<<

PHYS-454 Τhe free particle

1 The free particle-a n The free particle is that for which the potential V(x) is zero everywhere! n Clasically this would just mean motion at a constant velocity. But in the problem is very tricky. n The Schroedinger equation reads!

2 2 2 ! d ψ d ψ 2 2mE − 2 = Eψ ⇒ 2 = −k ψ , k ≡ 2m dx dx !

2 The free particle-b! n The solutions of this equations are plane waves: ψ x = Aeikx + Be−ikx ( ) n The time dependent solution is just the above solution multiplied by the standard time dependence e xp − i E t / ! : ( ) ⎛ !k ⎞ ⎛ !k ⎞ ik ⎜ x− t⎟ −ik ⎜ x+ t⎟ (x,t) Ae ⎝ 2m ⎠ Be ⎝ 2m ⎠ Ψ = +

3 The free particle-c!

n In the above solution the first term represents a wave traveling to the right, and the second represents a wave (of the same energy) going to the left. n Since they only differ by the sign in front of k, we might as well write: ⎛ !k 2 ⎞ i⎜ kx− t⎟ 2m Ψ (x,t) = Ae ⎝ ⎠ k

2mE ⎧k > 0 ⇒ traveling to the right k ≡ ± , with ⎨ ! k < 0 ⇒ traveling to the left ⎩ 4 …The free particle-d…!

n The speed of these waves (the coefficient of t over the coefficient of x) is ! k E vquantum = = 2m 2m n On the other hand, the classical speed of a free particle with kinetic energy E is given by 2E vclassical = = 2vquantum m 5 …The free particle-e… n Αpparently the quantum mechanical travels at half the speed of the particle it is supposed to represent! n There is also another problem: this wave function is not normalizable. +∞ 2 ∞ 2 Ψ* Ψ dx = A dx = A ∞ ∫−∞ k k ∫−∞ ( ) n In the case of the free particle, then, the separable solutions do not represent physically realizable states. A free particle cannot exist in a stationary state; or, to put it another way, there is no such thing as a free particle with a definite energy.! 6 …The free particle-e…

n This does not mean that these solutions are of no use for us. They play a mathematical role that is entirely independent of their physical interpretation. n The general solution to the time-dependent Schroedinger eq. is still a linear combination of separable solutions (only this time it’s an integral over the continuous variable k, instead of a sum over the discrete index n):

⎛ !2 k 2 ⎞ +∞ i⎜ kx− t⎟ 1 2m Ψ(x,t) = ∫ φ(k)e ⎝ ⎠ dk 2π −∞

7 …The free particle-f…

Where the analogy with the discrete spectrum is given by

c → 1/ 2π φ k dk n ( ) ( ) n Now the wavefunction can be normalized (for φ k ’ appropriate ( )). But it has a range of k s, and hence a range of energies and speeds. We call it a . !

8 …The free particle-f…

n Ψ x,0 In the generic problem we are given ( ) and we Ψ x,t are asked to find ( ) . For a free particle the problem is how to determine φ k so as to match the ( ) initial wave function: 1 +∞ Ψ(x,0) = ∫ φ(k)eikx dk 2π −∞

9 …The free particle-f…

n The answer is given by the Plancherel’s theorem of Fourier analysis: 1 +∞ 1 f (x) = ∫ F (k)eikx dk ⇔ F (k) = f (x)e−ikx dk 2π −∞ 2π F k f x n ( ) is called the of ( ) f x F k n ( ) is called the inverse Fourier transform of ( ) n So the solution to the generic quantum problem, for the free particles is: 1 +∞ φ (k) = ∫ Ψ(x,0)e−ikxdx 2π −∞ 10 …discussion of a paradox-a…

n We return now to the paradox: the separable Ψ x,t solution k ( ) travels at a different speed from the particle it represents! n We could easily avoid this problem by saying Ψ x,t that k ( ) is not a physically realizable state. But a further discussion reveals very interesting properties of the wave-packet and the velocity concept.

11 …discussion of a paradox-b… n The essential idea is this: A wavepacket is a superposition of sinusoidal functions whose amplitude is modulated by φ; it consists of “ripples” contained with an “envelope”. What corresponds to the particle velocity is not speed of the individuals ripples (the so called phase velocity), but rather the speed of the envelop (the ) - which, depending on the nature of the waves, can be greater than, less than, or equal to, the velocity that go to make it up.

12 …the wave packet…

13