77710 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

REGULATORY INFORMATION section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Office of Personnel Management SERVICE CENTER Act. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation The complete fall 2015 Unified Small Business Administration Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Agenda contains the Regulatory Plans of Social Security Administration Federal Acquisition Regulation Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory 30 Federal agencies and 59 Federal Actions agency regulatory agendas. Independent Regulatory Agencies Consumer Financial Protection Bureau AGENCY: Regulatory Information Service ADDRESSES: Regulatory Information Service Center (MVE), General Services Consumer Product Safety Commission Center. Federal Trade Commission Administration, 1800 F Street NW., ACTION: Introduction to the Regulatory National Indian Gaming Commission 2219F, Washington, DC 20405. Plan and the Unified Agenda of Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. AGENCY REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY further information about specific AGENDAS SUMMARY: Publication of the Unified regulatory actions, please refer to the Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory agency contact listed for each entry. Cabinet Departments Actions and the Regulatory Plan To provide comment on or to obtain Department of Agriculture represent key components of the further information about this Department of Commerce regulatory planning mechanism publication, contact: John C. Thomas, Department of Defense Department of Education prescribed in Executive Order 12866, Executive Director, Regulatory Department of Energy ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 Information Service Center (MVE), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FR 51735) and incorporated in General Services Administration, 1800 F Department of Homeland Security Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Street NW., 2219F, Washington, DC Department of Housing and Urban Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ 20405, (202) 482–7340. You may also Development issued on January 18, 2011 (76 FR send comments to us by email at: risc@ Department of the Interior 3821). The fall editions of the Unified gsa.gov. Department of Justice Department of Labor Agenda include the agency regulatory SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: plans required by E.O. 12866, which Department of Transportation Department of the Treasury identify regulatory priorities and TABLE OF CONTENTS provide additional detail about the most Introduction to The Regulatory Plan and Other Executive Agencies important significant regulatory actions the Unified Agenda of Federal Architectural and Transportation Barriers that agencies expect to take in the Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions Compliance Board coming year. Environmental Protection Agency In addition, the Regulatory Flexibility I. What are The Regulatory Plan and the General Services Administration Unified Agenda? National Aeronautics and Space Act requires that agencies publish II. Why are The Regulatory Plan and the Administration semiannual ‘‘regulatory flexibility Unified Agenda published? Small Business Administration agendas’’ describing regulatory actions III. How are The Regulatory Plan and the Federal Acquisition Regulation they are developing that will have Unified Agenda organized? Independent Agencies significant effects on small businesses IV. What information appears for each and other small entities (5 U.S.C. 602). entry? Consumer Financial Protection Bureau The Unified Agenda of Regulatory V. Abbreviations. Consumer Product Safety Commission Federal Communication Commission and Deregulatory Actions (Unified VI. How can users get copies of the Plan and the Agenda? Federal Reserve System Agenda), published in the fall and Nuclear Regulatory Commission spring, helps agencies fulfill all of these Introduction to the Fall 2015 Regulatory Plan Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. All federal regulatory AGENCY REGULATORY PLANS agencies have chosen to publish their INTRODUCTION TO THE REGULATORY Cabinet Departments PLAN AND THE UNIFIED AGENDA OF regulatory agendas as part of this FEDERAL REGULATORY AND Department of Agriculture publication. The complete Unified DEREGULATORY ACTIONS Agenda and Regulatory Plan can be Department of Commerce found online at http://www.reginfo.gov Department of Defense I. What are the Regulatory Plan and the Department of Education Unified Agenda? and a reduced print version can be Department of Energy found in the Federal Register. Department of Health and Human Services The Regulatory Plan serves as a Information regarding obtaining printed Department of Homeland Security defining statement of the copies can also be found on the Department of Housing and Urban Administration’s regulatory and Reginfo.gov Web site (or below, VI. How Development deregulatory policies and priorities. The Can Users Get Copies of the Plan and Department of the Interior Plan is part of the fall edition of the the Agenda?). Department of Justice Unified Agenda. Each participating The fall 2015 Unified Agenda Department of Labor agency’s regulatory plan contains: (1) A publication appearing in the Federal Department of Transportation Department of the Treasury narrative statement of the agency’s Register consists of The Regulatory Plan Department of Veterans Affairs regulatory and deregulatory priorities, and agency regulatory flexibility and, for the most part, (2) a description Other Executive Agencies agendas, in accordance with the of the most important significant publication requirements of the Architectural and Transportation Barriers regulatory and deregulatory actions that Regulatory Flexibility Act. Agency Compliance Board the agency reasonably expects to issue regulatory flexibility agendas contain Environmental Protection Agency Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in proposed or final form during the only those Agenda entries for rules that General Services Administration upcoming fiscal year. This edition are likely to have a significant economic National Aeronautics and Space includes the regulatory plans of 30 impact on a substantial number of small Administration agencies. entities and entries that have been National Archives and Records The Unified Agenda provides selected for periodic review under Administration information about regulations that the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77711

Government is considering or Railroad Retirement Board II. Why are the Regulatory Plan and the reviewing. The Unified Agenda has Social Security Administration* Unified Agenda published? appeared in the Federal Register twice Commodity Futures Trading The Regulatory Plan and the Unified each year since 1983 and has been Commission Agenda helps agencies comply with available online since 1995. The Consumer Product Safety Commission* their obligations under the Regulatory complete Unified Agenda is available to Farm Credit Administration Flexibility Act and various Executive the public at http://www.reginfo.gov. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation orders and other statutes. The online Unified Agenda offers Federal Energy Regulatory Commission flexible search tools and access to the Federal Housing Finance Agency Regulatory Flexibility Act historic Unified Agenda database Federal Maritime Commission The Regulatory Flexibility Act to1995. The complete online edition of Federal Trade Commission* requires agencies to identify those rules the Unified Agenda includes regulatory Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration that may have a significant economic agendas from 61 Federal agencies. Council impact on a substantial number of small Agencies of the United States Congress National Council on Disability entities (5 U.S.C. 602). Agencies meet are not included. National Credit Union Administration that requirement by including the The fall 2015 Unified Agenda National Indian Gaming Commission* information in their submissions for the publication appearing in the Federal National Labor Relations Board Unified Agenda. Agencies may also Register consists of The Regulatory Plan National Transportation Safety Board indicate those regulations that they are and agency regulatory flexibility Surface Transportation Board reviewing as part of their periodic agendas, in accordance with the The Regulatory Information Service review of existing rules under the publication requirements of the Center compiles the Unified Agenda for Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Regulatory Flexibility Act. Agency the Office of Information and Regulatory 610). Executive Order 13272, ‘‘Proper regulatory flexibility agendas contain Affairs (OIRA), part of the Office of Consideration of Small Entities in only those Agenda entries for rules that Management and Budget. OIRA is Agency Rulemaking,’’ signed August 13, are likely to have a significant economic responsible for overseeing the Federal 2002 (67 FR 53461), provides additional impact on a substantial number of small Government’s regulatory, paperwork, guidance on compliance with the Act. entities and entries that have been and information resource management Executive Order 12866 selected for periodic review under activities, including implementation of Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Executive Order 12866 (incorporated in Planning and Review,’’ signed Act. Printed entries display only the Executive Order 13563). The Center also September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51735), fields required by the Regulatory provides information about Federal requires covered agencies to prepare an Flexibility Act. Complete agenda regulatory activity to the President and agenda of all regulations under information for those entries appears, in his Executive Office, the Congress, a uniform format, in the online Unified development or review. The Order also agency officials, and the public. requires that certain agencies prepare Agenda at http://www.reginfo.gov. The activities included in the Agenda The following agencies have no annually a regulatory plan of their are, in general, those that will have a ‘‘most important significant regulatory entries for inclusion in the printed regulatory action within the next 12 regulatory flexibility agenda. An asterisk actions,’’ which appears as part of the months. Agencies may choose to fall Unified Agenda. Executive Order (*) indicates agencies that appear in The include activities that will have a longer Regulatory Plan. The regulatory agendas 13497, signed January 30, 2009 (74 FR timeframe than 12 months. Agency 6113), revoked the amendments to of these agencies are available to the agendas also show actions or reviews public at http://reginfo.gov. Executive Order 12866 that were completed or withdrawn since the last contained in Executive Order 13258 and Department of State Unified Agenda. Executive Order 12866 Executive Order 13422. Department of Veterans Affairs * does not require agencies to include Agency for International Development regulations concerning military or Executive Order 13563 Commission on Civil Rights foreign affairs functions or regulations Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Committee for Purchase From People related to agency organization, Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled management, or personnel matters. issued on January 18, 2011, Corporation for National and Agencies prepared entries for this supplements and reaffirms the Community Service publication to give the public notice of principles, structures, and definitions Court Services and Offender their plans to review, propose, and issue governing contemporary regulatory Supervision Agency for the District regulations. They have tried to predict review that were established in of Columbia their activities over the next 12 months Executive Order 12866, which includes Equal Employment Opportunity as accurately as possible, but dates and the general principles of regulation and Commission* schedules are subject to change. public participation, and orders Institute of Museum and Library Agencies may withdraw some of the integration and innovation in Services regulations now under development, coordination across agencies; flexible National Archives and Records and they may issue or propose other approaches where relevant, feasible, and Administration* regulations not included in their consistent with regulatory approaches; National Endowment for the Arts agendas. Agency actions in the scientific integrity in any scientific or National Endowment for the Humanities rulemaking process may occur before or technological information and processes National Science Foundation after the dates they have listed. The used to support the agencies’ regulatory Office of Government Ethics Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda do actions; and retrospective analysis of Office of Management and Budget not create a legal obligation on agencies existing regulations. Office of National Drug Control Policy to adhere to schedules in this Office of Personnel Management* publication or to confine their Executive Order 13132 Peace Corps regulatory activities to those regulations Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation* that appear within it. signed August 4, 1999 (64 FR 43255),

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77712 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

directs agencies to have an accountable include in their submissions for the providing information specific to that process to ensure meaningful and timely Unified Agenda information on whether agency plus descriptions of the agency’s input by State and local officials in the they have prepared or plan to prepare a regulatory and deregulatory actions. development of regulatory policies that Statement of Energy Effects for their The online, complete Unified Agenda have ‘‘federalism implications’’ as regulatory actions. contains the preambles of all defined in the Order. Under the Order, participating agencies. Unlike the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement an agency that is proposing a regulation printed edition, the online Agenda has Fairness Act with federalism implications, which no fixed ordering. In the online Agenda, either preempt State law or impose non- The Small Business Regulatory users can select the particular agencies’ statutory unfunded substantial direct Enforcement Fairness Act (Pub. L. 104– agendas they want to see. Users have compliance costs on State and local 121, title II) established a procedure for broad flexibility to specify the governments, must consult with State congressional review of rules (5 U.S.C. characteristics of the entries of interest and local officials early in the process 801 et seq.), which defers, unless to them by choosing the desired of developing the regulation. In exempted, the effective date of a responses to individual data fields. To addition, the agency must provide to the ‘‘major’’ rule for at least 60 days from see a listing of all of an agency’s entries, Director of the Office of Management the publication of the final rule in the a user can select the agency without and Budget a federalism summary Federal Register. The Act specifies that specifying any particular characteristics impact statement for such a regulation, a rule is ‘‘major’’ if it has resulted, or is of entries. which consists of a description of the likely to result, in an annual effect on Each entry in the Agenda is associated extent of the agency’s prior consultation the economy of $100 million or more or with one of five rulemaking stages. The with State and local officials, a meets other criteria specified in that rulemaking stages are: summary of their concerns and the Act. The Act provides that the 1. Prerule Stage—actions agencies agency’s position supporting the need to Administrator of OIRA will make the will undertake to determine whether or issue the regulation, and a statement of final determination as to whether a rule how to initiate rulemaking. Such actions the extent to which those concerns have is major. occur prior to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and may include been met. As part of this effort, agencies III. How are the Regulatory Plan and Advance Notices of Proposed include in their submissions for the the Unified Agenda organized? Unified Agenda information on whether Rulemaking (ANPRMs) and reviews of their regulatory actions may have an The Regulatory Plan appears in part II existing regulations. effect on the various levels of in a daily edition of the Federal 2. Proposed Rule Stage—actions for government and whether those actions Register. The Plan is a single document which agencies plan to publish a Notice have federalism implications. beginning with an introduction, of Proposed Rulemaking as the next step followed by a table of contents, followed in their rulemaking process or for which Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 by each agency’s section of the Plan. the closing date of the NPRM Comment The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Following the Plan in the Federal Period is the next step. of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4, title II) requires Register, as separate parts, are the 3. Final Rule Stage—actions for which agencies to prepare written assessments regulatory flexibility agendas for each agencies plan to publish a final rule or of the costs and benefits of significant agency whose agenda includes entries an interim final rule or to take other regulatory actions ‘‘that may result in for rules which are likely to have a final action as the next step. the expenditure by State, local, and significant economic impact on a 4. Long-Term Actions—items under tribal governments, in the aggregate, or substantial number of small entities or development but for which the agency by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or rules that have been selected for does not expect to have a regulatory more . . . in any 1 year . . .’’ The periodic review under section 610 of the action within the 12 months after requirement does not apply to Regulatory Flexibility Act. Each printed publication of this edition of the Unified independent regulatory agencies, nor agenda appears as a separate part. The Agenda. Some of the entries in this does it apply to certain subject areas sections of the Plan and the parts of the section may contain abbreviated excluded by section 4 of the Act. Unified Agenda are organized information. Affected agencies identify in the Unified alphabetically in four groups: Cabinet 5. Completed Actions — actions or Agenda those regulatory actions they departments; other executive agencies; reviews the agency has completed or believe are subject to title II of the Act. the Federal Acquisition Regulation, a withdrawn since publishing its last joint authority (Agenda only); and agenda. This section also includes items Executive Order 13211 independent regulatory agencies. the agency began and completed Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Agencies may in turn be divided into between issues of the Agenda. Concerning Regulations That subagencies. Each printed agency Long-Term Actions are rulemakings Significantly Affect Energy Supply, agenda has a table of contents listing the reported during the publication cycle Distribution, or Use,’’ signed May 18, agency’s printed entries that follow. that are outside of the required 12- 2001 (66 FR 28355), directs agencies to Each agency’s part of the Agenda month reporting period for which the provide, to the extent possible, contains a preamble providing Agenda was intended. Completed information regarding the adverse information specific to that agency. Actions in the publication cycle are effects that agency actions may have on Each printed agency agenda has a table rulemakings that are ending their the supply, distribution, and use of of contents listing the agency’s printed lifecycle either by Withdrawal or energy. Under the Order, the agency entries that follow. completion of the rulemaking process. must prepare and submit a Statement of Each agency’s section of the Plan Therefore, the Long-Term and Energy Effects to the Administrator of contains a narrative statement of Completed RINs do not represent the the Office of Information and Regulatory regulatory priorities and, for most ongoing, forward-looking nature Affairs, Office of Management and agencies, a description of the agency’s intended for reporting developing Budget, for ‘‘those matters identified as most important significant regulatory rulemakings in the Agenda pursuant to significant energy actions.’’ As part of and deregulatory actions. Each agency’s Executive Order 12866, section 4(b) and this effort, agencies may optionally part of the Agenda contains a preamble 4(c). To further differentiate these two

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77713

stages of rulemaking in the Unified completed section 610 reviews. In the (Pub. L. 104–4). The Act requires that, Agenda from active rulemakings, Long- online edition, these notations appear in before issuing an NPRM likely to result Term and Completed Actions are a separate field. in a mandate that may result in reported separately from active Priority—an indication of the expenditures by State, local, and tribal rulemakings, which can be any of the significance of the regulation. Agencies governments, in the aggregate, or by the first three stages of rulemaking listed assign each entry to one of the following private sector of more than $100 million above. A separate search function is five categories of significance. in 1 year, agencies, other than provided on http://reginfo.gov to search independent regulatory agencies, shall (1) Economically Significant for Completed and Long-Term Actions prepare a written statement containing apart from each other and active RINs. As defined in Executive Order 12866, an assessment of the anticipated costs A bullet (•) preceding the title of an a rulemaking action that will have an and benefits of the Federal mandate. entry indicates that the entry is annual effect on the economy of $100 Legal Authority—the section(s) of the appearing in the Unified Agenda for the million or more or will adversely affect United States Code (U.S.C.) or Public first time. in a material way the economy, a sector Law (Pub. L.) or the Executive order In the printed edition, all entries are of the economy, productivity, (E.O.) that authorize(s) the regulatory numbered sequentially from the competition, jobs, the environment, action. Agencies may provide popular beginning to the end of the publication. public health or safety, or State, local, name references to laws in addition to The sequence number preceding the or tribal governments or communities. these citations. title of each entry identifies the location The definition of an ‘‘economically CFR Citation—the section(s) of the of the entry in this edition. The significant’’ rule is similar but not Code of Federal Regulations that will be sequence number is used as the identical to the definition of a ‘‘major’’ affected by the action. reference in the printed table of rule under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104– Legal Deadline—whether the action is contents. Sequence numbers are not 121). (See below.) subject to a statutory or judicial used in the online Unified Agenda deadline, the date of that deadline, and because the unique Regulation Identifier (2) Other Significant whether the deadline pertains to an Number (RIN) is able to provide this A rulemaking that is not NPRM, a Final Action, or some other cross-reference capability. Economically Significant but is action. Editions of the Unified Agenda prior considered Significant by the agency. Abstract—a brief description of the to fall 2007 contained several indexes, This category includes rules that the problem the regulation will address; the which identified entries with various agency anticipates will be reviewed need for a Federal solution; to the extent characteristics. These included under Executive Order 12866 or rules available, alternatives that the agency is regulatory actions for which agencies that are a priority of the agency head. considering to address the problem; and believe that the Regulatory Flexibility These rules may or may not be included potential costs and benefits of the Act may require a Regulatory Flexibility in the agency’s regulatory plan. action. Analysis, actions selected for periodic Timetable—the dates and citations (if review under section 610(c) of the (3) Substantive, Nonsignificant available) for all past steps and a Regulatory Flexibility Act, and actions A rulemaking that has substantive projected date for at least the next step that may have federalism implications impacts, but is neither Significant, nor for the regulatory action. A date as defined in Executive Order 13132 or Routine and Frequent, nor displayed in the form 12/00/14 means other effects on levels of government. Informational/Administrative/Other. the agency is predicting the month and These indexes are no longer compiled, year the action will take place but not because users of the online Unified (4) Routine and Frequent the day it will occur. In some instances, Agenda have the flexibility to search for A rulemaking that is a specific case of agencies may indicate what the next entries with any combination of desired a multiple recurring application of a action will be, but the date of that action characteristics. The online edition regulatory program in the Code of is ‘‘To Be Determined.’’ ‘‘Next Action retains the Unified Agenda’s subject Federal Regulations and that does not Undetermined’’ indicates the agency index based on the Federal Register alter the body of the regulation. does not know what action it will take next. Thesaurus of Indexing Terms. In (5) Informational/Administrative/Other addition, online users have the option of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis searching Agenda text fields for words A rulemaking that is primarily Required—whether an analysis is or phrases. informational or pertains to agency required by the Regulatory Flexibility matters not central to accomplishing the Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) because the IV. What information appears for each agency’s regulatory mandate but that the rulemaking action is likely to have a entry? agency places in the Unified Agenda to significant economic impact on a All entries in the online Unified inform the public of the activity. substantial number of small entities as Agenda contain uniform data elements Major — whether the rule is ‘‘major’’ defined by the Act. including, at a minimum, the following under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104–121) Small Entities Affected—the types of information: because it has resulted or is likely to small entities (businesses, governmental Title of the Regulation—a brief result in an annual effect on the jurisdictions, or organizations) on which description of the subject of the economy of $100 million or more or the rulemaking action is likely to have regulation. In the printed edition, the meets other criteria specified in that an impact as defined by the Regulatory notation ‘‘Section 610 Review’’ Act. The Act provides that the Flexibility Act. Some agencies have following the title indicates that the Administrator of the Office of chosen to indicate likely effects on agency has selected the rule for its Information and Regulatory Affairs will small entities even though they believe periodic review of existing rules under make the final determination as to that a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. whether a rule is major. will not be required. 610(c)). Some agencies have indicated Unfunded Mandates—whether the Government Levels Affected—whether completions of section 610 reviews or rule is covered by section 202 of the the action is expected to affect levels of rulemaking actions resulting from Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 government and, if so, whether the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77714 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

governments are State, local, tribal, or previously completed RINs, or duplicate FY—The Federal fiscal year runs from Federal. RINs. October 1 to September 30. International Impacts—whether the Statement of Need—a description of NPRM—A Notice of Proposed regulation is expected to have the need for the regulatory action. Rulemaking is the document an agency international trade and investment Summary of the Legal Basis—a issues and publishes in the Federal effects, or otherwise may be of interest description of the legal basis for the Register that describes and solicits to the Nation’s international trading action, including whether any aspect of public comments on a proposed partners. the action is required by statute or court regulatory action. Under the Federalism—whether the action has order. Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. ‘‘federalism implications’’ as defined in Alternatives—a description of the 553), an NPRM must include, at a Executive Order 13132. This term refers minimum: alternatives the agency has considered • to actions ‘‘that have substantial direct or will consider as required by section A statement of the time, place, and effects on the States, on the relationship 4(c)(1)(B) of Executive Order 12866. nature of the public rulemaking between the national government and Anticipated Costs and Benefits—a proceeding; • A reference to the legal authority the States, or on the distribution of description of preliminary estimates of power and responsibilities among the under which the rule is proposed; and the anticipated costs and benefits of the • Either the terms or substance of the various levels of government.’’ action. proposed rule or a description of the Independent regulatory agencies are not Risks—a description of the magnitude subjects and issues involved. required to supply this information. of the risk the action addresses, the Public Law (or Pub. L.)—A public law Included in the Regulatory Plan— amount by which the agency expects the is a law passed by Congress and signed whether the rulemaking was included in action to reduce this risk, and the by the President or enacted over his the agency’s current regulatory plan relation of the risk and this risk veto. It has general applicability, unlike published in fall 2014. reduction effort to other risks and risk a private law that applies only to those Agency Contact—the name and phone reduction efforts within the agency’s persons or entities specifically number of at least one person in the jurisdiction. designated. Public laws are numbered in agency who is knowledgeable about the V. Abbreviations sequence throughout the 2-year life of rulemaking action. The agency may also each Congress; for example, Pub. L. provide the title, address, fax number, The following abbreviations appear 112–4 is the fourth public law of the email address, and TDD for each agency throughout this publication: 112th Congress. contact. ANPRM—An Advance Notice of RFA—A Regulatory Flexibility Some agencies have provided the Proposed Rulemaking is a preliminary Analysis is a description and analysis of following optional information: notice, published in the Federal the impact of a rule on small entities, RIN Information URL—the Internet Register, announcing that an agency is including small businesses, small address of a site that provides more considering a regulatory action. An governmental jurisdictions, and certain information about the entry. agency may issue an ANPRM before it small not-for-profit organizations. The Public Comment URL—the Internet develops a detailed proposed rule. An Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 address of a site that will accept public ANPRM describes the general area that et seq.) requires each agency to prepare comments on the entry. Alternatively, may be subject to regulation and usually an initial RFA for public comment when timely public comments may be asks for public comment on the issues it is required to publish an NPRM and submitted at the Governmentwide e- and options being discussed. An to make available a final RFA when the rulemaking site, http:// ANPRM is issued only when an agency final rule is published, unless the www.regulations.gov. believes it needs to gather more agency head certifies that the rule Additional Information—any information before proceeding to a would not have a significant economic information an agency wishes to include notice of proposed rulemaking. impact on a substantial number of small that does not have a specific CFR—The Code of Federal entities. corresponding data element. Regulations is an annual codification of RIN—The Regulation Identifier Compliance Cost to the Public—the the general and permanent regulations Number is assigned by the Regulatory estimated gross compliance cost of the published in the Federal Register by the Information Service Center to identify action. agencies of the Federal Government. each regulatory action listed in the Affected Sectors—the industrial The Code is divided into 50 titles, each Regulatory Plan and the Unified sectors that the action may most affect, title covering a broad area subject to Agenda, as directed by Executive Order either directly or indirectly. Affected Federal regulation. The CFR is keyed to 12866 (section 4(b)). Additionally, OMB sectors are identified by North and kept up to date by the daily issues has asked agencies to include RINs in American Industry Classification of the Federal Register. the headings of their Rule and Proposed System (NAICS) codes. E.O.—An Executive order is a Rule documents when publishing them Energy Effects—an indication of directive from the President to in the Federal Register, to make it easier whether the agency has prepared or Executive agencies, issued under for the public and agency officials to plans to prepare a Statement of Energy constitutional or statutory authority. track the publication history of Effects for the action, as required by Executive orders are published in the regulatory actions throughout their Executive Order 13211 ‘‘Actions Federal Register and in title 3 of the development. Concerning Regulations That Code of Federal Regulations. Seq. No.—The sequence number Significantly Affect Energy Supply, FR—The Federal Register is a daily identifies the location of an entry in the Distribution, or Use,’’ signed May 18, Federal Government publication that printed edition of the Regulatory Plan 2001 (66 FR 28355). provides a uniform system for and the Unified Agenda. Note that a Related RINs—one or more past or publishing Presidential documents, all specific regulatory action will have the current RIN(s) associated with activity proposed and final regulations, notices same RIN throughout its development related to this action, such as merged of meetings, and other official but will generally have different RINs, split RINs, new activity for documents issued by Federal agencies. sequence numbers if it appears in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77715

different printed editions of the Unified Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions Agenda. Sequence numbers are not used (agency regulatory flexibility agendas) since fall 1995 are available in in the online Unified Agenda. are available from the Superintendent of electronic form at http://reginfo.gov, U.S.C.—The United States Code is a Documents, U.S. Government Printing along with flexible search tools. consolidation and codification of all Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA The Government Printing Office’s general and permanent laws of the 15250–7954. Telephone: (202) 512–1800 GPO FDsys Web site contains copies of United States. The U.S.C. is divided into or 1–866–512–1800 (toll-free). the Agendas and Regulatory Plans that 50 titles, each title covering a broad area Copies of individual agency materials have been printed in the Federal of Federal law. may be available directly from the Register. These documents are available agency or may be found on the agency’s at http://www.fdsys.gov. VI. How can users get copies of the Plan Web site. Please contact the particular and the Agenda? agency for further information. Dated: November 16, 2015. Copies of the Federal Register issue All editions of The Regulatory Plan John C. Thomas, containing the printed edition of The and the Unified Agenda of Federal Executive Director.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77716 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

INTRODUCTION TO THE 2015 several factors: Regulations may count agencies to reevaluate existing rules and REGULATORY PLAN as economically significant because they to streamline, modify, or eliminate those Executive Order 12866, issued in impose costs, confer large benefits, or regulations that do not make sense in 1993, requires the production of a remove significant burdens. their current form. The agencies’ lookback efforts so far during this Unified Regulatory Agenda and Executive Orders 13563 and 13610: Regulatory Plan. Executive Order 13563, Regulatory Development, and the Administration have yielded issued in 2011, reaffirms the Retrospective Review of Regulation approximately $22 billion in savings for requirements of Executive Order 12866. the American public over the next five Executive Order 13563 reaffirmed the years. Consistent with these Executive Orders, principles, structures, and definitions in the Office of Information and Regulatory The Administration is continuing to Executive Order 12866, which has long work with agencies to institutionalize Affairs (OIRA) is providing the 2015 governed regulatory review. Executive Unified Regulatory Agenda (Agenda) retrospective review so that agencies Order 13563 explicitly points to the regularly review existing rules on the and the Regulatory Plan (Plan) for need for predictability and certainty in public review. The Agenda and Plan are books to ensure they remain effective, the regulatory system, as well as for use cost-justified, and based on the best preliminary statements of regulatory of the least burdensome means to and deregulatory policies and priorities available science. The Administration achieving regulatory ends. These will continue to examine what is under consideration. The Agenda and Executive Orders include the Plan include ‘‘active rulemakings’’ that working and what is not, and eliminate requirement that, to the extent unjustified and outdated regulations. agencies could possibly conclude over permitted by law, agencies should not the next year. Regulatory lookback is an ongoing proceed with rulemaking in the absence exercise, and continues to be a high The Plan provides a list of important of a reasoned determination that the regulatory actions that agencies are priority for the Administration. In benefits justify the costs. They also accordance with Executive Orders considering for issuance in proposed or establish public participation, final form during the 2016 fiscal year. In 13610 and 13563, in July 2015, agencies integration and innovation, flexible submitted to OIRA the latest updates of contrast, the Agenda is a more inclusive approaches, scientific integrity, and list, including numerous ministerial their retrospective review plans, which retrospective review as areas of are publicly available at: https://www. actions and routine rulemakings, as well emphasis in regulation. In particular, as long-term initiatives that agencies do whitehouse.gov/omb/oira/regulation- Executive Order 13563 explicitly draws reform. Federal agencies will again not plan to complete in the coming year attention to the need to measure and update their retrospective review plans but on which they are actively working. improve ‘‘the actual results of regulatory in January 2016. OIRA has asked A central purpose of the Agenda is to requirements’’—a clear reference to the agencies to continue to emphasize involve the public, including State, importance of the retrospective review regulatory lookbacks in their latest local, and tribal officials, in Federal of regulations. regulatory planning. The public Executive Order 13563 addresses new Regulatory Plans. examination of the Agenda and Plan regulations that are under development, Reflecting that focus, the current will facilitate public participation in a as well as retrospective review of Agenda lists approximately seventy-five regulatory system that, in the words of existing regulations that are already in rules under active development that are Executive Order 13563, protects ‘‘public place. With respect to agencies’ review characterized as retroactively reviewing health, welfare, safety, and our of existing regulations, the Executive existing programs. Below are some environment while promoting economic Order calls for careful reassessment examples of agency plans to reevaluate growth, innovation, competitiveness, based on empirical analysis. The current practices in accordance with and job creation.’’ We emphasize that prospective analysis required by Executive Orders 13563 and 13610: rules listed on the Agenda must still Executive Order 13563 may depend on —After extensive public engagement undergo significant development and a degree of prediction and speculation and in response to a recent court review before they are issued. No about a rule’s likely impacts, and the decision, the Environmental regulatory action can become effective actual costs and benefits of a regulation Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing until it has gone through the legally may be lower or higher than what was revisions to the 2007 Exceptional required processes, which generally anticipated when the rule was originally Events rule. These revisions will include public notice and comment. developed. streamline the process that states Any proposed or final action must also Executive Order 13610, Identifying follow to decide whether air quality satisfy the requirements of relevant and Reducing Regulatory Burdens, monitoring data associated with an statutes, Executive Orders, and issued in 2012, institutionalizes the ‘‘exceptional event’’ should be Presidential Memoranda. Those retrospective—or ‘‘lookback’’— included when determining if an area requirements, public comments, and mechanism set out in Executive Order is meeting national air quality new information may or may not lead 13563 by requiring agencies to report to standards. Exceptional events include an agency to go forward with an action the Office of Management and Budget natural events such as wildfires, that is currently under contemplation. and to the public twice each year stratospheric ozone intrusions, and Among other information, the Agenda (January and July) on the status of their volcanic and seismic activities. Given also provides an initial classification of retrospective review efforts. In these the possible influence of wildfires on whether a rulemaking is ‘‘significant’’ or reports, agencies are to ‘‘describe ozone, EPA is also releasing draft ‘‘economically significant’’ under the progress, anticipated accomplishments, guidance that provides states with terms of Executive Orders 12866 and and proposed timelines for relevant additional information on preparing 13563. Whether a regulation is listed on actions.’’ exceptional events demonstrations for the Agenda as ‘‘economically Executive Orders 13563 and 13610 wildfires as they relate to the ozone significant’’ within the meaning of recognize that circumstances may standards. Executive Order 12866 (generally, change in a way that requires —The Department of Labor (DOL) has having an annual effect on the economy reconsideration of regulatory taken steps to include retrospective of $100 million or more) can depend on requirements. Lookback analysis allows analysis requirements in new

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77717

regulations in order to facilitate for high loan-to-value FHA-insured the summer of 2014, the United States evaluation of their impacts. For mortgages. This change is based on and Canada released the U.S.-Canada example, DOL’s Mine Safety and the increased quality of construction Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Health Administration announced in materials and the standardization of Joint Forward Plan.1 The Forward Plan its 2014 Respirable Dust final rule that building codes and building code identifies twenty-four areas of it will conduct a retrospective review enforcement. HUD expects the rule to cooperation where the United States in 2017 to evaluate the data collected increase flexibility for homeowners and Canada will work together over the using continuous personal dust and reduce the regulatory burden on next three to five years in order to monitors. Additionally, the lenders. modernize our thinking around Occupational Safety and Health Executive Order 13609: International international regulatory cooperation and Administration’s Recordkeeping and Regulatory Cooperation develop a toolbox of strategies to Reporting Requirements final rule— address international regulatory issues moving from the Standard Industrial In addition to using regulatory as they arise. Building on the Forward Classification System to the North lookback as a tool to make the Plan, in the Spring of 2015, agencies in American Industry Classification regulatory system more efficient, the the United States and Canada issued System for determining which Administration has focused on joint work plans to guide focused industries are low-hazard and promoting international regulatory international regulatory cooperation potentially exempt from cooperation. International regulatory efforts. The Forward Plan and related recordkeeping requirements— cooperation supports economic growth, work represent a significant turning includes a commitment to conduct a job creation, innovation, trade and point in the Administration’s regulatory retrospective review of the agency’s investment, while also protecting public cooperation relationship with Canada, recordkeeping regulations. Finally, in health, safety, and welfare. In May 2012, and outline new Federal agency-level DOL’s Wage and Hour Division’s President Obama issued Executive partnership arrangements to help recent Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Order 13609, Promoting International institutionalize the ways in which our to modernize the Fair Labor Standards Regulatory Cooperation, which regulators work together. The Forward Act’s Overtime Exemptions for emphasizes the importance of these Plan will help remove unnecessary Executive, Administrative, efforts as a key tool for eliminating requirements, develop common Professional, Outside Sales and unnecessary differences in regulation standards, and identify potential areas Computer Employees, the Division between the United States and its major where future regulation may proposed to consider a future trading partners. Additionally, as part of unnecessarily differ. This kind of retrospective review of the rule after the regulatory lookback initiative, international cooperation on regulations it is finalized and implemented. Executive Order 13609 requires agencies between the United States and Canada —The Department of Housing and to ‘‘consider reforms to existing will help eliminate barriers to doing Urban Development (HUD) is working significant regulations that address business in the United States or with on a final rule to streamline, in unnecessary differences in regulatory U.S. companies, grow the economy, and several ways, the inspection and requirements between the United States create jobs. The Administration also home warranty requirements for the and its major trading partners . . . when continues to work with other countries, Federal Housing Administration’s stakeholders provide adequate including Mexico and Brazil, to identify (FHA) single family mortgage information to the agency establishing opportunities for regulatory insurance. In doing so, FHA would that the differences are unnecessary.’’ cooperation. increase choice and lower the costs Executive Order 13609 also directed for FHA borrowers. First, HUD is each agency to submit a Regulatory Plan * * * * * considering the removal of regulations that includes ‘‘a summary of its The Administration continues to that require the use of an inspector international regulatory cooperation foster a regulatory system that from the FHA Inspector Roster as a activities that are reasonably anticipated emphasizes the careful consideration of condition for FHA mortgage to lead to significant regulations.’’ costs and benefits, public participation, insurance. This change is based on Further, Executive Order 13609 requires integration, regulatory innovation, the recognition of the sufficiency and each agency to ‘‘ensure that significant flexible regulatory approaches, and quality of inspections carried out by regulations that the agency identifies as science. These considerations are meant local jurisdictions. Second, this rule having significant international impacts to produce a regulatory system that would also remove the regulations are designated as such’’ in the draws on recent learning, that is driven requiring homeowners to purchase Regulatory Agenda. by evidence, and that is suited to the 10-year protection plans from FHA- In furtherance of this focus on distinctive circumstances of the 21st approved warranty issuers to qualify international regulatory cooperation, in Century.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

1 ...... Payment Limitation and Payment Eligibility—Actively Engaged in Farming ...... 0560–AI31 Final Rule Stage. 2 ...... Importation, Interstate Movement, and Release Into the Environment of Certain 0579–AE15 Prerule Stage. Genetically Engineered Organisms. 3 ...... General Administrative Regulations; Catastrophic Risk Protection Endorsement; 0563–AC43 Final Rule Stage. Area Risk Protection Insurance Regulations; and the Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Basic Provisions.

1 Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/ default/files/omb/oira/irc/us-canada-rcc-joint- forward-plan.pdf.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77718 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE—Continued

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

4 ...... Enhancing Retailer Eligibility Standards in SNAP ...... 0584–AE27 Proposed Rule Stage. 5 ...... Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Photo Electronic Benefit 0584–AE45 Proposed Rule Stage. Transfer (EBT) Card Implementation Requirements. 6 ...... National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs: Nutrition Standards for 0584–AE09 Final Rule Stage. All Foods Sold in School, as Required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. 7 ...... Child and Adult Care Food Program: Meal Pattern Revisions Related to the 0584–AE18 Final Rule Stage. Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. 8 ...... Requirements for the Disposition of Non-Ambulatory Disabled Veal Calves ...... 0583–AD54 Final Rule Stage. 9 ...... USDA Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement Program ...... 0551–AA87 Final Rule Stage. 10 ...... Program Measures and Metrics ...... 0570–AA95 Final Rule Stage. 11 ...... Rural Broadband Access Loans and Loan Guarantees ...... 0572–AC34 Final Rule Stage. 12 ...... Agricultural Conservation Easement Program ...... 0578–AA61 Final Rule Stage. 13 ...... Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) ...... 0578–AA62 Final Rule Stage. 14 ...... Conservation Stewardship Program ...... 0578–AA63 Final Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

15 ...... Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Program ...... 0790–AJ40 Proposed Rule Stage. 16 ...... Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program Procedures ...... 0790–AI36 Final Rule Stage. 17 ...... Transition Assistance Program (TAP) for Military Personnel ...... 0790–AJ17 Final Rule Stage. 18 ...... Department of Defense (DoD)-Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cybersecurity (CS) 0790–AJ29 Final Rule Stage. Activities. 19 ...... Detection and Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic Parts—Further Implementation 0750–AI58 Proposed Rule Stage. (DFARS Case 2014–D005). 20 ...... Network Penetration Reporting and Contracting for Cloud Services (DFARS Case 0750–AI61 Final Rule Stage. 2013–D018). 21 ...... TRICARE: Mental Health and Substance Use ...... 0720–AB65 Proposed Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

22 ...... REPAYE ...... 1840–AD18 Final Rule Stage. 23 ...... Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act ...... 1830–AA21 Final Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

24 ...... Coverage Determination for Computers and Battery Backup Systems ...... 1904–AD04 Proposed Rule Stage. 25 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Lamps ...... 1904–AD09 Proposed Rule Stage. 26 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Non-Weatherized Gas Furnaces 1904–AD20 Proposed Rule Stage. 27 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment ...... 1904–AD34 Proposed Rule Stage. 28 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps ..... 1904–AD37 Proposed Rule Stage. 29 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Pumps ...... 1904–AC54 Final Rule Stage. 30 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for Small, Large, and Very Large Commercial 1904–AC95 Final Rule Stage. Package A/C and Heating Equipment.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

31 ...... Increase Number of Patients to which Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA)- 0930–AA22 Proposed Rule Stage. Waived Physicians Can Prescribe Buprenorphine. 32 ...... Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels ...... 0910–AF22 Final Rule Stage. 33 ...... Food Labeling: Serving Sizes of Foods That Can Reasonably Be Consumed At 0910–AF23 Final Rule Stage. One Eating Occasion; Dual-Column Labeling; Updating, Modifying, and Estab- lishing Certain RACCs. 34 ...... Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for 0910–AG35 Final Rule Stage. Human Consumption.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77719

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES—Continued

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

35 ...... ‘‘Tobacco Products’’ Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as 0910–AG38 Final Rule Stage. Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. 36 ...... Reports of Distribution and Sales Information for Antimicrobial Active Ingredients 0910–AG45 Final Rule Stage. Used in Food-Producing Animals. 37 ...... Focused Mitigation Strategies To Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration ... 0910–AG63 Final Rule Stage. 38 ...... Foreign Supplier Verification Program ...... 0910–AG64 Final Rule Stage. 39 ...... Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies to Conduct Food Safety 0910–AG66 Final Rule Stage. Audits and to Issue Certifications. 40 ...... Supplemental Applications Proposing Labeling Changes for Approved Drugs and 0910–AG94 Final Rule Stage. Biological Products. 41 ...... Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food ...... 0910–AG98 Final Rule Stage. 42 ...... Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Update (CMS–4168–P) ..... 0938–AR60 Proposed Rule Stage. 43 ...... Expansion of the CMS Qualified Entity Program (CMS–5061–P) ...... 0938–AS66 Proposed Rule Stage. 44 ...... Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Models 0938–AS69 Proposed Rule Stage. (APMs) in Medicare Fee-for-Service (CMS–5517–P). 45 ...... Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System for Acute Care Hospitals and the 0938–AS77 Proposed Rule Stage. Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and FY 2017 Rates (CMS–1655–P). 46 ...... CY 2017 Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and 0938–AS81 Proposed Rule Stage. Other Revisions to Medicare Part B (CMS–1654–P). 47 ...... CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient PPS Policy Changes and Payment Rates and Am- 0938–AS82 Proposed Rule Stage. bulatory Surgical Center Payment System Policy Changes and Payment Rates (CMS–1656–P). 48 ...... Medicaid Managed Care, CHIP Delivered in Managed Care, Medicaid and CHIP 0938–AS25 Final Rule Stage. Comprehensive Quality Strategies, and Revisions related to Third Party Liabil- ity (CMS–2390–F).

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

49 ...... Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) ...... 1601–AA69 Proposed Rule Stage. 50 ...... Adjustment of Status to Lawful Permanent Resident for Aliens in T and U Non- 1615–AA60 Proposed Rule Stage. immigrant Status. 51 ...... New Classification for Victims of Criminal Activity; Eligibility for the U Non- 1615–AA67 Proposed Rule Stage. immigrant Status. 52 ...... Exception to the Persecution Bar for Asylum, Refugee, and Temporary Protected 1615–AB89 Proposed Rule Stage. Status, and Withholding of Removal. 53 ...... Requirements for Filing Motions and Administrative Appeals ...... 1615–AB98 Proposed Rule Stage. 54 ...... Significant Public Benefit Parole for Entrepreneurs ...... 1615–AC04 Proposed Rule Stage. 55 ...... Retention of EB–1, EB–2, and EB–3 Immigrant Workers and Program Improve- 1615–AC05 Proposed Rule Stage. ments Affecting Highly-Skilled H–1B Alien Workers. 56 ...... Classification for Victims of Severe Forms of Trafficking in Persons; Eligibility for 1615–AA59 Final Rule Stage. T Nonimmigrant Status. 57 ...... Application of Immigration Regulations to the Commonwealth of the Northern 1615–AB77 Final Rule Stage. Mariana Islands. 58 ...... Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions ...... 1615–AB81 Final Rule Stage. 59 ...... Enhancing Opportunities for H–1B1, CW–1, and E–3 Nonimmigrants and EB–1 1615–AC00 Final Rule Stage. Immigrants. 60 ...... Expansion of Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility ...... 1615–AC03 Final Rule Stage. 61 ...... Inspection of Towing Vessels ...... 1625–AB06 Final Rule Stage. 62 ...... Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC); Card Reader Require- 1625–AB21 Final Rule Stage. ments. 63 ...... Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS) ...... 1651–AB04 Proposed Rule Stage. 64 ...... Definition of Form I–94 to Include Electronic Format ...... 1651–AA96 Final Rule Stage. 65 ...... Security Training for Surface Mode Employees ...... 1652–AA55 Proposed Rule Stage. 66 ...... Passenger Screening Using Advanced Imaging Technology ...... 1652–AA67 Final Rule Stage. 67 ...... Improving and Expanding Training Opportunities for F–1 Nonimmigrant Students 1653–AA72 Proposed Rule Stage. with STEM Degrees and Expanding Cap-Gap Relief for All F–1 Students With Pending H–1B Petitions.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

68 ...... Narrowing the Digital Divide through Broadband Installation in HUD-Funded New 2501–AD75 Proposed Rule Stage. Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation (FR–5890).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77720 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT—Continued

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

69 ...... Narrowing the Digital Divide Through Community Planning: Integrating 2506–AC41 Proposed Rule Stage. Broadband Planning Into HUD’s Consolidated Planning Process (FR–5891).

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

70 ...... Implementation of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (Section 504 of the Reha- 1190–AA60 Proposed Rule Stage. bilitation Act of 1973). 71 ...... Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability: Accessibility of Web Information and 1190–AA65 Proposed Rule Stage. Services of State and Local Governments. 72 ...... Revision of Standards and Procedures for the Enforcement of Section 274B of 1190–AA71 Proposed Rule Stage. the Immigration and Nationality Act. 73 ...... Implementation of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (Title II and Title III of the 1190–AA59 Final Rule Stage. ADA). 74 ...... Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Movie Captioning and Audio De- 1190–AA63 Final Rule Stage. scription. 75 ...... Motions To Reopen Removal, Deportation, or Exclusion Proceedings Based 1125–AA68 Proposed Rule Stage. Upon a Claim of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. 76 ...... Recognition of Organizations and Accreditation of Non-Attorney Representatives 1125–AA72 Proposed Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

77 ...... Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Contractors, Executive Order 13706 ...... 1235–AA13 Proposed Rule Stage. 78 ...... Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Profes- 1235–AA11 Final Rule Stage. sional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees. 79 ...... Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act ...... 1205–AB73 Proposed Rule Stage. 80 ...... Savings Arrangements Established by States for Non-Governmental Employees 1210–AB71 Proposed Rule Stage. 81 ...... Respirable Crystalline Silica ...... 1219–AB36 Proposed Rule Stage. 82 ...... Proximity Detection Systems for Mobile Machines in Underground Mines ...... 1219–AB78 Proposed Rule Stage. 83 ...... Criteria and Procedures for Proposed Assessment of Civil Penalties ...... 1219–AB72 Final Rule Stage. 84 ...... Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica ...... 1218–AB70 Final Rule Stage. 85 ...... Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses ...... 1218–AC49 Final Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

86 ...... Use of Mobile Wireless Devices for Voice Calls on Aircraft ...... 2105–AE30 Proposed Rule Stage. 87 ...... Airport Safety Management System ...... 2120–AJ38 Proposed Rule Stage. 88 ...... Pilot Professional Development ...... 2120–AJ87 Proposed Rule Stage. 89 ...... Revision of Airworthiness Standards for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter 2120–AK65 Proposed Rule Stage. Category Airplanes. 90 ...... Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems ...... 2120–AJ60 Final Rule Stage. 91 ...... National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP–21) ...... 2125–AF54 Proposed Rule Stage. 92 ...... National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP–21) ...... 2125–AF49 Final Rule Stage. 93 ...... National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP–21) ...... 2125–AF53 Final Rule Stage. 94 ...... Carrier Safety Fitness Determination ...... 2126–AB11 Proposed Rule Stage. 95 ...... Entry-Level Driver Training ...... 2126–AB66 Proposed Rule Stage. 96 ...... Commercial Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP–21) ...... 2126–AB18 Final Rule Stage. 97 ...... Rear Seat Belt Reminder System ...... 2127–AL37 Proposed Rule Stage. 98 ...... Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Work 2127–AL52 Proposed Rule Stage. Trucks: Phase 2. 99 ...... Transit Asset Management ...... 2132–AB07 Proposed Rule Stage. 100 ...... Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans ...... 2132–AB23 Proposed Rule Stage. 101 ...... Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines ...... 2137–AE66 Proposed Rule Stage. 102 ...... Pipeline Safety: Gas Transmission ...... 2137–AE72 Proposed Rule Stage. 103 ...... Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Response Plans and Information Sharing for High- 2137–AF08 Proposed Rule Stage. Hazard Flammable Trains.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77721

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

104 ...... Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS ...... 2060–AS05 Proposed Rule Stage. 105 ...... Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources 2060–AS30 Proposed Rule Stage. 106 ...... Model Trading Rules for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Electric Utility Gener- 2060–AS47 Proposed Rule Stage. ating Units Constructed on or Before January 8, 2014. 107 ...... Proposed Renewable Fuel Volume Standards for 2017 and Biomass Based Die- 2060–AS72 Proposed Rule Stage. sel Volume (BBD) for 2018. 108 ...... Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations ...... 2070–AJ38 Proposed Rule Stage. 109 ...... Trichloroethylene (TCE); Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(a) ...... 2070–AK03 Proposed Rule Stage. 110 ...... N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and Methylene Chloride; Rulemaking Under TSCA 2070–AK07 Proposed Rule Stage. Section 6(a). 111 ...... Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Class- 2050–AG61 Proposed Rule Stage. es of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining Industry. 112 ...... User Fee Schedule for Electronic Hazardous Waste Manifest ...... 2050–AG80 Proposed Rule Stage. 113 ...... Modernization of the Accidental Release Prevention Regulations Under Clean Air 2050–AG82 Proposed Rule Stage. Act. 114 ...... Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead ...... 2060–AQ44 Final Rule Stage. 115 ...... Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and 2060–AS16 Final Rule Stage. Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles—Phase 2. 116 ...... Renewable Fuel Volume Standards, 2014–2016 (Reg Plan) ...... 2060–AS22 Final Rule Stage. 117 ...... Findings That Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Aircraft Cause Or Contribute To 2060–AS31 Final Rule Stage. Air Pollution That May Reasonably Be Anticipated to Endanger Public Health And Welfare Under CAA Section 231 (Reg Plan). 118 ...... Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators ...... 2070–AJ20 Final Rule Stage. 119 ...... Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products ...... 2070–AJ44 Final Rule Stage.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

120 ...... The Federal Sector’s Obligation To Be a Model Employer of Individuals With Dis- 3046–AA94 Proposed Rule Stage. abilities. 121 ...... Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity Process ...... 3046–AB00 Proposed Rule Stage. 122 ...... Amendments to Regulations Under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination 3046–AB02 Proposed Rule Stage. Act of 2008. 123 ...... Amendments to Regulations Under the Americans With Disabilities Act ...... 3046–AB01 Final Rule Stage.

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

124 ...... Small Business Innovation Research Program and Small Business Technology 3245–AG64 Proposed Rule Stage. Transfer Program Policy Directive. 125 ...... Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) Program; Impact SBICs ...... 3245–AG66 Proposed Rule Stage. 126 ...... Affiliation for Business Loan Programs and Surety Bond Guarantee Program ...... 3245–AG73 Proposed Rule Stage. 127 ...... Small Business Mentor-Prote´ge´ Programs ...... 3245–AG24 Final Rule Stage. 128 ...... Small Business Government Contracting and National Defense Authorization Act 3245–AG58 Final Rule Stage. of 2013 Amendments.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

129 ...... Vocational Factors of Age, Education, and Work Experience in the Adult Dis- 0960–AH74 Prerule Stage. ability Determination Process. 130 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Musculoskeletal Disorders (3318P) ...... 0960–AG38 Proposed Rule Stage. 131 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Digestive Disorders (3441P) ...... 0960–AG65 Proposed Rule Stage. 132 ...... Acceptable Medical Sources, Evaluating Evidence, and Treating Sources 0960–AH51 Proposed Rule Stage. (3787P). 133 ...... Returning Evidence at the Appeals Council Level (3844F) ...... 0960–AH64 Proposed Rule Stage. 134 ...... Removal of the Expiration Date for State Disability Examiner Authority to Make 0960–AH70 Proposed Rule Stage. Fully Favorable Quick Disability Determinations and Compassionate Allow- ances. 135 ...... Anti-Harassment and Hostile Work Environment Case Tracking and Records 0960–AH82 Proposed Rule Stage. System Revised.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77722 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION—Continued

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

136 ...... Amendment to the Education Category, ‘‘Illiterate or Unable to Communicate in 0960–AH86 Proposed Rule Stage. English’’ and Clarification of Previous Work Experience Criterion for Persons who are ‘‘Illiterate’’. 137 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Neurological Impairments (806F) ...... 0960–AF35 Final Rule Stage. 138 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Respiratory System Disorders (859F) ...... 0960–AF58 Final Rule Stage. 139 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Mental Disorders (886F) ...... 0960–AF69 Final Rule Stage.

BILLING CODE 6820–27–P only to provide food and fiber, but for received. For more information about crucial emerging economic this rule, see RIN 0572–AC34. opportunities such as renewable energy, USDA also works to increase the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE broadband, and recreation. Many of the effectiveness of the Government’s Nation’s small businesses are located in investment in rural America. To this Fall 2015 Statement of Regulatory rural communities and are the engine of end, Rural Development will issue a Priorities job growth and an important source of final rule to establish program metrics to The U.S. Department of Agriculture innovation for the country. The measure the economic activities created (USDA) provides leadership on food, economic vitality and quality of life in through grants and loans, including any agriculture, natural resources, rural rural America depends on a healthy technical assistance provided as a development, nutrition, and related agricultural production system. Farmers component of the grant or loan program, issues based on sound public policy, the and ranchers face a challenging global, and to measure the short and long-term best available science, and efficient technologically advanced, and viability of award recipients, and any management. The Department touches competitive business environment. entities to whom recipients provide the lives of almost every American, USDA works to ensure that producers assistance using the awarded funds. The every day. Our regulatory plan reflects are prosperous and competitive, have action is required by section 6209 of the that reality and reinforces our access to new markets, can manage their 2014 Farm Bill, and will not change the commitment to achieve results for risks, and receive support in times of underlying provisions of the included everyone we serve. economic distress or weather-related programs, such as eligibility, The regulatory plan continues USDA disasters. Prosperous rural communities applications, scoring, and servicing efforts to implement several important are those with adequate assets to fully provisions. For more information about pieces of legislation. The 2014 Farm Bill support the well-being of community this rule, see RIN 0570–AA95. provides authorization for services and members. USDA helps to strengthen Increase agricultural opportunities by programs that impact every American rural assets by building physical, human ensuring a robust safety net, creating and millions of people around the and social, financial, and natural new markets, and supporting a world. The new Farm Bill builds on capital. competitive agricultural system. historic economic gains in rural In another step to increase the Enhance rural prosperity, including America over the past five years, while effectiveness of the Government’s leveraging capital markets to increase achieving meaningful reform and investment in rural America, the Farm Government’s investment in rural billions of dollars in savings for Service Agency (FSA) published a America. taxpayers. The Healthy, Hunger-Free proposed rule on March 26, 2015, on Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA) allows USDA is committed to providing behalf of the Commodity Credit USDA, for the first time in over 30 broadband to rural areas. Since 2009, Corporation (CCC) to specify the years, opportunity to make real reforms USDA investments have delivered requirements for a person to be to the school lunch and breakfast broadband service to 1.5 million considered actively engaged in farming programs by improving the critical households, businesses, schools, for the purpose of payment eligibility nutrition and hunger safety net for libraries and community facilities. for certain FSA and CCC programs. millions of children. These investments support the USDA These changes will ensure that farm To assist the country in addressing goal to create thriving communities program payments are going to the today’s challenges, USDA has where people want to live and raise farmers and farm families that they are developed a regulatory plan consistent families. Consistent with these efforts, intended to help. Specifically, FSA is with five strategic goals that articulate the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) revising and clarifying the requirements the Department’s priorities. published an interim rule on July 30, for a significant contribution of active 2015, implementing Rural Broadband personnel management to a farming 1. Assist Rural Communities To Create Access Loan and Loan Guarantee operation. These changes are required Prosperity So They Are Self-Sustaining, Program provisions included in section by the 2014 Farm Bill, and will not Re-Populating, and Economically 6104 of the 2014 Farm Bill. The rule apply to persons or entities comprised Thriving established two funding cycles to solely of family members. FSA is Rural America is home to a vibrant review and prioritize applications for currently developing a final rule to economy supported by nearly 50 the program. It also set a minimum level implement changes to the rule based on million Americans. These Americans of acceptable broadband service at 4 public comments received. For more come from diverse backgrounds and megabits downstream and 1 megabit information about this rule, see RIN work in a variety of industries, upstream. RUS is currently developing 0560–AI31. including manufacturing, agriculture, a final rule to implement changes to the The Federal Crop Insurance Program services, government, and trade. Today, administration of the Broadband mitigates production and revenue losses the country looks to rural America not program based on public comments from yield or price fluctuations and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77723

provides timely indemnity payments. designed to make substantial allowing enrollment of lands that are in The 2014 Farm Bill improved the contributions in the areas of soil health, the last year of the Conservation Reserve Federal Crop Insurance Program by resiliency to climate change, and Program. NRCS is currently developing allowing producers to elect coverage for improved water quality. a final rule to implement changes to the shallow losses, improved options for Improve the health of the Nation’s administration of CSP based on public growers of organic commodities, and the forests, grasslands and working lands by comments received. For more ability for diversified operations to managing our natural resources. information about this rule, see RIN insure their whole-farm under a single The Natural Resources Conservation 0578–AA63. policy. To strengthen further the farm Service (NRCS) administers the The Environmental Quality Incentives financial safety net, the Risk Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (EQIP) is another voluntary Management Agency (RMA) published Program (ACEP), which provides conservation program that helps an interim rule on June 30, 2014, that financial and technical assistance to agricultural producers in a manner that amended the general administrative help conserve agricultural lands and promotes agricultural production and regulations governing Catastrophic Risk wetlands and their related benefits. The environmental quality as compatible Protection Endorsement, Area Risk 2014 Farm Bill consolidated the goals. Through EQIP, agricultural Protection Insurance, and the basic Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP), the producers receive financial and provisions for Common Crop Insurance Farm and Ranch Lands Protection technical assistance to implement consistent with the changes mandated Program (FRPP), and the Grassland structural and management by the 2014 Farm Bill. RMA is currently Reserve Program (GRP) into ACEP. In conservation practices that optimize developing a final rule to implement fiscal year 2014, an estimated 143,833 environmental benefits on working changes based on public comments acres of farmland, grasslands, and agricultural land. Through EQIP, received. For more information about wetlands were enrolled into ACEP. producers addressed their conservation this rule, see RIN 0563–AC43. Through regulation, NRCS established a needs on over 11 million acres in fiscal comprehensive framework to implement year 2014. EQIP has been instrumental 2. Ensure Our National Forests and ACEP, and standardized criteria for in helping communities respond to Private Working Lands Are Conserved, implementing the program, provided drought. On December 12, 2014, NRCS Restored, and Made More Resilient to program participants with predictability published an interim rule that Climate Change, While Enhancing Our when they initiate an application and implemented changes mandated by Water Resources convey an easement. On February 27, 2014 Farm Bill and addressed a few key National forests and private working 2015, NRCS published an interim rule discretionary provisions, including, lands provide clean air, clean and to implement ACEP. NRCS is currently adding waiver authority to irrigation abundant water, and wildlife habitat. developing a final rule to implement history requirements, incorporation of These lands sustain jobs and produce changes to the administration of ACEP Tribal Conservation Advisory Councils food, fiber, timber, and bio-based based on public comments received. For where appropriate, and clarifying energy. Many of our landscapes are more information about this rule, see provisions related to Comprehensive scenic and culturally important and RIN 0578–AA61. Nutrient Management Plans (CNMP) provide Americans a chance to enjoy The Conservation Stewardship associated with Animal Feeding the outdoors. The 2014 Farm Bill Program (CSP) also helps the Operations (AFO). NRCS is currently delivered a strong conservation title that Department ensure that our national developing a final rule to implement made robust investments to conserve forests and private working lands are changes to the administration of EQIP and support America’s working lands, conserved, restored, and made more based on public comments received. For and consolidated, and streamlined resilient to climate change. Through more information about this rule, see programs to improve efficiency and CSP, NRCS provides financial and RIN 0578–AA62. encourage participation. Farm Bill technical assistance to eligible Contribute to clean and abundant conservation programs provide producers to conserve and enhance soil, water by protecting and enhancing America’s farmers, ranchers and others water, air, and related natural resources water resources on national forests and with technical and financial assistance on their land. NRCS makes funding for working lands. to enable conservation of natural CSP available nationwide on a The 2014 Farm Bill relinked highly resources, while protecting and continuous application basis. In fiscal erodible land conservation and wetland improving agricultural operations. year 2014, NRCS enrolled about 9.6 conservation compliance with eligibility Seventy percent of the American million acres and now CSP enrollment for premium support paid under the landscape is privately owned, making exceeds 60 million acres, about the size federal crop insurance program. The private lands conservation critical to the of Iowa and Indiana combined. On Farm Service Agency implemented health of our nation’s environment and November 5, 2014, NRCS published an these provisions through an interim rule ability to ensure our working lands are interim rule to implement provisions of published on April, 24, 2015. Since productive. To sustain these many the 2014 Farm bill that amended CSP. publication of the interim rule, more benefits, USDA has implemented the Key changes included: Limiting eligible than 98.2 percent of producers met the authorities provided by the 2014 Farm land to that in production for at least 4 requirement to certify conservation Bill to protect and enhance 1.3 billion of the 6 years preceding February 7, compliance to qualify for crop insurance acres of working lands. USDA also 2014, the date of enactment of the 2014 premium support payments. manages 193 million acres of national Farm Bill; requiring contract offers to Implementing these provisions for forests and grasslands. Our partners meet stewardship threshold for at least conservation compliance is expected to include Federal, Tribal, and State two priority resource concerns and meet extend conservation provisions for an governments; industry; non- or exceed one additional priority additional 1.5 million acres of highly governmental organizations, community resource concern by the end of the erodible lands and 1.1 million acres of groups and producers. The Nation’s stewardship contract; allowing wetlands, which will reduce soil lands face increasing threats that must enrollment of lands that are protected erosion, enhance water quality, and be addressed. USDA’s natural resource- by an agricultural land easement under create wildlife habitat. Through this focused regulatory strategies are the newly authorized ACEP; and action, NRCS modified the existing

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77724 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

wetlands Mitigation Banking Program to dietary diversity and nutrition, and reduce and prevent foodborne illness. remove the requirement that USDA hold supports the sustainability of school- To help ensure a plentiful supply of easements in the mitigation program. feeding programs as they transition to food, the Department detects and This allows entities recognized by full host-government ownership. The quickly responds to new invasive USDA to hold mitigation banking final rule will enable FAS and its species and emerging agricultural and easements granted by a person who partners to strengthen the capacity of public health situations. wishes to maintain payment eligibility host-governments to implement their Improve access to nutritious food. under the wetland conservation own homegrown school feeding USDA’s domestic nutrition assistance provision. FSA is currently developing programs. For more information about programs serve one in four Americans a final rule to implement changes to the this rule, see RIN 0551–AA87. annually. The Department is committed interim rule based on public comments Enhance America’s ability to develop to making benefits available to every received. For more information about and trade agricultural products derived eligible person who wishes to this rule, see RIN 0560–AI26. from new and emerging technologies. participate in the major nutrition USDA uses science-based regulatory assistance programs, including the 3. Help America Promote Agricultural systems to allow for the safe Production and Biotechnology Exports Supplemental Nutrition Assistance development, use, and trade of products Program (SNAP), the cornerstone of the as America Works To Increase Food derived from new agricultural Security nutrition assistance safety net, which technologies. USDA continues to helped over 46 million Americans— Food security is important for regulate the importation, interstate more than half of whom were children, sustainable economic growth of movement, and field-testing of newly the elderly, or individuals with developing nations and the long-term developed genetically engineered (GE) disabilities—put food on the table in economic prosperity and security of the organisms that qualify as ‘‘regulated 2014. The Department will soon United States. Unfortunately, global articles’’ to ensure they do not pose a propose changes to eligibility food insecurity is expected to rise in the threat to plant health before they can be requirements for SNAP retail food stores next five years. Food security means commercialized. These science-based to ensure access to nutrition foods for having a reliable source of nutritious evaluations facilitate the safe home preparation and consumption for and safe food and sufficient resources to introduction of new agricultural the families most vulnerable to food purchase it. USDA has a role in curbing production options and enhance public insecurity. While the ultimate objective this distressing trend through programs and international confidence in these is for economic opportunities to make such as Food for Progress and President products. As a part of this effort, the nutrition assistance unnecessary for as Obama’s Feed the Future Initiative and Animal and Plant Health Inspection many families as possible, we will through new technology-based Service (APHIS) will publish a proposed ensure that these vital programs remain solutions, such as the development of rule to revise its regulations and align ready to serve all eligible people who genetically engineered plants, that them with current authorizations by improves yields and reduces post- incorporating the noxious weed need them. harvest loss. authority and regulate GE organisms The Department is also committed to Ensure U.S. agricultural resources that pose plant pest or weed risks in a helping ensure children have access to contribute to enhanced global food manner that balances oversight and risk, healthy, balanced meals throughout the security. and that is based on the best available day, as mandated by HHFKA, through The Foreign Agriculture Service science. The regulatory framework being the USDA child nutrition programs, (FAS) will issue a final rule for the developed will enable more focused, including school, child care and Local and Regional procurement (LRP) risk-based regulation of GE organisms summer meal programs. The summer Program as authorized in section 3207 that pose plant pest or noxious weed meal programs have seen a historic of the 2014 Farm Bill. USDA risks and will implement regulatory increase in participation, with 11 implemented a successful LRP pilot requirements only to the extent million more meals served in 2015 program under the authorities of the necessary to achieve the APHIS compared to the previous summer, 2008 Farm Bill. LRP ties to the protection goal. For more information serving a total of more than 187 million President’s 2014 Trade Policy Agenda about this rule, see RIN 0579–AE15. meals at over 50,000 summer meal sites and works with developing nations to throughout the country. alleviate poverty and foster economic 4. Ensure That All of America’s Promote healthy diet and physical growth to provide better markets for Children Have Access to Safe, activity behaviors. U.S. exporters. LRP is expected to help Nutritious, and Balanced Meals The Administration has set a goal to alleviate hunger for millions of A plentiful supply of safe and solve the problem of childhood obesity individuals in food insecure countries. nutritious food is essential to the well- within a generation so that children LRP supports development activities being of every family and the healthy born today will reach adulthood at a that strengthen the capacity of food- development of every child in America. healthy weight. On school days, insecure developing countries, and Science has established strong links children who participate in both the build resilience and address the causes between diet, health, and productivity. breakfast and lunch programs consume of chronic food insecurity while also Even small improvements in the average as many as half of their calories at supporting USDA’s other food diet, fostered by USDA, may yield school. The Department must ensure assistance programs, including the significant health and economic that all foods served in school McGovern Dole International Food for benefits. However, foodborne illness is contribute to good health, and the Education and Child Nutrition Program still a common, costly—yet largely HHFKA provided new authority to set (McGovern-Dole). In addition, the preventable—public health problem, common-sense nutrition standards for program can be used to fill food even though the U.S. food supply food sold throughout the school day. To availability gaps generated by system is one of the safest in the world. help accomplish this goal, the Food and unexpected emergencies. LRP USDA is committed to ensuring that Nutrition Service (FNS) will publish complements ongoing activities under Americans have access to safe food three rules implementing provisions of the McGovern-Dole Program, improves through a farm-to-table approach to the HHFKA.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77725

FNS published an interim rule on changes to the proposed rule based on resources has been critical to meeting June 28, 2013, for Nutrition Standards public comments received. For more the needs of those that we serve. for All Foods Sold in School, as information about this rule, see RIN While these proactive steps have required by HHFKA. Section 208 0584–AE25. given USDA the tools to carry out our Protect agricultural health by requires the Secretary to promulgate mission-critical work, ensuring that minimizing major diseases and pests to regulations to establish science-based USDA’s millions of customers receive ensure access to safe, plentiful, and nutrition standards for all foods sold in stronger service, they are matters nutritious food. schools, outside the school meal relating to agency management, programs, on the school campus, and at The Food Safety and Inspection personnel, public property, and/or any time during the school day. FNS is Service (FSIS) continue to enforce and contracts, and as such they are not currently developing a final rule to improve compliance with the Humane subject to the notice and comment implement changes to the interim rule Methods of Slaughter Act. FSIS requirements for rulemaking codified at based on public comments received. For published a proposed rule on May 13, more information about this rule, see 2015, that would require non- 5 U.S.C. 553. Consequently, they are not RIN 0584–AE09. ambulatory disabled veal calves that are included in the Department’s regulatory FNS published the proposed rule, offered for slaughter to be condemned agenda. For more information about the Meal Pattern Revisions Related to the and promptly euthanized. Currently, USDA efforts to cut costs and modernize Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, FSIS allows veal calves that are unable operations via the Blueprint for Stronger on January 15, 2015, to implement to rise from a recumbent position to be Service Initiative, see http://www.usda. section 221 of the HHFKA. This section set aside and warmed or rested, and gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome requires USDA to review and update, no presented for slaughter if they regain the ?contentidonly=true&contentid= less frequently than once every 10 years, ability to walk. FSIS has found that this blueprint_for_stronger_service.html. requirements for meals served under the practice may contribute to the Retrospective Review of Existing inhumane treatment of the veal calves. Child and Adult Care Food Program Regulations (CACFP) to ensure that meals are This rule will improve compliance with consistent with the most recent Dietary the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act In accordance with Executive Order Guidelines for Americans and relevant by encouraging improved treatment of 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and nutrition science. FNS is currently veal calves, as well as improve Regulatory Review,’’ and Executive developing a final rule to implement inspection efficiency by allowing FSIS Order 13610, ‘‘Identifying and Reducing changes to the proposed rule based on inspection program personnel to devote Regulatory Burdens,’’ USDA continues public comments received. For more more time to activities related to food to review its existing regulations and information about this rule, see RIN safety. FSIS is currently developing a information collections to evaluate the 0584–AE18. final rule to implement these changes continued effectiveness in addressing FNS published the proposed rule, based on public comments received. For the circumstances for which the Local School Wellness Policy more information about this rule, see regulations were implemented. As part Implementation and School Nutrition RIN 0583–AD54. of this ongoing review to maximize the Environment Information, on February 5. Create a USDA for the 21st Century cost-effectiveness of its regulatory 28, 2014, to implement section 204 of That Is High Performing, Efficient, and programs, USDA will publish a Federal the HHFKA. As a result of meal pattern Adaptable Register notice inviting public comment changes in the school meals programs, to assist in analyzing its existing students are now eating 16 percent more USDA has been a leader in the significant regulations to determine vegetables and there was a 23 percent Federal government at implementing whether any should be modified, increase in the selection of fruit at innovative practices to rein in costs and streamlined, expanded, or repealed. lunch. This Act requires each local increase efficiencies. By taking steps to educational agency participating in find efficiencies and cut costs, USDA USDA has identified the following Federal child nutrition programs to employees have achieved savings and regulatory actions as associated with establish, for all schools under its cost avoidances of over $1.4 billion in retrospective review and analysis. Some jurisdiction, a local school wellness recent years. Some of these results came of the regulatory actions on the below policy to maintain this momentum. The from relatively smaller, common-sense list are completed actions, which do not HHFKA requires that the wellness initiatives such as the $1 million saved appear in the Regulatory Agenda. You policy include goals for nutrition, by streamlining the mail handling at one can find more information about these nutrition education, physical activity, of the USDA mailrooms or the completed rulemakings in past and other school-based activities that consolidation of the Department’s cell publications of the Unified Agenda promote student wellness. In addition, phone contracts, which is saving (search the Completed Actions sections) the HHFKA requires that local taxpayers over $5 million per year. on www.reginfo.gov. Other entries on educational agencies ensure stakeholder Other results have come from larger- this list are still in development and participation in development of local scale activities, such as the focus on have not yet appeared in the Regulatory school wellness policies; periodically reducing non-essential travel that has Agenda. You can read more about these assess compliance with the policies; and yielded over $400 million in entries and the Department’s strategy for disclose information about the policies efficiencies. Overall, these results have regulation reform at http://www.usda. to the public. FNS is currently allowed us to do more with less during gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid= developing a final rule to implement a time when such stewardship of USDA_OPEN.

Agency Title RIN

Animal Plant Health & Inspection Service Participation in the International Trade Data System (ITDS) via the Automated TBD. (APHIS). Commercial Environment (ACE). Food Safety & Inspection Service (FSIS) Electronic Export Application and Certification Fee ...... 0583–AD41. Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) ..... Input Export Form Numbers into the Automated Export System ...... TBD.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77726 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Agency Title RIN

AMS ...... Revisions to the Electronic Submission of the Import Request of Shell Eggs ...... 0581–AD40. APHIS ...... Forms for Declaration Mandated by 2008 Farm Bill (Lacey Act amendments) ..... 0579–AD99. Farm Service Agency (FSA) and Risk Acreage and Crop Reporting Streamlining Initiative ...... 0563–0084. Management Agency. FSA ...... Environmental Policies and Procedures; Compliance with the National Environ- 0560–AH02. mental Policy Act and Related Authorities. Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Delivery Streamlining Initiative (CDSI)—Conservation Client Gate- TBD. way (CCG). Rural Business Services (RBS) ...... Business and Industry Loan Guaranteed Program ...... 0570–AA85. Rural Housing Service ...... Community Facilities Loan and Grants ...... 0575–AC91. FSIS ...... Electronic Import Inspection and Certification of Imported Products and Foreign 0583–AD39. Establishments. Forest Service (FS) ...... National Environmental Policy Act Efficiencies ...... 0596–AD01. FSA ...... Streamlined Farm Loan Programs Direct Loan Making ...... 0560–0237. Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) ...... Direct Certification for School Meals ...... 0584–AE10. FSIS ...... Prior Labeling Approval System: Generic Label Approval ...... 0583–AC59. FSIS ...... Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection ...... 0583–AD32. FNS ...... Simplified Cost Accounting and Other Actions to Reduce Paperwork in the Sum- 0584–AD84. mer Food Service Program. Rural Business Services (RBS) ...... Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing Assist- 0570–AA73, ance. 0570–0065. RBS ...... Rural Energy for America Program ...... 0570–AA76.

USDA—FARM SERVICE AGENCY for payments based on being actively Abstract: USDA uses science-based (FSA) engaged in farming. regulatory systems to allow for the safe Anticipated Cost and Benefits: A cost- Final Rule Stage development, use, and trade of products benefit analysis was prepared for this derived from new agricultural 1. Payment Limitation and Payment rule and will be made available when technologies. USDA continues to Eligibility—Actively Engaged in the rule is published. regulate the importation, interstate Farming Risks: None. movement, and field-testing of newly Timetable: Priority: Other Significant. developed genetically engineered (GE) organisms that qualify as regulated Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1308–1 note Action Date FR Cite CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1400. articles’’ to ensure they do not pose a Legal Deadline: None. NPRM ...... 03/26/15 80 FR 15916 threat to plant health before they can be Abstract: The Farm Service Agency NPRM Comment 05/26/15 commercialized. These science-based Period End. evaluations facilitate the safe (FSA) is revising regulations on behalf Final Action ...... 12/00/15 of the Commodity Credit Corporation introduction of new agricultural production options and enhance public (CCC) to specify the requirements for a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis person to be considered actively and international confidence in these Required: No. products. As a part of this effort, the engaged in farming for the purpose of Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Animal and Plant Health Inspection payment eligibility for certain FSA and Organizations. Service (APHIS) will publish a proposed CCC programs. Specifically, FSA is Government Levels Affected: None. revising and clarifying the requirements Agency Contact: Deirdre Holder, rule to revise its regulations and align for a significant contribution of active Director, Regulatory Review Group, them with current authorizations by personnel management to a farming Department of Agriculture, Farm incorporating the noxious weed operation. These changes are required Service Agency, 1400 Independence authority and regulate GE organisms by the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250– that pose plant pest or weed risks in a 2014 Farm Bill). The provisions of the 0572, Phone: 202 205–5851, Fax: 202 manner that balances oversight and risk, rule will not apply to persons or entities 720–5233, Email: deirdre.holder@ and that is based on the best available comprised solely of family members. wdc.usda.gov. science. The regulatory framework being The rule will not change the existing RIN: 0560–AI31 developed will enable more focused, regulations as they relate to risk-based regulation of GE organisms contributions of land, capital, that pose plant pest or noxious weed equipment, labor, or the special rules risks and will implement regulatory related to landowners with a risk in the USDA—ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE (APHIS) requirements only to the extent crop or spouses. necessary to achieve the APHIS Statement of Need: This rule is Prerule Stage protection goal. needed to update the FSA regulations to • implement a provision in the 2014 Farm 2. Importation, Interstate Movement, Timetable: Bill. and Release Into the Environment of Action Date FR Cite Summary of Legal Basis: The Certain Genetically Engineered Organisms Agricultural Act of 2014 (Pub. L. 113– Notice of Intent to 11/00/15 79). Priority: Other Significant. Prepare an En- Alternatives: There are alternatives Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined vironmental Im- about how many managers a farming CFR Citation: 7 CFR 340. pact Statement. operation may be able to have qualify Legal Deadline: None. NPRM ...... 07/00/16

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77727

Action Date FR Cite Alternatives: N/A. definition of retail food store to clarify Anticipated Cost and Benefits: A when a retailer is a restaurant rather NPRM Comment 09/00/16 benefit-cost analysis was prepared for than a retail food store. Period End. the Interim Final Rule and no Summary of Legal Basis: Section 3(k) significant changes have been made to of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis this Final Rule which would alter the (the Act) generally (with limited Required: Undetermined. initial analysis which will be made exception) (1) requires that food Small Entities Affected: Businesses, available when the rule is published. purchased with SNAP benefits be meant Organizations. Risks: None. for home consumption and (2) forbids Government Levels Affected: Local, Timetable: the purchase of hot foods with SNAP State. benefits. The intent of those statutory International Impacts: This regulatory Action Date FR Cite requirements can be circumvented by action will be likely to have selling cold foods, which may be international trade and investment Interim Final Rule 06/30/14 79 FR 37155 Effective. purchased with SNAP benefits, and effects, or otherwise be of international offering onsite heating or cooking of interest. Interim Final Rule 09/02/14 Comment Pe- those same foods, either for free or at an Additional Information: Additional riod End. additional cost. In addition, section 9 of information about APHIS and its Final Action ...... 03/00/16 the Act provides for approval of retail programs is available on the Internet at food stores and wholesale food concerns http://www.aphis.usda.gov. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis based on their ability to effectuate the Agency Contact: Andrea Huberty, Required: No. purposes of the Program. Branch Chief, Policy, Program, and Small Entities Affected: No. Alternatives: Because this proposed Regulatory Consultation Branch, Policy Government Levels Affected: None. rule is under development, alternatives Coordination Program, BRS, Department Agency Contact: Timothy Hoffmann, are not yet articulated. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Director, Product Administration and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Standards Division, Department of proposed changes will allow FNS to Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236, Agriculture, Federal Crop Insurance improve access to healthy food choices Phone: 301 851–3880. Corporation, 6501 Beacon Drive, Kansas for SNAP participants and to ensure that RIN: 0579–AE15 City, MO 64133, Phone: 816 926–7387. participating retailers effectuate the RIN: 0563–AC43 purposes of the Program. FNS anticipates that these provisions will USDA—FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE have no significant costs to States. CORPORATION (FCIC) USDA—FOOD AND NUTRITION Risks: None identified. Timetable: Final Rule Stage SERVICE (FNS) 3. General Administrative Regulations; Proposed Rule Stage Action Date FR Cite Catastrophic Risk Protection 4. Enhancing Retailer Eligibility NPRM ...... 03/00/16 Endorsement; Area Risk Protection Standards in SNAP Insurance Regulations; and the Priority: Other Significant. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Legal Authority: 3 U.S.C. 2012; 9 Required: No. Basic Provisions U.S.C. 2018 Government Levels Affected: State. Priority: Economically Significant. CFR Citation: 7 CFR 271.2; 7 CFR Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. 278.1. Regulatory Review Specialist, Legal Authority: Pub. L. 113–79 Legal Deadline: None. Department of Agriculture, Food and CFR Citation: 7 CFR 400; 7 CFR 457. Abstract: This rulemaking will Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June address the criteria used to authorize Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: 30, 2014, 2015 Contract year. redemption of SNAP benefits (especially 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ Abstract: The Federal Crop Insurance by restaurant-type operations). fns.usda.gov. Corporation amends the General Statement of Need: The 2014 Farm Lynnette M. Thomas, Chief, Planning Administrative Regulations— Bill amended the Food and Nutrition and Regulatory Affairs Branch, Ineligibility for Programs under the Act of 2008 to increase the requirement Department of Agriculture, Food and Federal Crop Insurance Act, the that certain SNAP authorized retail food Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Catastrophic Risk Protection stores have available on a continual Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: Endorsement, the Area Risk Protection basis at least three varieties of items in 703 605–4782, Email: lynnette.thomas@ Insurance Regulations, and the Common each of four staple food categories to a fns.usda.gov. Crop Insurance Regulations, Basic mandatory minimum of seven. The 2014 RIN: 0584–AE27 Provisions, to revise those revisions Farm Bill also amended the Act to affected by changes mandated by the increase for certain SNAP authorized Agricultural Act of 2014 (commonly retail food stores the minimum number USDA—FNS referred to as the 2014 Farm Bill), of categories in which perishable foods enacted on February 7, 2014. are required from two to three. This rule 5. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Statement of Need: This Final rule is would codify these mandatory Program (SNAP) Photo Electronic needed complete the Interim Final Rule requirements. Further, using existing Benefit Transfer (EBT) Card that updates FCIC regulations required authority in the Act and feedback from Implementation Requirements to implement provisions of the an expansive Request for Information, Priority: Other Significant. Agricultural Act of 2014. the rulemaking also proposes changes to Legal Authority: Pub L. 104–193 Summary of Legal Basis: The address depth of stock, redefine staple CFR Citation: 7 CFR 273; 7 CFR 274; Agricultural Act of 2014. and accessory foods, and amend the 7 CFR 278.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77728 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Legal Deadline: None. Agencies are responsible for meals are served during meal service. Abstract: Under section 7(h)(9) of the approximately 50% of SNAP Section 208 requires the Secretary to Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the administration costs, which would promulgate regulations to establish Act), as amended [7 U.S.C. 2016(h)(9)], include the costs associated with science-based nutrition standards for all States have the option to require that implementing and maintaining photo foods sold in schools. The nutrition SNAP Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) EBT cards. standards apply to all food sold outside card contain a photo of one or more Risks: FNS recognizes the existence of the school meal programs, on the school household members. This rule would violating retailers and others buying and campus, and at any time during the incorporate into regulation and provide using multiple cards and pins to stock school day. additional clarity on the Food and their shelves and will propose an Statement of Need: This rule codifies Nutrition Service (FNS) guidance alternative to address possession of the two provisions of the Healthy, developed for State agencies wishing to multiple cards and PINs to allow for Hunger-Free Kids Act (Pub. L. 111–296; implement the photo EBT card option. additional verification at point-of-sale in the Act) under 7 CFR parts 210 and 220. Statement of Need: The regulation some specific instances. Section 203 requires schools would create a clearer structure for Recent attempts to implement participating in the National School those States wishing to exercise the photographs on the EBT card have Lunch Program to make available to option of placing a photo on EBT cards proven difficult for some States. This children free of charge, as nutritionally and ensure uniform accessibility for rule will expand on current program appropriate, potable water for participants in all States. regulations to provide clarification and consumption in the place where meals Summary of Legal Basis: The Food more detailed guidance to States are served during meal service. Section and Nutrition Act of 2008 requires that implementing the photo EBT option and 208 requires the Secretary to promulgate any States choosing to issue a photo on ensure program access is protected. proposed regulations to establish the EBT card establish procedures to Timetable: science-based nutrition standards for all ensure that all other household foods sold in schools not later than members or any authorized Action Date FR Cite December 13, 2011. The nutrition representative of the household may standards apply to all food sold outside utilize the card. Furthermore, applying NPRM ...... 11/00/15 the school meal programs, on the school this option must also preserve client campus, and at any time during the rights and responsibilities afforded by Regulatory Flexibility Analysis school day. the Act to ensure that all household Required: No. Summary of Legal Basis: There is no members are able to maintain Small Entities Affected: No. existing regulatory requirement to make uninterrupted access to benefits, that Government Levels Affected: Local, water available where meals are served. non-applicants applying on behalf of State. Regulations at 7 CFR parts 210.11 direct eligible household members are not Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, State agencies and school food negatively impacted, and that SNAP Regulatory Review Specialist, authorities to establish regulations recipients using photo EBT cards are Department of Agriculture, Food and necessary to control the sale of foods in treated equitably in accordance with Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center competition with lunches served under Federal law when purchasing food at Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: the NSLP, and prohibit the sale of foods authorized retailers. 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ of minimal nutritional value in the food Alternatives: None. fns.usda.gov. service areas during the lunch periods. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The RIN: 0584–AE45 The sale of other competitive foods may, changes to be proposed are not expected at the discretion of the State agency and to create serious inconsistencies or school food authority, be allowed in the otherwise interfere with actions taken or USDA—FNS food service area during the lunch planned by another agency or materially period only if all income from the sale alter the budgetary impacts of Final Rule Stage of such foods accrues to the benefit of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan 6. National School Lunch and School the nonprofit school food service or the programs or the rights and obligations of Breakfast Programs: Nutrition school or student organizations recipients thereof. The requirements Standards for All Foods Sold in School, approved by the school. State agencies will not raise novel or legal policy as Required by the Healthy, Hunger– and school food authorities may impose issues. Free Kids Act of 2010 additional restrictions on the sale of and Budgetary impact on FNS is expected income from all foods sold at any time to be limited. Photo EBT card Priority: Economically Significant. throughout schools participating in the implementation in multiple States may Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Program. require additional Federal staff for Unfunded Mandates: This action may Alternatives: None. review and approval of implementation affect State, local or tribal governments Anticipated Cost and Benefits: plans and for on-going monitoring via and the private sector. Expected Costs Analysis and Budgetary management evaluations. Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111–296 Effects Statement: The Congressional As a result of this rule, States that CFR Citation: 7 CFR 210; 7 CFR 220. Budget Office has determined that these exercise the option to implement photos Legal Deadline: None. provisions would incur no Federal on EBT cards would incur costs Abstract: This rule codifies the two costs. associated with development of an provisions of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Although the complexity of factors implementation plan, State staff Kids Act (Pub. L. 111–296; the Act) that influence overall food consumption training, client training, and retailer under 7 CFR parts 210 and 220. Section and obesity prevent us from defining a training. It is expected that providing 203 requires schools participating in the level of dietary change or disease or cost guidance or oversight of these National School Lunch Program to make reduction that is attributable to the rule, requirements would fall under the available to children free of charge, as there is evidence that standards like standard purview of these agencies and nutritionally appropriate, potable water those in the rule will positively could be absorbed by existing staff. State for consumption in the place where influence and perhaps directly improve

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77729

food choices and consumption patterns than once every 10 years, requirements Action Date FR Cite that contribute to students’ long-term for meals served under the Child and health and well-being, and reduce their Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) to Final Action ...... 03/00/16 risk for obesity. ensure those meals are consistent with Any rule-induced benefit of healthier the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Regulatory Flexibility Analysis eating by school children would be Americans and relevant nutrition Required: Yes. accompanied by costs, at least in the science. Small Entities Affected: Governmental short term. Healthier food may be more Statement of Need: Section 221 of the Jurisdictions. expensive than unhealthy food either in Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 Government Levels Affected: Local, raw materials, preparation, or both and (Pub. L. 111–296, the Act) requires State. this greater expense would be USDA to review and update, no less Agency Contact: James F. Herbert, distributed among students, schools, frequently than once every 10 years, Regulatory Review Specialist, and the food industry. requirements for meals served under the Department of Agriculture, Food and Risks: None known. Child and Adult Care Food Program Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Timetable: (CACFP) to ensure those meals are Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: consistent with the most recent Dietary 703 305–2572, Email: james.herbert@ Action Date FR Cite Guidelines for Americans and relevant fns.usda.gov. nutrition science. The Act also clarifies Lynnette M. Thomas, Chief, Planning NPRM ...... 02/08/13 78 FR 9530 the purpose of the program, restricts the NPRM Comment 04/09/13 and Regulatory Affairs Branch, Period End. use of food as a punishment or reward, Department of Agriculture, Food and Interim Final Rule 06/28/13 78 FR 39067 outlines requirements for milk and milk Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Interim Final Rule 08/27/13 substitution, and introduces Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: Effective. requirements for the availability of 703 605–4782, Email: lynnette.thomas@ Interim Final Rule 10/28/13 water. This rule establishes the criteria fns.usda.gov. Comment Pe- and procedures for implementing these RIN: 0584–AE18 riod End. provisions of the Act. Final Action ...... 03/00/16 Summary of Legal Basis: Section 221 of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 2010 (Pub. L. 111–296). USDA—FOOD SAFETY AND Required: Yes. Alternatives: There are several INSPECTION SERVICE (FSIS) Small Entities Affected: Governmental instances throughout the proposed rule Final Rule Stage Jurisdictions. and its associated Regulatory Impact Government Levels Affected: Local, Analysis that offered alternatives for 8. Requirements for the Disposition of State. review and comment to the various Non-Ambulatory Disabled Veal Calves Federalism: This action may have criteria and procedures discussed. Priority: Other Significant. federalism implications as defined in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Legal Authority: Federal Meat E.O. 13132. rule will improve the nutritional quality Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) Agency Contact: James F. Herbert, of meals served and the overall health CFR Citation: 9 CFR 309. Regulatory Review Specialist, of children participating in the CACFP. Legal Deadline: None. Department of Agriculture, Food and Most CACFP meals are served to Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center children from low-income households. Abstract: Food Safety and Inspection Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: As described in the Regulatory Impact Service (FSIS) is developing final 703 305–2572, Email: james.herbert@ Analysis, the baseline is the current cost regulations to amend the ante-mortem fns.usda.gov. of food to CACFP providers. The rule inspection regulations to remove a Lynnette M. Thomas, Chief, Planning more closely aligns the meals served in provision that permits establishments to and Regulatory Affairs Branch, CACFP with the Dietary Guidelines in set apart and hold for treatment veal Department of Agriculture, Food and an essentially cost-neutral manner. calves that are unable to rise from a Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center USDA estimates that the rule will result recumbent position and walk because Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: in a very small decrease in the cost for they are tired or cold (9 CFR 309.13(b)). 703 605–4782, Email: lynnette.thomas@ CACFP providers to prepare and serve The regulations permit such calves to fns.usda.gov. meals to program participants, and may proceed to slaughter if they are able to RIN: 0584–AE09 result in a small, temporary increase in rise and walk after being warmed or labor and administrative costs to rested. FSIS proposed to require that implement the rule. Therefore, it is non-ambulatory disabled (NAD) veal USDA—FNS projected that no meaningful net change calves that are offered for slaughter be condemned and promptly euthanized. 7. Child and Adult Care Food Program: in cost will occur as a result of this rule. Risks: None identified. The existing regulations require that Meal Pattern Revisions Related to the Timetable: NAD mature cattle be condemned on Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 ante-mortem inspection and that they be Priority: Other Significant. Action Date FR Cite promptly euthanized (9 CFR 309.3(e)). Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111–296 FSIS believes that prohibiting the CFR Citation: 7 CFR 210; 7 CFR 215; NPRM ...... 01/15/15 80 FR 2037 slaughter of all NAD veal calves would 7 CFR 220; 7 CFR 226. NPRM Comment 04/15/15 improve compliance with the Humane Legal Deadline: None. Period End. Methods of Slaughter Act of 1978 NPRM Comment 04/27/15 80 FR 23243 Abstract: This final rule will Period Ex- (HMSA), and the humane slaughter implement section 221 of the Healthy, tended. implementing regulations. It also would Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (Pub. L. NPRM Comment 05/27/15 improve the Agency’s inspection 111–296, the Act). It requires USDA to Period Ex- efficiency by eliminating the time that review and update, no less frequently tended End. FSIS inspection program personnel

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77730 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

(IPP) spend re-inspecting non- USDA—FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL regulations for existing USDA food ambulatory disabled veal calves. SERVICE (FAS) assistance programs, including Food for Progress Program and the McGovern- Statement of Need: Removing the Final Rule Stage provision from 9 CFR 309.13(b) would Dole International Food for Education eliminate uncertainty as to what is to be 9. USDA Local and Regional Food Aid and Child Nutrition Program. done with veal calves that are non- Procurement Program Summary of Legal Basis: 7 U.S.C. ambulatory disabled because they are Priority: Other Significant. 1726c and Sections 3207 of the tired or cold, or because they are injured Legal Authority: Section 3207 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Pub. L. 113– or sick, thereby ensuring the appropriate Agriculture Act of 2014 79). disposition of these animals. In CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Alternatives: N/A. addition, removing the provision in 9 Legal Deadline: None. CFR 309.13(b) would improve Abstract: FAS is issuing a final rule Anticipated Cost and Benefits: It is inspection efficiency by eliminating the with comment for the USDA Local and anticipated that adopting a local and time that FSIS IPP spend assessing the Regional Food Aid Procurement regional procurement program will treatment of non-ambulatory disabled Program (USDA LRP Program), bring about several benefits identified veal calves. authorized in section 3207 of the under the local and regional pilot project. Primarily, USDA LRP Program Summary of Legal Basis: 21 U.S.C. Agricultural Act of 2014. The USDA will result in cost savings in transport, 603(a) and (b). LRP Program funds may be used to shipping, and handling; better match Alternatives: The Agency considered support development activities that strengthen the capacity of food-insecure between recipients needs and program two alternatives to the proposed commodity availability; and time amendment: The status quo and developing countries, and build resilience and address the causes of savings between the procurement and prohibiting the slaughter of non- delivery of food, which is especially ambulatory disabled ‘‘bob veal,’’ which chronic food insecurity and support USDA’s other food assistance programs, important in emergency situations; and are calves generally less than one week providing a means to strengthen or old. especially the McGovern Dole International Food for Education and build local supply chains. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: If the Child Nutrition Program (McGovern- In addition, recipients under the LRP rule is adopted, non-ambulatory Dole). In addition, funds may be used to Pilot generally prefer locally and disabled veal calves will not be re- fill food availability gaps generated by regionally sourced food over food inspected during ante-mortem unexpected emergencies. USDA LRP sourced from other areas making it more inspection. The veal calves that are Program funding used to complement suitable for food preparation and more condemned during ante-mortem ongoing activities under the McGovern- accepted by school-aged children. This inspection will be euthanized. The Dole Program will improve dietary acceptability and availability would also estimated annual cost to the veal diversity and nutrition, and support the impact the small scale producers who industry would range between $2,368 graduation and sustainability of school- would experience an increase in and $161,405. The expected benefits of feeding programs as they transition to demand and help them achieve this proposed rule are not quantifiable. full host-government ownership. LRP economies of scale. However, the rule would ensure the funding will enable FAS and its humane disposition of the non- Risks: None. partners to build the capacity of host- ambulatory disabled veal calves. It also governments to implement their own Timetable: would increase the efficiency and homegrown school feeding programs. A effective implementation of inspection Action Date FR Cite final rule is needed for FAS to begin and humane handling requirements at implementing the program in FY 2016 official establishments. Final Rule With 02/00/16 and will establish awardee obligations Comments. Risks: None. regarding financial management and Timetable: performance standards specifying Regulatory Flexibility Analysis applicable Departmental regulations and Required: No. Action Date FR Cite incorporating statutory requirements. The promulgation of a rule to Government Levels Affected: None. NPRM ...... 05/13/15 80 FR 27269 NPRM Comment 08/12/15 administer the USDA LRP program will International Impacts: This regulatory Period End. require the assignment of a new CFR action will be likely to have Final Action ...... 03/00/16 number. international trade and investment Statement of Need: It is necessary for effects, or otherwise be of international Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Local and Regional Food Aid interest. Required: No. Procurement Program (LRP) regulations Additional Information: International to be put in place before solicitations for Government Levels Affected: None. Impacts: This regulatory action will be application to the LRP program can be likely to have international trade and Agency Contact: Dr. Daniel L. made for FY2016. The changes to Engeljohn, Assistant Administrator, development effects, or otherwise be of Section 3207 in the 2014 Farm Bill international interest. Office of Policy and Program require USDA to issue new regulations Development, Department of in order to enact the local and regional Agency Contact: Connie Ehrhart, Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection procurement provisions. The Management Analyst, Department of Service, 1400 Independence Avenue regulations will clarify: Program intent; Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural SW., 349–E JWB, Washington, DC application process; agreements process; Service, 1400 Independence Avenue 20250, Phone: 202 205–0495, Fax: 202 payments; transport; recordkeeping and SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 720–2025, Email: daniel.engeljohn@ reporting; monitoring and evaluation; 690–1578, Email: connie.ehrhart@ fsis.usda.gov. and noncompliance issues. The LRP fas.usda.gov. RIN: 0583–AD54 regulations will be aligned with RIN: 0551–AA87

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77731

USDA—RURAL BUSINESS— • Who is responsible for providing adopt prior to accepting applications for COOPERATIVE SERVICE (RBS) those metrics, and the time frame over future loans. RUS published this which the metrics will be collected (this regulation as an interim rule, which Final Rule Stage could vary depending on whether a took effect upon publication in the 10. Program Measures and Metrics grant or a loan/guaranteed loan is Federal Register on July 30, 2015. The Priority: Other Significant. awarded). rulemaking will allow the Agency to Legal Authority: Pub. L. 113–79, sec Summary of Legal Basis: begin accepting applications once again. Summary of Legal Basis: On May 13, 6209 Alternatives: 2002, the Farm Security and Rural CFR Citation: 7 CFR 4284, subpart J; Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Investment Act of 2002, Public Law 7 CFR 4280, subparts A and D; 7 CFR Risks: 107–171 (2002 Farm Bill) was signed 4284, subparts E and F; 7 CFR 4279, Timetable: into law. The 2002 Farm Bill amended subparts A and B; 7 CFR 4287, subpart Action Date FR Cite the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to B; 7 CFR 4274, subpart D; 7 CFR 1942, include title VI, the Rural Broadband subpart A; 7 CFR 3575, subpart A; 7 Interim Final Rule 05/00/16 Access Loan and Loan Guarantee CFR 3570, subpart B. Program (Broadband Loan Program), to Legal Deadline: None. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis be administered by the Agency. Title VI Abstract: The Agency is proposing to Required: No. authorized the Agency to approve loans publish an Interim Rule with request for Small Entities Affected: No. and loan guarantees for the costs of comments that will codify certain Government Levels Affected: None. construction, improvement, and program measures and metrics for Agency Contact: MaryPat Dasal, acquisition of facilities and equipment included Agency programs and Department of Agriculture, Rural for broadband service in eligible rural establish the process by which the Business–Cooperative Service, 1400 communities. Under the 2002 Farm Bill, Agency will collect the data. Section Independence Avenue SW., the Agency was directed to promulgate 6209 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 720– regulations without public comment. (2014 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 113–79) 7853, Email: marypat.daskal@ Implementing the program required a requires the Secretary of Agriculture to wdc.usda.gov. different lending approach for the collect data regarding economic RIN: 0570–AA95 Agency than it employed in its earlier activities created through grants and telephone program because of the loans, including any technical unregulated, highly competitive, and assistance provided as a component of technologically diverse nature of the the grant or loan program, and measure USDA—RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE (RUS) broadband market. Those regulations the short- and long-term viability of were published on January 30, 2003, at award recipients and any entities to Final Rule Stage 68 FR 4684. whom those recipients provide In an attempt to enhance the assistance using award funds. The 11. Rural Broadband Access Loans and Loan Guarantees Broadband Loan Program and to proposed action will not change the acknowledge growing criticism of underlying provisions of the included Priority: Other Significant. funding competitive areas, the Agency programs (e.g., eligibility, applications, Legal Authority: Pub. L. 107–171; 7 proposed to amend the program’s scoring, and servicing provisions). U.S.C. 901 et seq. regulations on May 11, 2007, at 72 FR Statement of Need: This interim rule CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1738. 26742. As the Agency began analysis of implements section 6209, Program Legal Deadline: None. the public comments it received on the Measures and Metrics, under the Abstract: The Rural Utilities Service proposed regulations, the Food, Agricultural Act of 2014 (2014 Farm (RUS) is amending regulations for the Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 Bill). The proposed action will codify Rural Broadband Access Loan and Loan (2008 Farm Bill) was working its way the measures and metrics identified in Guarantee program to implement through Congress. On March 14, 2011, section 6209(c)(2)(B) through (D) for section 6104 of the Agriculture Act of the Agency published an interim rule each included program and establish the 2014 (2014 Farm Bill), which made implementing the requirements of the process by which the Agency will changes the Agency must adopt prior to 2008 Farm Bill and started accepting collect the data. The proposed action accepting applications for future loans. applications. The Agency did not will not change the underlying RUS published this regulation as an receive any significant comments to the provisions of the included programs interim rule, which took effect upon interim rule and published a final rule (e.g., eligibility, applications, scoring, publication in the Federal Register on on February 6, 2013. With the and servicing provisions). July 30, 2015. The rulemaking will enactment of the Agricultural Act of To implement section 6209, the allow the Agency to begin accepting 2014 (2014 Farm Bill) section 6104, Agency plans to publish a single rule applications once again. Public Law 113–79 (Feb. 7, 2014), that will modify each of the included In addition, the Agency is seeking additional requirements were added to programs accordingly. While the comments regarding this interim rule to the Broadband Loan Program, including specific provisions may vary from guide its efforts in drafting the final rule the prioritization of approving program to program, the rule will, at for the Broadband Loan Program. The applications, a minimum benchmark of minimum, specify for each program: Comment Date ends September 28, broadband service, a more transparent • The performance measures required 2015. public notice requirement, and the first to be collected by the statute (i.e., Statement of Need: The Rural Utilities statutorily required reporting standards, percentage of increase of employees, Service (RUS) is amending regulations all of which are implemented in the number of business starts and clients for the Rural Broadband Access Loan rule. served, and any benefits such as an and Loan Guarantee program to Alternatives: N/A. increase in revenue or customer base) implement section 6104 of the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: and other measures in addition to these Agriculture Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill) Bringing broadband services to rural as determined by the Agency, which made changes the Agency must areas does present some challenges.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77732 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Because rural systems must contend the farm business, the more the farm telephone in the 20th century, and as with lower household density than used the Internet. railroads and highways were more than urban systems, the cost to deploy fiber- The 2015 subsidy rate is 18.69 a century ago. to-the-home (FTTH) and 4G LTE percent. The available FY 2015 budget Timetable: systems in urban communities is authority for this program is $4.5 considerably lower on a per household million, which will provide a program Action Date FR Cite basis, making urban systems more level of $24.077 million in outlays at the Interim Final Rule 07/30/15 80 FR 45397 economical to construct. Depending current subsidy rate. Since the Interim Regulation for the Broadband Program Interim Final Rule 07/30/15 upon the technology deployed it can Effective. cost three times more, on average, to was published in March of 2011, 27 Interim Final Rule 09/28/15 provide service to rural customers than applications have been received for an Comment Pe- to customers located in urban areas. average of 7 loan applications per year. riod End. Other associated rural issues, such as The applications range in size and may Final Rule ...... 07/00/16 environmental challenges or providing cover requests for funding for many wireless service through mountainous communities. All of the pre-loan data Regulatory Flexibility Analysis areas, also can add to the cost of collected by the applicant is generally Required: No. deployment. submitted to RUS at the same time. The Small Entities Affected: No. Areas with low population size, annual burden for preparation and Government Levels Affected: None. locations that have experienced submission per respondent for the pre- Agency Contact: Michele L. Brooks, persistent population loss and an aging loan data is estimated to be 400 hours Director, Program Development and population, or places where population per response, response to the public Regulatory Analysis, Department of is widely dispersed over demanding notice filing requirement is 1.5 hours Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, terrain generally have difficulty per response, and the preparation of Room 5159 South Building, STOP 1522, attracting broadband service providers. loan documents is estimated at 24 hours 1400 Independence Avenue SW., These characteristics can make the fixed per response. Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 690– The Agency estimates the cost to cost of providing broadband access too 1078, Fax: 202 720–8435, Email: respondents will be at $108,325. The high, or limit potential demand, thus [email protected]. overall hours spent per application and RIN: 0572–AC34 depressing the profitability of providing cost to respondents did not change from service. Clusters of lower service exist the former regulation. The projected in sparsely populated areas, such as the change in the overall cost to the USDA—NATURAL RESOURCES Dakotas, eastern Montana, northern government is minimal compared with CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) Minnesota, and eastern Oregon. Other the former projections, only $366. The low-service areas, such as the Missouri- burden of review breaks out into the Final Rule Stage Iowa border and Appalachia, have aging following fashion: It is projected that and declining numbers of residents. there will be one more hour for the 12. Agricultural Conservation Easement Nonetheless, rural areas in some States engineering analysis and financial Program (such as Nebraska, Kansas, and analysis per application. The initial Priority: Other Significant. Vermont) have higher-than expected financial review and initial engineering Legal Authority: Pub. L. 113–79 broadband service, given their review stay the same as it is under the CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1468. population characteristics, suggesting previous regulation, as does the loan Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, that policy, economic, and social factors closing attorney and clerical assistance. November 4, 2014, 270 days from can overcome common barriers to Finally, it is estimated that the Loan enactment of Pub. L. 113–79. broadband expansion. Closing-Analyst time per application Abstract: The Agricultural Act of 2014 Most employment growth in the U.S. will increase by a half hour. (the 2014 Act) consolidated the over the last several decades has been in Risks: Without access to advanced Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP), the the service sector, a sector especially telecommunications networks, rural Farm and Ranch Lands Protection conducive for broadband applications. areas suffer from declining educational Program (FRPP), and the Grassland Broadband allows rural areas to opportunities, inadequate health care, Reserve Program (GRP) into a single compete for low- and high-end service depressed economies, and high Agricultural Conservation Easement jobs, from call centers to software unemployment. In contrast, access to Program (ACEP). The consolidated development. Rural businesses have broadband can play a vital role in easement program has two components: been adopting more e-commerce and offsetting the obstacles of distances and An agricultural land easement Internet practices, improving efficiency isolation that have traditionally stifled component and a wetland reserve and expanding market reach. Some rural rural progress and living standards. easement component. The agricultural retailers use the Internet to satisfy With broadband infrastructure in place land easement component is patterned supplier requirements. The farm sector, high volumes of data can be shared after the former FRPP with GRP’s land a pioneer in rural Internet use, is easily across distances great and small. eligibility components merged into it. increasingly comprised of farm This technology is not a luxury service The wetland reserve easement businesses that purchase inputs and but rather a lifeline to modern everyday component is patterned after WRP. Land make sales online. Farm household transactions. Without this basic utility previously enrolled in the three characteristics such as age, education, rural residents do not and will not have contributing programs is considered presence of children, and household adequate medical or educational enrolled in the new ACEP. income are significant factors in services; rural businesses unable to Statement of Need: The Agricultural adopting broadband Internet use, thrive; and local governments Act of 2014 (2014 Act) consolidated whereas distance from urban centers is disorganized and unconnected. several of the Title XII (of the Food not a factor. Larger farm businesses are Broadband accessibility is as Security Act of 1985) conservation more apt to use broadband in managing fundamental for the future viability of easement programs and provided for the their operation; the more multifaceted rural communities today as was the continued operations of former

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77733

programs. NRCS promulgated a • Other costs incurred by society last practice implemented, but keeps consolidated conservation easement through market changes are localized or requirement that the contract term is not regulation to reflect the 2014 Act’s negligible. to exceed 10 years; (2) consolidates consolidation of the WRP, FRPP, and Risks: N/A. elements of Wildlife Habitat Incentives GRP programs. This action is needed to Timetable: Program (WHIP) and repeals WHIP respond to comments received. authority; (3) replaces rolling six-year Summary of Legal Basis: NRCS Action Date FR Cite payment limitation with payment limitation for FY 2014–FY 2018; (4) published an interim rule to implement Interim Final Rule 02/27/15 80 FR 11032 the consolidated conservation easement Interim Final Rule 04/28/15 requires Conservation Innovation Grants program. This regulation action is Comment Pe- (CIG) reporting no later than December pursuant to section 1246 of the Food riod End. 31, 2014, and every two years thereafter; Security Act of 1985, as amended by the Interim Final Rule 04/30/15 80 FR 24191 (4) establishes payment limitation at 2014 Act, which requires regulations Comment Pe- $450,000 and eliminates waiver necessary to implement title II of the riod Reopened. authority; (5) modifies the special rule 2014 Act through an interim rule with Interim Final Rule 05/28/15 for foregone income payments for Comment Pe- request for comments. certain associated management practices riod Reopened and resource concern priorities; (6) Alternatives: NRCS determined that End. rulemaking was the appropriate Final Rule ...... 04/00/16 makes advance payments available up mechanism through which to to 50 percent for eligible historically implement the 2014 Act consolidation Regulatory Flexibility Analysis underserved participants to purchase of the three source conservation Required: No. material or contract services instead of easement programs. Additionally, NRCS Small Entities Affected: No. the previous 30 percent; (7) provides determined that the Agency needs Government Levels Affected: None. flexibility for repayment of advance standard criteria for implementing the Agency Contact: Leslie Deavers, payment if not expended within 90 program and program participants need Acting Farm Bill Coordinator, days; and (8) requires that for each fiscal predictability when initiating an Department of Agriculture, Natural year from of the FY 2014 to FY 2018, at application and conveying an easement. Resources Conservation Service, 1400 least 5 percent of available EQIP funds The regulation aims to establish a Independence Avenue SW., shall be targeted for wildlife-related comprehensive framework for working Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 720– conservation practices. The 2014 Act with program participants to implement 5484, Email: leslie.deavers@ further identifies EQIP as a contributing ACEP. Upon consideration of public wdc.usda.gov. program authorized to accomplish the comment, NRCS will promulgate final RIN: 0578–AA61 purposes of the Regional Conservation program regulations. Partnership Program (RCPP) (subtitle I Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended). RCPP replaces the 2014 Act has consolidated three USDA—NRCS conservation easement programs into a Agricultural Water Enhancement single conservation easement program 13. Environmental Quality Incentives Program (AWEP), Chesapeake Bay with two components. The program will Program (EQIP) Watershed Program (CBWP), be implemented under the general Priority: Economically Significant. Cooperative Conservation Partnership supervision and direction of the Chief of Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Initiative (CCPI), and the Great Lakes NRCS, who is a Vice President of the Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 714b and Basin Program for soil erosion and Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). 714c; 16 U.S.C. 3839AA—3839–8 sediment control. Like the programs it Through ACEP, NRCS will continue to CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1466. replaces, RCPP will operate through purchase wetland reserve easements Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, regulations in place for contributing directly and will contribute funds to November 4, 2014, 270 days from programs. The other contributing eligible entities for their purchase of enactment of Pub. L. 113–79. programs include the Conservation agricultural land easements that protect Abstract: The Natural Resources Stewardship Program, the Healthy working farm and grazing lands. Conservation Service (NRCS) Forests Reserve Program, and the new Participation in the program is promulgated the current Environmental Agricultural Conservation Easement voluntary. Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Program (ACEP). NRCS published an regulation on January 15, 2009, through interim rule to incorporate the 2014 Act The primary benefits associated with changes to EQIP program this rulemaking are the following: an interim rule. The interim rule incorporated programmatic changes administration. This regulation action is • Provides an opportunity for public authorized by the Food, Conservation, pursuant to section 1246 of the Food comment in program regulations. Security Act of 1985, as amended by • and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Act). Provides a regulatory framework for NRCS published a correction to the section 2608 of the 2014 Act, which NRCS to implement a consolidated interim rule on March 12, 2009, and an requires regulations necessary to conservation easement program. amendment to the interim rule on May implement title II of the 2014 Act be • Provides transparency to the public 29, 2009. NRCS has implemented EQIP promulgated through the interim rule potential applicants on NRCS program in FY 2009 through FY 2013 under the process. requirements. current regulation. The Agricultural Act Statement of Need: The Agricultural The primary costs imposed by this of 2014 (2014 Act) amended chapter 4 Act of 2014 (the 2014 Act) consolidated regulation are the following: of subtitle D of title XII of the Food several of the title XII conservation • The costs incurred by private Security Act of 1985 by making the programs and provided for the landowners are negative or zero, since following changes to EQIP program continued operations of former this is a voluntary program, and they are requirements: (1) Eliminates programs. NRCS updated the EQIP compensated for the rights that they requirement that contract must remain regulation to incorporate the 2014 Act transfer. in place for a minimum of one year after changes, including consolidation of the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77734 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

purposes formerly addressed through Regulatory Flexibility Analysis program is voluntary. CSP encourages the Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program Required: No. land stewards to improve their (WHIP). This action is needed to Small Entities Affected: No. conservation performance by installing respond to comments received. Government Levels Affected: None. and adopting additional activities, and Summary of Legal Basis: The 2014 Agency Contact: Leslie Deavers, improving, maintaining, and managing Act has reauthorized and amended the Acting Farm Bill Coordinator, existing activities on eligible land. Environmental Quality Incentives Department of Agriculture, Natural NRCS makes funding for CSP available Program (EQIP). EQIP was first added to Resources Conservation Service, 1400 nationwide on a continuous application the Food Security Act of 1985 (1985 Independence Avenue SW., basis. Act) (16 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.) by the Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 720– Statement of Need: The Agricultural Federal Agriculture Improvement and 5484, Email: leslie.deavers@ Act of 2014 (the 2014 Act) amended Reform Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (16 wdc.usda.gov. several of the title XII conservation U.S.C. 3839aa). The program is RIN: 0578–AA62 programs and provided for the implemented under the general continued operations of former supervision and direction of the Chief of programs. NRCS updated the CSP regulation to incorporate the 2014 Act NRCS, who is a Vice President of the USDA—NRCS Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). changes. This action is responds to Alternatives: NRCS considered only 14. Conservation Stewardship Program comments received. making the changes mandated by the Summary of Legal Basis: The 2014 Priority: Other Significant. Act has reauthorized and amended the 2014 Farm Bill. This alternative would Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3838d to Conservation Stewardship Program have missed opportunities to improve 3838g (CSP). CSP was first added to the Food the implementation of the program. CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1470. Security Act of 1985 (1985 Act) (16 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Legal Deadline: None. U.S.C. 3801 et seq.) by the Food, Through EQIP, NRCS provides Abstract: NRCS published an interim Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. assistance to farmers and ranchers to rule to incorporate the Agriculture Act The program is implemented under the conserve and enhance soil, water, air, of 2014 (the 2014 Act) changes to general supervision and direction of the and related natural resources on their Conservation Stewardship Program Chief of NRCS, who is a Vice President land. Eligible lands include cropland, (CSP) program administration. This of the Commodity Credit Corporation grassland, rangeland, pasture, wetlands, regulatory action is pursuant to section (CCC). nonindustrial private forest land, and 1246 of the Food Security Act of 1985 Alternatives: NRCS considered only other agricultural land on which (1985 Act), as amended by the 2014 Act, making the changes mandated by the agricultural or forest-related products, which requires regulations necessary to 2014 Farm Bill. This alternative would or livestock are produced and natural implement title II of the 2014 Act have missed opportunities to improve resource concerns may be addressed. through an interim rule with request for the implementation of the program. Participation in the program is comments. NRCS would consider alternatives voluntary. Background: The Food, Conservation, suggested during the public comment The primary benefits associated with and Energy Act of 2008 Act (2008 Act) period. this rulemaking are the folowing: amended the 1985 Act to establish CSP Anticipated Cost and Benefits: CSP is • Provides continued consistency for and authorized the program in fiscal a voluntary program that encourages the NRCS to implement EQIP. years 2009 through 2013. The 2014 Act agricultural and forestry producers to • Provides transparency to potential re-authorized and revised CSP. The address priority resource concerns by applicants on NRCS program purpose of CSP is to encourage (1) undertaking additional conservation requirements. producers to address priority resource activities and (2) improving and The primary costs imposed by this concerns and improve and conserve the maintaining existing conservation regulation are the following: quality and condition of the natural systems. CSP provides financial and • All program participants must resources in a comprehensive manner technical assistance to help land follow the same requirements, even by (1) undertaking additional stewards conserve and enhance soil, though they are very different types of conservation activities, and (2) water, air, and related natural resources agricultural operations in different improving, maintaining, and managing on their land. resource contexts. existing conservation activities. The CSP is available to all producers, • Most program participants are Secretary of Agriculture delegated regardless of operation size or crops required to contribute at least 25 percent authority to the Chief, Natural produced, in all 50 States, the District of the resources needed to implement Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), of Columbia, and the Caribbean and program practices. However, such costs to administer CSP. Through CSP, NRCS Pacific Island areas. Eligible lands are standard for such financial provides financial and technical include cropland, grassland, prairie assistance programs. assistance to eligible producers to land, improved pastureland, rangeland, Risks: N/A. conserve and enhance soil, water, air, nonindustrial private forest land, and Timetable: and related natural resources on their agricultural land under the jurisdiction land. Eligible lands include private or of an Indian tribe. Applicants may Action Date FR Cite tribal cropland, grassland, pastureland, include individuals, legal entities, joint rangeland, non-industrial private forest operations, or Indian tribes. Interim Final Rule 12/12/14 79 FR 73953 lands, and other land in agricultural CSP pays participants for Interim Final Rule 12/12/14 areas (including cropped woodland, conservation performance, the higher Effective. marshes, and agricultural land capable the performance, the higher the Interim Final Rule 02/10/15 of being used for the production of payment. It provides two possible types Comment Pe- livestock) on which resource concerns of payments. An annual payment is riod End. Final Rule ...... 03/00/16 related to agricultural production could available for installing new conservation be addressed. Participation in the activities and maintaining existing

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77735

practices. A supplemental payment is Resources Conservation Service, 1400 ensuring a level playing field for U.S. available to participants who also adopt Independence Avenue SW., businesses, and ensuring that a resource conserving crop rotation. Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 720– technology transfer is consistent with Through five-year contracts, NRCS 5484, Email: leslie.deavers@ our nation’s economic and security makes payments as soon as practical wdc.usda.gov. interests; after October 1 of each fiscal year for RIN: 0578–AA63 • Provide effective management and contract activities installed and BILLING CODE 3410–90–P stewardship of our nation’s resources maintained in the previous year. A and assets to ensure sustainable person or legal entity may have more economic opportunities; and than one CSP contract but, for all CSP • Make informed policy decisions contracts combined, may not receive DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (DOC) and enable better understanding of the more than $40,000 in any year or more Statement of Regulatory and economy by providing accurate than $200,000 during any five-year Deregulatory Priorities economic and demographic data. period. Commerce is a vital resource base, a The primary benefits associated with Established in 1903, the Department tireless advocate, and Cabinet-level this rulemaking are the following: of Commerce (Commerce) is one of the voice for job creation. • Provides continued consistency for oldest Cabinet-level agencies in the The Regulatory Plan tracks the most the NRCS to implement CSP. Federal Government. Commerce’s important regulations that implement • Provides transparency to potential mission is to create the conditions for these policy and program priorities, applicants on NRCS program economic growth and opportunity by several of which involve regulation of requirements. promoting innovation, the private sector by Commerce. The primary costs imposed by this entrepreneurship, competitiveness, and Responding to the Administration’s regulation are that all program environmental stewardship. Commerce Regulatory Philosophy and Principles participants must follow the same basic has 12 operating units, which are programmatic requirements, even responsible for managing a diverse The vast majority of the Commerce’s though they are very different types of portfolio of programs and services, programs and activities do not involve agricultural operations in different ranging from trade promotion and regulation. Of Commerce’s 12 primary resource contexts. economic development assistance to operating units, only the National The 2014 Act further identifies CSP as broadband and the National Weather Oceanic and Atmospheric a contributing program authorized to Service. Administration (NOAA) will be accomplish the purposes of the Regional Commerce touches Americans daily, planning actions that are considered the Conservation Partnership Program in many ways—making possible the ‘‘most important’’ significant (RCPP) (subtitle I of title XII of the Food daily weather reports and survey preregulatory or regulatory actions for Security Act of 1985, as amended). research; facilitating technology that all FY 2016. During the next year, NOAA RCPP replaces the Agricultural Water of us use in the workplace and in the plans to publish eight rulemaking Enhancement Program (AWEP), home each day; supporting the actions that are designated as Regulatory Chesapeake Bay Watershed Program development, gathering, and Plan actions. The Bureau of Industry (CBWP), Cooperative Conservation transmission of information essential to and Security (BIS) may also publish Partnership Initiative (CCPI), and the competitive business; enabling the rulemaking actions designated as Great Lakes Basin Program for soil diversity of companies and goods found Regulatory Plan actions. Further erosion and sediment control. Like the in America’s and the world’s information on these actions is provided programs it replaces, RCPP will operate marketplace; and supporting below. through regulations in place for environmental and economic health for Commerce has a long-standing policy contributing programs. The other the communities in which Americans to prohibit the issuance of any contributing programs include the live. regulation that discriminates on the Environmental Quality Incentives Commerce has a clear and compelling basis of race, religion, gender, or any Program, the Healthy Forests Reserve vision for itself, for its role in the other suspect category and requires that Program, and the new Agricultural Federal Government, and for its roles all regulations be written so as to be Conservation Easement Program supporting the American people, now understandable to those affected by (ACEP). and in the future. To achieve this vision, them. The Secretary also requires that Risks: Commerce works in partnership with Commerce afford the public the Timetable: businesses, universities, communities, maximum possible opportunity to and workers to: participate in Departmental Action Date FR Cite • Innovate by creating new ideas rulemakings, even where public through cutting-edge science and participation is not required by law. Interim Final Rule 11/05/14 79 FR 65835 technology from advances in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Interim Final Rule 11/05/14 nanotechnology, to ocean exploration, Effective. Administration to broadband deployment, and by Interim Final Rule 01/05/15 NOAA establishes and administers Comment Pe- protecting American innovations riod End. through the patent and trademark Federal policy for the conservation and Final Rule ...... 03/00/16 system; management of the Nation’s oceanic, • Support entrepreneurship and coastal, and atmospheric resources. It Regulatory Flexibility Analysis commercialization by enabling provides a variety of essential Required: No. community development and environmental and climate services vital Small Entities Affected: No. strengthening minority businesses and to public safety and to the Nation’s Government Levels Affected: None. small manufacturers; economy, such as weather forecasts, Agency Contact: Leslie Deavers, • Maintain U.S. economic drought forecasts, and storm warnings. Acting Farm Bill Coordinator, competitiveness in the global It is a source of objective information on Department of Agriculture, Natural marketplace by promoting exports, the state of the environment. NOAA

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77736 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

plays the lead role in achieving approaches to management; increasing problems that FMPs may address is Commerce’s goal of promoting the populations of depleted, threatened, preventing overcapitalization stewardship by providing assessments or endangered species and marine (preventing excess fishing capacity) of of the global environment. mammals by implementing recovery fisheries. This may be resolved by Recognizing that economic growth plans that provide for their recovery market-based systems such as catch must go hand-in-hand with while still allowing for economic and shares, which permit shareholders to environmental stewardship, Commerce, recreational opportunities; promoting harvest a quantity of fish and which can through NOAA, conducts programs healthy coastal ecosystems by ensuring be traded on the open market. Harvest designed to provide a better that economic development is managed limits based on the best available understanding of the connections in ways that maintain biodiversity and scientific information, whether as a total between environmental health, long-term productivity for sustained fishing limit for a species in a fishery or economics, and national security. use; and modernizing navigation and as a share assigned to each vessel Commerce’s emphasis on ‘‘sustainable positioning services. In the participant, enable stressed stocks to fisheries’’ is designed to boost long-term environmental assessment and rebuild. Other measures include economic growth in a vital sector of the prediction area, goals include: staggering fishing seasons or limiting U.S. economy while conserving the Understanding climate change science gear types to avoid gear conflicts on the resources in the public trust and and impacts, and communicating that fishing grounds and establishing minimizing any economic dislocation understanding to government and seasonal and area closures to protect necessary to ensure long-term economic private sector stakeholders enabling fishery stocks. growth. Commerce is where business them to adapt; continually improving The FMCs provide a forum for public and environmental interests intersect, the National Weather Service; debate and, using the best scientific and the classic debate on the use of implementing reliable seasonal and information available, make the natural resources is transformed into a interannual climate forecasts to guide judgments needed to determine ‘‘win-win’’ situation for the economic planning; providing science- optimum yield on a fishery-by-fishery environment and the economy. based policy advice on options to deal basis. Optional management measures Three of NOAA’s major components, with very long-term (decadal to are examined and selected in the National Marine Fisheries Services centennial) changes in the environment; accordance with the national standards (NMFS), the National Ocean Service and advancing and improving short- set forth in the Magnuson-Stevens Act. (NOS), and the National Environmental term warning and forecast services for This process, including the selection of Satellite, Data, and Information Service the entire environment. the preferred management measures, (NESDIS), exercise regulatory authority. constitutes the development, in NMFS oversees the management and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery simplified form, of an FMP. The FMP, conservation of the Nation’s marine Conservation and Management Act together with draft implementing fisheries, protects threatened and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery regulations and supporting endangered marine and anadromous Conservation and Management Act documentation, is submitted to NMFS species and marine mammals, and (Magnuson-Stevens Act) rulemakings for review against the national standards promotes economic development of the concern the conservation and set forth in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, U.S. fishing industry. NOS assists the management of fishery resources in the in other provisions of the Act, and other coastal States in their management of U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone applicable laws. The same process land and ocean resources in their (generally 3–200 nautical miles). Among applies to amending an existing coastal zones, including estuarine the several hundred rulemakings that approved FMP. research reserves; manages the national NOAA plans to issue in FY 2016, a marine sanctuaries; monitors marine number of the preregulatory and Marine Mammal Protection Act pollution; and directs the national regulatory actions will be significant. The Marine Mammal Protection Act program for deep-seabed minerals and The exact number of such rulemakings of 1972 (MMPA) provides the authority ocean thermal energy. NESDIS is unknown, since they are usually for the conservation and management of administers the civilian weather initiated by the actions of eight regional marine mammals under U.S. satellite program and licenses private Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) jurisdiction. It expressly prohibits, with organizations to operate commercial that are responsible for preparing certain exceptions, the take of marine land-remote sensing satellite systems. fishery management plans (FMPs) and mammals. The MMPA allows NMFS to Commerce, through NOAA, has a FMP amendments, and for drafting permit the collection of wild animals for unique role in promoting stewardship of implementing regulations for each scientific research or public display or the global environment through managed fishery. NOAA issues to enhance the survival of a species or effective management of the Nation’s regulations to implement FMPs and stock. NMFS initiates rulemakings marine and coastal resources and in FMP amendments. Once a rulemaking is under the MMPA to establish a monitoring and predicting changes in triggered by an FMC, the Magnuson- management regime to reduce marine the Earth’s environment, thus linking Stevens Act places stringent deadlines mammal mortalities and injuries as a trade, development, and technology upon NOAA by which it must exercise result of interactions with fisheries. The with environmental issues. NOAA has its rulemaking responsibilities. FMPs MMPA also established the Marine the primary Federal responsibility for and FMP amendments for Atlantic Mammal Commission, which makes providing sound scientific observations, highly migratory species, such as recommendations to the Secretaries of assessments, and forecasts of bluefin tuna, swordfish, and sharks, are the Departments of Commerce and the environmental phenomena on which developed directly by NOAA, not by Interior and other Federal officials on resource management, adaptation, and FMCs. protecting and conserving marine other societal decisions can be made. FMPs address a variety of issues mammals. The Act underwent In the environmental stewardship including maximizing fishing significant changes in 1994 to allow for area, NOAA’s goals include: Rebuilding opportunities on healthy stocks, takings incidental to commercial fishing and maintaining strong U.S. fisheries by rebuilding overfished stocks, and operations, to provide certain using market-based tools and ecosystem addressing gear conflicts. One of the exemptions for subsistence and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77737

scientific uses, and to require the fishing industry.’’ The National Marine federal fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico preparation of stock assessments for all Fisheries Service (NMFS) last revised by supplementing harvest of wild marine mammal stocks in waters under the NS1 Guidelines in 2009 to reflect caught species with cultured product. U.S. jurisdiction. the requirements enacted by the This rulemaking would outline a Magnuson-Stevens Fishery regulatory permitting process for Endangered Species Act Conservation and Management aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico, The Endangered Species Act of 1973 Reauthorization Act of 2006 for annual including: (1) Required permits; (2) (ESA) provides for the conservation of catch limits and accountability duration of permits; (3) species allowed; species that are determined to be measures to end and prevent (4) designation of sites for aquaculture; ‘‘endangered’’ or ‘‘threatened,’’ and the overfishing. Since 2007, NMFS and the (5) reporting requirements; and (6) conservation of the ecosystems on Regional Fishery Management Councils regulations to aid in enforcement. which these species depend. The ESA have been implementing the new 4. Requirements for Importation of authorizes both NMFS and the Fish and annual catch limit and accountability Fish and Fish Products under the U.S. Wildlife Service (FWS) to jointly measures requirements. Based on Marine Mammal Protection Act (0648– administer the provisions of the MMPA. experience gained from implementing AY15): With this action, the National NMFS manages marine and annual catch limits and accountability Marine Fisheries Service is developing ‘‘anadromous’’ species, and FWS measures, NMFS has developed new procedures to implement the provisions manages land and freshwater species. perspectives and identified issues of section 101(a)(2) of the Marine Together, NMFS and FWS work to regarding the application of the NS1 Mammal Protection Act for imports of protect critically imperiled species from guidelines that may warrant them to be fish and fish products. Those provisions extinction. Of the approximately 1,300 revised to more fully meet the intended require the Secretary of Treasury to ban listed species found in part or entirely goal of preventing overfishing while imports of fish and fish products from in the United States and its waters, achieving, on a continuing basis, the fisheries with bycatch of marine NMFS has jurisdiction over optimum yield from each fishery. The mammals in excess of U.S. standards. approximately 60 species. NMFS’ focus of this action is to improve the The provisions further require the rulemaking actions are focused on NS1 guidelines. Secretary of Commerce to insist on determining whether any species under 2. Designation of Critical Habitat for reasonable proof from exporting nations its responsibility is an endangered or North Atlantic Right Whale (0648– of the effects on marine mammals of threatened species and whether those AY54): The National Marine Fisheries bycatch incidental to fisheries that species must be added to the list of Service proposes to revise critical harvest the fish and fish products to be protected species. NMFS is also habitat for the North Atlantic right imported. responsible for designating, reviewing, whale. This proposal would modify the 5. Revision to the Definition of and revising critical habitat for any critical habitat previously designated in Destruction or Adverse Modification of listed species. In addition, under the 1994, based on improved knowledge Critical Habitat (0648–BB80): The U.S. ESA’s procedural framework, Federal derived from a variety of studies, Fish and Wildlife Service’s and the agencies consult with NMFS on any internal analysis and surveys since National Marine Fisheries Service’s proposed action authorized, funded, or 1994. The improved understanding of revision of the regulatory definition of carried out by that agency that may right whale ecology and habitat needs ‘‘destruction or adverse modification’’ of affect one of the listed species or over the last 20 years supports the rule’s critical habitat will establish a binding designated critical habitat, or is likely to proposed expansion of critical habitat in regulatory definition to replace the 1986 jeopardize proposed species or areas of the northeast important for definition that was invalidated by adversely modify proposed critical feeding and in southern calving grounds Federal courts. habitat that is under NMFS’ jurisdiction. along the coast from southern North 6. Implementing Changes to the Carolina to northern Florida. Regulations for Designating Critical NOAA’s Regulatory Plan Actions 3. Fishery Management Plan for Habitat (0648–BB79): The U.S. Fish and While most of the rulemakings Regulating Offshore Marine Wildlife Service’s and the National undertaken by NOAA do not rise to the Aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico Marine Fisheries Service’s rule will level necessary to be included in (0648–AS65): The purpose of this amend portions of 50 CFR 424 to clarify Commerce’s regulatory plan, NMFS is fishery management plan is to develop procedures for designating and revising undertaking eight actions that rise to the a regional permitting process for critical habitat. The rule makes minor level of ‘‘most important’’ of regulating and promoting changes to the scope and purpose, alters Commerce’s significant regulatory environmentally sound and some definitions, and clarifies the actions and thus are included in this economically sustainable aquaculture in criteria for designating critical habitat. year’s regulatory plan. A description of the Gulf of Mexico exclusive economic 7. Final Policy Regarding the eight regulatory plan actions is zone. This fishery management plan Implementation of Section 4(b)(2) of the provided below. consists of ten actions, each with an Endangered Species Act (0648–BB82): 1. Revisions to the General section associated range of management This policy provides the U.S. Fish and and Standards 1, 3, and 7 of the alternatives, which would facilitate the Wildlife Service’s and the National National Standard Guidelines (0648– permitting of an estimated 5 to 20 Marine Fisheries Service’s position on BB92): This action would propose offshore aquaculture operations in the how we consider partnerships and revisions to the National Standard 1 Gulf of Mexico over the next 10 years, conservation plans, conservation plans (NS1) guidelines. National Standard 1 of with an estimated annual production of permitted under section 10 of the ESA, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery up to 64 million pounds. By tribal lands, military lands, Federal Conservation and Management Act establishing a regional permitting lands, national security and homeland states that ‘‘conservation and process for aquaculture, the Gulf of security impacts, and economic impacts management measures shall prevent Mexico Fishery Management Council in the exclusion process. The policy overfishing while achieving, on a will be positioned to achieve their will complement the amendment to the continuing basis, the optimum yield primary goal of increasing maximum regulations regarding impact analyses of from each fishery for the United States sustainable yield and optimum yield of critical habitat designations and clarify

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77738 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

critical habitat exclusions under section through cooperation with other controls will help strengthen our 4(b)(2) of the ESA and provide for a Governments. national security by focusing our efforts credible and predictable critical habitat on controlling the most critical products BIS’ Regulatory Plan Actions exclusion process. and technologies, and by enhancing the 8. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery In August 2009, the President directed competitiveness of key U.S. Conservation and Management Act; a broad-based interagency review of the manufacturing and technology sectors. Seafood Import Monitoring Program U.S. export control system with the goal In FY 2011, BIS began implementing (0648–BF09): The Magnuson-Stevens of strengthening national security and the ECRI with a final rule (76 FR 35275, Fishery Conservation and Management the competitiveness of key U.S. June 16, 2011) implementing a license Act prohibits the importation and trade manufacturing and technology sectors exception that authorizes exports, in interstate commerce of fishery by focusing on the current threats and reexports and transfers to destinations products from fish caught in in violation adapting to the changing economic and that do not pose a national security of any foreign law or regulation. technological landscape. In August concern, provided certain safeguards 2010, the President outlined an Bureau of Industry and Security against diversion to other destinations approach, known as the Export Control are taken. Additionally, BIS began The Bureau of Industry and Security Reform Initiative (ECRI), under which publishing proposed rules to add to its (BIS) advances U.S. national security, agencies that administer export controls Commerce Control List (CCL), military foreign policy, and economic objectives will apply new criteria for determining items the President determined no by maintaining and strengthening what items need to be controlled and a longer warranted control by the adaptable, efficient, and effective export common set of policies for determining Department of State. BIS continued to control and treaty compliance systems when an export license is required. The publish such proposed rules in FY 2012. as well as by administering programs to control list criteria are to be based on In FY 2013, BIS crossed an important prioritize certain contracts to promote transparent rules, which will reduce the milestone with publication of two final the national defense and to protect and uncertainty faced by our Allies, U.S. rules that began to put ECRI policies enhance the defense industrial base. industry and its foreign customers, and into place. An Initial Implementation will allow the Government to erect Major Programs and Activities rule (78 FR 22660, April 16, 2013) set higher walls around the most sensitive in place the structure under which BIS administers four sets of export items in order to enhance items the President determines no regulations. The Export Administration national security. longer warrant control on the United Regulations (EAR) regulate exports and Under the President’s approach, States Munitions List are controlled on reexports to protect national security, agencies are to apply the criteria and the Commerce Control List. It also foreign policy, and short supply revise the lists of munitions and dual- revised license exceptions and interests. The EAR also regulates U.S. use items that are controlled for export regulatory definitions, including the persons’ participation in certain so that they: boycotts administered by foreign • Distinguish the transactions that definition of ‘‘specially designed’’ to governments. The National Security should be subject to stricter levels of make those exceptions and definitions Industrial Base Regulations provide for control from those where more clearer and to more closely align them prioritization of certain contracts and permissive levels of control are with the International Traffic in Arms allocations of resources to promote the appropriate; Regulations, and added to the CCL national defense, require reporting of • Create a ‘‘bright line’’ between the certain military aircraft, gas turbine foreign Government-imposed offsets in two current control lists to clarify engines and related items. A second defense sales, provide for surveys to jurisdictional determinations and final rule (78 FR 40892, July 8, 2012) assess the capabilities of the industrial reduce Government and industry followed on by adding to the CCL base to support the national defense and uncertainty about whether particular military vehicles, vessels of war address the effect of imports on the items are subject to the control of the submersible vessels, and auxiliary defense industrial base. The Chemical State Department or the Commerce military equipment that President Weapons Convention Regulations Department; and determined no longer warrant control implement declaration, reporting, and • Are structurally aligned so that they on the USML. on-site inspection requirements in the potentially can be combined into a BIS continued its ECRI efforts and by private sector necessary to meet United single list of controlled items. the end of fiscal year 2015 had States treaty obligations under the BIS’ current regulatory plan action is published final rules adding to the CCL Chemical Weapons Convention treaty. designed to implement the initial phase additional items that the President The Additional Protocol Regulations of the President’s directive, which will determined no longer warrant control implement similar requirements with add to BIS’ export control purview, under rules administered by the State respect to an agreement between the military related items that the President Department in the following categories: United States and the International determines no longer warrant control Military training equipment; Explosives Atomic Energy Agency. under rules administered by the State and energetic materials; Personal BIS also has an enforcement Department. protective equipment; Launch vehicles component with nine offices covering As the agency responsible for leading and rockets; Spacecraft; and Military the United States. BIS export control the administration and enforcement of Electronics. During fiscal year 2015, BIS officers are also stationed at several U.S. U.S. export controls on dual-use and published proposed rules that would embassies and consulates abroad. BIS other items warranting controls but not add to the CCL items related to: Fire works with other U.S. Government under the provisions of export control control, range finder, optical and agencies to promote coordinated U.S. regulations administered by other guidance and control equipment; Government efforts in export controls departments, BIS plays a central role in Toxicological Agents; and Directed and other programs. BIS participates in the Administration’s efforts to reform energy weapons. BIS expects to U.S. Government efforts to strengthen the export control system. Changing continue with publication of proposed multilateral export control regimes and what we control, how we control it and and final rules to add items to the CCL to promote effective export controls how we enforce and manage our as part it the ECRI in fiscal year 2016.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77739

During fiscal year 2015, BIS initiated Oceanic and Atmospheric regulatory objectives and clarified the a process of evaluating the effectiveness Administration works with other remaining requirements to aid of its ECRI efforts. The first action in countries’ regulatory bodies through compliance. this process was publication of a notice regional fishery management NOAA continues to demonstrate great seeking public comments on the organizations to develop fair and success in fishery sustainability treatment of military aircraft and gas internationally-agreed-to fishery managed under the Magnuson-Stevens turbine engines, the first two categories standards for the High Seas. Act, with near-record landings and of items added to the CCL by this BIS is also engaged, in partnership revenue accomplished while rebuilding initiative. The notice sought public with the Departments of State and stocks across the country and input on whether the regulations are Defense, in revising the regulatory preventing overfishing. Since the clear, do not inadvertently control items framework for export control, through Magnuson-Stevens Act reauthorization in normal commercial use as military the President’s Export Control Reform in 2007, NMFS and the Regional Fishery items, account for technological Initiative (ECRI). Through this effort, the Management Councils have developments, and properly implement United States Government is moving implemented annual catch limits and the national security and foreign policy certain items currently controlled by the accountability measures in every fishery objectives of the reform effort. BIS United States Military List (USML) to management plan under National anticipates that this will be the first in the Commerce Control List (CCL) in BIS’ Standard One of the act. Informed by a a series of such notices that will be Export Administration Regulations. The robust public process that gained input published after the public has had time objective of ECRI is to improve through a public summit (Managing our to develop experience with each interoperability of U.S. military forces Nation’s Fisheries), visits to each region regulation that added categories of items with those of allied countries, and Council and multiple public to the CCL. strengthen the U.S. industrial base by, hearings, NMFS took the experience among other things, reducing incentives gained from 8 years of implementation Promoting International Regulatory for foreign manufacturers to design out Cooperation of National Standard One and has and avoid U.S.-origin content and proposed multiple substantive, As the President noted in Executive services, and allow export control technical changes to the National Order 13609, ‘‘international regulatory officials to focus Government resources Standard One rule that will improve cooperation, consistent with domestic on transactions that pose greater implementation and continue to support law and prerogatives and U.S. trade concern. Once fully implemented, the healthy fisheries. policy, can be an important means of new export control framework also will For more information, the most recent promoting’’ public health, welfare, benefit companies in the United States E.O. 13563 progress report for the safety, and our environment as well as seeking to export items through more Department can be found here: http:// economic growth, innovation, flexible and less burdensome export open.commerce.gov/news/2015/03/20/ competitiveness, and job creation. controls. commerce-plan-retrospective-analysis- Accordingly, in E.O. 13609, the existing-rules-0. President requires each executive Retrospective Review of Existing agency to include in its Regulatory Plan Regulations BILLING CODE 3510–12–P a summary of its international Pursuant to section 6 of Executive regulatory cooperation activities that are Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and reasonably anticipated to lead to Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE significant regulations. Department has identified several The Department of Commerce engages rulemakings as being associated with Statement of Regulatory Priorities with numerous international bodies in retrospective review and analysis in the Background various forums to promote the Department’s final retrospective review Department’s priorities and foster of regulations plan. Accordingly, the The Department of Defense (DoD) is regulations that do not ‘‘impair the Agency is reviewing these rules to the largest Federal department ability of American business to export determine whether action under E.O. consisting of three Military departments and compete internationally.’’ E.O. 13563 is appropriate. Some of these (Army, Navy, and Air Force), nine 13609(a). For example, the United States entries on this list may be completed Unified Combatant Commands, 17 Patent and Trademark Office is working actions, which do not appear in the Defense Agencies, and ten DoD Field with the European Patent Office to Regulatory Plan. However, more Activities. It has 1,304,807 military develop a new classification system for information can be found about these personnel and 866,923 civilians both offices’ use. The Bureau of Industry completed rulemakings in past assigned as of June 30, 2015, and over and Security, along with the Department publications of the Unified Agenda on 200 large and medium installations in of State and Department of Defense, Reginfo.gov in the Completed Actions the continental United States, U.S. engages with other countries in the section for the Agency. These territories, and foreign countries. The Wassenaar Arrangement, through which rulemakings can also be found on overall size, composition, and the international community develops a Regulations.gov. dispersion of DoD, coupled with an common list of items that should be Two rulemakings that are the product innovative regulatory program, presents subject to export controls because they of the Agency’s retrospective review are a challenge to the management of the are conventional arms or items that have from BIS and NOAA. BIS’ rule Defense regulatory efforts under both military and civil uses. Other streamlining the support documentation Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 multilateral export control regimes requirements in the Export ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ of include the Missile Technology Control Administration Regulations, published September 30, 1993. Regime, the Nuclear Suppliers Group, March 13, 2015, was the first Because of its diversified nature, DoD and the Australia Group, which lists comprehensive revision of these is affected by the regulations issued by items controlled for chemical and requirements in twenty years. The rule regulatory agencies such as the biological weapon nonproliferation reduced the paperwork burden on U.S. Departments of Commerce, Energy, purposes. In addition, the National exporters without compromising Health and Human Services, Housing

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77740 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

and Urban Development, Labor, State, regulatory program, fully incorporates technologies to allies and partners while Transportation, and the Environmental the provisions of the President’s helping prevent transfers to countries of Protection Agency. In order to develop priorities and objectives under E.O. national security and proliferation the best possible regulations that 12866. concern. DoD will continue to assess embody the principles and objectives new and emerging technologies to International Regulatory Cooperation embedded in E.O. 12866, there must be ensure items that provide critical coordination of proposed regulations As the President noted in E.O. 13609, military and intelligence capabilities are among the regulatory agencies and the ‘‘international regulatory cooperation, properly controlled on international affected DoD components. Coordinating consistent with domestic law and export control regime lists. the proposed regulations in advance prerogatives and U.S. trade policy, can Retrospective Review of Existing throughout an organization as large as be an important means of promoting’’ Regulations DoD is a straightforward, yet formidable, public health, welfare, safety, and our undertaking. environment as well as economic Pursuant to section 6 of E.O. 13563 DoD issues regulations that have an growth, innovation, competitiveness, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory effect on the public and can be and job creation. Accordingly, in E.O. Review (January 18, 2011), the following significant as defined in E.O. 12866. In 13609, the President requires each Regulatory Identification Numbers addition, some of DoD’s regulations may executive agency to include in its (RINs) have been identified as affect other agencies. DoD, as an integral Regulatory Plan a summary of its associated with retrospective review part of its program, not only receives international regulatory cooperation and analysis in the Department’s final coordinating actions from other activities that are reasonably anticipated retrospective review of regulations plan. agencies, but coordinates with the to lead to significant regulations. Several are of particular interest to small agencies that are affected by its The Department of Defense, along businesses. The entries on this list are regulations as well. with the Departments of State and completed actions, which do not appear Commerce, engages with other countries in The Regulatory Plan. However, more Overall Priorities in the Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear information can be found about these The Department needs to function at Suppliers Group, Australia Group, and completed rulemakings in past a reasonable cost, while ensuring that it Missile Technology Control Regime publications of the Unified Agenda on does not impose ineffective and through which the international Reginfo.gov in the Completed Actions unnecessarily burdensome regulations community develops a common list of section for DoD. These rulemakings can on the public. The rulemaking process items that should be subject to export also be found on Regulations.gov. We should be responsive, efficient, cost- controls. DoD has been a key participant will continue to identify retrospective effective, and both fair and perceived as in the Administration’s Export Control review regulations as they are published fair. This is being done in DoD while Reform effort that resulted in a complete and report on the progress of the overall reacting to the contradictory pressures overhaul of the U.S. Munitions List and plan biannually. DoD’s final agency of providing more services with fewer fundamental changes to the Commerce plan and all updates to the plan can be resources. The Department of Defense, Control List. New controls have found at: http://www.regulations.gov/# as a matter of overall priority for its facilitated transfers of goods and !docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036

Rule title RIN (*expected to significantly reduce burdens on small businesses)

0703–AA90 ...... Guidelines for Archaeological Investigation Permits and Other Research on Sunken Military Craft and Terrestrial Military Craft Under the Jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. 0703–AA92 ...... Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General. 0710–AA66 ...... Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule. 0710–AA60 ...... Nationwide Permit Program Regulations.* 0750–AG47 ...... Safeguarding Unclassified Controlled Technical Information (DFARS Case 2011–D039). 0750–AG62 ...... Patents, Data, and Copyrights (DFARS Case 2010–D001). 0750–AH11 ...... Only One Offer (DFARS Case 2011–D013). 0750–AH19 ...... Accelerated Payments to Small Business (DFARS Case 2011–D008). 0750–AH54 ...... Performance-Based Payments (DFARS Case 2011–D045). 0750–AH70 ...... Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty With Australia and the United Kingdom (DFARS Case 2012–D034). 0750–AH86 ...... Forward Pricing Rate Proposal Adequacy Checklist (DFARS Case 2012–D035). 0750–AH87 ...... System for Award Management Name Changes, Phase 1 Implementation (DFARS Case 2012–D053). 0750–AH90 ...... Clauses With Alternates—Transportation (DFARS Case 2012–D057). 0750–AH94 ...... Clauses with Alternates—Foreign Acquisition (DFARS Case 2013–D005). 0750–AH95 ...... Clauses with Alternates—Quality Assurance (DFARS Case 2013–D004). 0750–AI02 ...... Clauses with Alternates—Contract Financing (DFARS Case 2013–D014). 0750–AI10 ...... Clauses with Alternates—Research and Development Contracting (DFARS Case 2013–D026). 0750–AI19 ...... Clauses with Alternates—Taxes (DFARS Case 2013–D025). 0750–AI27 ...... Clauses with Alternates—Special Contracting Methods, Major System Acquisition, and Service Contracting (DFARS Case 2014–D004). 0750–AI03 ...... Approval of Rental Waiver Requests (DFARS Case 2013–D006). 0750–AI07 ...... Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or Hazardous Materials—Statutory Update (DFARS Case 2013–D013). 0750–AI18 ...... Photovoltaic Devices (DFARS Case 2014–D006). 0750–AI34 ...... State Sponsors of Terrorism (DFARS Case 2014–D014). 0750–AI43 ...... Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds. 0790–AI42 ...... Personnel Security Program. 0790–AI54 ...... Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies. 0790–AI77 ...... Provision of Early Intervention and Special Education Services to Eligible DoD Dependents. 0790–AI86 ...... Defense Logistics Agency Privacy Program. 0790–AI87 ...... Defense Logistics Agency Freedom of Information Act Program.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77741

Rule title RIN (*expected to significantly reduce burdens on small businesses)

0790–AI88 ...... Shelter for the Homeless. 0790–AJ03 ...... DoD Privacy Program. 0790–AJ06 ...... Voluntary Education Programs. 0790–AJ10 ...... Enhancement of Protections on Consumer Credit for Members of the Armed Forces and Their Dependents...... Pursuant to Executive Order 13563, DoD also removed 32 CFR part 513, ‘‘Indebtedness of Military Personnel,’’ because the part is obsolete and the governing policy is now codified at 32 CFR part 112.

