Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
2016 Plan Update 2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
TITLE: Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan: 2016 Plan Update
AUTHORS: Drew Christian, Director of Planning
GRAPHICS: Stan Balsman, GIS Director Jeremy Tanz, GIS Specialist and IT Director
DATE: September, 2016
SOURCE OF COPIES: Southeast Missouri Regional Planning and Economic Development Commission 1 West St. Joseph Street P.O. Box 366 Perryville, MO 63775
DOCUMENT NO.: DR-MO-1676-4.57A
Cover Photograph:
Table of Contents Page ii
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Table of Contents Introduction ...... 1 I. FEMA/SEMA/MACOG Planning Initiative ...... 1 II. Basis for Planning Authority ...... 1 III. Acknowledgments and Special Thanks ...... 2 IV. Organization...... 2 Chapter 1: Prerequisites ...... 3 1.1 Plan Adoption (See Appendix A) ...... 3 1.2 Assurance Statements of Compliance with FEMA ...... 3 Chapter 2: The Planning Process ...... 4 2.1 Documentation of the Planning Process ...... 4 2.1.1 2016 Plan Update Process ...... 4 2.2 Coordination with Other Agencies ...... 8 2.3 Integration with Other Planning Efforts ...... 9 2.3.1 Integration with Other Local Plans ...... 9 2.3.2 Integrating Planning Information with Other Mitigation Partners ...... 10 Chapter 3: Risk Assessment ...... 12 3.1 Identifying Hazards ...... 12 3.2 Profiling Hazards ...... 21 3.2.1 Dam & Levee Failure ...... 22 3.2.2 Drought ...... 31 3.2.3 Earthquake ...... 32 3.2.4 Extreme Cold ...... 38 3.2.5 Extreme Heat ...... 38 3.2.6 Flooding: Riverine & Flash ...... 40 3.2.7 Severe Winter Weather ...... 43 3.2.8 Sinkholes ...... 43 3.2.9 Tornadoes & Severe Thunderstorms ...... 44 3.2.10 Wildfire ...... 46 3.3 Assessing Vulnerability and Estimating Potential Losses ...... 47 3.3.1 Assessing Vulnerability ...... 47 3.3.2 Area-wide Hazard Vulnerability ...... 79
Table of Contents Page iii
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3 Geographically-Specific Hazard Vulnerability ...... 87 3.3.4 Estimating Potential Losses ...... 108 Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program ...... 121 4.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals and Objectives...... 123 4.1.1 County Mitigation Goals and Objectives ...... 124 4.1.2 Process for Identifying, Reviewing, and Updating County Goals and Objectives ..... 125 4.2 Capability Assessments ...... 126 4.2.1 Agencies ...... 126 4.2.2 Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Initiatives ...... 128 4.2.3 Funding Capabilities ...... 129 4.3 Mitigation Actions ...... 138 4.3.1 Actions That Will Be Considered ...... 138 4.3.2 Process for Identifying, Evaluating, Prioritizing, and Updating Mitigation Actions .. 148 4.3.3 Mitigation Action Implementation ...... 149 4.3.4 Review and Progress of Mitigation Actions ...... 150 4.3.5 Challenges in Implementation ...... 151 4.3.6 Mitigation Successes ...... 151 Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process ...... 152 5.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan ...... 152 5.1.1 Plan Maintenance Process ...... 152 5.2 Monitoring Goals, Objectives, and Activities ...... 153 Appendix A: Adoption Resolutions ...... 155 Appendix B: Meeting Documentation ...... 165 Appendix C: Storm Data ...... 174
Table of Contents Page iv
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
INTRODUCTION I. FEMA/SEMA/MACOG PLANNING INITIATIVE As a result of new federal regulations imposed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), cities, counties, and organizations that were eligible for hazard mitigation grant funding in the past will no longer be eligible after November, 2004, unless they have adopted a Hazard Mitigation Plan. This ruling affects more than 1,000 cities and 114 counties in Missouri. Although these communities will still be eligible for federal disaster Public Assistance and Individual Assistance, they will not be eligible for mitigation assistance unless they have developed and adopted a plan.
The State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) was faced with the challenge of trying to provide assistance, support, and guidance to all of these cities and counties in their efforts to develop and adopt a Hazard Mitigation Plan. As a result, SEMA approached the Missouri Association of Councils of Government (MACOG) to request participation of the Regional Planning Commissions in the effort to develop these plans. SEMA and MACOG cooperated to develop a joint Mitigation Planning Initiative to develop mitigation plans for natural disasters only. This restriction was necessary due to the funding limitations of FEMA.
While SEMA/MACOG developed this Mitigation Planning Initiative, the cities and counties received the funding to prepare the plans and contracted with Regional Planning Commissions to perform the work. SEMA provided training and technical assistance to the Regional Planning Commissions, but the funding will go to the participating cities and counties. All of the plans will be developed in accordance with a Scope of Work drawn up by SEMA. This method is being used to ensure that the local governments participate fully in the development of the Hazard Mitigation Plans that they adopt. It is felt that, if the local units of government do not participate in the development of the planning document, then they will not feel that they have any stake in following through with recommendations made in the plan.
Cape Girardeau County contracted with the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission through the SEMA Scope of Work to develop this plan. The County participated fully in the development of the plan. After this plan is approved, Cape Girardeau County and the cities and organizations in the County will be eligible to receive future mitigation assistance from FEMA. They will also be able to more effectively carry out mitigation activities to lessen any adverse impact of future disasters in the County.
II. BASIS FOR PLANNING AUTHORITY Authority to create a natural hazard mitigation plan is based in Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5165. This act was enacted under Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), P.L. 106-390. Section 104
Introduction Page 1
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
is the legal basis for FEMA’s Interim Final Rule for 44 CFR Parts 201 and 206 published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002.
III. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND SPECIAL THANKS We would like to thank all of those who assisted in the preparation of this plan: County Commissioners, the Emergency Management Office, various law enforcement and fire departments, and county and city offices and personnel. We would also like to thank the State Emergency Management Agency and the Missouri Association of Councils of Government for their advice and assistance in the process of developing this plan. Most importantly, we would like to thank the people of Cape Girardeau County for their assistance and involvement with this important planning document.
IV. ORGANIZATION This plan is organized around FEMA’s mitigation planning process and is divided into six chapters, briefly summarized below:
• Chapter 1 Prerequisite includes all applicable jurisdictions’ adoption of the plan and assurances that they will comply with all applicable state and federal statutes and regulations. • Chapter 2 Planning Process explains the planning process, including how it was prepared, who was involved, and how it was integrated with other related planning efforts. • Chapter 3 Risk Assessment features the risk assessment, which identifies the type and location of hazards that can affect the county, analyzes the county’s vulnerability to the hazards identified, and serves as the factual basis for the mitigation strategy. • Chapter 4 Comprehensive County Hazard Mitigation Program provides the county’s mitigation blueprint. Specifically, it includes goals and objectives, local capabilities, mitigation activities, and funding sources. • Chapter 5 Plan Maintenance presents the method the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team uses to monitor, evaluate, and update the plan. It also introduces how the team monitors project implementation and closeouts and reviews progress on achieving goals. • Appendices include supporting information for the various sections.
Introduction Page 2
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CHAPTER 1: PREREQUISITES 1.1 PLAN ADOPTION (SEE APPENDIX A) Development of an all-hazard mitigation plan is futile if the local units of government do not accept the document and its recommendations. Therefore, the Regional Planning Commission, in developing this document, has attempted to engender in all participants a sense of ownership of the resulting document.
1.2 ASSURANCE STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEMA This mitigation plan is in compliance with SEMA and FEMA guidance, as well as FEMA’s rules, regulations, and guidelines. It is also in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and other reasonable criterion established by FEMA and SEMA.
The plan also meets the minimum planning requirements for all FEMA mitigation programs such as the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program, the Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program, and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), and where appropriate, other FEMA mitigation related programs such as the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP), the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the Community Rating System (CRS).
To help further insure that this plan is in compliance with both the State and Federal Emergency Management Agencies’ requirements and to help the Planning Team and Committee focus as much as possible on content rather than format this plan was developed using observed best practices from other Hazard Mitigation Plans. Both the most recent Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan and the previously approved Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan served as templates for this plan. While the format is similar to the state’s plan, and while some pertinent general information has been pulled from the state’s and previous county plan, the information, data, goals, objectives, and actions of this Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan are wholly unique and specific to the county and the current challenges and threats it faces.
Chapter 1: Prerequisites Page 3
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CHAPTER 2: THE PLANNING PROCESS
This chapter documents the process used to develop this plan, including how the county coordinates its efforts with other agencies and planning efforts. The chapter is divided into three parts:
• Documentation of the Planning Process • Coordination among Agencies • Integration with other Planning Efforts
2.1 DOCUMENTATION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS The process established for this planning effort is based on the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA) planning and update requirements and FEMA’s associated guidance for county hazard mitigation plans. The primary steps in the planning process were:
1. Identify the types of natural hazards that affect the county and develop a brief history of each; 2. Determine the present and future risk and vulnerability of county residents to these hazards; 3. Assess the capabilities at the local level to mitigate hazards and disasters; 4. Establish and prioritize the major hazard mitigation issues that should be addressed in the Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan; and 5. Identify goals, objectives, and actions for addressing these issues to reduce the county’s vulnerability to present and future hazards.
2.1.1 2016 Plan Update Process The 2016 update to the Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan was initiated in 2015 with several meetings of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team working through each section of the previous plan to identify what information and data was still relevant and appropriate and what needed updating or deleting.
The team then used information from participating jurisdictions to update existing data and add new data as needed, including collecting updated data on hazard events and previous and current mitigation actions taken by the county, municipalities, and agencies. The following table illustrates the changes between the previous plan and this one.
Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 4
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 2.1.1-A Plan Update Change Log Cape Girardeau County Plan Update Change Log Previously in Current Plan section(s): Change Introduction Introduction Updated language and dates
Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Updated language and dates
Chapter 2 Chapter 2 Updated language, dates, and data
Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Updated language, dates, and data
Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Updated language, dates, and data
Chapter 5 Chapter 5 Updated language and dates
Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Meetings Three meetings of the HMPC were held during 2015. All meetings were open to the public and public notice was given for each meeting, as well as for review of the draft throughout the entire planning process.
At the first meeting, held August 17th, 2015, attendees discussed: • Hazard Mitigation Planning Purpose • Grant Programs Linked to Approved Plans • Hazard Mitigation Plan Participation Requirements • Public Outreach Strategy • Data Collection • Discussion of Hazards • Plan Adoption
During the second meeting, held September 15th, 2015, attendees discussed: • Participation Requirements and Status • Countywide Risk Assessment • Mitigation Goals • Mitigation Actions from Previous Plan • Discussed Public Comments Since Previous Meeting • Plan Adoption
During the third and final meeting, held December 4th, 2015, attendees discussed: Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 5
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Goal Statements • Risk Assessments • Public Comments Since Previous Meeting • Status of Previous Actions • New Actions • Hazard Mitigation Funding Opportunities • Plan Maintenance Strategy • Plan Adoption
Hazard Mitigation Planning Team: The HMPT is responsible for coordinating committee meetings and public notices and involvement and for drafting and maintaining the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team is composed of:
Chauncy Buchheit – Executive Director, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission David Grimes – Deputy Director, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission Stan Balsman – GIS/Mapping Director, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission Drew Christian – Director of Planning, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission Jeremy Tanz – GIS/ Mapping Specialist, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission
Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee: The HMPC was responsible for identifying relevant hazards in the county and for developing the county’s goals, objectives, and actions for the mitigation of those hazards. The committee is comprised of representatives from the participating jurisdictions, organizations, and agencies both within and outside the county. A “participating jurisdiction” is defined by the Committee as any jurisdiction that actively assists in the collection and analysis of data and provides input and feedback on the draft plan, including past, present, and future goals, objectives, and actions. Attendance to at least one committee meeting by an official of the participating jurisdiction or a designated representative was mandatory.
The following is a list of the various organizations participating and assisting with the updates to the 2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan along with the title(s) of the individual(s) participating.
• Cape Girardeau County – County Commissioner, Emergency Management Director • Scott County (not covered in this plan) – Emergency Management Director • City of Cape Girardeau – City Planner, Building Official, Deputy Fire Chief • City of Jackson – Fire Chief, Assistant Fire Chief, Public Works Director • Cape Girardeau 63 School District – Assistant Superintendent • Jackson R-II School District – School Resource Officer • Oak Ridge R-VI School District – Superintendent
Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 6
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Nell Holcomb R-IV School District – Superintendent • Delta R-V School District – Superintendent • Southeast Missouri State University – Emergency Plan Coordinator • Little River Drainage District – Manager, County EMD (designated representative)
All jurisdictions listed below are considered participating jurisdictions that intend to adopt this plan and possibly apply for funds as they become available from FEMA. These jurisdictions met the participation requirement by providing critical data about their respective jurisdiction’s goals, objectives, actions, plans, capabilities, conditions, and characteristics and by attending and participating in HMPC meetings.
EXHIBIT 2.1.1-B Participation Matrix Participating Jurisdiction Criteria (2016) Participating Participating NFIP Jurisdiction Meetings Actions Draft Formal Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Participant (2011) Attended Developed Reviewed Adoption (2016)
Cape Girardeau County Y X X X X X X
Cape Girardeau, City of Y X X X X X X
Jackson, City of Y X X X X X X Cape Girardeau 63 School Dist. N/A X X X X X X
Delta R-V School Dist. N/A X X X X X X
Jackson R-II School Dist. N/A X X X X X X Nell Holcomb R-IV School Dist. N/A X X X X X X
Oak Ridge R-VI School Dist. N/A X X X X X X Southeast Missouri State Univ. N/A X X X X X X Pending Little River Drainage Dist. N/A X X X X Pending Adoption
Allenville, Village of Y X
Delta, City of N X
Dutchtown, Village of* Y X
Gordonville, Village of N X
Oak Ridge, Town of N X
Old Appleton, Town of N X
Pocahontas, Town of N X
Whitewater, Town of Y X
*Note: As of writing, the village of Dutchtown is in the process of disincorporation and no governing body remains
Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 7
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Public Participation Effort was made to involve the public in all phases of the plan development. The public was notified of the plan update in general and of all public meetings through postings in the County Courthouse, city halls, on social media, on jurisdiction’s website (when available), and on the RPC’s website. These postings stated that the meeting in question was open to the public and that any and all comments or ideas that the public had on hazard vulnerability, mitigation goals, objectives, and actions were desired, along with contact information for the planners. The public was encouraged to attend all meetings and to provide feedback on plan content and the plan update process whether or not they attended meetings. All notices included the URL for the draft plan and contact information for providing comments and input. This plan update was conducted in accordance with the Missouri Sunshine Law. For more information see Appendix B: Public Participation.
During preparation of the plan, numerous meetings were held with the E-911 coordinator, law enforcement, fire, public works personnel, superintendents, and other participants to pinpoint and finalize the location of key facilities and vulnerabilities in the County and incorporated communities. When these facilities and vulnerabilities had been mapped, they were reviewed by the members of the committee.
2.2 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES The HMPC recognizes the importance of coordinating with local, state, and federal agencies and other interested groups involved in hazard mitigation in the planning process for the update of the County Hazard Mitigation Plan to enhance data collection, mitigation strategy development, plan implementation, and overall investment in Cape Girardeau County’s mitigation program.
The Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission acted as the coordinator of and participant on the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee during the planning process for the previously approved plan and for the 2016 update.
The previous section listed the agencies involved with the HMPC for the 2016 plan update. Members of the HMPC participated in the update process by attending planning meetings, providing data and information, and commenting on the draft version of the plan. Comments from previous reviews of the 2011 plan from FEMA Region VII and FEMA headquarters were incorporated into this update.
As hazard mitigation planning continuously involves multiple government agencies, private voluntary organizations, and commerce and industry, and it is assumed the role of other entities in updating this plan will increase over time. This plan will be adjusted accordingly to reflect new participants and their roles during the next review process.
Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 8
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Community Partnerships There are a number of active community partnerships, formal and informal, in Cape Girardeau County. The City Councils of the Cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson meet annually to discuss issues of common interest. The Southeast Missouri Major Case Squad is composed of members of the Sheriff’s Departments of Cape Girardeau and Bollinger Counties and the Cape Girardeau and Jackson Police Departments. Through the Major Case Squad, resources are shared in an effort to solve major criminal cases. The Cape Girardeau County 911 Board is a county-wide group which guides the 911 emergency response program in the County.
The Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force is composed of law enforcement officials from the Missouri Highway Patrol, local sheriff’s departments, and local police departments and works to apprehend drug dealers and reduce drug traffic in Southeast Missouri. The Cape Girardeau County Firefighters Association is a group comprised of fire chiefs from Cape Girardeau County and Scott City which meets monthly to discuss fire-related problems. The association maintains a county air van which is housed at the county’s fire departments on a rotating basis.
The various fire departments in the County have mutual-aid agreements in place which commit each department to come to the aid of other fire departments in the event of a fire which is beyond the ability of one department to contain or extinguish.
2.3 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER PLANNING EFFORTS 2.3.1 Integration with Other Local Plans Cape Girardeau County is fully committed to an effective and comprehensive mitigation program. A number of community plans are already in place in Cape Girardeau County. The Cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson have adopted comprehensive plans, as has the Village of Pocahontas. The City of Cape Girardeau also has in place an All Hazard Mitigation Plan which was prepared by Burns & McDonnell in 2000.
The Southeast Missouri Regional Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan, prepared by the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning and Economic Development Commission in 1990, addresses appropriate responses to the existence of hazardous waste materials in Cape Girardeau County, as well as the other six counties of the Southeast Missouri Region. The future wastewater needs of Cape Girardeau County were also identified and prioritized in the Southeast Missouri Regional Wastewater Treatment Needs Identification and Prioritization Project Report which was prepared in 1997.
Cape Girardeau County is also one of the seven counties included in the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for the Southeast Missouri Region which was prepared by the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning and Economic Development Commission in 2002. The CEDS is a broad-based plan for future growth and development in the Region, and in Cape Girardeau County.
Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 9
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The County has never implemented planning and zoning, and currently has not adopted building or fire codes. The County does, however, issue building permits outside incorporated city limits, primarily to ensure that new structures are not constructed in a floodplain.
Representatives from the county, communities, fire departments, police agencies, public health, emergency medical services, hospitals, and schools are members of the Emergency Management Agency. These members ensure that natural hazard mitigation measures are included in the plans of their respective organizations. Updates to the communities’ comprehensive plans will consider additional mitigation measures to be included in elements of the plans.
The municipalities with planning and zoning implemented will incorporate this hazard mitigation plan through appropriate plans such as comprehensive plans, transportation plans, emergency response plans, capital improvement plans, and economic development plans when such planning activities occur by integrating their vulnerability to hazards, goals and objectives, and actions identified herein into the other plans. The smaller municipalities with no planning or zoning mechanisms in place generally have no additional plans into which the hazard mitigation plan can be incorporated at the municipality level. Additionally, the applicable jurisdictions will incorporate the results of this plan into their floodplain management practices to help prevent unnecessary loss of life or damage to property.
The previous plan was incorporated into plans of the cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson as well as the County. The county integrated the plan into its floodplain management plan and its capital improvement plan. The cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson as well as the county incorporated information from the previous HMP into the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan, a long-range transportation plan for the urbanized area. No other major planning documents have been developed in the last five years by the county or municipalities. All jurisdictions do take hazard mitigation strategies and actions into consideration when developing their operating budgets, and those jurisdictions considering updates to comprehensive plans and other planning instruments intend to incorporate this plan as applicable.
2.3.2 Integrating Planning Information with Other Mitigation Partners The Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the participating jurisdiction’s hazards, risks, vulnerabilities, goals, objectives, priorities, and strategies for mitigation. The plan is the basic document that the county EMA uses to focus efforts to improve the lives of county residents. Over the years, the county has worked continuously to identify partners (federal, state, local, and business) interested in participating in the county’s mitigation efforts.
Integration of federal, state, and local agencies, business and industry, and private nonprofit organizations into the county mitigation program has been an ongoing process that has helped the county improve its mitigation plan over the years. The county and its appointed Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 10
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan representatives have had many meetings and discussions with these various entities involving reviews of current programs and policies that promote or could potentially promote mitigation initiatives throughout the county and reviews of existing and proposed plans to identify mitigation opportunities. The lessons learned through these programs and activities have contributed to the development of this plan and have been integrated into their own plans and programs.
This Hazard Mitigation Plan is available to all local agencies to reference when seeking information and guidance on hazard mitigation.
Cape Girardeau County and participating jurisdictions have worked in conjunction with numerous agencies and entities to help mitigate the effects of natural disasters within the county, including:
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • The Missouri Department of Conservation • The Missouri Department of Agriculture • The Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions, and Professional Registration • The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (DNR) • The Missouri Department of Transportation • U.S. Department of Transportation • Federal Highway Administration • U.S. Geological Survey • SEMA • FEMA • American Red Cross • Natural Resource Conservation Service
Chapter 2: The Planning Process Page 11
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CHAPTER 3: RISK ASSESSMENT
This document has been compiled to identify the hazards that exist at varying locations and degrees of magnitude throughout the county and to determine the potential impacts of these hazards on residents, property, and the environment. The information contained herein identifies capabilities essential to disaster response, for determining the probable effectiveness of allocating resources in emergency situations, and for encouraging the cooperation of various political subdivisions and emergency services in formulating regulations, plans, and programs to prepare for disasters and minimize loss of life, human suffering, and damage to public and private property. In addition, a thorough hazard analysis provides a foundation for educating government officials and the public on dangers posed by various hazards.
This Hazard Analysis provides a basis for activities proposed during the county’s planning efforts and should be used by local officials to plan and prioritize resource allocations.
3.1 IDENTIFYING HAZARDS Cape Girardeau County lies in the foothills of the Ozarks in Southeast Missouri. Terrain varies from flat alluvial bottom land along the Mississippi River to steeper forested areas in the western part of the County. In between the extremes, the land is mostly gently rolling in nature.
Because the County is located in the middle section of the United States, it is prone to several kinds of natural hazards. The county has a continental climate, meaning that the weather is changeable and has large variations in temperature and precipitation.
Warm and cool air masses often collide along sharply divided fronts, accompanied by violent thunderstorms having intense rains, strong winds, hail, lightning, and occasional tornadoes. These frontal storm systems can pass across the state at any time of the year, but are most frequent during the spring months (March, April, and May). There are two main factors that help determine the county’s weather: (1) the county is subject to weather extremes, and (2) extreme weather changes can occur rather quickly.
Most of the natural disasters that occur in the county result from a weather extreme or an extreme weather change. Because the county is situated in the center of the United States it is subject to many different influences that determine weather patterns.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 12
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.1-A Cape Girardeau County
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 13
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
According to Dr. Grant Darkow of the Department of Atmospheric Science at the University of Missouri-Columbia, in his piece Missouri Weather Patterns and Their Impact on Agriculture, published by the University Extension, reproduced here from the 2007 Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan, specific recognizable weather patterns are responsible for the state, and more specifically the county’s weather, especially those that “tend to produce extremes in precipitation, resulting in unusually wet or drought conditions, and extremes in temperature, either abnormally warm or cold.”
Darkow explains:
The character of air over Missouri on any particular day or series of days is dominated by the source regions from which it comes. Missouri’s mid-continental location makes it subject to air flows from a variety of source regions with markedly different properties.
The county is close enough to the Gulf of Mexico that warm air with high humidity can flow into the county from a southerly direction at almost any time of the year. This warm, moist air is the principal source of spring, summer, and fall precipitation and, occasionally, precipitation in winter as well.
In contrast, air arriving over Missouri from semi-arid to arid regions to the southwest is warm or hot and usually dry. Air that has moved from west to east over the Rocky Mountains arrives warm and dry, having lost most of its low-level moisture as it climbed the west side of the mountains.
Abnormally cold air in the winter and cold summer air with only very small moisture content arrives over Missouri from the northwest or north, whereas air entering Missouri from the northeast will tend to be cool and moist (see Exhibit No. 3.1-B).
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 14
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Exhibit 3.1-B: Source Regions & Atmospheric Characteristics for Air Arriving in Missouri
Normally, the flow from one of the principal source regions will last for two or three days before switching to a different direction and source region. These transitions typically are accompanied by a frontal passage during which the change in wind direction, temperature, and moisture content, or any combination, is concentrated.
In some instances, however, a particular flow pattern may be very persistent or dominant for a period of weeks or even months. These periods can lead to wet, dry, hot, or cold spells, and the extremes associated with these periods. These periods are characterized by particular upper air flow patterns and associated surface weather patterns (see Exhibits 3.1-C, D, E, F, G, & H).
The persistence of these weather patterns and the possible resulting condition is the subject of several of the natural disasters discussed in this study. Specifically, floods, droughts, fires, heat waves, severe cold, and winter storms can be the result of the persistence of one of these weather patterns, whereas tornadoes can represent the outgrowth of rapid shifts in weather patterns. Knowing these patterns may assist in alerting disaster planners and the general public to the possibility of a developing emergency situation.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 15
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Exhibit 3.1-C: Upper Air Pattern Exhibit 3.1-D: Surface Air Pattern
Exhibit 3.1-E: Upper Air Pattern Exhibit 3.1-F: Surface Air Pattern
Exhibit 3.1-G: Upper Air Pattern Exhibit 3.1-H: Surface Air Pattern
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 16
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Cape Girardeau County’s climate is typical for Southeast Missouri. Generally, the County has hot humid summers and mild to cold winters. Mean temperature in the County is 57.2° Fahrenheit. July is normally the hottest month, with a mean temperature of 75.7°, while January is usually the coldest, with a mean temperature of 32.4°. Freezing temperatures normally occur on 80 to 100 days of the year. The period of highest rainfall in Cape Girardeau County normally occurs in the fall, winter and spring. Mean rainfall is 46.54 inches per year. Snowfall may range from 13 to 14 inches in an average year.
The County has been divided into six physiographic divisions for purposes of this report. The Cape Hills, or River Hills, contains the most rugged terrain in the County, along with the most extensive area of timber. The Central Rolling Hills extend through the west- central part of the County before ending abruptly at the northern edge of the southern lowlands. The Western Hills are a smaller area of rugged terrain west of the Whitewater River and extending into Bollinger County. Extending across the southern part of the County are the Advance Lowlands, which are broken by Hickory Ridge. The final division is the Mississippi River Bottoms along the eastern border of Cape Girardeau County.
Soils in the County are divided into roughly seven associations. The Menfro-Winfield Association covers an extensive area of the County. These soils are developed in loess and, therefore, are subject to severe erosion and gullying if not managed correctly. The soils are usually found in cultivated fields on gently to strongly sloping uplands and pastures on steeper side slopes. Menfro soils are deep and well drained, occurring on ridgetops and side slopes, where slopes range from 2% to 30%. These soils have a silt- loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable, silty-clay-loam subsoil. Winfield soils are also found on ridgetops and side slopes, with slopes generally varying from 2% to 20%. They are deep but only moderately well drained. Winfield soils have a silt-loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable, silty-clay-loam subsoil.
The second soil association present is the Union-Goss-Gasconade-Crider Association. It occupies a small area in the western most part of the County. These soils occur in small areas of pasture and cultivated land on gently to moderately sloping ridgetops and forested, long, moderate to very steep side slopes. The soils have been formed in cherty limestone residual material. The Union and Crider soils also have a thin mantle of loess present. Union soils have a fragipan layer but are moderately well drained. The soil has a silt-loam topsoil grading downward into a moderately permeable subsoil overlying a massive fragipan. They occur on slopes of 3% to 20%. The Goss soils are deep, well drained, and occur on steep upland slopes to 2% to 45%. Topsoil is a cherty, silt-loam overlying a moderately permeable, very cherty, silty-clay subsoil. The Gasconade soils occur on steep upland slopes and are shallow and somewhat excessively drained. They have a flaggy, clay-loam topsoil overlying a flaggy, clay subsoil that has moderately slow permeability. The soils occur on slopes of 2% to 50% but are more common on slopes of 30% to 50%. Crider soils have a silt-loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable, Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 17
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
silty-clay-loam subsoil. They are deep, well drained upland soils that occur in some areas with karst (sinkhole) topography. They occur on slopes of nearly flat to 20%.
