to the existing processing plant. Restoration operation will involve the placement of soils and interburden clay to create final contours. This will be followed by the spreading of soils for restoration purposes. All sizes of particle will be present and considerable kinetic energy may be imparted to dusts during the placement of material.

Lorry Movements

2.6.6 Dumpers moving soils and restoration material shall travel along the main haul roads. This operation is not expected to generate significant quantities of dust and the routes will in any event be mainly below ground level and are not close to any residential properties. All haul roads shall be dampened as and when necessary to prevent dust particles.

2.6.7. The degree to which significant dust emissions that are capable of causing nuisance can arise from a particular site depends upon various factors, including:

(a) Time of year and climatic conditions, with dry conditions and high wind speeds being conducive to dust generation.

(b) Particle size distribution, with smaller, drier particles capable of entrainment at a lower threshold velocity. Most aggregates are too large to be entrained.

52

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

(c) Surface characteristics, with vegetation cover making material in bunds less susceptible to entrainment.

(d) Working methods, particularly vehicle movements, are capable of causing dust if not controlled.

(e) The proximity of environmentally sensitive receptors.

(f) The provision of control measures, aimed at alleviating the impact.

Mitigation Measures – Dust Control

2.6.8. A number of possible sources of dust have been identified which, in the absence of any remedial measures, have potential to give rise to dust nuisance. The following remedial measures shall be implemented to control dust emissions associated the proposed extraction area and related infrastructure.

2.6.9. Dusts, fibres and particulates are found in sand and gravel with a fines content and soils. They are generated during periods of dry weather in combination with windy conditions. The focus of the dust management is to control dust generation and movement at source and the main sources of dust at the Quarry are likely to be from the internal haul roads and from the surface of the restoration material during periods of dry weather.

2.6.10. The following dust control measures will be implemented and maintained throughout the operational life of the Quarry, with the objective of preventing or minimising the release of airborne dusts, fibres and particulates arising from the extraction and restoration operations in such quantities or concentrations that are likely to cause pollution of the environment or harm to human health.

53

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

General

• A high standard of housekeeping shall be maintained at all times

• All operatives receive formal training and instruction in relation to the control of the process and emissions to air.

Soil Movements

• Soil movements will be restricted to low meteorological periods

• Vehicle speeds will be limited

• The duration of the activity will be minimal

• Disturbance surfaces will be re-seeded as soon as is practicable

Mineral Excavation & Restoration

• Limited stockpiles

• Phasing / progressive restoration

• Placement of restoration material will be undertaken as slowly as possible

• A water bowser and sprays will be available to moisten material if required

Vehicle movements

• Vehicle speeds will be restricted

• The access road will be damped down when required using a water bowser

• Loading and unloading will occur in areas protected from wind

• Drop heights will be minimised

• All vehicle loads will be sheeted and loads inspected to ensure no potential spillages

• A water bowser and sprays will be available to moisten material if required.

General Procedures

54

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.6.11. The site manager will exercise day to day control over East Leake Quarry including proposed extraction area at all times and will have particular responsibility for securing full compliance with the conditions attached to the planning permission. Specifically he will assume control, either personally or by delegation to responsible staff, of -

(a) vehicle movements,

(b) all loading, placement of soil and material handling operations,

(c) the operation of dust suppression measures and

(d) inspection, cleaning and maintenance of all plant and equipment.

2.6.12. All staff / contractors will receive the necessary training relating to control of operations and potential sources of dust emission, including in particular, plant malfunctions and abnormal conditions. Staff will report any visible dust emissions to the site manager. The continuing effectiveness of the dust management scheme will be regularly reviewed.

2.6.13. Monitoring of dust will involve visual inspections of the extraction area, access roads and haul roads by the site manager or his deputy at least twice during each working day, with the details, results and weather conditions being recorded in a site log book.

2.6.14 The focus of the dust scheme will be to control dust generation and movement at source. An internal procedure shall be in place to deal with any significant release of dust or particulates outside the East Leake Quarry boundary and there will be a complaints procedure in operation to deal with any complaints by local residents, with a register of complaints kept on within the Quarry offices to record all concerns expressed either directly to the site or via regulatory authorities. Each complaint will be investigated and the action taken recorded and the minerals planning authority will be advised in writing within two weeks of any dust complaint received, together with the findings of the investigation and corrective action taken.

55

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Soil Movements and Handling

2.6.15. Soil stripping has to be undertaken when soils are dry and friable but shall not be moved in extreme weather conditions. However, dust can arise from the physical operations associated with the handling of restoration material and soils. When necessary, the working areas will be sprayed with water to suppress dust using a bowser, although such applications will be controlled.

2.6.16. Towards the later stages of the restoration, in the higher areas within the quarry, there is increased potential for fugitive dust emissions to escape from the extraction area. However, the progressive nature of the restoration work will ensure that the operational restoration area will be confined to relatively limited areas at any one time. This will ensure that the potential for dust arising will be reduced and that dust management controls can be focussed and concentrate on specific limited areas.