Administration Priorities information security for DoD Subcontracting Plans. The Test Program 1. Rulemakings that are expected to information that resides in or transits was established under section 834 of the have high net benefits well in excess of through contractor systems and a cloud NDAAs for FYs 1990 and 1992 to costs. environment. Recent high-profile determine whether the negotiation and The Department plans to finalize the breaches of Federal information show administration of comprehensive small following Defense Federal Acquisition the need to ensure that information business subcontracting plans would Regulation Supplement (DFARS) rules: security protections are clearly, result in an increase of opportunities • Requirements Relating to Supply effectively, and consistently addressed provided for small business concerns Chain Risk (DFARS case 2012–D050). in contracts. This rule will help protect under DoD contracts. A comprehensive This final rule implements section 806 covered defense information or other subcontracting plan (CSP) can be of the National Defense Authorization Government data from compromise and negotiated on a corporate, division, or Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011, protect against the loss of operationally sector level, rather than contract by as amended by section 806 of the NDAA critical support capabilities, which contract. This rule proposes to amend for FY 2013. Section 806 requires could directly impact national security. the DFARS to: (1) Extend the Test contracting officers to evaluate an • Detection and Avoidance of Program through December 31, 2017; (2) offerors supply chain risk when Counterfeit Electronic Parts—Further require contracting officers to consider purchasing information technology Implementation (DFARS case 2014– an offerors failure to make a good faith related to national security systems. D005). This final rule further effort to comply with its CSP in past This rule enables agencies to exclude implements section 818 of the NDAA performance evaluations; and (3) inform sources identified as having a supply for FY 2012, as modified by section 817 program participants that a CSP will not chain risk from consideration for award of the NDAA for FY 2015. Section 818, be negotiated with a contractor that did of a covered contract, in order to as modified by section 817, addresses not meet the small business goals minimize the potential risk for supplies required sources of electronic parts for negotiated in its prior CSP. This rule is and services purchased by DoD to defense contractors and subcontractors. of particular interest to small businesses maliciously degrade the integrity and This rule requires DoD and its because it holds prime contractors that operation of sensitive information contractors and subcontractors, except are participating in the program technology systems. The cost impact in limited circumstances, to acquire accountable for the small business goals will vary by solicitation or contract, electronic parts from trusted suppliers. established in their CSP, resulting in depending on the level of potential The rule also requires DoD contractors increased business opportunities for harm to DoD systems that may be and subcontractors that are not the small business subcontractors. avoided by excluding a source with an original component manufacturer, to 3. Rulemakings that streamline unacceptable supply chain risk. notify the Government if it is not regulations, reduce unjustified burdens, However, DoD anticipates significant possible to obtain an electronic part and minimize burdens on small savings to taxpayers by reducing the risk from a trusted supplier and to be businesses. of unsafe products entering the supply responsible for the inspection, test, and The Department plans to finalize the chain, which pose a serious threat to authentication of such parts in following DFARS rule— • sensitive government information accordance with existing industry Warranty Tracking of Serialized technology systems and put in jeopardy standards. Such validation of new parts Items (DFARS case 2014–D026). This the safety of our military forces. and new suppliers are steps that a final rule requires the use of the • Network Penetration Reporting and prudent contractor would take electronic contract attachments to Contracting for Cloud Services (DFARS notwithstanding this rule. The benefits record and track warranty data and case 2013–D018). This final rule associated with avoiding the acquisition source of repair information for implements section 941 of the NDAA of counterfeit electronic parts, which serialized items in the Product Data for FY 2013 and section 1632 of the could directly impact national security, Reporting and Evaluation Program NDAA for FY 2015. Section 941 requires far outweigh the minimal cost impact (PDREP) system. While contracting cleared defense contractors to report associated with the notification officers are encouraged to use the penetrations of networks and requirement imposed by this rule. electronic attachments, currently, it is information systems and allows DoD 2. Rulemakings of particular interest not mandatory in the DFARS. As a personnel access to equipment and to small businesses. result, offerors may propose warranty information to assess the impact of The Department plans to propose the terms in paper form, which are later reported penetrations. Section 1632 following DFARS rule— manually input into the PDREP system requires that a contractor designated as • Temporary Extension of Test when a contract is awarded. On the operationally critical must report each Program for Comprehensive Small other hand, the electronic contract time a cyber-incident occurs on that Business Subcontracting Plans (DFARS attachments are designed to easily contractor’s network or information case 2015–D013). This proposed rule upload to the PDREP system, which systems. Ultimately, DoD anticipates implements section 821 of the NDAA reduces: (1) The potential burden of significant savings to taxpayers as a for FY 2015 regarding the Test Program manually entering warranty terms in result of this rule, by improving for Comprehensive Small Business multiple places, and (2) inaccuracies in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77742 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

the data reported. By making use of will also provide an alternative to the feedback on newly enacted legislation these attachments mandatory, the rule high-level quality assurance standard that impacts the Department’s provides DoD the ability to more required by the DFARS for PSCs. acquisition regulations, prior to effectively track warranty data and Contract quality requirements fall into initiating rulemaking to draft the source of repair information for four general categories, depending on implementing rules; and (2) holding serialized items in a single repository of the extent of quality assurance needed public meetings to solicit industry warranty terms. by the Government for the acquisition feedback on proposed rulemakings. 4. Rules to be modified, streamlined, involved. In the case of PSC’s, the high- • Employ methods to facilitate and expanded, or repealed to make the level quality standard, ‘‘Management improve efficiency of the contracting agency’s regulatory program more System for Quality of Private Security process such as: (1) Requiring the use of effective or less burdensome in Company Operations—Requirements electronic forms; and (2) establishing achieving the regulatory objectives. with Guidance, ANSI/ASIS PSC.1– that electronic contract documents The Department plans to finalize the 2012’’ is mandatory. The alternative contained in Electronic Data Access following DFARS rule— proposed by this rule for PSCs (ISO system are official contract documents. • Clauses with Alternates—Small 18788: Management System Private Use of electronic means to accomplish Business Programs (DFARS case 2015– Security Operations—Requirements the contracting process: (1) Reduces the D017). This final rule amends those with Guidance) is substantially the same burden on both industry and the contract clauses associated with small as ANSI/ASIS PSC.1–2012 and is more Department associated with manual and business programs that are prescribed widely accepted on an international duplicative data entry, and (2) removes for use with an ‘‘alternate.’’ A basis. limitations on access to information. contracting officer selects a basic clause Specific DoD Priorities: For this 2. Health Affairs, Department of for inclusion in a contract based on the regulatory plan, there are five specific Defense clause prescription contained in the DoD priorities, all of which reflect the DFARS. Some clause prescriptions established regulatory principles. DoD The Department of Defense is able to require the use of ‘‘alternate’’ text has focused its regulatory resources on meet its dual mission of wartime within a basic clause depending on the the most serious health and safety risks. readiness and peacetime health care for circumstances of the acquisition. In lieu Perhaps most significant is that each of those entitled to DoD medical care and of listing the basic clause and any the priorities described below benefits by operating an extensive alternate text separately, this rule promulgates regulations to offset the network of military medical treatment proposes to include in the regulation the resource impacts of Federal decisions facilities supplemented by services full text of both the basic clause with on the public or to improve the quality furnished by civilian health care the alternate clause. This new of public life, such as those regulations providers and facilities through the convention will facilitate selection of concerning acquisition, health affairs, TRICARE program as administered clauses with alternates using automated transition assistance, and cyber security. under DoD contracts. TRICARE is a contract writing systems and ensure major health care program designed to paragraphs from the basic clause that 1. Acquisition, Technology, and improve the management and should be superseded by alternate text Logistics/Defense Procurement and integration of DoD’s health care delivery are not inadvertently included in the Acquisition Policy (DPAP), Department system. solicitation or contract. As a result, the of Defense The Department of Defense’s Military terms of a solicitation and contract are DPAP continuously reviews the Health System (MHS) continues to meet clearly communicated to offerors and DFARS and continues to lead the challenge of providing the world’s contractors who consider such terms Government efforts to— finest combat medicine and aeromedical during proposal development and • Improve the presentation, clarity, evacuation, while supporting peacetime contract performance. and streamlining of the regulation by: health care for those entitled to DoD 5. Rulemakings that have a significant (1) Implementing the new convention to medical care and benefits at home and international impact. construct clauses with alternates in a abroad. The MHS brings together the The Department plans to propose the manner whereby the alternate clauses worldwide health care resources of the following DFARS rule— are included in full-text; (2) removing Uniformed Services (often referred to as • Contractors Performing Private guidance that does not have a ‘‘direct care,’’ usually within military Security Functions (DFARS case 2015– significant effect beyond the internal treatment facilities) and supplements D021). During contingency operations, operating procedure of the Department this capability with services furnished humanitarian or peace operations, or or impose a significant cost or by network and non-network civilian other military operations or exercises, administrative impact on contractors or health care professionals, institutions, DoD employs private security offerors, which is more appropriately pharmacies, and suppliers, through the contractors (PSCs) to guard personnel, addressed in the DFARS Procedures, TRICARE program as administered facilities, designated sites, or property of Guidance, and Information; and (3) under DoD contracts, to provide access Federal agencies, the contractor or removing obsolete reporting or other to high quality health care services subcontractor, or a third party. requirements imposed on contractors. while maintaining the capability to Requirements for DoD contractors Such improvements ensure that the support military operations. The performing private security functions regulation contracting officers, TRICARE program serves 9.5 million outside the United States are currently contractors, and offerors have a clear Active Duty Service Members, National contained in the Federal Acquisition understanding of the rules for doing Guard and Reserve members, retirees, Regulation, and supplemented by the business with the Department of their families, survivors, and certain DFARS. This rule proposes to Defense. former spouses worldwide. TRICARE streamline the regulation by • Obtain early engagement with continues to offer an increasingly consolidating all terms and conditions industry on procurement topics of high integrated and comprehensive health for DoD PSCs in a single DFARS clause, public interest by: (1) Utilizing the care plan, refining and enhancing both which can be updated by DoD in a more DPAP Defense Acquisition Regulation benefits and programs in a manner efficient and timely manner. This rule System Web site to obtain early public consistent with the law, industry

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77743

standard of care, and best practices, to employment, or returning to school or anticipates publishing the interim final meet the changing needs of its an existing job. Service members receive rule in the second quarter of FY 2016. beneficiaries. The program’s goal is to training to meet CRS through the 4. Chief Information Officer, increase access to health care services, Transition GPS (Goals, Plans, Success) Department of Defense improve health care quality, and control curricula, including a core curricula and health care costs. individual tracks focused on Accessing The Department of Defense plans to The Defense Health Agency plans to Higher Education, Career Technical publish the final rule for the Defense publish the following rule— Training, and Entrepreneurship. All Industrial Base (DIB) Cybersecurity (CS) • Proposed Rule: TRICARE Mental Service members who are separating, Activities that implements statutory Health and Substance Abuse. This rule retiring, or being released from a period requirements for mandatory cyber proposes revisions to the TRICARE of 180 days or more of continuous incident reporting while maintaining regulation to reduce administrative Active Duty must complete all the voluntary cyber threat information barriers to access to mental health mandatory requirements of the Veterans sharing program. • benefit coverage and to improve access Opportunity to Work (VOW) Act, which Interim Final Rule: Defense to substance use disorder (SUD) includes pre-separation counseling to Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Security treatment for TRICARE beneficiaries, develop an Individual Transition Plan (CS) Activities. DoD revised its DoD– consistent with earlier Department of (ITP) and identify their career planning DIB Cybersecurity (CS) Activities Defense and Institute of Medicine needs; attend the Department of regulation to mandate reporting of cyber recommendations, current standards of Veterans Affairs (VA) Benefits Briefings incidents that result in an actual or practice in mental health and addition I and II to understand what VA benefits potentially adverse effect on a covered medicine, and governing laws. This the Service member earned, how to contractor information system or proposed rule has four main objectives: apply for them, and leverage them for a covered defense information residing (1) To eliminate of quantitative and positive economic outcome; and attend therein, or on a contractor’s ability to qualitative treatment limitations on SUD the Department of Labor Employment provide operationally critical support, and mental health benefit coverage and Workshop (DOLEW), which focuses on and modify eligibility criteria to permit align beneficiary cost-sharing for mental the mechanics of resume writing, greater participation in the voluntary health and SUD benefits with those networking, job search skills, interview DoD-Defense Industrial Base (DIB) applicable to medical/surgical benefits; skills, and labor market research. DoD Cybersecurity (CS) information sharing (2) to expand covered mental health and anticipates publishing the interim final program. DoD anticipates publishing the SUD treatment under TRICARE, to rule in the first quarter of FY 2016. final rule in the fourth quarter of FY include coverage of intensive outpatient • Interim Final Rule; Amendment: 2016. programs and treatment of opioid dependence; (3) to streamline the Sexual Assault Prevention and requirements for institutional providers Response (SAPR) Program. The purpose to become TRICARE authorized of this rule is to implement DoD policy DOD—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY providers; and (4) to develop TRICARE and assign responsibilities for the SAPR (OS) Program on prevention, response, and reimbursement methodologies for newly Proposed Rule Stage recognized mental health and SUD oversight of sexual assault. The goal is • intensive outpatient programs and for DoD to establish a culture free of 15. Sexual Assault Prevention and opioid treatment programs. DoD sexual assault through an environment Response (SAPR) Program of prevention, education and training, anticipates publishing the proposed rule Priority: Other Significant. in the second quarter of FY 2016. response capability, victim support, Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. 113; Pub. L. reporting procedures, and appropriate 109–364; Pub. L. 109–163; Pub. L. 108– 3. Personnel and Readiness, accountability that enhances the safety 375; Pub. L. 106–65; Pub. L. 110–417; Department of Defense and well-being of all persons. DoD Pub. L. 111–84; Pub. L. 112–81; Pub. L. The Department of Defense plans to anticipates publishing the interim final 113–66; Pub. L. 113–291 publish rules regarding transition rule in the second quarter of FY 2016. CFR Citation: 32 CFR 103. assistance for military personnel and • Interim Final Rule; Amendment: Legal Deadline: None. sexual assault prevention— Sexual Assault Prevention and Abstract: This part implements • Interim Final Rule: Transition Response (SAPR) Program Procedures. Department of Defense (DoD) policy and Assistance for Military Personnel (TAP). This rule establishes policy, assigns assigns responsibilities for the Sexual This rule establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides guidance Assault Prevention and Response responsibilities, and prescribes and procedures for the SAPR Program. (SAPR) Program on prevention, procedures for administration of the It establishes processes and procedures response, and oversight to sexual DoD Transition Assistance Program for the Sexual Assault Forensic assault. It is DoD policy to establish a (TAP). The goal of TAP is to prepare all Examination Kit, the multidisciplinary culture free of sexual assault through an eligible members of the Military Case Management Group, and guidance environment of prevention, education Services for a transition to civilian life, on how to handle sexual assault, SAPR and training, response capability, victim including preparing them to meet Career minimum program standards, SAPR support, reporting procedures, and Readiness Standards (CRS). The TAP training requirements, and SAPR appropriate accountability that provides information and training to requirements for the DoD Annual Report enhances the safety and wellbeing of all ensure Service members leaving Active on Sexual Assault in the Military. The persons covered by this regulation. Duty and eligible Reserve Component DoD goal is a culture free of sexual Statement of Need: The purpose of Service members being released from assault through an environment of this rule is to implement DoD policy active duty are prepared for their next prevention, education and training, and assign responsibilities for the step in life whether pursuing additional response capability, victim support, Sexual Assault Prevention and education, finding a job in the public or reporting procedures, and appropriate Response (SAPR) Program on private sector, starting their own accountability that enhances the safety prevention, response, and oversight to business or other form of self- and well-being of all persons. DoD sexual assault.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77744 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Summary of Legal Basis: Establishes competent, and recovery-oriented. enhances the safety and well-being of all SAPR minimum program standards, Sexual assault patients shall be given DoD members. SAPR training requirements, and SAPR priority, and treated as emergency cases. Statement of Need: The rule requirements for the DoD Annual Report Emergency care shall consist of establishes the processes and on Sexual Assault in the Military emergency healthcare and the offer of a procedures for the Sexual Assault consistent with title 10, United States Sexual Assault Forensic Examination Forensic Examination (SAFE) kit; the Code, the DoD Task Force Report on (SAFE). The victim shall be advised that multidisciplinary Case Management Care for Victims of Sexual Assault and even if a SAFE is declined the victim is Group to include guidance for the group pursuant to DoD Directive (DoDD) encouraged (but not mandated) to on how to handle sexual assault; SAPR 5124.02, DoDD 6495.01, and Public receive medical care, psychological minimum program standards; SAPR Laws 106–65, 108–375, 109–163, 109– care, and victim advocacy. training requirements; and SAPR 364, 110–417, 111–84, 111–383, 112–81, (4) Standardized SAPR requirements, requirements for the DoD Annual Report 112–239, 113–66, and 113–291. terminology, guidelines, protocols, and on Sexual Assault in the Military. Alternatives: The Department of guidelines for training materials shall Summary of Legal Basis: In February Defense will lack comprehensive SAPR focus on awareness, prevention, and of 2004, the former Secretary of Defense program policy guidance on the response at all levels, as appropriate. Donald H. Rumsfeld directed Dr. David prevention and response to sexual (5) An immediate, trained sexual S. C. Chu, the former Under Secretary of assaults involving members of the U.S. assault response capability shall be Defense for Personnel and Readiness, to Armed Forces. The DoD will not have available for each report of sexual review the DoD process for treatment guidance to establish a culture free of assault in all locations, including in and care of victims of sexual assault in sexual assault through an environment deployed locations. the Military Services. One of the of prevention, education and training, (6) Victims of sexual assault shall be recommendations emphasized the need response capability, victim support, protected from coercion, retaliation, and to establish a single point of reporting procedures, and appropriate reprisal. accountability for sexual assault policy accountability that enhances the safety Risks: The rule intends to enable within the Department. This led to the and well being of all persons covered by military readiness by establishing a establishment of the Joint Task Force for this part (32 CFR 103) and 32 CFR 105. culture free of sexual assault. This rule Sexual Assault Prevention and DoD will lack the policy guidance to aims to mitigate this risk to mission Response, and the naming of then promulgate requirements mandated in readiness. Brigadier General K.C. McClain as its the National Defense Authorization Timetable: commander in October 2004. The Task Acts. Force focused its initial efforts on Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Action Date FR Cite developing a new DoD-wide sexual Fiscal Year 2014 Operation and assault policy that incorporated Maintenance funding for DoD SAPRO NPRM ...... 03/00/16 recommendations set forth in the Task was $26.798 million with an additional Force Report on Care for Victims of Congressional allocation of $25.3 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Sexual Assault as well as in the Ronald million designated for the Special Required: No. W. Reagan National Defense Victims’ Counsel program and the Small Entities Affected: No. Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 Special Victims’ Investigation and Government Levels Affected: None. (Pub. L. 108–375). This act directed the Prosecution capability that was Additional Information: DoD Department to have a sexual assault reprogrammed to the Military Services Directive 6495.01, ‘‘Sexual Assault policy in place by January 1, 2005. and the National Guard Bureau. Prevention and Response (SAPR) Subsequent National Defense Additionally, each of the Military Program’’. Authorization Acts provided additional Services establishes its own SAPR Agency Contact: Diana Rangoussis, requirements for the Department of budget for the programmatic costs Department of Defense, Office of the Defense sexual assault prevention and arising from the implementation of the Secretary, Defense Pentagon, response program in: Section 113 of title training, prevention, reporting, Washington, DC 20301, Phone: 703 696– 10, United States Code; and Public Laws response, and oversight requirements 9422. 109–364, 109–163, 108–375, 106–65, established by this rule. RIN: 0790–AJ40 110–417, 111–84, 112–81, 112–239, The anticipated benefits associated 113–66, and 113–291. with this rule include: Alternatives: The Department of (1) A complete and up-to-date SAPR Defense will lack comprehensive Sexual DOD—OS Policy consisting of this part and 32 Assault Prevention and Response CFR 105, to include comprehensive Final Rule Stage (SAPR) procedures to implement the SAPR policy guidance on the DoD Directive 6495.01, Sexual Assault 16. Sexual Assault Prevention and prevention and response to sexual Prevention and Response (SAPR) Response Program Procedures assaults involving members of the U.S. Program, which is the DoD policy on Armed Forces. Priority: Other Significant. prevention and response to sexual (2) Guidance and policy with which Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. ch 47; Pub. assaults involving members of the U.S. the DoD may establish a culture free of L. 106–65; Pub. L. 108–375; Pub. L. Armed Forces. The DoD will not have sexual assault, through an environment 109–163; Pub. L. 109–364; Pub. L. 110– guidance to establish a culture free of of prevention, education and training, 417; Pub. L. 111–84; Pub. L. 111–383; sexual assault through an environment response capability, victim support, Pub. L. 112–81; Pub. L. 112–239; Pub. of prevention, education and training, reporting procedures, and appropriate L. 113–66; Pub. L. 113–291 response capability, victim support, accountability that enhances the safety CFR Citation: 32 CFR 105. reporting procedures, and appropriate and well being of all persons covered by Legal Deadline: None. accountability that enhances the safety this part and 32 CFR 105. Abstract: The procedures discussed and well-being of all persons covered by (3) Requirement to provide care that establish a culture of prevention, this part and 32 CFR 103. DoD will lack is gender-responsive, culturally response, and accountability that the implementing procedures to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77745

promulgate requirements mandated in (6) Sexual Assault Response response to victim feedback, publicize the National Defense Authorization Coordinators (SARC), SAPR Victim the DoD Safe Helpline to SARCs and Acts. Advocates (VA), and other responders Service members and at military Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The will assist sexual assault victims confinement facilities. preliminary estimate of the anticipated regardless of Service affiliation. (14) Added additional responsibilities cost associated with this rule for the (7) Service member and adult military for the DoD SAPRO Director (develop current fiscal year is approximately dependent victims of sexual assault metrics for measuring effectiveness, act $15.010 million. Additionally, each of shall receive timely access to as liaison between DoD and other the Military Services establishes its own comprehensive medical and agencies with regard to SAPR, oversee SAPR budget for the programmatic costs psychological treatment, including development of strategic program arising from the implementation of the emergency care treatment and services, guidance and joint planning objectives, training, prevention, reporting, as described in this part and 32 CFR quarterly include Military Service response, and oversight requirements 103. Academies as a SAPR IPT standard established by this rule. (8) Military Service members who file agenda item, semi-annually meet with The anticipated benefits associated Unrestricted and Restricted Reports of the Superintendents of the Military with this rule include: sexual assault shall be protected from Service Academies, and develop and (1) A complete SAPR Policy reprisal, or threat of reprisal, for filing administer standardized and voluntary consisting of this part and 32 CFR 103, a report. surveys for survivors of sexual assault to to include comprehensive SAPR (9) Service members and military comply with section 1726 of the procedures to implement the DoD dependents 18 years and older who National Defense Authorization Act For Directive 6495.01, Sexual Assault have been sexually assaulted have two Fiscal Year 2014, Public Law 113–66. Prevention and Response (SAPR) reporting options: Unrestricted or (15) Updates text throughout the Program, which is the DoD policy on Restricted Reporting. Unrestricted issuance to reflect Defense Sexual prevention and response to sexual Reporting of sexual assault is favored by Assault Incident Database (DSAID) assaults involving members of the U.S. the DoD. However, Unrestricted interface with MCIO case management Armed Forces. Reporting may represent a barrier for systems (rather than Military Service (2) Guidance and procedures with victims to access services, when the sexual assault case management which the DoD may establish a culture victim desires no command or DoD law systems) and procedures for entering free of sexual assault, through an enforcement involvement. final case disposition information into environment of prevention, education Consequently, the DoD recognizes a the database. and training, response capability, victim fundamental need to provide a Risks: The rule intends to enable support, reporting procedures, and confidential disclosure vehicle via the military readiness by establishing a appropriate accountability that Restricted Reporting option. Regardless culture free of sexual assault. This rule enhances the safety and well-being of all of whether the victim elects Restricted aims to mitigate this risk to mission persons covered by this part (32 CFR or Unrestricted Reporting, readiness. 105) and 32 CFR 103. confidentiality of medical information Timetable: (3) Requirement that medical care and shall be maintained in accordance with SAPR services are gender-responsive, DoD 6025.18–R. Action Date FR Cite culturally competent, and recovery- (10) Service members who are on oriented. A 24 hour, 7 day per week active duty but were victims of sexual Interim Final Rule 04/11/13 78 FR 21715 sexual assault response capability for all assault prior to enlistment or Interim Final Rule 04/11/13 locations, including deployed areas, commissioning are eligible to receive Effective. shall be established for persons covered SAPR services under either reporting Interim Final Rule 06/10/13 in this part. An immediate, trained option. The DoD shall provide support Comment Pe- sexual assault response capability shall to an active duty Military Service riod End. Interim Final Rule 03/00/16 be available for each report of sexual member regardless of when or where the assault in all locations, including in sexual assault took place. deployed locations. Sexual assault (11) Requirement to establish a DoD- Regulatory Flexibility Analysis victims shall be given priority, and wide certification program with a Required: No. treated as emergency cases. Emergency national accreditor to ensure all sexual Small Entities Affected: No. Government Levels Affected: None. care shall consist of emergency medical assault victims are offered the assistance Additional Information: DoD care and the offer of a SAFE. The victim of a SARC or SAPR VA who has Instruction 6495.02, ‘‘Sexual Assault shall be advised that even if a SAFE is obtained this certification. Prevention and Response (SAPR) declined the victim shall be encouraged (12) Implementing training standards Program Procedures’’. (but not mandated) to receive medical that cover general SAPR training for Agency Contact: Teresa Scalzo, care, psychological care, and victim Service members, and contain specific Department of Defense, Office of the advocacy. standards for: Accessions, annual, (4) Command sexual assault professional military education and Secretary, 4000 Defense Pentagon, awareness and prevention programs and leadership development training, pre- Washington, DC 20301–1155, Phone: DoD law enforcement and criminal and post-deployment, pre-command, 703 696–8977. justice procedures that enable persons General and Field Officers and SES, RIN: 0790–AI36 to be held appropriately accountable for military recruiters, civilians who their actions, shall be supported by all supervise military, and responders commanders. trainings. DOD—OS (5) Standardized SAPR requirements, (13) Requires Military Departments to terminology, guidelines, protocols, and establish procedures for supporting the 17. Transition Assistance Program guidelines for training materials shall DoD Safe Helpline in accordance with (TAP) for Military Personnel focus on awareness, prevention, and Guidelines for the DoD Safe Helpline for Priority: Economically Significant. response at all levels, as appropriate. the referral database provide timely Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77746 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1141; 10 develop a new training and services Implementation of these U.S.C. 1142 delivery model to help strengthen the recommendations transforms a Service CFR Citation: 32 CFR 88. transition readiness of Service members member’ experience during separating, Legal Deadline: None. from military to civilian life. Shortly retiring, demobilizing, or deactivating to Abstract: The DoD is committed to thereafter, Congress passed and the make the most informed career providing military personnel from President signed the VOW to Hire decisions by equipping them with the across the Services access to the TAP. Heroes Act of 2011, Public Law 112–56, tools they need to make a successful The TAP prepares all eligible members sections 201–265, 125 Stat. 715 (VOW transition. of the Military Services for a transition Act), which included steps to improve The rule discusses a redesigned to civilian life; enables eligible Service the existing TAP for Service members. program which implements, the members to meet the CRS as required by Among other things, the VOW Act made transition-related provisions of the this rule; and is the overarching participation in several components of VOW Act and recommendations of the program that provides transition TAP mandatory for all Service members Task Force to offer a tailored curriculum assistance, information, training, and (except in certain limited providing Service members with useful services to eligible transitioning Service circumstances). and quality instruction with members to prepare them to be career The task force delivered its initial connections to the benefits and ready when they transition back to recommendations to the President in resources available to them as Veterans. civilian life. Spouses of eligible Service December 2011 which required At the heart of the redesign is the new members are entitled to the DOLEW, job implementation of procedures to set of CRS. Just as Service members placement counseling, DoD/VA- document Service member must meet military mission readiness administered survivor information, participation, and to demonstrate standards while on Active Duty, Service financial planning assistance, transition Military Service compliance with 10 members will meet CRS before their plan assistance, VA-administered home U.S.C. chapter 58 requirements. The transition to civilian life. loan services, housing assistance Veterans Opportunity to Work (VOW) Spouses of eligible Service members benefits information, and counseling on Act of 2011 mandated transitioning are entitled to the DOLEW, job responsible borrowing practices. Service member’s participation in placement counseling, DoD/VA- Dependents of eligible Service receiving counseling and training on VA administered survivor information, members are entitled to career change Benefits. VA developed VA Benefits I financial planning assistance, transition counseling and information on suicide and II Briefings to meet this mandate. plan assistance, VA-administered home prevention. The VOW Act also mandated loan services, housing assistance These revisions will: Institutionalize transitioning Service members to benefits information, and counseling on the implementation of the VOW Act of received counseling and informed of responsible borrowing practices. 2011; require mandatory participation services regarding employment Dependents of eligible service members in the Department of Labor (DOL) assistance. The Department of Labor are entitled to career change counseling Employment Workshop (EW); revised its curriculum to meet this and information on suicide prevention. implement the Transition GPS (Goals, mandate with the Department of Labor Summary of Legal Basis: This Plans, Success) curriculum; require Employment Workshop. The VOW regulation is proposed under the development of an Individual requirements have been codified in 10 authority of title 10, U.S.C., chapter 58. Transition Plan (ITP); enhance tracking U.S.C. chapter 58 and attendance to all Title 10, U.S.C., section 1141 defines of attendance at TAP events; implement Transition GPS curricula is now involuntary separation; section 1142 of mandatory Career Readiness documented. provides the time period the Secretary Standards (CRS) for separating Service The redesigned TAP was developed concerned shall provide for individual members; and, incorporate a around four core recommendations: pre-separation counseling for each CAPSTONE event to document Adopt standards of career readiness member of the armed forces whose transition readiness and reinforce for transitioning Service members: discharge or release from active duty is Commanding Officer accountability and Service members should leave the anticipated as of a specific date; section support for the needs of individual military having met clearly defined 1143 requires the Secretary of Defense Service members. This rule improves standards of career readiness. to provide to members of the armed the process of conducting transition Implement a revamped TAP forces a certification or verification of services for eligible separating Service curriculum: Service members should be any job skills and experience acquired members across the Military Services provided with a set of value-added, while on active duty, that may have and establishes the data collection individually tailored training programs application to employment in the foundation to build short-, medium-, and services to equip them with the set civilian sector; section 1143a. requires and long-term program outcomes. of tools they need to pursue their post- the Secretary of Defense to encourage Statement of Need: In August 2011, military goals successfully. members and former members of the President Obama announced his Implement a CAPSTONE: Service armed forces to enter into public and comprehensive plan to ensure members should be afforded the community service jobs; section 1144 America’s Post 9/11 Veterans have the opportunity, shortly before they depart requires the Secretary of Labor, in support they need and deserve when the military, to review and verify that conjunction with the Secretaries of they leave the military, look for a job, they have met the CRS and received the Defense, Homeland Security, and and enter the civilian workforce. A key services they desire and to be steered to Veterans Affairs to establish and part of the President’s plan was his call the resources and benefits available to maintain a program to furnish for a career-ready military. Specifically, them as Veterans. counseling, assistance in identifying he directed DoD and Department of Implement a Military Life Cycle employment and training opportunities, Veterans Affairs (VA) to work closely (MLC) transition model: Transition help in obtaining such employment and with other federal agencies and the preparation for Service members should training, and other related information President’s economic and domestic occur over the entire span of their and services to members of the armed policy teams to lead a Veterans military careers not just in the last few forces and the spouses of such members Employment Initiative Task Force to months of their military service. who are transitioning; section 1145

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77747

prescribes transitional health benefits; readiness could not absorb the impact of mandatory, DoD published a policy to section 1146 describes commissary and the void. Additionally, there would be make CRS and Commanding Officer exchange benefits for members an increased expense required to verification that Service members are involuntarily separated from active activate or mobilize Reserve Component meeting CRS, mandatory. Vow Act duty; section 1147 prescribes guidance or National Guard personnel for the 9 to compliance and CRS must be met by all that may permit individuals who are 13 weeks prior to transition. Finally, Service members after they have served involuntarily separated to continue, not logistical challenges could result from 180 days in active duty status. Service more than 180 days after the date of Service members dealing with TAP members must attend Transition GPS separation, to reside (along with other requirements while deployed. For (Goals, Plans, Success) curriculum members of the individual’s household) example, units scheduled to mobilize modules that build career readiness if in military housing provided or leased would be delayed because a returning they cannot meet the CRS on their own. by the DoD; section 1148 addresses unit could occupy facilities (such as In cases where Service members receive relocation assistance for personnel billeting, classrooms, and training areas) a punitive or Under Other Than overseas; section 1149 provides that the deploying units needed to train Honorable Conditions discharge, guidance regarding excess leave and and prepare for mobilization. Commanding Officers have the permissive temporary duty; section A second alternative considered was discretion of determining participation 1150 prescribes guidance for affiliation establishment of regional residential in the other than mandatory Transition with Guard and Reserve units; section transition centers staffed by personnel GPS curricula. By policy, all Service 1151 prescribes guidance for retention from all Military Services, the members who do not meet the CRS will of assistive technology and services Departments of VA, Labor (DOL), and receive a warm handover to DOL, VA, provided before separation; section 1152 Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard), or other resources targeted at improving allows the Secretary of Defense to enter the U.S. Small Business Administration career readiness in the area where the into an agreement with the Attorney (SBA), and the OPM. Transitioning standard was not met. General to establish or participate in a Service members would be sent on The entire Transition GPS curriculum program to assist eligible members and temporary duty for a period of four to is now available online through Joint former members to obtain employment six weeks, 12 months prior to their Knowledge Online (JKO); however, with law enforcement agencies; section separation or retirement date to receive Service members must attend pre- 1153 allows the Secretary of Defense to transition services. Eligible Reserve separation counseling, VA briefings, and provide assistance to separated Service Component Service members would be the DOLEW in person. All other members to obtain employment with assigned to the centers as a continuation curriculum can be accessed through the health care providers; and section 1154 of their demobilization out-processing. JKO virtual platform. The virtual allows the Secretary of Defense to The potential costs to build or modify curriculum (VC) was launched at the provide assistance to eligible Service existing facilities, or rent facilities that beginning of FY14. DoD expected a cost members and former members to obtain would meet regional residential savings in FY14 due to use of the VC but employment as teachers (Troops-to- transition center requirements, as well the cost avoidance cannot be calculated Teachers Program). as costs for Service member travel to as VC utilization is appropriate on a Alternatives: The DoD considered and from the regional centers, reduced Service member-by-Service member several alternatives: the viability of this approach. basis. In President Obama’s speech in A third, less expensive option would Further, resource requirements for August of 2011 at the Washington Navy have left the existing TAP program DoD become more predictable when Yard, he used the term ‘‘Reverse Boot intact without increasing counselor and transition assistance is provided at pre- Camp’’ to demonstrate his vision for a curriculum facilitation resources. This determined points throughout the MLC redesigned TAP to increase the option would not have accountability TAP model, mitigating the impacts of preparedness of Service members to systems and procedures to demonstrate surge periods when large numbers of successfully transition from military compliance with the VOW Act that Service members separate, demobilize service to civilian communities. The mandates pre-separation counseling, or deactivate. President’s use of language initiated an attendance at the DOL’s three day The FY13 cost to DoD to implement interagency discussion on an approach Employment Workshop (DOLEW), and the TAP redesign was $122M and in to mirror the Military Services’ basic or attendance at two VA briefings. Due to FY14 DoD costs were $85M. The initial entry training programs. This increasing Veteran unemployment and difference is attributed to both approach would require the Military homeless percentages at the time of the implementation costs of the updated Services to devote approximately 9 to 13 decision, and the rebalancing of the program in FY13, and to efficiencies weeks, depending on curriculum military force, this cost neutral discovered as implementation was development, outcome measures, approach would not have the outcome completed throughout FY14. These assessments and individual military based capability intended to develop costs represent only the portion of the readiness and cultural differences, to career ready skills in transitioning interagency program that is paid by the afford Service members the opportunity Service members. This option, which DoD. The cost covers Defense civilian to use all aspects of a rigorous transition would not have met the requirements of and contracted staff (FTEs) salaries and preparation program. the law, would cost the Military benefits at 206 world-wide locations. While no cost estimates were Services approximately $70M versus the Civilian and contract labor account for conducted, this approach was deemed fiscal year 2013 (FY13) $122M for the approximately 88% of total program both expensive and would jeopardize implementation of the re-designed TAP. costs in both fiscal years. The remaining DoD’s ability to maintain mission Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The costs include equipment, computers readiness. Approximately 200,000– VOW Act mandated pre-separation (purchase, maintenance and operations), 250,000 Service members leave DOD counseling, VA Benefits Briefings I and Information Technology (IT) and each year. To concentrate on transition II, and the DOLEW and these architecture, data collection and preparation during the last 9 to 13 components were implemented in sharing, Web site development, weeks of an individual’s military career November 2012. On the same day the performance evaluation and would not be workable since mission VOW Act requirements became assessments, curriculum development

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77748 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

and modifications, materials (audio- Service members and their spouses. free of charge. The SBA then provides visual, CDs, eNotebooks, handouts, Costs to employers and community Service members the opportunity to be interactive brick and mortar classroom organizations supporting transition- matched to a successful business person sessions, virtual curriculum, etc.), related events and activities would be as a mentor. This is a tremendous facilitation training, research, studies, similar to those for VSOs and MSOs. commitment that must create additional and surveys. Within DoD, the re- The DoD is dependent upon other costs for the SBA. The SBA offices designed TAP capitalized upon existing federal agencies to deliver the continue to provide support to Veterans resources, e.g., use of certified financial redesigned TAP to transitioning Service as they pursue business plan planners housed in the Military members. The VA, DOL, SBA, development or start up loans; provision Services’ family centers to conduct Department of Education (ED), and of this support is in their charter, but financial planning or military education Office of Personnel Management (OPM) the increased awareness provided counselors used to conduct the have proven to be invaluable partners in through the Transition GPS curriculum Accessing Higher Education (AHE) supporting the Transition GPS is likely to increase the patronage and track. Other efficiencies include reuse or curriculum development and delivery, represent a cost to SBA. The SBA also upgrades to current facilities and and in providing follow-on services provides input to the TAP interagency classrooms used to deliver legacy TAP. required by a warm handover due to working groups and governance boards. Implementation costs in FY13 included unmet CRS. These interagency partners The SBA is engaged with data collection equipping classrooms to allow for strongly support TAP governance and and sharing efforts to determine individual internet access and train-the- performance measurement. program outcomes. trainer workshops to deliver the DoD Although DoD cannot estimate the VA provides facilitators who deliver portions of the Transition GPS costs for its interagency partners, TAP the mandatory VA Benefits Briefings I curriculum. Examples of efficiencies provides the Service members with and II as part of the Transition GPS discovered in FY14 include providing resources through the contributions of standardized curriculum required to train-the-trainer courses through its interagency partners that should be meet VOW Act requirements. The VA webinars and savings associated with identified as factors of total program facilitators also deliver the two-day Service members using the VC. cost. Transition assistance is a track for Career Technical Training that The DoD provides military spouses comprehensive interagency effort with provides instruction to Service members the statutory requirements of TAP as contributions from every partner to discern the best choices of career prescribed in Title 10, United States leveraged to provide support to the All- technical training institutions, financial Code. Other elements of TAP, Volunteer Force as the Service members aid, best use of the Post 9/11 GI Bill, etc. prescribed by DoD policy, are available prepare to become Veterans. The Benefits counselors deliver one-on-one to spouses if resources and space interagency partners deliver the benefits counseling on installations, as permits. Military spouses can attend the Transition GPS curriculum and one-on- space permits. As a primary resource for brick and mortar Transition GPS one services across 206 military Veterans, VA ensures benefits curriculum at no cost on a nearby installations across the globe. DoD can counselors are able to accept warm military installation. They can also take only speak to TAP costs within the handovers of transitioning Service the entire Transition GPS curriculum Defense fence line, but can discuss the members who do not meet CRS and online, virtually, at any time, from value provided by interagency partners. require VA assistance post separation. anywhere with a computer or laptop for The DOL provides skilled facilitators The VA hosts the interagency single free. that deliver the DOLEW, a mandatory web portal for connectivity between Many of our Veteran and Military element of the Transition GPS employers and transitioning Service Service Organizations, employers and standardized curriculum. DOL’s members, Veterans and military spouses local communities provide transition American Jobs Centers (AJCs) provide the Veterans Employment Center (VEC). support services to local installations. integral employment support to VA provides input to the TAP Installation Commanders are strongly transitioning Service members and interagency working groups and encouraged to permit access to Veteran transitioned Veterans. The AJCs are governance boards, and is involved in Service Organizations (VSOs) and identified as resources for the Service the data collection and sharing efforts to Military Service Organizations (MSOs) members during TAP which may determine program outcomes, all of to provide transition assistance-related increase visits from the informed which represent costs to the events and activities in the United Service members. The AJCs also support organization. States and abroad at no cost to the warm handovers of Service members ED serves a unique and highly valued government. Two memos signed by who have identified employment as a role in the interagency partnership by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel transition goal on their ITP but do not ensuring the entire curriculum, both in reinforce such access. The memos are meet the CRS for employment. DOL also classroom and virtual platform delivery, effective within 60 days of the provides input to the TAP interagency is based on adult learning principles. December 23 signing, and will remain in working groups and governance boards, Their consultative role, tapped daily by effect until the changes are codified and is involved in the data collection, the interagency partners, is critical to a within DoD. Access to installations is performance measurement, and quality TAP. ED also provides input to for the purpose of assisting Service standardization efforts, all of which the TAP interagency working groups members with their post-military represent costs to the organization. and governance boards and keeps a keen disability process and transition The SBA provides the Transition GPS eye toward meaningful TAP outcomes, resources and services. The costs to entrepreneurship track, Boots to all of which represent costs to the VSOs and MSOs would be any costs Business, to educate transitioning organization. associated with salaries for paid VSO Service members interested in starting The OPM contributes federal and MSO personnel. These their own business about the challenges employment information and resources organizations will pay for any costs small businesses face. Upon completing to the DOLEW, and enables the associated with travel to and from the Boots to Business track, the SBA connectivity between the VEC and USA military installations, as well as any allows Service members to access the Jobs Web sites. The OPM also provides materials they provide to separating SBA on-line entrepreneurship course, input to the TAP interagency working

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77749

groups and governance boards and that may arise in the next several The rule benefits communities across contributes to performance measures. months. the country. Civilian communities The costs to DoD’s interagency —79% said that the TAP was beneficial receive more educated, better trained partners were not calculated; in helping them gain the information and more prepared citizens when implementation of this rule was and skills they needed better to plan separating Service members return to mandated by the Vow Act and costs for their transition. communities as Veterans. Service all parties are already incurred. The —79% said that they will use what they members learn to align their military calculated costs to DoD and unmeasured learned from the TAP in their own skills with civilian employment costs to DoD’s interagency partners transition planning. opportunities, which enables the pool of provide significant resources to Service —A comparison of unemployment highly trained, adaptable, transitioning members resulting in benefits to the insurance usage suggests that recently Service members a more timely Nation. separated members of the military integration into the civilian workforce (2013 & 2014) were more likely to The benefits of the redesigned TAP to and local economies. apply what they learned in the re- the Service members are increased Service members also learn through designed TAP and were more career readiness to obtain employment, TAP about the rich suite of resources involved earlier in job training start their own business or enter career available to them from the interagency programs than unemployed claimants technical training or an institution of partners and have, for the asking, one- who did not have military experience higher learning at the point of on-one appointments with interagency (8.5% of UCX claimants versus 5.1% separation from military service. The partner staff, who can provide of Military service claimants). legacy, end-of-career TAP is replaced by assistance to Service members and their —According to the Bureau of Labor families both before and after the pre-determined opportunities across the Statistics, the unemployment rate for MLC for many transition-related Service member leaves active duty. Veterans of the current conflict More specifically, the components of activities to be completed during the declined by 1.8 percentage points normal course of business. the mandatory CRS target deliberate from August 2013 to August 2014 planning for financial preparedness as Since a direct economic estimate of coinciding with the time period when well as employment, education, housing the value of TAP is difficult for DoD to all Service members were required to and transportation plans and, for those demonstrate as it would require take the re-designed TAP. Service members with families, child collection of information from military The TAP also helps mitigate the care, schools, and spouse employment. personnel after they become private adjustment costs associated with labor The DoD and interagency partners citizens, the value of the TAP can be market transition. Military members incorporated the warm handover derived by demonstrating qualitatively must prepare for the adjustments requirement for any transitioning how Service members value the associated with losing military benefits Service member who does not meet the program and then displaying some (e.g. housing, health care, child care) to CRS. The warm handover is meant to changes in economic variables that can the benefits afforded in private sector or serve as an immediate bridge from DoD be differentiated between Veterans who nonmilitary public sector jobs. The TAP to the federal partners’ staffs, which are have access to TAP and non-Veterans addresses this very important aspect committed to providing needed support, who do not have access to the program. based on a regulatory mandate that they resources and services to Service —According to one independent attend both the DOLEW and the VA’s members post separation in the evaluation of the TAP, Service Veterans Benefits Briefings, and communities to which the Service members who had participated in the complete a 12 month post-separation members are returning. The intention is TAP had, on average, found their first financial plan to meet CRS. to provide early intervention before post-military job three weeks sooner The early alignment of military skills Veterans encounter the challenges than those who did not participate in with civilian workforce demands and currently identified by some the TAP. deliberate planning for transition communities, e.g., financial struggles, —An independent survey asked throughout a Service member’s career unemployment, lack of social supports Soldiers who had used the TAP their sets the stage for a well-timed flow of that can spiral down into homelessness, opinions about the curriculum. The Service members to our Nation’s labor risk taking behaviors, etc. Families and Soldiers reported positive opinions force. Employers state that transitioning communities benefit. about the usefulness of the TAP. Service members have critical job- Risks: If this rule is not put into effect, related skills, competencies, and 90% of the Soldiers felt that it was a approximately 200,000 Service members qualities including the ability to learn useful resource in searching for per year will return to their local new skills, strong leadership qualities, employment and 88% of them would communities ill prepared to assimilate and flexibility to work well in teams or recommend the TAP to a colleague. into the civilian workforce, effectively independently, ability to set and use the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits and According to a curriculum assessment achieve goals, recognition of problems other VA benefits that they have earned, completed at the end of each TAP and implementation of solutions, and minimize risks to starting small module, transitioning Service members ability to persevere in the face of businesses, and will be unaware of gave the TAP positive reviews on its obstacles. However, application of these community resources to assist them usefulness for their job search: skills and attributes must be translated with their reintegration. More —92% of reported that they found the into employer friendly language. These specifically, transitioning Service learning resources useful, including issues are addressed by the TAP. The members will be uninformed as to how notes, handouts, and audio-visuals. rule supports providing private and to best use their Post-9/11 GI Bill —83% reported that the modules public sector employers with a direct benefit—how to apply to a degree enhanced their confidence in their link to profiles and resumes of completion institution, how to choose own transition planning. separating Service members through the the best school for degree completion, or —81% reported that they now know Veterans Employment Center (VEC), how to choose a technical training how to access the necessary resources where employers can recruit from this program that leads to obtaining a to find answers to transition questions talent pipeline. credential—with a negative return on

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77750 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

their investment such as non- information residing therein, or on a Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Under graduation, inability to transfer credits, contractor’s ability to provide this rule, contractors will incur costs or falling victim to predatory operationally critical support, and associated with requirements for institutions, with an end result of modify eligibility criteria to permit reporting cyber incidents of covered wasting valuable taxpayer dollars. greater participation in the voluntary defense information on their covered Service members, a most DoD-Defense Industrial Base (DIB) contractor information system(s) or entrepreneurial population, would be Cybersecurity (CS) information sharing those affecting the contractor’s ability to poorly prepared to launch small program. provide operationally critical support. businesses successfully, becoming part Statement of Need: This rule complies Costs for contractors include identifying of the > 80% statistic of failed start-ups with statutory guidance under section and analyzing cyber incidents and their within the first year. Service members 941 of the National Defense impact on covered defense information, will be unprepared to capitalize upon Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal or a contractor’s ability to provide health care benefits due to them, as well Year (FY) 2013, and section 391 of Title operationally critical support, as well as as health care mandated by and 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), obtaining DoD-approved medium available through the Affordable Care requiring defense contractors to rapidly assurance certificates to ensure Act. These avoidable information, report cyber incidents on their authentication and identification when education and training gaps could unclassified networks or information produce negative outcomes such as systems that may affect unclassified reporting cyber incidents to DoD. increased unemployment, financial defense information, or that affect their Government costs include onboarding uncertainty, business bankruptcy, ability to provide operationally critical new companies under the voluntary family disruption, and even a possible support to the Department. This rule DoD–DIB CS information sharing increase in homelessness. These risks underscores the importance of better program, and collecting and analyzing would be felt by local communities to protecting unclassified defense cyber incident reports, malicious which transitioning Service members information against the immediate cyber software, and media. return as communities deal with the threat, while preserving the intellectual Risks: Cyber threats to DIB long term economic and social fallout. property and competitive capabilities of unclassified information systems Timetable: our national defense industrial base. represent an unacceptable risk of The rule enables DoD to better assess, in compromise of DoD information and Action Date FR Cite the near term, when mission critical mission and pose an imminent threat to capabilities and services are affected by Interim Final Rule 11/00/15 U.S. national security and economic cyber incidents and reinforces DoD’s security interests. The combination of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis overall efforts to defend DoD the mandatory DoD contractor cyber information, protect U.S. national Required: No. incident reporting, combined with the interests against cyber-attacks, and Small Entities Affected: No. voluntary participation in the DIB CS support military operations and Government Levels Affected: None. program, will enhance and supplement contingency plans worldwide. Additional Information: DoD DoD contractor capabilities to safeguard Instruction 1332.35, ‘‘Transition Cybersecurity is a Congressional priority and this rule supports the DoD information that resides on, or Assistance Program (TAP) for Military transits, DoD contractor unclassified Personnel.’’ Administration’s national cybersecurity network or information systems. Agency Contact: Mr. Ronald L. Horne, strategy emphasizing public-private Director of Policy and Programs, DoD information sharing. Timetable: Transition to Veterans Program Office, Summary of Legal Basis: The Department of Defense, Office of the activities in this rule implement DoD Action Date FR Cite Secretary, 1700 North Moore Street, statutory authorities to establish Suite 1410, Arlington, VA 22209, programs and activities to protect Interim Final Rule 10/02/15 80 FR 59581 Phone: 703 614–8631, Email: sensitive DoD information, including Interim Final Rule 10/02/15 Effective. [email protected]. when such information resides on or RIN: 0790–AJ17 transits information systems operated by Interim Final Rule 12/01/15 Comment Pe- contractors or others in support of DoD riod End. activities (e.g., 10 U.S.C. 391 and 2224, Final Action ...... 08/00/16 the Federal Information Security DOD—OS Modernization Act (FISMA), codified at 18. Department of Defense (DOD)— 44 U.S.C. 3551 et seq., section 941 of the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Defense Industrial Base (DIB) NDAA for FY 2013 (Pub. L. 112–239)). Required: No. Cybersecurity (CS) Activities Activities under this rule also fulfill Small Entities Affected: No. Priority: Other Significant. important elements of DoD’s critical Government Levels Affected: None. infrastructure protection Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. 391; 10 Agency Contact: Vicki Michetti, U.S.C. 2224; 44 U.S.C. 3506; 44 U.S.C. responsibilities, as the sector specific Department of Defense, Office of the 3544; and sec 941; Pub. L. 112–239, 126 agency for the DIB sector (see Secretary, 6000 Defense Pentagon, Stat. 1632 Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PPD– CFR Citation: 32 CFR 236. 21), Critical Infrastructure Security and Washington, DC 20301–6000, Phone: Legal Deadline: None. Resilience, available at https://www. 703 604–3177, Email: Abstract: DoD is revising its DoD–DIB whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/ [email protected]. Cybersecurity (CS) Activities regulation 02/12/presidential-policy-directive- RIN: 0790–AJ29 to mandate reporting of cyber incidents critical-infrastructure-security-and- that result in an actual or potentially resil). adverse effect on a covered contractor Alternatives: None. This is revision to information system or covered defense an existing regulation (32 CFR part 236).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77751

DOD—DEFENSE ACQUISITION in limited circumstances, shall acquire Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303; 41 REGULATIONS COUNCIL (DARC) electronic parts from trusted suppliers U.S.C. 1707; Pub. L. 112–239, sec 941; in order to further address the Pub. L. 113–291, sec 1632 Proposed Rule Stage avoidance of counterfeit electronic CFR Citation: 48 CFR 202; 48 CFR 19. • Detection and Avoidance of parts. DoD contractors and 204; 48 CFR 212; 48 CFR 239; 48 CFR Counterfeit Electronic Parts—Further subcontractors that are not the original 252. Implementation (DFARS Case 2014– component manufacturer are required Legal Deadline: None. D005) by the rule to notify the contracting Abstract: The Department of Defense officer if it is not possible to obtain an (DoD) is issuing an interim rule Priority: Other Significant. amending the Defense Federal Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303; Pub. electronic part from a trusted supplier. For those instances where the contractor Acquisition Regulation Supplement L. 112–81, sec 818; Pub. L. 113–291, sec (DFARS) to implement section 941 of 817 obtains electronic parts from sources other than a trusted supplier, the the National Defense Authorization Act CFR Citation: 48 CFR 202; 48 CFR (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 and 212; 48 CFR 246; 48 CFR 252. contractor is responsible for inspection, test, and authentication in accordance section 1632 of the NDAA for FY 2015, Legal Deadline: None. both of which require contractor Abstract: The Department of Defense with existing applicable industry standards. Such validation of new parts reporting on network penetrations. (DoD) is issuing a proposed rule to Section 941 requires cleared defense amend the Defense Federal Acquisition and new suppliers are steps that a prudent contractor would take contractors to report penetrations of Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to networks and information systems and further implement section 818 of the notwithstanding this rule. The additional burden imposed is the allows DoD personnel access to National Defense Authorization Act equipment and information to assess the (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, as notification requirement, which should have a minimal cost impact. The rule impact of reported penetrations. Section modified by section 817 of the NDAA 1632 requires that a contractor for FY 2015, which requires DoD to applies only to contractors subject to the Cost Accounting Standards. This rule designated as operationally critical must issue regulations establishing report each time a cyber-incident occurs enhances DoD’s ability to strengthen the requirements that DoD and DoD on that contractor’s network or integrity of the process for acquisition of contractors and subcontractors, except information systems. The rule requires electronic parts and benefits both the in limited circumstances, shall acquire contractors and subcontractors to report Government and contractors. electronic parts from trusted suppliers cyber incidents that result in an actual in order to further address the Risks: Failure to implement this rule or potentially adverse effect on a avoidance of counterfeit electronic may cause harm to the Government by covered contractor information system parts. On May 6, 2014, DoD published resulting in the acquisition of or covered defense information residing a final rule under DFARS Case 2012– counterfeit electronic parts which could therein, or on a contractor’s ability to D055, entitled Detection and Avoidance directly impact national security. provide operationally critical support. of Counterfeit Electronic Parts (78 FR Timetable: This rule also implements policy on the 26092). That final rule constituted the purchase of cloud computing services. initial partial implementation of section Action Date FR Cite The revisions to this rule will be 818. Revisions to this rule will be reported in future status updates as part reported in future status updates as part NPRM ...... 11/00/15 NPRM Comment 01/00/16 of DoD’s retrospective plan under of DoD’s retrospective plan under Period End. Executive Order 13563, completed in Executive Order 13563, completed in Final Action ...... 09/00/16 August 2011. DoD’s full plan can be August 2011. DoD’s full plan can be Final Action Effec- 09/00/16 accessed at: http://www.regulations.gov/ accessed at: http://www.regulations.gov/ tive. #!docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036. #!docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036. Statement of Need: DoD is required to Statement of Need: DoD is required to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis implement in the DFARS a requirement implement in the DFARS the Required: No. for contractors to report network requirement for defense contractors and Small Entities Affected: Businesses. penetrations. Additionally, the DoD subcontractors, whenever possible, to Government Levels Affected: Federal. Chief Information Officer (CIO) released acquire electronic parts from trusted Agency Contact: Jennifer Hawes, a Cloud Computing Security suppliers, in order to avoid acquisition Requirements Guide on January 13, of counterfeit electronic parts. Department of Defense, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, 3060 2015, which cloud service providers Summary of Legal Basis: This must comply with when providing regulation is proposed under the Defense Pentagon, Room 3B941, Washington, DC 20301–3060, Phone: cloud services to DoD. authorities of section 818 of the NDAA Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is 571 372–6115, Email: for FY 2012 (Pub. L. 112–81), as required under the authorities of section [email protected]. modified by section 817 of the NDAA 941 of the NDAA for FY 2013 (Pub. L. for FY 2015 (Pub. L. 113–291). Related RIN: Related to 0750–AH89 112–239) and section 1632 of the NDAA Alternatives: No viable alternatives RIN: 0750–AI58 for FY 2015 (Pub. L. 113–291). were identified, as this rule implements Alternatives: No viable alternatives section 818 of the NDAA for FY 2012, were identified, as this rule implements as modified by section 817 of the NDAA DOD—DARC section 941 of the NDAA for FY 2013 for FY 2015. and section 1632 of the NDAA for FY Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Cost Final Rule Stage 2015, as well as the guidance benefits or burdens associated with this 20. • Network Penetration Reporting established by the DoD CIO on security rule are not available. The law requires and Contracting for Cloud Services requirements for cloud computing. DoD to issue regulations establishing (DFARS Case 2013–D018) Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Cost requirements that DoD and DoD benefits or burdens associated with this contractors and subcontractors, except Priority: Other Significant. rule are not available. The objective of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77752 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

the rule is to improve information RIN: 0750–AI61 medical and surgical benefits. In security for DoD information stored on October 2008, the Mental Health Parity or transiting through contractor systems and Addictions Equity Act (MHPAEA) as well as in a cloud environment. The DOD—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT was signed into law as part of the rule will reduce the vulnerability of SECRETARY FOR HEALTH AFFAIRS Emergency Economic Stabilization Act DoD information via attacks on its (DODOASHA) of 2008. The changes made by MHPAEA systems and networks and those of DoD consists of new standards, including contractors. This rule improves national Proposed Rule Stage parity for substance use disorder security benefiting both the Government 21. • TRICARE: Mental Health and benefits, as well as amendments to the and contractors. This rule is likely to Substance Use existing mental health parity provisions have a cost impact on all contractors exacted in MHPA. This law requires that have covered defense information Priority: Other Significant. Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1073 group health insurance plans that on their information systems. The cost provide both medical/surgical and impact of the rule will vary in relation CFR Citation: 32 CFR 199. Legal Deadline: None. mental health benefits to provide those to the capabilities of each affected Abstract: This rule proposes revisions benefits at parity. Specifically, financial contractor to adapt their systems to meet to the TRICARE regulation to reduce requirements (e.g., deductibles, co- the new security controls. The benefits administrative barriers to access to payments, or coinsurance) and of the rule would be the potential mental health benefit coverage and to treatment limitations (e.g., days of decrease in the loss or compromise of improve access to substance use coverage and number of visits) cannot covered defense information; however, disorder (SUD) treatment for TRICARE be more restrictive for mental health this benefit across DoD is not beneficiaries, consistent with earlier benefits than they are for medical/ susceptible to being quantified or Department of Defense and Institute of surgical benefits. The MHPAEA was measured. Ultimately, DoD anticipates Medicine recommendations, current amended by the Patient Protection and significant savings to taxpayers by standards of practice in mental health Affordable Care Act, as amended by the improving information security for DoD and addition medicine, and governing Health Care and Reconciliation Act of information that resides in or transits laws. This proposed rule has four main 2010, to also apply to individual health through contractor systems and a cloud objectives: (1) To eliminate of insurance coverage. TRICARE is not a environment. quantitative and qualitative treatment group health plan subject to the MHPA Risks: Recent high-profile breaches of limitations on SUD and mental health 1996, the MHPAEA of 2008, or the Federal information show the need to benefit coverage and align beneficiary Health Care and Reconciliation Act. ensure that information security cost-sharing for mental health and SUD However, the provisions of these acts protections are clearly, effectively, and benefits with those applicable to serve as a model for TRICARE in consistently addressed in contracts. medical/surgical benefits; (2) to expand Failure to implement this rule may proposing changes to existing benefit covered mental health and SUD coverage so as to reduce administrative cause harm to the Government through treatment under TRICARE, to include the compromise of covered defense barriers to treatment and increase access coverage of intensive outpatient to medically or psychologically information or other Government data, programs and treatment of opioid or the loss of operationally critical necessary mental health care consistent dependence; (3) to streamline the with TRICARE statutory authority. support capabilities, which could requirements for institutional providers directly impact national security. to become TRICARE authorized Summary of Legal Basis: This Timetable: providers; and (4) to develop TRICARE regulation is proposed under the reimbursement methodologies for newly authorities of 10 U.S.C., section 1073, Action Date FR Cite recognized mental health and SUD which authorizes the Secretary of intensive outpatient programs and Defense to administer the medical and Interim Final Rule 08/26/15 80 FR 51739 dental benefits provided in chapter 55 Interim Final Rule 08/26/15 opioid treatment programs. Effective. Statement of Need: This rule is of title 10 U.S.C. The Department is Interim Final Rule 10/26/15 necessary to comply with the statutory authorized to provide medically Comment Pe- provisions in section 703 of the National necessary and appropriate medical care riod End. Defense Authorization Act for FY 2015 for mental and physical illnesses, Interim Final Rule 10/22/15 80 FR 63928 which removed TRICARE statutory day injuries and bodily malfunctions, Comment Pe- limitations on inpatient mental health including hospitalization, outpatient riod Extended. services. It is also necessary to adopt the care, drugs, and treatment of mental Interim Final Rule 11/20/15 conditions under 10 U.S.C. 1077(a)(1)– Comment Pe- four main objectives listed above. In riod Extended general, the DoD, pursuant to chapter 55 (3) and (5). Although section 1077 End. of title 10 U.S.C., covers health care, identifies the types of health care to be Final Action ...... 08/00/16 including mental health care, services provided in military treatment facilities, and supplies, which are medically or these types of health care are Regulatory Flexibility Analysis psychologically necessary to prevent, incorporated by reference as the types of Required: No. diagnose, and/or treat a mental or health care benefits authorized for Small Entities Affected: Businesses. physical illness, injury, or bodily coverage within the civilian health care Government Levels Affected: Federal. malfunction. In 1996, Congress enacted sector for active duty family members Agency Contact: Jennifer Hawes, the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 and retirees and their dependents Department of Defense, Defense (MHPA 1996) which required through sections 1079 and 1086, Acquisition Regulations Council, 3060 employment-related health insurance respectively. In general, the scope of Defense Pentagon, Room 3B941, coverage offered in connection with TRICARE benefits covered within the Washington, DC 20301–3060, Phone: group health plans to provide parity in civilian health care sector and the 571 372–6115, Email: aggregate lifetime and annual dollar TRICARE authorized providers of those [email protected]. limits for mental health benefits and benefits are found at 32 CFR part 199.4

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77753

and 199.6, respectively. Reimbursement Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC working closely with affected persons is addressed in 32 CFR 199.14. 22301, Phone: 703 681–0064. and groups. Specifically, we work with Alternatives: To the extent this rule RIN: 0720–AB65 a broad range of interested parties and implements statutorily required BILLING CODE 5001–06–P the general public, including families, provisions, no alternatives are students, and educators; State, local, applicable. Further, any alternative that and tribal governments; other Federal fails to address administrative barriers agencies; and neighborhood groups, to mental health and SUD treatment and DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION community-based early learning increasing access to medically or Statement of Regulatory Priorities programs, elementary and secondary psychologically necessary mental health schools, colleges, rehabilitation service care consistent with TRICARE statutory I. Introduction providers, adult education providers, authority is inconsistent with principles The U.S. Department of Education professional associations, advocacy of mental health parity and ignores (Department) supports States, local organizations, businesses, and labor well-validated evidence and current communities, institutions of higher organizations. standards of practice in mental health education, and others in improving If we determine that it is necessary to and SUD treatment. education and other services nationwide develop regulations, we seek public Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This in order to ensure that all Americans, participation at the key stages in the rule is not anticipated to have an annual including those with disabilities, rulemaking process. We invite the effect on the economy of $100 million receive a high-quality education and are public to submit comments on all or more. Thus, economically, it is not a prepared for high-quality employment. proposed regulations through the substantive, significant rule under the We provide leadership and financial Internet or by regular mail. We also Executive Order and the Congressional assistance pertaining to education and continue to seek greater public Review Act. All services and supplies related services at all levels to a wide participation in our rulemaking authorized under the TRICARE Basic range of stakeholders and individuals, activities through the use of transparent Program must be determined to be including State educational and other and interactive rulemaking procedures medically necessary in the treatment of agencies, local school districts, and new technologies. an illness, injury or bodily malfunction providers of early learning programs, To facilitate the public’s involvement, before the care can be cost shared by elementary and secondary schools, we participate in the Federal Docketing TRICARE. For this reason, DoD institutions of higher education, career Management System (FDMS), an anticipates that TRICARE will have a and technical schools, nonprofit electronic single Government-wide marginal increase in cost associated organizations, postsecondary students, access point (www.regulations.gov) that with increased access to authorized members of the public, families, and enables the public to submit comments mental health and SUD treatment many others. These efforts are helping on different types of Federal regulatory within the TRICARE Basic Program. to ensure that all children and students documents and read and respond to Failure to prevent or treat these from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 comments submitted by other members conditions results in severe and will be ready for, and succeed in, of the public during the public comment widespread consequences, including postsecondary education or period. This system provides the public increased risk of suicide and employment, and that students with the opportunity to submit exacerbation of mental and physical attending postsecondary institutions are comments electronically on any notice health disorders. Short-term treatments prepared for a profession or career. of proposed rulemaking or interim final usually are followed by relapses. These We also vigorously monitor and regulations open for comment, as well proposed revisions will increase access enforce the implementation of Federal as read and print any supporting to mental health and SUD treatment, civil rights laws in educational regulatory documents. including long-term outpatient care and programs and activities that receive We are continuing to streamline other systemic supports, resulting in Federal financial assistance, and information collections, reduce the more comprehensive care and hopefully support innovative programs, research burden on information providers a greater incentive for beneficiaries to and evaluation activities, technical involved in our programs, and make seek the care they need. assistance, and the dissemination of information easily accessible to the Risks: This proposed rule implements research and evaluation findings to public. statutorily required provisions for improve the quality of education. II. Regulatory Priorities adoption and implementation. No risk Overall, the laws, regulations, and to the public is applicable as this programs that the Department A. Elementary and Secondary proposed rule expands access to care, administers will affect nearly every Education Act of 1965, as Amended and streamlines requirements for American during his or her life. Indeed, We are working with Congress to TRICARE authorized provider approval. in the 2015–2016 school year, about 55 reauthorize the ESEA. As we do so, we Timetable: million students will attend an continue to provide flexibility on estimated 130,000 elementary and certain provisions of current law for Action Date FR Cite secondary schools in approximately States that are embracing reform. The 13,500 districts, and about 21 million mechanisms we are using will ensure NPRM ...... 01/00/16 students will enroll in degree-granting continued accountability and postsecondary schools. All of these commitment to high-quality education Regulatory Flexibility Analysis students may benefit from some degree for all students while providing States Required: No. of financial assistance or support from with increased flexibility to implement Small Entities Affected: No. the Department. State and local reforms to improve Government Levels Affected: None. In developing and implementing student achievement. The ESEA, when Agency Contact: Patricia Moseley, regulations, guidance, technical enacted, will likely require the Department of Defense, Office of assistance, and monitoring related to Department to promulgate conforming Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs, our programs, we are committed to regulations.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77754 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

B. Workforce Innovation and regulations. In the meantime, we are ED—OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY Opportunity Act continuing to work on several regulatory EDUCATION (OPE) President Obama signed the activities under the Title IV Federal Final Rule Stage Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Student Aid programs to improve Act (WIOA) into law on July 22, 2014. protections for students and safeguard 22. Repaye WIOA replaced the Workforce Federal dollars invested in Priority: Economically Significant. Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), postsecondary education. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1078; 20 including the Adult Education and IV. Principles for Regulating Family Literacy Act (AEFLA), and U.S.C. 1087e amended the Wagner-Peyser Act and the Over the next year, we may need to CFR Citation: 34 CFR 682.202; 34 CFR Rehabilitation Act of 1973 issue other regulations because of new 685.202; 34 CFR 685.208; 34 CFR (Rehabilitation Act). WIOA promotes legislation or programmatic changes. In 685.209. the integration of the workforce doing so, we will follow the Principles Legal Deadline: None. development system’s six ‘‘core for Regulating, which determine when Abstract: On June 9, 2014, the programs’’, including AEFLA and the and how we will regulate. Through President issued a memorandum (79 FR 33843) directing the Secretary to vocational rehabilitation program under consistent application of those propose regulations by June 9, 2015, Title I of the Rehabilitation Act, into the principles, we have eliminated revamped workforce development that will allow additional students who unnecessary regulations and identified system under Title I of WIOA. The borrowed Federal Direct Loans to cap situations in which major programs Department issued four NPRMs in their Federal student loan payments at could be implemented without April, 2015, one joint rule with the 10 percent of their income. The Department of Labor (DOL) and three regulations or with limited regulatory memorandum further directed the ED-specific packages. We plan to issue action. Secretary to issue final regulations after final rules for each of the four packages In deciding when to regulate, we considering all public comments with in April, 2016. consider the following: the goal of making the repayment option available to borrowers by December 31, C. Borrower Defense Issues • Whether regulations are essential to promote quality and equality of 2015. In August 2015, the Department Statement of Need: The President has opportunity in education. announced its intent to convene a issued a memorandum directing the committee to develop proposed • Whether a demonstrated problem Secretary to propose regulations by June regulations for determining which acts cannot be resolved without regulation. 9, 2015, that will allow additional or omissions of an institution of higher • Whether regulations are necessary student borrowers Federal Direct Loans education (‘‘institution’’) a borrower to provide a legally binding to cap their Federal student loan may assert as a defense to repayment of interpretation to resolve ambiguity. payments at 10 percent of their income. a loan made under the William D. Ford • The memorandum further directed the Federal Direct Loan (Federal Direct Whether entities or situations Secretary to issue final regulations after Loan) Program (‘‘borrower defenses’’) subject to regulation are similar enough considering all public comments with and the consequences of such borrower that a uniform approach through the goal of making the repayment option defenses for borrowers, institutions, and regulation would be meaningful and do available to borrowers by December 31, the Secretary. Specifically, the more good than harm. 2015. Department intends to address: (1) The • Whether regulations are needed to In addition, the notice of proposed procedures to be used for a borrower to protect the Federal interest, that is, to rulemaking will propose the establish a defense to repayment; (2) the ensure that Federal funds are used for establishment of procedures for Federal criteria that the Department will use to their intended purpose and to eliminate Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program identify acts or omissions of an fraud, waste, and abuse. loan holders to use the Department of institution that constitute defenses to Defense’s Defense Manpower Data In deciding how to regulate, we are repayment of Federal Direct Loans to Center (DDMC) database to identify U.S. the Secretary; (3) the standards and mindful of the following principles: military servicemembers who may be procedures that the Department will use • Regulate no more than necessary. eligible for a lower rate on their FFEL to determine the liability of the • Minimize burden to the extent Program loans under the institution participating in the Federal possible, and promote multiple Servicemembers Civil Relief Act Direct Loan Program for amounts based approaches to meeting statutory (SCRA). on borrower defenses; and (4) the effect requirements if possible. Summary of Legal Basis: The President directed the Secretary to of borrower defenses on institutional • capability assessments. The Department Encourage coordination of federally propose regulations that will allow is holding public hearings for interested funded activities with State and local additional student borrowers Federal parties to discuss the rulemaking agenda reform activities. Direct Loans to cap their Federal during September 2015, and anticipates • Ensure that the benefits justify the student loan payments at 10 percent of that any committee established after the costs of regulating. their income. These final regulations will amend public hearings will begin negotiations • To the extent possible, establish in January 2016. the Student Assistance General performance objectives rather than Provisions regulations governing Direct D. Higher Education Act of 1965, as specify compliance behavior. Loan cohort default rates (CDRs) to Amended • Encourage flexibility, to the extent expand the circumstances under which The Higher Education Act expired at possible and as needed to enable an institution may challenge or appeal the end of 2013, and its reauthorization, institutional forces to achieve desired the potential consequences of a draft or when enacted, will likely require the results. final CDR based on the institution’s Department to promulgate conforming participation rate index (PRI).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77755

Alternatives: These will be discussed participants, especially those with RIN: 1830–AA21 in the final regulations. significant barriers to employment, BILLING CODE 4000–01–P Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These thereby improving the quality of the will be discussed in the final workforce, reducing welfare regulations. dependency, and enhancing the Risks: These will be discussed in the productivity and competitiveness of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY final regulations. nation. Statement of Regulatory and Timetable: WIOA strengthened the alignment of Deregulatory Priorities the workforce development system’s six Action Date FR Cite core programs by imposing unified The Department of Energy strategic planning requirements, (Department or DOE) makes vital Notice of Intent to 09/03/14 79 FR 52273 contributions to the Nation’s welfare Establish Nego- common performance accountability measures, and requirements governing through its activities focused on tiated Rule- improving national security, energy making Com- the one-stop delivery system. In so mittee. doing, WIOA placed heightened supply, energy efficiency, NPRM ...... 07/09/15 80 FR 39608 emphasis on coordination and environmental remediation, and energy NPRM Comment 08/10/15 collaboration at the Federal, State, and research. The Department’s mission is Period End. to: local levels to ensure a streamlined and • Final Action ...... 11/00/15 coordinated service delivery system for Promote dependable, affordable and job seekers, including those with environmentally sound production and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis distribution of energy; disabilities, and employers. To that end, • Required: No. ED and DOL are issuing final Advance energy efficiency and Government Levels Affected: Federal, regulations to implement jointly- conservation; • Provide responsible stewardship of Local, State. administered activities under title I of the Nation’s nuclear weapons; URL for Public Comments: WIOA. These regulations lay the • Provide a responsible resolution to www.regulations.gov. foundation, through coordination and Agency Contact: Barbara Hoblitzell, the environmental legacy of nuclear collaboration at the Federal level, for Department of Education, Office of weapons production; and implementing the vision and goals of Postsecondary Education, Room 8019, • Strengthen U.S. scientific WIOA. 1990 K Street NW., Washington, DC discovery, economic competitiveness, Statement of Need: WIOA mandates 20006, Phone: 202 502–7649, Email: and improve quality of life through that the Department issue final [email protected]. innovations in science and technology. regulations by January 2016. RIN: 1840–AD18 The Department’s regulatory activities Summary of Legal Basis: WIOA are essential to achieving its critical mandates that the Department issue mission and to implementing major final regulations by January 2016. initiatives of the President’s National ED—OFFICE OF CAREER, Alternatives: These will be discussed Energy Policy. Among other things, the TECHNICAL, AND ADULT EDUCATION in the final regulations. Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda (OCTAE) Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These contain the rulemakings the Department will be discussed in the final Final Rule Stage will be engaged in during the coming regulations. year to fulfill the Department’s 23. Workforce Innovation and Risks: These will be discussed in the commitment to meeting deadlines for Opportunity Act final regulations. issuance of energy conservation Priority: Economically Significant. Timetable: standards and related test procedures. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Action Date FR Cite The Regulatory Plan and Unified Legal Authority: Pub. L. 113–128; 29 Agenda also reflect the Department’s U.S.C. 3101 NPRM ...... 04/16/15 80 FR 20573 continuing commitment to cut costs, CFR Citation: 34 CFR 361; 34 CFR NPRM Comment 06/15/15 reduce regulatory burden, and increase 463. Period End. responsiveness to the public. Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Final Action ...... 04/00/16 January 22, 2016. Retrospective Review of Existing Abstract: The Departments of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Regulations Education (ED) and Labor (DOL) are Required: No. Pursuant to section 6 of Executive implementing, through final regulations, Government Levels Affected: None. Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and jointly-administered activities URL for Public Comments: Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), authorized by title I of the Workforce www.regulations.gov. several regulations have been identified Innovation and Opportunity Act Agency Contact: Mary Louise Dirrigl, as associated with retrospective review (WIOA) (Pub. L. 113–128). Through Department of Education, Office of and analysis in the Department’s these regulations, the Departments will Special Education and Rehabilitative retrospective review of regulations plan. implement job training system reforms Services, Room 5156, 400 Maryland Some of the entries on this list may be and strengthen the nation’s workforce Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20202, completed actions, which do not appear development system to put Americans Phone: 202 245–7324, Email: in the Regulatory Plan. However, more back to work and make the United [email protected]. information can be found about these States more competitive in the 21st Cheryl Keenan, Department of completed rulemakings in past century. This joint rule provides Education, Office of Career, Technical, publications of the Unified Agenda on guidance for State and local workforce and Adult Education, Room 11–151, www.Reginfo.gov in the Completed development systems that increase the PCP, 550 12th Street SW., Washington, Actions section. These rulemakings can skill and credential attainment, DC 20202, Phone: 202 245–7810, Email: also be found on www.Regulations.gov. employment, retention, and earnings of [email protected]. The final agency plan can be found at

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77756 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/ Independence and Security Act of 2007 Abstract: DOE has tentatively default/files/other/2011-regulatory- (EISA 2007), the American Energy determined that computer and battery action-plans/departmentofenergy Manufacturing Technical Corrections backup systems (computer systems) regulatoryreformplanaugust2011.pdf. Act (AEMTCA), and the Energy qualify as covered products under Part Efficiency Improvement Act of 2015. A of Title III of EPCA, as amended. DOE Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer has not previously conducted an energy Products and Commercial Equipment The reports to Congress are posted at: http://energy.gov/eere/buildings/ conservation standard rulemaking for The Energy Policy and Conservation reports-and-publications. While each of computers systems. If, after public Act (EPCA) requires DOE to set these high priority rules will build on comment, DOE issues a final appliance efficiency standards at levels the progress made to date, and will determination of coverage for computer that achieve the maximum improvement continue to move the U.S. closer to a systems, DOE may prescribe both test in energy efficiency that is low carbon future, DOE believes that procedures and energy conservation technologically feasible and seven rulemakings are the most standards for computer systems. economically justified. The Department important of its significant regulatory Statement of Need: EPCA authorizes continues to follow its schedule for actions and, therefore, comprise the DOE to establish minimum energy setting new appliance efficiency Department’s Regulatory Plan. However, efficiency standards for certain standards. These rulemakings are because of the current stage of four of appliances and commercial equipment, expected to save American consumers the rulemakings, DOE has not yet including computer systems. EPCA billions of dollars in energy costs. proposed candidate standard levels for further requires that DOE review such Estimate of Combined Aggregate Costs these products and cannot provide an standards and determine whether to and Benefits estimate of combined aggregate costs amend them within six years after promulgation. In 2014, the Department published and benefits for this action. DOE will, however, in compliance with all Summary of Legal Basis: Title III, Part final rules that adopted new or amended B of the Energy Policy and Conservation energy conservation standards for ten applicable law, issue standards that provide the maximum improvement in Act of 1975 (EPCA or the Act), Pub. L. different products, including furnace 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309, as fans, motors, commercial refrigeration energy efficiency that is technologically feasible and economically justified. codified) established the Energy equipment, metal halide lamp fixtures, Conservation Program for Consumer external power supplies, commercial Estimates of energy savings will be provided when DOE issues the notice of Products Other Than Automobiles, a clothes washers; general service program covering most major household fluorescent lamps, and automatic proposed rulemakings for central air conditioners and heat pumps, appliances (collectively referred to as commercial ice makers. The ten covered products). In addition to computers and battery backup systems, standards finalized in 2014 are specifying a list of covered products, commercial water heaters, and general estimated to reduce carbon dioxide EPCA contains provisions that enable service fluorescent lamps. For small, emissions by over 400 million metric the Secretary to classify additional types large, and very large commercial tons and save American families and of consumer products as covered package air conditioning and heating businesses $78 billion in electricity bills products. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(20)). For a equipment, DOE estimates that energy through 2030. given product to be classified as a savings from electricity will be 11.7 Since 2009, the Energy Department covered product, the Secretary must quads over 30 years and the benefit to has finalized new efficiency standards determine that certain criteria are met. the Nation will be between $16.5 billion for more than 30 household and (42 U.S.C. 6292(b)(1). For the Secretary commercial products, including to $50.8 billion. For non-weatherized to prescribe an energy conservation dishwashers, refrigerators and water gas furnaces, DOE estimates that energy standard pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) heaters, which are estimated to save savings from electricity will be 2.78 and (p) for covered products added consumers several hundred billion quads over 30 years and the benefit to pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1), he dollars through 2030. To build on this the Nation will be between $3.1 billion must also determine that certain momentum, the Department is and $16.1 billion. For commercial and additional criteria are met. (42 U.S.C. committed to continuing to establish industrial pumps, DOE estimates that 6295(l)(1). new efficiency standards that—when the energy savings from electricity will Alternatives: The statute requires DOE combined with the progress already be 0.28 quads over 30 years and the to conduct rulemakings to establish made through previously finalized benefit to the Nation will be between standards to achieve the maximum standards—will reduce carbon pollution $0.41 billion and $1.11 billion. improvement in energy efficiency that by approximately 3 billion metric tons the Secretary determines is in total by 2030, equal to more than a technologically feasible and year’s carbon pollution from the entire DOE—ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND economically justified. In making this U.S. electricity system. RENEWABLE ENERGY (EE) determination, DOE conducts a As part of the President’s Climate thorough analysis of the alternative Action Plan, the Energy Department has Proposed Rule Stage standard levels, including the existing committed to an ambitious goal of 24. Coverage Determination for standard, based on the criteria specified finalizing at least 20 additional energy Computers and Battery Backup Systems by the statute. efficiency standards by the end of 2016. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The overall plan for implementing the Priority: Economically Significant. Because DOE has not yet proposed schedule is contained in the Report to Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is amended energy efficiency standards, Congress pursuant to section 141 of undetermined DOE cannot provide an estimate of EPACT 2005, which was released on Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined combined aggregate costs and benefits. January 31, 2006. This plan was last Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(20) DOE will, however, in compliance with updated in the August 2015 report to and (b) all applicable laws, issue standards that Congress and now includes the CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. provide for increased energy efficiency requirements of the Energy Legal Deadline: None. that are economically justified.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77757

Estimates of energy savings will be Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Action Date FR Cite provided when DOE issues the notice of January 1, 2017. proposed rulemaking. Abstract: Amendments to Energy Framework Docu- 12/09/13 78 FR 73737 Risks: Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) in ment Avail- Timetable: the Energy Independence and Security ability; Public Act of 2007 direct DOE to conduct two Meeting. Action Date FR Cite Framework Docu- 01/23/14 rulemaking cycles to evaluate energy ment Comment conservation standards for GSLs, the Period End. Notice of Pro- 02/28/14 79 FR 11345 first of which must be initiated no later posed Deter- Framework Docu- 01/23/14 79 FR 3742 mination. than January 1, 2014. EPCA specifically ment Comment NOPD Comment 03/31/14 states that the scope of the rulemaking Period Ex- Period End. is not limited to incandescent lamp tended. NOPD Comment 04/03/14 79 FR 18661 technologies. EPCA also states that DOE Framework Docu- 02/07/14 Period Ex- must consider in the first rulemaking ment Comment tended. cycle the minimum backstop Period Ex- tended End. NOPD Comment 04/15/14 requirement of 45 lumens per watt for Period Ex- Preliminary Anal- 12/11/14 79 FR 73503 general service lamps (GSLs) effective ysis; Notice of tended End. January 1, 2020. This rulemaking Framework Docu- 07/17/14 79 FR 41656 Public Meeting; ment. constitutes DOE’s first rulemaking cycle. Date 01/20/15. Framework Docu- 09/02/14 Statement of Need: EPCA requires Preliminary Anal- 02/09/15 ment Comment minimum energy efficiency standards ysis Comment Period End. for certain appliances and commercial Period End. Framework Docu- 08/05/14 79 FR 45377 equipment. Preliminary Anal- 01/30/15 80 FR 5052 ysis Comment ment Comment Summary of Legal Basis: Title III of Period Ex- Period Ex- the Energy Policy and Conservation Act tended. tended. of 1975 (EPCA or the Act) Public Law Framework Docu- 10/02/14 Preliminary Anal- 02/23/15 ment Comment 94163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309 as codified) ysis Comment Period Ex- established the Energy Conservation Period Ex- tended End. Program for Consumer Products Other tended End. NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Than Automobiles. Pursuant to EPCA NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Final Determina- 07/00/16 any new or amended energy Final Action ...... 10/00/16 tion. conservation standard that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prescribes Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for certain products such as general Required: Undetermined. Required: Undetermined. service lamps shall be designed to Government Levels Affected: Government Levels Affected: Local, achieve the maximum improvement in Undetermined. State. energy efficiency that is technologically Federalism: Undetermined. Federalism: Undetermined. feasible and economically justified (42 URL for More Information: URL for More Information: U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) and result in a www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ _ www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ significant conservation of energy (42 appliance standards/rulemaking.aspx appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/ U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B)). ?ruleid=83. ruleid/78. Alternatives: The statute requires DOE URL for Public Comments: URL for Public Comments: to conduct rulemakings to review www.regulations.gov/#!docket www.regulations.gov/ standards and to revise standards to Detail;D=EERE-2013-BT-STD-0051. #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2013-BT-DET- achieve the maximum improvement in Agency Contact: Lucy DeButts, Office 0035. energy efficiency that the Secretary of Buildings Technologies Program, EE– Agency Contact: Jeremy Dommu, determines is technologically feasible 5B, Department of Energy, Energy Office of Building Technologies and economically justified. In making Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 1000 Program, EE–2J, Department of Energy, this determination DOE conducts a Independence Avenue SW., Energy Efficiency and Renewable thorough analysis of the alternative Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202 287– Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue standard levels including the existing 1604, Email: [email protected]. SW., Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202 standard based on the criteria specified RIN: 1904–AD09 586–9870, Email: jeremy.dommu@ by the statute. ee.doe.gov. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: RIN: 1904–AD04 Because DOE has not yet proposed DOE—EE energy efficiency standards, DOE cannot provide an estimate of combined 26. Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Non-Weatherized Gas DOE—EE aggregate costs and benefits for these actions. DOE will, however, in Furnaces 25. Energy Conservation Standards compliance with all applicable law, Priority: Economically Significant. for General Service Lamps issue standards that provide for Major under 5 U.S.C. 801 Priority: Other Significant. Major increased energy efficiency that are Unfunded Mandates: This action may status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is economically justified. Estimates of affect the private sector under Pub. L. undetermined energy savings will be provided when 104–4. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined DOE issues the notice of proposed Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. rulemaking action. 6295(f)(4)(e); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1); 42 6295(i)(6)(A) and (B) Risks: U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3) CFR Citation: 10 CFR 430. Timetable: CFR Citation: 10 CFR 430.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77758 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, April energy savings will be provided when obligation to either propose amended 24, 2015. Final, Judicial, April 24, 2016, DOE issues the notice of proposed energy conservation standards for One year after issuance of the proposed rulemaking. commercial water heaters, hot water rule. Risks: supply boilers, and unfired hot water Abstract: The Energy Policy and Timetable: storage tanks or determine that the Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), as existing standards do not need to be amended, prescribes energy Action Date FR Cite amended. DOE must determine whether conservation standards for various national standards more stringent than consumer products and certain Notice of Public 10/30/14 79 FR 64517 those that are currently in place would commercial and industrial equipment, Meeting. NPRM and Public 03/12/15 80 FR 13120 result in a significant additional amount including residential furnaces. EPCA Meeting Date of energy savings and whether such also requires the DOE to periodically 03/27/15. amended national standards would be determine whether more-stringent NPRM Comment 05/20/15 80 FR 28851 technologically feasible and amended standards would be Period Ex- economically justified. technologically feasible and tended. Statement of Need: EPCA requires economically justified and would save a NPRM Extended 07/10/15 minimum energy efficiency standards significant amount of energy. DOE is Comment Pe- for certain appliances and commercial amending its energy conservation riod End. equipment, including commercial water standards for residential non- Notice of Data 09/14/15 80 FR 55038 heating equipment. EPCA further weatherized gas furnaces and mobile Availability requires that DOE review such (NODA). home gas furnaces in partial fulfillment NODA Comment 10/14/15 standards and determine whether to of a court-ordered remand of DOE’s Period End. amend them within six years after 2011 rulemaking for these products. NODA Comment 10/23/15 80 FR 64370 promulgation. Statement of Need: EPCA requires Period Re- Summary of Legal Basis: Title III, Part minimum energy efficiency standards opened. C of EPCA, Public Law 94163, (42 for certain appliances and commercial NODA Comment 11/06/15 U.S.C. 62916309, as codified) sets forth equipment, including residential Period Re- a variety of provisions designed to furnaces. opened End. improve energy efficiency and Summary of Legal Basis: Title III of Final Action ...... 01/00/16 established the Energy Conservation the Energy Policy and Conservation Act Program for Certain Industrial of 1975 (EPCA or the Act), Public Law Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Equipment, a program covering 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309, as Required: Undetermined. commercial and industrial equipment, codified), established the Energy Government Levels Affected: Local, including commercial water heating Conservation Program for Consumer State. (CWH) equipment that is the subject of Products Other Than Automobiles. URL for More Information: this rulemaking. (42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(K)). Pursuant to EPCA, any new or amended www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ EPCA requires DOE to evaluate and _ energy conservation standard that the appliance standards/product.aspx/ consider amending its energy U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) productid/72. conservation standards for certain prescribes for certain products, such as URL for Public Comments: commercial and industrial equipment residential furnaces, shall be designed www.regulations.gov/ (i.e., specified heating, air-conditioning, to achieve the maximum improvement #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD- and water heating equipment) each time in energy efficiency that is 0031. ASHRAE Standard 90.1 is updated with technologically feasible and Agency Contact: John Cymbalsky, respect to such equipment. (42 U.S.C. economically justified (42 U.S.C. Office of Building Technologies 6313(a)(6)(A)) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) and result in a significant Program, EE–5B, Department of Energy, 6313(a)(6)(A), for CWH equipment, conservation of energy (42 U.S.C. Energy Efficiency and Renewable EPCA directs that if ASHRAE Standard 6295(o)(3)(B)). Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue 90.1 is amended, DOE must publish in Alternatives: The statute requires DOE SW., Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202 the Federal Register an analysis of the to conduct rulemakings to review 287–1692, Email: john.cymbalsky@ energy savings potential of amended standards and to revise standards to ee.doe.gov. energy conservation standards within achieve the maximum improvement in RIN: 1904–AD20 180 days of the amendment of ASHRAE energy efficiency that the Secretary Standard 90.1. (42 U.S.C. determines is technologically feasible 6313(a)(6)(A)(i)) EPCA further directs and economically justified. In making DOE—EE that DOE must adopt amended this determination, DOE conducts a standards at the new efficiency level in thorough analysis of the alternative 27. Energy Conservation Standards for ASHRAE Standard 90.1, unless clear standard levels, including the existing Commercial Water Heating Equipment and convincing evidence supports a standard, based on the criteria specified Priority: Economically Significant. determination that adoption of a more- by the statute. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. stringent level would produce Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. significant additional energy savings Because DOE has not yet proposed Legal Authority: 412 U.S.C. and be technologically feasible and energy efficiency standards, DOE cannot 6313(a)(6)(C)(i) and (vi) economically justified. (42 U.S.C. provide an estimate of combined CFR Citation: 10 CFR 431. 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)) If DOE decides to aggregate costs and benefits for these Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, adopt as a national standard the actions. DOE will, however, in December 31, 2013, Either proposed efficiency levels specified in the compliance with all applicable laws, rule or determination not to amend amended ASHRAE Standard 90.1, DOE issue standards that provide for standards. must establish such standard not later increased energy efficiency that are Abstract: Once completed, this than 18 months after publication of the economically justified. Estimates of rulemaking will fulfill DOE’s statutory amended industry standard. (42 U.S.C.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77759

6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(I)) If DOE determines Action Date FR Cite establish a negotiated rulemaking that a more-stringent standard is working group to negotiate proposed appropriate under the statutory criteria, Request for Infor- 10/21/14 79 FR 62899 federal standards for the energy DOE must establish such more-stringent mation. efficiency requirements of central air standard not later than 30 months after RFI Comment Pe- 11/20/14 conditioners and heat pumps. publication of the revised ASHRAE riod End. Statement of Need: EPCA requires NPRM ...... 11/00/15 minimum energy efficiency standards Standard 90.1. (42 U.S.C. Final Action ...... 07/00/16 6313(a)(6)(B)(i)). for certain appliances and commercial equipment, including residential central In addition, EPCA requires DOE to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis air conditioner and heat pump products. periodically review its already- Required: Undetermined. EPCA further requires that DOE review established energy conservation Government Levels Affected: such standards and determine whether standards for covered ASHRAE Undetermined. to amend them six years after equipment and publish either a notice Federalism: Undetermined. URL for More promulgation. of proposed rulemaking with amended Summary of Legal Basis: Title III, Part standards or a determination that the Information:www1.eere.energy.gov/ _ B of the Energy Policy and Conservation standards do not need to be amended. buildings/appliance standards/ product.aspx/productid/51. Act of 1975 (EPCA or the Act), Public (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C)(i)) DOE’s Law 94163, (42 U.S.C. 62916309, as periodic review of ASHRAE equipment URL for Public Comments: www.regulations.gov/ codified) sets forth a variety of must occur [e]very six years. (42 U.S.C. provisions designed to improve energy 6313(a)(6)(C)(i)) EPCA also specifies that #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD- 0042. efficiency and established the Energy any amendments to the design Conservation Program for Consumer requirements with respect to the Agency Contact: Ashley Armstrong, General Engineer, EE–5B, Department of Products Other Than Automobiles, a ASHRAE equipment would trigger DOE program covering major household review of the potential energy savings Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence appliances (collectively referred to as under 42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(A)(i). EPCA ‘‘covered products’’), including also requires DOE to initiate a Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202 586–6590, Email: residential central air conditioners and rulemaking to consider amending the heat pumps that are the subject of this energy conservation standards for any [email protected]. RIN: 1904–AD34 rulemaking. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(3)) covered equipment for which more than Further, EPCA requires that, not later 6 years has elapsed since the issuance than six years after the issuance of a of the most recent final rule establishing final rule establishing or amending a or amending a standard for the product DOE—EE standard, DOE publish a NOPR as of December 18, 2012, in which case 28. Energy Conservation Standards for proposing new standards or a notice of DOE must publish either: (1) A notice of Central Air Conditioners and Heat determination that the existing determination that the current standards Pumps standards do not need to be amended. do not need to be amended, or (2) a (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)). Priority: Economically Significant. notice of proposed rulemaking Alternatives: The statute requires DOE Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is containing proposed standards. (42 to conduct rule makings to review undetermined. U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C)(vi)). standards and to revise standards to Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. achieve the maximum improvement in Alternatives: The statute requires DOE Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1) to conduct rule makings to review CFR Citation: 10 CFR 430. energy efficiency that the Secretary standards and to revise standards to Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June determines is technologically feasible achieve the maximum improvement in 6, 2017, Final rule or final and economically justified. In making energy efficiency that the Secretary determination. this determination, DOE conducts a determines is technologically feasible Abstract: DOE must determine thorough analysis of the alternative and economically justified. In making whether to amend the current energy standard levels, including the existing this determination, DOE conducts a conservation standards for residential standard, based on the criteria specified thorough analysis of the alternative central air conditioner and heat pump by the statute. standard levels, including the existing products. According to the Energy Anticipated Cost and Benefits: standard, based on the criteria specified Policy and Conservation Act’s six-year Because DOE has not yet proposed by the statute. review requirement (42 U.S.C. amended energy efficiency standards, DOE cannot provide an estimate of Anticipated Cost and Benefits: 6295(m)(1)), DOE must publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to propose new combined aggregate costs and benefits Because DOE has not yet proposed for these actions. DOE will, however, in amended energy efficiency standards, standards for residential central air conditioner and heat pump products, or compliance with all applicable laws, DOE cannot provide an estimate of issue standards that provide for combined aggregate costs and benefits a notice of determination that the existing standards do not need to be increased energy efficiency that are for these actions. DOE will, however, in economically justified. Estimates of compliance with all applicable laws, amended, by June 6, 2017. This rulemaking is to determine whether energy savings will be provided when issue standards that provide for DOE issues the notice of proposed increased energy efficiency that are amended standards for residential central air conditioner and heat pump rulemaking. economically justified. Estimates of Risks: products would result in a significant energy savings will be provided when Timetable: DOE issues the notice of proposed amount of additional energy savings, rulemaking. and whether those standards would be Action Date FR Cite technologically feasible and Risks: economically justified. On July 14, Request for Infor- 11/05/14 79 FR 65603 Timetable: 2015, DOE announced its intention to mation.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77760 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite and industrial pumps (78 FR 44036). Action Date FR Cite The purpose of the working group was RFI Comment Pe- 12/05/14 to discuss and, if possible, reach Availability of 02/01/13 78 FR 7304 riod End. consensus on a proposed rule for the Framework Notice of Public 07/14/15 80 FR 40938 energy efficiency of commercial and Document. Meeting of industrial pumps. The working group NPRM ...... 04/02/15 80 FR 17826 Working Group. NPRM Comment 06/01/15 NODA Provisional 08/28/15 80 FR 52206 negotiated standard levels that were Period End. Analysis Tools. accepted by ASRAC on July 7, 2014. As Final Action ...... 11/00/15 Notice of Public 09/10/15 80 FR 54444 a result, DOE has proposed to adopt the Meeting. working groups’ recommendations. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Statement of Need: EPCA authorizes Required: Undetermined. NODA Comment 12/31/15 DOE to establish minimum energy Government Levels Affected: Period End. efficiency standards for certain Undetermined. Final Action ...... 05/00/16 appliances and commercial equipment, URL for More Information: including Commercial and Industrial www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pumps. appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/ Required: Undetermined. Summary of Legal Basis: Title III, Part ruleid/14. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. C of EPCA, Public Law 94–163 (42 URL for Public Comments: Government Levels Affected: U.S.C. 6311–6317), established the www.regulations.gov/ Undetermined. Energy Conservation Program Certain #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2011-BT-STD- Federalism: Undetermined. Industrial Equipment. Pursuant to URL for More Information: 0031. EPCA, any new or amended energy Agency Contact: John Cymbalsky, www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ conservation standard that DOE Office of Building Technologies appliance_standards/ prescribes for certain equipment, such Program, EE–5B, Department of Energy, rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=104. as commercial and industrial pumps, URL for Public Comments: Energy Efficiency and Renewable shall be designed to achieve the Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue www.regulations.gov/ maximum improvement in energy #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD- SW., Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202 efficiency that is technologically 287–1692, Email: john.cymbalsky@ 0048. feasible and economically justified. (42 Agency Contact: Ashley Armstrong, ee.doe.gov. U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)). RIN: 1904–AC54 General Engineer, EE–5B, Department of Furthermore, the new or amended Energy, Energy Efficiency and standard must result in a significant Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C. Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)). DOE—EE Phone: 202 586–6590, Email: Alternatives: EPCA requires DOE, in 30. Energy Conservation Standards for [email protected]. conducting a rulemaking to consider Small, Large, and Very Large RIN: 1904–AD37 standards for commercial and industrial Commercial Package A/C and Heating equipment, including pumps, to Equipment establish standards that achieve the Priority: Economically Significant. maximum improvement in energy DOE—EE Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. efficiency that the Secretary determines Final Rule Stage Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6) is technologically feasible and CFR Citation: 10 CFR 431. 29. Energy Conservation Standards for economically justified. In making this Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, Commercial and Industrial Pumps determination, DOE conducts a December 31, 2013, Either proposed thorough analysis of the alternative Priority: Economically Significant. rule or determination. standard levels, including the existing Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Abstract: The Energy Policy and Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(A) standard, based on the criteria specified Conservation Act of 1975, as amended, CFR Citation: 10 CFR 431. by the statute. requires DOE to periodically review its Legal Deadline: None. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOE standards for small, large, and very large Abstract: EPCA, as amended, finds that the benefits to the Nation of commercial package air conditioners authorizes the Secretary to determine the proposed energy standards for and heating equipment (which includes whether establishing energy Commercial and Industrial Pumps (such commercial unitary air conditioners and conservation standards for commercial as energy savings, consumer average heat pumps—or CUACs). Under recent and industrial pumps is technically lifecycle cost savings, an increase in amendments to EPCA made by the feasible and economically justified and national net present value, and emission American Efficient Manufacturing would save a significant amount of reductions) outweigh the burdens (such Technical Corrections Act of 2012 Pub. energy. On June 13, 2013, DOE as loss of industry net present value). L. 112–210 (Dec. 18, 2012), DOE must published a notice of intent to establish DOE estimates that energy savings from review its standards for this equipment a negotiated rulemaking working group electricity will be 0.28 quads over 30 every six years and determine whether for the commercial and industrial years and the benefit to the Nation will they need amending. It also requires pumps rulemaking under the Appliance be between $0.41 billion to $1.11 that, for those equipment types for Standards and Rulemaking Federal billion. which more than six years have elapsed Risks: Advisory Committee (ASRAC) in since the most recent final rules Timetable: accordance with the Federal Advisory establishing or amending a standard for Committee Act (FACA) and the Action Date FR Cite that equipment, DOE must publish a Negotiated Rulemaking Act (NRA) to proposal to amend the applicable negotiate proposed Federal standards Request for Infor- 06/13/11 76 FR 34192 standard. More than six years has for the energy efficiency of commercial mation. elapsed since the standards for this

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77761

equipment were last amended. After years and the benefit to the Nation will implements programs that strengthen reviewing these standards and the be between $16.5 billion to $50.8 the health care system; advance available data, DOE has determined that billion. scientific knowledge and innovation; amending the current energy Risks: and improve the health, safety, and conservation standards for this Timetable: well-being of the American people. equipment would be technologically The Department’s regulatory priorities feasible and economically justified. Action Date FR Cite for Fiscal Year 2016 reflect this complex Accordingly, DOE proposed amending mission through planned rulemakings the current standards for this Request for Infor- 02/01/13 78 FR 7296 structured to implement the equipment. On April 1, 2015, DOE mation (RFI); Department’s six arcs for Document published a notice announcing that a Availability. implementation of its strategic plan: working group was created to RFI Comment Pe- 03/04/13 Leaving the Department Stronger; potentially develop negotiated riod End. Keeping People Healthy and Safe; standards. 80 FR 17363. NPRM and Public 09/09/14 79 FR 58948 Reducing the Number of Uninsured and Statement of Need: EPCA requires Meeting. Providing Access to Affordable Quality minimum energy efficiency standards NPRM Comment 12/01/14 Care; Leading in Science and for certain appliances and commercial Period End. Innovation; Delivering High Quality equipment, including Small, Large, and NPRM Comment 12/03/14 79 FR 71710 Care and Spending Our Health Care Very Large Commercial Package A/C Period Re- Dollars More Wisely; and, Ensuring the and Heating Equipment. opened. Building Blocks for Success at Every Summary of Legal Basis: Title III, Part NPRM Comment 12/22/14 Period Re- Stage of Life. This overview highlights B 1 of the Energy Policy and opened End. forthcoming rulemakings exemplifying Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA or the Notice of Public 05/07/15 80 FR 26199 these priorities. Act), Public Law 94163 (42 U.S.C. Meeting for I. Leaving the Department Stronger 62916309, as codified), established the Working Group. Energy Conservation Program for Final Action ...... 12/00/15 The Department’s work to improve Consumer Products Other Than the efficiency and accountability Automobiles. Pursuant to EPCA, any Regulatory Flexibility Analysis includes its innovation agenda, program new or amended energy conservation Required: Undetermined. integrity and key human resources standard that DOE prescribes for certain Government Levels Affected: initiatives. In particular, the Department equipment, such as small, large, and Undetermined. plans to issue a regulation revising very large air-cooled commercial Federalism: Undetermined. administrative appeal procedures for package air conditioning and heating International Impacts: This regulatory Medicare claim appeals to increase equipment (also known as commercial action will be likely to have efficiency in the Medicare claims review unitary air conditioners and heat international trade and investment and appeals process. Additionally, pumps), shall be designed to achieve the effects, or otherwise be of international consistent with the President’s maximum improvement in energy interest. Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving efficiency that is technologically URL for More Information: Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ the feasible and economically justified. (42 www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ Department remains committed to U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)). appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/ reducing regulatory burden on States, Furthermore, the new or amended ruleid/59. health care providers and suppliers, and standard must result in a significant URL for Public Comments: other regulated entities by updating conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C. www.regulations.gov/ current rules to align them with 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)). #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2013-BT-STD- emerging health and safety standards, Alternatives: The statute requires DOE 0007. and by eliminating outdated procedural to conduct rulemakings to review and Agency Contact: John Cymbalsky, provisions. A full listing of HHS’s revise standards to achieve the Office of Building Technologies retrospective review initiatives can be maximum improvement in energy Program, EE–5B, Department of Energy, found at http://www.hhs.gov/ efficiency that the Secretary determines Energy Efficiency and Renewable retrospectivereview. is technologically feasible and Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue II. Keeping People Healthy and Safe economically justified. In making this SW., Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202 determination, DOE conducts a 287–1692, Email: john.cymbalsky@ This HHS strategic priority thorough analysis of the alternative ee.doe.gov. encompasses the Department’s work to standard levels, including the existing RIN: 1904–AC95 enhance health, wellness and standard, based on the criteria specified prevention; detect and respond to a BILLING CODE 6450–01–P by the statute. potential disease outbreak or public Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOE health emergency; and prevent the finds that the benefits to the Nation of spread of disease across borders. Since the proposed energy standards for DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 1980, the prevalence of obesity among Small, Large, and Very Large HUMAN SERVICES children and adolescents has almost Commercial Package A/C and Heating tripled. Obesity has both immediate and Equipment (such as energy savings, Statement of Regulatory Priorities for long-term effects on the health and consumer average lifecycle cost savings, Fiscal Year 2016 quality of life of those affected, an increase in national net present As the federal agency with principal increasing their risk for chronic value, and emission reductions) responsibility for protecting the health diseases, including heart disease, type 2 outweigh the burdens (such as loss of of all Americans and for providing diabetes, certain cancers, stroke, and industry net present value). DOE essential human services, especially to arthritis—as well as increasing medical estimates that energy savings from those most vulnerable, the Department costs for the individual and the health electricity will be 11.7 quads over 30 of Health and Human Services (HHS) system. Building on the momentum of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77762 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

the First Lady’s ‘‘Let’s Move’’ initiative, distribution of tobacco products, to revise and clarify procedures for HHS has mobilized skills and expertise protect the public health and to reduce updates to product labeling to reflect from across the Department to address tobacco use by minors. Over the next certain types of newly acquired safety this epidemic with research, public fiscal year, FDA’s planned tobacco information through submission of a education, and public health strategies. regulations include proposing ‘‘changes being effected’’ supplement. Other representative regulations requirements that govern the methods III. Reducing the Number of Uninsured include: used in the pre-production design and Providing Access to Affordable manufacture, packing, and storage of Labeling and Nutrition Information tobacco products, a proposed rule that Quality Care The Food and Drug Administration would establish a process for the The Affordable Care Act expands (FDA) plans to issue two final rules submission of applications for new access to health insurance through designed to provide more useful, easy to tobacco products, and finalizing the improvements in Medicaid, the understand dietary information tools regulation deeming other tobacco establishment of Affordable Insurance that will help millions of American products that meet the statutory Exchanges, and coordination between families identify healthy choices in the definition of ‘‘tobacco product’’ to also Medicaid, the Children’s Health marketplace. These rules, each be subject to the FD&C Act. This final Insurance Program, and the Exchanges. benefiting from input received in regulation, known as the ‘‘deeming In implementing the Affordable Care extended public comment periods, rule,’’ is necessary to afford FDA the Act over the next fiscal year, HHS will include: authority to regulate additional products pursue regulations transforming the way D Food Labeling—Nutrition which include hookah, electronic our nation delivers care. This includes Information: FDA plans a rule, which, if cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, other creating better ways to pay providers, finalized, revises the nutrition and novel tobacco products, and future incentivize quality of care and distribute supplement facts labels on packaged tobacco products. information to build a health care food, which has not been updated since system that is better, smarter and Addressing Substance Use Disorders 1993 (when mandatory nutrition healthier with an engaged, educated, and Opioid Misuse, Abuse, and labeling of food was first required). The and empowered consumer at the center. aim of the proposed revision is to Overdose Death Prevention provide updated and easier to read HHS plans to undertake a number of Streamlining Medicaid Eligibility nutrition information on the label to regulations designed to fight misuse and Determinations help consumers maintain healthy abuse of prescription opioids and heroin A forthcoming final rule will bring to dietary practices; and and encourage individuals to seek completion regulatory provisions that D Food Labeling—Serving Sizes: FDA needed treatment for substance use support our efforts to assist States in plans a rule, which, if finalized, requires disorders. These initiatives include an implementing Medicaid eligibility serving-size information provided update to the regulation regarding determinations, appeals, enrollment within the food label, providing current confidentiality of substance abuse changes, and other State health subsidy nutrition information based on the treatment records to align with advances programs stemming from the Affordable amount of food that is typically eaten as in health information technology while Care Act. The intent of the rule is to a serving, to assist consumers in maintaining appropriate patient privacy afford each State substantial discretion maintaining healthy dietary practices. protections. HHS also will undertake an in the design and operation of that update of the current regulation around State’s exchange, with standardization Food Safety prescribing for buprenorphine to provided only where directed by the FDA will maintain HHS’s ongoing increase access to this Food and Drug Act, or where there are compelling effort to promulgate rules required Administration-approved, evidence- practical, efficiency or consumer- under the Food Safety Modernization based treatment for opioid dependence protection reasons. Act (FSMA), working with public and and help more people get the treatment private partners to build a new system necessary for their recovery. Parity for Mental Health Treatment of food safety oversight. Recently, FDA The Mental Health Parity and Drugs and Medical Devices finalized its preventive controls in the Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) manufacture and distribution of human In 2012, Congress provided new requires parity between mental health or foods and of animal feeds. This authorities under the Food and Drug substance use disorder benefits and additional suite of regulations, if Administration Safety and Innovation medical/surgical benefits, with respect finalized, constitutes the heart of the Act to support its mission of to financial requirements and treatment FSMA food safety program by safeguarding the quality of medical limitations under group health plans. instituting uniform practices for the products available to the public while Finalization of this rule will implement manufacture and distribution of food ensuring the availability of innovative MHPAEA by proposing standards for products, to ensure that those products products. FDA is implementing this Medicaid alternative benefit plans, are safe for consumption and will not new authority with a focus on Medicaid managed care organizations, cause or spread disease, including, protecting the quality of medical and the Children’s Health Insurance Sanitary Transportation of Human and products in the global drug supply Program. Animal Food and Focused Mitigation chain; improving the availability of Equitable and Non-Discriminatory Strategies to Protect Food Against needed drugs and devices; and Treatment Intentional Adulteration. promoting better-informed decisions by health professionals and patients. HHS Finalization of the rule implementing Preventing Death and Disease From is updating FDA’s regulations to reflect the Affordable Care Act’s Section 1557 Tobacco Use the increased use of generic drugs in the nondiscrimination provisions will In 2009, Congress enacted the Family current marketplace, and will describe ensure access to affordable, quality Smoking Prevention and Tobacco approaches for brand name and generic health care for all Americans— Control Act, authorizing FDA to regulate drug manufacturers to update product regardless of race, color, national origin, the manufacture, marketing, and labeling. This rule, if finalized, will sex, age and ability.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77763

