DOCSLIB.ORG

Leonadivide.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leonadivide.Pdf United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service September 2015 Angeles National Forest and San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Plan for Invasive Plants Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California For Information Contact: Janet Nickerman Project Lead, Angeles National Forest (626) 353-8439 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment Invasive Plant Treatment Project Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 - Alternatives, including the Proposed Action ................................................................. 9 Chapter 3 - Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences .......................................... 38 Human Health and Safety .......................................................................................................... 40 Invasive Plants and Native Vegetation ...................................................................................... 43 Special Status Plants .................................................................................................................. 42 Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................... 49 Soils and Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 59 Special Land Designations (Wilderness and Research Natural Areas) ...................................... 62 Recreation and Scenic Resources .............................................................................................. 67 Consequences Relative to Significance ..................................................................................... 71 Chapter 4 – List of agencies and persons consulted ....................................................................... 74 References ...................................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix A Summary of Public Comments .................................................................................. 81 Appendix B Additional Invasive Plant information ....................................................................... 87 Appendix C Potential Treatment Prescription Options .................................................................. 94 Appendix D Monitoring Plan ....................................................................................................... 100 Appendix E Projects, Activities and Factors Considered in Cumulative Effects……………….128 List of Figures Figure 1. Project Area Map. ........................................................................................................... 15 List of Tables Table 1. Summary of Proposed Treatment Methods. ..................................................................... 12 Table 2. Priority Treatment Areas and Projects ............................................................................. 16 Table 3. Comparison of Alternatives…………………………………………………………….36 Table 4. Summary of hazard indicators and toxicity categories for pesticides……………..........41 Table 5. Signal Word used for each acute toxicity category..........................................................41 Table 6. Approximate acres by vegetation type within the project area ………….……….42 Table 7. Response to Comments……………………..……………………………….………….81 Table 8. Invasive plants known to occur in and near the project area............................................88 Table 9. Some invasive species reproductive and dispersal mechanisms………………….…….90 Table 10. Potential Treatment Prescription Options..……………………………………….……94 Table 11.Projects, Activities and Factors Considered for Cumulative Effects………………….128 j iii Environmental Assessment Invasive Plant Treatment Project CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Background _____________________________________ Executive Order 13112 defines invasive plants as “non-native plants whose introduction does, or is likely to, cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health” (http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/eos/eo13112.html). Some invasive plants can change ecosystem processes such as hydrology, fire regimes, and soil chemistry. These invasive plants have a competitive advantage because they are no longer controlled by their natural predators, and can quickly spread out of control. They spread with no consideration for land ownership boundaries. Furthermore, invasive plants that grow along stream channels can easily and often increase their infestation because their seeds, effortlessly, are capable of traveling downstream. In California, approximately 3 percent of the plant species growing in the wild are considered invasive, but they inhabit a much greater proportion of the landscape (Cal-IPC). The purpose of this environmental assessment is to assess the environmental effects of invasive weed treatment in Angeles National Forest and San Gabriel Mountains National Monument watersheds, both on and off Forest and Monument lands. This proposed action will address areas not previously covered by the Invasive Plant Treatment Project, Santa Clara Watershed, Santa Clara/Mojove River Ranger District (ANF 2013) or the Invasive Plant Treatment Project, San Gabriel District (ANF 2011). These decision documents have completed evaluation for invasive weed treatments on Forest Service lands in the Santa Clara Watershed: Gorman, Liebre Gulch, Piru, Castaic, Fish Canyon, Elizabeth Lake Canyon, San Francisquito, Bouquet, Mint Canyon, Agua Dulce, Sand Canyon, Arrastre, and Aliso. The Invasive Plant Treatment Project, San Gabriel District covers the majority of the main drainages on the San Gabriel River Ranger District and San Dimas Experimental Forest (i.e., San Gabriel, Big