2.6.17. The control measures shall include the construction of temporary bunds, if considered appropriate. In unusually dry or windy conditions, placement of restoration material and soil handling would be suspended if it appears likely that dust could be carried towards any sensitive receptors.

Vehicle Movements

2.6.18 All lorries will be required to have sheeted loads in order to avoid the spillage of material or creation of dust outside the Quarry. Within East Leake Quarry internal movements will be restricted to clearly delineated routes, generally on a prepared surface and at low level wherever possible. The haul routes will be compacted, graded and maintained to provide a smooth running surface and will be designed to avoid sharp changes in gradient or alignment.

56

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.6.19. Temporary haul roads will be maintained in good condition and kept free from mud by regular grading, good drainage and use of hardcore as necessary. In dry weather, when necessary, a water bowser will be used to dampen the surface of haul roads and suppress dust where necessary.

2.6.20. All site vehicles will be maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s specification and will be fitted with upswept exhausts and radiator cowls. Internal haulage speeds will be controlled in order to minimise possible dust entrainment and appropriate instructions will be issued to all drivers.

2.6.21 The Quarry entrance and access road will be inspected daily to check whether they are clean and tidy and a road sweeping vehicle will be ordered within 24h if an inspection indicates mud levels are unacceptable. Movement of vehicles on or off site may be restricted as necessary and additional inspections will be carried out in response to complaints or following particularly heavy rainfall.

Air and Climatic Factors

2.6.22. East Leake Quarry does not lie with any of the local air quality management areas. Rushcliffe Local Air Quality Management assessment also confirmed that there are no areas of concern with regard to dust concentrations in the area and ambient particulate air quality standards are predicted to continue being in compliance with the UK Air Quality Standards. East Leake Quarry is not required to hold an Environmental Permit as the moisture content of the material excavated will ensure the risk of dust emission is very low.

Emissions to Air

2.6.23. Dusts, fibres and particulates are found in material with fines content and soils and they are generated during periods of dry weather in combination with windy

57

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

conditions. The main sources of dust are likely to be from movements along internal haul roads.

2.6.24. The measures that are to be implemented and maintained throughout the operational life of the Quarry are described in detail within the Air Quality Assessment. The objective of the measures will be to prevent and minimise the release of airborne dust, fibres and particulates arising from the permitted sand and gravel operations in such quantities or concentrations as are likely to cause pollution of the environment or harm to human health.

2.6.25. There will be some exhaust emission from the plant and machinery operating at the Quarry and the vehicles transporting material, which will all have diesel engines. However, the machine and vehicles will all be fitted with exhaust equipment in accordance with legislation under EC Directives.

2.6.26 The mitigation measures proposed in relation to dust control from operations at the Quarry were described above and involve a dust scheme focussed on control of dust generation and movement at source. Specific measures comprise:

(i) Sheeting of lorries (ii) Internal haul routes to be defined, with prepared surface and to be dampened as necessary (iii) Upswept exhausts on site vehicles (iv) Dampening of surface of restoration areas when necessary (v) Suspension of operations in extreme windy conditions (vi) Bunding, as needed (vii) Progressive restoration to minimise open areas.

Conclusion

58

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.6.27 These measures, together with a dust monitoring scheme for dust control will ensure that the continuation and development of sand and gravel extraction could be established and operated in a manner which would eliminate any impact from dust on the surrounding environment or adverse effect on the local amenity.

59

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.7 ARCHAEOLOGY

Introduction

2.7.1. The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, the direct and indirect effects of the proposal on material assets and the cultural heritage have been assessed.

2.7.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents including Policy M3.24, M3.25 of Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan. The policies seek to protect sites of archaeological importance and their setting and preserve listed buildings, their settling and historical context. The policies set out the need for archaeological evaluation of the full effect of the development proposal. In order to assess the level of hydrological impact a specific assessment has been undertaken by Guildhouse Consultancy Appendix 6 of the ES.

2.7.3 Guildhouse Consultancy, a copy of whose report is reproduced in Appendix 6, carried out a desk-based assessment of archaeological and historic features.

Existing Situation

2.7.4 A desk based study of the proposed extension area at Rempstone has been undertaken to determine what, if any, evidence exists of archaeological features within and around the site. Those sources included the County Sites and Monuments Record, the Local Studies Library and the County Record Office and include maps dating back to 1769.

2.7.5 This work has established the following:

(i) There are no Scheduled Ancient Monuments within or adjacent to the site;

60

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

(ii) There are no formally designated archaeological sites or historic features within or immediately adjacent to the site; (iii) There are no listed buildings or conservation areas within or adjacent to the site; (iv) There are no formally Registered Parks or Gardens within the site; and (v) There are no registered Battlefields

2.7.6 The Parish Boundary of East Leake and Rempstone provides evidence of medieval ploughing and some pottery as identified during previous investigation. Surrounding archaeological finds include St Peter’s in the Rushes from which the stone was used to create Rempstone Church as it stands, the original grave yard which continues to be used by the Rempstone Church. .