IV. Leading in Science and Innovation Improvements to Long-Term Care HHS—SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES HHS continues to expand on early This final rule would revise the ADMINISTRATION (SAMHSA) successes of more precise approaches in requirements that long-term care a few areas of medicine with the facilities must meet to participate in the Proposed Rule Stage Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI), and Medicare and Medicaid programs. The 31. • Increase Number of Patients to work on 21st Century Cures. In changes are necessary to reflect Which Drug Addiction Treatment Act particular, HHS, in collaboration with advances in the theory and practice of (DATA)—Waived Physicians Can the President’s Office of Science and service delivery and safety for patients Prescribe Buprenorphine Technology Policy will finalize in long-term care settings. The rule is revisions to existing rules governing Priority: Economically Significant. also an integral part of our efforts to Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. research on human subjects, often achieve broad-based improvements both Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2) referred to as the Common Rule. This in the quality of health care furnished CFR Citation: 42 CFR 8. rule would apply to institutions and through federal programs, and in patient Legal Deadline: None. researchers supported by HHS as well as safety, while at the same time reducing Abstract: This rule is needed to researchers throughout much of the procedural burdens on providers. improve the national response to the federal government who are conducting rise in prescribed opioid misuse and research involving human subjects. The VI. Ensuring the Building Blocks for heroin use and related morbidity and proposed revisions codified in the final Success at Every Stage of Life mortality by proposing an approach to rule will aim to better protect human increasing access to buprenorphine subjects while facilitating research, and Over the coming year, the Department will continue its support at critical treatment while protecting against also reducing burden, delay, and diversion. Medication assisted treatment ambiguity for investigators. stages of people’s lives, from infancy to old age, and topics including early (MAT) using buprenorphine, in combination with counseling and other V. Delivering High Quality Care and learning, Alzheimer’s and dementia. A support services, is one important tool Spending Our Health Care Dollars More forthcoming rule from the Wisely for treating opioid addiction. To address Administration for Children and this need and help close the gap in HHS continues work to build a health Families (ACF) will provide the first treatment services, SAMHSA would care delivery system that results in comprehensive update of Child Care propose to address restrictions in the better care, smarter spending, and and Development Fund (CCDF) use of buprenorphine imposed by the healthier people by finding better ways regulations since 1998. The CCDF is a Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA to pay providers, deliver care, and federal program that provides formula 2000). distribute information all while keeping grants to States, territories, and tribes. Statement of Need: The Drug the individual patient at the center. In The program provides financial Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 the coming fiscal year, the department assistance to low-income families to (DATA) provided the means for will complete a number of regulations to access child care so that they can work physicians to obtain a waiver from the accomplish this strategic objective: or attend a job-training or educational Controlled Substances Act in order to program. It also provides funding to treat opioid use disorders with Medicare Payment Rules improve the quality of child care and buprenorphine, an opioid partial Nine Medicare payment rules will be increase the supply and availability of opioid-agonist, without certification updated to better reflect the current child care for all families, including from SAMHSA as an Opioid Treatment state of medical practice and to respond those who receive no direct assistance Program (OTP). However, since the implementation of this act, the nation to feedback from providers seeking through CCDF. Another ACF rule, when finds itself in the midst of a public financial predictability and flexibility to finalized, would modify existing Head health crisis of prescribed opioid misuse better serve patients. Start performance standards to take into account increased knowledge in the and heroin use and related morbidity Medicaid Managed Care early childhood field since the and mortality. Every day in the United standards were last updated more than States 105 people die as a result of drug This final rule modernizes the overdose and another 6,748 are treated 15 years ago. Changes would strengthen Medicaid managed care regulations to in emergency departments for the requirements on curriculum and reflect changes in the usage of managed misuse or abuse of drugs. care delivery systems. The rule aligns assessment, supervision, health and Responses to this public health the rules governing Medicaid managed safety, and governance. The rule would problem include: Education of care with those of other major sources also streamline existing regulations to physicians in the appropriate of coverage, including coverage through eliminate unnecessary or duplicative management of pain and the role of Qualified Health Plans and Medicare requirements. opioid analgesics; implementation of Advantage plans, implements statutory Both rules are part of the effective prescription drug monitoring provision; strengthens actuarial Department’s retrospective review programs and other strategies to soundness payment provisions to initiative and highlight HHS’s promote patient safety while reducing promote the accountability of Medicaid commitment to protecting the public fraud and abuse; and promoting access managed care program rates; ensures health and effective human services to effective treatment for opioid use appropriate beneficiary protections and while pursuing smarter, more efficient disorders. Medical and clinical evidence enhances expectations for program regulation over the next fiscal year. indicates medication-assisted treatment integrity. The rule also implements with pharmacotherapies approved for provisions of the Children’s Health the treatment of substance use disorders Insurance Program Reauthorization Act are most effective for the treatment of of 2009 (CHIPRA) and addresses third opioid use disorders in particular. The party liability for trauma codes. medication-assisted treatment of opioid

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77764 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

use disorders reduces all-cause provide updated nutrition information not be able to determine the amount of mortality and reduces the morbidity, on the label to assist consumers in specific nutrients in a food product social dysfunction and criminality often maintaining healthy dietary practices. because mandatory declaration of those associated with this condition. The rule would modernize the nutrition nutrients is not currently required. However, access to effective treatment information found on the Nutrition Furthermore, consumers may overlook has always encountered significant Facts label, as well as the format and information on the label because it is concrete obstacles such as: Lack of appearance of the label. On July 27, not displayed prominently on the label. awareness of substance use disorders, 2015, FDA issued a supplemental notice Changes to the reference values, lack of coverage for needed services, of proposed rulemaking accepting nutrients declared on the label, and and inadequate treatment capacity. To comments on limited additional changes to the format and appearance of help close this gap, SAMHSA would provisions until October 13, 2015. Also the label would reduce the risk of like to address restrictions in the use of on July 27, 2015, FDA reopened the consumers not having information buprenorphine imposed by the Drug comment period on the proposed rule as necessary to assist them in maintaining Addiction Treatment Act (DATA 2000). to specific documents until September healthy dietary practices. 25, 2015. Summary of Legal Basis: 21 U.S.C. Timetable: 823(g)(2). Statement of Need: Almost all of the Alternatives: OTPs expansion of regulations for the nutrition labeling of Action Date FR Cite buprenorphine, use of naltrexone, foods and dietary supplements have not expansion of methadone; dose been amended since mandatory ANPRM ...... 07/11/03 68 FR 41507 limitations, formulation limitations. nutrition labeling was first required in ANPRM Comment 10/09/03 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As we 1993. New scientific evidence and Period End. move toward publication, estimates of consumer research has become available Second ANPRM .. 04/04/05 70 FR 17008 the cost and benefits of these provisions since 1993 that can be used to update Second ANPRM 06/20/05 the content and appearance of Comment Pe- will be included in the rule. riod End. Risks: As we move toward information on the Nutrition Facts and Supplement Facts labels. Consumers Third ANPRM ...... 11/02/07 72 FR 62149 publication, risks of these provisions Third ANPRM 01/31/08 will be included in the rule. can use the updated information to Comment Pe- Timetable: select foods that will assist them to riod End. maintain healthy dietary practices. NPRM ...... 03/03/14 79 FR 11879 Action Date FR Cite Summary of Legal Basis: FDA’s legal NPRM Comment 06/02/14 basis derives from sections 201, 403, Period End. NPRM ...... 04/00/16 and 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, Reopening of 07/27/15 80 FR 44302 NPRM Comment 06/00/16 and Cosmetic Act. Comment Pe- Period End. Alternatives: The Agency will riod as to Spe- consider different options for the cific Documents. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis amount of time that manufacturers have NPRM Comment 09/25/15 Required: Undetermined. to come into compliance with the Period End as Government Levels Affected: Federal, requirements of this regulation, when to Specific Doc- Local, State, Tribal. uments. finalized, so that the economic burden Supplemental 07/27/15 80 FR 44303 Agency Contact: Brian Altman, to industry can be minimized. NPRM to Solicit Legislative Director, Department of Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Comment on Health and Human Services, Substance rule will affect all foods that are Limited Addi- Abuse and Mental Health Services currently required to bear nutrition tional Provi- Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, labeling. It will have a significant cost sions. Rockville, MD 02857, Phone: 240 276– to industry because all food labels will Supplemental 10/13/15 2009, Email: [email protected]. have to be updated. Much of the NPRM to Solicit RIN: 0930–AA22 information currently provided on the Comment on Nutrition Facts and Supplement Facts Limited Addi- tional Provi- labels is based on old reference values sions Comment and scientific information. The changes HHS—FOOD AND DRUG Period End. would provide more current ADMINISTRATION (FDA) Administrative 09/10/15 80 FR 54446 information to assist consumers in Docket Update; Final Rule Stage constructing a healthful diet. The Extension of potential economic benefit from the Comment Pe- 32. Food Labeling: Revision of the final rule stems from the improvement riod. Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels in diet among the U.S. population. Diet Administrative 10/13/15 Priority: Economically Significant. is a significant factor in the reduction in Docket Update; Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Comment Pe- risk of chronic diseases such as riod End. Unfunded Mandates: This action may coronary heart disease, certain types of NPRM Reopening 10/20/15 80 FR 63477 affect the private sector under Pub. L. cancer, stroke, diabetes, and obesity. of Comment 104–4. Risks: If information on the Nutrition Period for Cer- Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 Facts and Supplement Facts label is not tain Documents. U.S.C. 343; 21 U.S.C. 371 updated, reference values that serve as NPRM Reopening 10/23/15 CFR Citation: 21 CFR 101.9; 21 CFR the basis for the percent daily value will of Comment 101.36. continue to be based on old scientific Period for Cer- Legal Deadline: None. evidence, and consumers could believe tain Documents Abstract: FDA is amending the that they are consuming an appropriate Comment Pe- riod End. labeling regulations for conventional amount of nutrients when, in fact, they Final Action ...... 03/00/16 foods and dietary supplements to are not. In addition, consumers would

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77765

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis labeling of foods have not been Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. amended since mandatory nutrition Required: Yes. Small Entities Affected: Businesses, labeling was first promulgated in 1993. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Governmental Jurisdictions. New scientific evidence, consumption Government Levels Affected: Federal, Government Levels Affected: Federal, data, and consumer research has State. Local. become available since 1993 that can be Federalism: This action may have Federalism: This action may have used to update the serving size federalism implications as defined in federalism implications as defined in information on Nutrition Facts labels to E.O. 13132. E.O. 13132. reflect the amount of food customarily International Impacts: This regulatory International Impacts: This regulatory consumed. This could allow consumers action will be likely to have action will be likely to have to use the serving size information more international trade and investment international trade and investment effectively by giving them information effects, or otherwise be of international effects, or otherwise be of international to help them select foods that will interest. interest. promote maintenance of healthy dietary Agency Contact: Cherisa Henderson, Additional Information: Includes practices. Nutritionist, Department of Health and Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. Summary of Legal Basis: FDA’s legal Human Services, Food and Drug Agency Contact: Blakeley Fitzpatrick, basis is derived from sections 201, 403 Administration, HFS–830, 5100 Paint Interdisciplinary Scientist, Department and 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug Branch Parkway, College Park, MD of Health and Human Services, Food and Cosmetic Act and section 2(b)(1) of 20740, Phone: 240 402–5429, Fax: 301 and Drug Administration, Center for the Nutrition Labeling and Education 436–1191, Email: Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Act of 1990. [email protected]. (HFS–830), HFS–830, 5100 Paint Branch RIN: 0910–AF23 Parkway, College Park, MD 20740, Alternatives: The Agency will Phone: 240 402–5429, Email: consider different options for the [email protected]. amount of time that manufacturers have HHS—FDA RIN: 0910–AF22 to come into compliance with the requirements of this regulation, so that 34. Standards for the Growing, the economic burden to industry can be Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of minimized. The Agency also intends to Produce for Human Consumption HHS—FDA publish this regulation simultaneously with other regulations requiring changes Priority: Economically Significant. 33. Food Labeling: Serving Sizes of Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Foods That Can Reasonably Be to Nutrition Fact labels to ease the economic burden on manufacturers. Unfunded Mandates: This action may Consumed at one Eating Occasion; affect the private sector under Pub. L. Dual-Column Labeling; Updating, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This 104–4. Modifying, and Establishing Certain rule will affect most foods that are Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 342; 21 RACCS currently required to bear nutrition U.S.C. 350h; 21 U.S.C. 371; 42 U.S.C. Priority: Economically Significant. labeling. It will have a significant cost 264; Pub. L. 111–353 (signed on January Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. to industry because food labels on all 4, 2011) Unfunded Mandates: This action may affected foods will have to be updated. CFR Citation: 21 CFR 112. affect the private sector under Pub. L. These changes would provide more Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, 104–4. current information to assist consumers October 31, 2015, To the Office of the Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 in constructing a healthful diet. Federal Register for publication. U.S.C. 343; 21 U.S.C. 371; Pub. L. 101– Risks: If the RACCs are not updated, Abstract: This rule will establish 535, sec 2(b)(1)(A) RACCs that serve as the basis for serving science-based minimum standards for CFR Citation: 21 CFR 101.9; 21 CFR sizes will continue to be based on old the safe production and harvesting of 101.12. consumption data. These updates to the those types of fruits and vegetables that Legal Deadline: None. RACCs will be based, in part, on current are raw agricultural commodities for Abstract: FDA is amending its nationwide consumption data. Without which the Secretary has determined that labeling regulations for foods to provide these updates, consumers will not have such standards minimize the risk of updated Reference Amounts current information to assist them in serious adverse health consequences or Customarily Consumed (RACCs) for constructing a healthy diet. death. The purpose of the rule is to certain food categories. This rule would Timetable: reduce the risk of illness associated with provide consumers with nutrition fresh produce. information based on the amount of Action Date FR Cite Statement of Need: FDA is taking this food that is customarily consumed, action to meet the requirements of the which would assist consumers in ANPRM ...... 04/04/05 70 FR 17010 Food Safety Moderhnization Act maintaining healthy dietary practices. In ANPRM Comment 06/20/05 (FSMA) and to address the food safety Period End. addition to updating certain RACCs, NPRM/Comment 03/03/14 79 FR 11989 challenges associated with fresh FDA is also amending the definition of Period Ex- produce and, thereby, protect the public single-serving containers; amending the tended. health. Data indicate that between 1973 label serving size for breath mints; and NPRM Comment 06/02/14 and 1997, outbreaks of foodborne illness providing for dual-column labeling, Period End. in the U.S. associated with fresh which would provide nutrition NPRM Comment 05/27/14 79 FR 29699 produce increased in absolute numbers information per serving and per Period Ex- and as a proportion of all reported container or unit, as applicable, under tended. foodborne illness outbreaks. The certain circumstances. NPRM Comment 08/01/14 Agency issued general good agricultural Period End. Statement of Need: The regulations Final Action ...... 03/00/16 practice guidelines for fresh fruits and for serving sizes for the nutrition vegetables over a decade ago.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77766 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Incorporating prevention-oriented Action Date FR Cite 402–1636, Email: samir.assar@ public health principles, and fda.hhs.gov. incorporating what we have learned in NPRM Comment 08/09/13 78 FR 48637 RIN: 0910–AG35 the past decade into a regulation is a Period Ex- critical step in establishing standards for tended. the production and harvesting of NPRM Comment 11/15/13 HHS—FDA produce, and reducing the foodborne Period Ex- tended End. illness attributed to fresh produce. Notice of Intent 08/19/13 78 FR 50358 35. ‘‘Tobacco Products’’ Subject to the Summary of Legal Basis: FDA is To Prepare an Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, relying on the amendments to the Environmental as Amended by the Family Smoking Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Impact State- Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the FD&C Act), provided by section 105 ment for the Priority: Economically Significant. of the FSMA (codified primarily in Proposed Rule. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. section 419 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. Notice of Intent 11/15/13 Unfunded Mandates: This action may 350h)). FDA’s legal basis also derives in To Prepare En- affect the private sector under Pub. L. part from sections 402(a)(3), 402(a)(4), vironmental Im- 104–4. and 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. pact Statement for the Pro- Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.; 342(a)(3), 342(a)(4), and 371(a)). FDA posed Rule The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic also intends to rely on section 361 of the Comment Pe- Act; Pub. L. 111–31; The Family Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 riod End. Smoking Prevention and Tobacco U.S.C. 264), which gives FDA authority NPRM Comment 11/20/13 78 FR 69605 Control Act to promulgate regulations to control the Period Ex- CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. spread of communicable disease. tended. Legal Deadline: None. Alternatives: Section 105 of the FSMA NPRM Comment 11/22/13 Abstract: The Family Smoking requires FDA to conduct this Period Ex- Prevention and Tobacco Control Act rulemaking. tended End. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FDA Environmental Im- 03/11/14 79 FR 13593 (Tobacco Control Act) provides the estimates that the costs to more than pact Statement Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the Pro- 300,000 domestic and foreign producers authority to regulate cigarettes, cigarette posed Rule; tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and and packers of fresh produce from the Comment Pe- proposal would include one-time costs smokeless tobacco. The Federal Food, riod Extended. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), as (e.g., new tools and equipment) and Environmental Im- 04/18/14 recurring costs (e.g., monitoring, pact Statement amended by the Tobacco Control Act, training, recordkeeping). FDA for the Pro- permits FDA to issue regulations anticipates that the benefits would be a posed Rule; deeming other tobacco products to be reduction in foodborne illness and Comment Pe- subject to the FD&C Act. This rule deaths associated with fresh produce. riod Extended would deem additional products End. The monetized annual benefits of this meeting the statutory definition of Supplemental 09/29/14 79 FR 58433 ‘‘tobacco product’’ to be subject to the rule are estimated to be $1 billion, and NPRM. the monetized annual costs are FD&C Act, and would specify additional Supplemental 12/15/14 restrictions. estimated to be $460 million, NPRM Com- domestically. ment Period Statement of Need: Currently, the Risks: This regulation would directly End. Tobacco Control Act provides FDA with and materially advance the Federal Draft Environ- 01/14/15 80 FR 1852 immediate authority to regulate Government’s substantial interest in mental Impact cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your- reducing the risks for illness and death Statement. own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco. associated with foodborne infections Draft Environ- 03/13/15 The Tobacco Control Act also permits mental Impact FDA to issue regulations deeming other associated with the consumption of Statement fresh produce. Less restrictive and less tobacco products that meet the statutory Comment Pe- definition of ‘‘tobacco product’’ to also comprehensive approaches have not riod End. been sufficiently effective in reducing Final Rule ...... 11/00/15 be subject to the FD&C Act. This the problems addressed by this regulation is necessary to afford FDA regulation. FDA anticipates that the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the authority to regulate additional regulation would lead to a significant Required: Yes. products which include hookah, decrease in foodborne illness associated Small Entities Affected: Businesses. electronic cigarettes, cigars, pipe with fresh produce consumed in the Government Levels Affected: None. tobacco, other novel tobacco products, United States. International Impacts: This regulatory and future tobacco products. Timetable: action will be likely to have Summary of Legal Basis: Section 901 international trade and investment of the FD&C Act, as amended by the Action Date FR Cite effects, or otherwise be of international Tobacco Control Act, permits FDA to interest. issue regulations deeming other tobacco NPRM ...... 01/16/13 78 FR 3503 Agency Contact: Samir Assar, products to be subject to the FD&C Act. NPRM Comment 05/16/13 Supervisory Consumer Safety Officer, Section 906(d) provides FDA with the Period End. Department of Health and Human authority to propose restrictions on the NPRM Comment 04/26/13 78 FR 24692 Period Ex- Services, Food and Drug sale and distribution of tobacco tended. Administration, Center for Food Safety products, including restrictions on the NPRM Comment 09/16/13 and Applied Nutrition, Office of Food access to, and the advertising and Period Ex- Safety, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, promotion of, tobacco products if FDA tended End. College Park, MD 20740, Phone: 240 determines that such regulation would

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77767

be appropriate for the protection of the available. This deeming rule is Abstract: This final rule would public health. necessary to provide FDA with require that the sponsor of each Alternatives: In addition to the authority to regulate these products approved or conditionally approved benefits and costs of both options for the (e.g., registration, product and antimicrobial new animal drug product proposed rule, FDA assessed the ingredient listing, user fees for certain submit an annual report to the Food and benefits and costs of several alternatives products, premarket requirements, and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) to the proposed rule: e.g., deeming only, adulteration and misbranding on the amount of each antimicrobial but exempt newly deemed products provisions). In addition, the additonal active ingredient in the drug product from certain requirements; exempt restrictions that FDA seeks to that is sold or distributed for use in certain classes of products from certain promulgate for the proposed deemed food-producing animals, including any requirements; deeming only, with no products will protect youth by distributor-labeled product. In addition additional provisions; and changes to restricting minors’ access to these to codifying these requirements, FDA is the compliance periods. products and will increase consumer exploring other requirements for the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The understanding of the impact of these collection of additional drug proposed rule consists of two co- products on public health. This rule is distribution data. proposals, option 1 and option 2. The consistent with other approaches that Statement of Need: Section 105 of the proposed option 1 deems all products the Agency has taken to address the Animal Drug User Fee Amendments of meeting the statutory definition of tobacco epidemic and is particularly 2008 (ADUFA) amended section 512 of ‘‘tobacco product’’ except accessories of necessary, given that consumer use may the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic a proposed deemed tobacco product to be gravitating to the proposed deemed Act (FD&C Act) to require that the be subject to chapter IX of the FD&C products. sponsor of each approved or Act. Option 1 also proposes additional Timetable: conditionally appoved new animal drug provisions that would apply to product that contains an antimicrobial proposed deemed products as well as to Action Date FR Cite active ingredient submit an annual certain other tobacco products. Option 2 report to FDA on the amount of each is the same as option 1 except that it NPRM ...... 04/25/14 79 FR 23142 antimicrobial active ingredient in the exempts premium cigars. We expect that NPRM Comment 07/09/14 drug product that is sold or distributed asserting our authority over these Period End. for use in food-producing animals, tobacco products will enable us to take NPRM Comment 06/24/14 79 FR 35711 including information on any further regulatory action in the future as Period Ex- tended. distributor-labeled product. This appropriate; those actions will have NPRM Comment 08/08/14 legislation was enacted to assist FDA in their own costs and benefits. The Period End. its continuing analysis of the proposed rule would generate some Final Action ...... 11/00/15 interactions (including drug resistance), direct benefits by providing information efficacy, and safety of antibiotics to consumers about the risks and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis characteristics of tobacco products approved for use in both humans and Required: Yes. food-producing animals (H. Rpt. 110– which may result in consumers Small Entities Affected: Businesses. reducing their use of cigars and other Government Levels Affected: 804). This rulemaking is to codify these tobacco products. Other potential Undetermined. requirements. In addition, FDA is benefits follow from premarket Federalism: Undetermined. exploring the establishment of other requirements which could prevent more International Impacts: This regulatory reporting requirements to provide for harmful products from appearing on the action will be likely to have the collection of additional drug market and worsening the health effects international trade and investment distribution data, including reporting of tobacco product use. The proposed effects, or otherwise be of international sales and distribution data by species. rule would impose costs in the form of interest. Summary of Legal Basis: Section 105 registration submission labeling and Agency Contact: Gerie Voss, Senior of ADUFA (Pub. L. 110–316; 122 Stat. other requirements; other likely costs Regulatory Counsel, Department of 3509) amended section 512 of the FD&C are not quantifiable based on current Health and Human Services, Food and Act (21 U.S.C. 360b) to require that data. Drug Administration, Center for sponsors of approved or conditionally Risks: Adolescence is the peak time Tobacco Products, Document Control approved applications for new animal for tobacco use initiation and Center, Building 71, Room G335, 10903 drugs containing an antimicrobial active experimentation. In recent years, new New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, ingredient submit an annual report to and emerging tobacco products, MD 20993, Phone: 877 287–1373, Fax: the Food and Drug Administration on sometimes referred to as ‘‘novel tobacco 301 595–1426, Email: ctpregulations@ the amount of each such ingredient in products,’’ have been developed and are fda.hhs.gov. the drug that is sold or distributed for becoming an increasing concern to RIN: 0910–AG38 use in food-producing animals, public health due, in part, to their including information on any appeal to youth and young adults. Non- distributor-labeled product. FDA is also issuing this rule under its authority regulated tobacco products come in HHS—FDA many forms, including electronic under section 512(l) of the FD&C Act to cigarettes, nicotine gels, and certain 36. Reports of Distribution and Sales collect information relating to approved dissolvable tobacco products (i.e., those Information for Antimicrobial Active new animal drugs. dissolvable products that do not Ingredients Used in Food-Producing Alternatives: This rulemaking codifies currently meet the definition of Animals the congressional mandate of ADUFA smokeless tobacco under 21 U.S.C. Priority: Other Significant. section 105. The annual reporting 387(18) because they do not contain cut, Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b(l); 21 required under ADUFA section 105 is ground, powdered, or leaf tobacco, and U.S.C. 371 necessary to address potential problems instead contain nicotine extracted from CFR Citation: 21 CFR 514.80. concerning the safety and effectiveness tobacco), and these products are widely Legal Deadline: None. of antimicrobial new animal drugs. Less

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77768 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

frequent data collection would hinder 350i; 21 U.S.C. 371; 21 U.S.C. 374; Pub. Government’s substantial interest in this purpose. L. 111–353 reducing the risk for illness and death Anticipated Cost and Benefits: CFR Citation: 21 CFR 121. associated with intentional adulteration Sponsors of antimicrobial drugs sold for Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, May of food. use in food-producing animals currently 31, 2016, To the Office of the Federal Timetable: report sales and distribution data to the Register for publication. Agency under section 105 of ADUFA; Abstract: This rule would require Action Date FR Cite this rulemaking will codify in FDA’s domestic and foreign food facilities that NPRM ...... 12/24/13 78 FR 78014 regulations a current statutory are required to register under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to NPRM Comment 03/25/14 79 FR 16251 requirement. There may be a minimal Period Ex- additional labor cost if any other address hazards that may be intentionally introduced by acts of tended. reporting requirement is included. NPRM Comment 03/31/14 Additional data beyond the reporting terrorism. These food facilities would be Period End. requirements specified in ADUFA required to identify and implement NPRM Comment 06/30/14 section 105 will help the Agency better focused mitigation strategies to Period Ex- understand how the use of medically significantly minimize or prevent tended End. important antimicrobial drugs in food- significant vulnerabilities identified at Final Rule ...... 06/00/16 producing animals may relate to actionable process steps in a food antimicrobial resistance. operation. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Statement of Need: FDA is taking this Required: Yes. Risks: Section 105 of ADUFA was action to meet the requirements of the Small Entities Affected: Businesses. enacted to address the problem of FSMA and to protect food from Government Levels Affected: antimicrobial resistance, and to help intentional adulteration when the intent Undetermined. ensure that FDA has the necessary is to cause large-scale public harm. International Impacts: This regulatory information to examine safety concerns Summary of Legal Basis: FDA’s action will be likely to have related to the use of antibiotics in food- authority for issuing this rule is international trade and investment producing animals. 154 Congressional provided by the Federal Food, Drug, and effects, or otherwise be of international Record H7534. Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) as interest. Timetable: amended by sections 103, 105, and 106 Agency Contact: Jody Menikheim, of the Food Safety Modernization Act Supervisory General Health Scientist, Action Date FR Cite (FSMA). Section 418 of the FD&C Act Department of Health and Human ANPRM ...... 07/27/12 77 FR 44177 addresses intentional adulteration in the Services, Food and Drug ANPRM Comment 09/25/12 context of facilities that manufacture, Administration, Center for Food Safety Period End. process, pack, or hold food and are and Applied Nutrition (HFS–005), 5100 ANPRM Comment 09/26/12 77 FR 59156 required to register under section 415 of Paint Branch Parkway, College Park, MD Period Ex- the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350g). Section 20740, Phone: 240 402–1864, Fax: 301 tended. 419 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350h) 436–2633, Email: fooddefense@ ANPRM Comment 11/26/12 addresses intentional adulteration in the fda.hhs.gov. Period End. RIN: 0910–AG63 Final Rule ...... 05/00/16 context of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities. Section Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 420 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350i) Required: No. addresses intentional adulteration in the HHS—FDA Small Entities Affected: Businesses. context of high risk foods and exempts farms except for farms that produce 38. Foreign Supplier Verification Government Levels Affected: None. Program Agency Contact: Sujaya Dessai, milk. FDA is implementing the Supervisory Veterinary Medical Officer, intentional adulteration provisions in Priority: Economically Significant. Department of Health and Human sections 418, 419, and 420 of the FD&C Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Services, Food and Drug Act in this rulemaking. Unfunded Mandates: This action may Alternatives: Section 103, 105 and 106 Administration, Center for Veterinary affect the private sector under Pub. L. of the FDA, Food Safety Modernization Medicine, Room 2620, HFV–212, 7519 104–4. Act require FDA to conduct this Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 384a; title Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, rulemaking. III, sec 301 of FDA Food Safety Phone: 240 402–5761, Email: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FDA Modernization Act; Pub. L. 111–353, [email protected]. estimates that the costs from the establishing sec 805 of the Federal Food, RIN: 0910–AG45 proposal to domestic and foreign Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) producers and packers of processed CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. foods would include new one-time costs Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, HHS—FDA (e.g., adoption of written food defense October 31, 2015, To the Office of the plans, setting up training programs, etc.) Federal Register for publication. 37. Focused Mitigation Strategies to and recurring costs (e.g., training Abstract: This rule describes what a Protect Food Against Intentional employees, and completing and food importer must do to verify that its Adulteration maintaining records used throughout foreign suppliers produce food that is as Priority: Economically Significant. the facility). FDA anticipates that the safe as food produced in the United Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. benefits would be a reduction in the States. FDA is taking this action to Unfunded Mandates: This action may possibility of illness, death, and improve the safety of food that is affect the private sector under Pub. L. economic disruption resulting from imported into the United States. 104–4. intentional adulteration of food. Statement of Need: The rule is needed Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331; 21 Risks: This regulation will directly to help improve the safety of food that U.S.C. 342; 21 U.S.C. 350g; 21 U.S.C. and materially advance the Federal is imported into the United States.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77769

Imported food products have increased certain types of foods or risks (e.g., for Action Date FR Cite dramatically over the last several high-risk foods), but allowing flexibility decades. Data indicate that about 15 in verification activities for other types NPRM ...... 07/29/13 78 FR 45729 percent of the U.S. food supply is of foods or risks; and (4) specifying use NPRM Comment 11/26/13 imported. FSMA provides the Agency of a particular verification activity for Period End. with additional tools and authorities to each particular kind of food or risk. To NPRM Comment 11/20/13 78 FR 69602 help ensure that imported foods are safe the extent possible while still ensuring Period Ex- tended. for U.S. consumers. Included among that verification activities are adequate NPRM Comment 01/27/14 these tools and authorities is a to ensure that foreign suppliers are Period Ex- requirement that importers perform risk- producing food in accordance with tended End. based foreign supplier verification applicable U.S. requirements, we will Supplemental 09/29/14 79 FR 58573 activities to verify that the food they seek to give importers the flexibility to NPRM. import is produced in compliance with choose verification procedures that are Supplemental 12/15/14 U.S. requirements, as applicable, and is appropriate to adequately address the NPRM Com- not adulterated or misbranded. This risks associated with the importation of ment Period proposed rule on the content of foreign a particular food. End. supplier verification programs (FSVPs) Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We are Final Rule ...... 11/00/15 sets forth the proposed steps that food still estimating the cost and benefits for Regulatory Flexibility Analysis importers would be required to take to this rule. However, the available Required: Yes. fulfill their responsibility to help ensure information suggests that the costs will be significant. Our preliminary analysis Small Entities Affected: Businesses. the safety of the food they bring into this Government Levels Affected: None. of FY10 OASIS data suggests that this country. International Impacts: This regulatory Summary of Legal Basis: Section rule will cover about 60,000 importers, action will be likely to have 805(c) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 240,000 unique combinations of international trade and investment 384a(c)) directs FDA, not later than one importers and foreign suppliers, and effects, or otherwise be of international year after the date of enactment of 540,000 unique combinations of interest. FSMA, to issue regulations on the importers, products, and foreign Agency Contact: Brian L. Pendleton, content of FSVPs. Section 805(c)(4) suppliers. These numbers imply that Senior Policy Advisor, Department of states that verification activities under provisions that require activity for each Health and Human Services, Food and such programs may include monitoring importer, each unique combination of Drug Administration, Office of Policy, records for shipments, lot-by-lot importer and foreign supplier, or each WO 32, Room 4245, 10903 New certification of compliance, annual unique combination of importer, Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD onsite inspections, checking the hazard product, and foreign supplier will 20993–0002, Phone: 301 796–4614, Fax: analysis and risk-based preventive generate significant costs. An example control plans of foreign suppliers, and of a provision linked to combinations of 301 847–8616, Email: brian.pendleton@ periodically testing and sampling importers and foreign suppliers would fda.hhs.gov. RIN: 0910–AG64 shipments of imported products. be a requirement to conduct a Section 301(b) of FSMA amends section verification activity, such as an onsite 301 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 331) by audit, under certain conditions. The adding section 301(zz), which cost of onsite audits will depend, in HHS—FDA designates as a prohibited act the part, on whether foreign suppliers can 39. Accreditation of Third-Party importation or offering for importation provide the same onsite audit results to Auditors/Certification Bodies to of a food if the importer (as defined in different importers, or whether every Conduct Food Safety Audits and to section 805) does not have in place an importer will need to take some action Issue Certifications FSVP in compliance with section 805. with respect to each of their foreign In addition, section 301(c) of FSMA suppliers. The benefits of this rule will Priority: Other Significant. amends section 801(a) of the FD&C Act consist of the reduction of adverse Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 384d; Pub. (21 U.S.C. 381(a)) by stating that an health events linked to imported food L. 111–353; sec 307 FDA Food Safety article of food being imported or offered that could result from increased Modernization Act; 21 U.S.C. 371; 21 for import into the United States shall compliance with applicable U.S.C. 381; 21 U.S.C. 384b; . . . be refused admission if it appears, from requirements, and are accounted for in CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1. an examination of a sample of such an the proposed rules that contain those Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, article or otherwise, that the importer is requirements. October 31, 2015, To the Office of the in violation of section 805. Risks: As stated above, about 15 Federal Register for publication. Alternatives: We are considering a percent of the U.S. food supply is Abstract: This rule establishes range of alternative approaches to the imported, and many of these imported regulations for accreditation of third- requirements for foreign supplier foods are high-risk commodities. party auditors to conduct food safety verification activities. These might According to recent data from the audits. FDA is taking this action to include: (1) Establishing a general Centers for Disease Control and improve the safety of food that is requirement that importers determine Prevention, each year, about 48 million imported into the United States. and conduct whatever verification Americans get sick, 128,000 are Statement of Need: The use of activity would adequately address the hospitalized, and 3,000 die from accredited third-party auditors to certify risks associated with the foods they foodborne diseases. We expect that the food imports will assist in ensuring the import; (2) allowing importers to choose adoption of FSVPs by food importers safety of food from foreign origin from a list of possible verification will benefit the public health by helping entering U.S. commerce. Accredited mechanisms, such as the activities listed to ensure that imported food is third-party auditors auditing foreign in section 805(c)(4) of the FD&C Act; (3) produced in compliance with other facilities can increase FDA’s requiring importers to conduct applicable food safety regulations. information about foreign facilities that particular verification activities for Timetable: FDA may not have adequate resources

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77770 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

to inspect in a particular year. FDA will offered for import into the United States HHS—FDA establish identified standards creating is safe and will not cause injury or 40. Supplemental Applications overall uniformity to complete the task. illness to animals or humans. The rule Proposing Labeling Changes for Audits that result in issuance of facility would implement a program for Approved Drugs and Biological or food certification will provide FDA accrediting third-party auditors to Products information about the compliance status conduct food safety audits of foreign of the facility. Additionally, auditors food entities, including registered Priority: Other Significant. will be required to submit audit reports foreign food facilities, and based on the Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 that may be reviewed by FDA for findings of the regulatory audit, to issue U.S.C. 331; 21 U.S.C. 352; 21 U.S.C. 353; purposes of compliance assessment and food or facility certifications. The 21 U.S.C. 355; 21 U.S.C. 371; 42 U.S.C. work planning. certifications could be used by 262; . . . CFR Citation: 21 CFR 314.70; 21 CFR Summary of Legal Basis: Section 808 importers seeking to participate in the 314.97; 21 CFR 314.150; 21 CFR 601.12. of the FD&C Act directs FDA to Voluntary Qualified Importer Program establish, not later than two years after Legal Deadline: None. for expedited review and entry of Abstract: This rule would amend the the date of enactment, a system for the product, and would be a means to recognition of accreditation bodies that regulations regarding new drug provide assurance of compliance with applications (NDAs), abbreviated new accredit third-party auditors, who, in the FD&C Act as a food risk-related turn, certify that eligible entities are in drug applications (ANDAs), and consideration. The food certifications biologics license applications (BLAs) to compliance with the provisions of the could be used when FDA makes FD&C Act. If within two years after the revise and clarify procedures for decisions regarding the importation of changes to the labeling of an approved date of the establishment of the system, foods with safety risks. The rule would FDA has not identified and recognized drug to reflect certain types of newly apply to any foreign or domestic acquired information in advance of an accreditation body, FDA may directly accreditation body seeking FDA accredit third party auditors. FDA’s review of such change. recognition, any foreign or domestic Statement of Need: In the current Alternatives: FSMA described in third-party auditor seeking detail the framework for, and marketplace, approximately 80 percent accreditation, any foreign food entity, of drugs dispensed are generic drugs requirements of, the accredited third- that chooses to be audited by an party auditor program. Alternatives approved in ANDAs. ANDA holders, accredited third party auditor and any like NDA holders and BLA holders, are include the degree to which the importer seeking to participate in the standards in the requirements are required to promptly review all adverse Voluntary Qualified Importer Program. drug experience information obtained or prescriptive or flexible. Fewer instances of unsafe or Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The otherwise received, and comply with misbranded food entering U.S. benefits of the proposed rule would be applicable reporting and recordkeeping commerce would reduce the risk of less unsafe or misbranded food entering requirements. However, under current serious illness and death to humans and U.S. commerce. Additional benefits FDA regulations, ANDA holders are not include the increased flow of credible animals. permitted to use the changes being Timetable: information to FDA regarding the effected (CBE) supplement process in the same manner as NDA holders and compliance status of foreign firms and Action Date FR Cite their foods that are ultimately offered BLA holders to independently update for import into the United States, which NPRM ...... 07/29/13 78 FR 45781 product labeling with certain newly information, in turn, would inform NPRM Comment 11/26/13 acquired safety information. This FDA’s work planning for inspection of Period End. regulatory difference recently has been foreign food facilities and might result NPRM Comment 11/20/13 78 FR 69603 determined to mean that an individual in a signal of possible problems with a Period Ex- can bring a product liability action for particular firm or its products, and with tended. ‘‘failure to warn’’ against an NDA NPRM Comment 01/27/14 holder, but generally not an ANDA sufficient signals, might raise questions Period Ex- about the rigor of the food safety tended End. holder. This may alter the incentives for regulatory system of the country of Final Action ...... 11/00/15 generic drug manufacturers to comply origin. The compliance costs of the with current requirements to conduct proposed rule would result from the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis robust postmarketing surveillance, additional labor and capital required of Required: No. evaluation, and reporting, and to ensure accreditation bodies seeking FDA Government Levels Affected: that their product labeling is accurate recognition and of third-party auditors Undetermined. and up-to-date. Accordingly, there is a seeking accreditation to the extent that International Impacts: This regulatory need for ANDA holders to be able to will involve the assembling of action will be likely to have independently update product labeling information for an application unique to international trade and investment to reflect certain newly acquired safety the FDA third-party auditor program, as effects, or otherwise be of international information as part of the ANDA well as assembling renewal applications interest. holder’s independent responsibility to and required reports and notifications. Agency Contact: Charlotte A. Christin, ensure that its product labeling is The compliance costs associated with Acting Director, Division of accurate and up-to-date. certification will be accounted for Enforcement, Office of Compliance, Summary of Legal Basis: The Food, separately under the costs associated Department of Health and Human Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 with participation in the Voluntary Services, Food and Drug et seq.) and the Public Health Service Qualified Importer Program. The third- Administration, Center for Food Safety Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) provide FDA party program is funded through and Applied Nutrition, 5100 Paint with authority over the labeling for revenue neutral-user fees, which will be Branch Parkway, Room 2C019, College drugs and biological products, and developed by FDA through rulemaking. Park, MD 20740, Phone: 240 402–3708, authorize the Agency to enact Risks: FDA is proposing this rule to Email: [email protected]. regulations to facilitate FDA’s review provide greater assurance that the food RIN: 0910–AG66 and approval of applications regarding

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77771

the labeling for those products. FDA’s 847–8440, Email: janice.weiner@ amended the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic authority to extend the CBE supplement fda.hhs.gov. Act (the FD&C Act), in part, by creating process for certain safety-related RIN: 0910–AG94 a new section, 416 of the FD&C Act (21 labeling changes to ANDA holders U.S.C. 350e). Section 416(b) of the FD&C arises from the same authority under Act directed us to issue regulations to require shippers, carriers by motor which FDA’s regulations relating to HHS—FDA NDA holders and BLA holders were vehicle or rail vehicle, receivers, and issued. 41. Sanitary Transportation of Human other persons engaged in the Alternatives: FDA is considering and Animal Food transportation of food to use prescribed several alternatives described in Priority: Economically Significant. sanitary transportation practices to comments submitted to the public Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. ensure that food is not transported docket established for the proposed Unfunded Mandates: This action may under conditions that may render the rule. affect the private sector under Pub. L. food adulterated. In addition, section Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FDA is 104–4. 111(a) of Food Safety Modernization Act reviewing comments submitted to the Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 350e; 21 (FSMA), directed us to issue these public docket and evaluating the U.S.C. 373; 21 U.S.C. 331; 21 U.S.C. 342; sanitary transportation regulations not anticipated costs and benefits that 21 U.S.C. 371; . . . later than 18 months after the date of would be associated with a final rule. CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1. enactment of FSMA. This action is part Risks: This rule is intended to remove Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, March of FDA’s larger effort to focus on obstacles to the prompt communication 31, 2016, To the Office of the Federal prevention of food safety problems of safety-related labeling changes that Register for publication. throughout the food chain. Summary of Legal Basis: FDA’s meet the regulatory criteria for a CBE Abstract: This rule would establish authority for issuing this rule is supplement. The rule may encourage requirements for parties including provided in the Sanitary Food generic drug companies to participate shippers, carriers by motor vehicle or Transportation Act (Pub. L. 109–59) more actively with FDA in ensuring the rail vehicle, and receivers engaged in which amended the FD&C Act by timeliness, accuracy, and completeness the transportation of food, including of drug safety labeling in accordance establishing section 416 which directed food for animals, to use sanitary FDA to issue regulations to require with current regulatory requirements. transportation practices to ensure that FDA’s posting of information on its Web shippers, carriers by motor vehicle or food is not transported under conditions rail vehicle, receivers, and other persons site regarding the safety-related labeling that may render the food adulterated. changes proposed in pending CBE engaged in the transportation of food to Statement of Need: There have been use prescribed sanitary transportation supplements would enhance concerns over the past few decades transparency, and facilitate access by practices to ensure that food is not about the need to ensure that food is transported under conditions that may health care providers and the public so transported in the United States in a that such information may be used to render the food adulterated. FDA is also sanitary manner. Congress responded to issuing this rule under section 111(a) of inform treatment decisions. these concerns by passing the Sanitary the Food Safety Modernization Act Timetable: Food Transportation Act of 1990 (1990 (Pub. L. 111–353), which directed FDA SFTA) which directed the Department Action Date FR Cite to promulgate these sanitary of Transportation (DOT) to establish transportation regulations. In addition, regulations to prevent food or food NPRM ...... 11/13/13 78 FR 67985 section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 NPRM Comment 12/27/13 78 FR 78796 additives transported in certain types of U.S.C. 371(a)) authorizes the Agency to Period Ex- bulk vehicles from being contaminated issue regulations for the efficient tended. by nonfood products that were enforcement of the Act. NPRM Comment 01/13/14 simultaneously or previously Alternatives: FSMA requires FDA to Period End. transported in those vehicles. Following promulgate regulations to establish NPRM Comment 03/13/14 the passage of the 1990 SFTA it became sanitary transportation practices under Period Ex- clear that potential sources of food the authority of the 2005 SFTA. tended End. contamination during transport were Anticipated Cost and Benefits: NPRM Comment 02/18/15 80 FR 8577 not just limited to nonfood products. Period Re- Because no complete data exist to opened. Most notably, a 1994 outbreak of precisely quantify the likelihood of food NPRM Comment 04/27/15 salmonellosis occurred in which ice becoming adulterated during its Period Re- cream mix became contaminated during transport, we are unable to estimate the opened End. transport in tanker trucks that had effectiveness of the requirements of the Final Rule ...... 07/00/16 previously hauled raw liquid eggs. That proposed rule to reduce potential outbreak affected an estimated 224,000 adverse health effects in humans or Regulatory Flexibility Analysis persons nationwide. In 2005, Congress animals. Furthermore, while we expect Required: Yes. reallocated authority for food small changes in behavior (in the form Small Entities Affected: Businesses. transportation safety to the Food and of safer practices), we do not anticipate Government Levels Affected: Drug Administration, Department of large scale changes in practices as a Undetermined. Transportation and the United States result of the requirements of this Agency Contact: Janice L. Weiner, Department of Agriculture by passing proposed rule. Nevertheless, improving Senior Regulatory Counsel, Department the 2005 Sanitary Food Transportation food transportation systems could of Health and Human Services, Food Act (2005 SFTA), a broader food reduce the number of recalls, reduce the and Drug Administration, Center for transportation safety law than the 1990 risk of adverse health effects related to Drug Evaluation and Research, 10903 SFTA in that its focus was not limited such contaminated human and animal New Hampshire Avenue, Building 51, only to preventing food contamination food and feed, and reduce the losses of Room 6268, Silver Spring, MD 20993– from nonfood sources during contaminated human and animal food 0002, Phone: 301 796–3601, Fax: 301 transportation. The 2005 SFTA and feed ingredients and products. The

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77772 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

compliance costs of the proposed rule on December 8, 2006. The rule would Risks: None. The proposals in this would result from the additional labor improve the quality of the existing rule would update the existing and capital required to carry out regulations, provide operational requirements to reflect current sanitary transportation practices during flexibility and modifications, and standards of practice. In addition, transportation operations and the costs remove redundancies and outdated proposed changes would provide added to train personnel and keep the required information. These updates are intended flexibility to providers, improve records. to ensure the health and safety of PACE efficiency and effectiveness, and Risks: FDA is proposing this rule to participants. enhance participant quality of care and establish sanitary transportation Statement of Need: We are proposing life. practices to provide greater assurance to revise and update policies to reflect Timetable: that food will not become adulterated subsequent changes in the practice of during transportation and will not cause caring for PACE participants and Action Date FR Cite illness or injury to humans or animals. changes in technology based on our The rule would apply to food experience implementing and NPRM ...... 02/00/16 transported in the United States by overseeing the PACE program. PACE Regulatory Flexibility Analysis motor vehicle or rail vehicle. has proven successful in keeping frail Required: No. Timetable: elderly individuals, some of whom are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid Small Entities Affected: Action Date FR Cite benefits (dual eligibles), in the Organizations. community. However, we believe that Government Levels Affected: Federal, ANPRM ...... 04/30/10 75 FR 22713 we should revise certain regulatory State. ANPRM Comment 08/30/10 provisions to afford more flexibility as Additional Information: Includes Period End. a means to encourage the expansion of Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. Agency Contact: Martha Hennessy, NPRM ...... 02/05/14 79 FR 7005 the PACE program to more states, NPRM Comment 05/23/14 79 FR 29699 Health Insurance Specialist, Department increasing access for participants, and Period Ex- of Health and Human Services, Centers further enhancing the program’s tended. for Medicare & Medicaid Services, NPRM Comment 05/31/14 effectiveness at providing care while reducing costs. Centers for Medicare, MS: C4–21–26, Period End. 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD NPRM Comment 07/30/14 Summary of Legal Basis: Sections Period Ex- 1894(f)(2) and 1934(f)(2) of the Act state 21244, Phone: 410 786–0575, Email: tended End. that the Secretary shall incorporate the [email protected]. Final Rule ...... 04/00/16 requirements applied to PACE RIN: 0938–AR60 demonstration waiver programs under Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the PACE Protocol when issuing interim Required: Yes. final or final regulations, to the extent HHS—CMS Small Entities Affected: Businesses. consistent with the provisions of • Government Levels Affected: State. sections 1894 and 1934 of the Act, but 43. Expansion of the CMS Qualified Federalism: This action may have allow the Secretary to modify or waive Entity Program (CMS–5061–P) federalism implications as defined in these provisions under certain Priority: Other Significant. E.O. 13132. circumstances. Sections 1894(a)(6) and Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114–10, sec Agency Contact: Michael E. Kashtock, 1934(a)(6) of the Act define the PACE 105 Supervisory Consumer Safety Officer, Protocol as the Protocol for PACE as CFR Citation: 42 CFR 401. Department of Health and Human published by On Lok, Inc., as of April Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, July Services, Food and Drug 14, 1995, or any successor protocol that 1, 2016, MACRA requires rule be Administration, Center for Food Safety may be agreed upon between the effective by July 1, 2016. and Applied Nutrition, Office of Food Secretary and On Lok, Inc. We issued Abstract: Under the Medicare Access Safety, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, the 1999 and 2002 interim final rules and CHIP Reauthorization Act College Park, MD 20740, Phone: 240 and the 2006 final rule under this (MACRA), this proposed rule would 402–2022, Fax: 301 346–2632, Email: authority. implement statutory requirements that [email protected]. Alternatives: The requirements for the expand the permissible uses of RIN: 0910–AG98 PACE program have not been Medicare claims data that is obtained by comprehensively updated in many qualified entities in accordance with years, but the effective and efficient applicable information, privacy, delivery of health care services has security and disclosure laws. In doing HHS—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & changed substantially in that time. We so, this rule would explain how MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) could choose not to make any regulatory qualified entities may create non-public Proposed Rule Stage changes; however, we believe the analyses and provide or sell such changes we are proposing are necessary analyses to authorized users, as well as 42. Programs of All-Inclusive Care for to ensure the requirements are how qualified entities may provide or the Elderly (PACE) Update (CMS–4168– consistent with current standards of sell combined data, or provide Medicare P) practice and continue to meet statutory claims data alone at no cost, to certain Priority: Other Significant. obligations. They will ensure that authorized users. This rule would also Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 participants receive care that maintains implement certain privacy and security U.S.C. 1395; 42 U.S.C. 1395eee(f); 42 or enhances quality of life and enable requirements and impose assessments U.S.C. 1396u–4(f) them to remain in the community. on qualified entities in the case of a CFR Citation: 42 CFR 460. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As we violation of a data use agreement. Legal Deadline: None. move toward publication, estimates of Statement of Need: The Qualified Abstract: This proposed rule would the cost and benefits of these provisions Entity Program, established by Section update the PACE regulations published will be included in the rule. 10332 of the Affordable Care Act,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77773

authorizes the disclosure of Medicare 339D, 7500 Security Blvd., Baltimore, APMs from the public and requires that claims data to qualified entities for use MD 21244, Phone: 202 690–8257, Email: the Secretary establish criteria for in public provider performance [email protected]. physician-focused payment models, reporting. New legislation in MACRA RIN: 0938–AS66 including models for specialist expands the use of Medicare data by physicians, by November 1, 2016. qualified entities to include additional Summary of Legal Basis: Section 101 of MACRA requires proposed and final analyses and access to certain data. HHS—CMS Effective July 1, 2016, qualified entities rules be published by November 1, may use the combined Medicare and 44. • Merit–Based Incentive Payment 2016, for release of criteria for publicly other claims data to conduct non-public System (MIPS) and Alternative submitted physician-focused payment analyses and provide or sell these Payment Models (APMS) in Medicare models and for the release of the MIPS analyses to select users for non-public Fee-for-Service (CMS–5517–P) (Section quality measure list. use. In addition, qualified entities may 610 Review) Alternatives: None. This is a statutory sell the combined data or provide the Priority: Economically Significant. requirement. Medicare data at no cost to providers, Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As we suppliers, hospital associations, and Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114–10, sec move toward publication, estimates of medical societies for non-public use. 101 the cost and benefits of these provisions While qualified entities are allowed to CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. will be included in the rule. use the CMS data for other purposes Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Risks: If this regulation is not than public reporting, the legislation November 1, 2016, MACRA deadline for published timely, physicians would not also includes an assessment on the establishing physician–focused payment have adequate time to prepare for the qualified entity for a breach of a data model criteria. Final, Statutory, January MIPS. Timetable: use agreement and new requirements for 1, 2017, MACRA deadline for annual reporting by the qualified requirements and policies for MIPS. Action Date FR Cite entities. These changes to the qualified Abstract: This proposed rule would entity program are important in driving implement provisions of the Medicare NPRM ...... 03/00/16 higher quality, lower cost care in Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act Medicare and the health system in (MACRA) related to MIPS and APMs. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis general. Additionally, these changes are Section 101 of MACRA authorizes a Required: Yes. expected to drive renewed interest in new MIPS, which repeals the Medicare Small Entities Affected: Businesses, the qualified entity program, leading to sustainable growth rate and improves Governmental Jurisdictions, more transparency of provider and Medicare payments for physician Organizations. supplier performance while ensuring services. MACRA consolidates the Government Levels Affected: Federal, beneficiary privacy. current programs of the Physician Tribal. Summary of Legal Basis: Section 105 Quality Reporting System, the Value- Agency Contact: James Sharp, Health of MACRA requires proposed and final Based Modifier, and the Electronic Insurance Specialist, Department of rules to be published and effective by Health Records Incentive Program into Health and Human Services, Centers for July 1, 2016. This legislation expands one program, MIPS, that streamlines Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center both the uses of Medicare data by and improves on the three distinct for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Qualified Entities as well as the data incentive programs. Additionally, Center, MS: WB–06–05, 7500 Security made available to them. MACRA authorizes incentive payments Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 Alternatives: None. This is a statutory for providers who participate in eligible 786–7388, Email: james.sharp@ requirement. APMs. cms.hhs.gov. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As we Statement of Need: Under MACRA, RIN: 0938–AS69 move toward publication, estimates of payment adjustments to eligible the cost and benefits of these provisions professional (EP) payments through will be included in the rule. MIPS and incentive payments for HHS—CMS Risks: The rule would require qualifying APM participants will be qualified entities to provide sufficient applied beginning January 1, 2019. EPs 45. • Hospital Inpatient Prospective evidence of data privacy and security under MIPS will be assessed a payment Payment System for Acute Care protection capabilities in order to avoid adjustment using four performance Hospitals and the Long-Term Care increased risks related to the protection categories: quality, resource use, clinical Hospital Prospective Payment System of beneficiary identifiable data. practice improvement activities, and and FY 2017 Rates (CMS–1655–P) Timetable: meaningful use of certified electronic (Section 610 Review) Action Date FR Cite health record (EHR) technology. Priority: Economically Significant. Qualifying APM participants must have Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. NPRM ...... 11/00/15 a specified amount of their Medicare Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 expenditures or patients through an U.S.C. 1395hh Regulatory Flexibility Analysis eligible APM that meets legislative CFR Citation: 42 CFR 412. Required: No. criteria that include quality measures Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, Small Entities Affected: Businesses, comparable to those in MIPS, required April 1, 2016. Final, Statutory, August Organizations. use of certified EHR technology, and 1, 2016. Government Levels Affected: None. either more than nominal financial risk Abstract: This annual proposed rule Agency Contact: Allison Oelschlaeger, or a structure as a medical home model. would revise the Medicare hospital Special Assistant, Department of Health Additionally, specific to physician- inpatient and long-term care hospital and Human Services, Centers for focused APMs, the legislation creates a prospective payment systems for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Technical Advisory Committee whose operating and capital-related costs. This Enterprise Data and Analytics, MS: role is to receive and evaluate proposed rule would implement changes arising

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77774 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

from our continuing experience with Phone: 410 786–6504, Email: Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare, these systems. [email protected]. MS: C4–01–15, 7500 Security Statement of Need: Centers for RIN: 0938–AS77 Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Phone: 410 786–3355, Email: annually revises the Medicare hospital [email protected]. inpatient prospective payment systems HHS—CMS RIN: 0938–AS81 (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs to implement changes arising from 46. • CY 2017 Revisions to Payment our continuing experience with these Policies Under the Physician Fee HHS—CMS systems. In addition, we describe the Schedule and Other Revisions to proposed changes to the amounts and Medicare Part B (CMS–1654–P) (Section 47. • CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient PPS factors used to determine the rates for 610 Review) Policy Changes and Payment Rates and Medicare hospital inpatient services for Priority: Economically Significant. Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment operating costs and capital-related costs. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. System Policy Changes and Payment Also, CMS annually updates the Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 Rates (CMS–1656–P) (Section 610 payment rates for the Medicare U.S.C. 1395hh; Pub. L. 114–10 Review) prospective payment system (PPS) for CFR Citation: 42 CFR 409; 42 CFR Priority: Economically Significant. inpatient hospital services provided by 410; 42 CFR 414. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. long-term care hospitals (LTCHs). The Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 rule solicits comments on the proposed November 1, 2016. U.S.C. 1395hh IPPS and LTCH payment rates and new Abstract: This annual proposed rule CFR Citation: 42 CFR 416; 42 CFR policies. CMS will issue a final rule would revise payment polices under the 419. containing the payment rates for the FY Medicare physician fee schedule, and Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, 2017 IPPS and LTCHs at least 60 days make other policy changes to payment November 1, 2016. before October 1, 2016. under Medicare Part B. These changes Abstract: This annual proposed rule Summary of Legal Basis: The Social would apply to services furnished would revise the Medicare hospital Security Act (the Act) sets forth a beginning January 1, 2017. outpatient prospective payment system system of payment for the operating Statement of Need: The statute to implement statutory requirements costs of acute care hospital inpatient requires that we establish each year, by and changes arising from our continuing stays under Medicare Part A (Hospital regulation, payment amounts for all experience with this system. The rule Insurance) based on prospectively set physicians’ services furnished in all fee describes changes to the amounts and rates. The Act requires the Secretary to schedule areas. This rule would factors used to determine payment rates pay for the capital-related costs of implement changes affecting Medicare for services. In addition, the rule would hospital inpatient and long-term care Part B payment to physicians and other change the ambulatory surgical center stays under a PPS. Under these systems, Part B suppliers. The final rule has a payment system list of services and Medicare payment for hospital inpatient statutory publication date of November rates. and long-term care operating and 1, 2016, and an implementation date of Statement of Need: Medicare pays capital-related costs is made at January 1, 2017. over 4,000 hospitals for outpatient predetermined, specific rates for each Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1848 department services under the hospital hospital discharge. These changes of the Social Security Act (the Act) outpatient prospective payment system would be applicable to services establishes the payment for physician (OPPS). The OPPS is based on groups of furnished on or after October 1, 2016. services provided under Medicare. clinically similar services called Alternatives: None. This implements a Section 1848 of the Act imposes an ambulatory payment classification statutory requirement. annual deadline of no later than groups (APCs). CMS annually revises Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Total November 1 for publication of the final the APC payment amounts based on the expenditures will be adjusted for FY rule or final physician fee schedule. most recent claims data, proposes new 2017. Alternatives: None. This rule payment policies, and updates the Risks: If this regulation is not implements a statutory requirement. payments for inflation using the published timely, inpatient hospital and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Total hospital operating market basket. LTCH services will not be paid expenditures will be adjusted for CY Medicare pays roughly 5,000 appropriately beginning October 1, 2017. Ambulatory Surgical enters (ASCs) 2016. Risks: If this regulation is not under the ASC payment system. CMS Timetable: published timely, physician services annually revises the payment under the will not be paid appropriately, Action Date FR Cite ASC payment system, proposes new beginning January 1, 2017. policies, and updates payments for Timetable: NPRM ...... 04/00/16 inflation. CMS will issue a final rule Action Date FR Cite containing the payment rates for the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 2017 OPPS and ASC payment system at Required: Yes. NPRM ...... 06/00/16 least 60 days before January 1, 2017. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1833 Government Levels Affected: Federal. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of the Social Security Act establishes Agency Contact: Donald Thompson, Required: Yes. Medicare payment for hospital Deputy Director, Division of Acute Care, Small Entities Affected: Businesses. outpatient services and ASC services. Department of Health and Human Government Levels Affected: Federal. The rule revises the Medicare hospital Services, Centers for Medicare & Agency Contact: Ryan Howe, Director, OPPS and ASC payment system to Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare, Division of Practitioner Services, implement applicable statutory MS: C4–01–26, 7500 Security Department of Health and Human requirements. In addition, the rule Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Services, Centers for Medicare & describes changes to the outpatient APC

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77775

system, relative payment weights, ensures appropriate beneficiary obsolete. For example, the existing outlier adjustments, and other amounts protections; and, enhances expectations version gives little acknowledgement to and factors used to determine the for program integrity. This rule also the use of electronic means of payment rates for Medicare hospital implements provisions of the Children’s communication and no recognition to outpatient services paid under the Health Insurance Program the recently created health care coverage prospective payment system as well as Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) and options offered through the Federal and changes to the rates and services paid addresses third party liability for trauma State marketplaces. This creates gaps under the ASC payment system. These codes. that leave States and managed care changes would be applicable to services Statement of Need: This rule plans with unclear, non-existent, or furnished on or after January 1, 2017. modernizes the Medicaid managed care confusing guidance and standards for Alternatives: None. This rule is a regulations recognizing changes in the program operation. We believe that with statutory requirement. usage of managed care delivery systems consistent standards and clearly defined Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Total since the release of the final rule in flexibilities for States, programs can expenditures will be adjusted for CY 2002. As Medicaid managed care develop in ways that not only transform 2017. programs have developed and matured the healthcare delivery system and Risks: If this regulation is not in the intervening years, States have fulfill the mission of the Medicaid published timely, outpatient hospital taken various approaches to program, but can improve the health and ASC services will not be paid implementation. This has resulted in and wellness of Medicaid enrollees. inconsistencies and, in some cases, less appropriately beginning January 1, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The than optimal results. To improve 2017. overall economic impact for this rule is Timetable: consistency and adopt policies and practices from States that have proven estimated to be $112 million in the first year of implementation. Additionally, Action Date FR Cite the most successful, we include revisions in this rule to strengthen non-quantifiable benefits include NPRM ...... 06/00/16 beneficiary protections, support improved health outcomes, reduced alignment with rules governing unnecessary services, improved Regulatory Flexibility Analysis managed care in other public and beneficiary experience, improved Required: Yes. private sector programs, strengthen access, and improved program Small Entities Affected: Businesses. actuarial soundness and the transparency which facilitates better Government Levels Affected: Federal. accountability of rates paid in the decisionmaking. Agency Contact: Marjorie Baldo, Medicaid managed care program, Risks: None. It is necessary to Health Insurance Specialist, Department improve quality of care, and implement modernize the Medicaid and CHIP of Health and Human Services, Centers statutory provisions issued since 2002. managed care and quality regulations to for Medicare & Medicaid Services, The rule also applies some of the support health care delivery system Center for Medicare, MS: C4–03–06, Medicaid managed care regulations to reform, improve population health 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD the Children’s Health Insurance outcomes, and improve the beneficiary 21244, Phone: 410 786–4617, Email: Program (CHIP). experience in a cost effective and [email protected]. Summary of Legal Basis: Congress consistent manner in all states. RIN: 0938–AS82 enacted specific standards for Medicaid Timetable: managed care programs in sections 4701 through 4709 of the Balanced Budget Action Date FR Cite HHS—CMS Act of 1997 (BBA). The BBA represented the first comprehensive NPRM ...... 06/01/15 80 FR 31097 Final Rule Stage revision to Federal statutes governing NPRM Comment 07/27/15 Period End. 48. Medicaid Managed Care, CHIP Medicaid managed care since the early 1980s. These standards are codified in Final Action ...... 04/00/16 Delivered in Managed Care, Medicaid sections 1903 and 1932 of the Act and and CHIP Comprehensive Quality implemented in a final rule published Strategies, and Revisions Related to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis June 14, 2002 (67 FR 40989). The Third Party Liability (CMS–2390–F) Required: No. Children’s Health Insurance Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Priority: Economically Significant. Reauthorization Act of 2009 and the Governmental Jurisdictions, Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Affordable Care Act applied some of the Organizations. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302 Medicaid managed care statutory CFR Citation: 42 CFR 430; 42 CFR provisions to CHIP. Government Levels Affected: Federal, 431; 42 CFR 438. Alternatives: We could choose not to State, Tribal. Legal Deadline: None. make any regulatory changes; however, Additional Information: Includes Abstract: This final rule modernizes while the 2002 final rule has been the Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. the Medicaid managed care regulations guiding regulation for Medicaid Agency Contact: Nicole Kaufman, to reflect changes in the usage of managed care, many questions and Technical Director, Department of managed care delivery systems. The rule issues have arisen in the intervening Health and Human Services, Centers for aligns the rules governing Medicaid years due to the current version’s lack Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center managed care with those of other major of clarity or detail in some areas. With for Medicaid and CHIP Services, MS: sources of coverage, including coverage no guidance in these areas, States have S2–14–16, 7500 Security Boulevard, through Qualified Health Plans and created various standards, leading to Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786– Medicare Advantage plans; implements inconsistency and, in some cases, less 6604, Email: nicole.kaufman@ statutory provisions; strengthens than optimal program performance. cms.hhs.gov. actuarial soundness payment provisions Additionally, many issues have arisen to promote the accountability of from the evolution of managed care that RIN: 0938–AS25 Medicaid managed care program rates; have rendered some provisions nearly BILLING CODE 4150–24–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77776 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND regulatory plan and in the agenda assess the costs and benefits of available SECURITY (DHS) support the Department’s responsibility regulatory alternatives and, if regulation Fall 2015 Statement of Regulatory areas listed above. These regulations is necessary, to select regulatory Priorities will improve the Department’s ability to approaches that maximize net benefits accomplish its mission. (including potential economic, The Department of Homeland The regulations we have identified in environmental, public health and safety Security (DHS or Department) was this year’s fall regulatory plan continue effects, distributive impacts, and created in 2003 pursuant to the to address legislative initiatives equity). Executive Order 13563 Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public including, but not limited to, the emphasizes the importance of Law 107–296. DHS has a vital mission: following acts: The Implementing To secure the Nation from the many quantifying both costs and benefits, of Recommendations of the 9/11 reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, threats we face. This requires the Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act), and of promoting flexibility. dedication of more than 225,000 Public Law 110–53 (Aug. 3, 2007); the employees in jobs that range from Consolidated Natural Resources Act of Finally, the Department values public aviation and border security to 2008 (CNRA), Public Law 110–229 (May involvement in the development of its emergency response, from cybersecurity 8, 2008); the Security and regulatory plan, agenda, and analyst to chemical facility inspector. Accountability for Every Port Act of regulations, and takes particular Our duties are wide-ranging, but our 2006 (SAFE Port Act), Public Law 109– concern with the impact its rules have goal is clear—keeping America safe. 347 (Oct. 13, 2006); and the on small businesses. DHS and each of Our mission gives us six main areas Consolidated Security, Disaster its components continue to emphasize of responsibility: Assistance, and Continuing the use of plain language in our notices 1. Prevent Terrorism and Enhance Appropriations Act, 2009, Public Law and rulemaking documents to promote Security, 2. Secure and Manage Our Borders, 110–329 (Sep. 30, 2008). a better understanding of regulations 3. Enforce and Administer Our DHS strives for organizational and increased public participation in Immigration Laws, excellence and uses a centralized and the Department’s rulemakings. unified approach in managing its 4. Safeguard and Secure Cyberspace, Retrospective Review of Existing 5. Ensure Resilience to Disasters, and regulatory resources. The Office of the 6. Mature and Strengthen DHS General Counsel manages the Regulations Department’s regulatory program, In achieving these goals, we are Pursuant to Executive Order 13563 continually strengthening our including the agenda and regulatory ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory partnerships with communities, first plan. In addition, DHS senior leadership Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), DHS identified responders, law enforcement, and reviews each significant regulatory the following regulatory actions as government agencies—at the State, project to ensure that the project fosters local, tribal, Federal, and international and supports the Department’s mission. associated with retrospective review levels. We are accelerating the The Department is committed to and analysis. Some of the regulatory deployment of science, technology, and ensuring that all of its regulatory actions on the below list may be innovation in order to make America initiatives are aligned with its guiding completed actions, which do not appear more secure, and we are becoming principles to protect civil rights and in The Regulatory Plan. You can find leaner, smarter, and more efficient, civil liberties, integrate our actions, more information about these completed ensuring that every security resource is build coalitions and partnerships, rulemakings in past publications of the used as effectively as possible. For a develop human resources, innovate, and Unified Agenda (search the Completed further discussion of our main areas of be accountable to the American public. Actions sections) on www.reginfo.gov. responsibility, see the DHS Web site at DHS is also committed to the Some of the entries on this list, http://www.dhs.gov/our-mission. principles described in Executive however, are active rulemakings. You The regulations we have summarized Orders 13563 and 12866 (as amended). can find entries for these rulemakings below in the Department’s fall 2015 Both Executive Orders direct agencies to on www.regulations.gov.

RIN Rule

1601–AA58 ...... Professional Conduct for Practitioners Rules and Procedures, and Representation and Appearances 1615–AB95 ...... Immigration Benefits Business Transformation, Increment II; Nonimmigrants Classes. 1615–AC00 ...... Enhancing Opportunities for H–1B1, CW–1, and E–3 Nonimmigrants and EB–1 Immigrants. 1625–AB38 ...... Updates to Maritime Security. 1625–AB80 ...... Revision to Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Requirements for Mariners. 1625–AC15 ...... Seafarers’ Access to Maritime Facilities. 1651–AA96 ...... Definition of Form I–94 to Include Electronic Format. 1651–AB05 ...... Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Procedures. 1653–AA63 ...... Adjustments to Limitations on Designated School Official Assignment and Study By F–2 and M–2 Nonimmigrants.

Promoting International Regulatory following regulatory actions that have (search the Completed Actions sections) Cooperation significant international impacts. Some on www.reginfo.gov. Some of the entries of the regulatory actions on the below on this list, however, are active Pursuant to sections 3 and 4(b) of list may be completed actions. You can rulemakings. You can find entries for Executive Order 13609 ‘‘Promoting find more information about these these rulemakings on International Regulatory Cooperation’’ completed rulemakings in past www.regulations.gov. (May 1, 2012), DHS has identified the publications of the Unified Agenda

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77777

RIN Rule

1625–AB38 ...... Updates to Maritime Security. 1651–AA70 ...... Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements. 1651–AA72 ...... Changes to the Visa Waiver Program To Implement the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) Pro- gram. 1651–AA98 ...... Amendments to Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements. 1651–AA96 ...... Definition of Form I–94 to Include Electronic Format.

DHS participates in some programs. In addition, it includes determinations that their international regulatory cooperation regulations from the Department’s major entrepreneurial activities in the United activities that are reasonably anticipated offices and directorates such as the States will provide the United States to lead to significant regulations. For National Protection and Programs with a significant public benefit. Parole example, the U.S. Coast Guard is the Directorate (NPPD). Below is a under these conditions would allow primary U.S. representative to the discussion of the fall 2015 regulatory individuals who have been awarded International Maritime Organization plan for DHS regulatory components, substantial U.S. investor financing or (IMO) and plays a major leadership role offices, and directorates. otherwise hold the promise of in establishing international standards innovation and job creation through the United States Citizenship and in the global maritime community. development of new technologies or the Immigration Services IMO’s work to establish international pursuit of cutting edge research to standards for maritime safety, security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration pursue development of startup and environmental protection closely Services (USCIS) administers businesses in the United States. This aligns with the U.S. Coast Guard immigration benefits and services while would provide an opportunity for much regulations. As an IMO member nation, protecting and securing our homeland. needed innovation and job creation in the U.S. is obliged to incorporate IMO USCIS has a strong commitment to the United States. treaty provisions not already part of U.S. welcoming individuals who seek entry Enhancing Opportunities for High- domestic policy into regulations for through the U.S. immigration system, Skilled Workers. DHS will issue a final those vessels affected by the providing clear and useful information rule following its May 2014, proposed international standards. Consequently, regarding the immigration process, rule designed to encourage and facilitate the U.S. Coast Guard initiates promoting the values of citizenship, and the employment and retention of certain rulemakings to harmonize with IMO assisting those in need of humanitarian high-skilled and transitional workers. international standards such as treaty protection. Based on a comprehensive As proposed, the rule would amend provisions and the codes, conventions, review of the planned USCIS regulatory regulations affecting high-skilled resolutions, and circulars that agenda, USCIS will promulgate several workers within the nonimmigrant supplement them. rulemakings to directly support these classifications for specialty occupation Also, President Obama and Prime commitments and goals. professionals from Chile and Singapore Minister Harper created the Canada-U.S. (H–1B1) and from Australia (E–3), to Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Regulations To Facilitate Retention of include these classifications in the list in February 2011. The RCC is an High-Skilled Workers and of classes of aliens authorized for initiative between both Federal Entrepreneurs employment incident to status with a Governments aimed at pursuing greater Employment-Based Immigration specific employer, to extend automatic alignment in regulation, increasing Modernization. USCIS will propose to employment authorization extensions mutual recognition of regulatory implement certain provisions of the with pending extension of stay requests, practices and establishing smarter, more American Competitiveness and and to update filing procedures. The effective and less burdensome Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 rule would also amend regulations regulations in specific sectors. The and the American Competitiveness in regarding continued employment Canada-U.S. RCC initiative arose out of the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000, authorization for nonimmigrant workers the recognition that high level, focused, Public Law 106–313, as amended by the in the Commonwealth of the Northern and sustained effort would be required Twenty-First Century Department of Mariana Islands (CNMI)-only to reach a more substantive level of Justice Appropriations Authorization Transitional Worker (CW–1) regulatory cooperation. Since its Act of 2002, Public Law 107–273. classification. Finally, the rule would creation in early 2011, the U.S. Coast USCIS will seek public feedback in amend regulations related to the Guard has participated in stakeholder codifying its interpretation of these immigration classification for consultations with their Transport statutes. Additionally, USCIS will employment-based first preference (EB– Canada counterparts and the public, propose to amend its regulations to 1) outstanding professors or researchers drafted items for inclusion in the RCC provide greater stability and job to allow the submission of comparable Action Plan, and detailed work plans for flexibility to certain beneficiaries of evidence. These changes would each included Action Plan item. approved employment-based immigrant encourage and facilitate the The fall 2015 regulatory plan for DHS petitions during their transition from employment and retention of these includes regulations from DHS nonimmigrant to lawful permanent high-skilled workers. components—including U.S. residence status and to enable U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services businesses to hire and retain highly- Improvements to the Immigration (USCIS), the U.S. Coast Guard (Coast skilled foreign-born workers. System Guard), U.S. Customs and Border Significant Public Benefit Parole for Provisional Unlawful Presence Protection (CBP), the U.S. Immigration Entrepreneurs. USCIS will propose to Waivers. DHS will issue a final rule and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the establish conditions for paroling foreign following its July 2015, proposed rule Transportation Security Administration entrepreneurs into the United States regarding the provisional unlawful (TSA), which have active regulatory based on case-by-case discretionary presence waiver process. As proposed,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77778 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

this rule would expand access to the requirements for these vulnerable search and rescue. The Coast Guard provisional unlawful presence waiver groups, their advocates, and the supports the Department’s overarching program to additional aliens for whom community through these regulatory goals of mobilizing and organizing our an immigrant visa is immediately initiatives. These rulemakings will Nation to secure the homeland from available and who can show extreme contain provisions to adjust terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and hardship to a qualifying U.S. citizen or documentary requirements for this other emergencies. The rulemaking lawful permanent resident spouse or vulnerable population and provide projects identified for the Coast Guard parent. greater clarity to the law enforcement in the Unified Agenda, and the rules Requirements for Filing Motions and community. appearing in the fall 2015 Regulatory Administrative Appeals. USCIS will Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions. Plan below, contribute to the fulfillment propose to revise the procedural This final rule makes procedural of those responsibilities and reflect our regulations governing appeals and changes and resolves interpretive issues regulatory policies. motions to reopen or reconsider before following the amendments mandated by its Administrative Appeals Office, and Congress. It will enable child aliens who Inspection of Towing Vessels. The to require that applicants and have been abused, neglected, or Coast Guard has proposed regulations petitioners exhaust administrative abandoned and placed under the governing the inspection of towing remedies before seeking judicial review jurisdiction of a juvenile court or placed vessels, including an optional safety of an unfavorable decision. The changes with an individual or entity, to obtain management system. The regulations for proposed by the rule will streamline the classification as Special Immigrant this large class of vessels would procedures before the Administrative Juvenile. Such classification can establish operations, lifesaving, fire Appeals Office and improve the regularize immigration status for these protection, machinery and electrical efficiency of the adjudication process. aliens and allow for adjustment of status systems and equipment, and Regulations Related to the to lawful permanent resident. construction and arrangement standards Commonwealth of Northern Mariana for towing vessels. This rulemaking also Islands. This final rule amends DHS and United States Coast Guard sets standards for the optional towing Department of Justice (DOJ) regulations The U.S. Coast Guard (Coast Guard) is safety management system (TSMS) and to comply with the Consolidated a military, multi-mission, maritime related third-party organizations, as well Natural Resources Act of 2008 (CNRA). service of the United States and the only as procedures for obtaining a certificate The CNRA extends the immigration military organization within DHS. It is of inspection under either the TSMS or laws of the United States to the the principal Federal agency responsible Coast Guard annual-inspection option. Consolidated Northern Mariana Islands for maritime safety, security, and This rulemaking would implement (CNMI). In 2009, USCIS issued an stewardship and delivers daily value to section 415 of the Coast Guard and interim final rule to implement the Nation through multi-mission Maritime Transportation Act of 2004. conforming amendments to the DHS resources, authorities, and capabilities. The intent of this rulemaking, which and DOJ regulations. This joint DHS– Effective governance in the maritime would create 46 CFR, subchapter M, is DOJ final rule titled ‘‘Application of domain hinges upon an integrated to promote safer work practices and Immigration Regulations to the CNMI’’ approach to safety, security, and reduce towing vessel casualties. would finalize the 2009 interim final stewardship. The Coast Guard’s policies Transportation Worker Identification rule. and capabilities are integrated and interdependent, delivering results Credential (TWIC)—Reader Regulatory Changes Involving through a network of enduring Requirements. In accordance with the Humanitarian Benefits partnerships. The Coast Guard’s ability Maritime Transportation Safety Act of Exception to the Persecution Bar for to field versatile capabilities and highly- 2002 (MTSA) and the Security and Asylum, Refugee, or Temporary trained personnel is one of the U.S. Accountability For Every Port Act of Protected Status, and Withholding of Government’s most significant and 2006 (SAFE Port Act), the Coast Guard Removal. In a joint rulemaking, DHS important strengths in the maritime is establishing rules requiring electronic and DOJ will propose amendments to environment. TWIC readers at high-risk vessels and existing DHS and DOJ regulations to America is a maritime nation, and our facilities. These rules would ensure that resolve ambiguity in the statutory security, resilience, and economic prior to being granted unescorted access language precluding eligibility for prosperity are intrinsically linked to the to a designated secure area at a high-risk asylum, refugee resettlement, temporary oceans. Safety, efficient waterways, and vessel or facility: (1) The individual will protected status, and withholding or freedom of transit on the high seas are have his or her TWIC electronically removal of an applicant who ordered, essential to our well-being. The Coast authenticated; (2) the status of the incited, assisted, or otherwise Guard is leaning forward, poised to individual’s credential will be participated in the persecution of meet the demands of the modern electronically validated against an up- others. The proposed rule would maritime environment. The Coast Guard to-date list maintained by the TSA; and provide a limited exception for creates value for the public through (3) the individual’s identity will be persecutory actions taken by the solid prevention and response efforts. electronically confirmed by comparing applicant under duress and would Activities involving oversight and his or her fingerprint or other biometric clarify the required level of the regulation, enforcement, maritime sample with a biometric template stored applicant’s knowledge of the presence, and public and private on the credential. By promulgating these persecution. partnership foster increased maritime rules, the Coast Guard is complying ‘‘T’’ and ‘‘U’’ Nonimmigrants. USCIS safety, security, and stewardship. with the statutory requirement in the plans additional regulatory initiatives The statutory responsibilities of the SAFE Port Act, improving security at related to T nonimmigrants (victims of Coast Guard include ensuring marine the highest risk vessels and facilities, trafficking) and U nonimmigrants safety and security, preserving maritime and making full use of the electronic (victims of criminal activity). USCIS mobility, protecting the marine and biometric security features hopes to provide greater consistency in environment, enforcing U.S. laws and integrated into the TWIC and mandated eligibility, application, and procedural international treaties, and performing by Congress in MTSA.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77779

United States Customs and Border determines to be reasonably necessary In addition to the regulations that CBP Protection to ensure cargo safety and security. issues to promote DHS’s mission, CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP’s current Trade Act regulations also issues regulations related to the (CBP) is the Federal agency principally pertaining to air cargo require the mission of the Department of the responsible for the security of our electronic submission of various Treasury. Under section 403(1) of the Nation’s borders, both at and between advance data to CBP no later than either Homeland Security Act of 2002, the the ports of entry and at official the time of departure of the aircraft for former-U.S. Customs Service, including crossings into the United States. CBP the United States (from specified functions of the Secretary of the must accomplish its border security and locations) or four hours prior to arrival Treasury relating thereto, transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security. As enforcement mission without stifling in the United States for all other part of the initial organization of DHS, the flow of legitimate trade and travel. locations. CBP intends to propose the Customs Service inspection and The primary mission of CBP is its amendments to these regulations to trade functions were combined with the homeland security mission, that is, to implement the Air Cargo Advance immigration and agricultural inspection prevent terrorists and terrorist weapons Screening (ACAS) program. To improve functions and the Border Patrol and from entering the United States. An CBP’s risk assessment and targeting transferred into CBP. It is noted that important aspect of this priority mission capabilities and to enable CBP to target certain regulatory authority of the U.S. involves improving security at our and identify risky cargo prior to Customs Service relating to customs borders and ports of entry, but it also departure of the aircraft to the United revenue function was retained by the means extending our zone of security States, ACAS would require the Department of the Treasury (see the beyond our physical borders. submission of certain of the advance CBP is also responsible for electronic information for air cargo Department of the Treasury Regulatory administering laws concerning the earlier in the process. In most cases, the Plan). In addition to its plans to importation into the United States of information would have to be submitted continue issuing regulations to enhance goods, and enforcing the laws as early as practicable but no later than border security, CBP, during fiscal year concerning the entry of persons into the prior to the loading of cargo onto an 2016, expects to continue to issue United States. This includes regulating aircraft at the last foreign port of regulatory documents that will facilitate and facilitating international trade; departure to the United States. CBP, in legitimate trade and implement trade collecting import duties; enforcing U.S. conjunction with TSA, has been benefit programs. CBP regulations trade, immigration and other laws of the operating ACAS as a voluntary pilot regarding the customs revenue function United States at our borders; inspecting program since 2010 and would like to are discussed in the Regulatory Plan of imports, overseeing the activities of implement ACAS as a regulatory the Department of the Treasury. persons and businesses engaged in program. Federal Emergency Management importing; enforcing the laws Definition of Form I–94 to Include Agency Electronic Format. DHS issues the Form concerning smuggling and trafficking in The Federal Emergency Management I–94 to certain aliens and uses the Form contraband; apprehending individuals Agency (FEMA) does not have any I–94 for various purposes such as attempting to enter the United States significant regulatory actions planned documenting status in the United States, illegally; protecting our agriculture and for fiscal year 2016. economic interests from harmful pests the approved length of stay, and and diseases; servicing all people, departure. DHS generally issues the Federal Law Enforcement Training vehicles and cargo entering the United Form I–94 to aliens at the time they Center States; maintaining export controls; and lawfully enter the United States. On The Federal Law Enforcement protecting U.S. businesses from theft of March 27, 2013, CBP published an Training Center (FLETC) does not have their intellectual property. interim final rule amending existing any significant regulatory actions In carrying out its priority mission, regulations to add a new definition of planned for fiscal year 2016. CBP’s goal is to facilitate the processing the term ‘‘Form I–94.’’ The new of legitimate trade and people efficiently definition includes the collection of United States Immigration and Customs without compromising security. arrival/departure and admission or Enforcement Consistent with its primary mission of parole information by DHS, whether in ICE is the principal criminal homeland security, CBP intends to issue paper or electronic format. The investigative arm of the Department of several rules during the next fiscal year definition also clarified various terms Homeland Security and one of the three that are intended to improve security at that are associated with the use of the Department components charged with our borders and ports of entry. CBP is Form I–94 to accommodate an the civil enforcement of the Nation’s also automating some procedures that electronic version of the Form I–94. The immigration laws. Its primary mission is increase efficiencies and reduce the rule also added a valid, unexpired to protect national security, public costs and burdens to travelers. We have nonimmigrant DHS admission or parole safety, and the integrity of our borders highlighted two of these rules below. stamp in a foreign passport to the list of through the criminal and civil Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS). documents designated as evidence of enforcement of Federal law governing The Trade Act of 2002, as amended, alien registration. These revisions border control, customs, trade, and authorizes the Secretary of Homeland enabled DHS to transition to an immigration. During fiscal year 2016, Security to promulgate regulations automated process whereby DHS creates ICE will focus rulemaking efforts on providing for the transmission to CBP a Form I–94 in an electronic format improvements in the area of student and through an electronic data interchange based on passenger, passport and visa exchange visitor programs and to system, of information pertaining to information that DHS obtains advance initiatives related to F–1 cargo to be brought into the United electronically from air and sea carriers nonimmigrant students: States or to be sent from the United and the Department of State as well as Improving and Expanding Training States, prior to the arrival or departure through the inspection process. CBP Opportunities for F–1 Nonimmigrant of the cargo. The cargo information intends to publish a final rule during Students with STEM Degrees and required is that which the Secretary the next fiscal year. Expanding Cap-Gap Relief for All F–1

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77780 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Students With Pending H–1B Petitions. substantive modifications to CFATS carriers, and over-the-road bus operators The Department of Homeland Security based on public comments received on to conduct security training for front will propose a rule to enhance the ANPRM and based on program line employees. This regulation would opportunities for F–1 nonimmigrant implementation experience the implement sections 1408 (Public students graduating with a science, Department has gained since 2007. The Transportation), 1517 (Freight technology, engineering, or mathematics NPRM will also propose modifications Railroads), and 1534 (Over-the-Road (STEM) degree to further their courses to CFATS in order to align its regulatory Buses) of the Implementing of study through an extension of text with the requirements of the Recommendations of the 9/11 optional practical training (OPT) with Protecting and Securing Chemical Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act), employers enrolled in USCIS’s E-Verify Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of Public Law 110–53, August 3, 2007. In employment verification program. DHS 2014. Accordingly, the Department compliance with the definitions of anticipates that the rule would replace anticipates that the NPRM will propose frontline employees in the pertinent a 2008 interim final rule (IFR) that was both discretionary and non- provisions of the 9/11 Act, the Notice of recently held to be procedurally invalid, discretionary modifications to CFATS, Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) would and that is the subject of a temporarily with the goals of harmonizing the propose to define which employees are stayed vacatur. The proposed rule regulation with its statutory authority required to undergo training. The NPRM would enhance the academic benefit of and of making the CFATS program more would also propose definitions for the STEM extension and would help efficient and effective. transportation security-sensitive ensure that the nation’s colleges and Transportation Security Administration materials, as required by section 1501 of universities remain globally competitive the 9/11 Act. in attracting international STEM The Transportation Security students to study in the United States Administration (TSA) protects the Standardized Vetting, Adjudication, prior to returning to their home Nation’s transportation systems to and Redress Process and Fees. TSA is countries. ensure freedom of movement for people developing a proposed rule to establish and commerce. TSA is committed to and update fees, and revise and National Protection and Programs continuously setting the standard for standardize the procedures and Directorate excellence in transportation security adjudication criteria for most of the The National Protection and Programs through its people, processes, and security threat assessments (STAs) of Directorate’s (NPPD) vision is a safe, technology as we work to meet the individuals that TSA conducts. The secure, and resilient infrastructure immediate and long-term needs of the proposal would improve procedures for where the American way of life can transportation sector. conducting STAs for transportation thrive. NPPD leads the national effort to In fiscal year 2016, TSA will promote workers from almost all modes of protect and enhance the resilience of the the DHS mission by emphasizing transportation, including those covered nation’s physical and cyber regulatory efforts that will allow TSA to under the 9/11 Act. In addition, TSA infrastructure. better identify, detect, and protect will propose consistent and equitable Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism against threats against various modes of fees to cover the cost of the STAs. TSA Standards. Recognizing both the the transportation system, while plans to identify new efficiencies in importance of the nation’s chemical facilitating the efficient movement of processing STAs and ways to streamline facilities to the American way of life the traveling public, transportation existing regulations by simplifying and the need to secure high-risk workers, and cargo. language and removing redundancies. chemical facilities against terrorist Passenger Screening Using Advanced As part of this proposed rule, TSA will attacks, in December 2014 Congress Imaging Technology (AIT). TSA intends propose revisions to the Alien Flight passed and the President signed into to issue a final rule to amend its civil Student Program (AFSP) regulations. law the Protecting and Securing aviation regulations to address whether TSA published an IFR for the AFSP on Chemical Facilities from Terrorist screening and inspection of an September 20, 2004. TSA regulations Attacks Act of 2014, Pub. L. 113–254. individual, conducted to control access require aliens seeking to train at Federal This legislation provides the to the sterile area of an airport or to an Aviation Administration-regulated flight Department continuing authority to aircraft, may include the use of schools to complete an application and implement the Chemical Facility Anti- advanced imaging technology (AIT). undergo an STA prior to beginning Terrorism Standards (CFATS) regulatory TSA published an NPRM on March 26, flight training. There are four categories program, a unique regulatory program 2013, to comply with the decision under which students currently fall; the mandating that high-risk chemical rendered by the U.S. Court of Appeals nature of the STA depends on the facilities in the United States draft and for the District of Columbia Circuit in student’s category. TSA is considering implement security plans satisfying Electronic Privacy Information Center changes to the AFSP that would risk-based performance standards (EPIC) v. U.S. Department of Homeland improve equity among fee payers and established by DHS. Security on July 15, 2011, (653 F.3d 1 enable the implementation of new CFATS has been in effect since 2007, (D.C. Cir. 2011)). The Court directed technologies to support vetting. and on August 18, 2014, the Department TSA to conduct notice-and-comment published an Advance Notice of rulemaking on the use of AIT in the United States Secret Service Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in primary screening of passengers. order to seek public comment on ways Security Training for Surface Mode The United States Secret Service does to make the program more effective. The Employees. TSA will propose not have any significant regulatory Department will continue the regulations to enhance the security of actions planned for fiscal year 2016. rulemaking effort that commenced with several non-aviation modes of DHS Regulatory Plan for Fiscal Year the publication of that ANPRM, and transportation. In particular, TSA will 2016 intends to publish a Notice of Proposed propose regulations requiring freight Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing a railroad carriers, public transportation A more detailed description of the number of changes to the CFATS agencies (including rail mass transit and priority regulations that comprise DHS’s program. The NPRM will propose bus systems), passenger railroad fall 2015 regulatory plan follows.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77781

DHS—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY public to provide recommendations for Department of Justice Reauthorization (OS) possible program changes. DHS is Act of 2005. The Trafficking Victims reviewing the public comments received Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Proposed Rule Stage in response to the ANPRM, after which Public Law 110–457, made amendments 49. Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism DHS intends to publish a Notice of to the T nonimmigrant status provisions Standards (CFATS) Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). of the Immigration and Nationality Act Priority: Other Significant. Risks: (INA). The Violence Against Women’s Legal Authority: sec 550 of the Timetable: Reauthorization Act of 2013, Public Law Department of Homeland Security 113–4, made amendments to the T and Action Date FR Cite Appropriations Act of 2007 Pub. L. 109– U nonimmigrant status and the T and U 295, as amended adjustment of status provisions of the ANPRM ...... 08/18/14 79 FR 48693 Immigration and Nationality Act. The CFR Citation: 6 CFR 27. ANPRM Comment 10/17/14 Legal Deadline: None. Period End. Department of Homeland Security Abstract: The Department of NPRM ...... 07/00/16 (DHS) will issue a proposed rule to Homeland Security (DHS) previously propose the changes required by recent invited public comment on an advance Regulatory Flexibility Analysis legislation. notice of proposed rulemaking Required: Yes. Statement of Need: This regulation is (ANPRM) for potential revisions to the Small Entities Affected: Businesses. necessary to permit aliens in lawful T or Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Government Levels Affected: Federal, U nonimmigrant status, including Standards (CFATS) regulations. The Local, State. derivatives, to apply for adjustment of ANPRM provided an opportunity for the URL for More Information: status to that of lawful permanent public to provide recommendations for www.regulations.gov. residents. possible program changes. DHS is URL for Public Comments: Summary of Legal Basis: This reviewing the public comments received www.regulations.gov. regulation is necessary to permit aliens in response to the ANPRM, after which Agency Contact: Jon MacLaren, Chief, in lawful T or U nonimmigrant status to DHS intends to publish a Notice of Rulemaking Section, Department of apply for adjustment of status to that of Proposed Rulemaking. Homeland Security, National Protection lawful permanent residents. T Statement of Need: DHS intends to and Programs Directorate, Infrastructure nonimmigrant status is available to propose several potential program Security Compliance Division (NPPD/ aliens who are victims of a severe form changes to the CFATS regulation. These ISCD), 245 Murray Lane, Mail Stop of trafficking in persons and who have changes have been identified in the five 0610, Arlington, VA 20528–0610, assisted or are assisting law enforcement years since program implementation. Phone: 703 235–5263, Fax: 703 603– in the investigation or prosecution of In addition, in December 2014, a new 4935, Email: jon.m.maclaren@ the acts of trafficking. law (the Protecting and Securing hq.dhs.gov. U nonimmigrant status is available to Chemical Facilities from Terrorist RIN: 1601–AA69 aliens who are victims of certain Attacks Act of 2014) was enacted which qualifying criminal activity crimes and provides DHS continuing authority to have been, are being, or are likely to be implement CFATS. DHS must make helpful to the investigation or DHS—U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND several modifications and additions to prosecution of those crimes. IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) conform the CFATS regulation with the Alternatives: DHS did not consider new law. Proposed Rule Stage alternatives to managing T and U Summary of Legal Basis: The applications for adjustment of status. 50. Adjustment of Status to Lawful Protecting and Securing Chemical Ease of administration dictates that Permanent Resident for Aliens in T and Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of adjustment of status applications from T U Nonimmigrant Status 2014 (Pub. L. 113–254) added Title XXI and U nonimmigrants would be best to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 Priority: Other Significant. handled on a first in, first out basis, (HSA) to authorize in permanent law a Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. because that is the way applications for Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1101 to 1104; 8 U.S.C. T and U status are currently handled. Standards (CFATS) program. See 6 1182; 8 U.S.C. 1184; 8 U.S.C. 1187; 8 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS U.S.C. 621 et seq. Title XXI supersedes U.S.C. 1201; 8 U.S.C. 1224 to 1227; 8 uses fees to fund the cost of processing section 550 of the Department of U.S.C. 1252 to 1252a; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 22 applications and associated support Homeland Security Appropriations Act U.S.C. 7101; 22 U.S.C. 7105; Pub. L. benefits. In the 2008 interim final rule, of 2007, Pub. L. 109–295, under which 113–4 DHS estimated the fee collection the CFATS program was originally CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204; 8 CFR 214; resulting from this rule at approximately established in April 2007. Section 8 CFR 245. $3 million in the first year, $1.9 million 2107(a) of the HSA specifically Legal Deadline: None. in the second year, and an average about authorizes DHS to ‘‘promulgate Abstract: This rule sets forth measures $32 million in the third and subsequent regulations or amend existing CFATS by which certain victims of severe forms years. DHS is in the process of updating regulations to implement the provisions of trafficking who have been granted T these cost estimates. under [Title XXI]. 6 U.S.C. 627(a). In nonimmigrant status and victims of The anticipated benefits of these addition, section 2107(b)(2) of the HSA certain qualifying criminal activity who expenditures include: Continued requires DHS to repeal any existing have been granted U nonimmigrant assistance to trafficked and other CFATS regulation that [DHS] status may apply for adjustment of qualifying crime victims and their determines is duplicative of, or conflicts status to lawful permanent resident in families, increased investigation and with, [Title XXI]. 6 U.S.C. 627(b)(2). accordance with Public Law 106–386, prosecution of traffickers in persons and Alternatives: Victims of Trafficking and Violence other qualifying crimes, and the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Protection Act of 2000; and Public Law elimination of abuses caused by ANPRM provided an opportunity for the 109–162, Violence Against Women and trafficking and criminal activities.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77782 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Risks: While there is a limit of 5,000 procedures to be followed to petition for Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS adjustments based on T nonimmigrant the U nonimmigrant classifications. estimated the total annual cost of the status per fiscal year, there is no such Specifically, the rule would address the interim rule to petitioners to be $6.2 limit on those applying for adjustment essential elements that must be million in the interim final rule based on U nonimmigrant status. demonstrated to receive the published in 2007. This cost included Eligible applicants for adjustment of nonimmigrant classification, procedures the biometric services fee, the status based on T nonimmigrant status that must be followed to file a petition opportunity cost of time needed to will be placed on a waiting list and evidentiary guidance to assist in the submit the required forms, the maintained by U.S. Citizenship and petitioning process. Eligible victims opportunity cost of time required and Immigration Services (USCIS). would be allowed to remain in the cost of traveling to visit a USCIS Timetable: United States if granted U Application Support Center. DHS is nonimmigrant status. The Trafficking currently in the process of updating our Action Date FR Cite Victims Protection Reauthorization Act cost estimates since U nonimmigrant of 2008, Public Law 110–457, and the visa petitioners are no longer required to Interim Final Rule 12/12/08 73 FR 75540 Violence Against Women pay the biometric services fee. The Interim Final Rule 01/12/09 Reauthorization Act (VAWA) of 2013, anticipated benefits of these Effective. Public Law 113–4, made amendments to Interim Final Rule 02/10/09 expenditures include assistance to Comment Pe- the U nonimmigrant status provisions of victims of qualifying criminal activity riod End. the Immigration and Nationality Act. and their families and increases in NPRM ...... 10/00/16 The Department of Homeland Security arrests and prosecutions of criminals had issued an interim final rule in 2007. nationwide. Additional benefits include Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Statement of Need: This regulation is heightened awareness by law Required: No. necessary to allow alien victims of enforcement of victimization of aliens in Small Entities Affected: No. certain crimes to petition for U their community, and streamlining the Government Levels Affected: Federal, nonimmigrant status. U nonimmigrant petitioning process so that victims may Local, State. status is available to eligible victims of benefit from this immigration relief. Additional Information: CIS No. certain qualifying criminal activity who: Risks: There is a statutory cap of 2134–01 Transferred from RIN 1115– (1) Have suffered substantial physical or 10,000 principal U nonimmigrant visas AG21. mental abuse as a result of the that may be granted per fiscal year at 8 URL for More Information: qualifying criminal activity; (2) the alien U.S.C. 1184(p)(2). Eligible petitioners www.regulations.gov. possesses information about the crime; who are not granted principal U–1 URL for Public Comments: (3) the alien has been, is being, or is nonimmigrant status due solely to the www.regulations.gov. likely to be helpful in the investigation numerical limit will be placed on a Agency Contact: Maureen A. Dunn, or prosecution of the crime; and (4) the waiting list maintained by U.S. Chief, Family Immigration and Victim criminal activity took place in the Citizenship and Immigration Services Protection Division, Department of United States, including military (USCIS). To protect U–1 petitioners and Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship installations and Indian country, or the their families, USCIS will use various and Immigration Services, Office of territories or possessions of the United means to prevent the removal of U–1 Policy and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts States. This rule addresses the eligibility petitioners and their eligible family Avenue NW., Suite 1200, Washington, requirements that must be met for members on the waiting list, including DC 20529, Phone: 202 272–1470, Fax: classification as a U nonimmigrant alien exercising its authority to allow deferred 202 272–1480, Email: maureen.a.dunn@ and implements statutory amendments action, parole, and stays of removal, in uscis.dhs.gov. to these requirements, streamlines the cooperation with other DHS RIN: 1615–AA60 procedures to petition for U components. nonimmigrant status, and provides Timetable: evidentiary guidance to assist in the petition process. Action Date FR Cite DHS—USCIS Summary of Legal Basis: Congress 51. New Classification for Victims of created the U nonimmigrant Interim Final Rule 09/17/07 72 FR 53013 classification in the Battered Immigrant Interim Final Rule 10/17/07 Criminal Activity; Eligibility for the U Effective. Nonimmigrant Status Women Protection Act of 2000 (BIWPA) to provide immigration relief for alien Interim Final Rule 11/17/07 Priority: Other Significant. victims of certain qualifying criminal Comment Pe- Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. riod End. activity and who are helpful to law NPRM ...... 10/00/16 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1101 enforcement in the investigation or (note); 8 U.S.C. 1102; Pub. L. 113–4 prosecution of these crimes. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 204; Alternatives: To provide victims with Required: No. 8 CFR 212; 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 299. immigration benefits and services and Small Entities Affected: No. Legal Deadline: None. keeping in mind the purpose of the U Government Levels Affected: Federal, Abstract: This rule proposes new visa as a law enforcement tool, DHS is Local, State. application and eligibility requirements considering and using suggestions from Additional Information: Transferred for U nonimmigrant status. The U stakeholders in developing this from RIN 1115–AG39. classification is for non-U.S. citizen/ regulation. These suggestions came in URL for More Information: lawful permanent resident victims of the form of public comment from the www.regulations.gov. certain crimes who cooperate with an 2007 interim final rule as well as USCIS’ URL for Public Comments: investigation or prosecution of those six years of experience with the U www.regulations.gov. crimes. There is a limit of 10,000 nonimmigrant status program, including Agency Contact: Maureen A. Dunn, principals per fiscal year. This rule regular meetings and outreach events Chief, Family Immigration and Victim would propose to establish new with stakeholders and law enforcement. Protection Division, Department of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77783

Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship Alternatives: DHS did consider the DHS—USCIS and Immigration Services, Office of alternative of not publishing a 53. Requirements for Filing Motions Policy and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts rulemaking on these issues. To leave and Administrative Appeals Avenue NW., Suite 1200, Washington, this important area of the law without DC 20529, Phone: 202 272–1470, Fax: an administrative interpretation would Priority: Other Significant. Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 202 272–1480, Email: maureen.a.dunn@ confuse adjudicators and the public. uscis.dhs.gov. 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 RIN: 1615–AA67 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The U.S.C. 1304; 6 U.S.C. 112 programs affected by this rule exist so CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 204; that the United States may respond 8 CFR 205; 8 CFR 210; 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR effectively to global humanitarian 245a; 8 CFR 320; 8 CFR 105 (new); . . . DHS—USCIS situations and assist people who are in Legal Deadline: None. 52. Exception to the Persecution Bar for need. USCIS provides a number of Abstract: This proposed rule proposes Asylum, Refugee, and Temporary humanitarian programs and protection to revise the requirements and Protected Status, and Withholding of to assist individuals in need of shelter procedures for the filing of motions and Removal or aid from disasters, oppression, appeals before the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. emergency medical issues, and other Priority: Other Significant. Citizenship and Immigration Services Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 urgent circumstances. This rule will (USCIS), and its Administrative Appeals U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1158; 8 U.S.C. advance the humanitarian goals of the Office (AAO). The proposed changes are 1254a; Pub. L. 110–229 asylum/refugee program, and other CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1; 8 CFR 207; 8 intended to streamline the existing specialized programs. The main benefits processes for filing motions and appeals CFR 208; 8 CFR 240; 8 CFR 244; 8 CFR of such goals tend to be intangible and 1001; 8 CFR 1208; 8 CFR 1240. and will reduce delays in the review difficult to quantify in economic and and appellate process. This rule also Legal Deadline: None. monetary terms. These forms of relief Abstract: This joint rule proposes proposes additional changes amendments to Department of have not been available to individuals necessitated by the establishment of Homeland Security (DHS) and who engaged in persecution of others DHS and its components. The proposed Department of Justice (DOJ) regulations under duress. This rule will allow an changes are intended to promote to describe the circumstances under exception to this bar from protection for simplicity, accessibility, and efficiency which an applicant will continue to be applicants who can meet the in the administration of USCIS appeals. eligible for asylum, refugee, or appropriate evidentiary standard. The Department also solicits public temporary protected status, special rule Consequently, this rule may result in a comment on proposed changes to the cancellation of removal under the small increase in the number of AAO’s appellate jurisdiction. Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central applicants for humanitarian programs. Statement of Need: This rule proposes American Relief Act, and withholding To the extent a small increase in to make numerous changes to of removal, even if DHS or DOJ has applicants occurs, there could be streamline the current appeal and determined that the applicant’s actions additional fee costs incurred by these motion processes which: (1) Will result contributed, in some way to the applicants. in cost savings to the Government, persecution of others when the applicants, and petitioners; and (2) will Risks: If DHS were not to publish a applicant’s actions were taken under provide for a more efficient use of regulation, the public would face a duress. USCIS officer and clerical staff time, as Statement of Need: This rule resolves lengthy period of confusion on these well as more uniformity with Board of ambiguity in the statutory language issues. There could also be inconsistent Immigration Appeals appeal and motion precluding eligibility for asylum, interpretations of the statutory language, processes. refugee, and temporary protected status leading to significant litigation and Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301; of an applicant who ordered, incited, delay for the affected public. 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 8 U.S.C. assisted, or otherwise participated in the Timetable: 1101 and notes 1102, 1103, 1151, 1153, persecution of others. The proposed 1154, 1182, 1184, 1185 note (sec 7209 amendment would provide a limited Action Date FR Cite of Pub. L. 108–458; title VII of Pub. L. exception for actions taken by the 110–229), 1186a, 1187, 1221,1223, 1225 applicant under duress and clarify the NPRM ...... 10/00/16 to 1227, 1255a, and 1255a note, 1281, required levels of the applicant’s 1282, 1301 to 1305, 1324a, 1356, 1372, knowledge of the persecution. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 1379, 1409(c), 1443 to 1444, 1448, 1452, Summary of Legal Basis: In Negusie v. Required: No. 1455, 1641, 1731 to 1732; 31 U.S.C. Holder, 129 S. Ct. 1159 (2009), the 9701; 48 U.S.C. 1901, 1931 note; section Supreme Court addressed whether the Small Entities Affected: No. 643, Public Law 104–208, 110, Stat. persecutor bar should apply when an Government Levels Affected: None. 3009–708; section 141 of the Compacts alien’s actions were taken under duress. Agency Contact: Ronald W. Whitney, of Free Association with the Federated DHS believes that this is an appropriate Deputy Chief, Refugee and Asylum Law States of Micronesia and the Republic of subject for rulemaking and proposes to Division, Department of Homeland the Marshall Islands, and with the amend the applicable regulations to set Government of Palau; title VII of Public Security, U.S. Citizenship and out its interpretation of the statute. In Law 110–229; Public Law 107–296, 116 Immigration Services, Office of Chief developing this regulatory initiative, Stat. 2135 (6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); Public DHS has carefully considered the Counsel, 20 Massachusetts Avenue Law 82–414, 66 Stat. 173, 238, 254, 264; purpose and history behind enactment NW., Washington, DC 20529, Phone: title VII of Public Law 110–229; of the persecutor bar, including its 415 293–1244, Fax: 415 293–1269, Executive Order 12356. international law origins and the Email: [email protected]. Alternatives: The alternative to this criminal law concepts upon which they RIN: 1615–AB89 rule would be to continue under the are based. current process without change.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77784 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As a U.S.C. 1182(d)(5). No existing regulation and enforce the immigration and result of streamlining the appeal and explains how DHS determines what nationality laws, as well as INA section motion process, DHS anticipates provides a significant public benefit to 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5), which quantitative and qualitative benefits to the U.S. economy. This regulation refers to the Secretary’s discretionary DHS and the public. We also anticipate clarifies this standard with respect to authority to grant parole and provides cost savings to DHS and applicants as a entrepreneur parolees. DHS with regulatory authority to result of the proposed changes. This regulation focuses specifically on establish terms and conditions for Risks: the significant economic public benefit parole once authorized. Timetable: provided by foreign entrepreneurs because of the particular benefit they Alternatives: Action Date FR Cite bring to the U.S. economy. However, the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS full potential of foreign entrepreneurs to estimates the costs of the rule are NPRM ...... 10/00/16 benefit the U.S. economy is limited by directly linked to the application fee the fact that many foreign entrepreneurs and opportunity costs associated with Regulatory Flexibility Analysis do not qualify under existing Required: Yes. requesting significant public benefit nonimmigrant and immigrant parole. DHS does not estimate there will Small Entities Affected: Governmental classifications. Given the technical Jurisdictions. be any negative impacts to the U.S. nature of entrepreneurship, and the economy as a result of this rule. Government Levels Affected: None. limited guidance to date on what Additional Information: Previously Economic benefits can be expected from constitutes a significant public benefit, this rule, because some number of new 1615–AB29 (CIS 2311–04), which was DHS believes that it is necessary to withdrawn in 2007. establish the conditions of such an ventures and research endeavors will be Agency Contact: Charles ‘‘Locky’’ economically-based significant public conducted in the United States that Nimick, Deputy Chief, Department of benefit parole by regulation. Combined otherwise would not. It is reasonable to Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship with a unique application process, the assume that investment and research and Immigration Services, goal is to ensure that the high standard spending on new firms associated with Administrative Appeals Office, 20 set by the statute authorizing significant this proposed rule will directly and Massachusetts Avenue NW., public benefit parole is uniformly met indirectly benefit the U.S. economy and Washington, DC 20529–2090, Phone: across adjudications. job creation. In addition, innovation and 703 224–4501, Email: charles.nimick@ In this rule, DHS is proposing to research and development spending are usics.dhs.gov. establish the conditions for significant likely to generate new patents and new Related RIN: Duplicate of 1615–AB29 public benefit parole with respect to RIN: 1615–AB98 technologies, further enhancing certain entrepreneurs and start-up innovation. Some portion of the founders backed by U.S. investors or immigrant entrepreneurs likely to be grants. DHS believes that this proposal, attracted to this parole program may DHS—USCIS once implemented, would encourage develop high impact firms that can be entrepreneurs to create and develop 54. Significant Public Benefit Parole for expected to contribute start-up entities in the United States disproportionately to job creation. Entrepreneurs with high growth potential to create jobs Priority: Other Significant. Major for U.S. workers and benefit the U.S. Risks: status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is economy. U.S. competitiveness would Timetable: undetermined. increase by attracting more Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. entrepreneurs to the United States. This Action Date FR Cite 1182(d)(5)(A) proposal provides a fair, transparent, CFR Citation: 8 CFR 212.5. and predictable framework by which NPRM ...... 12/00/15 Legal Deadline: None. DHS will exercise its discretion to Abstract: The Department of adjudicate, on a case-by-case basis, such Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing parole requests under the existing Required: No. to establish a program that would allow statutory authority at INA section for consideration of parole into the 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5). Government Levels Affected: None. United States, on a case-by-case basis, of Lastly, this proposed rule provides a International Impacts: This regulatory certain inventors, researchers, and pathway, based on authority currently action will be likely to have entrepreneurs who will establish a U.S. provided to the Secretary, for international trade and investment start-up entity, and who have been entrepreneurs to develop businesses in effects, or otherwise be of international awarded substantial U.S. investor the United States, create jobs for U.S. interest. financing or otherwise hold the promise workers, and, at the same time, establish Agency Contact: Kevin J. Cummings, of innovation and job creation through a track record of experience and/or the development of new technologies or accomplishments. Such a track record Chief, Business and Foreign Workers the pursuit of cutting edge research. may lead to meeting eligibility Division, Department of Homeland Based on investment, job-creation, and requirements for existing nonimmigrant Security, U.S. Citizenship and other factors, the entrepreneur may be or immigrant classifications. Immigration Services, Office of Policy eligible for temporary parole. Summary of Legal Basis: The and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts Avenue Statement of Need: The Immigration Secretary’s authority for this proposed NW., Washington, DC 20529–2140, and Nationality Act (INA) authorizes the regulatory amendment can be found in Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– Secretary, in the exercise of discretion, the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ to parole arriving aliens into the United Public Law 107–296, section 102, 116 uscis.dhs.gov. States on a case-by-case basis for urgent Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 112, and INA RIN: 1615–AC04 humanitarian reasons or significant section 103, 8 U.S.C. 1103, which give public benefit. INA section 212(d)(5), 8 the Secretary the authority to administer

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77785

DHS—USCIS 102 of the Homeland Security Act of Floor, Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 55. Retention of EB–1, EB–2, and EB–3 2002, Public Law 107–296, 116 Stat. Massachusetts Avenue NW., Immigrant Workers and Program 2135, 6 U.S.C. 112, and section 103(a) Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– Improvements Affecting Highly-Skilled of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1470, Fax: 202 272–1480, Email: H–1B Alien Workers (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), which authorize [email protected]. the Secretary to administer and enforce Related RIN: Related to 1615–AB97 Priority: Other Significant. Major the immigration and nationality laws. In RIN: 1615–AC05 under 5 U.S.C. 801. pertinent part, ACWIA authorized the Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 112; 8 U.S.C. Secretary to impose a fee on certain H– 1154 and 1155; 8 U.S.C. 1184; 8 U.S.C. 1B petitioners which would be used to DHS—USCIS 1255; 8 U.S.C. 1324a train American workers, and AC21 CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204 to 205; 8 provides authority to increase access to Final Rule Stage U.S.C. 214; 8 CFR 245; 8 CFR 274a. Legal Deadline: None. foreign workers as well as to train U.S. 56. Classification for Victims of Severe Abstract: The Department of workers. In addition, section Forms of Trafficking in Persons; Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing 274A(h)(3)(B) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. Eligibility for T Nonimmigrant Status to amend its regulations affecting 1324a(h)(3)(B), recognizes the Secretary’s authority to extend Priority: Other Significant. certain employment-based immigrant Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. and nonimmigrant classifications. This employment to noncitizens in the United States, and section 205 of the 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1101 to 1104; 8 U.S.C. rule proposes to amend current 1182; 8 U.S.C. 1184; 8 U.S.C. 1187; 8 regulations to provide stability and job INA, 8 U.S.C. 1155, recognizes the Secretary’s authority to exercise U.S.C. 1201; 8 U.S.C. 1224 to 1227; 8 flexibility for the beneficiaries of U.S.C. 1252 to 1252a; 22 U.S.C. 7101; 22 approved employment-based immigrant discretion in determining the revocability of any petition approved by U.S.C. 7105; Pub. L. 113–4 visa petitions while they wait to become CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 212; lawful permanent residents. DHS is also him under section 204 of the INA. Alternatives: The alternative would be 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 274a; 8 CFR 299. proposing to conform its regulations Legal Deadline: None. with the American Competitiveness in to continue under current procedures Abstract: The T nonimmigrant the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 without change. classification was created by the Victims Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The (AC21) as amended by the Twenty-First of Trafficking and Violence Protection proposed amendments would increase Century Department of Justice Act of 2000, Public Law 106–386. The the incentive of highly-skilled and other Appropriations Authorization Act (the classification was designed for eligible foreign workers who have begun the 21st Century DOJ Appropriations Act), victims of severe forms of trafficking in immigration process to remain in and as well as the American persons who aid law enforcement with contribute to the U.S. economy as they Competitiveness and Workforce their investigation or prosecution of the complete the process to adjust status to Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA). The traffickers, and who can establish that or otherwise acquire lawful permanent rule also seeks to clarify several they would suffer extreme hardship resident status, thereby minimizing interpretive questions raised by ACWIA involving unusual and severe harm if disruptions to petitioning U.S. and AC21 regarding H–1B petitions, and they were removed from the United employers. Attracting and retaining incorporate relevant AC21 policy States. The rule streamlines application highly-skilled persons is important memoranda and an Administrative procedures and responsibilities for the when considering the contributions of Appeals Office precedent decision, and Department of Homeland Security these individuals to the U.S. economy, would ensure that DHS practice is (DHS) and provides guidance to the including advances in entrepreneurial consistent with them. public on how to meet certain Statement of Need: This rule provides and research and development requirements to obtain T nonimmigrant needed stability and flexibility to endeavors, which are highly correlated status. Several reauthorizations, certain employment-based immigrants with overall economic growth and job including the Violence Against Women while they wait to become lawful creation. Reauthorization Act of 2013, Public Law Risks: permanent residents. These 113–4, have made amendments to the T Timetable: amendments would support U.S. nonimmigrant status provisions in the employers by better enabling them to Action Date FR Cite Immigration and Nationality Act. This hire and retain highly skilled and other rule implements those amendments. foreign workers. DHS proposes to NPRM ...... 12/00/15 Statement of Need: This rule accomplish this, in part, by addresses the essential elements that implementing certain provisions of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis must be demonstrated for classification ACWIA and AC21, as amended by the Required: Undetermined. as a T nonimmigrant alien and 21st Century DOJ Appropriations Act. Government Levels Affected: None. implements statutory amendments to The 21st Century DOJ Appropriations International Impacts: This regulatory these elements, streamlines the Authorization Act, which will impact action will be likely to have procedures to be followed by applicants certain foreign nationals seeking international trade and investment to apply for T nonimmigrant status, and permanent residency in the United effects, or otherwise be of international provides evidentiary guidance to assist States, as well as H–1B workers. interest. in the application process. Further, by clarifying interpretive Additional Information: 1615–AB97 Summary of Legal Basis: Section questions related to these provisions, will be merged under this rule, 1615– 107(e) of the Victims of Trafficking and this rulemaking would ensure that DHS AC05. Violence Protection Act of 2000 Public practice is consistent with statute. Agency Contact: Kevin Cummings, Law 106–386, as amended, established Summary of Legal Basis: The Branch Chief, Business and Foreign the T classification to provide authority of the Secretary of Homeland Workers Division, Department of immigration relief for certain eligible Security (Secretary) for these regulatory Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship victims of severe forms of trafficking in amendments can be found in section and Immigration Services, Second persons who assist law enforcement

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77786 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

authorities in investigating and and Immigration Services, Office of The Secretary and the Attorney General prosecuting the perpetrators of these Policy and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts are making conforming amendments to crimes. Avenue NW., Suite 1200, Washington, their respective regulations in this Alternatives: To provide victims with DC 20529, Phone: 202 272–1470, Fax: single rulemaking document. immigration benefits and services, 202 272–1480, Email: maureen.a.dunn@ Summary of Legal Basis: Congress keeping in mind the purpose of the T uscis.dhs.gov. extended the immigration laws of the visa to also serve as a law enforcement RIN: 1615–AA59 United States to the CNMI. The stated tool, DHS is considering and using purpose of the CNRA is to ensure suggestions from stakeholders in effective border control procedures, to developing this regulation. These DHS—USCIS properly address national security and suggestions came in the form of public homeland security concerns by comment to the 2002 interim final rule, 57. Application of Immigration extending U.S. immigration law to the as well as from over 10 years of Regulations to the Commonwealth of CNMI (phasing-out the CNMI’s experience with the T nonimmigrant the Northern Mariana Islands nonresident contract worker program status program, including regular Priority: Other Significant. while minimizing to the greatest extent meetings with stakeholders and regular Legal Authority: Pub. L. 110–229; 8 practicable the potential adverse outreach events. U.S.C. 1101 and note; 8 U.S.C. 1102; 8 economic and fiscal effects of that Anticipated Cost and Benefits: U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1182 and note; 8 phase-out), to maximize the CNMI’s Applicants for T nonimmigrant status U.S.C. 1184; 8 U.S.C. 1187; 8 U.S.C. potential for future economic and do not pay application or biometric fees. 1223; 8 U.S.C. 1225; 8 U.S.C. 1226; 8 business growth, and to assure worker The anticipated benefits of this rule U.S.C. 1227; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 8 U.S.C. protections from the potential for abuse include: Assistance to trafficked victims 1185 note; 8 U.S.C. 48; U.S.C. 1806; 8 and exploitation. and their families; an increase in the U.S.C. 1186a; 8 U.S.C. 1187; 8 U.S.C. Alternatives: number of cases brought forward for 1221; 8 U.S.C. 1281; 8 U.S.C. 1282; 8 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs: investigation and/or prosecution of U.S.C. 1301 to 1305 and 1372; Pub. L. The interim rule established basic traffickers in persons; heightened 104–208; Pub. L. 106–386; Compacts of provisions necessary for the application awareness by the law enforcement Free Association with the Federated of the INA to the CNMI and updated community of trafficking in persons; States of Micronesia and the Republic of definitions and existing DHS and DOJ and streamlining the application the Marshall Islands, and with the regulations in areas that were confusing process for victims. Government of Palau, sec 141; 48 U.S.C. or in conflict with how they are to be Risks: There is a 5,000-person limit to 1901 note and 1931 note; Pub. L. 105– applied to implement the INA in the the number of individuals who can be 100; Pub. L. 105–277; 8 U.S.C. 1324a CNMI. As such, that rule made no granted T–1 status per fiscal year. CFR Citation: 8 CFR 212.4(k)(1) and changes that had identifiable direct or Eligible applicants who are not granted (2); 8 CFR 214.16(a), (b), (c) and (d); 8 indirect economic impacts that could be T–1 status due solely to the numerical CFR 245.1(d)(1)(v) and (vi); 8 CFR quantified. Benefits: This final rule limit will be placed on a waiting list 274a.12(b)(24); 8 CFR 1245.1(d)(1)(v), makes regulatory changes in order to maintained by U.S. Citizenship and (vi), and (vii); 8 CFR 2. lessen the adverse impacts of the CNRA Immigration Services (USCIS). To Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, on employers and employees in the protect T–1 applicants and their November 28, 2009, Consolidated CNMI and assist the CNMI in its families, USCIS will use various means Natural Resources Act (CNRA) of 2008. transition to the INA. to prevent the removal of T–1 applicants Public Law 110–229, the Consolidated Risks: on the waiting list, and their family Natural Resources Act of 2008 (CNRA), Timetable: members who are eligible for derivative was enacted on May 8, 2008. Title VII T status, including its existing authority of this statute extended the provisions Action Date FR Cite to grant deferred action, parole, and of the Immigration and Nationality Act stays of removal, in cooperation with Interim Final Rule 10/28/09 74 FR 55725 (INA) to the Commonwealth of the other DHS components. Interim Final Rule 11/27/09 Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Timetable: Comment Pe- Abstract: This final rule amends the riod End. Action Date FR Cite Department of Homeland Security Correction ...... 12/22/09 74 FR 67969 (DHS) and the Department of Justice Final Action ...... 10/00/16 Interim Final Rule 01/31/02 67 FR 4784 (DOJ) regulations to comply with the Interim Final Rule 03/04/02 CNRA. The CNRA extends the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Effective. immigration laws of the United States to Required: No. Interim Final Rule 04/01/02 the CNMI. This rule finalizes the Small Entities Affected: No. Comment Pe- interim rule and implements Government Levels Affected: None. riod End. Interim Final Rule 06/00/16 conforming amendments to their Additional Information: CIS 2460–08. respective regulations. URL for More Information: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Statement of Need: This rule finalizes www.regulations.gov. Required: No. the interim rule to conform existing URL for Public Comments: Small Entities Affected: No. regulations with the CNRA. Some of the www.regulations.gov. Government Levels Affected: Federal, changes implemented under the CNRA Agency Contact: Kevin J. Cummings, Local, State. affect existing regulations governing Chief, Business and Foreign Workers Additional Information: Transferred both DHS immigration policy and Division, Department of Homeland from RIN 1115–AG19. procedures and proceedings before the Security, U.S. Citizenship and Agency Contact: Maureen A. Dunn, immigration judges and the Board. Immigration Services, Office of Policy Chief, Family Immigration and Victim Accordingly, it is necessary to make and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts Avenue Protection Division, Department of amendments both to the DHS NW., Washington, DC 20529–2140, Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship regulations and to the DOJ regulations. Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272–

