I hereby give notice that a meeting of Horizons Regional Council will be held on:

Date: Tuesday, 24 March 2015 Time: 10.00am Venue: Tararua Room Horizons Regional Council 11-15 Victoria Avenue

REGIONAL COUNCIL

AGENDA

MEMBERSHIP

Chair Cr EB Gordon Deputy Chair Cr PW Rieger, QSO JP Councillors Cr JJ Barrow Cr LR Burnell, QSM Cr DB Cotton Cr MC Guy Cr RJ Keedwell Cr PJ Kelly, JP Cr GM McKellar Cr DR Pearce Cr BE Rollinson Cr CI Sheldon

Michael McCartney Chief Executive

Contact Telephone: 0508 800 800 Email: [email protected] Postal Address: Private Bag 11025, Palmerston North 4442

Full Agendas are available on Horizons Regional Council website www.horizons.govt.nz

Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Items in the agenda may be subject to amendment or withdrawal at the meeting.

for further information regarding this agenda, please contact: Julie Kennedy, 06 9522 800

CONTACTS 24 hr Freephone : [email protected] www.horizons.govt.nz 0508 800 800

SERVICE Kairanga Marton Taumarunui Woodville CENTRES Cnr Rongotea & Hammond Street 34 Maata Street Cnr Vogel (SH2) & Tay Kairanga-Bunnythorpe Rds, Sts Palmerston North

REGIONAL Palmerston North Wanganui HOUSES 11-15 Victoria Avenue 181 Guyton Street

DEPOTS Levin Taihape 11 Bruce Road Torere Road Ohotu

POSTAL Horizons Regional Council, Private Bag 11025, Manawatu Mail Centre, Palmerston North 4442 ADDRESS FAX 06 9522 929

Regional Council 24 March 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 WELCOME 5

2 APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE 5 Leave of Absence has been granted to Cr Sheldon

3 PUBLIC SPEAKING RIGHTS 5 Public Speaking Rights must be connected to an item in the Agenda

4 SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS 5

5 MEMBER’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST 5

6 PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS 5

7 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Regional Council meeting, 24 February 2015 7

8 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT

9 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 9.1 Consideration of the Consultation Document 2015-25 and Supporting Information for adoption Report No: 15-47 23 Annex A - Consultation Document 2015-25 27 9.2 Adoption of the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 Report No: 15-48 47 Annex A - Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 53 9.3 Capital Connection Rail Service Report No: 15-46 137 9.4 Submission on Local Government Funding Report No: 15-49 141 9.5 Councillors' Workshop Attendance - 4 December 2014 to 18 March 2015 Report No: 15-51 143 Annex A - Councillors' Workshop Attendance 144

10 COMMITTEE REPORTS 10.1 Report of Regional Transport Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Recommendations - 3 March 2015 145 10.2 Report of Strategy & Policy Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Recommendations - 10 March 2015 153 10.3 Report of Catchment Operations Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Recommendations - 11 March 2015 159

Page 3

Regional Council 24 March 2015

11 COUNCILLOR REPORTS 11.1 Chairman‟s Report 11.2 Members‟ Reports and Questions

12 PART TWO – PUBLIC EXCLUDED SECTION 12.1 Procedural motion to exclude the public 167 PX1 Confirmation of Public Excluded Meeting held on 24 February 2015 PX2 Report of Public Excluded Strategy & Policy Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Recommendations - 10 March 2015 PX3 Report of Public Excluded Catchment Operations Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Recommendations - 11 March 2015 PX4 MWRC Holdings Draft Statement of Intent 2015-16 to 2017-18 Report No: PX15-50 PX5 Council to consider whether any item in the Public Excluded minutes can be moved into the public domain, and define the extent of the release. PX6 Members‟ Questions

Page 4

Regional Council 24 March 2015

AGENDA

1 WELCOME

2 APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE Leave of Absence has been granted to Cr Sheldon.

3 PUBLIC SPEAKING RIGHTS Notification to speak is required by 4pm on the working day prior to the meeting. Further information is available on www.horizons.govt.nz\Council\ or by phoning 0508 800 800.