The third soil association present in Cape Girardeau County is the Hartville-Ashton- Cedargap-Nolin Association. This association occurs in the bottom lands along the Whitewater, Little Whitewater, and Castor River Diversion Channel. The bottoms include nearly level to moderately sloping terraces. These are primarily used for pasture, hay growing, and cultivated crops. These soils have formed in loamy alluvial deposits. The Hartville soils are deep, somewhat poorly drained, and found on nearly level to gently sloping terraces or second bottoms. The soils have a silt-loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable, silt-loam subsoil. Ashton soils occur on slopes ranging up to 6% and have a high available water capacity. They have a silt-loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable, silt-loam subsoil. The Cedargap soils are deep soils found on floodplains and are well drained to somewhat excessively drained. The soil has a cherty silt-loam topsoil overlying a cherty silt-loam subsoil. Nolin soils are deep, well drained soils occurring on low, nearly level (0% to 4% slopes) floodplains. They have a silt-loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable, silt-loam subsoil.
A fourth soil association present in Cape Girardeau County is the Calhoun-Convent- Falaya Association. This association is found in the bottom lands in southern Cape Girardeau County. These are broad, nearly level cultivated fields with a few pastures. It also includes some small areas of forest in low places that flood frequently. Calhoun soils are deep, poorly drained, and occur on slopes of less than 1%. These soils have a silt-loam topsoil overlying a slowly permeable, silty-clay-loam subsoil. The Convent soils are deep, somewhat poorly drained, occurring on slopes of up to 3%. They consist of a silt-loam topsoil overlying a moderately permeable subsoil of very fine sandy-loam and silt-loam layers. Soils of the Falaya association are deep and somewhat poorly drained. They occur on slopes of 2% or less and are subject to flooding if not protected by levees. Topsoil is silt-loam overlying a silt-loam subsoil.
The fifth soil association present is the Sharkey Association. It occurs in a very small area in the extreme southern part of Cape Girardeau County. The area is very low, containing broad, nearly level to slightly depressed cultivated fields. It also encompasses scattered, small areas of cypress and other water-tolerant vegetation bordering swamps and drainage lines. Sharkey soils have formed in clayey alluvial sediments deposited in slack water areas. Sharkey’s profile is that of a clayey topsoil overlying a slow to very slowly permeable clay subsoil. The soils are deep, poorly drained on slopes that are generally 2% or less.
The Memphis-Loring Association is the sixth soil association present in the County. It is found only in the Arbor Ridge area in southwestern Cape Girardeau County. This area includes broad, cultivated fields, pastures and orchards on gently sloping areas. These are upland soils that have formed in loess. The Memphis soils are deep and well Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 18
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
drained. They occur on uplands and stream terraces. Topsoil is silt-loam, overlying a moderately permeable silty-clay-loam subsoil. Slopes are generally 20% or less, although they can be up to 40%. Loring soils are also upland soils, moderately well drained. They have a silt-loam topsoil and a moderately permeable silt-loam subsoil. The subsoil overlies a massive, compact, brittle fragipan.
The seventh soil association in Cape Girardeau County is the Caruthersville-Commerce- Hayti Association. It occurs only in a small area of the Mississippi Bottoms in eastern Cape Girardeau County. The area is dominated by nearly level, loamy cultivated fields. The soils have formed in loamy alluvial sediments. The Caruthersville soils are deep, moderately well drained, and occur on higher elevations bordering the river channel. Topsoil is a very fine sandy-loam overlying a moderately permeable, very find sandy- loam and silt-loam subsoil. Commerce soils are deep, somewhat poorly drained, on slopes of 2% or less. A silt-loam or silty-clay-loam topsoil overlies a moderately to slowly permeable silt-loam or silty-clay-loam subsoil. Hayti soils occur in depressions in floodplains. They are deep and poorly drained. Topsoil is very dark, silty-clay-loam and the subsoil is a slowly permeable, silty-clay loam.
Cape Girardeau County has six major rock types underlying the County. A combination of limestone and shale underlies nearly the eastern third of the County. The central part of the County is underlain by a combination of limestone, dolomite and some shale. Sandstone underlies a narrow strip in the County, running diagonally from the northwest corner of the County to the south-central area at the northern edge of the bottom lands. The western edge of the County is underlain by a combination of dolomite with some limestone, sandstone and shale. The southern portion of the County is underlain by alluvium, a combination of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. Within this area is a small island composed of clays and sandstone.
Natural Hazards Natural hazards can be complex, occurring with a wide range of intensities. Some events are instantaneous and offer no window of warning, such as earthquakes. Some offer a short window in which to alert the public to take actions, such as tornadoes or severe thunderstorms. Others occur less frequently and are typically more expansive, with some warning time to allow the public time to prepare, such as flooding.
The following natural hazards were determined by the HMPC to threaten the county based on historical records and local knowledge:
• Dam & Levee Failures • Drought • Earthquakes • Extreme Cold Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 19
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Extreme Heat • Flash & Riverine Flooding • Sinkholes • Severe Winter Weather (Snow, Ice) • Tornadoes and Thunderstorms (Downbursts, Lightning, Hail, Heavy Rains, and Wind) • Wild Fires
The following hazards were excluded by the HMPC due to no record of the disaster having occurred in the county:
• Avalanche (not a mountainous area) • Hurricane (not a coastal area) • Landslide (no historical basis) • Tidal Wave (not a coastal area) • Volcanic Activity (no historical basis)
Below is a list of Public Assistance Declared Disasters involving the county dating back to 1998:
2009 06/19 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding 2009 02/17 Severe Winter Storms 2008 11/13 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding 2008 06/25 Severe Storms and Flooding 2008 03/17 Severe Storms and Flooding 2008 03/12 Severe Winter Storms and Flooding 2003 05/06 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding
Below is a list of Individual Assistance Declared Disasters involving the county dating back to 1998:
2003 05/06 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding 2002 05/06 Severe Storms and Tornadoes
Below is a list of Emergency Declarations involving the county dating back to 2005:
2016 01/02 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding 2011 02/03 Severe Winter Storm 2009 01/30 Severe Winter Storm 2007 12/12 Severe Winter Storms 2005 09/10 Hurricane Katrina Evacuation
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 20
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.2 PROFILING HAZARDS This Hazard Analysis assesses various risks facing the county and its communities in order to evaluate and rank them. This process is then used to characterize hazards for emergency planning. It estimates the probability of occurrence and the severity of consequences for each hazard and provides a method of comparison. The evaluation involves many interrelated variables (toxicity, demographics, topography, etc.), and should be used by local officials in planning and prioritizing allocation of resources.
A careful examination of hazard event profiles serves to define historic hazard trends and provides a reference point for understanding the potential impacts from future predicted events. Reviewing historic data assists in evaluating hazard event profiles, which focus on answering the following questions: How often might a particular disaster occur? Where are we most likely to be affected? and, How bad can it get?
Natural Hazard Identification/Elimination Process Various sources were researched concerning data related to the natural disasters in Cape Girardeau County. The Center for Earthquake Information, the U. S. Geological Survey, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Climate Data Center, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers National Inventory of Dams, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, and FEMA and SEMA. Other sources included newspaper accounts, historical records and local residents.
Natural hazards identified from these sources were researched as to repetitiveness, severity, and likelihood of re-occurrence. Some hazards identified are area wide occurrences and not confined to one county or city.
Community-Wide Hazard Profile and List of Hazards Identified Past history indicates that the county could be affected by tornadoes/thunderstorms, flash flooding, extreme heat and cold, drought, severe winter storms, wildfires, dam failures, sinkholes, and earthquakes.
The disaster that has caused the greatest damage and loss of life in the past has been flooding on the Mississippi River. This primarily affects the City of Cape Girardeau, Dutchtown, Whitewater, Allenville and other rural areas of the County. Flash flooding has caused damage in the County and in the Cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson.
Extreme heat is common, but has resulted in no reported deaths nor injuries. Severe winter weather has regularly affected the County, though also having caused no reported direct injuries or deaths. There have been no known dam failures in the
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 21
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
County. Drought is a hazard that occurs over a large area, and the statistics reported on it reflect numerous counties or perhaps the entire state. There have been no significant wildfires in the County in recent memory. Small brush fires are handled by the local fire departments and are brought under quick control.
No record of a damaging earthquake in the County can be found in the records, other than the New Madrid Earthquake of 1811-1812. Due to the wide area that would be affected and the potential severity of a major earthquake, it has the potential to be the most devastating natural hazard.
Given the county’s karst topography in certain areas (mainly in and immediately near the City of Cape Girardeau) sink holes are a common occurrence; however, in recent years the City of Cape Girardeau has taken steps to identify and protect sink holes throughout the karst region of the city.
Hazards are profiled below alphabetically.
3.2.1 Dam & Levee Failure Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Dam Failure Dam building peaked in the 30 years following World War II. In that time frame, over one-half of the 80,000 plus dams in the United States were built. A dam, according to the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety is, “Any artificial barrier, including appurtenant works, which impounds or diverts water, and which (1) is 25 feet or more in height from the natural bed of the stream or watercourse measured at the downstream toe of the barrier or from the lowest elevation of the outside limit of the barrier if it is not across a stream channel or watercourse, to the maximum water storage elevation or (2) has an impounding capacity at maximum water storage elevation of 50 acre-feet or more. These guidelines do not apply to any such barrier which is not in excess of 6 feet in height, regardless of storage capacity, or which has storage capacity at maximum water storage elevation not in excess of 15 acre-feet regardless of height. This lower size limitation should be waived if there is potentially significant downstream hazard.”
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources regulates the design, construction and maintenance of non-federal, non-agricultural dams that are at least 35 feet in height. Dam owners have the responsibility for the safe design, operation and maintenance of their dams. They are responsible for having an emergency plan and coordinating the plan with local officials. The danger from dams arises when they fail and send a sudden rush of water, mud and debris down a valley, flooding the areas and destroying lives and
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 22
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
property. Exhibit 3.2.1-A shows a listing of DNR regulated dams in the county, while Exhibit 3.2.1-B shows the location of these dams.
Exhibit No. 3.2.1-C National Inventory of Dams-Cape Girardeau County shows all dams in the county that are listed on the National Inventory of Dams (NID). The NID consists of dams meeting at least one of the following criteria: • High hazard classification – loss of one human life is likely if the dam fails; • Significant hazard classification – possible loss of human life and likely significant property or environmental destruction; • Equal to or exceeds 25 feet in height and exceeds 15 acre-feet in storage; or Equal to or exceeds 50 acre-feet in storage and exceeds 6 feet in height.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 23
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.2.1-A DNR Cape Girardeau County Dam Report
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 24
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 25
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.2.1-B DNR Cape Girardeau County Dam Map
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 26
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Exhibit 3.2.1-C National Inventory of Dams-Cape Girardeau County Hazard Distance Enforce- Other Dam Potential Inspection To City ment Dam Name Name NIDID * Date River Nearest City * (Mi.) * County Authority LAKE TANGLEWOOD TR-JUDEN CAPE CAPE NORTH DAM - MO31225 High 10/28/1980 CREEK GIRARDEAU - GIRARDEAU N NORTH HILLS NORTH HILLS ESTATE ESTATE SURBD SUBDIVISION TR-CAPE LA CAPE CAPE LAKE DAM LAKE MO30950 High - CROIX CREEK GIRARDEAU 5 GIRARDEAU N LAKE TRIBUTARY HOLLENBECK TO CAPE CAPE CAPE DAM - MO40050 High 6/14/2012 LACROIX CR. GIRARDEAU - GIRARDEAU Y LAKE BOUTIN TR-FLORA NEELYS CAPE DAM - MO40008 High 9/15/2006 CREEK LANDING 3 GIRARDEAU Y CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU CAPE DAM - MO40109 High 6/14/2012 - - - GIRARDEAU Y NORTH TWIN TR-RAMSEY CAPE CAPE LAKES DAM - MO31216 High 10/30/1980 BRANCH GIRARDEAU - GIRARDEAU N TR- PEMBERTON HEADWATER LAKE DAM-SEC DIVERSION CAPE 22 - MO30973 High - CHANNL DUTCHTOWN - GIRARDEAU N LAKE TANGLEWOOD TR-JUDEN CAPE CAPE SOUTH DAM - MO31224 High 10/28/1980 CREEK GIRARDEAU - GIRARDEAU N LITTLE BEAR TR-CAPE LA CAPE CAPE LAKE DAM - MO30533 High 10/28/1980 CROIX GIRARDEAU 1 GIRARDEAU N BROWN LAKE TR-JUDEN CAPE CAPE DAM - MO31223 High 10/28/1980 CREEK GIRARDEAU - GIRARDEAU N
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 27
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
GARMS LAKE TR-CAPE LA CAPE CAPE DAM - MO31218 High 10/30/1980 CROIX GIRAREDAU - GIRARDEAU N SPRING LAKE TR-HUBBLE CAPE DAM - MO31180 High 12/2/1980 CREEK JACKSON 2 GIRARDEAU N LAKE GIRARDEAU TR-CROOKED CAPE DAM - MO30066 High 4/19/2012 CREEK DONGOLA 15 GIRARDEAU Y TR-INDIAN CAPE CAPE LIPPS LAKE DAM - MO30214 High 3/29/2011 CREEK GIRARDEAU 9 GIRARDEAU Y STALLINGS BROS HUGHES NEELYS CAPE DAM - MO30213 High - CREEK LANDING 26 GIRARDEAU N BELLA VISTA TR INDIAN CAPE DAM - MO30211 High 1/4/2011 CREEK WARE ILL 10 GIRARDEAU Y TR RAMSEY CAPE CAPE JUDEN - MO40002 Low - BRANCH GIRADEAU - GIRARDEAU N TR- HEADWATER EVANS LAKE DIVERSION CAPE DAM EAST - MO31723 Low - CHNL DUTCHTOWN - GIRARDEAU N
DELBERT LEE TR-WHITE CAPE COBB DAM - MO50607 Low - WATER RIVER BURFORDVILLE 2.3 GIRARDEAU N MONONAME TR HUBBLE CAPE 805 - MO30969 Low - CREEK DUTCHTOWN - GIRARDEAU N MONONAME TR APPLE CAPE 821 - MO30975 Low - RIVER HINDERLAND - GIRARDEAU N
TR WILLIAMS MONONAME CREEK CAPE 804 (DRY) - MO30968 Low - OFFSTREAM DUTCHTOWN - GIRARDEAU N LITTLE PONDEROSA TR-CAPE LAKE(TOO LACROIX CAPE CAPE SMALL) - MO31222 Low 3/27/1981 CREEK GIRARDEAU - GIRARDEAU N
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 28
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
TR- CEDAR LAKE WHITEWATER CAPE DAM - MO31235 Low - RIVER WHITEWATER 9 GIRARDEAU N TR- HEADWATER EVANS LAKE DIVERSION CAPE DAM WEST - MO31722 Low - CHNL DUTCHTOWN - GIRARDEAU N TR CEDAR LAKE WHITEWATER CAPE DAM CEDAR LAKE MO30006 Low - RIVER BURFORDVILLE 5 GIRARDEAU N PEMBERTON LAKE DAM-US TR-HUBBLE CAPE SURVEY 2283 - MO30208 Low - CREEK DUTCHTOWN 2 GIRARDEAU N TR-SISUN CAPE JERRY DAVIS - MO50663 Low - CREEK MISSIPPI RIVER 10 GIRARDEAU N TR- DELBERT LEE WHITEWATER CAPE COBB - MO50444 Low - RIVER NONE - GIRARDEAU N
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 29
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Levee Failure Levees are earth embankments constructed along rivers and coastlines to protect adjacent lands from flooding. Floodwalls are concrete structures, often components of levee systems, designed for urban areas where there is insufficient room for earthen levees. When levees and floodwalls and their appurtenant structures are stressed beyond their capabilities to withstand floods, levee failure can result in loss of life and injuries as well as damages to property, the environment, and the economy. For purposes of this discussion, levee failure will refer to both overtopping and breach of a levee.
Currently, there is no single comprehensive inventory of levee systems in the State of Missouri. Levees have been constructed across the State by public entities and private entities with varying levels of protection, inspection oversight and maintenance. The lack of a comprehensive levee inventory is not unique to the State of Missouri. It was brought to the national forefront after Hurricane Katrina as a result of the many levee failures caused by the hurricane floodwaters. The ensuing loss of life and damage to property highlighted the need for a program responsible for levee oversight.
There are three major levees in the county: the Flood wall in downtown Cape Girardeau, the Red Star District Levee that protects the Red Star Neighborhood just north of downtown Cape Girardeau, and the Little River Drainage District located on the south side of the Diversion Channel.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
Dam Failure There have been no recorded dam failures in the county in the past 20 years. This equates to a 0% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 0/20=0%
Levee Failure There have been multiple levee failures in the county due to either structural failures or overtopping. The Red Star District Levee has failed multiple times over the years during times of extremely high river levels as in 1993, leading to millions of dollars of damage. During the 1993 flood both the Flood Wall and Diversion Channel Levee came within only a few feet of being topped, and more recently in the winter of 2015 both were nearly topped again.
There have been approximately 2 levee failures in the county in the past 20 years. This equates to a 10% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 2/20=10%
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 30
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.2.2 Drought Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Drought is the result of insufficient rainfall over an extended period of time, resulting in extensive damage to crops and loss in yield. Extended droughts can also result in serious water supply problems for individuals and communities. Drought is a normal, recurring climatic condition and is a temporary aberration, as opposed to aridity, which is a permanent feature of climate. Current literature addresses three types of drought:
Meteorological drought–defined on the basis of the degree of dryness, in comparison to some “normal” amount, along with the duration of the dry period.
Agricultural drought–defined as a deficiency in soil moisture.
Hydrological drought–defined as the effects of periods of precipitation shortfalls on surface and subsurface water supplies.
The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), Exhibit No. 3.2.2-A, which is published by NOAA and the Department of Agriculture, is the most commonly used indicator of drought and drought severity in the United States. Other indexes are also used to determine drought and its effects. Some of these indices are listed below:
Percent of Normal - a simple calculation that is effective for comparing a single region or season.
Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) - based on the probability of precipitation for any time scale. It can provide early warning of a drought and help assess severity.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 31
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.2.2-A. Palmer Drought Severity Index
-4 or less Extreme Drought -4 to -3 Severe Drought -3 to -2 Moderate Drought -2 to -1 Mild Drought -1 to -0.5 Incipient Dry Spell 0 Normal -0.5 to 0.5 Near Normal 0.5 to 1 Incipient Wet Spell 1 to 2 Slightly Wet 2 to 3 Moderately Wet 3 to 4 Very Wet 4 or More Extremely Wet
Crop Moisture Index (CMI)–this index reflects moisture supply in a major crop-producing region in the short term.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
It can be assumed that the County suffered the effects of the drought of 1901. It would have also felt the effects of the Dust Bowl years of the 1930’s and early 1940’s. In the 1950’s, there were also a number of drought years, especially the years between 1953 and 1957. A general drought also occurred in the state in 1988, recording the century’s lowest annual precipitation for the state. Droughts also occurred in 2000, 2005, and 2007.
The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) lists 25 drought occurrences in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 25/20=100%
3.2.3 Earthquake Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 32
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
An earthquake is a shaking of the earth’s crust, which can be mild or violent depending on the intensity of the quake. Some areas of the United States are more susceptible to earthquakes than other areas. The New Madrid Seismic Zone, in which the county is located, is one of the more active areas in the U. S. Depending on its intensity, an earthquake can be felt in an area ranging from several hundred square miles to several thousand square miles. If damage occurs, it may be limited to dishes falling from shelves and breaking or it may topple major buildings, overpasses, bridges and other vital structures.
The Richter Scale is used to measure the magnitude of an earthquake. The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale is used to describe earthquake effects. Both scales are shown below.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 33
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Richter Scale M=1 to 3: Recorded on local seismographs, but generally not felt. M=3 to 4: Often felt, no damage. M=5: Felt widely, slight damage near epicenter. M=6: Damage to poorly constructed building and other structures within ten kilometers. M=7: “Major” earthquake, causes serious damage up to one hundred kilometers. M=8: “Great” earthquake, great destruction, loss of life over several hundred kilometers M=9: Rare great earthquake, major damage over a large region over one thousand kilometers.
Modified Mercalli Scale I. Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable circumstances. II. Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings. Delicately suspended objects may swing. III. Felt quite noticeably indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings, but many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly. Vibration like passing of truck. IV. During the day felt indoors by many, outdoors by few. At night some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls made cracking sound. Sensations like heavy truck striking building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably. V. Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows, etc., broken; a few instances of cracked plaster; unstable objects overturned. Disturbance of trees, poles and other tall objects sometimes noticed. Pendulum clocks may stop. VI. Felt by all; many frightened and run outdoors. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster or damaged chimneys. Damage slight. VII. Everybody runs outdoors. Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable in poorly build or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken. Noticed by persons driving motor cars. VIII. Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse; great in poorly built structures. Panel walls thrown out of frame structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned. Sand and mud ejected in small amounts. Changes in well water. Disturbed persons driving motor cars. IX. Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well designed frame structures thrown out of plumb; great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse. Building shifted off foundations. Ground cracked conspicuously. Underground pipes broken.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 34
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
X. Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations; ground badly cracked. Rails bent. Landslides considerable from river banks and steep slopes. Shifted sand and mud. Water splashed (slopped) over banks. XI. Few, if any masonry, structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Broad fissures in ground. Underground pipe lines completely out of service. Earth slumps and land slips in soft ground. Rails bent greatly. XII. DAMAGE TOTAL. Waves seen on ground surfaces. Lines of sight and level distorted. Objects thrown upward into the air.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
Earthquakes from 1699 through 2010 throughout the multi-state region are presented below (Exhibit No. 3.2.3-A). In recent years there have been earthquakes recorded in the county ranging in magnitude from 1 to 3, but no known serious damage has resulted.
The New Madrid Seismic Zone (generally from Memphis, TN to Cape Girardeau, MO) experiences more than 200 measurable earthquakes a year. Earthquakes of magnitude 2.5 to 3 on the Richter scale are felt annually, with a quake of 4 or more being released every 18 months. An earthquake of 5.0 or greater on the Richter scale occurs about once per decade. This magnitude quake can cause significant damage and be felt in several states. A quake of 6.0 or greater has a 25% to 40% chance of occurring in a 50- year time span. There is a 7% to 10% chance of an earthquake of the 7.5 magnitude of the New Madrid earthquake occurring by 2050. This magnitude of earthquake would be felt in half the United States and damage 20 states or more.
In the last 20 years, http://www.earthquaketrack.com reports 2 earthquakes of magnitude 4.0 or greater near Cape Girardeau County. In the past 42 years, no earthquake of 5.0 magnitude or higher has been reported within 150 miles. Based on this data, this plan assumes a 10% chance of a 4.0 magnitude earthquake occurring in any given year. 2/20=10%
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 35
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.2.3-A: Earthquakes 1699-2010 (USGS)
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 36
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.2.3-B: Projected Earthquake Intensities (Modified Mercalli Scale)
Source: 2010 Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 37
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.2.4 Extreme Cold Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Extreme cold can be defined in a number of ways depending on location and criteria. The CDC defines extreme cold as temperatures well below an area’s average temperature, making such a definition dependent on location and the interpretation of “well below.” At the same time, cold temperatures will affect humans, livestock, and infrastructure at different thresholds and rates. However, in keeping with this plans primary goal of protecting human lives the Planning Committee chose to use a definition of extreme cold relating first and foremost to public health.
According to the National Weather Service exposure to temperatures at or below zero degrees and sustained winds of 15 mph or greater will cause frostbite in 30 minutes or less. As such, this plan defines extreme cold as temperatures at or below 0 degrees Fahrenheit. Extreme cold can be expected to affect the county as a whole, though low lying valleys and hollows are likely to experience somewhat more severe temperatures and less severe wind speeds. For people not properly protected extreme cold can cause frostbite, hypothermia, and death. Structures can also experience damage from extreme cold caused by freezing pipes, freeze/thaw cycles, and soil heaving.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) lists 8 cold/extreme cold occurrences in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 40% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 8/20=40%
3.2.5 Extreme Heat Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Extreme heat waves are unexpected killers. Most people do not realize the danger of high temperatures combined with high humidity. The body cools itself by dissipating heat by varying the rate and depth of blood circulation, by losing water through the skin and sweat glands, and by panting as a last resort. Evaporation of the sweat cools the body and helps it to deal with higher temperatures. However, high relative humidity retards evaporation and thus robs the body of the ability to cool off. The Heat Index measures the effects that high temperature, combined with high humidity, have on the ability of the body to cool itself. The Heat Index is a measure of how hot it feels when high temperature and humidity are combined. Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 38
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
A high Heat Index can have serious consequences for the health of those who work or play outside in it. It is also a serious health hazard to those living in houses or apartments without air conditioning or fans. When the Heat Index is between 90° and 105°, a person is susceptible to sunstroke, heat cramps, and heat exhaustion. A 105° to 130° Heat Index rating can cause sunstroke, heat cramps and heat exhaustion along with possible heat stroke. If the heat index is higher than 130°, then heat stroke is likely with prolonged exposure. To reduce the risk of serious health problems during times of high Heat Index readings, it is recommended that light, loose clothing and a large hat be worn outside. Also, drink water frequently, avoid alcoholic beverages, and stay in the shade as much as possible. Strenuous outdoor activity should be done in the early morning or late evening hours when the Heat Index is expected to be lower.
Exhibit No. 3.2.5-A is a Heat Index chart illustrating the effect of the combination of heat and humidity on how hot the temperature feels. It should be noted that the chart is based on shady, light wind conditions. If exposure is to full sunlight, the Heat Index can increase by 15°.
A new index has been developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association called the Mean Heat Index. The Mean Heat Index is an average of the Heat Index for the coolest and hottest times of the day. It measures how hot the temperature feels to a person over the course of an entire day. The Mean Heat Index is being used by NOAA to issue heat wave warnings up to seven days in advance of the heat wave.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 39
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.2.5-A Heat Index
Air Temperature (F) RH (%) 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 30 67 73 78 84 90 96 104 113 123 135 148 35 67 73 79 85 91 98 107 118 130 143 40 68 74 79 86 93 101 110 123 137 151 45 68 74 80 87 95 104 115 129 143 50 69 75 81 88 96 107 120 135 150 55 69 75 81 89 98 110 126 142 60 70 76 82 90 100 114 132 149 65 70 76 83 91 102 119 138 70 70 77 85 93 106 124 144 75 70 77 86 95 109 130 80 71 78 86 97 113 136 85 71 78 87 99 117 90 71 79 88 102 122 95 71 79 89 105 100 72 80 91 108
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
In the past 20 years, there have been 41 extreme heat events in which Cape Girardeau County was included. These events resulted in 5 deaths, 26 injuries and an unspecified amount in crop damages.
The (NCDC) lists 41 heat/excessive heat occurrences in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 41/20=100%
3.2.6 Flooding: Riverine & Flash Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Flooding results in the partial or complete inundation of normally dry land. Riverine flooding occurs as the result of the overflow of rivers, streams, drains, and lakes due to excessive rainfall, rapid snow or ice melt. There are several types of flooding, including headwater, backwater, and interior drainage. Flash flooding is another type of flooding
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 40
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
that can occur as a result of rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. This type of flooding usually occurs on smaller rivers, creeks and streams as a result of heavy rainfall. Flash floods can also occur when a dam is breached or overtopped. Since flash floods can occur so quickly, they are usually more likely to cause deaths than flooding on the Mississippi River.
Cape Girardeau County is also designated as “Effective FIS/FIRM” for the Risk MAP project. Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Program that provides communities with flood information and tools they can use to enhance their mitigation plans and take action to better protect their citizens.
Through collaboration with State, Tribal, and local entities, Risk MAP delivers quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to life and property. This data is not yet available for Cape Girardeau County, though work is underway. Exhibit No. 3.2.6-A Risk MAP Status Map shows the status of all Missouri counties.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 41
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
Records maintained by the NCDC list 119 flooding events in Cape Girardeau County in the past 20 years. These include both flash flooding of small streams as well as flooding on the Mississippi River. The river flooding ranges from events that barely reach flood stage to major flooding in 1993, 1995 and 2002. This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 119/20=100%
Exhibit No. 3.2.6-B lists the 15 highest river crests as recorded on the Chester, Illinois, river gauge. It is of interest that all of these crests have occurred since 1973, apparently indicating a trend of the river crests increasing over the years.