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77787

1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ protection; and (5) creating a timeframe Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 uscis.dhs.gov. for adjudications. U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1151; 8 U.S.C. Related RIN: Related to 1615–AB76, Alternatives: DHS is considering and 1153; 8 U.S.C. 1154; 8 U.S.C. 1182; 8 Related to 1615–AB75 using suggestions from stakeholders to U.S.C. 1184; 8 U.S.C. 1186a; 8 U.S.C. RIN: 1615–AB77 keep in mind the vulnerable nature of 1255; 8 U.S.C. 1641; 8 U.S.C. 1187; 8 abused, abandoned and neglected U.S.C. 1221; 8 U.S.C. 1281; 8 U.S.C. children in developing this regulation. 1282; 8 U.S.C. 1301–1305 and 1372; These suggestions came in the form of Pub. L. 104–208, sec 643; Pub. L. 106– DHS—USCIS public comment from the 2011 386; Compacts of Free Association with 58. Special Immigrant Juvenile proposed rule. the Federated States of Micronesia and Petitions Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In the the Republic of Marshall Islands, and Priority: Other Significant. 2011 proposed rule, DHS estimated with the Government of Palau, sec 141; Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 there would be no additional regulatory 48 U.S.C. 1901 note and 1931 note; Pub. U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1151; 8 U.S.C. compliance costs for petitioning L. 110–229; 8 U.S.C. 1258; 8 U.S.C. 1153; 8 U.S.C. 1154 individuals or any program costs for the 1324a; 48 U.S.C. 1806; 8 U.S.C. 1102 CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3)(ii)– CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204; 8 CFR 205; Government as a result of the proposed (iv); 8 CFR 214.1(c)(1); 8 CFR 248.3(a); 8 CFR 245. amendments. Qualitatively, DHS 8 CFR 274a.12(b)(9), (b)(20), (b)(23)– Legal Deadline: None. estimated that the proposed rule would (25); 8 CFR 2. Abstract: The Department of codify the practices and procedures Legal Deadline: None. Homeland Security (DHS) is amending currently implemented via internal policy directives issued by USCIS, Abstract: The Department of its regulations governing the Special Homeland Security (DHS) is updating Immigrant Juvenile (SIJ) classification thereby establishing clear guidance for petitioners. DHS is currently in the the regulations to include nonimmigrant and related applications for adjustment high-skilled specialty occupation of status to permanent resident. Special process of updating our final cost and benefit estimates. professionals from Chile and Singapore Immigrant Juvenile classification is a (H–1B1) and from Australia (E–3) in the humanitarian-based immigration Risks: The failure to promulgate a final rule in this area presents list of classes of aliens authorized for protection for children who cannot be employment incident to status with a reunified with one or both parents significant risk of further inconsistency and confusion in the law. The specific employer, to clarify that H–1B1 because of abuse, neglect, abandonment, and principal E–3 nonimmigrants are or a similar basis found under State law. Government’s interests in fair, efficient, and consistent adjudications would be allowed to work without having to This final rule implements updates to separately apply to DHS for eligibility requirements and other compromised. Timetable: employment authorization. DHS is also changes made by the Trafficking amending the regulations to provide Victims Protection Reauthorization Act Action Date FR Cite authorization for continued of 2008, Pub. L. 110–457. DHS received employment with the same employer if comments on the proposed rule in 2011 NPRM ...... 09/06/11 76 FR 54978 the employer has timely filed for an and intends to issue a final rule in the NPRM Comment 11/07/11 extension of the nonimmigrant’s stay. coming year. Period End. DHS is also providing for this same Statement of Need: This rule would Final Rule ...... 10/00/16 continued work authorization for address the eligibility requirements that Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana must be met for SIJ classification and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Islands (CNMI)—Only Transitional related adjustment of status, implement Required: No. Worker (CW–1) nonimmigrants if a statutory amendments to these Small Entities Affected: No. Petition for a CNMI-Only Nonimmigrant requirements, and provide procedural Government Levels Affected: Federal, Transitional Worker, Form I–129CW, is and evidentiary guidance to assist in the State. timely filed to apply for an extension of petition process. URL for More Information: stay. In addition, DHS is updating the Summary of Legal Basis: Congress www.regulations.gov. regulations describing the filing established the SIJ classification in the URL for Public Comments: procedures for extensions of stay and Immigration Act of 1990 (IMMACT). www.regulations.gov. change of status requests to include the The 1998 Appropriations Act amended Agency Contact: Maureen A. Dunn, principal E–3 and H–1B1 nonimmigrant the SIJ classification by limiting Chief, Family Immigration and Victim classifications. These changes eligibility to children declared Protection Division, Department of harmonize the regulations for E–3, H– dependent on a juvenile court because Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship 1B1, and CW–1 nonimmigrant of abuse, abandonment, or neglect and and Immigration Services, Office of classifications with existing regulations creating consent functions. The Policy and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts for other, similarly situated Trafficking Victims Protection Avenue NW., Suite 1200, Washington, nonimmigrant classifications. Finally, Reauthorization Act of 2008 made many DC 20529, Phone: 202 272–1470, Fax: DHS is expanding the current list of changes to the SIJ classification 202 272–1480, Email: maureen.a.dunn@ evidentiary criteria for employment- including: (1) Creating a requirement uscis.dhs.gov. based first preference (EB–1) that the petitioner’s reunification with RIN: 1615–AB81 outstanding professors and researchers one or both parents not be viable due to to allow the submission of evidence abuse, abandonment, neglect, or a comparable to the other forms of similar basis under State law; (2) DHS—USCIS evidence already listed in the expanding the population of children regulations. This harmonizes the who may be eligible to include those 59. Enhancing Opportunities for H–1B1, regulations for EB–1 outstanding placed by a juvenile court with an CW–1, and E–3 Nonimmigrants and EB– professors and researchers with other individual or entity; (3) modifying the 1 Immigrants employment-based immigrant categories consent functions; (4) providing age-out Priority: Other Significant. that already allow for submission of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77788 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

comparable evidence. DHS is amending file a petition with USCIS to make an Agency Contact: Kevin J. Cummings, the regulations to benefit these high- extension of stay or change of status Chief, Business and Foreign Workers skilled workers and CW–1 transitional request, simply codify current practice Division, Department of Homeland workers by removing unnecessary and impose no additional costs. Security, U.S. Citizenship and hurdles that place such workers at a Likewise, the regulatory amendments Immigration Services, Office of Policy disadvantage when compared to governing CW–1 nonimmigrants would and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts Avenue similarly situated workers in other visa not impose any additional costs for NW., Washington, DC 20529–2140, classifications. petitioning employers or for CW–1 Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– Statement of Need: As proposed, this nonimmigrant workers. The benefits of 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ rule would improve the programs the rule are to provide equity for CW– uscis.dhs.gov. serving the E–3, H–1B1, and CW–1 1 nonimmigrant workers whose RIN: 1615–AC00 nonimmigrant classifications and the extension of stay request is filed by the EB–1 immigrant classification for same employer relative to other CW–1 outstanding professors and researchers. nonimmigrant workers. Additionally, The proposed changes harmonize the this provision mitigates any potential DHS—USCIS regulations governing these distortion in the labor market for 60. Expansion of Provisional Unlawful classifications with regulations employers of CW–1 nonimmigrant Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility governing similar visa classifications by workers created by current inconsistent Priority: Other Significant. removing unnecessary hurdles that regulatory provisions which currently Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 place E–3, H–1B1, CW–1 and certain offer an incentive to file for extensions U.S.C. 1182 EB–1 workers at a disadvantage. of stay with new employers rather than Summary of Legal Basis: The CFR Citation: 8 CFR 212.7. current employers. The portion of the Legal Deadline: None. Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public rule addressing the evidentiary Law 107–296, section 102, 116 Stat. Abstract: The Department of requirements for the EB–1 outstanding Homeland Security (DHS) is amending 2135 (Nov. 25, 2002), 6 U.S.C. 112, and professor and researcher employment- its regulations to expand eligibility for the Immigration and Nationality Act of based immigrant classification allows the provisional unlawful presence 1952 (INA), charge the Secretary of for the submission of comparable waiver of certain grounds of Homeland Security (Secretary) with evidence (achievements not listed in the inadmissibility based on the accrual of administration and enforcement of the criteria such as important patents or unlawful presence to all aliens who are immigration and nationality laws. See prestigious, peer-reviewed funding statutorily eligible for a waiver of such INA section 103, 8 U.S.C. 1103. grants) for that listed in 8 CFR grounds, are seeking such a waiver in Alternatives: A number of the changes 204.5(i)(3)(i)(A) through (F) to establish connection with an immigrant visa are part of DHS’s Retrospective Review that the EB–1 professor or researcher is application, and meet other conditions. Plan for Existing Regulations. During recognized internationally as In relation to the statutory requirement development of DHS’s Retrospective outstanding in his or her academic field. that a waiver applicant must Review Plan, DHS received a comment Harmonizing the evidentiary demonstrate that the denial of the from the public requesting specific requirements for EB–1 outstanding waiver would result in extreme changes to the DHS regulations that professors and researchers with other hardship to a qualifying relative, DHS is govern continued work authorization for comparable employment-based eliminating the restrictions currently E–3 and H–1B1 nonimmigrants when an immigrant classifications provides contained in the provisional unlawful extension of status petition is timely equity for EB–1 outstanding professors presence regulation that limits the filed, and to expand the types of and researchers relative to those other qualifying relative to U.S. citizen evidence allowable in support of employment-based visa categories. immigrant petitions for outstanding Risks: spouses and parents. This rule permits researchers or professors. This rule is Timetable: an applicant for a provisional waiver to responsive to that comment, and with establish the eligibility requirement of the retrospective review principles of Action Date FR Cite showing extreme hardship to any Executive Order 13563. qualifying relative named in the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The E– NPRM ...... 05/12/14 79 FR 26870 statutory waiver provision namely a 3 and H–1B1 provisions do not impose NPRM Comment 07/11/14 U.S. citizen or lawful permanent any additional costs on petitioning Period End. resident spouses and parents. Final Action ...... 01/00/16 employers, individuals or Government Statement of Need: Currently, DHS entities, including the Federal Regulatory Flexibility Analysis allows certain immediate relatives who government. The regulatory Required: No. are in the United States to request a amendments provide equity for E–3 and Small Entities Affected: Businesses, provisional unlawful presence waiver H–1B1 nonimmigrants relative to other Organizations. before departing for consular processing employment-based nonimmigrants Government Levels Affected: None. of their immigrant visas. Currently, this listed in 8 CFR 274a.12.(b)(20). This International Impacts: This regulatory waiver process is only available to those provision may also allow employers of action will be likely to have immediate relatives whose sole ground E–3 or H–1B1 nonimmigrant workers to international trade and investment of inadmissibility would be unlawful avoid the cost of lost productivity effects, or otherwise be of international presence under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of resulting from interruptions of work interest. the Immigration and Nationality Act while an extension of stay petition is Additional Information: Includes (INA) and who can demonstrate that the pending. The regulatory changes that Retrospective Review under Executive denial of the waiver would result in clarify principal E–3 and H–1B1 Order 13563. extreme hardship to their U.S. citizen nonimmigrant classifications are URL for More Information: spouse or parent. employment authorized incident to www.regulations.gov. All other aliens seeking an immigrant status with a specific employer and that URL for Public Comments: visa through consular process who these nonimmigrant classifications must www.regulations.gov. require a waiver of inadmissibility to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77789

overcome the bars in INA section traveling abroad. Finally, this rule towing vessels by ensuring that towing 212(a)(9)(B)(i) must file the waiver at the would increase USCIS and DOS vessels adhere to prescribed safety end of the consular processing and after efficiencies by streamlining the waiver standards. This proposed rule was the consular immigrant visa interview. process for unlawful presence for the developed in cooperation with the Obtaining the waiver through this expanded group. Towing Vessel Safety Advisory process can be lengthy. These aliens Risks: Committee. It would establish a new typically have to wait abroad for at least Timetable: subchapter dedicated to towing vessels, several months for a decision on their covering vessel equipment, systems, waiver applications and until a visa can Action Date FR Cite operational standards, and inspection be issued. During this period, applicants requirements. must endure separation from the U.S. NPRM ...... 07/22/15 80 FR 43338 Summary of Legal Basis: Proposed citizen and lawful permanent resident NPRM Comment 09/21/15 new subchapter authority: 46 U.S.C. Period End. 3103, 3301, 3306, 3308, 3316, 8104, family members in the United States, Final Action ...... 04/00/16 which, in turn, often results in 8904; 33 CFR 1.05; DHS Delegation 0170.1. The Coast Guard and Maritime emotional and financial hardships to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Transportation Act of 2004 (CGMTA some U.S. citizens, lawful permanent Required: No. 2004), Public Law 108–293, 118 Stat. residents, and their families. Government Levels Affected: None. 1028, (Aug. 9, 2004), established new Inefficiencies in this waiver process also Agency Contact: Mark Phillips, Chief, authorities for towing vessels as follows: create costs for the Federal Government. Residence and Naturalization Division, As proposed, USCIS may grant a section 415 added towing vessels, as Department of Homeland Security, U.S. provisional unlawful presence waiver to defined in section 2101 of title 46, Citizenship and Immigration Services, aliens if they are statutorily eligible for United States Code (U.S.C.), as a class Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 an immigrant visa and for a waiver of of vessels that are subject to safety inadmissibility based on unlawful Massachusetts Avenue NW., inspections under chapter 33 of that presence. As proposed, this rule also Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– title (Id. at 1047). Section 415 also would expand who may be considered 1470, Email: mark.phillips@ added new section 3306(j) of title 46, a qualifying relative for purposes of the uscis.dhs.gov. authorizing the Secretary of Homeland extreme hardship determination to Related RIN: Related to 1615–AB99 Security to establish, by regulation, a include lawful permanent resident RIN: 1615–AC03 safety management system appropriate spouses and parents. The changes are for the characteristics, methods of made in the interest of family unity and operation, and nature of service of customer service. This rule also removes DHS—U.S. COAST GUARD (USCG) towing vessels (Id.). Section 409 added from the affected regulations all new section 8904(c) of title 46, U.S.C., unnecessary procedural instructions Final Rule Stage authorizing the Secretary to establish, regarding office names and locations, 61. Inspection of Towing Vessels by regulation, ‘‘maximum hours of position titles and responsibilities, and service (including recording and form numbers. These instructions are Priority: Other Significant. recordkeeping of that service) of often unnecessary, and unrestricted Legal Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3103; 46 individuals engaged on a towing vessel USCIS’ ability to better utilize its U.S.C. 3301; 46 U.S.C. 3306; 46 U.S.C. that is at least 26 feet in length resources and serve its customers. 3308; 46 U.S.C. 3316; 46 U.S.C. 3703; 46 measured from end to end over the deck Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301; U.S.C. 8104; 46 U.S.C. 8904; DHS (excluding the sheer).’’ (Id. at 1044–45.) 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1304, 1356; 31 Delegation No. 0170.1 Alternatives: We considered the U.S.C. 9701; Public Law 107296, 116 CFR Citation: 46 CFR 2; 46 CFR 15; following alternatives for the notice of Stat. 2135; 6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.; E.O. 12356, 46 CFR 136 to 144. proposed rulemaking (NPRM): One 47 FR 14874, 15557, 3 CFR, 1982 Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, regulatory alternative would be the Comp., p. 166; 8 CFR part 2; Public Law January 13, 2011. Final, Statutory, addition of towing vessels to one or 11254. 8 U.S.C. 1101 and note, 1102, October 15, 2011. On October 15, 2010, more existing subchapters that deal with 1103, 1182 and note, 1184, 1187, 1223, the Coast Guard Authorization Act of other inspected vessels, such as cargo 1225, 1226, 1227, 1255, 1359; 8 U.S.C. 2010 was enacted as Public Law 111– and miscellaneous vessels (subchapter 1185 note (section 7209 of Pub. L. 281. It requires that a proposed rule be I), offshore supply vessels (subchapter 108458); 8 CFR part 2. Section 212.1(q) issued within 90 days after enactment L), or small passenger vessels also issued under section 702, Public and that a final rule be issued within 1 (subchapter T). We do not believe, Law 110229, 122 Stat. 754, 854. year of enactment. however, that this approach would Alternatives: The alternative to this Abstract: This rulemaking would recognize the often ‘‘unique’’ nature and rule would be to continue under the implement a program of inspection for characteristics of the towing industry in current process without change. certification of towing vessels, which general and towing vessels in particular. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As a were previously uninspected. It would The same approach could be adopted result of expanding the population of prescribe standards for safety for use of a safety management system aliens who would benefit from a management systems and third-party by requiring compliance with title 33, streamlined immigrant visa process, auditors and surveyors, along with Code of Federal Regulations, part 96 DHS believes that both the affected standards for construction, operation, (Rules for the Safe Operation of Vessels population and the Federal Government vessel systems, safety equipment, and and Safety Management Systems). will benefit. In addition to reducing the recordkeeping. Adoption of these requirements, emotional hardship that U.S. citizen and Statement of Need: This rulemaking without an alternative safety lawful permanent resident families would implement section 415 of the management system, would also not be experience as a result of separation from Coast Guard and Maritime ‘‘appropriate for the characteristics, their alien relatives, DHS anticipates Transportation Act of 2004. The intent methods of operation, and nature of these families would experience fewer of the proposed rule is to promote safer service of towing vessels.’’ The Coast financial burdens associated with work practices and reduce casualties on Guard has had extensive public

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77790 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

involvement (four public meetings, over Towing vessel accidents result in reader rulemaking. During the 100 separate comments submitted to the fatalities, injuries, property damage, rulemaking process, we will take into docket, as well as extensive ongoing pollution, and delays. account the final pilot data and the dialogue with members of the Towing Timetable: various conditions in which TWIC Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC)) readers may be employed. For example, regarding development of these Action Date FR Cite we will consider the types of vessels regulations. Adoption of one of the and facilities that will use TWIC alternatives discussed above would NPRM ...... 08/11/11 76 FR 49976 readers, locations of secure and likely receive little public or industry Notice of Public 09/09/11 76 FR 55847 restricted areas, operational constraints, Meetings. support, especially considering the NPRM Comment 12/09/11 and need for accessibility. TSAC efforts toward development of Period End. Recordkeeping requirements, standards to be incorporated into a Final Rule ...... 02/00/16 amendments to security plans, and the separate subchapter dealing specifically requirement for data exchanges (i.e., with the inspection of towing vessels. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Canceled Card List) between TSA and An approach that would seem to be Required: Yes. vessel or facility owners/operators will more in keeping with the intent of Small Entities Affected: Businesses, also be addressed in this rulemaking. Congress would be the adoption of Governmental Jurisdictions, Statement of Need: The Maritime certain existing standards from those Organizations. Transportation Security Act (MTSA) of applied to other inspected vessels. In Government Levels Affected: State. 2002 explicitly required the issuance of some cases, these existing standards Additional Information: Docket ID a biometric transportation security card would be appropriately modified and USCG–2006–24412. to all U.S. merchant mariners and to tailored to the nature and operation of URL for More Information: workers requiring unescorted access to certain categories of towing vessels. The www.regulations.gov. secure areas of MTSA-regulated adopted standards would come from URL for Public Comments: facilities and vessels. On May 22, 2006, inspected vessels that have www.regulations.gov. the Transportation Security demonstrated ‘‘good marine practice’’ Agency Contact: LCDR William Administration (TSA) and the Coast within the maritime community. These Nabach, Project Manager, Office of Guard published a notice of proposed regulations would be incorporated into Operating & Environmental Standards, rulemaking (NPRM) to carry out this a subchapter specifically addressing the CG–OES–2, Department of Homeland statute, proposing a Transportation inspection for certification of towing Security, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) vessels. The law requiring the Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., STOP 7509, Program where TSA conducts security inspection for certification of towing Washington, DC 20593–7509, Phone: threat assessments and issues vessels is a statutory mandate, 202 372–1386, Email: identification credentials, while the compelling the Coast Guard to develop [email protected]. Coast Guard requires integration of the regulations appropriate for the nature of RIN: 1625–AB06 TWIC into the access control systems of towing vessels and their specific vessels, facilities, and Outer Continental industry. Shelf facilities. Based on comments Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We received during the public comment estimate that, as a result of this DHS—USCG period, TSA and the Coast Guard split rulemaking, owners and operators of 62. Transportation Worker the TWIC rule. The final TWIC rule, towing vessels would incur additional Identification Credential (TWIC); Card published in January 2007, addressed annualized costs, discounted at 7 Reader Requirements the issuance of the TWIC and use of the percent, in the range of $14.3 million to TWIC as a visual identification $17.1 million. The cost of this Priority: Other Significant. credential at access control points. In an rulemaking would involve provisions Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226; 33 ANPRM, published in March 2009, and for safety management systems, U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 701; 50 U.S.C. a NPRM, published in March 2013, the standards for construction, operation, 191; 50 U.S.C. 192; E.O. 12656 Coast Guard proposed a risk-based vessel systems, safety equipment, and CFR Citation: 33 CFR, subchapter H. approach to TWIC reader requirements recordkeeping. Our cost assessment Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, and included proposals to classify includes existing and new vessels. The August 20, 2010, SAFE Port Act, MTSA-regulated vessels and facilities Coast Guard developed the codified at 46 U.S.C. 70105(k). The final into one of three risk groups, based on requirements in the proposed rule by rule is required two years after the specific factors related to TSI researching both the human factors and commencement of the pilot program. consequence, and apply TWIC reader equipment failures that caused towing The final rule is required two years requirements for vessels and facilities in vessel accidents. We believe that the after the commencement of the pilot conjunction with their relative risk- proposed rule would address a wide program. group placement. This rulemaking is range of causes of towing vessel Abstract: The Coast Guard is necessary to comply with the SAFE Port accidents and supports the main goal of establishing electronic card reader Act and to complete the implementation improving safety in the towing industry. requirements for maritime facilities and of the TWIC Program in our ports. By The primary benefit of the proposed vessels to be used in combination with requiring electronic card readers at rule is an increase in vessel safety and TSA’s Transportation Worker vessels and facilities, the Coast Guard a resulting decrease in the risk of towing Identification Credential (TWIC). will further enhance port security and vessel accidents and their Congress enacted several statutory improve access control measures. consequences. We estimate an requirements within the Security and Summary of Legal Basis: The statutory annualized benefit of $28.5 million from Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port authorities for the Coast Guard to this rule. Act of 2006 to guide regulations prescribe, change, revise, or amend Risks: This regulatory action would pertaining to TWIC readers, including these regulations are provided under 33 reduce the risk of towing vessel the need to evaluate TSA’s final pilot U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. chapter accidents and their consequences. program report as part of the TWIC 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 192; Executive Order

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77791

12656, 3 CFR 1988 Comp., p. 585; 33 Action Date FR Cite address this risk by giving DHS the data CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–11, 6.14, 6.16, and it needs to improve targeting of the 6.19; Department of Homeland Security NPRM ...... 03/22/13 78 FR 20558 cargo prior to takeoff. Delegation No. 0170.1. NPRM Comment 05/10/13 78 FR 27335 Summary of Legal Basis: Alternatives: The implementation of Period Ex- Alternatives: In addition to the tended. TWIC reader requirements is mandated proposed rule, CBP analyzed two by the SAFE Port Act. We considered NPRM Comment 06/20/13 Period Ex- alternatives—Requiring the data several alternatives in the formulation of tended End. elements to be transmitted to CBP this proposal. These alternatives were Final Rule ...... 02/00/16 further in advance than the proposed based on risk analysis of different rule requires; and requiring fewer data combinations of facility and vessel Regulatory Flexibility Analysis elements. CBP concluded that the populations facing TWIC reader Required: Yes. proposal rule provides the most requirements. The preferred alternative Small Entities Affected: Businesses, favorable balance between security selected allowed the Coast Guard to Governmental Jurisdictions. outcomes and impacts to air target the highest risk entities while Government Levels Affected: None. transportation. minimizing the overall burden. Additional Information: Docket ID Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The USCG–2007–28915. improve CBP’s risk assessment and main cost drivers of this rule are the URL for More Information: targeting capabilities and to enable CBP acquisition and installation of TWIC www.regulations.gov. to target and identify risk cargo prior to readers and the maintenance of the URL for Public Comments: departure of the aircraft to the United affected entity’s TWIC reader system. www.regulations.gov. States, ACAS would require the Initial costs, which we would distribute Agency Contact: LT Mason Wilcox, submission of certain of the advance over a phased-in implementation Project Manager, Department of electronic information for air cargo period, consist predominantly of the Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, earlier in the process. In most cases, the costs to purchase, install, and integrate Commandant (CG–FAC–2), 2703 Martin information would have to be submitted approved TWIC readers into their Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., STOP 7501, as early as practicable, but no later than current physical access control system. Washington, DC 20593–7501, Phone: prior to the loading of cargo onto an Recurring annual costs will be driven by 202 372–1123, Email: mason.c.wilcox@ aircraft at the last foreign port of costs associated with canceled card list uscg.mil. departure to the United States. CBP, in updates, opportunity costs associated Related RIN: Related to 1625–AB02 with delays and replacement of TWICs RIN: 1625–AB21 conjunction with TSA, has been that cannot be read, and maintenance of operating ACAS as a voluntary pilot the affected entity’s TWIC reader program since 2010. CBP believes this system. As reported in the NPRM pilot program has proven successful by DHS—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER Regulatory Analysis, the total 10-year not only mitigating risks to the United PROTECTION (USCBP) total industry and government cost for States, but also minimizing costs to the the TWIC is $234.3 million Proposed Rule Stage private sector. As such, CBP is undiscounted and $186.1 discounted at proposing to transition the ACAS pilot 63. Air Cargo Advance Screening 7 percent. We estimate the annualized program into a permanent program. (ACAS) cost of this rule to industry to be $26.5 Costs of this program to carriers include million at a 7 percent discount rate. The Priority: Other Significant. one-time costs to upgrade systems to benefits of the rulemaking include the Legal Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2071 note facilitate transmission of these data to enhancement of the security of vessel CFR Citation: 19 CFR 122. CBP and recurring per transmission ports and other facilities by ensuring Legal Deadline: None. costs. Benefits of the program include that only individuals who hold valid Abstract: U.S. Customs and Border improved security that will result from TWICs are granted unescorted access to Protection (CBP) is proposing to amend having these data further in advance. secure areas at those locations. the implementing regulations of the Risks: Risks: USCG used risk-based decision- Trade Act of 2002 regarding the Timetable: making to develop this rulemaking. submission of advance electronic Based on this analysis, the Coast Guard information for air cargo and other Action Date FR Cite provisions to provide for the Air Cargo has proposed requiring higher-risk NPRM ...... 03/00/16 vessels and facilities to meet the Advance Screening (ACAS) program. requirements for electronic TWIC ACAS would require the submission of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis inspection, while continuing to allow certain advance electronic information Required: Undetermined. lower-risk vessels and facilities to use for air cargo. This will allow CBP to Government Levels Affected: TWIC as a visual identification better target and identify dangerous Undetermined. credential. cargo and ensure that any risk Timetable: associated with such cargo is mitigated International Impacts: This regulatory before the aircraft departs for the United action will be likely to have Action Date FR Cite States. CBP, in conjunction with international trade and investment Transportation Security Administration, effects, or otherwise be of international ANPRM ...... 03/27/09 74 FR 13360 has been operating ACAS as a voluntary interest. Notice of Public 04/15/09 74 FR 17444 pilot program since 2010 and would like Agency Contact: Craig Clark, Program Meeting. to implement ACAS as a regulatory Manager, Vessel Manifest & Importer ANPRM Comment 05/26/09 Period End. program. Security Filing, Office of Cargo and Notice of Public 05/26/09 Statement of Need: DHS has Conveyance Security, Department of Meeting Com- identified an elevated risk associated Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and ment Period with cargo being transported to the Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania End. United States by air. This rule will help Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20229,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77792 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Phone: 202 344–3052, Email: Summary of Legal Basis: Section develop a secure Web site, and fully [email protected]. 103(a) of the Immigration and automate the Form I–94 fully will equal RIN: 1651–AB04 Nationality Act (INA) generally about $1.3 million in calendar year authorizes the Secretary of Homeland 2012. CBP will incur costs of $0.09 Security to establish such regulations million in subsequent years to operate and prescribe such forms of reports, and maintain these systems. Aliens DHS—USCBP entries, and other papers necessary to arriving as diplomats and students Final Rule Stage carry out his or her authority to would bear costs when logging into the administer and enforce the immigration Web site and printing electronic I–94s. 64. Definition of Form I–94 To Include and nationality laws and to guard the The temporary workers and aliens in the Electronic Format borders of the United States against ’’Other/Unknown’’ category bear costs Priority: Other Significant. illegal entry of aliens. when logging into the Web site, Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 Alternatives: CBP considered two traveling to a location with public U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1201; 8 U.S.C. alternatives to this rule: eliminating the internet access, and printing a paper 1301; 8 U.S.C. 1303 to 1305; 5 U.S.C. paper Form I–94 in the air and sea copy of their electronic Form I–94. 301; Pub. L. 107–296, 116 stat 2135; 6 environments entirely and providing the Using the primary estimate for a U.S.C. 1 et seq. paper Form I–94 to all travelers who are traveler’s value of time, aliens would CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1.4; 8 CFR not B–1/B–2 travelers. Eliminating the bear costs between $36.6 million and 264.1(b). paper Form I–94 option for refugees, $46.4 million from 2013 to 2016. Total Legal Deadline: None. applicants for asylum, parolees, and costs for this rule for 2013 would range Abstract: The Form I–94 is issued to those travelers who request one would from $34.2 million to $40.1 million, certain aliens upon arrival in the United not result in a significant cost savings to with a primary estimate of costs equal CBP and would harm travelers who States or when changing status in the to $36.7 million. CBP, carriers, and have an immediate need for an United States. The Form I–94 is used to foreign travelers would accrue benefits electronic Form I–94 or who face document arrival and departure and as a result of this rule. CBP would save obstacles to accessing their electronic provides evidence of the terms of contract and printing costs of $15.6 Form I–94. A second alternative to the admission or parole. Customs and million per year of our analysis. Carriers rule is to provide a paper Form I–94 to Border Protection (CBP) is transitioning would save a total of $1.3 million in any travelers who are not B–1/B–2 to an automated process whereby it will printing costs per year. All aliens would travelers. Under this alternative, create a Form I–94 in an electronic save the eight-minute time burden for travelers would receive and complete format based on passenger, passport, filling out the paper Form I–94 and the paper Form I– 94 during their certain aliens who lose the Form I–94 and visa information currently obtained inspection when they arrive in the electronically from air and sea carriers would save the $330 fee and 25-minute United States. The electronic Form I–94 time burden for filling out the Form I– and the Department of State as well as would still be automatically created through the inspection process. Prior to 102. Using the primary estimate for a during the inspection, but the CBP traveler’s value of time, aliens would this rule, the Form I–94 was solely a officer would need to verify that the paper form that was completed by the obtain benefits between $112.6 million information appearing on the form and $141.6 million from 2013 to 2016. alien upon arrival. After the matches the information in CBP’s implementation of the Advance Total benefits for this rule for 2013 systems. In addition, CBP would need to would range from $110.7 million to Passenger Information System (APIS) write the Form I–94 number on each following 9/11, CBP began collecting $155.6 million, with a primary estimate paper Form I–94 so that their paper of benefits equal to $129.5 million. information on aliens traveling by air or form matches the electronic record. As sea to the United States electronically Overall, this rule results in substantial noted in the analysis, 25.1 percent of cost savings (benefits) for foreign from carriers in advance of arrival. For aliens are non-B–1/B–2 travelers. Filling aliens arriving in the United States by travelers, carriers, and CBP. CBP out and processing this many paper anticipates a net benefit in 2013 of air or sea, CBP obtains almost all of the Forms I–94 at airports and seaports information contained on the paper between $59.7 million and $98.7 would increase processing times million for foreign travelers, $1.3 Form I–94 electronically and in advance considerably. At the same time, it would via APIS. The few fields on the Form I– million for carriers, and $15.5 million only provide a small savings to the for CBP. Net benefits to U.S. entities 94 that are not collected via APIS are individual traveler. either already collected by the (carriers and CBP) in 2013 total $16.8 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: With million. CBP anticipates the total net Department of State and transmitted to the implementation of this rule, CBP CBP or can be collected by the CBP benefits to both domestic and foreign will no longer collect Form I–94 entities in 2013 range from $76.5 officer from the individual at the time information as a matter of course of inspection. This means that CBP no million to $115.5 million. In our directly from aliens traveling to the primary analysis, the total net benefits longer needs to collect Form I–94 United States by air or sea. Instead, CBP information as a matter of course are $92.8 million in 2013. For the will create an electronic Form I–94 for primary estimate, annualized net directly from aliens traveling to the foreign travelers based on the benefits range from $78.1 million to United States by air or sea. At this time, information in its databases. This rule $80.0 million, depending on the the automated process will apply only makes the necessary changes to the discount rate used. More information on to aliens arriving at air and sea ports of regulations to enable CBP to transition costs and benefits can be found in the entry. to an automated process. Both CBP and interim final rule. Statement of Need: This rule makes aliens would bear costs as a result of Risks: N/A. the necessary changes to the regulations this rule. CBP would bear costs to link Timetable: to enable CBP to transition to an its data systems and to build a Web site automated process whereby CBP will so aliens can access their electronic Action Date FR Cite create an electronic Form I–94 based on Forms I–94. CBP estimates that the total the information in its databases. cost for CBP to link data systems, Interim Final Rule 03/27/13 78 FR 18457

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77793

Action Date FR Cite road buses are due no later than 6 Engagement, Department of Homeland months after the date of enactment. Security, Transportation Security Interim Final Rule 04/26/13 Abstract: This rule would require Administration, 601 South 12th Street, Comment Pe- security awareness training for front- Arlington, VA 20598–6028, Phone: 571 riod End. line employees for potential terrorism- 227–1145, Fax: 571 227–2935, Email: Interim Final Rule 04/26/13 related security threats and conditions [email protected]. Effective. pursuant to the 9/11 Act. This rule Monica Grasso Ph.D., Manager, Final Action ...... 02/00/16 would apply to higher-risk public Economic Analysis Branch–Cross Modal Regulatory Flexibility Analysis transportation, freight rail, and over-the- Division, Department of Homeland Required: No. road bus owner/operators and take into Security, Transportation Security Government Levels Affected: None. consideration the many actions higher- Administration, Office of Security International Impacts: This regulatory risk owner/operators have already taken Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 action will be likely to have since 9/11 to enhance the baseline of South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– international trade and investment security through training of their 6028, Phone: 571 227–3329, Email: effects, or otherwise be of international employees. The rulemaking will also [email protected]. Traci Klemm, Assistant Chief Counsel interest. propose extending security coordinator for Multi-Modal Security Standards, Additional Information: Includes and reporting security incident Department of Homeland Security, Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. requirements applicable to rail operators Transportation Security Administration, URL for More Information: under current 49 CFR part 1580 to the Office of the Chief Counsel, 601 South www.regulations.gov. non-rail transportation components of 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6002, URL for Public Comments: covered public transportation agencies Phone: 571 227–3596, Email: www.regulations.gov. and over-the-road buses. [email protected]. Agency Contact: Suzanne Shepherd, Statement of Need: Employee training Related RIN: Related to 1652–AA56, Director, Electronic System for Travel is an important and effective tool for Merged with 1652–AA57, Merged with Authorization, Department of Homeland averting or mitigating potential attacks by those with malicious intent who may 1652–AA59 Security, U.S. Customs and Border RIN: 1652–AA55 Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue target surface transportation and plan or NW., Washington, DC 20229, Phone: perpetrate actions that may cause 202 344–2073, Email: significant injuries, loss of life, or [email protected]. economic disruption. DHS—TSA RIN: 1651–AA96 Summary of Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. 114; sections 1408, 1517, and 1534 of Final Rule Stage Public Law 110–53, Implementing 66. Passenger Screening Using Recommendations of the 9/11 Advanced Imaging Technology DHS—TRANSPORTATION SECURITY Commission Act of 2007 (Aug. 3, 2007; ADMINISTRATION (TSA) 121 Stat. 266). Priority: Economically Significant. Alternatives: TSA is required by Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Proposed Rule Stage statute to publish regulations requiring Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44925 65. Security Training for Surface Mode security training programs for these CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1540.107. Legal Deadline: None. Employees owner/operators. As part of its notice of Abstract: The Transportation Security proposed rulemaking, TSA will seek Priority: Other Significant. Administration (TSA) intends to issue a public comment on the alternative ways Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114; Pub. L. final rule to address whether screening in which the final rule could carry out 110–53, secs 1408, 1517, and 1534 and inspection of an individual, the requirements of the statute. CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1520; 49 CFR conducted to control access to the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA is 1570; 49 CFR 1580; 49 CFR 1582 (new); sterile area of an airport or to an aircraft, in the process of determining the costs 49 CFR 1584 (new). may include the use of advanced and benefits of this rulemaking. Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, imaging technology (AIT). The notice of November 1, 2007, Interim Rule for Risks: The Department of Homeland Security aims to prevent terrorist attacks proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was public transportation agencies is due 90 published on March 26, 2013, to comply days after date of enactment. within the United States and to reduce the vulnerability of the United States to with the decision rendered by the U.S. Final, Statutory, August 3, 2008, Rule Court of Appeals for the District of for public transportation agencies is due terrorism. By providing for security training for personnel, TSA intends in Columbia Circuit in Electronic Privacy one year after date of enactment. Information Center (EPIC) v. U.S. Final, Statutory, February 3, 2008, this rulemaking to reduce the risk of a terrorist attack on this transportation Department of Homeland Security on Rule for railroads and over-the-road July 15, 2011. 653 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. buses is due six months after date of sector. Timetable: 2011). The Court directed TSA to enactment. conduct notice and comment According to sec 1408 of Pub. L. 110– Action Date FR Cite rulemaking on the use of AIT in the 53, Implementing Recommendations of primary screening of passengers. the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Aug. NPRM ...... 09/00/16 Statement of Need: TSA is issuing 3, 2007; 121 Stat. 266), interim final this rulemaking to respond to the regulations for public transportation Regulatory Flexibility Analysis decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for agencies are due 90 days after the date Required: Yes. the District of Columbia Circuit in EPIC of enactment (Nov. 1, 2007), and final Small Entities Affected: Businesses. v. DHS 653 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011). regulations are due 1 year after the date Government Levels Affected: Local. Summary of Legal Basis: In its of enactment of this Act. According to Agency Contact: Chandru (Jack) Kalro, decision in EPIC v. DHS 653 F.3d 1 sec 1517 of the same Act, final Deputy Director, Surface Division, (D.C. Cir. 2011), the Court of Appeals for regulations for railroads and over-the- Office of Security Policy and Industry the District of Columbia Circuit found

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77794 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

that TSA failed to justify its failure to Action Date FR Cite a science, technology, engineering, or conduct notice and comment mathematics (STEM) degree from an rulemaking and remanded to TSA for NPRM ...... 03/26/13 78 FR 18287 accredited school certified by U.S. further proceedings. NPRM Comment 06/24/13 Immigration and Custom Enforcement Period End. (ICE) Student and Exchange Visitor Alternatives: As alternatives to the Final Rule ...... 01/00/16 preferred regulatory proposal presented Program (SEVP), and to further their courses of study through optional in the NPRM, TSA examined three other Regulatory Flexibility Analysis options. These alternatives include a practical training (OPT) with employers Required: Yes. enrolled in the U.S. Citizenship and continuation of the screening Small Entities Affected: Governmental Immigration Services’ (USCIS’) E-Verify environment prior to 2008 (no action), Jurisdictions. employment verification program. The increased use of physical pat-down Government Levels Affected: None. proposed rule would replace a 2008 searches that supplements primary URL for More Information: interim final rule (IFR) that was screening with walk through metal www.regulations.gov. detectors (WTMDs), and increased use URL for Public Comments: invalidated and will be vacated on of explosive trace detection (ETD) www.regulations.gov. February 12, 2016, per a ruling by the screening that supplements primary Agency Contact: Chawanna U.S. District Court for the District of screening with WTMDs. These Carrington, Project Manager, Passenger Columbia on August 12, 2015, in the alternatives, and the reasons why TSA Screening Program, Department of Washington Alliance of Technology rejected them in favor of the proposed Homeland Security, Transportation Workers v. U.S. Department of rule, are discussed in detail in chapter Security Administration, Office of Homeland Security litigation. 3 of the AIT NPRM regulatory Security Capabilities, 601 South 12th Statement of Need: This proposed evaluation impact analysis. Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6016, rule would enhance the academic experience of STEM OPT students, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA Phone: 571 227–2958, Fax: 571 227– increase the overall competitiveness of reports in the NPRM that the net cost of 1931, Email: chawanna.carrington@ U.S. educational institutions, and AIT deployment from 2008–2011 has tsa.dhs.gov. provide important benefits to the U.S. been $841.2 million (undiscounted) and Monica Grasso Ph.D., Manager, economy. that TSA has borne over 99 percent of Economic Analysis Branch–Cross Modal all costs related to AIT deployment. Division, Department of Homeland Summary of Legal Basis: TSA projects that from 2012–2015 net Security, Transportation Security Alternatives: AIT related costs will be approximately Administration, Office of Security Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not yet $1.5 billion (undiscounted), $1.4 billion Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 determined. at a three percent discount rate, and South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– Risks: $1.3 billion at a seven percent discount 6028, Phone: 571 227–3329, Email: Timetable: rate. During 2012–2015, TSA estimates [email protected]. it will also incur over 98 percent of AIT- Linda L. Kent, Assistant Chief Action Date FR Cite related costs with equipment and Counsel for Regulations and Security NPRM ...... 10/19/15 80 FR 63375 personnel costs being the largest Standards, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security NPRM Comment 11/18/15 categories of expenditures. The Period End. operations described in this rule Administration, Office of the Chief Final Rule ...... 01/00/16 produce benefits by reducing security Counsel, 601 South 12th Street, risks through the deployment of AIT Arlington, VA 20598–6002, Phone: 571 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis that is capable of detecting both metallic 227–2675, Fax: 571 227–1381, Email: Required: Undetermined. [email protected]. and non-metallic weapons and Government Levels Affected: None. RIN: 1652–AA67 explosives. Terrorists continue to test International Impacts: This regulatory security measures in an attempt to find action will be likely to have and exploit vulnerabilities. The threat to international trade and investment aviation security has evolved to include DHS—U.S. IMMIGRATION AND effects, or otherwise be of international the use of non-metallic explosives. AIT CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (USICE) interest. is a proven technology based on Proposed Rule Stage Agency Contact: Katherine H. laboratory testing and field experience Westerlund, Acting Unit Chief, SEVP and is an essential component of TSA’s 67. Improving and Expanding Training Policy, Student and Exchange Visitor security screening because it provides Opportunities for F–1 Nonimmigrant Program, Department of Homeland the best opportunity to detect metallic Students With STEM Degrees and Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs and nonmetallic anomalies concealed Expanding CAP–GAP Relief for All F– Enforcement, Potomac Center North, under clothing. More information about 1 Students With Pending H–1B Petitions 500 12th Street SW., STOP 5600, costs and benefits can be found in the Priority: Economically Significant. Washington, DC 20536–5600, Phone: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. TSA is 703 603–3400, Email: [email protected]; in the process of determining the costs Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Molly Stubbs, ICE Regulatory and benefits of the final rule. Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1182; 8 U.S.C. Coordinator, Department of Homeland Risks: DHS aims to prevent terrorist 1184; 8 U.S.C. 1221; 8 U.S.C. 1281 and Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs attacks and to reduce the vulnerability 1282; 8 U.S.C. 1302 to 1305 Enforcement, Office of the Director, of the United States to terrorism. By CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 274a. PTN—Potomac Center North, 500 12th screening passengers with AIT, TSA Legal Deadline: None. Street SW., Washington, DC 20536, will reduce the risk that a terrorist will Abstract: The Department of Phone: 202 732–6202, Email: smuggle a non-metallic threat on board Homeland Security is proposing a new [email protected]. an aircraft. rule to enhance opportunities for F–1 RIN: 1653–AA72 Timetable: nonimmigrant students graduating with BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77795

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND quality of life. HUD housing serves at collaboration among local governments, URBAN DEVELOPMENT least two broad populations: people public housing agencies, Internet who are in a position to markedly Fall 2015 Statement of Regulatory service providers, philanthropic increase their self-sufficiency and Priorities foundations, nonprofit organizations, people who will need long-term support and other relevant stakeholders to work Introduction—HUD’s Mission (for example, the frail elderly and together to produce local solutions for Secretary Julia´n Castro has called the people with severe disabilities). For narrowing the digital divide in Department of Housing and Urban those individuals who are able, communities served by HUD across the Development (HUD) the Department of increasing self-sufficiency requires nation. The demonstration, or pilot as it Opportunity because of the unique access to life-skills training, wealth- is also called, commenced with the impact it can make on the lives of creation and asset-building participation of 28 communities. Americans. As Secretary Castro has opportunities, job training, and career Through contributions made by the services. noted, where people live shapes how Internet service providers and other they live—the types and number of Knowledge is one pillar to achieving self-sufficiency and the American participating organizations, these 28 available jobs, the quality of the communities will benefit from the education their children receive, and Dream—a catalyst for upward mobility, as well as an investment that ensures ConnectHome collaboration by the overall quality of life.1 Although one receiving, for the residents living in of HUD’s core objectives is to help each generation is, at least, as successful as the last. The adoption, associated HUD public and assisted housing in families secure quality, affordable these communities, broadband housing, its mission is much broader. programming, and use of broadband technology are powerful tools to infrastructure, literacy training, related HUD celebrated the 50th anniversary of content, and devices that provide for its establishment in September 2015. increase access to knowledge; however, accessing high-speed Internet.4 President Lyndon Johnson, in his there is a ‘‘digital divide’’ in this nation remarks on the passage of the legislation between those with broadband Internet The importance of all Americans in 1965 establishing HUD, provided a access and those without it. having access to the Internet cannot be This Statement of Regulatory clear and succinct statement of the overstated. As HUD stated in its Priorities highlights two rules that will objectives for the new Department: ‘‘to announcement of the Digital focus on narrowing the digital divide in make sure that every family in America Opportunity Demonstration, published low-income communities served by lives in a home of dignity and a in the Federal Register on April 3, 2015, HUD. neighborhood of pride, a community of at 80 FR 18248, many low-income opportunity, and a city of promise and Regulatory Priority: Narrowing the Americans do not have broadband hope.’’ 2 Digital Divide in HUD Communities Internet at home, contributing to the In brief, HUD’s mission is to provide On March 23, 2015, President Obama estimated 66 million Americans who are families and communities with the tools issued a Presidential Memorandum on without the most basic digital literacy to build a brighter future. Consistent ‘‘Expanding Broadband Deployment and skills. It is for these reasons that HUD with this vision, HUD programs impact Adoption by Addressing Regulatory is exploring ways beyond small towns, big cities, rural Barriers and Encouraging Investment ConnectHome, to narrow the digital communities, and tribal communities and Training.’’ 3 In this memorandum, divide for the low-income individuals across the country. HUD works to the President noted that access to high- and families served by HUD multifamily strengthen the housing market and speed broadband is no longer a luxury, rental housing programs. protect consumers; meet the need for but a necessity for American families, The following two rules featured in quality affordable rental homes; utilize businesses, and consumers. Mobile this Regulatory Plan are part of this housing as a platform for improving wireless access to the Internet, such as effort. quality of life; and build inclusive and provided through smartphone, is an sustainable communities free from insufficient alternative to broadband • Narrowing the Digital Divide discrimination. connectivity. Such wireless access through Broadband Installation in HUD- Statement of Regulatory Priorities provides lower connection speeds and Funded New Construction and lesser functionality for the full range of Substantial Rehabilitation This Statement of Regulatory household uses (such as word Priorities, together with HUD’s Fall • Narrowing the Digital Divide processing and other software) Semiannual Agenda of Regulations, through Community Planning: compared to place-based broadband highlights the most significant Integrating Broadband Access Planning Internet connection. The President regulatory and deregulatory initiatives into HUD’s Consolidated Planning further noted that the Federal that HUD seeks to complete during the Process government has an important role to upcoming fiscal year. As noted in the Introduction, a central play in developing coordinated policies Aggregate Costs and Benefits to promote broadband deployment and feature of HUD’s mission is to use Executive Order 12866, as amended, housing as a platform for improving adoption, including promoting best practices, breaking down regulatory requires the agency to provide its best estimate of the combined aggregate costs 1 Secretary Julia´n Castro, Remarks to the barriers, and encouraging further Department of Housing and Urban Development, investment. and benefits of all regulations included ‘‘A Year of Progress: Building a Stronger HUD for On July 15, 2015, HUD launched its in the agency’s Regulatory Plan that will the Next 50 Years’’ (July 27, 2015). See http:// Digital Opportunity Demonstration, be made pursued in FY 2016. HUD portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/ known as ‘‘ConnectHome,’’ in which expects that the neither the total speeches_remarks_statements/2015/Remarks_ 072715. HUD provided a platform for economic costs nor the total efficiency 2 President Lyndon Baines Johnson, Remarks gains will exceed $100 million. upon Enactment of the Housing and Urban 3 https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/ Development Act of 1965 (April 10, 1965). http:// 2015/03/23/presidential-memorandum-expanding- www.lbjlibrary.org/mediakits/hud/p6.html. broadband-deployment-and-adoption-addr. 4 http://connecthome.hud.gov/.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77796 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Narrowing the Digital Divide Through populations impacted by the digital replacement) on one or more of the Broadband Installation in HUD-Funded divide, HUD is at the forefront of following systems: Electrical, New Construction and Substantial implementing these Administration mechanical, or plumbing. This further Rehabilitation efforts. The digital divide in broadband minimizes the costs of the rule by HUD Office: Office of the Secretary. access, connectivity, and use ensuring that only significant work that Rulemaking Stage: Proposed Rule. disproportionately affects certain would lower the burden of installing Priority: Significant. Americans: Those who earn less than broadband infrastructure triggers the Legal Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701q and $25,000 annually; individuals who did proposed requirements. 4568; 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d, not finish high school; and African HUD also recognizes that there may 1437f, 1437g, 1437n, 1437z–2, 1437z–7, Americans and Hispanics. Eighty-four be some communities or buildings 3535(d), 5301–5320, 8013, 11371 et seq., percent of households with HUD where installing broadband assistance make less than $20,000 per 12701–12839, 12901–12912, 13611– infrastructure is infeasible or year, and 63 percent are African 13619; sec 327, Pub. L. 109–115, 119 impractical due to a variety of American or Hispanic (46 percent and Stat. 2936, and sec 607, Pub. L. 109– circumstances (e.g., no broadband 17 percent, respectively). Of these HUD- 162, 119 Stat. 3051 access is available near the community, assisted household, 38 percent have CFR Citation: 24 CFR 5, 92, 93, 570, the building itself may have some children who are 18 years or younger. 574, 578, 880, 891, 905, and 983. difficulties in supporting the The proposed rule will build on the Legal Deadline: None. infrastructure). In these instances, HUD success of ConnectHome by ensuring Abstract: Through this proposed rule, is reserving the right to determine that that when construction or significant HUD continues its efforts to narrow the installation of broadband infrastructure rehabilitation is done using HUD funds, digital divide in low-income is not feasible and excusing the grantee the infrastructure needed for broadband communities served by HUD by from the installation requirement. access is included in the work. providing broadband access to Risks: This rule poses no risk to Alternatives: Construction and public health, safety, or the communities in need of such access, rehabilitation standards are regulatory where feasible and under HUD environment. in nature, so amending them to require Timetable: programs that authorize use of HUD the installation of broadband funds for such purpose. Broadband is infrastructure requires rulemaking. Action Date FR Cite the common term used to refer to a very Without amending the construction and fast connection to the Internet. Such rehabilitation standards, there is no way NPRM ...... 01/00/16 connection is also referred to as high- to require grantees to install broadband speed broadband or high-speed Internet. infrastructure in multifamily housing. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis In this rule, HUD proposes to require Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The Required: No. installation of broadband infrastructure proposed rule would provide that for Small Entities Affected: No. at the time of new construction or new construction or substantial Government Levels Affected: State, substantial rehabilitation of multifamily rehabilitation of multifamily rental Local. rental housing that is funded by HUD. housing funded by HUD that, as part of Federalism Affected: No. Installation of broadband infrastructure the new construction or substantial Energy Affected: No. at the time of new construction or rehabilitation to be undertaken, such International Impacts: No. substantial rehabilitation is generally activity must include installation of Agency Contact: Camille E. Acevedo, easier and less costly than when such broadband infrastructure. Installing Associate General Counsel for installation is undertaken as a stand- broadband infrastructure will be an Legislation and Regulations, Department alone effort. The proposed rule, additional cost when doing HUD- of Housing and Urban Development, however, recognizes that installation of funded new construction/substantial 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC broadband infrastructure may not be rehabilitation. However, HUD notes that 20410, Phone: 202 708–3055. feasible for all new construction or none of the HUD covered programs RIN: 2501–AD75 substantial rehabilitation, and therefore listed in this rule require a grantee to Narrowing the Digital Divide Through the proposed rule allows limited undertake new construction or Community Planning: Integrating exceptions to the installation substantial rehabilitation. New Broadband Planning Into HUD’s requirements. Installing unit-based construction and substantial Consolidated Planning Process high-speed Internet in multifamily rehabilitation are eligible activities that rental housing that is newly constructed grantees may undertake under HUD- HUD Office: Office of the Assistant or substantially rehabilitated with HUD funded programs. Therefore, entities Secretary for Community Planning and funding will not only expand affordable will not incur any costs than they Development. housing for low-income families but otherwise would incur by using their Rulemaking Stage: Proposed Rule. will provide a platform for individuals HUD funds to voluntarily undertake Priority: Significant. and families residing in such housing to new construction or substantial Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), participate in the digital economy and rehabilitation under HUD funded- 3601–3619, 5301–5315, 11331–11388, increase their access to economic programs that authorize such activities. 12701–12711, 12741–12756, and 12901– opportunities. Further, HUD is seeking to minimize 12912 the costs of installation by pairing the CFR Citation: 24 CFR 91. Statement of Need installation requirements with new Legal Deadline: None. The proposed rule is part of several construction or rehabilitation work Abstract: For communities to survive mutually supportive efforts being taken when costs are lower than installation in this digital era, planning for by the Administration to close the broadband infrastructure when no other broadband access must be a basic digital divide for low-income work is being done. Additionally, HUD component of their community communities. As noted above, many is proposing to define ‘‘substantial planning process. HUD’s Consolidated low-income Americans do not have rehabilitation’’ as significant work (50 Plan is a planning mechanism designed broadband Internet at home. Given the percent or more of full system to help States and local governments

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77797

assess their affordable housing and permanent features of HUD’s Action Date FR Cite community development needs and community planning regulations. NPRM ...... 01/00/16 make data-driven, place-based Alternatives: The Consolidated Plan investment decisions. The consolidated requirements are regulatory in nature so planning process serves as the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis rulemaking is necessary to revise them. framework for a community-wide Required: No. While non-regulatory guidance dialogue to identify housing and Small Entities Affected: No. community development priorities that encouraging the consideration of Government Levels Affected: State, align and focus funding from HUD’s broadband access in the consolidated Local. formula block grant programs. planning process is a possible Federalism Affected: No. This proposed rule would amend alternative, such guidance is non- Energy Affected: No. HUD’s Consolidated Plan regulations to binding. Accordingly, rulemaking is the International Impacts: No. require that jurisdictions, in their only possible option to accomplish the Agency Contact: Camille E. Acevedo, planning efforts, consider the needs of policy goals described above. Associate General Counsel for Legislation and Regulations, Department broadband access for low-income Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The of Housing and Urban Development, residents in the communities they serve. proposed rule will amend the Broadband is the common term used to 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC Consolidated Plan regulations to require 20410, Phone: 202 708–3055. refer to a very fast connection to the that States and local governments Internet. Such connection is also RIN: 2506–AC41 evaluate the access of public and other referred to as high-speed broadband or assisted housing residents to broadband high-speed Internet. Specifically, the Internet service. The proposed rule would require that States and regulatory changes are concerned with HUD—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY localities that submit a consolidated (HUDSEC) plan evaluate whether residents of the consolidated planning process and HUD-funded housing have access to HUD does not anticipate that the costs Proposed Rule Stage high-speed Internet and, if so, in what of the revised consultation and • reporting requirements, as proposed in 68. Narrowing the Digital Divide ways is such access made available to Through Broadband Installation in this rule, will be significant since the these residents. If low-income residents HUD-Funded New Construction and regulatory changes merely build upon in the communities do not have access Substantial Rehabilitation (FR–5890) to high-speed Internet, States and similar existing requirements rather jurisdictions must consider whether than mandating completely new Priority: Other Significant. such access can be made available to procedures. While the proposed rule Legal Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701q; 12 their communities as part of their would require States and local U.S.C. 4568; 1437a, 1437c, 1437d, investment of HUD funds. The proposed governments to consider, as part of their 1437f, 1437n, 1437z–2, 1437z–7; 42 regulatory amendments build upon Consolidated Planning process, the U.S.C. 3535(d); 42 U.S.C. 5301–5320; 42 other HUD efforts to close the digital broadband access needs of resident of U.S.C. 8013; 42 U.S.C. 11371 et seq.; 42 divide and help ensure that the benefits public and other assisted housing, the U.S.C. 12701–12839; 42 U.S.C. 12901– 12912; 42 U.S.C. 13611–13619; sec 327, of high-speed Internet reach every rule does not mandate that actions be Pub. L. 109–115, 119 Stat 2936; sec 607, American household, regardless of their taken to meet those needs. The economic backgrounds. Pub. L. 109–162, 119 Stat 3051 significant interest expressed by many CFR Citation: 24 CFR 5; 24 CFR 92; Statement of Need: The proposed rule communities in participating in is part of several mutually supportive 24 CFR 93; 24 CFR 570; 24 CFR 578; 24 ConnectHome demonstrated to HUD CFR 880; 24 CFR 905; 24 CFR 983. efforts being taken by the that many jurisdictions that are already Administration to close the digital Legal Deadline: None. engaged in planning to bring high-speed divide for low-income communities. As Abstract: Through this proposed rule, Internet access to their low-income noted above, many low-income HUD continues its efforts to narrow the Americans do not have broadband communities. These jurisdictions also digital divide in low-income Internet at home. Given the populations demonstrated their awareness of the communities served by HUD by impacted by the digital divide, HUD is harmful effects of the digital divide and providing, where feasible and with HUD at the forefront of implementing these a high interest in narrowing that divide. funding, broadband access to Administration efforts. The digital Additionally, given the positive communities in need of such access. divide in broadband access, response to ConnectHome, HUD Broadband is the common term used to connectivity, and use disproportionately anticipates that many State and local refer to a very fast connection to the affects certain Americans: Those who governments will devote resources, Internet. Such connection is also earn less than $25,000 annually; whether public or private, without any referred to as high-speed broadband or individuals who did not finish high mandate from HUD, to bring high-speed high-speed Internet. In this rule, HUD school; and African Americans and Internet access to their communities. proposes to require installation of Hispanics. Eighty-four percent of This rule therefore, which only requires broadband infrastructure at the time of households with HUD assistance make consideration of the needs in low- new construction or substantial less than $20,000 per year, and 63 income communities to access to rehabilitation of multifamily rental percent are African American or broadband Internet service, has a housing that is funded by HUD. Hispanic (46 percent and 17 percent, minimal cost impact on all grantees Installation of broadband infrastructure respectively). Of these HUD-assisted subject to the Consolidated Planning at the time of new construction or household, 38 percent have children process. substantial rehabilitation is generally who are 18 years or younger. The easier and less costly than when such proposed regulatory amendments will Risks: This rule poses no risk to installation is undertaken as a stand- build on the success of ConnectHome by public health, safety, or the alone effort. The proposed rule, codifying the policy goals of increased environment. however, recognizes that installation of Internet access and digital literacy as Timetable: broadband infrastructure may not be

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77798 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

feasible for all new construction or none of the HUD covered programs HUD—OFFICE OF COMMUNITY substantial rehabilitation, and therefore listed in this rule require a grantee to PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) the proposed rule allows limited undertake new construction or Proposed Rule Stage exceptions to the installation substantial rehabilitation. New requirements. Installing unit-based construction and substantial 69. • Narrowing the Digital Divide high-speed Internet in multifamily rehabilitation are eligible activities that Through Community Planning: rental housing that is newly constructed grantees may take using HUD funds. Integrating Broadband Planning Into and substantially rehabilitated with Therefore, entities will not incur any HUD’s Consolidated Planning Process HUD funding will not only expand costs than they otherwise would incur (FR–5891) affordable housing for low-income by voluntarily undertaking new Priority: Other Significant. families but will provide a platform for construction or substantial Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d); 42 individuals and families residing in rehabilitation, and the costs of these U.S.C. 3601–3619; 42 U.S.C. 5301–5315; such housing to participate in the digital activities are funded by HUD. 42 U.S.C. 11331–11388; 42 economy, and increase their access to Further, HUD is seeking to minimize U.S.C.12701–12711; 42 U.S.C.12741– economic opportunities. the costs of installation by pairing the Statement of Need: The proposed rule 12756; 42 U.S.C. 12901–12912 installation requirements with new CFR Citation: 24 CFR 91. is part of several mutually supportive Legal Deadline: None. efforts being taken by the construction or rehabilitation work Abstract: For communities to survive Administration to close the digital when costs are lower than installation in this digital era, planning for divide for low-income communities. As broadband infrastructure when no other broadband access must be a basic noted above, many low-income work is being done. Additionally, HUD component of their community Americans do not have broadband is proposing to define substantial planning process. HUD’s Consolidated Internet at home. Given the populations rehabilitation as significant work (50 impacted by the digital divide, HUD is percent or more of full system Plan is a planning mechanism designed at the forefront of implementing these replacement) on one or more of the to help States and local governments to Administration efforts. The digital following systems: electrical, assess their affordable housing and divide in broadband access, mechanical, or plumbing. This further community development needs and to connectivity, and use disproportionately minimizes the costs of the rule by make data-driven, place-based affects certain Americans: Those who ensuring that only significant work that investment decisions. The consolidated earn less than $25,000 annually; would lower the burden of installing planning process serves as the individuals who did not finish high broadband infrastructure triggers the framework for a community-wide school; and African Americans and proposed requirements. dialogue to identify housing and Hispanics. Eighty-four percent of HUD also recognizes that there may community development priorities that households with HUD assistance make be some communities or buildings align and focus funding from HUD’s less than $20,000 per year, and 63 where installing broadband formula block grant programs. percent are African American or infrastructure is infeasible or This proposed rule would amend Hispanic (46 percent and 17 percent, impractical due to a variety of HUD’s Consolidated Plan regulations to respectively). Of these HUD-assisted circumstances (e.g., no broadband require that jurisdictions, in their household, 38 percent have children access is available near the community, planning efforts, consider the needs of who are 18 years or younger. The the building itself may have some broadband access for low-income proposed rule will build on the success difficulties in supporting the residents in the communities they serve. of ConnectHome by ensuring that when infrastructure). In these instances, HUD Broadband is the common term used to construction or significant rehabilitation is reserving the right to determine that refer to a very fast connection to the is done using HUD funds, the installation of broadband infrastructure Internet. Such connection is also infrastructure needed for broadband is not feasible and excusing the grantee referred to as high-speed broadband or access is included in the work. from the installation requirement. high-speed Internet. Specifically, the Summary of Legal Basis: None. rule would require that States and Alternatives: Construction and Risks: This rule poses no risk to localities that submit a consolidated rehabilitation standards are regulatory public health, safety, or the plan evaluate whether residents of in nature, so amending them to require environment. HUD-funded housing have access to the installation of broadband Timetable: high-speed Internet and, if so, in what infrastructure requires rulemaking. ways is such access made available to Without amending the construction and Action Date FR Cite these residents. If low-income residents rehabilitation standards, there is no way in the communities do not have access to require grantees to install broadband NPRM ...... 01/00/16 to high-speed Internet, States and infrastructure in multifamily housing. jurisdictions must consider whether Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Regulatory Flexibility Analysis such access can be made available to proposed rule would provide that for Required: No. their communities, as part of their new construction or substantial Government Levels Affected: None. investment of HUD funds. The proposed rehabilitation of multifamily rental regulatory amendments build upon housing funded by HUD that, as part of Agency Contact: Camille E. Acevedo, other HUD efforts to close the digital the new construction or substantial Associate General Counsel for divide and help ensure that the benefits rehabilitation to be undertaken, such Legislation and Regulations, Office of of high-speed Internet reach every activity must include installation of the General Counsel, Department of American household, regardless of their broadband infrastructure. Installing Housing and Urban Development, Office economic backgrounds. broadband infrastructure will be an of the Secretary, 451 7th Street SW., Statement of Need: The proposed rule additional cost when doing HUD- Washington, DC 20410, Phone: 202 708– is part of several mutually supportive funded new construction/substantial 5132. efforts being taken by the rehabilitation. However, HUD notes that RIN: 2501–AD75 Administration to close the digital

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77799

divide for low-income communities. As demonstrated their awareness of the The Department protects and recovers noted above, many low-income harmful effects of the digital divide and endangered species; protects natural, Americans do not have broadband a high interest in narrowing that divide. historic, and cultural resources; Internet at home. Given the populations Additionally, given the positive manages water projects that are a impacted by the digital divide, HUD is response to ConnectHome, HUD lifeline and economic engine for many at the forefront of implementing these anticipates that many State and local communities in the West; manages Administration efforts. The digital governments will devote resources, forests and fights wildfires; manages divide in broadband access, whether public or private, without any Federal energy resources; regulates connectivity, and use disproportionately mandate from HUD, to bring high-speed surface coal mining operations; reclaims affects certain Americans: Those who Internet access to their communities. abandoned coal mines; educates earn less than $25,000 annually; This rule therefore, which only requires children in Indian schools; and provides individuals who did not finish high consideration of the needs in low- recreational opportunities for over 400 school; and African Americans and income communities to access to million visitors annually in the Nation’s Hispanics. Eighty-four percent of broadband Internet service, has a national parks, public lands, national households with HUD assistance make minimal cost impact on all grantees wildlife refuges, and recreation areas. less than $20,000 per year, and 63 subject to the Consolidated Planning DOI will continue to review and percent are African American or process. update its regulations and policies to Hispanic (46 percent and 17 percent, Risks: This rule poses no risk to ensure that they are effective and respectively). Of these HUD-assisted public health, safety, or the efficient, and that they promote household, 38 percent have children environment. accountability and sustainability. DOI who are 18 years or younger. The Timetable: will emphasize regulations and policies proposed regulatory amendments will that: build on the success of ConnectHome by Action Date FR Cite • Promote environmentally codifying the policy goals of increased NPRM ...... 01/00/16 responsible, safe, and balanced Internet access and digital literacy as development of renewable and permanent features of HUD’s Regulatory Flexibility Analysis conventional energy on our public lands community planning regulations. Required: No. and the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS); Summary of Legal Basis: None. Small Entities Affected: Governmental • Use the best available science to Alternatives: The Consolidated Plan Jurisdictions. ensure that public resources are requirements are regulatory in nature so Government Levels Affected: None. protected, conserved, and used wisely; rulemaking is necessary to revise them. Agency Contact: Camille E. Acevedo, • Preserve America’s natural While non-regulatory guidance Associate General Counsel for treasures for future generations; encouraging the consideration of Legislation and Regulations, Office of • Improve the nation-to-nation broadband access in the consolidated the General Counsel, Department of relationship with American Indian planning process is a possible Housing and Urban Development, Office tribes and promote tribal self- alternative, such guidance is non- of the Secretary, 451 7th Street SW., determination and self-governance; binding. Accordingly, rulemaking is the Washington, DC 20410, Phone: 202 708– • Promote partnerships with States, only possible option to accomplish the 5132. tribes, local governments, other groups, policy goals described above. RIN: 2506–AC41 and individuals to achieve common Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The BILLING CODE 4210–67–P goals; and proposed rule will amend the • Promote transparency, fairness, Consolidated Plan regulations to require accountability, and the highest ethical that States and local governments standards while maintaining evaluate the access of public and other DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (DOI) performance goals. assisted housing residents to broadband Statement of Regulatory Priorities Internet service. The proposed Major Regulatory Areas regulatory changes are concerned with The Department of the Interior (DOI) The Department’s bureaus implement the consolidated planning process and is the principal Federal steward of our congressionally mandated programs HUD does not anticipate that the costs Nation’s public lands and resources, through their regulations. Some of these of the revised consultation and including many of our cultural regulatory programs include: reporting requirements, as proposed in treasures. DOI serves as trustee to Native • Overseeing the development of this rule, will be significant since the Americans and Alaska native trust onshore and offshore energy, including regulatory changes merely build upon assets and is responsible for relations renewable, mineral, oil and gas, and similar existing requirements rather with the island territories under United other energy resources; than mandating completely new States jurisdiction. The Department • Regulating surface coal mining and procedures. While the proposed rule manages more than 500 million acres of reclamation operations on public and would require States and local Federal lands, including 408 park units private lands; governments to consider, as part of their and 563 wildlife refuges, and more than • Managing migratory birds and Consolidated Planning process, the one billion submerged offshore acres. preserving marine mammals and broadband access needs of resident of These areas include natural resources endangered species; public and other assisted housing, the that are essential for America’s • Managing dedicated lands, such as rule does not mandate the actions that industry—oil and gas, coal, and national parks, wildlife refuges, actions be taken to meet those needs. minerals such as gold and uranium. On National Landscape Conservation The significant interest in participating public lands and the Outer Continental System lands, and American Indian in ConnectHome demonstrated to HUD Shelf, Interior provides access for trust lands; that many jurisdictions that are already renewable and conventional energy • Managing public lands open to engaged in planning to bring high-speed development and manages the multiple use; Internet access to their low-income protection and restoration of surface- • Managing revenues from American communities. These jurisdictions also mined lands. Indian and Federal minerals;

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77800 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

• Fulfilling trust and other (3) Empowering People and • Improved compliance and responsibilities pertaining to American Communities transparency by use of plain language in Indians and Alaska Natives; and The Department strongly encourages our regulations and guidance • Managing natural resource damage public participation in the regulatory documents. The Department’s Final Plan for assessments. process and will continue to actively Retrospective Review and biannual engage the public in the implementation Regulatory Policy status reports can be viewed at http:// of priority initiatives. Throughout the www.doi.gov/open/regsreview. DOI’s regulatory programs seek to Department, individual bureaus and operate programs transparently, offices are ensuring that the American Bureaus and Offices Within DOI efficiently, and cooperatively while people have an active role in managing maximizing protection of our land, The following sections give an our Nation’s public lands and resources. overview of some of the major resources, and environment in a fiscally For example, every year FWS responsible way by: regulatory priorities of DOI bureaus and establishes migratory bird hunting offices. (1) Protecting Natural, Cultural, and seasons in partnership with flyway Heritage Resources councils composed of State fish and Bureau of Indian Affairs wildlife agencies. FWS also holds a The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) The Department’s mission includes series of public meetings to give other provides services to approximately 1.9 protecting and providing access to our interested parties, including hunters million Indians and Alaska Natives, and Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and other groups, opportunities to maintains a government-to-government and honoring our trust responsibilities participate in establishing the upcoming relationship with the 567 federally to tribes. We are committed to this season’s regulations. Similarly, BLM recognized Indian tribes. The Bureau mission and to applying laws and uses Resource Advisory Councils to also administers and manages 55 regulations fairly and effectively. Our advise on management of public lands million acres of surface land and 57 priorities include protecting public and resources. These citizen-based million acres of subsurface minerals health and safety, restoring and groups allow individuals from all held in trust by the United States for maintaining public lands, protecting backgrounds and interests to have a Indians and Indian tribes. BIA’s mission threatened and endangered species, voice in management of public lands. is to enhance the quality of life, promote ameliorating land- and resource- Retrospective Review of Regulations economic opportunity, and protect and management problems on public lands, improve the trust assets of American and ensuring accountability and President Obama’s Executive Order Indians, Indian tribes, and Alaska compliance with Federal laws and 13563 directs agencies to make the Natives, as well as to provide quality regulations. regulatory system work better for the education opportunities to students in (2) Sustainably Using Energy, Water, American public. Regulations should Indian schools. and Natural Resources ‘‘. . . protect public health, welfare, In the coming year, BIA will continue safety, and our environment while its focus on improved management of Since the beginning of the Obama promoting economic growth, trust responsibilities with each Administration, the Department has innovation, competitiveness, and job regulatory review and revision. The focused on renewable energy issues and creation.’’ DOI’s plan for retrospective Bureau will also continue to promote has established priorities for regulatory review identifies specific economic development in Indian environmentally responsible efforts to relieve regulatory burdens, add communities by ensuring the development of renewable energy on jobs to the economy, and make regulations support, rather than hinder, public lands and the OCS. Industry has regulations work better for the American productive land management. In responded by investing in the public while protecting our addition, BIA will focus on updating development of wind farms off the environment and resources. Indian education regulations and on Atlantic seacoast and solar, wind, and The Department routinely meets with other regulatory changes to increase geothermal energy facilities throughout stakeholders to solicit feedback and transparency in support of the the West. Power generation from these gather input on how modernize our President’s Open Government Initiative. new energy sources produces virtually regulatory programs, through efforts In the coming year, BIA’s regulatory no greenhouse gases and, when done in such as incorporating performance priorities are to: an environmentally responsible manner, based standards where appropriate and • Finalize regulations to meet the harnesses with minimum impact removing outdated and unnecessary Indian trust reform goals for rights-of- abundant renewable energy. The requirements. DOI bureaus are ways across Indian land. Department will continue its intra- and continuing to work to make our • Develop regulatory changes inter-departmental efforts to move regulations easier to comply with and necessary for improved Indian forward with the environmentally understand. Our regulatory process education. responsible review and permitting of ensures that bureaus share ideas on how BIA is reviewing regulations that renewable energy projects on public to reduce regulatory burdens while require the Bureau of Indian Education lands and the Outer Continental Shelf, meeting the requirements of the laws to follow 23 different State adequate and will identify how its regulatory they enforce and improving their yearly progress standards; the review processes can be improved to facilitate stewardship of the environment and will determine whether a uniform the responsible development of these resources. Results include: standard would better meet the needs of resources. • Effective stewardship of our students at Bureau-funded schools. In implementing these priorities Nation’s resources in a way that is With regard to undergraduate education, through its regulations, the Department responsive to the needs of small the Bureau of Indian Education plans to will create jobs and contribute to a businesses; finalize regulations that address grants healthy economy while protecting our • Increased benefits per dollar spent to tribally controlled community signature landscapes, natural resources, by careful evaluation of the economic colleges and other Indian education wildlife, and cultural resources. effects of planned rules; and regulations. These reviews identify

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77801

provisions that need to be updated to Orders (Order) for Site Security (Order regulations as contemplated by GAO comply with applicable statutes and 3), Oil Measurement (Order 4), and Gas recommendations. ensure that the proper regulatory Measurement (Order 5). These Orders • Creating a competitive process for framework is in place to support were last updated in 1989. The primary offering lands for solar and wind energy students in Bureau-funded schools. purpose for these updates is to keep development. • Revise regulations to reflect pace with changing industry practices, BLM will finalize a rule that would updated statutory provisions and emerging and new technologies, establish an efficient competitive increase transparency. respond to recommendations from the process for leasing public lands for solar BIA is making a concentrated effort to Government Accountability Office, the and wind energy development. The improve the readability and precision of U.S. Department of the Interior regulations will establish competitive its regulations. Because trust (Department) Office of the Inspector bidding procedures for lands within beneficiaries often turn to the General, and the Department’s designated solar and wind energy regulations for guidance on how a given Subcommittee on Royalty Management. development leasing areas, define BIA process works, BIA is ensuring that The proposed changes address findings qualifications for potential bidders, and each revised regulation is written as and recommendations that in part structure the financial arrangements clearly as possible and accurately formed the basis for the GAO’s necessary for the process. The rule will reflects the current organization of the inclusion of the Department’s oil and enhance BLM’s ability to capture fair Bureau. The Bureau is also simplifying gas program on the GAO’s High Risk market value for the use of public lands, language and eliminating obsolete List in 2011 (GAO–11–278) and for its ensure fair access to leasing provisions. In the coming year, the continuing to keep the program on the opportunities for renewable energy Bureau also plans to finalize revisions to list in the 2013 and 2015 updates. The development, and foster the growth and regulations regarding rights-of-way (25 Orders will be published as proposed development of the renewable energy CFR 169); Secretarial elections (25 CFR rules in 43 Code of Federal Regulations sector of the economy. 81); the Housing Improvement Program (CFR) 3173, 3174 and 3175 respectively. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (25 CFR 256); Indian Reservation Roads • Preventing waste of produced (BOEM) (25 CFR 170); and Indian Child Welfare natural gas and ensuring fair return to Act proceedings (25 CFR 23). The Bureau of Ocean Energy the taxpayer. Management (BOEM) promotes energy Bureau of Land Management BLM’s current requirements regarding independence, environmental venting and flaring of natural gas from BLM manages the 245-million-acre protection, and economic development oil and gas operations are over three National System of Public Lands, through responsible, science-based decades old. The agency is currently located primarily in the western States, management of offshore conventional preparing a proposed rule to address including Alaska, and the 700-million- and renewable energy resources. It is emissions reductions and minimize acre subsurface mineral estate located dedicated to offering opportunities to waste through improved standards for throughout the Nation. In doing so, BLM develop the conventional and renewable venting, flaring, and fugitive losses of manages such varied uses as energy and energy and the underlying mineral methane from oil and gas production mineral development, outdoor resources of the Outer Continental Shelf facilities on Federal and Indian lands. recreation, livestock grazing, and (OCS) in an efficient and effective • Ensure that taxpayers receive a fair forestry and woodlands products. BLM’s manner, balancing the need for return from energy resources developed complex multiple-use mission affects economic growth with the protection of on the public lands, those resources are the lives of millions of Americans, the environment. BOEM oversees the diligently and responsibly developed, including those who live near and visit expansion of domestic energy and that adequate financial measures the public lands, as well as those who production, enhancing the potential for exist to address the risks. benefit from the commodities, such as domestic energy independence and the minerals, energy, or timber, produced The Government Accountability generation of revenue to support the from the lands’ rich resources. In Office (GAO) recommended to the BLM economic development of the country. undertaking its management that steps be taken to revise its BOEM thoughtfully considers and responsibilities, BLM seeks to conserve regulations with respect to onshore balances the potential environmental our public lands’ natural and cultural royalty rates to provide flexibility to impacts associated with exploring and resources and sustain the health and change those rates. On April 21, 2015, extracting OCS resources with the productivity of the public lands for the the BLM issued an Advance Notice of critical need for domestic energy use and enjoyment of present and future Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) seeking production. BOEM’s near-term generations. public comment on potential updates to regulatory agenda will focus on a In the coming year, BLM’s highest BLM rules governing oil and gas royalty number of issues, including: • regulatory priorities include: rates, rental payments, lease sale Enhancing the regulatory efficiency • Provide for site security by minimum bids, civil penalty caps and of the offshore renewables program. preventing theft and loss and to enable financial assurances. Over 82,000 One rulemaking in particular has been accurate measurement and production comments were received by the end of proposed to address recommendations accountability. the comment period on June 19, 2015. submitted to BOEM by the • Ensure that crude oil produced Most of the comments focused on fiscal Transportation Research Board of the from Federal and Indian oil and gas lease terms—royalty rates, rentals, and National Academies of Science, and leases is accurately measured and minimum bids. There were a few other stakeholders in the renewable accounted for. comments on bonding and very few on energy development process. • Ensure that gas produced from civil penalties. The analysis of these Specifically, this rulemaking will clarify Federal and Indian oil and gas leases is comments is on-going and is expected to the role of Certified Verification Agents accurately measured and accounted. be complete by the end of calendar year as part of the process of designing, The Bureau of Land Management 2015. Following completion of the fabricating, and installing offshore wind (BLM) is updating and improving the analysis of these comments the BLM energy facilities for the OCS. current versions of Onshore Oil and Gas will consider possible revisions to its Additionally, BOEM is working to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77802 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

transfer regulatory oversight offshore oil and natural gas resources. Office of Natural Resources Revenue responsibilities relating to offshore BSEE’s priorities in fulfillment of its ONRR will continue to collect, renewable energy inspections and mission are to: (1) Regulate, enforce, and account for, and disburse revenues from certain enforcement activities to the respond to OCS development using the Federal offshore energy and mineral Bureau of Safety and Environmental full range of authorities, policies, and leases and from onshore mineral leases Enforcement (BSEE). This transfer in tools to compel safety and on Federal and Indian lands. The being undertaken in an effort to environmental responsibility and program operates nationwide and is implement Department of the Interior appropriate development of offshore oil primarily responsible for timely and Secretarial Order 3299, and will help and natural gas resources; and (2) Build accurate collection, distribution, and ensure that these oversight activities and sustain the organizational, accounting for revenues associated with will be conducted by the DOI bureau technical, and intellectual capacity mineral and energy production. ONRR’s with the appropriate experience and within and across BSEE’s key regulatory plan is as follows: expertise in operational matters. functions—capacity that keeps pace • Implement regulations to ensure • Updating BOEM’s Air Quality with OCS industry technology compliance. Program. improvements, innovates in regulation BOEM’s original air quality rules date ONRR is promulgating final rules to and enforcement, and reduces risk ensure compliance with the Federal Oil largely from 1980 and have not been through systemic assessment and updated substantially since that time. and Gas Royalty Simplification and regulatory and enforcement actions. Fairness Act of 1996, which will also From 1990 to 2011, DOI exercised BSEE has identified the following four jurisdiction for air quality only for OCS clarify regulatory processes and areas of regulatory priorities: direction for lessors on Federal leases. sources operating in the Gulf of Mexico. • Improving Crane and Helicopter • Simplify valuation regulations. In fiscal year 2011, Congress expanded Safety on Offshore Facilities. DOI’s authority by transferring to it ONRR plans to finalize regulations at BSEE will finalize a rule regarding title 30 of the Code of Federal responsibility for monitoring OCS air crane safety on fixed offshore platforms quality off the North Slope Borough of Regulations (CFR) part 1206 for and will propose a rule for helicopter/ establishing the value for royalty the State of Alaska, including the helideck safety. Beaufort Sea, and the Chukchi Sea. purposes of (1) oil and natural gas • Improving Oil Spill Response Plans BOEM will propose regulations to produced from Federal leases; and (2) and Procedures. reflect changes that have occurred over coal produced from Federal and Indian BSEE will update regulations for the past thirty-four years and the new leases. Additionally, the rule offshore oil spill response plans by regulatory jurisdiction. In its consolidates sections of the regulations incorporating requirements for development of proposed regulations, common to all minerals, such as improved procedures. The procedures BOEM coordinated with other bureaus definitions and instructions regarding that will be required are based on and agencies, including the U.S. Fish how a payor should request a valuation lessons learned from the Deepwater and Wildlife Service, the National Park determination. Clarify and simplify Horizon spill, as well as nearly two Service, and the Environmental issuing notices of non-compliance and decades of agency oversight and Protection Agency. civil penalties. • applicable BSEE research. This rule will amend ONRR civil Promoting Effective Financial • Assurance and Risk Management. Tailoring Drilling Requirements to penalty regulations to: (1) Codify BOEM has the responsibility to ensure the Unique Conditions of the Arctic. application of those regulations to solid that lessees and operators on the OCS BSEE and BOEM will finalize a joint minerals and geothermal leases as the do not engage in activities that could rule that promotes safe, responsible, and Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 generate an undue risk of financial loss effective exploratory drilling activities authorizes; (2) adjust Federal Oil and to the government. BOEM formally on the Arctic OCS by taking into Gas Royalty Management Act civil established a program office to review account the unique aspects and risks of penalty amounts for inflation as the these issues, and is working with operating in the Arctic, in order to Federal Civil Penalty Inflation industry and others to determine how to ensure protection of the Arctic’s Adjustment Act requires; (3) clarify and improve the regulatory regime to better communities and marine environment. simplify the existing regulations for • align with the realities of aging offshore Managing and Mitigating Well issuing notices of noncompliance and infrastructure, hazard risks, and Control and Blowout Preventer Risks. civil penalties under 30 CFR part 1241; increasing costs of decommissioning. In BSEE will finalize a rule concerning and (4) provide notice that ONRR will order to minimize the potential adverse requirements on blowout preventers and post its matrices for civil penalty impact of any proposed regulations, and critical reforms in the areas of well assessments on the ONRR Web site. in an effort to take all issues and views design, well control, casing, cementing, • Define methodologies for into proper account, BOEM published real-time monitoring, and subsea distribution and disbursement of an Advance Notice of Proposed containment. This rule will address qualified revenues from certain leases Rulemaking, and has engaged with multiple recommendations resulting under the Gulf of Mexico Energy industry on the subject. BOEM has since from various investigations from the Security Act (GOMESA). issued a Notice to Lessees, will review Deepwater Horizon incident. ONRR is amending the regulations on comments, finalize guidance, and Additionally, BSEE will finalize the distribution and disbursement of determine whether to update its revisions of its regulations on qualified revenues from certain leases regulation in this area. production safety systems and life cycle on the Gulf of Mexico’s Outer analysis. This final rule will expand the Continental Shelf, per the statutory Bureau of Safety and Environmental use of life cycle management of critical direction contained in the Gulf of Enforcement equipment and will address issues such Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006. BSEE’s mission is to regulate safety, as subsurface safety devices, safety This regulation sets forth the formulas emergency preparedness, environmental device testing, and requirements for and methodologies for calculating and responsibility and appropriate operating production systems on the allocating revenues during the second development and conservation of OCS. phase of revenue sharing to: The States

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77803

of Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and source of energy.’’ In response to its • Restore native aquatic populations Texas; their eligible Coastal Political statutory mandate, OSM has sought to and nationally significant fisheries; Subdivisions; the Land and Water develop and maintain a stable • Enforce Federal wildlife laws and Conservation Fund; and the United regulatory program that is safe, cost- regulate international trade; States Treasury. Additionally, in this effective, and environmentally sound. A • Conserve and restore wildlife final rule, the Department of the Interior stable regulatory program ensures that habitat such as wetlands; • moves the Gulf of Mexico Energy the coal mining industry has clear Help foreign governments conserve Security Act of 2006’s Phase I guidelines for operation and wildlife through international regulations from the Bureau of Ocean conservation efforts; reclamation, and that citizens know • Energy Management’s 30 CFR chapter V how the program is being implemented. Distribute Federal funds to States, to ONRR’s 30 CFR chapter XII, and OSM’s Federal regulatory program territories, and tribes for fish and provides additional clarification and wildlife conservation projects; and sets minimum requirements for • minor definition changes to the current obtaining a permit for surface and Manage the more than 150-million- revenue-sharing regulations. underground coal mining operations, acre National Wildlife Refuge System, • Simplify the valuation of coal sets performance standards for those which protects and conserves fish and advance royalty. operations, requires reclamation of wildlife and their habitats and allows The new regulations will implement lands and waters disturbed by mining, the public to engage in outdoor the provisions of the Energy Policy Act and requires enforcement to ensure that recreational activities. of 2005 (EPAct) governing the payment the standards are met. OSM is the During the next year, FWS regulatory of advance royalty on coal resources primary regulatory authority for SMCRA priorities will include: • Regulations under the Endangered produced from Federal leases. The enforcement until a State or Indian tribe Species Act (ESA). EPAct provisions amend the Mineral develops its own regulatory program, Leasing Act of 1920 (MLA). ONRR is We will issue multiple rules to add which is no less effective than the species to, remove species from, and also adding information collection Federal program. When a State or Indian requirements that are applicable to all reclassify species on the Lists of tribe achieves ‘‘primacy,’’ it assumes Endangered and Threatened Wildlife solid minerals leases and also are direct responsibility for permitting, necessary to implement the EPAct and Plants and to designate critical inspection, and enforcement activities habitat for certain listed species. We Federal coal advance royalty provisions. under its federally approved regulatory • Consolidate billing and collection will issue a rule to improve the process program. The regulatory standards in for listing species by revising the systems at the Department level. Federal program states and in primacy This Direct Final Rule (DFR) amends process for submitting petitions to list, states are essentially the same with only those sections of the Code of Federal delist, or reclassify species. We will minor, non-substantive differences. Regulations (CFR) pertaining to how to further the protection of native species Today, 24 States have primacy, submit rental and bonus payments for and their ecosystems through a policy including 23 of the 24 coal producing onshore lease sales. The goals are to that will provide incentives for States. OSM’s regulatory priorities for increase flexibility in how the voluntary conservation actions taken for the coming year will focus on: species prior to their listing under the Department collects these payments and • Stream Protection. to provide consistency between onshore Protect streams and related ESA. In accordance with Executive and offshore lease sale payments and environmental resources from the Order 13563 (‘‘Improving Regulation collections. The DFR changes references adverse effects of surface coal mining and Regulatory Review’’), we will issue to paying rents and bonuses from the operations. OSM plans to finalize rules to improve the process of critical BLM State Office to paying rents and regulations to improve the balance habitat designation, including clarifying bonuses as stipulated in the terms of a between environmental protection and definitions of ‘‘critical habitat’’ and BLM Lease Sale Notice. BLM will notify the Nation’s need for coal by better ‘‘destruction or adverse modification’’ of potential bidders of their payment protecting streams from the adverse critical habitat, and a policy to explain options in the Lease Sale Notice during impacts of surface coal mining how we consider various factors in the pre-sale notification process, which operations. determining exclusions to critical occurs 90 days prior to the lease sale • habitat under section 4(b)(2) of the ESA. Coal Combustion Residues. • date. This additional flexibility will Establish Federal standards for the Regulations under the Migratory allow for a transition period for beneficial use of coal combustion Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). successful implementation and residues on active and abandoned coal In carrying out our responsibility to coordination between BLM and ONRR. mines. manage migratory bird populations, we issue annual migratory bird hunting Office of Surface Mining Reclamation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regulations, which establish the and Enforcement The mission of the U.S. Fish and frameworks (outside limits) for States to The Office of Surface Mining Wildlife Service (FWS) is to work with establish season lengths, bag limits, and Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) others to conserve, protect, and enhance areas for migratory game bird hunting. was created by the Surface Mining fish, wildlife, and plants and their In compliance with E.O. 13563, Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 habitats for the continuing benefit of the beginning with the 2016–17 hunting (SMCRA). Under SMCRA, OSM has two American people. FWS also provides season, we are using a new schedule for principal functions—the regulation of opportunities for Americans to enjoy the promulgating these regulations that is surface coal mining and reclamation outdoors and our shared natural more efficient and will provide operations and the reclamation and heritage. potential season dates for the States to restoration of abandoned coal mine FWS fulfills its responsibilities consider much earlier than was possible lands. In enacting SMCRA, Congress through a diverse array of programs that: under the old process. For example, we directed OSM to ‘‘strike a balance • Protect and recover endangered and anticipate proposing season frameworks between protection of the environment threatened species; in December 2015, instead of during the and agricultural productivity and the • Monitor and manage migratory summer of 2016, which will make Nation’s need for coal as an essential birds; planning easier for the States and all

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77804 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

parties interested in migratory bird and help U.S. importers and exporters • Wise Decisions: Integrating social, hunting. of wildlife products understand how to economic, environmental, and ethical We will also issue a programmatic conduct lawful international trade. We considerations into the decision-making environmental impact statement to will also rewrite a substantial portion of process. evaluate the potential environmental our regulations for the importation, • Effective Management: Instilling a impacts of a proposal to authorize exportation, and transportation of performance management philosophy incidental take of migratory birds under wildlife by proposing changes to the that fosters creativity, focuses on results, the MBTA. We are considering port structure and inspection fees and and requires accountability at all levels. rulemaking to address various making the regulations easier to • Research and Technology: approaches to regulating incidental take understand. Incorporating research findings and new of migratory birds. The rulemaking To help protect African elephants, we technologies to improve work practices, would establish appropriate standards will finalize regulations regarding ivory products, and services. for any such regulatory approach to from African elephants to prohibit The NPS regulatory priorities for the ensure that incidental take of migratory interstate commerce and export, except coming year include: • birds is appropriately mitigated, which for antique specimens and certain other Managing Off-Road Vehicle Use. may include requiring measures to items. Import of sport-hunted trophies Rules for Fire Island National avoid or minimize take or securing would still be allowed, but the number Seashore, Glen Canyon National compensation. Recreation Area, Cape Lookout National • of trophies that could be imported by a Regulations to administer the hunter in a given year would be limited. Seashore, and Big Cypress National National Wildlife Refuge System Finally, to protect native species and Preserve would allow for management (NWRS). prevent the spread of injurious species, of off-road vehicle (ORV) use, to protect In carrying out our statutory we will propose regulations to improve and preserve natural and cultural responsibility to provide wildlife- our process for making injurious resources, and provide a variety of dependent recreational opportunities on wildlife determinations for foreign visitor use experiences while NWRS lands, we issue an annual rule to species under the Lacey Act to prevent minimizing conflicts among user update the hunting and fishing the importation and interstate groups. Further, the rules would regulations on specific refuges. To transportation and commerce of designate ORV routes and establish ensure protection of NWRS resources, injurious wildlife. operational requirements and we will issue a proposed rule to ensure restrictions. that businesses conducting oil or gas National Park Service • Managing Bicycling. operations on NWRS lands do so in a The National Park Service (NPS) A new rule would authorize and manner that prevents or minimizes preserves unimpaired the natural and allow for management of bicycling at damage to the lands, visitor values, and cultural resources and values within Rocky Mountain National Park. management objectives. • Implementing the Native American more than 400 units of the National Park • Regulations to carry out the Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. System encompassing nearly 84 million Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration (1) A new rule would establish a acres of lands and waters for the (WSFR) Act. process for disposition of Unclaimed enjoyment, education, and inspiration To strengthen our partnership with Human Remains and Funerary Objects of this and future generations. The NPS State conservation organizations, we are discovered after November 16, 1990, on also cooperates with partners to extend working on several rules to update and Federal or Indian Lands. clarify our WSFR regulations. States rely the benefits of natural and resource (2) A rule revising the existing on FWS to distribute finances from trust conservation and outdoor recreation regulations would describe the fund and excise tax revenues, and the throughout the United States and the NAGPRA process in plain language, FWS relies on the States to implement world. eliminate ambiguity, clarify terms, and eligible conservation projects. Planned To achieve this mission NPS adheres include Native Hawaiians in the regulatory revisions will help to reflect to the following guiding principles: • process. The rule would eliminate several new decisions that State and Excellent Service: Providing the unnecessary requirements for museums Federal partners have agreed upon, and best possible service to park visitors and and would not add processes or collect to clarify language in clear and precise partners. additional information. • terms. We will expand on existing Productive Partnerships: • Regulating non-Federal oil and gas regulations that prescribe processes that Collaborating with Federal, State, tribal, activity on NPS land. applicants and grantees must follow and local governments, private NPS will revise its existing when applying for and managing grants organizations, and businesses to work regulations to account for new from FWS. We will also revise our toward common goals. technology and industry practices, • regulations under the Clean Vessel Act Citizen Involvement: Providing eliminate regulatory exemptions, update program to improve management and opportunities for citizens to participate new legal requirements, remove caps on execution of that program. in the decisions and actions of the bond amounts, and allow the NPS to • Regulations to carry out the National Park Service. recover compliance costs associated Convention on International Trade in • Heritage Education: Educating park with administering the regulations. Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and visitors and the general public about • Managing service animals. Flora (CITES) and the Lacey Act. their history and common heritage. The rule will define and differentiate In accordance with section 3(a) of • Outstanding Employees: service animals from pets, and will Executive Order 13609 (‘‘Promoting Empowering a diverse workforce describe the circumstances under which International Regulatory Cooperation’’), committed to excellence, integrity, and service animals would be allowed in a we will update our CITES regulations to quality work. park area. The rule will ensure NPS incorporate provisions resulting from • Employee Development: Providing compliance with Section 504 of the the 16th Conference of the Parties to developmental opportunities and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (28 U.S.C. CITES. The revisions will help us more training so employees have the ‘‘tools to 794) and better align NPS regulations effectively promote species conservation do the job’’ safely and efficiently. with the Americans with Disabilities

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77805

Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 1211 et seq.) and Jurisdiction. Publishing this rule will Web Information and Services of State the Department of Justice Service implement the provisions of Public Law and Local Governments. Animal regulations of 2011 (28 CFR 106–206, which directs the The Department will also be revising 36.104). establishment of permits and reasonable its regulations for Coordination of • Preserving and managing fees for commercial filming and certain Enforcement of Non-Discrimination in paleontological resources. still photography activities on public Federally Assisted Programs, as well as This rule would implement lands. revising regulations implementing provisions of the Paleontological section 274B of the Immigration and BILLING CODE 4334–63–P Resources Protection Act. The rule Nationality Act. would preserve, manage, and protect The Department’s other disability paleontological resources on Federal nondiscrimination rulemaking lands and ensure that these resources DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)— initiatives, while important priorities for are available for current and future FALL 2015 the Department’s rulemaking agenda, generations to enjoy as part of America’s will be included in the Department’s Statement of Regulatory Priorities national heritage. The rule would long-term actions for fiscal years 2017 address management, collection, and The mission of the Department of and 2018. As will be discussed more curation of paleontological resources Justice is to enforce the law and defend fully below, these initiatives include: (1) from Federal lands using scientific the interests of the United States Accessibility of Medical Equipment and principles and expertise. Provisions of according to the law, to ensure public Furniture; (2) Accessibility of Beds in the rule will ensure that resources are safety against foreign and domestic Guestrooms with Mobility Features in collected in accordance with permits threats, to provide Federal leadership in Places of Lodging; (3) Next Generation and curated in an approved repository. preventing and controlling crime, to 9–1–1 Services; (4) Accessibility of Web The rule would also protect confidential seek just punishment for those guilty of Information and Services of Public locality data, and authorize penalties for unlawful behavior, and to ensure the Accommodations; and (5) Accessibility illegally collecting, damaging, altering, fair and impartial administration of of Equipment and Furniture. defacing, or selling paleontological justice for all Americans. In carrying out Regulatory Plan Initiatives resources. its mission, the Department is guided by • Collecting plants for traditional four core values: (1) Equal justice under ADA Amendments Act. In September cultural practices. the law; (2) honesty and integrity; (3) 2008, Congress passed the ADA The rule will authorize Park commitment to excellence; and (4) Amendments Act, which revises the definition of ‘‘disability’’ to more Superintendents to enter into respect for the worth and dignity of each broadly encompass impairments that agreements with federally recognized human being. The Department of Justice substantially limit a major life activity. tribes to permit tribal members to is primarily a law enforcement agency, On January 30, 2014, the Department collect limited quantities of plant not a regulatory agency; it carries out its published a Notice of Proposed resources in parks to be used for principal investigative, prosecutorial, Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing traditional cultural practices and and other enforcement activities amendments to both its title II and title activities. through means other than the regulatory III ADA regulations in order to process. Bureau of Reclamation incorporate the statutory changes set The Bureau of Reclamation’s mission The regulatory priorities of the forth in the ADA Amendments Act. The is to manage, develop, and protect water Department include initiatives in the comment period closed on March 31, and related resources in an areas of civil rights, criminal law 2014. The Department expects to environmentally and economically enforcement and immigration. These publish a final rule incorporating these sound manner in the interest of the initiatives are summarized below. In changes into the ADA implementing American public. To accomplish this addition, several other components of regulations in fiscal year 2016. The mission, we employ management, the Department carry out important Department also plans to propose engineering, and science to achieve responsibilities through the regulatory amendments to its section 504 effective and environmentally sensitive process. Although their regulatory regulations to implement the ADA solutions. efforts are not separately discussed in Amendments Act of 2008 in fiscal year Reclamation projects provide: this overview of the regulatory 2016. Irrigation water service, municipal and priorities, those components have key Captioning and Audio Description in industrial water supply, hydroelectric roles in implementing the Department’s Movie Theaters. Title III of the ADA power generation, water quality anti-terrorism and law enforcement requires public accommodations to take improvement, groundwater priorities. ‘‘such steps as may be necessary to management, fish and wildlife Civil Rights Division ensure that no individual with a enhancement, outdoor recreation, flood disability is treated differently because control, navigation, river regulation and The Department is including four of the absence of auxiliary aids and control, system optimization, and disability nondiscrimination rulemaking services, unless the covered entity can related uses. We have continued to initiatives in its Regulatory Plan: (1) demonstrate that taking such steps focus on increased security at our Implementation of the ADA would cause a fundamental alteration or facilities. Amendments Act of 2008 in the ADA would result in an undue burden.’’ 42 Our regulatory program focus in fiscal regulations (titles II and III); (2) U.S.C. 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). Both open year 2016 is to publish a proposed Implementation of the ADA and closed captioning and audio minor amendment to 43 CFR part 429 to Amendments Act of 2008 in the recordings are examples of auxiliary bring it into compliance with the Department’s section 504 regulations; aids and services that should be requirements of 43 CFR part 5, (3) Nondiscrimination on the Basis of provided by places of public Commercial Filming and Similar Disability by Public Accommodations: accommodations, 28 CFR 36.303(b)(1)– Projects and Still Photography on Movie Captioning and Audio (2). The Department stated in the Certain Areas under Department Description; and (4) Accessibility of preamble to its 1991 rule that ‘‘[m]ovie

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77806 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

theaters are not required . . . to present days until December 1, 2014. The it was considering amending its open-captioned films,’’ 28 CFR part 36, Department received approximately 435 regulations implementing titles II and III app. C (2011), but it did not address public comments in response to the of the ADA to require Web site closed captioning and audio description movie captioning and audio description accessibility and it sought public in movie theaters. In the movie theater NPRM and expects to publish a final comment regarding what standards, if context, ‘‘closed captioning’’ refers to rule during fiscal year 2016. any, it should adopt for Web site captions that only the patron requesting Web site Accessibility: State and local accessibility, whether the Department the closed captions can see because the Governments. The Internet as it is should adopt coverage limitations for captions are delivered to the patron at known today did not exist when certain entities, and what resources and or near the patron’s seat. Audio Congress enacted the ADA, yet today services are available to make existing description is a technology that enables the Internet plays a critical role in the Web sites accessible to individuals with individuals who are blind or have low daily personal, professional, civic, and disabilities. The Department also vision to enjoy movies by providing a business life of Americans. The ADA’s solicited comments on the costs of spoken narration of key visual elements expansive nondiscrimination mandate making Web sites accessible and on the of a visually delivered medium, such as reaches goods and services provided by existence of any other effective and actions, settings, facial expressions, public accommodations and public reasonably feasible alternatives to costumes, and scene changes. entities using Internet Web sites. Being making Web sites accessible. The Since 1991, there have been many unable to access Web sites puts Department received approximately 440 individuals at a great disadvantage in technological advances in the area of public comments and is in the process today’s society, which is driven by a closed captioning and audio description of reviewing these comments. The dynamic electronic marketplace and for first-run movies. In June 2008, the Department will be publishing separate unprecedented access to information. Department issued an NPRM to revise NPRMs addressing Web site For individuals with disabilities who the ADA title III regulation, 73 FR accessibility pursuant to titles II and III experience barriers to their ability to 34466, in which the Department stated of the ADA. The Department expects to travel or to leave their homes, the that it was considering options for publish the title II NPRM early in fiscal Internet may be their only way to access year 2016. requiring that movie theater owners or certain government programs and Coordination of Enforcement of Non- operators exhibit movies that are services. In this regard, the Internet is Discrimination in Federally Assisted captioned or that provide video dramatically changing the way that Programs. In addition, the Department (narrative) description. The Department governmental entities serve the public. is planning to revise the coordination issued an ANPRM on July 26, 2010, to Public entities are increasingly regulations implementing title VI of the obtain more information regarding providing their constituents access to Civil Rights Act, which have not been issues raised by commenters; to seek government services and programs updated in over 30 years. Among other comment on technical questions that through their Web sites. Information things, the updates will revise outdated arose from the Department’s research; available on the Internet has become a provisions, streamline procedural steps, and to learn more about the status of gateway to education, and participation streamline and clarify provisions digital conversion. In addition, the in many other public programs and regarding information and data Department sought information activities. Through Government Web collection, promote opportunities to regarding whether other technologies or sites, the public can obtain information encourage public engagement, and areas of interest (e.g., 3D) have or correspond with local officials incorporate current law regarding developed or are in the process of without having to wait in line or be meaningful access for individuals who development that would either replace placed on hold. They can also pay fines, are limited English proficient. The or augment digital cinema or make any apply for benefits, renew State-issued Department expects to publish its regulatory requirements for captioning identification, register to vote, file taxes, NPRM during fiscal year 2016. and audio description more difficult or request copies of vital records, and Implementation of Section 274B of expensive to implement. The complete numerous other everyday the Immigration and Nationality Act. Department received approximately tasks. The availability of these services The Department also proposes to revise 1,171 public comments in response to and information online not only makes regulations implementing section 274B its movie captioning and video life easier for the public but also often of the Immigration and Nationality Act, description ANPRM. On August 1, 2014, enables governmental entities to operate and to reflect the new name of the office the Department published its NPRM more efficiently and at a lower cost. within the Department charged with proposing to revise the ADA title III The ADA’s promise to provide an enforcing this statute. The proposed regulation to require movie theaters to equal opportunity for individuals with revisions are appropriate to conform the have the capability to exhibit movies disabilities to participate in and benefit regulations to the statutory text as with closed movie captioning and audio from all aspects of American civic and amended, simplify and add definitions description (which was described in the economic life will be achieved in of statutory terms, update and clarify ANPRM as video description) for all today’s technologically advanced the procedures for filing and processing showings of movies that are available society only if it is clear to State and charges of discrimination, ensure with closed movie captioning or audio local governments that their Web sites effective investigations of unfair description, to require theaters to must be accessible. Consequently, the immigration-related employment provide notice to the public about the Department is planning to amend its practices, and update outdated availability of these services, and to regulation implementing title II of the references. The Department expects to ensure that theaters have staff available ADA to require public entities that publish an NPRM proposing these who can provide information to patrons provide services, programs or activities changes during fiscal year 2016. about the use of these services. In to the public through Internet Web sites response to a request for an extension of to make their sites accessible to and Long-Term Actions the public comment period, the usable by individuals with disabilities. The remaining disability Department has issued a notice The Department, in its 2010 ANPRM nondiscrimination rulemaking extending the comment period for 60 on Web site accessibility, indicated that initiatives from the 2010 ANPRMs are

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77807

included in the Department’s long-term Internet may be their only way to access applicable, when it proposes priorities projected for fiscal years 2017 certain goods and services. Beyond accessibility standards for equipment and 2018: goods and services, information and furniture that is not fixed. The Next Generation 9–1–1. This ANPRM available on the Internet has become a ANPRM sought information about other sought information on possible gateway to education, socializing, and categories of equipment, including beds revisions to the Department’s regulation entertainment. in accessible guest rooms, and medical to ensure direct access to Next The Department’s 2010 ANPRM on equipment and furniture. The Generation 9–1–1 (NG 9–1–1) services Web site accessibility, as previously Department received approximately 420 for individuals with disabilities. In pointed out, sought public comment comments in response to its ANPRM 1991, the Department of Justice regarding what standards, if any, it and is in the process of reviewing these published a regulation to implement should adopt for Web site accessibility, comments. The Department plans to title II of the Americans with whether the Department should adopt publish in fiscal year 2017 a separate Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). That coverage limitations for certain entities, NPRM pursuant to title III of the ADA regulation requires public safety including small businesses, and what on beds in accessible guest rooms, and answering points (PSAPs) to provide resources and services are available to in fiscal year 2018 an NPRM pursuant direct access to persons with disabilities make existing Web sites accessible to to titles II and III of the ADA that who use analog telecommunication individuals with disabilities. The focuses solely on accessible medical devices for the deaf (TTYs), 28 CFR Department also solicited comments on equipment and furniture. The remaining 35.162. Since that rule was published, the costs of making Web sites accessible items of equipment and furniture there have been major changes in the and on the existence of any other addressed in the 2010 ANPRM will be types of communications technology effective and reasonably feasible the subject of an NPRM that the used by the general public and by alternatives to making Web sites Department anticipates publishing in people who have disabilities that affect accessible. The Department is reviewing fiscal year 2018. their hearing or speech. Many the public comments received in individuals with disabilities now use response to the ANPRM and, as noted Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms the Internet and wireless text devices as above, plans to publish the title II and Explosives (ATF) their primary modes of NPRM on Web site accessibility early in ATF issues regulations to enforce the telecommunications. At the same time, fiscal year 2016. The Department Federal laws relating to the manufacture PSAPs are planning to shift from analog believes that the title II Web site and commerce of firearms and telecommunications technology to new accessibility rule will facilitate the explosives. ATF’s mission and Internet-Protocol (IP)-enabled NG 9–1–1 creation of an important infrastructure regulations are designed to, among other services that will provide voice and data for Web accessibility that will be very objectives, curb illegal traffic in, and (such as text, pictures, and video) important in the Department’s criminal use of, firearms and explosives, capabilities. As PSAPs transition from preparation of the title III Web site and to assist State, local, and other the analog systems to the new accessibility NPRM. Consequently, the Federal law enforcement agencies in technologies, it is essential that people Department has decided to extend the reducing crime and violence. The with communication disabilities be able time period for development of the Department is planning to finalize a to use the new systems. Therefore, the proposed title III Web site accessibility proposed rule to amend ATF’s Department published this ANPRM to rule and include it among its long-term regulations regarding the making or begin to develop appropriate regulatory rulemaking priorities. The Department transferring of a firearm under the guidance for PSAPs that are making this expects to publish the title III Web site National Firearms Act. As proposed, transition. The Department is in the accessibility NPRM during fiscal year this rule would (1) add a definition for process of completing its review of the 2018. the term ‘‘responsible person’’; (2) approximately 146 public comments it Equipment and Furniture. Both title II received in response to its NG 9–1–1 and title III of the ADA require covered require each responsible person of a ANPRM and expects to publish an entities to make reasonable corporation, trust or legal entity to NPRM addressing accessibility of NG 9– modifications in their programs or complete a specified form, and to 1–1 during fiscal year 2017. services to facilitate participation by submit photographs and fingerprints; Web site Accessibility: Public persons with disabilities. In addition, and (3) modify the requirements Accommodations. As noted above, the covered entities are required to ensure regarding the certificate of the chief law ADA’s expansive nondiscrimination that people are not excluded from enforcement officer. mandate reaches the goods and services participation because facilities are ATF will continue, as a priority provided by public accommodations inaccessible or because the entity has during fiscal year 2016, to seek using Internet Web sites. The inability failed to provide auxiliary aids. The use modifications to its regulations to access Web sites puts individuals at of accessible equipment and furniture is governing commerce in firearms and a great disadvantage in today’s society, often critical to an entity’s ability to explosives. ATF plans to issue which is driven by a dynamic electronic provide a person with a disability equal regulations to finalize the current marketplace and unprecedented access access to its services. Changes in interim rules implementing the to information. On the economic front, technology have resulted in the provisions of the Safe Explosives Act, electronic commerce, or ‘‘e-commerce,’’ development and improved availability title XI, subtitle C, of Public Law 107– often offers consumers a wider selection of accessible equipment and furniture 296, the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and lower prices than traditional, that benefit individuals with (enacted Nov. 25, 2002). ATF also has ‘‘brick-and-mortar’’ storefronts, with the disabilities. The 2010 ADA Standards begun a rulemaking process that will added convenience of not having to include accessibility requirements for lead to promulgation of a revised set of leave one’s home to obtain goods and some types of fixed equipment (e.g., regulations (27 CFR part 771) governing services. And, as also stated above, for ATMs, washing machines, dryers, the procedure and practice for proposed individuals with disabilities who tables, benches and vending machines) denial of applications for explosives experience barriers to their ability to and the Department plans to look to licenses or permits and proposed travel or to leave their homes, the these standards for guidance, where revocation of such licenses and permits.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77808 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) receive and archive these electronic criminal prosecutions relating to the DEA is the primary agency prescriptions. immigration laws. responsible for coordinating the drug Bureau of Prisons In several pending rulemaking actions, the Department is working to law enforcement activities of the United The Federal Bureau of Prisons issues States and also assists in the revise and update the regulations regulations to enforce the Federal laws relating to immigration proceedings in implementation of the President’s relating to its mission: To protect order to further EOIR’s primary mission National Drug Control Strategy. DEA society by confining offenders in the to adjudicate immigration cases by implements and enforces titles II and III controlled environments of prisons and fairly, expeditiously, and uniformly of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse community-based facilities that are safe, interpreting and administering the Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and humane, cost-efficient, and Nation’s immigration laws. These the Controlled Substances Import and appropriately secure, and that provide pending regulations include but are not Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801–971), as work and other self-improvement limited to: A proposed regulation to amended, and collectively referred to as opportunities to assist offenders in establish procedures for the filing and the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). becoming law-abiding citizens. During adjudication of motions to reopen DEA’s mission is to enforce the CSA and the next 12 months, in addition to other its regulations and bring to the criminal regulatory objectives aimed at removal, deportation, and exclusion and civil justice system those accomplishing its mission, the Bureau proceedings based upon a claim of organizations and individuals involved will continue its ongoing efforts to: ineffective assistance of counsel; a final in the growing, manufacture, or Streamline regulations, eliminating regulation to improve the recognition distribution of controlled substances unnecessary language and improving and accreditation process for and listed chemicals appearing in or readability; improve disciplinary organizations and representatives that destined for illicit traffic in the United procedures through a revision of the appear in immigration proceedings States. DEA promulgates the CSA subpart relating to the disciplinary before EOIR; and a proposed regulation implementing regulations in title 21 of process; reduce the introduction of to implement procedures that address the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), contraband through various means, such the specialized needs of unaccompanied parts 1300 to 1321. The CSA and its as clarifying drug and alcohol alien children in removal proceedings implementing regulations are designed surveillance testing programs; protect pursuant to the William Wilberforce to prevent, detect, and eliminate the the public from continuing criminal Trafficking Victims Protection diversion of controlled substances and activity committed within prison; and Reauthorization Act of 2008. In listed chemicals into the illicit market enhance the Bureau’s ability to more addition, EOIR recently published a while providing for the legitimate closely monitor the communications of final regulation to allow for separate medical, scientific, research, and high-risk inmates. representation in custody and bond industrial needs of the United States. proceedings and a final regulation to Pursuant to its statutory authority, Executive Office for Immigration Review enhance the eligibility requirements for DEA continuously evaluates new and (EOIR) providers to appear on the List of Pro emerging substances to determine On March 1, 2003, pursuant to the Bono Legal Service Providers. Finally, whether such substances should be Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA), in response to Executive Order 13653, controlled under the CSA. During fiscal the responsibility for immigration the Department is retrospectively year 2016, in addition to initiating enforcement and border security and for reviewing EOIR’s regulations to temporary scheduling actions to prevent providing immigration-related services eliminate regulations that unnecessarily imminent hazard to the public safety, and benefits, such as naturalization, duplicate DHS’s regulations and update DEA will also consider petitions to immigrant petitions, and work outdated references to the pre-2002 control or reschedule various authorization, was transferred from the immigration system. substances. Among other regulatory Justice Department’s former Retrospective Review of Existing reviews and initiatives, the DEA will Immigration and Naturalization Service Regulations initiate the notice of proposed (INS) to the Department of Homeland rulemaking titled, ‘‘Transporting Security (DHS). However, the Pursuant to section 6 of Executive Controlled Substances Away from immigration judges and the Board of Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and Principal Places of Business or Principal Immigration Appeals (Board) in EOIR Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), the Places of Professional Practice on an As remain part of the Department of Justice. following Regulatory Identifier Numbers Needed and Random Basis.’’ In this The immigration judges adjudicate (RINs) have been identified as rule, the DEA proposes to amend its approximately 300,000 cases each year associated with retrospective review regulations governing the registration, to determine whether aliens should be and analysis in the Department’s final security, reporting, recordkeeping, and ordered removed from the United States retrospective review of regulations plan. ordering requirements in circumstances or should be granted some form of relief Some of these entries on this list may where practitioners transport controlled from removal. The Board has be completed actions, which do not substances for dispensing to patients on jurisdiction over appeals from the appear in The Regulatory Plan. an as needed and random basis. Lastly, decisions of immigration judges, as well However, more information can be the DEA will finalize its Interim Final as other matters. Accordingly, the found about these completed Rule for Electronic Prescriptions for Attorney General has a continued role rulemakings in past publications of the Controlled Substances. By this final in the conducting of immigration Unified Agenda on Reginfo.gov in the rule, the DEA would finalize its proceedings, including removal Completed Actions section for that regulations to clarify: (1) The criteria by proceedings and custody determinations agency. These rulemakings can also be which DEA-registered practitioners may regarding the detention of aliens found on Regulations.gov. The final electronically issue controlled substance pending completion of removal Justice Department plan can be found at: prescriptions; and (2) the criteria by proceedings. The Attorney General also http://www.justice.gov/open/doj-rr- which DEA-registered pharmacies may is responsible for civil litigation and final-plan.pdf.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77809

RIN Title Description

1125–AA62 ...... List of Pro Bono Legal Service Pro- The Department has published a Final rule amending the EOIR regulations to viders for Aliens in Immigration Pro- enhance the eligibility requirements for organizations, private attorneys, and ceedings. referral services to be included on the List of Pro Bono Legal Service Pro- viders. 1125–AA71 ...... Retrospective Regulatory Review Advance notice of future rulemaking concerning appeals of DHS decisions (8 Under E.O. 13563 of 8 CFR Parts CFR part 1103), documentary requirements for aliens (8 CFR parts 1211 1003, 1103, 1211, 1212, 1215, 1216, and 1212), control of aliens departing from the United States (8 CFR part 1235. 1215), procedures governing conditional permanent resident status (8 CFR part 1216), and inspection of individuals applying for admission to the United States (8 CFR part 1235). A number of attorneys, firms, and organi- zations in immigration practice are small entities. EOIR believes this rule will improve the efficiency and fairness of adjudications before EOIR by, for ex- ample, eliminating duplication, ensuring consistency with the Department of Homeland Security’s regulations in chapter I of title 8 of the CFR, and delin- eating more clearly the authority and jurisdiction of each agency. The ANPRM was published on 9/28/2012. The comment period closed on 11/27/ 2012. EOIR is currently in the process of reviewing the comments received and drafting two follow-up NPRMs. 1125–AA72 ...... Recognition of Organizations and Ac- This rule amends the regulations governing the requirements and procedures creditations of Non-Attorney Rep- for authorizing representatives of non-profit religious, charitable, social serv- resentatives. ice, or similar organizations to represent persons in proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 1125–AA78 ...... Separate Representation for Custody The Department has published a Final rule amending the Executive Office for and Bond Proceedings. Immigration Review (EOIR) regulations relating to the representation of aliens in custody and bond proceedings by allowing a representative to enter an appearance in custody and bond proceedings before EOIR without committing to appear on behalf of the alien for all proceedings before the Immigration Court. 1117–AB37 ...... Transporting to Dispense Controlled DEA proposes to amend its regulations to clearly delineate how to transport, Substances on an As-Needed and dispense, and store controlled substances away from registered locations Random Basis. when such activities are for the purpose of dispensing controlled substances on an as-needed and random basis. These proposed amendments include changes necessary to implement the Veterinary Medicine Mobility Act of 2014 and to clarify controlled substance handling requirements for emer- gency response operations. 1117–AB41 ...... Implementation of the International DEA plans to update its regulations for the import and export of tableting and Trade Data System. encapsulating machines, controlled substances, and listed chemicals, and its regulations relating to reports required for domestic transactions in listed chemicals, gammy-hydroxybutyric acid, and tableting and encapsulating ma- chines. In accordance with Executive Order 13563, the DEA has plans to review its import and export regulations and reporting requirements for do- mestic transactions in listed chemicals (and gammy-hydroxybutyric acid) and tableting and encapsulating machines, and evaluate them for clarity, consistency, continued accuracy, and effectiveness. The proposed amend- ments would clarify certain policies and reflect current procedures and tech- nological advancements. The amendments would also allow for the imple- mentation, as applicable to tableting and encapsulating machines, controlled substances, and listed chemicals, of the President’s Executive Order 13659 on streamlining the export/import process and requiring the government- wide utilization of the International Trade Data System. 1121–AA85; 1121– Public Safety Officers’ Benefits (PSOB) These two related rules are a priority because certain key provisions of the AA86. Program. PSOB rule have been superseded by statutory change, a need exists to im- prove the overall efficiency of the program, and the last significant update to the rules was in 2008. The first rule would be relatively short and would up- date the existing regulation to address issues related to injuries and deaths of public safety officers asserted to have been caused by 9/11 services, and offset issues with the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund. The second rule would be a more comprehensive update of the PSOB regulation. These re- visions are necessary as a result of significant changes to the Program fol- lowing the enactment of the Dale Long Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Im- provements Act of 2012 (signed into law in January 2013), as well as rec- ommendations from an OIG Audit finalized in July 2015, and other internal reviews that identified the need to streamline the claims review process to reduce delays and increase transparency.

