Mandates and Benefits in Policies

International Conference on Strategies and Policies on Open Access to Scientific Information 22nd - 24th June 2005

http://www.eprints.org/ http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/ http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/

Dr Leslie Carr School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Acknowledgements

• Thanks to Southampton University colleagues for slides – –Jessie Hey –Tim Brody Personal Context

• I give this talk with three roles

– Open Access Software (GNU EPrints) Technical Director

– Open Access Institutional Repository manager (x 2)

– Researcher (ie someone who publishes papers) distributed information systems, digital libraries, hypertext, semantic web, knowledge management, open access

• The presentation will address what it is like to work (as a researcher) in an environment where Open Access is already happening. Historical Context: (1994) & Open Archiving Initiative (1999)

• In an ideal world of scholarly communication – all research is freely available through research archives (personal and subject) • But journals become more and more expensive (serials crisis) • The work of researchers in our institution (even our own research) is often unavailable • June 27th 1994 Stevan Harnad’s ‘Subversive Proposal’ leading to the open access vision for scholarly material

• October 1999, Open Archiving Initiative (Santa Fe) between research archive maintainers – led to OAI-PMH metadata interoperability Current Context: Open Access Repositories

• An outcome of the OAI meeting was the development of GNU EPrints Open Source Repository Software to provide Open Access • Locally the result is – Repository of 9,000+ research articles for School of Electronics and Computer Science – Repository of 6,000 research outputs for University of Southampton • Globally – 160 repository installations throughout the world. What is EPrints?

• It is a repository – a Web-based database

• that allows individuals • to deposit important digital items • with appropriate metadata

• for – dissemination – curation – reporting EPrints Motivation: Open Access

• Ensuring that the output of research is available to researchers across the world – by providing dissemination channels which are independent of journal subscriptions

• Repositories are a major type of Open Access channel – Green Road = Repositories – Gold Road = Publishing Model EPrints Motivation: Benefits of Open Access

• Maximizing research impact – increased citations

• By maximizing research access – increased downloads

• Moral high ground – Benefit for science – Benefit for scientists (in 3-5 years) OA Citation Advantage

Citation impact for articles in the same journal and year are consistently higher for articles that have been self-archived by their authors. (Left is a comparison for Astronomy articles that are and are not in ArXiv.) The citation impact advantage is found in all fields analyzed so far, including articles (self-archived in any kind of open-access website or archive) in social sciences (above right) biological sciences (below right) and all fields of Physics (self-archived in ArXiv, below). Note that the percentage of published articles that have been self-archived (green bars) varies from about 10-20%from field to field and that the size of the open-access citation impact advantage (red bars) varies from about 25% to over 300%, but it is always positive. Social Sciences http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html Signal detection analysis of the hit/miss rate of the algorithm that searched for full-text OA papers on the web: d’ = 2.45 (sensitivity) b = .52 (bias)

Biological Sciences Mandates and Benefits

• The moral high ground of citation impact is not enough to motivate researchers on a daily basis

• Need a carrot and stick approach –mandates –benefits Open Access: No mandates

Archives without an institutional self-archiving policy (near empty, in some cases for several years) Open Access: Mandates

Two archives with an institutional self-archiving policy Southampton Department of Electronic and Computer Science (since 2002) and Southampton University (since 2004) More archives with institutional self-archiving policies: Max-Planck Institute (Edoc) (Germany), Physics ArXiv (USA), University of Amsterdam (Netherlands), Lund University (Sweden) Southampton Pre-Mandate 15 Dec 2004

'We see our Institutional Repository as a key tool for the stewardship of the University's digital research assets,' said Professor Paul Curran, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of the University. 'It will provide greater access to our research, as well as offering a valuable mechanism for reporting and recording it.’ Southampton Mandate

• Every researcher must deposit their publications which are to be used for research assessment (by end 2005).

• 3 staff members allocated to help run repository. ECS School Mandate 2002

• Pre-2002: required to enter bibliographic data into the School database

• From 2002: required to also deposit the “full-text” document –otherwise the publication does not exist for promotion purposes Mandate: hard or soft?

• Neither mandate is 100% watertight – they are a management stance – internal dissent and debate are still ongoing

• BUT they mark an organisational sea- change – researchers either comply straight away (cf Swan & Brown 2005) – or later, once it is considered normal. UK National Mandates

• National Funding Councils – Hastening slowly – Responsibility of public money – Speaking firmly, but working collaboratively

• Compare Independent Private Funders – Wellcome Trust Benefits: auto updated CV Benefits: magically updated CV

• On average, each paper is co-authored by 3 ECS researchers – only 1/3 papers need to be self- archived by each researcher! – each paper takes ~ 6 mins

• Some research groups designate secretaries to deposit everyone’s papers Benefits: latest research Benefits: high visibility Benefits: visibility Benefits: national visibility Benefits: marketing research Press releases link to paper

Benefits: easy form filling

/ 2 2 5 4 1 k/ u c. a . n o t so s. t n ri p e / / : p t t h

: me i t n i rd a rw o F ) 5 0 0 (2 e ssi Je y, e H e n i l u Pa , n so mp Si . 6 1 . p , 8 . o N , rm o f n I SC I J AE. R e h t d n a s i D AR

T d n a Benefits: automatic administrative returns

• Annual institutional census of all research output

• Six yearly national Research Assessment Exercise Benefits: never type bibliographic details twice! Benefits: keep CV details Benefits to researchers and managers Who does self-archiving?

• Institution? • National (funding) body? • Discipline?

• Key issue –where is the research done? –who controls the careers of the researchers? Summary

• Open Access has many positive benefits

• It needs to be backed up by a positive mandate and positive career-oriented benefits

• The institution may be the appropriate focus for mandate and reward.