DOCSLIB.ORG

Finding Alternatives to the Hard Disk Drive for Virtual Memory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finding Alternatives to the Hard Disk Drive for Virtual Memory Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2009-07-01 Finding Alternatives to the Hard Disk Drive for Virtual Memory Bruce Albert Embry Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Embry, Bruce Albert, "Finding Alternatives to the Hard Disk Drive for Virtual Memory" (2009). Theses and Dissertations. 1727. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1727 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FINDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE HARD DISK DRIVE FOR VIRTUAL MEMORY by Bruce A. Embry A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science School of Technology Brigham Young University August 2009 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL Of a thesis submitted by Bruce A. Embry This thesis has been read by each member of the following graduate committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. Date B a r r y M. Lunt, Chair Date C. Richard G. Helps, Member Date Michael G. Bailey, Member BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY As chair of the candidate’s graduate committee, I have read the thesis of Bruce A. Embry in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographical style are consistent and acceptable and fulfill university and department style requirements; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the graduate committee and is ready for submission to the university library. Date B a r r y M. Lunt Chair, Graduate Committee Accepted for the Department Val D. Hawks Director, School of Technology Accepted for the College Alan R. Parkinson Dean, Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology ABSTRACT FINDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE HARD DISK DRIVE FOR VIRTUAL MEMORY Bruce A. Embry School of Technology Master of Science Current computer systems fill the demand of operating systems and applications for ever greater amounts of random access memory by paging the least recently used data to the hard disk drive. This paging process is called “virtual memory,” to indicate that the hard disk drive is used to create the illusion that the computer has more random access memory than it actually has. Unfortunately, the fastest hard disk drives are over five orders of magnitude slower than the DRAM they are emulating. When the demand for memory increases to the point that processes are being continually saved to disk and then retrieved again, a process called “thrashing” occurs, and the performance of the entire computer system plummets. This thesis sought to find alternatives for home and small business computer users to the hard disk drive for virtual memory which would not suffer from the same long delays. Virtual memory is especially important for older computers, which often are limited by their motherboards, their processors and their power supplies to a relatively small amount of random access memory. Thus, this thesis was focused on improving the performance of older computers by replacing the hard disk drive with faster technologies for the virtual memory. Of the different technologies considered, flash memory was selected because of its low power requirements, its ready availability, its relatively low cost and its significantly faster random access times. Two devices were evaluated on a system with a 512MB of RAM, a Pentium 4 processor and a SATA hard disk drive. Theoretical models and a simulator were developed, and physical performance measurements were taken. Flash memory was not shown to be significantly faster than the hard disk drive in virtual memory applications. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Barry Lunt for his insightful critiques of this thesis, along with his friendship and encouragement. Professor Richard Helps is acknowledged for his ever vigilant devil’s advocacy which sharpened my own thinking. I am grateful to Dr. Michael Bailey for his support and research suggestions. I wish to thank the School of Technology for the use of computers and laboratory space. Most of all, I acknowledge the great debt that I owe my wife, JoAnne, for her patience and support during this long and arduous journey of exploration and self- discovery. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Computer Storage Systems ............................................................................ 4 1.2 Common Memory Devices............................................................................. 5 1.3 Additional Memory Devices .......................................................................... 9 1.4 Formulas ......................................................................................................... 9 1.5 Objective and Delineations .......................................................................... 17 1.6 Hypothesis .................................................................................................... 18 1.7 Methodology ................................................................................................ 