4 SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS To consider, and if thought fit, to pass a resolution to permit the Committee/Council to consider any further items relating to items following below which do not appear on the Order Paper of this meeting and/or the meeting to be held with the public excluded. Such resolution is required to be made pursuant to Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended), and the Chairperson must advise: (i) The reason why the item was not on the Order Paper, and (ii) The reason why the discussion of this item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.

5 MEMBER’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST Members are reminded of their obligation to declare any conflicts of interest they might have in respect of the items on this Agenda.

6 PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS Deputations: Written notice (fewer than 150 words) concerning the nature of the deputation must be lodged with the Chief Executive at least 2 working days before the date of the meeting and subsequently approved by the Chairperson. Petitions: Written notice to the Chief Executive is required at least 2 working days before the date of the meeting. Further information is available on www.horizons.govt.nz\Council\ or by phoning 0508 800 800.

Page 5

Regional Council 24 March 2015

Minutes of the eighteenth meeting of the ninth triennium of Horizons Regional Council held at 10.00am on Tuesday 24 February 2015, in the Tararua Room Horizons Regional Council, 11-15 Victoria Avenue, Palmerston North.

PRESENT Crs EB Gordon (Chairman), JJ Barrow, LR Burnell QSM (to 11.04am), DB Cotton, MC Guy, RJ Keedwell, PJ Kelly JP, GM McKellar, DR Pearce, PW Rieger QSO JP, BE Rollinson, CI Sheldon. IN ATTENDANCE Chief Executive Mr MJ McCartney Group Manager Corporate and Governance Mr C Grant Committee Secretary Mrs JA Kennedy ALSO PRESENT At various times during the meeting: Dr N Peet (Group Manager Strategy & Regulation), Mr C Mitchell (Group Manager Environmental Management), Mr G Shirley (Group Manager Regional Services & Information), Mr A Cook (Group Manager Operations), Mrs K Ritani, (Media & Communications Manager).

WELCOME The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting.

APOLOGIES Cr Burnell advised he would be leaving the meeting early.

PUBLIC SPEAKING RIGHTS There were no requests for public speaking rights.

SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS The Chairman noted the items contained in the Supplementary Agenda:  Item 10.2 – Report of Passenger Transport Committee  Item PX3 – MWRC Holding–28 North Street, Palmerston North (Report No. PX15-22)

MEMBERS’ CONFLICTS OF INTEREST There were no conflicts of interest declared.

PETITIONS / DEPUTATIONS There were no petitions/deputations.

Page 7

Regional Council 24 March 2015

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 15-185 Moved Guy/Sheldon That the minutes of the Regional Council meeting held on 16 December 2014, as circulated, be confirmed as a correct record, with the following amendments:  Members‟ Reports, last line Cr Keedwell‟s report amend “…facilitated at a Camp Rangi Woods meeting” to “…attended a Camp Rangi Woods meeting”.  Members‟ Reports, third line Cr McKellar‟s report amend „Dessert‟ to „Desert‟.

Matters Arising: In regard to Wanganui District Council discharging directly to the ocean, Dr Peet advised that warning signs had been erected at South Beach and information had been requested around ocean outfall monitoring.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 15-186 Moved Keedwell/Kelly That the minutes of the Regional Council meeting held on 10 February 2015 as circulated, be confirmed as a correct record. CARRIED

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT The Chief Executive (CE) presented his report. In referring to the annexes attached to his report he highlighted a „briefing paper‟ detailing discussion topics held with the Minister for Primary Industries. The CE acknowledged the input and effort of Mr Craig Grant (Group Manager Corporate and Governance) in the coordination of a Manawatu-Wanganui LASS collective procurement project for insurance services, which involved 25 councils from across New Zealand. The CE noted the very good progression of work on the Economic Study and said a briefing would given to the Regional Chiefs‟ Group, prior to the Zone Three meeting to be held on 5-6 March 2015. The CE updated Members on the LAWA module and noted the considerable international interest it was attracting. He said traffic to the site had doubled since its launch late last year. The Chief Executive and Dr Peet (Group Manager Strategy & Regulation) responded to Members‟ comments about the Bonny Glen landfill hearing, in particular its location. In response to a query, Mr Mitchell (Group Manager Environmental Management) provided an overview of the presentation on drones scheduled for 25 February in the Boardroom. Cr Guy commented on the „briefing paper‟ detailing discussion topics held with the Minister for Primary Industries, and noted the absence of any mention of forestry. The CE said forestry was not specifically raised but that work continued on the Afforestation Grants Scheme with Ministry officials. 15-187 Moved Gordon/Rollinson That the Chief Executive‟s report be received. CARRIED