EXHIBIT 3.2.6-B Highest 15 Historic River Crests Chester, Illinois, Mississippi River Gauge
CREST DATE (IN FEET) 49.74 August 7, 1993 44.00 May 23, 1995 43.32 April 30, 1973 41.02 May 5, 1983 40.58 May 17, 2002 39.54 October 10, 1986 39.4 July 1, 2008 39.2 June 30, 2008 38.90 April 16, 1994 36.95 September 19, 2008 36.60 February 28, 1985 35.53 May 20, 1990 35.31 June 11, 2001 35.14 November 23, 1985 35.00 April 19,1998
Appendix B contains the Repetitive Loss Listing for Cape Girardeau County. The table illustrates that the County has suffered 374 losses over the years. The majority of these losses have been in the City of Cape Girardeau, which accounted for 84.5%, of the County’s losses. The City of Jackson accounted for 4% of the losses in the County. The remaining 11.5% of the losses occurred in the rural areas of the County. Fifteen of the
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 42
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
properties had flood insurance policies. Eleven of the losses in the out-county area have been mitigated. The City of Cape Girardeau has mitigated 21 of the losses and the City of Jackson has mitigated 13 of the properties.
3.2.7 Severe Winter Weather Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Severe winter weather includes heavy snow, sleet, and ice storms. In all likelihood, the hazard would affect the entire County or a significant portion of it. Damages primarily occur to suspended utility lines. If the weight of the snow and ice were heavy enough, there could be problems with collapsed gutters and roofs. Hazardous road conditions often occur resulting in accidents and, occasionally, the complete shutdown of major transportation routes.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
Some type of severe winter weather has occurred on an average of three times per year in the past six years. The amount of economic loss and number of deaths and injuries are difficult to estimate due to the fact that most of these events cover a number of counties, and statistics gathered are for all of the damages resulting from the storm event.
The NCDC lists 34 winter weather occurrences (Heavy Snow, Winter Storm, Ice Storm) in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 34/20=100%
3.2.8 Sinkholes Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Land subsidence is the sinking of the earth’s surface due to the movement of earth materials below the surface. This sinking can be sudden or gradual and is generally attributed to the removal of subsurface water or the draining of organic soils. In Cape Girardeau County the rock below the surface is commonly limestone, which can be naturally dissolved by circulating groundwater. As the rock dissolves, spaces and caverns form, and ultimately the land above the spaces collapses. In the county, sinkhole problems are usually a result of surface materials above openings into bedrock caves eroding and collapsing into the cave opening. These collapses are called “cover
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 43
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
collapses” and geologic information can be applied to predict the general regions where collapse will occur. Sinkholes range in size from several square yards to hundreds of acres and may be quite shallow or hundreds of feet deep.
Sinkhole formation is most intense where the bedrock is most soluble and has been exposed to extended periods of weathering and where surficial materials are between 40 and 80 feet in thickness and are composed of relict bedrock structure residuum containing clays with low dry densities. Bedrock faulting also contributes to deep weathering, cave formation, and sinkhole formation.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
Numerous sinkholes exist in the county’s karst regions (areas with soluble bedrock). While most of them are from natural causes, others are a result of human activities. Triggering factors include activities that alter the natural hydrologic conditions, the collapse of storm sewers or other abandoned and forgotten manmade voids, and subsurface mining. There is no data available at this time to identify when a given sinkhole formed, making it currently impossible to calculate a rate of occurrence. However, the existence of sinkholes and the known karst regions of the county indicate there is a chance of a new sinkhole forming.
3.2.9 Tornadoes & Severe Thunderstorms Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Tornadoes Tornadoes are violently rotating cyclical currents of air spinning at speeds of 40 mph to over 300 mph. Severe thunder/electrical storms can accompany tornadoes, along with straight-line winds, downbursts, lightning, hail and heavy rain. A tornado can travel in any direction, but most travel in a southwest to northeast path. The forward speed can range from stationary to 70 mph, but usually averages 30 mph. Tornadoes can occur at any time of the day, with the hours between 3:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. being the most likely times for them to strike. Any person or structure in the County can be damaged by a tornado. The severity of the damage depends on several factors: a) the strength of the tornado, b) the proximity of the tornado to the person or structure, c) the strength of the structure, d) what kind of shelter the person can find. Damage can range from slight to total.
Severe Thunderstorms A thunderstorm is defined as a storm that contains lightning and thunder which is caused by unstable atmospheric conditions. When the upper air which is cold sinks and Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 44
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
the warm moist air rises, storm clouds or “thunderheads” develop resulting in thunderstorms. This can occur singularly, in clusters or in lines. The National Weather Service defines a thunderstorm as severe if it contains hail that is one inch or the wind gusts are at 58 mph or higher. At any given moment across the world, there are about 1,800 thunderstorms occurring. Severe thunderstorms most often occur in the county in the spring and summer, during the afternoon and evenings, but can occur at any time. The entire county is at risk to the damaging effects of Severe Thunderstorms.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
Tornadoes Statistics gathered since 1995 indicate that 20 tornadoes have touched down in Cape Girardeau County. May is the month in which the most tornadoes have occurred, with six recorded. Three tornadoes have occurred in January, March, and April, while February had two recorded touchdowns, and June, October, and November had one each. Only the months of July, August, and September have not recorded a tornado since 1995, though additional historical records indicate a tornado can occur in any month. The latest tornado recorded in the County occurred on October 31, 2013 in Dutchtown when an EF1 tornado did approximately $130,000 in damage. The most severe tornado since 1995 remains the May 6, 2003 event, when an F-3 tornado struck the City of Jackson doing extensive damage. Homes, businesses and public buildings were damaged or destroyed, including the police and fire stations. Two persons were injured and treated at a local hospital. Damage estimates for this event totaled approximately $12,000,000.
The EF-scale classifies tornadoes according to the wind speed and severity of damage. Wind speeds on the EF-scale are listed in the following table:
EXHIBIT NO. 3.2.9-A Tornado Classes MAGNITUDE WIND SPEED (MPH) EF-0 65-85 EF-1 86-110 EF-2 111-135 EF-3 136-165 EF-4 166-200 EF-5 201+
Cape Girardeau County’s tornadoes have ranged from EF-0 to EF-3 in strength. These tornadoes have injured three persons and caused approximately $13,000,000 in property damage.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 45
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The NCDC lists 15 tornado occurrences in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 75% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 15/20=75%
Thunderstorms Thunderstorms have occurred practically every year in the county, mostly during the spring and summer months, though they can occur at any time in the year. These thunderstorms have ranged in duration from only a few minutes to hours long and in severity from no damage to severe damage due to wind and lightning.
The NCDC lists 58 occurrences of high/strong winds and heavy rain in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 58/20=100%
The NCDC list 84 occurrences of hail in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 84/20=100%
The NCDC list 9 occurrences of lightning in the county since 1995 (20 years). This equates to a 45% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 9/20=45%
3.2.10 Wildfire Description of Hazard (Type of hazard, pathways/areas likely affected, type of damage, etc.):
Wildfires can occur on any day of the year, in forests or grasslands. However, the majority of the fires will occur in spring when the county has high winds and low humidity and rural residents are beginning to prepare their gardens and clearing old leaves and limbs from their yards. Many have no other way to dispose of these than to burn them. This can lead to field and woodland fires if the burning trash is caught by the wind and blown into dry fields or woods. Forested land covers 24% of the county.
Historical Statistics (Frequency, strength, # of lives lost, # of injuries, economic losses, etc.):
According to the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC), There have been 379 wildfires recorded in the county from 2003 to 2015. Most of these wildfires are small and quickly brought under control by local fire departments. If the fires were to be larger, then local fire departments and the MDC would cooperate in extinguishing the fire. Forested land covers 24% of Cape Girardeau County.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 46
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The MDC lists 379 wild fire occurrences in the county since 2003 (13 years). This equates to a 100% chance of occurrence in any given year based on historical records. 379/13=100%
3.3 ASSESSING VULNERABILITY AND ESTIMATING POTENTIAL LOSSES 3.3.1 Assessing Vulnerability According to FEMA’s risk assessment guidance (FEMA 386-2), vulnerability is defined as being open to damage. Risk is defined as the possibility of loss or injury. This section details the vulnerability and risk that the County faces from natural disasters.
This vulnerability analysis used a variety of methods, including GIS mapping and analysis of past historic losses. Potential losses were estimated by using two tools: GIS mapping and local risk assessments. These methods are described in greater detail in Section 3.3.2 Estimating Potential Losses and followed by the results of the loss estimates for the each of the three priority hazards.
3.3.1.1 County Policies and Development Trends Cape Girardeau County is a First Class County. Voters of the County officially adopted planning and zoning authority in November, 1972. The County developed and adopted a Master Plan for Cape Girardeau County in 1977. Prior to the adoption of the Master Plan, the County instituted land subdivision and mobile home park regulations to govern new development in the County. The County continued to enforce these regulations until the late 1990’s when the County Commission felt it was necessary to develop zoning regulations to further help guide development in the County. As a result of this effort, an organized movement was begun by a citizens group to vote out the authority for planning and zoning in the County. This move was successful, and the County has not had any type of planning and zoning activity since that time.
The sole power that the County exercises with regard to controlling development is its floodplain policy. Missouri State Statute 49.600 authorizes a county to adopt standards to comply with the Federal Flood Insurance Program. Cape Girardeau County has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since April 15, 1988, when it entered the regular program. The County requires that anyone intending to erect a structure obtain a building permit from the County Assessor to ensure that the proposed structure is not located in a floodplain. The adoption of the floodplain regulations has served to prohibit residential construction in areas that would be subject to flooding by high water on rivers or flash flooding by creeks in the County. Any subdivisions that are being developed in the out-county area are either completely out Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 47
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
of any floodplains or do not encroach on any floodplain that lies within the development.
At the present time, the County has no established regulations relating to hazard mitigation other than its participation in the National Flood Insurance Program and the issuing of building permits to deny construction in a floodplain. No other land use regulations are in effect in the County.
The County does perform snow removal on the County roads when a severe winter storm occurs. This keeps the roads open for the residents and also allows emergency vehicles to respond to calls. The County expends a considerable amount of time and resources in the effort to keep the County roads passable.
Currently, the County does not have any formal mechanism for planning; therefore, it cannot incorporate risk assessment into the planning. Decisions are made in response to the occurrence of a disaster. Following a disaster, there are discussions among the County Commissioners, County officials, department heads and representatives of various government agencies concerning steps that can be taken to lessen any such impact in the future.
As stated above, the current criteria for mitigation normally are thought of after a disaster strikes. It is then that consideration is given to the vulnerability of the County to the type of disaster that just occurred, as well as other disasters. It must also be realized that counties have a limited amount of dollars available to them and are continually under pressure by various segments of the community to provide funds for numerous projects. Hazard mitigation often comes in low on the radar of perceived need by the citizens of the County until after a disaster occurs. It is at that point in time that they discover the need for mitigation measures to potentially lessen the effects of another such disaster. Prior to the implementation of this plan, the County had no formal mechanism for prioritizing mitigation measures and allocating funding to accomplish that mitigation. Most past mitigation efforts occurred as a reaction to a disaster and were the types of mitigation allowed and encouraged by the federal agencies that funded them.
Presently, the County does not have a formal method of determining the cost- effectiveness of mitigation measures undertaken as a result of a disaster. Since these measures are carried out under the auspices of a federal agency, the County receives guidance as to what can be done and the amount that can be spent on a case-by-case basis.
The County will improve hazard mitigation measures with the adoption of this plan. The purpose of this plan is to provide the County with suggested actions that can be taken to
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 48
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
mitigate each natural hazard and identify possible sources of funding to implement the suggestions.
Options for future mitigation funding include obtaining funds from FEMA/SEMA as a result of the occurrence of a natural disaster. This is the most common method of counties securing mitigation funding. It results in the implementation of mitigation actions that are approved by the funding agency, such as a flood buyout program. Other possibilities include grants and loans from the Community Development Block Grant Program, USDA Rural Development, the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as other state and federal programs.
The County could attempt to enact a sales tax or bond issue to be used to fund mitigation measures, but this would require a vote of the residents and could be a difficult measure to get passed. Current tax collections in the County would not allow it to dedicate more than a token amount to hazard mitigation projects. Tax increases are not popular, and unless people can be convinced that the increase will benefit them directly, it is unlikely to pass. Since most natural disasters affect a limited population, it is difficult to convince a sufficient number of voters to get a tax measure passed.
Private or corporate funding for mitigation measures is relatively unlikely. A possible exception might be if a mitigation measure that was needed by a corporation also happened to benefit the County. Most private individuals and corporations look to the state or federal government to fund major mitigation projects.
The County is an active participant in the NFIP. The county employs a floodplain manager, who enforces the county’s floodplain ordinance, which generally prohibits development in a SFHA unless proper documentation of elevations is provided. The floodplain manager also monitors all SFHA in the county for development activity as well as changes in the floodplain. When needed, the county works to implement changes in floodplain maps and documentation.
Development Trends The county has seen population growth of over 10% between 2000 and 2010 and nearly 4% between 2010 and 2015. Development has occurred in multiple locations around the county, some scattered as single home developments and some clustered in multi- structure developments, mostly located near the cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson.
This development leads to an increased exposure to all area-wide hazards such as tornadoes and winter weather, as additional lives and structures are now susceptible to such hazards. Development in floodplains has been prohibited as part of the county’s participation in the NFIP. Additionally, no significant development has occurred near the county’s dams or levees. Exposure to wild fires is estimated to have remained effectively Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 49
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
unchanged as development has added new structures but reduced forest cover. Exposure to sinkholes is estimated to have increased slightly due to new structures being potentially built near future sinkholes, although due to the nature of sinkholes this number is virtually impossible to accurately predict. 3.3.1.2City Policies and Development Trends The City of Cape Girardeau was selected by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to become a “Project Impact: Disaster Resistant Community” in 1998. As part of that process, the City received a demonstration grant to further expand the City’s hazard mitigation efforts. One of the first steps was to develop an All Hazard Mitigation Plan to help the community to reduce or eliminate the need to respond to an emergency. The City of Cape Girardeau also has an established Emergency Management Plan, designed to minimize loss of human life and destruction of property by utilizing available manpower and equipment during the emergency. The City of Cape Girardeau also has a parks and stormwater tax, of which about 8% goes to stormwater abatement projects.
Both the Cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson have Emergency Operations Plans in effect. The purpose of these plans is to save lives, minimize injuries, protect property, preserve functioning civil government and maintain economic activities essential to their survival and recovery from natural, technological and war-related disasters. These plans establish the guidelines for conducting efficient, effective, coordinated emergency operations involving the use of all resources belonging to these jurisdictions or available to them.
The remaining municipalities in Cape Girardeau County have no formal mitigation policies in place. These communities face the same risks and hazards as those identified for the County.
The Village of Allenville has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since April 17, 1998. The City of Cape Girardeau has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since November 5, 1980. The Village of Dutchtown has participated since December 30, 1998. The City of Jackson has participated in the program since May 4, 1973. The Village of Whitewater has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since April 2, 1998. The City of Delta does not participate in the flood insurance program, and sanctions were applied on December 6, 1975. The Villages of Gordonville, Oak Ridge, Old Appleton, and Pocahontas have not been identified as having flood hazards and therefore are not required to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program.
The Cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson, and the Village of Pocahontas have adopted comprehensive plans. Cape Girardeau and Jackson have also adopted subdivision and zoning ordinances, along with building codes. These regulations require that new structures in the Cities be constructed according to accepted building practices. Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 50
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The City of Cape Girardeau and Jackson both have warning systems in place to alert the public to impending natural disasters. Southeast Missouri State University, in the City of Cape Girardeau, has seven warning sirens distributed throughout the campus. These are used to alert students and faculty when tornadoes have been sighted in the area. Some adjoining neighborhoods in the City also are alerted by the sirens. Warning sirens can be fairly effective for portions of a city, but with a limited number of sirens, there are areas where it is difficult, if not impossible, to hear the sirens. The stronger the storm, the less likely it is that residents will be able to hear the sirens.
The Cities of Cape Girardeau’s and Jackson’s Public Works Departments respond immediately when a significant snowfall is forecast. City crews begin spreading salt and cinders on the streets as soon as snow accumulates in order to encourage melting. As the snow deepens, they plow the streets to keep them passable. These efforts continue for the duration of the storm event.
Financing options for the local communities are primarily the same as those outlined for the County. There are various grant and loan programs available from state and federal agencies if the project falls within their definition of an eligible activity. The communities can also attempt to pass bond issues or tax proposals to fund hazard mitigation measures. However, these are just as difficult to get passed in the communities as in the County. Private financing is no more likely to occur in a city than it is in a county. However, it could be that, due to the smaller size of a city, the action of a major industry to protect its workers, such as a tornado warning system, might benefit the entire town. As with the County, most of the communities’ residents will see major hazard mitigation projects as the realm of state and federal government.
Both cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson are active participant in the NFIP. Both employ floodplain managers who enforce their city’s respective floodplain ordinances. As with the county, these ordinances generally prohibit development in a SFHA unless proper documentation of elevations is provided. The floodplain managers also monitor all SFHA in their jurisdictions for development activity as well as changes in the floodplain. When needed, the cities work to implement changes in floodplain maps and documentation.
Development Trends Growth trends in the cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson have been similar to the County’s, with the cities seeing a 7% and 15% growth in population, respectively between 2000 and 2010. During the period between 2010 and 2015 the City of Cape Girardeau grew by 4%, while the City of Jackson grew at a rapid pace of more than 8%. As with the county, this growth has led to an increase in exposure to all area-wide hazards. Jackson has likely had an increase in exposure to sinkholes as some of the new Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 51
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
development has occurred in an area near existing sinkholes. For the city of Cape Girardeau, its areas with known sinkholes have been developed for years; most new development now occurs in areas away from existing sinkholes. As such, the city of Cape Girardeau’s exposure to sinkholes is unchanged.
As with the County, both cities prohibit development in special flood hazard areas as part of their participation in the NFIP program. However, additional development has led to an increase in impermeable surfaces which will increase the volume of stormwater runoff and expose additional persons to the effects of closed roads, etc. Also similar to the county, both cities have had no additional development in estimated inundation areas and wild fire exposure is estimated to be unchanged as well.
3.3.1.3 Demographic Information Cape Girardeau County’s population has been climbing steadily since 1900. During the period 1900 through 2010, the County grew at an average of 19% per decade. Exhibit No. 3.3.1.3-A illustrates Cape Girardeau County’s population trends over the past 110 years. In 2010, 69.5% of the County’s population was classified as urban, while remainder was classified as rural. This represents a decline in the number of persons classified as urban since 2000, when it was 67.5%.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 52
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.3-A County Population Trend 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 Population 20000 10000 0
The County contains 574 square miles of land with a density of 131.8 persons per square mile. Population statistics for the 10 incorporated communities in the County are presented in the chart labeled Exhibit No. 3.3.1.3-B. A population density map for Cape Girardeau County is presented in Exhibit No. 3.3.1.3-C.
According to the 2010 census, 5.5% of Cape Girardeau County’s population over 25 years old had less than a 9th grade education, while another 8.7% had attended high school but had not graduated. High school graduates or GED recipients accounted for 33.9% of the County’s population, those attending college but not graduating accounted for 20.3%, those with associates degrees represented 4.6%, Bachelor’s degrees 17.7% and graduate and professional degrees represented 9.2%.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 53
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.3-B Cape Girardeau County Population Statistics
Population Geography % 2010 2000 Change Change Cape Girardeau County 75,674 68,693 6,981 10.2% Allenville 116 104 12 11.5% Cape Girardeau, City of 37,941 35,349 2,592 7.3% Delta 438 517 -79 -15.3% Gordonville 391 425 -34 -8.0% Jackson 13,758 11,947 1,811 15.2% Oak Ridge 243 202 41 20.3% Old Appleton 85 82 3 3.7% Pocahontas 114 127 -13 -10.2% Whitewater 125 113 12 10.6% Unincorporated 22,463 19,827 2,636 13.3% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 54
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan Population Density Map 3.3.1.3-C
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 55
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, American Communities Survey (ACS), the median family income in Cape Girardeau County increased 13.3%, from $54,246 in 2009 (2009 inflation- adjusted dollars) to $57,284 in 2014 (2014 inflation-adjusted dollars). Average family income also increased from $68,812 to $71,349, or 4%. Household income also increased between 2009 and 2014, with median household income increasing from $43,639 (2009 inflation- adjusted dollars) to $45,849 (2014 inflation-adjusted dollars). Per capita income rose from $23,229 in 2009 to $23,684 in 2014. In 2014, 17.3% of the County’s population was determined to be living below the poverty level.
According to the ACS, in 2014 there were 32,771 housing units in Cape Girardeau County. Of these units, 29,672 were occupied, while 3,099 were vacant. Of those occupied, 19,175 were occupied by the owner while 10,497 were rented. There were 391 units five years of age or less and 12,003 units that were over 45 years of age. The median housing value was $138,000 in 2014, up 4% from the 2010 figure of $132,500.
Cape Girardeau County’s age cohorts in relation to the state and nation are presented in Exhibit Numbers. 3.3.1.3-D and E. EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.3-D Population Below Age 5 Geography 2010 % of % Pop 2000 Change Change Cape Girardeau County 6.2% 4,717 4,088 629 15.4%
Missouri 6.5% 390,237 369,898 20,339 5.5%
United States 6.5% 20,201,362 19,175,798 1,025,564 5.3% Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.3-E Population 65 Years and Over Geography 2010 % of % Pop 2000 Change Change Cape Girardeau County 14.3% 10,834 9,460 1,374 12.7%
Missouri 14.0% 838,294 755,379 82,915 9.9%
United States 13.0% 40,267,984 34,991,753 5,276,231 13.1% Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 56
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.1.4 Economy, Industry and Employment Cape Girardeau County has a relatively strong economy fueled by manufacturing, retail, service businesses, and agriculture, although the recession has hindered the economic growth of the county and municipalities. During the 10-year period from 2005 to 2014, unemployment in the county dropped from 8.0% to 6.2%. The economic strength of Cape Girardeau County is at least in part the result of the long-term effort of local officials and developers to diversify the area economy. Interstate 55, which bisects the County from north to south, has contributed greatly to the County’s healthy economy, as has the presence of a major university and a growing health care industry. A list of the county’s largest employers is included in Exhibit No. 3.3.1.4-A.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 57
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.4-A 2016 Major Employers
Company Industry Employees Saint Francis Medical Center Hospital 2,817 SoutheastHEALTH Hospital 2,430 Procter & Gamble Manufacturing 1,200 Southeast Missouri State University University 1,107 Robinson Construction Construction 475 Isle Casino Cape Girardeau Gaming 450 Mondi Jackson Manufacturing 428 Delta Companies Manufacturing 425 Wal-Mart Supercenter Retail 400 VIP Industries Service 360 Drury Hotels Service 329 Havco Wood Products Manufacturing 315 AT&T Missouri Service 310 The Lutheran Home Retirement Facility 300 Rhodes 101 Convenience Service 250 Excel, Inc. Warehousing 200 Buzzi Unicem USA Manufacturing 180 BioKyowa, Inc. Manufacturing 178 American Rail Car Manufacturing 175 Wahlco, D.W. Tool Manufacturing 175 Rust Communications Media 170 Schaefer's Electrical Enclosurers Manufacturing 165 Missouri Veteran's Home Health Care 164 JCPenny Company Retail 155 Drury Southwest Real-Estate Developers 153 Rubbermaid Manufacturing 150 MidAmerica Hotels Service 140 RapcoHorizon Manufacturing 137 Life Care Center of Cape Nursing Home 110 Source: Cape Area Magnet
Exhibit No. 3.3.1.4-B provides a comparison of retail activity in Cape Girardeau County during the 5-year period from 2007 to 2012. During the period, the number of retail firms in Cape Girardeau County declined from 455 in 2007 to 415 in 2012, while the number of employees also declined from 6,137 to 5,855. However, sales and payroll for the retail industry both increased during the same timeframe.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 58
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.4-B Retail Trends in Cape Girardeau County 2007-2012
Retail Trade Sector No of Annual Payroll No of Est Sales ($1,000) ($1,000) Emp $ $ 2012 415 1,611,435 131,060 5,855 $ $ 2007 455 1,353,015 122,095 6,137 $ $ Change -40 258,420 8,965 -282 Source: US Census Bureau, Economic Census
Cape Girardeau County experienced a decline in the manufacturing sector during the 5-year period from 2007 to 2012, as indicated in the following exhibit, No. 3.3.1.4-C. The number of manufacturing establishments declined by 2%, while employment in the manufacturing sector declined from 4,574 in 2007 to 3,700 in 2012, a decrease of 19%.
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.4-C Manufacturing Activity 2007-2012 Manufacturing Sector Value of shipments No of and services Annual Payroll No of Est ($1,000) ($1,000) Emp $ $ 2012 95 2,884,546 181,920 3,700 2007 97 N/A N/A 4,574 Change -2 -874 Some 2007 data suppressed by US Census Bureau Source: US Census Bureau, Economic Census
3.3.1.5 Schools and Universities Public elementary and secondary education in Cape Girardeau County is provided by five school districts: Cape Girardeau 63, Delta R-V, Jackson R-II, Nell Holcomb R-IV and Oak Ridge R-VI. All five districts are accredited, the highest rating given by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Exhibit No. 3.3.1.5-A). The Nell Holcomb R-IV District provides elementary education only. A small area in northwestern Cape Girardeau County is served by the Meadow Heights R-II School District, and the Advance R-IV School District serves a small area in the southwest corner of the County. These school districts are headquartered in neighboring counties and are included in their respective county’s plan.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 59
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.5-A Cape Girardeau County School District Enrollments and Ratings, 2002-2003
2016 2015 HS Enrollment Graduation School District (K-12) Rate
Cape Girardeau 63 4,021 84.9%
Delta R-V 256 100.0%
Jackson R-II 4,855 94.9%
Nell Holcomb R-IV 287 N/A
Oak Ridge R-VI 342 100.0%
Total 9,761 Note: Nell Holcomb offers elementary grades only Source: Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education
In addition to excellent educational programs, public schools in Cape Girardeau County offer a wide variety of athletic, cultural and extra-curricular activities. Special educational opportunities available in Cape Girardeau County range from remedial reading and gifted education to speech pathology and special education programs. Head Start programs are also available in the county under the direction of East Missouri Action Agency.
Vocational Career Opportunities Technical career training opportunities in a wide range of skill areas are available to students in Cape Girardeau County through the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center which is located at 1080 South Silver Springs Road in Cape Girardeau. The Career and Technology Center currently offers 19 full-time courses. Among the popular programs offered at the Center are Health Professions and Related Sciences, Business Management and Administrative Services, Precision Production Trades, Mechanics and Repairers, and Computer and Information Sciences.
Southeast Missouri State University With an enrollment of approximately 9,500 students, Southeast Missouri State University offers more than 150 areas of study in science, technology, education, the health professions, business and the liberal arts. The University has a student/faculty ratio of 18 to 1. The average freshman classroom size is 25 to 30. Students come from all 50 states and from countries around the world.
The University’s programs are arranged among the Harrison College of Business, the College of Education, the College of Health and Human Services, the College of Liberal Arts, the College of Science and Mathematics, the School of University Studies, the School of Graduate Studies and Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 60
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Research, the School of Extended Learning, and the School of Polytechnic Studies. Student activities include more than 150 social and special-interest student organizations, 11 national fraternities and nine national sororities.
3.3.1.6 Endangered Species Cape Girardeau County is home to a number of rare or endangered species of mussels, fish, birds and plants which are listed in Exhibit No. 3.3.1.6-A. Species identified with an asterisk (*) are also considered to be of national significance.