and Little Dalton, San Dimas drainages), 350ft to either side of the high-water mark. If the invasive species are left unchecked, the ecosystems within the project area will dramatically change. Invasive plants create a host of adverse environmental effects, including displacement of native plants and reduction in habitat and forage for wildlife (including federally listed threatened and endangered, and Forest Service sensitive1 species); reduction in water quantity; potential reduction in soil productivity; and potential increase in the intensity and frequency of wildfires. After wildfires, non-native plant species typically re-establish more rapidly than native plants, suppressing the recovery of the native vegetation and allowing the invasive plants to expand their range. In addition, when wildfires occur too frequently (tamarisk and arundo-dominated communities experience higher fire frequencies than native riparian communities), some native vegetation loses the ability to recover, effectively converting high diversity native plant communities into low diversity non-native plant communities. The Angeles National Forest Land Management Plan (Forest Plan) states, “….some of the greatest threats to riparian and aquatic habitats are from the invasion of non-native plant species, particularly tamarisk, arundo, and cape ivy within the stream channels….” (Forest Plan, part 1, p. 41; USFS 2005). The Federal Noxious Weed Act of 1974 (7 USC 214), Section 15, requires federal land management agencies to develop and establish a management program for control of undesirable plants that are classified under state or federal law as undesirable, noxious, harmful, injurious or poisonous on federal lands under the agency’s jurisdiction (7 USC 2814[a]). The Act also requires the federal land management agencies to enter into cooperative agreements to coordinate the management of 4 Environmental Assessment Invasive Plant Treatment Project undesirable plant species on federal lands where similar programs are being implemented on state and private lands in the same area (7 U.S.C. 2814[c]). The Wyden Amendment (Public Law 105-277, Section 323 as amended by Public Law 109-54, Section 434) authorizes the Forest Service to enter into cooperative agreements to benefit resources within watersheds on National Forest System lands. Agreements may be with willing federal, tribal, state, and local governments, private and nonprofit entities, and landowners to conduct activities on public or private lands for the protection, restoration, and enhancement of fish and wildlife habitat and other resources; reduction of risk for natural disaster where public safety is threatened; or a combination of both. Executive Order 13112
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Clara River Conservancy Sespe Cienega Restoration and Pubilc Access Project
    Santa Clara River Conservancy Sespe Cienega Restoration and Pubilc Access Project About Santa Clara River Conservancy Vision Vision The Santa Clara River Conservancy (SCRC) is a Public Access non-profit, collaborative land trust focusing on restoring The surrounding communities are currently isolated native habitat to one of California’s most dynamic water- from the river and have asked for increased public sheds. SCRC encourages the community to join the access to the river for some time. SCRC and organization’s mission through various outreach, educa- CDFW hope to address some of that demand in tion, recreation events, activities, and volunteer efforts. the envisioned public access improvements on this Project Description property. The plans for public access improve- ments will include design of interpretative displays The goal of this planning effort at Sespe Cienega is to and walking trails that will allow for public access develop working plans to restore riparian and wetland to and along the Santa Clara River, ultimately habitats and natural river function to this property under increasing the public access footprint along the permanent protection by CDFW, and to provide public Santa Clara River that is the Santa Clara River access to the river for the communities of Fillmore, Santa Parkway vision. Paula, and Piru. Restoring the river to its natural and historical functions has additional benefits to the surrounding area by providing a space for sustainable Restoration agriculture, land conservation, and climate resilience. The SCRC, in coordination with UCSB, CDFW, and Still planning process will be a joint effort among the Santa Water Sciences will develop working plans to Clara River Conservancy (SCRC), the California Depart- guide restoration of riparian and wetland habitats ment of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and the University of and natural river function on the property to its California, Santa Barbara (UCSB).
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the 32Nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, Brought to You by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a Non-Profit Plant Nursery
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for April 25, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. Wildflowers are fading in the low elevation desert regions, but we are getting some reports from local mountains above the 4000 ft elevation where spring and accompanying wildflowers are just arriving. Up near Idyllwild in the San Jacinto Mountains, take a hike on the Deer Springs Trail from the trail head at Hwy 243. There are some very sweet blooming species along the trail. Pink-bracted manzanita (Arctostaphylos pringlei ssp. drupacea) is an abundant flowering shrub. This is a gorgeous manzanita. Bajada lupine (Lupinus concinnus) and strigose lotus (Acmispon strigosus) are still at their peak and almost equally abundant. There is a lot of red-root cryptantha (Cryptantha micrantha) and whiskerbrush (Leptosiphon ciliatus). Martin's paintbrush (Castilleja i ssp. martinii) are spectacular lining the trail and Chaparral whitethorn (Ceanothus leucodermis) is still at peak bloom. Near the trail head, Parish's Jacumba milkvetch (Astragalus douglasii var. parishii) are at their showiest right now. California rock-cress (Boechera californica) are past their prime, but still around. Some golden yarrow (Eriophyllum confertiflorum var. confertiflorum) are starting to bloom, and the first of what is sure to be many sticky cinquefoil (Drymocallis glandulosa var. reflexa) can be found. There are only a few Southern mountain lupines (Lupinus excubitus var.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Chumash-Style Pictograph Sites in Fernandeño Territory
    THREE CHUMASH-STYLE PICTOGRAPH SITES IN FERNANDEÑO TERRITORY ALBERT KNIGHT SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have an elaborate polychrome pictograph component. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and major midden deposits that are rich in artifacts also characterize these three sites. One of these sites, the “Burro Flats” site, has the most colorful, elaborate, and well-preserved pictographs in the region south of the Santa Clara River and west of the Los Angeles Basin and the San Fernando Valley. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Coastal Chumash and Fernandeño. The style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN-1072, VEN-149, and LAN-357) is clearly the same as that found in Chumash territory. If the quantity and the quality of rock art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial sites for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction. This article discusses the polychrome rock art at the Burro Flats site (VEN-1072), the Lake Manor site (VEN-148/149), and the Chatsworth site (LAN-357). All three of these sites are located in rock shelters in the eastern Simi Hills. The Simi Hills are mostly located in southeast Ventura County, although the eastern end is in Los Angeles County (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed, San Bernardino Mountains, California
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281748553 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Article · January 2013 CITATIONS READS 0 28 6 authors, including: Naomi S. Fraga Thomas Stoughton Rancho Santa Ana B… Plymouth State Univ… 8 PUBLICATIONS 14 3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Thomas Stoughton Retrieved on: 24 November 2016 Crossosoma 37(1&2), 2011 9 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Naomi S. Fraga, LeRoy Gross, Duncan Bell, Orlando Mistretta, Justin Wood1, and Tommy Stoughton Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 North College Avenue Claremont, California 91711 1Aspen Environmental Group, 201 North First Avenue, Suite 102, Upland, California 91786 [email protected] All Photos by Naomi S. Fraga ABSTRACT: We present an annotated catalogue of the vascular flora of the upper Santa Ana River watershed, in the southern San Bernardino Mountains, in southern California. The catalogue is based on a floristic study, undertaken from 2008 to 2010. Approximately 65 team days were spent in the field and over 5,000 collections were made over the course of the study. The study area is ca. 155 km2 in area (40,000 ac) and ranges in elevation from 1402 m to 3033 m. The study area is botanically diverse with more than 750 taxa documented, including 56 taxa of conservation concern and 81 non-native taxa. Vegetation and habitat types in the area include chaparral, evergreen oak forest and woodland, riparian forest, coniferous forest, montane meadow, and pebble plain habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Debris Flow Erosion in the San Gabriel Mountains, CA
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE POST-FIRE DEBRIS FLOW EROSION IN THE SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE STATION FIRE, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science in Geology By Martha M. Ahlstrom August, 2013 The thesis of Martha M. Ahlstrom is approved: _________________________________ ________________ Dr. Matthew d'Alessio Date _________________________________ ________________ Dr. Julie Laity Date _________________________________ ________________ Dr. Richard Heermance, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgments I most heartily thank Dr. Richard Heermance for his exceptional guidance, advice, patience, knowledge, support, and willingness in allowing me to conduct a study on debris flows. My other committee members, Dr. Julie Laity and Dr. Matthew d’Alessio, made heroic efforts in editing my thesis. I appreciate all their efforts to ensure the scientific integrity of this project. I also thank all the professors in the CSUN Geological Sciences Department for their support. I especially thank Dr. Vicki Pedone for her guidance and encouragement. Mrs. Marilyn Hanna and the Geological Sciences Scholarship Committee funded this thesis project. I am grateful for their support, grants, and scholarships. This project would have not been completed in such a timely manner without the awesome field assistants who trekked all over the San Gabriel Mountains to help conduct the field work. My field assistants included CSUN undergraduate geology students, CSUN graduate students, Morning Star Christian Academy students, LA Valley College students, and family members. I value all their time and efforts. I thank all my family members for their patience, graciousness, and support while I completed this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Wait! Aren't We Part of the San Gabriel Mountains?