Executive Order 13609—Promoting reasonably anticipated to lead to Executive Order 13659 International Regulatory Cooperation significant regulations. Executive Order 13659, ‘‘Streamlining The Department is not currently the Export/Import Process for America’s engaged in international regulatory Businesses,’’ provided new directives cooperation activities that are for agencies to improve the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77810 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

technologies, policies, and other Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, State, local or tribal Governments or controls governing the movement of 28 CFR part 39 and part 42, subpart G, communities. The Department’s section goods across our national borders. This and its regulation implementing 504 rule will incorporate the same includes additional steps to implement Executive Order 12250, 28 CFR part 41, changes made by the ADA Amendments the International Trade Data System as to reflect statutory amendments to the Act to the definition of disability as are an electronic information exchange definition of disability applicable to included in the proposed changes to the capability, or ‘‘single window,’’ through section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, ADA title II and title III rules (1190– which businesses will transmit data which were enacted in the ADA AA59), which will be published in the required by participating agencies for Amendments Act of 2008, Public Law Federal Register in the near future. the importation or exportation of cargo. 110–325, 122 Stat. 3553 (Sep. 25, 2008). Therefore, we do not believe that the At the Department of Justice, The ADA Amendments Act took effect revisions to the Department’s existing stakeholders must obtain pre-import on January 1, 2009. The ADA section 504 federally assisted and pre-export authorizations from the Amendments Act revised 29 U.S.C. 705, regulations will have any additional Drug Enforcement Administration to make the definition of disability used economic impact, because public and (DEA) (relating to controlled substances in the nondiscrimination provisions in private entities that receive federal and listed chemicals), or from the title V of the Rehabilitation Act financial assistance from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms consistent with the amended ADA Department are also likely to be subject and Explosives (ATF) (relating to requirements. These amendments (1) to titles II or III of the ADA. The firearms, ammunition, and explosives). add illustrative lists of ‘‘major life Department expects to consider further The ITDS ‘‘single window’’ will work in activities,’’ including ‘‘major bodily the economic impact of the proposed conjunction with these pre-import and functions,’’ that provide more examples rule on the Department’s existing pre-export authorizations. Because the of covered activities and covered section 504 federally conducted ITDS excludes applications for permits, conditions than are now contained in regulations, but anticipates that the rule licenses, or certifications, the ITDS agency regulations (sec 3[2]); (2) clarify will not be economically significant single window will not be used by DEA that a person who is ‘‘regarded as’’ within the meaning of Executive Order registrants, regulated persons, or brokers having a disability does not have to be 12866. This is because the revisions to or traders applying for permits or filing regarded as being substantially limited these regulations will only apply to the import/export declarations, notifications in a major life activity (sec 3[3]); and (3) Department’s programs and activities or reports. The DEA import/export add rules of construction regarding the and how those programs and activities application and filing processes will definition of disability that provide are operated so as to ensure compliance continue to remain separate from (and guidance in applying the term with the nondiscrimination in advance of) the ITDS single window. ‘‘substantially limits’’ and prohibit requirements of section 504. In the Entities will continue to use the DEA consideration of mitigating measures in NPRM, the Department will be soliciting application and filing processes; determining whether a person has a public comment in response to its initial however, the processes will be disability (sec 3[4]). The Department assessment of the impact of the electronic rather than paper. After anticipates that these changes will be proposed rule. DEA’s approval or notification of receipt published for comment in a proposed Risks: Failure to update the as appropriate, the DEA will transmit rule within the next 12 months. During Department’s section 504 regulations to the necessary information electronically the drafting of these revisions, the conform to statutory changes will to the ITDS and the registrant or Department will also review the interfere with the Department’s regulated person. currently published rules to ensure that enforcement efforts and lead to Pursuant to section 6 of E.O. 13659, any other legal requirements under the confusion about the law’s requirements DEA and ATF have consulted with U.S. Rehabilitation Act have been properly among entities that receive Federal Customs and Border Protection (CBP) addressed in these regulations. financial assistance from the Statement of Need: This rule is and are continuing to study what Department or who participate in its necessary to bring the Department’s modifications and technical changes to federally conducted programs. prior section 504 regulations into their existing regulations and Timetable: operational systems are needed to compliance with the ADA Amendments achieve the goals of E.O. 13659. Act of 2008, which became effective on Action Date FR Cite January 1, 2009. Summary of Legal Basis: The NPRM ...... 05/00/16 summary of the legal basis of authority NPRM Comment 06/00/16 DOJ—CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION (CRT) for this regulation is set forth above in Period End. Proposed Rule Stage the abstract. Final Action ...... 12/00/16 Alternatives: Because this NPRM 70. Implementation of the ADA implements statutory changes to the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Amendments Act of 2008 (Section 504 section 504 definition of disability, Required: No. of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) there are no appropriate alternatives to Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Priority: Other Significant. issuing this NPRM. Governmental Jurisdictions. Legal Authority: Pub. L. 110–325; 29 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Government Levels Affected: Local, U.S.C. 794 (sec 504 of the Rehabilitation Department’s preliminary assessment in State. Act of 1973, as amended); E.O. 12250 this early stage of the rulemaking Federalism: Undetermined. (45 FR 72955; 11/04/1980) process is that this rule will not be Agency Contact: Rebecca B. Bond, CFR Citation: 28 CFR 39; 28 CFR 41; ‘‘economically significant,’’ that is, that Chief, Department of Justice, Civil 28 CFR 42, subpart G. the rule will not have an annual effect Rights Division, Disability Rights Legal Deadline: None. on the economy of $100 million, or Section, 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Abstract: This rule would propose to adversely affect in a material way the Washington, DC 20530, Phone: 800 514– amend the Department’s regulations economy, a sector of the economy, the 0301. implementing section 504 of the environment, public health or safety or RIN: 1190–AA60

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77811

DOJ—CRT paperwork; and expand the possibilities because there are no specific ADA 71. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of of reaching new sectors of the standards for Web site accessibility, Disability: Accessibility of Web community or offering new programs or these Web sites vary in actual usability. Information and Services of State and services. Many States and localities Summary of Legal Basis: The ADA Local Governments have begun to improve the accessibility requires that State and local of portions of their Web sites. However, Governments provide qualified Priority: Economically Significant. full compliance with the ADA’s promise individuals with disabilities equal Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. to provide an equal opportunity for access to their programs, services, or Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101 et individuals with disabilities to activities unless doing so would seq. participate in and benefit from all fundamentally alter the nature of their CFR Citation: 28 CFR 35. aspects of the programs, services, and Legal Deadline: None. programs, services, or activities or Abstract: The Department published activities provided by State and local would impose an undue burden. 42. an ANPRM on July 26, 2010, RIN 1190– governments in today’s technologically U.S.C. 12132. AA61, that addressed issues relating to advanced society will only occur if it is Alternatives: The Department intends proposed revisions of both the title II clear to public entities that their Web to consider various alternatives for and title III ADA regulations in order to sites must be accessible. Consequently, ensuring full access to Web sites of State provide guidance on the obligations of the Department intends to publish a and local Governments and will solicit covered entities to make programs, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) public comment addressing these services and activities offered over the to amend its title II regulations to alternatives. expressly address the obligations of Web accessible to individuals with Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The public entities to make the Web sites disabilities. The Department has now Department anticipates that this rule they use to provide programs, activities, divided the rulemakings in the next step will be ‘‘economically significant,’’ that of the rulemaking process so as to or services or information to the public accessible to and usable by individuals is, that the rule will have an annual proceed with separate notices of effect on the economy of $100 million, proposed rulemakings for title II and with disabilities under the legal framework established by the ADA. The or adversely affect in a material way the title III. The title III rulemaking on Web proposed regulation will propose the economy, a sector of the economy, the accessibility will continue under RIN scope of the obligation to provide environment, public health or safety or 1190–AA61 and the title II rulemaking accessibility when persons with State, local or tribal Governments or will continue under the new RIN 1190– disabilities access public Web sites, as communities. However, the Department AA65. This rulemaking will provide well as propose the technical standards believes that revising its title II rule to specific guidance to State and local necessary to comply with the ADA. clarify the obligations of State and local governments in order to make services, Statement of Need: Many people with Governments to provide accessible Web programs, or activities offered to the disabilities use ‘‘assistive technology’’ to sites will significantly increase the public via the Web accessible to enable them to use computers and opportunities for citizens with individuals with disabilities. The ADA access the Internet. Individuals who are disabilities to participate in, and benefit requires that State and local blind or have low vision who cannot see from, State and local Government governments provide qualified computer monitors may use screen programs, activities, and services. It will individuals with disabilities equal readers—devices that speak the text that also ensure that individuals have access access to their programs, services, or would normally appear on a monitor. to important information that is activities unless doing so would People who have difficulty using a provided over the Internet, including fundamentally alter the nature of their computer mouse can use voice emergency information. The Department programs, services, or activities or recognition software to control their also believes that providing accessible would impose an undue burden. 42. computers with verbal commands. Web sites will benefit State and local U.S.C. 12132. The Internet as it is People with other types of disabilities Governments as it will increase the known today did not exist when may use still other kinds of assistive numbers of citizens who can use these Congress enacted the ADA; yet today technology. New and innovative Web sites, and thus improve the the Internet is dramatically changing the assistive technologies are being efficiency of delivery of services to the way that governmental entities serve the introduced every day. public. In drafting this NPRM, the public. Taking advantage of new Web sites that do not accommodate Department will attempt to minimize technology, citizens can now use State assistive technology, for example, can the compliance costs to State and local and local government Web sites to create unnecessary barriers for people Governments while ensuring the correspond online with local officials; with disabilities, just as buildings not benefits of compliance to persons with obtain information about government designed to accommodate people with disabilities. services; renew library books or driver’s disabilities prevent some individuals Risks: If the Department does not licenses; pay fines; register to vote; from entering and accessing services. revise its ADA title II regulations to obtain tax information and file tax Web designers may not realize how address Web site accessibility, persons returns; apply for jobs or benefits; and simple features built into a Web site will with disabilities in many communities complete numerous other civic tasks. assist someone who, for instance, will continue to be unable to access These Government Web sites are cannot see a computer monitor or use a their State and local governmental important because they allow programs mouse. In addition, in many cases, these services in the same manner available to and services to be offered in a more Web sites do not provide captioning for citizens without disabilities, and in dynamic, interactive way in order to videos or live events streamed over the some cases will not be able to access increase citizen participation; increase web, leaving persons who are deaf or those services at all. convenience and speed in obtaining hard of hearing unable to access the Timetable: information or services; reduce costs in information that is being provided. providing information about Although an increasing number of State Action Date FR Cite Government services and administering and local Governments are making programs; reduce the amount of efforts to provide accessible Web sites, ANPRM ...... 07/26/10 75 FR 43460

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77812 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite within the Department charged with Action Date FR Cite enforcing this statute. ANPRM Comment 01/21/11 Summary of Legal Basis: Statutory NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Period End. Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1324b; 8 U.S.C. NPRM Comment 01/00/16 NPRM ...... 01/00/16 1103(a)(1), (g). Period End. NPRM Comment 04/00/16 Final Action ...... 11/00/16 Period End. Alternatives: The Department believes that an NPRM is the most appropriate, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and for some revisions a necessary, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No. Required: Yes. method for achieving the goals of the Government Levels Affected: None. revisions. Issuing this NPRM is Small Entities Affected: Governmental Agency Contact: Alberto Ruisanchez, necessary to correct outdated regulatory Jurisdictions. Deputy Special Counsel, OSC, provisions and incorporate statutory Government Levels Affected: Local, Department of Justice, Civil Rights changes to section 274B of the INA. State. Division, 1425 New York Ave. NW., Likewise, revising the regulations to be Federalism: Undetermined. Suite 9000, Washington, DC 20530, consistent with longstanding agency Phone: 202 616–5594, Fax: 202 616– Additional Information: Split from guidance and relevant case law is RIN 1190–AA61. 5509, Email: [email protected]. appropriate and will reduce potential RIN: 1190–AA71 Agency Contact: Rebecca B. Bond, confusion about the law. Further, Chief, Department of Justice, Civil because the regulations already include Rights Division, Disability Rights procedures for filing and processing Section, 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., charges, it is appropriate to revise the DOJ—CRT Washington, DC 20530, Phone: 800 514– regulations to reflect updates to these Final Rule Stage 0301. processes and procedures. Finally, it is RIN: 1190–AA65 appropriate to update the regulations to 73. Implementation of the ADA reflect the new name of the office Amendments Act of 2008 (Title II and charged with enforcing the statute. Title III of the ADA) DOJ—CRT Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Priority: Other Significant. Department has determined that this 72. Revision of Standards and Legal Authority: Pub. L. 110–325; 42 rule is not economically significant, that Procedures for the Enforcement of U.S.C. 12134(a); 42 U.S.C. 12186(b) is, that the rule will not have an annual Section 274B of the Immigration and CFR Citation: 28 CFR 35; 28 CFR 36. effect on the economy of $100 million, Nationality Act Legal Deadline: None. or adversely affect in a material way the Abstract: This rule would propose to Priority: Other Significant. economy, a sector of the economy, the amend the Department’s regulations Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 8 U.S.C. environment, public health or safety or implementing title II and title III of the 1103(a)(1); 8 U.S.C. 1103(g); 8 U.S.C. State, local or tribal governments or Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 1324b; 28 U.S.C. 509; 28 U.S.C. 510; 28 communities. Any estimated costs to the 28 CFR part 35 and 28 CFR part 36, to U.S.C. 515–519 public relate to costs employers may implement changes to the ADA enacted CFR Citation: 28 CFR 0; 28 CFR 44. incur familiarizing themselves with the in the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Legal Deadline: None. rule, updating their relevant policies if Public Law 110–325, 122 Stat. 3553 Abstract: The Department of Justice needed, and participating in a voluntary (Sept. 25, 2008). The ADA Amendments proposes to revise regulations training webinar. In the NPRM, the Act took effect on January 1, 2009. The implementing section 274B of the Department will be soliciting public ADA Amendments Act amended the Immigration and Nationality Act and to comment in response to its preliminary Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 reflect the new name of the office within analysis regarding the costs imposed by U.S.C. 12101, et seq., to clarify terms the Department charged with enforcing the rule. While not easily quantifiable within the definition of disability and to this statute. The proposed revisions are due to data limitations, the Department establish standards that must be applied appropriate to conform the regulations identified several benefits of the rule, to determine if a person has a covered to the statutory text as amended, including: (1) Helping employers disability. These changes are intended simplify and add definitions of statutory understand the law more efficiently, (2) to mitigate the effects of the Supreme terms, update and clarify the procedures increasing public access to government Court’s decisions in Sutton v. United for filing and processing charges of services, and (3) eliminating public Airlines, 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and discrimination, ensure effective confusion regarding two offices in the Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. investigations of unfair immigration- Federal government with the same Williams, 534, U.S. 184 (2002). related employment practices, and name. Specifically, the ADA Amendments Act update outdated references. Risks: Failure to update the (1) adds illustrative lists of ‘‘major life Statement of Need: The regulatory regulations to conform to the statutory activities,’’ including ‘‘major bodily revisions are necessary to conform the amendments will interfere with the functions,’’ that provide more examples regulations to section 274B of the Department’s enforcement efforts. of covered activities and covered Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Further, failure to revise the regulations conditions than are now contained in as amended. The regulatory revisions to reflect changes to the filing and agency regulations (42 U.S.C. 12102(2)); also simplify and add definitions of processing of charges and the new name (2) clarifies that a person who is statutory terms, update and clarify the of the office charged with enforcing the ‘‘regarded as’’ having a disability does procedures for filing and processing law will lead to confusion among the not have to be regarded as being charges of discrimination, ensure public, most specifically employers substantially limited in a major life effective investigations of unfair subject to the law’s requirements and activity (42 U.S.C. 12103(3)); and (3) immigration-related employment workers whose rights are guaranteed by adds rules of construction regarding the practices, replace outdated references, the law. definition of disability that provide and reflect the new name of the office Timetable: guidance in applying the term

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77813

‘‘substantially limits’’ and prohibit accommodations, and the benefits of U.S.C. 12181–12189. Title III makes it consideration of mitigating measures in access to reasonable modifications of unlawful for places of public determining whether a person has a policies, practices and procedures to accommodation, such as movie theaters, disability (42 U.S.C. 12102(4)). meet their needs in a variety of contexts. to discriminate against individuals with Statement of Need: This rule is In this NPRM, the Department will be disabilities in the full and equal necessary to bring the Department’s soliciting public comment in response enjoyment of the goods, services, ADA regulations into compliance with to its preliminary analysis. facilities, privileges, advantages, or the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Risks: The ADA authorizes the accommodations of a place of public which became effective on January 1, Attorney General to enforce the ADA accommodation (42 U.S.C. 12182[a]). 2009. In addition, this rule is necessary and to promulgate regulations Moreover, title III prohibits places of to make the Department’s ADA title II implementing the law’s requirements. public accommodation from affording and title III regulations consistent with Failure to update the Department’s an unequal or lesser service to the ADA title I regulations issued on regulations to conform to statutory individuals or classes of individuals March 25, 2011 by the Equal changes and to be consistent with the with disabilities than is offered to other Employment Opportunity Commission EEOC regulations under title I of the individuals (42 U.S.C. (EEOC) incorporating the ADA ADA will interfere with the 12182(b)(1)(A)(ii)). Title III requires Amendments Act definition of Department’s enforcement efforts and places of public accommodation to take disability. lead to confusion about the law’s ‘‘such steps as may be necessary to Summary of Legal Basis: The requirements among entities covered by ensure that no individual with a summary of the legal basis of authority titles I, II and III of the ADA, as well as disability is excluded, denied services, for this regulation is set forth above in members of the public. segregated or otherwise treated the abstract. Timetable: differently because of the absence of Alternatives: In order to ensure auxiliary aids and services, such as consistency in application of the ADA Action Date FR Cite captioning and video description, Amendments Act across titles I, II and unless the entity can demonstrate that III of the ADA, this rule is intended to NPRM ...... 01/30/14 79 FR 4839 taking such steps would fundamentally be consistent with the language of the NPRM Comment 03/31/14 alter the nature of the good, service, EEOC’s rule implementing the ADA Period End. facility, privilege, advantage, or Amendments Act with respect to title I Final Action ...... 01/00/16 accommodation being offered or would of the ADA (employment). The result in an undue burden,’’ (42 U.S.C. Department will, however, consider Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii)). alternative regulatory language Required: No. suggested by commenters so long as it Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Statement of Need: A significant-and maintains that consistency. Governmental Jurisdictions. increasing-proportion of Americans Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Government Levels Affected: Local, have hearing or vision disabilities that Department’s preliminary analysis State. prevent them from fully and effectively indicates that the proposed rule would Agency Contact: Rebecca B. Bond, understanding movies without not be ‘‘economically significant,’’ that Chief, Department of Justice, Civil captioning or audio description. For is, the rule will not have an annual Rights Division, Disability Rights persons with hearing and vision effect on the economy of $100 million, Section, 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., disabilities, the unavailability of or adversely affect in a material way the Washington, DC 20530, Phone: 800 514– captioned or audio-described movies economy, a sector of the economy, the 0301. inhibits their ability to socialize and environment, public health or safety or RIN: 1190–AA59 fully take part in family outings and State, local or tribal governments or deprives them of the opportunity to communities. According to the meaningfully participate in an Department’s preliminary analysis, it is DOJ—CRT important aspect of American culture. anticipated that the rule will cost Many individuals with hearing or vision between $36.32 million and $61.8 74. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of disabilities who commented on the million in the first year (the year with Disability; Movie Captioning and Audio Department’s 2010 ANPRM remarked the highest costs). The Department Description that they have not been able to enjoy a estimates that in the first year of the Priority: Other Significant. commercial movie unless they watched implementation of the proposed rule, Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101, et it on TV, or that when they took their approximately 142,000 students will seq. children to the movies they could not take advantage of additional testing CFR Citation: 28 CFR 36. understand what they were seeing or accommodations than otherwise would Legal Deadline: None. discuss what was happening with their have been able to without the changes Abstract: Following its advance notice children. Today, more and more movies made to the definition of disability to of proposed rulemaking published on are produced with captions and audio conform to the ADA Amendments Act. July 26, 2010, the Department plans to description. However, despite the The Department believes that this will publish a proposed rule addressing the underlying ADA obligation, the result in benefits for many of these requirements for captioning and video advancement of digital technology and individuals in the form of significantly description of movies exhibited in the availability of captioned and audio- higher earnings potential. The movie theatres under title III of the described films, many movie theaters Department expects that the rule will Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 are still not exhibiting captioned or also have significant non-quantifiable (ADA). Title III prohibits discrimination audio-described movies, and when they benefits to persons with newly covered on the basis of disability in the activities do exhibit them, they are only for a few disabilities in other contexts, such as of places of public accommodation showings of a movie, and usually at off- benefits of non-exclusion from the (private entities whose operations affect times. Recently, a number of theater programs, services and activities of State commerce and that fall into one of companies have committed to provide and local governments and public twelve categories listed in the ADA). 42 greater availability of captioning and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77814 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

audio description. In some cases, these Action Date FR Cite Statement of Need: This regulation is have been nationwide commitments; in necessary to comply with Matter of other cases it has only been in a NPRM Comment 09/30/14 Compean, Bangaly & J–E–C–, 25 I&N particular State or locality. A uniform Period End. Dec. 1 (A.G. 2009), in which the Federal ADA requirement for captioning NPRM Extended 12/01/14 Attorney General directed EOIR to and audio description is necessary to Comment Pe- develop regulations governing claims of riod End. ensure that access to movies for persons Final Action ...... 05/00/16 ineffective assistance of counsel in with hearing and vision disabilities is proceedings before the immigration not dictated by the individual’s Regulatory Flexibility Analysis judges and the Board of Immigration residence or the presence of litigation in Required: Yes. Appeals. The purpose of this proposed their locality. In addition, the movie Small Entities Affected: Businesses. rule is to establish uniform procedural theater industry is in the process of Government Levels Affected: None. and substantive requirements for the converting its movie screens to use Agency Contact: Rebecca B. Bond, filing of motions to reopen based upon digital technology, and the Department Chief, Department of Justice, Civil a claim of ineffective assistance of believes that it will be extremely helpful Rights Division, Disability Rights counsel and to provide a uniform to provide timely guidance on the ADA Section, 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., standard for adjudicating such motions. requirements for captioning and audio Washington, DC 20530, Phone: 800 514– Summary of Legal Basis: The description so that the industry may 0301. summary of the legal basis for the factor this into its conversion efforts and RIN: 1190–AA63 authority for this regulation is set forth minimize costs. in the above abstract. Summary of Legal Basis: The Alternatives: The Department will summary of the legal basis of authority DOJ—EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR consider any public comments it may for this regulation is set forth above in IMMIGRATION REVIEW (EOIR) receive regarding achievable alternatives the abstract. that will still accomplish the goal of Alternatives: The Department will Proposed Rule Stage setting forth a framework for claims of consider any public comments that 75. Motions To Reopen Removal, ineffective assistance of counsel that propose achievable alternatives that will Deportation, or Exclusion Proceedings supports the integrity of immigration still accomplish the goal of providing Based Upon a Claim of Ineffective proceedings. access to movies for persons with Assistance of Counsel Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The hearing and vision disabilities. Department’s preliminary analysis Priority: Other Significant. However, the Department believes that indicates that the proposed rule would Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. the baseline alternative of not providing not be economically significant, that is, 521; 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1154, 1155, such access would be inconsistent with that the rule will not have an annual 1158, 1182, 1226, 1229, 1229a, 1229b, effect on the economy of $100 million, the provisions of title III of the ADA. 1229c, 1231, 1252, 1254a, 1255, 1282, or adversely affect in a material way the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The 1324d, 1330, 1361, 1362; 28 U.S.C. 509, economy, a sector of the economy, the Department’s preliminary analysis 510, 1746; sec 2 Reorg Plan No 2 of environment, public health or safety or indicates that the proposed rule would 1950; 3 CFR, 1949–1953, Comp, p 1002; State, local or tribal governments or not be ‘‘economically significant,’’ that sec 203 of Pub. L. 105–100, 111 Stat communities. is, that the rule will not have an annual 2196–200; sec 1506 and 1510 of Pub. L. Risks: Without the proposed changes effect on the economy of $100 million, 106–386, 114 Stat 1527–29, 1531–32; to the Department’s regulations, the or adversely affect in a material way the sec 1505 of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat Department will not have complied economy, a sector of the economy, the 2763A–326–328; title VII of Pub. L. 110– with the Attorney General’s directive in environment, public health or safety or 229 State, local or tribal governments or CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1003; 8 CFR Matter of Compean, Bangaly & J–E–C–, communities. In the NPRM, the 1208. 25 I&N Dec. 1 (A.G. 2009) and the Department solicited public comment in Legal Deadline: None. procedural and substantive response to its preliminary analysis Abstract: The Department of Justice requirements for filing—and the regarding the costs imposed by the rule. (Department) is planning to propose to standards for adjudicating—motions to Risks: Without the proposed changes amend the regulations of the Executive reopen based upon a claim of ineffective to the Department’s title III regulation, Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) by assistance of counsel will lack persons with hearing and vision establishing procedures for the filing uniformity. disabilities will continue to be denied and adjudication of motions to reopen Timetable: access to movies shown in movie removal, deportation, and exclusion theaters and movie theater owners and proceedings based upon a claim of Action Date FR Cite operators will not understand what they ineffective assistance of counsel. This NPRM ...... 01/00/16 are required to do in order to provide proposed rule is in response to Matter NPRM Comment 03/00/16 auxiliary aids and services to patrons of Compean, Bangaly & J–E–C–, 25 I&N Period End. with hearing and vision disabilities. Dec. 1 (A.G. 2009), in which the Final Action ...... 11/00/16 Timetable: Attorney General directed EOIR to develop such regulations. The Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Action Date FR Cite Department is also planning to propose Required: No. to amend the EOIR regulations to Government Levels Affected: None. ANPRM ...... 07/26/10 75 FR 43467 provide that ineffective assistance of URL for More Information: ANPRM Comment 01/24/11 Period End. counsel may constitute extraordinary www.regulations.gov. NPRM ...... 08/01/14 79 FR 44975 circumstances that may excuse the URL for Public Comments: NPRM Comment 09/08/14 79 FR 53146 failure to file an asylum application www.regulations.gov. Period Ex- within one year after the date of arrival Agency Contact: Jean King, General tended. in the United States. Counsel, Department of Justice,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77815

Executive Office for Immigration qualified legal representation for individuals. Without the proposed Review, 5197 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, underserved populations in immigration changes, the Department will be limited Falls Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 cases before federal administrative in its ability to expand the availability 305–0470. agencies by revising the eligibility of non-lawyer representation and to RIN: 1125–AA68 requirements and procedures for provide increased oversight over recognizing organizations and recognized organizations and their accrediting their representatives to representatives. provide immigration legal services to Timetable: DOJ—EOIR underserved populations. The proposed 76. Recognition of Organizations and rule also imposes greater oversight over Action Date FR Cite Accreditation of Non-Attorney recognized organizations and their Representatives representatives in order to protect NPRM ...... 10/01/15 80 FR 59514 against potential abuse of vulnerable NPRM Comment 11/30/15 Priority: Other Significant. Period End. Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. immigrant populations by unscrupulous Final Action ...... 09/00/16 521; 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 organizations and individuals. Summary of Legal Basis: The U.S.C. 1154; 8 U.S.C. 1155; 8 U.S.C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis proposed rule is a revision of current 1158; 8 U.S.C. 1182; 8 U.S.C. 1226; 8 Required: No. regulations that are authorized under 8 U.S.C. 1229; 8 U.S.C. 1229a; 8 U.S.C. Small Entities Affected: No. U.S.C. 292, regarding authorization to 1229b; 8 U.S.C. 1229c; 8 U.S.C. 1231; 8 Government Levels Affected: None. practice before the immigration courts U.S.C. 1232; 8 U.S.C. 1252b; 8 U.S.C. International Impacts: This regulatory and the Board. action will be likely to have 1254a; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 8 U.S.C. 1324d; 8 Alternatives: The R&A regulations international trade and investment U.S.C. 1330; 8 U.S.C. 1361; 8 U.S.C. have been comprehensively examined 1362; 28 U.S.C. 509; 28 U.S.C. 510; 28 in light of various issues that have effects, or otherwise be of international U.S.C. 1746; sec 2 Reorg Plan No 2 of arisen and input has been solicited from interest. 1950; 3 CFR, 1949–1953 Comp, 1002; the public on how to address in Additional Information: Public sec 203 of Pub. L. 105–100, 111 Stat amended regulations various Meeting notice 77 FR 9590 (Feb. 17, 2196–200; sec 1506 and 1510 of Pub. L. developments over the past 30 years. 2012). 106–386, 114 Stat 1527–29, 1531–1532; The proposed rule is the product of both URL for More Information: sec 1505 of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat internal and external deliberations, and www.regulations.gov. 2763 A–326 to –328 the proposed rule directly addresses URL for Public Comments: CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1001; 8 CFR alternatives approaches to the current www.regulations.gov. 1003; 8 CFR 1292. regulations that the Department has Agency Contact: Jean King, General Legal Deadline: None. either decided to adopt or reject in the Counsel, Department of Justice, Abstract: This rule would propose to proposed rule. The Department will Executive Office for Immigration amend the regulations governing the consider any public comments that Review, 5197 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, requirements and procedures for propose achievable alternatives that will Falls Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 authorizing the representatives of still accomplish the goals of this 305–0470. nonprofit religious, charitable, social proposed rule. RIN: 1125–AA72 service, or similar organizations to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The BILLING CODE 4410–BP–P represent aliens in proceedings before Department’s preliminary analysis the Executive Office for Immigration indicates that the proposed rule would Review and the Department of not be economically significant, that is, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Homeland Security. that the rule will not have an annual Statement of Need: The Recognition effect on the economy of $100 million, Fall 2015 Statement of Regulatory and Accreditation (R&A) program or adversely affect in a material way the Priorities addresses the critical and ongoing economy, a sector of the economy, the Introduction shortage of qualified legal environment, public health or safety or representation for underserved State, local or tribal governments or The Department’s Fall 2015 populations in immigration cases before communities. The proposed rule, like Regulatory Agenda is driven by federal administrative agencies. the current regulations, does not assess Secretary Perez’s commitment to Through the R&A program, EOIR any fees on an organization to apply for building a stronger America through permits qualified non-attorneys to initial recognition or accreditation, to shared prosperity. This means more represent persons before the DHS, the renew recognition or accreditation, or to opportunity for workers to acquire the immigration courts, and the Board of extend recognition. skills they need to succeed, to earn a fair Immigration Appeals (Board). For over Risks: The purpose of this proposed day’s pay for a fair day’s work, for 30 years, the R&A regulations have rule is to promote effective and efficient workers and employers to compete on a remained largely unchanged, despite administration of justice before DHS level playing field, for veterans to thrive structural changes in the government, and EOIR by increasing the availability in the civilian economy, for people with the changing realities of the immigration of competent non-lawyer representation disabilities to be productive members of system, the inability of non-profit for underserved immigrant populations. the labor force, for workers to retire with organizations to meet the increased The proposed rule seeks to accomplish dignity, and for people to work in a safe need for legal representation under the this goal by amending the requirements environment with the full protection of current regulations, and the surge in for recognition and accreditation to our anti-discrimination laws. fraud and abuse by unscrupulous increase the availability of qualified In recent years, the Department of organizations and individuals preying representation for primarily low-income Labor has taken bold steps to use our on indigent and vulnerable populations. and indigent persons while protecting regulatory authorities to address many The proposed rule seeks to address the public from fraud and abuse by of the most critical challenges facing the critical and ongoing shortage of unscrupulous organizations and workers and their families.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77816 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

We took action to give home care • ensuring that individuals have the WIOA makes to the public workforce workers a raise by guaranteeing them peace of mind that comes with access to system regarding Combined and Unified minimum wage and overtime for the health care, retirement, and federal State Plans, performance accountability, hard work that they do. We required workers’ compensation benefits when and the one-stop delivery system and mine operators to limit miners’ they need them; one-stop centers.2 The Departments are exposure to coal dust, which will • safeguarding a fair day’s pay for a analyzing the comments received and dramatically reduce black lung disease fair day’s work for all hardworking developing a Final Rule. and save lives. Americans, regardless of race, gender, • The Department’s Civil Rights We updated our regulations to require religion, sexual orientation, or gender Center (CRC) will issue a proposed rule federal contractors and subcontractors identity; to implement the nondiscrimination to treat applicants and employees • giving workers a voice in their provisions in Section 188 of WIOA. The without regard to their sexual workplaces; and rule would update the regulations • orientation or gender identity. protecting the safety and health of implementing the nondiscrimination Along with the Department of workers so they do not have to risk their obligations in Section 188 of WIA to Education, we have proposed new lives for a paycheck. address current compliance issues in regulations that will transform our Under Secretary Perez’s leadership, the workforce system, and to nation’s workforce system, giving the Department continues its incorporate developments and workers the chance to develop the skills commitment to ensuring that interpretations of existing that will prepare them to succeed in collaboration, consensus-building and nondiscrimination law into the 21st century jobs and careers. We extensive stakeholder outreach are workforce development system. To proposed extending overtime integral to all of its regulatory efforts. ensure no gap in coverage between the protections to roughly 5 million Successful rulemaking requires that we effective date of WIOA and this workers. build a big table and keep an open rulemaking, CRC issued a Final Rule We proposed important new conflict mind. that makes only technical revisions to of interest protections for 401(k) and Training More Workers and Job-Seekers the WIA Section 188 rule, changing IRA investors that would require for Twenty-First Century Jobs references from ‘‘WIA’’ to ‘‘WIOA.’’ 3 The current Final Rule ultimately would retirement advisors to put their clients’ Sustained economic growth requires a ultimately be superseded by any Final best interests before their own profits. fundamental transformation of the Rule arising from the subsequent NPRM. Working with the Federal Acquisition workforce development system, • ETA issued a NPRM on November Regulatory Council we proposed building new partnerships, engaging 6, 2015 that proposes updated equal regulations that will implement the employers, emphasizing proven opportunity regulations implementing President’s Fair Pay and Safe strategies like apprenticeships, and the National Apprenticeship Act of Workplaces Executive Order, holding preparing people for the demands of the 1937, which prohibit discrimination in federal contractors accountable when 21st century economy as never before. registered apprenticeship on the basis of they put workers’ safety, hard-earned The Department’s regulatory priorities race, color, religion, national origin, and wages and basic workplace rights at reflect the Secretary’s vision for a sex, and which require that program risk. modern job-driven workforce system sponsors take affirmative action to We finalized a rule to help close the that helps businesses stay on the provide equal opportunity. Most persistent pay gap that exists between competitive cutting edge and helps notably, the proposed rule would men and women by providing workers punch their ticket to the middle update equal opportunity standards to employees working on federal contracts class. with real pay transparency and • ETA issued a Notice of Proposed include age (40 and older) and disability openness enabling them to freely talk Rulemaking (NPRM) on April 16, 2015, among the list of protected bases. It about their compensation. that implements the important changes would also strengthen the affirmative The 2015 Regulatory Plan highlights made to the public workforce system by action provisions by detailing the Labor Department’s most the Workforce Innovation and mandatory actions that sponsors must noteworthy and significant rulemaking take, and by requiring affirmative action Opportunity Act (WIOA) (Pub. L. 113– 4 efforts, with each addressing these top 128), signed by the President on July 22, for individuals with disabilities. priorities of its regulatory agencies: 2014, and replacing the Workforce Ensuring Access to Health Care, Employee Benefits Security Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) and Retirement, and Workers’ Compensation Administration (EBSA), Employment amending the Wagner-Peyser Act. This Benefits and Training Administration (ETA), NPRM enables the Department to The American Dream does not end Mine Safety and Health Administration implement WIOA, empowering the when a person retires. A financially (MSHA), Office of Federal Contract public workforce system and its secure retirement is a fundamental Compliance Programs (OFCCP), partners to increase employment, pillar of the middle class. People need Occupational Safety and Health retention, and earnings of participants, access to retirement savings vehicles; Administration (OSHA), Office of Labor- meet the skill requirements of and when they work hard and save Management Standards (OLMS), Office employers, and enhance the responsibly, they need access to sound of Workers’ Compensation Programs productivity and competitiveness of the (OWCP), Veterans’ Employment Service 1 nation. The Department is analyzing 2 (VETS), and Wage and Hour Division Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Joint comments received and developing a Rule for Unified and Combined State Plans, (WHD). These regulatory priorities Final Rule. In addition, as required by Performance Accountability, and the One-Stop exemplify the five components of the WIOA, the Departments of Education System Joint Provisions (RIN: 1205–AB74). Secretary’s opportunity agenda: and Labor issued a joint NPRM on April 3 Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and • Training more people, including Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce 16, 2015, to implement the changes that Innovation Act of 2014 (RIN: 1291–A37). veterans and people with disabilities, to 4 Equal Employment Opportunity in have the skills they need for the in- 1 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Apprenticeship Amendment of Regulations (RIN: demand jobs of the 21st century; (RIN: 1205–AB73). 1205–AB59).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77817

retirement investment advice from The Department also promulgates middle-class workers are not denied someone looking out for their best regulations to ensure that federal overtime protections that Congress interest. The Department has a workers’ compensation benefits intended, the Department issued an regulatory program designed do exactly programs are fairly administered: NPRM that would raise the salary that. • OWCP will issue a Final Rule under threshold. The Department is currently • Last spring EBSA proposed a rule to the Black Lung Benefits Act that will analyzing comments.8 help assure workers’ retirement security address claimants’ and coal mine • WHD will issue a proposed rule to by clarifying the circumstances under operators’ responsibility to disclose establish the ability of employees of which a person will be considered a medical information developed in federal contractors to earn seven days of ‘‘fiduciary’’ when providing investment connection with a claim.6 In addition, paid sick leave per year, implementing advice related to retirement plans, the Final Rule may also clarify a coal Executive Order 13706, signed by individual retirement accounts, and mine operator’s liability for paying President Obama on September 7, 2015, other employee benefit plans, and to benefits while seeking modification of a enabling these workers to use leave to participants, beneficiaries, and owners decision to award benefits and may care for themselves, family members, or of such plans and accounts. The clarify the evidence submission loved ones without fear of losing their proposed rule includes a prohibited limitations. paychecks or their jobs. transaction exemption for any advice • OWCP will issue an additional that raises any conflict of interest NPRM under the Black Lung Benefits Giving Workers a Voice in Their concerns so that the advice has to first Act that would address how medical Workplaces be provided pursuant to a contract providers are reimbursed for covered There is a direct link throughout our where the advisor agrees to provide the services rendered to coal miners, nation’s history between a vibrant advice in the best interest of the client. including the possibility of modernizing middle class and the power of worker The underlying principle is very simple and standardizing payment 7 voice. The economy is strong when the and rooted in basic common sense: if methodologies and fee schedules. middle class is strong, and the middle you want to give financial advice, you Safeguarding Fair Pay for All Americans class is strong when workers have a seat have to put your clients’ best interests at the table, when they have a chance first, and not your own. EBSA continues The Department’s regulatory agenda prioritizes ensuring that all Americans to organize and negotiate for their fair to review the extensive public share of the value they helped create. By comments submitted on the proposed receive a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work, and are not discriminated against contrast, it’s not a coincidence that rule.5 middle-class wage stagnation coincides • EBSA recognizes that around one- with respect to hiring, employment, or benefits on the basis of race, gender, with a decline in the percentage of third of American workers lack access to workers represented by unions. The a retirement plan at work. Inadequate sexual orientation, or gender identity. The Department takes a robust approach Department’s regulatory program retirement savings places stress on therefore promotes policies that give various state and federal retirement to implementing its wage-and-hour and nondiscrimination regulations through workers a voice on the job. income support programs. Some states • OFCCP recently issued a Final Rule have passed laws to set up state-based education, outreach and strategic enforcement across industries. These implementing Executive Order 13665, auto-enrollment IRA arrangements for signed by the President on April 8, workers whose employers don’t offer a regulations are grounded in a commitment to an inclusive and diverse 2014, prohibiting discrimination by plan. However, many of these states Federal contractors and subcontractors remain concerned about preemption by workforce and rewarding hard work with a fair wage to provide workers with against certain of their employees for the Employee Retirement Income disclosing compensation information. Security Act of 1974. At the President’s a real pathway to middle class jobs. • WHD plans to publish a Final Rule This Executive Order was intended to direction on July 13, 2015, EBSA plans address policies that limit the ability to to publish a proposed rule to clarify revising the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA’s) overtime exemptions, as advocate for themselves about their pay how states can move forward, including and that prohibit employee with respect to requirements to directed by a March 2014 Presidential Memorandum. The FLSA generally conversations about compensation, automatically enroll employees, and which can serve as a significant barrier offer coverage in ways that are requires covered employers to pay their employees at least the federal minimum to Federal enforcement of the laws consistent with federal laws governing against compensation discrimination.9 employee benefit plans. wage for all hours worked, and one-and- one-half times their regular rate of pay • OLMS plans to publish a Final Rule EBSA will also continue to issue for hours worked in excess of 40 in a that will better align our regulations guidance implementing the health workweek (‘‘overtime’’). However, there with the statutory text of the Labor- reform provisions of the Affordable Care are a number of exemptions from the Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, giving more people greater access FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime Act (LMRDA) to create greater balance to quality medical care. EBSA’s requirements, including an exemption between union and employer/consultant regulations reduce discrimination in for bona fide executive, administrative, reporting requirements in situations health coverage, promote better access or professional employees. In line with where employers engage consultants to to quality coverage, and protect the the Presidential Memorandum directing persuade employees concerning their ability of individuals and businesses to the Secretary to modernize and rights to organize and bargain keep their current health coverage. streamline the existing overtime collectively. This is one important step Many of these regulations are joint regulations for these ‘‘white collar’’ to enhance workers’ abilities to make rulemakings with the Departments of employees to ensure that hardworking Health and Human Services and 8 Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Treasury. 6 Black Lung Benefits Act: Medical Evidence Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside (RIN: 1240–AA10). Sales, and Computer Employees (RIN: 1235–AA11). 5 Conflict of Interest Rule: Investment Advice 7 Black Lung Benefits Act: Benefit Payments (RIN: 9 Prohibitions Against Pay Secrecy Policies and (RIN: 1210–AB32). 1240–AA11). Actions (RIN: 1250–AA06).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77818 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

informed choices about crystalline silica, which kills hundreds systems.14 This builds on a Final Rule representation.10 and sickens thousands more each year. issued in January 2015 that addressed OSHA estimates that the proposed rule the danger that miners face when Protecting the Safety and Health of would ultimately save nearly 700 lives working near continuous mining Workers and prevent 1,600 new cases of silicosis machines in underground coal mines.15 No one should have to sacrifice their annually. OSHA held public hearings life for their livelihood, and a nation over nearly a month last spring in Regulatory Review and Burden built on the dignity of work must Washington, DC, during which over 200 Reduction provide safe working conditions for its industry, labor, and public health On January 18, 2011, the President people. Through our rulemaking, we are stakeholders participated. The post- committed to protecting workers in all issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13563, hearing brief period ended on August entitled ‘‘Improving Regulation and kinds of workplaces, including above- 18, 2014.11 As a part of the Secretary’s and below-ground coal and metal/ Regulatory Review.’’ The Department is strategy for securing safe and healthy committed to smart regulations that nonmetal mines, and we want to ensure work environments, MSHA will utilize that benefits programs are available to ensure the health welfare and safety of information provided by OSHA to all working Americans and foster workers and their families when they undertake regulatory action related to economic growth, job creation, and are injured on the job. So many silica exposure in mines.12 competitiveness of American business. workplace injuries, illnesses and • OSHA is developing a Final Rule fatalities are preventable. They not only that will address employers’ electronic The Department’s Fall 2015 Regulatory put workers in harm’s way, they submission of data required by agency Agenda also aims to achieve more jeopardize their economic security, regulations governing the Recording and efficient and less burdensome often forcing families out of the middle Reporting of Occupational Injuries. An regulations through a retrospective class and into poverty. The updated and modernized reporting review of the Labor Department Department’s safety and health system would enable a more efficient regulations. regulatory proposals are based on the and timely collection of data—including In August 2011, as part of a responsibility of employers to provide by leveraging data already maintained government-wide response to the E.O., workers with workplaces that do not electronically by many large the Department published its ‘‘Plan for threaten their safety or health and we employers—and would improve the Retrospective Analysis of Existing reject the false choice between worker accuracy and availability of relevant Rules.’’ (This plan, and each subsequent safety and economic growth. Our efforts records and statistics, in addition to update, can be found at www.dol.gov/ will both save lives and improve leveraging data already maintained regulations/.) The current regulatory employers’ bottom lines. electronically by many large agenda includes 23 retrospective review • OSHA’s top priority is a Final Rule employers.13 projects, which are listed below aimed at curbing lung cancer, silicosis, • MSHA issued a proposed rule that pursuant to section 6 of E.O. 13563. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease would require underground mine More information about completed and kidney disease in America’s operators to equip certain mobile rulemakings no longer included in the workers by lowering worker exposure to machines with proximity detection plan can be found on www.Reginfo.gov.

Whether it is expected Regulatory to significantly reduce Agency Identifier No. Title of rulemaking burdens on small businesses

EBSA ...... 1210–AB47 ...... Amendment of Abandoned Plan Program ...... Yes. EBSA ...... 1210–AB63 ...... 21st Century Initiative to Modernize the Form 5500 Series and Implementing and To Be Determined. Related Regulations. ETA ...... 1205–AB59 ...... Equal Employment Opportunity in Apprenticeship and Training, Amendment of To Be Determined. Regulations. ETA ...... 1205–AB62 ...... Implementation of Total Unemployment Rate Extended Benefits Trigger and No. Rounding Rule. ETA ...... 1205–AB75 ...... Modernizing the Permanent Labor Certification Program (PERM) ...... To Be Determined. MSHA ...... 1219–AB72 ...... Criteria and Procedures for Proposed Assessment of Civil Penalties (Part 100) ..... To Be Determined. OFCCP ...... 1250–AA05 ...... Sex Discrimination Guidelines ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218–AC34 ...... Bloodborne Pathogens ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218–AC67 ...... Standard Improvement Project—Phase IV (SIP IV) ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218–AC74 ...... Review/Lookback of OSHA Chemical Standards ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218–AC81 ...... Cranes and Derricks in Construction: Amendments ...... Yes. OSHA ...... 1218–AC82 ...... Process Safety Management and Flammable Liquids ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218–AC87 ...... Updating OSHA Standards Based on National Consensus Standards (Eye and To Be Determined. Face Protection). OSHA ...... 1218–AC49 ...... Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses ...... No. OSHA ...... 1218–AC76 ...... Streamlining of Provisions on State Plans for Occupational Safety and Health ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218– ...... Revocation of Obsolete PELs ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218– ...... Powered Industrial Trucks ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218– ...... Power Presses ...... To Be Determined. OSHA ...... 1218– ...... Lock-Out/Tag-Out Update ...... To Be Determined.

10 Persuader Agreements: Employer and Labor 13 Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and 15 Proximity Detection Systems for Continuous Relations Consultant Reporting Under the LMRDA Illnesses (RIN: 1218–AC49). Mining Machines in Underground Coal Mines (RIN: (RIN: 1245–AA03). 14 Proximity Detection Systems for Mobile 1219–AB65). 11 Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica Machines in Underground Mines (RIN: 1219– (RIN: 1218–AB70). AB78). 12 Respirable Crystalline Silica (RIN: 1219–AB36).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77819

Whether it is expected Regulatory to significantly reduce Agency Identifier No. Title of rulemaking burdens on small businesses

OWCP ...... 1240–AA11 ...... Black Lung Benefits Act: Medical Benefit Payments ...... To Be Determined. OWCP ...... 1240–AA09 ...... Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act: Transmission of Documents No. and Information.

DOL—WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION Order indicates that [t]hese savings and 202 693–0805, Email: waterman.robert@ (WHD) quality improvements will lead to dol.gov. improved economy and efficiency in RIN: 1235–AA13 Proposed Rule Stage Government procurement. 77. • Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Summary of Legal Basis: Section 2 of the Executive Order states that Contractors, Executive Order 13706 DOL—WHD Priority: Economically Significant. Executive Departments and agencies Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. shall, to the extent permitted by law, Final Rule Stage ensure that new contracts, contract-like Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. 78. Defining and Delimiting the Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined instruments, and solicitations (collectively referred to as contacts), as Exemptions for Executive, CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Administrative, Professional, Outside Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, described in section 6 of the order, Sales, and Computer Employees September 30, 2016. include a clause, which the contractor Executive Order 13706, Establishing and any subcontractors shall Priority: Economically Significant. Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors incorporate into lower-tier subcontracts, Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. (80 FR 54697). specifying, as a condition of payment, Unfunded Mandates: This action may Abstract: Executive Order 13706, that all employees in the performance of affect the private sector under Pub. L. Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal the contract or any subcontract 104–4. Contractors (80 FR 54697) establishes thereunder, shall earn not less than 1 Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1) paid sick leave for Federal contractors hour of paid sick leave for every 30 (Fair Labor Standards Act) and subcontractors. The Executive hours worked. The Order goes on to CFR Citation: 29 CFR 541. Order indicates that Executive indicate that a contractor may not set a Legal Deadline: None. Departments and agencies shall, to the limit on the total accrual of paid sick Abstract: The Department proposes to extent permitted by law, ensure that leave per year, or at any point in time, update the regulations governing which new contracts, contract-like at less than 56 hours. The Order goes on executive, administrative, and instruments, and solicitations as to describe the purposes for which the professional employees (white collar described in section 6 of the Order, employee may use the paid the sick workers) are entitled to the Fair Labor include a clause, which the contractor leave. The Executive Order requires the Standards Act’s minimum wage and and any subcontractors shall Secretary of Labor to issue regulations overtime pay protections. Key incorporate into lower-tier subcontracts, implementing the E.O. by September 30, provisions of the proposed rule include: specifying that all employees, in the 2016. (1) Setting the standard salary level performance of the contract or any Alternatives: To be determined. required for exemption at the 40th subcontract thereunder, shall earn not Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The percentile of weekly earnings for full- less than one hour of paid sick leave for Executive Order indicates benefits time salaried workers (projected to be every 30 hours worked. Consistent with associated with the paid sick leave E.O. $970 per week, or $50,440 annually, in the Executive Order, the Department of include improved health and 2016); (2) increasing the total annual Labor will issue implementing performance of employees of Federal compensation requirement needed to regulations. contractors, ensuring that contractors exempt highly compensated employees Statement of Need: On September 7, remain competitive in line with model to the annualized value of the 90th 2015, President Barack Obama signed employers, and improved economy and percentile of weekly earnings of full- Executive Order 13706 Establishing efficiency in Government procurement. time salaried workers ($122,148 Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors. Costs will be determined as part of the annually); and (3) establishing a The Executive Order states that the NPRM. mechanism for automatically updating Order seeks to increase efficiency and Risks: To be determined. the salary and compensation levels cost savings in the work performed by Timetable: going forward to ensure that they will parties that contract with the Federal continue to provide a useful and Government by ensuring that employees Action Date FR Cite effective test for exemption. The on those contracts can earn up to 7 days NPRM ...... 02/00/16 Department last updated these or more of paid sick leave annually, regulations in 2004, which, among other including paid leave allowing for family Regulatory Flexibility Analysis items, set the standard salary level at care. The Order states that providing Required: Yes. not less than $455 per week. access to paid sick leave will improve Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Statement of Need: On March 13, the health and performance of Governmental Jurisdictions. 2014, President Obama signed a employees of Federal contractors and Government Levels Affected: Federal. Presidential Memorandum directing the bring benefits packages at Federal Agency Contact: Robert Waterman, Department to update the regulations contractors in line with model Compliance Specialist, Department of defining which white collar workers are employers, ensuring that they remain Labor, Wage and Hour Division, 200 protected by the FLSA’s minimum wage competitive employers in the search for Constitution Avenue NW., Room S– and overtime standards. 79 FR 18737 dedicated and talented employees. The 3010, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: (Apr. 3, 2014). Consistent with the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77820 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

President’s goal of ensuring workers are Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Department issue a Notice of Proposed paid a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s Avenue NW., Room S–3502, FP Rulemaking (NPRM) and then Final work, the memorandum instructed the Building, Washington, DC 20210, Rule that implements the changes Department to look for ways to Phone: 202 693–0406, Fax: 202 693– WIOA makes to the public workforce modernize and simplify the regulations 1387. system in regulations. while ensuring that the FLSA’s intended RIN: 1235–AA11 Alternatives: Since Congress overtime protections are fully statutorily directed the Department of implemented. Labor to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and Final Rule that Summary of Legal Basis: There are a DOL—EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING implements the changes WIOA makes to number of exemptions from the FLSA’s ADMINISTRATION (ETA) minimum wage and overtime the public workforce system there is no requirements. Section 13(a)(1) of the Proposed Rule Stage alternative. FLSA, codified at 29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1), Anticipated Cost and Benefits: 79. Workforce Innovation and Undetermined. exempts from both minimum wage and Opportunity Act overtime protection ‘‘any employee Risks: Undetermined. employed in a bona fide executive, Priority: Other Significant. Major Timetable: administrative, or professional capacity under 5 U.S.C. 801. . . . or in the capacity of outside Legal Authority: Section 503(f) of the Action Date FR Cite salesman (as such terms are defined and Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (Pub. L. 113–128) NPRM ...... 04/16/15 80 FR 20690 delimited from time to time by NPRM Comment 06/15/15 regulations of the Secretary, subject to CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, Period End. the provisions of [the Administrative Analyze Com- 11/00/15 January 22, 2015, Public Law 113–128. ments. Procedure Act] . . .).’’ The FLSA does Final, Statutory, January 18, 2016. not define the terms ‘‘executive,’’ Abstract: On July 22, 2014, the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ‘‘administrative,’’ ‘‘professional,’’’ or President signed the Workforce ‘‘outside salesman.’’ Pursuant to Required: Yes. Innovation and Opportunity Act Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Congress’ grant of rulemaking authority, (WIOA) (Pub. L. 113–128). WIOA the Department in 1938 issued the first Governmental Jurisdictions, repeals the Workforce Investment Act of Organizations. regulations at 29 CFR part 541, defining 1998 (WIA) and amends the Wagner- the scope of the section 13(a)(1) Government Levels Affected: Federal, Peyser Act. (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) The Local, State, Tribal. exemptions. Because Congress explicitly Department of Labor issued a Notice of delegated to the Secretary of Labor the Agency Contact: Portia Wu, Assistant Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on April Secretary for Employment and Training, power to define and delimit the specific 16, 2015 that proposed to implement the terms of the exemptions through notice Department of Labor, Employment and changes WIOA makes to the public Training Administration, 200 and comment rulemaking, the workforce system in regulations. regulations so issued have the binding Constitution Avenue NW., FP Building, Through the NPRM, the Department Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 639– effect of law. See Batterton v. Francis, proposed ways to carry out the purposes 432 U.S. 416, 425 n.9 (1977). 2700. of WIOA to provide workforce RIN: 1205–AB73 Alternatives: Alternatives were listed investment activities, through State and in the Department’s NPRM published in local workforce development systems, the Federal Register July 6, 2015 (80 FR that increase employment, retention, 38516). and earnings of participants, meet the DOL—EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Anticipated Cost and Benefits: skill requirements of employers, and SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (EBSA) Detailed analysis of the costs and enhance the productivity and Proposed Rule Stage benefits is included in the Department’s competitiveness of the Nation. The • NPRM published in the Federal Department is analyzing the comments 80. Savings Arrangements Register July 6, 2015 (80 FR 38516). received and developing a final rule. Established by States for Non- Risks: Risks were discussed in the Statement of Need: On July 22, 2014, Governmental Employees NPRM published in the Federal the President signed the Workforce Priority: Other Significant. Register July 6, 2015 (80 FR 38516). Innovation and Opportunity Act Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1135 Timetable: (WIOA) (Pub. L. 113–128) into law. (ERISA sec 505); 29 U.S.C. 1002 (ERISA WIOA repeals the Workforce Investment sec 3(2)) Action Date FR Cite Act of 1998 (WIA) (29 U.S.C. 2801 et CFR Citation: 29 CFR 2510.3–2. NPRM ...... 07/06/15 80 FR 38516 seq.) and amends the Wagner-Peyser Legal Deadline: None. NPRM Comment 09/04/15 Act. As a result, the WIA and Wagner- Abstract: About one-third of Period End. Peyser regulations no longer reflect American workers lack access to a Final Rule ...... 07/00/16 current law and we must change. retirement plan at work. For older Therefore, the Department of Labor Americans, inadequate retirement Regulatory Flexibility Analysis issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking savings can mean sacrificing or Required: Yes. (NPRM) that proposes to implement the skimping on food, housing, health care, Small Entities Affected: Businesses, WIOA. The Department is moving transportation, and other necessities. Governmental Jurisdictions, forward in analyzing comments President Obama has long supported Organizations. received and developing a final rule. federal legislation to require automatic Government Levels Affected: Federal, Summary of Legal Basis: The enrollment of new workers in payroll Local, State, Tribal. Workforce Innovation and Opportunity deduction IRAs if they lack access to a Agency Contact: Mary Ziegler, Act (WIOA) (Pub. L. 113–128), signed 401(k)-type plan through their Assistant Administrator, Office of by the President on July 22, 2014. employer. In the absence of Policy, Wage and Hour (WHD), Section 503(f) of WIOA requires that the Congressional action, some states have

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77821

passed laws to set up state-based Regulatory Flexibility Analysis afforded by the existing standards. savings plans and require employers not Required: Undetermined. MSHA will consider alternative currently offering workplace plans to Government Levels Affected: methods of addressing miners’ automatically enroll employees into Undetermined. exposures based on the capabilities of IRAs. Others are looking at ways to Agency Contact: Jeffrey J. Turner, the sampling and analytical methods. encourage employers to provide Deputy Director, Office of Regulations Anticipated Cost and Benefits: MSHA coverage under state-administered and Interpretations, Department of will prepare estimates of the anticipated 401(k)-type plans or other retirement Labor, Employee Benefits Security costs and benefits associated with the alternatives including IRAs and the Administration, 200 Constitution proposed rule. Treasury’s new starter savings program, Avenue NW., FP Building, Room N– Risks: For over 70 years, toxicology myRA. However, many of these states 5655, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: information and epidemiological studies remain concerned about preemption by 202 693–8500, Fax: 202 219–7291. have shown that exposure to respirable ERISA. On July 13, 2015, the President RIN: 1210–AB71 crystalline silica presents potential directed the Department to publish a health risks to miners. These potential proposed rule clarifying how states may adverse health effects include simple offer retirement savings arrangements to DOL—MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH silicosis and progressive massive private-sector employees in ways that ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) fibrosis (lung scarring). Evidence are consistent with federal laws indicates that exposure to silica may governing employee benefit plans. The Proposed Rule Stage cause cancer. MSHA believes that the proposal will set forth circumstances in 81. Respirable Crystalline Silica health evidence forms a reasonable basis which a state could establish a payroll for reducing miners’ exposures to deduction savings program, with an Priority: Other Significant. respirable crystalline silica. automatic enrollment feature, without Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811 Timetable: giving rise to an employee pension CFR Citation: 30 CFR 58. benefit plan under ERISA. Legal Deadline: None. Action Date FR Cite Statement of Need: The proposal Abstract: Current standards limit responds to the President’s directive to exposures to quartz (crystalline silica) in NPRM ...... 04/00/16 the Department of Labor, issued at the respirable dust. The metal and nonmetal 2015 White House Conference on Aging, mining industry standard is based on Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to publish a proposed regulation by the the 1973 American Conference of Required: Undetermined. end of 2015 to support the efforts of a Governmental Industrial Hygienists Small Entities Affected: Businesses, growing number of states trying to (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values Governmental Jurisdictions. promote broader access to workplace formula: 10 mg/m3 divided by the Government Levels Affected: Local, retirement saving opportunities for percentage of quartz plus 2. State. America’s workers. The regulation Overexposure to crystalline silica can URL for More Information: would clarify that state savings result in some miners developing www.msha.gov/regsinfo.htm. initiatives would not cause the silicosis, an irreversible but preventable URL for Public Comments: establishment of ERISA covered lung disease, which ultimately may be www.regulations.gov. employee benefit plans, so long as the fatal. The formula is designed to limit Agency Contact: Sheila McConnell, conditions of the regulation are met. exposures to 0.1 mg/m3 (100 ug/m3) of Acting Director, Office of Standards, Summary of Legal Basis: Section 505 silica. The National Institute for Regulations, and Variances, Department of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1135, provides the Occupational Safety and Health of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Secretary of Labor with broad authority (NIOSH) recommends a 50 ug/m3 Administration, 201 12th Street South, to prescribe such regulations as he finds exposure limit for respirable crystalline Room 4E401, Arlington, VA 22202– necessary and appropriate to carry out silica. MSHA will publish a proposed 5452, Phone: 202 693–9440, Fax: 202 the provisions of Title I of the Act. rule to address miners’ exposure to 693–9441, Email: mcconnell.sheila.a@ Section 3(2) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1002, respirable crystalline silica. dol.gov. defines the term ‘‘employee pension Statement of Need: MSHA standards RIN: 1219–AB36 benefit plan’’. The Department’s are outdated; current regulations may regulations at 29 CFR 2510.3–2 clarify not protect workers from developing the term ‘‘employee pension benefit silicosis. Evidence indicates that miners DOL—MSHA plan’’ by identifying certain specific continue to develop silicosis. MSHA’s plans, funds and programs that do not proposed regulatory action exemplifies 82. Proximity Detection Systems for constitute ‘‘employee pension benefit the Agency’s commitment to protecting Mobile Machines in Underground plans’’. the most vulnerable populations while Mines Alternatives: Since the President assuring broad-based compliance. Priority: Other Significant. directed the Department to publish a MSHA will regulate based on sound Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811 proposed rule clarifying how states may science to eliminate or reduce the CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. offer retirement savings arrangement to hazards with the broadest and most Legal Deadline: None. private-sector employees, there is no serious consequences. MSHA intends to Abstract: Mine Safety and Health alternative. use OSHA’s work on the health effects Administration (MSHA) published a Anticipated Cost and Benefits: and risk assessment, adapting it as proposed rule that address the hazards Undetermined. necessary for the mining industry. miners face when working near mobile Risks: Undetermined. Summary of Legal Basis: equipment in underground mines. Timetable: Promulgation of this standard is MSHA has concluded, from authorized by section 101 of the Federal investigations of accidents involving Action Date FR Cite Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. mobile equipment and other reports, NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Alternatives: This rulemaking would that action is needed to protect miner improve health protection from that safety. Mobile equipment can pin,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77822 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

crush, or strike a miner working near Small Entities Affected: Businesses. or orders, inspectors are required to the equipment. Proximity detection Government Levels Affected: None. evaluate safety and health conditions, technology can prevent these types of URL for More Information: and make decisions about the statutory accidents. The proposed rule would www.msha.gov/regsinfo.htm. criteria related to assessing penalties. strengthen the protection for URL for Public Comments: The proposed changes in the measures underground miners by reducing the www.regulations.gov. of the evaluation criteria would result in potential of pinning, crushing, or Agency Contact: Sheila McConnell, fewer areas of disagreement and earlier striking hazards associated with Acting Director, Office of Standards, resolution of enforcement issues. The working close to mobile equipment. Regulations, and Variances, Department proposal would require conforming Statement of Need: Mining is one of of Labor, Mine Safety and Health changes to the Mine Citation/Order form the most hazardous industries in this Administration, 201 12th Street South, (MSHA Form 7000–3). Room 4E401, Arlington, VA 22202– country. Miners continue to be injured Summary of Legal Basis: Section 104 or killed resulting from pinning, 5452, Phone: 202 693–9440, Fax: 202 693–9441, Email: mcconnell.sheila.a@ of the Mine Act requires MSHA to issue crushing, or striking accidents involving citations or orders to mine operators for mobile equipment. Equipment is dol.gov. any violations of a mandatory health or available to help prevent accidents that Related RIN: Related to 1219–AB65 safety standard, rule, order, or cause debilitating injuries and RIN: 1219–AB78 regulation promulgated under the Mine accidental death. Act. Sections 105 and 110 of the Mine Summary of Legal Basis: Act provide for assessment of these Promulgation of this standard is DOL—MSHA penalties. authorized by section 101(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of Final Rule Stage Alternatives: The proposal would 1977, as amended by the Mine 83. Criteria and Procedures for include several alternatives in the Improvement and New Emergency Proposed Assessment of Civil Penalties preamble and requests comments on Response Act of 2006. them. Priority: Other Significant. Alternatives: No reasonable Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 815; 30 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: alternatives to this regulation would be U.S.C. 820; 30 U.S.C. 957 MSHA’s proposed rule includes an as comprehensive or as effective in CFR Citation: 30 CFR 100. estimate of the anticipated costs and eliminating hazards and preventing Legal Deadline: None. benefits. injuries. Abstract: The Mine Safety and Health Risks: MSHA’s existing procedures for Anticipated Cost and Benefits: MSHA Administration (MSHA) revises the assessing civil penalties can be revised will develop a preliminary regulatory process for proposing civil penalties. to improve the efficiency of the economic analysis to accompany the The assessment of civil penalties is a Agency’s efforts and to facilitate the proposed rule. key component in MSHA’s strategy to resolution of enforcement issues. In the Risks: The lack of proximity detection enforce safety and health standards. overwhelming majority of contested systems on mobile equipment in Congress intended that the imposition cases before the Commission, the issue underground mines contributes to a of civil penalties would induce mine is not whether a violation occurred. higher incidence of debilitating injuries operators to be proactive in their Rather, the parties disagree on the and accidental deaths. approach to mine safety and health, and gravity of the violation, the degree of Timetable: take necessary action to prevent safety mine operator negligence, and other and health hazards before they occur. Action Date FR Cite criterion. The proposed changes should MSHA believes that the procedures for result in fewer areas of disagreement Request for Infor- 02/01/10 75 FR 5009 assessing civil penalties can be revised and earlier resolution of enforcement mation (RFI). to improve the efficiency of the issues, which should result in fewer RFI Comment Pe- 04/02/10 Agency’s efforts and to facilitate the contests of violations or proposed riod End. resolution of enforcement issues. assessments. NPRM ...... 09/02/15 80 FR 53070 Statement of Need: Section 110(a) of Scheduling of 09/28/15 80 FR 58229 the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act Timetable: Public Hearing. of 1977 (Mine Act) requires MSHA to Action Date FR Cite Public Hearing— 10/06/15 assess a civil penalty for a violation of Denver, Colo- a mandatory health or safety standard or rado 10/06/ NPRM ...... 07/31/14 79 FR 44494 2015. violation of any provision of the Mine NPRM Comment 09/29/14 Public Hearing— 10/08/15 Act. The mine operator has 30 days Period End. Birmingham, from receipt of the proposed assessment NPRM Comment 09/16/14 79 FR 55408 Alabama 10/08/ to contest it before the Federal Mine Period Ex- 2015. Safety and Health Review Commission tended. Public Hearing— 10/19/15 (Commission), an independent NPRM Comment 12/03/14 Beaver, West adjudicatory agency established under Period Ex- Virginia 10/19/ the Mine Act. A proposed assessment tended End. 2015. that is not contested within 30 days NPRM Notice of 11/07/14 79 FR 66345 Public Hearing— 10/29/15 Public Hear- Indianapolis, In- becomes a final order of the Commission. A proposed assessment ings, Close of diana 10/29/ Comment Pe- 2015. that is contested within 30 days riod. NPRM Comment 12/01/15 proceeds to the Commission for NPRM Notice of 01/09/15 Period End. adjudication. The proposed rule would Public Hear- promote consistency, objectivity, and ings, Close of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis efficiency in the proposed assessment of Comment Pe- Required: No. civil penalties. When issuing citations riod End.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77823

Action Date FR Cite ultimately fatal. The current OSHA crystalline silica is a known human permissible exposure limit (PEL) for carcinogen. Exposure to crystalline NPRM Notice of 12/31/14 79 FR 78749 general industry is based on a formula silica has also been associated with an Public Hearing; proposed by the American Conference increased risk of developing Extension of of Governmental Industrial Hygienists tuberculosis and other nonmalignant Comment Pe- (ACGIH) in 1968 (PEL = 10mg/cubic respiratory diseases, as well as renal and riod; Close of meter/(% silica + 2), as respirable dust). Record. autoimmune diseases. Exposure studies Extension of 03/12/15 The current PEL for construction and and OSHA enforcement data indicate Comment Pe- shipyards (derived from ACGIH’s 1970 that some workers continue to be riod End. Threshold Limit Value) is based on exposed to levels of crystalline silica far NPRM Comment 02/10/15 80 FR 7393 particle counting technology, which is in excess of current exposure limits. Period Ex- considered obsolete. NIOSH and ACGIH Congress has included compensation of tended; Close recommend 50 mg/m3 and 25 mg/m3 silicosis victims on Federal nuclear of Record. exposure limits, respectively, for testing sites in the Energy Employees’ NPRM Comment 03/31/15 respirable crystalline silica. Occupational Illness Compensation Period Ex- Both industry and worker groups have Program Act of 2000. There is a tended End. recognized that a comprehensive Final Rule ...... 03/00/16 particular need for the Agency to standard for crystalline silica is needed modernize its exposure limits for to provide for exposure monitoring, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis construction and shipyard workers. medical surveillance, and worker Required: Undetermined. training. ASTM International has Summary of Legal Basis: The legal Small Entities Affected: Businesses. published recommended standards for basis for the proposed rule was a Government Levels Affected: None. addressing the hazards of crystalline preliminary determination that workers URL for More Information: silica. The Building Construction Trades are exposed to a significant risk of www.msha.gov/regsinfo.htm. Department of the AFL–CIO has also silicosis and other serious disease, and URL for Public Comments: developed a recommended that rulemaking is needed to www.regulations.gov. comprehensive program standard. These substantially reduce the risk. In Agency Contact: Sheila McConnell, standards include provisions for addition, the proposed rule recognized Acting Director, Office of Standards, methods of compliance, exposure that the PELs for construction and Regulations, and Variances, Department monitoring, training, and medical maritime are outdated, and need to be of Labor, Mine Safety and Health surveillance. revised to reflect current sampling and Administration, 201 12th Street South, The NPRM was published on analytical technologies. Room 4E401, Arlington, VA 22202– September 12, 2013 (78 FR 56274). Alternatives: Over the past several 5452, Phone: 202 693–9440, Fax: 202 OSHA received over 1,700 comments years, the Agency has attempted to 693–9441, Email: mcconnell.sheila.a@ from the public on the proposed rule, address this problem through a variety dol.gov. and over 200 stakeholders provided of non-regulatory approaches, including RIN: 1219–AB72 testimony during public hearings on the initiation of a Special Emphasis proposal. The agency is now reviewing Program on silica in October 1997, and considering the evidence in the sponsorship with NIOSH and MSHA of DOL—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND rulemaking record. the National Conference to Eliminate HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) Statement of Need: Workers are Silicosis, and dissemination of guidance exposed to crystalline silica dust in information on its Web site. Final Rule Stage general industry, construction, and maritime industries. Industries that Anticipated Cost and Benefits: OSHA 84. Occupational Exposure to preliminarily estimated the cost of the Crystalline Silica could be particularly affected by a standard for crystalline silica include: proposed rule to be $664 million per Priority: Economically Significant. Foundries, industries that have abrasive year. OSHA preliminarily estimated that Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. blasting operations, paint manufacture, the proposed rule would prevent nearly Unfunded Mandates: This action may glass and concrete product manufacture, 700 deaths per year and prevent over affect the private sector under Pub. L. brick making, china and pottery 1,600 cases of silicosis annually once 104–4. manufacture, manufacture of plumbing the full effect of the rule are realized, Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 655(b); 29 fixtures, and many construction and would result in monetized benefits U.S.C. 657 activities including highway repair, of $2.8 to $4.7 billion annually. CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1910; 29 CFR masonry, concrete work, rock drilling, Risks: A detailed risk analysis is 1915; 29 CFR 1917; 29 CFR 1918; 29 and tuckpointing. The seriousness of the under way. CFR 1926. health hazards associated with silica Timetable: Legal Deadline: None. exposure is demonstrated by the Abstract: Crystalline silica is a fatalities and disabling illnesses that Action Date FR Cite significant component of the earth’s continue to occur. From 2009 to 2013 crust, and many workers in a wide range silicosis was identified on over 500 Completed 12/19/03 of industries are exposed to it, usually death certificates as an underlying or SBREFA Re- in the form of respirable quartz or, less contributing cause of death. It is likely port. frequently, cristobalite. Chronic silicosis that many more cases have occurred Initiated Peer Re- 05/22/09 is a uniquely occupational disease where silicosis went undetected. In view of Health Effects and resulting from exposure of employees addition, the International Agency for Risk Assess- over long periods of time (10 years or Research on Cancer has designated ment. more). Exposure to high levels of crystalline silica as carcinogenic to Completed Peer 01/24/10 respirable crystalline silica causes acute humans, and the National Toxicology Review. or accelerated forms of silicosis that are Program has concluded that respirable NPRM ...... 09/12/13 78 FR 56274

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77824 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite data in electronic format on a timely Safety and Health Administration, 200 basis is needed to help OSHA, Constitution Avenue NW., FP Building, NPRM Comment 10/31/13 78 FR 65242 employers, employees, researchers, and Room N–3653, Washington, DC 20210, Period Ex- the public more effectively prevent Phone: 202 693–2300, Fax: 202 693– tended; Notice workplace injuries and illnesses, as well 1644, Email: [email protected]. of Intention to as support President Obama’s Open Appear at Pub RIN: 1218–AC49 Government Initiative to increase the Hearing; Sched- BILLING CODE 4510–04–P uling Pub Hear- ability of the public to easily find, ing. download, and use the resulting dataset NPRM Comment 01/29/14 79 FR 4641 generated and held by the Federal Period Ex- Government. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tended. Summary of Legal Basis: The (DOT) NPRM Comment 02/11/14 Occupational Safety and Health Act of Period Ex- Introduction: Department Overview 1970 authorize the Secretary of Labor to and Summary of Regulatory Priorities tended End. develop and maintain an effective Informal Public 03/18/14 program of collection, compilation, and The Department of Transportation Hearing. (DOT) consists of nine operating Post Hearing 08/18/14 analysis of occupational safety and Briefs Ends. health statistics (29 U.S.C. 673). administrations and the Office of the Final Rule ...... 02/00/16 Alternatives: The alternative to the Secretary, each of which has statutory proposed rulemaking would be to take responsibility for a wide range of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis no regulatory action. regulations. DOT regulates safety in the Required: Yes. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: OSHA aviation, motor carrier, railroad, motor Small Entities Affected: Businesses. estimates that this final rule will have vehicle, commercial space, public Government Levels Affected: Federal, economic costs of $15 million per year. transportation, and pipeline Local, State, Tribal. The Agency believes that the annual transportation areas. DOT also regulates Federalism: This action may have benefits, while unquantified, aviation consumer and economic issues federalism implications as defined in significantly exceed the annual costs. and provides financial assistance for E.O. 13132. These benefits include increased programs involving highways, airports, Agency Contact: William Perry, prevention of workplace injuries and public transportation, the maritime Director, Directorate of Standards and illnesses as a result of expanded access industry, railroads, and motor vehicle Guidance, Department of Labor, to timely, establishment-specific injury/ safety. In addition, the Department Occupational Safety and Health illness information by OSHA, writes regulations to carry out a variety Administration, 200 Constitution employers, employees, employee of statutes ranging from the Americans Avenue NW., Room N–3718, FP representatives, potential employees, With Disabilities Act to the Uniform Building, Washington, DC 20210, customers, potential customers, and Time Act. Finally, DOT develops and Phone: 202 693–1950, Fax: 202 693– researchers. implements a wide range of regulations 1678, Email: [email protected]. Risks: Analysis of risks is still under that govern internal DOT programs such RIN: 1218–AB70 development. as acquisitions and grants, access for the Timetable: disabled, environmental protection, energy conservation, information Action Date FR Cite technology, occupational safety and DOL—OSHA health, property asset management, Stakeholder Meet- 05/25/10 75 FR 24505 85. Improve Tracking of Workplace ings. seismic safety, and the use of aircraft Injuries and Illnesses NPRM ...... 11/08/13 78 FR 67254 and vehicles. Priority: Other Significant. NPRM Comment 02/06/14 The Department’s Regulatory Priorities Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 657 Period End. CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1904. Notice of Public 11/15/13 78 FR 68782 The Department’s regulatory priorities Legal Deadline: None. Meeting on 01/ respond to the challenges and 09/2013. Abstract: Occupational Safety and opportunities we face. Our mission NPRM Comment 01/07/14 79 FR 778 generally is as follows: Health Administration (OSHA) is Period Ex- making changes to its reporting system tended. The national objectives of general for occupational injuries and illnesses. NPRM Comment 03/08/14 welfare, economic growth and stability, An updated and modernized reporting Period Ex- and the security of the United States system would enable a more efficient tended End. require the development of and timely collection of data, and would NPRM Comment 08/14/14 79 FR 47605 transportation policies and programs improve the accuracy and availability of Period Re- that contribute to providing fast, safe, the relevant records and statistics. This opened. efficient, and convenient transportation NPRM Comment 10/14/14 rulemaking involves modification to 29 at the lowest cost consistent with those Period Re- and other national objectives, including CFR part 1904.41 to expand OSHA’s opened End. legal authority to collect and make Final Rule ...... 03/00/16 the efficient use and conservation of the available injury and illness information resources of the United States. required under part 1904, and a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis To help us achieve our mission, we modification to 29 CFR part 1904.35 to Required: No. have five goals in the Department’s clarify an employee’s right to report Government Levels Affected: None. Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014– injury and illnesses to their employer Agency Contact: Amanda Edens, 2018: without fear of retaliation. Director, Directorate of Technical • Safety: Improve public health and Statement of Need: The collection of Support and Emergency Management, safety by ‘‘reducing transportation- establishment specific injury and illness Department of Labor, Occupational related fatalities, injuries, and crashes.’’

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77825

• State of Good Repair: Ensure the Each of the rulemakings in the Secretary and other appropriate U.S. ‘‘proactively maintains critical regulatory plan is described below in appointed officials review and concur in transportation infrastructure in a state of detail. In order to place them in context, all significant DOT rules. DOT good repair.’’ we first review the Department’s continually seeks to improve its • Economic Competitiveness: regulatory philosophy and our regulatory process. A few examples Promote ‘‘transportation policies and initiatives to educate and inform the include: The Department’s development investments that bring lasting and public about transportation safety of regulatory process and related equitable economic benefits to the issues. We then describe the role of the training courses for its employees; Nation and its citizens.’’ Department’s retrospective reviews and creation of an electronic rulemaking • Quality of Life: Foster quality of life its regulatory process and other tracking and coordination system; the in communities by ‘‘integrating important regulatory initiatives of OST use of direct final rulemaking; the use transportation policies, plans, with and of each of the Department’s of regulatory negotiation; a continually coordinated housing and economic components. Since each transportation expanding and improved Internet page development policies to increase ‘‘mode’’ within the Department has its that provides important regulatory transportation choices and access to own area of focus, we summarize the information, including ‘‘effects’’ reports transportation services for all.’’ regulatory priorities of each mode and and status reports (http://www.dot.gov/ • Environmental Sustainability: of OST, which supervises and regulations); and the continued Advance ‘‘environmental sustainable coordinates modal initiatives and has its exploration and use of Internet blogs policies and investments that reduce own regulatory responsibilities, such as and other Web 2.0 technology to carbon and other harmful emissions consumer protection in the aviation increase and enhance public from transportation sources.’’ industry. participation in its rulemaking process. In identifying our regulatory priorities In addition, the Department continues for the next year, the Department The Department’s Regulatory to engage in a wide variety of activities considered its mission and goals and Philosophy and Initiatives to help cement the partnerships focused on a number of factors, The Department has adopted a between its agencies and its customers including the following: regulatory philosophy that applies to all that will produce good results for • The relative risk being addressed its rulemaking activities. This transportation programs and safety. The • Requirements imposed by law philosophy is articulated as follows: Department’s agencies also have • Actions on the National DOT regulations must be clear, simple, established a number of continuing Transportation Safety Board ‘‘Most timely, fair, reasonable, and necessary. partnership mechanisms in the form of Wanted List’’ They will be issued only after an rulemaking advisory committees. • The costs and benefits of the appropriate opportunity for public regulations comment, which must provide an equal The Department’s Retrospective Review • The advantages of nonregulatory chance for all affected interests to of Existing Regulations alternatives participate, and after appropriate In accordance with Executive Order • Opportunities for deregulatory action consultation with other governmental (E.O.) 13563 (Improving Regulation and • The enforceability of any rule, entities. The Department will fully Regulatory Review), the Department including the effect on agency consider the comments received. It will actively engaged in a special resources assess the risks addressed by the rules retrospective review of our existing This regulatory plan identifies the and their costs and benefits, including rules to determine whether they need to Department’s regulatory priorities—the the cumulative effects. The Department be revised or revoked. This review was 19 pending rulemakings chosen, from will consider appropriate alternatives, in addition to those reviews in among the dozens of significant including nonregulatory approaches. It accordance with section 610 of the rulemakings listed in the Department’s will also make every effort to ensure Regulatory Flexibility Act, E.O. 12866, broader regulatory agenda, that the that regulation does not impose and the Department’s Regulatory Department believes will merit special unreasonable mandates. Policies and Procedures. As part of this attention in the upcoming year. The The Department stresses the effort, we also reviewed our processes rules included in the regulatory plan importance of conducting high-quality for determining what rules to review embody the Department’s focus on our rulemakings in a timely manner and and ensuring that the rules are strategic goals. reducing the number of old effectively reviewed. As a result of the The regulatory plan reflects the rulemakings. To implement this, the review, we identified many rules for Department’s primary focus on safety— Department has required the following expedited review and changes to our a focus that extends across several actions: (1) Regular meetings of senior retrospective review process. Pursuant modes of transportation. For example: DOT officials to ensure effective policy to section 6 of E.O. 13563, the following • The Federal Aviation leadership and timely decisions, (2) Regulatory Identifier Numbers (RINs) Administration (FAA) will continue its effective tracking and coordination of have been identified as associated with efforts to implement safety management rulemakings, (3) regular reporting, (4) retrospective review and analysis in the systems. early briefings of interested officials, (5) Department’s final retrospective review • The Federal Motor Carrier Safety regular training of staff, and (6) adequate of regulations plan. Some of these Administration (FMCSA) continues its allocations of resources. The entries on this list may be completed work to strengthen the requirements for Department has achieved significant actions, which do not appear in The Electronic Logging Devices and revise success because of this effort. It allows Regulatory Plan. If a retrospective motor carrier safety fitness the Department to use its resources review action has been completed it will determination procedures. more effectively and efficiently. no longer appear on the list below. • The National Highway Traffic The Department’s regulatory policies However, more information can be Safety Administration (NHTSA) will and procedures provide a found about these completed continue its rulemaking efforts to reduce comprehensive internal management rulemakings on the Unified Agenda death and injury resulting from motor and review process for new and existing publications at Reginfo.gov in the vehicle crashes. regulations and ensure that the Completed Actions section for that

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77826 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

agency. These rulemakings can also be found at http://www.dot.gov/ found on Regulations.gov. The final regulations. agency retrospective review plan can be

Significantly reduces RIN Retrospective review of existing regulations costs on small Rulemaking title businesses

1. 2105–AE29 ...... Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities: Over-the-Road Buses (RRR) ...... TBD. 2. 2120–AJ94 ...... Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) (RRR). 3. 2120–AK24 ...... Fuel Tank and System Lightning Protection (RRR). 4. 2120–AK28 ...... Aviation Training Devices; Pilot Certification, Training, and Pilot Schools; Other Provisions (RRR). 5. 2120–AK32 ...... Acceptance Criteria for Portable Oxygen Concentrators Used Onboard Aircraft (RRR). 6. 2120–AK34 ...... Flammability Requirements for Transport Category Airplanes (RRR). 7. 2120–AK44 ...... Reciprocal Waivers of Claims for Non-Party Customer Beneficiaries, Signature of Waivers of Claims by Commercial Space Transportation Customers. And Waiver of Claims and Assump- tion of Responsibility for Permitted Activities with No Customer (RRR). 8. 2125–AF62 ...... Acquisition of Right-of-Way (RRR) (MAP–21) ...... N. 9. 2125–AF65 ...... Buy America (RRR) ...... TBD. 10. 2126–AB46 ...... Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR). 11. 2126–AB47 ...... Electronic Signatures and Documents (E-Signatures) (RRR). 12. 2126–AB49 ...... Elimination of Redundant Maintenance Rule (RRR). 13. 2127–AK98 ...... Pedestrian Safety Global Technical Regulation (RRR). 14. 2127–AL03 ...... Part 571 FMVSS No. 205, Glazing Materials, GTR (RRR). 15. 2127–AL05 ...... Amend FMVSS No. 210 to Incorporate the Use of a New Force Application Device (RRR) ...... Y. 16. 2127–AL17 ...... 49 CFR Part 595, Subpart C, Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle Modifications to Accom- modate People With Disabilities, from FMVSS No. 226 (RRR). 17. 2127–AL20 ...... Upgrade of LATCH Usability Requirements (MAP–21) (RRR). 18. 2127–AL24 ...... Rapid Tire Deflation Test in FMVSS No. 110 (RRR). 19. 2127–AL41 ...... FMVSS No. 571.108 License Plate Mounting Angle (RRR). 20. 2127–AL58 ...... Upgrade of Rear Impact Guard Requirements for Trailers and Semitrailers (RRR). 21. 2130–AC40 ...... Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers; Miscellaneous Revisions (RRR). 22. 2130–AC41 ...... Hours of Service Recordkeeping; Electronic Recordkeeping Amendments (RRR). 23. 2130–AC43 ...... Safety Glazing Standards; Miscellaneous Revisions (RRR). 24. 2137–AE72 ...... Pipeline Safety: Gas Transmission (RRR) ...... Y. 25. 2137–AE80 ...... Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Pressure Vessel Requirements (DOT Spec Cylinders) Y. (RRR). 26. 2137–AE81 ...... Hazardous Materials: Reverse Logistics (RRR) ...... Y. 27. 2137–AE86 ...... Hazardous Materials: Requirements for the Safe Transportation of Bulk Explosives (RRR). 28. 2137–AE94 ...... Pipeline Safety: Operator Qualification, Cost Recovery, Accident and Incident Notification, and Y. Other Changes (RRR). 29. 2137–AF00 ...... Hazardous Materials: Adoption of Special Permits (MAP–21) (RRR) ...... Y. 30. 2137–AF04 ...... Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR). 31. 2137–AF10 ...... Hazardous Materials: Revision of the Requirements for Carriage by Aircraft (RRR).

International Regulatory Cooperation Executive Order 13609, we have related activities. The FAA also plays an Executive Order 13609 (Promoting increased our efforts in this area. For active role in the standard-setting work International Regulatory Cooperation) example, many of DOT’s Operating of the International Civil Aviation stresses that ‘‘[i]n an increasingly global Administrations are active in Organization (ICAO), particularly on the economy, international regulatory groundbreaking government-wide Air Navigation Commission and the cooperation, consistent with domestic Regulatory Cooperation Councils (RCC) Legal Committee. In doing so, the FAA law and prerogatives and U.S. trade with Canada, Mexico, and the European works with other Nations to shape the policy, can be an important means of Union. These RCC working groups are standards and recommended practices promoting the goals of’’ Executive Order setting a precedent in developing and adopted by ICAO. The FAA’s 13563 to ‘‘protect public health, welfare, testing approaches to international rulemaking actions related to safety safety, and our environment while coordination of rulemaking to reduce management systems are examples of promoting economic growth, barriers to international trade. We also the FAA’s harmonization efforts. innovation, competitiveness, and job have been exploring innovative NHTSA is actively engaged in creation.’’ DOT has long recognized the approaches to ease the development international regulatory cooperative value of international regulatory process. efforts on both a multilateral and a cooperation and has engaged in a Examples of the many cooperative bilateral basis, exchanging information variety of activities with both foreign efforts we are engaged in include the on best practices and otherwise seeking governments and international bodies. following: to leverage its resources for addressing These activities have ranged from The FAA maintains ongoing efforts vehicle issues in the U.S. As noted in cooperation in the development of with foreign civil aviation authorities, Executive Order 13609: ‘‘(i)n meeting particular standards to discussions of including in particular the European shared challenges involving health, necessary steps for rulemakings in Aviation Safety Agency and Transport safety, labor, security, environmental, general, such as risk assessments and Canada, to harmonize standards and and other issues, international cost-benefit analyses of possible practices where doing so will improve regulatory cooperation can identify standards. Since the issuance of the safety of aviation and aviation- approaches that are at least as protective

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00118 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77827

as those that are or would be adopted in Statements (RPSs) outlining the has a Memorandum of Cooperation in the absence of such cooperation’’ and framework for how cooperative place to ensure that cross-border ‘‘can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent activities will be managed between shipments are not hampered by unnecessary differences in regulatory agencies. In that same period, regulators conflicting regulations. The pipeline requirements.’’ will also develop and complete detailed group at PHMSA incorporates many As the representative, for vehicle work plans to begin to address the standards by reference into the Pipeline safety matters, of the United States, one commitments in the Forward Plan. To Safety Regulations, and the of 33 contracting parties to the 1998 facilitate future cooperation, the RCC development of these standards benefit Agreement on the Harmonization of will work over the next year on cross- from the participation of experts from Vehicle Regulations, NHTSA is an cutting issues in areas such as: ‘‘sharing around the world. active participant in the World Forum information with foreign governments, In the areas of airline consumer for Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) at the joint funding of new initiatives and our protection and civil rights regulation, UN. Under that umbrella, NHTSA is respective rulemaking processes.’’ OST is particularly conscientious in currently working on the development To broaden and deepen its seeking international regulatory of harmonized regulations for the safety cooperative efforts with the European cooperation. For example, the of electric vehicles; hydrogen and fuel Union, NHTSA is participating in Department participates in the standard- cell vehicles; advanced head restraints; ongoing negotiations regarding the setting activities of ICAO and meets and pole side impact test procedures; Transatlantic Trade and Investment works with other governments and pedestrian protection; the safety risks Partnership which is ‘‘aimed at international airline associations on the associated with quieter vehicles, such as providing greater compatibility and implementation of U.S. and foreign electric and hybrid electric vehicles; transparency in trade and investment aviation rules. and advancements in tires. regulation, while maintaining high In recognition of the large cross- levels of health, safety, and For a number of years the Department border market in motor vehicles and environmental protection.’’ NHTSA is has also provided information on which motor vehicle equipment, NHTSA is seeking to build on existing levels of of its rulemaking actions have working bilaterally with Transport safety and lay the groundwork for future international effects. This information, Canada under the Motor Vehicles cooperation in addressing emerging updated monthly, is available at the Working Group of the U.S.–Canada safety issues and technologies. Department’s regulatory information Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) PHMSA’s hazardous material group Web site, http://www.dot.gov/ to facilitate implementation of the works with ICAO, the UN regulations, under the heading ‘‘Reports initial RCC Joint Action Plan. Under this Subcommittee of Experts on Dangerous on Rulemakings and Enforcement.’’ Plan, NHTSA and Transport Canada are Goods, and the International Maritime (The reports can be found under working on the development of Organization. Through participation in headings for ‘‘EU,’’ ‘‘NAFTA’’ (Canada international standards on quieter these international bodies, PHMSA is and Mexico) and ‘‘Foreign.’’) A list of vehicles, electric vehicle safety, and able to advocate on behalf of U.S. safety our significant rulemakings that are hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles. and commercial interests to guide the expected to have international effects Building on the initial Joint Action development of international standards follows; the identifying RIN provided Plan, the U.S. and Canada issued a Joint with which U.S. businesses have to below can be used to find summary and Forward Plan on August 29, 2014. The comply when shipping in international other information about the rulemakings Forward Plan provided that regulators commerce. PHMSA additionally in the Department’s Regulatory Agenda would develop Regulatory Partnership participates in the RCC with Canada and published along with this Plan:

DOT significant rulemakings with international impacts RIN Rulemaking title

2105–AD91 ...... Accessibility of Airports. 2105–AE06 ...... E-Cigarette. 2120–AJ38 ...... Airport Safety Management System. 2120–AJ60 ...... Small Unmanned Aircraft. 2120–AJ69 ...... Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Territory and Airspace of Afghanistan. 2120–AJ89 ...... Slot Management and Transparency. 2120–AK09 ...... Drug & Alcohol Testing for Repair Stations. 2120–AK65 ...... Revision of Airworthiness Standards for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Air- planes. 2126–AA34 ...... Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers. 2126–AA35 ...... Safety Monitoring System and Compliance Initiative for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers Operating in the United States. 2124–AA70 ...... Limitations on the Issuance of Commercial Driver Licenses with a Hazardous Materials Endorse- ment. 2126–AB56 ...... MAP–21 Enhancements and Other Updates to the Unified Registration System. 2127–AK76 ...... Tire Fuel Efficiency Part 2. 2127–AK93 ...... Quieter Vehicles Sound Alert. 2133–AB74 ...... Cargo Preference.

As we identify rulemakings arising them to our Web site report and The Department’s Regulatory Process out of our ongoing regulatory subsequent Agendas and Plans. The Department will also continue its cooperation activities that we efforts to use advances in technology to reasonably anticipate will lead to improve its rulemaking management significant regulations, we will add process. For example, the Department

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77828 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

created an effective tracking system for the regulatory process. The General decisions; (2) NAS Initiative—Lay the significant rulemakings to ensure that Counsel’s office works closely with foundation for the National Airspace either rules are completed in a timely representatives of other agencies, OMB, System of the future by achieving manner or delays are identified and the White House, and congressional prioritized NextGen benefits, enabling fixed. Through this tracking system, a staff to provide information on how the safe and efficient integration of new monthly status report is generated. To various proposals would affect the user entrants including Unmanned make its efforts more transparent, the ability of the Department to perform its Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Commercial Department has made this report safety, infrastructure, and other Space flights, and deliver more efficient, Internet accessible at http://www.dot. missions. streamlined air traffic management gov/regulations. By doing this, the During Fiscal Year 2016, OST will services; (3) Global Leadership— Department is providing valuable focus its efforts on voice Improve safety, air traffic efficiency, and information concerning our rulemaking communications on passengers´ mobile environmental sustainability across the activity and is providing information wireless devices on scheduled flights globe through an integrated, data-driven necessary for the public to evaluate the within, to and from the United States approach that shapes global standards, Department’s progress in meeting its (2105–AE30). enhances collaboration and commitment to completing quality OST will also continue its efforts on harmonization, and better targets FAA rulemakings in a timely manner. the following rulemaking initiatives: resources and efforts; and (4) Workforce The Department continues to place • Airline Passenger Protections III of the Future—Prepare FAA’s human great emphasis on the need to complete (2105–AE11) capital for the future, by identifying, high-quality rulemakings by involving • In-Flight Medical Oxygen and other recruiting, and training a workforce senior departmental officials in regular ACAA issues (2105–AE12) with the leadership, technical, and meetings to resolve issues • In-Flight Entertainment (2105–AE32) functional skills to ensure the U.S. has expeditiously. Reporting of Statistics for Mishandled the world’s safest and most productive Office of the Secretary of Transportation Baggage and Wheelchairs (2105–AE41) aviation sector. FAA activities that may lead to (OST) OST will also continue its efforts to rulemaking in Fiscal Year 2016 include The Office of the Secretary (OST) help coordinate the activities of several continuing to: oversees the regulatory process for the operating administrations that advance • Promote and expand safety Department. OST implements the various departmental efforts that information-sharing efforts, such as Department’s regulatory policies and support the Administration’s initiatives FAA-industry partnerships and data- procedures and is responsible for on promoting safety, stimulating the driven safety programs that prioritize ensuring the involvement of top economy and creating jobs, sustaining and address risks before they lead to management in regulatory and building America’s transportation accidents. Specifically, FAA will decisionmaking. Through the General infrastructure, and improving quality of continue implementing Commercial Counsel’s office, OST is also responsible life for the people and communities Aviation Safety Team projects related to for ensuring that the Department who use transportation systems subject controlled flight into terrain, loss of complies with the Administrative to the Department’s policies. It will also control of an aircraft, uncontained Procedure Act, Executive Order 12866 continue to oversee the Department’s engine failures, runway incursions, (Regulatory Planning and Review), rulemaking actions to implement the weather, pilot decision making, and Executive Order 13563, DOT’s ‘‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st cabin safety. Some of these projects may Regulatory Policies and Procedures, and Century Act’’ (MAP–21). result in rulemaking and guidance other legal and policy requirements materials. affecting rulemaking. Although OST’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) • Respond to the FAA Modernization principal role concerns the review of the The Federal Aviation Administration and Reform Act of 2012 (the Act), which Department’s significant rulemakings, is charged with safely and efficiently directed the FAA to initiate a this office has the lead role in the operating and maintaining the most rulemaking proceeding to issue substance of such projects as those complex aviation system in the world. guidelines and regulations relating to concerning aviation economic rules, the Destination 2025, an FAA initiative that ADS–B In technology and Americans with Disabilities Act, and captures the agency’s vision of recommendations from an Aviation rules that affect multiple elements of the transforming the Nation’s aviation Rulemaking Committee on ADS–B–In Department. system by 2025, has proven to be an capabilities in consideration of the OST provides guidance and training effective tool for pushing the agency to FAA’s evolving thinking on how to regarding compliance with regulatory think about longer-term aspirations; provide an integrated suite of requirements and process for personnel FAA has established a vision that communication, navigation, and throughout the Department. OST also defines the agency’s priorities for the surveillance (CNS) capabilities to plays an instrumental role in the next five years. The changing achieve full NextGen performance. Department’s efforts to improve our technological and industry environment • Respond to the Act, which also economic analyses; risk assessments; compels us to transform the agency. recommended we complete the regulatory flexibility analyses; other And the challenging fiscal environment rulemaking for small Unmanned related analyses; retrospective reviews we face only increases the need to Aircraft Systems, and consider how to of rules; and data quality, including prioritize our goals. fully integrate UAS operations in the peer reviews. We have identified four major NAS, which will require future OST also leads and coordinates the strategic initiatives where we will focus rulemaking. Department’s response to the Office of our efforts: (1) Risk-based Decision • Respond to the Airline Safety and Management and Budget’s (OMB) Making—Build on safety management Federal Aviation Administration intergovernmental review of other principles to proactively address Extension Act of 2010 (H.R. 5900), agencies’ significant rulemaking emerging safety risk by using consistent, which requires the FAA to develop and documents and to Administration and data-informed approaches to make implement Safety Management Systems congressional proposals that concern smarter, system-level, risk-based (SMS) where these systems will

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00120 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77829

improve safety of aviation and aviation- U.S. aircraft manufacturers and The Airport Safety Management related activities. An SMS proactively operators, some of which are small System rulemaking would: identifies potential hazards in the businesses. Standardization should help • Require certain airport certificate operating environment, analyzes the the U.S. aerospace industry remain holders to develop, implement, risks of those hazards, and encourages internationally competitive. The FAA maintain, and adhere to a safety mitigation prior to an accident or continues to publish regulations based management system (SMS) for its incident. In its most general form, an on internal analysis, public comment, aviation related activities. SMS is a set of decision-making tools and recommendations of Aviation The Flight Crewmember Mentoring, that can be used to plan, organize, Rulemaking Committees that are the Leadership and Professional direct, and control activities in a result of cooperative rulemaking Development rulemaking would: manner that enhances safety. between the U.S. and other countries. • Ensure air carriers establish or • Respond to the Small Airplane FAA top regulatory priorities for modify training programs to address Revitalization Act of 2013 (H.R. 1848), Fiscal Year 2016 include: mentoring, leadership and professional which requires the FAA adopt the • Operation and Certification of Small development of flight crewmembers in recommendations from part 23 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (2120– part 121 operations. Reorganization Aviation Rulemaking AJ60) (Pub. L. 112–95 (Feb. 14, 2012)) Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) • Revision of Airworthiness Standards Federal Highway Administration for improving safety and reducing for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and (FHWA) certification costs for general aviation. Commuter Category Airplanes (2120– The Federal Highway Administration The ARC recommendations include a AK65) (FHWA) carries out the Federal highway broad range of policy and regulatory • Airport Safety Management System program in partnership with State and changes that it believes could (2120–AJ38) local agencies to meet the Nation’s significantly improve the safety of • Flight Crewmember Mentoring, transportation needs. The FHWA’s general aviation aircraft while Leadership and Professional mission is to improve continually the simultaneously reducing certification Development (2120–AJ87) quality and performance of our Nation’s and modification costs for these aircraft. The Operation and Certification of highway system and its intermodal Among the ARC’s recommendations is a Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems connectors. suggestion that compliance with part 23 rulemaking would: Consistent with this mission, the requirements be performance-based, • Adopt specific rules for the FHWA will continue: focusing on the complexity and operation of small unmanned aircraft • With ongoing regulatory initiatives performance of an aircraft instead of the systems in the national airspace system; in support of its surface transportation current regulations based on weight and and programs; type of propulsion. In announcing the • Address the classification of small • To implement legislation in the ARC’s recommendations, the Secretary unmanned aircraft, certification of their most cost-effective way possible; and of Transportation said ‘‘Streamlining the pilots and visual observers, registration, • To pursue regulatory reform in design and certification process could approval of operations, and operational provide a cost-efficient way to build areas where project development can be limits. streamlined or accelerated, duplicative simple airplanes that still incorporate The Revision of Airworthiness the latest in safety initiatives. These requirements can be consolidated, Standards for Normal, Utility, recordkeeping requirements can be changes have the potential to save Acrobatic, and Commuter Category money and maintain our safety reduced or simplified, and the Airplanes rulemaking would: decisionmaking authority of our State standing—a win-win situation for • Reorganize part 23 into and local partners can be increased. manufacturers, pilots and the general performance-based requirements by MAP–21 authorizes the Federal aviation community as a whole.’’ removing the detailed design surface transportation programs for Further, these changes are consistent requirements from part 23; with directions to agencies in [Executive • Promote the adoption of the newly highways, highway safety, and transit Order 13610 ‘‘Identifying and Reducing created performance-based for the two-year period from 2012–2014. Regulatory Burdens,’’ we continue to airworthiness design standard as an The FHWA has analyzed MAP–21 to find ways to make our regulatory internationally accepted standard by the identify Congressionally directed program more effective or less majority of other civil aviation rulemakings. These rulemakings will be burdensome; provide quantifiable authorities; the FHWA’s top regulatory priorities for monetary savings or quantifiable • Re-align the part 23 requirements to the coming year. reductions in paperwork burdens, and promote the development of entry-level Additionally, the FHWA is in the modify and streamline regulations in airplanes similar to those certified process of reviewing all FHWA light of changed circumstances.] under Certification Specification for regulations to ensure that they are • Work cooperatively to harmonize Very Light Aircraft (CS–VLA); consistent with MAP–21 and will the U.S. aviation regulations with those • Enhance the FAA’s ability to update those regulations that are not of other countries, without address new technology; consistent with the recently enacted compromising rigorous safety standards, • Increase the general aviation (GA) legislation. or our requirements to develop cost level of safety provided by new and During Fiscal Year 2016, FHWA will benefit analysis. The differences modified airplanes; continue its focus on improving the worldwide in certification standards, • Amend the stall, stall warning, and quality and performance of our Nation’s practice and procedures, and operating spin requirements to reduce fatal highway systems by creating national rules must be identified and minimized accidents and increase crashworthiness performance management measures and to reduce the regulatory burden on the by allowing new methods for occupant standards to be used by the States to international aviation system. The protection; and meet the national transportation goals differences between the FAA • Address icing conditions that are identified in section 1203 of MAP–21 regulations and the requirements of currently not included in part 23 under the following rulemaking other nations impose a heavy burden on regulations. initiatives:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77830 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

• National Goals and Performance establish training requirements for efficiency standards for medium- and Management Measures (Safety) (RIN: individuals before they can obtain their heavy-duty on-highway vehicles and 2125–AF49) CDL or certain endorsements. It will work trucks for model years beyond • National Goals and Performance define curricula for training providers 2018. This final rule will be responsive Management Measures (Bridges and and establish requirements and to requirements of the Energy Pavement) (RIN: 2125–AF53) procedures for the schools. The Independence and Security Act of 2007 • National Goals and Performance proposed rule is based on consensus as well as the President’s Climate Management Measures (Congestion recommendations from the Agency’s Action Plan. Reduction, CMAQ, Freight, and Entry-Level Driver Training Advisory NHTSA plans to issue a notice of Performance of Interstate/Non- Committee (ELDTAC), a negotiated proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on Interstate NHS) (RIN: 2125–AF54). rulemaking committee that held a series vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) Federal Motor Carrier Safety of 6 meetings between February and communications in Fiscal Year 2016. Administration (FMCSA) May 2015. V2V communications are currently Also in FY 2016, FMCSA plans to perceived to become a foundational The mission of the Federal Motor issue a final rule on the Commercial aspect of vehicle automation. In Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol response to requirements in MAP–21, is to reduce crashes, injuries, and Clearinghouse (RIN 2126–AB18). The NHTSA plans to issue a NPRM that fatalities involving commercial trucks rule would establish a clearinghouse would propose requiring automobile and buses. A strong regulatory program requiring employers and service agents manufacturers to install a seat belt is a cornerstone of FMCSA’s compliance to report information about current and reminder system for the front passenger and enforcement efforts to advance this prospective employees’ drug and and rear designated seating positions in safety mission. FMCSA develops new alcohol test results. It would require passenger vehicles. The seat belt and more effective safety regulations employers and certain service agents to reminder system is intended to increase based on three core priorities: Raising search the Clearinghouse for current and belt usage and thereby improve the the safety bar for entry, maintaining prospective employees’ positive drug crash protection of vehicle occupants high standards, and removing high-risk and alcohol test results as a condition of who would otherwise have been behavior. In addition to Agency-directed permitting those employees to perform unbelted. The Agency will also continue regulations, FMCSA develops safety-sensitive functions. This would work toward a NPRM that would regulations mandated by Congress, provide FMCSA and employers the consider requirements for rear impact through legislation such as MAP–21. necessary tools to identify drivers who guards and other safety strategies on FMCSA regulations establish standards are prohibited from operating a CMV single unit trucks to mitigate under-ride for motor carriers, commercial drivers, based on DOT drug and alcohol program crashes into the rear of single unit commercial motor vehicles, and State violations and ensure that such drivers trucks. agencies receiving certain motor carrier receive the required evaluation and In addition to numerous programs safety grants and issuing commercial treatment before resuming safety- that focus on the safe performance of drivers’ licenses. sensitive functions. motor vehicles, the Agency is engaged FMCSA’s regulatory plan for FY 2016 in a variety of programs to improve includes completion of a number of National Highway Traffic Safety driver and occupant behavior. These rulemakings that are high priorities for Administration programs emphasize the human aspects the Agency because they would have a The statutory responsibilities of the of motor vehicle safety and recognize positive impact on safety. Among the National Highway Traffic Safety the important role of the States in this rulemakings included in the plan are: Administration (NHTSA) relating to common pursuit. NHTSA has identified (1) Carrier Safety Fitness Determination motor vehicles include reducing the two high-priority areas: Safety belt use (RIN 2126–AB11), (2) Entry Level Driver number of, and mitigating the effects of, and impaired driving. To address these Training (RIN 2126–AB66), and (3) motor vehicle crashes and related issue areas, the Agency is focusing Commercial Driver’s License Drug and fatalities and injuries; providing safety especially on three strategies— Alcohol Clearinghouse (RIN 2126– performance information to aid conducting highly visible, well- AB18). prospective purchasers of vehicles, publicized enforcement; supporting Together, these priority rules could child restraints, and tires; and prosecutors who handle impaired improve substantially commercial motor improving automotive fuel efficiency. driving cases and expanding the use of vehicle (CMV) safety on our Nation’s NHTSA pursues policies that encourage DWI/Drug Courts, which hold offenders highways by increasing FMCSA’s ability the development of non-regulatory accountable for receiving and to provide safety oversight of motor approaches when feasible in meeting its completing treatment for alcohol abuse carriers and commercial drivers. statutory mandates. It issues new and dependency; and adopting alcohol In FY 2016, FMCSA plans to complete standards and regulations or screening and brief intervention by the public comment period and issue a amendments to existing standards and medical and health care professionals. final rule on Carrier Safety Fitness regulations when appropriate. It ensures Other behavioral efforts encourage child Determination (RIN 2126–AB11) to that regulatory alternatives reflect a safety-seat use; combat excessive speed, establish a new safety fitness careful assessment of the problem and a driver distraction, and aggressive determination standard that will enable comprehensive analysis of the benefits, driving; improve motorcycle, bicycle, the Agency to prohibit ‘‘unfit’’ carriers costs, and other impacts associated with and pedestrian safety; and provide from operating on the Nation’s the proposed regulatory action. Finally, consumer information to the public. highways and contribute to the it considers alternatives consistent with Agency’s overall goal of decreasing the Administration’s regulatory Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) CMV-related fatalities and injuries. principles. FRA’s current regulatory program In FY 2016, FMCSA plans to complete In Fiscal Year 2016, NHTSA, in reflects a number of pending the public comment period and issue a conjunction with the Environmental proceedings to satisfy mandates final rule on Entry Level Driver Training Protection Agency, will publish a final resulting from the Rail Safety (RIN 2126–AB66). This rule would rule to address phase two of fuel Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA08), and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77831

the Passenger Rail Investment and • Provide maximum local discretion; the global marketplace while creating Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA), as • Ensure the most productive use of well-paying jobs at home. well as actions under its general safety limited Federal resources; MARAD’s primary regulatory rulemaking authority and actions • Protect taxpayer investments in activities in Fiscal Year 2016 will be to supporting a high-performing passenger public transportation; continue the update of existing • rail network and to address the safe and Incorporate principles of sound regulations as part of the Department’s effective movement of energy products, management into the grant management Retrospective Regulatory Review effort, particularly crude oil. RSIA08 alone has process. and to propose new regulations where required 21 rulemaking actions, 17 of As the needs for public transportation appropriate. which have been completed. FRA have changed over the years, the Federal continues to prioritize its rulemakings transit programs have grown in number Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety according to the greatest effect on safety and complexity often requiring Administration (PHMSA) while promoting economic growth, implementation through the rulemaking The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials innovation, competitiveness, and job process. FTA is currently implementing Safety Administration (PHMSA) has creation, as well as expressed many of its public transportation responsibility for rulemaking under two congressional interest, while working to programs authorized under MAP–21 programs. Through the Associate complete as many mandated through the regulatory process. To that Administrator for Hazardous Materials rulemakings as quickly as possible. end, FTA’s regulatory priorities include Safety, PHMSA administers regulatory Through the Railroad Safety Advisory implementing the newly authorized programs under Federal hazardous Committee (RSAC), FRA is working to Public Transportation Safety Program materials transportation law and the complete its on-going development of (49 U.S.C. 5329), such as the Public Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as requirements related to the creation and Transportation Safety Plan and updating amended by the Oil Pollution Act of implementation of railroad risk the State Safety Oversight rule, as well 1990. Through the Associate reduction and system safety programs. as, implementing requirements for Administrator for Pipeline Safety, FRA is developing proposed rulemaking Transit Asset Management Systems (49 PHMSA administers regulatory documents based on the U.S.C. 5326). The joint FTA/FHWA programs under the Federal pipeline recommendations of an RSAC working planning rule which will be merged safety laws and the Federal Water group containing the fatigue with FTA/FHWA’s Additional Pollution Control Act, as amended by management provisions related to both Authorities for Planning and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. The proceedings. FRA is also in the process Environmental Linkages rule and FTA’s Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, of developing a significant regulatory Bus Testing rule round out its regulatory and Job Creation Act of 2011 included action that would propose requirements priorities. a number of rulemaking studies and related to the crew size of passenger and Maritime Administration (MARAD) mandates and additional enforcement freight trains, including trains authorities that continue to impact transporting crude oil and ethanol by The Maritime Administration (MARAD) administers Federal laws and PHMSA’s regulatory activities in Fiscal rail. FRA continues its work to produce 1 programs to improve and strengthen the Year 2015. a rulemaking containing RSAC- MAP–21 reauthorized the hazardous supported actions that advance high- maritime transportation system to meet the economic, environmental, and materials safety program and required performing passenger rail to proposed several regulatory actions by PHMSA. standards for alternative compliance security needs of the Nation. To that end, MARAD’s efforts are focused upon PHMSA has been very effective in with FRA’s Passenger Equipment Safety implementing the MAP–21 provisions. Standards for the operation of Tier III ensuring a strong American presence in the domestic and international trades MAP–21 established over thirty distinct passenger equipment. Finally, FRA is provisions applicable to PHMSA’s developing proposed rules regarding and to expanding maritime opportunities for American businesses Hazardous Materials Safety Program. track inspections aimed at improving For example, MAP–21 required PHMSA rail integrity to allow continuous rail and workers. MARAD’s regulatory objectives and to codify its procedures for issuing integrity testing and to address the use special permits and the criteria it uses of inward and outward facing priorities reflect the agency’s responsibility for ensuring the to evaluate special permit and approval locomotive-mounted cameras and other applications. MAP–21 requires PHMSA recording devices. availability of water transportation services for American shippers and to conduct a review of existing special Federal Transit Administration (FTA) consumers and, in times of war or permits and publish a rulemaking every two years to codify special permits that FTA helps communities support national emergency, for the U.S. armed have been in continuous effect for a ten- public transportation by making grants forces. Major program areas include the year period. MAP–21 also requires of Federal funding for transit vehicles, following: Maritime Security, Voluntary PHMSA to evaluate the feasibility of construction of transit facilities, and Intermodal Sealift Agreement, National paperless hazard communication as an planning and operation of transit and Defense Reserve Fleet and the Ready effective means for transmitting other transit-related purposes. FTA Reserve Force, Cargo Preference, shipment information between shippers, regulatory activity implements the laws Maritime Guaranteed Loan Financing, carriers, responders, and enforcement that apply to recipients’ uses of Federal United States Merchant Marine officials. funding and the terms and conditions of Academy, Mariner Education and PHMSA will continue to work toward FTA grant awards. FTA policy regarding Training Support, Deepwater Port improving safety related to regulations is to: Licensing, and Port and Intermodal • Ensure the safety of public Development. Additionally, MARAD transportation of hazardous materials by transportation systems. administers the Small Shipyard Grants all transportation modes, including • Provide maximum benefit to the Program through which equipment and 1 http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pv_obj_cache/pv_ Nation’s mobility through the technical skills training are provided to obj_id_7FD46010F0497123865B976479CFF3952 connectivity of transportation America’s maritime workforce, with the E990200/filename/Pipeline%20Reauthorization infrastructure; aim of helping businesses to compete in %20Bill%202011.pdf.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77832 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

pipeline, while promoting economic PHMSA aims to reduce the risks comprehensive oil spill response plans growth, innovation, competitiveness, related to the transportation of (OSRPs) for crude oil trains. PHMSA and job creation. We will concentrate on hazardous materials by rail. Preventing will continue to take regulatory actions the prevention of high-risk incidents tank car incidents and minimizing the to enhance the safe transportation of identified through the findings of the consequences when an incident does energy products. National Transportation Safety Board occur are not only DOT priorities, but On October 13, 2015 [80 FR 61609], (NTSB) and PHMSA’s evaluation of are also shared by our Federal and PHMSA issued an NPRM proposing transportation incident data. PHMSA international partners, the NTSB, changes to the regulations covering will use all available Agency tools to industry, and the general public. hazardous liquid onshore pipelines. assess data; evaluate alternative safety Expansion in United States energy Specifically, the agency proposed strategies, including regulatory production has led to significant regulatory changes relative to High strategies as necessary and appropriate; challenges in the transportation system. Consequence Areas (HCAs) for integrity target enforcement efforts; and enhance Expansion in oil production has led to management (IM) protections, repair outreach, public education, and training increasing volumes of energy products timeframes, and reporting for all to promote safety outcomes. transported to refineries. With a growing hazardous liquid gathering lines. The domestic supply, rail transportation, in agency also addressed public safety and PHMSA will continue to focus on the particular, has emerged as an alternative environmental aspects of any new streamlining of its regulatory system to transportation by pipeline or vessel. requirements, as well as the cost and reducing regulatory burdens. The growing reliance on trains to implications and regulatory burden. PHMSA will evaluate existing rules to transport large volumes of flammable PHMSA also will be revisiting the examine whether they remain justified; liquids raises risks that have been requirements in the Pipeline Safety should be modified to account for highlighted by the recent instances of Regulations addressing integrity changing circumstances and trains carrying crude oil that have management principles for Gas technologies; or should be streamlined derailed. PHMSA and FRA issued a Transmission pipelines. In particular, or even repealed. PHMSA will continue final rule on May 8, 2015 (80 FR 26643), PHMSA is planning to propose to evaluate, analyze, and be responsive designed to lessen the frequency and requirements to address repair criteria to petitions for rulemaking. PHMSA will consequences of train accidents for both HCA and non-HCA areas, review regulations, letters of involving flammable liquids. In assessment methods, validating and interpretation, petitions for rulemaking, addition, PHMSA and FRA issued an integrating pipeline data, risk special permits, enforcement actions, Advanced Notice of Proposed assessments, knowledge gained through approvals, and international standards Rulemaking on August 1, 2014 (79 FR the IM program, corrosion control, to identify inconsistencies, outdated 45079), seeking comment on potential management of change, gathering lines, provisions, and barriers to regulatory revisions to its regulations that would and safety features on launchers and compliance. expand the applicability of receivers.

QUANTIFIABLE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RULEMAKINGS ON THE 2015 TO 2016 DOT REGULATORY PLAN [This chart does not account for benefits and costs that could not be monetized, which may be substantial]

Quantifiable Quantifiable costs benefits Agency/RIN No. Title Stage discounted 2013 $ discounted 2013 $ (millions) (millions)

OST

2105–AE30 ...... Use of Mobile Wireless Devices for NPRM 03/16 ...... TBD ...... TBD. Voice Calls on Aircraft.

FAA

2120–AJ38 ...... Airport Safety Management System SNPRM 11/15 ..... $157.5 ...... $225.9. 2120–AJ60 ...... Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems .. FR 4/16 ...... $5.7 ...... TBD. 2120–AJ87 ...... Pilot Professional Development ...... NPRM 12/15 ...... $46.8 ...... $46.3. 2120–AK65 ...... Revision of Airworthiness Standards NPRM 01/16 ...... $3.9 ...... $11.6. for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes.

FHWA

2125–AF49 ...... Performance Management 1 ...... FR 11/15 ...... $5.4 ...... Breakeven Analysis. Note: These are preliminary agency estimates only. They have not been reviewed by others outside of DOT. The estimates could change after interagency review. 2125–AF53 ...... Performance Management 2 ...... NPRM (Analyzing $21.2 ...... Breakeven Analysis. Comments 12/ Note: These are preliminary agency 15) FR TBD. estimates only. They have not been reviewed by others outside of DOT. The estimates could change after interagency review.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77833

QUANTIFIABLE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RULEMAKINGS ON THE 2015 TO 2016 DOT REGULATORY PLAN—Continued [This chart does not account for benefits and costs that could not be monetized, which may be substantial]

Quantifiable Quantifiable costs benefits Agency/RIN No. Title Stage discounted 2013 $ discounted 2013 $ (millions) (millions)

2125–AF54 ...... Performance Management 3 ...... NPRM 12/15 ...... TBD ...... Breakeven Analysis.

FMCSA

2126–AB11 ...... Carrier Safety Fitness Determination NPRM 11/15 ...... $7 ...... $241. 2126–AB18 ...... Commercial Driver’s License Drug FR 03/16 ...... $174 ...... $230. and Alcohol Clearinghouse. 2126–AB66 ...... Entry Level Driver Training ...... NPRM 11/15 ...... TBD ...... TBD.

NHTSA

2127–AL37 ...... Rear Seat Belt Reminder System .... NPRM 04/16 ...... $164.3–$324.6 ...... 310–465.5. Note: These are preliminary agency Note: These are prelimi- estimates only. They have not nary agency estimates been reviewed by others outside only. They have not of DOT. The estimates could been reviewed by oth- change after interagency review. ers outside of DOT. The estimates could change after inter- agency review. 2127–AL52 ...... Fuel Efficiency Standards for NPRM (Analyzing $30,500–$31,100 ...... $261,000–$276,000. Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehi- Comments 11/ cles and Work Trucks: Phase 2. 15) FR TBD.

FTA

2132–AB07 ...... Transit Asset Management ...... NPRM (Analyzing $18.9 million (Annualized) ...... Breakeven Analysis. Comments 11/ 15). 2132–AB23 ...... Public Transportation Agency Safety NPRM 12/15 ...... $92 million (Annualized) ...... Breakeven Analysis. Plan.

PHMSA

2137–AE66 ...... Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore NPRM 11/15 ...... TBD ...... TBD. Liquid Hazardous Pipelines. 2137–AE72 ...... Pipeline Safety: Gas Transmission NPRM 12/15 ...... TBD ...... TBD. (RRR). 2137–AF08 ...... Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Re- NPRM 01/16 ...... TBD ...... TBD. sponse Plans and Information Sharing for High-Hazard Flam- mable Trains. Notes: Costs and benefits of rulemakings may be forecast over varying periods. Although the forecast periods will be the same for any given rulemaking, comparisons between proceedings should be made cautiously. Costs and benefits are generally discounted at a 7 percent discount rate over the period analyzed. The Department of Transportation generally assumes that there are economic benefits to avoiding a fatality of $9.4 million. That economic value is included as part of the benefits estimates shown in the chart. As noted above, we have not included the non-quantifiable benefits.

DOT—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY within, to and from the United States. seeking comment on whether to ban (OST) The Federal Communications voice calls on aircraft. Statement of Need: This rulemaking Proposed Rule Stage Commission (FCC) recently issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that if proposes to regulate the practice of 86. +Use of Mobile Wireless Devices for adopted would, among other things, permitting airline passengers to use Voice Calls on Aircraft create a pathway for airlines to permit mobile wireless devices to make voice Priority: Other Significant. the use of cellphones or other mobile calls onboard aircraft. Currently, the Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712, 49 wireless devices to make or receive calls FCC bans the use of certain cellular U.S.C. 41702 on board aircraft. DOT supports the frequencies on aircraft; this rule CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. FCC’s proposal to revise its rules in light effectively prohibits the use of cellular Legal Deadline: None. of the technology available and to telephone frequencies to make voice Abstract: The Department of expand access to mobile wireless data calls while in flight. In 2013, however, Transportation (DOT or Department) is the FCC issued an NPRM which services on board aircraft; however, seeking comment on whether it should proposed lifting the ban on cellular under the Department’s aviation adopt a rule to restrict voice frequencies while in flight, so long as communications on passengers’ mobile consumer protection authority and the aircraft is equipped with an wireless devices on scheduled flights because of concerns raised, we are Airborne Access System. Moreover,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77834 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

airlines are increasingly installing Wi-Fi advances, and airlines’ own policies documents from a variety of technology onboard aircraft. These would allow. commenters. Because of the complexity systems operate outside the scope of the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD. of the issues and concerns raised by the FCC’s ban and have the capacity to Risks: n/a. commenters, the FAA began to transmit voice calls. In light of these Timetable: reevaluate whether deployment of SMS developments, the Department at all certificated airports was the most anticipates an environment in which Action Date FR Cite effective approach. The FAA continues voice calls on aircraft would be not only to believe that an SMS can address permitted, but increasingly frequent. In ANPRM ...... 02/24/14 79 FR 10049 potential safety gaps that are not ANPRM Comment 03/26/14 completely eliminated through effective February 2014, the Department issued Period End. an ANPRM seeking comment on NPRM ...... 03/00/16 FAA regulations and technical operating whether to regulate the use of voice standards. Summary of Legal Basis: The FAA’s calls onboard aircraft. Comments Regulatory Flexibility Analysis authority to issue rules regarding received by the public (along with Required: No. aviation safety is found in title 49 of the pilots’ organizations and flight Small Entities Affected: No. United States Code. Subtitle I, section attendants’ organizations) Government Levels Affected: None. 106 describes the authority of the FAA overwhelmingly favored a ban. URL for More Information: Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Summary of Legal Basis: The primary www.regulations.gov. Programs, describes in more detail the legal basis for this rulemaking is 49 URL for Public Comments: scope of the agency’s authority. The U.S.C. 41712, which prohibits unfair or www.regulations.gov. FAA is proposing this rulemaking under deceptive practices in air transportation Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie, or the sale of air transportation. The the authority described in subtitle VII, Principal Deputy Assistant General part A, subpart III, section 44706, Department submits that permitting Counsel, Department of Transportation, passengers to make voice calls within ‘‘Airport operating certificates.’’ Under Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey that section, Congress charges the FAA the confines of an aircraft may be Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, ‘‘unfair’’ in that it subjects other with issuing airport operating Phone: 202 366–9342, TDD Phone: 202 certificates (AOC) that contain terms passengers to significant unavoidable 755–7687, Fax: 202 366–7152, Email: harm without countervailing benefits. that the Administrator finds necessary [email protected]. to ensure safety in air transportation. The Department’s consumer protection RIN: 2105–AE30 This proposed rule is within the scope authority found in section 41712 also of that authority because it requires supports a proposed rule which would certain certificated airports to develop require sellers of air transportation to and maintain an SMS. The development notify passengers when a given flight DOT—FEDERAL AVIATION and implementation of an SMS ensures does permit the use of voice calls. ADMINISTRATION (FAA) safety in air transportation by assisting Another legal basis for the proposed Proposed Rule Stage these airports in proactively identifying rule is 49 U.S.C. 41702, which provides and mitigating safety hazards. that air carriers shall provide ‘‘safe and 87. +Airport Safety Management System Alternatives: The FAA is exploring adequate’’ domestic air transportation. various alternatives to determine how to The Department relied on section 41702 Priority: Other Significant. apply an SMS requirement to a group of when it determined that the discomfort Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44706; 49 airports that gains the most benefit in a to passengers from smoking on aircraft U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 cost-effective manner. was significant enough to justify U.S.C. 44701 to 44706; 49 U.S.C. 44709; Anticipated Cost and Benefits: regulating smoking to ensure adequate 49 U.S.C. 44719 Benefits are estimated at $370,788,457 service in domestic air transportation. CFR Citation: 14 CFR 139. ($225,850,869 present value) and total The Department submits that voice calls Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, costs are estimated at $238,865,692 on aircraft would create a similar type November 5, 2012, final rule. ($157,496,312 present value), with of passenger hardship. Abstract: This rulemaking would benefits exceeding costs. These are Alternatives: The Department’s require certain airport certificate holders preliminary estimates subject to change NPRM, as currently drafted, would to develop, implement, maintain, and based on further review and analysis. propose three (co-equal) alternative adhere to a safety management system Risks: An SMS is a formalized rules: (1) Prohibiting airlines from (SMS) for its aviation related activities. approach to managing safety by permitting passengers to use mobile An SMS is a formalized approach to developing an organization-wide safety devices to make voice calls on domestic managing safety by developing an policy, developing formal methods of flights and domestic segments of organization-wide safety policy, identifying hazards, analyzing and international flights; (2) prohibiting developing formal methods of mitigating risk, developing methods for airlines from permitting passengers to identifying hazards, analyzing and ensuring continuous safety use mobile devices to make voice calls mitigating risk, developing methods for improvement, and creating on both domestic flights and ensuring continuous safety organization-wide safety promotion international flights; and (3) not banning improvement, and creating strategies. An SMS provides an voice calls, but requiring sellers of air organization-wide safety promotion organization’s management with a set of transportation to disclose in advance strategies. decisionmaking tools that can be used to when a particular flight is one on which Statement of Need: In the NPRM plan, organize, direct, and control its voice calls are permitted. The published on October 7, 2010, the FAA business activities in a manner that alternative to these three proposals is to proposed to require all part 139 enhances safety and ensures compliance take no action; this alternative would certificate holders to develop and with regulatory standards. Adherence to require no advance notice and would implement an SMS to improve the standard operating procedures, passengers to make voice calls to the safety of their aviation-related activities. proactive identification and mitigation extent that the FCC’s rule, technological The FAA received 65 comment of hazards and risks, and effective

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77835

communications are crucial to CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121. value) and the total compliance costs is continued operational safety. The FAA Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, $67.632 ($46.774 present value). envisions an SMS would provide an April 20, 2015, NPRM. Risks: As recognized by the National airport with an added layer of safety to Abstract: This rulemaking would Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the help reduce the number of near-misses, amend the regulations for air carrier overall safety and reliability of the incidents, and accidents. An SMS also training programs under part 121. The National Airspace System demonstrates would ensure that all levels of airport action is necessary to ensure that air that most pilots conduct operations with management understand safety carriers establish or modify training a high degree of professionalism. implications of airfield operations. programs to address mentoring, Nevertheless, a problem still exists in Timetable: leadership and professional the aviation industry with some pilots development of flight crewmembers in acting unprofessionally and not Action Date FR Cite part 121 operations. This rulemaking is adhering to standard operating required by the Airline Safety and procedures, including sterile cockpit. NPRM ...... 10/07/10 75 FR 62008 Federal Aviation Administration Act of NPRM Comment 12/10/10 75 FR 76928 The NTSB has continued to cite 2010. inadequate leadership in the flight deck, Period Ex- Statement of Need: On August 1, tended. pilots’ unprofessional behavior, and NPRM Comment 01/05/11 2010, the President signed the Airline pilots’ failure to comply with the sterile Period End. Safety and Federal Aviation cockpit rule as factors in multiple End of Extended 03/07/11 Administration Extension Act of 2010 accidents and incidents including Comment Pe- (Pub. L. 111–216). Section 206 of Public Pinnacle Airlines flight 3701 and Colgan riod. Law 111–216 directed the FAA to Air, Inc. flight 3407. The FAA intends Second Extension 03/07/11 76 FR 12300 convene an aviation rulemaking for this proposal to mitigate of Comment committee (ARC) to develop procedures unprofessional pilot behavior which Period. for each part 121 air carrier pertaining End of Second 07/05/11 would reduce pilot errors that can lead to mentoring, professional development, to a catastrophic event. Extended Com- and leadership and command training ment Period. Timetable: Supplemental 12/00/15 for pilots serving in part 121 operations NPRM. and to issue a Notice of Proposed Action Date FR Cite Rulemaking (NPRM) based on the ARC Regulatory Flexibility Analysis recommendations. This NPRM is NPRM ...... 03/00/16 Required: Yes. necessary to satisfy a requirement of Small Entities Affected: Businesses. section 206 of Public Law 111–216. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Government Levels Affected: State. Summary of Legal Basis: The FAA Required: No. Additional Information: The authority to issue rules on aviation Small Entities Affected: Businesses. estimated costs of this rule do not safety is found in title 49 of the United Government Levels Affected: None. include the costs of mitigations that States Code. Subtitle I, section 106 URL for More Information: operators could incur as a result of describes the authority of the FAA www.regulations.gov. conducting the risk analysis proposed in Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation URL for Public Comments: this rule. Given the range of mitigation Programs, describes in more detail the www.regulations.gov. actions possible, it is difficult to provide scope of the agency’s authority. This Agency Contact: Sheri Pippin, a quantitative estimate of both the costs rulemaking is promulgated under the Department of Transportation, Federal and benefits of such mitigations. general authority described in 49 U.S.C. Aviation Administration, 15000 However, we anticipate that operators 106(f) and 44701(a) and the specific Aviation Blvd., Lawndale, CA 90261, will only implement mitigations where authority found in section 206 of Public Phone: 310 725–7342, Email: benefits exceeds costs. As such, the Law 111–216, the Airline Safety and [email protected]. FAA believes that the costs of this rule Federal Aviation Administration Related RIN: Related to 2120–AJ00 would be justified by the anticipated Extension Act of 2010 (49 U.S.C. 44701 RIN: 2120–AJ87 benefits of the rule, if adopted as note), which directed the FAA to proposed. convene an aviation rulemaking URL for More Information: committee (ARC) and conduct a DOT—FAA www.regulations.gov. rulemaking proceeding based on this URL for Public Comments: ARC’s recommendations pertaining to 89. +Revision of Airworthiness www.regulations.gov. mentoring, professional development, Standards for Normal, Utility, Agency Contact: Keri Lyons, and leadership and command training Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Department of Transportation, Federal for pilots serving in part 121 operations. Airplanes Aviation Administration, 800 Section 206 further required that the Priority: Other Significant. Independence Avenue SW., FAA include in leadership and Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 267– command training, instruction on U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 8972, Email: [email protected]. compliance with flightcrew member 44702; 49 U.S.C. 44704 Related RIN: Related to 2120–AJ15 duties under 14 CFR 121.542. CFR Citation: 14 CFR 23. RIN: 2120–AJ38 Alternatives: The Flight Crewmember Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, Mentoring, Leadership, and Professional December 15, 2015, NPRM (Pub. L. 113– Development ARC presented 53). DOT—FAA recommendations to the FAA in its Abstract: This rulemaking would report dated November 2, 2010. revise title 14, Code of Federal 88. +Pilot Professional Development Anticipated Cost and Benefits: For the Regulations (14 CFR) part 23 as a set of Priority: Other Significant. timeframe 2015 to 2024 (millions of performance based regulations for the Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); 2013 Dollars), the total cost saving design and certification of small Pub. L. 111–216, sec 206 benefits is $72.017 ($46.263 present transport category aircraft. This

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77836 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

rulemaking would: (1) Reorganize part (CAR 3) part 3, or very early amendment Agency Contact: Lowell Foster, 23 into performance-based requirements levels of part 23, and reflect the level of Department of Transportation, Federal by removing the detailed design safety technology available when they Aviation Administration, 901 Locust St., requirements from part 23. The detailed were designed decades ago. Without Kansas City, MO 64106, Phone: 816– design provisions that would assist new airplanes and improved existing 329–4125, Email: [email protected]. applicants in complying with the new airplanes, we will not see the safety RIN: 2120–AK65 performance-based requirements would improvements in GA that are possible be identified in means of compliance with the technology developed since the (MOC) documents to support this effort; 1970’s. This rulemaking effort targets: DOT—FAA (2) promote the adoption of the newly increasing the safety level in new created performance-based airplanes; reducing the cost of Final Rule Stage certification to encourage newer and airworthiness design standard as an 90. +Operation and Certification of safer airplane development; and create internationally accepted standard by the Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems majority of other civil aviation new opportunities to address safety authorities; (3) re-align the part 23 related issues, not just in new airplanes, Priority: Other Significant. requirements to promote the but eventually with the existing fleet. Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701; Pub. development of entry-level airplanes Summary of Legal Basis: Authority: L. 112–95 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–44702, CFR Citation: 14 CFR 91. similar to those certified under Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Certification Specification for Very 44704. Additionally, Public Law 113– 53, Small Airplane Revitalization Act of August 14, 2014, Pub. L. 112–95, sec Light Aircraft (CS–VLA); (4) enhance 332(b) requires issuance of final rule 18 the FAA’s ability to address new 2013 (Nov. 27, 2013), requires that the FAA issue a final rule revising these months after integration plan is technology; (5) increase the general submitted to Congress. Integration plan aviation (GA) level of safety provided by standards by December 15, 2015. Alternatives: Several alternatives are due Feb. 14, 2013. new and modified airplanes; (6) amend Abstract: This rulemaking would the stall, stall warning, and spin considering. 1. Retaining part 23 in its current form without adopting the allow the commercial operation of small requirements to reduce fatal accidents unmanned aircraft systems (small UAS) and increase crashworthiness by recommendations of the ARC and the CPS. 2. Revising part 23 using a tiered in the National Airspace System (NAS). allowing new methods for occupant These changes would address the protection; (7) address icing conditions approach and adopting a performance and complexity tiering structure instead operation of small unmanned aircraft that are currently not included in part systems, certification of their operators, 23 regulations. of the propulsion and weight-based approach used today, but retaining the registration of the small unmanned Statement of Need: The FAA’s detailed design requirements in the rule. aircraft, and display of registration strategic vision in line with Destination 3. Allowing an industry standard for markings. This action would also find 2025, communicates FAA goals to part 23 entry-level airplanes as an airworthiness certification is not increase safety throughout general alternative to part 23. Airplanes other required for small unmanned aircraft aviation by enabling and facilitating than entry-level would still be regulated system operations subject to this innovation and development of safety within the confines of the existing part rulemaking. enhancing products. This project 23. being Statement of Need: This rulemaking intends to provide an appropriate and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: For the would amend regulations to adopt globally competitive regulatory timeframe 2017 to 2036 (2014 $ specific rules for the operation of Small structure that allows small transport Millions), the total costs are $3.9 ($3.9 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the category airplanes to achieve FAA safety present value) and the total benefits are National Airspace System (NAS). These goals through innovation and $30.8 ($11.6 present value). changes would address the compliance with performance-based Risks: To be determined. classification of small UAS, certification safety standards. One focus area is Loss Timetable: of small UAS pilots, registration of of Control (LOC) accidents, which small UAS, and small UAS operational continues to be the largest source of Action Date FR Cite limits. The changes are necessary to fatal GA accidents. To address LOC allow for routine non-recreational NPRM ...... 01/00/16 accidents, the Small Airplane operation of small UAS. Absent this Directorate is focused on establishing Regulatory Flexibility Analysis rulemaking effort, operators would need standards based on a safety continuum Required: Yes. to file a request for exemption or that balances the level of certitude, Small Entities Affected: Businesses. certificate of waiver to operate. appropriate level of safety, and Government Levels Affected: Summary of Legal Basis: The FAA’s acceptable risk for each segment of GA. Undetermined. authority to issue rules on aviation This risk-based approach to certification Additional Information: Additionally, safety is found in title 49 of the U.S. has already served the FAA and public Public Law 113–53, Small Airplane Code. Subtitle I, section 106 describes well, with the application of section Revitalization Act of 2013 states: ‘‘SEC. the authority of the FAA Administrator, 23.1309 to avionics equipment in part 3. SAFETY AND REGULATORY including the authority to issue, rescind, 23 airplanes, leading to the successful IMPROVEMENTS FOR GENERAL and revise regulations. Subtitle VII, introduction of glass cockpits in small AVIATION. (a) IN GENERAL.— Aviation Programs, describes in more GA airplanes. To improve the GA fleet’s Not later than December 15, 2015, the detail the scope of the agency’s safety level over that of today’s aging Administrator of the Federal Aviation authority. This rulemaking is fleet, the FAA needs to allow industry Administration shall issue a final promulgated under the authority to build new part 23 certificated rule—’’ described subtitle VII, part A, subpart airplanes with today’s safety enhancing URL for More Information: III, chapter 447, Safety Regulation. technologies. Although a number of new www.regulations.gov. Pursuant to section 44701 (a)(5), the small airplanes are being built, many are URL for Public Comments: FAA is charged with promoting safe certified to the Civil Air Regulations www.regulations.gov. flight of civil aircraft by, among other

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77837

things, prescribing regulations the FAA DOT—FEDERAL HIGHWAY Risks: N/A. finds necessary for safety in air ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) Timetable: commerce and national security. This Proposed Rule Stage rulemaking is within the scope of that Action Date FR Cite authority. 91. +National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP–21) NPRM ...... 12/00/15 Alternatives: The overall quantified benefits to society will eventually be Priority: Other Significant. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis determined by market forces and the Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112–141 sec Required: No. ingenuity of the entrepreneurs. We 1203; 49 FR 1.85 Small Entities Affected: No. expect markets to evolve within the CFR Citation: 23 CFR 490. Government Levels Affected: Federal, Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, constraints of the proposed State. April 1, 2014, NPRM. URL for More Information: requirements and we assess the Section 1203 of MAP–21 requires the potential market within the context of Secretary to promulgate a rulemaking www.regulations.gov. URL for Public Comments: the demand for sUAS services. We within 18 months after the date of estimate the total benefits and costs enactment. www.regulations.gov. associated with the requirements Abstract: This rulemaking would Agency Contact: Francine Shaw- contained in the proposal. As this is an create national performance Whitson, Department of Transportation, enabling rulemaking action, the management measures and standards to Federal Highway Administration, 1200 estimated benefits cannot yet be be used by the States to meet the New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, quantified. The total estimated costs are national transportation goals identified DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8028, Email: $8.0 million. in section 1203 of MAP–21. This [email protected]. RIN: 2125–AF54 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The rulemaking would also establish the costs are estimated at $6,803,100 process to be used by States to set ($5,714,000 present value). The FAA performance targets that reflect their has not quantified the benefits for this performance measures. The FHWA DOT—FHWA anticipates issuing up to three rulemaking because we lack sufficient Final Rule Stage data. The FAA invited commenters to rulemakings in this area. This provide data that could be used to rulemaking covers Congestion 92. +National Goals and Performance Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and quantify the benefits of this rulemaking. Management Measures (Map–21) Freight issues. Risks: Commercial operations Statement of Need: The Moving Priority: Other Significant. currently have no legal means to Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Legal Authority: 23 U.S.C. 150 conduct operations without an FAA- Act (MAP–21) transforms the Federal- CFR Citation: 23 CFR 490. issued exemption. aid highway program by establishing Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, April 1, 2014, NPRM. Timetable: new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient Section 1203 of MAP–21 requires the Secretary to promulgate a rulemaking Action Date FR Cite investment of Federal transportation funds. Performance management within 18 months after the date of NPRM ...... 02/23/15 80 FR 9544 refocuses attention on national enactment. NPRM Comment 04/24/15 transportation goals, increases the Abstract: This rulemaking would Period End. accountability and transparency of the create national performance Final Rule ...... 04/00/16 Federal-aid highway program, and management measures and standards to improves project decisionmaking be used by the States to meet the through performance-based planning national transportation goals identified Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in section 1203 of MAP–21. This Required: Yes. and programming. This rulemaking is the third of three that would propose rulemaking would also establish the Small Entities Affected: Businesses, the establishment of performance process to be used by States to set Governmental Jurisdictions. measures for State DOTs and MPOs to performance targets that reflect their Government Levels Affected: None. use to carry out Federal-aid highway performance measures. The FHWA anticipates publishing up to three International Impacts: This regulatory programs and to assess performance in each of the 12 areas mandated by MAP– separate rulemakings to address the action will be likely to have different areas covered by this section. international trade and investment 21. This rulemaking would establish performance measures for State DOTs to This rulemaking, the first, will cover effects, or otherwise be of international safety. interest. use in the areas of Congestion Reduction, Congestion mitigation and Statement of Need: The Moving URL for More Information: air quality improvement program Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century www.regulations.gov. (CMAQ), Freight, and Performance of Act (MAP–21) transforms the Federal- URL for Public Comments: Interstate/Non-Interstate National aid highway program by establishing www.regulations.gov. Highway System. new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient Agency Contact: Lance Nuckolls, Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1203 of MAP–21 requires the Secretary of investment of Federal transportation Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration funds. Performance management Office, Department of Transportation, Transportation to establish performance measures and standards through a refocuses attention on national Federal Aviation Administration, 490 rulemaking to assess performance in 12 transportation goals, increases the L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC areas. accountability and transparency of the 20024, Phone: 202 267–8447, Email: Alternatives: N/A. Federal-aid highway program, and [email protected]. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not yet improves project decision-making RIN: 2120–AJ60 determined. through performance-based planning

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77838 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

and programming. This rulemaking is Action Date FR Cite the establishment of performance the first of three that would propose the measures for State DOTs and MPOs to establishment of performance measures NPRM Comment 06/09/14 use to carry out Federal-aid highway for State DOTs and MPOs to use to carry Period End. programs and to assess performance in out Federal-aid highway programs and Comment Period 06/30/14 79 FR 30508 each of the 12 areas mandated by MAP– to assess performance in each of the 12 Extended. 21. This rulemaking would establish Final Rule ...... 02/00/16 areas mandated by MAP–21. This performance measures for State DOTs to use to carry out the National Highway rulemaking would establish Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Performance Program (NHPP) and to performance measures to carry out the Required: No. assess: Condition of pavements on the Highway Safety Improvement Program Small Entities Affected: No. and to assess serious injuries and Government Levels Affected: State. National Highways System (NHS) fatalities, both in number and expressed URL for More Information: (excluding the Interstate System), as a rate, on all public roads. In addition www.regulations.gov. condition of pavements on the Interstate this rulemaking would establish the URL for Public Comments: System, and condition of bridges on the process for State DOTs and MPOs to use www.regulations.gov. NHS. This rulemaking would also to establish and report safety targets, Agency Contact: Francine Shaw- propose: The definitions that will be and the process that FHWA will use to Whitson, Department of Transportation, applicable to the new 23 CFR 490; the assess progress State DOTs have made Federal Highway Administration, 1200 process to be used by State DOTs and in achieving safety targets. New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, MPOs to establish performance targets Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1203 DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8028, Email: that reflect the measures proposed in of MAP–21 requires the Secretary of [email protected]. this rulemaking; a methodology to be Transportation to establish performance RIN: 2125–AF49 used to assess State DOTs compliance measures and standards through a with the target achievement provision rulemaking to assess performance in 12 specified under 23 U.S.C. 119(e)(7); and areas. the process to be followed by State DOT—FHWA Alternatives: N/A. DOTs to report on progress towards the achievement of pavement and bridge Anticipated Cost and Benefits: 93. +National Goals and Performance Management Measures (Map–21) condition-related performance targets. Preliminary estimates show that the Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1203 total costs for a 10 year period is Priority: Other Significant. of MAP–21 requires the Secretary of $66,695,260 (undiscounted), Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112–141 sec Transportation to establish performance $53,873,609 (7% discount rate), and 1203; 49 CFR 1.85 measures and standards through a $60,504,205 (3% discount rate). The CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. rulemaking to assess performance in 12 DOT performed a break-even analysis Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, areas. that estimates the number of fatalities April 1, 2014, NPRM. Alternatives: N/A. and incapacitating injuries the rule Section 1203 of MAP–21 requires the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The would need to prevent for the benefits Secretary to promulgate a rulemaking FHWA estimated the incremental costs of the rule to justify the costs. within 18 months after the date of associated with the new requirements Preliminary estimates show that the enactment. proposed in this regulatory action that proposed rule would need to prevent Abstract: This rulemaking would represent a change to current practices approximately 7 fatalities over 10 years, create national performance for State DOTs and MPOs. Following or less than one avoided fatality per year management measures and standards to this approach, the estimated 10-year nationwide, to outweigh the anticipated be used by the States to meet the undiscounted incremental costs to costs of the proposed rule. When the national transportation goals identified comply with this rule are $196.4 break-even analysis uses incapacitating in section 1203 of MAP–21. This million. The FHWA could not directly injuries as the reduction metric, rulemaking would also establish the quantify the expected benefits due to preliminary estimates show that the process to be used by States to set data limitations and the amorphous proposed rule must be responsible for performance targets that reflect their nature of the benefits from the proposed reducing approximately 153 performance measures. The FHWA rule. Therefore, in order to evaluate the incapacitating injuries over 10 years, or anticipates issuing up to three benefits, FHWA used a break-even approximately 15 per year, to outweigh rulemakings in this area. This analysis as the primary approach to the anticipated costs of the proposed rulemaking, number two, will cover the quantify benefits. For both pavements rule. In other words, the proposed rule bridges and pavement. and bridges, FHWA focused its break- must result in approximately 7 fewer Statement of Need: The Moving even analysis on Vehicle Operating fatalities, which is equivalent to Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Costs (VOC) savings. The FHWA approximately 153 fewer incapacitating Act (MAP–21) transforms the Federal- estimated the number of road miles of injuries, over 10 years, for the proposed aid highway program by establishing deficient pavement that would have to rule to be cost-beneficial. new requirements for performance be improved and the number of posted Note: These are preliminary agency management to ensure the most efficient bridges that would have to be avoided estimates only. They have not been investment of Federal transportation in order for the benefits of the rule to reviewed by others outside of DOT. The funds. Performance management justify the costs. The results of the estimates could change after interagency refocuses attention on national break-even analysis quantified the review. transportation goals, increases the dollar value of the benefits that the Risks: N/A. accountability and transparency of the proposed rule must generate to Timetable: Federal-aid highway program, and outweigh the threshold value, the improves project decisionmaking estimated cost of the proposed rule, Action Date FR Cite through performance-based planning which is $196.4 million in and programming. This rulemaking is undiscounted dollars. The FHWA NPRM ...... 03/11/14 79 FR 13846 the second of three that would propose believes that the proposed rule would