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.6-A Rare and Endangered Species Cape Girardeau County
Species Status County
Mussels
Arcidens confragosa (Rock Pocket) Endangered Cape Girardeau Obovaria olivaria (Hickory-Nut) Endangered Cape Girardeau Potamilus purpuratus (Western Heel Splitter) Endangered Cape Girardeau Villosa lienosa lienosa Rare Cape Girardeau Epioblasma triquetra (Snuffbox) Endangered Cape Girardeau
Fishes
Acipenser Fulvescens (Lake Sturgeon) Endangered Cape Girardeau (Mississippi River) Scaphirhynchus albus (Pallid Sturgeon) Endangered Cape Girardeau (Mississippi River) Lepisosteus spatula (Alligator Gar) Rare Cape Girardeau (Mississippi River) Alosa alabamae (Alabama Shad) Rare Cape Girardeau (Mississippi River) Hybopsis gelid (Sturgeon Chub) Rare Cape Girardeau (Mississippi River) Hybopsis meeki (Sicklefin Chub) Rare Cape Girardeau (Mississippi River) Notropis amnis (Pallid Shiner) Possibly Cape Girardeau Extirpated (Mississippi River) Notropis emiliae (Pugnose Minnow) Endangered Cape Girardeau
Birds Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 61
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Phalacrocorax auritus Endangered Cape Girardeau (Double-crested Cormorant) Ictinia mississippiensis Rare Cape Girardeau (Mississippi Kite) Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Bald Eagle) *Rare All Counties Tyto alba (Common Barn Owl) Endangered Cape Girardeau
Mammals
Mustela frenata (Long Tailed Weasel) Rare All Counties
Species Status County
Plant Kingdom
Peltandra virginica (Arrow Arum) Rare Cape Girardeau Thalia dealbata (Thalia) Rare Cape Girardeau Gaylussacia baccata (Black Huckleberry) Rare Cape Girardeau Chionanthus virginica (Fringe Tree) Rare Cape Girardeau Obolavia virginica (Pennywort) Endangered Cape Girardeau Physostegia intermedia (False Dragonhead) Rare Cape Girardeau Pycnanthemum muticum (Mountain Mint) Rare Cape Girardeau Boltonia asteroides var. decurrens *Endangered Cape Girardeau
The rare or endangered species of animals and plants found in Cape Girardeau County are less likely to be affected by natural hazards than by manmade or technological hazards. Probably most vulnerable are the fish species found in the river systems which could be severely affected by any major contamination of the watersheds.
3.3.1.7 Historic Properties There are many structures in Cape Girardeau County of significant historic importance. Seven structures in the County are currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places, as are three historic districts, two located in the City of Cape Girardeau and one located in the City of Jackson. National Register properties in the County include:
• The Bennett-Tobler-Pace-Oliver House, located at 224 East Adams Street in Jackson (listed April 18, 1985).
• The Big Hill Farmstead Historic District, located at 2246 Missouri Route PP in Jackson (listed December 22, 1999).
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 62
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• The Burfordville Covered Bridge, located at the east edge of Burfordville on County Road HH (listed May 19, 1970).
• The Burfordville Mill, located off Missouri Highway 34 in Burfordville (listed May 27, 1971).
• The Cape Girardeau Commercial Historic District, which includes the 100 block of North Main Street and the 100 block of Broadway in Cape Girardeau (listed July 20, 2000).
• The Clark, George Boardman House, located at 6 South Fountain Street in Cape Girardeau (listed July 22, 1994).
• The Frizel-Welling House, located at 209 West Main Street in Cape Girardeau (listed June 25, 1999).
• The Glenn House, located at 325 South Spanish Street in Cape Girardeau (listed October 11, 1997).
• The Haarig Commercial Historic District, which is located along sections of the 600 block of Good Hope Street and the 300 block of South Sprigg Street in Cape Girardeau (listed July 20, 2000).
• The Hanover Lutheran Church, located at 2949 Perryville Road in Cape Girardeau (listed September 14, 1987).
These National Register properties, and other historic structures found in Cape Girardeau County, are probably most vulnerable to damage which could be caused by earthquakes, tornados or severe thunderstorms.
3.3.1.8 Infrastructure Roadways Cape Girardeau County is served by numerous highways that provide the primary mode of transportation in the County. An extensive network of County-maintained roads connect to state maintained “lettered” routes throughout the County. The state maintains these paved “farm to market” roads to meet their original purpose of providing access to towns and markets for the residents of the rural areas of the County. The County maintains a system of county roads to connect to the state routes and provide ingress and egress from farms and residences in the rural areas of the County.
The major transportation route through the County is Interstate 55, which bisects the County from north to south. This is a four-lane, limited access highway designed to move high volumes
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 63
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
of traffic with a minimum of delay. It serves as the primary route for traffic into and out of the County (Exhibit No. 3.3.1.8-A).
The County is also served by Highways 61, 34, 74, 72, and 25. Highway 61 was the former north-south route through the County prior to the construction of Interstate 55. Highway 25, a two-lane highway, provides another connection between the County and Highway 60 and the Bootheel area of Missouri. Highway 72 is a two lane-route that provides a westward connection from the City of Jackson to Fredericktown and ultimately to Interstate 44 at Rolla. Highway 34 is a two-lane route that provides access to Highway 60 near Van Buren. Highway 74 is a short route providing a connection between Interstate 55 and Highway 25 at Dutchtown. It also provides access to the new Bill Emerson bridge across the Mississippi River to Illinois.
In addition, the City of Cape Girardeau is the site of the recently completed Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge which connects Missouri and Illinois. The new four-lane bridge replaces an old two-lane structure competed in 1927. The new $170,000,000 cable stay bridge is 100’ x 4,000’, and its roadway is 60 feet above the river. The structure currently carries approximately 14,000 vehicles per day, a number that is projected to rise to 26,000 vehicles per day by 2015.
Railroads The County is served by three railroads: the Burlington Northern-Santa Fe, the Union Pacific, and the SEMO Port railroad. The railroads are on the eastern edge of the County and parallel the course of the Mississippi River. No passenger service is provided by the railroads serving Cape Girardeau County. The Southeast Missouri Regional Port Railroad is a locally owned, common carrier switching railroad connecting the port with the Burlington Northern-Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroad railroads.
A fourth railroad, the St. Louis Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad, is a locally owned tourist line that provides a 10-mile excursion trip between Jackson and Gordonville. The railroad uses a historic steam engine built in 1946, along with historic railroad cars to provide a unique railroading experience.
Airports The Cape Girardeau Regional Airport is located just across the county line in Scott County. It has a 6,499’ x 150’ concrete runway. It also has a 3,996’ x 100’ crosswind asphaltic/concrete runway. Major airframe and power plant services are available at the airport, along with fuel and overnight hangar storage. Corporate Airlines provides connecting flights between Cape Girardeau and Lambert-St. Louis International Airport, with three departures and three arrivals per day, with the exception of weekends.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 64
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Public Transportation The Cape Girardeau County Transit Authority provides public transportation to the elderly, handicapped, and general public in the County with most trips occurring in the City of Cape Girardeau. The Transit Authority is active with the Transportation Advisory Committee coordinated by the RPC and MODOT and helps to ensure that the transit needs of local residents are addressed. Southeast Missouri State University operates a transit system to ferry students around the campus. It does not operate outside of the university campus.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 65
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.1.8-A Transportation Facilities
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 66
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Sewer and Water Facilities There is no public sewer service available to the general public in the County. There are some small private systems serving subdivisions in the County, but there are no public sewer districts in the County. The Cities of Cape Girardeau, Delta, and Jackson have sewage collection and treatment systems. The Villages of Oak Ridge and Pocahontas are in the process of drawing up plans and arranging financing to construct sewerage collection and treatment systems. The remaining communities in the County are in need of sewage collection and treatment systems but, at the present time, do not have the financial resources to construct the systems.
The Cities of Cape Girardeau, Delta, and Jackson have their own municipal water supply and distribution systems. The Villages of Allenville and Whitewater have a combined water supply and distribution system to serve their residents. There are five public water supply districts in the County. Cape-Perry Public Water Supply District No. 1 serves a large part of northern Cape Girardeau County, including Old Appleton, Pocahontas, Oak Ridge and Fruitland. Cape Girardeau County Public Water Supply District No. 2 serves a part of western Cape Girardeau County in the Millersville area. Cape Girardeau County Public Water Supply District No. 4 serves the Villages of Gordonville and Dutchtown and the unincorporated area between them. Cape Girardeau County Public Water Supply District No. 5 has just recently formed and covers an area in the eastern part of the County. Stoddard County Public Water Supply No. 2 serves a small part of the County around the Randles community.
Electric and Natural Gas AmerenUE, Citizens Electric Cooperative, Black River Electric, and SEMO Electric Coop provide electrical power throughout Cape Girardeau County. The City of Jackson’s Department of Public Works is responsible for electrical generation and distribution in the City of Jackson. AmerenUE , Citizens Electric, Black River Electric, and SEMO Electric Coop supply power to the remainder of the County. Natural gas is supplied to the City Cape Girardeau by AmerenUE and the City of Jackson by Associated Natural Gas Company.
Solid Waste There is no County-wide solid waste collection system in Cape Girardeau County. Private companies provide contract service to customers throughout the County. The Cities of Cape Girardeau and Jackson each provide their own solid waste pick up service, and each City operates a solid waste transfer station to transfer the trash to approved landfills. Both Cities also operate a recycling program to remove recyclable materials from the waste stream and reduce the amount of trash being landfilled. The rest of the County either has no solid waste pick up or they have to contract with a private company to pick up their trash.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 67
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.1.9 Medical and Emergency Services Saint Francis Medical Center Saint Francis Medical Center is a full-service, tertiary care medical center located at 211 Saint Francis Drive in Cape Girardeau. The 249-bed Catholic facility was founded in 1875 and offers state of the art health care treatment in a number of specialties.
The Gene E. Huckstep Emergency Center at Saint Francis provides a high degree of care to trauma patients. Trauma services include diagnostics such as MRI, CT or laboratory tests; trauma surgeons; specialty surgeons such as orthopaedic, neuro and cardiac surgeons; critical nursing care; and expert medical monitoring. The surgeons, physicians, nurses and staff are dedicated to providing high quality care at a moment’s notice.
Other services at Saint Francis include the Wound Healing Center, Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, the Cancer Institute, Orthopaedic Services, the Neurosciences Institute, the Heart Institute, the Universal Health and Fitness Center, Womancare, Home Health, the Sleep Well Program, the Pain Management Center, and the Sports Medicine Center.
Southeast Missouri Hospital Founded in 1928 by a group of physicians and businessmen, Southeast Missouri Hospital has grown into a major 272-bed regional medical complex that records more than 11,400 inpatient admissions annually and more than 34,000 emergency visits. More than 180 physicians and surgeons, in most medical specialties, are joined by an employee force of more than 1,500 and by 400 volunteers in delivering care to a service region that includes more than a half million residents in Southeast Missouri and Southern Illinois. The hospital has recently formed a partnership with Cardinal Glennon Children’s Hospital in St. Louis that will enhance pediatric services for children in the region.
Southeast offers a wide scope of services, including emergency services with its Chest Pain Center and ERexpress, the Regional Heart Center, the Regional Cancer Center, the Regional Center for Women’s and Children’s Services, and the Regional Brain and Spine Center where diagnostic and surgery services are available to deal with cerebral vascular surgery, spinal surgery, endoscopic neurosurgery and neuro-trauma. Other designated inpatient services include pediatrics and pediatric special care, orthopaedics and the Bone and Joint Replacement Center, adult psychiatric services and a Comprehensive Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit.
Cape Girardeau County 911 Emergency Communications Emergency communications for Cape Girardeau County are routed through the Cape Girardeau County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) located in the lower level of the Cape Girardeau County Administration Building, #1 Barton Square in Jackson. Spending of all 911 money is regulated by the County Commission. Emergency communications are overseen by an advisory Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 68
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan board which includes representation from the Cape Girardeau Police Department, the Cape Girardeau Fire Department, the Jackson Police Department, the Jackson Fire Department and the Sheriff’s Department.
Emergency calls coming in to the 911 Communications Center are automatically routed to the appropriate city. Calls coming in from a Jackson address are routed to the Jackson 911 office which is located at the Jackson Police Department. Calls originating from a Cape Girardeau address are routed to the 911 dispatcher at the Cape Girardeau Police Department. Calls coming in from County addresses are routed to the Emergency Operations Center in the County Administration Building. Approximately 40% of all 911 calls in the County are from cell phone users. Cell phone calls can only be pinpointed to the nearest cell tower.
Cape Girardeau County Mobile Command Center, Power and Light Trailer and HAZMAT Resource Trailer The Cape Girardeau County Mobile Command Center is a self-supporting command and communications vehicle available to any Emergency Response Agency of a governmental subdivision within Cape Girardeau County. Its purpose is to facilitate and support a centralized command structure at the incident site and to provide multi-jurisdictional communications to the on-scene commander. An additional command area is available under an attached awning on the passenger side of the vehicle. Radio/cellular/land line hookups are available on the outside of the vehicle under the awning area. The County also maintains a power and light trailer and an LEPD HAZMAT Resource Trailer which is stored at Cape Girardeau Fire Station No. 4.
Cape County Private Ambulance Service, Inc. Cape County Private Ambulance Service, Inc. (CCPA), provides emergency and non-emergency ambulance service throughout Cape Girardeau County. The service is located at 1458 North Kingshighway in Cape Girardeau and operates a second base in Jackson. CCPA has provided ambulance service to Cape Girardeau County since 1968. A leader in the field of EMS, emergency calls are handled by full-time certified Emergency Medical Dispatchers using Medical Priority’s EMD protocols which provides the caller with life saving and injury preventing pre-arrival instructions, including phone instruction on critical life-saving maneuvers such as CPR, choking and serious bleeding.
Each emergency ambulance is equipped with cutting edge technology, including 12 lead EKG and telemetry capability, leading emergency drugs, and staffed with Missouri licensed and National Registry certified paramedics and EMT’s. Non-emergency transportation may be provided using Advanced Life Support vehicles and crews if special or advanced services are required or may be provided by Basic Life Support crews if appropriate.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 69
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Air Evac Lifeteam Headquartered in West Plains, Missouri, Air Evac Lifeteam (Air Evac EMS, Inc.) provides emergency helicopter service to residents of Cape Girardeau County and surrounding counties. The company currently has 26 bases in nine states. Every helicopter in the Air Evac fleet is a Bell 206L. Helicopters are usually dispatched from the West Plains office via telephone.
ARCH Air Medical Services ARCH (Area Rescue Consortium of Hospitals) is a St. Louis based medical helicopter/air ambulance service. It was originally formed by a partnership of St. Louis University, Barnes- Jewish Hospital and St. John’s Mercy Medical Center. In 2000, Mercy Air Service, Inc., purchased ARCH. Two months later, the same company expanded the ARCH service by purchasing the former LifeBeat service based at Southeast Missouri Hospital in Cape Girardeau and made it a part of the ARCH service. The company has a remote dispatch repeater in the Cape Girardeau area used for radio dispatching
ARCH crews consist of a pilot, a paramedic and a flight nurse. The pilots work 12-hour shifts, while the paramedic and flight nurse work 24-hour shifts. The dispatch and headquarters are located in St. Louis, and the company maintains a base at the Cape Girardeau Regional Airport.
Department of Public Safety–Southeast Missouri State University The Department of Public Safety is the University’s primary unit for supporting the personal safety of students, employees and visitors. The department is located on D-Wing in Dearmont Quadrangle, 360 Dearmont Circle. The department consists of four major units: University Police, Parking Services, Emergency Preparedness Planning, and Transportation. The police division consists of 16 trained, state certified peace officers, most of whom hold bachelors degrees in criminal justice of related fields.
The Department of Public Safety has University Police Officers on duty 24 hours a day, seven days a week. There are 29 emergency call boxes placed in strategic locations around campus, all marked by large vertical “emergency” signs. Pushing the call box button initiates a 911 emergency call to the University Police Communications Center.
Cape Girardeau County Health Department The main office of the Cape Girardeau County Health Department is located at 1121 Linden Street in Cape Girardeau. The department provides a variety of health-related services to County residents. These include immunizations, the WIC program, the asthma case management program, a tuberculosis program, a sexually transmitted disease clinic, a home visiting program, breast and cervical cancer control program, pregnancy testing and temporary Medicaid, case management, a communicable disease clinic, HIV/AIDS service coordination, and daycare consultation
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 70
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Cape Girardeau County Sheriff’s Department The Cape Girardeau County Sheriff’s Department and Cape Girardeau County Jail are located at 216 North Missouri Avenue in Jackson. The Sheriff’s Department patrols an area of 577 square miles. The department has a staff of 19 employees divided into patrol, dispatch, jail and administration. The County Jail has the capacity to house 212 prisoners.
Cape Girardeau Police Department The Cape Girardeau Police Department is located at 40 South Sprigg Street. The department’s Central Dispatch Unit is staffed with nine telecommunicators and one supervisor. Communications personnel receive, evaluate, and disseminate calls for police and fire service.
In addition to its regular force, the Police Department can be augmented by the Cape Girardeau Police Reserve when necessary. The Police Reserve Division is comprised of 13 volunteer commissioned police officers serving the community with full police responsibilities and powers while on duty. All members of the police reserve have completed law enforcement academy training and are certified as police officers in the State of Missouri.
Jackson Police Department The Jackson Police Department is located at the Police/Fire Complex at 525 South Hope Street. The department is presently staffed with 23 commissioned and six non-commissioned personnel. The Department has 12 marked and unmarked response vehicles and one truck. The Police Department is responsible for the dispatching of all calls for police service, as well as those for fire, medical and 911 for the City of Jackson
Cape Girardeau Fire Department The Cape Girardeau Fire Department operates four fire stations in order to provide firefighting services throughout the community. The Fire Department currently has 56 paid firefighters. Fire Station No. 1, the main station, is located at #1 South Sprigg Street in Cape Girardeau. Equipment operated by Fire Station No. 1 includes a fire engine with a 750 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM (gallons per minute) pumping capacity, a reserve engine equipped with a 1,000 gallon tank and1,000 GPM pumping capacity, a rescue truck equipped with a 500 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity and an electric winch, and a grass and brush truck equipped with a 200 gallon tank and a 250 GPM portable pump. Other equipment includes a technical rescue trailer and two john boats.
Fire Station No. 2 is located at 378 South Mount Auburn Road. The station is equipped with an airport fast response unit which can be dispatched to Cape Girardeau Regional Airport. The engine is equipped with a 500 gallon nitrogen-expelled water tank premixed with 6% AFFF light water foam. Other equipment includes a fire engine with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,250 GPM pumping capacity and an engine equipped with a 102 foot aerial ladder and a 200 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM pumping capacity.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 71
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Fire Station No. 3 is located at 429 Emerald Street. The station is equipped with a fire engine equipped with a 750 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM pumping capacity and a reserve engine equipped with a 750 gallon tank and 1,000 GPM pumping capacity.
Fire Station No. 4 is located at 1429 Kurre Lane and is equipped with a rescue truck which is equipped with a 500 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM pumping capacity.
Delta Rural Fire Protection District The Delta Rural Fire Protection District operates from Station No. 1, located at 211 East State Street in Delta. Currently, the district has a roster of 20 firefighters. Firefighting equipment includes a pumper with a 750 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity, a pumper with a 750 gallon tank and 1,250 GPM pumping capacity, a pumper with an 800 gallon tank and 500 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker with a 2,040 gallon tank and a 400 GPM portable pump, and a brush truck equipped with a 250 gallon tank and a 300 GPM auxiliary pump.
East County Fire Protection District The East County Fire Protection District operates three fire stations. Station No. 1 is located at 7515 State Highway 177 in the Egypt Mills area, Station No. 2 is located at 4000 State Highway V in the Indian Creek area, and Station No. 3 is located at 4564 County Road 621 in Hanover. The district currently has a roster of 41 volunteer firefighters.
Station No. 1 operates a pumper with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM pumping capacity, a 3,000 gallon tanker, a water supply/brush truck equipped with a 250 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity, and a 4x4 pickup which serves as the Chief’s truck.
Station No. 2 operates a pumper with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,000 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker with a 1,500 gallon tank and a 310 GPM portable pump, a tanker with a 2,000 gallon tank and a 310 GPM portable pump, a brush truck equipped with a 50 gallon tank and pump, and a 4x4 ATV with a 50 gallon tank and pump.
Equipment operated by Station No. 3 includes a pumper with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM pumping capacity, a pumper/tanker with a 2,000 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker with a 1,000 gallon tank and a 310 GPM portable pump, a brush truck equipped with a 110 gallon tank with pump and a service truck.
Fruitland Area Volunteer Fire District The Fruitland Area Volunteer Fire District operates two fire stations: Station No. 1 which is located at 7273 U. S. Highway 61 in Fruitland and Station No. 2 which is located at 216 County Road 516 in New Wells. The district currently has a roster of 26 volunteer firefighters.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 72
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Station No. 1 operates a pumper with a 750 gallon tank with 1,000 GPM pumping capacity, a pumper/tanker with a 2,000 gallon tank and 500 GPM pumping capacity, two tankers with 2,000 gallon tanks each, a water supply/brush truck with a 200 gallon tank and a 500 GPM portable pump, and a rescue van.
Equipment operated by Station No. 2 includes a pumper with a 500 gallon tank and 500 GPM pumping capacity, a pumper/tanker with a 2,000 gallon tank and 500 GPM pumping capacity, and a brush truck equipped with a 200 gallon tank and a pressure pump.
Gordonville Area Fire Protection District The Gordonville Area Fire Protection District operates from three fire stations: Station No. 1 which is located at 605 State Highway Z, Station No. 2 which is located at 3183 State Highway F, and Station No. 3 which is located at 10329 State Highway 25. The district currently has a roster of 27 firefighters.
Equipment operated from Station No. 1 includes a pumper with a 2,500 gallon tank and 1,250 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker with a 1,800 gallon tank and a 500 GPM portable pump, and a brush truck equipped with a 250 gallon tank and a 350 GPM permanent mount pump.
Station No. 2 operates a pumper with a 750 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity and a tanker with a 1,000 gallon tank and a 300 GPM portable pump.
Station No. 3 is equipped with a pumper with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,250 GPM pumping capacity and a tanker with a 1,500 gallon tank and a 500 GPM portable pump.
Jackson Fire Department The Jackson Fire Department is located at 525 South Hope Street in Jackson. The Department is staffed by the Chief, the Assistant Chief and three crews composed of 23 firefighters. Equipment operated by the department includes a pumper with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,000 GPM pumping capacity, a ladder truck with a 500 gallon tank and 1m000 GPM pumping capacity and a 50' boom-mounted snorkel, a reserve engine with a 1,000 gallon tank and 1,000 GPM pumping capacity, a truck equipped with a 300 gallon tank with 300 GPM pumping capacity, a pumper with a 750 gallon tank and 1,500 GPM pumping capacity, a rescue truck, the Chief’s car, a 4x4 pickup used by the Assistant Chief, a staff car and a rescue boat.
Millersville Rural Fire Protection District The Millersville Rural Fire District maintains three fire stations: Station No. 1 located at 126 County Road 483 in Millersville, Station No. 2 located at 255 State Highway 34, and Station No. #3 which is located at 271 State Highway HH in Burfordville. The District has a roster of 25 volunteer firefighters.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 73
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Equipment operated by Station No. 1 includes a pumper with a 1,000 gallon tank with 500 GPM pumping capacity and a 35 gallon foam tank, a tanker with a 2,000 gallon tank, and a brush truck with a 300 gallon tank and 125 GPM pumping capacity.
Station No. 2 operates a pumper with a 750 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity and a tanker with a 1,120 gallon tank and 350 GPM pumping capacity.
Equipment operated by Station No. 3 includes a pumper with a 750 gallon tank and 500 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker with a 1,120 gallon tank and a 200 GPM pump, and a tanker with a 3,000 gallon tank and 750 GPM pumping capacity.
North Cape County Fire Protection District The North Cape County Rural Fire District operates two fire stations: the North Station located at I-55 & Highway KK (1134 County Road 501) and the South Station located at 217 Scots Pine Lane. The district has a force of 20 volunteer firefighters.
Equipment maintained at the North Station includes a pumper with a 900 gallon tank and a 1,000 GPM pump, a tanker with a 1,700 gallon tank with 300 GPM pumping capacity, a brush truck equipped with a 200 gallon tank and an 18 horsepower pump, and a service van.
The South Station maintains a pumper equipped with a 1,100 gallon tank and 500 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker equipped with a 2,350 gallon tank and a 250 GPM portable pump, and a brush truck with a 200 gallon tank and an 11 horsepower pump.
Whitewater Fire Protection District The Whitewater Fire Protection District operates two fire stations: Station No. 1 located at 8530 State Highway A and Station No. 2 located at 2150 County Road 380. The District has a roster of 16 volunteer firefighters.
Station No. 1 operates a pumper equipped with a 750 gallon tank and 1,250 GPM pumping capacity, a tanker with a 2,000 gallon tank, a brush truck equipped with a 125 gallon tank and a 300 gallon auxiliary pump, and a service truck.
Equipment operated by Station No. 2 includes a pumper with a 750 gallon tank with 750 GPM pumping capacity, a 1,500 gallon tanker and a brush truck equipped with a 125 gallon tank and a 300 GPM auxiliary pump.
3.3.1.10 Key Community Facilities Key community facilities in Cape Girardeau County include medical/emergency facilities, schools, and long-term care facilities. These facilities represent resources for care and shelter in
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 74
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan the event of a natural disaster, populations requiring a higher level of care, and installations critical to community services.
In the event of a natural disaster of any magnitude, the ability of emergency and medical facilities in Cape Girardeau County to respond quickly, and to treat large numbers of people, will be important factors in mitigating injuries and the loss of lives. Cape Girardeau County is fortunate to have significant medical resources and a sizeable number of physicians and specialists readily available. Important medical facilities are listed in Exhibit No. 3.3.1.10-A.
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.10-A Cape Girardeau County Medical/Emergency Facilities
FACILITY NAME ADDRESS CITY Saint Francis Medical Center 211 Saint Francis Drive Cape Girardeau Southeast Missouri Hospital 1701 Lacey Street Cape Girardeau Cape Girardeau County Health 1121 Linden Street Cape Girardeau Department
Schools, Long-Term Care Facilities and Correctional Facilities More than 21,000 students in Cape Girardeau County attend various public and private elementary, middle and high schools, as well as Southeast Missouri State University. These populations need special consideration in the event of a natural disaster, as do students in child-care facilities in the County.