Page 8

Regional Council 24 March 2015

PROPOSED LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANISATION IN Report No 15-19 This report sought Council‟s direction on a response to the Local Government Commission‟s (the Commission) proposed reorganisation of the Greater Wellington Region. Dr Peet (Group Manager Strategy & Regulation) introduced the item. He referred to the map at Annex A and explained the direct effect to Horizons Regional Council (HRC) of the proposed reorganisation. Members fully considered the proposed reorganisation structure, asked questions of clarification about possible implications, sought clarification around the strengths and weaknesses of a unitary authority, including the effects of a unitary authority to the HRC Region, and provided their views for and against the suggested recommendations at paragraph 2. Further questions were asked about catchment management for the Mataikona River, and whether or not there would be any cost implications as a result of the proposed realignment of the Greater Wellington-Manawatu- Wanganui boundary. During discussion, some Members believed the proposal required further investigation as the implications to Horizons Regional Council were not clear. Members suggested a meeting with the Commissioner would be beneficial to seek clarification on the proposal, and to discuss HRC‟s views. Ultimately, recommendation (a) was put to the meeting, followed by an amended recommendation b (iv). 15-188 Moved Kelly/Burnell It is recommended that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-19 and Annexes. CARRIED

15-189 Moved Keedwell/Sheldon It is recommended that the Council: b instructs officers to: iv. arrange a meeting with the Commission to discuss the Council‟s view, and that a letter be written seeking further clarification. CARRIED There was further comment made in support of making a written submission. The Chief Executive explained that the letter to the Commissioner would express the reason for seeking a meeting, and asked that the letter be treated as a formal submission.

Cr Burnell left the meeting at 11.04am.

MODEL STANDING ORDERS - INCLUSION OF AUDIO OR AUDIOVISUAL ATTENDANCE Report No 15-18 This report provided Members with information on the section of the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act 2014 relating to the attendance at meetings by audio link or audiovisual link. This amendment applied to both Councillors and Members of the public. Mr Grant (Group Manager Corporate & Governance) introduced the item, and explained the significance of the new Clause 25A in Schedule 7 of the Amendment Act. He further explained the requirement for the provisions of Clause 25A to be included in Horizons Regional Council‟s Model Standing Orders (MSO) until such time as Local Government New Zealand had undertaken a formal review of MSO later in 2015. Mr Grant referred to the sections contained in Annex B which would become sections 2.19 and 2.20 to Horizons‟ MSO, subject to Members‟ consideration and approval. Mr Grant stressed

Page 9

Regional Council 24 March 2015

that a Member who attended a meeting by means of audio link or audiovisual link would have no voting rights, and the Member would not constitute part of the quorum. He explained the meetings and provisions to which the audio link or audiovisual link applied. Members fully considered the information, provided their views, and sought clarification on various points. Although Cr Rollinson spoke favourably of the audiovisual trial he had participated in, he said that clarity of hearing was a problem. Mr Grant said that an upgrade of the current microphone system would be looked at. 15-190 Moved Kelly/Cotton It is recommended that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-18 and Annexes. b. approves the inclusion of sections 2.19 and 2.20 in Horizons Regional Council‟s Model Standing Orders (at Annex B); c. notes the consequential amendment to section 3.17.2; d. approves and adopts the revised Horizons Regional Council Model Standing Orders. CARRIED

LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEW ZEALAND CONFERENCE 2015 Report No 15-20 This report determined Members‟ attendance at the 2015 Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) Conference. The Chairman said Councillors were given the opportunity to attend the Conference once per triennium, however recommended that a Councillor could attend more than once per triennium if there was insufficient interest. He said it was important to have Councillor representation at the Conference. The Chairman responded to Members‟ questions around the policy and budget for Councillors training and development. The Chairman noted he would not be attending the 2015 Conference. Councillors Barrow, Pearce, and Sheldon expressed a desire to attend the 2015 Conference. 15-191 Moved Gordon/Kelly It is recommended that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-20. b. approves the attendance of Councillors Barrow, Pearce, Sheldon with expenses paid, and the Chief Executive, at the 2015 Local Government New Zealand Conference at Rotorua from 19-21 July 2015, and includes any regional pre tour. CARRIED

COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAMME REVIEW Report No 15-21 This item presented recommended changes to the Community Grants Programme for 2015. Mrs Ritani (Media and Communications Manager) introduced the report and highlighted the recommendations (paragraph 5.4) made by the Community Grants Committee in response to a drop in application numbers. Members commented on the recommended changes, provided their views, and asked questions of clarification. The Chief Executive explained that as well as the Group Manager Environmental Management and Horizons‟ Media and Communications Manager,

Page 10

Regional Council 24 March 2015

the Chair of the Environment Committee would also be involved in the final decision making process on recipients. Mrs Ritani explained that by changing the application timeframes it was hoped to generate more applications from those interested in planting projects. 15-192 Moved Kelly/Barrow It is recommended that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-21. b. approves the recommended changes put forward to council as outlined below:  Change the application period to April 2015 to coincide with the planning timeframe for spring planting projects. Funding would be spent in the 2015-16 financial year.  Amend the funding requirement outlining the need to uplift funds within two months of receiving notification of a successful application to the end of the next financial year (for example June 30 2016).  Increase the limit per grant application to $7,500 in order to encourage higher quality applications.  Keep the current structure for application reviews and decision making with Horizons‟ Environmental and Communications staff putting forward recommendations to the Horizons‟ Group Manager Environmental Management and Horizons‟ Media and Communications Manager for final decision on recipients. However, add Horizons‟ Chair of Environment Committee to this final decision making process. CARRIED

ENDORSEMENT AND ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REPORT OF ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE - ENDORSE AND ADOPT RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 11 FEBRUARY 2015 15-193 Moved Sheldon/McKellar That the Council endorses and adopts the resolutions and recommendations of the Environment Committee meeting held on 11 February 2015. CARRIED Matters Arising: In response to a query, Dr Peet (Group Manager Strategy & Regulation) said there would be a road show undertaken on the proposed changes to the new Overseer Model (irrigation).

REPORT OF PASSENGER TRANSPORT COMMITTEE - ENDORSE AND ADOPT RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 17 FEBRUARY 2015 15-194 Moved Keedwell/Sheldon That the Council endorses and adopts the resolutions and recommendations of the Passenger Transport Committee meeting held on 17 February 2015, as amended:  Public Speaking Rights – fifth line, delete …‟and outlined a proposed timetable‟. CARRIED

Page 11

Regional Council 24 March 2015

CHAIRMAN’S REPORT The Chairman presented his report. He referred to a letter received from the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) which confirmed that the applicable Funding Assistance Rate based on the weighted average benefits of the regional Manawatu-Wanganui Road Safety Programme for the 2015-2018 National Land Transport Programme at 65%. The letter also explained NZTA‟s views on why Horizons Regional Council (HRC) should not exit from the road safety function. The Chairman said that NZTA had been encouraged to make a submission on HRC road safety function to the Long-term Plan Submissions Hearing. The Chairman commented on a letter from the Mayor of Palmerston North City Council to the Honourable Simon Bridges (Minister of Transport), copied to Horizons Regional Council, which provided strong support for the efforts by Horizons Regional Council to seek funding for the retention of the Capital Connection passenger rail service. The Chairman responded to Members‟ questions of clarification on points raised. 15-195 Moved Gordon/Pearce That the Chairman‟s report be received. CARRIED

MEMBER’S REPORTS AND QUESTIONS Cr Kelly commented on his attendance at the CentrePort open day held on 14 February, and commented on his attendance at the Local Government New Zealand Three Waters presentation. Cr Keedwell attended the usual meetings and workshops and she attended the Regional Land Transport Plan Submissions Hearings. Cr McKellar attended the usual meetings and workshops. He attended a dairy award sponsors night in Feilding, and attended the Oroua Catchment Care Group meeting. Cr McKellar suggested it would be beneficial for a representative from Horizons Regional Council to attend the next meeting. Cr Guy attended the usual meetings and workshops. He commented on his attendance at the Regional Land Transport Plan Submissions Hearing to which he made a private submission. He attended the public official opening of Burkes Pump and thanked and congratulated the organisers for a well planned and efficient function.