Potential for Archaeology

2.7.7 Both topographically and in terms of soil characteristics the site has been classified as ‘favourable’ so far as archaeological potential is concerned.

2.7.8 For the different archaeological periods a summary assessment of archaeological potential has been undertaken based on the desk assessment as follows: Earlier Prehistoric – Palaeolithic:‘In-situ deposit – Low; Redeposited artefacts – Low- Medium Potential Mesolithic: All Features Very Low Potential Earlier / Later Neolithic; Isolated features / small clusters – confirmed monuments - Low Later Prehistoric Early Bronze Age: Isolated features – confirmed (minimal activity only) monuments – low Later Bronze Age / Early Iron Age; Settlement related features / deposits Medium - High Iron Age: Diffused features – confirmed Late Iron Age / Early Roman and Roman 61

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Later Iron Age/ Early Roman; Diffused settlement feature enclosures/ field system) - Confirmed Roman: PDAN peripheral settlement features – low- medium Medieval Medieval: Early (410-1065 AD) – Anglo Saxon features – very low Later (1066-1500 AD) small focus with structural remains and associated occupation – confirmed; other features - low Post Medieval / Recent Post Medieval / Recent; field boundaries – confirmed; significant features – low Undated features All features - low

2.7.9 In addition the potential for environmental remains has been noted as ‘low-medium’ with isolated waterlogging and mineralized deposits / artefacts being assessed as low.

2.7.10 There are no Listed Buildings with the proposed extraction area but there is an early 19 th Century Listed building 175m south east in the form of Rempstone Hall and Stanford Hall 500m south west. There are other listed buildings in the form of farm house, cottages and swimming pools within close proximity of the proposed extension. Stanford Hall Gardens is also a registered Park and Garden classified an English Heritage Grade 2 Park. The proposed extraction area is not identified as a Battlefield although Battle did take place within the vicinity.

Assessment of Archaeological Effects

2.7.11 The Archaeological Desk Based Assessment (PDA) lies on a North East facing slope between 79-72 AOD on the same topographical terrain as the current workings and there is no evidence to suggest that landuse has been any different between the two locations. Both lie on rising ground close to the minor watershed between Sheepwash and Kingston Brooks. Previous working known as Jenks was clearly used for funerary and some form of settlement in the later prehistoric periods and again cemetery in the early Anglo-Saxon period. The funerary location appear to be 62

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

topographically related to slightly elevated areas (hill/ridge) and whilst the PDA has no such visible features it does rise to the western boundary and there is a slight high spot on the eastern boundary – both of these location may have increased potential because of this. Overall the PDA is viewed topographically favourable and soil related favourable.

2.7.12 There is no evidence of Palaeolithic, no confirmed Mesolithic activity, limited Neolithic activity (limited to 20 flints), there is clear evidence of Bronze Age in the form of funerary and there is material from the Middle Iron Age. The extraction area also shows no signs of Roman features, there is demonstrable evidence for Anglo-Saxon in the form of burials near Sheepwash Brook, evidence shows Later Medieval settlements near Rempstone and there is also evidence of Post Medieval activity.

2.7.13 Any archaeological remains could have been affected by the limited topsoil covering, long term cultivation, digging of pits for mineral, previous use of metal detectors, soil acidity and animal and plant disturbance.

2.7.14 There is a clear evidence base from the existing working that there is a high potential from Late Medieval and Post Medieval, Anglo-Saxon, Bronze Age with some potential for Iron Age. The quality of finds and remains will vary of the extraction area due to agricultural cultivation.

2.7.15 The proposed development would result in the disturbance of archaeological resources except along the field margins. To mitigate archaeological impact a continuous or intermittent observation of topsoil stripping shall be undertaken which would then enable preservation by record. For sites of major significance ‘set-piece’ excavation shall be undertaken sites of lesser significance by sample excavation and recording. Mitigation involves archive consolidating, interim assessment and reporting with an overall assessment with analysis being published and then archive deposition.

Mitigation Measures 63

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.7.16 Trial Trenching, was undertaken autumn 2013 which did not identify any find which would require preservation in situ. Details of the trial trenching can be found in Appendix 6.

2.7.17 After discussions with Nottinghamshire County Archaeological Curator it was advised that archaeological trial trenching would be required prior to planning determination. Trial trenching was undertaken on the proposed extraction area. 17 trenches were cut approximately 100m x 2m (3300m 2) which provides a 4% sample. The trial trenching shall clarify and characterise the level of truncation / preservation of archaeological remains, and provide additional data as to the archaeological potential of the extension area and its significance or otherwise, relative to the regional research agenda.