Long-term care facilities are also more likely to be impacted in a natural disaster. These facilities fulfill a range of needs including retirement, assisted living, intermediate care, and continuing care. Residents of these facilities may have mobility and/or cognition issues that present special problems. Facilities in Cape Girardeau County requiring special consideration in the event of a natural disaster are listed in Exhibit No. 3.3.1.10-B.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 75
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.1.10-B Cape Girardeau County Facilities Requiring Special Consideration
FACILITY NAME ADDRESS CITY OCCUPANTS Schools 1000 South Silver Springs Central High School Cape Girardeau 1,355 Road Cape Girardeau Career and 1080 South Silver Springs 300 Cape Girardeau Technical Center Road on average Central Junior High School 205 Caruthers Street Cape Girardeau 644 Alma Schrader Elementary 1360 Randol Street Cape Girardeau 287 School Franklin Elementary School 215 North Louisiana Street Cape Girardeau 225 Blanchard Elementary School 1829 North Sprigg Street Cape Girardeau 291 Clippard Elementary School 2860 Hopper Road Cape Girardeau 263 520 South Minnesota Jefferson Elementary School Cape Girardeau 279 Street Central Middle School 1900 Thilenius Street Cape Girardeau 634 Nell Holcomb Elementary School 6547 State Highway 177 Cape Girardeau 339 Delta High School 324 Liberty Street Delta 150 Delta Elementary School 3666 State Highway N Delta 175 Gordonville Attendance Center 653 State Highway Z Gordonville 55 (Jackson R-II School District) Jackson Senior High School 315 South Missouri Street Jackson 1,179 Russell Hawkins Junior High 210 North West Lane Jackson 766 School 1651 West Independence Jackson Middle School Jackson 758 Street Orchard Drive Elementary 1402 Orchard Drive Jackson 488 School North Elementary School 10730 State Highway W Jackson 265 South Elementary School 1701 South Hope Street Jackson 508 West Lane Elementary School 338 North West Lane Jackson 401 444 West Jefferson Primary Annex Jackson 129 Boulevard
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 76
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
FACILITY NAME ADDRESS CITY OCCUPANTS Millersville Attendance Center 377 State Highway B Millersville 74 (Jackson R-II School District) Oak Ridge High School 4198 State Highway E Oak Ridge 176 Oak Ridge Elementary School 4198 State Highway E Oak Ridge 207 Cape Christian School 1855 Perryville Road Cape Girardeau 115 Deer Creek Christian Academy 2039 Cape LaCroix Road Cape Girardeau 52 Eagle Ridge Christian School & 4210 State Highway K Cape Girardeau 191 Little Eagles Learning Center Immaculate Conception Catholic 250 East Madison Street Jackson 265 School Saint Paul Lutheran School 216 South Russell Street Jackson 320 Notre Dame High School 265 Notre Dame Drive Cape Girardeau 470 804 North Cape Rock Saxony Lutheran High School Cape Girardeau 58 Drive Trinity Lutheran School 55 North Pacific Street Cape Girardeau 185 Southeast Missouri State One University Plaza Cape Girardeau 9,500 University Nursing/Residential Facilities Auburn Creek-Assisted Living 2910 Beaver Creek Drive Cape Girardeau 42 Capetown Assisted living 2957 Cape LaCroix Road Cape Girardeau 24 Chateau Girardeau 3120 Independence Street Cape Girardeau 60 Chateau Girardeau Assisted 3120 Independence Street Cape Girardeau 40 Living Center Country Gardens RCF II 210 Franks Lane Cape Girardeau 56 Fountainbleau Lodge 2001 North Kingshighway Cape Girardeau 30 Fountainbleau Lodge Residential 2001 North Kingshighway Cape Girardeau 60 Care Facility II Frederick Street Manor 429 North Frederick Street Cape Girardeau 32 Frederick Street Manor II 435 North Frederick Street Cape Girardeau 7 Heartland Care and 2525 Boutin Drive Cape Girardeau 102 Rehabilitation Center Jackson Manor Nursing Home 710 Broadridge Street Jackson 90 Jackson Residential Care 316 East Adams Street Jackson 19 Jefferson Manor 902 Jefferson Avenue Cape Girardeau 10
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 77
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
FACILITY NAME ADDRESS CITY OCCUPANTS Life Care Center of Cape 2852 Independence Street Cape Girardeau 120 Girardeau Louis E. Masterman Center 341 North Main Street Cape Girardeau 18 The Lutheran Home 2825 Bloomfield Road Cape Girardeau 274 Lutheran Home Residential Care 2825 Bloomfield Road Cape Girardeau 105 II Maple Crest Manor 430 North Frederick Street Cape Girardeau 48 Monticello House 1115 K-Land Drive Jackson 75 Monticello House Residential 1115 K-Land Drive Jackson 62 Care Facility II Oak Ridge Manor 5108 State Highway B Oak Ridge 20 Parkwood Manor 325 North Sprigg Street Cape Girardeau 30 Ratliff Care Center 717 North Sprigg Street Cape Girardeau 46 Sprigg Street Manor 701 North Sprigg Street Cape Girardeau 15 Correctional/Rehabilitation 216 North Missouri Cape Girardeau County Jail Jackson 212 Avenue Cape Girardeau County 44 North Lorimier Street Cape Girardeau 334-6001 Juvenile Detention Center Cape Girardeau City Jail 40 South Sprigg Street Cape Girardeau 335-6621
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 78
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.1.11 Media Coverage The Southeast Missourian, located at 301 Broadway in Cape Girardeau, provides complete news coverage throughout Cape Girardeau County and surrounding counties. The newspaper is published daily and provides good coverage of issues and events in the various communities of Cape Girardeau County. The Cash-Book Journal, published weekly in Jackson, also provides coverage of news and events in Jackson and surrounding communities in Cape Girardeau County.
In-depth local and regional television coverage is provided by KFVS-TV 12, a CBS affiliate located at 310 Broadway in Cape Girardeau. KBSI-TV Fox 23, located at 806 Enterprise in Cape Girardeau, provides programming from the Fox Television Network. WSIL-TV, located in Harrisburg, Illinois, and WPSD-TV, located in Paducah, are both received in Cape Girardeau County and also provide weather and other public warnings. A number of local radio stations serve Cape Girardeau County. These include KBHI, KBXB, KCGQ-FM, KGKS KISS-FM, KGMO/KAPE/KYRX Radio, K 103/KEZS, KRCU 90.9 FM/NPR, K REZ, KUGT 1170 AM Christian Radio, KWKZ-Pure Country 106.1, KYRX Mix 104.7, and KZIM-960 AM.
News releases from the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning and Economic Development Commission are currently distributed to over 20 area newspapers and radio and television stations in the seven-county Region. These media contacts will be used to disseminate any information about the hazard mitigation planning process.
3.3.2 Area-wide Hazard Vulnerability The following section details the county and local jurisdictions’ vulnerability to non- geographically specific hazards with recommended actions to mitigate the effects of such hazards. A complete list of mitigation activities can be found in Section 4.3 Mitigation Actions.
The following table shows the probability and severity rankings determined by the HMPC for the non-geographically specific hazards in the county.
EXHIBIT 3.3.2-A Area-wide Hazard Vulnerability Natural Hazards Probability Severity Drought Moderate Moderate Earthquakes Moderate High Extreme Cold Moderate Moderate Extreme Heat Moderate Moderate Severe Winter Weather (Snow, Ice, Hail) High High Tornadoes/Severe Thunderstorms High High
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 79
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The following definitions, as determined by the HMPC, explain the ratings for each hazard. The HMPC felt that, given the potential for loss of life, a low threshold should be considered for events to be considered having a “high” probability:
Probability - The likelihood that the hazard will occur. • Low - The hazard has little or no chance of happening
o (Less than 5 percent chance of occurrence in any given year) • Moderate - The hazard has a reasonable probability of occurring
o (5 to 19 percent chance of occurrence in any given year) • High - The probability is considered sufficiently high to assume that the event will occur
o (20 percent or higher chance of occurrence in any given year) Severity - The deaths, injuries, or damage (property or environmental) that could result from the hazard. • Low - Few or minor damages or injuries are likely. • Moderate - Injuries to personnel and damage to property and the environment is expected. • High - Deaths and major injuries and damage will likely occur
3.3.2.1 Drought Vulnerability Future Severity: Drought in Cape Girardeau County primarily affects the agricultural segment of the economy. A prolonged drought could deplete water supplies in the County. The County normally receives 45 to 48 inches of rain per year. Cape Girardeau County lies in the Salem Plateau and Southeastern Lowlands. Wells drilled in both of these geologic formations usually supply ample groundwater.
Cape Girardeau County is rated by the state as having a moderate susceptibility to drought (Exhibit No. 3.3.2.1-A). Lack of precipitation adversely affects crops and dries out pastures and woodlands, which increases the risk of wildfire in the County. Groundwater resources are adequate to meet most private needs during periods of adequate rainfall.
Future Probability: It is possible that the county could experience a drought in any given year. Chances of a drought are outlined below, with severities based on the Palmer Drought Severity Index.
Incipient Dry Spell High Mild Drought Moderate
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 80
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Moderate Drought Moderate Severe Drought Low Extreme Drought Low
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 81
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.2.1-A
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 82
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.2.2 Earthquake Vulnerability Future Severity: Cape Girardeau County falls within the area VIII on the modified Mercalli intensity scale should an earthquake of 7.6 magnitude strike. At this intensity, poorly built or designed structures suffer considerable damage. Damage is slight in specially designed structures, considerable in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse, and great in poorly built structures. Panel walls are thrown out of frame structures. Weak chimneys break at roof lines and cornices from towers and high buildings fall. Sand and mud are ejected in small amounts.
According to the Missouri State HMP, given a Mw 7.7 earthquake, Cape Girardeau County is estimated to experience a total economic loss of over $4 billion, with approximately 4,736 households displaced, of which over half are expected to need short-term sheltering. The Joint State & Region VII Response Operations Plan estimates that nearly 14,300 buildings in the county will be “moderately” damaged or worse, based on Mid America Earthquake (MAE) Center estimates. Additionally, all infrastructures will be significantly impacted, ranging from severe damage to total destruction. While such an intense earthquake, equal to the 1811 and 1812 earthquakes, is unlikely in any given year, it would be catastrophic to the county.
Magnitude 1 Quake Low Magnitude 2 Quake Low Magnitude 3 Quake Low Magnitude 4 Quake Moderate Magnitude 5 Quake Moderate Magnitude 6 Quake Moderate Magnitude 7 Quake High Magnitude 8+ Quake High
Future Probability: The risk of a particular magnitude earthquake occurring is listed below:
Magnitude 1 Quake High Magnitude 2 Quake High Magnitude 3 Quake High Magnitude 4 Quake Moderate Magnitude 5 Quake Moderate Magnitude 6 Quake Low Magnitude 7 Quake Low Magnitude 8 or greater Low
3.3.2.3 Extreme Cold Vulnerability Future Severity:
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 83
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Extreme cold primarily affects the residents of the county, though there can be damage to infrastructure and buildings if the temperature drops low enough. Livestock are also at risk to extreme cold.
The most at-risk cohort of county residents has historically been the elderly, especially those on fixed income that choose to forego the higher utility bills associated with heating their home. Children can also be at risk to extreme cold, especially those that walk to school or must wait for a school bus. However, schools in the county typically cancel classes when temperatures drop too low for students to safely get to and from school.
0 degrees F: Low -10 degrees F: Moderate -20 degrees F: Moderate -30 degrees F: High -40 degrees F and below: High
Future Probability: While recent trends in average temperature have shown a slight increase the county is still vulnerable to extreme cold, especially during January, historically coldest month of the year. The likelihood of the county experiencing extremely cold temperatures is stated below:
0 degrees F: High -10 degrees F: Moderate -20 degrees F: Low -30 degrees F: Low -40 degrees F and below: Low
3.3.2.4 Extreme Heat Vulnerability Future Severity: Heat waves in the past have caused crop and property damage, and more significantly, injury and death. There have been two heat-related deaths reported in Cape Girardeau County in the past fifteen years. During these heat events, the heat indices ranged from just over 100° F to 120° F.
Most of the deaths and injuries resulting from heat waves occur in large cities rather than in rural areas. However, rural areas are more susceptible to crop damage than urban areas. Other damages, such as overtaxed power grids and heat buckled highways, can occur in rural as well as urban areas. The future probable severity is shown below for Cape Girardeau County.
Heat Index: Extreme Danger 130° F or greater: High Danger 105° F to 130° F: Moderate Extreme Caution 90° F to 105° F: Low Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 84
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Caution 80° F to 90° F: Low
Future Probability: Temperatures in excess of 90° F normally occur in July and August. Combined with the high humidity that also normally occurs at this time of year, it is understandable that heat waves are a natural event. Five of the past six heat waves have occurred in July and August. Since most of these heat waves were in the Extreme Caution to Danger range, it is anticipated that this is the most likely event to occur in the future.
Extreme Danger: Low Danger: Moderate Extreme Caution: High Caution: High
3.3.2.5 Severe Winter Weather Future Severity: Based on the severity of the past events, it is anticipated that future events will be of low severity, though a high severity event is possible, especially considering the recent trend over the past few years towards freezing rain over snow or sleet. Freezing rain coats limbs and power lines, quickly increasing the weight on these objects to the point of failure. Freezing rain also makes travel and transportation highly difficult and dangerous and can almost completely shut down an entire region given the correct combination of factors.
Future Probability: Based on the historical statistics, there is a high probability of an occurrence of severe winter weather of some type taking place in any given year.
3.3.2.6 Tornado/Severe Thunderstorm Vulnerability Tornado: Future Severity: Given past records and evidence from other similarly sized counties across the nation that have been hit by a tornado the following levels of severity have been assigned to the respective levels of tornados.
F0: Low F1: Moderate F2: High F3: High F4: High F5: High
Future Probability: Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 85
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Based on the historical evidence of past events it is almost a given that at least one tornado will occur within the county within the next five to ten years. The probability for a given strength of tornado occurring is inverse to severity, decreasing as severity increases.
F0: High F1: High F2: Moderate F3: Moderate F4: Low F5: Low
Severe Thunderstorm: Future Severity: High/Strong Winds & Heavy Rain The severity of high/strong winds & heavy rain in the county is rated as Moderate due to the possibilities of loss of life and property damage.
Hail The severity of hail in the county is rated as Low due to the limited historical impact of the event to human life or property.
Lightning The severity of lightning in the county is rated as Low due to the limited historical impact of the event to human life and property.
Future Probability: High/Strong Winds & Heavy Rain Based on the historical occurrences of high/strong winds & heavy rain every year in the county the probability of such an occurrence in any given year is rated as High.
Hail Based on the historical occurrences of hail every year in the county the probability of such an occurrence in any given year is rated as High.
Lightning Based on the historical occurrences of lightning in the county the probability of such an occurrence in any given year is rated as High.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 86
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3 Geographically-Specific Hazard Vulnerability The following section details the vulnerability of each jurisdiction to the geographically-specific hazards of dam failure, flooding, sinkholes, and wildfires. This section is organized by type of jurisdiction (e.g. fire districts, school districts) and then by individual jurisdictions and the hazards that each is vulnerable to. The section includes maps with jurisdictional boundaries of all participating jurisdictions with all geographically-specific hazards identified within its boundaries unless otherwise noted.
For Dam and Levee Failure there is no inundation area data available for the county. As such, aerial photography was used to identify structures in an estimated inundation area to determine the probability and severity of such failures on the jurisdictions.
3.3.3.1 County and Municipalities
EXHIBIT No. 3.3.3.1-A County and Municipality Vulnerability Probability Severity Low Moderate High Low Moderate High Cape Girardeau County Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X City of Cape Girardeau Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X City of Jackson Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 87
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Cape Girardeau County Dam & Levee Failure There are 15 dams in the County classified as “high hazard.” Unfortunately, no inundation data or maps are available for any of these dams, making determination and location of potentially affected structures difficult. Based on aerial photography analysis by the HMPC (including the county Emergency Management Director) and planning staff, and consultation with the Emergency Action Plans (EAP) when available, it was determined that these dams potentially affect approximately 122 structures. See EXHIBIT 3.2.1-B for the map which includes these 15 dams.
There is only one major levee in the county, the Little River Drainage District Levee on the south side of the Diversion Channel. This levee protects the Cape Girardeau Municipal Airport, multiple commercial and industrial facilities, and crop land. This levee is only topped during the most severe of flood events, those typically identified as 500 year events.
Given the County’s and DNR’s monitoring of these dams combined with the design height of the Diversion Channel levee along with the types of development these structures protect the probability of a dam or levee failure is rated as low and the severity of such a failure is rated as moderate.
Riverine & Flash Flooding Given the large amounts of flood prone areas in the County the probability of flooding occurring in the county is rated as high; however, due to the disperse settlement patterns in the county such flooding is only rated at a moderate severity level.
Multiple roads and highways in the county are vulnerable to being closed during flash flooding events. This includes, but is not limited to: Rtes AB, B, D, F, K, P, U, UU, W, 34, 55, 61, 72, 177, and County Roads 214, 222, 231, 349, 350, 379, and 454. Additionally, some structures along these routes are susceptible to flooding.
Sinkholes There is a moderate probability of sinkholes occurring in the County, especially in the northern areas of the county. However, based on the characteristics and historical absence of damage due to existing sinkholes in the County the severity of existing and any new sinkholes is rated as low.
Wild Fire Given the amount of undeveloped land in the county there is a high probability of wild fires occurring; however, such occurrences are anticipated to be of low severity as fire districts throughout the county are trained and prepared to quickly subdue any such outbreaks.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 88
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
City of Cape Girardeau Dam & Levee Failure There are only two dams over 35 feet within or near the City of Cape Girardeau with the potential to affect approximately 75 buildings. Given the city’s and DNR’s monitoring of these dams the probability of a dam failure is rated as low and the severity of such a failure is also rated as low.
The floodwall along the Mississippi River in downtown Cape Girardeau is maintained and inspected by the USACE. This wall protects numerous businesses along the would-be riverfront from frequent flooding. Several years, including 1993 and 2015, the river has come within a few feet of topping the wall. Probability of a failure of the floodwall is rated as low given USACE inspections, while severity is rated as high based on the amount of property damage that would be done.
Riverine & Flash Flooding The effects of riverine flooding on the City of Cape Girardeau have been reduced for those areas not protected by the City’s floodwall and levee through participation in flood buyout programs. As a result, the effects of river flooding on the residents of Cape Girardeau have been eased. Areas of the City will still experience flooding when the Mississippi River rises above flood stage; however, the buyouts have removed a significant number of people from the floodplain.
The City of Cape Girardeau has also made channel improvements to a mile of Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of Walker Branch to reduce flash flooding. A 157-acre dry retention basin was also constructed in the upper Cape La Croix watershed to help control flash flooding in the City.
Due to these mitigation efforts by the city the probability and severity of a flood are rated as moderate rather than high as would be expected without such mitigation actions.
During flash flood events, some roads in the city are prone to closure, including Good Hope St, Whitener, Westerior, Silver Springs, Hawthorne, Mt Auburn, Lexington Ave, Main St, Water St, K, 34, 61, 74, and 177/Big Bend Rd. Additionally, areas around Arena Park are very susceptible to flood events.
Sinkholes There is a small amount of sinkholes throughout the city, implying that there is a moderate probability of another sinkhole forming. The city is currently dealing with a newly formed sinkhole at the wastewater treatment facility which has the potential to cause substantial damage to the facility and the environment if not properly handled. However, the city is actively working with engineers to determine the best course of action and does not anticipate any serious effects to the facility or environment. Given that this newest sinkhole is the only
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 89
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
one in the history of the city to present a problem the severity of future sinkholes is given a rating of low.
Wild Fire Given the amount of undeveloped land in the municipality and historical records there is a high probability of wild fires occurring; however, such occurrences are anticipated to be of low severity as the fire department is trained and prepared to quickly subdue any such outbreaks.
City of Jackson Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees within or near the municipality. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine & Flash Flooding There is a moderate amount of flood prone area shown in the city, though some of that area has been mitigated by stream channel improvements to Hubble and Goose Creeks and elevating critical structures above the floodplain. Due to these mitigation efforts by the city the probability and severity of a flood are rated as moderate rather than high as would be expected without such mitigation actions.
During flashfloods, some roads in the city are prone to flooding and closure. This includes some of the streets through City Park (Mary St. and Parkview St), Bainbridge Rd, Jefferson St, Independence St, Lee Ave, and Hwys 34, 61, and 72.
Sinkholes There is a small amount of sinkholes throughout the city, implying that there is a moderate probability of another sinkhole forming. Only a single existing sinkhole lies within 50 feet of a building and there is no record of sinkholes causing any major damage to buildings in the city’s history. As such, the probability of sinkholes is rated as moderate while the severity of an event is rated as low.
Wild Fire Given the amount of undeveloped land in the municipality and historical statistics there is a high probability of wild fires occurring; however, such occurrences are anticipated to be of low severity as the fire department is trained and prepared to quickly subdue any such outbreaks.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 90
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.3.1-B CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY MAP
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 91
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.1-D CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 92
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.1-H JACKSON LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 93
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.2 Public School Districts EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.3.2-A Public School Districts Vulnerability Probability Severity Low Moderate High Low Moderate High Cape Girardeau 63 School District Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X Delta R-V School District Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X Jackson R-II School District Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X Nell Holcomb R-IV School District Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X Oak Ridge R-VI School District Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X
Cape Girardeau 63 School District Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees near jurisdiction-owned structures. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 94
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Riverine Flooding There are no buildings owned by the district located in flood prone areas. As such, probability and severity of a flood event are rated as low.
Sinkholes There are no sinkholes within 50 feet of buildings owned by the district. As such, probability and severity of a sinkhole are rated as low.
Wild Fire There is only a single school located near a large massings of dense vegetation, and that school has a sizable buffer between it and the woodline. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Delta R-V School District Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees near jurisdiction-owned structures. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine Flooding The Delta High School is partially located within a projected flood prone area. While the probability of a flood occurring is moderate, due to the small amount of building actually in the flood area the severity is rated as low.
Sinkholes There are no sinkholes within 50 feet of buildings owned by the district. As such, probability and severity of a sinkhole are rated as low.
Wild Fire There are no large massings of dense vegetation directly adjacent to district owned buildings. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Jackson R-II School District Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees near jurisdiction-owned structures. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine Flooding There are no buildings owned by the district located in flood prone areas. As such, probability and severity of a flood event are rated as low.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 95
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Sinkholes There are no sinkholes within 50 feet of buildings owned by the district. As such, probability and severity of a sinkhole are rated as low.
Wild Fire There are no large massings of dense vegetation directly adjacent to district owned buildings. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Nell Holcomb R-IV School District Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees near jurisdiction-owned structures. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine Flooding While a portion of district property does lie within a flood prone area there are no buildings owned by the district located in the prone area. As such, probability of a flood event is rated as moderate while the severity of a flood event is rated as low.
Sinkholes There are no sinkholes within 50 feet of buildings owned by the district. As such, probability and severity of a sinkhole are rated as low.
Wild Fire There are no large massings of dense vegetation directly adjacent to district owned buildings. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Oak Ridge R-VI School District Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees near jurisdiction-owned structures. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine Flooding There are no buildings owned by the district located in flood prone areas. As such, probability and severity of a flood event are rated as low.
Sinkholes There are no sinkholes within 50 feet of buildings owned by the district. As such, probability and severity of a sinkhole are rated as low.
Wild Fire There are no large massings of dense vegetation directly adjacent to district owned buildings. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 96
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Exhibit 3.3.3.2-B Public Schools Overview
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 97
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.3.2-C CAPE GIRARDEAU SCHOOL DIST. 63 LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 98
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.2-D DELTA R-V LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 99
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.2-E JACKSON R-II LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 100
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.2-F NELL HOLCOMB LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 101
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.2-G OAK RIDGE R-VI LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 102
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Southeast Missouri State University Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams or major levees near jurisdiction-owned structures. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine Flooding There are no buildings owned by the school located in flood prone areas. As such, probability and severity of a flood event are rated as low.
Sinkholes There are two sinkholes on University property which are minimal in size and are not located within 50 feet of a building and are therefore not expected to cause any damage to University property or disrupt University services. Probability is rated as moderate and severity is rated as low.
Wild Fire There are no large massings of dense vegetation directly adjacent to school owned buildings. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 103
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.3.3-C SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIV. LOCATION SPECIFIC HAZARDS
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 104
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.3.3-D SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIV. CAMPUS MAP
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 105
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.3.3 Other Participating Jurisdictions EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.3.3-A Other Participating Jurisdictions Vulnerability Probability Severity Low Moderate High Low Moderate High Little River Drainage District Dam & Levee Failure X X Flooding X X Sinkholes X X Wild Fire X X
Little River Drainage District Dam & Levee Failure There are no dams near jurisdiction-owned structures. The district maintains the Little River Levee, although no district owned structures are within the potential flood zone. Upon the completion of the Dutchtown buyout the district will maintain the vacant property in the floodplain, although no structures will remain. As such, probability and severity of a dam or levee failure are rated as low.
Riverine Flooding There are no buildings owned by the district located in flood prone areas. As such, probability and severity of a flood event are rated as low.
Sinkholes There are no sinkholes within 50 feet of buildings owned by the district. As such, probability and severity of a sinkhole are rated as low.
Wild Fire There are no large massings of dense vegetation directly adjacent to district owned buildings. As such, probability and severity of a wild fire are rated as low.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 106
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.3-A Little River Drainage District Location Specific Hazards
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 107
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.4 Estimating Potential Losses 3.3.4.1 Repetitive Losses The following table shows the repetitive loss properties within the county. There have been numerous properties identified with a total payout of just over $3.7 million dollars.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 108
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.4.1-A CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY REPETITIVE LOSS LISTING
Total Amount Paid Location of Property Structure Type On Structure CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 124,334.40 CAPE GIRARDEAU 2-4 FAMILY $ 60,252.94 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 7,519.91 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 52,242.45 JACKSON SINGLE FMLY $ 28,723.98 BURFORDVILLE SINGLE FMLY $ 61,697.29 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 16,208.11 WHITEWATER SINGLE FMLY $ 54,163.11 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 22,696.17 BURFORDVILLE OTHR-NONRES $ 32,951.22 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 42,465.33 WHITEWATER SINGLE FMLY $ 22,139.68 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 6,149.55 DUTCHTOWN SINGLE FMLY $ 36,345.43 CHAFFEE SINGLE FMLY $ 44,637.74 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 66,550.30 CHAFFEE SINGLE FMLY $ 17,897.69 WHITEWATER SINGLE FMLY $ 147,570.91 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 45,022.26 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 46,704.75 CAPE GIRARDEAU BUSI-NONRES $ 51,785.48 WHITEWATER SINGLE FMLY $ 44,070.74 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 18,549.69 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 7,332.95 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 46,063.11 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 33,776.56 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 5,103.46 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 7,987.33 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 23,327.38 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 51,347.12 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 43,005.73 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 12,002.25 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 145,260.61 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 35,833.43 CAPE GIRARDEAU ASSMD CONDO $ 17,291.16 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 20,491.04 Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 109
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 33,081.27 CAPE GIRARDEAU ASSMD CONDO $ 24,937.37 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 31,511.83 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 74,216.00 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 119,971.08 CAPE GIRARDEAU ASSMD CONDO $ 241,593.95 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 7,954.21 CAPE GIRARDEAN OTHR-NONRES $ 7,400.00 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 50,649.74 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 30,710.25 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 14,505.90 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 10,208.03 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 5,767.03 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 8,677.85 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 37,647.06 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 66,196.77 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 8,241.18 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 116,057.49 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 15,419.27 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 82,349.14 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 36,135.78 CAPE GERARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 17,239.56 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 112,034.15 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 21,762.26 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 2,872.06 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 35,748.90 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 24,272.15 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 12,472.11 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 119,969.95 CAPE GIRARDEAU ASSMD CONDO $ 118,080.69 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 8,161.79 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 25,326.87 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 12,360.01 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 15,930.54 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 15,050.68 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 8,173.56 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 23,787.88 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 23,834.18 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 3,907.18 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 34,893.05 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 123,861.14
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 110
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 11,952.30 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 18,479.55 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 9,283.80 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 28,729.96 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 17,807.68 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 6,678.04 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 5,321.02 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 30,689.21 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 15,984.73 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 20,000.00 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 18,810.78 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 20,715.92 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 39,610.55 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 36,303.61 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 33,932.30 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 22,414.75 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 29,006.96 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 19,116.39 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 32,673.61 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 48,900.00 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 49,015.35 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 96,441.25 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 43,455.48 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 25,930.70 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 42,000.00 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 6,157.22 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 27,920.73 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 29,476.94 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 21,000.00 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 30,115.28 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 13,410.54 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 27,501.36 CAPE GIRARDEAU OTHR-NONRES $ 18,702.96 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 8,803.42 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 30,811.50 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 26,231.42 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 5,951.97 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 14,920.61 CAPE GIRARDEAU SINGLE FMLY $ 5,600.05 JACKSON SINGLE FMLY $ 143,434.26 JACKSON SINGLE FMLY $ 11,633.86
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 111
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
JACKSON SINGLE FMLY $ 45,967.98 JACKSON SINGLE FMLY $ 19,850.16 JACKSON SINGLE FMLY $ 4,862.05 Total $ 4,498,077.42
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 112
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3.3.4.2 Loss Estimates Loss estimates for the county and municipalities were developed based on a structure count conducted within the county by the University of Missouri, Columbia. The structure count was made using aerial photography counting any visible structure; therefore, there is some amount of error inherent in the final figures as structures such as detached garages or sheds were possibly counted.
Valuation of residences was based on 2014 ACS data for median home value. Commercial and industrial structure value is based on a multiplier of median home value unique to each jurisdiction. Public building values based on local officials' determinations. Damage valuation for all other jurisdictions was made using approximate values for each building type (e.g. school, office, etc.) as determined by local officials. All valuation methods were based on the methods used in the previous two updates to the county's HMP and were determined by the HMPC based on local knowledge.
Estimates for the number of structures impacted by riverine flooding, sinkholes, and wild fires were calculated using GIS to determine the number of structures inside the floodplain for flooding and within 50 ft of an existing sinkhole or dense vegetation for sinkholes and wild fires.
Estimates for the number of structures impacted by a dam or levee failure were done using aerial photography and estimating the number of structures within the estimated inundation zone. There is currently no data available for inundation zones within the county, therefore, inundation zones were estimated by the HMPC based on local knowledge.
Estimates for the number of structures and individuals impacted by county-wide hazards (e.g. 25% damage to 10% of structures) were developed using the methodology used in the previous two updates to the county's HMP and were determined by the HMPC based on local knowledge.
The original intent was to utilize HAZUS software developed by FEMA to develop these damage estimates. However, at the time of writing, HAZUS has not been updated to work with the most current version of ArcGIS, which the RPC utilizes. As such, HAZUS was not an option for this plan's damage estimates, but will be the preferred method for the next 5 year update, assuming it has been updated.