The meeting adjourned at 12.04pm. The meeting reconvened at 12.40pm.

Cr Pearce attended the usual meetings and workshops. He attended a meeting with affected parties at State Highway 3 in regard to an emerging cycle way. He commented on his observations on the size of the rock falls which come down the Rangitikei River in the Ohingaiti area. There was discussion on how best to alert river users to the hazard. Cr Rieger attended the Regional Land Transport Plan Submissions Hearing, the public official opening of Burkes Pump, and he attended the Passenger Transport Committee meeting. He attended the usual meetings and workshops. Cr Cotton attended the usual meetings and workshops. He attended a Rural Community Board meeting, and commented on his River City Press article. He commented on his attendance at a meeting with affected parties at State Highway 3 in regard to an emerging cycle way.

Page 12

Regional Council 24 March 2015

The Chief Executive clarified Members‟ questions in regard to capital costs and operating costs for the weed harvester. Cr Rollinson raised concern around a number of calls he had received from established farmers in his constituency about the Plant Pest Strategy, in particular the proliferation of gorse in the area and the 20 metre rule, which farmers believed was not working. Cr Barrow attended the usual meetings and workshops. He attended a Rural Womens‟ Network meeting in Woodville, attended two Scheme Liaison Committee meetings, and he commented on his attendance at five Farmers‟ meetings in the Tararua in regard to One Plan Nutrient Management Implementation. Cr Sheldon attended the usual meetings and workshops. She attended a Foxton River Loop Working Party meeting and noted the absence of Horizons Regional Council staff. She commented on her attendance at the Local Government New Zealand Three Waters presentation. She responded to Members‟ questions about the Foxton Loop Working Party meeting.

MEMBERS’ QUESTIONS Cr Keedwell commented on Councillors availability to speak to the public during the Long-term Plan consultation period. Cr Keedwell referred to a „fossil fuel global divestment‟ held the previous week. She asked whether Horizons Regional Council (HRC) had an investment policy, and had HRC considered the implications of divesting in fossil fuel? The Chief Executive replied that HRC did not have a policy on that. He suggested an „action point‟ be noted to ask the Bank to disclose their investment policy, and to disclose what business HRC investment money was supporting. In response to a question, the Chairman explained Horizons Regional Council‟s position around the appointment of board members to CentrePort. Cr Barrow referred to an email from Lyn Charlton asking for information about chemical use and its safety, testing for chemical contamination in waterways, and Horizons Regional Council‟s position in that regard. Cr Barrow indicated that Lyn Charlton would be seeking a deputation to Council. Cr Sheldon commented on an empty section owned by Horizons Regional Council (HRC) located next to the Woodville Office. She asked if HRC would be open to an approach to use the section as a community garden and collect rain water from the roof. The Chief Executive said an approach could be made in that regard. Cr Rollinson asked for clarification on the final outcome of the Ruapehu Alpine Lift fine and what arrangements were in place for a community meeting. An „action point‟ was requested to arrange an initial meeting prior to the next Council meeting.

Page 13

Regional Council 24 March 2015

PROCEDURAL MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC 15-196 Moved Guy/Cotton THAT the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows. This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 and section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows: General subject of each matter Reason for passing this Ground(s) under section 48(1) to be considered resolution for the passing of this resolution PX1 Confirmation of Public s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Excluded Meeting held on information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of 16 December 2014 enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists s7(2)(i) - the withholding of the under section 7. information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations).

PX2 Confirmation of Public s7(2)(i) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Excluded Meeting held on information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of 10 February 2015 enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry on, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, negotiations information for which good (including commercial and reason for withholding exists industrial negotiations). under section 7. s7(2)(g) - the withholding of the information is necessary to maintain legal.

PX3 MWRC Holding - 28 North s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Street, Palmerston North information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists The information contained in under section 7. this report is commercially sensitive as it includes details around tender prices.

Page 14

Regional Council 24 March 2015

PX4 Council / Committee to consider whether any item in the Public Excluded minutes can be moved into the public domain and define the extent of the release PX5 Members‟ Questions

CARRIED

The meeting adjourned to the Public Excluded part of the meeting at 1.13pm and resumed at 1.46pm.