2.7.18 The trenches were identified for the following reasons; Trench Schedule (as supplied by consultant - A.Havercroft July 2013) 01 ?Anglo-Saxon Field System ditch from Jenk’s Land/High Ground 02 Large W-E Ditch (?Late Iron Age land boundary) from Jenk’s Land 03 Large SW-NE Ditch (?Late Iron Age land boundary)from Jenk’s Land 04 S Peters Churchyard – possible associated medieval/post-medieval features 05 Lower slopes on West side of north central knoll 06 Upper subsoils/profile in slight ‘valley’ – already seen in Jenk’s Land 07 Upper subsoils/profile in slight ‘valley’ – already seen in Jenk’s Land 08 Level ground in lee of higher ground to the SW and S 09 Contour deflection towards the southern base of north central knoll 10 Top of north central knoll and slope to the SE 11 Site of Gravel Pit and access on 1769 Rempstone Tithe/HER location for A/S brooches 12 Level ground lying between high ground to the N, NW and w where contours at E end of the shallow ‘valley’ fork to N & S of high ground to the E 13 Level ground to the SE of north central knoll 14 Level ground to the E of north central knoll 15 Lower slope of rising ground at east end of site and with margin of Sheepwash Brook 64

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

16 Central slope of high ground to east/minor contour deflection/HER location ?A/S Drinking horn/’’horned god mount’ 17 Lower slope of high ground towards SE

2.7.19 Initial results indicate fairly widespread feature distribution with only 1 or 2`blank` of virtually `blank` trenches. Features identified are as expected all `earth cut` into the subsoil/natural horizons. Future soil stripping shall need to take topsoil and then probably the same depth (if not more in places) of upper sub type material to be able to see the archaeological interface. Feature definitions have been variable and include `linears` (?enclosures/field systems) possible post holes/structure on top of `rise` at N end of Trench 10 (highest spot). Subsoil type material is very different and clayey in this Trench, Thrussington Till deposit as predicted. No sign of any burials adjacent to churchyard nor any obvious trace of medieval/later settlement going with church - so it does seem that the churchyard boundaries are definitive. No obvious signs of any Saxon burials although knowledge of the area should not preclude the possibility.

65

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.7.20 The findings of the archaeological trenching indicate there are archaeological features within the proposed excavation area but non requiring preservation in situ. It is therefore concluded that the proposed mitigation strategy of strip, map and sample be the most appropriate means of mitigation.

2.7.21 The following mitigation strategy is proposed based upon a strip, map and sample methodology which has been successfully applied on the previously permitted areas.

2.7.22 Continuous observation of topsoil and upper subsoil type material strips as agreed with the archaeological officer (on behalf of the MPA) with a general contractor project design for strip, map and sample to enable investigation of (i) Site of major significance by set –piece excavation (ii) Sites of lesser significance by sample excavation and recording

o Intermittent observation of the mineral with (i) and (ii) as above

o Archive consolidation, finds / sample processing and summary interim reporting

o Overall assessment at the conclusion of all siteworks and updated project design

o Analysis and publication

o Archive deposition

2.7.23 It is proposed that this mitigation strategy be formally secured by an appropriate condition attached to any grant of planning permission thus ensuring that any archaeological features are properly identified and recorded.

Historic Environment

66

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.7.24 The proposed extension area is located within close proximity to Rempstone Parish All Saints Church which Grade II listed building. The historic curtilage of the Church is defined by mature trees and woodland planted since the 18 Century. The Church setting has expanded over recent years to incorporate a parishioner’s car park and further areas for final resting.

2.7.25 National Planning Policy Framework requires applicants to describe the significance of any heritage asset affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The Desk Based assessment acknowledges surrounding listed building and in this instance it is considered All Saints Church would be a feature affected by the proposed development. The location of Stanford Hall or Rempstone Hall is such that it is not considered the proposed extension to East Leake Quarry would impact the setting of the Grade II* buildings and park land as it is separated by the A6006 and existing quarrying operations.

2.7.26 The setting of All Saints Church would be the footprint of the church grounds as the surrounding land to the north east is residential, to the east and south the site is bound by the A6006 and the agricultural land to the west is a changing landscape through agricultural operations and crop regime. The Church building is screened by existing vegetation but the larger footprint of the church grounds would be open to view of the proposed extraction area. When considering the impact of the development upon the Church there are two elements to consider, operational and restoration.

2.7.27 The operational period is anticipated to be between 10-12y. It is proposed for screening mounds and landscaping to be introduced around the church to protect the tranquility of the site from distant operational noise and visual activity. This would mean the car park would lose the open views of the agricultural fields and right of way which leads to the historic cemetery, but this would be temporary. The scheme seeks to retain a link and public right of way between the church and the historic cemetery through the operational period by travelling either side of the operations 67

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

which will still enable parish walker to see the church tower. A screening bund will be created along the line of the electricity wires which will be seeded and landscaped to prevent views of the operations, reduce impact from noise and dust.

2.7.28 Upon completion of operations the site shall be restored to agriculture and wetland. The views from the church will be restored to agriculture with the original right of way reinstated in it definitive route. The reclamation of the site would see part the historic landscape instated adjacent to All Saints Church.