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77839

surpass this threshold and, as a result, on-road safety data and investigation alternative focuses on the carriers with the benefits of the rule would outweigh information. The intended effect of this the highest crash rates, and represent the costs. action is to more effectively use FMCSA the best opportunity for the Agency to Note: These are preliminary agency data and resources to identify unfit have an impact on safety with its estimates only. They have not been motor carriers and to remove them from limited resources. The number of reviewed by others outside of DOT. The the Nation’s roadways. proposed unfit determinations that estimates could change after interagency Statement of Need: Because of the would result and the Agency’s capacity review. time and expense associated with the to manage this population was also an Risks: N/A. on-site compliance review, only a small important consideration in both options. Timetable: fraction of carriers (approximately While the Agency can accommodate the 7,000) receive a safety fitness number of investigations and on-road Action Date FR Cite determination each year. Since the inspections resulting in proposed unfit current safety fitness determination determinations based on its current NPRM ...... 01/05/15 80 FR 326 process is based exclusively on the resources, the number of follow-up NPRM Comment 02/17/15 80 FR 8250 results of an on-site comprehensive Period Ex- enforcement cases, compliance tended. compliance review, the great majority of agreements, and oversight required from NPRM Comment 04/06/15 carriers subject to FMCSA jurisdiction this population maximizes the capacity Period End. do not receive a timely determination of of the Agency’s existing staff to NPRM Extended 05/08/15 their safety fitness. The proposed administer the expected proposed and Comment Pe- methodology for determining motor final unfit determinations. riod End. carrier safety fitness should correct Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Final Rule ...... 05/00/16 many of the deficiencies of the current Agency is continuing to review the process. In correcting these deficiencies, estimated costs and benefits of the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis FMCSA has made a concerted effort to proposed rule. Preliminary estimates Required: No. develop a ‘‘transparent’’ method for the indicate that annualized benefits may be Small Entities Affected: No. Safety Fitness Determination (SFD) that in the range of $241 to $286 million and Government Levels Affected: Federal, would allow each motor carrier to annualized costs within the range of $6 State. understand fully how FMCSA URL for More Information: and $8 million. established that carrier’s specific SFD. Risks: A risk of incorrectly identifying www.regulations.gov. Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is a compliant carrier as not compliant and URL for Public Comments: based primarily on the authority of 49 consequently subjecting the carrier to www.regulations.gov. U.S.C. 31144, which directs the unnecessary expenses has been Agency Contact: Francine Shaw- Secretary of Transportation to analyzed and has been found to be Whitson, Department of Transportation, ‘‘determine whether an owner or negligible under the process being Federal Highway Administration, 1200 operator is fit to operate a commercial proposed. New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, motor vehicle’’ and to ‘‘maintain by DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8028, Email: regulation a procedure for determining Timetable: [email protected]. the safety fitness of an owner or Action Date FR Cite RIN: 2125–AF53 operator.’’ This statute was first enacted as part of the Motor Carrier Safety Act NPRM ...... 11/00/15 of 1984, section 215, Public Law 98– DOT—FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER 554, 98 Stat. 2844 (Oct. 30, 1984). The Regulatory Flexibility Analysis SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (FMCSA) proposed rule also relies on the Required: Yes. provisions of 49 U.S.C. 31133, which Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Proposed Rule Stage gives the Secretary ‘‘broad Organizations. administrative powers to assist in the 94. +Carrier Safety Fitness Government Levels Affected: None. implementation’’ of the provisions of Determination Additional Information: 0. the Motor Carrier Safety Act now found URL for More Information: Priority: Economically Significant. in chapter 311 of title 49, U.S.C. These www.regulations.gov. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. powers include, among others, authority URL for Public Comments: Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31144; sec to conduct inspections and 4009 of TEA–21 www.regulations.gov. investigations, compile statistics, Agency Contact: David Miller, CFR Citation: 49 CFR 385. require production of records and Regulatory Development Division, Legal Deadline: None. property, prescribe recordkeeping and Department of Transportation, Federal Abstract: FMCSA proposes to amend reporting requirements and to perform Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety other acts considered appropriate. These 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Regulations (FMCSRs) to adopt revised powers are used to obtain the data used Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366– methodologies that would result in a by the Safety Management System and 5370, Email: [email protected]. safety fitness determination (SFD). The by the proposed new methodology for RIN: 2126–AB11 proposed methodologies would safety fitness determinations. Under 49 determine when a motor carrier is not CFR 1.87, the Secretary has delegated fit to operate commercial motor vehicles the authority to carry out the functions (CMVs) in or affecting interstate in subchapters I, III, and IV of chapter DOT—FMCSA commerce based on (1) the carrier’s on- 311, title 49, U.S.C., to the FMCSA road safety performance in relation to 95. +Entry-Level Driver Training Administrator. Sections 31133 and (Section 610 Review) five of the Agency’s seven Behavioral 31144 are part of subchapter III of Analysis and Safety Improvement chapter 311. Priority: Economically Significant. Categories (BASICs); (2) an Alternatives: The Agency has been Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. investigation; or (3) a combination of considering two alternatives. Each Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00131 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77840 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 380; 49 CFR Action Date FR Cite Progress in the 21st Century (MAP–21) 383; 49 CFR 384. Act. MAP–21 requires creation of the Legal Deadline: None. NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Clearinghouse by 10/1/14. Abstract: FMCSA proposes to adopt Statement of Need: This rulemaking new standards for mandatory training Regulatory Flexibility Analysis would improve the safety of the requirements for entry-level operators of Required: Yes. Nation’s highways by ensuring that commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) that Small Entities Affected: Businesses, employers know when drivers test are required to complete a skills test Governmental Jurisdictions, positive for drugs and/or alcohol and prior to obtaining a commercial driver’s Organizations. are not qualified to perform safety- license (CDL). FMCSA is conducting a Government Levels Affected: None. sensitive functions. It would also ensure negotiated rulemaking (Reg-Neg) URL for More Information: that drivers who have tested positive proceeding to implement the new entry- www.regulations.gov. and have not completed the return to URL for Public Comments: level driver training (ELDT) provisions duty process are not driving and will www.regulations.gov. in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the ensure that they receive the required Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher, MC– 21st Century Act (MAP–21) and other evaluation and treatment before PRR, Department of Transportation, relevant laws. Therefore, FMCSA resuming safety-sensitive functions. proposes to require persons applying for Federal Motor Carrier Safety new or upgraded CDLs to complete Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. Summary of Legal Basis: Section classroom, range, and behind-the-wheel SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 32402 of the Moving Ahead for Progress training from a training provider listed 366–3740, Email: sean.gallagher@ in the 21st Century Act (MAP–21)) (Pub. on a National Registry. Training dot.gov. L. 112–141, 126 stat. 405) directs the modules for those individuals applying Related RIN: Related to 2126–AB06 Secretary of Transportation to establish for a Hazardous Materials (HM), RIN: 2126–AB66 a national clearinghouse for controlled Passenger (P), or School Bus (S) substance and alcohol test results of Endorsement may also be proposed. commercial motor vehicle operators. In addition, FMCSA has general authority This notice of proposed rulemaking DOT—FMCSA would strengthen the Agency’s ELDT to promulgate safety standards, requirements, which would enhance the Final Rule Stage including those governing drivers’ use safety of CMV operations on our of drugs or alcohol while operating a 96. +Commercial Driver’s License Drug CMV. The Motor Carrier Safety Act of Nation’s highways. and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP–21) Statement of Need: The Agency 1984 Public Law 98–554 (the 1984 Act) believes this rulemaking would enhance Priority: Economically Significant. provides authority to regulate drivers, the safety of commercial motor vehicle Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. motor carriers, and vehicle equipment (CMV) operations on our nation’s Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31306 and requires the Secretary of highways by establishing a more CFR Citation: 49 CFR 382. Transportation to prescribe minimum extensive entry-level driver training Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, safety standards for CMVs. Including: (ELDT) protocol and by increasing the October 1, 2014, clearinghouse required (1) CMVs are maintained, equipped number of drivers who receive ELDT. It to be established by 10/01/2014. loaded, and operated safely; (2) the would revise the standards for Abstract: This rulemaking would responsibilities imposed on CMV mandatory training requirements for create a central database for verified operators do not impair their ability to entry-level operators of CMVs in positive controlled substances and operate the vehicles safely; (3) the interstate and intrastate operations who alcohol test results for commercial physical condition of CMV operators is are required to possess a commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders and adequate to enable them to operate the driver’s license (CDL). FMCSA proposes refusals by such drivers to submit to vehicles safely; and (4) CMV operation new training standards for certain testing. This rulemaking would require does not have a deleterious effect on individuals applying for their initial employers of CDL holders and service physical condition of the operators; and CDL, an upgrade of their CDL (e.g., a agents to report positive test results and (5) CMV drivers are not coerced by a Class B CDL holder seeking a Class A refusals to test into the Clearinghouse. motor carrier, shipper, receiver, or CDL), or a hazardous materials, Prospective employers, acting on an transportation intermediary to operate a passenger, or school bus endorsement application for a CDL driver position CMV in violation of regulations for their license. with the applicant’s written consent to promulgated under (49 U.S.C. 31136(a)). Summary of Legal Basis: FMCSA’s access the Clearinghouse, would query Alternatives: To be determined. legal authority to propose this the Clearinghouse to determine if any Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In the rulemaking is derived from the Motor specific information about the driver final rule the Agency estimated $230 Carrier Act of 1935, the Motor Carrier applicant is in the Clearinghouse before million in annual benefits from Safety Act of 1984, the Commercial allowing the applicant to be hired and increased crash reduction from the rule. Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986, and to drive CMVs. This rulemaking is This is against an estimated $174 the Moving Ahead for Progress in the intended to increase highway safety by million in total annual costs. ensuring CDL holders, who have tested 21st Century Act. Risks: A risk of not knowing when a positive or have refused to submit to Alternatives: The Agency has been driver has not completed the ‘‘return to testing, have completed the U.S. DOT’s considering several alternatives. duty’’ process and enabling job-hopping return-to-duty process before driving Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The within the industry. CMVs in interstate or intrastate Agency is continuing to review the Timetable: estimated costs and benefits of the commerce. It is also intended to ensure proposed rule. that employers are meeting their drug Action Date FR Cite Risks: A risk of a driver not receiving and alcohol testing responsibilities. adequate training before applying for a Additionally, provisions in this NPRM ...... 02/20/14 79 FR 9703 CDL. rulemaking would also be responsive to NPRM Comment 04/21/14 Timetable: requirements of the Moving Ahead for Period End.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77841

Action Date FR Cite of 1,695 rear-seat passenger vehicle Regulatory Flexibility Analysis occupants killed. Of these fatalities, Required: No. NPRM Comment 04/22/14 1,057 rear-seat occupants (62.4%) were Small Entities Affected: No. Period Ex- known to be unrestrained. According to Government Levels Affected: None. tended End. recent NASS–GES data, there was an URL for More Information: NPRM Comment 04/22/14 79 FR 22467 annual average of 46,927 rear-seat www.regulations.gov. Period Ex- tended. occupants injured, of which 15,254 URL for Public Comments: Final Rule ...... 03/00/16 (32.5%) were unrestrained. These www.regulations.gov. unrestrained occupants who were killed Agency Contact: Carla Rush, Safety Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or injured represent the rear-seat Standards Engineer, Department of Required: Yes. occupant target population. There was Transportation, National Highway Small Entities Affected: Businesses. an annual average of 3,846 front Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Government Levels Affected: Federal, outboard passenger seat occupant Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC Local, State, Tribal. fatalities in the FARS data. Of these 20590, Phone: 202 366–4583, Email: Federalism: This action may have fatalities, 1,799 occupants (46.8%) were [email protected]. federalism implications as defined in unrestrained. In addition, according to RIN: 2127–AL37 E.O. 13132. NASS–GES data, there was an annual Additional Information: MAP–21 average of 67,948 injured occupants in included provisions for a Drug and front outboard seating positions in DOT—NHTSA Alcohol Test Clearinghouse that affect crashes. Of those front outboard seat this rulemaking. occupants injured, 20,369 (30%) were 98. +Fuel Efficiency Standards for URL for More Information: unrestrained. These unrestrained Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles and www.regulations.gov. occupants who were killed or injured in Work Trucks: Phase 2 URL for Public Comments: crashes represent the front outboard Priority: Economically Significant. www.regulations.gov. passenger seat occupant target Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Agency Contact: Juan Moya, population. Unfunded Mandates: This action may Department of Transportation, Federal Summary of Legal Basis: MAP–21 affect the private sector under Pub. L. Motor Carrier Safety Administration, required the Secretary to initiate a 104–4. 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., rulemaking proceeding to amend Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366– FMVSS No. 208 to provide a safety belt 32902(k)(2); delegation of authority at 4844, Email: [email protected]. use warning system for designated 49 CFR 1.95 RIN: 2126–AB18 seating positions in the rear seat. [1] It CFR Citation: 49 CFR 523; 49 CFR directed the Secretary to either issue a 534; 49 CFR 535. final rule, or, if the Secretary Legal Deadline: None. DOT—NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC determined that such an amendment Abstract: This rulemaking would SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (NHTSA) did not meet the requirements and address fuel efficiency standards for considerations of 49 U.S.C. 30111, to medium- and heavy-duty on-highway Proposed Rule Stage submit a report to Congress describing vehicles and work trucks for model 97. +Rear Seat Belt Reminder System the reasons for not prescribing such a years beyond 2018. This rulemaking standard. Priority: Economically Significant. would respond to requirements of the Alternatives: The agency considered Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Energy Independence and Security Act several alternatives, including (1) Low Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30101; of 2007 (EISA), title 1, subtitle A, cost front outboard passenger system delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 sections 102 and 108, as they amend 49 CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.208. without occupant protection; (2) U.S.C. 32902, which was signed into Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, requiring a SBRS for the front center law December 19, 2007. The statute October 1, 2014, Initiate. seat; (3) system hardening from requires that NHTSA establish a Final, Statutory, October 1, 2015, inadvertent and intentional defeat; and medium- and heavy-duty on-highway Final Rule. (4) awarding points through NCAP for vehicle and work truck fuel efficiency Abstract: This rulemaking would rear SBRSs. improvement program that achieves the amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The maximum feasible improvement, Standard No. 208, occupant crash proposed rule would result in 43.7–65.4 including standards that are protection, to require automobile equivalent lives saved (ELS) and 33.7– appropriate, cost-effective, and manufacturers to install a seat belt 60.6 ELS at 3% and 7% discount rates, technologically feasible. The law reminder system for the front passenger respectively. The estimated total cost requires that the new standards provide and rear designated seating positions in range is $164.3 million to $324.6 at least 4 full model years of regulatory passenger vehicles. The seat belt million. lead-time and 3 full model years of reminder system is intended to increase Note: These are preliminary agency regulatory stability (i.e., the standards belt usage and thereby improve the estimates only. They have not been must remain in effect for 3 years before crash protection of vehicle occupants reviewed by others outside of DOT. The they may be amended). This action who would otherwise have been estimates could change after interagency would follow the first ever Greenhouse unbelted. This rulemaking would review. Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel respond in part to a petition for Risks: The agency believes there are Efficiency Standards for Medium- and rulemaking submitted by Public Citizen no substantial risks to this rulemaking. Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles and Advocates for Highway and Auto Timetable: (‘‘Phase 1’’) (76 FR 57106, September Safety, as well as to requirements in 15, 2011). In June, 2013, the President’s MAP–21. Action Date FR Cite Climate Action Plan called for the Statement of Need: Based on recent NPRM ...... 10/00/16 Department of Transportation to FARS data, there was an annual average develop fuel efficiency standards and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77842 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

the Environmental Protection Agency to no-action alternative that serves as the DOT—FEDERAL TRANSIT develop greenhouse gas emission baseline for the cost and benefit ADMINISTRATION (FTA) standards in joint rulemaking within the analyses; Alternative 2 would increase Proposed Rule Stage President’s second term. In February, standards beyond model year 2018 2014, the President directed DOT and levels in model years 2018 to 2024 or 99. +Transit Asset Management EPA to complete the second phase of 2025; Alternative 3, the Preferred Priority: Economically Significant. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards Alternative, would set more stringent Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. and Fuel Efficiency Standards for standards than Alternative 2 in model Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5326(d) Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and years 2018 to 2027; Alternative 4 CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Vehicles during his second term. approximately achieves the same Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, Statement of Need: Setting fuel stringency as Alternative 3 in fewer October 1, 2013, Secretary must issue consumption standards for commercial rule to implement the Transit Asset medium-duty and heavy-duty on- model years (2018 to 2024 or 2025); and Management System by October 1, 2013. highway vehicles and work trucks will Alternative 5 includes the most stringent of the alternative standards in Abstract: This ANPRM has been reduce fuel consumption, and will consolidated with the ANPRM for the thereby improve U.S. energy security by model years 2018 to 2024 or 2025. National and Public Transportation reducing dependence on foreign oil, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency Safety Plans. See 2132–AB20. which has been a national objective estimated total costs for the preferred This rule will establish a system for since the first oil price shocks in the alternative over the lifetimes of model Transit Asset Management (TAM) for all 1970s. Transportation accounts for year 2018 to 2029 vehicles are $30.5 operators of public transportation, for about 70 percent of U.S. petroleum billion to $31.1 billion, and estimated all modes of transportation throughout consumption, and medium- and heavy- total benefits are $261 billion to $276 the United States. This national system duty vehicles currently account for billion (3% discount rate). will be based on the term ‘‘State of Good about 20 percent of oil use in the U.S. Repair,’’ to be developed through transportation sector. Net petroleum Risks: The agency believes there are imports now account for approximately no substantial risks to this rulemaking. rulemaking, which will generate accurate data about the condition of the 30 percent of U.S. petroleum Timetable: consumption. World crude oil transit agencies’ assets, and performance measures for improving the conditions production is highly concentrated, Action Date FR Cite exacerbating the risks of supply of those assets. disruptions and price shocks. Therefore, NPRM ...... 07/13/15 80 FR 40137 Statement of Need: In its most recent setting fuel consumption standards for NPRM: Notice of 07/28/15 80 FR 44863 biennial Conditions and Performance commercial medium-duty and heavy- Public Hearings Report, FTA estimated that the nation’s duty on-highway vehicles and work and Extension transit state of good repair backlog is trucks will reduce fuel consumption of Comment $86 billion and growing. It is the goal of and improve U.S. energy security. In Period. the FTA to help bring the nation’s June, 2013, the President’s Climate NPRM: Comment 09/08/15 80 FR 53756 public transportation capital assets into Period Ex- Action Plan called for the Department of a state of good repair. To attain this goal, tended. this NPRM establishes the National Transportation to develop fuel NPRM: Extended 09/17/15 efficiency standards and the Transit Asset Management (TAM) Comment Pe- System, that includes: The definition of Environmental Protection Agency to riod End. state of good repair; requirements for develop greenhouse gas emission NPRM: Extended 10/01/15 standards in joint rulemaking within the Comment Pe- Transit Asset Management Plans based President’s second term. riod End. on inventories of transit providers’ Summary of Legal Basis: This Analyzing Com- 11/00/15 facilities, equipment, rolling stock, and rulemaking would respond to ments. infrastructure, their assessments of the requirements of the Energy condition of those assets, and a prioritization of projects to meet state of Independence and Security Act of 2007 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis good repair targets; requirements for (EISA), title 1, subtitle A, sections 102 Required: Undetermined. and 108, as they amend 49 U.S.C. reporting to the National Transit 32902, which was signed into law Government Levels Affected: None. Database; an analytical process and December 19, 2007. These sections Energy Effects: Statement of Energy decision support tool to assist transit authorize the creation of a fuel Effects planned as required by Executive provider in estimating their capital efficiency improvement program, Order 13211. investment needs and prioritizing investments; and technical assistance designed to achieve the maximum URL for More Information: feasible improvement for commercial from FTA. Also, this NPRM establishes www.regulations.gov. medium- and heavy-duty on-highway performance measures for classes of vehicles and work trucks, that includes URL for Public Comments: assets and requirements for transit appropriate test methods, measurement www.regulations.gov. provider’s to set performance targets for metrics, standards, and compliance and Agency Contact: James Tamm, Fuel assets based on the performance enforcement protocols that are Economy Division Chief, Department of measures. In addition, the National appropriate, cost-effective and Transportation, National Highway Transit Asset Management System technologically feasible. Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New complements the needs-based, formula Alternatives: In the proposal, NHTSA Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC program of Federal financial assistance evaluated five alternatives for semi for State of Good Repair administered 20590, Phone: 202 493–0515, Email: tractors and trailers, heavy-duty pickup under 49 U.S.C. 5337. The National [email protected]. trucks and work vans, vocational TAM System is designed to foster vehicles, and separate standards for RIN: 2127–AL52 informed decision-making on the needs heavy-duty engines. Alternative 1 is a for repair, rehabilitation, and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77843

replacement of capital assets used or Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5329(c) ‘‘economically significant’’ rule under available for use in public CFR Citation: 49 CFR 673. Executive Order 12866, as it would cost transportation, based on accurate and Legal Deadline: None. approximately $111 million in the first comprehensive data and information Abstract: This rulemaking would year, and $90 million per year about the condition of those assets. In establish requirements for States or thereafter. The average annual cost over concert with the planning requirements recipients to develop and implement a 20-year horizon period is $92 million. at 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304, and the individual agency safety plans. The The benefits of the proposed rule are regulations there under, FTA expects requirements of this rulemaking will be estimated at $775 million per year over States, transit providers, and based on the principles and concepts of the 20-year horizon period. metropolitan planning organizations to Safety Management Systems (SMS). Risks: The NPRM is merely a proposal allocate available Federal, State and SMS is the formal, top-down, for public comment, and would not local funding towards those capital organization-wide approach to impose any binding obligations. assets most in need of recapitalization. managing safety risks and assuring the However, given that the safety program Summary of Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. effectiveness of a transit agency’s safety is new, there will likely be significant 5326. risk controls. SMS includes systematic interest in any action FTA takes to Alternatives: MAP–21 requires the procedures, practices, and policies for implement the requirements of the Department to issue this regulation. managing hazards and risks. program. This NPRM will set forth FTA’s Statement of Need: The public Timetable: rulemaking goals, soliciting comments transportation industry remains among on alternatives to regulation, such the safest surface transportation modes Action Date FR Cite circulars and guidance. in terms of total reported safety events, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The fatalities, and injuries. The National NPRM ...... 01/00/16 costs of this rulemaking are unknown, Safety Council (NSC) reports that, in as the prospective shape and direction most locations around the nation, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of the regulatory obligations are passengers on public transportation Required: No. undetermined. vehicles are 40 to 70 times less likely to Small Entities Affected: No. Risks: Regulated parties could raise experience an accident than drivers and Government Levels Affected: None. the traditional concerns about unfunded passengers in private automobiles. URL for More Information: Federal mandates and lack of Nonetheless, given the complexity of www.regulations.gov. transparency. But, the costs of public transportation service, the URL for Public Comments: developing a TAM Plan are eligible for condition and performance of transit www.regulations.gov. reimbursement under the section 5307, equipment and facilities, turnover in the Agency Contact: Candace Key, 5311, and 5337 program. transit workforce, and the quality of Department of Transportation, Federal Timetable: procedures, training, and supervision, Transit Administration, 1200 New the public transportation industry Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC Action Date FR Cite remains vulnerable to catastrophic 20590, Phone: 202 366–4011, Email: accidents. This Notice of Proposed [email protected]. ANPRM ...... 10/03/13 78 FR 61251 Rulemaking (NPRM) proposes a Related RIN: Split from 2132–AB20, ANPRM Comment 01/02/14 minimal set of requirements for Public Related to 2132–AB22 Period End. RIN: 2132–AB23 NPRM ...... 09/30/15 80 FR 58912 Transportation Agency Safety Plans that NPRM Comment 11/30/15 would carry out the several explicit Period End. statutory mandates in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century DOT—PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Act (Pub. L. 112–141; July 6, 2012) MATERIALS SAFETY Required: Undetermined. (MAP–21), now codified at 49 U.S.C. ADMINISTRATION (PHMSA) Small Entities Affected: Governmental 5329(d), to strengthen the safety of Jurisdictions. public transportation systems that Proposed Rule Stage Government Levels Affected: receive Federal financial assistance 101. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of On- Undetermined. under chapter 53. This NPRM proposes Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines URL for More Information: requirements for the adoption of Safety www.regulations.gov. Management Systems (SMS) principles Priority: Other Significant. URL for Public Comments: and methods; the development, Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et www.regulations.gov. certification, and update of Public seq. Agency Contact: Bonnie Graves, Transportation Agency Safety Plans; CFR Citation: 49 CFR 195. Attorney Advisor, Department of and the coordination of Public Legal Deadline: None. Transportation, Federal Transit Transportation Agency Safety Plan Abstract: This rulemaking would Administration, 1200 New Jersey elements with other FTA programs and address effective procedures that Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, proposed rules, as specified in MAP–21. hazardous liquid operators can use to Phone: 202 366–0644, Email: Summary of Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. improve the protection of High [email protected]. 5329(d). Consequence Areas (HCA) and other Related RIN: Merged with 2132–AB20 Alternatives: MAP–21 requires the vulnerable areas along their hazardous RIN: 2132–AB07 Department to issue this regulation. The liquid onshore pipelines. PHMSA is NPRM will set forth FTA’s proposals for considering whether changes are needed implementing the requirement for to the regulations covering hazardous DOT—FTA Public Transportation Safety Plans and liquid onshore pipelines, whether other solicit comments on alternatives to both areas should be included as HCAs for 100. +Public Transportation Agency the proposals therein and to regulation. integrity management (IM) protections, Safety Plans Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FTA what the repair time frames should be Priority: Other Significant. has determined that this is an for areas outside the HCAs that are

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00135 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77844 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

assessed as part of the IM program, Transportation (Secretary) with the Legal Deadline: None. whether leak detection standards are authority to prescribe minimum Federal Abstract: In this rulemaking, PHMSA necessary, valve spacing requirements safety standards for hazardous liquid will be revisiting the requirements in are needed on new construction or pipeline facilities. That authority, as the Pipeline Safety Regulations existing pipelines, and PHMSA should amended in subsequent addressing integrity management extend regulation to certain pipelines reauthorizations, is currently codified in principles for Gas Transmission currently exempt from regulation. The the Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. pipelines. In particular, PHMSA will agency would also address the public 60101 et seq.). address: repair criteria for both HCA safety and environmental aspects any Alternatives: The various alternatives and non-HCA areas, assessment new requirements, as well as the cost analyzed included no action ‘‘status methods, validating and integrating implications and regulatory burden. quo’’ and individualized alternatives pipeline data, risk assessments, Statement of Need: PHMSA is based on the proposed amendments. knowledge gained through the IM proposing to make the following Anticipated Cost and Benefits: program, corrosion control, management changes to the hazardous liquid PHMSA cannot estimate costs or of change, gathering lines, and safety pipeline safety regulations: (1) Repeal benefits precisely, but based on the features on launchers and receivers. the exception for gravity lines; (2) information, the present value of costs Statement of Need: PHMSA will be Extend certain reporting requirements to and benefits over a 20-year period is reviewing the definition of an HCA all hazardous liquid gathering lines; (3) approximately $56 million and $98 (including the concept of a potential Require inspections of pipelines in areas million, respectively at 7 percent. Thus, impact radius), the repair criteria for affected by extreme weather, natural net benefits are approximately $46 both HCA and non-HCA areas, requiring disasters, and other similar events; (4) million ($102 million-$56 million) over the use of automatic and remote Require periodic assessments of 20 years. controlled shut off valves, valve pipelines that are not already covered Risks: The proposed rule will provide spacing, and whether applying the under the integrity management (IM) increased safety for the regulated integrity management program program requirements; (5) Expand the entities and reduce pipeline safety risks. requirements to additional areas would use of leak detection systems on Timetable: mitigate the need for class location hazardous liquid pipelines to mitigate requirements. This rulemaking is in the effects of failures that occur outside Action Date FR Cite direct response to Congressional of high consequence areas; (6) Modify mandates in the 2011 Pipeline the IM repair criteria, both by expanding ANPRM ...... 10/18/10 75 FR 63774 reauthorization act, specifically; section the list of conditions that require ANPRM Comment 01/18/11 4 (e) Gas IM plus 6 months), section immediate remediation and Period End. 5(IM), 8 (leak detection), 23 ANPRM Comment 01/04/11 76 FR 303 (b)(2)(exceedance of MAOP); section 29 consolidating the timeframes for Period Ex- remediating all other conditions, and tended. (seismicity). apply those same criteria to pipelines ANPRM Extended 02/18/11 Summary of Legal Basis: Congress has that are not subject to the IM Comment Pe- authorized Federal regulation of the requirements, with an adjusted schedule riod End. transportation of gas by pipeline under for performing non-immediate repairs; NPRM ...... 10/13/15 80 FR 61609 the Commerce Clause of the U.S. and, (7) Increase the use of inline NPRM Comment 01/08/16 Constitution. Authorization is codified inspection tools by requiring that any Period End. in the Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. pipeline that could affect a high 60101 et seq.), a series of statutes that consequence area be capable of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis are administered by the DOT, PHMSA. accommodating these devices within 20 Required: Yes. PHMSA has used that authority to years, unless its basic construction will Small Entities Affected: Businesses. promulgate comprehensive minimum not permit that accommodation. (8) Government Levels Affected: None. safety standards for the transportation of Other regulations will also be clarified URL for More Information: gas by pipeline. to improve compliance and www.regulations.gov. Alternatives: Alternative analyzed enforcement. These changes will protect URL for Public Comments: included no change and extension of the the public, property, and the www.regulations.gov. compliance deadlines associated with environment by ensuring that additional Agency Contact: John Gale, Director the major cost of the requirement area; pipelines are subject to regulation, Standards and Rulemaking, Department namely, development and increasing the detection and of Transportation, Pipeline and implementation of management of remediation of unsafe conditions, and Hazardous Materials Safety change processes that apply to all gas mitigating the adverse effects of pipeline Administration, 1200 New Jersey transmission pipelines beyond that failures. This rule responds to a Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, which already applies to beyond IMP- congressional mandate in the 2011 Phone: 202 366–0434, Email: john.gale@ and control center-related processes. Pipeline Reauthorization Act (sections dot.gov. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: 5, 8, 21, 29, 14); NTSB recommendation RIN: 2137–AE66 PHMSA does not expect the proposed P–12–03 and P–12–04; and GAO rule to adversely affect the economy or recommendation 12–388. any sector of the economy in terms of Summary of Legal Basis: Congress DOT—PHMSA productivity and employment, the established the current framework for environment, public health, safety, or regulating the safety of hazardous liquid 102. +Pipeline Safety: Gas State, local, or tribal government. pipelines in the Hazardous Liquid Transmission PHMSA has also determined, as Pipeline Safety Act (HLPSA) of 1979 Priority: Economically Significant. required by the Regulatory Flexibility (Pub. L. 96–129). Like its predecessor, Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Act, that the rule would not have a the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et significant economic impact on a 1968 (Pub. L. 90–481), the HLPSA seq. substantial number of small entities in provided the Secretary of CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192. the United States. Additionally, PHMSA

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77845

determined that the rule would not rail. Currently, the majority of the rail and onshore and offshore oil facilities to impose annual expenditures on State, community transporting oil, including develop, submit, update and in some local, or tribal governments in excess of crude oil transported as a hazardous cases obtain approval of oil spill $138 million, and thus does not require material, is subject to the basic oil spill response plans. Executive Order 12777 an Unfunded Mandates Reform Act response plan requirement of 49 CFR delegated responsibility to the Secretary analysis. However, the rule would 130.31(a) based on the understanding of Transportation for certain impose annual expenditure on private that most rail tank cars being used to transportation-related facilities. The sector in excess of $138 million. Here is transport crude oil have a capacity Secretary of Transportation delegated a summary of the costs and benefits: greater than 3,500 gallons. However, a the authority to promulgate regulations Present Values Calculated at 3 Percent comprehensive response plan for the to PHMSA and provides FRA the Discount for Gas rule Avg Annual Cost shipment of oil is only required when approval authority for railroad ORSPs. Estimate: $138.3 Million/year. Avg the oil is in a quantity greater than Alternatives: PHMSA and FRA are Annual Benefit Estimate: $204.53 42,000 gallons per package. Tank cars of committed to a comprehensive Million/year Avg Annual Net Benefit this size are not used to transport oil by approach to addressing the risk and Estimate: $68.60 Million/year. rail. As a result, the railroads do not file consequences of derailments involving Risks: This proposed rule will a comprehensive oil response plan. flammable liquids by addressing not strengthen current pipeline regulations Based on this difference and the recent only oil spill response plans, but and lower the safety risk of all regulated occurrence of high-profile accidents communication requirements between entities. involving crude oil, the National railroads and communities. Obtaining Timetable: Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has information and comments in a NPRM recommended in Safety will provide the greatest opportunity for Action Date FR Cite Recommendation R–14–5 that the public participation in the development Department and PHMSA reconsider the of regulatory amendments, and promote ANPRM ...... 08/25/11 76 FR 53086 threshold quantity for requiring the greater exchange of information and ANPRM Comment 11/16/11 76 FR 70953 development of a comprehensive perspectives among the various Period Ex- stakeholders to promote future tended. response plan for the shipment of oil. In ANPRM Comment 12/02/11 response to the NTSB Safety regulatory action on these issues. Period End. Recommendation R–14–5 and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The End of Extended 01/20/12 significant interest from congressional NPRM will request comments on both Comment Pe- stakeholders, environmental groups, the path forward and the economic riod. and the general public, PHMSA is impacts. We will evaluate comments NPRM ...... 12/00/15 seeking specific comment on revisions prior to developing the final rule, and to the oil spill response plan once the final rule is drafted the costs Regulatory Flexibility Analysis requirements in 49 CFR part 130, and benefits will be detailed. Required: No. including threshold quantities. Risks: DOT analyzed recent incidents, Small Entities Affected: No. Statement of Need: This rulemaking is National Transportation Safety Board Government Levels Affected: None. important to mitigate the effects of (NTSB) Safety Recommendations, Additional Information: SB–Y IC–N potential train accidents involving the received input from stakeholder SLT–N. release of flammable liquid energy outreach efforts (including first URL for More Information: products by increasing planning and responders) to determine amending the www.regulations.gov. preparedness. The proposals in this applicability and requirements of URL for Public Comments: rulemaking are shaped by public comprehensive oil spill response plans www.regulations.gov. comments, National Transportation and codifying requirements for Agency Contact: Cameron H. Safety Board (NTSB) Safety information sharing is important. DOT Satterthwaite, Transportation Recommendations, analysis of recent will continue to research these topics Regulations Specialist, Department of accidents, and input from stakeholder and evaluate comment feedback prior to Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous outreach efforts (including first the final rule. DOT expects the highest Materials Safety Administration, 1200 responders). To this end, PHMSA will ranked options will be low cost and New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, consider expanding the applicability of most effective at providing better DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8553, Email: comprehensive oil spill response plans; preparedness and planning to mitigate [email protected]. clarifying the requirements for the effects of a derailment. RIN: 2137–AE72 comprehensive oil spill response plans; Timetable: requiring railroads to share additional information; and providing an Action Date FR Cite DOT—PHMSA alternative test method for determining the initial boiling point of a flammable ANPRM ...... 08/01/14 79 FR 45079 ANPRM Comment 09/30/14 103. +Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill liquid. Response Plans and Information Period End. Summary of Legal Basis: The NPRM ...... 01/00/16 Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b), which Trains authorizes the Secretary of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Priority: Other Significant. Transportation to ‘‘prescribe regulations Required: Yes. Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. for the safe transportation, including Small Entities Affected: Businesses. CFR Citation: 49 CFR 130; 49 CFR security, of hazardous materials in Government Levels Affected: None. 174. intrastate, interstate, and foreign Additional Information: HM–251B; Legal Deadline: None. commerce.’’ The authority of 33 U.S.C. SB–N, IC–N, SLT–N. Abstract: In this rulemaking, PHMSA 1321, the Federal Water Pollution URL for More Information: is seeking comment on revisions to the Control Act (FWPCA), which directs the www.regulations.gov. Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) President to issue regulations requiring URL for Public Comments: applicable to the transportation of oil by owners and operators of certain vessels www.regulations.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77846 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Agency Contact: Ben Supko, imposed on persons and businesses tax returns, pay tax, and submit reports Transportation Regulations Specialist, subject to those regulations. of operations less frequently, that is Department of Transportation, Pipeline every quarter rather than twice monthly. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade and Hazardous Materials Safety As part of this rulemaking, TTB also Bureau Administration, 1200 New Jersey made a number of changes to the forms Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and brewers use to report on their Phone: 202 366–8553, Email: Trade Bureau (TTB) issues regulations operations. The two versions of the [email protected]. to implement and enforce the Federal Brewer’s Report of Operations forms Related RIN: Related to 2137–AE91, laws relating to alcohol, tobacco, (TTB F 5130.9 and TTB F 5130.26) were Related to 2137–AF07 firearms, and ammunition excise taxes streamlined based on feedback from the RIN: 2137–AF08 and certain non-tax laws relating to industry. These changes included alcohol. TTB’s mission and regulations removing two separate parts, adding BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P are designed to: clarifying instructions, and revising TTB (1) Collect the taxes on alcohol, F 5130.26 (previously for brewpub tobacco, firearms, and ammunition; reporting only) to be an ‘‘EZ’’ reporting DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (2) protect the consumer by ensuring option for small brewers to facilitate the the integrity of alcohol products; and new quarterly reporting mandate. TTB Statement of Regulatory Priorities (3) prevent unfair and unlawful released the new versions of the reports The primary missions of the market activity for alcohol and tobacco in the second quarter of FY 2015. This Department of the Treasury are: products. combination of regulatory amendments In the last several years, TTB has • To promote prosperous and stable and form changes have reduced identified changes in the industries it regulatory burdens and administrative American and world economies, regulates, as well as new technologies including promoting domestic economic costs for small brewers and created available in compliance enforcement. In administrative efficiencies for TTB. growth and maintaining our Nation’s response, TTB has focused on revising leadership in global economic issues, In FY 2016, TTB will continue its its regulations to ensure that it multi-year Regulations Modernization supervising national banks and thrift accomplishes its mission in a way that institutions, and helping to bring effort by prioritizing projects that will facilitates industry growth and reduces update its Import and Export residents of distressed communities into burdens where possible, while at the the economic mainstream. regulations, Labeling Requirements • same time collecting the revenue and regulations, Specially Denatured and To manage the Government’s protecting consumers from deceptive finances by protecting the revenue and Completely Denatured Alcohol labeling and advertising of alcohol regulations, Nonbeverage Products collecting the correct amount of revenue beverages. This modernization effort regulations, Distilled Spirits Plant under the Internal Revenue Code, resulted in the publishing of two key Reporting requirements, and Civil overseeing customs revenue functions, rulemakings that took effect in FY 2014– Monetary Penalty for Violations of the financing the Federal Government and 15 that reduced burden on TTB- Alcohol Beverage Labeling Act managing its fiscal operations, and regulated industry members. regulation. producing our Nation’s coins and On March 27, 2014, TTB published a This fiscal year TTB plans to give currency. final rule (79 FR 17029) amending its • priority to the following regulatory To safeguard the U.S. and regulations in 27 CFR part 73 regarding matters: international financial systems from the electronic submission of forms and Revisions to Export and Import those who would use these systems for other documents. Among other things, Regulations Related to the International illegal purposes or to compromise U.S. this rule provided for the electronic Trade Data System. TTB is currently national security interests, while submission to TTB of forms requiring preparing for the implementation of the keeping them free and open to third-party signatures, such as bond International Trade Data System (ITDS) legitimate users. forms and powers of attorney. It also and, specifically, the transition to an all- Consistent with these missions, most provided that any requirement in the electronic import and export regulations of the Department and its TTB regulations to submit a document environment. The ITDS, as described in constituent bureaus are promulgated to to another agency may be met by the section 405 of the Security and interpret and implement the laws as electronic submission of the document Accountability for Every Port Act of enacted by the Congress and signed by to the other agency, as long as the other 2006 (the ‘‘SAFE Port Act’’) (Public Law the President. It is the policy of the agency provides for, and authorizes, the 109–347), is an electronic information Department to comply with applicable electronic submission of such exchange capability, or ‘‘single requirements to issue a notice of document. window,’’ through which businesses proposed rulemaking and carefully On September 30, 2014, TTB will transmit data required by consider public comments before published a final rule (79 FR 58674) that participating Federal agencies for the adopting a final rule. Also, the reduced the compliance burden for the importation or exportation of cargo. To Department invites interested parties to beer industry. This rule reduced the enhance Federal coordination submit views on rulemaking projects penal sum of the bond required for associated with the development of the while a proposed rule is being certain small brewers to a flat $1,000, ITDS and put in place specific deadlines developed. which applies to brewers whose excise for implementation, President Obama, To the extent permitted by law, it is tax liability is reasonably expected to be on February 19, 2014, signed an the policy of the Department to adhere not more than $50,000 in a given Executive Order on Streamlining the to the regulatory philosophy and calendar year and who were liable for Export/Import Process for America’s principles set forth in Executive Orders not more than $50,000 in such taxes in Businesses. In line with section 3(e) of 12866, 13563, and 13609 and to develop the preceding calendar year. the Executive Order, TTB was required regulations that maximize aggregate net Additionally, TTB adopted as a final to develop a timeline for ITDS benefits to society while minimizing the rule its prior proposal to provide that implementation. Updating the economic and paperwork burdens those brewers must file Federal excise regulations for transition to the all-

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00138 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77847

electronic environment is part of the removed for exportation without Under the authority of the IRC, TTB implementation process. payment of tax or with drawback of any regulates denatured alcohol that is unfit TTB has completed its review of the excise tax previously paid, subject to the for beverage use, which may be removed relevant regulatory requirements and submission of proof of export. However, from a regulated distilled spirits plant identified those that it intends to update the current export regulations require free of tax. SDA and CDA are widely to address an all-electronic industry members to obtain documents used in the American fuel, medical, and environment. As noted above, TTB and follow procedures that do not manufacturing sectors. The industrial regulations in 27 CFR part 73 have reflect current technology or take into alcohol industry far exceeds the already been amended to remove account current industry business beverage alcohol industry in size and regulatory barriers to the electronic practices. The notice of proposed scope, and it is a rapidly growing submission of TTB-required documents rulemaking that TTB will publish to industry in the United States. Some to another agency. In FY 2016, TTB implement ITDS for exports will concerns have been raised that the intends to publish a notice of proposed include proposals to amend the current regulations may create rulemaking to propose changes to TTB regulations to provide industry significant roadblocks for industry regulatory sections that address the members with clear and updated members in getting products to the submission of information or procedures for removal of alcohol and marketplace quickly and efficiently. To documentation at importation, and to tobacco products for exportation, thus help alleviate these concerns, TTB update and streamline TTB regulatory facilitating exportation of those published a notice of proposed processes for importations and make products. Increasing U.S. exports rulemaking (78 FR 38628) and, in FY clear the circumstances in which the benefits the U.S. economy and is 2016, plans to issue a final rule that will submission of certain data elements consistent with Treasury and reclassify certain SDA formulas as CDA replaces the submission of paper Administration priorities. and issue new general-use formulas for documents. Specifically, TTB will Revisions to the Labeling articles made with SDA. propose that data from certain forms Requirements (Parts 4 (Wine), 5 TTB estimates that these changes will (e.g., the TTB F 5100.31 (Application for (Distilled Spirits), and 7 (Malt result in an 80 percent reduction in the and Certification/Exemption of Label/ Beverages)). The Federal Alcohol formula approval submissions currently Bottle Approval)) may be submitted Administration Act requires that alcohol required from industry members. The electronically at importation through beverages introduced in interstate reduction in formula submissions will enable TTB to redirect its resources to the ‘‘single window’’ in lieu of the commerce have a label issued and submission of the paper documents to address backlogs that exist in other approved under regulations prescribed U.S. Customs and Border Protection areas of TTB’s mission activities, such by the Secretary of the Treasury. In personnel. TTB also reviewed existing as analyses of compliance samples for accordance with the mandate of requirements and processes to industrial/fuel alcohol to protect the Executive Order 13563 of January 18, determine how the all-electronic revenue and working with industry to 2011, regarding improving regulation environment can be used to reduce test and approve new and more and regulatory review, TTB conducted burden. For example, many regulatory environmentally friendly denaturants. an analysis of its labeling regulations to provisions in TTB’s import and export Additionally, the reclassification of identify any that might be outmoded, regulations require forms to be certain SDA formulas as CDA formulas ineffective, insufficient, or excessively submitted in triplicate or quadruplicate, will not jeopardize the revenue because and the availability of the relevant data burdensome, and to modify, streamline, it is more difficult to separate potable electronically makes such multiple expand, or repeal them in accordance alcohol from CDA than it is from SDA, submissions unnecessary. The with that analysis. These regulations and CDA is less likely to be used for amendments to the regulations that TTB were also reviewed to assess their beverage purposes due to its taste. will propose to implement ITDS for applicability to the modern alcohol Similarly, authorizing new general-use imports will facilitate legitimate trade beverage marketplace. As a result of this formulas will not jeopardize the revenue and allow enforcement resources to be review, TTB plans to propose in FY because it will be difficult to remove focused on identifying noncompliance. 2016 revisions to modernize the potable alcohol from articles made with On August 7, 2015, TTB published a regulations concerning the labeling the specific SDA formulations. Other notice (80 FR 47558) announcing a pilot requirements for wine, distilled spirits, changes made by this final rule will program for importers who want to gain and malt beverages. TTB anticipates that remove unnecessary regulatory burdens experience with the ITDS ‘‘single these regulatory changes will assist and update the regulations to align them window’’ functionality for providing industry in voluntarily complying with with current industry practice. data on the TTB-regulated commodities. these requirements for the over 160,000 Revision of the Part 17 Regulations, This pilot program will help familiarize label applications that are projected to Drawback on Taxpaid Distilled Spirits both TTB and the public with the new be submitted in FY 2016, which will Used in Manufacturing Nonbeverage environment and assist TTB and the decrease industry burden associated Products, to Allow Self-Certification of public to refine the implementation of with the label approval requirement and Nonbeverage Product Formulas. TTB is ITDS. TTB is planning to publish result in the regulated industries being considering revisions to the regulations rulemaking on its import and export able to bring products to market without in 27 CFR part 17 governing regulations in FY 2016, and the pilot undue delay. nonbeverage products made with program will provide valuable Revisions to Specially Denatured and taxpaid distilled spirits. These information for this undertaking. Completely Denatured Alcohol nonbeverage products include foods, In addition, in recent years, TTB has Regulations. TTB proposed changes to medicines, and flavors. This proposal, identified selected sections of its export regulations for specially denatured which TTB intends to publish in FY regulations (27 CFR parts 28 and 44) alcohol (SDA) and completely 2016, offers a new method of formula that it intends to amend to clarify and denatured alcohol (CDA) that will certification by incorporating update the requirements. Under the provide a reduction in regulatory quantitative standards into the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (IRC), burden while posing no risk to the regulations and establishing new the products taxed by TTB may be revenue. voluntary procedures that would further

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00139 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77848 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

streamline the formula review process $11,000 (the level at which it was set Imported from U.S. Insular Possessions for products that meet the standards. following the first inflation adjustment final rule, Technical Corrections to the This proposal provides adequate in 1996) to $16,000. The increased North American Free Trade Agreement protection to the revenue because TTB maximum penalty will help maintain Uniform Regulations final rule, and will continue to receive submissions of the deterrent effect of the penalty. Liberalization of Certain Documentary certified formulas; however, TTB will Evidence Required As Proof of Community Development Financial not take action on certified formula Exportation on Drawback Claims final Institutions Fund submissions unless TTB discovers that rule. On February 10, 2015, U.S. the formulas require correction. By The Community Development Customs and Border Protection allowing for self-certification of certain Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund) published the United States-Australia nonbeverage product formulas, this was established by the Community Free Trade Agreement interim final rule proposal would nearly eliminate the Development Banking and Financial (80 FR 7303) to the CBP regulations, need for TTB to formally approve all Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701 which implemented the preferential such formulas. These changes would et seq.). The mission of the CDFI Fund tariff treatment and other customs- result in significant cost savings for the is to increase economic opportunity and related provisions of the United States- nonbeverage alcohol industry, which promote community development Australia Free Trade Agreement currently must obtain formula approval investments for underserved Implementation Act. In addition, on from TTB, and some savings for TTB, populations and in distressed May 11, 2015, CBP and Treasury issued which must review and take action to communities in the United States. The a final rule (80 FR 26828) titled approve or disapprove each formula. CDFI Fund currently administers the ‘‘Technical Corrections to the North Revisions to Distilled Spirits Plant following programs: The Community American Free Trade Agreement Reporting Requirements. In FY 2012, Development Financial Institutions Uniform Regulations’’ which amended TTB published a notice of proposed (CDFI) Program, the Bank Enterprise CBP regulations implementing rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to revise Award (BEA) Program, the Native conforming changes of the preferential regulations in 27 CFR part 19 to replace American CDFI Assistance (NACA) tariff treatment and other customs- the current four report forms used by Program, the New Markets Tax Credit related provisions of the North distilled spirits plants to report their (NMTC) Program, the Financial American Free Trade Agreement operations on a monthly basis with two Education and Counseling Pilot Program (NAFTA) entered into by the United new report forms that would be (FEC), the Capital Magnet Fund (CMF), States, Canada, and Mexico. On August submitted on a monthly basis. (Plants and the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program 7, 2015, CBP issued a final rule (80 FR that file taxes on a quarterly basis would (BGP). 47405) titled ‘‘Liberalization of Certain submit the new reports on a quarterly In FY 2016, the CDFI Fund will Documentary Evidence Required As basis.) This project will address publish updated regulations for its Proof of Exportation on Drawback numerous concerns and desires for Capital Magnet Fund (CMF) to Claims’’ which amended CBP improved reporting by the distilled incorporate the requirements of the regulations by removing some of the spirits industry and result in cost Uniform Administrative Requirements, requirements for documentation used to savings to industry and TTB by Cost Principles, and Audit establish proof of exportation for significantly reducing the number of Requirements for Federal Awards (2 drawback claims. monthly plant operations reports that CFR part 200) and make other policy This past fiscal year, consistent with must be completed and filed by industry updates. the goals of Executive Orders 12866 and members and processed by TTB. TTB Customs Revenue Functions 13563, Treasury and CBP issued a final preliminarily estimates that this project rule titled ‘‘Documentation Related to will result in a reduction of paperwork The Homeland Security Act of 2002 Goods Imported From U.S. Insular burden hours for industry members, as (the Act) provides that, although many Possessions’’ on February 11, 2015 (80 well as savings in processing hours and functions of the former United States FR 7537), that amended CBP regulations contractor time for TTB. In addition, Customs Service were transferred to the to eliminate the requirement that a TTB estimates that this project will Department of Homeland Security, the customs officer at the port of export result in additional savings in staff time Secretary of the Treasury retains sole verify and sign CBP Form 3229, based on the more efficient and effective legal authority over customs revenue Certificate of Origin for U.S. Insular processing of reports and the use of functions. The Act also authorizes the Possessions, and to require instead that report data to reconcile industry Secretary of the Treasury to delegate any the importer present this form, upon member tax accounts. In FY 2016, TTB of the retained authority over customs CBP’s request, rather than submit it with intends to publish a Supplemental revenue functions to the Secretary of each entry as the current regulations NPRM that will include new proposals Homeland Security. By Treasury require. The amendments streamline the to address comments received in Department Order No. 100–16, the entry process by making it more response to the initial NPRM. Secretary of the Treasury delegated to efficient as it would reduce the overall Inflation Adjustment to the Civil the Secretary of Homeland Security administrative burden on both the trade Monetary Penalty for Violations of the authority to promulgate regulations and CBP. If the importer does not Alcohol Beverage Labeling Act. The pertaining to the customs revenue maintain CBP Form 3229 in its Federal Civil Penalties Inflation functions subject to certain exceptions. possession, the importer may be subject Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by This Order further provided that the to a recordkeeping penalty. the Debt Collection Improvement Act of Secretary of the Treasury retained the Treasury and CBP are currently 1996, requires Federal agencies to adjust sole authority to approve such working towards the implementation of certain civil monetary penalties for regulations. the International Trade Data System inflation according to a formula set out During the past fiscal year, among the (ITDS). The ITDS, as described in in the statute. In FY 2016, TTB plans to customs-revenue function regulations section 405 of the Security and publish a final rule increasing the issued were the United States-Australia Accountability for Every Port Act of maximum penalty for violations of the Free Trade Agreement interim final rule, 2006 (the ‘‘SAFE Port Act’’) (Public Law Alcohol Beverage Labeling Act from the Documentation Related to Goods 109–347), is an electronic information

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77849

exchange capability, or ‘‘Single that in-bond merchandise is properly organization and function. The final Window,’’ through which businesses entered or exported. rule was issued on May 18, 2015, 80 FR will transmit data required by Inter-Partes Proceedings Concerning 28345. participating agencies for the Exclusion Orders Based on Unfair Flood Insurance (12 CFR parts 22 and importation or exportation of cargo. To Practices in Import Trade. Treasury and 172). The banking agencies,1 Farm enhance Federal coordination CBP plans to publish a proposal to Credit Administration (FCA), and the associated with the development of the amend its regulations with respect to National Credit Union Administration ITDS, Treasury and CBP plan to issue an administrative rulings related to the (NCUA) revised their regulations interim regulation which will to reflect importation of articles in light of regarding loans in areas having special that on November 1, 2015, the exclusion orders issued by the United flood hazards to implement provisions Automated Commercial Environment States International Trade Commission of the Homeowner Flood Insurance (ACE) is a CBP-authorized Electronic (‘‘Commission’’) under section 337 of Affordability Act of 2014 (HFIAA), Data Interchange (EDI) System. This the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The which amends some of the changes to regulatory document informs the public proposed amendments seek to promote the Flood Disaster Protection Act of that the Automated Commercial System the speed, accuracy, and transparency of 1973 mandated by the Biggert-Waters (ACS) is being phased out as a CBP- such rulings through the creation of an Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 authorized EDI System for the inter partes proceeding to replace the (Biggert-Waters). The rule requires the processing electronic entry and entry current ex parte process. escrow of flood insurance payments on summary filings (also known as entry Customs and Border Protection’s residential improved real estate securing filings). In the future when there is full Bond Program. Treasury and CBP plan a loan, consistent with the changes set functionality, ACE will replace the to publish a final rule amending the forth in HFIAA. The final rule also Automated Commercial System (ACS) regulations to reflect the centralization incorporates an exemption in HFIAA for as the CBP-authorized EDI system for of the continuous bond program at certain detached structures from the processing commercial trade data. CBP’s Revenue Division. The changes mandatory flood insurance purchase During fiscal year 2016, CBP and proposed would support CBP’s bond requirement. The rule also implements Treasury also plan to give priority to the program by ensuring an efficient and the provisions of Biggert-Waters related following regulatory matters involving uniform approach to the approval, to the force placement of flood the customs revenue functions: maintenance, and periodic review of insurance. Finally, the rule integrates Disclosure of Information for Certain continuous bonds, as well as the OCC’s flood insurance regulations Intellectual Property Rights Enforced at accommodating the use of information for national banks and Federal savings the Border. Treasury and CBP plan to technology and modern business associations. The final rule was issued finalize interim amendments to the CBP practices. on July 21, 2015, 80 FR 43216. regulations which provides a pre- Office of the Comptroller of the Appraisal Management Companies seizure notice procedure for disclosing Currency (12 CFR part 34). The banking agencies, information appearing on the imported the Federal Housing Finance Agency merchandise and/or its retail packing The primary mission of the Office of (FHFA), NCUA and the Consumer suspected of bearing a counterfeit mark the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to an intellectual property right holder is to charter, regulate, and supervise all issued a rule that sets minimum for the limited purpose of obtaining the national banks and Federal Savings standards for state registration and right holder’s assistance in determining Associations (FSAs). The agency also supervision of appraisal management whether the mark is counterfeit or not. supervises the Federal branches and companies (AMCs). The rule Free Trade Agreements. Treasury and agencies of foreign banks. The OCC’s implements the minimum requirements CBP also plan to issue final regulations goal in supervising the financial in section 1473 of the Dodd-Frank Act this fiscal year to implement the institutions subject to its jurisdiction is to be applied by states in the registration preferential trade benefit provisions of to ensure that they operate in a safe and and supervision of AMCs. It also the United States-Singapore Free Trade sound manner and in compliance with implements the requirement in section Agreement Implementation Act. laws requiring fair treatment of their 1473 of the Dodd-Frank Act for states to Treasury and CBP also expect to issue customers and fair access to credit and report to the Appraisal Subcommittee final regulations implementing the financial products. (ASC) of the Federal Financial Significant rules issued during fiscal preferential trade benefit provisions of Institutions Examination Council the year 2015 include: the United States-Australia Free Trade information needed by the ASC to Integration of National Bank and Agreement Implementation Act. administer the national registry of In-Bond Process. Consistent with the Federal Savings Association AMCs. The final rule was issued on practice of continuing to move forward Regulations: Licensing Rules (12 CFR June 6, 2015, 80 FR 32658. parts 4, 5, 7, 14, 32, 34, 100, 116, 143, with Customs Modernization provisions Margin and Capital Requirements for 144, 145, 146, 150, 152, 159, 160, 161, of the North American Free Trade Covered Swap Entities (12 CFR part 45). 162, 163, 174, 192, and 193). The OCC Implementation Act to improve its The banking agencies, FCA, and FHFA issued a final rule that integrates its regulatory procedures, Treasury and issued a proposed rule to establish rules relating to policies and procedures CBP plan to finalize this fiscal year the minimum margin and capital for corporate activities and transactions proposal to change the in-bond process requirements for registered swap involving national banks and FSAs. The by issuing final regulations to amend dealers, major swap participants, final rule also revises some of these the in-bond regulations that were security-based swap dealers, and major rules in order to eliminate unnecessary proposed on February 22, 2012 (77 FR security-based swap participants for requirements, consistent with safety and 10622). The proposed changes, which one of the agencies is the soundness; promote fairness in including the automation of the in-bond prudential regulator. The proposed rule process, would modernize, simplify, supervision; and to make other and facilitate the in-bond process while technical and conforming changes. The 1 OCC, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve enhancing CBP’s ability to regulate and final rule also includes amendments to System (Board), and Federal Deposit Insurance track in-bond merchandise to ensure update OCC rules for agency Corporation (FDIC).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77850 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

will implement sections 731 and 764 of 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the making the financial system the Dodd-Frank Act, which require the banking agencies, NCUA, SEC, and increasingly resistant to abuse by money agencies to adopt rules jointly to FHFA, to jointly prescribe regulations or launderers, terrorists and their financial establish capital requirements and guidance prohibiting any type of supporters, and other perpetrators of initial and variation margin incentive-based payment arrangement, crime. requirements for such entities on all or any feature of any such arrangement, The Secretary of the Treasury, non-cleared swaps and non-cleared that the regulators determine encourages through FinCEN, is authorized by the security-based swaps in order to offset inappropriate risks by covered financial BSA to issue regulations requiring the greater risk to such entities and the institutions by providing an executive financial institutions to file reports and financial system arising from the use of officer, employee, director, or principal keep records that are determined to swaps and security-based swaps that are shareholder with excessive have a high degree of usefulness in not cleared. A second proposal was compensation, fees or benefits, or that criminal, tax, or regulatory matters or in issued on September 24, 2014, 79 FR could lead to material financial loss to the conduct of intelligence or counter- 57348. the covered financial institution. The intelligence activities to protect against Credit Risk Retention (12 CFR part Dodd-Frank Act also requires such international terrorism. The BSA also 43). The banking agencies, Securities agencies to jointly prescribe regulations authorizes requiring designated and Exchange Commission (SEC), or guidance requiring each covered financial institutions to establish anti- FHFA, and the Department of Housing financial institution to disclose to its money laundering programs and and Urban Development (HUD) issued regulator the structure of all incentive- compliance procedures. To implement rules to implement the credit risk based compensation arrangements and realize its mission, FinCEN has retention requirements of section 15G of offered by such institution sufficient to established regulatory objectives and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 determine whether the compensation priorities to safeguard the financial U.S.C. 78o–11), as added by section 941 structure provides any officer, system from the abuses of financial of the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 15G employee, director, or principal crime, including terrorist financing, generally requires the securitizer of shareholder with excessive money laundering, and other illicit asset-backed securities to retain not less compensation or could lead to material activity. These objectives and priorities than 5 percent of the credit risk of the financial loss to the institution. The include: (1) Issuing, interpreting, and assets collateralizing the asset-backed proposed rule was issued on April 14, enforcing compliance with regulations securities. Section 15G includes a 2011, 76 FR 21170. implementing the BSA; (2) supporting, variety of exemptions from these Source of Strength (12 CFR part 47). working with, and as appropriate, requirements, including an exemption The banking agencies plan to issue a overseeing compliance examination for asset-backed securities that are proposed rule to implement section functions delegated to other Federal collateralized exclusively by residential 616(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Section regulators; (3) managing the collection, mortgages that qualify as ‘‘qualified 616(d) requires that bank holding processing, storage, and dissemination residential mortgages,’’ as such term is companies, savings and loan holding of data related to the BSA; (4) defined by the agencies by rule. The companies and other companies that maintaining a government-wide access final rule was issued on December 24, directly or indirectly control an insured service to that same data and for 2014, 78 FR 77602. depository institution serve as a source network users with overlapping Regulatory priorities for fiscal year of strength for the insured depository interests; (5) conducting analysis in 2016 include finalizing any proposals institution. The appropriate Federal support of policymakers, law listed above as well as the following banking agency for the insured enforcement, regulatory and intelligence rulemakings: depository institution may require that agencies, and the financial sector; and Automated Valuation Models (parts the company submit a report that would (6) coordinating with and collaborating 34, 164). The banking agencies, NCUA, assess the company’s ability to comply on anti-terrorism and anti-money FHFA and CFPB, in consultation with with the provisions of the statute and its laundering initiatives with domestic law the ASC and the Appraisal Standards compliance. enforcement and intelligence agencies, Board of the Appraisal Foundation, are Net Stable Funding Ratio (12 CFR part as well as foreign financial intelligence required to promulgate regulations to 50). The banking agencies plan to issue units. implement quality-control standards a proposed rule to implement the Basel During fiscal year 2015, FinCEN required under the statute. Section net stable funding ratio standards. These issued the following regulatory actions: 1473(q) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires standards would require large, Anti-Money Laundering Program and that automated valuation models used internationally active banking SAR Requirements for Investment to estimate collateral value in organizations to maintain sufficient Advisers. On August 25, 2015, FinCEN connection with mortgage origination stable funding to support their assets, published in the Federal Register a and securitization activity, comply with generally over a one-year time horizon. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) quality-control standards designed to to solicit public comment on proposed ensure a high level of confidence in the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network rules under the BSA that would estimates produced by automated As chief administrator of the Bank prescribe minimum standards for anti- valuation models; protect against Secrecy Act (BSA), the Financial Crimes money laundering programs to be manipulation of data; seek to avoid Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is established by certain investment conflicts of interest; require random responsible for developing and advisers and to require such investment sample testing and reviews; and account implementing regulations that are the advisers to report suspicious activity to for other factors the agencies deem core of the Department’s anti-money FinCEN. appropriate. The agencies plan to issue laundering and counter-terrorism Imposition of Special Measure against a proposed rule to implement the financing efforts. FinCEN’s FBME Bank Ltd., formerly known as requirement to adopt quality-control responsibilities and objectives are Federal Bank of the Middle East, Ltd., standards. linked to, and flow from, that role. In as a Financial Institution of Primary Incentive-Based Compensation fulfilling this role, FinCEN seeks to Money Laundering Concern. On July 29, Arrangements (12 CFR part 42). Section enhance U.S. national security by 2015, FinCEN issued a final rule

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00142 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77851

imposing the fifth special measure customers, subject to certain Changes to the Travel and under section 311 of the USA PATRIOT exemptions. Recordkeeping Requirements for Funds Act against FBME. The fifth special Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Transfers and Transmittals of Funds. measure prohibits or conditions the Accounts. FinCEN has drafted an NPRM FinCEN is considering changes to opening or maintaining of to address requests from filers for require that more information be correspondent or payable-through clarification of certain requirements collected and maintained by financial accounts for the designated institution regarding the Report of Foreign Bank institutions on funds transfers and by U.S. financial institutions. This and Financial Accounts (FBAR), transmittals of funds and to lower the action followed a notice of finding including requirements with respect to threshold. issued on July 22, 2014 that FBME is a employees, who have signature Changes to the Currency and financial institution of primary money authority over, but no financial interest Monetary Instrument Report (CMIR) laundering concern and an NPRM in, the foreign financial accounts of Reporting Requirements. FinCEN will proposing the imposition of the fifth their employers. research, obtain, and analyze relevant special measure. FBME filed suit on Cross Border Electronic Transmittal of data to validate the need for changes August 7, 2015 in the United States Funds. On September 27, 2010, FinCEN aimed at updating and improving the District Court for the District of issued an NPRM in conjunction with CMIR and ancillary reporting Columbia; FBME also moved for a the feasibility study prepared pursuant requirements. Possible areas of study to preliminary injunction. On August 27, to the Intelligence Reform and be examined could include current 2015, the Court granted the preliminary Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 trends in cash transportation across injunction and enjoined the rule from concerning the issue of obtaining international borders, transparency taking effect until a final judgment is information about certain cross-border levels of physical transportation of entered. funds transfers and transmittals of currency, the feasibility of harmonizing Imposition of Special Measure against funds. As FinCEN has continued to data fields with bordering countries, Banca Privada d’Andorra as a Financial work on developing the system to and information derived from FinCEN’s Institution of Primary Money receive, store, and use this data, FinCEN experience with Geographic Targeting Laundering Concern. On March 10, has drafted a Supplemental NPRM to Orders. 2015, FinCEN issued a finding that update the previously published Other Requirements. FinCEN also will Banca Privada d’Andorra is a financial proposed rule and provide additional continue to issue proposed and final institution operating outside of the information to those banks and money rules pursuant to section 311 of the USA United States that is of primary money transmitters that will become subject to PATRIOT Act, as appropriate. Finally, laundering concern under section 311 of the rule. FinCEN expects that it may propose the USA PATRIOT Act. Also on March Anti-Money Laundering Program various technical and other regulatory 10, 2015, FinCEN issued an NPRM to Requirements for Banks Lacking a amendments in conjunction with its impose the fifth special measure against Federal Functional Regulator. FinCEN ongoing, comprehensive review of the institution. The fifth special has drafted an NPRM to remove the existing regulations to enhance measure prohibits or conditions the anti-money laundering (AML) program regulatory efficiency, and as a result of opening or maintaining of exemption for banks that lack a Federal the efforts of an interagency task force correspondent or payable-through functional regulator, including, but not currently focusing on improvements to accounts for the designated institution limited to, private banks, non-federally the U.S. regulatory framework for anti- by U.S. financial institutions. insured credit unions, and certain trust money laundering. Administrative Rulings and Written companies. The proposed rule would Guidance. FinCEN published 4 prescribe minimum standards for AML Bureau of the Fiscal Service administrative rulings and written programs and would ensure that all The Bureau of the Fiscal Service guidance pieces, and provided 30 banks, regardless of whether they are (Fiscal Service) administers regulations responses to written inquiries/ subject to Federal regulation and pertaining to the Government’s financial correspondence interpreting the BSA oversight, are required to establish and activities, including: (1) Implementing and providing clarity to regulated implement AML programs. Treasury’s borrowing authority, industries. Amendments to the Definitions of including regulating the sale and issue FinCEN’s regulatory priorities for Broker or Dealer in Securities. FinCEN of Treasury securities, (2) Administering fiscal year 2016 include finalizing any has drafted an NPRM that proposes Government revenue and debt initiatives mentioned above that are not amendments to the regulatory collection, (3) Administering finalized by fiscal year end, as well as definitions of broker or dealer in Governmentwide accounting programs, the following in-process and potential securities under the BSA regulations. (4) Managing certain Federal projects: The proposed changes would expand investments, (5) Disbursing the majority Customer Due Diligence the current scope of the definitions to of Government electronic and check Requirements. On August 4, 2014, include funding portals and would payments, (6) Assisting Federal agencies FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed require them to implement policies and in reducing the number of improper Rulemaking (NPRM) to solicit public procedures reasonably designed to payments, and (7) Providing comment on proposed rules under the achieve compliance with all of the BSA administrative and operational support BSA to clarify and strengthen customer requirements that are currently to Federal agencies through franchise due diligence requirements for banks, applicable to brokers or dealers in shared services. brokers or dealers in securities, mutual securities. During fiscal year 2016, the Fiscal funds, and futures commission Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Service will accord priority to the merchants and introducing brokers in Regulations—Registration Requirements following regulatory projects: commodities. The proposed rules of Money Services Businesses. FinCEN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for contain explicit customer due diligence is considering issuing an NPRM to Publishing Delinquent Debtor requirements and include a new amend the requirements for money Information. The Debt Collection regulatory requirement to identify services businesses with respect to Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104– beneficial owners of legal entity registering with FinCEN. 134, 110 Stat. 1321 (DCIA) authorizes

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77852 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Federal agencies to publish or otherwise (Pub. L. 111–152) (referred to Interest on Deferred Tax Liability for publicly disseminate information collectively as the Affordable Care Act Contingent Payment Installment Sales. regarding the identity of persons owing (ACA)). The ACA’s reform of the health Section 453 of the Code generally allows delinquent nontax debts to the United insurance system affects individuals, taxpayers to report the gain from a sale States for the purpose of collecting the families, employers, health care of property in the taxable year or years debts, provided certain criteria are met. providers, and health insurance in which payments are received, rather Treasury proposes to issue a notice of providers. The ACA provides authority than in the year of sale. Section 453A of proposed rulemaking seeking comments for Treasury and the IRS to issue the Code imposes an interest charge on on a proposed rule that would establish regulations and other guidance to the tax liability that is deferred as a the procedures Federal agencies must implement tax provisions in the ACA, result of reporting the gain when follow before promulgating their own some of which are already effective and payments are received. The interest rules to publish information about some of which will become effective charge generally applies to installment delinquent debtors and the standards for over the next several years. Since obligations that arise from a sale of determining when use of this debt enactment of the ACA, Treasury and the property using the installment method if collection remedy is appropriate. IRS have issued a series of temporary, the sales price of the property exceeds Offset of Tax Refund Payments to proposed, and final regulations $150,000, and the face amount of all Collect Past-Due Support. Currently, implementing over a dozen provisions such installment obligations held by a there is no time limit to recoup offset of the ACA, including the premium tax taxpayer that arose during, and are amounts that were collected from tax credit under section 36B of the Code, outstanding as of the close of, a taxable refunds to which the debtor taxpayer the small-business health coverage tax year exceeds $5,000,000. The interest was not entitled. An interim rule with credit under section 45R of the Code, charge provided in section 453A cannot request for comments would provide a new requirements for charitable be determined under the terms of the time limit for such recoupments. hospitals under section 501(r) of the statute if an installment obligation Debt Collection Authorities Under the Code, limits on tax preferences for provides for contingent payments. Debt Collection Improvement Act of remuneration provided by certain health Accordingly, in section 453A(c)(6), 1996. The Data Accountability and insurance providers under section Congress authorized the Secretary of the Transparency Act of 2014 changed the 162(m)(6) of the Code, the employer Treasury to issue regulations providing statutory requirement for federal shared responsibility provisions under for the application of section 453A in agencies to submit delinquent debts to section 4980H of the Code, the the case of installment sales with Treasury for purposes of administrative individual shared responsibility contingent payments. Treasury and the offset from 180 days delinquent to 120 provisions under section 5000A of the IRS intend to issue proposed regulations days delinquent. The direct final rule Code, insurer and employer reporting that, when finalized, will provide will amend the regulations to conform under sections 6055 and 6056 of the guidance and reduce uncertainty to that statutory change. Code, and several revenue-raising regarding the application of section Amendment to Savings Bond provisions, including fees on branded 453A to contingent payments. Regulations. Fiscal Service plans to prescription drugs under section 9008 of amend regulations in 31 CFR parts 315, Rules for Home Construction the ACA, fees on health insurance Contracts. In general, section 460(a) of 353, and 360 to allow consideration of providers under section 9010 of the certain state escheat claims when the the Code requires taxpayers to use the ACA, the tax on indoor tanning services percentage-of-completion method (PCM) state cannot show that the owner, under 5000B of the Code, the net coowner, or beneficiary is deceased. to account for taxable income from any investment income tax under section long-term contract. Under the PCM, Internal Revenue Service 1411 of the Code, and the additional income is generally reported in The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Medicare tax under sections 3101 and installments as work is performed, and working with the Office of Tax Policy, 3102 of the Code. expenses are generally deducted in the promulgates regulations that interpret In fiscal year 2016, Treasury and the taxable year incurred. However, and implement the Internal Revenue IRS will continue to provide guidance to taxpayers with contracts that meet the Code (Code) and related tax statutes. implement tax provisions of the ACA, definition of a ‘‘home construction The purpose of these regulations is to including: contract,’’ under section 460(e)(4), are • carry out the tax policy determined by Proposed and final regulations not required to use the PCM for those Congress in a fair, impartial, and related to numerous aspects of the contracts and may, instead, use an reasonable manner, taking into account premium tax credit under section 36B, exempt method. Exempt methods the intent of Congress, the realities of including the determination of include the completed contract method relevant transactions, the need for the minimum value of eligible-employer- (CCM) and the accrual method. Under Government to administer the rules and sponsored plans; the CCM, for example, a taxpayer • monitor compliance, and the overall Regulations under section 4980I of generally takes into account the entire integrity of the Federal tax system. The the Code relating to the excise tax on gross contract price and all incurred goal is to make the regulations practical high cost employer-provided coverage; allocable contract costs in the taxable and as clear and simple as possible. • Regulations on expatriate health year the taxpayer completes the During fiscal year 2016, the IRS will plans under the Expatriate Health contract. Treasury and the IRS believe accord priority to the following Coverage Clarification Act of 2014 for that amended rules are needed to reduce regulatory projects: purposes of sections 36B, 4980I, and uncertainty and controversy, including Tax-Related Affordable Care Act 5000A of the Code, and section 9010 of litigation, regarding when a contract Provisions. On March 23, 2010, the the Patient Protection and Affordable qualifies as a ‘‘home construction President signed the Patient Protection Care Act, as amended by the Health contract’’ and when the income and and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Pub. Care and Education Reconciliation Act; allocable deductions are taken into L. 111–148) and on March 30, 2010, the • Final regulations regarding issues account under the CCM. On August 4, President signed the Health Care and related to the net investment income tax 2008, Treasury and the IRS published Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 under section 1411 of the Code. proposed regulations on the types of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77853

contracts that are eligible for the home provides rules requiring that the basis of additional guidance under section 103 construction contract exemption. The certain property acquired from a of the Code for determining when an preamble to those regulations stated that decedent be consistent with the estate entity is a political subdivision. Treasury and the IRS expected to tax value of the property. Section 6035 Contingent Notional Principal propose additional rules specific to requires executors who are required to Contract Regulations. Notice 2001–44 home construction contracts accounted file a return under section 6018(a) of the (2001–2 CB 77) outlined four possible for using the CCM. After considering Code (and other persons required to file approaches for recognizing nonperiodic comments received and the need for a return under section 6018(b)) after July payments made or received on a additional and clearer rules to reduce 31, 2015, to furnish statements with the notional principal contract (NPC) when ongoing uncertainty and controversy, IRS and certain estate beneficiaries the contract includes a nonperiodic Treasury and the IRS have determined providing information regarding the payment that is contingent in fact or in that it would be beneficial to taxpayers value of certain property acquired from amount. The Notice solicited further to present all of the proposed changes a decedent. Section 6662(k) provides a comments and information on the to the current regulations in a single penalty for certain recipients of property treatment of such payments. After document. Treasury and the IRS plan to acquired from an estate required to file considering the comments received in withdraw the 2008 proposed regulations a return after July 31, 2015, who do not response to Notice 2001–44, Treasury and replace them with new, more report a basis that is consistent with the and the IRS published proposed comprehensive proposed regulations. value determined under section 1014(f) regulations (69 FR 8886) (the 2004 Research Expenditures. Section 41 of when the property is sold (or deemed proposed regulations) that would amend the Code provides a credit against sold). On August 21, 2015, Notice 2015– section 1.446–3 and provide additional taxable income for certain expenses 57 was issued. This notice delayed the rules regarding the timing and character paid or incurred in conducting research due date for any statements required by of income, deduction, gain, or loss with activities. To assist in resolving areas of section 6035 to February 29, 2016. The respect to such nonperiodic payments, controversy and uncertainty with IRS is in the process of issuing a form, including termination payments. On respect to research expenses, Treasury a schedule, and instructions thereto to December 7, 2007, Treasury and the IRS and the IRS plan to issue final facilitate the reporting required by released Notice 2008–2 requesting regulations with respect to the section 6035. It is expected these comments and information with respect definition and credit eligibility of documents will be available in draft to transactions frequently referred to as expenditures for internal use software. form for taxpayers’ use prior to February prepaid forward contracts. On May 8, Income Inclusion When Lessee 29, 2016. Treasury and the IRS will 2015, Treasury and the IRS published Treated as Having Acquired Investment issue proposed regulations providing temporary and proposed regulations (80 Credit Property. Section 50(d)(5) of the guidance under sections 1014(f), 6035, FR 26437) relating to the treatment of Code provides that, for purposes of the and 6662(k) within 18 months of July nonperiodic payments. Treasury and the investment credit, rules similar to 31, 2015. IRS plan to finalize the temporary former section 48(d) (as in effect prior Arbitrage Investment Restrictions on regulations and to re-propose to the enactment of Revenue Tax-Exempt Bonds. The arbitrage regulations to address issues relating to Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Public Law investment restrictions on tax-exempt the timing and character of nonperiodic 101–508)) apply. Former section bonds under section 148 of the Code contingent payments on NPCs, 48(d)(5)(B) of the Code generally generally limit issuers from investing including termination payments and provides that when a lessor of bond proceeds in higher-yielding payments on prepaid forward contracts. investment credit property elects to treat investments. On September 16, 2013, Tax Treatment of Distressed Debt. A the lessee as having acquired the Treasury and the IRS published number of tax issues relating to the property, the lessee of the property must proposed regulations (78 FR 56842) to amount, character, and timing of include an applicable amount in gross address selected current issues income, expense, gain, or loss on income. Treasury and the IRS plan to involving the arbitrage investment distressed debt remain unresolved. issue regulations to address how the restrictions, including guidance on the During fiscal year 2016, Treasury and section 50(d)(5) income-inclusion rules issue price definition used in the the IRS plan to address certain of these operate when a partnership is the lessee. computation of bond yield, working issues in published guidance. Domestic Production Activities capital financings, grants, investment Definition of Real Property and Income. Section 199 of the Code valuation, modifications, terminations Qualifying Income for REIT Purposes. A provides a deduction for certain income of qualified hedging transactions, and taxpayer must satisfy certain asset and attributable to domestic production selected other issues. On June 24, 2015, income requirements to qualify as a real activities. To assist in resolving areas of Treasury and the IRS published estate investment trust (REIT) under controversy and uncertainty with proposed regulations (80 FR 36301) that section 856 of the Code. REITs have respect to the eligibility of income from revise the 2013 guidance on the issue sought to invest in various types of online computer software, Treasury and price definition. Treasury and the IRS assets that are not directly addressed by the IRS plan to issue regulations plan to finalize the proposed regulations the current regulations or other regarding the application of section 199 on the arbitrage investment restrictions, published guidance. On May 14, 2014, to online computer software. including the issue price definition used Treasury and the IRS published Consistent Basis Reporting between in the computation of bond yield. proposed regulations (79 FR 27508) to Estate and Person Acquiring Property Guidance on the Definition of update and clarify the definition of real from Decedent. On July 31, 2015, the Political Subdivision for Tax-Exempt, property for REIT qualification President of the United States signed Tax-Credit, and Direct-Pay Bonds. A purposes, including guidance H.R. 3236, Surface Transportation and political subdivision may be a valid addressing whether a component of a Veterans Health Care Choice issuer of tax-exempt, tax-credit, and larger item is tested on its own or only Improvement Act of 2015 (Act) (P.L. direct-pay bonds. Concerns have been as part of the larger item, the scope of 114–41), into law. Section 2004 of the raised about what is required for an the asset to be tested, and whether Act added new Code sections 1014(f), entity to be a political subdivision. certain intangible assets qualify as real 6035, and 6662(k). Section 1014(f) Treasury and the IRS plan to provide property. Treasury and the IRS plan to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77854 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

finalize the proposed regulations in the section 707(c) to make those regulations consideration for the contribution. The fiscal year. Treasury and the IRS also consistent with the proposed allocation of partnership liabilities to plan to provide guidance clarifying the regulations under section 707(a)(2)(A). the partners under section 752 of the definition of income for purposes of Treasury and the IRS expect to issue Code may impact the determination of section 856. final regulations during fiscal year 2016. whether a disguised sale has occurred Corporate Spin-offs and Split-offs. Transfers of Property to Partnerships and whether gain is otherwise Section 355 and related provisions of with Related Foreign Partners. Section recognized upon a distribution. the Code allow for the tax-free 721(c) of the Code provides authority to Treasury and the IRS published distribution of stock or securities of a issue regulations that prevent the use of proposed regulations on January 30, controlled corporation if certain a partnership to shift gain to a foreign 2014, to address certain issues that arise requirements are met. For example, the person. Treasury and the IRS exercised in the disguised sale context and other distributing corporation must distribute this authority on August 6, 2015, by issues regarding the partners’ shares of a controlling interest in the controlled issuing Notice 2015–54. The notice partnership liabilities. Treasury and the corporation, and both the distributing denies nonrecognition treatment to IRS are considering comments on the and controlled corporations must be certain contributions by U.S. persons to proposed regulations and expect to engaged in the active conduct of a trade partnerships that have foreign partners issue regulations on this issue in fiscal or business immediately after the related to the transferor, unless year 2016. distribution. Treasury and the IRS conditions that preserve U.S. taxing Certain Partnership Distributions intend to provide guidance on the nexus with respect to the built-in gain Treated as Sales or Exchanges. In 1954, qualification of a distribution for tax- in the transferred property are met. The Congress enacted section 751 to prevent free treatment under section 355, notice also addresses the consequences the use of a partnership to convert including (1) regulations that address under section 482 of the Code of potential ordinary income into capital when a corporation is treated as engaged controlled transactions involving gain. In 1956, Treasury and the IRS in an active trade or business, and (2) partnerships. Treasury and the IRS issued regulations implementing section final regulations that define predecessor intend to issue the regulations described 751 of the Code. The current or successor corporation for purposes of in the notice in this fiscal year. regulations, however, do not always Country-by-Country Reporting. This the exception to tax-free treatment achieve the purpose of the statute. In fiscal year, pursuant to authority under section 355(e). Treasury and the 2006, Treasury and the IRS published granted under sections 6011, 6012, IRS also intend to provide guidance Notice 2006–14 (2006–1 CB 498) to relating to the tax treatment of other 6031, and 6038 of the Code, Treasury propose and solicit alternative transactions undertaken as part of a plan and the IRS expect to issue regulations approaches to section 751 that better that includes a distribution of stock or requiring reporting of country-by- achieve the purpose of the statute while securities of a controlled corporation, country information by large U.S. providing greater simplicity. Treasury such as changes to the voting power of multinational enterprises (MNEs). The and the IRS published proposed the controlled corporation’s stock in regulations will require those MNEs to regulations following up on Notice anticipation of the distribution, the report income, earnings, taxes paid, and 2006–14 on November 3, 2014. These issuance of debt of the distributing certain economic activity for each regulations were intended to provide corporation and retirement of such debt country in which the MNE group guidance on determining a partner’s using stock or securities of the conducts business, consistent with a controlled corporation, and the transfer template released by the Organisation interest in a partnership’s section 751 of cash or property between a for Economic Co-operation and property and how a partnership distributing or controlled corporation Development (OECD) as part of its recognizes income required by section and its shareholder(s) in connection report ‘‘Guidance on Transfer Pricing 751. Treasury and the IRS expect to with the distribution. Documentation and Country-by-Country issue final regulations during fiscal year Disguised Payments for Services. Reporting.’’ The information will be 2016. Section 707(a)(2)(A) of the Code used for transfer pricing risk Penalties and Limitation Periods. provides that if a partner performs assessment. Congress amended several penalty services for a partnership and receives Currency. On September 6, 2006, provisions in the Internal Revenue Code a related direct or indirect allocation Treasury and the IRS published a notice in the past several years. Treasury and and distribution, and the performance of of proposed rulemaking under section the IRS intend to publish a number of services and the allocation and 987 of the Code that proposes rules for guidance projects in fiscal year 2016 distribution, when viewed together, are translating a section 987 qualified addressing these penalty provisions. properly characterized as a transaction business unit’s income or loss into the Specifically, Treasury and the IRS occurring between the partnership and taxpayer’s functional currency for each intend to publish final regulations a partner acting other than in its taxable year, as well as for determining under section 6708 of the Code capacity as a partner, the transfer will be the amount of section 987 currency gain regarding the penalty for failure to make treated as occurring between the or loss that must be recognized when a available upon request a list of advisees partnership and one who is not a section 987 qualified business unit that is required to be maintained under partner. Treasury and the IRS published makes a remittance. Treasury and the section 6112 of the Code. The proposed proposed regulations on July 23, 2015, IRS expect to finalize the proposed regulations were published on March 8, to provide guidance on when an regulations in this fiscal year. 2013. Treasury and the IRS also intend arrangement that is purported to be a Disguised Sale and Allocation of to publish proposed regulations under distributive share under section 704(b) Liabilities. A contribution of property sections 6662, 6662A, and 6664 of the of the Code will be recharacterized as a by a partner to a partnership may be Code to provide further guidance on the disguised payment for services under recharacterized as a sale under section circumstances under which a taxpayer section 707(a)(2)(A). The proposed 707(a)(2)(B) of the Code if the could be subject to the accuracy related regulations also provide for partnership distributes to the penalty on underpayments or reportable modifications to the regulations contributing partner cash or other transaction understatements and the governing guaranteed payments under property that is, in substance, reasonable cause exception.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77855

Inversion Transactions. On September losses from dispositions. In this fiscal ABLE Account guidance. On 22, 2014, Treasury and the IRS issued year, Treasury and the IRS expect to December 19, 2014, Congress passed Notice 2014–52, addressing the issue regulations to implement these The Stephen Beck, Jr., Achieving a application of sections 7874 and 367 of notices, and also provide substantial Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of the Code to inversions, as well as additional guidance under section 2014, adding section 529A to the Code certain tax avoidance transactions that 901(m). to enable states to create qualified ABLE are commonly undertaken after an Transfers of Property to Foreign programs under which disabled inversion transaction. In this fiscal year, Corporations. Section 367 of the Code individuals may establish a tax- Treasury and the IRS expect to issue provides special rules to address the advantaged account to pay for regulations implementing the rules transfer of property, including disability-related expenses. To be intangible property, by U.S. persons to described in Notice 2014–52. Also in eligible to establish an ABLE account, foreign corporations in certain this fiscal year, and as announced in the individual must have become Notice 2014–52, Treasury and the IRS nonrecognition transactions. Under disabled prior to age 26. As required by expect to issue additional guidance to existing temporary regulations issued in the statute, Treasury and the IRS on further limit inversion transactions that 1986, favorable treatment is afforded to are contrary to the purposes of section the outbound transfer of ‘‘foreign June 19, 2015, published proposed 7874 and the benefits of post-inversion goodwill and going concern value,’’ regulations implementing the provision. tax avoidance transactions. which has created incentives for States may rely on the proposed Information Reporting for Foreign taxpayers to categorize transfers of high- regulations for establishing a qualified Accounts of U.S. Persons. In March value intangible property as such. On ABLE program. Treasury and the IRS 2010, chapter 4 (sections 1471 to 1474) September 14, 2015, Treasury and the intend to finalize the regulations during was added to subtitle A of the Internal IRS released proposed regulations that the 2016 fiscal year, taking into account Revenue Code as part of the Hiring would eliminate that favorable all comments received. Incentives to Restore Employment Act treatment. Treasury and the IRS released Guidance Responding to the SEC’s (HIRE Act) (Pub. L. 111–147). Chapter 4 on the same day temporary and Money Market Reform Rule. On July 23, was enacted to address concerns with proposed regulations under section 482 2014, the SEC adopted a final rule to offshore tax evasion by U.S. citizens and that clarify the coordination of the reduce the systemic risk that money residents and generally requires foreign application of the transfer pricing rules market funds present to the national financial institutions (FFIs) to enter into in conjunction with other provisions, economy. Later that day, Treasury and an agreement (FFI Agreement) with the including section 367. Treasury and the the IRS issued simplifying guidance, IRS to report information regarding IRS intend to finalize the proposed including proposed regulations (79 FR financial accounts of U.S. persons and section 367 regulations and the 43694), designed to ameliorate the tax certain foreign entities with significant temporary and proposed section 482 compliance difficulties that the SEC rule U.S. ownership. An FFI that does not regulations in this fiscal year. enter into an FFI Agreement, or that is Section 501(c) Guidance. After would otherwise pose for certain money not otherwise deemed compliant with reviewing over 160,000 comments market funds and their shareholders. In FATCA, generally will be subject to a submitted on the proposed regulations fiscal year 2016, Treasury and the IRS withholding tax on the gross amount of under section 501(c)(4) published in intend to finalize the proposed certain payments from U.S. sources. fiscal year 2014, Treasury and the IRS regulations. Treasury and the IRS have issued plan to issue revised proposed Guidance Relating to Publicly Traded proposed, temporary, and final regulations that provide guidance under Partnerships. Section 7704 of the Code regulations under chapter 4, followed by section 501(c) relating to limitations on provides that a partnership whose proposed and temporary regulations political campaign activities of certain interests are traded on either an modifying certain provisions of the final tax-exempt organizations. established securities market or on a regulations; proposed and temporary Guidance on Multiemployer Benefit secondary market (a ‘‘publicly traded regulations under chapters 3 and 61, Suspensions. The Multiemployer partnership’’) is generally treated as a and section 3406, to coordinate with Pension Reform Act of 2014 (MPRA) corporation for Federal tax purposes. those chapter 4 regulations; as well as enacted new rules for multiemployer However, section 7704(c) permits implementing revenue procedures and plans that are projected to have publicly traded partnerships to be insufficient funds, at some point in the other guidance. Treasury and the IRS treated as partnerships for Federal tax future, to pay the full plan benefits to expect to issue further guidance with purposes if 90 percent or more of which individuals will be entitled. respect to FATCA and related partnership income consists of provisions in this fiscal year, including MPRA permits the sponsor of such a plan to reduce the pension benefits ‘‘qualifying income.’’ Section 7704(d) finalizing of the aforementioned chapter provides that income is generally 3, 4 and 61 regulations and proposed payable to plan participants and qualifying income if it is passive income regulations covering the compliance beneficiaries if certain conditions are or is derived from exploration, requirement of entities acting as satisfied, after submitting an application development, mining or production, sponsoring entities on behalf of certain to Treasury for approval and conducting foreign entities. a participant vote. Two sets of proposed processing, refining, transportation, or Foreign Tax Credits and Covered and temporary regulations, each set marketing of a mineral or natural Asset Acquisitions. Section 901(m) of covering different aspects of the resource. Treasury and the IRS issued the Code limits the availability of legislation, have been published, as well proposed regulations in 2015 to provide foreign tax credits in certain cases in as a revenue procedure concerning the guidance and reduce uncertainty which U.S. tax law and foreign tax law application process. A public hearing on regarding the scope of the natural provide different rules for recognizing the first set of regulations has been held resource exception. After considering income and gain. In 2014, Treasury and and over 700 comments received. comments on the proposed regulations, the IRS issued two notices providing Treasury and the IRS plan to finalize Treasury and the IRS expect to issue guidance under section 901(m) both sets of regulations in this fiscal final regulations in fiscal year 2016. regarding the treatment of gains and year. BILLING CODE 4810–25–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00147 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77856 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS its system of medical centers, nursing Retrospective Review of Existing AFFAIRS (VA) homes, domiciliaries, and outpatient Regulations Statement of Regulatory Priorities medical and dental facilities. The Pursuant to section 6 of Executive primary mission of the National The Department of Veterans Affairs Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and Cemetery Administration is to bury (VA) administers benefit programs that Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), the eligible veterans, members of the recognize the important public following Regulatory Identifier Numbers obligations to those who served this Reserve components, and their (RINs) have been identified as Nation. VA’s regulatory responsibility is dependents in VA National Cemeteries associated with retrospective review almost solely confined to carrying out and to maintain those cemeteries as and analysis in the Department’s final mandates of the laws enacted by national shrines in perpetuity as a final retrospective review of regulations plan. Congress relating to programs for tribute of a grateful Nation to Some of these entries on this list may veterans and their families. VA’s major commemorate their service and sacrifice be completed actions, which do not regulatory objective is to implement to our Nation. appear in The Regulatory Plan. these laws with fairness, justice, and However, more information can be VA Regulatory Priorities efficiency. found about these completed Most of the regulations issued by VA VA’s main regulatory priority is to rulemakings in past publications of the involve at least one of three VA implement the Veterans Access, Choice, Unified Agenda on Reginfo.gov in the components: The Veterans Benefits and Accountability Act of 2014, which Completed Actions section for that agency. These rulemakings can also be Administration, the Veterans Health has been amended by Congress in 2015 Administration, and the National found on Regulations.gov. The final (Public Laws 114–19 and 114–41). The Cemetery Administration. The primary agency plans can be found at: http:// purpose of the law is to establish a mission of the Veterans Benefits www.va.gov/ORPM/docs/RegMgmt_VA_ Administration is to provide high- program to furnish hospital care and EO13563_VA_OIRA_Status_Report_ quality and timely nonmedical benefits medical services through non-VA health 201507.pdf. to eligible veterans and their care providers to veterans who cannot VA’s most recent report on its dependents. The primary mission of the be seen within VA’s wait time goals, retrospective review of regulations can Veterans Health Administration is to live far from any VA medical facility, or be found at: http://www.va.gov/ORPM/ provide high-quality health care on a would face undue hardship travelling to docs/RegMgmt_VA_EO13563_RegRev timely basis to eligible veterans through a VA medical facility. Plan20110810.docx.

Significantly reduce RIN Title burdens on small businesses

2900–AP50 ...... Revise and Streamline VA Acquisition Regulation to Adhere to Federal Acquisition ...... No. 2900–AO53 ...... Fiduciary Activities ...... No. Multiple RINs ...... VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (with specific body system) ...... No.

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P This plan highlights four rulemaking technology covered by section 508 of priorities for the Access Board in FY the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as 2016: (A) Information and amended (29 U.S.C. 794d) (Section 508), ARCHITECTURAL AND Communication Technology and the accessibility guidelines for TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS Accessibility Standards and Guidelines; telecommunications equipment and COMPLIANCE BOARD (B) Americans with Disabilities Act customer premises equipment covered (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for by section 255 of the Communications FY 2016 Regulatory Plan Transportation Vehicles; (C) Medical Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 255) (Section Diagnostic Equipment Accessibility Statement of Regulatory and 255). Section 508 requires the Federal Standards; and (D) Accessibility Deregulatory Priorities Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in Council) and each appropriate federal The Architectural and Transportation the Public Right-of-Way. The guidelines department or agency to revise their Barriers Compliance Board (Access and standards would enable individuals procurement policies and directives no Board) is an independent federal agency with disabilities to achieve greater later than 6 months after the Access established by section 502 of the participation in our society, Board’s publication of standards. The Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 792). The independent living, and economic self- FAR Council has incorporated the Access Board is responsible for sufficiency, and would promote our accessibility standards for electronic developing accessibility guidelines and national values of equity, human and information technology in the standards under various laws to ensure dignity, and fairness, the benefits of Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR that individuals with disabilities have which are difficult to quantify. Chapter 1). Under section 255, the access to and use of buildings and The rulemakings are summarized Federal Communications Commission facilities, transportation vehicles, below. (FCC) is responsible for issuing information and communication A. Information and Communication implementing regulations and enforcing technology, and medical diagnostic Technology Accessibility Standards and section 255. The FCC has promulgated equipment. Other federal agencies adopt Guidelines (RIN: 3014–AA37). enforceable standards (47 CFR parts 6 the accessibility guidelines and and 7) implementing section 255 that standards issued by the Access Board as This rulemaking would update in a are consistent with the Access Board’s mandatory requirements for entities single document the accessibility accessibility guidelines for under their jurisdiction. standards for electronic and information telecommunications equipment and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00148 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77857

customer premises equipment. The changes to the existing standards and The accessibility guidelines for other Access Board’s 2010 ANPRM included guidelines. The advisory committee was transportation vehicles covered by the a proposal to amend section 220 of the comprised of a broad cross-section of ADA, including vehicles operated in Americans with Disabilities Act stakeholders, including representatives fixed guideway systems (e.g., rapid rail, Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), but, from industry, disability groups, and light rail, commuter rail, high speed rail based on public comments, the ADAAG government agencies from the U.S. the and intercity rail) would be updated in proposal is no longer included in this European Commission, Canada, a future rulemaking. The guidelines rulemaking and will be pursued Australia, and Japan. Recognizing the ensure that transportation vehicles separately at a later date. importance of standardization across covered by the ADA are readily A.1. Statement of Need: The Access markets worldwide, the advisory accessible to and usable by individuals Board issued the Electronic and committee coordinated its work with with disabilities. The U.S. Department Information Technology Accessibility standard-setting bodies in the U.S. and of Transportation (DOT) has issued Standards in 2000 (65 FR 80500, abroad, such as the World Wide Web enforceable standards (49 CFR part 37) December 21, 2000), and the Consortium (W3C). The Access Board that apply to the acquisition of new, Telecommunications Act Accessibility expects that the Information and used, and remanufactured Guidelines for telecommunications Communication Technology Standards transportation vehicles, and the equipment and customer premises and Guidelines will have international remanufacture of existing transportation equipment in 1998 (63 FR 5608, influences. The Access Board first vehicles covered by the ADA. DOT is February 3, 1998). Since the standards published Advance Notices of Proposed expected to update its standards in a and the guidelines were issued, Rulemaking (ANPRMs) in the Federal separate rulemaking to be consistent technology has evolved and changed. Register in 2010 and 2011 requesting with the updated guidelines. Telecommunications products and public comments on draft updates to the B.1. Statement of Need: The Access electronic and information technology standards and guidelines (75 FR 13457, Board issued the ADA Accessibility products have converged. For example, March 22, 2010; and 76 FR 76640, Guidelines for Transportation Vehicles smartphones can perform many of the December 8, 2011). The NPRM was in 1991, and amended the guidelines in same functions as computers. Real time published in the Federal Register on 1998 to include additional requirements text technologies and video relay February 27, 2015 (80 FR 10880). The for over-the-road buses. Level boarding services are replacing TTY’s (text comment period closed on May 28, bus systems were introduced in the U.S. telephones). The Access Board is 2015. The proposed rule, comments on after the 1991 guidelines were issued. updating the standards and guidelines the proposed rule, records and We are revising the 1991 guidelines to together to address changes in transcripts from three public hearings, include new requirements for level technology and to make them and the preliminary regulatory impact boarding bus systems, automated stop consistent. analysis are available in the rulemaking and route announcements, and other A.2. Summary of the Legal Basis: docket at http://www.regulations.gov/# changes. Section 508 and Section 255 require the !docketDetail;D=ATBCB-2015-0002. The B.2. Summary of the Legal Basis: Title Access Board to develop accessibility final rule will address and incorporate II of the ADA applies to state and local standards for electronic and information comments submitted in response to the governments and title III of the ADA technology and accessibility guidelines NPRM. applies to places of public for telecommunications equipment and A.4. Anticipated Costs and Benefits: accommodation operated by private customer premises equipment, and to The Access Board worked with a entities. The ADA covers designated periodically review and update the contractor to assess costs and benefits public transportation services provided standards and guidelines to reflect and prepare a preliminary regulatory by state and local governments and technological advances and changes. impact assessment to accompany the specified public transportation services Section 508 requires that when NPRM. Baseline cost estimates of provided by private entities that are developing, procuring, maintaining, or complying with Section 508 and Section primarily engaged in the business of using electronic and information 255 are made, and incremental costs transporting people and whose technology, each federal department or due to the revised or new requirements operations affect commerce. (See 42 agency must ensure, unless an undue are estimated for federal agencies and U.S.C. 12141 to 12147 and 12184.) Bus burden would be imposed on the telecommunications equipment rapid transit systems, including level department or agency, that electronic manufacturers. Anticipated benefits are boarding bus systems, that provide and information technology (regardless also numerous, including hard-to public transportation services, are of the type of medium) allows quantify benefits such as increased covered by the ADA. individuals with disabilities to have ability for people with disabilities to The Access Board is required by the access to and use of information and obtain information and conduct ADA and the Rehabilitation Act to data that is comparable to the access transactions electronically. The Access establish and maintain guidelines for and use of the information and data by Board will prepare a final regulatory the accessibility standards adopted by others without disabilities. Section 255 impact assessment to accompany the DOT for transportation vehicles requires telecommunications final rule, which will incorporate acquired or manufactured by entities manufacturers to ensure that information received from commenters covered by the ADA. Compliance with telecommunications equipment and to the NPRM. the new guidelines is not required until customer premises equipment are DOT revises its accessibility standards designed, developed, and fabricated to B. Americans With Disabilities Act for transportation vehicles acquired or be accessible to and usable by (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for remanufactured by entities covered by individuals with disabilities when it is Transportation Vehicles (RIN: 3014– the ADA to be consistent with the new readily achievable to do so. AA38). guidelines. A.3. Alternatives: The Access Board This rulemaking would update the B.3. Alternatives: The Access Board established a Telecommunications and accessibility guidelines for buses, over- issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Electronic and Information Technology the-road buses, and vans covered by the to revise the 1991 guidelines for buses, Advisory Committee to recommend Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). over-the-road buses, and vans in 2010

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00149 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77858 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

(75 FR 43748, July 26, 2010). The individuals with disabilities also incorporate comments submitted in proposed rule, comments on the provided information on barriers that response to the NPRM. proposed rule, transcripts from public affect the accessibility and usability of C.4. Anticipated Costs and Benefits: hearings and an information meeting, various types of medical diagnostic In conjunction with the NPRM, the and other related documents are equipment. The national survey and Access Board published a preliminary available in the rulemaking docket at focus group studies are discussed in the regulatory assessment of the proposed http://www.regulations.gov/#!docket NPRM. MDE standards. The Access Board is Detail;D=ATBCB-2010-0004. The final C.2. Summary of the Legal Basis: working on a final regulatory rule will address and incorporate Section 4203 of the Patient Protection assessment, which will evaluate the comments submitted in response to the and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111– incremental costs and benefits of the NPRM. 148, 124 Stat. 570) amended title V of final rule from quantitative and B.4. Anticipated Costs and Benefits: the Rehabilitation Act, which qualitative perspectives as information In conjunction with the NPRM, the establishes rights and protections for permits. It is anticipated that the final Access Board published a report individuals with disabilities, by adding MDE standards will address many of the entitled ‘‘Cost Estimates for Automated section 510 to the Rehabilitation Act (29 barriers that have been identified as Stop and Route Announcements’’ (July U.S.C. 794f) (Section 510). Section 510 affecting the accessibility and usability 2010), which is available on the agency requires the Access Board, in of diagnostic equipment by individuals Web site (www.access-board.gov) and consultation with the Commissioner of with disabilities. The standards aim to the rulemaking docket. A final the Food and Drug Administration facilitate independent transfers by regulatory assessment will be prepared (FDA), to develop standards that contain individuals with disabilities onto and to accompany the final rule. The final minimum technical criteria to ensure off of diagnostic equipment, and enable regulatory assessment will evaluate that medical diagnostic equipment used them to maintain their independence, estimated incremental costs for new or in or in conjunction with medical confidence, and dignity, lessening the revised requirements for buses, over- settings such as physicians’ offices, need for health care personnel to assist the-road buses, and vans in the final clinics, emergency rooms, and hospitals individuals with disabilities when rule, as well as provide a description of are accessible to and usable by transferring on and off of diagnostic qualitative benefits. It is anticipated that individuals with disabilities. equipment. The standards also are this rule will improve access to wheeled Section 510 does not address who is expected to improve the quality of transportation vehicles for persons who required to comply with the standards. health care for individuals with have mobility disabilities, persons who However, the Americans with disabilities and ensure that they receive have difficulty hearing or are deaf, and Disabilities Act requires health care examinations, diagnostic procedures, persons who have difficulty seeing or providers to provide individuals with and other health care services are blind to make better use of disabilities full and equal access to their equivalent to those received by transportation services. health care services and facilities. The individuals without disabilities. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is C. Medical Diagnostic Equipment responsible for issuing regulations to D. Accessibility Guidelines for Accessibility Standards (RIN: 3014– implement the Americans with Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right- AA40). Disabilities Act and enforcing the law. of-Way (RIN: 3014–AA26). The Access Board plans to issue a The NPRM discusses DOJ activities The rulemaking would establish final rule establishing accessibility related to health care providers and accessibility guidelines to ensure that standards for medical diagnostic medical diagnostic equipment. sidewalks and pedestrian facilities in equipment used in or in conjunction C.3. Alternatives: The Access Board the public right-of-way are accessible to with medical settings such as worked with the FDA and DOJ in and usable by individuals with physicians’ offices, clinics, emergency developing the standards. The Access disabilities. A Supplemental Notice of rooms, and hospitals. The standards Board considered the Association for Proposed Rulemaking consolidated this will contain minimum technical criteria the Advancement of Medical rulemaking with RIN 3014–AA41; to ensure that medical diagnostic Instrumentation’s ANSI/AAMI HE accessibility guidelines for shared use equipment, including examination 75:2009, ‘‘Human factors engineering- paths (which are multi-use paths tables, examination chairs, weight Design of medical devices,’’ which designed primarily for use by bicyclists scales, mammography equipment, and includes recommended practices to and pedestrians—including persons other imaging equipment used by health provide accessibility for individuals with disabilities—for transportation and care providers for diagnostic purposes with disabilities. The Access Board also recreation purposes). The U.S. are accessible to and usable by established a Medical Diagnostic Department of Justice, U.S. Department individuals with disabilities. The Equipment Accessibility Standards of Transportation, and other federal Access Board published a Notice of Advisory Committee that included agencies are expected to adopt the Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the representatives from the disability accessibility guidelines for pedestrian Federal Register in 2012 (77 FR 6916, community and manufacturers of facilities in the public right-of way and February 9, 2012). medical diagnostic equipment to make for shared use paths, as enforceable C.1. Statement of Need: A national recommendations on issues raised in standards in separate rulemakings for survey of a diverse sample of public comments and responses to the construction and alteration of individuals with a wide range of questions in the NPRM. The Advisory facilities covered by the Americans with disabilities, including mobility and Committee report, completed in Disabilities Act, section 504 of the sensory disabilities, showed that the December 2013, is available at http:// Rehabilitation Act, and the respondents had difficulty getting on www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and- Architectural Barriers Act. and off examination tables and chairs, standards/health-care/about-this- D.1. Statement of Need: While the radiology equipment and weight scales, rulemaking/advisory-committee-final- Access Board has issued accessibility and experienced problems with report. The final rule will be based guidelines for the design, construction, physical comfort, safety and recommendations of the advisory and alteration of buildings and facilities communication. Focus group studies of committee, and will also address and covered by the Americans with

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77859

Disabilities Act (ADA) and the are newly installed or replaced at • Protecting Human Health and the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) (36 signalized intersections; and (3) Environment by Enforcing Laws and CFR part 1191), these guidelines were pedestrian activated signals at Assuring Compliance developed primarily for buildings and roundabouts with multi-lane pedestrian All of this work will be undertaken facilities on sites. Some of the crossings. In addition, the fourth with a strong commitment to science, provisions in these guidelines can be requirement for provision of a 2 percent law and transparency. readily applied to pedestrian facilities maximum cross slope on pedestrian Highlights of EPA’S Regulatory Plan in the public right-of-way such as curb access routes within pedestrian street ramps. However, other provisions need crossings with yield or stop control was EPA’s more than forty years of to be adapted or new provisions estimated to have more than minimal protecting public health and the developed for pedestrian facilities that monetary impacts on state and local environment demonstrates our nation’s are built in the public right-of-way as governments when constructing commitment to reducing pollution that well as shared use paths. roadways with pedestrian crossings in can threaten the air we breathe, the D.2. Summary of the Legal Basis: hilly areas. The NPRM included water we use and the communities we Section 502 (b)(3) of the Rehabilitation questions requesting information to live in. This Regulatory Plan contains Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 792 assess the costs and benefits of these information on some of our most (b)(3), requires the Access Board to provisions, as well as other provisions important upcoming regulatory actions. establish and maintain minimum that may have cost impacts. The Access As always, our Semiannual Regulatory guidelines for the standards issued by Board will prepare a final regulatory Agenda contains information on a other agencies pursuant to the ADA and impact assessment to accompany the broader spectrum of EPA’s upcoming ABA. In addition, section 504 of the final rule based on information regulatory actions. ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12204, required the provided in response to questions in the Guiding Priorities Access Board to issue accessibility NPRM and other sources. guidelines for buildings and facilities The EPA’s success depends on covered by that law. BILLING CODE 8150–01–P supporting innovation and creativity in D.3. Alternatives: The Access Board both what we do and how we do it. To established a Public Rights-of-Way guide the agency’s efforts, the Agency Access Advisory Committee to make ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION has established several guiding recommendations for the guidelines. AGENCY (EPA) priorities. These priorities are The advisory committee was comprised enumerated in the list that follows, of a broad cross-section of stakeholders, Statement of Priorities along with recent progress and future including representatives of state and Overview objectives for each. local government agencies responsible 1. Addressing Climate Change and for constructing facilities in the public For more than 40 years, the U.S. Improving Air Quality right-of-way, transportation engineers, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) disability groups, and bicycling and has worked to protect people’s health The Agency will continue to deploy pedestrian organizations. The Access and the environment. By taking existing regulatory tools where Board released two drafts of the advantage of the best thinking, the appropriate and warranted. Addressing guidelines for public comment, an newest technologies and the most cost- climate change calls for coordinated NPRM (76 FR 44664, July 11, 2011) effective, sustainable solutions, EPA and national and global efforts to reduce based on the advisory committee report its federal, state, local, and community emissions and develop and deploy new, and public comments on the draft partners have made important progress cleaner technologies. Using the Clean guidelines, and a supplemental notice of to address pollution where people live, Air Act, EPA will continue to develop proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) work, play, and learn. From cleaning up greenhouse gas standards for both regarding shared use paths (78 FR contaminated waste sites to reducing mobile and stationary sources. 10110, February 13, 2013). The final greenhouse gases, mercury and other air Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards rule will address and incorporate emissions, to investing in water and for Power Plants. As part of the comments submitted in response to the wastewater treatment, the American President’s Climate Action Plan, in July NPRM and SNPRM. people have seen and felt tangible 2015, the EPA promulgated the Clean D.4. Anticipated Costs and Benefits: benefits to their health and Power Plan final rules setting guidelines In conjunction with the NPRM, the surroundings. Efforts to reduce air for states to follow in reducing carbon Access Board published a preliminary pollution alone have produced emissions from existing power plants, as regulatory assessment of the proposed hundreds of billions of dollars in well as finalizing emission standards for accessibility guidelines for pedestrian benefits in the United States. new plants. At the same time, EPA facilities in the public right-of-way, To keep up this momentum in the proposed Model Rules, to be finalized in which is available in the rulemaking coming year, EPA will use regulatory 2016, to help the states develop plans docket at http://www.regulations.gov/# authorities, along with grant- and that adequately implement the carbon- !docketDetail;D=ATBCB-2011-0004. The incentive-based programs, technical and reduction guidelines. The July 2015 Access Board identified four provisions compliance assistance and tools, proposal also included a Federal Plan in the NPRM that were expected to have research and educational initiatives to that will serve as a backstop in cases more than minimal monetary impacts address the priorities set forth in EPA’s where states do not adequately on state and local governments. Three of Strategic Plan: implement the guidelines. By 2030 these four requirements are related to: • Addressing Climate Change and carbon emissions from existing plants (1) Detectable warning surfaces on Improving Air Quality are estimated to be reduced by 32% newly constructed and altered curb • Protecting America’s Waters from 2005 levels. ramps and blended transitions at • Cleaning up Communities and Heavy-Duty Vehicles GHG Emission pedestrian street crossings; (2) Advancing Sustainable Development Standards. In 2011, in cooperation with accessible pedestrian signals and • Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals the Department of Transportation pushbuttons when pedestrian signals and Preventing Pollution (DOT), EPA issued the first-ever

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00151 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77860 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards manifest fees. The initial fees, to be had previously issued regulations, as and Fuel Efficiency Standards for established in the final rule, are required by the Clean Air Act Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and expected to cover the operation and Amendments of 1990, in response to a Vehicles for model years 2014–2018. On maintenance costs for the system, as number of catastrophic chemical June 19, 2015, EPA and DOT proposed well as the costs associated with the accidents occurring worldwide that had a second set of standards to further development of the system. The EPA resulted in public and worker fatalities reduce greenhouse gas emissions and plans to also announce in the final rule and injuries, environmental damage, fuel consumption from a wide range of the date on which the system will be and other community impacts. OSHA on-road vehicles from semi-trucks to the implemented and available to users. published the Process Safety largest pickup trucks and vans and all Once the national e-Manifest system Management (PSM) standard (29 CFR types and sizes of work trucks and becomes available, hazardous waste part 1910.119) in 1992. EPA modeled buses. These new standards will be handlers will be able to complete, sign, the RMP regulation after OSHA’s PSM finalized in 2016. This action is another transmit, and store electronic manifests standard and published the RMP rule in important component of the President’s through the national IT system, or they two stages—a list of regulated Climate Action Plan. can elect to continue tracking the substances and threshold quantities in Reviewing and Implementing Air hazardous waste under the paper 1994; and the RMP final regulation, Quality Standards. Despite progress, manifest system. Further, waste containing risk management millions of Americans still live in areas handlers that currently submit manifests requirements, in 1996. Both the OSHA that exceed one or more of the national to the states will no longer be required PSM standard and the EPA RMP air pollution standards. This year’s to do so, unless required by the state, as regulation aim to prevent, or minimize regulatory plan describes efforts to the EPA will collect both the remaining the consequences of, accidental review the primary National Ambient paper manifest copies and electronic chemical releases to workers and the Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for manifests in the national system and community. lead. It also includes a rule to reduce will disseminate the manifest data to The EPA is considering modifications state-to-state atmospheric transport of those States that want it. to the current RMP regulations in order pollutants that contribute to CERCLA Section 108(b)—Hard Rock to (1) reduce the likelihood and severity nonattainment of the ozone NAAQS. Mining. Section 108(b) of the of accidental releases, (2) improve Comprehensive Environmental emergency response when those 2. Protecting America’s Waters Response, Compensation, and Liability releases occur, and (2) enhance state Despite considerable progress, many Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, and local emergency preparedness and of America’s waters remain imperiled. establishes certain authorities response in an effort to mitigate the Water quality protection programs face concerning financial responsibility effects of accidents. complex challenges, from nutrient requirements. The Agency has loadings and stormwater runoff to identified classes of facilities within the 4. Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals and invasive species and drinking water Hard Rock mining industry as those for Preventing Pollution contaminants. These challenges demand which financial responsibility One of EPA’s highest priorities is to both traditional and innovative requirements will be first developed. make significant progress in assuring strategies. EPA’s 108(b) rules will address the the safety of chemicals. Using sound degree and duration of risks associated science as a compass, EPA protects 3. Cleaning up Communities and with aspects of hazardous substance individuals, families, and the Advancing Sustainable Development management at hard rock mining and environment from potential risks of Just as today’s economy is vastly mineral processing facilities. These pesticides and other chemicals. In its different from that of 40 years before, regulations will help ensure that implementation of these programs, EPA EPA’s regulatory program is evolving to businesses make financial arrangements uses several different statutory recognize the progress that has already to address risks from hazardous authorities, including the Federal been made in environmental protection substances at their sites, and encourage Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide and to incorporate new technologies businesses to improve their Act (FIFRA), the Federal Food, Drug and and approaches that allow us to provide management of hazardous substances. Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), the Toxic for an environmentally sustainable Modernization of the Accidental Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the future more efficiently and effectively. Release Prevention Regulations under Pollution Prevention Act (PPA), as well Establishing User Fees for the Use of Clean Air Act. On August 1, 2013, as collaborative and voluntary activities. RCRA Manifests. The e-Manifest Final President Obama signed Executive In FY 2016, the Agency will continue to Rule of February 7, 2014 codified Order 13650, entitled Improving satisfy its overall directives under these certain provisions of the ‘‘Hazardous Chemical Facility Safety and Security authorities and highlights the following Waste Electronic Manifest (E.O. 13650 or the E.O.). The E.O. was actions in this Regulatory Plan: Establishment Act’’ (or the Act), which prompted by major chemical accidents, EPA’s Existing Chemicals directed the EPA to adopt a regulation such as the explosion at the West Management Program Under TSCA. As that authorized the use of electronic Fertilizer facility in West, Texas on part of EPA’s ongoing efforts to ensure manifests to track hazardous waste April 17, 2013. E.O. 13650 directs the the safety of chemicals, EPA plans to shipments nationwide. The Act also federal government to carry out a take a range of identified regulatory instructed the EPA to develop a user- number of tasks whose overall aim is to actions for certain chemicals and assess fee-funded e-Manifest system. Since the prevent chemical accidents. Among the other chemicals to determine if risk Act grants broad discretion to the EPA tasks discussed, the E.O. directs reduction action is needed to address to determine the fees and gives the agencies to consider possible changes to potential concerns. After completing Agency authority to collect such fees for existing chemical safety regulations, risk assessments and identifying both electronic manifests and any paper such as the EPA’s Risk Management concerns related to several specific uses manifests that continue in use, the EPA Plan (RMP) regulation (40 CFR part 68). of Trichloroethylene (TCE) and plans to issue a rulemaking to establish Both EPA and the Occupational methylene chloride, and n- the appropriate electronic and paper Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) methylpyrrolidone (NMP), EPA is

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77861

initiating action under TSCA section 6 reassessment that no longer meet the to provide the Agency with data needed to address these risks and determine TSCA standard. to determine the potential exposure and what requirements may be necessary to Enhancing Agricultural Worker effects of pesticides on bees and other adequately protect the public, workers, Protection. As a result of extensive important non-target insect pollinators. and the environment from unreasonable stakeholder engagement and public Pollinator insects are ecologically and risk of exposure to these chemicals. meetings, EPA is acting to enhance the economically important. Recognizing Addressing Formaldehyde Used in pesticide worker safety program. EPA heightened concerns for honey bees due Composite Wood Products. As directed plans to issue final amendments to the to pollinator declines and that the by the Formaldehyde Standards for agricultural worker protection science has now evolved to where Composite Wood Products Act of 2010, regulation that strengthens protections additional toxicity and exposure EPA is developing a final regulation to for agricultural farm workers and protocols are available, EPA issued address formaldehyde emissions from pesticide handlers. The revisions will interim study guidance for bees in 2011. hardwood plywood, particleboard and address key environmental justice EPA developed finalized guidance in medium-density fiberboard that is sold, concerns for a population that may be 2014 on the conduct of exposure and supplied, offered for sale, or disproportionately affected by pesticide effect studies used to characterize the manufactured in the United States. exposure. The final rule is expected to potential risk of pesticides to bees. The Lead-based Paint Program. EPA is improve pesticide safety training, use of development and implementation of developing a final rule that would personal protective equipment, and updates data requirements is intended implement several amendments to the access to decontamination supplies, and to provide the information the Agency EPA lead-based paint program that improve agricultural workers’ ability to needs to evaluate whether a proposed or would improve efficiencies and save protect themselves and their families existing use of a pesticide may have an resources for those involved. EPA from potential secondary exposure to unreasonable adverse effect on these proposed changes in 2014 to the EPA pesticides and pesticide residues. Other important insects and support pesticide lead-based paint program that would, changes are intended to bring hazard registration decisions under FIFRA. communications and respirator among other things, amend the requirements more in line with 5. Protecting Human Health and the renovation, repair and painting rule by Occupational Safety and Health Environment by Enforcing Laws and removing the requirement for hands-on Administration requirements and to Assuring Compliance refresher training for renovators so that clarify current requirements to facilitate they can take the refresher course online program implementation and Today’s pollution challenges require a and without the need to travel to a enforcement. modern approach to compliance, taking training facility for the hands-on Strengthening Pesticide Applicator advantage of new tools and approaches portion. EPA also proposed to amend Safety. As part of EPA’s effort to while strengthening vigorous the lead-based paint abatement program enhance the pesticide worker safety enforcement of environmental laws. by removing the requirement for firms, program, the Agency also proposed Next Generation Compliance is EPA’s training providers and individuals to revisions to the existing regulation integrated strategy to do that, designed apply for and be certified or accredited concerning the certification of to bring together the best thinking from in each EPA-administered jurisdiction applicators of restricted-use pesticides. inside and outside EPA. where they work (i.e., state, tribe or This proposed rule is intended to ensure EPA’s Next Generation Compliance territory where EPA runs the abatement that the federal certification standards consists of five interconnected program). In addition, as directed by adequately protect applicators, the components, each designed to improve TSCA section 402(c)(3), EPA is public and the environment from the effectiveness of our compliance developing a proposed rule to address potential risks associated with use of program: renovation or remodeling activities that restricted use pesticides. The proposed • Design regulations and permits that create lead-based paint hazards in pre- changes are intended to improve the are easier to implement, with a goal of 1978 public buildings and commercial competency of certified applicators of improved compliance and buildings. EPA previously issued a final restricted use pesticides, increase environmental outcomes. rule to address lead-based paint hazards protection for noncertified applicators created by these activities in target of restricted use pesticides operating • Use and promote advanced housing and child-occupied facilities. under the direct supervision of a emissions/pollutant detection Reassessment of PCB Use certified applicator through enhanced technology so that regulated entities, the Authorizations. When enacted in 1978, pesticide safety training and standards government, and the public can more TSCA banned the manufacture, for supervision of noncertified easily see pollutant discharges, processing, distribution in commerce, applicators, and establish a minimum environmental conditions, and and use of polychlorinated biphenyls age requirement for such noncertified noncompliance. (PCBs), except when uses would pose applicators. Also, in keeping with EPA’s • Shift toward electronic reporting to no unreasonable risk of injury to health commitment to work more closely with help make environmental reporting or the environment. EPA is reassessing tribal governments to strengthen more accurate, complete, and efficient certain ongoing, authorized uses of environmental protection in Indian while helping EPA and co-regulators PCBs that were established by Country, certain proposed changes are better manage information, improve regulation in 1979, including the use, intended to provide more practical effectiveness and transparency. distribution in commerce, marking and options for establishing certification • storage for reuse of liquid PCBs in programs in Indian Country. Expand transparency by making electric equipment, to determine Evaluating Pesticide Risks to Bees and information more accessible to the whether those authorized uses still meet Other Pollinators. As part of the efforts public. TSCA’s ‘‘no unreasonable risk’’ outlined in the ‘‘National Strategy to • Develop and use innovative standard. EPA plans to propose the Promote the Health of Honey Bees and enforcement approaches (e.g., data revocation or revision of any PCBs use Other Pollinators,’’ EPA is working to analytics and targeting) to achieve more authorizations included in this update its pesticide data requirements widespread compliance.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77862 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Retrospective Review of Existing identified as associated with Regulatory Plan but appear in EPA’s Regulations retrospective review and analysis in the semiannual regulatory agenda. These Pursuant to section 6 of Executive Agency’s final plan for retrospective rulemakings can also be found on Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and review of regulations, or one of its Regulations.gov. EPA’s final agency Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), the subsequent updates. Some of the entries plan can be found at: http://www.epa. following EPA actions have been on this list may not appear in The gov/regdarrt/retrospective/.

Regulatory Rulemaking title Identifier No. (RIN)

New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators—Amendments ...... 2060–AP06 Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events—Rule Revisions ...... 2060–AS02 Public Notice Provisions in CAA Permitting Programs ...... 2060–AS59 Regional Haze Regulations—Revision to SIP Submission Date and Requirements for Progress Reports ...... 2060–AS55 Title V Petitions Process Improvement Rulemaking ...... 2060–AS61 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions ...... 2040–AF15 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule ...... 2040–AF25 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Group Regulation of Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) ...... 2040–AF29 Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals ...... 2050–AG39 Hazardous Waste Export-Import Revisions Rule ...... 2050–AG77 Improvements to the Hazardous Waste Generator Regulatory Program (Parts 261–265) ...... 2050–AG70 Revisions to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle D Research, Demonstration & Development Permit Rule ...... 2050–AG75 Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators ...... 2070–AJ20 Lead; Lead-based Paint Program; Amendment to Jurisdiction-Specific Certification and Accreditation Requirements and Ren- ovator Refresher Training Requirements ...... 2070–AK02

AGGREGATION OF BENEFITS AND COSTS FROM MONETIZED RULES REPORTED IN THE REGULATORY PLAN

Benefits Costs Net benefits Rule Base year (millions $/year) (millions $/year) (millions $/year) Low High Low High Low High

Discount Rate = 3%

Oil and Gas Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources ...... 2012 $200 $210 $150 $170 $35 $42 GHG Emissions and Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines– Phase 2 * ...... 2012 3,700 4,900 (5,660) (7,300) 9,400 12,300 Model Trading Rules for GHG Emissions from EGUs Constructed Before 1–8– 14; Amendments...... 2012 3,564 8,249 2,546 1,426 1,018 6,823 Review of the National Ambient Air Qual- ity Standards for Lead ...... 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 GHG Endangerment Findings for Aircraft 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 RFS 2014–2016 ...... 2012 0 0 118 595 (118) (595) Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Ap- plicators ...... 2012 21 22 50 50 (28) (28) Formaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products ...... 2012 21 50 75 84 (62) (25) Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the Formaldehyde Standards ...... 2012 $0 $0 $0.04 $0.04 ($0.04) ($0.04)

Aggregate Estimates ...... 2012 7,507 13,431 (2,721) (4,975) 10,245 18,517

Discount Rate = 7%

Oil and Gas Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources ...... 2012 200 210 150 170 35 42 GHG Emissions and Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines– Phase 2 * ...... 2012 4,200 4,800 (6,000) (5,460) 10,100 10,200 Model Trading Rules for GHG Emissions from EGUs Constructed Before 1–8– 14; Amendments...... 2012 3,463 7,842 2,546 1,426 1,120 6,416 Review of the National Ambient Air Qual- ity Standards for Lead ...... 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 GHG Endangerment Findings for Aircraft 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 RFS 2014–2016 ...... 2012 0 0 118 595 (118) (595) Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Ap- plicators ...... 2012 21 22 50 50 (28) (28)

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77863

AGGREGATION OF BENEFITS AND COSTS FROM MONETIZED RULES REPORTED IN THE REGULATORY PLAN—Continued

Benefits Costs Net benefits Rule Base year (millions $/year) (millions $/year) (millions $/year) Low High Low High Low High

Formaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products ...... 2012 21 50 75 84 (62) (25) Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the Formaldehyde Standards ...... 2012 0 0 0.04 0.04 (0.04) (0.04)

Aggregate Estimates ...... 2012 7,905 12,923 (3,061) (3,135) 11,046 16,010 * In order to maintain consistency between the NHTSA’s and EPA’s analyses, the fuel savings values are treated as negative costs consistent with the information presented in the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the rulemaking (http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ- OAR-2014-0827-0243).