18 1.8 Overview of Remaining Chapters ................................................................ 19 2 Review of Literature ........................................................................................... 21 2.1 Virtual Memory – an early pioneer .............................................................. 21 2.2 Virtual Memory – the computer science approach....................................... 27 2.3 Virtual memory - an IT approach ................................................................. 29 2.4 Solid State Devices – flash memory ............................................................. 31 2.5 Solid State Devices – other options .............................................................. 38 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 41 3.1 Triangulation ................................................................................................ 41 3.2 Theoretical Model ........................................................................................ 42 3.3 Published Data and Benchmarking .............................................................. 46 3.4 Virtual Memory Simulation ......................................................................... 47 vii 3.5 Physical Measurement .................................................................................. 48 4 Results 51 4.1 Model Systems .............................................................................................. 51 4.2 Theoretical Calculations ............................................................................... 55 4.3 Simulator Results .......................................................................................... 56 4.4 Physical Measurement Results ..................................................................... 58 4.5 Interpretation of Results ................................................................................ 62 5 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................. 67 5.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................... 67 5.2 Recommendations ......................................................................................... 69 6 References ............................................................................................................ 71 Appendix A. Glossary ............................................................................................... 77 Appendix B. Master Simulator Program Source Code ......................................... 83 Appendix C. Slave Simulator Program Source Code ............................................ 85 Appendix D. Physical Measurement Program Source Code ................................. 94 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Characteristics of Common Memory Devices .....................................................6 Table 1-2 Performance Characteristics of Three-Level Memory Hierarchy ........................16 Table 4-1 Initial Information and Performance Data ............................................................52 Table 4-2 Regression Results of SiSoftware Sandra Measurements ....................................54 Table 4-3 Theoretical Calculations .......................................................................................56 Table 4-4 Simulator Results ..................................................................................................57 Table 4-5 Physical Performance Measurements ...................................................................60 Table 4-6 Physical Performance Comparisons .....................................................................61 Table 4-7 Comparison of Results .........................................................................................62 ix x LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4-1 Sequential Access Times .................................................................................... 63 Figure 4-2 Strided Access
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Partitioner Och Filsystem 2
    Partitioner och filsystem 2 File systems FAT Unix-like NTFS Vad är ett filsystem? • Datorer behöver en metod för att lagra och hämta data… • Referensmodell för filsystem (Carrier) – Filsystem kategori • Layout och storleksinformation – Innehålls kategori • Kluster och block – data enheter – Metadata kategori • Tidsinformation, storlek, access kontroll • Adresser till allokerade data enheter – Filnamn kategori • Oftast ihop-kopplad med metadata – Applikations kategori • Quota • Journaler • De modernaste påminner mycket om relations databaser Windows • NTFS (New Technology File System) – 6 versioner finns, de nyaste är v3.0 (Windows 2000) och v3.1 (XP, 2003, Vista, 2008, 7), kallas även 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0 och 6.1 (efter OS version) – Stöd för unicode, säkerhet, mm. - är mycket mer komplext än FAT! – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntfs • FAT 12/16/32, VFAT (långa filnamn i Win95) – Används fortfarande men är inte effektivt för större lagringskapaciteter (klusterstorleken) – Långsammare access än NTFS • Windows Future Storage (WinFS) inställt projekt, enligt rykten var det en SQL-databas som ligger ovanpå ett NTFS filsystem – Läs mer på: http://www.ntfs.com/ – Och: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS FAT12, 16 och 32 • FAT12, finns på floppy diskar – Begränsad lagringskapacitet – Designat för MS-DOS 1.0 • FAT16, var designat för större diskar – Äldre OS använde detta • MS-DOS 3.0, Win95 OSR1, NT 3.5 och NT 4.0 – Max diskstorlek 2 GB • FAT32 kom när diskar större än 2GB kom – Vissa äldre och alla nya OS kan använda FAT32 • Windows 98/Me/2000/XP/2003/Vista/7 och 2008 • Begränsningar med FAT32 – Största formaterabara volymen är 32GB (större volymer kan dock användas, < 16 TiB) – Begränsade features vad gäller komprimering, kryptering, säkerhet och hastighet jämfört mot NTFS • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAT_file_system exFAT • exFAT (Extended File Allocation Table, a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhance Your Customer's Vista System with Datatraveler Readyflash
    kingston.com/windowsvista Enhance your customer’s Vista system with DataTraveler ReadyFlash For more information, Complement your Vista™ sales with a Kingston® for Windows ReadyBoost with at least 512 MB of please contact your dedicated DataTraveler® ReadyFlash USB Flash drive enhanced available space. Kingston representative: for Windows® ReadyBoost™. Craig McQueenie – Central Can I enable ReadyBoost with any USB (416) 315-9097 Ideal for systems with limited memory expansion Flash drive? [email protected] capabilities, Windows ReadyBoost allows a user to No, Vista will only offer the option of using Daniel Ouimet – Quebec utilize memory outside of system memory module ReadyBoost on USB Flash drives that have met both (514) 244-4901 upgrades. For instance, if a notebook has a maximum a specific performance and a capacity threshold. [email protected] memory capacity of 1 GB installed, Windows Patrick Jan – West ReadyBoost allows for usage of a Flash memory Will Kingston offer additional Flash memory (604) 961-8038 device, such as DataTraveler ReadyFlash as a more devices for ReadyBoost? [email protected] responsive storage medium for ReadyBoost cache. Yes, Kingston will offer additional Flash products that Royal Taylor – Central (416) 617-6714 Kingston Part Number: DTR/1GB are enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost. Please contact [email protected] your Kingston representative for further details. Description: 1-GB USB Flash drive enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost. Can I use more than one ReadyBoost enabled device at a time? Windows Vista allows for only one device enabled FAQ: for ReadyBoost at a time. What is ReadyBoost? ReadyBoost is a Microsoft Windows Vista feature How much memory should I allocate for which may improve system performance by ReadyBoost? allowing a compatible USB drive to be configured If you have selected to use ReadyBoost, you can with a ReadyBoost cache.
    [Show full text]
  • Azor: Using Two-Level Block Selection to Improve SSD-Based I/O Caches
    Azor: Using Two-level Block Selection to Improve SSD-based I/O caches Yannis Klonatos∗†, Thanos Makatos∗, Manolis Marazakis∗, Michail D. Flouris∗, and Angelos Bilas∗† ∗Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Science (ICS) 100 N. Plastira Ave., Vassilika Vouton, Heraklion, GR-70013, Greece †Department of Computer Science, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, GR 71409, Greece. {klonatos, mcatos, maraz, flouris, bilas}@ics.forth.gr Abstract—Flash-based solid state drives (SSDs) exhibit poten- approaches that are application-specific and require application tial for solving I/O bottlenecks by offering superior performance knowledge, intervention, and tuning, Azor transparently and over hard disks for several workloads. In this work we design dynamically places data blocks in the SSD cache as they flow Azor, an SSD-based I/O cache that operates at the block-level and is transparent to existing applications, such as databases. Our in the I/O path between main memory and HDDs. In this work, design provides various choices for associativity, write policies we investigate the following problems: and cache line size, while maintaining a high degree of I/O concurrency. Our main contribution is that we explore differ- TABLE I entiation of HDD blocks according to their expected importance HDD AND SSD PERFORMANCE METRICS. on system performance. We design and analyze a two-level block selection scheme that dynamically differentiates HDD blocks, and SSD HDD selectively places them in the limited space of the SSD cache. Price/capacity ($/GB) $3 $0.3 We implement Azor in the Linux kernel and evaluate its Response time (ms) 0.17 12.6 effectiveness experimentally using a server-type platform and Throughput (R/W) (MB/s) 277/202 100/90 large problem sizes with three I/O intensive workloads: TPC-H, IOPS (R/W) 30,000/3,500 150/150 SPECsfs2008, and Hammerora.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS-OPEN - REGIONAL 2019 Page 1 of 8
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS-OPEN - REGIONAL 2019 Page 1 of 8 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS (391) —OPEN EVENT— REGIONAL – 2019 DO NOT WRITE ON TEST BOOKLET TOTAL POINTS _________ (100 points) Failure to adhere to any of the following rules will result in disqualification: 1. Contestant must hand in this test booklet and all printouts. Failure to do so will result in disqualification. 2. No equipment, supplies, or materials other than those specified for this event are allowed in the testing area. No previous BPA tests and/or sample tests or facsimile (handwritten, photocopied, or keyed) are allowed in the testing area. 3. Electronic devices will be monitored according to ACT standards. No more than sixty (60) minutes testing time Property of Business Professionals of America. May be reproduced only for use in the Business Professionals of America Workplace Skills Assessment Program competition. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS-OPEN - REGIONAL 2019 Page 2 of 8 MULTIPLE CHOICE Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. Mark A if the statement is true. Mark B if the statement is false. 1. Which of the following appears on the right side of any Windows 8 screen when you move your pointer to a right corner? A. Live tile B. Memory Manager C. Charms bar D. System tray 2. Which element of the Windows 7 GUI gives windows a glassy appearance, but also consumes more hardware resources? A. Control panel B. Aero user interface C. Charms interface D. Logic interface 3. The top of a top-down hierarchical structure of subdirectories is called which of the following? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Windows Internals, Sixth Edition, Part 2
    spine = 1.2” Part 2 About the Authors Mark Russinovich is a Technical Fellow in ® the Windows Azure™ group at Microsoft. Windows Internals He is coauthor of Windows Sysinternals SIXTH EDITION Administrator’s Reference, co-creator of the Sysinternals tools available from Microsoft Windows ® The definitive guide—fully updated for Windows 7 TechNet, and coauthor of the Windows Internals and Windows Server 2008 R2 book series. Delve inside Windows architecture and internals—and see how core David A. Solomon is coauthor of the Windows Internals book series and has taught components work behind the scenes. Led by a team of internationally his Windows internals class to thousands of renowned internals experts, this classic guide has been fully updated Windows developers and IT professionals worldwide, SIXTH for Windows 7 and Windows Server® 2008 R2—and now presents its including Microsoft staff. He is a regular speaker 6EDITION coverage in two volumes. at Microsoft conferences, including TechNet As always, you get critical, insider perspectives on how Windows and PDC. operates. And through hands-on experiments, you’ll experience its Alex Ionescu is a chief software architect and internal behavior firsthand—knowledge you can apply to improve consultant expert in low-level system software, application design, debugging, system performance, and support. kernel development, security training, and Internals reverse engineering. He teaches Windows internals courses with David Solomon, and is ® In Part 2, you will: active in the security research community.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1901.01161V1 [Cs.CR] 4 Jan 2019
    Page Cache Attacks Daniel Gruss1, Erik Kraft1, Trishita Tiwari2, Michael Schwarz1, Ari Trachtenberg2, Jason Hennessey3, Alex Ionescu4, Anders Fogh5 1 Graz University of Technology, 2 Boston University, 3 NetApp, 4 CrowdStrike, 5 Intel Corporation Abstract last twenty years [3, 40, 53]. Osvik et al. [51] showed that an attacker can observe the cache state at the granularity of We present a new hardware-agnostic side-channel attack that a cache set using Prime+Probe, and later Yarom et al. [77] targets one of the most fundamental software caches in mod- showed this with cache line granularity using Flush+Reload. ern computer systems: the operating system page cache. The While different cache attacks have different use cases, the page cache is a pure software cache that contains all disk- accuracy of Flush+Reload remains unrivaled. backed pages, including program binaries, shared libraries, Indeed, virtually all Flush+Reload attacks target pages in and other files, and our attacks thus work across cores and the so-called page cache [30, 33, 34, 35, 42, 77]. The page CPUs. Our side-channel permits unprivileged monitoring of cache is a pure software cache implemented in all major op- some memory accesses of other processes, with a spatial res- erating systems today, and it contains virtually all pages in olution of 4 kB and a temporal resolution of 2 µs on Linux use. Pages that contain data accessible to multiple programs, (restricted to 6:7 measurements per second) and 466 ns on such as disk-backed pages (e.g., program binaries, shared li- Windows (restricted to 223 measurements per second); this braries, other files, etc.), are shared among all processes re- is roughly the same order of magnitude as the current state- gardless of privilege and permission boundaries [24].
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Windows Vista Advanced Forensic Topics – Day 1
    Windows Vista and NTFS File System Internals Exploration of Windows Vista Advanced Forensic Topics – Day 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION – DO NOT SHARE THESE MATERIALS ©2007 Microsoft Corporation – All Rights Reserved Windows Client Forensics (Windows Vista Advanced Topics) Transactional NTFS and Registry Explained LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION – DO NOT SHARE THESE MATERIALS ©2007 Microsoft Corporation – All Rights Reserved New Features Important Changes of Interest LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION – DO NOT SHARE THESE MATERIALS ©2007 Microsoft Corporation – All Rights Reserved Self-Healing File System • Vista includes a “self-healing” function which can correct certain errors in the system • Vista maintains a list of hashes of known files and checks the hashes periodically • On non-system files Vista will validate the file metadata • Files whose hashes do not match or metadata is not valid will be replaced the next time the system is rebooted LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION – DO NOT SHARE THESE MATERIALS ©2007 Microsoft Corporation – All Rights Reserved Self-Healing File System • Equivalent to Chkdsk and defrag processes constantly running in the background • This has the potential to decrease the usefulness of the free space and slack space on the disk as well as limit the ability to recover deleted files LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION – DO NOT SHARE THESE MATERIALS ©2007 Microsoft Corporation – All Rights Reserved Self-Healing File System • Healed files can be identified by an examination of the event
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Is the Second Part of a Three Part Series
    12/31/2020 Windows Administration: Inside the Windows Vista Kernel: Part 2 | Microsoft Docs 09/08/2016 • 23 minutes to read This article is the second part of a three part series. Click here to read Part One. Click here to read Part Three. Windows Administration Inside the Windows Vista Kernel: Part 2 Mark Russinovich At a Glance: Memory management Startup and shutdown Power management Last month, in the first installment of this three-part series, I looked at Windows Vista kernel enhancements in the areas of processes and I/O. This time I'll cover advances in the way Windows Vista manages memory, as well as major improvements to system startup, shutdown, and power management (Part One). Every release of Windows® improves scalability and performance, and Windows Vista™ is no different. The Windows Vista Memory Manager includes numerous enhancements, like more extensive use of lock-free synchronization techniques, finer-grained locking, tighter data-structure packing, larger paging I/Os, support for modern GPU memory architectures, and more efficient use of the hardware Translation Lookaside Buffer. Plus, Windows Vista memory management now offers dynamic address space allocation for the requirements of different workloads. Four performance-enhancing features that use new technologies make their operating system debut on Windows Vista: SuperFetch, ReadyBoost, ReadyBoot, and ReadyDrive. I'll discuss them in detail later in this article. Dynamic Kernel Address Space https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/technet-magazine/cc162480(v=msdn.10) 1/15 12/31/2020 Windows Administration: Inside the Windows Vista Kernel: Part 2 | Microsoft Docs Windows and the applications that run on it have bumped their heads on the address space limits of 32-bit processors.
    [Show full text]
  • Securetraveler™ User's Manual
    ™ SecureTraveler User’s Manual ™ SecureTraveler is the DataTraveler® II + Migo configuration utility program that allows corporate and home users to set up public and password-protected privacy zones on the DataTraveler II + Migo USB Flash Drives. It also allows users to set Windows shortcuts to launch the program conveniently. This document is designed to get you started with SecureTraveler and includes important frequently asked questions (FAQs). For the latest FAQs, please visit the DataTraveler® website at www.kingston.com/support/faqs/datatraveler. Document No: 4808038-001.A00 Secure Traveler User’s Manual 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 System ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Requirements................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 3 2 Public And Privacy Zones.................................................................................................... 3 ® 3 Connecting The DataTraveler II + Migo ............................................................................. 5 ® ™ 4 Configuring The DataTraveler II + Migo With SecureTraveler ...................................... 6 4.1 Creating the Privacy Zone.............................................................................................. 6 4.2 Accessing Your Privacy Zone .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C 2007 by Qingbo Zhu. All Rights Reserved. PERFORMANCE AWARE ENERGY EFFICIENT STORAGE SYSTEMS