2.7.29 It is not considered that the proposed development would significantly harm the setting of All Saints Church during the operation phase or upon restoration.

68

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.8 TRANSPORT AND ACCESS

Introduction

2.8.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, transportation and traffic has the potential to impact human beings, flora and fauna. The impact on air quality and climate will also need to be assessed.

2.8.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents including M3.12, M3.13 and M3.14 and planning policy should prevent demonstrable harm to the function of highway network and promote traffic management. In order to assess the transport impact a specific assessment has been undertaken by PT Planners Appendix 7 of the ES.

2.8.3 Access to the extraction area is via an internal haul road through East Leake Quarry which runs from the quarry plant site running easterly through the previous extraction area known as Jenks and an existing hedgerow. Only internal vehicles shall use this internal haul road. External vehicles shall continue to use the main site access via A6006 / Rempstone Road.

2.8.4. The existing site access leads onto Rempstone Road which is classified as B road with a maximum speed limit of 60mph. The site access has been designed in accordance with Highway standards and has sufficient visibility of 150m in either direction which is considered sufficient for the continuation of vehicles leaving the site. Rempstone Road is a quiet country road and therefore does not require a right turning lane into the site due to the limited vehicle use of the site. From Rempstone Road HGV’s travel left out of the site for approximately 150m to the Junction with the A6006. Again the junction has adequate visibility and vehicles are permitted to travel in either direction. 69

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.8.5 No HGV’s are allowed to turn right out of the quarry towards the village of East Leake as set out in a clause within the existing 106 legal agreement which would be replicated within a new 106 agreement should planning permission be approved.

Existing Traffic Patterns

2.8.6. Existing traffic patterns were investigated through weekday classified surveys undertaken on Tuesday 10th May 2012 at the quarry entrance and the junction with the A6006 between the hours of 07.00 and 10.00 and 15.30 and 18.30. These time periods were chosen as they should represent maximum network traffic. The survey data confirmed that the peak hourly flows occurred between 0730-08.30 and 16.30- 17.30. Traffic flow data is illustrated in Appendix 7 within the Transport Assessment.

Existing Quarry Traffic

2.8.7 The existing operations generated approximately 90 HGV vehicles per day. The traffic survey confirmed that limited quarry vehicles travel at peak flow periods.

Accident History

2.8.8 Analysis of Highway safety records confirms a limited accident history for local roads as a total of 6 accidents occurred between 2008 and 2012 over the whole study area. Of which 3 were classified as slight and 3 classified as severe. The accidents were not located at the Quarry entrance nor did they involve vulnerable road users. It is therefore concluded that vehicle associated with the Quarry have caused no direct accidents in the area.

70

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Proposed Development

2.8.9. The proposed development shall not increase mineral production above historic levels of approximately 100-180,000tpa therefore a daily level of approximately 72- 100 vehicle movements shall continue and the proposed development will not generate any additional traffic using the local highway network, when compared with the current site operations.

2.8.10. The site shall continue to implement vehicle safety controls relating to speed, segregation, manoeuvring, parking and access to the working areas, sheeting/ containment, dampening of roads by water bowser, maintenance of surfaces and entry and exit via the weighbridge.

Traffic Issues

2.8.11 It is concluded that the quarry access arrangements and local highway network remains suitable to accommodate traffic associate with a continuation of quarrying activities until all mineral extraction and operations shall have ceased. Since 1991, when the first mineral extraction consent was granted there have been no reported highway safety or capacity issues associated with quarry traffic using this route to access the wider highway network of the A6006. It is therefore considered that the existing access is suitable to accommodate traffic associated with a continuation of quarrying activities. The Junction with the A6006 was deemed suitable by the Highway Authority in 1991 and subsequent permissions. An assessment of the junction has been undertaken within the Transport Assessment and it is concluded that the junction should continue to operate within its design capacity and should not have a detrimental impact to highway safety.

2.8.12. The local highway authority has previously deemed the environmental network impact of 100 daily trips associated with the quarry to be acceptable for the local highway network. This level is not predicted to increase as part of this proposal and therefore should remain acceptable. 71

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.8.13. The percentage increases in traffic flows on the local roads have been assessed by the two rules of thumb given in the IEA Guidelines for use in an initial screening process

• Rule 1: include highway links where traffic flows will increase by more than 30% (or the number of heavy goods vehicles will increase by more than 30%)

• Rule 2: include any other specifically sensitive area where traffic flows have increased by 10% or more.

2.8.14. As noted in the EIA Guidelines, an increase in traffic flows of less than 10% is within normal day-to-day variation and should therefore be assumed to create no discernable impact on the traffic/road environment.

2.8.15 The proposed develop does not equate to any percentage increase in vehicle movements.

Conclusions on Impact of Road Traffic

2.8.16. Since the development will not result in additional traffic using local highways or the wider network, it will not be necessary to change the current access and management arrangements for East Leake Quarry.

