Crown Road and z Park » o :;c m I­ « > 0:::. w --i Vl Z C o o U _>o~ -< Area nos. ' Ii HI/(I Ill. ' , I I nil \ 24/49 R.. Pfomvng.Transport ond Client ~es D~rtment page no. proposals for the preservation and enhancement of 1. Introduction the area's character and appearance, the study will J cake forward relevant policies contained in the The Crown Road and Twickenham Park Conserva­ Unitary Development Plan, providing a framework for tlon Areas lie between the towns of Richmond and action by the Council. local residents. businesses. Twickenham at the centre of a meander of the River developers and statutory bodies.The identification of Thames.The British Rail south west line cuts through the area's special character provides a basis for the area on a north·east. south·west axis.The station, specific problems to be identified. proposals to be St. Margaret's. is situated at the centre of the Crown made and for general guidelines and useful infonna­ Road conservation area.The busy Cherney Road tion to be given. (A3 t6) traverses the north of the area and the conservation areas are located orr, and close to, St. The Study will be in the following format; the Propos­ Margaret's Road which marks the landward boundary als Map should be read in conjunction with the text. of the originalTwickenham Park. I. Incroduction 2 History and development of the Policy Context conservation areas. National 3. Crown Road Conservation Area:­ Conservation areas were introduced In the Civic i. Character appraisal Amenities Act 1967.The definition ofa conserva· i1. Pressures tion area Is "an area of special architectural or iii. Problems historic interest. the character or appearance of 4. Twickenham Park Conservation Area:­ which it is desirable to preserve or enhance." i. Character appraisal i1. Pressures local authorities have continued to designate new iii. Problems conservation areas and to extend existing ones. 5. Proposals for the Conservation Areas Crown Road was designated on 14 June 1988, and 6. Implementation Twickenham Park was first designated on 3 June 1976 and extended on 7 September 1982. Section 71 of the Planning (listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 places a duty on local authorities to 2. History and "formulate and publish proposals for the preservation af}d enhancement of conservation areas." development This Act provides the legislative base for aU conser­ vation related matters.The Town and Country The history and development of the two conservation (General Permitted Development) Order (GDO areas, Crown Road and Twickenham Park. is best 1995) defines the nature of works within conserva­ understood by studying their origins within a much tion areas which require planning consent. Planning larger geographical area historically known as Policy Guidance: Planning and the Historic Environ· Twickenham Park.Twickenham Park was located on ment (PPG IS Sept 1994) provides in plain English a the westem bank of the rive;Thames.The extent of full statement of Government policies for the the Park is illustrated below. identification and protection of historic buildings. conservation areas and other elements of the historic environment.

Local The Richmond upon Thames Unitary Development Plan (UDP) sets out local planning policies for the Designation. Protection and Enhancement of Conservation Areas (ENV 9 and ENV IC).This Plan forms the basis for decisions taken by the Council. Copies of the UDP are held in reference sections of local libraries and are available for reference or purchase at the Reception on the 2nd floor of the Civic Centre,York Street,TWickenham.

This study has been prepared by the Planning and Area nos. Building Control Division in consultation with other 24/49 departments of the Council, and most importantly. in consultation with the local community. By publishing Extract (rom John Rocque's /74/ mop o(Landon _no 2

-. o ~ The Thames and provided the reason for In 1131 HenryVI took over the tenancy of the the Roman settlement in this area as recent ar­ manor and park and made them one of the ameni­ chaeological evidence has shown. Part of the ties of the great Shene Palace (). By Twickenham Park conservation area has been 1504. HenryVlI had formalised this arrangement and identified within the UDP as an area of archaeologi­ the park became known as the New Park of cal potential. Richmond. The first large residential house was built here In 1561, its estate taking up about two thirds of Settlement and enclosure of land probably contin­ the original Park. By r571 the estate passed into ued in the Saxon period and by the ome of the pnvate ownership and by 1592 it was known as Norman Conquest the area had become established Twickenham Pari<.. Moses Glover's map of 1635 as pan of the Hundred of Isleworth. Mer the shows the succeeding manor house, bUilt in 1609, as Conquest the Hundred was awarded to Walter de Tudor in style, gabled, with a turret and spire at each StValeri and stayed within the famlty until 1227. In end of the elevation.The grounds contained formal this year the Park was enclosed from the wild gardens adjoining the lake,Twickenham Park re­ (/) uncultivated he.athland by Richard Earl of Cornwall, mained intact in private ownershIp until 1805. A brother of King Henry III rna/or event within thIS period was the construction, between 1774-76, of Richmond Bridge whIch rt A major landmark in the history ofTwickenham replaced the histOric ferry crossing. Park was the foundatlon there. in 1115. of $yon C Abbey which was dediQted to $t Saviour and St. It was only after the death of lord Cavendish in Bridget. However. the nuns found the area unhealthy 1805 that Twickenham Park became sub- divided even after digging a great drainage ditch. The into separate land holdings, marking the end of an a. present-day lake in the $t. Margaret's Estate origi­ era. The original house had completely disappeared nated from this humble beginning. In 1431 HenryVI by 1850 In the northern end of the original Park "'< gave permission for the Abbey to relocate to the three large houses were built. eventually known as site of today's $yon House. In the Cl1th and C 15th Gordon, Lacy, and 5t Margaret's Houses. It was the Area nos the Park was used for keeping and hunting of deer, latter which gave its name to the area after 1854. and a hunting lodge was built in the Park circa 1375. 24/49 page no. The southern portion of the original Twickenham Park also gamed a new Twickenham Park House 3. Crown Road 3 which was situated JUSt below the high tide barrier of today. It was built circa 1828 on land which now Conservation Area forms Park House Gardens and survived until 1929 when it was demolished. From the 1820's onwards parcels of land were sold off for development on a Character Appraisal regular basis and the old maps show the changing This conservation area is physically centred around apppearance of the area. St. Margaret's station and consists of the shopping and commercial centre serving the densely devel­ The map of 1863 shows an important development oped surrounding residential area.The Crown Road within the old park, the arrival it; 1850 of the Conservation Area is essentially urban in character Windsor-Staines and South Western Railway line. By with continuous shop-fronts lining the backs of the 1881 St. Margaret's sution had been built and the pavements. Shops tend to be independent traders surrounding area was developed at a much faster ranging from newsagents, convenience stores and rate because of the improved connection to central bakers to more specialist gift. antique and furniture London. As greater numbers of large villas were shops.The shops are interspersed with restaurants. built. shops and businesses grew up to serve them. cafes and take-away food outlets, which together The commercial activity was concentrated around with the continuous stream of through traffic the station in Crown Road and St. Margaret's Road. creates a busy and lively environment. Social and economic change at the end of the C 19th resulted in a change of development pattern to The buildings within this conservation area date much smaller houses on more modest plots.The mainly from the 1880's when the area was first area which once consisted ofTwickenham Park developed in response to the arrival of the railway. continued to be developed through the 1930's until The predominant use of red brick and slate as no public open space remamed and Twickenham building materials provides a unified physical charac­ Park survived in name only. ter.

Area nos. 24/49 In St. Margaret"s Road the shop-frontS and associated The remaining part of the conservation area, Crown page no, advertising provide much colour and interest at Street Road, is also commercial.lt does not have such a level.There are a number of original shop-frontS grand scale as St. Margaret'S Road but retains a busy, 4 remaining and many others ret:1In at least some of lively atmosphere.The road is narrower than St. their original features. A characteristic of the shops Margaret's Road with correspondingly narrower Within !:he conservatioo area is the generous private pavementS although the shops still retain their own foreoourt associated with each unit.The existence of forecourtS.The predominant matenals are still red () !:he forecourtS further widens the perceived pave­ brick and slate and the shops form a continuous ment area giving a promenade effect to VIews along facade to the west side of the street. Building style IS the St.Margaret's Road. more vaned and idiosyncratic and there is plenty of o high quality architectural detail. Unfortunately some The urban quality of the street scene is emphasised buildings have had their original sash windows ::J by three dramatic terraced blocks of red brick. replaced with modern PVCu units which damage pedimented, Dutch gabled design.The gables punctu­ the elevational modelling and the pattern of original (I) ate and enliven the cootinuous roofscape The quality' giazlng bars has been lost. of !:he elevations is entwKed by moulded, dec.ontivre temJ;cotta paneb at first floor and abow.The block on (1) the northern Side of the road differs in that it curves gently to follow the line of the pavement and forms an ., important element dosing the view from Crown Road to St. Margaret's Road. < The Station by COOtleSt is an isolated but elegant building which IS currently disfigured by a dumsy, III poorly poslnoned canopy to the front elevation.The Staoon fonns a Ioca.lland.mark espeaally when viewed rt on the rising ground from theA316.The St. Margaret's -. public house is also something of a local landmark pardy due to its prominent position but also pardy due to itS striking tiled base and "Italianate" StuCCO o decontion at ground floor level.The quirky hex3g0r\31 flower stall adJacent to 165, St. Margaret's Road ::J provides a welcome splash of colour and adds to !:he vigour of the area (~~ II).

Shop-(rants in Crown Rood

The Crown Road shops have staned to become more specialist in nature With several furnishIng, gift and antique shops which are beginning to attract custom In their own right. Again. many of the original shop-fronts effectively remain in their original form and most cont3in some original V'l features whIch are imporant to retain. rt Crown Road is also occupied by the St. Margaret's publiC house and car park.This peninsula Site is C shared with Park Cottages which are sited at right angles to Crown Road. They date from the mid C 19th and form a low, compact 2 storey terrace of a.. great charm. They are largely unaltered in appear­ ance and are reached by a path which runs in front of theIr densely planted, small front gardens.The ""< gardens provide a riOt of colour during the summer Area nos. months and the dense foliage screens the cottages from general view giving them an air of secrecy. 24/49 St Margarel's Road: Dutch gabled parades o( shops

• page no. The end elevation ofTwickenham Film Studios terminates the view from Crown Road to St. Problems Margaret's Road in a dramatic if somewhat stark Shops 5 fashion. • Poor condition of and inappropnate a1tera­ tlonsfrepairs to the surface of shop fore.. Pressures courts. This conservation area suffers from traffic.Through • Some original shop-fronts SUrYIYe almost traffic using St. Margaret's Road Is often held up by Intact but many are In poor condition and vehicles turning right into and out of Amyand Park require repair and/or renov.toon. Road. Parked vehicles servicing shops and illegally or Many shop-fronts retain some anginal poorly parked cars also add to congestion. Car • feawres which would benefit from repair and! parking is a contentious issue within the area: local renovation. businesses and shop owners l:ielieve that there is a or lack of short term parking and that this dissuades • Some shop-fronts have been replaced in potential customers; local residents face camped. entirety by modem designs using Inappropri­ tion for on-street spaces from commuters who ate rnaterials.and fail to respect the original drive to St. Margaret's station. Recently introduced proportions of the shop-front or parent short-term Pay and Display parking In Crown Road blolllding. has proved to be successful and similar additional • There is much superfluous and obsolete parking would be welcomed locally. signage above shop-fronts which has a detrimental effect on the street scene. Whilst the recent economic recession and growth • Use of unpainted. extemal, metal security of Richmond as a shopping centre have affected the shutters on shop-fronts also has a negative shops and businesses within the conservation area Impact 00 the appearance of the conservation ( pushing some to the limits of economic viability)...... There are only a few vacant shops.There is pressure to change the use of some shop units to office. Environment residential and other business uses and such change • Lack of street treeS. will generally be resisted by the Council. • Inappropriate and ugly canopy to stauoo degrades both che building and the conserva· The Crown Road Conservation Area sits within an non ..... area known locally as St.Margaret·s. the boundaries 01 which have never been quantified and thus there • The car parle. of the St.Marpret's public house are few physical signs identifying the area on the Is perceived as a local eyesore because of ground.The local community identifies strongly with poorly defined. weak boundary treatment. St. Margaret's as a place and feel that the sense of • Lack of seatlng areas. One small seatlng area place should be reinforced through improved ad;acent to the CatholIC Church, JUSt outside signage and environmental improvements. the consef'\latlOll area. is under used and could be Improved. This conservation area is very densely developed • The concrete post and metall'alled fence to and there is no public open space or street trees. the pavement edge of the embankment are All soft landscaping is provided by views into private unattractive and mapproprlate for use In the areas and gardens.The lack of open space reduces conservation area. the opportunity for seating areas and places to • The hoarding situated on the gable end of pause away from the bustle of commercial activity. Park Cottages faong Crown Road is visually obtrusive. • Advertising clutter, satellite dishes and air conditioning units plus alterations to windows e.g replacement with PVCu or removal of glazing bars. cause damage to the Integrity of the design 01 ei

H;gh...,. • Lack of short: term Pay and Display parking for use by >hcppen. • juncUon 01 Crown Road with s< Ma.-ganot's Area nos. Road Is very wkIe and is difficutt to cross on 24149 fooc. Obtrusive hoarding on gable end ofPark Cottages

• 4. Twickenham Park page 00. Conservation Area 6

Character appraisal () This conservatlon area adjoins me eastern boundary of the Crown Road Conservatlon Area and extends eastwards to encompass the north side of Rosslyn o Road and the whole of Riverdale Road.The area has an air of refined, leafy. residential gli\ndeur which ::J would be difficult to recreate in "a modem develop­ menL (I) This sophistication resulu from the fact that the (1) houses were de'Vehped in the I870's for the increas­ ingly affluentVlCtOria.n middle classes on land libel"· ated by the sub-division ofTwlckenham Park..The ., massive scale and complex fonn of these suburban Ilomes is complemented by the spacious grounds they < are built within.The survival of a cohesive group of such houses within the Borough is rare. ~ Nos.I-14 The 8orons The west sIde of Riverdale Road contains the most architecturally exuberant houses.They are an eclectic The east side of the road is ltalianate in style with 3 rt fonn ofVICtOIian Gothic. with strong refereoces to pairs of equally large semi-detached houses. Most of -. Scottish Baronial style with striking ~chromatic lhese buildIngs have been converted into flats with the brickwork..The rooflrnes are peppered with turrets. physkal evidence of this being the unfortunate loss of finials, gables and d'llmneys.The houses are well set garden area to car parking. extract vents to windows o back from the road behind well kept walls, hedges and and a prevalence of bin Stores. Despite this change of railings.The buildings are sepan.ted by characteristi­ use, Riverdale Road 5011 retains a qUIet. resIdential ::J cally large gaps and their generous grounds contain dignity. many towering. mawre Cedar treeS which add to the overall theatrical effect. Most of these houses are still Rosslyn Road is lined on its north side by houses of in single ownership. a similar size but its south side (which IS JUSt outside the conservation area) is lined by a mundane collection of single storey garages and out buildings associated with houses fronting St. Margaret's Road. Consequently Rosslyn Road lacks the overall grandeur of Riverdale Road.The houses are ltalianate in style and polychromatic brickwork is supplemented by the use of whIte paInted stone door and window surrounds. Street trees are deciduOllS nther than conIferous which gIves the srreet a rather Jess dramatic appeannce than Riverdale Road. Most of the houses have been converted into multiple occupation and the front gardens and boundary treatments have suffered as the consequence of provision of car parking.

The Barons (the site in 1263 where Richard Earl of Comwall met some of the Barons. who camped in lhe Park whilst anning to oppose the King prior to the Battle of Lewes) is the closest group of houses to the Crown Road conservation area.They are reminiscent in scale and charaCter to those described in Riverdale and Rosslyn Roads. No:s 15-24 are pal" of semt­ Area nos. detached villas. simpler in style than those already described in this conservation area., but remaining at 24/49 £Xu~ront Gomic houses in Riverdale Rood an imposing height of 4 Storeys. No.'s 1·14 (ann an ~ page no. Impressive storey terrace which backs on to $t. Margaret's Road.The continuous eaves, ground floor bay windows and heavily modelled window sur· 7 rounds unify the terrace (see drawing previous page).The setting of this terrace has been drastically affected by sub-division ausing the wholesale removal of front gardens. and front boundanes for use as car parking.The rear gardens remain welt defined by a high brick wall, behind which is a substantial belt of large mature trees.These trees form an important Landmark in the view along SL Margaret's Road. Unfortunately d'le rear elevation of the block is marred by the addition of a number of clumsy, modem dormer windows.

The Twickenham Park conservation area contains two listed bUildings: Bute Lodge, a Grade II early C 19th Regency house which fronts Park Road, and Victoria Lodge. a Single storey stuccco gate lodge Un$lghrJy gorogfi (oong onto Rosslyn Rood built in the mid C 19th in the form of a Doric temple. which occupies the western comer of Rosslyn and St. Margaret's Road. 4. Conservation Area Pressures Proposals: The Twickenham Park Conservation Area retains its for enhancement or preservation of quiet. residential grandeur throughout, however the the character of the conservation area. • character does become weakened closest to the Crown Road Conservation Area.This is mainly due The detailed proposals are illustrated on the to the pressure to provide off street car parking separate Conservation Area Proposals sheet which serving each flat within the original houses.There is accompanies this document. also competition for on street parking between residents and commuters especially around The Many proposals fall outside of the Council's control Hirons which is conveniently close to SLMargaret's and it should be noted that current financial station. Additional competltlon for parking space in constraints on the Council mean that the Barons are caused by visitors and employees of proposals for which it is responsible may take the Twickenham Film Studios.Whilst the Studios are longer than is desirable to implement. not within the conservation area they are an important feature of the area having existed on this site since the tum of the century . 5. Summary Problems The proposals generated by this study affect the • Loss of front gardens and damage to bound· following ;. ary treatments as a result of provision of car porl

This approach is considered to be necessary for the follOWing properties in the study area :. 0­ nos. 1·13 Park Cottages '< Separate guidance will be published to assist owners of properties covered by these Article 4(2) Direc­ Area nos. tions. 24/49 VIew along nos. 1-13 Pork Cottoges _no Division for advice. Of particular concern are The follOWIng shop fronts are of sufficient architec· propo~Js for donner windows and extensions. both wraJ or hIstoric interest to justify their retention 9 of which can have a negative Impact on the street and applications for their replacement will nonnally scene. In this context It should be noted that rear be refused:­ elev.ttions OIre also often visible from the public domain. Of equal impact is the breaking down of no.s 109-111 (odd) St. Margaret's Rood front boundaries and the destruction or adaptation no. 126a St. Margaret's Road of front gardens for car parking. Supplementary no. 131 St. Margaret's Road guidance is also available on these subjects from the no.s 139-141 (odd) St. Margaret's Rood Council. no.s I 33-S(odd) St. Margaret's Road no. 32 Crown Road Shop fronts no. 123 St. Margaret's Road An important objective of alls study is to retilin and improve the quality of shop-fronts within the Crown Road conserY.ilDon aru.. As part of a number of measures intended to promote their survival. dIscretionary shop-front grants may be available from the Council.These gl7lnts are suitable for those wishing to repair original shop-fronts or replace an existing ill-considered newer shop-front with a design more sympathetic to the character of the conservation area.

Crown Road and St. Margaret's Road have a variety of building styles and shop- fronts, including some very poor modern and replacement shop-fronts and also much indifferent signage.There are several near complete original shop-fronts surviving in these roads and many others retam a large proportion of Original features. In order to improve the appear­ ance of the shopping area and therefor-e help to en$:ourage increased patronage, every effort should be made to raise the standard of design for shop­ fronts: demands for speed and cheapness in shop fitting should not result in harsh materials, lack of detail, standard fascias, Inappropriate blinds and poorly modelled fronts. No. /260 SL Margaret's Rood

Those shop froots listed below not already desIg­ nated as Buildmgs ofTownscape MerIt will be designated ;as such :­

nos I 16-1 H SL Margaret's Rood no.s 109·1 I I (odd) SLMargaret's Rood no.s 6-10 (even) Crown Road no.s 26-32 (even) Crown Road no. 12l St. Margaret's Road

The following are areas where groups of shop fronts are of a sufficient quality to justify restoration of missing features as opposed to wholesale replace­ ment of the entire front.Where a recent shop froot of poor standard already exists in the group it is expected that any new scheme will reinstate the proportions and matenals originally typical to the group.The objective is not to produce a slavish reproduction but to avoid a strident conflict be­ l...J tweerl the new and old frontages and to create a Flower kJosl<. SL Morgoret's Rood streetsc.ape with some interest and continUity. St.Margaret's Road no.s 113-119(odd) Implementation P'&" no. station kiosks Ths study contains wide ranging proposals intended no., 12S-131(odd) to preserve Of" enhance the character of the Crown 10 no.S 137-t65(odd) Road andTwickenham Park Conserv.illtion Areas. no.S 116-126(even) Crown Road no.s 2·22(even) The Council Will Implement those proposals under no.s 26-32(even) its contrOl as and when appropriate funds become () available and wilt give advice on grants and action The Council will publish separate and more detailed that can be taken by other groups and Individuals gUidance for shop fronts within the Crown Road o Conservation Area, which will be available on The Council will monitor the effectiveness of Article applio,tion.This witt assist in negetiations on of ( 2 ) Directions and the up-take of grants and will ~ planning applications and guide owners and tenants review the progress of enhancement proposals on a conceming repairs or minor alterations not requir. regular basis. (n ing planning pennission.

Whilst the appearance of shop fronts is vital to the Acknowledgements ([) character of an area, other factors such as tn.ffic The co-operation and input of the Twickenham Park movement, parking arrangements, amenity area. local Residents Association and Mr A.C.B Urwin is ..., support and the economic Situation all contribute gratefully acknowledged by the london Borough of towards the creation of a successful "bustling" Richmond upon Thames. shopping area. Other proposals made within this < study are intended to enhance the appearance and The cover illustration and the draWings of the encourage greater use of the shopping area. flower kiosk were produced by James Openshaw for PJ the london Borough of Richmond upon Thames. r-t Landscaping and Planting This study was approved by the Planning and _. Transport Committee In January I996,and was In the absence of public open space, private gardens published in February 1997. both front and rear. have a significant role to play in o the character of this conservation area.. Rear gardens frequently provide the only views of Other publications ~ u~interruptedsemi-natural habitat (~~J.There The london Borough of Richmond upon Thames will be a presumption against backland development has also published the following mformation. unless It can be demonstrated that there would be no significant detrimental effect on amenity and the Planning In{ormation leaflets quality of the local environment. no. I Conserva.tion Areas no.2 listed Buildings » Trees in conservation areas which are not already no.3 Historic BUildings ..., subject to a Tree Preservation Order, are protected no. of Historic Buildings: Maintenance and Repair automatically by the requirement that six weeks' no.5 Trees: legislation and Procedure ([) notice must be given to the Council before any no.6 Buildings ofTownsape Merit proposed work is carried out.There are plenty of opportunlOes for residents to restore front bound· PJ ary walls and raihngs and the Council is happy to Design Guidance leaflets give guidance on this. 1'10.1 DesIgn Guidelmes for Shop-fronts and ShopSigns no.2 DeSIgn Guidelines for Car Parking in Front Vl Gardens no.3 Design Guidelines for Extemal Alterations to r-t Houses no.4 DeSign Guidelines for House Extensions C no.5 Trees: Landscape Design, Planting and Care no.6 Guidelines for Small Housing Sites no. 7 GUidelines for the Sitmg of Satellite Dishes a. and other Communications Apparatus no. 8 DesIgn Guidelines: Wildlife In Gardens '< no. 9 Design Guidelines for nawre Conservation and Development ...... no, no. 10 SeaJrity by Design 24/49 page no. Conser-vation Area Studies Shop-front Guidance: Area I: Barnes Green Barnes Green Study: Shop-fronts, Policies and Areal: Green GUidance 11 TWlCkenham Green :. Shop-front Guidance Area '" Area 10: Trafalgar Road Crown Road Study: Shop-front Guidance· Area II: Hampton COUrt Green Castelnau: Shop-front Guidance AorflI2: Hampton Village Study: Shop-frorlt Guidance~ Area 18: Hampton WIck Area 25: CaStelnau, Bame~ These leaflets and documents are available from Areas 27 & 37: lock and HIgh Planning Recepoon on the 2nd floor of the Civic Street,Teddington Centre.Those marked ~ are available in draft. fonn Areas 30& 31: St. Matthias and Sheen Road and are awaiting printing at the date of this publica­ Area ]8: Hampton Hill High Stree~ tion. Areas 49 & 24: Crown Road and Twickenham Park, St. Margaret's· Area 57: LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES john M. Barkley CEng Dip TE DMS FICE MIHT MIMgt Article" Guidance Director Planning Transport and Client Services Bames Green Study: The Uon Houses Hampton Wick Study: 10-12(even) lower Yvonne Trimmer BA MCD Teddington Road, 75-79(odd) High Sueet. Head of Planning and Building Control 52·58(even) and 6O.70(even) Park Road. Crown Road and Twickenham Park Study: nos. 1·13 2nd Floor, Civic Centre, 41 York Street. Park Cotages* Twickenham. Middlesex.TW I 3BZ Castelnau Study: nos. 1-7 Castelnau R~ Tel:0181 891 1"'11 • Hampton Hill Study: 91·93 High Street*' Printed on recycled paper.

Area nos. 24/49 Shop-fronts in Craovn Rood