    Wait! Aren’t We Part of the San Gabriel Mountains? A very strange and mysterious thing happened on Friday, October 10, 2014, when President Obama announced the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument. Suddenly a gaping hole was cut into the Angeles National Forest, and areas like the Arroyo Seco, Tujunga, and the mountain watershed of the Los Angeles River were excised from the map delineating the new national monu- ment. Until the final announcement, the Arroyo Seco and the other stretches of the front range of the San Gabriel Mountains in the southwest corner of the Angeles National Forest all the way from Azusa to Sylmar in the San Fernando Valley were included in the advance maps and description of the monument. This is the portion of the Angeles National Forest that is closest to dense urban popula- tions and is heavily-used. It has also been the site just five years ago of the worst fire in Los Angeles County history, compounded by a major flood the next year. For this area, long-neglected by the US Forest Service, the map of the Map published in San Gabriel Valley newspapers prior to San Gabriel Mountains National dedication ceremony Monument certainly does not represent the “geography of hope” that President Obama promised on Friday. On Thursday, October 9, just the day before the presidential an- nouncement, this is the map that was published in San Gabriel Val- ley newspapers. But the official map that was re- leased on Friday is found on the next page. The strange shape of the territory of the national monument be- comes all the more bewildering Official Boundaries of the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument and egregious when a viewer reviews the map of the Station Fire in 2009, the largest fire in the his- tory of Southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • References and Appendices
    References Ainley, D.G., S.G. Allen, and L.B. Spear. 1995. Off- Arnold, R.A. 1983. Ecological studies on six endan- shore occurrence patterns of marbled murrelets gered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): in central California. In: C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the Jr., M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt, technical edi- design of habitat preserves. University of Cali- tors. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled fornia Publications in Entomology 99: 1–161. Murrelet. USDA Forest Service, General Techni- Atwood, J.L. 1993. California gnatcatchers and coastal cal Report PSW-152; 361–369. sage scrub: the biological basis for endangered Allen, C.R., R.S. Lutz, S. Demairais. 1995. Red im- species listing. In: J.E. Keeley, editor. Interface ported fire ant impacts on Northern Bobwhite between ecology and land development in Cali- populations. Ecological Applications 5: 632-638. fornia. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Allen, E.B., P.E. Padgett, A. Bytnerowicz, and R.A. Los Angeles; 149–169. Minnich. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on Atwood, J.L., P. Bloom, D. Murphy, R. Fisher, T. Scott, coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In T. Smith, R. Wills, P. Zedler. 1996. Principles of A. Bytnerowicz, M.J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling, reserve design and species conservation for the tech. coords. Proceedings of the international sym- southern Orange County NCCP (Draft of Oc- posium on air pollution and climate change effects tober 21, 1996). Unpublished manuscript. on forest ecosystems, February 5–9, 1996, River- Austin, M. 1903. The Land of Little Rain. University side, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fresno-Kings Unit Fire Plan
    Fresno-Kings Unit 5/03/2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/30/20 Appendix A 36-38 Fire Plan Projects B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Appendix B 40-41 Added Wildland Activity B. Garabedian Chart 4/30/20 Appendix C 42 Update Ignition Data B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Various 103-119 2019 Accomplishment B. Garabedian i TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS .................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 FIRE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ..................................................... 4 SECTION II: COLLABORATION..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7 Biological Resources
    3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section identifies major plant and animal resources within the City’s Planning Area and assesses the potential impacts of the proposed General Plan on biological resources with the understanding that certain resources, especially wildlife, are transitory and may potentially be present in a wide variety of areas regardless of previous records of observation. The City’s Planning Area consists of its incorporated boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is located outside the City’s boundaries and the adopted SOI. The City and the County Planning Areas together comprise the OVOV Planning Area. A substantial portion of the area within the City has been developed. Species within the remaining natural areas are adapted to the Mediterranean climate of the region, in that they thrive in the cool, wet winters, and dry, hot summers typical of the area. Within the City boundaries, these areas include the Santa Clara River through the City; and portions of San Francisquito Canyon, Sand Canyon, Whitney Canyon, and Placerita Canyon. The major natural features of the City’s adopted SOI include the Liebre Mountains south of the National Forest boundary, including Cruzan Mesa and portions of Tick Canyon, Mint Canyon, Bouquet Canyon and San Francisquito Canyon; and the San Gabriel Mountains north of the National Forest boundary, including portions of Sand Canyon and
    [Show full text]
  • Final CCP Appendices a & B
    Appendix A – Glossary of Terms Appendix A – Glossary of Terms Adaptive management - The rigorous application of management, research, and monitoring to gain information and experience necessary to assess and modify management activities. A process that uses feedback from refuge research and monitoring and evaluation of management actions to support or modify objectives and strategies at all planning levels. Alliance (plant Alliance) - A uniform group of plant associations sharing one or more dominant or diagnostic plant species, which are found in the uppermost strata of the vegetation. Alkalinity - Refers to the extent to which water or soils contain soluble mineral salts. Waters with a pH greater than 7.4 are considered alkaline. Alluvial - Made of clay, sand, or dirt washed by flowing water. Alternatives - Different sets of objectives and strategies or means of achieving refuge purposes and goals, helping fulfill the Refuge System mission, and resolving issues. (1) A reasonable way to fix the identified problem or satisfy the stated need. (40 CFR 150.2) (2) Alternatives are different means of accomplishing refuge purposes and goals and contributing to the System mission (Draft Service Manual 602 FW 1.5). Anadromous - A lifecycle of fish that involves migrating up rivers from the sea to breed in fresh water followed by young returning to the sea until reaching maturity. Animal Unit (AU) - Defines forage consumption on the basis of one standard mature 1,000-pound cow, either dry or with calf up to 6 months old; all other classes and kinds of animals can be related to this standard. Animal-unit-day (AUD) - The amount (26 pounds) of air-dry forage calculated to meet one animal unit’s requirement for one day.
    [Show full text]