2.8.17 As the development will not result in additional traffic using Rempstone Road or the A6006 and allowing for growth in background traffic levels, this route will remain well within its design capacity.

72

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.8.18 Over all the report demonstrates that the current arrangements for traffic associated with East Leake Quarry remains suitable for the continuation of sand and gravel extraction proposed.

73

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.9 SOIL AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Introduction

2.9.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) states that the direct and indirect effects of development should be assessed in terms of their impact on specific factors. Based on the factors identified in Article 3 of the EIA regulations, the direct and indirect effects upon the soil environment may have upon the flora and fauna and the loss of agricultural land upon human beings will also be assessed.

2.9.2 In considering the issues set out in NPPF, Development Plan and other policy documents M3.16 there is an understanding to protect best and most versatile agricultural land and conserve our natural resources, including soil quality. In order to assess the agricultural classification an assessment has been undertaken Stephen Rochford Appendix 8 of the ES.

2.9.3 A soil and agricultural land classification report was commissioned to confirm the extraction area land classification and pre-working physical condition of the agricultural field.

2.9.4 A survey was undertaken on site on the May 2012 and August 2012 which included 50 auger borings and 4 pits at or close to locations 100m apart as determined by the OS grid.

2.9.5 The proposed extension is more complex than previous surveys of the existing quarry as it has two main types of soil, linked to the main geological formations. The topsoil has been described as very dark grey brown, medium sandy loam with 15% small, medium and large rounded stones and subsoil type material is split into two levels although has historically been processed as it is very stony with medium sandy loam and not dissimilar to the reserve. The extraction also includes clay loam type subsoil material which underlays proportion of the grade 2 agricultural classification.

74

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.9.6 The agricultural land classification quantifies the proposed extension is grade 2-3 with the majority being 2 and 3a with small sections of 3b.

2.9.7 There is an average thickness of 35cm of topsoil and stony subsoil type material and varies between 30-70cm in depth, historically the stony subsoil type material has been processed due to the high content of sand and stone.

2.9.8 All soil handling and storage shall be undertaken in accordance with DEFRA good practice guide to soil handling and the soil handling scheme Appendix 15 to the planning statement.

2.9.9 It is recommended with quantity of soils on site that the restoration profile provides 30cm topsoil and a typical depth of 30cm of loamy subsoil type material and 30cm of inter-burden site waste. This recommendation has been taken into consideration in the design of the restoration scheme and soil placement for agriculture and woodland planting areas.

2.9.10 All soils shall be retained on site and handled in accordance with DEFRA good practice guide, soils shall be stored appropriately in 3m high bunds (topsoil) or 4-5m high bunds (interburden / clay) seeded and maintained or direct placed. A significant proportion of the extraction area shall be reclaimed to grade 2 /3 best and most versatile agricultural land. It is therefore consideration appropriate mitigation measures shall be implemented to ensure no significant impact is caused to soil resources on site.

75

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.10 CUMULATIVE IMPACT

2.10.1 This section of the Environmental Statement assesses the potential cumulative impact of the proposed developed. An assessment is made in of the impacts upon existing mineral extraction in addition to sensitive receptors.

2.10.2 The assessment of cumulative impact is required as part of an ES under schedule 4 of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 2011. There is only one mineral site located within 5km search of the proposed extraction area which is East Leake sand and gravel extraction operation.

2.10.3 In terms of the cumulative impact upon communities the key urban areas are East Leake Village and Rempstone Village. These communities are therefore identified as a potentially sensitive receptor to cumulative impact arising from the proposed extension area at East Leake Quarry.

2.10.4 Specific sensitive receptors are also identified throughout the Environment Statement at being the following;

Lings Farmhouse Home Farm Cottage Rempstone Church 4 Loughborough Road Beech Tree Lodge The Lings Farm Rempstone Hall / Holy Cross Cottage Home Farm

2.10.5 Nottinghamshire Local Plan makes reference to potential cumulative impact specifically within policy M3.27 which states;

POLICY M3.27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT

76

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Planning permission will not be granted for minerals development which would result cumulatively in a significant adverse impact on the environment and/ or the amenity of local communities.

2.10.6 There are currently no statutory guidelines adopted in the UK for the assessment of cumulative impact. Guidance has therefore been adopted from the EU document ‘guidelines for the assessment of indirect and cumulative impacts as well as impact interactions’. Cumulative impacts are impacts that result from changes caused by other past, present or reasonable foreseeable action, together with those directly attributable to the project. These guidelines detail the assessment of cumulative impact under two different definitions;

Incremental

Incremental impacts in that which occur when one type of impact from a development occurs at the same time as another impact from a separate development.

Combined

Combined impact relates to different kinds of impact caused by one development at on particular location.