Burden Reduction International Regulatory Cooperation interstate transport with respect to the Activities 2008 ozone National Ambient Air As described above, EPA continues to EPA has considered international Quality Standards. This action will not review its existing regulations in an address the particulate matter National effort to achieve its mission in the most regulatory cooperation activities as described in Executive Order 13609 and Ambient Air Quality Standards. efficient means possible. To this end, Statement of Need: Interstate the Agency is committed to identifying has identified the following international activity that is anticipated transport poses significant challenges areas in its regulatory program where with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS significant savings or quantifiable to lead to a significant regulation in the following year: in the eastern United States, and this reductions in paperwork burdens might ozone pollution transport presents be achieved, as outlined in Executive Regulatory public health and welfare concerns. Orders 13563 and 13610, while Rulemaking title Identifier No. Summary of Legal Basis: The statutory protecting public health and our (RIN) authority for this proposed action is environment. provided by the CAA as amended (42 Formaldehyde Emission 2070–AJ44 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). Specifically, Rules Expected to Affect Small Entities Standards for Composite Wood Products. sections 110 and 301 of the CAA By better coordinating small business provide the primary statutory bases for activities, EPA aims to improve its this proposal. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), Streamlining the Export/Import Process technical assistance and outreach also known as the ‘‘good neighbor for America’s Businesses efforts, minimize burdens to small provision,’’ provides the basis for this businesses in its regulations, and EPA has considered import and proposed action. It requires that each simplify small businesses’ participation export streamlining activities as state SIP shall include provisions in its voluntary programs. Actions that described in Executive Order 13659 and sufficient to ‘‘prohibit . . . any source may affect small entities can be tracked identified the following rulemaking or other type of emissions activity on EPA’s Regulatory Development and activity: within the State from emitting any air Retrospective Review Tracker (http:// pollutants in amounts which will—(I) www.epa.gov/regdarrt/) at any time. Regulatory contribute significantly to Rulemaking title Identifier No. This Plan includes the following rules (RIN) nonattainment in, or interfere with that may be of particular interest to maintenance by, any other State with small entities: Hazardous Waste Export- 2050–AG77 respect to any [NAAQS].’’ Import Revisions Rule. Alternatives: Alternatives will be Regulatory identified as the proposal is developed. Rulemaking title Identifier No. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs (RIN) and benefits will be analyzed as the Formaldehyde Emission 2070–AJ44 EPA—AIR AND RADIATION (AR) proposal is developed. Risks: Risks will be analyzed as the Standards for Composite Proposed Rule Stage Wood Products. proposal is developed. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2060–AS16 104. Interstate Transport Rule for the Timetable: and Fuel Efficiency Stand- 2008 Ozone NAAQS ards for Medium- and Action Date FR Cite Heavy-Duty Engines and Priority: Economically Significant. Vehicles—Phase 2. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Oil and Natural Gas Sector: 2060–AS30 Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Final Rule ...... 08/00/16 Emission Standards for Clean Air Act New and Modified CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Sources. Legal Deadline: None. Required: No. Financial Responsibility Re- 2050–AG61 Abstract: This proposed rule would Small Entities Affected: No. quirements Under address Clean Air Act (CAA) Government Levels Affected: Federal. CERCLA Section 108(b) requirements concerning the transport Additional Information: Docket for Classes of Facilities in of air pollution across State boundaries. #:EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0500. the Hard Rock Mining In- It is the next step for the EPA to move dustry. Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel forward with the States to address Electric Power Generation

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00155 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77864 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

URL for More Information: http:// petitions pertaining to the previously 170,000 to 180,000 tons of VOC, and www.epa.gov/airtransport/ozone promulgated rule in 2012. EPA 1,900 to 2,500 tons of hazardous air transportNAAQS.html. proposed these amendments on August pollutants in 2025. The proposal’s Agency Contact: David Risley, 18, 2015. methane-related monetized climate Environmental Protection Agency, Air Summary of Legal Basis: New source benefits are estimated to be $460 to $550 and Radiation, 6204M, Washington, DC performance standards are issued under million in 2025. The estimate of total 20460, Phone: 202 343–9177, Email: CAA section 111. annualized engineering costs of the [email protected]. Alternatives: Alternatives for this final proposed NSPS (with gas savings) is RIN: 2060–AS05 rule have not yet been determined. The $320 to $420 million in 2025. The EPA proposed both methane and VOC quantified net benefits are estimated to standards for several emission sources be $120 to $150 million in 2025 using not currently covered by the NSPS (i.e., EPA—AR a 3 percent discount rate (model hydraulically fractured oil well average) for climate benefits. 105. Oil and Natural Gas Sector: completions, fugitive emissions from Risks: This action is a reconsideration Emission Standards for New and well sites and compressor stations, and of new source performance standards Modified Sources pneumatic pumps). In addition, the EPA and, thus, does not assess risk. proposed methane standards for certain Timetable: Priority: Economically Significant. emission sources that are currently Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. regulated for VOC (i.e., hydraulically Action Date FR Cite Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. fractured gas well completions, Clean Air Act equipment leaks at natural gas NPRM ...... 09/18/15 80 FR 56593 CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60. processing plants). The proposed NPRM Comment 11/17/15 Legal Deadline: None. amendments would establish methane Period End. Abstract: Consistent with the White standards for certain equipment across Final Rule ...... 06/00/16 House Methane Strategy and the January the source category and extend the 14, 2015, announcement of the EPA’s current VOC standards to the remaining Regulatory Flexibility Analysis approach to achieving methane and unregulated equipment. Lastly, Required: Yes. volatile organic compounds (VOC) amendments proposed to the current Small Entities Affected: Businesses. reductions from the oil and natural gas NSPS that improve implementation of Government Levels Affected: None. Additional Information: Docket #: sector, this action will finalize several aspects of the current standards. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0505. amendments to the 2012 new source Except for the implementation URL for More Information: performance standards (NSPS) for this improvements and the setting of www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas. sector. The proposed rule published 9/ standards for methane, these Agency Contact: Bruce Moore, 18/15, included methane and VOC amendments do not change the Environmental Protection Agency, Air standards for sources not covered by the requirements for operations already and Radiation, E143–01, Research 2012 Oil and Gas NSPS, such as covered by the current standards. The Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 completions of hydraulically fractured EPA has incorporated flexibility to the oil wells, pneumatic pumps and fugitive extent possible into the proposed rule 541–5460, Fax: 919 541–0246, Email: emissions at well sites and compressor affected sources can achieve emissions [email protected]. RIN: 2060–AS30 stations. The proposal also included reductions in a cost-effective way. In methane standards for sources covered additional to proposing alternatives in the 2012 NSPS. In addition, in options where possible, the EPA response to the reconsideration solicited comments on alternative EPA—AR petitions received for the 2012 NSPS approaches. We believe that affected 106. Model Trading Rules for and the 2013 amendments to the NSPS, sources already complying with more Greenhouse Gas Emissions From this proposal addressed the issues for stringent State requirements may also be Electric Utility Generating Units which the EPA is granting in compliance with this rule. Constructed on or Before January 8, reconsideration. Furthermore, the EPA is mindful that 2014 Statement of Need: This action some facilities that will be subject to the finalizes amendments the new source proposed EPA standards will also be Priority: Economically Significant. performance standards for the oil and subject to current or future requirements Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. natural gas source category by setting of the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. standards for both methane and volatile Land Management (BLM) rules covering CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62. organic compounds for certain production of natural gas on Federal Legal Deadline: None. equipment, processes, and activities lands. The EPA and BLM have Abstract: The EPA is planning a across this source category that were not maintained an ongoing dialogue during notice of final rulemaking for model covered in the 2012 rules. This action development of this action to identify rules to implement greenhouse gas responds to the 2014 Climate Action opportunities for alignment and ways to emission guidelines for existing fossil Plan: Strategy to Reduce Methane minimize potential conflicting fuel-fired electric generating units Emissions (the Methane Strategy). The requirements and will continue to (EGUs). Emission guidelines were Methane Strategy instructs the EPA to coordinate through the agencies’ signed 8/3/15 as the Carbon Pollution complete regulations pertaining to the respective proposals and final Emission Guidelines for Existing sources of methane in the oil and gas rulemakings. Stationary Sources: Electric Utility sector by the end of 2016. Specifically, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Generating Units (the Clean Power in January 2015, the Administration EPA is currently assessing the costs and Plan). This plan is part of the announced a new goal to cut methane benefits associated with the final action. President’s Climate Action Plan emissions from the oil and gas sector. The August 18, 2015, proposal announced in June 2013 to reduce Additionally, this action finalizes estimated the emission reductions are carbon emissions from the power sector certain issues raised in reconsideration 340,000 to 400,000 tons of methane, by 30 percent below 2005 levels. This

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00156 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77865

action offers States model trading rules in cases where the state fails to submit additional costs. States operating under that they can follow in developing their a satisfactory plan as the agency would a Federal plan may adopt own plans in order to capitalize on the have under CAA section 110(c) in the complementary measures outside of that flexibility built into the final Emission case of failure to submit an plan to facilitate compliance and lower Guidelines. implementation plan. In addition, the costs to the benefit of power generators Statement of Need: The Federal plan EPA has authority under CAA section and consumers. Implementing the and model trading rules proposal is part 111(d)(1) to prescribe regulations that proposed action will generate benefits of President Obama’s Climate Action establish procedures similar to CAA by reducing emissions of CO2 and Plan (CAP). The CAP called for the section 110 with respect to the criteria pollutant precursors, including reduction of carbon emissions from the submission of state plans, and the EPA sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and power sector by 30 percent below 2005 also has general rulemaking authority, directly emitted particles. The estimated levels. In this action, the EPA has as necessary, to implement the CAA benefits associated with these emission proposed a Federal plan to implement under CAA section 301. This rule will reductions are beyond those achieved the Clean Power Plan emission provide model rules that states can by previous EPA rulemakings including guidelines (EGs) for affected fossil fuel- tailor for implementation as a state plan the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards fired EGUs operating in States that do to ensure that emission standards under rule. The health and welfare benefits not have approved State plans. authority of section 111 of the CAA (the from reducing air pollution were Specifically, the EPA has co-proposed Clean Power Plan EGs) are implemented considered co-benefits for the proposal. two different approaches to a Federal for affected EGUs. We were only able to quantify the plan to implement the Clean Power Plan Alternatives: The final Clean Power climate benefits from reduced emissions EGs—a rate-based trading approach and Plan EGs are related to, but separate of CO2 and the health co-benefits a mass-based trading approach. The from the model trading rules and the associated with reduced exposure to proposal also serves to provide a model federal plan. The final EGs detail the PM2.5 and ozone. There were many rule that States can tailor for CO2 reduction goals for sources by state. additional benefits which we were not implementation as a State plan. A State The purpose of the model rules is to able to quantify, leading to an program that adheres to the model provide states an example that the states underestimate of monetized benefits. In trading rule provisions specified in this can follow in developing their own summary, we estimated the total rulemaking would be presumptively plans in order to capitalize on the combined climate benefits and health approvable. The Federal plan will flexibility built into the final Clean co-benefits for the rate-based Federal achieve the same levels of emissions Power Plan EGs. The purpose of the plan approach to be $3.5 to $4.6 billion performance as required of State plans federal plan is to lay out mechanisms to in 2020, $18 to $28 billion in 2025, and under the EGs. The agency has proposed achieve reductions in CO2 emissions $34 to $54 billion in 2030 (3 percent a finding that it is necessary or from affected EGUs that are not covered discount rate, 2011$). Total combined appropriate to implement a Clean Air by an EPA-approved state plan. The climate benefits and health co-benefits Act (CAA) section 111(d) Federal plan EPA has co-proposed two basic for the mass-based Federal plan for the affected EGUs located in Indian approaches to a federal plan, a rate- approach were estimated to be $5.3 to country. The agency has also proposed based emission trading program and a $8.1 billion in 2020, $19 to $29 billion certain enhancements to the process and mass-based emission trading program. in 2025, and $32 to $48 billion in 2030 timing for State submittals and EPA Within these two approaches, the EPA (3 percent discount rate, 2011$). action in the CAA section 111(d) has presented a range of options for Risks: The risk addressed is the framework regulations of 40 CFR part comment through which affected EGUs current and future threat of climate 60, subpart B (these proposals are not a would meet a rate-based goal or a mass- change to public health and welfare, as part of the Federal plan or model based equivalent. The EPA has demonstrated in the 2009 Endangerment trading rules). incorporated flexibility to the extent and Cause or Contribute Finding for Summary of Legal Basis: Greenhouse possible into the proposed federal plan Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) gas (GHG) pollution threatens the so affected units can achieve these of the Clean Air Act. The EPA made this American public’s health and welfare by reductions in a cost-effective way. contributing to long-lasting changes in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The determination based primarily upon the our climate that can have a range of EPA estimated the annual incremental recent, major assessments by the U.S. negative effects on human health and compliance cost for the rate-based Global Change Research Program the environment. The U.S. Supreme Federal plan approach to be $2.5 billion (USGCRP), the National Research Court ruled that GHGs meet the in 2020, $1.0 billion in 2025 and $8.4 Council (NRC) of the National definition of ‘‘air pollutant’’ in the CAA, billion in 2030. The EPA estimated the Academies and the Intergovernmental and this decision clarified that the annual incremental compliance cost for Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). CAA’s authorities and requirements the mass-based Federal plan approach Timetable: apply to GHG emissions. GHGs, to be $1.4 billion in 2020, $3.0 billion Action Date FR Cite including carbon dioxide (CO2) from in 2025, and $5.1 billion in 2030. The power plants, may persist in the Federal plan would be implemented NPRM ...... 10/23/15 80 FR 64965 atmosphere from decades to millennia, only in those States that do not have a NPRM Comment 01/21/16 depending on the specific GHG. This fully approved State plan as required Period End. special characteristic makes it crucial to under the final Clean Power Plan. In Final Rule ...... 08/00/16 take initial steps now to limit GHG those States where a Federal plan may emissions from fossil fuel-fired power be required, a final Federal plan will Regulatory Flexibility Analysis plants, specifically emissions of CO2, implement the same emission Required: No. since they are the nation’s largest guidelines for affected power plants Small Entities Affected: No. sources of carbon pollution. Section outlined in the Clean Power Plan. The Government Levels Affected: Federal, 111(d)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. model trading rules and the Federal Local, State, Tribal. 7411(d)(2), provides the EPA the same plan would not require additional Agency Contact: Toni Jones, authority to prescribe a plan for a state control requirements or impose Environmental Protection Agency, Air

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00157 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77866 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

and Radiation, E143–03, Research Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Air RIN: 2060–AS72 Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 Act section 211(o) requires EPA to 541–0316, Fax: 919 541–3470, Email: implement the Renewable Fuels [email protected]. Standard Program. The CAA requires EPA—OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY Nicholas Swanson, Environmental that the Agency set annual volume AND POLLUTION PREVENTION Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, requirements for four different (OCSPP) E143–03, Research Triangle Park, NC categories of renewable fuels: cellulosic 27711, Phone: 919 541–4080, Fax: 919 biofuel, biomass based diesel (BBD), Proposed Rule Stage 541–1039, Email: swanson.nicholas@ advanced biofuel, and total renewable 108. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); epa.gov. fuel. The statute requires the standards Reassessment of use Authorizations RIN: 2060–AS47 be finalized by November 30 of the year prior to the year in which the standards Priority: Other Significant. Major would apply. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Alternatives: Application of specific undetermined. EPA—AR provisions for this program are set forth Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. 107. • Proposed Renewable Fuel in the law. The law requires standards Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Volume Standards for 2017 and be established annually. The only Substances Control Act Biomass Based Diesel Volume (BBD) for CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761. alternatives authorized under the law Legal Deadline: None. 2018 are those which allow for waiving in Abstract: The EPA’s regulations Priority: Other Significant. whole or in part the volumes of governing the use of polychlorinated Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7619 Clean renewable fuel for which the standards biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical Air Act apply. equipment and other applications were CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: first issued in the late 1970s and have Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Illustrative cost scenarios will be not been updated since 1998. The EPA November 30, 2015. Statutory November prepared during development of the has initiated rulemaking to reassess the 30. rule. The short time frame provided for ongoing authorized uses of PCBs to Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires the annual renewable fuel rule process determine whether certain use the EPA to promulgate regulations that does not allow sufficient time for EPA authorizations should be ended or specify the annual volume requirements to conduct a comprehensive analysis of phased out because they can no longer for renewable fuels under the the benefits of the standards, and the be justified under section 6(e) of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) statute does not require it. Moreover, the Toxic Substances Control Act, which program. Standards are to be set for four costs and benefits of the RFS program as requires that the authorized use will not different categories of renewable fuels: a whole are best assessed when the present an unreasonable risk of injury to cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel program is fully mature in 2022. We health and the environment. As the first (BBD), advanced biofuel, and total continue to believe that this is the case, step in this reassessment, the EPA renewable fuel. The statute requires the as the annual standard-setting process published an Advanced Notice of standards be finalized by November 30 encourages consideration of the program Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in of the year prior to the year in which the on a piecemeal (i.e., year to year) basis, 2010. The EPA reviewed and considered standards would apply. In the case of which may not reflect the long-term all comments received on the ANPRM biomass-based diesel, the statute economic effects of the program. in planning the current rulemaking. requires applicable volumes be set no Therefore, for the purpose of the annual This action will address the following later than 14 months before the year for rulemaking, we are preparing specific areas: (1) The use, distribution which the requirements would apply. illustrative cost impacts. in commerce, marking and storage for This action would propose the Risks: Failure to set RFS annual reuse of liquid PCBs in electric applicable volumes for all renewable standards would create uncertainty in equipment; (2) improvements to the fuel categories for 2017, and would also the marketplace as to the volumes of existing use authorization for natural proposed the BBD standard for 2018. renewable fuels that are required for gas pipelines; and (3) definitional and Statement of Need: The Clean Air Act blending in transportation fuels. other regulatory ‘‘fixes.’’ The section 211(o) specifies annual volume Timetable: reassessment of use authorizations requirements for renewable fuels under related to liquid PCBs in equipment will Action Date FR Cite the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) focus on small capacitors in fluorescent program. Standards are to be set for four NPRM ...... 06/00/16 light ballasts, large capacitors, different categories of renewable fuels: Final Rule ...... 12/00/16 transformers and other electrical cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel equipment. In addition, revised testing, (BBD), advanced biofuel, and total Regulatory Flexibility Analysis characterization, and reporting renewable fuel. The statute requires the Required: No. requirements for PCBs in natural gas standards be finalized by November 30 Small Entities Affected: No. pipeline systems to provide more of the year prior to the year in which the Government Levels Affected: None. transparency for the Agency and the standards would apply. In the case of Agency Contact: David Korotney, public when PCB releases occur will be biomass-based diesel, the statute Environmental Protection Agency, Air considered. Consistent with Executive requires applicable volumes be set no and Radiation, N27, Ann Arbor, MI Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation later than 14 months before the year for 48105, Phone: 734 214–4507, Email: and Regulatory Review’’, wherever which the requirements would apply. [email protected]. possible and consistent with the overall This action would, as required by law, Paul Argyropoulos, Environmental objectives of this rulemaking, the propose the applicable volumes for all Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Agency will also eliminate or fix renewable fuel categories for 2017, and 6401A, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: regulatory inefficiencies noted by the would also proposed the BBD standard 202 564–1123, Email: Agency or in public comments on the for 2018. [email protected]. ANPRM.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00158 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77867

Statement of Need: The EPA is Scientific, and Technical Services; 92 uses, as a spotting agent in dry cleaning, reassessing authorized uses of PCBs to Public Administration; 53 Real Estate and in certain consumer products determine whether certain uses should and Rental and Leasing; 811 Repair and would pose an unreasonable risk to be ended or phased out because they Maintenance; 48–49 Transportation and human health and the environment. can no longer be justified under section Warehousing; 22 Utilities; 562 Waste Summary of Legal Basis: Section 6 of 6(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Management and Remediation Services. the Toxic Substances Control Act Act, which requires that the authorized URL for More Information: http:// provides authority for the EPA to ban or use will not present an unreasonable www.epa.gov/pcb. restrict the manufacture (including risk of injury to health and the Agency Contact: Sara Kemme, import), processing, distribution in environment. A rulemaking is needed to Environmental Protection Agency, commerce, and use of chemicals, as well revise or revoke any PCB use Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution as any manner or method of disposal. authorizations that no longer meet the Prevention, 7404T, Washington, DC Alternatives: Alternatives will be TSCA unreasonable risk standard. 20460, Phone: 202 566–0511, Fax: 202 developed as part of the development of Summary of Legal Basis: The 566–0473, Email: [email protected]. a proposed rule. authority for this action comes from Peter Gimlin, Environmental Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The TSCA section 6(e)(2)(B) and (C) of TSCA Protection Agency, Office of Chemical EPA will prepare a regulatory impact (15 U.S.C. 605(e)(2)(B) and (C)), as well Safety and Pollution Prevention, 7404T, analysis as part of the development of as TSCA section 6(e)(1)(B) (15 U.S.C. Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566– a proposed rule. 2605(e)(1)(B)). 0515, Fax: 202 566–0473, Email: Risks: In the published TCE Risk Alternatives: The EPA published an [email protected]. Assessment, the EPA identified Advanced Notice of Proposed RIN: 2070–AJ38 significant risks to human health in Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 7, 2010, occupational, consumer and residential and took comment through August 20, settings. The risk assessment identified health risks from TCE exposures to 2010. EPA reviewed and considered all EPA—OCSPP consumers using aerosol degreasers and comments received on the ANPRM in spray fixatives, and health risks to planning the current rulemaking. 109. Trichloroethylene (TCE); workers when TCE is used in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(a) commercial shops and as a stain EPA is currently evaluating the costs Priority: Other Significant. Major removing agent in dry cleaning. and benefits of this action. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Timetable: Risks: The EPA is currently evaluating undetermined. the possible risks presented by ongoing Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Action Date FR Cite uses of PCBs. PCB exposures can cause Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic significant human health and ecological Substances Control Act NPRM ...... 03/00/16 effects. The EPA and the International CFR Citation: 40 CFR NYD. Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Legal Deadline: None. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis have characterized some commercial Abstract: Section 6 of the Toxic Required: Undetermined. Government Levels Affected: PCB mixtures as probably carcinogenic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides Undetermined. to humans. In addition to authority for the EPA to ban or restrict carcinogenicity, potential effects of PCB Federalism: Undetermined. the manufacture (including import), Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical exposure include neurotoxicity, processing, distribution in commerce, reproductive and developmental Manufacturing. and use of chemicals, as well as any URL for More Information: http:// toxicity, immune system suppression, manner or method of disposal. The EPA liver damage, skin irritation, and www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/. identified trichloroethylene (TCE) for Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic, endocrine disruption. PCBs persist in risk evaluation as part of its Work Plan Environmental Protection Agency, the environment for long periods of time for Chemical Assessment under TSCA. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution and bioaccumulate, especially in fish TCE is used in industrial and Prevention, 7405M, Washington, DC and marine animals. PCBs are also commercial processes, and also has 20460, Phone: 202 564–0984, Email: readily transported across long some limited uses in consumer [email protected]. distances in the environment, and can products. In the June 2014 TSCA Work Katherine Sleasman, Environmental easily cycle between air, water, and soil. Plan Chemical Risk Assessment for TCE, Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Timetable: the EPA identified risks associated with Safety and Pollution Prevention, 7405M, commercial degreasing and some Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– Action Date FR Cite consumer uses. EPA is initiating 7716, Fax: 202 564–4775, Email: ANPRM ...... 04/07/10 75 FR 17645 rulemaking under TSCA section 6 to [email protected]. Second ANPRM .. 06/16/10 75 FR 34076 address these risks, if the EPA finds that RIN: 2070–AK03 NPRM ...... 06/00/16 there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the risks to human health or the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis environment are unreasonable. EPA—OCSPP Required: Undetermined. Statement of Need: In the June 2014 Government Levels Affected: Local, TSCA Work Plan Chemical Risk 110. N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and State, Tribal. Assessment for TCE, the EPA identified Methylene Chloride; Rulemaking Under Federalism: This action may have risks associated with commercial TSCA Section 6(A) federalism implications as defined in degreasing and some consumer uses. Priority: Other Significant. Major E.O. 13132. The EPA is initiating a rulemaking status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Additional Information: Docket #: under TSCA section 6 to address these undetermined. EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0757. risks. Specifically, the EPA will Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Sectors Affected: 31–33 determine whether the continued use of Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Manufacturing; 54 Professional, TCE in some commercial degreasing Substances Control Act

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00159 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77868 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

CFR Citation: 40 CFR NYD. NMP in occupational, consumer and processing facilities. These regulations Legal Deadline: None. residential settings. will help ensure that businesses make Abstract: Section 6 of the Toxic Timetable: financial arrangements to address risks Substances Control Act provides from hazardous substances at their sites, authority for the EPA to ban or restrict Action Date FR Cite and encourage businesses to improve the manufacture (including import), their management of hazardous NPRM ...... 03/00/16 processing, distribution in commerce, substances. and use of chemicals, as well as any Summary of Legal Basis: Section Regulatory Flexibility Analysis manner or method of disposal of 108(b) of the Comprehensive Required: Undetermined. chemicals. The EPA identified n- Environmental Response, Government Levels Affected: methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and Undetermined. Compensation, and Liability Act methylene chloride for risk evaluation Federalism: Undetermined. (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, as part of its TSCA Work Plan for Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical establishes certain regulatory authorities Chemical Assessments. NMP and Manufacturing. concerning financial responsibility methylene chloride are used in URL for More Information: http:// requirements. Specifically, the statutory commercial processes and in consumer www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/. language addresses the promulgation of products in residential settings. In the Agency Contact: Niva Kramek, regulations that require classes of August 2014 TSCA Work Plan Chemical Environmental Protection Agency, facilities to establish and maintain Risk Assessment for methylene chloride Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution evidence of financial responsibility and the March 2015 TSCA Work Plan Prevention, 7506P, Washington, DC consistent with the degree and duration Chemical Risk Assessment for NMP, the 20460, Phone: 703 605–1193, Fax: 703 of risk associated with the production, EPA identified risks associated with 305–5884, Email: [email protected]. transportation, treatment, storage, or commercial and consumer paint and Katherine Sleasman, Environmental disposal of hazardous substances. varnish stripping uses. The EPA is Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Alternatives: The EPA is considering initiating rulemaking under TSCA Safety and Pollution Prevention, 7405M, proposing for comment alternatives for section 6 to address these risks, if the Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– allowable types of financial EPA finds that there is a reasonable 7716, Fax: 202 564–4775, Email: instruments. basis to conclude that the risks to [email protected]. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The human health or the environment are RIN: 2070–AK07 EPA expects that the primary costs of unreasonable. the rule will be the costs to facilities for Statement of Need: The EPA procuring required financial identified n-methylpyrrolidone and instruments. The EPA also expects to methylene chloride for risk evaluation EPA—SOLID WASTE AND incur administrative and oversight as part of its Work Plan for Chemical EMERGENCY RESPONSE (SWER) costs. These regulations will help Assessments under TSCA. In the August Proposed Rule Stage ensure that businesses make financial 2014 Risk Assessment for methylene arrangements to address risks from chloride and March 2015 Risk 111. Financial Responsibility hazardous substances at their sites, and Assessment for NMP, the EPA identified Requirements Under CERCLA Section encourage businesses to improve their risks associated with commercial and 108(B) for Classes of Facilities in the management of hazardous substances. consumer paint removal uses. The EPA Hard Rock Mining Industry Risks: EPA’s 108(b) rules are intended is initiating rulemaking under TSCA Priority: Economically Significant. to address the risks associated with the section 6 to address these risks. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. production, transportation, treatment, Specifically, the EPA will determine Unfunded Mandates: This action may storage or disposal of hazardous whether the use of NMP or methylene affect the private sector under Pub. L. substances at hard rock mining and chloride in commercial and consumer 104–4. mineral processing facilities. paint removal poses an unreasonable Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601 et Timetable: risk to human health and the seq.; 42 U.S.C. 9608(b) environment. CFR Citation: None. Action Date FR Cite Summary of Legal Basis: Section 6 of Legal Deadline: None. the Toxic Substances Control Act Abstract: Section 108(b) of the Notice ...... 07/28/09 74 FR 37213 provides authority for the EPA to ban or Comprehensive Environmental NPRM ...... 08/00/16 restrict the manufacture (including Response, Compensation, and Liability import), processing, distribution in Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis commerce, and use of chemicals, as well establishes certain authorities Required: Yes. as any manner or method of disposal. concerning financial responsibility Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Alternatives: Alternatives will be requirements. The Agency has Government Levels Affected: Federal. developed as part of the development of identified classes of facilities within the Federalism: This action may have a proposed rule. hard rock mining industry as those for federalism implications as defined in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The which financial responsibility E.O. 13132. EPA will prepare a regulatory impact requirements will be first developed. Additional Information: Docket analysis as part of the development of EPA intends to include requirements for #:EPA–HQ–SFUND–2009–0265. Split a proposed rule. financial responsibility, as well as from RIN 2050–AG56. Risks: As indicated in the published notification and implementation. Sectors Affected: 212 Mining (except Risk Assessments and supplemental Statement of Need: EPA’s 108(b) rules Oil and Gas); 331 Primary Metal analyses for these chemicals, the EPA will address the degree and duration of Manufacturing. determined that there is risk of adverse risks associated with aspects of URL for More Information: http:// human health effects (acute and hazardous substance management at www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ chronic) for methylene chloride and hard rock mining and mineral financialresponsibility/.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00160 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77869

URL for Public Comments: http:// Manifest Final rule, in order to comply and utilize manifest data for program www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; with the Hazardous Waste Electronic management purposes. D=EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0265-0001. Manifest Establishment Act, which Risks: This action does not address Agency Contact: Ben Lesser, required the EPA to issue a regulation any particular risks in the EPA’s Environmental Protection Agency, Solid authorizing electronic manifests by jurisdiction as it does not change Waste and Emergency Response, 5302P, October 5, 2013. In issuing that rule, the existing requirements for manifesting Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 308– EPA completed an important step that hazardous waste shipments. It will 0314, Email: [email protected]. must precede the development of a merely propose for comment our fee Barbara Foster, Environmental national e-Manifest system, as required methodology for setting the appropriate Protection Agency, Solid Waste and by the Hazardous Waste Electronic fees of electronic manifests, and paper Emergency Response, 5304P, Manifest Establishment Act. This rule is manifests that continue in use, at such Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 308– the second regulation that must precede time as the system to receive them is 7057, Email: the development of the e-Manifest built and operational. [email protected]. system. This action will implement the Timetable: RIN: 2050–AG61 broad discretion granted on the Agency to establish reasonable user fees for the Action Date FR Cite various activities associated with using NPRM ...... 05/00/16 EPA—SWER and submitting electronic and paper manifests to the national system. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 112. User Fee Schedule for Electronic Additionally, OMB Circular A–25 on Hazardous Waste Manifest Required: Undetermined. User Charges provides that agencies of Government Levels Affected: Federal, Priority: Other Significant. Major the Executive Branch must generally set State, Local. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is user fee charges or fees through Additional Information: Docket undetermined. regulation. #:EPA–HQ–RCRA–2001–0032. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6939(g) Summary of Legal Basis: Section 2(c) Sectors Affected: 11 Agriculture, CFR Citation: Undetermined. of the e-Manifest Act authorizes the EPA Forestry, Fishing and Hunting; 21 Legal Deadline: None. to impose on manifest users reasonable Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Abstract: After promulgation of the user fees to pay any costs incurred in Extraction; 22 Utilities; 23 Construction; first e-Manifest regulation in February developing, operating, maintaining, and 31–33 Manufacturing; 42 Wholesale 2014 to authorize the use of electronic upgrading the system, including any Trade; 44–45 Retail Trade; 48–49 manifests and to codify key provisions costs incurred in collecting and Transportation and Warehousing; 51 of the Hazardous Waste Electronic processing data from any paper manifest Information; 562 Waste Management Manifest Establishment Act (or Act), the submitted to the system. Thus, this and Remediation Services; 92 Public EPA is moving forward on the Action will implement the broad Administration. development of the separate e-Manifest discretion granted on the Agency to URL for More Information: http:// User Fee Schedule Regulation. The Act establish reasonable user fees for the www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/ authorizes the EPA to impose on various activities associated with using transportation/manifest/e-man.htm. manifest users reasonable service fees and submitting electronic and paper Agency Contact: Rich LaShier, that are necessary to pay costs incurred manifests to the national system. Environmental Protection Agency, Solid in developing, operating, maintaining Alternatives: The EPA plans to issue Waste and Emergency Response, 5304P, and upgrading the system, including rulemaking to establish the appropriate Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 308– costs incurred in collecting and electronic manifest and paper manifest 8796, Fax: 703 308–0514, Email: processing data from any paper manifest fees. The EPA plans to propose for [email protected]. submitted to the system after the date on comment alternatives for imposing and Bryan Groce, Environmental which the system enters operation. The collecting electronic manifest and paper Protection Agency, Solid Waste and agency plans to issue both a proposed fees. Emergency Response, 5304P, and final rule in setting the appropriate Anticipated Cost and Benefits: When Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 308– electronic manifest and manifest fees. the e-Manifest Final Rule was published 8750, Fax: 703 308–0514, Email: The EPA intends to propose for in February 2014, the Agency deferred [email protected]. comment the fee methodology for the development of the detailed risk RIN: 2050–AG80 establishing the electronic manifest and impact analysis (RIA) for the e-Manifest paper service fees. The agency plans in system until the User Fee Schedule a final rule to establish a program of fees Rule. Thus, the RIA for the proposed EPA—SWER that will be imposed on users of the e- User Fee Schedule Rule will not be manifest system and announce the user limited to the impacts of the user fees 113. Modernization of the Accidental fee schedule for manifest-related announced in the rule, but will also Release Prevention Regulations Under activities, including activities associated estimate the costs and benefits of the Clean Air Act with the collection and processing of overall e-Manifest system. The primary Priority: Economically Significant. paper manifests submitted to the EPA. costs in the e-Manifest RIA will be the Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. The agency also plans in that final rule cost to build the system, the costs for Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. to announce (1) the date upon which the industry and state governments to Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412(r) EPA will be ready to transmit and connect to the system, and the cost to CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68. receive manifests through the national run the system. The most significant Legal Deadline: None. e-Manifest system and (2) the date upon benefit of the e-Manifest system Abstract: In response to Executive which the user community must comply estimated in the RIA will be reduced Order 13650, the EPA is considering with the new e-Manifest regulation. burden for industry to comply with potential revisions to its Risk Statement of Need: On February 7, RCRA manifesting requirements, and Management Program regulations and 2014, the EPA promulgated the e- the reduced burden on states that collect related programs. The Agency may

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00161 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77870 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

consider the addition of new accident address some issues that may be raised Manufacturing; 42471 Petroleum Bulk prevention or emergency response in the proposed action. Stations and Terminals; 32411 program elements, and/or changes to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs Petroleum Refineries; 311615 Poultry existing elements, and/or other changes will include the burden on regulated Processing; 49312 Refrigerated to the existing regulatory provisions. entities associated with implementing Warehousing and Storage; 22132 Statement of Need: In response to new or revised requirements, including Sewage Treatment Facilities; 11511 Executive Order 13650, the EPA is program implementation, training, Support Activities for Crop Production; considering potential revisions to its equipment purchases, and 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Risk Management Program regulations. recordkeeping, as applicable. Some Systems. The Executive Order establishes the costs will also accrue to implementing URL for More Information: http:// Chemical Facility Safety and Security agencies and local governments, due to www2.epa.gov/rmp. Working Group (‘‘Working Group’’), co- enhanced local coordination and Agency Contact: James Belke, chaired by the Secretary of Homeland recordkeeping requirements. Benefits Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Security, the Administrator of the EPA, will result from avoiding the harmful Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, and the Secretary of Labor or their accident consequences to communities Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– designated representatives at the and the environment, such as deaths, 8023, Fax: 202 564–8444, Email: Assistant Secretary level or higher, and injuries, and property damage, [email protected]. composed of senior representatives of environmental damage, and from Kathy Franklin, Environmental other federal departments, agencies, and mitigating the effects of releases that Protection Agency, Solid Waste and offices. The Executive Order requires may occur. Emergency Response, 5104A, the Working Group to carry out a Risks: The proposed action will Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– number of tasks whose overall goal is to address the risks associated with 7987, Fax: 202 564–2625, Email: prevent chemical accidents, such as the accidental releases of listed regulated [email protected]. explosion that occurred at the West toxic and flammable substances to the RIN: 2050–AG82 Fertilizer facility in West, Texas, on air from stationary sources. Substances April 17, 2013, which killed 15 people, regulated under the RMP program injured many others, and did extensive include highly toxic and flammable damage to the town. Section 6(a)(i) of substances that can cause deaths, EPA—AIR AND RADIATION (AR) the Executive Order requires the injuries, property and environmental Final Rule Stage Working Group to develop options for damage, and other on- and off-site improved chemical facility safety and consequences if accidentally released. 114. Review of the National Ambient security that identify ‘‘improvements to The proposed action will reduce these Air Quality Standards for Lead existing risk management practices risks by making accidental releases less Priority: Other Significant. Major through agency programs, private sector likely, and by mitigating the severity of status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is initiatives, Government guidance, releases that may occur. The proposed undetermined. outreach, standards, and regulations.’’ action would not address the risks of Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7408; 42 Section 6(c) of Executive Order 13650 non-accidental chemical releases, U.S.C. 7409 requires the Administrator of the EPA to accidental releases of non-regulated review the RMP Program (RMP). CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50. substances, chemicals released to other Legal Deadline: None. Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Air media, and air releases from mobile Act Section 112(r)(7) authorizes the EPA Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act sources. Amendments of 1977, the EPA is Administrator to promulgate regulations Timetable: to prevent accidental releases. Section required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality criteria for the 112(r)(7)(A) authorizes release Action Date FR Cite prevention, detection, and correction primary (health-based) and secondary requirements that may include a broad NPRM ...... 11/00/15 (welfare-based) national ambient air range of methods, make distinctions quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 among classes and types of facilities, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis years. On November 12, 2008, the EPA and may take into consideration other Required: Undetermined. published a final rule to revise the factors, including, but not limited to, Government Levels Affected: Federal, primary and secondary NAAQS for lead size, location, process and substance Local, State, Tribal. to provide increased protection for factors, and response capabilities. Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical public health and welfare. The EPA has Section 112(r)(7)(B) authorizes Manufacturing; 49313 Farm Product now initiated the next review. This new reasonable regulations and appropriate Warehousing and Storage; 42491 Farm review includes the preparation of an guidance to provide, to the greatest Supplies Merchant Wholesalers; 311511 Integrated Review Plan, an Integrated extent practicable, for the prevention Fluid Milk Manufacturing; 311 Food Science Assessment, and, if warranted, and detection of accidental releases of Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil Fuel a Risk/Exposure Assessment, and also a regulated substances and for response to Electric Power Generation; 311411 Policy Assessment Document by the such releases by the owners or operators Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable EPA, with opportunities for review by of the sources of such releases. Manufacturing; 49311 General EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Alternatives: The EPA is considering Warehousing and Storage; 31152 Ice Committee and the public. These revisions to the accident prevention, Cream and Frozen Dessert documents inform the Administrator’s emergency response, recordkeeping, and Manufacturing; 311612 Meat Processed proposed decision as to whether to other provisions in 40 CFR part 68 to from Carcasses; 211112 Natural Gas retain or revise the standards. The address chemical accident risks. The Liquid Extraction; 32519 Other Basic proposed decision was published in the proposed action will contain the EPA’s Organic Chemical Manufacturing; 42469 Federal Register with opportunity preferred option, as well as alternative Other Chemical and Allied Products provided for public comment. The regulatory options. The EPA also is Merchant Wholesalers; 49319 Other Administrator’s final decisions will take considering publishing guidance to Warehousing and Storage; 322 Paper into consideration these documents and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00162 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77871

public comment on the proposed Action Date FR Cite Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles (75 decision. FR 57106, September 15, 2011). Statement of Need: Under the Clean Final Rule ...... 06/00/16 Statement of Need: Under Clean Air Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is Act authority, the EPA has determined required to review and if appropriate Regulatory Flexibility Analysis that emissions of greenhouse gases revise the air quality criteria for the Required: No. (GHG) from new motor vehicles and primary (health-based) and secondary Small Entities Affected: No. engines cause or contribute to air (welfare-based) national ambient air Government Levels Affected: State. pollution that may reasonably be quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 Additional Information: Docket anticipated to endanger public health years. In the last lead NAAQS review, #:EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0108. and welfare. Therefore, there is a need EPA published a final rule on November URL for More Information: http:// to reduce GHG emissions from medium- 12, 2008, to revise the primary and www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/ and heavy-duty vehicles to protect secondary NAAQS for lead to provide s_pb_index.html. public health and welfare. The medium- increased protection for public health Agency Contact: Deirdre Murphy, and heavy-duty truck sector accounts and welfare. Environmental Protection Agency, Air for approximately 23 percent of the U.S. Summary of Legal Basis: Under the and Radiation, C539–02, Research mobile source GHG emissions and is the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Triangle Park, NC 27709, Phone: 919 second-largest mobile source sector. EPA is required to review and if 541–0729, Fax: 919 541–0840, Email: GHG emissions from this sector are appropriate revise the air quality criteria [email protected]. forecast to continue increasing rapidly; for the primary (health-based) and Ginger Tennant, Environmental reflecting the anticipated impact of secondary (welfare-based) national Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, factors such as economic growth and ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) C504–06, Research Triangle Park, NC increased movement of freight by every 5 years. 27711, Phone: 919 541–4072, Fax: 919 trucks. This rulemaking would Alternatives: The main alternative for 541–0237, Email: significantly reduce GHG emissions the Administrator’s decision on the [email protected]. from future medium- and heavy-duty review of the national ambient air RIN: 2060–AQ44 vehicles by setting GHG standards that quality standards for lead is whether to will lead to the introduction of GHG- retain or revise the existing standards. reducing vehicle and engine Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The technologies. Clean Air Act makes clear that the EPA—AR Summary of Legal Basis: The Clean economic and technical feasibility of 115. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Air Act section 202(a)(1) states that attaining standards are not to be Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- ‘‘The Administrator shall by regulation considered in setting or revising the and Heavy-Duty Engines and prescribe (and from time to time revise) NAAQS, although such factors may be Vehicles—Phase 2 in accordance with the provisions of considered in the development of state Priority: Economically Significant. this section, standards applicable to the plans to implement the standards. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. emission of any air pollutant from any Accordingly, when the Agency proposes Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. class or classes of new motor vehicles or revisions to the standards, the Agency Clean Air Act new motor vehicle engines, which in his prepares cost and benefit information in CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1036; 40 CFR judgment cause, or contribute to, air order to provide states information that 1037; 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 22; 40 CFR 85; pollution which may reasonably be may be useful in considering different 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 600; 40 CFR 1033; anticipated to endanger public health or implementation strategies for meeting 40 CFR 1039; 40 CFR 1042; 40 CFR welfare.’’ Section 202(a) covers all on- proposed or final standards. In those 1043; 40 CFR 1065; 40 CFR 1066; 40 highway vehicles including medium- instances, cost and benefit information CFR 1068. and heavy-duty trucks. In April 2007, is generally included in the regulatory Legal Deadline: None. the Supreme Court found in analysis accompanying the final rule. Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse Risks: As part of the review, the EPA Abstract: During the President’s gases fit well within the Act’s definition prepares an Integrated Review Plan, an second term, the EPA and the of ‘‘air pollutant’’ and that EPA has Integrated Science Assessment, and, if Department of Transportation, in close statutory authority to regulate emission warranted, a Risk/Exposure Assessment, coordination with the California Air of such gases from new motor vehicles. and also a Policy Assessment document, Resources Board, are developing a Lastly, in April 2009, EPA issued the with opportunities for review by the comprehensive National Program for Proposed Endangerment and Cause-or- EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Committee and the public. These Greenhouse Gas Emission and Fuel Gases under the Clean Air Act. The documents will inform the Efficiency Standards for model years endangerment proposal stated that Administrator’s decision as to whether beyond 2018. These second sets of greenhouse gases from new motor to retain or revise the standards. The standards would further reduce vehicles and engines cause or contribute proposed decision was published in the greenhouse gas emissions and fuel to air pollution that may reasonably be Federal Register with opportunity consumption from a wide range of on- anticipated to endanger public health provided for public comment. The road vehicles from semi-trucks to the and welfare. Administrator’s final decisions will take largest pickup trucks and vans, and all into consideration these documents and types and sizes of work trucks and Alternatives: The rulemaking will public comment on the proposed buses. This action will be in continued include an evaluation of regulatory decision. response to the President’s directive to alternatives. In addition, the rule is Timetable: take coordinated steps to produce a new expected to include tools such as generation of clean vehicles. This action averaging, banking, and trading of Action Date FR Cite follows the first ever Greenhouse Gas emissions credits as an alternative Emissions Standards and Fuel approach for compliance with the NPRM ...... 01/05/15 80 FR 277 Efficiency Standards for Medium- and program.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00163 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77872 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Anticipated Cost and Benefits: which the requirements would apply. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Detailed analysis of economy-wide cost This action would finalize the Government Levels Affected: None. impacts, greenhouse gas emission applicable volumes for all renewable Energy Effects: Statement of Energy reductions, and societal benefits will be fuel categories for 2014, 2015 and 2016, Effects planned as required by Executive performed during development of the and would also finalize the BBD Order 13211. rule. standard for 2017. International Impacts: This regulatory Risks: The failure to set new GHG Statement of Need: The Clean Air Act action will be likely to have standards for medium- and heavy-duty Section 211(o) specifies annual volume international trade and investment trucks risks continued increases in GHG requirements for renewable fuels under effects, or otherwise be of international emissions from the trucking industry the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) interest. and therefore increased risk of program. Standards are to be set for four Additional Information: Docket #: unacceptable climate change impacts. different categories of renewable fuels: EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0111. Timetable: Cellulosic biofuel, biomass based diesel Sectors Affected: 325199 All Other (BBD), advanced biofuel, and total Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing; Action Date FR Cite renewable fuel. The statute requires the 325193 Ethyl Alcohol Manufacturing; standards be finalized by November 30 424690 Other Chemical and Allied NPRM ...... 07/13/15 80 FR 40137 NPRM Comment 09/11/15 of the year prior to the year in which the Products Merchant Wholesalers; 454319 Period End. standards would apply. In the case of Other Fuel Dealers; 424710 Petroleum NPRM Comment 09/02/15 80 FR 53756 biomass based diesel, the statute Bulk Stations and Terminals; 324110 Period Ex- requires applicable volumes be set no Petroleum Refineries; 424720 Petroleum tended. later than 14 months before the year for and Petroleum Products Merchant NPRM Comment 10/01/15 which the requirements would apply. Wholesalers (except Bulk Stations and Period Ex- This action would, as required by law, Terminals) tended End. finalize the applicable volumes for all URL for More Information: http:// Final Rule ...... 07/00/16 renewable fuel categories for 2014— www2.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard- 2016, and would also finalize the BBD program. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis standard for 2017. Agency Contact: David Korotney, Required: Yes. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Air Government Levels Affected: Federal, Act Section 211(o) requires EPA to and Radiation, N27, Ann Arbor, MI State. implement the Renewable Fuels 48105, Phone: 734 214–4507, Email: Agency Contact: Matt Spears, Standard Program. The Act requires the [email protected]. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Agency set annual volume requirements Paul Argyropoulos, Environmental and Radiation, Mail Code: ASD1, Ann for four different categories of renewable Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Arbor, MI 48105, Phone: 734 214–4921, fuels: Cellulosic biofuel, biomass based 6401A, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: Fax: 734 214–4816, Email: diesel (BBD), advanced biofuel, and 202 564–1123, Email: [email protected]. total renewable fuel. The statute [email protected]. Charles Moulis, Environmental requires the standards be finalized by RIN: 2060–AS22 Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, November 30 of the year prior to the NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, Phone: year in which the standards would 734 214–4826. apply. EPA—AR RIN: 2060–AS16 Alternatives: Application of specific provisions for this program are set forth 117. Findings That Greenhouse Gas in the law. The law requires standards Emissions From Aircraft Cause or be established annually. The only Contribute to Air Pollution That May EPA—AR alternatives authorized under the law Reasonably Be Anticipated To 116. Renewable Fuel Volume are those which allow for waiving in Endanger Public Health and Welfare Standards, 2014–2016 (Reg Plan) whole or in part the volumes of Under CAA Section 231 (Reg Plan) renewable fuel for which the standards Priority: Other Significant. Priority: Other Significant. Major Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et apply. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is seq., Clean Air Act Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs undetermined. CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80, subpart M. and benefits of the program were Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Legal Deadline: None. analyzed in the 2010 Final Rule Clean Air Act Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires establishing the regulatory provisions CFR Citation: 40 CFR 87; 40 CFR the EPA to promulgate regulations that for the RFS program. 1068. specify the annual volume requirements Risks: Risks of the program were Legal Deadline: None. for renewable fuels under the analyzed in the 2010 Final Rule Abstract: The EPA issued its proposed Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) establishing the regulatory provisions findings under section 231(a) of the program. Standards are to be set for four for the RFS program. Clean Air Act (CAA) on July 1, 2015 (80 different categories of renewable fuels: Timetable: FR 37757) that aircraft greenhouse gas Cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel (GHG) emissions cause or contribute to (BBD), advanced biofuel, and total Action Date FR Cite air pollution which may reasonably be renewable fuel. The statute requires the NPRM ...... 06/10/15 80 FR 33100 anticipated to endanger public health standards be finalized by November 30 NPRM Comment 07/27/15 and welfare. This action will finalize the of the year prior to the year in which the Period End. proposed findings and respond to standards would apply. In the case of Final Rule ...... 12/00/15 public comments. If finalized, the biomass-based diesel, the statute findings are scientific determinations requires applicable volumes be set no Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under section 231(a) of the Clean Air later than 14 months before the year for Required: No. Act; the EPA is not planning at this time

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00164 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77873

to propose or issue aircraft engine GHG regulatory standards under section extensive stakeholder engagement and emission standards. This action 231(a)(2)(A) of the CAA. public meetings, to ensure that they continues to rely on the peer-reviewed Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This adequately protect applicators, the science from the major climate change section is not applicable, as this action public, and the environment from science assessments of the U.S. Global is a scientific determination and does potential harm due to exposure to Change Research Program (USGCRP), not create any regulatory standards restricted use pesticides (RUPs). This National Research Council (NRC), and under section 231(a)(2)(A) of the CAA. action is intended to improve the the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Risks: The risks discussed here are the training and awareness of certified Change (IPCC) underlying the 2009 current and future threat of climate applicators of RUPs and to increase endangerment and cause or contribute change to public health and welfare, protection for noncertified applicators findings for GHGs under section 202 of relying on the scientific and technical of RUPs operating under the direct the CAA, along with updated reports evidence in the record for the 2009 supervision of a certified applicator from the same major climate change section 202 CAA endangerment and through enhanced pesticide safety assessments. cause or contribute findings and training and standards for supervision Statement of Need: This action makes building on it with more recent major of noncertified applicators. a determination regarding the current scientific assessments. Statement of Need: Change is needed and future threat of climate change to Timetable: to strengthen the protections for public health and welfare. This action pesticide applicators, the public, and comes in response to a citizen petition Action Date FR Cite the environment from harm due to submitted by Friends of the Earth, pesticide exposure. ANPRM ...... 07/01/15 80 FR 37757 Summary of Legal Basis: This action Oceana, the Center for Biological ANPRM Comment 08/31/15 Diversity, and Earthjustice requesting is issued under the authority of the Period End. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and that the EPA issue a GHG endangerment NPRM ...... 07/01/15 80 FR 37757 Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136– finding and standards under section NPRM Comment 08/31/15 231(a)(2)(A) of the Act for GHG Period End. 136y, particularly sections 136a(d), 136i, and 136w. emissions from aircraft engines. Further, Final Rule ...... 06/00/16 Alternatives: The Agency has the EPA anticipates that the developed mechanisms to improve International Civil Aviation Regulatory Flexibility Analysis applicator trainers and make training Organization (ICAO) will adopt a final Required: No. materials more accessible. The Agency international aircraft carbon dioxide Small Entities Affected: No. has also developed nationally relevant (CO2) emissions standard in February Government Levels Affected: Federal. training and certification materials to 2016. The outcome of the final aircraft International Impacts: This regulatory preserve State resources while GHG endangerment and cause or action will be likely to have improving competency. However, these contribute findings is a pre-requisite for international trade and investment mechanisms and materials do not the subsequent domestic rulemaking effects, or otherwise be of international address other requisite needs for process. interest. Docket #: EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0228. improving protections, such as Summary of Legal Basis: Section URL for More Information: http:// requirements for determining 231(a)(2)(A) of the CAA states that ‘‘The www3.epa.gov/otaq/aviation.htm. competency and recertification. The Administrator shall, from time to time, Agency Contact: Lesley Jantarasami, EPA worked with key stakeholders to issue proposed emission standards Environmental Protection Agency, Air identify and evaluate various applicable to the emission of any air and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania alternatives and regulatory options pollutant from any class or classes of Avenue, 6207–A, Washington, DC during the development of the proposed aircraft engines which in [her] judgment 20460, Phone: 202 343–9929, Email: rule. These are discussed in detail in the causes, or contributes to, air pollution [email protected]. proposed rule, and Economic Analysis which may reasonably be anticipated to RIN: 2060–AS31 that was prepared for the proposed rule. endanger public health or welfare.’’ Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Before the Administrator may issue EPA prepared an Economic Analysis standards addressing emissions of GHGs (EA) of the potential costs and impacts EPA—OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY under section 231, the Administrator associated with the proposed rule, a AND POLLUTION PREVENTION must satisfy a two-step test. First, the copy or which is available in the docket, (OCSPP) Administrator must decide whether, in discussed in more detail in unit III of her judgment, the air pollution under Final Rule Stage the proposed rule; and briefly consideration may reasonably be summarized here. The EPA monetized 118. Pesticides; Certification of anticipated to endanger public health or benefits based on avoided acute Pesticide Applicators welfare. Second, the Administrator must pesticide incidents are estimated at decide whether, in her judgment, Priority: Other Significant. $80.5 million/year after adjustment for emissions of an air pollutant from Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. underreporting of pesticide incidents certain classes of aircraft engines cause Federal Insecticide Fungicide and (EA chapter 6.5). Qualitative benefits or contribute to this air pollution. If the Rodenticide Act include the following: Administrator answers both questions CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156; 40 CFR • Willingness to pay to avoid acute in the affirmative, she must issue 171. effects of pesticide exposure beyond standards under section 231. See Legal Deadline: None. cost of treatment and loss of Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 533 Abstract: The EPA is developing a productivity. (2007) (interpreting analogous provision final rule to revise the federal • Reduced latent effect of avoided in CAA section 202). regulations governing the certified acute pesticide exposure. Alternatives: This section is not pesticide applicator program (40 CFR • Reduced chronic effects from lower applicable, as this action is a scientific part 171). In August 2015, the EPA chronic pesticide exposure to workers, determination and does not create any proposed revisions based on years of handlers, and farmworker families,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00165 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77874 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

including a range of illnesses such as URL for More Information: http:// fiberboard, and particleboard sold, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, prostate www.epa.gov/oppfead1/safety/ supplied, offered for sale, or cancer, Parkinson’s disease, lung cancer, applicators/applicators.htm. manufactured (including imported) in chronic bronchitis, and asthma. (EA URL for Public Comments: http:// the United States. Pursuant to TSCA chapter 6.4 & 6.6) EPA estimated total www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; section 3(7), the definition of incremental costs of $47.2 million/year D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0183-0001. manufacture’’ includes import. As (EA chapter 5), which included the Agency Contact: Michelle Arling, required by title VI, these regulations following: Environmental Protection Agency, apply to hardwood plywood, medium- • $19.5 million/year for costs to Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution density fiberboard, and particleboard. Private Applicators, with an estimated Prevention, 7506P, Washington, DC TSCA Title VI also directs EPA to 490,000 impacted and an average cost of 20460, Phone: 703 308–5891, Fax: 703 promulgate supplementary provisions to $40 per applicator (EA chapter 5 & 5.6). 308–2962, Email: ensure compliance with the emissions • $27.4 million/year for costs to [email protected]. standards, including provisions related Commercial Applicators, with an Kevin Keaney, Environmental to labeling; chain of custody estimated 414,000 impacted and an Protection Agency, Office of Chemical requirements; sell-through provisions; average cost of $66 per applicator (EA Safety and Pollution Prevention, 7506c, ultra-low-emitting formaldehyde resins; chapter 5 & 5.6). Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 305– no-added formaldehyde-based resins; • $359,000 for costs to States and 7666, Email: [email protected]. finished goods; third-party testing and other jurisdictions, with an estimated 63 RIN: 2070–AJ20 certification; auditing and reporting of impacted (EA chapter 5). The EPA third-party certifiers; recordkeeping; estimated that there is no significant enforcement; laminated products; and impact on a substantial number of small exceptions from the requirements of EPA—OCSPP entities. EPA estimated that the regulations promulgated pursuant to proposed rule may affect over 800,000 119. Formaldehyde Emission Standards this subsection for products and small farms that use pesticides, for Composite Wood Products components containing de minimis amounts of composite wood products. although about half are unlikely to Priority: Other Significant. As noted in the previously published apply restricted use pesticides. The Unfunded Mandates: This action may Regulatory Agenda entry for each estimated impact for small entities is affect the private sector under Pub. L. rulemaking, EPA has decided to issue a less than 0.1% of the annual revenues 104–4. single final rule that addresses both of for the average small entity (EA chapter Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2697 Toxic these proposals. As such, EPA is also 5.7). The EPA also estimated that the Substances Control Act combining the entries for the Regulatory proposed rule will have a negligible CFR Citation: 40 CFR 770. effect on jobs and employment because Agenda. Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Statement of Need: TSCA title VI most private and commercial January 1, 2013, Deadline for applicators are self-employed; and the directs EPA to promulgate regulations to promulgation of regulations, per 15 implement the statutory formaldehyde estimated incremental cost per U.S.C. 2697(d). applicator represents from 0.3 to 0.5 emission standards and emissions Abstract: The EPA is developing a testing requirements for composite percent of the cost of a part-time final rule under the Formaldehyde employee (EA chapter 5.6). wood products (hardwood plywood, Standards for Composite Wood Products particleboard, and medium-density Risks: Applicators are at risk from Act that was enacted in 2010 as title VI exposure to pesticides they handle for fiberboard). It also directs EPA to of Toxic Substances Control Act include regulatory provisions relating to their work. The public and the (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2697. In 2013, EPA environment may also be at risk from third-party testing and certification in issued two proposed rules. A proposed addition to the auditing and reporting of misapplication by applicators. Revisions rule to establish a framework for a TSCA to the regulations are expected to third-party certifiers. title VI Third-Party Certification Summary of Legal Basis: EPA will minimize these risks by ensuring the Program whereby third-party certifiers issue this rule under title VI of the Toxic competency of certified applicators. (TPCs) are accredited by accreditation Timetable: Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 bodies (ABs) so that they may certify U.S.C. 2697, enacted in the composite wood product panel Action Date FR Cite Formaldehyde Standards for Composite producers under TSCA title VI. That Wood Products Act of 2010, which NPRM ...... 08/24/15 80 FR 51355 proposed rule identified the roles and provides authority for the EPA to Final Rule ...... 10/00/16 responsibilities of the groups involved ‘‘promulgate regulations to implement in the TPC process (EPA, ABs, and the standards required under subsection Regulatory Flexibility Analysis TPCs), as well as the criteria for (b)’’ of the Act. This provision includes Required: Undetermined. participation in the program. It also authority to promulgate regulations Small Entities Affected: Businesses. proposed general requirements for relating to ‘‘third-party testing and Government Levels Affected: Federal, TPCs, such as conducting and verifying certification’’ and ‘‘auditing and Local, State, Tribal. formaldehyde emission tests, inspecting reporting of third-party certifiers.’’ Additional Information: Docket #: and auditing panel producers, and Congress directed EPA to consider a EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0183. Includes ensuring that panel producers’ quality number of elements for inclusion in the retrospective review under Executive assurance and quality control implementing regulations, many of Order 13563. procedures comply with the regulations which are aspects of the California Air Sectors Affected: 9241 Administration set forth in the proposed rule. A Resources Board (CARB) program. of Environmental Quality Programs; 111 separate proposed rule issued in 2013 These elements include: (a) Labeling, (b) Crop Production; 32532 Pesticide and under RIN 2070–AJ92 covered the chain of custody requirements, (c) sell- Other Agricultural Chemical implementation of the statutory through provisions, (d) ultra low- Manufacturing; 5617 Services to formaldehyde emission standards for emitting formaldehyde resins, (e) no- Buildings and Dwellings. hardwood plywood, medium-density added formaldehyde-based resins, (f)

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00166 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77875

finished goods, (g) third-party testing fabricate, distribute, or sell composite International Impacts: This regulatory and certification, (h) auditing and wood products. EPA also estimated that action will be likely to have reporting of TPCs, (i) recordkeeping, (j) the rulemaking would impact nearly international trade and investment enforcement, (k) laminated products, 879,000 small businesses: Over 851,000 effects, or otherwise be of international and (l) exceptions from the have costs impacts less than 1% of interest. requirements of regulations revenues, over 23,000 firms have Additional Information: Docket #: promulgated for products and impacts between 1% and 3%, and over ANPRM stage: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008– components containing de minimis 4,000 firms have impacts greater than 0627; NPRM Stage: EPA–HQ–OPPT– amounts of composite wood products. 3% of revenues. Most firms with 2011–0380; NPRM2 Stage: EPA–HQ– Alternatives: TSCA title VI establishes impacts over 1% have annualized costs OPPT–2012–0018. This entry includes national formaldehyde emission of less than $250 per year. The proposed the rulemaking previously identified standards for composite wood products implementation rule increases the level under RIN 2070–AJ92. and the EPA has not been given the of environmental protection for all Sectors Affected: 541611 authority to change those standards. affected populations without having any Administrative Management and EPA is evaluating allowable alternatives disproportionately high and adverse General Management Consulting in this rulemaking. human health or environmental effects Services; 325199 All Other Basic Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The on any population, including any Organic Chemical Manufacturing; Economic Analysis issued with the minority or low-income population or 541990 All Other Professional, proposed third-party certification children. The estimated costs of the Scientific, and Technical Services; program rule provides the EPA analysis proposed implementation rule exceed 561990 All Other Support Services; of the potential costs and impacts the quantified benefits. There are 813910 Business Associations; 337212 associated with the proposed third-party additional unquantified benefits due to Custom Architectural Woodwork and certification program. As proposed, the other avoided health effects. After Millwork Manufacturing; 321213 annualized costs are estimated at assessing both the costs and the benefits Engineered Wood Member (except approximately $34,000 per year using of the proposal, including the Truss) Manufacturing; 541330 either a 3% discount rate or a 7% unquantified benefits, EPA has made a Engineering Services; 423210 Furniture discount rate. These requirements reasoned determination that the benefits Merchant Wholesalers; 442110 would impact an estimated nine small of the proposal justify its costs. entities, of which eight are expected to Furniture Stores; 444130 Hardware Risks: At room temperature, Stores; 321211 Hardwood Veneer and have impacts of less than 1% of formaldehyde is a colorless, flammable revenues or expenses, and one is Plywood Manufacturing; 444110 Home gas that has a distinct, pungent smell. Centers; 33712 Household and expected to have impacts between 1% Small amounts of formaldehyde are and 3%. State, Local, and Tribal Institutional Furniture Manufacturing; naturally produced by plants, animals 337127 Institutional Furniture Governments are not expected to be and humans. Formaldehyde is used subject to the requirements, which Manufacturing; 423310 Lumber, widely by industry to manufacture a Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel apply to third-party certifiers and range of building materials and accreditation bodies. The proposal does Merchant Wholesalers; 453930 numerous household products. It is in Manufactured (Mobile) Home Dealers; not have a significant intergovernmental resins used to manufacture some mandate, significant or unique effect on 321991 Manufactured Home (Mobile composite wood products (e.g., Home) Manufacturing; 336213 Motor small governments, or have Federalism hardwood plywood, particleboard and implications. The Economic Analysis Home Manufacturing; 337122 medium-density fiberboard). Everyone issued with the proposed Nonupholstered Wood Household is exposed to small amounts of implementation rule provides EPA’s Furniture Manufacturing; 444190 Other formaldehyde in the air, some foods, analysis of the potential costs and Building Material Dealers; 423390 Other and products, including composite benefits associated with the proposed Construction Material Merchant wood products. The primary way you implementation requirements. As Wholesalers; 325211 Plastics Material can be exposed to formaldehyde is by proposed, the rulemaking will reduce and Resin Manufacturing; 321992 breathing air containing it. exposures to formaldehyde, resulting in Prefabricated Wood Building Formaldehyde can cause irritation of the benefits from avoided adverse health Manufacturing; 813920 Professional skin, eyes, nose, and throat. High levels effects. For the subset of health effects Organizations; 321219 Reconstituted where the results were quantified, the of exposure may cause some types of Wood Product Manufacturing; 441210 estimated annualized benefits (due to cancers. Recreational Vehicle Dealers; 337215 Timetable: avoided incidence of eye irritation and Showcase, Partition, Shelving, and Locker Manufacturing; 321212 nasopharyngeal cancer) are $20 million Action Date FR Cite to $48 million per year using a 3% Softwood Veneer and Plywood discount rate, and $9 million to $23 ANPRM ...... 12/03/08 73 FR 73620 Manufacturing; 541380 Testing million per year using a 7% discount Second ANPRM .. 01/30/09 74 FR 5632 Laboratories; 336214 Travel Trailer and rate. There are additional unquantified NPRM ...... 06/10/13 78 FR 34795 Camper Manufacturing; 337121 benefits due to other avoided health NPRM Comment 07/23/13 78 FR 44090 Upholstered Household Furniture effects. The annualized costs for the Period Ex- Manufacturing; 3212 Veneer, Plywood, proposed implementation requirements tended. and Engineered Wood Product NPRM Comment 08/21/13 78 FR 51696 Manufacturing; 337110 Wood Kitchen are estimated at $72 million to $81 Period Ex- million per year using a 3% discount tended. Cabinet and Countertop Manufacturing; rate, and $80 million to $89 million per Final Rule ...... 05/00/16 337211 Wood Office Furniture year using a 7% discount rate. Manufacturing. Government entities are not expected to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis URL for More Information: Docket be subject to the rule’s requirements, Required: Yes. EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0018–0001; which apply to entities that Small Entities Affected: Businesses. http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/ manufacture (including import), Government Levels Affected: None. formaldehyde/index.html.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00167 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77876 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

URL for Public Comments: http:// discrimination on the basis of race, penalties as part of wellness programs www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; color, religion, sex, national origin, age, offered through health plans. EEOC also D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0380-0001. or disability). plans to address other aspects of Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler, The first item in this Regulatory Plan wellness programs that may be subject Environmental Protection Agency, is entitled ‘‘The Federal Sector’s to the ADA’s nondiscrimination Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Obligation To Be a Model Employer of provisions. The EEOC issued an NPRM Prevention, 7404T, Washington, DC Individuals with Disabilities.’’ The on July 20, 2014, and intends to issue 20460, Phone: 202 566–0484, Email: EEOC’s regulations implementing a final rule in February 2016. [email protected]. section 501, as set forth in 29 CFR part The fourth item is entitled Robert Courtnage, Environmental 1614, require Federal agencies and ‘‘Amendments to Regulations Under the Protection Agency, Office of Chemical departments to be ‘‘model employers’’ Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Safety and Pollution Prevention, 7404T, of individuals with disabilities. The Act of 2008.’’ This rule would amend Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566– Commission issued an Advanced Notice the regulations on the Genetic 1081, Email: [email protected]. of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on Information Nondiscrimination Act of RIN: 2070–AJ44 May 15, 2014, (79 FR 27824), and 2008 to address inducements to BILLING CODE 6560–50–P intends to issue a proposed rule to employees’ spouses or other family revise the regulations regarding the members who respond to questions Federal Government’s affirmative about their current or past medical EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY employment obligations in 29 CFR part conditions on health risk assessments. It COMMISSION (EEOC) 1614 to include a more detailed will also correct a typographical error in explanation of how Federal agencies the rule’s discussion of wellness Statement of Regulatory and and departments should ‘‘give full programs and add references to the Deregulatory Priorities consideration to the hiring, placement, Affordable Care Act, where appropriate. The mission of the Equal Employment and advancement of qualified The EEOC issued an NPRM on October Opportunity Commission (EEOC, individuals with disabilities.’’ Any 30, 2015. The EEOC intends to issue a Commission, or agency) is to ensure revisions would be informed by final rule in February 2016. equality of opportunity in employment Management Directive 715, and may Consistent with section 4(c) of by vigorously enforcing and educating include goals consistent with Executive Executive Order 12866, this statement the public about the following Federal Order 13548. Furthermore, any was reviewed and approved by the statutes: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act revisions would result in costs only to Chair of the Agency. The statement has of 1964, as amended (prohibits the Federal Government; would not been reviewed or approved by the employment discrimination on the basis contribute to increasing the employment other members of the Commission. of race, color, sex (including of individuals with disabilities; and Retrospective Review of Existing pregnancy), religion, or national origin); would not affect risks to public health, Regulations the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended safety, or the environment. (makes it illegal to pay unequal wages The second item is entitled ‘‘Federal Pursuant to section 6 of Executive to men and women performing Sector Equal Employment Opportunity Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation substantially equal work under similar Process.’’ In July 2012, the Commission and Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), working conditions at the same published a final rule containing 15 the following Regulatory Identifier establishment); the Age Discrimination discrete changes to various parts of the Numbers (RINs) have been identified as in Employment Act of 1967, as amended Federal sector EEO process, and associated with retrospective review (prohibits employment discrimination indicated that the rule was the and analysis in the EEOC’s final based on age of 40 or older); Titles I and Commission’s initial step in a broader retrospective review of regulations plan. V of the Americans with Disabilities review of the Federal sector EEO Some of the entries on this list may be Act, as amended, and sections 501 and process. The Commission issued an completed actions, which do not appear 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, as ANPRM on February 6, 2015, and in The Regulatory Plan. However, more amended (prohibit employment intends to issue an NPRM in August information can be found about these discrimination based on disability); 2016, aimed at making the process more completed rulemakings in past Title II of the Genetic Information fair and efficient. publications of the Unified Agenda on Nondiscrimination Act (prohibits The third item is entitled Reginfo.gov (http://reginfo.gov/) in the employment discrimination based on ‘‘Amendments to Regulations Under the Completed Actions section. These genetic information and limits Americans With Disabilities Act.’’ This rulemakings can also be found on acquisition and disclosure of genetic rule would amend the regulations to Regulations.gov (http://regulations.gov). information); and section 304 of the implement the equal employment The EEOC’s final Plan for Retrospective Government Employee Rights Act of provisions of the Americans with Analysis of Existing Rules can be found 1991 (protects certain previously Disabilities Act (ADA) to address the at: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/ exempt state & local government interaction between title I of the ADA regulations/retro_review_plan_ employees from employment and financial inducements and/or final.cfm.

RIN Title Effect on small business

3046–AA91 ...... Revisions to procedures for complaints or charges of employ- This rulemaking may decrease burdens on small businesses ment discrimination based on disability subject to the by making the charge/complaint process more efficient. Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Re- habilitation Act of 1973. 3046–AA92 ...... Revisions to procedures for complaints/charges of employ- This rulemaking may decrease burdens on small businesses ment discrimination based on disability filed against em- by making the charge/complaint process more efficient. ployers holding government contacts or subcontracts.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00168 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77877

RIN Title Effect on small business

3046–AA93 ...... Revisions to procedures for complaints of employment dis- This rulemaking may decrease burdens on small businesses crimination filed against recipients of federal financial as- by making the charge/complaint process more efficient. sistance. 3046–AB00 ...... Federal sector equal employment opportunity process ...... This rulemaking pertains to the federal sector equal employ- ment opportunity process and thus is not expected to affect small businesses.

EEOC Summary of Legal Basis: Section 501 653–6034, Email: aaron.konopasky@ of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as eeoc.gov. Proposed Rule Stage amended (section 501), 29 U.S.C. 791, in Related RIN: Related to 3046–AA73 120. The Federal Sector’s Obligation To addition to requiring nondiscrimination RIN: 3046–AA94 Be a Model Employer of Individuals with respect to Federal employees and With Disabilities applicants for Federal employment who are individuals with disabilities, also Priority: Other Significant. EEOC requires Federal agencies to maintain, Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 791(b) update annually, and submit to the 121. Federal Sector Equal Employment CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1614.203(a). Commission an affirmative action Opportunity Process Legal Deadline: None. program plan for the hiring, placement, Abstract: Section 501 of the Priority: Other Significant. and advancement of individuals with Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 206(d); 29 Rehabilitation Act, as amended (Section disabilities. As part of its responsibility U.S.C. 633a; 29 U.S.C. 791; 29 U.S.C. 501), prohibits discrimination against for the administration and enforcement 794; 42 U.S.C. 2000e–16; E.O. 10577; individuals with disabilities in the of equal opportunity in Federal E.O. 11222; E.O. 11478; E.O. 12106; Federal Government. The EEOC’s employment, the Commission is Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1978; 42 regulations implementing section 501, authorized under 29 U.S.C. 794a(a)(1) to U.S.C. 2000ff–6(e) as set forth in 29 CFR part 1614, require issue rules, regulations, orders, and CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1614. Federal agencies and departments to be instructions pursuant to section 501. Legal Deadline: None. ‘‘model employers’’ of individuals with Abstract: In July 2012, the 1 Alternatives: The EEOC considered all disabilities. On May 15, 2014, the alternatives offered by ANPRM public Commission published a final rule Commission issued an Advance Notice commenters. The EEOC will consider all containing 15 discrete changes to of Proposed Rulemaking (79 FR 27824) alternatives offered by future public various parts of the Federal sector EEO that sought public comments on commenters. complaint process, and indicated that whether and how the existing Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Any the rule was the Commission’s initial regulations could be improved to costs that might result would only be step in a broader review of the Federal provide more detail on what being a borne by the Federal Government. The sector EEO process. On February 6, ‘‘model employer’’ means and how revisions would contribute to increased 2015, the Commission issued an Federal agencies and departments employment of individuals with Advance Notice of Proposed should ‘‘give full consideration to the disabilities. Rulemaking (ANPRM) (80 FR 6669), that hiring, placement and advancement of Risks: The proposed changes do not sought public input on additional issues qualified individuals with affect risks to public health, safety, or associated with the Federal sector EEO 2 disabilities.’’ The EEOC’s review of the the environment. process. comments and potential revisions was Timetable: Statement of Need: Any proposals informed by the discussion in contained in an NPRM would be aimed Management Directive 715 of the tools Action Date FR Cite at making the process more fair and Federal agencies should use to establish ANPRM ...... 05/15/14 79 FR 27824 efficient. goals for the employment and Summary of Legal Basis: Title VII of advancement of individuals with ANPRM Comment 07/14/14 Period End. the Civil Rights Act of 1964 authorizes disabilities. The EEOC’s review of the NPRM ...... 11/00/15 EEOC ‘‘to issue such rules, regulations, comments and potential revisions was orders, and instructions as it deems also informed by, and consistent with, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis necessary and appropriate to carry out the goals of Executive Order 13548 to Required: No. its responsibilities under . . . section increase the employment of individuals Small Entities Affected: No. [717].’’ 42 U.S.C. 2000e–16(b). with disabilities and the employment of Government Levels Affected: Federal. Alternatives: The EEOC will consider individuals with targeted disabilities. Agency Contact: Christopher all alternatives offered by public Statement of Need: Pursuant to Kuczynski, Assistant Legal Counsel, commenters. section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Based the Commission is authorized to issue Employment Opportunity Commission, on the information currently available, such regulations as it deems necessary 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC we anticipate that most of the changes to carry out its responsibilities under 20507, Phone: 202 663–4665, TDD will have no cost and will benefit users this Act. Executive Order 13548 called Phone: 202 663–7026, Fax: 202 653– of the process by correcting or clarifying for increased efforts by Federal agencies 6034, Email: christopher.kuczynski@ the requirements. Any cost that might and departments to recruit, hire, retain, eeoc.gov. result would only be borne by the and return individuals with disabilities Aaron Konopasky, Senior Attorney Federal Government. to the Federal workforce. Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal Risks: Any proposed revisions would Employment Opportunity Commission, not affect risks to the public health, 1 29 CFR 1614.203(a). 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC safety, or the environment. 2 Id. 20507, Phone: 202 663–4127, Fax: 202 Timetable:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00169 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77878 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite implementing title II of the Act. The CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1630. EEOC issued regulations on November Legal Deadline: None. ANPRM ...... 02/06/15 80 FR 6669 9, 2010. These proposed revisions are Abstract: This proposed rule would ANPRM Comment 04/07/15 based on that statutory requirement. amend the regulations to implement the Period End. Alternatives: The EEOC will consider equal employment provisions of the NPRM ...... 08/00/16 all alternatives offered by public Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) commenters. to address the interaction between title Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Based I of the ADA and financial inducements Required: No. on the information currently available, and/or penalties as part of wellness Small Entities Affected: No. the Commission does not anticipate that programs offered through health plans. Government Levels Affected: Federal. the rule will impose additional costs on EEOC also plans to address other Agency Contact: Thomas J. Schlageter, employers, beyond minimal costs to aspects of wellness programs that may Assistant Legal Counsel, Office of Legal train human resource professionals. The be subject to the ADA’s Counsel, Equal Employment regulation does not impose any new nondiscrimination provisions in this Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street employer reporting or recordkeeping Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. NE., Washington, DC 20507, Phone: 202 obligations. We anticipate that the Statement of Need: The revision to 29 663–4668, Fax: 202 653–6034, Email: changes will benefit entities covered by CFR 1630.14(d) is needed to address [email protected]. numerous inquiries EEOC has received Gary Hozempa, Senior Attorney title II of GINA by clarifying that about whether an employer that Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal employers who offer wellness programs complies with regulations implementing Employment Opportunity Commission, are free to adopt a certain type of the final Health Insurance Portability 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC inducement without violating GINA, as and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules 20507, Phone: 202 663–4666, Fax: 202 well as correcting an internal citation, concerning wellness program 653–6034, Email: gary.hozempa@ and providing citations to the ACA. Risks: The proposed rule imposes no incentives, as amended by the eeoc.gov. new or additional risks to employers. Affordable Care Act (ACA), will be in RIN: 3046–AB00 The proposal does not address risks to compliance with the ADA. public safety or the environment. Summary of Legal Basis: The ADA Timetable: requires the EEOC to issue regulations EEOC implementing title I of the Act. The Action Date FR Cite 122. Amendments to Regulations Under EEOC initially issued regulations in the Genetic Information 1991 on the law’s requirements and NPRM ...... 10/30/15 80 FR 66853 prohibited practices with respect to Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 NPRM Comment 12/29/15 employment and issued amended Priority: Other Significant. Period End. Final Action ...... 02/00/16 regulations in 2011 to conform to Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000ff changes to the ADA made by the ADA CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1635. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Amendments Act of 2008. These Legal Deadline: None. proposed revisions are based on that Abstract: This proposed rule would Required: No. Small Entities Affected: Businesses, statutory requirement. amend the regulations on the Genetic Governmental Jurisdictions, Alternatives: The EEOC will consider Information Nondiscrimination Act of Organizations. all alternatives offered by public 2008 to address inducements to Government Levels Affected: Federal, commenters. employees’ spouses or other family Local, State. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Based members who respond to questions Agency Contact: Christopher on the information currently available, about their current or past medical Kuczynski, Assistant Legal Counsel, the Commission does not anticipate that conditions on health risk assessments Office of Legal Counsel, Equal the rule will impose additional costs on (HRA). This Notice of Proposed Employment Opportunity Commission, employers, beyond minimal costs to Rulemaking will also correct a 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC train human resource professionals. The typographical error in the rule’s 20507, Phone: 202 663–4665, TDD regulation does not impose any new discussion of wellness programs and Phone: 202 663–7026, Fax: 202 653– employer reporting or recordkeeping add references to the Affordable Care 6034, Email: christopher.kuczynski@ obligations. We anticipate that the Act, where appropriate. eeoc.gov. changes will benefit entities covered by Statement of Need: The revision to 29 Kerry Leibig, Senior Attorney title I of the ADA by generally CFR 1635.8 is needed to address Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal promoting consistency between the numerous inquiries received by EEOC Employment Opportunity Commission, ADA and HIPAA, as amended by the about whether an employer will violate 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC ACA, and result in greater predictability the Genetic Information 20507, Phone: 202 663–4516, Fax: 202 and ease of administration. Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008 653–6034, Email: [email protected]. Risks: by offering an employee a financial RIN: 3046–AB02 The proposed rule imposes no new or inducement if the employee’s family additional risks to employers. The member completes an HRA that asks proposal does not address risks to about the family member’s current public safety or the environment. health status. Technical amendments EEOC Timetable: are also needed to correct a Final Rule Stage typographical error and to include Action Date FR Cite references to the ACA, where 123. Amendments to Regulations Under appropriate. the Americans with Disabilities Act NPRM ...... 04/20/15 80 FR 21659 Summary of Legal Basis: GINA, Priority: Other Significant. NPRM Comment 06/19/15 Period End. section 211, 42 U.S.C. 2000ff–10, Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101 et Final Action ...... 02/00/16 requires the EEOC to issue regulations seq.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00170 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77879

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis broad areas. The first is space with no external impact, and a Required: No. acquisition through both leases and regulatory portion, the General Services Small Entities Affected: Businesses, construction. PBS translates general Administration Acquisition Regulation Governmental Jurisdictions, needs into specific requirements, (GSAR). The GSAR establishes agency Organizations. marshals the necessary resources, and acquisition regulations that affect GSA’s Government Levels Affected: Federal, delivers the space necessary to meet the business partners (e.g. prospective Local, State. respective missions of its Federal offerors and contractors) and acquisition Agency Contact: Christopher clients. The second area is management of leasehold interests in real property. Kuczynski, Assistant Legal Counsel, of space. This involves making Federal Acquisition Regulation Office of Legal Counsel, Equal decisions on maintenance, servicing Employment Opportunity Commission, tenants, and ultimately, deciding when On behalf of the General Services 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC and how to dispose of a property at the Administration (GSA), the Office of 20507, Phone: 202 663–4665, TDD end of its useful life. Government-wide Policy, in Phone: 202 663–7026, Fax: 202 653– conjunction with Department of Defense 6034, Email: Office of Government-Wide Policy (OGP) (DOD) and National Aeronautics and [email protected]. OGP sets Government-wide policy in Space Administration (NASA), write Joyce Walker-Jones, Senior Attorney the areas of personal and real property, and sign the Federal Acquisition Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal travel and transportation, information Regulation (FAR), the rule book for all Employment Opportunity Commission, technology, regulatory information, and federal agency procurements that 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC use of Federal advisory committees. governs the billions of contract dollars 20507, Phone: 202 663–7031, Fax: 202 OGP also helps direct how all Federal expended by the Government every 653–6034, Email: joyce.walker- supplies and services are acquired as year. [email protected]. well as GSA’s own acquisition RIN: 3046–AB01 programs. II. Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities BILLING CODE 6570–01–P OGP’s policy regulations are described below: FTR Regulatory Priorities Office of Asset and Transportation In fiscal year 2016, GSA plans to GENERAL SERVICES Management (Federal Travel amend the FTR by: ADMINISTRATION (GSA) Regulation) • Revising Chapter 301, Temporary Duty Travel, ensuring accountability Regulatory Plan—October 2015 Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) enumerates the travel and relocation and transparency. This revision will I. Mission and Overview policy for all title 5 Executive agency ensure agencies’ travel for missions is GSA oversees the business of the employees. The FTR is the regulation efficient and effective, reduces costs, Federal Government by supplying contained in 41 Code of Federal promotes sustainability, and Federal purchasers with cost-effective, Regulations (CFR), chapters 300 through incorporates industry best practices at high-quality products and services from 304, that implements statutory the lowest logical travel cost. • commercial vendors providing requirements and executive branch Revising Chapter 302, Relocation workplaces for Federal employees, policies for travel by Federal civilian Allowances for miscellaneous items overseeing the preservation of historic employees and others authorized to based on administrative changes, case Federal properties, providing tools, travel at Government expense. decisions, and agency review. equipment, and non-tactical vehicles to Office of Asset and Transportation FMR Regulatory Priorities the U.S. military, and providing State Management (Federal Management and local governments with law In fiscal year 2016, GSA plans to Regulation) amend the FMR by: enforcement equipment, firefighting and • rescue equipment, and disaster recovery Federal Management Regulation Revising rules regarding products and services. (FMR) establishes policy for aircraft, management of Federal real property; • GSA’s work is done through the transportation, personal property, real Revising rules regarding Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), the property, and mail management. The management of Federal personal Public Buildings Service (PBS), and the FMR is the successor regulation to the property. • Office of Government-wide Policy Federal Property Management Revising rules under management (OGP). Regulation (FPMR), and it contains of mail and transportation. updated regulatory policies originally GSAR Regulatory Priorities Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) found in the FPMR. FAS is the lead organization for GSA plans, to update the GSAR to Office of Acquisition Policy (General procurement of products and services maintain consistency with the Federal Services Administration Acquisition (other than real property) for the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and to Manual (GSAM) and the General Government and leverages the buying implement streamlined and innovative Services Administration Acquisition power of the Government by acquisition procedures that contractors, Regulation (GSAR)) consolidating Federal agencies’ offerors, and GSA contracting personnel requirements for common goods and GSA’s internal rules and practices on can utilize when entering into and services. how it buys goods and services from its administering contractual relationships. business partners are covered by the Current GSAR initiatives are focused Public Buildings Service (PBS) General Services Administration on— PBS is the largest public real estate Acquisition Manual (GSAM), which • Providing consistency with the organization in the United States, implements and supplement the Federal FAR; providing facilities and workspace Acquisition Regulation at GSA. The • Eliminating coverage that solutions to more than 60 Federal GSAM comprises both a non-regulatory duplicates the FAR or creates agencies PBS’ activities fall into two portion (GSAM), which reflects policies inconsistencies within the GSAR;

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00171 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77880 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

• Rewriting sections that have approximately 17,300 businesses, most had previously never received public become irrelevant because of changes in of whom are small, have GSA Schedule comment. technology or business processes or that contracts. Additionally, GSAR case 2015–G512 place unnecessary administrative GSAR Case 2013–G504, Transactional Unenforceable Commercial Supplier burdens on contractors and the Data Reporting and GSAR Case 2013– Agreement Terms will propose a way to Government; G502, Federal Supply Schedules streamline the evaluation process to • Streamlining or simplifying the award contracts containing commercial Administrative Changes are both of regulation; supplier agreements. By streamlining interest to GSA proposed a rule to • Rolling up coverage from the this process, GSA anticipates reducing capture transactional data, and in return services and regions/zones that should barriers to entry for small businesses. be in the GSAR, specifically targeting eliminate the requirement for Regulations Which Promote Open PBS’s construction contracting policies contractors to track prices offered to the Government and Disclosure and the GSA Schedules Program; customer or class of customers • Streamlining the evaluation process designated for purposes of the Price There are currently no regulations for contracts containing commercial Reductions Clause. Among other which promote open Government and supplier agreements; and benefits, GSA anticipates this rule to disclosure. • Reviewing pricing practices for the result in a net burden reduction to GSA III. Retrospective Review of Existing GSA Schedules Program. Schedule contractors and reduce the need for costly, duplicative contract Regulations Regulations of Concern to Small vehicles, thereby reducing the barrier to Pursuant to section 6 of Executive Businesses entry for small businesses in the Federal Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and GSAR rules are relevant to small marketplace. GSAR Case 2013–G502, Regulatory Review’’ (July, 2015), the businesses that do or wish to do Federal Supply Schedules GSA retrospective review and analysis business with the Federal Government. Administrative Changes updates the final and updated regulations plan can GSA is reviewing regulations that GSA Schedules program to implement be found at www.gsa.gov/ govern the GSA Schedules program; long standing Schedules clauses that improvingregulations.

Completed actions

3090–AI79 ...... Federal Management Regulation (FMR); FMR Case 2008–102–4, Mail Management, Financial Requirements for All Agencies. 3090–AI81 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2008–G509, Rewrite GSAR 536, Con- struction and Architect-Engineer Contracts (Withdrawn). 3090–AI82 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2006–G506, Environment, Conservation, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace. 3090–AI95 ...... Federal Travel Regulation (FTR); FTR Case 2009–307, Temporary Duty (TDY) Travel Allowances (Taxes); Relocation Allowances (Taxes). 3090–AJ23 ...... Federal Travel Regulation (FTR); FTR Case 2011–310; Telework Travel Expenses Test Programs. 3090–AJ26 ...... Federal Management Regulation (FMR); FMR Case 2012–102–2; Donation of Surplus Personal Property. 3090–AJ27 ...... Federal Travel Regulation (FTR); FTR Case 2012–301; Removal of Conference Lodging Allowance Provisions. 3090–AJ31 ...... General Service Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2012–G503, Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) and Sales Reporting. 3090–AJ34 ...... Federal Management Regulation (FMR); FMR Case 2012–102–5, Restrictions on International Transportation of Freight and Household Goods. 3090–AJ35 ...... Federal Management Regulation (FMR); FMR Case 2013–102–1; Obligating Authority. 3090–AJ36 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2012–G501, Electronic Contracting Initia- tive. 3090–AJ42 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2010–G511, Purchasing by Non-Federal Entities. 3090–AJ46 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2013–G501; Qualifications of Offerors. 3090–AJ47 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2014–G501; Progressive Awards and Monthly Quantity Allocations.

Dated: September 18, 2015. aeronautics ability. NASA’s basic aeronautics, and space exploration to Christine Harada, organization consists of the enhance knowledge, education, Associate Administrator, Office of Headquarters, nine field Centers, the Jet innovation, economic vitality, and Government-wide Policy. Propulsion Laboratory (a Federally stewardship of the Earth.’’ The FY 2014 BILLING CODE 6820–34–P Funded Research and Development Strategic Plan, (available at http://www. Center), and several component nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/2014 installations which report to Center NASA Strategic Plan.pdf), guides Directors. Responsibility for overall NASA’s program activities through a NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND planning, coordination, and control of SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) framework of the following three NASA programs is vested in NASA strategic goals: Statement of Regulatory Priorities Headquarters located in Washington, • Strategic Goal 1: Expand the DC. The National Aeronautics and Space frontiers of knowledge, capability, and Administration (NASA) aim is to NASA continues to implement opportunity in space. programs according to its 2014 Strategic increase human understanding of the • Strategic Goal 2: Advance solar system and the universe that Plan. The Agency’s mission is to ‘‘Drive understanding of Earth and develop contains it, and to improve American advances in science, technology,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00172 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77881

technologies to improve the quality of unnecessary and burdensome 2. NASA FAR Supplement: Safety and life on our home planet. regulations, clarify regulatory language, Health Measures and Mishap Reporting • Strategic Goal 3: Serve the and simplify processes. More than 1.9 [48 CFR 1852.233]—NASA is finalizing American public and accomplish our million hours of information collection its regulations to revise a current clause mission by effectively managing our requirements (ICRs) were identified as related to safety and health measures people, technical capabilities, and no longer required and duplicative of and mishaps reporting by narrowing the infrastructure. active FAR-level ICRs. Specifically, application of the clause, resulting in a In the decades since Congress enacted OMB control numbers 2700–0085, decrease in the reporting burden on the National Aeronautics and Space Act 2700–0086, and 2700–0087 were contractors while reinforcing the of 1958, NASA has challenged its discontinued as part of the NFS rewrite measures contractors at NASA facilities scientific and engineering capabilities in initiative. The Agency will continue to must take to protect the safety of their pursuing its mission, generating analyze the NFS to implement workers, NASA employees, the public, tremendous results and benefits for procurement-related statutes, Executive and high value assets These humankind. NASA will continue to orders, NASA initiatives, and Federal amendments will streamline and reduce push scientific and technical boundaries procurement policy that streamline reporting requirements imposed on the in pursuit of these goals. current processes and procedures. public. International Regulatory Cooperation 3. NASA FAR Supplement: Drug and Retrospective Review of Existing Alcohol Free Workplace and Mission As the President noted in Executive Regulations Critical Systems Personnel Reliability Order 13609, ‘‘international regulatory Pursuant to section 6 of Executive Program [48 CFR 1823, 1846, and cooperation, consistent with domestic Order 13579 ‘‘Regulation and 1852]—NASA amended its regulations law and prerogatives and U.S. trade Independent Regulatory Agencies’’ (Jul. to remove requirements related to the policy, can be an important means of 11, 2011), NASA regulations associated discontinued Space Flight Mission promoting’’ public health, welfare, with its retrospective review and Critical System Personnel Reliability safety, and our environment as well as analysis are described in the Agency’s Program (PRP) and to revise economic growth, innovation, final retrospective plan of existing requirements related to contractor drug competitiveness, and job creation. regulations. NASA’s final plan and and alcohol testing. These amendments Accordingly, in Executive Order 13609, updates can be found at http:// eliminated contractors’ costs and the President requires each executive www.nasa.gov/open, under the Open burden for implementing PRP [80 FR agency to include in its Regulatory Plan Government News. Below describes the 60552]. a summary of its international rulemakings that were recently 4. Uniform Administrative regulatory cooperation activities that are completed or are near completion. Requirements, Cost Principles and reasonably anticipated to lead to Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Rulemakings That Were Streamlined significant regulations. [2 CFR 1800]—NASA amended is and Reduced Unjustified Burdens In August 2009, the President directed regulations to incorporate requirements a broad-based interagency review of the 1. Discrimination on Basis of for the use of the Federal Awardee U.S. export control system, with the Handicap [14 CFR 1251]—NASA is Performance & Integrity Information goal of strengthening national security finalizing its section 504 regulations to Systems, in accordance with OMB’s by focusing efforts on controlling the incorporate changes to the definition of uniform guidance. These amendments most critical products and technologies disability required by the Americans are expected to reduce duplication and and by enhancing the competitiveness with Disabilities Act (ADA) risk associated with administering of U.S. manufacturing and technology Amendments Act of 2008, include an grants and cooperative agreements; the sectors. While NASA does not have any affirmative statement of the chance of errors, and allows for the regulations implementing this initiative, longstanding requirement for reasonable timely closeout of grants and the Agency does serve on the accommodations in programs, services, cooperative agreements [80 FR 54701]. interagency review team in a and activities, include a definition of 5. NASA Far Supplement: Denied consultative and supportive role for this direct threat and a provision describing Access to NASA Facilities [48 CFR process, along with the Department of the parameters of the existing direct 1852.242–72]—NASA amended its Defense, the Department of State and threat defense to a claim of regulations to remove ‘‘Observance of the Department of Commerce. discrimination, clarify the existing Legal Holidays’’ and added in its place In addition, NASA serves as one of obligation to provide auxiliary aids and a new clause entitled, ‘‘Denied Access the signatories to the Federal services to qualified individuals with to NASA Facilities,’’ because the Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The FAR disabilities, update the methods of October 2013 Government shutdown at 48 CFR chapter 1, contains communication that recipients may use revealed a need for NASA to be specific procurement regulations that apply to to inform program beneficiaries of their and differentiate between conditions NASA and other Federal agencies. obligation to comply with section 504 to when contractor employees may be Pursuant to 41 U.S.C. section 1302 and reflect changes in technology, adopt denied access to their work location in FAR 1.103(b), the FAR is jointly updated accessibility standards a NASA facility. These amendments prepared, issued, and maintained by the applicable to the design, construction, standardize procedures and provide Secretary of Defense, the Administrator and alteration of buildings and facilities, greater clarity to contractors on of General Services, and the establish time periods for compliance conditions when contractors may be Administrator, National Aeronautics with these updated accessibility denied access to NASA facilities due to and Space Administration, under their standards, provide NASA with access to a Government shutdown [80 FR 52642]. several statutory authorities. NASA recipient data and records to determine 6. NASA FAR Supplement #3—NASA implements and supplements FAR compliance with section 504, and make amended its regulations to eliminate requirements through the NASA FAR administrative updates to correct titles. unnecessary regulatory text, streamline Supplement (NFS), 48 CFR chapter 18. These amendments will reduce overly-burdensome regulations, clarify NASA finalized the entire NFS rewrite administrative burdens imposed on the language, and simplify processes where initiative this year to eliminate public. possible [80 FR 36719].

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00173 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77882 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Rulemakings That Was Modified, NASA capital asset threshold of proposed rules will affect Federal Streamlined, Expanded, or Repealed $100,000 and determined an increase in agencies’ records management programs 7. Space Flight [14 CFR 1214]—NASA the capital asset threshold to $500,000 relating to proper records creation and is proposing to amend its regulations to was warranted. NASA expects this rule maintenance, adequate documentation, remove language that refers to the to benefit NASA contractors by reducing electronic recordkeeping requirements, retired Space Shuttle Program and to some of the administrative burden use of the Electronic Records Archive clarify language for other ongoing associated with financial reporting of (ERA) for records transfer, and records disposition. Phase I (RIN 3095–AB74) programs that requires some of this rule NASA property in the custody of includes changes to provisions in 36 to remain in place. contractors. Of the 568 NASA contracts CFR parts 1223 (Managing Essential 8. NASA Protective Services [14 CFR awarded in 2014, approximately 114 Records), 1224 (Records Disposition 1204]—NASA is amending its traffic contracts (20%) that required reporting Programs), 1227 (General Records enforcement regulation to correct of Government property were awarded Schedules), 1229 (Emergency citations, and to clarify the regulation’s to small businesses. [80 FR 51957]. Authorization to Destroy Records), 1232 scope, policy, responsibilities, Abstracts for other regulations that (Transfer of Records to Records Storage procedures, and violation descriptions. will be amended or repealed between Facilities), 1233 (Transfer Use and 9. Processing of Monetary Claims [14 October 2015 and October 2016 are Disposition of Records in a NARA CFR 1261]—NASA is amending its reported in the fall 2015 edition of Federal Records Center), 1235 (Transfer regulations to change the amount to Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory of Records to the National Archives of collect installment payments from and Deregulation actions. the United States), 1236 (Electronic $20,000 to $1000 to align with Title II, BILLING CODE 7510–13–P records management), 1237 Claims of the United States (Audiovisual Cartographic and Related Government, section 3711(a)(2) Records Management), and 1239 Collection and Compromise. This NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS (Program Assistance and Inspections). regulation will also be amended to ADMINISTRATION (NARA) NARA has substantially revamped these include the rules for the use of provisions and they are out for public Statement of Regulatory Priorities contractors for debt collection and new comment this fall. Phase II (RIN 3095– provisions allowing for debts to be Overview AB85) is underway, with the remaining transferred to the Treasury Department parts of subchapter B currently The National Archives and Records for direct collection, as prescribed by undergoing revision. Administration (NARA) primarily issues Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act The second priority is a new of 1990. regulations directed to other Federal regulation on Controlled Unclassified 10. Duty Free Entry of Space Articles agencies and to the public. These Information (CUI). The Information [14 CFR 1217]—NASA amended its regulations include records Security Oversight Office (ISOO), a regulations to remove language that management, information services, component of NARA, is promulgating refers to the Space Shuttle Program and access to and use of NARA holdings, this rule pursuant to Executive Order to clarify language for other ongoing and grant programs. For example, 13556. The Order establishes an open programs that require some of this rule records management regulations and uniform program for managing to remain in place [80 FR 45864]. directed to Federal agencies concern the information requiring safeguarding or 11. Removal of Obsolete Regulations proper management and disposition of dissemination controls. This rule sets [14 CFR 1216]—NASA amended its Federal records. Through the forth guidance to agencies on regulations to remove regulatory text Information Security Oversight Office safeguarding, disseminating, marking, that is covered in internal NASA (ISOO), NARA also issues Government- and decontrolling CUI, self-inspection policies and requirements [80 FR wide regulations concerning and oversight requirements, and other 30352]. information security classification and facets of the program. 12. Administrative Updates [14 CFR declassification programs. NARA And the third priority is a new 1207, 1245, 1262, 1263, 1264, & 1266] regulations directed to the public regulation on the Office of Government NASA amended its regulations to make address access to and use of our Information Services functions and administrative updates to correct historically valuable holdings, including procedures. The Open Government Act spelling citations [80 FR 42028]. archives, donated historical materials, of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–175, 121 Stat. Nixon Presidential materials, and 2524), amended the Freedom of Rulemaking That Is of Particular Presidential records. NARA also issues Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552, as Concerns to Small Business regulations relating to the National amended), and created the Office of 13. NASA Capitalization Threshold Historical Publications and Records Government Information Services [48 CFR 1845 and 1852]—NASA issued Commission (NHPRC) grant programs. (OGIS) within the National Archives an interim rule amending the NASA NARA has three regulatory priorities and Records Administration (NARA). FAR Supplement to increase the NASA for fiscal year 2016, which are included OGIS is proposing regulations, pursuant capitalization threshold from $100,000 in The Regulatory Plan. The first are to 44 U.S.C. 2104, to clarify, elaborate to $500,000. The Government revisions to the Federal records upon, and specify the procedures in Accountability Office (GAO) management regulations found at 36 place for Federal agencies and public recommends that capital asset CFR chapter XII, subchapter B (phases requesters who seek OGIS’s services thresholds should be periodically I and II). The proposed changes include within the FOIA system. The reevaluated to ensure their continuing changes resulting from the 2011 regulations will specify the means by relevance and that they are established Presidential Memorandum on Managing which OGIS carries out its role as the at a level that would not omit a Government Records, the 2012 Federal FOIA Ombudsman—by working significant amount of assets from the Managing Government Records with Federal agencies to provide an balance sheet. Accordingly, the NASA Directive (M–12–18), and Public Law alternative to litigation in resolving Office of the Chief Financial Officer 113–187, The Presidential and Federal FOIA disputes, by independently conducted a review of the current Records Acts Amendments of 2014. The reviewing agency FOIA policies,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00174 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77883

procedures, and compliance, and by reflect the planning and reporting Work) to Hire Heroes Act of 2011, recommending improvements to FOIA’s requirements of the Government which requires Federal agencies to administration. Performance and Results treat certain active duty service BILLING CODE 7515–01–P Modernization Act. members as preference eligibles for • Human Resources Management purposes of competing for a Reporting Requirements position in the competitive service, even though the service members U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 3206–AM69 have not been discharged or MANAGEMENT The U.S. Office of Personnel released from active duty and do Management (OPM) is issuing final Statement of Regulatory and not have a Department of Defense regulations to remove or amend Deregulatory Priorities (DD) form 214, Certificate of Release certain provisions relating to or Discharge from Active Duty. In Fall 2015 Unified Agenda reporting requirements for Federal addition, OPM updated its I. Mission and Overview agencies that OPM has determined—pursuant to Executive regulations to reference existing OPM works in several broad Order 13583 of August 18, 2011, requirements for the alternative categories to recruit, retain and honor a ‘‘Establishing a Coordinated ranking and selection procedure world-class workforce for the American Government-Wide Initiative to called ‘‘category rating;’’ and to add people. a reference to the end date of • Promote Diversity and Inclusion in We manage Federal job the Federal Workforce’’—are no Operation Iraqi Freedom, which announcement postings at longer needed. This Executive order affected veteran status and USAJOBS.gov, and set policy on included a requirement for OPM to: preference eligibility. This action governmentwide hiring procedures. • ‘‘review applicable directives to will align OPM’s regulations with We conduct background agencies related to the development the existing statute. investigations for prospective or submission of agency human • employees and security clearances capital and other workforce plans Suitability across government, with hundreds of and reports in connection with thousands of cases each year. 3206–AN25 • recruitment, hiring, promotion, We uphold and defend the merit retention, professional The Office of Personnel Management systems in Federal civil service, making development, and training policies (OPM) will be proposing sure that the Federal workforce uses fair and practices, and develop a modifications to its rules to better practices in all aspects of personnel strategy for consolidating such ensure that applicants from all management. segments of society, including those • agency plans and reports where We manage pension benefits for appropriate and permitted by with prior criminal histories, retired Federal employees and their law . . .’’ receive a fair opportunity to families. We also administer health and • compete for Federal employment. other insurance programs for Federal Senior Employee Performance The proposed changes would Management System Certification employees and retirees. prohibit the collection of criminal • We provide training and 3206–AL20 background information until the development programs and other The U.S. Office of Personnel best qualified candidates are management tools for Federal Management (OPM) is proposing referred to a hiring manager. These employees and agencies. changes to the senior employee • In many cases, we take the lead in regulations would better ensure that performance management system applicants are evaluated as to developing, testing and implementing certification regulations which will new governmentwide policies that relevant competencies before ultimately replace interim criminal history information is relate to personnel issues. regulations published in 2004. Altogether, we work to make the collected. OPM would be providing Proposed changes reflect lessons a mechanism for requesting Federal government America’s model learned from several years of exceptions when there are employer for the 21st century. certifying agency Senior Executive legitimate, specific job-related, II. Statement of Regulatory and Service (SES) and Senior-Level (SL) reasons why agencies may need to Deregulatory Priorities and Scientific and Professional (ST) performance management systems disqualify candidates with certain Management Priorities and recommendations from a cross- types of adverse history from • Personnel Management in Agencies agency workgroup. particular types of positions. 3206–AL98 Hiring Priorities Health Benefit Priorities The U.S. Office of Personnel • • Federal Employees Health Benefits Management (OPM) will reissue a Veterans’ Preference Program: Family Member new proposed rule that will provide 3206–AM79 Disenrollments and Process for Removal regulatory definitions for various The U.S. Office of Personnel documents related to the strategic Management (OPM) issued interim 3206–AN09 management of human resources, regulations to implement statutory clarify requirements regarding the changes pertaining to veterans’ The U.S. Office of Personnel systems and metrics for managing preference. These changes were in Management (OPM) is issuing a human resources in the Federal response to the Hubbard Act, which proposed rule to clarify the process Government, streamline/clarify broadened the category of for removing ineligible individuals procedures agencies are required to individuals eligible for veterans’ from Federal Employees Health follow, eliminate the Human preference; and to implement the Benefits (FEHB) Program Self and Capital Management Report, and VOW (Veterans Opportunity to Family enrollments.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00175 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77884 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Pay and Leave Priorites for earning and using religious States v. Windsor, holding Section compensatory time off, and define Æ Compensatory Time Off for Religious 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act key terms. Observances (DOMA) unconstitutional. Æ 3206–AL55 Family and Medical Leave Act; III. Retrospective Review of Existing The U.S. Office of Personnel Definition of Spouse Regulations Management (OPM) will issue a 3206–AM90 final rule regarding compensatory The U.S. Office of Personnel Pursuant to section 6 of Executive time off for religious observances. Management (OPM) is revising the Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and The final regulation will address definition of ‘‘spouse’’ in its Regulatory Review’’ (July, 2015), the comments to the proposed rule (78 regulations on the Family and OPM retrospective review and analysis FR 53695), and will clarify Medical Leave Act (FMLA) as a final and updated regulations plan can employee and agency result of the decision by the United be found at https://www.opm.gov/about- responsibilities, provide timeframes States Supreme Court in United us/open-government/accountability/.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT—COMPLETED ACTIONS

Regulation Title Identifier No.

Managing Senior Executive Performance ...... 3206–AM48 Designation of National Security Positions In the Competitive Service, and Related Matters ...... 3206–AM73 Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Jacksonville, FL; Savannah, GA; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; and Roanoke, VA, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas ...... 3206–AN15 Federal Employees’ Retirement System; Present Value Conversion Factors for Spouses of Deceased Separated Employees 3206–AN16 Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program: Providing Option C Coverage for Children of Same-Sex Domestic Part- ners ...... 3206–AN04 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Disputed Claims and External Review Requirements ...... 3206–AM42 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Rate Setting for Community-Rated Plans ...... 3206–AN00 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Self Plus One Enrollment Type ...... 3206–AN08 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: FEHB Plan Performance Assessment System ...... 3206–AN13 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Subrogation and Reimbursement Recovery ...... 3206–AN14 Prevailing Rate Systems; Special Wage Schedules for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Control Employees of the Vicks- burg District in Mississippi ...... 3206–AN17 Overtime Pay for Border Patrol Agents ...... 3206–AN19 Federal Long-Term Care Insurance Program Eligibility Changes ...... 3206–AN05 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Enrollment Options Following the Termination of a Plan or Plan Option ...... 3206–AN07 General Schedule Locality Pay Areas ...... 3206–AM88

Beth F. Cobert, flexible, and timely regulations to help PBGC Insurance Programs Acting Director Office of Personnel affected parties. Management. PBGC continues to follow a regulatory PBGC administers two insurance programs for privately defined benefit BILLING CODE 6325–44–P approach that does not inadvertently discourage the maintenance of existing plans under title IV of the Employee defined benefit plans or the Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 establishment of new plans. Thus, in (ERISA): PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY developing new regulations and • Single-Employer Program. Under CORPORATION (PBGC) reviewing existing regulations, the the single-employer program, when a Statement of Regulatory and focus, to the extent possible, is to avoid plan terminates with insufficient assets Deregulatory Priorities placing burdens on plans, employers, to cover all plan benefits (distress and and participants, and to ease and involuntary terminations), PBGC pays The Pension Benefit Guaranty simplify employer compliance. PBGC plan benefits that are guaranteed under Corporation (PBGC) protects the particularly strives to meet the needs of title IV. PBGC also pays nonguaranteed pensions of more than 40 million people small businesses that sponsor defined plan benefits to the extent funded by in more than 25,000 private-sector benefit plans. plan assets or recoveries from defined benefit plans. PBGC receives no PBGC develops its regulations in employers. tax revenues. Operations are financed accordance with the principles set forth • Multiemployer Program. The by insurance premiums, investment in Executive Order 13563 ‘‘Improving smaller multiemployer program covers income, assets from pension plans Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ approximately 1,400 collectively trusteed by PBGC, and recoveries from (Jan. 18, 2011), and PBGC’s Plan for bargained plans involving more than the companies formerly responsible for Regulatory Review (Regulatory Review one unrelated employer. PBGC provides the trusteed plans. Plan).1 This Statement of Regulatory financial assistance (in the form of a To carry out these functions, PBGC and Deregulatory Priorities reflects loan) to the plan if the plan is unable issues regulations on such matters as PBGC’s ongoing implementation of its to pay benefits at the guaranteed level. Regulatory Review Plan. termination, payment of premiums, The guarantee is differently structured reporting and disclosure, and from and generally significantly smaller 1 assessment and collection of employer http://www.pbgc.gov/documents/plan-for- than the single-employer guarantee. regulatory-review.pdf . Progress reports on the plan liability. The Corporation is committed can be found at http://www.pbgc.gov/res/laws-and- At the end of FY 2014, PBGC had a to issuing simple, understandable, regulations/reducing-regulatory-burden.html. deficit of about $62 billion in its

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00176 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77885

insurance programs. Current PBGC guidance that do not impose undue regulations and reduce burden, enhance premiums are insufficient. burdens that could impede maintenance retirement security, and to implement or establishment of defined benefit statutory changes, particularly the Regulatory Objectives and Priorities plans. Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of PBGC’s regulatory objectives and Through its regulations and other 2014 (MPRA) and the Pension priorities are developed in the context guidance, PBGC strives to minimize Protection Act of 2006 (PPA 2006). of the Corporation’s statutory purposes: burdens on plans, plan sponsors, and • To encourage voluntary private Rethinking Existing Regulations plan participants; simplify filing; pension plans. • To provide for the timely and provide relief for small businesses and Pursuant to section 6 of Executive uninterrupted payment of pension plans; and assist plans in complying Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and benefits. with applicable requirements. To Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), the • To keep premiums at the lowest enhance policy-making through following Regulatory Identifier Numbers possible levels. collaboration, PBGC also plans to (RINs) have been identified as Pensions and the statutory framework expand opportunities for public associated with retrospective review in which they are maintained and participation in rulemaking (see Open and analysis in the Department’s final terminate are complex. Despite this Government and Public Participation retrospective review of regulations plan. complexity, PBGC is committed to below). The regulatory actions associated with issuing simple, understandable, flexible, PBGC’s current regulatory objectives these RINs, as well as other regulatory and timely regulations and other and priorities are to simplify its review projects, are described below.

Title RIN Effect on small business

Annual Financial and Actuarial Information Reporting; Changes to Waivers ...... 1212–AB30 Expected to reduce burden on small business. Reportable Events ...... 1212–AB06 Expected to reduce burden on small business. Multiemployer Plans; Electronic Filing Requirements ...... 1212–AB28 Expected to reduce burden on small business. Valuation assumptions and methods; interest and mortality ...... 1212–AB25 Undetermined.

ERISA section 4010. PBGC reviewed flexibility to determine whether a Retirement Security its regulation on Annual Financial and reporting waiver will apply. Under the DC to DB plan rollovers. In November Actuarial Information Reporting (part new rules, reporting will be limited to 2015, PBGC published a final rule 5 that 4010) and the related e-filing situations that pose the greatest risk to clarifies the treatment of benefits application to consider ways of the pension insurance system. The final resulting from a rollover distribution reducing reporting burden and ensuring rule was developed in response to from a defined contribution plan to a that PBGC receives the critical comments on two earlier proposals, defined benefit plan, if the defined information it needs. In July 2015, PBGC discussion at PBGC’s first-ever 2 benefit plan was terminated and published a proposed rule that would regulatory hearing, and Executive Order trusteed by PBGC.6 Under the final modify the existing reporting waiver for 13563. regulation, a benefit resulting from companies with aggregate underfunding Multiemployer plans filing rollover amounts generally will not be of less than $15 million in all their subject to PBGC’s maximum plans. This change would better align requirements. In September 2015, PBGC 4 guaranteeable benefit or phase-in the regulation with the original intent of published a final rule that will require electronic filing of certain limitations and will be in the second generally limiting 4010 reporting relief highest priority category of benefits in to smaller plans. The proposal would multiemployer plan notices. These changes will make the provision of the allocation of assets. This rulemaking also add two new reporting waivers, was part of PBGC’s efforts to enhance codify the guidance provided in recent information to PBGC more efficient and effective and result in a slight decrease retirement security by promoting statutory changes and related PBGC lifetime income options. guidance on 4010 reporting, and make in burden on the public. other technical changes. PBGC expects Valuation assumptions and methods; Statutory Implementation to publish a final rule early in FY 2016. interest and mortality. PBGC has MPRA. MPRA established new Reportable events. ERISA section established a routine, periodic review of options for trustees of multiemployer 4043 and PBGC’s implementing PBGC’s regulations and policies to plans that will potentially run out of regulation requires that pension plans ensure that the actuarial and economic money to apply to PBGC for financial and the companies that sponsor them content remains current. PBGC plans to assistance. In June 2015, PBGC give PBGC notice of various events publish a proposed rule in FY 2016 that published an interim final rule 7 affecting either the company or the plan would amend its benefit valuation and prescribing the application process and that may signal financial problems and asset allocation regulations by notice requirements for partitions of could potentially put pensions at risk. improving its valuation assumptions eligible multiemployer plans under In September 2015, PBGC published a and methods. Chief among the MPRA. PBGC received nine comments final rule 3 that will provide the majority modifications PBGC is considering are of sponsors and plans with increased 5 modifications to mortality rates and the http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-11-25/ pdf/2014-27826.pdf. 2 http://www.pbgc.gov/Documents/2015- format of its interest factors. 6 79 FR 18483 (Apr. 2, 2014), http://www.pbgc. 18177.pdf. gov/documents/2014-07323.pdf. 3 http://www.pbgc.gov/documents/2015- 4 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-17/ 7 http://www.pbgc.gov/documents/2015- 14930.pdf. pdf/2015-23361.pdf. 14930.pdf.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00177 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77886 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

on the interim final rule and expects to simplifying and streamlining current and lower income levels than the issue a new final rule in December 2015. requirements, better coordinating with Nation’s averages and those in PBGC is also developing a proposed rule requirements of other agencies, and traditionally underserved markets. The that would prescribe rules for facilitated providing more options for sponsors of Agency serves as a guarantor of small mergers of multiemployer plans under terminating non-covered plans. business loans, and also provides MPRA and conform the existing management and technical assistance to Open Government and Increased Public regulation to changes in the law. PBGC existing or potential small business Participation expects to publish that proposal in owners through various grants, December 2015. PBGC is doing more to encourage cooperative agreements or contracts. Cash balance plans. PPA 2006 public participation in the regulatory This access to capital and other changed the rules for determining process. For example, PBGC’s current assistance provides a crucial foundation benefits in cash balance plans and other efforts to reduce regulatory burden are for those starting a new business, or statutory hybrid plans. In October 2011, in substantial part a response to public growing an existing business and PBGC published a proposed rule comments. The regulatory projects ultimately helps to create new jobs. SBA implementing the changes in both discussed above highlight PBGC’s also provides direct financial assistance PBGC-trusteed plans and in plans that customer-focused efforts to reduce to homeowners, renters, and small close out in the private sector.8 Now regulatory burden. business to help in the rebuilding of that Treasury has issued final PBGC’s Regulatory Review Plan sets communities in the aftermath of a regulations on statutory hybrid plans, forth ways to expand opportunities for disaster. public participation in the regulatory PBGC is developing a final rule, which Reducing Burden on Small Businesses it expects to publish early in FY 2016. process. For example, in June 2013, Missing participants. A major focus of PBGC held its first-ever regulatory SBA’s regulatory policy reflects a PBGC’s current regulatory efforts is the hearing on the reportable events commitment to developing regulations development of a proposal to improve proposed rule, so that the agency would that reduce or eliminate the burden on and expand the existing missing have a better understanding of the needs the public, in particular the Agency’s participants program. As authorized by and concerns of plan administrators and core constituents—small businesses. PPA 2006, the expanded program will plan sponsors. Discussion at that SBA’s regulatory process generally cover terminating defined contribution hearing informed PBGC’s final rule. includes an assessment of the costs and plans, non-covered defined benefit PBGC’s 2015 Request for Information 9 benefits of the regulations as required by plans, and multiemployer plans. The on partitions and facilitated mergers Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory proposal will take into account under MPRA is an example of PBGC’s Planning and Review;’’ Executive Order comments received from employers, efforts to solicit public participation in 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and plans, and other stakeholders in the regulatory process. Regulatory Review;’’ and the Regulatory response to a 2013 Request for PBGC plans to provide additional Flexibility Act. SBA’s program offices Information. PBGC is working with IRS means for public involvement, are particularly invested in finding ways and DOL to coordinate government including on-line town hall meetings, to reduce the burden imposed by the requirements for dealing with missing social media, and continuing Agency’s core activities in its loan, participant issues. PBGC expects to opportunity for public comment on innovation, and procurement programs. publish a proposed regulation early in PBGC’s Web site. Openness and Transparency FY 2016. PBGC also invites comments on the Regulatory Review Plan on an on-going SBA promotes transparency, Small Businesses basis as we engage in the review collaboration, and public participation PBGC takes into account the special process. Comments should be sent to in its rulemaking process. To that end, needs and concerns of small businesses [email protected]. SBA routinely solicits comments on its in making policy. A large percentage of PBGC will continue to look for ways regulations. Where appropriate, SBA the plans insured by PBGC are small or to further improve its regulations. also conducts hearings, webinars, and maintained by small employers. PBGC BILLING CODE 7709–02–P other public events as part of its has issued or is considering several regulatory process. proposed rules that will focus on small Regulatory Framework businesses: Reportable events. The reportable events final rule discussed U.S. SMALL BUSINESS The SBA’s FY 2014 to FY 2018 above under Retrospective Review of ADMINISTRATION (SBA) strategic plan serves as the foundation Existing Regulations would waive many Statement of Regulatory Priorities for the regulations that the Agency will reporting requirements for plans with develop during the next twelve months. Overview fewer than 100 participants. This Strategic Plan provides a ERISA section 4010. The proposed The mission of the U.S. Small framework for strengthening, rule discussed above under Business Administration (SBA) is to streamlining, and simplifying SBA’s Retrospective Review of Existing maintain and strengthen the Nation’s programs while leveraging collaborative Regulations would preserve the existing economy by enabling the establishment relationships with other agencies and waiver reporting waiver tied to and viability of small businesses and by the private sector to maximize the tools aggregate underfunding of less than $15 assisting in economic recovery of small business owners and million for sponsors of smaller plans. communities after disasters. In carrying entrepreneurs need to drive American Missing participants. The missing out this mission, SBA strives to improve innovation and strengthen the economy. participants proposed rule discussed the economic environment for small The plan sets out three strategic goals: above under PPA 2006 Implementation businesses, including those in areas that (1) Growing businesses and creating would benefit small businesses by have significantly higher unemployment jobs; (2) serving as the voice for small business; and (3) building an SBA that 8 76 FR 67105 (Oct. 31, 2011), http://www.pbgc. 9 http://www.pbgc.gov/documents/2015- meets the needs of today’s and gov/Documents/2011-28124.pdf. 03434.pdf. tomorrow’s small businesses. In order to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00178 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77887

achieve these goals SBA will, among aligning the requirements with normal extend the availability of mentor- other objectives, focus on: commercial industry practices. prote´ge´ programs to all small business • concerns. During the next twelve Expanding access to capital through (2) Small Business Investment Company SBA’s extensive lending network; months, one of SBA’s priorities will be • (SBIC) Program; Impact SBICs (RIN: Ensuring Federal contracting goals 3245–AG66) to issue final regulations establishing are met or exceeded by collaborating these mentor-prote´ge´ programs. The across the Federal Government to This rule proposes to establish a various types of assistance that a mentor expand opportunities for small regulatory structure for the SBIC will be expected to provide to a prote´ge´ businesses and strengthen the integrity program’s Impact Investment Fund include technical and/or management of the Federal contracting data and initiative, which is currently assistance; financial assistance in the certification process; implemented via policy memorandum. form of equity investment and/or loans; • Strengthening SBA’s relevance to The goal of the Impact Investment Fund subcontracts and/or assistance in high growth entrepreneurs and small is to support small business investment performing prime contracts with the strategies that maximize financial businesses to more effectively drive Government in the form of joint venture returns while also yielding enhanced innovation and job creation; and arrangements. The regulatory action social, environmental, or economic • Mitigating risk and improving would enhance the ability of small impacts as part of the SBIC program’s program oversight. business concerns to obtain larger prime overall effort to supplement the flow of contracts that would be normally out of The regulations reported in SBA’s private equity and long-term loan funds the reach of these businesses. The small semi-annual regulatory agenda and plan to small businesses in underserved ´ ´ are intended to facilitate achievement of communities and the innovative sectors business mentor-protege programs these goals and objectives. Over the next whose capital needs are not being met. would allow all small businesses to tap twelve months, SBA’s highest regulatory The proposed rule supports the into the expertise and capital of larger priorities will be to implement the development of America’s growing firms, which in turn would help small following regulations and program impact investing industry by making business concerns become more guidance: (1) Affiliation for Business available a new type of SBIC license competitive in the Federal procurement Loan Programs and Surety Bond called an Impact SBIC to investment arena. Guarantee Program (RIN: 3245–AG73); funds meeting the SBIC program’s (2) Small Business Investment Company (4) Small Business Government licensing qualifications, provides Contracting and National Defense (SBIC) Program; Impact SBICs (RIN: application and examination fee 3245–AG66); (3) Small Business Authorization Act of 2013 Amendments considerations to incentivize impact (RIN: 3245–AG58) Mentor-Prote´ge´ Programs (RIN: 3245– investing participation, establishes AG24), (4) Small Business Government leverage eligibility requirements, and SBA proposed amending its Contracting and National Defense establishes reporting and performance regulations to implement provisions of Authorization Act of 2013 Amendments measures for licensed funds to maintain the National Defense Authorization Act (RIN: 3245–AG58), and (5) Small Impact SBIC designation. The proposed of 2013, which pertain to performance Business Innovation Research Program rule would require an Impact SBIC to requirements applicable to small and Small Business Technology invest at least 50% of its total invested business and socioeconomic program Transfer Program Policy Directive (RIN: capital in one or both categories of set aside contracts and small business 3245–AG64). impact investment: (a) SBA-identified subcontracting. SBA also proposed to (1) Affiliation for Business Loan impact investments, which are amend SBA’s regulations concerning the Programs and Surety Bond Guarantee investments in small businesses located nonmanufacturer rule and affiliation Program (RIN: 3245–AG73) in geographic areas and sectors of rules. Further, SBA proposed to allow a national priority designated by SBA, joint venture to qualify as small for any This rule will propose to amend such as Low- and Moderate- Income government procurement as long as SBA’s regulations to redefine how the Zones (LMI); and/or (b) fund-identified each partner to the joint venture agency determines affiliation as it impact investments, which are qualifies individually as small. relates to eligibility for its Surety Bond investments that meet an SBIC’s own Guarantee (SBG) Program and the definition, subject to SBA’s approval, of (5) Small Business Innovation Research business loan programs, consisting of an ‘‘Impact Investment,’’ such as small Program and Small Business the 7(a) and 504 Loan Programs and the businesses operating in the clean Technology Transfer Program Policy Business Disaster Loan Programs. SBA energy, education or healthcare sectors. Directive (RIN: 3245–AG64): has reviewed the applicable regulations and concluded that, in order to expand (3) Small Business Mentor-Prote´ge´ This proposal seeks to revise the the reach of these programs and increase Programs (RIN: 3245–AG24) Small Business Innovation Research accessibility to the benefits the SBA currently has a mentor-prote´ge´ (SBIR) and Small Business Technology programs offer for small businesses, one program for the 8(a) Business Transfer (STTR) Policy Directives. of the Agency’s priorities will be to Development Program that is intended Specifically, SBA proposes to combine simplify guidelines for determining to enhance the capabilities of the the two directives into one integrated affiliation for program eligibility based prote´ge´ and to improve its ability to Directive, clarify the Phase III on size. The proposed amendments successfully compete for Federal preference afforded to SBIR and STTR would reduce the regulatory burden on contracts. The Small Business Jobs Act small business awardees, add small businesses and SBA participating authorized SBA to use this model to definitions relating to data rights, clarify lenders, streamline delivery of program establish similar mentor-prote´ge´ the benchmarks for progress towards assistance, and lower the costs related to programs for the Service Disabled commercialization, and update language program participation. As part of its Veteran Owned, HUBZone and Women- regarding the calculations of extramural process to develop this rule, SBA Owned Small Business Programs. The Research/Research & Development solicited and received public feedback National Defense Authorization Act for budgets used to fund the SBIR/STTR in support of simplifying the rules and FY 2013 further authorized SBA to programs.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00179 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77888 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Retrospective Review of Existing Statement of Need: It is necessary to Agency Contact: Edsel M. Brown Jr., Regulations update the data rights, Phase III Assistant Director, Office of Innovation, Pursuant to section 6 of Executive preference, benchmark sections, and Small Business Administration, 409 Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and clarify how agencies calculate Third Street SW., Washington, DC Regulatory Review’’ (Jan. 18, 2011), SBA extramural budget due to numerous 20416, Phone: 202 205–6450, Email: developed a plan for the retrospective inquiries and requests for clarification [email protected]. review of its regulations. Since that date received from SBIR and STTR Program RIN: 3245–AG64 SBA has issued several updates to this Managers and small businesses plan to reflect the Agency’s ongoing regarding these issues. Requests for clarification indicate that there is efforts in carrying out this executive SBA order. The final agency plan and review confusion among participating agencies updates, which can be found at http:// and small business concerns regarding 125. Small Business Investment www.sba.gov/about-sba/sba_ these policy issues. It is necessary to Company (SBIC) Program; Impact performance/open_government/ combine the Policy Directives to SBICS retrospective_review_of_regulations, increase ease of use and to reduce Priority: Other Significant. currently identify the three rules and duplicity, as much of the language in Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 681 the policy directive discussed above. the current Directives is identical for CFR Citation: 13 CFR 107. both programs. The clarifications and Legal Deadline: None. consolidation will provide clearer Abstract: This rule proposes to guidance and uniformity of these SBA establish a regulatory structure for the sections of the Policy Directive, and are SBIC Programs Impact Investment Fund, Proposed Rule Stage necessary to enhance the efficient which is currently being implemented implementation of the programs. through a policy memorandum to 124. Small Business Innovation Summary of Legal Basis: Section 9(j) interested applicants. The rule proposes Research Program and Small Business and (p) of the Small Business Act, to establish in the regulations a new Technology Transfer Program Policy codified at 15 U.S.C. 638(j) & (p) type of SBIC license called the Impact Directive requires SBA to issue directives to the SBIR/STTR participating agencies to SBIC license and will include Priority: Other Significant. application and examination fee Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 638(p); simplify and standardize program proposals, selections, contracting, considerations to incentivize Impact Pub. L. 112–81, sec 5001, et seq. Investment Fund participation. Impact CFR Citation: 13 CFR Chapter 1. compliance, and audit procedures, Legal Deadline: None. while allowing the participating SBICs may also be able to access Early Abstract: SBA reviews its Small agencies flexibility in the operation of Stage leverage on the same terms as Business Innovation Research (SBIR) their individual programs. Early Stage SBICs without applying and Small Business Technology Alternatives: If SBA does not amend through the Early Stage call process Transfer (STTR) program policy the Policy Directives, the participating defined in 107.310. This will allow directives regularly to determine areas agencies and small business concerns Impact SBICs with early stage strategies that need updating and further will continue to need additional to apply for the program. The new clarification. On November 7, 2014, guidance and clarification regarding the license will be available to investment SBA issued an advance notice of policy implementation of data rights, Phase III funds that meet the SBIC Programs directive amendments and request for awards, and the commercialization licensing qualifications and commit to comments at 77 FR 66342. SBA benchmarks. invest at least 50% of their invested explained that it intended to update the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The capital in impact investments as defined directives on a regular basis and to consolidation and revision of the SBIR/ in the rule. The rule would also outline restructure and reorganize the STTR Policy Directive is essential to the reporting and performance measures for directives, as well as address certain efficient implementation of the licensed funds to maintain Impact policy issues relating to SBIR and STTR respective programs. There may be some Investment Fund designation. The goal data rights and Phase III work. In this costs associated with the consolidation of the Impact Investment Fund is to ANPRM, SBA outlined what it believed and revision of the Policy Directives, support small business investment were the issues concerning data rights such as updating current resource strategies that maximize financial and Phase III awards and requested materials to reflect the clarifications and returns while also yielding enhanced feedback on several questions posed. consolidation to one document; social environmental or economic The comments SBA received were however, SBA anticipates such costs are impacts as part of the SBIC Programs generally in agreement that the sections not burdensome. overall effort to supplement the flow of of the directives relating to data rights Risks: None identified. private equity and long-term loan funds and Phase III awards need further Timetable: to small businesses whose capital needs clarification. are not being met. SBA is proposing clarification of the Action Date FR Cite Statement of Need: SBA originally issues relating to both programs announced the launch of the SBIC ANPRM ...... 11/07/14 79 FR 66342 program’s Impact Investing Initiative concerning data rights, Phase III awards, ANPRM Comment 01/06/15 and miscellaneous issues such as Period End. (Initiative) on April 7, 2011, with a benchmarks to commercialization NPRM ...... 12/00/15 commitment of $1 billion in debenture achievement and the calculation of leverage over a 5-year period to SBICs extramural budget. SBA is also Regulatory Flexibility Analysis that committed to deploy at least 50% proposing to amend both the SBIR and Required: No. of their total invested capital in small STTR policy directives by combining Government Levels Affected: Federal. businesses located in low-to-moderate the two directives into one because the Additional Information: Included in income areas, economically-distressed general structure of both programs is the SBA’s Retrospective Review under areas and rural areas, as well as small same. Executive Orders 13563 and 13610. businesses active in the education and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00180 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77889

clean energy sectors. Subsequently, SBA the Initiative by promulgating Third Street SW., Washington, DC made several changes to the Initiative in regulations. In addition, SBA 20416, Phone: 202–205–6714, Email: 2014, including renaming the Initiative considered restricting the definition of [email protected]. the Impact Investment Fund, and an Impact Investment to financings that RIN: 3245–AG66 expanding its scope to reflect SBA’s meet requirements already outlined in commitment beyond the initial 5-year federal regulations, such as Energy- term. This proposed rule follows that Savings Investments, LMI Investments SBA commitment by providing a permanent or investments in rural areas. These framework within the SBIC program’s investments are aligned with federal 126. Affiliation for Business Loan regulations, highlighting the important policy priorities and are easy to define Programs and Surety Bond Guarantee role of impact investing by supporting and monitor, but SBA determined a Program the development of America’s growing more accommodative approach would Priority: Other Significant. impact investing industry, and seeking be more effective. The proposed rule has Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6) to expand the pool of investment capital been drafted to allow Impact SBIC CFR Citation: 13 CFR 115; 13 CFR available to underserved communities applicants to make SBA-identified 120; 13 CFR 121. and innovative sectors. The proposed impact investments, which target Legal Deadline: None. rule requires an Impact SBIC to invest federal priority areas, or make fund- Abstract: The U.S. Small Business at least 50% of its total invested capital identified impact investments that align Administration (SBA) has determined in one or both categories of impact with their own definitions of impact. that changing conditions in the investment: (1) SBA-identified impact This approach expands the reach of American economy and a constantly investments, which are investments in SBA’s impact investing efforts beyond evolving small business community small businesses located in geographic the limited subset of investments that compel it to seek ways to improve areas and sectors of national priority meet existing regulatory criteria and program efficiency for its Surety Bond designated by SBA, such as Low and promotes freedom of choice for impact Guarantee (SBG) Program, and the Moderate Income Zones; and (2) fund- fund managers to pursue an impact business loan programs consisting of the identified impact investments, which investing strategy based on their own 7(a) Loan Program, the Business Disaster are investments that meet an SBIC’s definition of Impact Investment. Loan Programs (the Economic Injury own definition, subject to SBA’s Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Disaster Loans, Reservist Injury Disaster approval, of an Impact Investment, such proposed rule will result in an Loans, Physical Disaster Business as small businesses operating in the approximate 6.1 basis point increase in Loans, Immediate Disaster Assistance clean energy, education and/or the annual charge paid by all SBICs Program loans), the Microloan Program, healthcare sectors. The proposed rule with outstanding leverage and will and the Development Company Program will encourage the creation of Impact include de minimis additional oversight (the 504 Loan Program). As a result, SBICs by providing certain application costs to SBA in monitoring the SBA proposes to simplify guidelines for and examination fee discounts to these additional reporting requirements that determining affiliation for eligibility funds. Impact SBICs must comply with. The based on size as it relates to these Summary of Legal Basis: The policy proposed rule benefits SBA by programs. This proposed rule would goal of the Small Business Investment encouraging SBICs to deploy capital to redefine affiliation for all five Programs, Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C. 661 et seq., is to small businesses operating in thereby simplifying eligibility stimulate and supplement the flow of geographic areas and sectors of national determinations. Statement of Need: The U.S. Small private equity capital and long-term priority designated by SBA, and SBA Business Administration (SBA) has loan funds to the nation’s small expects that it will result in increased determined that changing conditions in businesses for the sound financing of financings to small businesses taking their growth, expansion, and the American economy and a constantly innovative approaches in, among others, evolving small business community modernization. The Small Business the educational, clean energy and Investment Act contains several compel it to seek ways to improve healthcare sectors. As a corollary provisions aimed at promoting the flow program efficiency for its Surety Bond benefit, the proposed rule will support of capital to several special categories of Guarantee (‘‘SBG’’) Program, and the the development of the impact investing small business, including those located business loan programs consisting of the industry more broadly by incorporating in low income geographic areas, those 7(a) Loan Program, the Economic Injury impact investing best practices, engaged in energy-saving activities and Disaster Loan (‘‘EIDL’’) Program, the especially with regard to the smaller businesses, 15 U.S.C. Microloan Program, and the measurement and assessment of impact. 683(b)(2)(C), 683(b)(2)(D), 683(d). The Development Company Program (the Risks: None identified. ‘‘504 Loan Program’’). proposed rule was crafted to enhance Timetable: the SBIC program’s effectiveness in SBA’s surety bond and business loan channeling much-needed capital to Action Date FR Cite programs are dedicated to providing small businesses operating in these and solutions to qualified small businesses other underserved areas and sectors of NPRM ...... 01/00/16 unable to secure conventional financing the U.S. economy. or surety bonding through traditional Alternatives: SBA considered several Regulatory Flexibility Analysis channels. Receipt of this form of SBA alternatives to the proposed regulation, Required: Yes. assistance includes program including continuing its impact Small Entities Affected: Businesses. qualifications surrounding the size of a investment objectives solely through Government Levels Affected: None. small business applicant. The proposed existing policy initiatives. However, Additional Information: Included in regulations set forth affiliation those policy initiatives did not provide SBA’s Retrospective Review under principles more in keeping with the sufficient incentives to attract Impact Executive Orders 13563 and 13610. capital structures presented in the SBIC fund managers to the program. Agency Contact: Nate T. Yohannes, surety and business loan programs. Moreover, SBA determined that it must Senior Advisor, Office of Investments, Summary of Legal Basis: Executive demonstrate a lasting commitment to Small Business Administration, 409 Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00181 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77890 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

and Regulatory Review,’’ provides that would also significantly reduce the two statutes, the rule will establish a agencies ‘‘must identify and use the burden on loan applicants to provide Government-wide mentor-prote´ge´ best, most innovative, and least additional documentation evidencing program for all small business concerns, burdensome tools for achieving that they are eligible for SBA loan consistent with SBA’s mentor-prote´ge´ regulatory ends.’’ (Emphasis added). assistance. program for Participants in SBA’s 8(a) Executive Order 13563 further provides Risks: This action introduces a form Business Development (BD) program. that ‘‘[t]o facilitate the periodic review of regulatory risk associated with The rule will also make minor changes of existing significant regulations, considering applicants currently unable to the mentor-prote´ge´ provisions for the agencies shall consider how best to to receive SBA financial assistance. It is, 8(a) Business Development program in promote retrospective analysis of rules however, inequitable to disregard a order to make the mentor-prote´ge´ rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, small business because its distributed for each of the programs as consistent as insufficient, or excessively burdensome, ownership or an affiliate’s franchise or possible. The rule will amend the and to modify, streamline, expand, or licensing agreement compels SBA to current joint venture provisions to repeal them in accordance with what aggregate unrelated entities for clarify the conditions for creating and has been learned.’’ (Emphasis added). determining a small concern’s size. operating joint venture partnerships, SBA has reviewed its regulations with Making these types of businesses including the effect of such partnerships regard to the business loan programs eligible for SBA assistance would on any mentor-prote´ge´ relationships. and Surety Bond Guarantee program expand our mission of providing this Finally, the rule will make several and is proposing a number of vital source of assistance to small additional changes to current size, 8(a) amendments and revisions to business. This additional assistance Office of Hearings and Appeals or accomplish this goal. The loan programs would serve to reduce reputational risk HUBZone regulations, concerning authorized by the Small Business Act associated with SBA’s efficacy as a among other things, ownership and (Act), 15 U.S.C. 631 et seq., that are federal program truly committed to control, changes in primary industry, affected by this proposed rule are: (1) needs of the small business community. standards of review and interested party The 7(a) Loan Program authorized by Timetable: status for some appeals. section 7(a) of the Act, (2) the Economic Statement of Need: The Small Injury Disaster Loan (‘‘EIDL’’) Program Action Date FR Cite Business Jobs Act determined that the authorized by section 7(b) of the Act, SBA-administered mentor-prote´ge´ and (3) the Microloan Program NPRM ...... 10/02/15 80 FR 59667 program currently available to 8(a) BD authorized by section 7(m) of the Act. NPRM Comment 12/01/15 participants is a valuable tool for all The 504 Loan Program, which is Period End. small business concerns and authorized authorized by Title V of the Small Final Rule ...... 06/00/16 SBA to establish mentor prote´ge´ Business Investment Act of 1958 (the programs for the HUBZone SBC, Service ‘‘SBIA’’), as amended, 15 U.S.C. 695 et Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Disabled Veteran-Owned SBCs, and seq., is also affected. This rule also Required: Yes. Women-Owned Small Business proposes revisions to the Surety Bond Small Entities Affected: Businesses. programs. This authority is consistent Guarantee (‘‘SBG’’) Program, authorized Government Levels Affected: None. with recommendations issued by an by section 411 of the SBIA. Additional Information: Included in interagency task force created by Alternatives: SBA first considered SBA’s Retrospective Review under President Obama on Federal Contracting retaining the existing principles used to Executive Orders 13563 and 13610. Opportunities for Small Businesses. evaluate the size of a small business. It Agency Contact: John M. Wade, Among other things, the task force rejected that alternative arguing that a Acting Director, Office of Financial recommended that mentor-prote´ge´ strict interpretation of these existing Assistance, Small Business programs should be promoted through a rules extends indiscriminate harm to Administration, 409 Third Street SW., new Government-wide framework to small business growth and economic Washington, DC 20416, Phone: 202 205– give small businesses the opportunity to development. SBA also considered 3647, Email: [email protected]. develop under the wing of experienced proposing a different regulation on size RIN: 3245–AG73 large businesses in an expanded Federal exclusively for the surety and business procurement arena. loan program. It rejected this alternative Summary of Legal Basis: The Small recognizing the merits behind many of SBA Business Jobs Act of 2010, Public Law the other standards in the current No. 111–240, section 1347(b)(3), regulations. Final Rule Stage authorizes SBA to establish mentor- In these proposed rules, SBA proffers ´ ´ 127. Small Business Mentor-Prote´ge´ protege programs for HUBZone SBC, that the size a of small business Programs Service Disabled Veteran-Owned SBCs, applicant with diffused ownership or and Women-Owned Small Business operating under franchise or license Priority: Other Significant. programs SBCs. The National Defense agreements should be determined Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111–240; sec Authorization Act for FY 2013; Public eligible without aggregating minority 1347;15 U.S.C. 657r Law 112–239, section 1641, authorizes ownership interests, common CFR Citation: 13 CFR 121; 13 CFR SBA to establish programs for all SBCs. investments or by reference to an 124; 13 CFR 125; 13 CFR 126; 13 CFR Alternatives: At this point, SBA affiliate’s relationship to any franchisor 127; 13 CFR 134 believes that the best option for or licensor. Legal Deadline: None. implementing the authority is to create Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Abstract: The U.S. Small Business a regulatory scheme that is similar to the will ultimately reduce the costs of Administration (SBA or Agency) is existing mentor-prote´ge´ program. submitting an application for the loan amending its regulations to implement Anticipated Cost and Benefits: SBA applicant and its participating lender. provisions of the Small Business Jobs has not yet quantified the costs By eliminating or modifying certain Act of 2010 and the National Defense associated with this rule. However, affiliation principles for the Business Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. program participants, particularly the Loan Programs, this proposed rule Based on authorities provided in these prote´ge´s, would be able to leverage the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00182 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77891

mentoring opportunities as a form of subcontracting. SBA is also proposing to Public Law 112–239, 126 Stat. 1632 business development assistance that make changes to its regulations (Jan. 2013), made several amendments could enhance their capabilities to concerning the nonmanufacturer rule to SBA’s contracting programs as successfully compete for contracts in and affiliation rules. Further, SBA is authorized by the Small Business Act. and out of the Federal contracting arena. proposing to allow a joint venture to This rule is necessary in order to This assistance may include technical qualify as small for any government implement these amendments to the and/or management assistance; financial procurement as long as each partner to Small Business Act and ensure assistance in the form of equity the joint venture qualifies individually consistency between SBA’s contracting investments and/or loans; subcontracts; as small under the size standard regulations and the statute. SBA must and/or assistance in performing prime corresponding to the NAICS code implement the statutory provisions in contracts with the Government in the assigned in the solicitation. the NDAA. There is no alternative to form of joint venture arrangements. Statement of Need: The National implementing those provisions. There is Risks: None identified. Defense Authorization Act of 2013 also no viable alternative to not Timetable: (NDAA), Public Law 112–239, 126 Stat. implementing the non-statutory based 1632 (Jan. 2013), made several changes; to retain the status quo would Action Date FR Cite amendments to SBA’s contracting mean continued confusion, litigation programs as authorized by the Small and controversy particularly with NPRM ...... 02/05/15 80 FR 6618 Business Act. This rule is necessary in respect to the joint venture and NPRM Comment 04/06/15 order to implement these amendments Period End. nonmanufacturer regulations. NPRM Comment 04/07/15 80 FR 18556 to the Small Business Act and ensure Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These Period Exten- consistency between SBA’s contracting final regulations should benefit small sion. regulations and the statute. The rule business concerns by allowing small NPRM Comment 05/06/15 also contains other changes not business concern prime contractors to Period End. specifically resulting from the NDAA use similarly situated small business Final Rule ...... 04/00/16 but which are either necessary to create concern subcontractors in the conformance with the NDAA performance of a set aside contract, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis amendments, or are necessary to clarify thereby expanding the capacity of the Required: Yes. existing ambiguities and simplify small business prime contractor and Small Entities Affected: Businesses. certain regulations governing SBA’s size potentially enabling the firm to compete Government Levels Affected: None. and government contracting programs, for and obtain larger contracts. It also Agency Contact: Brenda J. Fernandez, including the exception to affiliation for strengthens the small business Procurement Analyst, Small Business certain joint ventures and the non- subcontracting provisions, which may Administration, 409 Third Street SW., manufacturer regulations. result in more subcontract awards to Washington, DC 20416, Phone: 202– Summary of Legal Basis: This small business concerns. The final rule 205–7337, Email: proposed rule implements Sections also seeks to address or clarify issues [email protected]. 1621, 1651, 1652, and 1653 of the that are ambiguous or subject to dispute, RIN: 3245–AG24 NDAA. As a result of changes in section thereby providing clarity to contracting 1621 of the NDAA, as codified at 15 officers as well as small business U.S.C. 644(l), the rule amends the concerns. Clarifying the confusion and SBA regulations regarding the uncertainty concerning the applicability responsibilities of Procurement Center of SBA contracting regulations will 128. Small Business Government Representatives as set forth in 13 CFR reduce the time burden on the small Contracting and National Defense 125. Section 1651 of the NDAA, business contracting community and Authorization Act of 2013 Amendments codified at 15 U.S.C. 657s, amendments therefore make it easier for them to Priority: Other Significant. regarding the limitations on contract with the Federal Government. Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 631; Public subcontracting for full or partial small This rule does not impose any Law 112–239 business set-aside contracts, 8(a) significant new compliance or other CFR Citation: 13 CFR 121; 13 CFR Business Development contracts, costs on small business concerns. Under 124; 13 CFR 125; 13 CFR 126; 13 CFR Service Disabled Veteran-Owned current law, firms must adhere to 127. contracts, HUBZone contracts, and certain requirements when performing Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, July Women Owned Small Business (WOSB) set aside contracts; the rule does not 2, 2013, National Defense Authorization and Economically Disadvantaged WOSB change those requirements. Further, Act for FY2013, Public Law 112–239, contracts, authorizes the changes to the SBA expects that costs now incurred by section 1696. applicable regulations governing each of small business concerns as a result of Section 1696 requires guidance on the these types of contracts as set forth in ambiguous or indefinite regulations will statutory limitations on subcontracting 13 CFR parts 124, 125, 126, and 127. be eliminated or reduced. to be issued, pursuant to notice and Section 1652 of the NDAA, codified at Risks: None identified. comment rulemaking within 180 days 15 U.S.C. 645, prescribes penalties for Timetable: (July 2, 2013) after enactment of the concerns that violate the limitations on NDAA. subcontracting. Changes will be made to Action Date FR Cite Abstract: The U.S. Small Business 13 CFR 125 to implement this statutory Administration (SBA or Agency) is authority. Section 1653 of the NDAA, as NPRM ...... 12/29/14 79 FR 77955 amending its regulations to implement codified at 15 U.S.C. 637(d), amends the NPRM Comment 02/27/15 provisions of the National Defense Period End. requirements for subcontracting plans, NPRM Comment 03/09/15 80 FR 12353 Authorization Act of 2013, which including corrective action plans. This Period Re- pertain to performance requirements rule amends 13 CFR 125 to incorporate opened. applicable to small business and implementing regulations. Second NPRM 04/06/15 socioeconomic program set aside Alternatives: The National Defense Comment Pe- contracts and small business Authorization Act of 2013 (NDAA), riod End.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00183 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77892 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite the Disability Determination Services in consider under our quick disability advance or by way of reimbursement for determinations and compassionate Final Rule ...... 04/00/16 necessary costs in making disability allowances processes, determinations. • Revise our rules regarding returning Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The ten entries in our regulatory plan evidence at the Appeals Council level to Required: Yes. (plan) represent issues of major give the Appeals Council discretion in Small Entities Affected: Businesses. importance to the Agency. We describe returning additional evidence that it Government Levels Affected: None. the individual initiatives more fully in receives when it determines the Agency Contact: Brenda J. Fernandez, the attached plan. additional evidence does not relate to Procurement Analyst, Small Business Improving the Disability Process the period on or before the date of the Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Administrative Law Judge’s decision, Washington, DC 20416, Phone: 202– Since the continued improvement of and 205–7337, Email: the disability program is of vital concern • Create a new system of records that [email protected]. to us, we include initiatives in the plan exempts certain records from disclosure. RIN: 3245–AG58 addressing disability-related issues. This new system tracks anti-harassment These initiatives include one proposed BILLING CODE 8025–01–P claims made by our employees. and four final rules that update the medical listings used to determine Retrospective Review of Existing disability. The revisions reflect our Regulations SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION adjudicative experience and advances in (SSA) medical knowledge, diagnosis, and Pursuant to section 6 of Executive treatment. Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation Statement of Regulatory Priorities and Regulatory Review’’ (January 18, We administer the Retirement, Enhance Public Service 2011), the following Regulatory Survivors, and Disability Insurance There are five proposed rules that will Identifier Numbers (RINs) have been programs under title II of the Social propose to: identified as associated with Security Act (Act), the Supplemental • Require claimants to submit or retrospective review and analysis in our Security Income (SSI) program under inform us about all evidence known to final retrospective review of regulations title XVI of the Act, and the Special them that relates to their disability plan. Some of the entries on this list Veterans Benefits program under title claim, may be completed actions, which do not VIII of the Act. As directed by Congress, • Clarify our guidelines regarding appear in The Regulatory Plan. You can we also assist in administering portions how we will evaluate work experience find more information about these of the Medicare program under title for persons characterized as ‘‘Illiterate,’’ completed rulemakings in past XVIII of the Act. Our regulations codify and clarify our guidelines on how we publications of the Unified Agenda at: the requirements for eligibility and evaluate previous work experience for www.Reginfo.gov in the Completed entitlement to benefits, and our persons who are ‘‘Illiterate’’, Actions section for the Social Security procedures for administering these • Remove the expiration date from Administration. You can also find these programs. Generally, our regulations do our rule authorizing State agency rulemakings at www.Regulations.gov. not impose burdens on the private disability examiners to make fully The agency final plans are located at sector or on State or local governments, favorable determinations without the http://mwww.ba.ssa.gov/open/ except for the States’ Disability approval of a State agency medical or regsreview/EO-13563-Final-Plan- Determination Services. We fully fund psychological consultant in claims we Progress-Update.html.

