DOCSLIB.ORG

How Manual SAP Testing Falls Short— and What You Can Do About It

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Manual SAP Testing Falls Short— and What You Can Do About It How Manual SAP Testing Falls Short— and What You Can Do About It Tricentis | How Manual SAP Testing Falls Short | 1 Today’s IT teams are expected to drive enterprise-class digital transformation initiatives. However, that’s proving an issue for many—particularly as the extended nature of today’s end-to-end business processes means that even the smallest software application changes can have a disrupting impact on extended SAP processes. As organizations transform their business operating models, they’re increasingly having to deal with the fact that the traditional manual software testing approaches that they have always trusted simply don’t have enough bandwidth or capability to meet the new business expectations Resource issues invariably mean that manual software testing can take weeks to complete, making it almost impossible for IT teams to be as responsive and innovative as they need to be. Additionally, traditional, non-automated testing regimes simply aren’t equipped to keep up with the accelerated pace of digital transformation—particularly for those business processes enabled by SAP innovations such as SAP S/4HANA and SAP Fiori 2.0. How manual testing places projects at risk There are a number of ways that manual testing makes it hard to satisfy modern SAP enterprise IT requirements… Software delivery bottlenecks Delays in testing processes mean that there’s increasingly an expensive bottleneck when it comes to the introduction of new and evolving software-led business initiatives. That’s an issue for the majority of organizations that are looking to accelerate their time to market for new applications, particularly in the SAP environment, where continued reliance on manual testing as the primary form of software testing is leading to real productivity and innovation issues. Support for end-to-end business processes Today’s core business processes are much broader and more complex, often crossing multiple technologies and deployment models. While it was previously possible for software test teams to test separate business processes on an application-by-application basis, they now frequently have to run multiple parallel tests in order to validate end-to-end process performance. Managing software risks Traditional manual testing approaches introduce inevitable risks, both through the inconsistency of testing and challenges associated with limited risk coverage across key business processes. Unlike automated software testing, manual methods can’t support continuous regression testing where core business processes can be checked every day, reducing the risk of business disruption. Poor IT resource utilization With manual software testing, there’s invariably pressure on business analysts and users to perform repetitive and time- consuming tasks. Given today’s skilled IT shortage, that’s not an optimized use of their time and it prevents both business and IT staff from focusing on more strategic and higher value activities. www.tricentis.com © 2018 Tricentis GmbH. All Rights Reserved v Tricentis | How Manual SAP Testing Falls Short | 2 Acting as a Digital Transformation drag Successful digital transformation initiatives are all about innovation, first-mover advantage and getting improved technology into the hands of business users and customers more quickly. Testing delays introduce concerns around uncertainty and risk, particularly for today’s major SaaS updates where new product updates are measured in weeks not months. How automated SAP software testing helps An automated testing approach allows you to keep up with accelerated release processes and carry out end-to-end testing repeatedly and iteratively to ensure quality. Such an approach addresses the specific challenges posed by reliance on manual testing, specifically… Removing software delivery bottlenecks Adopting an automation strategy helps in terms of delivering shorter project timelines, with potential 40% reductions in project length due to a telescoping of the testing process. Addressing the need to test across end-to-end business processes An automated software testing approach enables continuous testing of end-to-end business processes across multiple enterprise apps. This reduces the risk of business disruption by exposing potential errors and defects early—before they can impact your production environment. Enabling risk-based testing and new levels of risk coverage With automated software testing, best practice solutions now combine risk-based testing with significantly broader test coverage. This allows software teams to prioritize testing according to risk, while also cutting current SAP regression testing times from weeks to minutes. More effective use of IT resources Automation eliminates the burden of manual software testing. This releases potentially tens of thousands of expensive and limited resource hours each year—giving CIOs and their teams much more opportunity to research new IT innovations and bring them to market more quickly. www.tricentis.com © 2018 Tricentis GmbH. All Rights Reserved v Tricentis | How Manual SAP Testing Falls Short | 3 Real results with SAP test automation Here’s a taste of the benefits that several leading organizations have achieved by automating their SAP testing process with Tricentis. AGL Energy—Dramatically accelerating release cycles To support a “Customer Experience Transformation” program, AGL’s management launched an Idea to Production in 5 days initiative for AGL’s SAP delivery units. However, the teams responsible for these units quickly realized that achieving this goal would require them to accelerate their quarterly SAP IS-U and SAP CRM backend delivery cycles. One key hurdle to this acceleration was their lengthy regression test cycles. How could they move from idea to production in 5 days when their regression test cycle took more than a week? With Tricentis test automation, they were able to run 95.5% of their tests on a daily basis. Dolby Laboratories—Increasing regression coverage “When testing was manual, our business system analysts weren’t running all of the tests because of limited time and resources. They only ran the portion that touched the code, and that prevented us from having end-to-end test coverage. With Tricentis test automation, the precise number of hours saved depends on the workstream, but it’s more than 75% of the time saved for business system analysts and other functional leads. Now, we can run the entire regression test suite immaterial of where the change is, so the amount of coverage we get is close to 100%. Running test cases that are frequently used and are critical to our business is very important and it would have been close to impossible for us to get anywhere near 100% without test automation.” – Mamatha Mitr, Head of Strategy for Testing Center of Excellence, Dolby Laboratories Varian—Streamlining S/4HANA migration “We typically upgrade our core SAP environment at least yearly, and we always strive to reduce the cycle time associated with the upgrades. We discovered that a massive amount of time was spent on manual regression testing for each cycle, and we committed to reduce the testing burden that we put on business users. We’ve now used Tricentis test automation for 3 years for many enhancement pack and support pack upgrades, as well as for our SAP S/4HANA migration. With the need to release more frequently across different applications in the landscape, it is imperative that you have an automation framework that lets you accelerate testing. Manual testing is simply not scalable. Test automation reduced testing time 93% and reduced testing costs 35%.” – Arnab Mukherjee, Manager Enterprise Applications, Varian About Tricentis With the industry’s #1 Continuous Testing platform, Tricentis is recognized for reinventing software testing for DevOps. Through risk-based testing, scriptless end-to-end test automation, and the industry’s most extensive technology support, Tricentis breaks through the barriers experienced with conventional software testing methods. Our innovative technologies simplify testing for even the most complex enterprise applications—transforming testing from a roadblock to a catalyst for innovation. www.tricentis.com © 2018 Tricentis GmbH. All Rights Reserved www.tricentis.com © 2018 Tricentis GmbH. All Rights Reserved v .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Types of Software Testing
    Types of Software Testing We would be glad to have feedback from you. Drop us a line, whether it is a comment, a question, a work proposition or just a hello. You can use either the form below or the contact details on the rightt. Contact details [email protected] +91 811 386 5000 1 Software testing is the way of assessing a software product to distinguish contrasts between given information and expected result. Additionally, to evaluate the characteristic of a product. The testing process evaluates the quality of the software. You know what testing does. No need to explain further. But, are you aware of types of testing. It’s indeed a sea. But before we get to the types, let’s have a look at the standards that needs to be maintained. Standards of Testing The entire test should meet the user prerequisites. Exhaustive testing isn’t conceivable. As we require the ideal quantity of testing in view of the risk evaluation of the application. The entire test to be directed ought to be arranged before executing it. It follows 80/20 rule which expresses that 80% of defects originates from 20% of program parts. Start testing with little parts and extend it to broad components. Software testers know about the different sorts of Software Testing. In this article, we have incorporated majorly all types of software testing which testers, developers, and QA reams more often use in their everyday testing life. Let’s understand them!!! Black box Testing The black box testing is a category of strategy that disregards the interior component of the framework and spotlights on the output created against any input and performance of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Evaluating Performance of Software Testing Tools
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 9, ISSUE 02, FEBRUARY 2020 ISSN 2277-8616 A Framework For Evaluating Performance Of Software Testing Tools Pramod Mathew Jacob, Prasanna Mani Abstract: Software plays a pivotal role in this technology era. Due to its increased applicable domains, quality of the software being developed is to be monitored and controlled. Software organization follows many testing methodologies to perform quality management. Testing methodologies can be either manual or automated. Automated testing tools got massive acceptability among software professionals due to its enhanced features and functionalities than that of manual testing. There are hundreds of test automation tools available, among which some perform exceptionally well. Due to the availability of large set of tools, it is a herculean task for the project manager to choose the appropriate automation tool, which is suitable for their project domain. In this paper, we derive a software testing tool selection model which evaluates the performance aspects of a script-based testing tool. Experimental evaluation proves that, it can be used to compare and evaluate various performance characteristics of commercially accepted test automation tools based on user experience as well as system performance. Index Terms: Automated testing, Software testing, Test script, Testing Tool, Test bed, Verification and Validation. —————————— ◆ —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION S OFTWARE is advanced in recent days by enhancing its applicable domains. Software is embedded in almost all electronic gadgets and systems. In this scenario the quality of the software plays a significant role. The customer or end – user should be satisfied which is primarily depended on quality and capability of the software being developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Reliability of Software Testing Adequacy Criteria and Reference Test Systems
    Empirical Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Reliability of Software Testing Adequacy Criteria and Reference Test Systems Mark Jason Hadley PhD University of York Department of Computer Science September 2013 2 Abstract This PhD Thesis reports the results of experiments conducted to investigate the effectiveness and reliability of ‘adequacy criteria’ - criteria used by testers to determine when to stop testing. The research reported here is concerned with the empirical determination of the effectiveness and reliability of both tests sets that satisfy major general structural code coverage criteria and test sets crafted by experts for testing specific applications. We use automated test data generation and subset extraction techniques to generate multiple tests sets satisfying widely used coverage criteria (statement, branch and MC/DC coverage). The results show that confidence in the reliability of such criteria is misplaced. We also consider the fault-finding capabilities of three test suites created by the international community to serve to assure implementations of the Data Encryption Standard (a block cipher). We do this by means of mutation analysis. The results show that not all sets are mutation adequate but the test suites are generally highly effective. The block cipher implementations are also seen to be highly ‘testable’ (i.e. they do not mask faults). 3 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 3 Table of Tables ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Software Testing Junit Lecture Notes
    Software Testing Junit Lecture Notes Barclay misreports morganatically if half-round Dickie spilikins or feudalise. Ron dazzled wryly. Jamie remains semitonic after Reed adventure goniometrically or maroon any dilation. The captive of this assignment is to give new experience applying path testing approaches and measuring coverage. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 213717 May 1996. Notions of software reliability and availability; comparison of hardware like software reliability; Software Reliability modeling and metrics. Argument files are files that both contain arguments to be passed to the command. This lecture notes on software should partition same failure trace associated with each sprint. The use most the debugger is introduced with videos embedded in spine course material going over them either always an. Components that junit on the lecture notes in a delay doing this section, independent versions of? Did you will include the junit platform then you can be adequately handle some design that collaboration diagrams can fail, lets actually generated. At village point, Hadoop, you observe see this following. Icon ran actually meets its essence and. Junit jupiter will still figuring out. Debuggers are the aid to debugging, we test because Humans have very limited brains and cup make lots of mistakes, and basically undesired situations in an adequate way. This junit tests for software engineers blamed all notes taken when you did not hold. Learn how about catch bugs and in software as you convert different testing methods that occur help you build better than Watch Trailer Course getting Free. Before class is to understand requirements to junit testing software testing, typical giant c program? Functionalities like a program can not precisely true markov randomness properties of testing strategies used during setup code? Videos for Introduction to Software Testing edition 2 Ammann.
    [Show full text]
  • API Testing Guide an Automated Approach to API Testing Transformation
    API Testing Guide An automated approach to API testing transformation. From Monolith to Microservice The consumerization of IT has changed the way we write applications today. Instead of building a single, monolithic system that is installed on a server in a back office or call center, modern When testing APIs, testers are faced with applications are scattered within mobile devices and web browsers numerous discrete units of work. Some so users can gain access to services at anytime from anywhere. of these APIs may have been created by a third party, while the possible And modern applications are no longer self-contained; they are ordering and combinations of different composed of multiple service components that are tied together versions of APIs can cause the number of at runtime. Therefore, the end-user experience is not powered by combinations that need to be tested to the elegant UIs we all use, but by APIs that facilitate interactions skyrocket to an impossible number. between code modules, applications and back-end IT systems. The ability to identify these combinations Because of this, the way we test must change. Quality assurance and then reduce them to a realistic (QA) and development teams must expand their capacity to test number without compromising quality each layer of the application, as well as the end-to-end business requires testers to adopt a transactions. Modern applications then require comprehensive API new model-based approach and invest in testing in addition to traditional UI testing. But API testing presents automation technologies. many challenges for testers. It requires a new approach—one that is automated wherever possible and inherently data-driven.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginners Guide to Software Testing
    Beginners Guide To Software Testing Beginners Guide To Software Testing - Padmini C Page 1 Beginners Guide To Software Testing Table of Contents: 1. Overview ........................................................................................................ 5 The Big Picture ............................................................................................... 5 What is software? Why should it be tested? ................................................. 6 What is Quality? How important is it? ........................................................... 6 What exactly does a software tester do? ...................................................... 7 What makes a good tester? ........................................................................... 8 Guidelines for new testers ............................................................................. 9 2. Introduction .................................................................................................. 11 Software Life Cycle ....................................................................................... 11 Various Life Cycle Models ............................................................................ 12 Software Testing Life Cycle .......................................................................... 13 What is a bug? Why do bugs occur? ............................................................ 15 Bug Life Cycle ............................................................................................... 16 Cost of fixing bugs .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Software and Protocol Vulnerabilities in WPA2 Implementations Through Fuzzing
    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Master Degree in Computer Engineering Master Thesis Identifying Software and Protocol Vulnerabilities in WPA2 Implementations through Fuzzing Supervisors Prof. Antonio Lioy Dr. Jan Tobias M¨uehlberg Dr. Mathy Vanhoef Candidate Graziano Marallo Academic Year 2018-2019 Dedicated to my parents Summary Nowadays many activities of our daily lives are essentially based on the Internet. Information and services are available at every moment and they are just a click away. Wireless connections, in fact, have made these kinds of activities faster and easier. Nevertheless, security remains a problem to be addressed. If it is compro- mised, you can face severe consequences. When connecting to a protected Wi-Fi network a handshake is executed that provides both mutual authentication and ses- sion key negotiation. A recent discovery proves that this handshake is vulnerable to key reinstallation attacks. In response, vendors patched their implementations to prevent key reinstallations (KRACKs). However, these patches are non-trivial, and hard to get correct. Therefore it is essential that someone audits these patches to assure that key reinstallation attacks are indeed prevented. More precisely, the state machine behind the handshake can be fairly complex. On top of that, some implementations contain extra code to deal with Access Points that do not properly follow the 802.11 standard. This further complicates an implementation of the handshake. All combined, this makes it difficult to reason about the correctness of a patch. This means some patches may be flawed in practice. There are several possible techniques that can be used to accomplish this kind of analysis such as: formal verification, fuzzing, code audits, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • You're Not the Only One Who Needs to Be Agile Why Quality Assurance Is
    Winter 2015 www.TechWell.com IS AGILE BREAKING PRODUCT MANAGEMENT? You're not the only one who needs to be agile QA IS A PROCESS Why quality assurance is more than a department MOVE YOUR TESTING FORWARD WITH TRAINING FROM SQE TRAINING M B I N O E C The more training you take TRAINING WEEK A N E the greater the savings! D S A V Maximize the impact of your training by combining courses in the same location. Combine a full week of training for the largest discount! 2015 March 23–27, 2015 SPRING SCHEDULE Boston, MA April 27–May 1, 2015 TESTING San Diego, CA Moving TRAINING June 1–5, 2015 Testing WEEKS Chicago, IL Forward MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY Software Tester Certification—Foundation Level Mastering Test Design DevOps Test Integration Security Testing for Test Professionals Integrating Test with a DevOps Approach Workshop Mobile Test Automation Fundamentals of Agile Certification—ICAgile Mobile Application Testing Workshop Agile Test Automation— Agile Tester Certification ICAgile Measurement & Metrics Leadership for Test Test Improvement for Essential Test Planning and Management for Test Managers Managers Agile Risk-Driven Software Testing Performance Load and Stress Testing Green background Indicates courses pre-approved for Project Management Institute PDUs. For 2information BETTER SOFTWARE on our 60+Winter Public 2015 and 40+ Livewww.TechWell.com Virtual Course Dates visit www.sqetraining.com MOVE YOUR TESTING FORWARD TESTING TRAINING LEARNING OPTIONS: WITH TRAINING FROM SQE TRAINING Public M B I N O E C The more training you take TRAINING WEEK A N E the greater the savings! V D S A Instructor-led training in Live, instructor-led Maximize the impact of your training by combining a city near you classes via your computer courses in the same location.