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository c 2007 by Qingbo Zhu. All rights reserved. PERFORMANCE AWARE ENERGY EFFICIENT STORAGE SYSTEMS BY QINGBO ZHU B.S., Nanjing University, China, 1999 M.E., Nanjing University, China, 2002 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2007 Urbana, Illinois Abstract Trends in Internet infrastructure are driving towards using data centers to provide services such as web hosting and outsourced storage. Data centers typically have high power require- ments and may require as much electricity as an entire city. This makes energy a growing consideration in the Total Cost of Ownership for data centers. Among all components , disk storage is one of the biggest energy consumers. For a typical medium-sized data center, disk drives would represent an electricity budget of $7–9 million per year. Therefore, it is very important to reduce disk energy consumption in data centers. Designing an energy-efficient high-end storage system is a challenging task. Conserving energy usually incurs performance penalty; however, performance is very critical in data cen- ters as they must meet response-time Service Level Agreement they provide to customers. Moreover, compared to single disk systems, high-end storage systems consisting of hundreds or thousands of disks is much more complex. All components including storage cache man- agement, disk power control and data layout need to be carefully designed to minimize disk energy consumption in a performance-conscious manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximizing Your Server Memory and Storage Investments with Windows Server 2012 R2 October 21, 2014
    Executive Summary Maximizing Your Server Memory and Storage Investments with Windows Server 2012 R2 October 21, 2014 What’s inside • Windows Server 2012 fully leverages today’s computing, network, and storage resources. • Hyper-V virtualization enables efficient use of the vast amounts of memory on today’s systems. • Solid-state drives offer the highest levels of performance with the lowest power consumption. • Trim functionality is critical for maintaining SSD performance. • Storage Spaces manages storage for improved performance. • Consider workloads, endurance needs, and power loss protection when selecting memory. Sponsored by: John Savill, Windows Technical Specialist Came ron Crandall, Senior Technology Manager, Kingston Technology SSD Product Engineering Department EXECUTIVE SUMMARY :: PAGE 2 Overview On July 15, 2015, Microsoft ends support for Windows 2003. As support ends, the numerous companies still using this operating system must migrate to Windows Server 2012 or 2012 R2 to take advantage of having a fully supported operating system, as well as to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements that would be negated by using an unsupported operating system. Since Windows 2003, Microsoft has updated the server operating system to natively support technology that is now commonplace. From virtualized systems to SSDs (solid-state drives), Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are built not just to support these newer technologies, but to offer improved performance and easier use. Organizations shouldn’t just swap in Windows Server 2012 or 2012 R2. Instead, organizations should understand the benefits available with the operating system upgrade. It is also an ideal time to consider the power and high performance available with SSDs on these systems, something Kingston Technology can help organizations better understand.
    [Show full text]
  • FM01FD10B/00 Philips USB Flash Drive
    Philips USB Flash Drive 1GB executive edition FM01FD10B Expand your performance to store documents, photos and music The combination of high storage capacity, fast data transfer and small size makes the Philips USB flash drive executive edition an attractive buy. It is enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost and comes with a complete software suite. Performance and capacity • 1GB storage capacity for large data files • Fast data transfer with high-speed USB 2.0 • Protect your valuable, personal data with a password • Enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost Designed for you • Trendy, exclusive design with nice shape and smooth curves • Integrated cap stays attached to the drive, never lose it! • Activity indicator lights up when copying files Everything you need • Specially designed and easy to use software pre-installed USB Flash Drive FM01FD10B/00 1GB executive edition Specifications Highlights Storage Media Packaging Data 1GB storage capacity • Built-in memory type: SLC NAND Flash • 12NC: 908210008005 A useful 1GB gives you the capacity to store, swap • Transfer rate: reads max 25MB/s, writes max • EAN/UPC/GTIN: 8710895960335 and share large files like documents, music and 15MB/s • Gross weight: 0.053 kg pictures via the USB port of your PC or laptop. • Built-in Memory Capacity: 1 GB • Height: 180 mm • Length: 130 mm Fast data transfer Connectivity • Width: 15 mm High-speed data transfer rates significantly cut •USB: High-speed USB 2.0 • Tare weight: 0.039 kg annoying waiting time when you're copying large multimedia files to or from your computer's hard Software Inner Carton disk. • Carry it Easy: Password protection, File • Quantity: 15 synchronisation, Portable Outlook Express-trial, • EAN/UPC/GTIN: 87 12581 36836 4 Password protection Trace free browsing-trial, Favorites Sync-trial • Tare weight: 0.725 kg Due to password protection including 256-bit AES • Gross weight: 0.935 kg encryption, your valuable personal data can be Accessories • Length: 200 mm protected from unauthorized access by simply using •Cables: No • Width: 180 mm a password.
    [Show full text]