Therefore, while these loss estimates are not exact, they use a fact-based, clear methodology for calculation, which was employed during the previous two plan updates. The HMPC believes they represent a reasonable estimate of a hazard's impact.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 113
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.4.2-A County-wide Hazard Damage Estimates County-wide Hazard Damage Estimates Base Figures Count Value Population 77,031 - Total Residences 32,771 $4,522,398,000 Total Commercial/Industrial Sturctures 2,852 $983,940,000 Total Public Buildings 42 $8,400,000 Total Structures 35,665 $5,514,738,000 Affected People & Structures by Hazard Drought Estimates based on a drought causing 1% damage to 5% of structures in the county Count Damage Population 3,852 - Residences 1,639 $2,261,199.00 Commercial/Industrial Structures 143 $491,970.00 Public Buildings 2 $4,200.00 Total Structures 1,783 $2,757,369 Earthquake Estimates based on an earthquake causing 25% damage to 50% of structures in the county Count Damage Population 38,516 - Residences 16,386 $565,299,750 Commercial/Industrial Structures 1,426 $122,992,500 Public Buildings 21 $1,050,000 Total Structures 17,833 $689,342,250 Extreme Cold Estimates based on extreme cold causing 1% damage to 5% of structures in the county Count Damage Population 3,852 - Residences 1,639 $2,261,199 Commercial/Industrial Structures 143 $491,970 Public Buildings 2 $4,200 Total Structures 1,783 $2,757,369
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 114
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Extreme Heat
Estimates based on extreme heat causing 1% damage to 5% of structures in the county Count Damage Population 3,852 - Residences 1,639 $2,261,199 Commercial/Industrial Structures 143 $491,970 Public Buildings 2 $4,200 Total Structures 1,783 $2,757,369 Severe Thunder Storm Estimates based on a thunder storm causing 5% damage to 10% of the structures in the county Count Damage Population 7,703 - Residences 3,277 $22,611,990 Commercial/Industrial Structures 285 $4,919,700 Public Buildings 4 $42,000 Total Structures 3,567 $27,573,690 Tornado Estimates based on a tornado causing 25% damage to 5% of the structures in the county Count Damage Population 3,852 - Residences 1,639 $56,529,975 Commercial/Industrial Structures 143 $12,299,250 Public Buildings 2 $105,000 Total Structures 1,783 $68,934,225 Winter Storm Estimates based on a winter storm causing 5% damage to 10% of the structures in the county Count Damage Population 7,703 - Residences 3,277 $22,611,990 Commercial/Industrial Structures 285 $4,919,700 Public Buildings 4 $42,000 Total Structures 3,567 $27,573,690
Notes:
Base Population from 2014 ACS
Base Total Residences from 2014 ACS Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 115
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Base Total Commercial/Industrial Structures based on % of Base Total Residences and adjusted according to local knowledge
Total Public Buildings from local officials
Damage estimate percentages for each hazard determined by HMPC based on historical records and local knowledge
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 116
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.4.2-B County & Municipality Geographically Specific Hazard Damage Estimates Cape Girardeau County and Municipalities - Geographically Specific Hazards Damage Estimates Affected People and Structures Base Figures Dam Failure Riverine Flooding Sinkholes Wild Fires Count Value Count Damage Count Damage Count Damage Count Damage
Population 22,725 119 362 0 114
Residential 9,045 $1,335,502,100 48 $3,506,708 144 $5,315,431 0 $0 45 $1,669,378 Commercial/Industrial 494 $192,107,250 3 $583,322 7 $656,237 0 $0 2 $240,134 Public 6 $3,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Structures County Balance County Total 9,545 $1,530,609,350 51 $4,090,030 151 $5,971,668 0 $0 48 $1,909,512 Population 38,665 79 133 1 48
Residential 17,185 $2,228,894,500 35 $2,269,750 59 $1,913,075 0 $4,540 21 $696,530 Commercial/Industrial 1,698 $550,576,500 3 $405,313 30 $2,411,609 0 $8,106 2 $172,055 Girardeau
City of Cape of City Public 16 $8,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Structures Total 18,899 $2,787,471,000 38 $2,675,063 89 $4,324,684 1 $12,646 24 $868,585 Population 14,221 0 41 0 18
Residential 5,899 $900,187,400 0 $0 17 $648,550 0 $2,289 7 $281,309 Commercial/Industrial 589 $224,703,500 0 $0 4 $405,344 0 $3,815 1 $70,220 Jackson Public 13 $6,500,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Structures Total 6,501 $1,131,390,900 0 $0 21 $1,053,894 0 $6,104 8 $351,528 Notes: Base Population from 2014 ACS Base Total Residences from 2014 ACS Base Total Commercial/Industrial Structures based on % of Base Total Residences and adjusted according to local knowledge Total Public Buildings from local officials Structures exposed to each hazard determined through local knowledge, GIS estimates, and aerial photo analysis Damage estimate percentages for each hazard determined by HMPC based on historical records and local knowledge
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 117
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Dam Failure estimate percentages: 50% damage to 50% of all structures in an estimated innundation area Riverine Flooding estimate percentages: 25% damage to 25% of all structures in a flood zone Sinkhole estimate percentages: 10% damage to 5% of all structures within 50ft of a sinkhole Wild Fire estimate percentages: 25% damage to 5% of all structures in forest cover
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 118
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.4.2-C Public School Districts and SEMO University Geographically Specific Hazard Damage Estimates Public School Districts & SEMO University - Geographically Specific Hazards Damage Estimates Affected Structures
Base Figures Dam Failure Riverine Flooding Sinkholes Wild Fire Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Count Estimated Value Count Damage Count Damage Count Damage Count Damage Cape Girardeau No. 63 9 $108,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Delta R-V 2 $24,000,000 0 $0 1 $1,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 Jackson R-II 10 $120,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Nell Holcomb R-IV 1 $12,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Oak Ridge R-VI 2 $24,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 SEMO University 60 $1,440,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Notes: Per building value determined by HMPC and based on local averages
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 119
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 3.3.4.2-C Other Participating Jurisdictions Geographically Specific Hazard Damage Estimates Other Jurisdictions - Geographically Specific Hazards Damage Estimates Affected Structures
Base Figures Dam Failure Riverine Flooding Sinkholes Wild Fire Structure Estimated Structure Structure Structure Structure Count Value Count Damage Count Damage Count Damage Count Damage Little River Drainage Dist 1 $100,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Notes: Per building value determined by HMPC and based on local averages
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 120
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CHAPTER 4: HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM
Mitigation, as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary is “...to cause to become less harsh or hostile...to make less severe or painful.” As used in this document’s context, it is defined as “...sustained action that reduces or eliminates long-term risk to people and property from natural hazards and their effects.” The purpose of mitigation planning is to lessen the effect of natural disasters on the community, families, homes, and the economy.
One way to mitigate against certain disasters is to avoid development in areas that are susceptible to that disaster. Regulations could be passed to prohibit development in a floodplain for instance. Other measures could be taken to retrofit existing structures with safe rooms or shelters for protection during tornadoes. The primary goal of mitigation is to keep people and buildings out of harm’s way.
Mitigation versus Preparedness, Response and Recovery Hazard mitigation planning is designed to include long-term activities to reduce or eliminate a hazard or its damages. While preparedness, response, and recovery are aimed at dealing with the effects of a disaster, mitigation is targeted at lessening or eliminating a hazard. Preparedness deals with a community’s activities to develop response and recovery capabilities in the face of a hazard. Response deals with immediate actions to save lives, protect property, and stabilize situations resulting from a hazard. Recovery focuses on activities that get the community back to normal after a disaster.
Mitigation plans benefit the community by saving lives and reducing property damage from disasters. Each community’s mitigation actions will differ to some extent from any other community’s due to the unique circumstances of each community. Mitigation planning should identify problems and solutions specifically for a particular community.
The community should strive for a multi-objective plan that can address multiple problems with a single solution. This can tie the mitigation plan in with other plans and objectives of the community and give it broader support. Once the mitigation plan is in place, the community is better prepared to take steps to permanently reduce future risk of losses.
The one factor that has become perfectly clear during the hazard mitigation planning process is that a tremendous amount of information and planning data is available; however, it is very difficult to obtain. In order to obtain information concerning hazardous materials, population growth patterns, sales data, employment data, building conditions, road and bridge conditions, and a variety of other data factors, numerous agencies, businesses and resource documents need to be accessed.
As a result of this finding, it is further evident that a true GIS system needs to be set up encompassing the entire county. This system will involve a centrally coordinated database that
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 121
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
is made available via Internet or linked computer to all responders and decision makers who will be involved with responding to any future disaster.
The GIS system will incorporate such information as is readily available from the County Assessor’s Office, which includes individual property data, including ownership of the property, age of any structures, their square footage, and value. This information will be coordinated with the 911 response and will be readily available to the responder merely by clicking the property and pulling up the data concerning the building. Additional information in the GIS will include types of roads to get to the structure and any known hazards in the area, including hazardous materials stored on-site. The database will also include information concerning any potential detours enroute to the hazard that would include known weight limits on bridges and locations of hydrants, conditions and sizes of water lines, the ability to attach pumper trucks to the hydrants, and flow data for the hydrants. The GIS system will also include information on public buildings, including floor plans, when available, showing emergency exits; numbers of people who generally would be in the buildings at peak times, be they customers or employees; and escape routes for emergency situations.
Since multiple entities will be involved in preparing and maintaining the database for the GIS system, multiple funding sources will be available for the set up and maintenance of the system. The County Assessor’s Office currently updates all information on each parcel of property at least on an annual basis. This information should be collected and put in a database that is accessible to the 911 office and to the emergency responders. It should be in a data form that will be readily downloadable to the mapping software to allow the GIS manager access and easy update of the GIS database. Cities that are collecting data on new home construction and reviewing plans should begin getting copies of the plans in an electronic format that will allow for the floor plans to be downloaded to the GIS databases to give responders visual images of the escape routes, particularly for areas where large numbers of people are generally assembled.
A mitigation plan benefits the community by providing it with a guide to actions that need to be taken following a disaster. It helps to ensure that the proper steps will be taken in the recovery process and allows the community to make the best use of post-disaster funding to make safety improvements that will alleviate the effects of future disasters.
The hazard mitigation plan also qualifies the community to access various federal and state programs to fund mitigation activities. The plan aids in the recovery process by ensuring that the best mitigation measures are instituted under the stress of the post-disaster urgency to rebuild.
It is essential that local mitigation policy be formalized and focused to minimize the risk of future devastation and the corresponding impact on the residents and property of the county. This can only be accomplished by establishing workable goals and objectives that integrate efforts into one cohesive mitigation strategy and that also take full advantage of public-private partnerships. Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 122
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Development of a sound mitigation strategy provides a focus that helps local governments identify priorities and channel their limited resources toward critical mitigation projects. This process helps officials make the most effective use of available resources.
The county will continue to enhance its ability to meet its goals and objectives by taking maximum advantage of the mitigation resources available, both present and future, to reduce the impact of natural and manmade disasters on the residents and infrastructure of the county. The county will also continue to vigorously pursue methods to augment existing programs by exploring and taking advantage of other opportunities, such as public-private partnerships.
The results of the planning process, which include the risk assessment, capability assessment, goal setting, and identification of mitigation measures, and the hard work of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC) led to the action plan that follows.
4.1 HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this section is to describe the goals and objectives of the county mitigation program. In order to be effective, these goals and objectives must be achievable and they must complement other local mitigation strategies. They also play a role in the review and prioritization of proposed mitigation projects, which must also complement the county’s overall mitigation strategy. Before adopting them, the county evaluated the goals, objectives, and especially the actions, using the STAPLEE (social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic, and environmental) criteria.
It is important that the results of these mitigation efforts are evident to local governments, public-private partnerships, and the general public. By establishing achievable goals and objectives, the groups involved in the process can see that their efforts are making a difference and that success in other mitigation efforts is also possible.
The county reviews these goals and objectives as part of the regular plan update process and more frequently as needed to reflect current situations. The process used to identify, review, and update the goals and objectives during the 2016 update is described later in this section.
Section 4.1.1 County Mitigation Goals and Objectives provides the primary goals and objectives for the county’s hazard mitigation program in prioritized order. The county encourages its partners to consider these mitigation goals when developing mitigation and other plans.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 123
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
4.1.1 County Mitigation Goals and Objectives Goal #1: Protect the health, safety, and welfare of county residents.
Objective 1.1: Maintain a mitigation program that addresses ways to mitigate loss of life and injury due to disaster events.
Objective 1.2: Support organizations that work to mitigate adverse effects of disasters
Objective 1.3: Increase public awareness of disaster risks and effective mitigation measures.
Objective 1.4: Support the development of enabling legislation, programs, and capabilities of local jurisdictions, agencies, institutions, and businesses involved in mitigation activities.
Objective 1.5: Educate local officials, agencies, institutions, and businesses about the benefits of mitigation actions.
Goal #2: Ensure the operation of critical facilities and services.
Objective 2.1: Target mitigation projects that protect key facilities and services.
Objective 2.2: Educate local officials, agencies, institutions, and businesses that provide critical services about the benefits of mitigation actions.
Objective 2.3: Emphasize mitigation techniques during new and renovation construction of critical facilities.
Objective 2.4: Encourage officials, agencies, institutions, and businesses to integrate mitigation plan into other plans.
Objective 2.5: Maintain a mitigation program that addresses ways to disseminate disaster data and information in a timely manner.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 124
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Goal #3: Protect public and private property.
Objective 3.1: Maintain a mitigation program that addresses ways to mitigate loss of property due to disaster events.
Objective 3.2: Support organizations that work to mitigate adverse effects of disasters.
Objective 3.3: Increase public awareness of disaster risks and effective mitigation measures.
Objective 3.4: Support the development of enabling legislation, programs, and capabilities of local jurisdictions, agencies, institutions, and businesses involved in mitigation activities.
Objective 3.5: Educate local officials, agencies, institutions, and businesses about the benefits of mitigation actions.
Goal #4: Enhance informed decision making of mitigation actions.
Objective 4.1: Maintain a mitigation program that addresses ways to disseminate disaster data and information in a timely manner.
Objective 4.2: Foster communication between jurisdictions, agencies, institutions, businesses, and citizens about disasters and mitigation.
Objective 4.3: Educate local officials, agencies, institutions, and businesses about the benefits of mitigation actions.
4.1.2 Process for Identifying, Reviewing, and Updating County Goals and Objectives As part of the 2016 plan update, the goals and objectives from the 2011 plan were reviewed to determine if they still address current and anticipated future conditions. This was accomplished during the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meetings. The HMPC evaluated the goals and objectives based on:
• The updated risk assessment, which includes changes in growth and development, recent disasters, and analysis of local risk assessments; • Assessment of changes and challenges in local capabilities since the 2011 plan; and
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 125
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Identification of achieved mitigation objectives from the 2011 plan.
The following section describes how the local mitigation plan goals and objectives were reviewed and considered during the 2016 update. Section 4.3 Mitigation Actions includes detailed and updated mitigation measures designed to meet the designated goals and objectives and progress on these objectives is evaluated in Section 4.3 Mitigation Actions.
The HMPC concluded that the goals and objectives from the 2011 plan remain valid and continue to guide the county’s mitigation strategy, though the Committee felt that the goals and objectives could be better worded and streamlined. As such, while the goals and objectives have been reworked the crux of the previous goals and objectives remain. Life safety remains the top priority.
4.2 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENTS This section discusses Cape Girardeau County and the municipalities within existing capabilities, including agencies, programs, outreach and partnerships, and plans and policies, for mitigating hazards. Capabilities related to development in hazard-prone areas and funding hazard mitigation projects are also discussed. During the 2016 plan update, the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team evaluated capabilities by identifying the changes in capabilities since the 2011 plan and assessing the challenges and opportunities for improving capabilities.
4.2.1 Agencies Cape Girardeau County has an adopted Emergency Operations Plan which is in the process of being revised. The plan is being developed in cooperation with the communities in the County. The County’s authorization to develop such a plan derives from Chapter 44 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri. The County has no mitigation policy or program, other than the restrictions on development in the floodplains of the County.
The County’s emergency operations center and emergency management coordinator provide the capability and organization to handle disasters affecting the County and also to handle mitigation to lessen the effects of these disasters in the future. All the components are in place to coordinate these actions between the communities and the County. Emergency services from throughout the County have coordinated and combined their efforts to prepare the Emergency Operations Plan.
The small size of most of the incorporated towns in the county makes having extensive municipal services impractical and inefficient. These towns rely heavily on the county’s agencies for hazard mitigation capabilities.
The following entities, agencies, and organizations play either a primary or supportive role in hazard mitigation actions:
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 126
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Cape Girardeau County County Commission County EMA Sheriff’s Department Highway Department Rural Fire Districts Health Department Ambulance Service
City of Cape Girardeau Mayor City Council Police Department Fire Department Public Works City Administrator Planning Department St. Francis Medical Center Southeast Missouri Hospital
Jackson Mayor City Council Police Department Fire Department Public Works City Administrator Planning Department
Allenville Mayor City Council
Delta Mayor City Council
Gordonville Mayor City Council
Oak Ridge Mayor Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 127
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
City Council
Old Appleton Mayor City Council
Pocahontas Mayor City Council
Whitewater Mayor City Council
4.2.2 Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Initiatives Cape Girardeau County has an adopted Emergency Operations Plan which is in the process of being revised. The plan is being developed in cooperation with the communities in the County. The County’s authorization to develop such a plan derives from Chapter 44 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri. The County has no mitigation policy or program, other than the restrictions on development in the floodplains of the County.
The County’s emergency operations center and emergency management coordinator provide the capability and organization to handle disasters affecting the County and also to handle mitigation to lessen the effects of these disasters in the future. All the components are in place to coordinate these actions between the communities and the County. Emergency services from throughout the County have coordinated and combined their efforts to prepare the Emergency Operations Plan.
Again, the small size of most of the communities leaves them with very few avenues to implement, enforce, or encourage hazard mitigation actions. None of these towns have any kind of zoning or land use controls available to them.
The following are lists of the various methods the above entities use to help mitigate the effects of disasters within the county and its municipalities:
Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan Emergency Operations Plan Restriction on Flood Plain Development
City of Cape Girardeau Hazard Mitigation Plan Emergency Operations Plan Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 128
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Comprehensive Plan Zoning Building Codes
Jackson Hazard Mitigation Plan Emergency Operations Plan Comprehensive Plan Zoning Building Codes
All Other Municipalities Hazard Mitigation Plan Emergency Operations Plan
4.2.3 Funding Capabilities As previously discussed, the ability of the county and municipalities to fund hazard mitigation efforts is extremely limited. The vast majority of funds for mitigation projects come from state and federal programs as citizens are hesitant to pass tax increases for mitigation when they perceive more immediate issues with which to be dealt. Local businesses are also unlikely to contribute funds towards mitigation as they believe it to be an issue for local, state, and federal government to handle. Private investment in mitigation measure typically only affects the public in cases where the effects of mitigation measures of a business or private community inadvertently spill over into surrounding areas (i.e. Tornado sirens). This funding limitation severely hampers local governments’ hazard mitigation capabilities, leaving them with mitigation planning as their most effective capability.
Cape Girardeau County and the municipalities use a variety of sources to fund local mitigation activities. While most of the funding is from the federal government, some also comes from state and local levels.
4.2.3.1 Primary Federal and State Funding Through the wise use of available federal and state funds, made available through a variety of programs (Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Public Assistance, Federal Unmet Needs, Project Impact, Flood Mitigation Assistance, Pre-Disaster Mitigation, Community Development Block Grants, Department of Natural Resources Stormwater Grants, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and more), the county has been able to successfully mitigate many areas against the devastating effects of future disasters.
FEMA’s three main hazard mitigation programs are the primary sources of current funding for the county and the municipalities’ mitigation activities. These three programs are the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and Pre-Disaster Mitigation Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 129
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
program. Two newer FEMA programs, the Repetitive Flood Claims program and the Severe Repetitive Loss program, are potential funding sources for the future. All five of these programs are discussed further in the following pages.
Flood Mitigation Assistance Program Program Summary: The Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA) is a program under FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Its purpose is to implement cost-effective measures that reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood damage to buildings, manufactured homes, and other structures insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The FMA provides planning grants for communities to assess their flood risk and identify actions to reduce it. Planning grants may be used to develop a new or update an existing flood mitigation plan (this also applies to the flood hazard portion of multihazard mitigation plans).
Project grants are available for acquisition, structure demolition, or structure relocation with the property deed restricted for open space uses in perpetuity; elevation of structures; dry floodproofing of nonresidential structures; and minor structural flood control activities.
Planning grants are available for flood mitigation planning activities.
Amount: For fiscal year 2007 (October 1, 2006-September 30, 2007), Congress appropriated $31 million for the FMA. Based on an allocation formula, each state will receive a base amount of $110,000. Surplus amounts will be distributed based on each state/territory’s participation in the NFIP (number of policies and repetitive loss properties).
Eligibility: In Missouri, SEMA serves as the applicant for all FMA grants. State-level agencies, federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and local governments (including state-recognized Indian tribes and authorized Indian tribal organizations) are eligible to apply to SEMA for assistance as subapplicants. Individuals and private nonprofit organizations are not eligible to apply to the state, but a relevant state agency or local community may apply on their behalf. SEMA reviews and prioritizes subapplications and submits the grant application with subapplications to FEMA for review and approval.
All subapplicants must be participating and in good standing in the NFIP.
For project grants, subapplicants must have a FEMA-approved flood mitigation plan or multihazard mitigation plan that meets FMA planning requirements. All activities submitted for consideration must be consistent with the local mitigation plan as well as the Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 130
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Cost-Share Requirements: FMA funds are provided on a 75 percent federal/25 percent nonfederal cost share basis. The recipient must provide the 25 percent match, only half of which may be in-kind contributions. For severe repetitive loss properties, FEMA will contribute up to 90 percent of the total eligible costs if the state has taken actions to reduce the number of severe repetitive loss properties and has an approved state mitigation plan that specifies how it intends to reduce the number of severe repetitive loss properties.
Requirements: Recipients of FMA planning grants must produce FEMA-approved flood mitigation plans.
More Information: Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program www.fema.gov/government/grant/fma/index.shtm
SEMA (573) 526-9100 http://sema.dps.mo.gov/
FEMA Region VII (816) 283-7063 www.fema.gov/about/contact/regionvii.shtm
SEMA Fund Administrator: Logistics, Mitigation and Floodplain Management Branch, State Hazard Mitigation Officer
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Program Summary: The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) is a FEMA program. Its purpose is to provide funds to states, territories, Indian tribal governments, and communities to significantly reduce or permanently eliminate future risk to lives and property from natural hazards. HMGP funds projects in accordance with priorities identified in state, tribal, or local hazard mitigation plans, and enables mitigation measures to be implemented during the recovery from a disaster.
HMGP funds can be used for projects to protect either public or private property, as long as the project fits within state and local government mitigation strategies to address areas of risk and complies with program guidelines. Examples of projects include acquiring and relocating structures from hazard-prone areas; retrofitting structures to protect them from floods, high winds, earthquakes, or other natural hazards; constructing certain types of minor and localized flood control projects; and constructing safe rooms inside schools or other buildings in tornado prone areas.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 131
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The state may set aside up to 7 percent of the HMGP funds received following a presidential disaster declaration to develop FEMA-approved mitigation plans. The state may also set aside up to 5 percent of the HMGP funds to be used to fund the State 5% Initiative Projects.
Amount: Federal funding under the HMGP is available following a major disaster declaration if requested by the governor. The amount of an HMGP grant will depend on the costs associated with each individual disaster. Since the Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan is an enhanced plan, the state is eligible for up to 20 percent of the total estimated federal assistance provided after a major disaster declaration. States with standard hazard mitigation plans are eligible for 15 percent for amounts not more than $2 billion, 10 percent for amounts of more than $2 billion and not more than $10 billion, and 7.5 percent on amounts more than $10 billion and not more than $35.3 billion.
Eligibility: HMGP funds are administered by SEMA. Local governments, certain private nonprofit organizations or institutions, and Indian tribes or authorized tribal organizations are eligible to apply to SEMA for assistance as subapplicants. Individuals and businesses are not eligible to apply to the state, but eligible local governments or private nonprofit organizations may apply on their behalf. SEMA reviews and prioritizes subapplications and submits the grant application with subapplications to FEMA for review and approval.
For project grants, subapplicants must have a FEMA-approved local mitigation plan. All activities submitted for consideration must be consistent with the local mitigation plan as well as the Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Cost-Share Requirements: HMGP funds are provided on a 75 percent federal/25 percent nonfederal cost share basis. The nonfederal match does not does not need to be cash; in-kind services and/or materials may be used.
More Information: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program www.fema.gov/government/grant/hmgp/index.shtm
SEMA (573) 526-9100 http://sema.dps.mo.gov/
FEMA Region VII (816) 283-7969 www.fema.gov/about/contact/regionvii.shtm
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 132
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
SEMA Fund Administrator: Logistics, Mitigation and Floodplain Management Branch, State Hazard Mitigation Officer
Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Program Summary: The Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program is a FEMA grant program. Its purpose is to provide funds to states, territories, Indian tribal governments, and communities for hazard mitigation planning and the implementation of mitigation projects prior to a disaster event. Funding these plans and projects reduces overall risks to the population and structures, while also reducing reliance on funding from actual disaster declarations.
Project grants are available for voluntary acquisition of real property (i.e., structures and land, where necessary) for open space conversion; relocation of public or private structures; elevation of existing public or private structures to avoid flooding; structural and nonstructural retrofitting of existing public or private structures to meet/exceed applicable building codes; construction of safe rooms for public and private structures; vegetation management (e.g., for wildfire); protective measures for utilities, water and sanitary sewer systems, and infrastructure; storm water management projects; and localized flood control projects that are designed specifically to protect critical facilities and that do not constitute a section of a larger flood control system.
Planning grants are available for new plan development, plan upgrades, and comprehensive plan reviews and updates.
Amount: For fiscal year 2007 (October 1, 2006-September 30, 2007), Congress appropriated $100 million for competitive grants, technical assistance, and program support. Each state will receive at least $500,000 for subapplication(s). The rest of the money will be awarded to subapplicants on a competitive basis (nationally). The proposed program budget for fiscal year 2008 is $100 million.
Eligibility: In Missouri, SEMA serves as the applicant for all PDM grants. State-level agencies, including state institutions (e.g., state hospital or university); federally recognized Indian tribal governments; local governments (including state recognized Indian tribes and authorized Indian tribal organizations); public colleges and universities; and Indian Tribal colleges and universities are eligible to apply to SEMA for assistance as subapplicants. Private nonprofit organizations and private colleges and universities are not eligible to apply to the state, but an eligible, relevant state agency or local government may apply on their behalf. SEMA reviews and prioritizes subapplications and submits the grant application with subapplications to FEMA for review and approval.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 133
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
All subapplicants that have been identified through the NFIP as having a Special Flood Hazard Area and that have a Flood Hazard Boundary Map or a Flood Insurance Rate Map must be participating and in good standing in the NFIP.
For project grants, subapplicants must have a FEMA-approved local mitigation plan. All activities submitted for consideration must be consistent with the local mitigation plan as well as the Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Cost-Share Requirements: PDM grants are provided on a 75 percent federal/25 percent nonfederal cost share basis. Small and impoverished communities may be eligible for up to a 90 percent federal cost-share.
Requirements: Recipients of PDM planning grants must produce FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plans.
More Information: Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program www.fema.gov/government/grant/pdm/index.shtm
SEMA (573) 526-9100 http://sema.dps.mo.gov/
FEMA Region VII (816) 283-7063 www.fema.gov/about/contact/regionvii.shtm
SEMA Fund Administrator: Logistics, Mitigation and Floodplain Management Branch, State Hazard Mitigation Officer
Repetitive Flood Claims Program Program Summary: The Repetitive Flood Claims (RFC) program is a FEMA program. Its purpose is to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood damage to structures insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that have had one or more claim payment(s) for flood damage.
Project grants are available for acquisition, structure demolition, or structure relocation with the property deed restricted for open-space uses in perpetuity.
Planning grants are not available.
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 134
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Amount: For fiscal year 2007(October 1, 2006-September 30, 2007), Congress appropriated $10 million for the RFC program. RFC grants are awarded nationally without reference to state allocations, quotas, or other formula-based allocation(s) of funds.
Eligibility: RFC funds can only be used mitigate structures that are located within a state or community that cannot meet the requirements of the FMA for either cost share or capacity to manage the activities.
In Missouri, SEMA serves as the applicant for all RFC grants. State-level agencies, federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and local governments (including state-recognized Indian tribes and authorized Indian tribal organizations) are eligible to apply to SEMA for assistance as subapplicants. Individuals and private nonprofit organizations are not eligible to apply to the state, but a relevant state agency or local community may apply on their behalf. SEMA reviews and prioritizes subapplications and submits the grant application with subapplications to FEMA for review and approval.
All subapplicants must be participating and in good standing in the NFIP.
Cost-Share Requirements: All RFC grants are eligible for up to 100 percent federal assistance.
More Information: Repetitive Flood Claims Program www.fema.gov/government/grant/rfc/index.shtm
SEMA (573) 526-9100 http://sema.dps.mo.gov/
FEMA Region VII (816) 283-7063 www.fema.gov/about/contact/regionvii.shtm
SEMA Fund Administrator: Logistics, Mitigation and Floodplain Management Branch, State Hazard Mitigation Officer
Severe Repetitive Loss Program (Information is preliminary; guidance has not been released as of this publication.)
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 135
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Program Summary: The Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) program is a FEMA program. Its purpose is to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood damage to severe repetitive loss residential properties and the associated drain on the National Flood Insurance Fund (NFIF) from such properties. FEMA defines SRL properties as residential properties that have at least four NFIP claim payments over $5,000 each, at least two of which occurred within any ten-year period, and the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeds $20,000; or that have at least two separate claims payments (building payments only) where the total of the payments exceeds the value of the property, when two such claims have occurred within any ten-year period.
Project grants are available for flood mitigation activities such as acquisition, structure demolition, or structure relocation with the property deed restricted for open-space uses in perpetuity; elevation of structures; floodproofing of structures; minor physical localized flood control projects; and demolition and rebuilding of structures.
Planning grants are not available.
Amount: The SRL program is authorized for up to $40 million for each fiscal year 2005 through 2009.
Eligibility: In Missouri, SEMA serves as the applicant for all SRL grants. State-level agencies, federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and local governments (including state-recognized Indian tribes and authorized Indian tribal organizations) are eligible to apply to SEMA for assistance as subapplicants. Individuals and private nonprofit organizations are not eligible to apply to the state, but a relevant state agency or local community may apply on their behalf. SEMA reviews and prioritizes subapplications and submits the grant application with subapplications to FEMA for review and approval.
All subapplicants must be participating and in good standing in the NFIP.
Cost-Share Requirements: SRL grants are provided on a 75 percent federal/25 percent nonfederal cost share basis. Up to 90 percent federal cost-share funding may be available for projects approved in states, territories, and federally recognized Indian Tribes with FEMA-approved standard or enhanced mitigation plans or Indian tribal plans that include a strategy for mitigating existing and future SRL properties.
More Information: Severe Repetitive Loss Program www.fema.gov/government/grant/srl/index.shtm
SEMA (573) 526-9100 Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 136
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan http://sema.dps.mo.gov/
FEMA Region VII (816) 283-7063 www.fema.gov/about/contact/regionvii.shtm
SEMA Fund Administrator: Logistics, Mitigation and Floodplain Management Branch, State Hazard Mitigation Officer
Chapter 3: Risk Assessment Page 137
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
4.3 MITIGATION ACTIONS This section introduces the mitigation action categories considered by the county to meet the goals and objectives of this plan. The categories are provided, followed by background on how they were identified and prioritized. This section also describes how the action categories were reviewed during the 2016 update to reflect changes in risk, progress in mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities. It then describes implementation and the progress in implementation of mitigation actions.
4.3.1 Actions That Will Be Considered Mitigation efforts can be classified into the six categories discussed below.
Prevention Measures: intended to keep the problem from getting worse. These measures aim to ensure that future developments do not increase loses suffered in a hazard. Some examples of prevention measures are; planning and zoning, open space preservation, land development regulations, and storm water management.
Property Protection Measures: used to modify buildings subject to hazard risk or their surroundings. These measures may be inexpensive to implement, and some of the costs might be shared between government and property owners. Examples of the types of actions that might be undertaken are acquisition of lands vulnerable to damage from hazards, relocation of people and buildings from hazard prone areas, and rebuilding or modifying structures to reduce damages caused by future hazard events.
Natural Resource Protection Measures: intended to reduce the intensity of hazard effects, as well as to improve the quality of the environment and wildlife habitats. Some examples would include wetlands protection and erosion and sediment controls.
Emergency Services Measures: designed to protect people before and after an event. Examples of these measures include warning systems, critical facilities protection, and health and safety maintenance.
Structural Mitigation Measures: intended to protect people and property at risk. They involve construction of man-made structures to control hazards. These may include reservoirs; levees, floodwalls and seawalls; channel modifications; and storm sewers.
Public Information Mitigation Measures: used to inform the public of hazardous conditions and areas and the measures necessary to avoid potential damage and injury. Some examples of informational activities to aid mitigation are providing hazard maps and other hazard information, using the print media and radio/TV spots to provide hazard information, notification to residents and property owners in hazardous areas, and presentations at
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 138
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
meetings and neighborhood groups. Other activities could include real estate disclosure or educational classes for children and adults.
Criteria for Prioritization The county’s most serious natural hazard in the past has been tornadoes/thunderstorms followed by floods, and severe winter weather. Although a serious earthquake has not occurred in the County since 1811-1812 they have the potential to be the most devastating disaster and therefore warrant serious consideration. Extreme heat and cold, drought, dam failures, sinkholes, and wildfires follow, in no particular order.
The following matrix provides an analysis and prioritization of the county’s proposed mitigation measures. These actions were reviewed according to the STAPLEE criteria, which include social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental considerations. The Priority column indicates the priority of a project based on its cost-benefit review.
For this update no actions were classified as “Completed.” This is due to one of two reasons: either the action is of an open-ended nature, i.e. maintain mutual aid agreements; or the action lacked the financial, political, or social backing to be completed, i.e. buying out repetitive loss properties (financial) or implementing zoning in the county (political/social).
Some actions are more applicable to specific jurisdictions than others; as such, applicable jurisdictions are noted for each action according to the following coding system:
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 139
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Legend Jurisdiction A = All Participating Jurisdictions 1 = County and All Municipalities 1.1 = Cape Girardeau County 1.2 = City of Cape Girardeau 1.3 = Jackson 2 = All Public School Districts & SEMO Univeristy 2.1 = Cape Girardeau No. 63 School Dist 2.2 = Delta R-V School Dist 2.3 = Jackson R-II School Dist 2.4 = Nell Holcomb R-IV School Dist 2.5 = Oak Ridge R-VI School Dist 2.6 = Southeast Missouri State Univ. 3 = All Other Participating Jurisdictions 3.1 = Little River Drainage Dist.
Priority - as determined by the HMPC based on STAPLEE scoring and consideration of cost/benefit ratio. As most all of the actions listed do not have easily defined values for costs and benefits and most jurisdictions do not have a method of cost-benefit analysis in place, determinations were made by jurisdictions based on their local knowledge and discussions among HMPC members about historical and future costs and benefits. For the next plan update, alternative cost-benefit evaluation methods will be evaluated for effectiveness and efficiency. High = Project has a low cost/benefit ratio, making it a top priority for applicable jurisdictions Med = Project has a moderate cost/benefit ratio, making it important to applicable jurisdictions, but not a top priority Low = Project has a high cost/benefit ratio, making it financially difficult to justify
Potential Funding Sources: L = Local S = State F = Federal P = Private
STAPLEE Challenges (X in box indicates this aspect represents a current or potential obstacle for the completion of the action.) Determined by the HMPC though discussion of historical and potential challenges for projects.
Goals - marks the goal(s) addressed by the action
Hazard - Lists the hazards addressed by the action DL = Dam & Levee Failures Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 140
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
DR = Drought EQ = Earthquakes EC = Extreme Cold EH = Extreme Heat FL = Flash & Riverine Flooding SH = Sinkholes WW = Severe Winter Weather (Snow, Ice) TT = Tornadoes and Thunderstorms (Downbursts, Lightning, Hail, Heavy Rains, and Wind) WF = Wild Fires
Timeframe - the expected amount of time to complete the action, as determined by the jurisdictions and HMPC S = Short - less than 1 year M = Medium - 1-3 years L = Long - over 3 years
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 141
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT 4.3.1-A Hazard Mitigation Action Matrix
STAPLEE Challenges (X indicates a Goals
current or potential obstacle) ngoing
O
Priority Life evised, Jurisdiction R Property Legal Social
Lead Information Political Technical Economic ew, Departments Potential Funding Srcs N Emergency Services Action or Agencies Administrative Environmental Hazard Timeframe Prevention Measures
EQ, EC, Enforce building 1.2, EH, WW, codes 1.3 O Building Code High L X X X X X TT S
Enforce flood plain Floodplain regulations 1 O Managers High L X X X X X FL S
Continue to comply and implement the Floodplain NFIP requirements 1 O Managers High L X X X FL S
Buyout repetitive loss Floodplain F properties 1 O Managers Med S X X X X X FL M
Issue evacuation Emergency orders when Management, necessary to remove Police people from areas or Departement, DL, EQ, buildings threatened Principals/ FL, WW, by a hazard A O Officials High L X X X X X TT, WF S
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 142
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Continue to approve and regularly inspect dams over 35 feet in L height or located in a 1.1, S populated area. 1.2 O DNR Med F X X X X DL, FL S Property Protection Measures
Encourage mobile homes to be anchored or tied down in compliance with manufacturers Emergency recommendations 1 O Management Med L X X X TT S Retrofit, where Emergency possible, buildings Management, and bridges to make Public Works, L them more seismic Facilities S resistant A O Manager Low F X X X X EQ L
Clear brush and Public Works, debris from the land Facilities surrounding buildings A O Manager Low L X X X X X WF S Natural Resource Protection Measures
Floodplain Manager, Parks Department, Retain green space Public Works, and reduce hard Facilties surface areas A O Manager Med L X X X X X FL S Emergency Services Measures Extend outdoor warning systems into areas not already Emergency DL, EQ, covered 1 O Management High F X X X X FL, TT M
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 143
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Encourage reinforcement of communication Emergency EQ, SH, towers 1 O Management Low n/a X X X X X WW, TT S DL, EQ, Provide emergency Emergency EC, EH, backup power Management, L FL, SH, generators to critical Facilites S WW, TT, facilities A O Manager High F X X WF M Acquire necessary general and DL, DR, specialized Emergency EQ, EC, equipment for hazard Management, EH, FL, mitigation and Facilites L SH, WW, response A O Manager Med F X X TT, WF M DL, DR, Commission, EQ, EC, City Council, EH, FL, Maintain mutual aid Board of SH, WW, agreements A O Directors High L X X X TT, WF S
Emergency Monitor weather Management, DR, EC, information to reduce Principals/ EH, FL, reaction times A O Officials High L X X WW, TT S Confirm that all DL, DR, equipment and Emergency EQ, EC, supplies are in Management, EH, FL, operable/usable Facilites SH, WW, condition A O Manager High L X TT, WF S Emergency DL, EQ, Management, EC, EH, Provide emergency Principal, L FL, SH, shelters during Facilites F WW, TT, hazard events 1, 2 O Manager High P X X X WF S
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 144
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
GIS Depts, DL, DR, Emergency EQ, EC, Maintain a Management, L EH, FL, Geographic Facilities S SH, WW, Information System A O Manager High F X X X X X TT, WF S Develop inundation Emergency data for dam and Management, S levee failures A N Superintendent Med F X X X X X X DL L DL, DR, Make pertinent data EQ, EC, available to all Emergency L EH, FL, appropriate agencies Management, S SH, WW, and departments A O Superintendent High F X X X X TT, WF S Structural Mitigation Measures
Construct safe Public Works, rooms/ emergency Facilities shelters 1, 2 O Manager High L X X EQ, TT L Maintain and repair L the existing levee S system 3 O Superintendent High F X X X X DL, FL S Raise low-water L crossings, where Road Dept, S economically feasible 1 O Public Works Med F X X X FL L Clear obstructions Facilities from stream channels Manager, within jurisdiction A O Public Works Med L X X X X X X FL S Public Information Measures Encourage residents to obtain Weather Emergency Alert Radios 1 O Management Low L X X X X WW, TT S
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 145
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Enlist local radio, TV, and cable systems to DL, EQ, broadcast timely Emergency FL, WW, warnings 1 O Management High n/a X X X TT S
Educate the public DL, DR, concerning hazards EQ, EC, that threaten them EH, FL, and mitigation Emergency SH, WW, actions they can take A O Management High L X X X X X TT, WF S DL, DR, Declare public Commission, EQ, EC, emergencies when Mayor, EH, FL, conditions Emergency SH, WW, necessitate 1 O Management High L X X X X TT, WF S
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 146
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXHIBIT NO. 4.3.1-B CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY EXISTING COMMUNITY PLANS
Effective goal for source existing goal statements mitigation? Emergency The plan outlines actions to be taken by local government officials and cooperating private or Operations Plan for volunteer organizations to: 1) prevent avoidable disasters and reduce the vulnerability of Cape Cape Girardeau Girardeau County residents to any disasters that may strike; 2) establish capabilities for protecting Yes County and its incor- citizens from the effects of disasters; 3) respond effectively to the actual occurrence of disasters; porated and 4) provide for recovery in the aftermath of any emergency involving extensive damage within communities. the County. All Hazard Mitigation The plan identifies the hazards that put the City of Cape Girardeau & Jackson at risk. The plan Plan, City of Cape assesses the existing level of mitigation efforts and capabilities of the community and it provides Yes Girardeau, Jackson additional recommendations for actions to reduce loss of life, property damage, business losses, and minimize recovery time. Cape Girardeau, Comprehensive Plans for the communities listed. Their goals are to conserve sufficient land to Jackson, and meet the needs of the communities during the planning period, provide a variety of housing to Pocahontas meet the needs of the residents, provide community facilities to meet the citizens’ needs, provide Yes a transportation system to safely channel traffic within the communities, and provide adequate recreational facilities for the citizens.
Chapter 4: Hazard Mitigation Program Page 147
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
4.3.2 Process for Identifying, Evaluating, Prioritizing, and Updating Mitigation Actions Projects in this plan were identified over years of mitigation planning in the county by various organizations and agencies. The nature of recent disasters has often dictated the project types and hazards addressed. In the 1990s, flooding emphasized the importance, and benefits of, floodplain maintenance, stream clearing and channelization, and levee maintenance and improvement. Tornado events in more recent years have shifted the local interest from flood projects to tornado safe rooms.
All of the mitigation actions have proven to be effective based on past experience. Some are more effective than others. Effectiveness is measured in general terms based on how well the project meets multiple objectives:
High - mitigates impacts to life safety and property Moderate - mitigates impacts to life safety only or property only
The county uses STAPLEE (social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic, and environmental) to rank mitigation actions:
STAPLEE is used as a screening tool to determine if the project makes sense and is worthy of consideration and implementation. During the 2016 update, HMPC members used STAPLEE to update the county’s mitigation goals and measures. New proposed mitigation actions developed during the planning process were presented and the HMPC were given the opportunity to review each action with the STAPLEE criteria in mind.
When several projects of the same type are considered for funding, the projects with the most direct mitigation of impacts to life safety are given top priority, in concurrence with this plan’s top goal.
During the 2016 plan update, the HMPC assessed existing actions and developed new actions for consideration based on the review of:
• Updated risk assessments; • Goals and objectives; • Existing local actions, including priorities; and • Local capabilities
No actions from the 2011 plan were deleted or deferred. Some actions' priority rankings were adjusted by the HMPC in light of recent hazard events, costs, benefits, and funding availability.
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 148
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
4.3.3 Mitigation Action Implementation Implementation of mitigation actions will be accomplished according to the overall mitigation strategy presented at the beginning of this chapter. Mitigation is implemented in the county, municipalities, and other jurisdictions through, but not limited to:
• Existing and future plans • Policies, procedures, and programs • Budgeting • County and municipality activities - e.g., safe rooms in schools • Partnering on federal, state, and local efforts and initiatives, including public-private partnerships • Monitoring of pre- and post-disaster opportunities
Cape Girardeau County’s primary planning tool is its Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which describes the short-term plan for all capital projects in the jurisdiction. Hazard mitigation actions have been and will continue to be included in the CIP when appropriate (i.e. for activities for capital projects). Also when appropriate, the actions and data of this plan have been and will be incorporated into the county’s Emergency Operations Plan and used to modify the floodplain ordinance. The county has no other planning vehicles in which to incorporate this plan.
Neither the city of Cape Girardeau nor Jackson has updated their comprehensive plan in the past 5 years. However, the city of Cape Girardeau is anticipating updating their 8 year old comprehensive plan within the next 5 years, and will incorporate this plan. When Jackson updates its comprehensive plan it will also incorporate this plan as needed. This plan will also be incorporated into both cities economic development plans when considering the economic impact of disasters.
The county and both communities are also a part of the Southeast Metropolitan Planning Organization (SEMPO); a multi-jurisdictional organization formed to handle regional transportation planning. The MPO develops both a long-range transportation plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), and a short- range project program, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Both of these documents incorporate this plan concerning transportation issues and projects related to hazards (primarily flooding).
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 149
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The school districts and the University all incorporate this plan into their CIPs, as well as their long- and/or short-range facilities plans. Additionally, the University is also a member of SEMPO. The levee district incorporates this plan into its own emergency response plans when appropriate, and its CIP as well.
Over the years, the county and/or municipalities have partnered in and/or supported many of the mitigation-related efforts of local, state, and federal agencies, businesses, educational institutions, and private associations. The following are some examples of these efforts:
• Flood detention/retention basin projects • Storm water management programs • River and creek cleanup efforts • Stream bank stabilization projects • Dam safety efforts • Wetlands protection efforts • Reduction of environmental damage • Historical areas and property documentations • protection of endangered species and wildlife • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ flood control programs • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Weather Radio All Hazards promotion • Automatic shutoff valves (gas and water) • Building codes • Bridge and highway retrofits and building to seismic design • U.S. Geological Survey and Department of Natural Resources soil mapping and seismic studies • Sanitation and disease prevention • U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development Community safety programs • Soil conservation and stabilization • American Red Cross volunteer programs • Homeland security programs • Disaster education in schools 4.3.4 Review and Progress of Mitigation Actions During the 2016 update to this plan, the status of mitigation actions implemented over the past five years was evaluated to ensure that the county and its municipalities are making progress with their mitigation strategy. Progress is measured based on the following variables:
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 150
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
The number of projects implemented over time The successful disbursement of mitigation grant funds over time The disaster losses avoided over time (given a post-disaster event) Plans, partnerships, and outreach developed over time
The number of projects that incorporate mitigation while meeting other community objectives, such as a floodplain buyout project that becomes a community park and natural area, is another measure of success. These are the kinds of projects that gain community buy-in for mitigation and do not need a disaster to demonstrate tangible benefits.
Another measure of progress is the achievement of mitigation on a day-to-day basis through activities of the local jurisdictions.
4.3.5 Challenges in Implementation In general, the county has been very successful in implementing mitigation projects. Funding, or lack thereof, has been the single biggest challenge in implementing mitigation projects in the county and municipalities.
Another challenge for the county and municipalities is that it is often difficult to garner the necessary amount of public support for mitigation actions until after a hazard event has occurred, leaving the jurisdictions in a more reactive state than a proactive one.
4.3.6 Mitigation Successes The county and municipalities have been successful at many mitigation measures, though most are ongoing actions that look to continuously improve upon current conditions. The county and cities have seen progress with efforts to educate the public about hazard response and mitigation with the continued support of local schools, employers, and media outlets.
The entire Regional Planning Commission’s seven county area, of which Cape Girardeau County is a part, has funded a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) department inside the RPC. This department is highly involved in the day-to-day planning efforts of the county, from comprehensive planning to key facilities inventories to hazard mitigation. As more data is collected and more local departments and agencies become active in the partnership the GIS department’s ability to assist in hazard mitigation planning will grow exponentially. Other successes include the construction of a safe room in the new Jackson Civic Center, flood buyouts in Cape Girardeau County (Dutchtown) and Jackson, the purchase of generators by multiple jurisdictions.
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 151
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CHAPTER 5: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS This chapter focuses on two aspects of the jurisdictions’ involvement in the plan maintenance process:
• Monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan • Monitoring progress of mitigation activities
As with the original 2016 update to the Hazard Mitigation Plan, the public will be invited to all annual meetings of the HMPC. The public will also be given notice of proposed changes to any part of the plan and will be provided the opportunity to view the proposed changes and comment on them prior to the Planning Committee’s approval or disapproval through postings at the county courthouse, city halls, social media, jurisdictions’ websites, and the RPC’s website. All meetings will continue to be conducted in accordance and compliance with all Missouri Sunshine Laws.
5.1 MONITORING, EVALUATING, AND UPDATING THE PLAN The current Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan is the result of the combined efforts of the HMPT, the HMPC, numerous agencies and departments of the county and municipalities, local businesses and organizations, and concerned citizens.
Hazard mitigation planning is a continuous and ongoing process. Policies and procedures established in this plan reflect the current emergency management and hazard mitigation philosophy at the local, state, and national level. Changes in hazard mitigation programs and/or priorities, including changes in legislation and available funding, may necessitate modifications to this plan. A major disaster could also necessitate modifications to this plan.
5.1.1 Plan Maintenance Process The following plan maintenance methodology was used for the maintenance of the previous plan and was found to be highly effective and is therefore being continued for the maintenance of this plan. During the maintenance process of the previous plan, the HMPC was reconvened on an as-needed basis by the County EMD.
The HMPC is the lead group responsible for developing, monitoring, and updating the Cape Girardeau County HMP. Update/review meetings of the HMPC are scheduled by the County EMD on an as-needed basis to review and update the plan. These meetings will be conducted at a minimum:
• In the event of a major disaster and/or upon receiving a presidential disaster declaration, if needed/warranted;
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 152
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• As part of the county’s hazard mitigation plan review/update every five years; and • When required/needed due to changes in federal/state regulations and/or legislation that impact the hazard mitigation program
In addition to these plan updates, the HMPT monitors the plan, its integration within local agencies and organizations, progress and setbacks in mitigation activities, and changes in legislation, regulations, and funding that could impact the plan. If the HMPT feels that the current environment has changed substantially enough to warrant review of the plan the team may suggest that a special meeting of the HMPC be called.
Representatives from the various agencies and departments on the HMPC are responsible for reviewing the plan and providing input and suggested changes based on the mitigation initiatives being undertaken by their respective organizations.
During updates, local agencies:
• Review hazard mitigation projects and initiatives to ensure there are no potential conflicts with ongoing agency initiatives, • Review hazard mitigation projects and initiatives to ensure they complement the existing mitigation strategy, and • Review existing state/federal programs to ensure that the county and municipalities are taking full advantage of possible funding sources in their implementation of the hazard mitigation program.
A review of plan goals and objectives is also emphasized as part of the regular plan review process. Additionally, proposed mitigation projects are reviewed to determine how they help local government meet their established goals and objectives.
Public involvement in the hazard mitigation process is accomplished through open public meetings as part of the development and review of local hazard mitigation plans.
5.2 MONITORING GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIVITIES The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee will be responsible for monitoring and updating the goals, objectives, and mitigation actions included in this plan. Each time the Committee meets according to the schedule in the previous section it will evaluate the appropriateness and status of all goals, objectives, and mitigation projects in the county while also proposing any additions to the plan’s vision and activities. In the interim, the HMPT will monitor mitigation activities within the county and report to the Committee its findings, as they relate to the county and municipalities’ goals, objectives, and actions, when necessary.
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 153
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Due to the distribution of maintenance responsibilities across all concerned parties there will be no additional staffing requirements for any government agency or department, private organization, or the RPC.
Individual agencies and organizations, through their representative on the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, are responsible for monitoring the plan for changes and needs as it relates to their group’s functions and for reporting any such developments to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team and/or the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee.
Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance Process Page 154
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
APPENDIX A: ADOPTION RESOLUTIONS
Page 155
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 156
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 157
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 158
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 159
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 160
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 161
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 162
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 163
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 164
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
APPENDIX B: MEETING DOCUMENTATION
Page 165
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan PUBLIC NOTICE
Cape Girardeau County and Participating Jurisdictions, along with the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission (SEMO RPC) are beginning the plan update process for the 2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan.
This process is open to the public.
Meeting notices will be posted at this location, the County Courthouse, participating jurisdictions City Halls/offices, at the SEMO RPC office, and on the RPC’s website: www.semorpc.org. Public participation is encouraged to help develop the best plan possible. All meetings are open to the public and any comments, concerns, ideas, or suggestions are welcome at any time during this plan update, regardless of meeting attendance. The draft plan can be found at: http://www.semorpc.org/hazard_mitigation_planning.html For more information or to provide comments or feedback on the draft, please contact: Drew Christian Director of Planning Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission 1 W. St. Joseph Street P.O. Box 366 Perryville, MO 63775 Phone: 573-547-8357 ext 315 Fax: 573-547-7283 [email protected] www.semorpc.org
Page 166
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan PUBLIC NOTICE Cape Girardeau County and Participating Jurisdictions, along with the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission (SEMO RPC), are holding a Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meeting for the 2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan on
Monday, August 17th, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. at the Workforce Development Board Office 760 S. Kingshighway, Suite C, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703.
This meeting is open to the public.
Public participation is encouraged to help develop the best plan possible. The draft plan can be found at: http://www.semorpc.org/hazard_mitigation_planning.html For more information or to provide comments or feedback on the draft, please contact: Drew Christian Director of Planning Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission 1 W. St. Joseph Street P.O. Box 366 Perryville, MO 63775 Phone: 573-547-8357 ext 315 Fax: 573-547-7283 [email protected] www.semorpc.org
Page 167
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan PUBLIC NOTICE Cape Girardeau County and Participating Jurisdictions, along with the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission (SEMO RPC), are holding a Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meeting for the 2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan on
Tuesday, September 15th, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. at the Workforce Development Board Office 760 S. Kingshighway, Suite C, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703.
This meeting is open to the public.
Public participation is encouraged to help develop the best plan possible. The draft plan can be found at: http://www.semorpc.org/hazard_mitigation_planning.html For more information or to provide comments or feedback on the draft, please contact: Drew Christian Director of Planning Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission 1 W. St. Joseph Street P.O. Box 366 Perryville, MO 63775 Phone: 573-547-8357 ext 315 Fax: 573-547-7283 [email protected] www.semorpc.org
Page 168
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan PUBLIC NOTICE Cape Girardeau County and Participating Jurisdictions, along with the Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission (SEMO RPC), are holding a Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meeting for the 2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan on
Friday, December 4th, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. at the Workforce Development Board Office 760 S. Kingshighway, Suite C, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703.
This meeting is open to the public.
Public participation is encouraged to help develop the best plan possible. The draft plan can be found at: http://www.semorpc.org/hazard_mitigation_planning.html For more information or to provide comments or feedback on the draft, please contact: Drew Christian Director of Planning Southeast Missouri Regional Planning Commission 1 W. St. Joseph Street P.O. Box 366 Perryville, MO 63775 Phone: 573-547-8357 ext 315 Fax: 573-547-7283 [email protected] www.semorpc.org
Page 169
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Example of meeting notice on website.
Page 170
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 171
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 172
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 173
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
APPENDIX C: STORM DATA
Page 174
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
All data in Appendix C sourced from the Nation Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Centers for Environmental Information’s (NCEI) Storm Events Database. Drought DAMAGE DAMAGE BEGIN EVENT DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS CZ NAME STR DATE TYPE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/15/1996 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/1/1998 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/1/1999 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/1/1999 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 10/1/1999 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 11/1/1999 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/1/1999 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/1/2002 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/1/2002 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/22/2004 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/5/2005 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/1/2005 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/1/2005 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/21/2007 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/1/2007 Drought 0 0 0 2050000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 10/1/2010 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 11/1/2010 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/1/2010 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/18/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/1/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/1/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/1/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/1/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 10/1/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 11/1/2012 Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 175
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Page 176
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Extreme Cold DAMAGE DAMAGE BEGIN DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS CZ NAME STR DATE EVENT TYPE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/2/1996 Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/10/1997 Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/12/2000 Extreme Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/1/2001 Extreme Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/23/2003 Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/23/2004 Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/15/2009 Extreme Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/5/2014 Cold/Wind Chill 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 177
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Extreme Heat DAMAGE DAMAGE BEGIN DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS CZ NAME STR DATE EVENT TYPE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/26/1997 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/1/1998 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/18/1998 Heat 0 3 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/1/1998 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/18/1999 Heat 1 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/7/2001 Heat 1 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/3/2002 Heat 0 2 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/10/2004 Heat 0 4 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/21/2005 Heat 2 10 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/19/2005 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/19/2006 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/1/2006 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/19/2006 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/6/2007 Heat 0 5 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/15/2007 Heat 1 2 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/2/2008 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/5/2008 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/19/2009 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/22/2009 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/26/2009 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/18/2010 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/20/2010 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/14/2010 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/20/2010 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/22/2010 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/29/2010 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/3/2010 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/9/2010 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/10/2011 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/19/2011 Excessive Heat 0 0 6000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/27/2011 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/31/2011 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/1/2011 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/3/2011 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 178
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/6/2011 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/28/2012 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/1/2012 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/17/2012 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/23/2012 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/31/2013 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 8/20/2014 Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 179
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Flooding DAMAGE DAMAGE BEGIN EVENT DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS CZ AME STR BEGIN LOCATION DATE TYPE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/5/1996 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 4/22/1996 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. MILLERSVILLE 4/28/1996 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/1/1996 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 5/10/1996 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/1/1996 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 6/12/1996 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. LEEMON 10/17/1996 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/24/1997 Flood 0 0 25000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/1/1997 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/1/1997 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/1/1997 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/1/1997 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 6/17/1997 Flash Flood 0 0 10000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 1/6/1998 Flood 0 0 5000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. BURFORDVILLE 2/17/1998 Flood 0 0 5000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/20/1998 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/3/1998 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/15/1998 Flash Flood 0 0 5000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/1/1998 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/19/1998 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/1/1998 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 1/21/1999 Flash Flood 0 0 20000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 1/22/1999 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 180
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/1/1999 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. WHITEWATER 4/3/1999 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/18/1999 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/1/1999 Flood 0 0 10000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/1/1999 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. OAK RIDGE 6/17/2000 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 6/17/2000 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/30/2000 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 7/1/2000 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/28/2001 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/1/2001 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/11/2001 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/6/2001 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/19/2001 Flash Flood 0 0 50000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 8/31/2001 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/16/2001 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. WHITEWATER 3/25/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 5/8/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/8/2002 Flood 0 0 100000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 5/12/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 300000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 5/16/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 15000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/1/2002 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/15/2002 Flood 0 0 0 5000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 12/18/2002 Flood 0 0 6000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 4/25/2003 Flash Flood 0 0 2000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 5/6/2003 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/11/2003 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 181
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
(ZONE) CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/9/2004 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/29/2004 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/1/2004 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 7/22/2004 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 8/4/2004 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/6/2005 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 4/12/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 50000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 7/19/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 10000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 11/15/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 200000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. MILLERSVILLE 11/28/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 3/9/2006 Flash Flood 0 0 30000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. OAK RIDGE 5/10/2006 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 8/11/2006 Flash Flood 0 0 10000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. COUNTYWIDE 8/27/2006 Flash Flood 0 0 100000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/10/2007 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 6/24/2007 Flash Flood 0 0 15000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 3/7/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. DAISY 3/18/2008 Flood 0 0 2800000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/19/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/1/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 4/3/2008 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/10/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/1/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/2/2008 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 6/6/2008 Flood 0 0 0 100000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/1/2008 Flood 0 0 0 100000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. EGYPT MILLS 7/30/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 8/1/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 9/16/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 9/19/2008 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/15/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/31/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/1/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/15/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 182
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/1/2009 Flood 0 0 0 20000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 6/18/2009 Flood 0 0 0 10000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 8/4/2009 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 9/6/2009 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. NASH 10/8/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. ORIOLE 10/30/2009 Flood 0 0 20000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 10/30/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 11/1/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 11/19/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 12/24/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 12/29/2009 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 1/26/2010 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 3/15/2010 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 4/1/2010 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 4/28/2010 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 5/1/2010 Flood 0 0 0 10000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 5/15/2010 Flood 0 0 0 20000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 6/12/2010 Flood 0 0 0 7000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/1/2010 Flood 0 0 0 4000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 8/1/2010 Flood 0 0 0 2000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 8/17/2010 Flood 0 0 0 1000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 2/27/2011 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 3/1/2011 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 4/20/2011 Flood 0 0 100000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. ALLENVILLE 4/24/2011 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/25/2011 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 (CGI)CAPE CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GIRARDEAU 5/1/2011 Flood 0 0 30000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 5/1/2011 Flood 0 0 1000000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 6/1/2011 Flood 0 0 20000 10000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/1/2011 Flood 0 0 3000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 3/14/2013 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/19/2013 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/19/2013 Flood 0 0 50000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 5/1/2013 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 5/31/2013 Flood 0 0 0 0 0 0 (CGI)CAPE CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GIRARDEAU 6/1/2013 Flood 0 0 100000 100000 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 6/17/2013 Flash Flood 0 0 200000 0 0 0
Page 183
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. NEW WELLS 12/21/2013 Flood 0 0 4000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. GULF JCT 7/8/2014 Flood 0 0 3000 0 0 0
Page 184
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Severe Thunderstorms (Wind and Rain) DAMAGE DAMAGE DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS LOCATION BEGIN DATE EVENT TYPE MAGNITUDE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/30/1997 High Wind 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 11/10/1998 High Wind 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/20/2000 High Wind 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/9/2002 High Wind 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/16/2003 Strong Wind 40 0 0 2000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 5/4/2003 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 6/11/2003 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 7/28/2003 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 8/30/2003 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 9/2/2003 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/22/2005 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 6/8/2005 Strong Wind 40 0 0 7000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 8/7/2005 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/25/2005 Strong Wind 40 0 0 3000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/8/2006 Strong Wind 41 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/19/2006 Strong Wind 28 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/16/2006 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 7/11/2006 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 10/27/2006 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 11/10/2006 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/1/2006 Strong Wind 28 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/11/2007 Strong Wind 27 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/22/2007 Strong Wind 41 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/29/2008 High Wind 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/17/2008 Strong Wind 43 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 5/11/2008 Strong Wind 46 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 6/26/2008 Heavy Rain 0 0 20000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 7/30/2008 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 8/22/2008 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 9/14/2008 High Wind 50 0 0 2000000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 12/9/2008 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/27/2008 Strong Wind 41 0 0 1000 0 0 0
Page 185
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/9/2009 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/11/2009 High Wind 50 0 0 10000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/8/2009 Strong Wind 37 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/24/2009 Strong Wind 37 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 5/27/2009 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 8/4/2009 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/9/2009 Strong Wind 38 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/24/2009 Strong Wind 45 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/6/2010 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 10/26/2010 Strong Wind 45 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 11/25/2010 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/3/2011 Strong Wind 42 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 6/18/2011 Heavy Rain 0 0 4000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 6/19/2011 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 9/24/2011 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 11/13/2011 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 12/3/2011 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/20/2012 Strong Wind 43 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. 1/12/2013 Heavy Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/29/2013 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 4/18/2013 Strong Wind 40 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 11/17/2013 Strong Wind 39 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/21/2014 Strong Wind 42 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/26/2014 Strong Wind 44 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/20/2014 Strong Wind 45 0 0 1000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/12/2014 Strong Wind 42 0 0 1000 0 0 0 TOTAL 58 0 0 2073000 0 0 0
Page 186
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Severe Thunderstorms (Hail)
DAMAGE DAMAGE DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS BEGIN LOCATION BEGIN DATE MAGNITUDE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT Fruitland 5/16/1995 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jackson 5/17/1995 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delta 5/18/1995 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delta 6/8/1995 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/28/1996 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 EGYPT MILLS 5/2/1996 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 6/12/1996 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEEMON 10/17/1996 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 DAISY 7/14/1997 0.88 0 0 3000 0 0 0 ORIOLE 7/14/1997 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/13/1998 1.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRIEDHEIM 5/21/1998 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEELYS LNDG 6/14/1998 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA 4/3/1999 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/3/1999 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA 2/18/2000 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 RANDLES 4/16/2000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/27/2000 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 5/23/2000 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 ARBOR 5/23/2000 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 6/14/2001 1.75 0 0 4000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/18/2001 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 POCAHONTAS 10/23/2001 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA 4/19/2002 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 GORDONVILLE 4/24/2002 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEELYS LNDG 4/30/2002 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 5/8/2002 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA 5/25/2002 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/25/2002 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 187
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
FRUITLAND 11/9/2002 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 4/24/2003 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAK RIDGE 4/29/2003 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 5/6/2003 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 5/6/2003 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUTCHTOWN 7/28/2003 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAK RIDGE 5/26/2004 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 7/22/2004 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALLENVILLE 10/18/2004 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 RANDLES 3/30/2005 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 4/12/2005 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 4/12/2005 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/13/2005 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAK RIDGE 6/13/2005 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEELYS LNDG 6/13/2005 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAK RIDGE 3/11/2006 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/11/2006 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/12/2006 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 4/2/2006 1.75 0 0 250000 0 0 0 JACKSON 4/30/2006 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 WHITEWATER 4/30/2006 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/25/2006 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 11/10/2006 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 6/24/2007 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEEMON 1/29/2008 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 1/29/2008 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEELYS LNDG 2/5/2008 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/27/2008 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA 3/27/2008 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 4/3/2008 1.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 9/19/2008 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/9/2009 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUTCHTOWN 4/7/2010 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 DAISY 7/30/2010 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 188
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/9/2011 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 4/15/2011 2.5 0 0 100000 0 0 0 JACKSON 4/27/2011 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 EGYPT MILLS 6/15/2011 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/2/2012 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 MILLERSVILLE 3/14/2012 1.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAK RIDGE 3/14/2012 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/15/2012 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA 3/23/2012 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/23/2012 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/23/2012 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/23/2012 2.5 0 0 10000 0 0 0 BURFORDVILLE 7/1/2012 1.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 7/1/2012 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 2/20/2014 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 4/3/2014 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRUITLAND 5/10/2014 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 8/19/2014 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 8/19/2014 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 3/25/2015 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/25/2015 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 84 0 0 367000 0 0 0
Page 189
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Severe Thunderstorms (Lightning) DAMAGE DAMAGE DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS LOCATION DATE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/2/2002 0 0 20000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 8/13/2002 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 4/25/2003 0 0 2000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/28/2003 0 0 0 0 0 0 JACKSON 7/30/2008 0 0 5000 0 0 0 ALLENVILLE 12/9/2008 0 0 10000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU 7/11/2009 0 0 10000 0 0 0 JACKSON 2/28/2011 0 0 5000 0 0 0 JACKSON 8/19/2014 0 0 10000 0 0 0 TOTAL 9 0 0 62000 0 0 0
Page 190
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Severe Winter Weather DAMAGE DAMAGE DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS CZ NAME STR BEGIN DATE EVENT TYPE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/2/1996 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/16/1996 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/8/1997 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/15/1997 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/1/1999 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/8/1999 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/13/1999 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/28/2000 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/13/2000 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/21/2001 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/18/2002 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/6/2002 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/4/2002 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/23/2002 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/16/2003 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/6/2003 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/16/2003 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/23/2003 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/25/2004 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/5/2004 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/22/2004 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/31/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/1/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/11/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 3000000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/21/2008 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/3/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 50000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/15/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/26/2009 Winter Storm 0 0 500000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 1/29/2010 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 1 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/25/2012 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/21/2013 Ice Storm 0 0 50000 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 12/5/2013 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 191
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 2/4/2014 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPE GIRARDEAU (ZONE) 3/2/2014 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 192
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Tornadoes DAMAGE DAMAGE BEGIN EVENT TOR F DEATHS INJURIES PROPERTY CROPS INJURIES DEATHS TOR TOR CZ NAME STR BEGIN LOCATION DATE TYPE SCALE DIRECT DIRECT NUM NUM INDIRECT INDIRECT LENGTH WIDTH CAPE GIRARDEAU AND SCOTT CO. Randles 5/18/1995 Tornado 0 0 70000 0 0 0 8 50 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. POCAHONTAS 4/15/1998 Tornado F0 0 0 10000 0 0 0 0.6 40 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. DUTCHTOWN 6/26/2000 Tornado F0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 30 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. FRUITLAND 11/9/2002 Tornado F0 0 0 25000 0 0 0 0.8 50 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. BURFORDVILLE 5/6/2003 Tornado F1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 50 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. JACKSON 5/6/2003 Tornado F3 0 2 12000000 0 0 0 2 50 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 5/6/2003 Tornado F1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 50 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CRUMP 4/24/2004 Tornado F2 0 0 10000 0 0 0 5.4 200 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. ORIOLE 1/29/2008 Tornado EF1 0 0 75000 0 0 0 2.61 200 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CRUMP 3/8/2009 Tornado EF1 0 0 70000 0 0 0 1.61 70 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. RANDLES 4/19/2011 Tornado EF0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0.1 40 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. SHAWNEETOWN 5/23/2011 Tornado EF0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0.48 40 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. NEELYS LNDG 5/25/2011 Tornado EF1 0 0 20000 0 0 0 2.13 250 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. KURREVILLE 2/29/2012 Tornado EF2 0 0 100000 0 0 0 5.33 120 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. OAK RIDGE 2/29/2012 Tornado EF2 0 1 150000 0 0 0 12.09 300 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU 3/23/2012 Tornado EF0 0 0 10000 0 0 0 0.25 50 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. NEELYS LNDG 3/23/2012 Tornado EF1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.57 300 CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. DELTA 1/29/2013 Tornado EF1 0 0 250000 0 0 0 5.45 100 CAPE GIRARDEAU JACKSON 1/29/2013 Tornado EF1 0 0 80000 0 0 0 6.79 100
Page 193
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
CO. CAPE GIRARDEAU CO. DUTCHTOWN 10/31/2013 Tornado EF1 0 0 130000 0 0 0 3.9 150
Page 194
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Wild Fires Acres Structures Structures Structures Date City Burnt Damaged Threatened Destroyed 2/13/2003 Jackson 5 0 0 0 4/13/2003 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/25/2003 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/31/2003 Hale 20 0 0 0 11/4/2003 Jackson 0 0 0 0 1/4/2004 Jackson 0 0 0 0 1/15/2004 Jackson 0 0 0 0 1/15/2004 Jackson 0 0 0 0 1/16/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.02 0 0 0 2/15/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 2/23/2004 Jackson 1 0 0 0 2/28/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.03 0 0 0 2/28/2004 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/2/2004 Cape Girardeau 2.5 0 0 0 3/2/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.25 0 0 0 3/7/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.5 0 0 0 3/7/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 3/11/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 4/2/2004 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 4/13/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 7/1/2004 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 7/4/2004 Cape Girardeau 0.5 0 0 0 7/27/2004 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 9/28/2004 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 9/28/2004 Cape Girardeau 2.5 0 0 0 9/28/2004 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 10/4/2004 Dexter 1 0 0 0 10/29/2004 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 2/18/2005 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 3/5/2005 Patton 150 0 0 0 3/13/2005 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/14/2005 Patton 0.1 0 0 0 3/18/2005 Patton 0.1 0 0 0
Page 195
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
3/18/2005 Patton 0.1 0 0 0 4/5/2005 Patton 0.1 0 0 0 6/2/2005 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 6/3/2005 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 6/15/2005 Patton 4 0 0 0 6/19/2005 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 7/2/2005 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/9/2005 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 9/4/2005 Jackson 0 0 0 0 9/10/2005 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 9/13/2005 Jackson 0 0 0 0 10/3/2005 Jackson 0 0 0 0 11/8/2005 Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 11/11/2005 Jackson 0 0 0 0 11/14/2005 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/19/2005 Jackson 0 0 0 0 12/19/2005 Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 1/8/2006 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 1/15/2006 Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 2/26/2006 Cape Girardeau 3 0 0 0 3/2/2006 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 3/3/2006 Cape Girardeau 2 0 0 0 4/1/2006 Cape Girardeau 3 0 0 0 4/6/2006 Bell City 0.1 0 0 0 5/17/2006 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/13/2006 Jackson 1 0 0 0 8/6/2006 Jackson 1 0 0 0 8/19/2006 Jackson 1 0 0 0 9/15/2006 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 11/3/2006 Cape Girardeau 1.5 0 0 0 11/9/2006 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 11/23/2006 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 11/24/2006 Cape Girardeau 10 0 0 0 12/3/2006 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/9/2006 crump 10 0 0 0 12/9/2006 Cape Girardeau 5 0 0 0
Page 196
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
12/10/2006 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 1/19/2007 County Road 472 0.1 0 0 0 2/4/2007 County Road 506 2.5 0 0 0 2/7/2007 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 2/10/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 2/11/2007 Jackson 0.5 0 0 0 2/20/2007 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 3/4/2007 County Road 370 1 0 0 0 3/4/2007 Crupp 10 0 0 0 3/6/2007 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 3/6/2007 Jackson 12 0 1 0 3/26/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/26/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/26/2007 Cape Girardeau 5 0 0 0 3/27/2007 Millersville 1 0 0 0 4/22/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 4/28/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/16/2007 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 6/20/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/21/2007 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 7/4/2007 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 8/27/2007 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 9/16/2007 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 11/6/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/7/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/20/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/1/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/21/2007 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/28/2008 Bell City 0.1 0 0 0 3/2/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/21/2008 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 3/24/2008 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 4/16/2008 Bell city 3 0 0 0 5/1/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 5/1/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/1/2008 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0
Page 197
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
6/23/2008 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 6/23/2008 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 7/7/2008 Jackson 0.5 0 0 0 8/25/2008 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 9/14/2008 Cape Girardeau 0.1 0 0 0 9/26/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/5/2008 delta 1 0 0 0 11/19/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/19/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/19/2008 delta 0.2 0 0 0 11/23/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/29/2008 Cape Girardeau 0.5 0 1 0 12/6/2008 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/20/2008 Jackson 0.5 0 0 0 1/1/2009 delta 0.25 0 0 0 1/14/2009 delta 13.5 0 1 0 1/19/2009 delta 2 0 0 0 1/24/2009 Millersville 1 0 0 0 2/24/2009 Jackson 1 0 0 0 2/26/2009 Cape Girardeau 3 0 1 0 3/2/2009 Cape Girardeau 0.01 0 0 0 3/6/2009 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/6/2009 Millersville 3 0 0 0 3/8/2009 Freidheim 0.5 0 0 0 3/13/2009 Jackson 1 0 0 0 Camden Line Rd., 3/18/2009 Camdenton 300 0 6 0 3/19/2009 Oak Ridge 80 0 0 0 3/21/2009 Millersville 0.5 0 0 0 3/22/2009 millerville 160 0 0 0 3/22/2009 Millersville 20 0 0 0 3/22/2009 Millersville 50 0 0 0 3/22/2009 Millersville 20 0 0 0 3/26/2009 Millersville 1 0 0 0 4/4/2009 Friedheim 0.5 0 0 0 4/24/2009 Daisy 15 0 0 0
Page 198
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
5/11/2009 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/2/2009 Jackson 5 0 0 0 7/10/2009 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/23/2009 Jackson 1 0 0 0 8/14/2009 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 8/14/2009 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 9/17/2009 whitewater 5 0 0 0 9/27/2009 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 9/28/2009 Millersville 110 0 0 0 10/4/2009 Cape Girardeau 0.01 0 0 0 10/25/2009 Millersville 4 0 0 0 10/25/2009 Oak Ridge 0.1 0 0 0 11/1/2009 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 11/7/2009 whitewater 10 0 2 0 11/10/2009 Cape Girardeau 3 0 1 0 11/11/2009 Cape Girardeau 7 0 0 0 11/11/2009 delta 5 0 0 0 1/29/2010 Jackson, MO 1 0 0 0 2/20/2010 Jackson 2 0 0 0 2/20/2010 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 3/6/2010 delta 0.3 0 0 0 3/8/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/8/2010 delta 0.1 0 0 0 3/11/2010 whitewater 2 0 0 0 4/2/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 4/14/2010 Delta 70 0 0 0 4/22/2010 whitewater 1 0 0 0 6/26/2010 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 6/26/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/2/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/2/2010 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 7/4/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/17/2010 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 8/12/2010 Oak Ridge 0.1 0 0 0 8/17/2010 delta 5 0 0 0 8/31/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 1
Page 199
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
9/11/2010 Jackson, MO 1 0 0 0 9/18/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 9/20/2010 Dutchtown 2 0 2 0 9/29/2010 delta 0.3 0 0 0 10/6/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/10/2010 Tilsit 2 0 0 0 10/15/2010 delta 10 0 1 0 10/23/2010 Old Appleton 0.1 0 0 0 10/24/2010 Oak Ridge 30 0 0 0 10/26/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/26/2010 jackson 1 0 0 0 10/27/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/27/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/31/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/1/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/5/2010 Cape Girardeau 3 0 0 0 11/6/2010 Freidheim 0.5 0 0 0 11/6/2010 Oak Ridge 5 0 0 0 11/8/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/8/2010 Delta 1.5 0 1 0 11/8/2010 delta 10 0 1 0 11/8/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/9/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/9/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/9/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/11/2010 Oak Ridge 0.1 0 0 0 11/11/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/11/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/11/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/11/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/12/2010 Fruitland 6 0 1 0 11/12/2010 Jackson 20 0 1 0 11/13/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/14/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/14/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/14/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0
Page 200
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
11/15/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/20/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/23/2010 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/4/2011 Cape Girardeau 0.5 0 1 0 1/6/2011 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 1/8/2011 Oak Ridge 1.5 0 0 0 1/8/2011 White wtaer 5 0 0 0 1/9/2011 delta 1 0 0 0 1/15/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/15/2011 Cape Girardeau 0.25 0 1 0 1/16/2011 Friedheim 0.5 0 1 0 1/27/2011 Oak Ridge 2 0 0 0 1/28/2011 Old Appleton 1.5 0 0 0 1/29/2011 Oak Ridge 1 0 1 0 2/14/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 2/16/2011 Jackson 2 0 2 1 2/17/2011 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 2/18/2011 Friedheim 20 0 1 0 2/22/2011 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 3/7/2011 Oak Ridge 20 0 0 0 3/11/2011 Oak Ridge 0.75 0 0 0 3/12/2011 Friedheim 4 0 0 0 3/17/2011 Whitewater 3 0 0 0 3/19/2011 Shawneetown 8 0 0 0 3/20/2011 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 3/20/2011 Friedheim 7 0 0 0 3/20/2011 Jackson 10 0 0 0 3/23/2011 Jackson 25 0 0 0 4/1/2011 Pocahontas 1 0 0 0 4/2/2011 Whitewater 6 0 0 0 4/2/2011 Fruitland 15 0 0 0 4/2/2011 Fruitland 10 0 0 0 4/3/2011 Jackson 59 0 1 0 4/3/2011 Neelys Landing 75 0 2 1 4/3/2011 Cape Girardeau 0.5 0 0 0 4/3/2011 Fruitland 50 2 5 1
Page 201
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
4/3/2011 JACKSON 60 0 0 0 4/3/2011 Apple Creek 50 0 0 2 4/3/2011 Apple Creek 50 0 0 2 4/3/2011 FRUITLAND 50 0 0 0 4/3/2011 Fruitland 25 0 4 2 4/3/2011 Pocahontas 5 0 0 0 4/3/2011 New Wells 60 0 0 0 4/3/2011 Jackson 15 0 0 0 4/3/2011 FRUITLAND 70 0 0 0 4/6/2011 Delta 1 0 0 0 5/30/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 5/30/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/3/2011 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 6/4/2011 Cape Girardeau 0.75 0 0 0 6/13/2011 Tilsit 5 0 0 0 6/16/2011 Burfordville 3 0 0 0 6/26/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 9/1/2011 Daisy 1 0 0 0 10/11/2011 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 10/20/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/20/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/22/2011 Cape Girardeau 2 0 0 0 12/1/2011 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/7/2012 Tilsit 2 0 0 0 1/8/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/24/2012 Delta 5 0 0 0 1/29/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/31/2012 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 2/28/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 2/29/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/10/2012 jACKSON 1 0 0 0 3/28/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 5/28/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 5/30/2012 Oak Ridge 1 0 0 0 6/3/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/7/2012 Old Appleton 1 0 0 0
Page 202
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
6/25/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/27/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/27/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 6/28/2012 Gordonville 3 0 0 0 7/2/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 7/3/2012 Oak Ridge 2.5 0 0 0 7/5/2012 Gordonville 3 0 2 0 7/15/2012 Oak Ridge 0.25 0 0 0 8/18/2012 Oak Ridge 0.1 0 0 0 8/22/2012 Millersville 7 0 0 0 8/22/2012 Millersville 5 0 0 0 8/22/2012 fulton 1 1 0 0 8/22/2012 Millersville 5 0 0 0 8/28/2012 Daisy 1.5 0 0 0 9/19/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 9/19/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 9/22/2012 Oak Ridge 3 0 0 0 9/30/2012 jackson 1 0 0 0 9/30/2012 jackson 1 0 0 0 10/28/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/10/2012 Oak Ridge 0.5 0 0 0 11/10/2012 Gordonville 2 0 0 0 11/22/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 12/1/2012 Jackson 1 0 0 0 2/11/2013 cape girardeau 0.5 0 0 0 3/7/2013 Friedheim 100 0 0 0 3/9/2013 Fruitland 2 0 0 0 3/21/2013 fruitland 1.75 0 0 0 3/31/2013 Fruitland 0.25 0 0 0 4/4/2013 Jackson 1.5 0 0 0 4/6/2013 Jackson 1 0 0 0 4/6/2013 Whitewater 8 0 0 0 5/24/2013 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 6/20/2013 cape girardeau 0.25 0 0 0 6/21/2013 Fruitland 0.5 0 0 0 8/15/2013 cape girardeau 1.5 0 0 0
Page 203
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
11/4/2013 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/13/2013 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 11/13/2013 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 11/16/2013 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/20/2013 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/13/2014 Jackson 1 0 0 0 1/17/2014 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 1/18/2014 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 1/24/2014 Jackson 0.1 0 1 0 1/26/2014 Friedheim 85 0 0 0 1/26/2014 Oak Ridge 4.5 0 0 0 2/15/2014 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 2/19/2014 Jackson 1 0 1 0 2/22/2014 Whitewater 8 0 2 0 2/24/2014 Oak Ridge 1.7 0 0 0 2/28/2014 Jackson 0.2 0 1 0 3/1/2014 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 3/15/2014 jackson 0.1 0 0 0 3/15/2014 Burforfordsville 6 0 2 0 3/15/2014 Gordonville 3 0 1 0 3/21/2014 Friedheim 2 0 0 0 3/21/2014 Friedheim 5 0 0 0 3/26/2014 Jackson 0.3 0 0 0 4/1/2014 Gordonville 1 0 2 0 4/12/2014 Old Appleton 0.5 0 0 0 4/17/2014 Friedheim 0.5 0 0 0 4/17/2014 Gordonville 5 0 0 0 4/18/2014 Old Appleton 0.5 0 0 0 4/19/2014 Oak Ridge 0.5 0 0 0 5/3/2014 Oak Ridge 1 0 0 0 6/4/2014 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 6/16/2014 Jackson 1 0 0 0 9/28/2014 Shawneetown 1 0 0 0 11/14/2014 Oak Ridge 0.5 0 0 0 11/14/2014 Shawneetown 1 0 0 0 11/21/2014 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0
Page 204
2016 Cape Girardeau County Hazard Mitigation Plan
12/13/2014 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 2/13/2015 Cape Girardeau 10 0 2 0 2/14/2015 Jackson 8 0 2 0 2/24/2015 Gordonville, Mo 1 0 0 0 3/23/2015 Jackson 1 0 0 0 3/31/2015 Gordonville 1 0 0 0 4/1/2015 Jackson 0.1 0 0 0 7/15/2015 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 8/10/2015 Jackson 0.01 0 0 0 8/21/2015 Friedheim 0.02 0 0 0 9/24/2015 Gordonville 1 0 1 0 10/15/2015 Oak Ridge. MO 80 0 0 0 10/15/2015 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/16/2015 Shaawneetown 12 0 0 0 10/17/2015 Jackson 1 0 0 0 10/20/2015 Whitewater 3 1 7 0 10/30/2015 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/9/2015 Daisy 40 0 0 0 11/10/2015 Whitewater 5 0 4 0 11/13/2015 Gordonville 60 1 4 0 11/14/2015 Jackson 1 0 0 0 11/14/2015 Jackson 2 0 2 1 12/8/2015 Jackson 1 0 0 0 Total 379 2619.12 5 73 11
Page 205