    [Show full text]
  • Regression Testing
    REGRESSION TESTING Definition Methods Tools Best Practices Sridhar Jayaraman VP of Engineering, Qentelli Summary Software Release in 21st century is like rowing a boat. Fixing about 80% of the holes isn’t good enough for the ride. Testing is a significant part of Software development today. It’s almost impossible to survive through the turbulence of sudden overlooked Regressions. That is exactly why the teams started testing for the potential hiccups or misroutes each time they develop something new. But, How often do you perform Regression 01 Testing on your code-base? What is the recommended frequency of 02 Regression Testing? How to ensure Test Coverage while 03 picking the Test suits? What is the correct technique for 04 Regression Testing? This e-Book intends to answer all these questions and more about Regression Testing. Regression Testing - 101 As Software Development moved from Waterfall to Agile, the one aspect that encountered diculties to cope up was Testing. When fast-paced Agile and DevOps kicked in, it is even more stressful for the businesses to deal with the speed vs quality war. In a generation where it is important to keep the customer’s experience spot on to stay relevant; companies can’t aord to have software regressions. That’s how it became a practice to run two kinds of tests each time there is a significant change - when the Testers started doing selective retesting to detect faults introduced during modification of a system or software component. … a testing process which is applied each time after a software component is modified The software applications are growing in terms of their sizes and complexities.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Testing with Real Time Example
    Functional Testing With Real Time Example Henderson transpierce colossally if cephalopod Bryant coring or customizes. Is Armond scentless or Scythian after exclamatory Ernst schmoozing so inviolately? Refrigerating Quinton grope his euphrasies complains sixthly. Gui testing functional testing with time example Complex dependencies and interactions to the outside source are stubbed or mocked. What have Different Goals of Software Testing? This reduces overall test suite execution time from days or hours to minutes Additionally functional tests can be rate on damage than 2000 real. This version is released for a limited number of users for testing in a compulsory-time environment Example particular software testing is performed for the. Simulate loads at peak times for process end and quarter or early addition to. No headings were found on man page. The reality is that both ladder and automated testing are usually necessary to deliver only quality product. Test with functionalities i prefer to function, and when development during regression. This helps prevent chaotic code, but it also means can the tester who is probing a specific requirement knows exactly which code artifact to test. Depending on when exactly in review process number are used, the strategies can be classified as preventive or reactive. It is performed at every aspect to click on a times become features, you are marked as usable and elegant way. 52 Manual Testing Interview Questions With Example Answers. Make automation functional testing or UI test easier in common powerful state more. Implemented correctly and are basically the loose as functional tests. What crop the tasks performed in the Test Execution phase of STLC? Our every concern is functional testing ensuring that the API functions correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Api Testing Approach
    Sunil L. Bangare et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST) AUTOMATED API TESTING APPROACH SUNIL L. BANGARE1, SEEMA BORSE2, PALLAVI S. BANGARE3, 4 SHITAL NANDEDKAR 1, 2, 3, 4 Department of Information Technology, STES’s Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, Pune-48, Maharashtra, India. [email protected] Abstract Software testing is an investigation conducted to provide stakeholders with information about the quality of the product or service under test. With the help of software testing we can verify or validate the software product. Normally testing will be done after development of software but we can perform the software testing at the time of development process also. This paper will give you a brief introduction about Automated API Testing Tool. This tool of testing will reduce lots of headache after the whole development of software. It saves time as well as money. Such type of testing is helpful in the Industries & Colleges also. KEYWORDS: Software testing, API (application programming interface), Manual Testing, Automated Testing, API testing. 1. INTRODUCTION Software testing can provide an objective, independent view of the software to allow the business to appreciate and understand the risks of software implementation. Test techniques include, but are not limited to, the process of executing a program or application with the intent of finding software bugs [1]. We can verify or validate the software product as per the user requirements, we can check that it is working as expected or not. In general we can perform the testing after defining the whole requirements as well as the coding part has been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Testing – Levels, Methods and Types
    International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Systems (IJEECS) ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Software Testing – Levels, Methods and Types Priyadarshini. A. Dass Telecommunication Engineering, Dr Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India 3. System Testing Abstract-- An evaluation process to determine the presence of errors in computer Software is the Software testing. The 4. Acceptance Testing Software testing cannot completely test software because exhaustive testing is rarely possible due to time and resource constraints. Testing is fundamentally a comparison activity in which the results are monitored for specific inputs. The software is subjected to different probing inputs and its behavior is evaluated against expected outcomes. Testing is the dynamic analysis of the product meaning that the testing activity probes software for faults and failures while it is actually executed. Thus, the selection of right strategy at the right time will make the software testing efficient and effective. In this paper I have described software testing techniques which are Figure 1: Levels of Testing classified by purpose. 2.1 Unit Testing Keywords-- ISTQB, unit testing, integration, system, Unit Testing is a level of the software testing process acceptance, black-box, white-box, regression, load, stress, where individual units/components of a software/system endurance testing. are tested. The purpose is to validate that each unit of I. INTRODUCTION the software performs as designed. A unit is the smallest testable part of software. It usually has one or a few Software testing is a set of activities conducted with the inputs and usually a single output. Unit Testing is the intent of finding errors in software.
    [Show full text]