Expected to significantly reduce RIN Title burdens on small businesses

0960–AF35 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Neurological Impairments ...... No. 0960–AF58 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Respiratory System Disorders ...... No. 0960–AF69 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Mental Disorders ...... No. 0960–AF88 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Hematological Disorders ...... No. 0960–AG21 ...... New Medical Criteria for Evaluating Language and Speech Disorders ...... No. 0960–AG28 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Growth Impairments ...... No. 0960–AG38 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Musculoskeletal Disorders ...... No. 0960–AG65 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Digestive Disorders ...... No. 0960–AG71 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and for Evalu- No. ating Functional Limitations in Immune System Disorders. 0960–AG74 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Cardiovascular Disorders ...... No. 0960–AH43 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic Diseases) ...... No. 0960–AH54 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Hearing Loss and Disturbances of Labyrinthine-Vestibular No. Function.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00184 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77893

SSA Regulatory Flexibility Analysis comments that we published in Required: No. November 2001. Prerule Stage Small Entities Affected: No. Summary of Legal Basis: 129. Vocational Factors of Age, Government Levels Affected: None. Administrative—not required by statute Education, and Work Experience in the URL for Public Comments: or court order. Adult Disability Determination Process www.regulations.gov. Alternatives: We considered Priority: Other Significant. Agency Contact: Elaine Tocco, continuing to use our current criteria. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. Vocational Policy Specialist, Social However, we believe these proposed 423(d)(2)(A); 42 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)(B) Security Administration, Office of revisions are necessary because of CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1562; 20 Disability Programs, 6401 Security medical advances since we last CFR 404.1565; 20 CFR 416.962; 20 CFR Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, comprehensively revised the 416.965. Phone: 410 966–6356. musculoskeletal listings in 2001, our Legal Deadline: None. William P. Gibson, Social Insurance program experience, information we Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Abstract: We are soliciting public received from medical experts we Security Administration, Office of input about how we should consider the consulted, and comments we received Regulations and Reports Clearance, vocational factors of age, education, and in response to a final rule with request 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD work experience in adult disability for public comments that we published 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039. claims under titles II and XVI of the in November 2001. Social Security Act (Act). There have RIN: 0960–AH74 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: been significant changes in technology Currently being determined. use and workforce demographics since Risks: We expect the public and we first adopted our vocational factor SSA adjudicators to support the removal and regulations in 1978 (43 FR 55349). We clarification of ambiguous terms and Proposed Rule Stage are requesting public comments, along phrases, and the addition of specific, with any supporting data, to assist in 130. Revised Medical Criteria for demonstrable functional criteria for our efforts to streamline, simplify, and Evaluating Musculoskeletal Disorders determining listing-level severity of all ensure the ongoing relevance of our (3318P) musculoskeletal disorders. disability determination programs. Priority: Other Significant. We expect adjudicators to support the Statement of Need: There have been Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 change in the framework of the text significant changes in technology use U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 because it makes the guidance in the and workforce demographics since we U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); introductory text and listings easier to first adopted our vocational factor 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 access and understand. regulations in 1978. We are requesting U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 Timetable: public comments, along with any U.S.C. 1381a; 42 U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. supporting data, to assist in our efforts 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b Action Date FR Cite to streamline, simplify, and ensure the CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app 1. ongoing relevance of our disability NPRM ...... 08/00/16 Legal Deadline: None. determination programs. Abstract: Sections 1.00 and 101.00, Summary of Legal Basis: Section Musculoskeletal System, of appendix 1 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 205(a) of the Act and, by reference to to subpart P of part 404 of our Required: No. section 205(a), section 1631(d)(1). Our regulations describe those Small Entities Affected: No. solicitation of information from the musculoskeletal system disorders that Government Levels Affected: None. public is part of our effort to ensure that we consider severe enough to prevent a we are evaluating all relevant Additional Information: Includes person from doing any gainful activity, information as we determine what, if Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. or that cause marked and severe any, updates to our vocational factors URL for Public Comments: functional limitations for a child are necessary. www.regulations.gov. claiming Supplemental Security Income Alternatives: Alternatives are Agency Contact: Cheryl A. Williams, payments under title XVI. We are undetermined, since this is an advanced Director, Social Security proposing to revise the criteria in these notice of proposed rulemaking, and is Administration, Office of Medical sections to ensure that the medical specifically in an information gathering Listings Improvement, 6401 Security evaluation criteria are up-to-date and stage. Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, consistent with the latest advances in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Phone: 410 965–1020. medical knowledge and treatment. Undetermined at this time. Statement of Need: We propose to Nancy Miller, Social Insurance Risks: Undetermined at this time. revise the criteria in the Listing of Specialist, Social Security Timetable: Impairments (listings) that we use to Administration, Office of Medical evaluate claims involving Listings Improvement, 6401 Security Action Date FR Cite musculoskeletal disorders in adults and Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–1573. ANPRM ...... 09/14/15 80 FR 55050 children under titles II and XVI of the ANPRM Comment 10/30/15 80 FR 66843 Social Security Act (Act). These Brian J. Rudick, Social Insurance Period Ex- proposed revisions reflect our Specialist. Regulations Writer, Social tended. adjudicative experience, advances in Security Administration, Office of ANPRM Comment 11/13/15 medical knowledge and treatment of Regulations and Reports Clearance, Period End. musculoskeletal disorders, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD ANPRM Comment 12/14/15 recommendations from medical experts, 21235–6401, Phone: 410 965–7102, Period Ex- Email: [email protected]. tended End. and comments we received in response to a final rule with request for public RIN: 0960–AG38

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00185 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77894 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

SSA Shawnette Ashburne, Social Alternatives: Undetermined at this 131. Revised Medical Criteria for Insurance Specialist, Social Security time. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Evaluating Digestive Disorders (3441P) Administration, Office of Medical Listings Improvement, 6401 Security Undetermined at this time. Priority: Other Significant. Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Risks: Undetermined at this time. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 Phone: 410 966–5788. Timetable: U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 Brian J. Rudick, Social Insurance U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Action Date FR Cite 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 Security Administration, Office of NPRM ...... 05/00/16 U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 Regulations and Reports Clearance, U.S.C. 1381a; 42 U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 21235–6401, Phone: 410 965–7102. Required: Undetermined. CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app 1. RIN: 0960–AG65 Legal Deadline: None. Government Levels Affected: Abstract: Sections 5.00 and 105.00, Undetermined. Digestive Systems, of appendix 1 to URL for Public Comments: subpart P of part 404 of our regulations SSA www.regulations.gov. Agency Contact: Joshua Silverman, describe those digestive disorders that 132. Acceptable Medical Sources, we consider severe enough to prevent a Social Insurance Specialist, Social Evaluating Evidence, and Treating Security Administration, Office of person from doing any gainful activity, Sources (3787P) or that cause marked and severe Vocational, Evaluation, and Process functional limitations for a child Priority: Other Significant. Major Policy, 6401 Security Boulevard, claiming Supplemental Security Income status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Phone: 410 payments under title XVI. We are undetermined. 594–2128. proposing to revise the criteria in these Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 Dan O’Brien, Social Insurance sections to ensure that the medical U.S.C. 423(d)(5)(A); 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); Specialist, Social Security evaluation criteria are up-to-date and 42 U.S.C. 1010(a); 42 U.S.C. Administration, Office of Employment consistent with the latest advances in 1382c(a)(3)(H)(i); 42 U.S.C. Support Programs, 6401 Security medical knowledge and treatment. 1382c(a)(3)(H)(i) Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Statement of Need: These proposed CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1502; 20 Phone: 410 965–1632. rules will update, simplify, and clarify CFR 404.1512; 20 CFR 404.1520b; 20 Helen Droddy, Social Insurance our rules. CFR 404.1521 to 404.1523; 20 CFR Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Summary of Legal Basis: 404.1526 and 404.1527; 20 CFR Security Administration, Office of Administrative—not required by statute 404.1530; 20 CFR 404.1546; 20 CFR Regulations and Reports Clearance, or court order. 416.902; 20 CFR 416.912; 20 CFR 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD Alternatives: We could continue to 416.920b; 20 CFR 416.921 to 416.923; 20 21235–6401, Phone: 410 965–1483, use our current criteria. However, we CFR 416.926 and 416.927; 20 CFR Email: [email protected]. believe these proposed revisions are 416.930; 20 CFR 416.946. RIN: 0960–AH51 necessary because of our program Legal Deadline: None. experience, information we received Abstract: We are proposing several from medical experts we consulted, and revisions to our evidence rules. The SSA comments we received at the Listings proposals include: Redefining several Symposium and in response to the key terms related to evidence; 133. Returning Evidence at the Appeals ANPRM. explaining what is and is not evidence; Council Level (3844F) Anticipated Cost and Benefits: revising how we consider and articulate Priority: Other Significant. Major Presently under review. our consideration of medical opinions status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Risks: None. and administrative findings of fact; and undetermined. Timetable: reorganizing our evidence regulations Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 401(j); 42 for each of use. These revisions would U.S.C. 404(f); 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. Action Date FR Cite simplify and reorganize our rules to 405(b); 42 U.S.C. 405(d) to (h); 42 U.S.C. make them easier to understand and 405(j); 42 U.S.C. 405 note; 42 U.S.C. ANPRM ...... 12/12/07 72 FR 70527 apply, allow us to make more accurate ANPRM Comment 02/11/08 421; 42 U.S.C. 421 note; 42 U.S.C. Period End. and consistent decisions, and 423(i); 42 U.S.C. 425; 42 U.S.C. NPRM ...... 08/00/16 emphasize the need for objective 902(a)(5); 42 U.S.C. 902 note; 42 U.S.C. medical evidence in disability and 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b Regulatory Flexibility Analysis blindness claims under titles II and XVI CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.976; 20 CFR Required: No. of the Social Security Act. 416.1476. Small Entities Affected: No. Statement of Need: These revisions Legal Deadline: None. Government Levels Affected: None. would simplify and reorganize our rules Abstract: We propose to revise our Additional Information: Includes to make them easier to understand and rules regarding returning evidence at the Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. apply, allow us to make more accurate Appeals Council level. Our current URL for Public Comments: and consistent decisions, and regulations require the Appeals Council www.regulations.gov. emphasize the need for objective to return to the claimant additional Agency Contact: Cheryl A. Williams, medical evidence in disability and evidence when the Appeals Council Director, Social Security blindness claims under titles II and XVI finds that the evidence does not relate Administration, Office of Medical of the Social Security Act. to the period on or before the date of the Listings Improvement, 6401 Security Summary of Legal Basis: administrative law judge (ALJ) hearing Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Administrative—not required by statute decision. With the availability and use Phone: 410 965–1020. or court order. of our electronic services, and because

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00186 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77895

the current procedures are not Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 605– Risks: There is no determined risk to administratively efficient or cost 7100. making this program permanent, at this effective, these rules would no longer Brian J. Rudick, Social Insurance time. require us to return any additional Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Timetable: evidence when the Appeals Council Security Administration, Office of determines the additional evidence does Regulations and Reports Clearance, Action Date FR Cite not relate to the period on or before the 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD date of the ALJ decision, except in rare 21235–6401, Phone: 410 965–7102. NPRM ...... 04/00/16 circumstances. We are not proposing RIN: 0960–AH64 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis any changes to how the Appeals Required: No. Council considers additional evidence Small Entities Affected: No. or when the Appeals Council gives SSA Government Levels Affected: None. protective filing based on the receipt of URL for Public Comments: 134. Removal of the Expiration Date for additional evidence. www.regulations.gov. Statement of Need: We propose to State Disability Examiner Authority To Agency Contact: Kenneth Williams, amend our regulations by revising our Make Fully Favorable Quick Disability Social Insurance Specialist, Social rules regarding returning evidence at the Determinations and Compassionate Security Administration, Office of Appeals Council (AC) level. Our current Allowances Disability Policy, 6401 Security rules state that the AC will return to the Priority: Other Significant. Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, claimant additional evidence it receives Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 Phone: 410 965–0608. when the AC finds the evidence does U.S.C. 421; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5) William P. Gibson, Social Insurance not relate to the period on or before the CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1615; 20 Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social date of the administrative law judge CFR 416.1015. Security Administration, Office of (ALJ) hearing decision. We are Legal Deadline: None. Regulations and Reports Clearance, proposing these revisions to provide the Abstract: We propose removing the 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD AC discretion in returning additional expiration date from our rule 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039. evidence that it receives when the AC authorizing State agency disability RIN: 0960–AH70 determines the additional evidence does examiners to make fully favorable not relate to the period on or before the determinations without the approval of date of the ALJ decision. a State agency medical or psychological SSA Summary of Legal Basis: consultant in claims that we consider Administrative—not required by statute under our quick disability 135. Anti-Harassment and Hostile Work or court order. determinations (QDD) and Environment Case Tracking and Alternatives: We could have chosen compassionate allowances (CAL) Records System Revised not to amend our regulations, but we processes. The disability examiner Priority: Other Significant. Major believe that with the increasing use of authority expires on November 11, status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is the Electronic Records Express system, 2016. In this proposed rule, we remove undetermined. the practice of returning evidence is the expiration date from the disability Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) unnecessary. In addition, the practice of examiner authority, so that the authority CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. returning documents submitted to us continues indefinitely. Removing the Legal Deadline: None. electronically is not administratively expiration date will allow us to Abstract: We are adding an exemption efficient or cost-effective. continue to make some favorable to the listed SSA System of Records for Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These disability determinations more quickly. a Harassment Allegation Case Tracking proposed rules should have no effect on We are making no other substantive and Management Information System. Old-Age, Survivors and Disability changes. Statement of Need: We are required to Insurance or Supplemental Security Statement of Need: Our review of amend our Code of Federal Regulations Income benefits. cases that qualify for adjudication under (CFR) when a new system of records is The administrative effect of this this test program decreases the time for instituted within the agency that regulation is negligible (i.e., less than 25 issuing disability decisions to claimants; exempts certain records from disclosure. workyears or $2 million annually). we are therefore making the program Here, we are creating a new system of Risks: None. permanent. records and an exemption to disclosure Timetable: Summary of Legal Basis: The Social of some of those records, necessitating Security Act authorizes the testing of Action Date FR Cite a new system of records disclosure in innovative adjudicative procedures our CFR. NPRM ...... 10/21/15 80 FR 63717 [Secs. 205(a), 221, and 702(a)(5) of the Summary of Legal Basis: In NPRM Comment 11/20/15 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), accordance with the Privacy Act (5 Period End. 421, and 902(a)(5))], and we are now U.S.C. 552a) we are issuing public proposing to make this test program a notice of our intent to establish a new Regulatory Flexibility Analysis permanent process. system of records. Required: No. Alternatives: We could continue to Alternatives: There is no alternative. Small Entities Affected: No. extend this successful program each Failure to amend our CFR, while using Government Levels Affected: None. year, or we could discontinue the a new system of records, would be URL for Public Comments: process altogether. contrary to the statutory authority and www.regulations.gov. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs intent of 5 U.S.C. 552. Agency Contact: Maren Weight, are presently undetermined. This Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Appeals Officer, Social Security process decreases the overall time some Undetermined at this time. We stand to Administration, Office of Appellate claimants wait for a disability benefit by tracking anti-harassment Operations, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Falls determination. claims by our employees, and through

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00187 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77896 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

this tracking system accurately We use the education category in our Anticipated Cost and Benefits: determine the outcomes for these medical-vocational guidelines in Undetermined at this time. claims. appendix 2 to subpart P of part 404 of Risks: For disability determinations Risks: Failure to implement the new our regulations (Appendix 2). The and decisions for people living in system of records and correlated medical-vocational guidelines direct or countries who do not have English as exemption in our CFR would prevent provide a framework for disability their official language, we are currently the institution of the new system, determinations and decisions at the required to use guidelines for people thereby causing the agency to be out of final step in our sequential evaluation who are ‘‘illiterate or unable to compliance with EEOC guidelines. process. We propose clarifying that we communicate in English,’’ even when Timetable: consider a person Illiterate when he or English is not the official language of she is unable to read or write in any the country in which the person lives. Action Date FR Cite language. Timetable: Under this revised definition of NPRM ...... 11/00/15 Illiterate, we propose clarifying our Action Date FR Cite guidelines on how we evaluate previous NPRM ...... 04/00/16 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis work experience for persons who are Required: No. Illiterate when we decide whether a Small Entities Affected: No. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis person is disabled. These proposed Required: Undetermined. Government Levels Affected: None. clarifications ensure our guidelines URL for Public Comments: Government Levels Affected: None. clearly reflect our longstanding policy www.regulations.gov. URL for Public Comments: in 404.1565(a) and 416.965(a). If a Agency Contact: Pamela J. Carcirieri, www.regulations.gov. person has skilled or semiskilled work Division Director, Social Security Agency Contact: Elaine Tocco, experience, but cannot use those skills Administration, Office of the General Vocational Policy Specialist, Social in other work (i.e., the skills are not Counsel, Office of Privacy and Security Administration, Office of transferable to other work), the person’s Disclosure, 6401 Security Boulevard, Disability Programs, 6401 Security ability to adjust to other work is no Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Phone: 410 Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, greater than if he or she had only Phone: 410 966–6356. 965–0355. unskilled work experience. The William P. Gibson, Social Insurance William P. Gibson, Social Insurance proposed revisions will clarify how we Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social evaluate a person’s ability to adjust to Security Administration, Office of Security Administration, Office of other work if his or her education Regulations and Reports Clearance, Regulations and Reports Clearance, category is Illiterate by identifying 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD which medical-vocational guidelines 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039. 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039. apply given these case facts. RIN: 0960–AH86 RIN: 0960–AH82 Statement of Need: When we promulgated the existing vocational framework, we judged that illiteracy or SSA inability to communicate in English was SSA a vocational adversity in adjusting to 136. • Amendment to the Education Final Rule Stage other work. We proposed amending our Category, ‘‘Illiterate or Unable To education category ‘‘Illiterate or unable 137. Revised Medical Criteria for Communicate in English’’ and to communicate in English’’ to Evaluating Neurological Impairments Clarification of Previous Work ‘‘Illiterate’’ and clarifying that what we (806F) Experience Criterion for Persons Who mean by ‘‘Illiterate’’ is inability to read Priority: Other Significant. Are ‘‘Illiterate’’ and write in any language. This would Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 Priority: Other Significant. eliminate the false equivalence between U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 ‘‘inability to communicate in English’’ U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); U.S.C. 405(a)(b); 42 U.S.C. 405(d)(h); 42 and illiteracy, while retaining 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. ‘‘Illiterate’’ in any language as a U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 421(i); 42 U.S.C. 421(j); 42 U.S.C. vocational disadvantage. U.S.C. 1381a; 42 U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. 421(m); 42 U.S.C. 421 note; 42 U.S.C. Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b 422(c); 42 U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 423 205(a) of the Act and, by reference to CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app 1. note; 42 U.S.C. 425; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); section 205(a), section 1631(d)(1) Legal Deadline: None. 42 U.S.C. 902 note; 42 U.S.C. 1382; 42 provide that ‘‘. . . [t]he Commissioner Abstract: Sections 11.00 and 111.00, U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. 1382h; 42 U.S.C. of Social Security shall have full power Neurological Impairments, of appendix 1383(a); 42 U.S.C. 1383(c); 42 U.S.C. and authority to make rules and 1 to subpart P of part 404 of our 1383(d)(1); 42 U.S.C. 1383(p); 42 U.S.C. regulations and to establish procedures, regulations describe neurological 1383b; 42 U.S.C. 1382h note not inconsistent with the provisions of impairments that we consider severe CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1564; 20 this title, which are necessary or enough to prevent a person from doing CFR 416.964. appropriate to carry out such any gainful activity, or that cause Legal Deadline: None. provisions, and shall adopt reasonable marked and severe functional Abstract: We propose amending our and proper rules and regulations to limitations for a child claiming education category Illiterate or unable to regulate and provide for the nature and Supplemental Security Income communicate in English to Illiterate, extent of the proofs and evidence and payments under title XVI. We will and we propose to clarify our guidelines the method of taking and furnishing the revise these sections to ensure that the regarding how we will evaluate work same in order to establish the right to medical evaluation criteria are up-to- experience for persons characterized as benefits hereunder.’’ date and consistent with the latest Illiterate when we determine whether Alternatives: Undetermined at this advances in medical knowledge and that person is disabled. time. treatment.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00188 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77897

Statement of Need: These final rules 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD Action Date FR Cite are necessary to update the listings for 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039. evaluating neurological impairments to RIN: 0960–AF35 ANPRM Comment 06/13/05 reflect advances in medical knowledge, Period End. treatment, and methods of evaluating NPRM ...... 02/04/13 78 FR 7968 these impairments. The changes will NPRM Comment 04/05/13 SSA Period End. ensure that determinations of disability Final Action ...... 04/00/16 have a sound medical basis, that 138. Revised Medical Criteria for claimants receive equal treatment Evaluating Respiratory System Regulatory Flexibility Analysis through the use of specific criteria, and Disorders (859F) Required: No. that people who are disabled can be Priority: Other Significant. Small Entities Affected: No. readily identified and awarded benefits Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 Government Levels Affected: None. if all other factors of entitlement or U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 Additional Information: Includes eligibility are met. U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 URL for Public Comments: Administrative—not required by statute U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 www.regulations.gov or court order. U.S.C. 1381a; 42 U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. Agency Contact: Cheryl A Williams, Alternatives: We considered not 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b Director, Social Security revising the listings and continuing to CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app 1. Administration, Office of Medical use our current criteria. However, we Legal Deadline: None. Listings Improvement, 6401 Security believe that these revisions are Abstract: Sections 3.00 and 103.00, Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, preferable because of the medical Respiratory System, of appendix 1 to Phone: 410 965–1020. advances that have been made in subpart P of part 404 of our regulations Joanna Firmin, Social Insurance treating and evaluating these types of describe respiratory system disorders Specialist, Social Security impairments. that we consider severe enough to Administration, Office of Medical Anticipated Cost and Benefits: prevent an individual from doing any Listings Improvement, 6401 Security Estimated Savings—low. gainful activity or that cause marked Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Risks: None. and severe functional limitations for a Phone: 410 965–7782. Timetable: child claiming SSI payments under title Helen Droddy, Social Insurance Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Action Date FR Cite XVI. We will revise these sections to ensure that the medical evaluation Security Administration, Office of Regulations and Reports Clearance, ANPRM ...... 04/13/05 70 FR 19356 criteria are up-to-date and consistent ANPRM Comment 06/13/05 with the latest advances in medical 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD Period End. knowledge and treatment. 21235–6401, Phone: 410 965–1483, NPRM ...... 02/25/14 79 FR 10636 Statement of Need: These final Email: [email protected]. NPRM Comment 04/28/14 regulations are necessary to update the RIN: 0960–AF58 Period End. Respiratory System listings to reflect NPRM Comment 05/01/14 79 FR 24634 Period Re- advances in medical knowledge, opened. treatment, and methods of evaluating SSA respiratory disorders. The changes will NPRM Comment 06/02/14 139. Revised Medical Criteria for ensure that determinations of disability Period Re- Evaluating Mental Disorders (886F) opened End. have a sound medical basis, that Final Action ...... 09/00/16 claimants receive equal treatment Priority: Other Significant. through the use of specific criteria, and Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis that people who are disabled can be U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 Required: No. readily identified and awarded benefits U.S.C. 405(d) to 42 U.S.C. 405(h); 42 Small Entities Affected: No. if all other factors of entitlement or U.S.C. 416(i); 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. Government Levels Affected: None. eligibility are met. 421(h); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 U.S.C. 423; Additional Information: Includes Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 U.S.C. 1381a; 42 Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. Administrative—not required by statute U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. 1383; 42 U.S.C. URL for Public Comments: or court order. 1383b www.regulations.gov. Alternatives: We considered not CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app 1; Agency Contact: Cheryl A Williams, revising the listings and continuing to 20 CFR 404.1520a; 20 CFR 416.920a; 20 Director, Social Security use our current criteria. However, we CFR 416.934. Administration, Office of Medical believe that these revisions are Legal Deadline: None. Listings Improvement, 6401 Security preferable because of the medical Abstract: Sections 12.00 and 112.00, Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, advances that have been made in Mental Disorders, of appendix 1 to Phone: 410 965–1020. treating and evaluating respiratory subpart P of part 404 of our regulations Shawnette Ashburne, Social diseases and because of our adjudicative describe those mental impairments that Insurance Specialist, Social Security experience. we consider severe enough to prevent a Administration, Office of Medical Anticipated Cost and Benefits: person from doing any gainful activity, Listings Improvement, 6401 Security Estimated costs—low. or that cause marked and severe Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Risks: None. functional limitations for a child Phone: 410 966–5788. Timetable: claiming Supplemental Security Income William P. Gibson, Social Insurance payments under title XVI. We will Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Action Date FR Cite revise the criteria in these sections to Security Administration, Office of ensure that the medical evaluation Regulations and Reports Clearance, ANPRM ...... 04/13/05 70 FR 19358 criteria are up-to-date and consistent

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00189 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77898 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

with the latest advances in medical Listings Improvement, 6401 Security statutory requirements from the Small knowledge and treatment. Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Business Jobs Act of 2010 and is aimed Statement of Need: These regulations Phone: 410 965–9118. at providing agencies with clarifying are necessary to update the listings for William P. Gibson, Social Insurance guidance on how to use multiple-award evaluating mental disorders to reflect Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social contracts as a tool to increase Federal advances in medical knowledge, Security Administration, Office of contracting opportunities for small treatment, and methods of evaluating Regulations and Reports Clearance, businesses. (FAR Case 2014–002) these disorders. The changes will ensure 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD Small Business Subcontracting that determinations of disability have a 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039. Improvements—This case implements sound medical basis, that claimants RIN: 0960–AF69 statutory requirements from the Small receive equal treatment through the use BILLING CODE 4191–02–P Business Jobs Act of 2010 aimed at of specific criteria, and that people who protecting small business subcontractors are disabled can be readily identified and increasing subcontracting and awarded benefits if all other factors opportunities for small businesses. (FAR FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION of entitlement or eligibility are met. Case 2014–003) (FAR) Summary of Legal Basis: Payment of Subcontractors—This case Administrative—not required by statute I. Mission and Overview implements section 1334 of the Small or court order. The Federal Acquisition Regulation Business Jobs Act of 2010 and the Small Alternatives: We considered not (FAR) was established to codify uniform Business Administration’s (SBA) Final revising the listings or making only policies for acquisition of supplies and Rule 78 FR 42391, Small Business minor technical changes. However, we services by executive agencies. It is Subcontracting. The rule requires prime believe that these revisions are issued and maintained jointly, pursuant contractors of contracts requiring a preferable because of the medical to the Office of Federal Procurement subcontracting plan to notify the advances that have been made in Policy (OFPP) Reauthorization Act, contracting officer in writing if the treating and evaluating these types of under the statutory authorities granted prime contractor pays a reduced price to disorders. We have not to the Secretary of Defense, a subcontractor or if payment is more comprehensively revised the current Administrator of General Services, and than 90 days past due. A contracting listings in over 15 years. Medical the Administrator, National Aeronautics officer will then use his or her best advances in disability evaluation and and Space Administration. Statutory judgment in determining whether the treatment and our program experience authorities to issue and revise the FAR late or reduced payment was justified make clear that the current listings do have been delegated to the procurement and if not the contracting officer will not reflect state-of-the-art medical executives in Department of Defense record the identity of a prime contractor knowledge and technology. (DoD), GSA, and National Aeronautics with a history of unjustified untimely Anticipated Cost and Benefits: and Space Administration (NASA). payments to subcontractors in the Savings estimates for fiscal years 2010 Federal Awardee Performance and to 2018: (in millions of dollars) OASDI– II. Statement of Regulatory and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or 315, SSI–370. Deregulatory Priorities any successor system. (FAR Case 2014– Risks: None. Federal Acquisition Regulation 004) Timetable: Priorities Consolidation and Bundling of Contract Requirements—This case Action Date FR Cite Specific FAR cases that the FAR Council plans to address in Fiscal Year implements statutory requirements from ANPRM ...... 03/17/03 68 FR 12639 2016 include: the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, ANPRM Comment 06/16/03 which created a definition for contract Period End. Regulations To Improve Small Business consolidation and limited its use by NPRM ...... 08/19/10 75 FR 51336 Opportunities in Government agencies until certain steps are taken to NPRM Comment 11/17/10 Contracting identify and minimize the negative Period End. Contracts under the Small Business impact to small businesses. (FAR Case NPRM ...... 11/24/10 75 FR 71632 2014–015) NPRM Comment 12/09/10 Administration 8(a) Program—This case Period End. clarifies FAR subpart 19.8, ‘‘Contracting Sole Source Contracts to Women- Final Action ...... 04/00/16 with the Small Business Administration Owned Small Businesses—This case (The 8(a) Program).’’ (FAR Case 2012– implements statutory requirements from Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 022) the NDAA for FY 2015, which provides Required: No. Clarification of Requirement for for sole source authority under the Small Entities Affected: No. Justifications for 8(a) Sole-Source Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Government Levels Affected: None. Contracts—This case clarifies the Program. The new authority is expected Additional Information: Includes requirement for a justification for 8(a) to increase WOSB participation in the Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. sole-source contracts, in response to Federal marketplace. (FAR Case 2015– URL for Public Comments: GAO Report to the Chairman, 032) www.regulations.gov. Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight, Labor—Regulations Which Promote Fair Agency Contact: Cheryl A Williams, Committee on Homeland Security and Pay and Safe Workplace Practices Director, Social Security Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, Administration, Office of Medical entitled Federal Contracting: Slow Start Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces—This Listings Improvement, 6401 Security to Implementation of Justifications for rule implements Executive Order 13673, Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, 8(a) Sole-Source Contracts (GAO–13– Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces, seeks to Phone: 410 965–1020. 118 dated December 2012). (FAR Case increase efficiency in the work Janet Bendann, Social Insurance 2013–018) performed by Federal contractors by Specialist, Social Security Set-Asides under Multiple Award ensuring that they understand and Administration, Office of Medical Contracts—This case implements comply with labor laws designed to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00190 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77899

promote safe, healthy, fair and effective Regulations That Promote Protection of the Enemy), title VIII, of the National workplaces. (FAR Case 2014–025) Government Information and Systems Defense Authorization Act for FY 2015 Establishing a Minimum wage for Privacy Training—This case creates a (Pub. L. 113–291), enacted 12/19/2014. Contractors—This rule implements FAR clause to require contractors that Section 841 prohibits providing funds to Executive Order 13658, Establishing a (1) need access to a system of records, the enemy. Section 842 provides Minimum Wage for Contractors, which (2) handle personally identifiable additional access to records. Section 843 requires agencies, to the extent information, or (3) design, develop, provides definitions. (FAR Case 2015– 014) permitted by law, to include a clause in maintain, or operate a system of records new solicitations and resultant on behalf of the Government, have their Regulations That Streamline and contracts, specifying, as a condition of personnel complete privacy training. Reduce Unjustified Burdens payment, that the minimum wage to be This addition complies with subsections Provisions and Clauses for paid to workers, in the performance of (e) (agency requirements) and (m) the contract or any subcontract there Acquisitions of Commercial Items and (Government contractors) of the Privacy Acquisitions That Do Not Exceed the under, shall be at least $10.10 per hour Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). (FAR Case 2010– beginning January 1, 2015. (FAR Case Simplified Acquisition Threshold—This 013) case implements a new approach to the 2015–003) Organizational Conflicts of Interest Further Amendments to Equal prescription and flowdown for and Unequal Access to Information— provisions and clauses applicable to the Employment Opportunity—This rule This case implements section 841 of the acquisition of commercial items or implements Executive Order 13672, NDAA for FY 2009 (Pub. L. 110–147). acquisitions that do not exceed the dated July 21, 2014, and Department of Section 841 requires consideration of simplified acquisition threshold. Each Labor (DOL) regulations at 41 CFR 60, how to address the current needs of the clause prescription and each clause published December 9, 2014. The acquisition community with regard to flowdown for commercial items is Executive Order and the DOL Organizational Conflicts of Interest. specified within the prescription/clause regulations provide for a uniform policy Separately addresses issues regarding itself, without having to cross-check in Federal Government procurement by unequal access to information. (FAR another clause or list. The rule supports prohibiting discrimination based on Case 2011–001) the use of automated contract writing sexual orientation and gender identity. Basic Safeguarding of Contractor systems and reduced necessary FAR (FAR case 2015–013) Information Systems—This case amends maintenance when clauses are updated. Combating Trafficking in Persons— the FAR to implement procedures for (FAR Case 2015–004) Definition of ‘‘Recruitment Fees’’—This safeguarding contractor information Retention Period—This case updates case considers a new definition for the systems that contain information the file retention periods identified at term ‘‘recruitment fees’’ at the request of provided by or generated for the FAR subpart 4.805, Government the Senior Policy Operating Group Government. The purpose of these Contract Files, to conform with the (SPOG) for Combating Trafficking in safeguards is to provide the Government retention periods in the National Persons. (FAR Case 2015–017) with the necessary assurance that Archives and Records Administration Environmental Rules—Regulations That contractors are taking basic security (NARA) General Records Schedule 1.1, Promote Environmental Goals measures on their information systems Financial Management and Reporting containing Government information. Records, published on September 12, High Global Warming Potential (FAR Case 2011–020) 2014. (FAR Case 2015–009) Hydrofluorocarbons—This case Contractor Use of Information—This Simplified Acquisition Threshold for facilitates implementation of the case addresses contractor access to Contracts in Support of Humanitarian or President’s Climate Action Plan with controlled unclassified information. Peacekeeping Operation—This case regard to high global warming potential (FAR Case 2014–021) implements 41 U.S.C. 153 by increasing hydrofluorocarbons. (FAR Case 2014– the simplified acquisition threshold for Regulations Which Promote Ethics and 026) contracts to be awarded and performed, Integrity in Contractor Performance Public Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas or purchases to be made, outside the Emissions and Reduction Goals— Information on Corporate Contractor United States in support of a Representation—This case creates an Performance and Integrity—This case humanitarian or peacekeeping annual representation within the implements section 852 of the NDAA operation. (FAR Case 2015–020) System for Award Management (SAM) for FY 2013 (Pub. L. 112–239). Section Removal of Regulations Relating to for contractors to indicate if and where 852 requires that FAPIIS include, to the Telegraphic Communication—This case they publicly disclose GHG emissions extent practicable, information on any removes the terms ‘‘telegraph,’’ and GHG reduction goals or targets. This parent, subsidiary, or successor entities ‘‘telegram,’’ and related regulations from information will help the Government to the corporation. (FAR Case 2013–020) the FAR, in accordance with OFPP assess supplier GHG management Prohibition on Contracting with Memorandum dated December 4, 2014, practices and assist agencies in Corporations with Delinquent Taxes or which directed removal or revision of developing strategies to engage with a Felony Conviction.—This case outdated regulations. (FAR Case 2015– contractors to reduce supply chain implements multiple sections of the 035) emissions as directed in section 15 of Consolidated and Further Continuing Reverse Auction Guidance—This case Executive Order 13693, Planning for Appropriations Act, 2015. (Pub. L. 113– Implements OFPP memorandum, Federal Sustainability in the Next 235) to prohibit using any of the funds ‘‘Effective Use of Reverse Auctions.’’The Decade, dated March 19, 2015. (FAR appropriated by the Act to enter into a memorandum provides guidance on the Case 2015–024) contract with any corporation with a usage of reverse auctions, and was Sustainable Acquisition—This case delinquent Federal tax liability or a issued in response to recommendations implements E.O. 13693, Planning for felony conviction. (FAR case 2015–011) within GAO report (Reverse Auctions: Federal Sustainability in the Next Prohibition on Providing Funds to the Guidance is Needed to Maximize Decade, which supersedes E.O.s 13423 Enemy—This case implements sections Competition and Achieve Cost Savings, and 13514. (FAR Case 2015–033) 841–843, subtitle E (Never Contract with GAO–14–108). (FAR Case 2015–038)

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00191 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77900 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Regulations Which Promote Fiscal Past Performance Evaluation (4) Federal consumer financial law is Responsibility (Accountability and Requirements—This case updates FAR enforced consistently, without regard to Transparency) subpart 42.15 to identify ‘‘regulatory status of a person as a depository Applicability of the Senior Executive compliance’’ as a separate evaluation institution, in order to promote fair Compensation Benchmark. Proposes factor in the Contractor Past competition; and (5) Markets for consumer financial retroactive implementation of section Performance Assessment System products and services operate 803 of the National Defense (CPARS) and require agencies use past transparently and efficiently to facilitate Authorization Act for Fiscal performance information in the Past access and innovation. Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112–81), which Performance Information three years for extends the limitation on allowability of construction and architect-engineer CFPB Regulatory Priorities contracts. (FAR Case 2015–027) compensation for certain contractor The CFPB’s regulatory priorities for personnel from senior executives to all Dated: October 7, 2015. the period from November 1, 2015, to DoD, NASA, and Coast Guard contractor William Clark, October 31, 2016, include continuing employees. (FAR Case 2012–025) rulemaking activities to address critical Limitation on Allowable Government Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition issues in various markets for consumer Contractor Compensation Costs—This Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy. financial products and services and case implements Public Law 113–67, implementing Dodd-Frank Act mortgage which limits costs of compensation of BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P protections. The Bureau has also made contractor and subcontractor employees. changes to its long-term agenda, which (FAR Case 2014–012) are discussed below. Strategic Sourcing Documentation— FALL 2015 STATEMENT OF Bureau Regulatory Efforts in Various This case implements section 836 of the REGULATORY PRIORITIES FY15 NDAA. Section 836 requires that Consumer Markets when purchasing services and supplies CFPB Purposes and Functions The Bureau is working on a number that are offered under the Federal The Bureau of Consumer Financial of rulemakings to address important Strategic Sourcing Initiative but the Protection (CFPB or Bureau) was consumer protection issues in a wide Initiative in not used, the contract file established in 2010 as an independent variety of markets for consumer shall include an analysis of comparative bureau of the Federal Reserve System by financial products and services. value, including price and nonprice the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and For example, the Bureau is beginning factors, between the services and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law a rulemaking process to follow up on a supplies offered under such Initiative 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376) (Dodd-Frank report it issued to Congress in March and services and supplies offered under Act). Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, 2015, concerning the use of agreements the source or sources used for the the CFPB has rulemaking, supervisory, providing for arbitration of any future purchase. (FAR Case 2015–015) enforcement, and other authorities dispute between covered persons and Prohibition on Reimbursement for relating to consumer financial products consumers in connection with the Congressional Investigations and and services. Among these are the offering or providing of consumer Inquiries—This case implements section consumer financial protection financial products or services. The 857 of the NDAA for FY15, which authorities that transferred to the CFPB report, which was required by the Dodd- amends 10 U.S.C. 2324(e)(1). Section from seven Federal agencies on the Frank Act, expanded on preliminary 857 disallows costs incurred by a designated transfer date, July 21, 2011. results of arbitration research that had contractor in connection with a These authorities include the ability to been released by the Bureau in congressional investigation or inquiry issue regulations under more than a December 2013. Following release of the into an issue that is the subject 10 dozen Federal consumer financial laws. report, the CFPB analyzed whether rules U.S.C. 2324(k)(2). (FAR Case 2015–016) governing pre-dispute arbitration As provided in section 1021 of the Determination of Fair and Reasonable agreements are warranted, and, if so, Dodd-Frank Act, the purpose of the Prices on Orders under Multiple-Award what types of rules would be CFPB is to implement and enforce Contracts—This case clarifies the appropriate. The Bureau has Federal consumer financial laws responsibilities for ordering activity preliminarily determined that it should consistently for the purpose of ensuring contracting officers to determine fair proceed with a rulemaking regarding that all consumers have access to and reasonable prices when using pre-dispute arbitration agreements. To markets for consumer financial products Federal Supply Schedules. (FAR Case begin the rulemaking process, the and services and that such markets are 2015–021) Bureau intends to convene a panel in fair, transparent, and competitive. The Federal Supply Schedule Order Level fall 2015, under the Small Business CFPB is authorized to exercise its Materials—This case provides Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act authorities for the purpose of ensuring clarification of the authority to acquire and in conjunction with the Office of that, with respect to consumer financial order-level materials when placing a Management and Budget and the Small products and services: task order or establishing a blanket Business Administration’s Chief purchase agreement against a Federal (1) Consumers are provided with Counsel for Advocacy, to consult with Supply Schedule contract. (FAR Case timely and understandable information small businesses that may be affected by 2015–023) to make responsible decisions about the policy proposals under financial transactions; consideration. Regulations Which Promote (2) Consumers are protected from The Bureau is also analyzing Accountability and Transparency unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and consumer protection concerns Uniform Use of Line Items—This case practices and from discrimination; associated with the use of payday, auto establishes a requirement for use of a (3) Outdated, unnecessary, or unduly title, and similar lending products in standardized uniform line item burdensome regulations are regularly anticipation of the release of a notice of numbering structure in Federal identified and addressed in order to proposed rulemaking to address acts or procurement. (FAR Case 2013–014) reduce unwarranted regulatory burdens; practices in connection with these

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00192 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77901

products. In March 2015, as part of the expressly bring prepaid products within originations and servicing and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement the ambit of Regulation E (which integrating various federal mortgage Fairness Act process, the Bureau implements the Electronic Fund disclosures as discussed further below. released an outline of proposals under Transfer Act) as prepaid accounts and to The Bureau is also working to consideration concerning the failure to create new provisions specific to such implement Dodd-Frank amendments to determine whether consumers have the accounts. The proposal would also the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act ability to repay without default or re- amend Regulation E and Regulation Z (HMDA), which augment existing data borrowing and certain payment (which implements the Truth in reporting requirements regarding collection practices. The Bureau Lending Act) to regulate prepaid housing-related loans and applications completed the Small Business accounts with overdraft services or for such loans. In addition to obtaining Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act credit features. data that is critical to the purposes of process in June 2015. The Bureau had The Bureau is also continuing HMDA—which include providing the previously released substantial research rulemaking activities that will further public and public officials with on certain of these products, issuing a establish the Bureau’s nonbank information that can be used to help white paper in April 2013, and a data supervisory authority by defining larger determine whether financial institutions point in March 2014, and is continuing participants of certain markets for are serving the housing needs of their to conduct additional research that it consumer financial products and communities, assisting public officials expects to release in conjunction with services. Larger participants of such in the distribution of public sector the rulemaking proposal. markets, as the Bureau defines by rule, investments, and assisting in identifying Building on Bureau research and are subject to the Bureau’s supervisory possible discriminatory lending patterns other sources, the Bureau is also authority. The Bureau expects that its and enforcing antidiscrimination engaged in policy analysis and further next larger participant rulemaking will statutes—the Bureau views this research initiatives in preparation for a focus on the markets for consumer rulemaking as an opportunity to rulemaking on overdraft programs on installment loans and vehicle title loans streamline and modernize HMDA data checking accounts. The CFPB issued a for purposes of supervision. The Bureau collection and reporting, in furtherance white paper in June 2013, and a report is also considering whether rules to of its mission under the Dodd-Frank Act in July 2014, based on supervisory data require registration of these or other to reduce unwarranted regulatory from several large banks that non-depository lenders would facilitate burden. The Bureau published a highlighted a number of possible supervision, as has been suggested to proposed HMDA rule in the Federal consumer protection concerns, the Bureau by both consumer advocates Register in August 2014, to add several including how consumers opt in to and industry groups. new reporting requirements and to overdraft coverage for ATM and one- The Bureau is also continuing to clarify several existing requirements. time debit card transactions, overdraft develop research on other critical Publication of the proposal followed coverage limits, transaction posting markets to help implement statutory initial outreach efforts and the order practices, overdraft and directives and to assess whether convening of a panel under the Small insufficient funds fee structures, and regulation of other consumer financial Business Regulatory Enforcement involuntary account closures. The CFPB products and services may be Fairness Act in conjunction with the is continuing to engage in additional warranted. For example, the Bureau is Office of Management and Budget and research and has begun consumer starting its work to implement section the Small Business Administration’s testing initiatives relating to the opt-in 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which Chief Counsel for Advocacy, to consult process. amends the Equal Credit Opportunity with small lenders who may be affected In addition, the Bureau also engaged Act to require financial institutions to by the rulemaking. As part of the in policy analysis and research report information concerning credit process for developing the HMDA final initiatives in preparation for a applications made by women-owned, rule, the Bureau is reviewing and rulemaking on debt collection activities, minority-owned, and small businesses. considering public comments on the which are the single largest source of The Bureau will focus on outreach and proposed rule, consulting and complaints to the federal government of research to develop its understanding of coordinating with other agencies, any industry. Building on the Bureau’s the players, products, and practices in conducting additional outreach to build November 2013, Advance Notice of the small business lending market and and refine operational capacity, and Proposed Rulemaking, the CFPB is in of the potential ways to implement preparing to assist financial institutions the process of analyzing the results of a section 1071. The CFPB then expects to in their compliance efforts. The Bureau survey to obtain information from begin developing proposed regulations expects to issue a final rule in fall 2015. consumers about their experiences with concerning the data to be collected and Another major effort of the Bureau is debt collection. The Bureau is also appropriate procedures, information the implementation of its final rule undertaking consumer testing initiatives safeguards, and privacy protections for combining several federal mortgage to determine what information would be information-gathering under this disclosures that consumers receive in useful for consumers to have about debt section. connection with applying for and collection and their debts and how that closing on a mortgage loan under the information should be provided to Implementing Dodd-Frank Act Mortgage Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the them. Protections Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act The Bureau is also working on a final The Bureau is also continuing its (RESPA). The integrated forms are the rule to create a comprehensive set of efforts to implement critical consumer cornerstone of the Bureau’s broader protections for general purpose protections under the Dodd-Frank Act ‘‘Know Before You Owe’’ mortgage reloadable cards and other similar to guard against mortgage market initiative. The rule, in most cases, products, which are increasingly being practices that contributed to the nation’s requires that two forms, the Loan used by consumers in place of most significant financial crisis in Estimate and the Closing Disclosure, traditional checking accounts or credit several decades. The Bureau has already replace four different federal cards. The Bureau issued a proposed issued regulations implementing Dodd- disclosures. These new forms will help rule in November 2014, seeking to Frank Act protections for mortgage consumers better understand their

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00193 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77902 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

options, choose the deal that is best for predominantly in ‘‘rural or than finalizing notices that are at least them, and avoid costly surprises at the underserved’’ areas and published a five years old. closing table. The Bureau conducted notice of proposed rulemaking in the With regard to consumer reporting, extensive qualitative testing of the new Federal Register in February 2015. The the Bureau continues to monitor the forms prior to issuing a proposal, and Bureau anticipates issuing a final rule in credit reporting market through its also conducted a post-proposal September 2015. supervisory, enforcement, and research quantitative study to validate the results The Bureau also published a proposal efforts, and to consider prior research, of the new forms. The results of the in the Federal Register in December including a white paper the Bureau quantitative testing showed that 2014, to amend various provisions of its published on the largest consumer consumers of all different experience mortgage servicing rules in both reporting agencies in December 2012, levels, with loans of different Regulation X, which implements and reports on credit report accuracy characteristics—whether focused on RESPA, and Regulation Z. The proposal produced by the Federal Trade buying a home or refinancing—were included further clarification of the Commission pursuant to the Fair and able to understand the Bureau’s new applicability of certain provisions when Accurate Credit Transactions Act. As forms better than the current forms. the borrower is in bankruptcy, possible this work continues, the Bureau will The final rule combining the federal additional enhancements to loss evaluate possible policy responses to mortgage disclosures under TILA and mitigation requirements, proposed issues identified, including potential RESPA was issued in November 2013, applicability of certain provisions to additional rules or amendments to and takes effect October 3, 2015. The successors in interest, and other topics. existing rules governing consumer Bureau has worked intensively to As the Bureau develops a final rule, it reporting. Potential topics for support implementation efforts, is reviewing and considering public consideration might include the including consumer education comments on the proposed rule, accuracy of credit reports, including the initiatives. To facilitate implementation, consulting with other agencies, processes for resolving consumer the Bureau has released a small entity conducting consumer testing of certain disputes, or other issues. Further, in May 2015, the CFPB compliance guide, a guide to forms, a disclosures, and preparing to support issued a request for information seeking readiness guide, sample forms, and implementation and consumer comment from the public regarding additional materials. The Bureau has education efforts. The Bureau expects to student loan servicing practices, conducted six free, publicly available issue a final rule in late spring 2016. webinars to answer common questions including those related to payment and hosted an additional webinar Further, the Bureau continues to processing, servicing transfers, targeted at housing counselors. In participate in a series of interagency complaint resolution, co-signer release, January 2015, after extensive outreach to rulemakings to implement various and procedures regarding alternative stakeholders, the Bureau adopted two Dodd-Frank Act amendments to TILA repayment and refinancing options. In minor modifications and technical and the Financial Institutions Reform, September 2015, the CFPB released a amendments to the rule to smooth Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 report regarding student loan servicing compliance for industry.1 After (FIRREA) relating to mortgage practices, based, in part, on comments discovering an administrative error in appraisals. In April 2015, in conjunction submitted in response to the request for June 2015, the Bureau issued a proposal with the Office of the Comptroller of the information. The CFPB will also to extend the effective date from August Currency, the Board of Governors of the continue to monitor the student loan 1, 2015 to October 3, 2015, and finalized Federal Reserve System, the Federal servicing market for trends and the extension of the effective date on Deposit Insurance Corporation, the developments. As this work continues, July 24, 2015. The Bureau expects to National Credit Union Administration the Bureau will evaluate possible policy continue working to support Board, and the Federal Housing Finance responses, including potential implementation of the rule, monitor the Agency, the Bureau issued a final rule rulemaking. Possible topics for market, and make clarifications and adopting certain minimum requirements consideration might include specific adjustments to the rule where for appraisal management companies. acts or practices and consumer warranted. These joint agency efforts are continuing disclosures. The Bureau also continues to work in with further efforts to implement The Bureau has continued work to support of the full implementation of, amendments to FIRREA concerning consider opportunities to modernize and to facilitate compliance with, required quality control standards for and streamline regulations that it various mortgage-related final rules the use of automated valuation models. inherited from other agencies pursuant issued by the Bureau in January 2013, Bureau Long-Term Planning Efforts to a transfer of rulemaking authority to strengthen consumer protections under the Dodd-Frank Act. This work involving the origination and servicing The Bureau has also updated its long- includes implementing the of mortgages. These rules, implementing term agenda to reflect its expectations consolidation and streamlining of requirements under the Dodd-Frank beyond fiscal year 2016. As noted in federal mortgage disclosure forms Act, were all effective by January 2014. these items, the Bureau intends to discussed earlier, and exploring The Bureau is working diligently to explore potential rulemakings to opportunities to reduce unwarranted monitor the market and continues to address important issues related to regulatory burden as part of the HMDA make clarifications and adjustments to consumer reporting and student loan rulemaking. While the Bureau considers the rules where warranted. For example, servicing. The Bureau has also the modernizing and streamlining effort in order to promote access to credit, the eliminated a listing for certain mortgage- to be important, it has determined that Bureau engaged in further research to related rulemakings inherited from aspects of the inherited proposals to assess the impact of certain provisions other agencies pursuant to the transfer amend Regulation Z have become stale implemented under the Dodd-Frank Act of rulemaking authority under the with the passage of several years since that modify general requirements for Dodd-Frank Act in 2011. The Bureau their issuance. At this point, the Bureau small creditors that operate remains interested in the subjects of believes that any rulemaking it may these rulemakings but anticipates that it undertake in the areas the proposals 1 80 FR 8767 (Feb. 19, 2015). would develop new proposals rather addressed would be best achieved

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00194 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77903

through fresh initiatives that would CFR 1009.8 require the Commission to products and services, provides begin with new proposals based on new consider, among other factors, the consumers the best choice of products reviews of the relevant markets and following criteria when deciding the and services at the lowest prices. other appropriate outreach and fact level of priority for any particular The Commission pursues its goal of gathering, followed by fresh analyses of project: promoting competition in the any policy and legal issues or concerns • Frequency and severity of injury; marketplace through two different but presented. The CFPB has been • causality of injury; complementary approaches. Unfair or evaluating further action regarding these • chronic illness and future injuries; deceptive acts or practices injure both pending proposals and, at this time, has • costs and benefits of Commission consumers and honest competitors alike determined that it will take no further action; and undermine competitive markets. action. The Bureau is continuing to • unforeseen nature of the risk; Through its consumer protection assess the mortgage market on an • vulnerability of the population at activities, the Commission seeks to ongoing basis and will revisit the need risk; ensure that consumers receive accurate, to initiate new proposals at a later date. • probability of exposure to the truthful, and non-misleading The Bureau also has begun planning hazard; and information in the marketplace. At the to conduct assessments of significant • additional criteria that warrant same time, for consumers to have a rules it has adopted, pursuant to section Commission attention. choice of products and services at 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act. That Significant Regulatory Actions: competitive prices and quality, the section requires the Bureau to conduct Currently, the Commission is marketplace must be free from such assessments to address, among considering one rule that would anticompetitive business practices. other relevant factors, the effectiveness constitute a ‘‘significant regulatory Thus, the second part of the of the rules in meeting the purposes and action’’ under the definition of that term Commission’s basic mission—antitrust objectives of Title X of the Dodd-Frank in Executive Order 12866: enforcement—is to prohibit Act and the specific goals of the rules anticompetitive mergers or other 1. Flammability Standard for anticompetitive business practices assessed, to publish a report of each Upholstered Furniture assessment not later than five years after without unduly interfering with the the effective date of the subject rule, and Under section 4 of the Flammable legitimate activities of businesses. These to invite public comment on Fabrics Act (‘‘FFA’’), the Commission two complementary missions make the recommendations for modifying, may issue a flammability standard or Commission unique insofar as it is the expanding, or eliminating the subject other regulation for a product of interior Nation’s only Federal agency to be given rule before publishing each report. The furnishing if the Commission this combination of statutory authority Bureau will provide further information determines that such a standard is to protect consumers. about its expectations for the lookback needed to adequately protect the public The Commission is, first and process as its planning continues. against unreasonable risk of the foremost, a law enforcement agency. It occurrence of fire leading to death or pursues its mandate primarily through BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P personal injury, or significant property case-by-case enforcement of the FTC Act damage. The Commission’s regulatory and other statutes. In addition, the proceeding could result in several Commission is also charged with the CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY actions, one of which could be the responsibility of issuing and enforcing COMMISSION (CPSC) development of a mandatory standard regulations under a number of statutes. The Commission is responsible for Statement of Regulatory Priorities requiring that upholstered furniture meet mandatory requirements specified enforcing 16 trade regulation rules The U.S. Consumer Product Safety in the standard. promulgated pursuant to the FTC Act. Commission is charged with protecting Other examples include the regulations the public from unreasonable risks of BILLING CODE 6355–01–P enforced pursuant to credit, financial death and injury associated with and marketing practice statutes 1 and to consumer products. To achieve this energy laws.2 The Commission also has goal, among other things, the CPSC: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC) adopted a number of voluntary industry • Develops mandatory product safety guides. Most of the regulations and Statement of Regulatory and standards or bans when other efforts are guides pertain to consumer protection Deregulatory Priorities inadequate to address a safety hazard, or matters and are intended to ensure that where required by statute; I. Regulatory and Deregulatory consumers receive the information • obtains repair, replacement, or Priorities necessary to evaluate competing products and make informed purchasing refunds for defective products that Background present a substantial product hazard; decisions. • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC develops information and education Commission Initiatives campaigns about the safety of consumer or Commission) is an independent products; agency charged by its enabling statute, The Commission protects consumers • participates in the development or the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC through a variety of tools, including revision of voluntary product safety Act), with protecting American both regulatory and non-regulatory standards; and consumers from ‘‘unfair methods of • follows statutory mandates. competition’’ and ‘‘unfair or deceptive 1 For example, the Controlling the Assault of Non- Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 Unless directed otherwise by acts or practices’’ in the marketplace. (CAN–SPAM Act) (15 U.S.C. 7701–7713) and the congressional mandate, when deciding The Commission strives to ensure that Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse which of these approaches to take in consumers benefit from a vigorously Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6101–6108). any specific case, the CPSC gathers and competitive marketplace. The 2 For example, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (106 analyzes data about the nature and Commission’s work is rooted in a belief Stat. 2776, codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code, particularly 42 U.S.C. 6201 et seq. and the extent of the risk presented by the that competition, based on truthful and Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 product. The Commission’s rules at 16 non-misleading information about (EISA)).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00195 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77904 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

approaches. It has encouraged industry addition, Snapchat, Inc., settled charges protect consumers’ privacy and security, self-regulation, developed a corporate that it deceived its users when it touted as Americans start to reap the benefits leniency policy for certain rule an app’s ability to send ‘‘snaps’’ that from a growing world of Internet- violations, and established compliance would ‘‘disappear forever’’ after a set connected devices. The Internet of partnerships where appropriate. time.5 Moreover, the company’s alleged Things universe is expanding quickly, As detailed below, protecting failure to secure its Find Friends feature and there are now over 25 billion consumer privacy, preventing and led to a breach that enabled attackers to connected devices in use worldwide, mitigating identity theft, containing the access usernames and phone numbers with that number set to rise significantly rising costs of health care and for millions of users. The settlement as consumer goods companies, auto prescription drugs, fostering prohibits future misrepresentations and manufacturers, healthcare providers, competition and innovation in cutting- requires the implementation of a and other businesses continue to invest edge, high-tech industries, challenging comprehensive privacy program. in connected devices, according to data deceptive advertising and marketing, The ‘‘Start With Security’’ initiative cited in the report. In addition to the and safeguarding the interests of helps businesses protect consumers’ report, the FTC also released a new potentially vulnerable consumers, such information through new guidance for publication for businesses containing as children and the financially businesses that draw on the lessons advice about how to build security into distressed, continue to be at the learned in the more than 50 data products connected to the Internet of forefront of the Commission’s consumer security cases brought by the FTC Things. ‘‘Careful Connections: Building protection and competition programs. through the years, as well as a series of Security in the Internet of Things’’ By subject area, the FTC discusses some conferences to be held across the encourages companies to implement a 3 of the major workshops, reports, and country aimed at small- and medium- risk-based approach and take advantage initiatives it has pursued since the 2014 sized businesses in various industries, of best practices developed by security Regulatory Plan was published. with the first event held on September experts, such as using strong encryption (a) Protecting Consumer Privacy. As 9, 2015, in San Francisco, CA, and the and proper authentication.8 the nation’s top enforcer on the second one to be held in Austin, TX, on consumer privacy beat, the FTC works November 5, 2015. Aimed at start-ups (b) Protecting Children. Children to ensure that consumers can take and developers, the September event increasingly use the Internet for advantage of the benefits of a dynamic brought together experts to provide entertainment, information and and ever-changing digital marketplace information on security by design, schoolwork. The FTC enforces the without compromising their privacy. common security vulnerabilities, Children’s Online Privacy Protection The FTC achieves that goal through civil strategies for secure development, and Act (COPPA) and the COPPA Rule to law enforcement, policy initiatives, and vulnerability response. The Austin protect children’s privacy when they are consumer and business education. For event will provide similar practical tips online by putting their parents in charge example, the FTC’s unparalleled and guidance for the Austin start-up of who gets to collect personal experience in consumer privacy community. information about their preteen kids. enforcement has addressed practices The business guidance, titled ‘‘Start For example, the FTC charged online offline, online, and in the mobile with Security A Guide for Business,’’ review site Yelp Inc., and mobile app environment by large, well-known was published mid-2015 and lays out developer TinyCo, Inc., with improperly companies and lesser-known players ten key steps to effective data security, collecting children’s information in alike. drawn from the alleged facts in the violation of the COPPA Rule.9 The FTC Data security is an important focus of FTC’s data security cases.6 The alleged that Yelp failed to implement a the Commission’s privacy work. Since document is designed to provide an functional age-screen in its apps, which 2002, the FTC has brought 53 cases easy way for companies to understand allowed children under 13 to register for against companies that have engaged in the lessons learned from those previous the service, despite having an age-screen unfair or deceptive practices that the cases. It includes references to the cases, mechanism on its Web site. The Commission alleged put consumers’ as well as plain-language explanations Commission also alleged that many of personal data at unreasonable risk. The of the security principles at play. In TinyCo’s apps, which used themes agency has been actively monitoring the addition to the new guidance, the FTC appealing to children, brightly colored mobile marketplace to safeguard data has also introduced a one-stop Web site animated characters, and simple privacy and security. For instance, that consolidates the Commission’s data language, were in fact directed at Credit Karma, Inc., and Fandango, LLC, security information for businesses. It children under 13; TinyCo therefore was settled charges that they misrepresented can be found at www.ftc.gov/ required to comply with the COPPA the security of their mobile apps and datasecurity. Rule when collecting children’s put the sensitive personal information On January 27, 2015, the staff of the information, such as email addresses. of millions of people at risk.4 Despite Commission released a report titled To resolve the Commission’s their security promises, these ‘‘Internet of Things Privacy & Security allegations, Yelp paid $450,000 and companies allegedly failed to take in a Connected World’’ 7 that TinyCo paid $300,000 in civil penalties. reasonable steps to secure their mobile recommended a series of concrete steps apps, leaving people’s sensitive that businesses can take to enhance and 8 See ‘‘Careful Connections: Building Security in personal information vulnerable to the Internet of Things’’ at https://www.ftc.gov/ attackers who could intercept any of the 5 In the Matter of Snapchat, Docket No. C–4501, system/files/documents/plain-language/pdf0199- information the apps sent or received. In Decision and Order, December 23, 2014. carefulconnections-buildingsecurityinternetof 6 The publication can be found at https://www.ftc. things.pdf. gov/system/files/documents/plain-language/ 9 United States of America (on behalf of the FTC), 3 The FTC also prepares a number of annual and pdf0205-startwithsecurity.pdf. v. Yelp Inc., No. 3:14–cv–04163 (N.D. CA.) periodic reports on the statutes it administers. 7 See ‘‘Internet of Things Privacy & Security in a (Stipulated Order For Permanent Injunction And These are not discussed in this plan. Connected World FTC Staff Report (January 2015)’’ Civil Penalty Judgment) (September 16, 2014); 4 In the Matter of Credit Karma, Docket No. C– at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/ United States of America (on behalf of the FTC), v. 4480, Decision and Order, August 13, 2014; In the reports/federal-trade-commission-staff-report- TinyCo, Inc., No: 3:14–cv–04164 (N.D. CA.) Matter of Fandango, Docket No. C–4481, Decision november-2013-workshop-entitled-internet-things- (Stipulated Order For Permanent Injunction And and Order, August 13, 2014. privacy/150127iotrpt.pdf. Civil Penalty Judgment) (September 16, 2014).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00196 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77905

The Commission is actively litigating essentially operating as a spam filter for webinar, bilingual Twitter chats, and to protect children and their parents the telephone. several Tax Identity Theft Awareness when children use mobile apps that (d) Protecting Financially Distressed Week events across the country to raise appeal to children and offer virtual Consumers. Even as the economy awareness about tax identity theft and goods for sale. On August 1, 2014, the recovers, some consumers continue to give people tips about how to respond FTC filed a court complaint alleging that face financial challenges. The FTC acts to it. The FTC’s Tax Identity Theft Amazon.com, Inc. billed parents and to ensure that consumers are protected Awareness Week Web site 14 provided other account holders for millions of from deceptive and unfair credit material for regional events held in the dollars in unauthorized in-app charges practices and get the information they states with the highest reported rates of incurred by children.10 Amazon offers need to make informed financial identity theft. many children’s apps in its app store for choices. The Commission has continued (f) Ensuring Consumers Benefit From download to mobile devices such as the its enforcement efforts by bringing law New Technologies While Also Kindle Fire. The lawsuit seeks a court enforcement actions to curb deceptive Protecting Them. order requiring refunds to consumers for and unfair practices in mortgage rescue, • Mobile Cramming. The widespread the unauthorized charges and debt relief, auto financing and debt adoption of mobile devices has permanently banning the company from collection. provided many important benefits to In June 2015, the Commission billing parents and other account consumers, including the convenience initiated a series of Debt Collection holders for in-app charges without their of paying for goods and services using Dialogue hearings, with the first one in consent. This is the FTC’s third case a mobile phone. The Commission Buffalo co-hosted by the New York relating to children’s in-app purchases; continues to prosecute crammers—third Attorney General’s Office. The Buffalo Apple and Google both settled FTC parties that place unwanted charges on event drew nearly 200 participants, consumers’ phone bills—and this past complaints concerning the issue in most of them collection industry 2014.11 year focused its attention on the role members. The second hearing was held played by mobile carriers. AT&T (c) Protecting Seniors. The on September 29, 2015, in Dallas, Texas. Mobility, LLC and T-Mobile USA, Inc. Commission works vigilantly to fight On November 18, 2015, the Commission agreed to pay $80 million and at least telephone scams that harm millions of plans to co-host the Atlanta event with $90 million, respectively, to settle Americans. The agency has aggressively the Georgia Attorney General’s Office. 12 claims that they charged customers used law enforcement tools as well as At each event, the FTC and its state and hundreds of millions of dollars for efforts to educate consumers about these federal law enforcement partners will third-party subscriptions (such as scams and to find technological discuss recent enforcement actions, ringtones and text messages) and solutions that will make it more difficult consumer complaints about debt pocketed a significant percentage of the collection practices, and compliance for scammers to operate and hide from charges.15 issues. The speakers will welcome law enforcement. FTC education and • Cross Device Tracking. The questions and comments from collection outreach programs reach tens of Commission will host a workshop on industry members and others who millions of people every year. Among Nov. 16, 2015, to examine the privacy attend. them is the ‘‘Pass It On’’ program that issues around the tracking of provides seniors with information, in (e) Fighting Identity Theft. The issue of identity theft has been the top consumers’ activities across their English and Spanish, on a variety of different information technology 13 consumer complaint reported to the scams targeting the elderly. The devices for advertising and marketing agency also works with the Elder Justice FTC for the past 15 years, and in 2014, the Commission received more than purposes, a practice known as ‘‘cross- Coordinating Council to help protect device tracking.’’ As consumers use an seniors and with the AARP Foundation, 330,000 complaints from consumers who were victims of identity theft. On increasingly diverse array of devices, whose peer counselors provided fraud- from smart phones to tablets to wearable avoidance advice last year to more than May 14, 2015, the FTC launched IdentityTheft.gov, a new resource that devices, they interact with platforms, a thousand seniors who had filed applications, software and publishers in complaints with the FTC about certain makes it easier for identity theft victims to report and recover from identity theft. ways that were impossible to conceive frauds, including lottery, prize even just a few years ago. The workshop promotion, and grandparent scams. The A Spanish version of the site is also available at www.RobodeIdentidad.gov. will explore a number of questions Commission is also promoting about the potential benefits to initiatives to make it harder for The new Web site provides an interactive checklist that walks people consumers of effective cross-device scammers to fake or ‘‘spoof’’ their caller tracking and examine the potential Identification information and the more through the recovery process and helps them understand which recovery steps privacy and security risks. widespread availability of technology (g) Promoting Competition in Health that will block calls from fraudsters, should be taken upon learning their identity has been stolen. It also provides Care. The FTC continues to work to sample letters and other helpful eliminate anticompetitive settlements 10 FTC v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2:14–cv–01038 featuring payments by branded drug (W.D. Wash.) (Complaint For Permanent Injunction resources. In addition, the site offers And Other Equitable Relief filed on July 10, 2014) specialized tips for specific forms of firms to generic competitors to keep (Order Adopting Stipulated Protective Order identity theft, including tax-related and generic drugs off the market (so-called, entered January 12, 2015). medical identity theft. The site also has 11 14 In the Matter of Apple Inc., Docket No. C–4444, advice for people who have been See http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/features/ Decision and Order, March 25, 2014; In the Matter feature-0029-tax-identity-theft-awareness-week. of Google Inc., Docket No. 122 3237, Proposed notified that their personal information 15 Federal Trade Commission v. AT&T Mobility, Agreement Containing Consent Order, September 4, was exposed in a data breach. LLC, No. 1:14–cv–03227–HLM (N.D. Ga.) 2014. Tax identity theft is increasingly a (Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and 12 The FTC has brought approximately 180 cases growing share of identity theft-related Monetary Judgment filed October 8, 2014); Federal involving telemarketing fraud against more than Trade Commission v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:14– 1100 defendants during the past decade. complaints. In January 2015, the FTC cv–0097–JLR (W.D. Wa.) (Stipulated Order for 13 See Pass It On at http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/ sponsored a Tax Identity Theft Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment filed features/feature-0030-pass-it-on#identity-theft. Awareness Week including, hosting a December 22, 2014).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00197 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77906 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

‘‘pay-for-delay’’ agreements). It’s a demand higher reimbursement rates for barred non-dentists from offering practice where the pharmaceutical its affiliated doctors from commercial competing teeth whitening services to industry wins, but consumers lose. The health plans without offering benefits consumers. The Court’s decision makes brand company protects its drug that could not be achieved in ways with clear that state agencies constituted in franchise, and the generic competitor less of an impact on competition. this manner are subject to the federal shares in the monopoly profits Moreover, in April 2014, in the first antitrust laws unless the state’s political preserved by avoiding competition. In a appellate decision in a health care processes explicitly authorize and significant victory on June 17, 2013, the provider merger in 15 years, the U.S. supervise market-related activities by U.S. Supreme Court held that pay-for- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit the state agencies. delay agreements between brand and upheld the Commission’s 2012 decision (j) Fostering Innovation & generic drug companies are subject to finding that ProMedica Health System, Competition. For more than two antitrust scrutiny under an antitrust Inc.’s acquisition of a rival, St. Luke’s decades, the Commission has examined ‘‘rule of reason’’ analysis. FTC v. Hospital in the Toledo, Ohio area, difficult issues at the intersection of Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 756 (2013). Then, violated the antitrust laws. The antitrust and intellectual property law— on June 17, 2015, the U.S. District Court Commission’s order requires ProMedica issues related to innovation, standard- for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to divest St. Luke’s Hospital to an FTC- setting, and patents. The Commission’s approved the Federal Trade approved buyer. work in this area is grounded in the Commission’s record-setting $1.2 billion (h) Promoting Competition in recognition that intellectual property settlement with Cephalon Inc., which FoodService Distribution Industry. and competition laws share the also prohibits Cephalon and the world’s Following a June 23, 2015 ruling by the fundamental goals of promoting largest generic manufacturer, Teva U.S. District Court for the District of innovation and consumer welfare. The Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., which Columbia granting the Federal Trade Commission has authored several acquired Cephalon in 2012, from Commission’s request for a preliminary seminal reports on competition and entering into most kinds of pay-for- injunction, Sysco and US Foods patent law and conducted workshops to delay deals. The underlying case against abandoned their proposed merger, and learn more about emerging practices and Cephalon involved paying four generic the Commission dismissed its related trends. drug makers to hold off on launching administrative complaint.19 FTC For instance, the FTC is currently their own version of the narcolepsy Chairwoman Ramirez commented, using its authority under Section 6(b) of treatment drug Provigil.16 ‘‘This proposed merger between the the Federal Trade Commission Act to The FTC now has two active pay-for- country’s two largest foodservice explore the impact of patent assertion delay litigations underway in federal distributors would have likely increased entity (PAE) activities. Last year, the courts. Both of them involve the prices paid by restaurants, hotels, FTC received authority from the Office blockbuster male testosterone cafeterias, and hospitals across the of Management and Budget to issue replacement drug Androgel, including country for food products and related compulsory process orders to PAEs and the Actavis case on remand to the U.S. services, and ultimately the prices paid other industry participants to develop a District Court for the Northern District by people eating at those better understanding of PAE business of Georgia and FTC v. AbbVie, Inc., in establishments. The FTC is committed models. The FTC currently is analyzing the U.S. District Court for the Eastern to maintaining vigorous competition in data received from respondents, and District of Pennsylvania.17 markets like this one that directly plans to issue a report summarizing its Another key Commission enforcement impact prices consumers pay for findings. priority is preventing mergers that everyday purchases.’’ (k) Advertising for Homeopathic would give health care providers (i) State Professional Boards. The FTC Products. The Commission hosted a leverage to raise rates charged to works to promote competition across public workshop on September 21, commercial health care plans for vital the economy and advocates on behalf of 2015, that examined advertising for services. The Commission obtained a Americans to help prevent occupational over-the-counter (OTC) homeopathic significant victory for consumers when licensing requirements, which now products. During the last few decades, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals govern a significant and growing the homeopathic drug industry in the upheld a lower court ruling that the segment of the economy, from unduly United States has grown considerably combination of the two largest providers suppressing pro-consumer competition. from a multimillion-dollar to a of adult primary care physician services On February 25, 2015, the Supreme multibillion-dollar market. In that time, in the Nampa, Idaho area would Court affirmed the Commission’s the homeopathic drug market has substantially reduce competition.18 The position in North Carolina State Board shifted from one based primarily on decision upheld a district court of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade formulations prescribed for an decision, following an 18-day trial, that Commission, 135 S. Ct. 1101 (2015), by individual user to mass-market the St. Luke’s Hospital/Saltzer Group ruling that a state may not give private formulations widely advertised and sold merger violated the antitrust laws market participants unsupervised nationwide in major retail stores. because it increased St. Luke’s ability to authority to suppress competition even Because of rapid growth in the if they act through a formally designated marketing and consumer use of 16 FTC v. Cephalon, Inc., No. 2:08–CV–02141 ‘‘state agency.’’ In this case, the North homeopathic products, the FTC hosted (E.D. Pa.) (Stipulated Order for Permanent Carolina dental board’s members, the workshop to evaluate the advertising Injunction and Equitable Monetary Relief filed June primarily dentists, were drawn from the for such products. The workshop 17, 2015). brought together a variety of 17 FTC v. AbbVie, Inc., No. 2:14–cv–05151–RK very occupation they regulate, and they (E.D. Pa.) (Complaint for Injunctive and Other stakeholders, including medical Equitable Relief filed on September 8, 2014). 19 FTC v. Sysco, USF Holding Corp., and US professionals, industry representatives, 18 Saint Alphonsus Medical Center—Nampa, Inc., Foods, Inc., No. 1:15–cv–00256 (D.D.C.) consumer advocates, and government et al. v. St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd., No. 1:12– (Memorandum Opinion of United States District regulators. CV–00560–BLW; FTC and State of Idaho v. St. Judge Amit P. Mehta Concluding That the Luke’s Health System, Ltd. and Saltzer Medical Commission Is Likely To Prove That the Proposed (l) Alcohol Advertising. The Group, P.A., No. 1:13–CV–00116–BLW, aff’d. 778 Acquisition Violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act Commission continues to support and F.3d 775 (9th Cir. 2015). filed June 29, 2015). monitor industry self-regulation of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00198 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77907

alcohol marketing to reduce underage remedy. The study will update and The FTC strives to promote sound targeting. During the Spring of 2014, the expand on the divestiture study the FTC approaches to common issues by FTC released its fourth and most recent issued in 1999. The new study, which building relationships with sister report on self-regulation in the alcohol was cleared by the Office of agencies around the world. With over industry, which set out Management and Budget on August 12, 130 jurisdictions enforcing competition recommendations to further limit 2015, will focus on 90 merger orders laws, the FTC continues to lead efforts alcohol marketing to minors.20 The issued by the Commission between 2006 to develop strong mutual enforcement Commission also continues to promote and 2012.24 cooperation and sound policy the ‘‘We Don’t Serve Teens’’ consumer (o) Protecting Consumers from Cross- internationally. For example, the FTC education program, supporting the legal Border Harm. The FTC continues to co-leads the International Competition drinking age.21 develop international enforcement Network’s (ICN) Agency Effectiveness (m) Energy Prices. Few issues are cooperation to combat cross-border Working Group and its investigative more important to consumers and consumer fraud. The agency has used its process initiative. This project resulted businesses than the prices they pay for statutory authority under the U.S. SAFE in the ICN’s adoption of Guidance on gasoline to run their vehicles and energy WEB Act and complementary tools to Investigative Process, which is the most to heat and light their homes and share evidence and provide comprehensive agency-led effort to date businesses. Given the impact of energy investigative assistance. The agency also to articulate guidance on investigative prices on consumer budgets, the energy continues to participate actively in the principles and practices that promote sector continues to be a major focus of International Consumer Protection and procedural fairness and effective FTC law enforcement and study. Enforcement Network (ICPEN), acting as enforcement in the areas of Accordingly, the FTC works to maintain the network Secretariat and working transparency, meaningful engagement competition in energy industries, with foreign counterparts on with parties, and confidentiality in invoking all the powers at its disposal— www.econsumer.gov, a Web site in eight antitrust investigations, The FTC also including monitoring industry languages for filing international was a key drafter of the recently adopted activities, investigating possible consumer complaints. The FTC has Recommendation of the Organization antitrust violations, prosecuting cases, expanded its international complaints for Economic Cooperation and and conducting studies—to protect reporting to include worldwide data by Development (OECD) on international consumers from anticompetitive region, and is working to share more cooperation in competition conduct in the industry.22 For example, such information with foreign law investigations. the Commission recently challenged a enforcement counterparts. In addition, In fiscal year 2014, the Commission proposed acquisition involving two FTC staff cooperates with foreign coordinated with antitrust agencies in energy companies supplying gasoline in criminal enforcers through the 37 investigations, and it is on target to Hawaii. In an administrative complaint International Mass Marketing Fraud surpass that number in 2015. This issued with a negotiated settlement of Working Group, and with spam and included transactions such as charges, the Commission alleged that cybercrime enforcers through the Medtronic’s acquisition of Covidien, in Par Petroleum’s acquisition of Mid Pac ‘‘London Action Plan’’ network. which we worked with antitrust Petroleum would likely have The FTC also continues to advocate agencies in multiple jurisdictions, substantially lessened competition in for global interoperability and strong including Canada, China, the European the bulk supply of Hawaii-grade privacy enforcement. The agency has Union, Japan, and Mexico, to reach consistent results.26 The FTC also gasoline blendstock—which is gasoline brought at least 39 enforcement participated in the U.S.-China Joint before it is blended with ethanol to actionsto support the U.S.-EU Safe Committee on Commerce and Trade and make finished gasoline.23 In view of the Harbor Framework (‘‘Safe Harbor’’) for Strategic and Economic Dialogue teams fundamental importance of oil, natural cross-border data transfers. In light of that recently negotiated commitments gas, and other energy resources to the the European Court of Justice’s October with China, including with regard to overall vitality of the United States and 6, 2015 decision regarding Safe Harbor, procedural fairness in anti-monopoly world economy, we expect that FTC the Commission will continue to work law proceedings. The FTC also played review and oversight of the oil and together with the U.S. Department of an active role in the Trans-Pacific natural gas industries will remain a Commerce and European authorities to develop effective solutions that protect Partnership and Transatlantic Trade and centerpiece of our work for years to Investment Partnership agreement that come. consumer privacy with respect to cross- border data transfers. The agency also was reached on October 5, 2015 after (n) Remedy Study. The FTC is five years of negotiations. studying the effectiveness of the continues to strengthen enforcement ties with foreign privacy counterparts. The (p) Self-Regulatory and Compliance Commission’s orders in merger cases Initiatives with Industry. The where it required a divestiture or other FTC pursues these relationships both bilaterally, this year for example signing Commission continues to engage industry in compliance partnerships in 20 a Memorandum of Understanding with See Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry the funeral and franchise industries. (March 2014), available at http://www.ftc.gov/ the Dutch data protection authority, and Specifically, the Commission’s Funeral system/files/documents/reports/self-regulation- multilaterally, through networks like the alcohol-industry-report-federal-trade-commission/ Rule Offender Program, conducted in 140320alcoholreport.pdf. Global Privacy Enforcement Network 25 partnership with the National Funeral 21 (GPEN) and GPEN Alert. More information can be found at http://www. Directors Association, is designed to dontserveteens.gov/. educate funeral home operators found 22 Information regarding FTC oil and gas industry 24 For more information, see the Remedy Study initiatives is available at https://www.ftc.gov/tips- weblink at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/studies/ in violation of the requirements of the advice/competition-guidance/industry-guidance/ remedy-study. oil-and-gas. 25 See October 26, 2015 press release titled ‘‘FTC 26 See press release ‘‘FTC Puts Conditions on 23 Par Petroleum Corp., FTC File No. 1410171 and Seven International Partners Launch New Medtronic’s Proposed Acquisition of Covidien’’ (F.T.C. Mar. 18, 2015) (proposed consent order), Initiative to Boost Cooperation in Protecting dated November 26, 2014, at https://www.ftc.gov/ available at https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases- Consumer Privacy,’’ at https://www.ftc.gov/news- news-events/press-releases/2014/11/ftc-puts- proceedings/141-0171/par-petroleum-mid-pac- events/press-releases/2015/10/ftc-seven- conditions-medtronics-proposed-acquisition- petroleum. international-partners-launch-new-initiative-boost. covidien.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00199 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77908 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Funeral Rule, 16 CFR 453, so that they identifiable information (PII) data set to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This can meet the rule’s disclosure the FTC’s own and separate vendor of program is also broader than the review requirements. More than 485 funeral credit history information. That data contemplated under the Regulatory homes have participated in the program was sent to the FTC’s vendor, which Flexibility Act, in that it provides the since its inception in 1996. In addition, then sent the credit history data for the Commission with an ongoing systematic the Commission established the sample, stripped of any PII, to the FTC. approach for seeking information about Franchise Rule Alternative Law The FTC’s vendor also sent PII data to the costs and benefits of its rules and Enforcement Program in partnership the Social Security Administration, guides and whether there are changes with the International Franchise which in November 2014 provided the that could minimize any adverse Association (IFA), a nonprofit FTC with race and ethnicity data for the economic effects, not just a ‘‘significant organization that represents both sample, which is essential for the economic impact upon a substantial franchisors and franchisees. This Report. FTC Bureau of Economics staff number of small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 610. program is designed to assist franchisors expects to have a final draft of the As part of its continuing 10-year found to have a minor or technical Report ready to circulate to the review plan, the Commission examines violation of the Franchise Rule, 16 CFR Commission by the end of the 2015 the effect of rules and guides on small 436, in complying with the rule. calendar year. This study is not affected businesses and on the marketplace in Violations involving fraud or other by the Consumer Financial Protection general. These reviews may lead to the section 5 violations are not candidates Act. revision or rescission of rules and for referral to the program. The IFA FACTA Section 319 Study on guides to ensure that the Commission’s teaches the franchisor how to comply Improving Accuracy of Consumer Credit consumer protection and competition with the rule and monitors its business Reports. Section 319 of FACTA requires goals are achieved efficiently and at the for a period of years. Where appropriate, the FTC to study the accuracy and least cost to business. In a number of the program offers franchisees the completeness of information in instances, the Commission has opportunity to mediate claims arising consumers’ credit reports and to determined that existing rules and from the law violations. Since December consider methods for improving the guides were no longer necessary or in 1998, 21 companies have agreed to accuracy and completeness of such the public interest. Most of the matters participate in the program. information. Section 319 of the Act also currently under review pertain to requires the Commission to issue a consumer protection and are intended Rulemakings and Studies Required by series of biennial reports to Congress to ensure that consumers receive the Statute over a period of 11 years. In January information necessary to evaluate Congress has enacted laws requiring 2015, the Commission issued the sixth competing products and make informed the Commission to undertake and final report; a follow-up study of purchasing decisions. Pursuant to this rulemakings and studies. This section the credit report accuracy study issued program, the Commission has rescinded discusses required rules and studies. by the FTC in 2012 that examined how 37 rules and guides promulgated under The final actions section below many consumers had errors on at least the FTC’s general authority and updated describes actions taken on the required one of three nationwide credit reports. dozens of others since the early 1990s. rulemakings and studies since the 2014 The follow-up study issued in 2015 In light of Executive Orders 13563 Regulatory Plan was published. found that 37 percent of the follow-up and 13579, the FTC continues to take a FACTA Rules. The Commission has study participants who originally fresh look at its long-standing regulatory issued all of the rules required by disputed errors now accepted the review process. The Commission is FACTA (Fair and Accurate Credit disputed information as correct. The taking a number of steps to ease burdens Transactions Act). These rules are remaining participants believed the on business and promote transparency codified in several parts of 16 CFR 602 disputed information was still incorrect in its regulatory review program: et seq., amending or supplementing and half of those consumers planned to • The Commission recently issued a regulations relating to the Fair Credit continue their dispute with the revised 10-year review schedule (see Reporting Act. appropriate credit reporting agency. The next paragraph below) and is FACTA Section 215 Study on final study recommends that credit accelerating the review of a number of Homeowners Insurance and Credit reporting agencies (CRAs) review and rules and guides in response to recent Scores. On March 27, 2009, the improve the process they use to notify changes in technology and the Commission issued 6(b) compulsory consumers about the results of dispute marketplace. The Commission is information requests to the nine largest investigations, and that CRAs continue currently reviewing more than 15 of the private providers of homeowner to explore efforts to educate consumers 65 rules and guides within its insurance in the nation. The purpose regarding their rights to review their jurisdiction. was to help the FTC collect data for its credit reports and dispute inaccurate • The Commission continues to study on the effects of credit-based information. request and review public comments on scores in the homeowner insurance the effectiveness of its regulatory review Retrospective Review of Existing market, a study mandated by section program and suggestions for its Regulations 215 of FACTA. During the summer and improvement. fall of 2009, these nine insurers In 1992, the Commission • The FTC maintains a Web page at submitted responses to the implemented a program to review its http://www.ftc.gov/regreview that serves Commission’s requests. FTC staff rules and guides regularly. The as a one-stop shop for the public to examined the large policy-level and Commission’s review program is obtain information and provide quote-level data files included in these patterned after provisions in the comments on individual rules and submissions (containing millions of Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– guides under review as well as the policies and quotes) and selected a 612. Under the Commission’s program, Commission’s regulatory review sample for the study. The insurance rules are reviewed on a 10-year program generally. companies then worked with their schedule. For many rules, this has In addition, the Commission’s 10-year vendor to ensure the security of resulted in more frequent reviews than periodic review schedule includes delivering the sample’s personally are generally required by section 610 of initiating reviews for the following rules

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00200 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77909

and guides (80 FR 5713, Feb. 3, 2015) consumers about ethanol concentration consent of the consumer. On June 24, during 2015: and suitability for their cars and 2015, the Commission proposed (1) Contact Lens Rule, 16 CFR 315, engines. Responding to the comments, amending the Rule to allow motor (2) Ophthalmic Practice Rules, 16 CFR the final amendments provide greater vehicle dealers instead to notify their 456, and flexibility for businesses to comply with customers that a privacy policy is (3) Preservation of Consumers’ Claims the ethanol labeling requirements, and available on their Web site, under and Defenses Rule (Holder in Due do not adopt the alternative octane certain circumstances. 80 FR 36267. The Course Rule) 16 CFR 433, and during rating method proposed in the 2014 proposed amendment would also revise 2016: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal the scope and definitions in the Rule in (4) Standards for Safeguarding Register publication is expected by light of the transfer of part of the Customer Information, 16 CFR 314, December 2015. Commission’s rulemaking authority to (5) CAN–SPAM Rule, 16 CFR 316, Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 305. the Consumer Financial Protection (6) Labeling and Advertising of Home The Energy Labeling Rule is officially Bureau in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Insulation, 16 CFR 460, and known as the Rule Concerning Reform and Consumer Protection Act. (7) Disposal of Consumer Report Disclosures Regarding Energy The comment period closed on August Information and Records, 16 CFR 682. Consumption and Water Use of Certain 31, 2015. Staff anticipates that the As set out below under Ongoing Rule Home Appliances and Other Products Commission will issue a final rule and Guide Reviews, the Commission Required Under the Energy Policy and amendment by early 2016. recently initiated reviews of the Hobby Conservation Act. On November 2, Hobby Rules, 16 CFR 304. As part of Rules, 16 CFR 304, the Telemarketing 2015, the Commission issued proposed the systematic rule review process, on Sales Rule (TSR), 16 CFR 308, the amendments to the Rule to create July 14, 2014, the Commission Contact Lens Rule, 16 CFR 315, and the requirements related to a new label requested public comments on, among Eyeglass Rule, 16 CFR 456. database on the Department of Energy’s other things, the economic impact and Ongoing Rule and Guide Reviews Web site, redesign ceiling fan labels, benefits of the Hobby Rules (Rules and improve and update the comparability Regulations under the Hobby Protection The Commission is continuing review ranges for refrigerator labels, revise Act); possible conflict between the of a number of rules and guides, which central air conditioner labels in Rules and State, local, or other Federal are discussed below. laws or regulations; and the effect on the (a) Rules response to new Department of Energy enforcement requirements, improve Rules of any technological, economic, or Premerger Notification Rules and other industry changes. 79 FR 40691. Report Form (or HSR Rules), 16 CFR water heater labels, and update current plumbing disclosures. 80 FR 67351. The The comment period closed on 801–803. The Premerger Office is September 22, 2014. The Hobby considering amendments to the comment period will close on January 11, 2016.27 Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 2101–2106, Instructions to the HSR Form to update prohibits manufacturing or importing information related to NAICS (North Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), 16 CFR 308. Anti-Fraud Provisions—On imitation numismatic and collectible American Industry Classification political items unless they are marked System) codes and recent rule changes May 21, 2013, the Commission proposed ‘‘Anti-Fraud’’ amendments to in accordance with regulations and to allow the submission of filings prescribed by the Federal Trade on electronic media. The proposed the TSR concerning, among other things, the misuse of novel payment Commission. The implementing Rules amendments may be issued during the prescribe that imitation political items— fourth quarter of 2015. The Premerger methods by telemarketers and sellers. 78 FR 41200 (July 9, 2013). After a short such as buttons, posters or coffee Office is also considering amendments mugs—must be marked with the to the HSR Rules regarding standards for extension, the comment period closed on August 8, 2013. In the middle of calendar year in which they were the valuation of potentially reportable manufactured, and imitation transactions. The proposed amendments November 2015, the Commission announced a final rule action containing numismatic items—including coins, may be issued during the second quarter tokens and paper money—must be of 2016. ‘‘Anti-Fraud’’ amendments. Federal Register publication is anticipated by marked with the word ‘‘copy.’’ Staff Fuel Rating Rule, 16 CFR 306. First anticipates sending a recommendation issued in 1979, the Fuel Rating Rule (or December 2015. Periodic Rule Review—On August 11, to the Commission by early 2016. Automotive Fuel Ratings, Certification 2014, the Commission initiated periodic Care Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 423. and Posting Rule) enables consumers to review of the TSR as set out on the 10- Promulgated in 1971, the Rule on Care buy gasoline with an appropriate octane year review schedule. 79 FR 46732. The Labeling of Textile Apparel and Certain rating for their vehicle and establishes comment period as extended closed on Piece Goods as Amended (the Care standard procedures for determining, November 13, 2014. 79 FR 61267 (Oct. Labeling Rule) makes it an unfair or certifying, and posting octane ratings. 10, 2014). Staff anticipates making a deceptive act or practice for On March 27, 2014, the Commission recommendation to the Commission by manufacturers and importers of textile proposed amendments to the Rule that the end of 2015. wearing apparel and certain piece goods would adopt and revise rating, Privacy Rule, 16 CFR 313. The Privacy to sell these items without attaching certification, and labeling requirements Rule or Privacy of Consumer Financial care labels stating ‘‘what regular care is for blends of gasoline with more than 10 Information Rule requires among other needed for the ordinary use of the percent ethanol and would allow an things that certain motor vehicle dealers product.’’ The Rule also requires that alternative octane rating method that provide an annual disclosure of their the manufacturer or importer possess, would lower compliance costs. 79 FR privacy policies to their customers by prior to sale, a reasonable basis for the 18850. The comment period closed on hand delivery, mail, electronic delivery, care instructions and allows the use of July 2, 2014. In the middle of November or through a Web site, but only with the approved care symbols in lieu of words 2015, the Commission announced final to disclose care instructions. After rule amendments that require entities 27 See Final Actions below for information about reviewing the comments from a periodic rate and certify all ethanol fuels to a separate completed rulemaking proceeding for the rule review (76 FR. 41148; July 13, provide useful information to Energy Labeling Rule. 2011), the Commission concluded on

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00201 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77910 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

September 20, 2012, that the Rule contact lens fitting, and verify contact The Fair Packaging and Labeling Act continued to benefit consumers and lens prescriptions to contact lens sellers (FPLA) Rules, 16 CFR 500–502. In would be retained, and sought authorized by consumers to seek such November 2015, the Commission comments on potential updates to the verification. Sellers may provide contact concluded its periodic review of the Rule, including changes that would: lenses only in accordance with a valid FLPA Rules and issued final rule Allow garment manufacturers and prescription that is directly presented to amendments that modernized the place- marketers to include instructions for the seller or verified with the prescriber. of-business listing requirement to professional wetcleaning on labels; The Eyeglass Rule requires that an incorporate online resources, eliminated permit the use of ASTM Standard optometrist or ophthalmologist must obsolete references to commodities D5489–07, ‘‘Standard Guide for Care give the patient, at no extra cost, a copy advertised using the terms ‘‘cents off,’’ Symbols for Care Instructions on Textile of the eyeglass prescription immediately ‘‘introductory offer’’ and ‘‘economy Products,’’ or ISO 3758:2005(E), after the examination is completed. The size,’’ and incorporated a more ‘‘Textiles—Care labeling code using Rule also prohibits optometrists and comprehensive metric chart. [Rule symbols,’’ in lieu of terms; clarify what ophthalmologists from conditioning the Review and Request for Comments. 79 can constitute a reasonable basis for care availability of an eye examination, as FR 15272 (Mar. 19, 2014)] [NPRM, 80 instructions; and update the definition defined by the Rule, on a requirement FR 5491 (Feb. 2, 2015)]. The changes are of ‘‘dryclean.’’ 77 FR 58338. On March that the patient agrees to purchase effective 30 days after the date of 28, 2014, the Commission hosted a ophthalmic goods from the optometrist publication in the Federal Register. The public roundtable in Washington, DC, or ophthalmologist. FPLA requires consumer commodities that analyzed proposed changes to the Safeguards Rule (or Standards for to be marked with statements of: (1) Rule. Staff anticipates forwarding a Safeguarding Customer Information), 16 Identity; (2) net quantity of contents; recommendation to the Commission by CFR 314: In 2016, the Commission plans and (3) name and place of the business fall 2015. to initiate periodic review of the of manufacturer, packer, or distributor. Used Car Rule, 16 CFR 455. The Used Safeguards Rule as part of its ongoing These requirements serve FPLA’s stated Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule systematic review of all rules and purpose of ‘‘enabling consumers to (‘‘Used Car Rule’’), 16 CFR 455, sets out guides. The Safeguards Rule, as directed obtain accurate information as to the the general duties of a used vehicle by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB), quantity of the contents and . . . to dealer; requires that a completed Buyers requires each financial institution to facilitate value comparisons.’’ Guide be posted at all times on the side develop a written information security Consumer Warranty Rules, 16 CFR window of each used car a dealer offers program that is appropriate to its size 701–703. On July 20, 2015, the for sale; and mandates disclosure of and complexity, the nature and scope of whether the vehicle is covered by a Commission concluded its review of the its activities, and the sensitivity of the dealer warranty and, if so, the type and Interpretations, Rules, and Guides under customer information at issue. duration of the warranty coverage, or the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and whether the vehicle is being sold ‘‘as is- (b) Guides announced it would keep the Rules and no warranty.’’ The Commission Jewelry Guides, 16 CFR 23. The Guides in their present form (Rules at 16 published a notice seeking public Commission sought public comments CFR 701–703; Guides at 16 CFR 239) comments on the effectiveness and on its Guides for the Jewelry, Precious while modifying the Interpretations in impact of the rule. See 73 FR 42285 Metals, and Pewter Industries, which 16 CFR 700.10 and 700.11(a). See 80 FR (July 21, 2008). The comment period, as are commonly known as the Jewelry 42710 (Final Rule) (July 20, 2015); 76 FR extended and then reopened, ended on Guides. 77 FR 39202 (July 2, 2012). 52596 (Rule Review; Request for June 15, 2009. In response to comments, Since completing its last review of the Comments) (Aug. 23, 2011). The the Commission published a Notice of Jewelry Guides in 1996, the Commission Commission revised Part 700.10 of the Proposed Rulemaking on December 17, revised sections of the Guides and Interpretations to clarify that implied 2012 (See 77 FR 74746) and a final rule addressed other issues raised in tying—warranty language that implies revising the Spanish translation of the petitions from jewelry trade to a consumer that warranty coverage is window form on December 12, 2012. associations. The Guides explain to conditioned on the use of select parts or See 77 FR 73912. The extended businesses how to avoid making service—is deceptive. It also revised comment period on the NPRM ended on deceptive claims about precious metal, Part 700.10 to state that, to the extent March 13, 2012. The Commission issued pewter, diamond, gemstone, and pearl that the Warranty Act’s service contract a Supplemental NPRM on November 28, products and when they should make provisions apply to the insurance 2014. 79 FR 70804. Staff anticipates disclosures to avoid unfair or deceptive business, they are effective if they do forwarding a recommendation to the trade practices. The comment period not interfere with state laws regulating Commission by the end of 2015. initially set to close on August 27, 2012, the business of insurance. For more Contact Lens Rule, 16 CFR 315, and was subsequently extended until background, the Rule Governing the Eyeglass Rule, 16 CFR 456: As part of September 28, 2012. Staff also Disclosure of Written Consumer Product the systematic rule review process, on conducted a public roundtable to Warranty Terms and Conditions, 16 CFR September 3, 2015, the Commission examine possible modifications to the 701 (Rule 701) establishes requirements issued Federal Register notices seeking Guides in June 2013. The Commission for warrantors for disclosing the terms public comments about the Contact is currently considering a staff and conditions of written warranties on Lens Rule and the Eyeglass Rule (or recommendation and expects to take consumer products actually costing the Trade Regulation Rule on Ophthalmic further action by early 2016. consumer more than $15.00. The Rule Practice Rules). 80 FR 53272 (Contact Governing the Pre-Sale Availability of Final Actions Lens Rule) and 80 FR 53274 (Eyeglass Written Warranty Terms, 16 CFR 702 Rule). The comment period extended Since the publication of the 2014 (Rule 702), requires sellers and until October 26, 2015. The Contact Regulatory Plan, the Commission has warrantors to make the terms of a Lens Rule requires contact lens issued the following final rules or taken written warranty available to the prescribers to provide prescriptions to other actions to close other rulemaking consumer prior to sale. The Rule their patients upon the completion of a proceedings. Governing Informal Dispute Settlement

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00202 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77911

Procedures (IDSM), 16 CFR 703 (Rule the Commission issued final rule Commission has no proposed rules that 703), establishes minimum amendments to expand coverage of the would have significant international requirements for those informal dispute Lighting Facts label, require room air impacts under the definition in settlement mechanisms that are conditioner labels on packaging instead Executive Order 13609. Also, there are incorporated by the warrantor into its of the units themselves, enhance the no international regulatory cooperation consumer product warranty. By durability of appliance labels, and activities that are reasonably anticipated incorporating the IDSM into the improve plumbing disclosure to lead to significant regulations under warranty, the warrantor requires the requirements. 80 FR 67285. This action Executive Order 13609. consumer to use the IDSM before completed the Commission’s recent BILLING CODE 6750–01–P pursuing any legal remedies in court. regulatory review of the Energy Labeling The review also included the related Rule. Guides for the Advertising of Warranties and Guarantees, 16 CFR 239, and the Summary NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING Interpretations of Magnuson-Moss In both content and process, the FTC’s COMMISSION (NIGC) Warranty Act, 16 CFR 700. ongoing and proposed regulatory Statement of Regulatory Priorities Cooling Off Rule, 16 CFR 429: On actions are consistent with the In 1988, Congress adopted the Indian January 9, 2015, the Commission President’s priorities. The actions under Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) (Pub. L. amended the Cooling-Off Rule (or Trade consideration inform and protect 100–497, 102 Stat. 2475) with a primary Regulation Rule Concerning Cooling Off consumers, while minimizing the purpose of providing ‘‘a statutory basis Period for Sales Made at Homes or at regulatory burdens on businesses. The for the operation of gaming by Indian Certain Other Locations), by increasing Commission will continue working tribes as a means of promoting tribal the exclusionary limit for all door-to- toward these goals. The Commission’s economic development, self-sufficiency, door sales at locations other than a 10-year review program is patterned and strong tribal governments.’’ IGRA buyer’s residence from $25 up to $130. after provisions in the Regulatory established the National Indian Gaming Under the final rule, the revised Flexibility Act and complies with the Commission (NIGC or the Commission) definition of door-to-door sale Small Business Regulatory Enforcement to protect such gaming, amongst other distinguishes between sales at a buyer’s Fairness Act of 1996. The Commission’s things, as a means of generating tribal residence and those at other locations. 10-year program also is consistent with revenue. The revised definition retains coverage section 5(a) of Executive Order 12866, At its core, Indian gaming is a for sales made at a buyer’s residence which directs executive branch agencies function of sovereignty exercised by that have a purchase price of $25 or to develop a plan to reevaluate tribal governments. In addition, the more. 80 FR 1329 (Jan. 9, 2015). The periodically all of their significant Federal government maintains a final rule amendment was effective on existing regulations. 58 FR 51735 (Sept. government-to-government relationship March 13, 2015. 30, 1993). In addition, the final rules with the tribes—a responsibility of the The Unavailability Rule, 16 CFR 424: issued by the Commission continue to NIGC. Thus, while the Agency is On November 19, 2014, the Commission be consistent with the President’s committed to strong regulation of Indian announced the completion of its review Statement of Regulatory Philosophy and gaming, the Commission is equally of the Unavailability Rule (or Rule on Principles, Executive Order 12866, committed to strengthening Retail Food Store Advertising and section 1(a), which directs agencies to government-to-government relations by Marketing Practices) and the retention promulgate only such regulations as are, engaging in meaningful consultation of the Rule in its current form. [Final inter alia, required by law or are made with tribes to fulfill IGRA’s intent. The Rule, 79 FR 70053 (Nov. 25, 2014); necessary by compelling public need, NIGC’s vision is to adhere to principles ANPRM, 76 FR 51308 (Aug. 12, 2011)]. such as material failures of private of good government, including The Unavailability Rule states that it is markets to protect or improve the health transparency to promote agency a violation of Section 5 of the Federal and safety of the public. accountability and fiscal responsibility, Trade Commission Act for retail stores The Commission continues to identify to operate consistently to ensure of food, groceries, or other merchandise and weigh the costs and benefits of fairness and clarity in the to advertise products for sale at a stated proposed actions and possible administration of IGRA, and to respect price if those stores do not have the alternative actions and to receive the the responsibilities of each sovereign in advertised products in stock and readily broadest practicable array of comment order to fully promote tribal economic available to customers during the from affected consumers, businesses, development, self-sufficiency, and effective period of the advertisement, and the public at large. In sum, the strong tribal governments. The NIGC is unless the advertisement clearly Commission’s regulatory actions are fully committed to working with tribes discloses that supplies of the advertised aimed at efficiently and fairly promoting to ensure the integrity of the industry by products are limited or are available the ability of ‘‘private markets to protect exercising its regulatory responsibilities only at some outlets. or improve the health and safety of the Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 305: On public, the environment, or the well- (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 December 29, 2014, the Commission being of the American people.’’ million or more or adversely affect in a material issued a final rule updating label Executive Order 12866, section 1. way the economy; a sector of the economy; requirements for heating and cooling productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; II. Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal equipment and removed information governments or communities; from furnace labels about regional The Commission has no proposed (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise conservation standards. 79 FR 77868. rules that would be a ‘‘significant interfere with an action taken or planned by another The amendments were effective on regulatory action’’ under the definition agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of 28 29 April 6, 2015. On November 2, 2015, in Executive Order 12866. The entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or 28 See Ongoing Rule and Guide Reviews for 29 Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out information about a separate ongoing rulemaking a regulatory action to be ‘‘significant’’ if it is likely of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the proceeding for the Energy Labeling Rule. to result in a rule that may: principles set forth in this Executive order.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00203 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77912 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

through technical assistance, Self-Regulation of Class II Gaming requirements imposed are still compliance, and enforcement activities. regulations; (vi) regulation that would necessary. provide a preference to qualified Indian- Retrospective Review of Existing The NRC’s Regulatory Plan contains a owned businesses when purchasing Regulations statement of: (1) The major rules that the goods or services for the Commission at NRC expects to publish in final form in As an independent regulatory agency, a fair market price; (vii) finalized fiscal year (FY) 2015 and FY 2016; (2) the NIGC has been performing a revisions to the background the other significant rulemakings that retrospective review of its existing investigation and licensing regulations the NRC expects to publish in final form regulations well before Executive Order in order to streamline the process for in FY 2015; and (3) the other significant 13579 was issued on July 11, 2011. The submitting information and to rulemakings that the NRC expects to NIGC, however, recognizes the distinguish the requirements for publish in final form in FY 2016 and importance of Executive Order 13579 temporary and permanent licenses (viii) beyond. Major rules include rules that and its regulatory review is being revisions to the minimum technical are likely to result in (1) an annual effect conducted in the spirit of Executive standards for gaming equipment used on the economy of $100 million or Order 13579, to identify those with the play of Class II games and, (ix) more; (2) a major increase in costs or regulations that may be outmoded, revisions to the existing Privacy Act prices for consumers, individual ineffective, insufficient, or excessively Procedures in part 515 as a means to industries, Federal, state, or local burdensome and to modify, streamline, streamline internal processes. government agencies, or geographic expand, or repeal them in accordance The NIGC anticipates that the ongoing regions; or (3) significant adverse effects with input from the public. In addition, consultations with tribes will continue on competition, employment, as required by Executive Order 13175, to play an important role in the investment, productivity, or innovation, the Commission has been conducting development of the NIGC’s rulemaking or on the ability of United States-based government-to-government efforts. enterprises to compete with foreign- consultations with tribes regarding each BILLING CODE 7565–01–P based enterprises in domestic and regulation’s relevancy, consistency in export markets. Other significant application, and limitations or barriers rulemakings include rules that are not to implementation, based on the tribes’ economically significant but are experiences. The consultation process is U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY considered important by the agency. For also intended to result in the COMMISSION’S FISCAL YEAR 2015 identification of areas for improvement REGULATORY PLAN each major rule and other significant rulemaking, the NRC is including a and needed amendments, if any, new A. Statement of Regulatory Priorities regulations, and the possible repeal of citation, if available, to an applicable outdated regulations. Under the authority of the Atomic Federal Register (FR) notice that The following Regulatory Identifier Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and provides further information, a Numbers (RINs) have been identified as the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, summary of the legal basis, an associated with the review: as amended, the U.S. Nuclear explanation of why the NRC is pursuing Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the major rule or other significant RIN Title the possession and use of source, rulemaking, the schedule, and contact byproduct, and special nuclear material. information. 3141–AA32 Amendment of Definitions. The NRC’s regulatory mission is to B.1. Major Rules (FY 2015) 3141–AA55 Minimum Internal Control license and regulate the Nation’s Standards. The NRC will have published one 3141–AA58 Amendment of Approval of civilian use of byproduct, source, and Management Contracts. special nuclear materials to ensure major rule in final form by the end of 3141–AA60 Class II Minimum Internal Con- adequate protection of public health and FY 2015. trol Standards. safety, promote the common defense Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee 3141–AA61 Self-Regulation of Class II and security, and protect the Recovery for Fiscal Year 2015 Gaming. environment. As part of its mission, the (Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 3141–AA62 Buy Indian Goods and Services NRC regulates the operation of nuclear 3150–AJ44)—Through this rule, the (BIGS) Rule. power plants and fuel-cycle plants; the NRC will amend the licensing, 3141–AA63 Tribal Background Investiga- safeguarding of nuclear materials from inspection, and annual fees charged to tions and Licensing. 3141–AA64 Class II Minimum Technical theft and sabotage; the safe transport, its applicants and licensees. The Standards. storage, and disposal of radioactive proposed amendments are necessary to 3141–AA65 Privacy Act Procedures. materials and wastes; the implement the Omnibus Budget decommissioning and safe release for Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, More specifically, the NIGC is other uses of licensed facilities that are which requires the NRC to recover currently considering promulgating new no longer in operation; and the medical, through fees approximately 90 percent regulations in the following areas: (i) industrial, and research applications of of its budget authority in FY 2015, not Amendments to its regulatory nuclear material. In addition, the NRC including amounts appropriated for definitions to conform to the newly licenses the import and export of Waste Incidental to Reprocessing, the promulgated rules; (ii) the removal, radioactive materials. As part of its Nuclear Waste Fund, generic homeland revision, or suspension of the existing regulatory process, the NRC routinely security activities, and Inspector minimum internal control standards conducts comprehensive regulatory General services for the Defense Nuclear (MICS) in part 542; (iii) updates or analyses that examine the costs and Facilities Safety Board. These fees revisions to its management contract benefits of contemplated regulations. represent the cost of NRC services regulations to address the current state The NRC has developed internal provided to applicants and licensees. of the industry; (iv) the review and procedures and programs to ensure that The proposed rule was published in the revision of the minimum internal it imposes only necessary requirements FR on March 23, 2015 (80 FR 15475), control standards for Class II gaming on its licensees and to review existing and the comment period ended on April updates; (v) updates and revisions to its regulations to determine whether the 22, 2015.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00204 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan 77913

B.2. Major Rules (FY 2016) The NRC has proposed one other prescriptive requirements with The NRC anticipates publishing one significant rulemaking in FY 2015. performance-based requirements, Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal major rule in final form in FY 2016. incorporate recent research findings, (RIN 3150–AI92), was published on Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee and expand applicability to all fuel March 26, 2015 (80 FR 16082). This Recovery for Fiscal Year 2016—The designs and cladding materials. Further, proposed rule amends the NRC’s NRC will update its requirement to the proposed rule would allow licensees regulations governing low-level recover approximately 90 percent of its to use an alternative risk-informed radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal budget authority in FY 2016. approach to evaluate the effects of facilities to require new and revised debris on long-term cooling. C.1. Other Significant Rulemakings (FY site-specific technical analyses, to Containment Protection and Release 2015) permit the development of site-specific Reduction for Mark I and Mark II criteria for LLRW acceptance based on The NRC will have published nine Boiling Water Reactors (RIN 3150– the results of these analyses, to facilitate other significant rulemakings in final AJ26)—This proposed rule would implementation, and to better align the form in FY 2015. amend the NRC’s regulations to provide requirements with current health and Economic Simplified Boiling-Water a performance-based option for filtering safety standards. The related guidance Reactor Design Certification (RIN 3150– strategies with drywell filtration and document, NUREG–2175, ‘‘Guidance for AI85), was published on October 15, severe accident management of boiling- Conducting Technical Analyses for 10 2014 (79 FR 61943), and effective water reactor Mark I and Mark II CFR part 61,’’ was published for November 14, 2014. containments. The proposed rule would comment in the same issue of the FR (80 Definition of a Utilization Facility also define performance-based FR 15930). The proposed rule would (RIN 3150–AJ48), was published on requirements to prevent the release of affect licensees, license applicants, and October 17, 2014 (79 FR 62329), and significant amounts of radioactive the Agreement States. Comments on the effective on December 31, 2014. material from containment following the proposed rule and draft NUREG are due Approval of American Society of dominant severe accident sequences at by July 24, 2015. Mechanical Engineers’ Code Cases (RIN boiling-water reactors with Mark I and 3150–AI72), was published on C.2. Other Significant Rulemakings (FY Mark II containments and would November 5, 2014 (79 FR 65775), and 2016 and Beyond) establish acceptance criteria for effective on December 5, 2014. The other significant rulemakings that confinement strategies. Holtec International HI—STORM the NRC anticipates publishing in FY Enhanced Weapons, Firearms FLOOD/WIND System (RIN 3150–AJ40), 2016 and beyond are listed below. Some Background Checks, and Security Event was published on October 3, 2014 (79 of these regulatory priorities are a result Notifications (RIN 3150–AI49)—This FR 59623), and effective on December of recommendations from the proposed rule would implement the 17, 2014. Fukushima Dai-ichi Near-Term Task NRC’s authority under Section 161a of ® NAC International MAGNASTOR Force. In 2011, the NRC established this the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as System (RIN 3150–AJ39), was published task force to examine regulatory amended, and revise existing on January 29, 2015 (80 FR 4757), and requirements, programs, processes, and regulations governing security event effective on April 14, 2015. implementation based on information notifications. Holtec International HI—STORM 100 from the Fukushima Dai-ichi site in Medical Use of Byproduct Material— Cask System (RIN 3150–AJ47), was Japan, following the March 11, 2011, Medical Event Definitions, Training and published on February 5, 2015 (80 FR earthquake and tsunami (see Experience, and Clarifying Amendments 6430). Because the NRC received at least ‘‘Recommendations for Enhancing (RIN 3150–AI63; 79 FR 42409)—The one significant adverse comment in Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The proposed rule would amend medical response to the companion proposed Near-Term Task Force Review of use regulations related to medical event rule (80 FR 6466), the agency withdrew Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi definitions for permanent implant the direct final rule on April 20, 2015 Accident,’’ dated July 12, 2011 (the brachytherapy; training and experience (80 FR 21639). The NRC will address NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access requirements for authorized users, the adverse comments received on the and Management System Accession No. medical physicists, Radiation Safety companion proposed rule in a pending ML111861807)). Officers, and nuclear pharmacists; and final rule. Mitigation Strategies for Beyond requirements for the testing and Holtec International HI—STORM Design Basis Events (RIN 3150–AJ49)— reporting of failed molybdenum/ FLOOD/WIND System (RIN 3150–AJ52), This proposed rule combines two technetium and rubidium generators. was published on March 19, 2015 (80 activities for which documents have The proposed rule would also make FR 14291). The final rule is scheduled been published in the FR: Onsite changes that would allow Associate to become effective on June 2, 2015, Emergency Response Capabilities (RIN Radiation Safety Officers to be named unless significant adverse comments are 3150–AJ11; NRC–2012–0031) and on a medical license and make other received. Station Blackout Mitigation Strategies clarifications. Further, this rulemaking NAC International MAGNASTOR® (RIN 3150–AJ08; NRC–2011–0299). The would consider a request filed in a System (RIN 3150–AJ50), was published rule would amend the NRC’s regulations petition for rulemaking (PRM), PRM– on April 15, 2015 (80 FR 20149). The applicable to power reactors to provide 35–20, to ‘‘grandfather’’ certain board- final rule will be effective on June 29, requirements for the mitigation of certified individuals, and per 2015, unless significant adverse beyond-design-basis events that Commission direction in the Staff comments are received by May 15, 2015. includes station blackout mitigation Requirements Memorandum dated One Certificate of Compliance strategies and enhanced onsite August 13, 2012, to SECY–12–0053, Rulemaking (RIN 3150–AJ58)—This emergency response capabilities. subsume a proposed rule previously rulemaking will allow power reactor Performance-Based Emergency Core published under RIN 3150–AI26, licensees to store spent fuel in an Cooling System Acceptance Criteria ‘‘Medical Use of Byproduct Material- approved cask design under a general (RIN 3150–AH42; 79 FR 16105)—This Amendments/Medical Event Definition’’ license. proposed rule would replace [NRC–2008–0071].

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00205 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77914 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Regulatory Plan

Physical Protection for Category I, II, 11, 2001, security orders in regulations, and update transportation security and III Special Nuclear Material (RIN develop a revised material attractiveness regulations. 3150–AJ41)—This proposed rule would approach for special nuclear material, [FR Doc. 2015–30690 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am] incorporate numerous post-September BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00206 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\15DEP2.SGM 15DEP2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS