IMPORTANT NOTICE:
The information in this PDF file is subject to Trans Tasman’s full copyright and entitlements as defined and protected by international law. The contents of the file are for the sole use of the addressee. All content in this file is owned and operated by Trans Tasman Media Ltd, and the copying or distribution of this file, internally or externally, is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission and consent of Trans Tasman Media Ltd.
2016 New Zealand Government Departments Review
Please be aware that unauthorised photocopying, faxing and scanning or any other distribution of our newsletters constitutes copyright infringement is illegal and subject to fines up to $100,000.
TERMS & CONDITIONS OF YOUR MULTI-USER ELECTRONIC SUBSCRIPTION
As you have purchased a multi-user site licence for The 2016 New Zealand Government Department Review, under the terms of the agreement you may distribute it to as many people within your organisation as you wish.
However, it is not to be forwarded to any other outside individual, business or entity.
Coded Document - 7TH EDITION -
7th Annual Analysis Of The Inner Workings Of The NZ Bureaucracy A Trans Tasman Briefing Review New Zealand Government Departments
- People And Policy -
An Analysis Of The Inner Workings Of The NZ Bureaucracy
2016 Edition
Published by Trans Tasman Media Limited PO Box 2197, Christchurch New Zealand Ph: 64 3 365 3891 Fax: 64 3 365 3894 Website: www.transtasman.co.nz Email: [email protected] ISSN 2253-4970 (Print) ISSN 2253-4989 (Online) Researched and Written by The Trans Tasman Editors and Senior Writers
ISBN 978-0-9864617-3-6
Copyright 2016 Trans Tasman Media Ltd
Released June 2016. COPYRIGHT ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed.
1 Table Of Contents
Introduction - Everything Hinges On The New SSC Boss 4 Letter From The Editor 8 Independent Board Of Advisers 2016 9 The Questionnaire 10 The Rankings 18 Top 10s 20 Board Of Adviser’s General Comments 22 How Good Is The Minister? 23 The Board Of Independent Adviser’s Comments 24 CEO Of The Year - Peter Hughes [Ministry of Education] 28 Department Of The Year - Accident Compensation Corporation 29 Government Departments - Explanatory Notes 30 Accident Compensation Corporation 31 Crown Law Office 34 Department Of Conservation 36 Department Of Corrections 39 Department Of Internal Affairs 42 Department Of The Prime Minister And Cabinet 45 Earthquake Commission 49 Education Review Office 52 Government Communications Security Bureau & SIS 55 Inland Revenue Department 59 Land Information New Zealand 63 Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) 66 Housing New Zealand Corporation 70 Ministry For Culture And Heritage 73 Ministry of Defence and NZ Defence Force 76 Ministry Of Education 80 Ministry For The Environment 84 Environmental Protection Authority 88
2 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Ministry Of Foreign Affairs And Trade 90 Ministry Of Health 94 Ministry Of Justice 98 Ministry Of Maori Development/Te Puni Kokiri 100 Ministry Of Pacific Peoples 102 Ministry for Primary Industries 104 Ministry Of Social Development 108 Ministry Of Transport 111 Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand 115 Maritime New Zealand 116 Transport Accident Investigation Commission 117 Airways Corporation 118 Ministry Of Women’s Affairs 120 New Zealand Customs Service 123 New Zealand Trade And Enterprise 126 New Zealand Transport Agency 129 New Zealand Police 132 Offices Of Parliament 136 Reserve Bank Of New Zealand 147 Serious Fraud Office 150 State Services Commission 153 Statistics New Zealand 157 Tertiary Education Commission 160 The Treasury 163 WorkSafe New Zealand 167 Rising Stars: Some Officials To Keep An Eye On 170 CEO Salaries 171 Budget - Total Appropriations for Each Vote* 173 Staff - (FTEs) 175
3 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Introduction - Everything Hinges On The New SSC Boss
How much rests on the broad shoulders of Peter Hughes, State Services Commissioner-designate, taking up his role on July 4. It’s Independence Day in the United States but it’s also a metaphor for how much the public service – and the Government – is looking for a new way forward. It would be fair to say parts of the public service have been in something of a hiatus in recent years with neither Ministers nor CEOs expressing unalloyed joy with the outgoing Commissioner Iain Rennie. Is this unfair? Possibly, but it is one of the consequences of having someone in a CEO slot for eight years. Given the political cycle and churn, it must be difficult to innovate after such time. Forward or back, you’re damned. However, there is a developing sense around Wellington and among some Ministers even Hughes confronts a nuclear option: either he lifts the performance of the State Services Commission - or it will be folded into the ever-expanding Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet. One of the problems for Rennie is his position has been the focal point for Ministers frustrated by slow progress and departments pushing back at the change he tried to oversee. The Commissioner’s job can be likened to the chief herder of cats – very clever and stubborn cats. Continuity is one thing but unless carefully managed and nuanced, it can be limiting. If there is a single element emerging from our survey of the public sector, it is the need for fresh enthusiasm from the top. “Let’s engage with new thinking and see how it can mesh with the Government’s intention” is a common theme. To be sure there is frustration in some parts with the Government’s Better Public Services initiatives - but there is also a willingness among the sharper CEOs to get on with the work which underpins the Government’s objectives. There is also recognition with Finance Minister Bill English and now Associate Paula Bennett, there are two individuals who are determined to energise, refresh, innovate and make the differences which matter. It helps English has an intimate comprehension of the how the machinery of Government should work. Not change, in the sense of lumping together departments as in the brutal construct of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Enterprise, or even the Ministry of Primary Production, now the driver from Ministers is co-operation and sharing. Law changes to allow greater cross departmental work and organisation have had little impact so far. However the tools are there to be used. Progress has been made in cross-agency work in a number of sectors, but many still find it difficult. An energetic private-enterpriser might make a fortune in demolishing silos. Crucially English and Bennett are also willing to allow the public sector to take risks and even fail in trying to tackle NZ’s most difficult problems, especially when past way of doing things have had little impact. This is probably one of the biggest mind shifts needed in a sector which is risk averse and where change risks failure. The caution is understandable, no one likes bad headlines and there is a lot at stake financially. Government remains big business, accounting for 25% of GDP. At current count there are 28 departments, 22 Crown agencies, 20 district health boards, 16 autonomous Crown entities, 17 independent Crown entities, 11 Crown entities and 7 Crown research institutes, 150 Crown entity subsidiaries, 2416 school boards of trustees, eight universities, 18 polytechnics and institutes of technology, three wananga, the Reserve Bank, the Offices of Parliament, 14 State owned enterprises and three mixed ownership model companies in the energy sector.
4 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. The most recent employment statistics (June 2015 year) indicate there are 45,438 full time equivalent people in the public sector. FTEs rose slightly by 0.1%. Over the same period, the size of the State sector increased by 0.6%, health sector by 2.4%, education sector by 3.0%, total public sector by 0.8% and the private sector by 3.4%. There was little change in the regional distribution of Public Service employees in 2015. Wellington region remains the largest share with 41.1% down slightly from 41.4% in 2014 followed by Auckland at 20.2%, Canterbury at 9.7% and Waikato with 8.4%. If there is one portfolio which will mark the present Government, it is Social Welfare under Minister Anne Tolley. The Dame Paula Rebstock report on the future of child welfare is one of those which appears only once in decades. It’s most recent equivalent would be the late Justice Sir Owen Woodhouse’s monumental Royal Commission 1967 inquiry into accident compensation. Rebstock proposes a new way forward: follow the child. Minister Tolley has appointed four new independents to the Vulnerable Children’s Board to help support the overhaul of the care and protection system. They are Dame Paula, who will chair the reconfigured Board, Peter Douglas, Dame Diane Robertson and Geoff Dangerfield. They join the current members, who are the chief executives of MSD, Health, Education, Police, Corrections, TPK and Justice. As Finance Minister Bill English put it recently, the emphasis is on the Government’s programme of Social Investment, where the goal is to make sure the baseline spend addresses the drivers of social dysfunction, rather than simply servicing misery. Instead of passively paying a sickness benefit for 40 years, for example, the Government wants to take steps to intervene now to help vulnerable New Zealanders get a job, lead a better life, and save the Government money in the long run. It’s about using data and investment techniques to understand how to change a life. In the Ministry of Social Development, for example, all the funding to support people from welfare into work, $700m per year, has been pooled together to allow the Ministry to channel it to where it will be most useful. This approach has been successful – the latest figures show the welfare system’s future lifetime cost has reduced by $12bn over the last four years as a result of Government actions, or the equivalent of 60,000 people each spending 15 years less on a benefit, compared to pre-reform expectations. English says the Government welcomes the accountability that goes with being measured publicly on results, for example through the Better Public Services targets which, he says, is unique in the developed world. It also welcome’s the public’s rising expectation we the government will use their money effectively. Data sharing is an essential part of this. He says “to understand what works, we the Government need to know what services went to whom, something we don’t yet know. We need to know whether those interventions changed outcomes, what worked and by how much.” Things English says we’re only starting to see now. He argues if the Government can understand the long term fiscal and social consequences of those changes, it can use the information to decide where to invest next for better measurement, evaluation and feedback. Services which take the time and efforts of vulnerable individuals and families for no improvement in outcomes reduce resilience and perpetuate the hardship cycle. While stopping services which don’t work will free up resources, the process is not an easy one, the first steps of Whanau Ora showed this. One reason to stop things which don’t work is it saves Government effort and tax payers’ money.
5 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. A better reason to stop things which don’t work is because it wastes the time, effort and resilience of those for whom we are trying to help. All too often, officials tell English there isn’t the capability outside the public service to make better use of data to show impact. He disagrees and says the perception is certainly changing within the public service. Capability is going to lift. Government departments hold enormous stores of information directly relevant to understanding what services work. All too often this information sits in silos within departments. It is often difficult and sometimes impossible to access. There are also problems with using this information. For instance, there are ethical issues around profiling and privacy concerns around the misuse of data, all areas which set off alarm bells in the risk adverse private sector. The greater use of information in the social sector flows through to financial management. The Crown manages over $263bn in assets and almost $184bn in liabilities. In any year it spends around $73bn and generates revenue of a similar amount. Secretary to the Treasury Gabriel Makhlouf says for Government, money is a means to an end. The “end” being to raise living standards for New Zealanders. As well as managing significant and valuable assets, Government has a role as a regulator and responsibility for delivery of a range of services. The stewardship role the Government plays requires a high degree of trust. Maintaining trust depends on being transparent. In relation to being transparent about the state of the nation’s finance, the most recent global survey on Open Budgeting, New Zealand ranked first out of the 102 countries surveyed. Owning the right assets such as schools, hospitals, roads, IT, managing them well, funding their maintenance sustainably, and managing risks to the Crown’s balance sheet are all critical to the ongoing provision of high-quality, cost-effective public services. He says a modern and trusted state sector, one able to operate effectively in these changing times is crucial to improving outcomes for the people we the Government serves. As a sector the public service must deliver value, and the policy advice it makes to the Government underpins this. In the cut and thrust of front line delivery, this might seem somewhat theoretical and removed from likely coal face realities. In the past, the policy making world has had some degree of separation, in tangible and intangible ways. The State Sector has always known the advice given to the Government cannot be made in a vacuum. There will always be trade-offs and the need to balance specific needs with national impacts. Local Government rules, regulations and services also have a direct impact on communities and businesses. Makhlouf says the public service is using data to innovate how Government works, to understand and manage risk, and to make better-informed decisions. Government agencies like the Department of Internal Affairs are trying to seize the opportunity digital delivery offers by getting easily usable services out to those who need them, in a way which makes it easy for them to use. The ability to accurately measure the effectiveness of Government spending is a fundamental part of transparency. Within the Treasury there is a dedicated Government Investment Portfolio team focused on increasing accountability through greater transparency. The production of the Treasury’s Investment Statement in 2014 which details the Crown’s balance sheet shows line by line what assets the Government’s assets holds. The number of schools, recreational facilities, reserves - everything - is publicly available for anyone to look at.
6 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Last year Treasury released the first annual report providing a snapshot of the Government’s overall investment programme, covering 409 projects such as ICT, new schools, Defence projects and construction with a total annual cost of $6bn. Treasury also released the first tri-annual Major Projects Performance Report, providing a comprehensive update on the 38 most complex of those 409 investment projects, and tracking whether they are delivering on expectations. This has not been a comfortable process with many resenting the public exposure of risk and Treasury’s assessment of this, most notably in Gerry Brownlee’s rejection of Treasury’s views on progress in rebuilding Christchurch. Likewise the impact of four year plans is growing throughout departments. At first many ignored them or paid lip service. But the discipline of being told there is little chance of new money without a credible and viable four year plan is taking hold. The Administrative and Support Services Benchmarking report also provides performance information across agencies and gives transparency over a significant area of expenditure. The benchmarking reports are an important step towards transparency and scrutiny of costs in the public sector. There is a new mantra in the public service: do it with us - not to us. As Makhlouf points out, the State Sector doesn’t always know best. Talking with, and more importantly listening to, a range of people is important - and fundamental to building trust. He says Government services are often complex, fragmented and sometimes hard to navigate. Businesses find it takes more effort to deal with Government than it should. The Better for Business partnership is changing this as part of the Government’s Better Public Services programme. However, there remain problems with new technology which is disrupting many businesses and changing everyday life. The public sector and the laws they work under are not known for their nimbleness. Businesses which fail to adapt go under, whereas departments have a steady flow of funding despite performance, this makes the public sector slow to change. There is no greater example of this than Inland Revenue being unable to implement policy changes because its technology cannot cope with change. This is being addressed through the massive upgrade planned, however smaller examples exist throughout the public service. The times, they are changing.
Max Bowden, Editor-in-Chief Ian Templeton, Senior Editor
Brian Lockstone, Senior Writer Tony Doe, Research Analyst Numerous other Trans Tasman contributors were involved in compiling this report.
7 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Letter From The Editor
DEAR CLIENT, Welcome to the 7th annual edition of Trans Tasman’s look at the workings of the Ministries, Government Departments and Agencies. As always the Ministries, Departments and Agencies are reviewed by some of the country’s best political writers, as well as being ranked on “real world” criteria by an Independent Board of Advisers. The Board of Advisers also nominates the civil service “rising stars.” The top Department and CEO of the year are arrived at by tallying the scores given to individual Departments and CEOs by the members of the Board. The rankings are based on results of a questionnaire published here. The Trans Tasman Editorial team and the Independent Board of Advisers have no contact with regard to the content of the publication. This year’s publication looks at the significance to the state sector of the departure of Iain Rennie as State Service Commissioner and his replacement by one of the Board of Adviser’s favourites, Peter Hughes. The arrival of such a popular and well respected public servant in the top job is sure to have a significant impact, as will the departure of Rennie, whose credibility had been steadily slipping away. The National Party has had its feet firmly under the Treasury benches for another year, and a better public service is still its aim. How well it has achieved this so far, and what changes are needed if it feels it is failing are examined in this Review.
Max Bowden Publisher/Editor in Chief The Trans Tasman Political Alert [email protected]
8 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Independent Board Of Advisers 2016 s Annabel Young Board Of Advisers Shipping Federation Explanation s David Farrar Some of our regular advisers are back Kiwi Blog to add their comments this year, and they’re joined by some new faces as well. s Bruce Robertson Director/Consultant The members of this Board come from a variety of sectors and organisations s Charles Finny which “use” the Government Saunders Unsworth Departments, Ministries and Agencies on a regular basis as customers rather s Malcolm Alexander than politicians. Local Government New Zealand Members of the Board of Advisers s Mai Chen are leaders in fields such as business Chen Palmer consultancy, lobbying, accounctancy, the trade union movement, education, s Ken Shirley Road Transport Forum hospitality, and social services. They are highly placed individuals who have an s Katherine Rich inside knowledge of the workings of Food and Grocery Council the state sector and first hand dealings s Fa’amatuainu Tino Pereira with those who run these powerful Niu Vision Group Government organisations. s Mark Unsworth In order to determine how they relate to and interact with Government Saunders Unsworth Departments we asked them to answer s Tracy Watkins a questionnaire and provide individual Fairfax Media comments, which are published in this Review. s John Milford Wellington Employers Chamber of Commerce s Alistair Shaw New Zealand Union of Students’ Associations s Graeme Peters Electricity Networks Association NOTES s Chris Roberts The Board of Advisers worked Tourism Industry Aotearoa independently of each other with no knowledge of who the other s Kim Campbell contributors were. Advisers who EMA Northern believed they may have a conflict of interest were managed appropriately. Some Advisers worked with colleagues presenting a combined ranking score. Advisers confined their answers to the areas they had knowledge of.
9 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. The Questionnaire
Once members of the Independent Board Of Advisers accept their invitation to take part, they are emailed a link to the questionnaire. This gives them the opportunity to give each Department a numerical ranking out of seven over four categories. The results of these rankings are used to determine the CEO and Department of the Year. They are also asked for additional comments, which are published later in this report, but are not attributed to any individual. The questionnaire is reproduced below.
KEYWORD SEARCH For electronic users of this document please make use of the Keyword Search function at the top of your PDF browser.
10 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Copy of Government Agencies 2016
1. Survey ranking
1. To ensure that the review is objective we have invited 20 opinion leaders to form an independent board of advisers.
This survey asks you, as one of the independent board of advisers to rank the performance of various Government Departments. Your ratings will remain confidential and any comments will be non attributable.
The survey should take no longer than 40 minutes.
This is the fifth year of the review All core state agencies are listed, with the name of their current chief executive in brackets.
Please rank each agency on a 1 to 7 scale with 1 indicating "consistently under-performs", a 4 "does a satisfactory job" and a 7 "consistently exceeds expectations".
If you do not feel able to rate an agency on the individual criteria, you can just rate it on the overall performance. It will be useful to get as many detailed rankings as possible though.
You do not have to answer each question if you do not have the necessary facts. However, please feel free to liaise with any business colleague who could assist you.
Note that you do not have to click on the drop down menu in each box. You can just type a number from 1 to 7 and then hit TAB to go to the next box.
Budget Performance of the Performance/Value Quality of Service Overall Performance Chief Executive for Money Delivery of the Agency
Accident Compensation Corporation (Scott Pickering)
Ministry of Primary Industries (Martyn Dunne)
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (David Smol)
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (John Ombler, Acting)
Department of Conservation (Lou Sanson)
Department of Corrections (Ray Smith)
Crown Law Office (Una Jagose appointed February)
11 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Budget Performance of the Performance/Value Quality of Service Overall Performance Chief Executive for Money Delivery of the Agency
Ministry for Culture and Heritage (Paul James)
New ealand Customs Service (Carolyn Tremain)
Ministry of Defence (Helene Quilter)
Ministry of Education (Peter Hughes)
Education Review Office (Iona Holsted)
Ministry for the Environment (Vicky Robertson)
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Brook Barrington)
Government Communications Security Bureau (Acting Director Lisa Fong)
Ministry of Health (Chai Chuah)
Inland Revenue Department (Naomi Ferguson)
Department of Internal Affairs (Colin MacDonald)
Ministry of Justice (Andrew Bridgman)
Land Information New ealand (Peter Mersei)
Te Puni kiri - Ministry of M ori Development (Michelle Hippolite)
Ministry for Pacific Peoples (Pauline inter)
New ealand Police (Mike Bush)
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (Andrew ibblewhite)
Reserve Bank (Graeme heeler)
Serious Fraud Office (Julie Read)
Ministry of Social Development (Brendan Boyle)
State Services Commission (Iain Rennie)
Statistics New ealand (Li MacPherson)
12 ©Trans Tasman Media Ltd: Photocopying or distributing this Report electronically is prohibited by international copyright laws and treaties, and would subject the purchaser to penalties of up to $100,000 PER COPY distributed. Budget Performance of the Performance/Value Quality of Service Overall Performance Chief Executive for Money Delivery of the Agency
Ministry of Transport (Martin Matthews)
New ealand Transport Agency (Fergus Gammie)
New ealand Trade and Enterprise (Peter Chrisp)
Tertiary Education Commission (Tim Fowler)
The Treasury (Gabriel Makhlouf)
Ministry for omen (Jo Cribb)