2.10.7 There are no surface mineral extraction areas within 2km of the site, East Leake British Gypsum site is located 2.5km to the north and Bunny Landfill is located 3.5km to the north east of East Leake Quarry. Neither operations directly link to the A6006 but do link into the large highway network of the A60. Bunny Landfill is within the latter stages of development and East Leake British Gypsum is excavated below ground level both operations beyond high undulation of the Nottingham Wolds and are not visible from East Leake Quarry and beyond the a cumulative distance regarding noise dust and ecology.

2.10.8 This section summaries the likely cumulative impacts of the proposed extraction area in relation to sensitive receptors and existing mineral extraction.

77

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Table 10.1

Summary of Incremental impact

Potential impact Type of impact Development

Transport Incremental Production and vehicle levels shall remain as permitted at a level of 100 vehicle movements per day and an average production level of 100- 180,000tpa. East Leake Quarry is the only minerals and waste operation to access the A6006 it is therefore concluded there shall be no cumulative impact from continued extraction with surrounding mineral and waste operations upon the wider highway network.

Flora and Fauna Incremental The proposed extension shall disturb an additional area of land through mineral extraction although this is limited in ecological value due it current landuse of intensive agriculture. The proposed extension area shall continue to be progressively restored reducing ecological disturbed. Previous mineral extraction at East Leake Quarry shall continue to be restored therefore the areas of open void would be limited to approximately 4 phases at any one time. It is therefore concluded that there shall be limited cumulative impact from previous mineral extraction and the proposed extension upon the local Flora and Fauna.

Landscape and Incremental The proposed extension shall increase the landuse of visual impact mineral extraction at East Leake Quarry which will in the short term impact the local landscape character and visual impact. The proposed extension shall

78

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

retain elements of previous mineral extraction in the form of the plant site and silt lagoons all of which are prominently screened from sensitive receptors reducing any significant visual impact. There shall be short term views from the public right of way until the Quarry is restored conservation habitat and agriculture. Long term impact shall be minimal as the land is restored to a combination of wetland conservation and agriculture

Noise Incremental The site does not propose to increase plant or machinery at the Quarry. The proposed extension shall not work simultaneously with other permitted areas reducing any cumulative impact by means of noise. The proposed extension shall continue within the limits of existing noise levels and proposed which are in accordance with National Planning Policy. Pumping operations will operate simultaneously although the distance and noise source are such that the impact would be limited.

Air Quality Incremental Air quality will be reduced as the site would not be extracting concurrently and the extraction areas are of some distance from sensitive receptors. The existing infrastructure shall not be altered or production increased therefore it is concluded there should not be any cumulative impact.

Water Resources Incremental The proposed extension shall utilise existing water management structures and discharge points. It is therefore considered due to the location of the proposed extraction area, mitigation measures in place there should be no cumulative impact upon

79

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

ground water. Although there shall be additional void areas open at once dewatering would only over lap during the final phase of Burton’s and initial phase 1 of Rempstone.

Soils Incremental The proposed extension shall be disturbed via mineral working and soils stored on site. Soils generated from Rempstone shall remain on Rempstone. Although the plant site and Jenks shall still require final restoration soils from previously stored soils which have been established and seeded to protect soil structure and therefore limiting any cumulative impact.

Archaeology Incremental All areas of Mineral Extraction at East Leake Quarry shall be subject to a WSI and the sequence will overlap. The investigation of archaeology on the proposed extension area would provide additional information and context to the final publications at East Leake Quarry therefore the cumulative impact would be minimal and may be described as positive.

Transport

2.10.9 The proposed extension shall not increase vehicle movements only the duration of operations at East Leake Quarry through the proposed restoration. East Leake Quarry has operated without any highway concerns concurrently with East Leake British Gypsum and Bunny Landfill for many years.

Flora and Fauna

80

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

2.10.10 The proposed extension is of limited ecological value and doesn’t provide a habitat corridor to the existing site due to the intensity of agricultural working. The proposed restoration and increased conservation habitat should improve ecological habitats on site and provide a habitat corridor along Sheepwash Brook. The progressive nature of the mineral extractions should ensure there is no cumulative impact upon flora and fauna.

Landscape and visual impact

2.10.11 The sensitive receptors to the south and east of the proposed extension area shall be screened by mature hedgerow and soil bund reducing any impact and limited visual impact to properties within East Leake Village or Rempstone Village and to the north and east of the proposed extension area and existing site. Cumulative impact would only be present along public rights of way and Loughborough Road although this will be limited due by progressive restoration.

Noise and Air Quality

2.10.12 As operations will not be operated simultaneously and no additional equipment shall be purchased, it is not feasible to operate both areas at once therefore cumulative impact would be unlikely. Good housekeeping and mitigation measures in the form of acoustic bunds (seeded) and dust suppression measures will ensure the operational areas do not cause cumulative impact.

Water Resources

2.10.13 Although it is likely pumping shall be undertaken on land known as Burton’s for the first phases of Rempstone while restoration works are completed this impact shall be limited. The water management lagoons shall utilise existing and new lagoons and continue to implement good practice mitigation measures and necessary permits to ensure there is not cumulative impact. 81

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

Soil Resources

2.10.14 The incremental impact upon soil resources is not considered relevant as soil resources will remain separate. The proposed extension area has been designed to protect BMV agricultural land and to retain the individual soil structure.

Archaeology

2.10.15 The potential impact upon features of cultural heritage importance, including the setting of such features, is considered unlikely to be subject to cumulative impact; as such impacts are generally site specific.

Combined Impact

2.10.16 The combined impacts of the proposed extension at East Leake upon local sensitive receptors has been summarised in table 10.2 in particular, transport, noise, air quality and visual impact;

Table 10.2 Summary of Combined impacts

Sensitive Noise Air Quality Transport Visual Comments Receptor Home Farm Minor / Slight Limited Potential for Not Limited Cottage screened by impact dust during Applicable impact soil mounds although soil stripping No Increase screened by although due in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal

82

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

The Lings Minor / Slight Limited Potential for Not Limited Farm although impact dust during Applicable Impact screened by although soil stripping No Increase soil mounds screened by although due in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal Ling Farm Minor / Slight Limited Potential for Not Limited House although impact dust during Applicable impact screened by although soil stripping No Increase soil mounds screened by although due in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal Holy Cross Minor / Slight Limited Potential for Not Limited Cottage although impact dust during Applicable impact screened by although soil stripping No Increase soil mounds screened by although due in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal Rempstone Minor / Slight Limited Potential for Not Limited Hall although impact dust during Applicable impact screened by although soil stripping No Increase soil mounds screened by although due in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal Home Farm Limited Potential for Not Minor / Slight Limited impact dust during Applicable although impact although soil stripping screened by No Increase screened by although due Soil Mounds in vehicle Soil Mounds to distance movements and screening impact

83

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

marginal Rempstone Limited Potential for Not Minor / Slight Limited Church impact dust during Applicable although impact although soil stripping screened by No Increase screened by although due soil mounds in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal 4 Medium Potential for Not Minor / Slight Medium Loughborough Impact dust during Applicable impact Road soil stripping No Increase although due in vehicle to distance movements and screening impact marginal Beech Tree Limited Potential for Not Minor / Slight Limited Lodge impact dust during Applicable although impact although soil stripping screened by No Increase screened by although due soil mounds in vehicle soil mounds to distance movements and screening impact marginal Right of Way Marginal Potential for Not Moderate Moderate dust during Applicable impact impact. Screening soil stripping during mounds No Increase operations in vehicle no impact movements once restored

Summary of Combined Impacts

2.10.17 The proposed extension area is located to the east of the existing workings and moving away from sensitive receptors in East Leake Village but moving towards sensitive receptors in Rempstone Village therefore the impact upon sensitive 84

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

receptors is varied. Sensitive receptors to the south and east of the proposed extension area are to be screened by soil mounds and existing vegetation therefore the visual impact of existing and proposed working shall be limited.

2.10.18 The phased working pattern will reduce the impact upon noise and air quality limiting a combined or cumulative impact.

2.10.19 There shall be no increase in vehicle movements, limiting any combined impact

2.10.20 It is considered with good environmental practice and mitigation measures there should be no cumulative impact upon sensitive receptors at East Leake Quarry.

85

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

3.0 PART THREE (C) – SUMMARY

3.1 CONCLUSION

3.1.2 This Environmental Statement has set out details of the proposed extension and its physical and environmental characteristics, restoration via soil placement and interburden clay and details of the relevant planning policy background. It has described the main environmental effects of the proposals, the mitigation measures proposed to deal with them and the likely effectiveness of the measures. From this work a number of main conclusions emerge:-

(a) Extension to existing operations. There shall be no simultaneous extraction therefore reducing the noise, dust and hydrological impact. The site production level shall remain at the same level of approximately 150- 180,000tpa. Utilising the same production level limits cumulative impacts shall be limited.

(b) The proposed restoration would cause very limited visual impact on the locality. In the medium to longer term the restoration of the proposed excavation area offers opportunities for best and most versatile agricultural land to be reinstated with improved habitat creation in the field margins and wetland conservation complementing the visual appearance and landscape character of the site.

(c) The level of noise generated by the proposed development would for most of the life of the operations readily comply with criterion levels derived from the official recommendations in NPPF and the noise emissions would be within environmentally acceptable limits. At the final stages of restoration the normal criterion level would be exceeded for a very short period of time. However the operations could be completed well within the higher criterion level that is allowed for ‘temporary operations’ and within the permissible eight week time

86

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL 2014 EXTENSION – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

period allowed for such operations and a working method is proposed that would keep noise levels to the lowest practicable levels.

(d) The placement of soils and clay shall have no significant environmental impacts in terms of dust or other emissions, traffic impact or effects on ecology, hydrology or groundwater.

(e) The proposed development is generally in accordance with the relevant development plan provisions and it is hoped a positive determination could be sought.

(f) The reclamation of mineral resources at this time would complement sustainable development principles of utilising existing infrastructure and mitigation measures.

87