The Chairman advised that Mr Barry Gilliland (Senior Policy Analyst) had completed 40 years service with Horizons Regional Council. There was a farewell for Mr Allan Kirk (Environmental Programme Coordinator) to be held on Friday 27 February at Regional House Wanganui.

The meeting closed at 1.47pm.

Confirmed

______CHIEF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

Page 15

Regional Council 24 March 2015

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT TO COUNCIL Tuesday, 24 February 2015 Michael McCartney – Chief Executive

Introduction

1. The year has started with significant activity within the region, sector and in the world of central government. For a more detailed account of Horizons notable operational activity since December 2014 please refer to the annexed Council Update. Also attached at Annex B are the agendas from the February meetings of the Regional Sector Group (RSG), the Regional Chief Executive Officers (RCEO) and the Chief Executives‟ Environment Forum (CEEF).

Planning and Policy

2. Understandably, the work on the Long-term Plan has dominated much of our policy work since December. The contribution by elected members and the project team to get the draft LTP to a point where the collective views of members can be put to the community has been significant. The plan is now on track to receive its audit assessment before returning to council for its full endorsement to seek public input. The journey has comprised close to 20 workshops culminating in a number of formal items to Strategy and Policy meetings.

3. The Policy team has commenced the development of a One Plan Monitoring framework incorporating a methodology to measure the delivery and impact of the One Plan across the four well-beings. That framework will be presented to Council in the near future.

Regulatory Activity

4. A number of high profile consent applications have reached or are about to reach decision points. The Feilding WWTP consent decision has been released with a number of parties indicating their intention to appeal. The PNCC WWTP consent condition review decision is due out very soon and the hearing for the Bonny Glen landfill extension commenced on 17 February 2015. All of these proposals have considerable public interest.

Catchment Operations

5. The main highlight in recent times in the Operations area was the public opening of the Burkes Pumpstation. The event was well attended by affected landowners as a well as general members of the public. This project is a significant achievement for HRC and quite rightly should be celebrated.

6. The city reach work (Anzac Cliffs) has recommenced after a brief delay due to rock supply. The project is progressing at pace however there is a risk that the rock supply delays could cause the project to run into the next construction season. The influencing factor will be the river levels and the timing of when the winter flows arrive, rendering river crossings impossible.

7. In relation to SLUI the key matter of interest is the decision from MPI on our application for Hill Country Erosion funding. We expect to hear from MPI on this matter in March. This will be helpful to inform our LTP deliberations.

Page 16

Regional Council 24 March 2015

Emergency Management

8. Recently MCDEM undertook an audit of the CDEMG in our region as part of a national process. The process involved a questionnaire and interview exercise involving key members (mayors, chair etc.) of the Group. We expect a report on the findings of the audit in the near future.

MW LASS Ltd

9. The work in MW LASS is continuing to be busy. The collective aerial photography project is underway - updating our imagery across the region. By securing a project cost collectively there is considerable savings. Archives Central is also going well with a council from outside the region securing the services of this facility boosting the annual income by around 25k per annum. A number of other councils have also shown increased interest in the services of Archives Central.

10. MW LASS (Craig Grant) has coordinated a collective procurement project for insurance services involving 25 councils from across New Zealand. While final decisions are yet to be made as to the successful provider the indications are that the savings to this region‟s MW LASS member councils could be very significant.

Economic Growth Study

11. The work by Henley Hutchings (supported by MBIE and MPI) is progressing well. The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) meets later this week to receive an update on the progress with the study. My understanding is a draft will be completed in the next month and the information that could be in that draft will be shared with the Regional Chiefs prior to the Zone Three meeting.

12. We are in the process of arranging a presentation from the consultants to this Council around the time that the study is released publicly. The study will help to define economic growth opportunity focus areas while that strategy/action plan work project managed by Spearhead and Horizons will assist in mapping out how we give life to the study findings. Alongside the action plan work consideration probably needs to be applied to how the current institutional arrangements for facilitating economic growth are organised going forward.

National

13. The RSG meeting was attended by Hon Nic Smith, Minister for the Environment. The Minister outlined his plans and timeframe to introduce both RMA changes and the Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Bill. These legislative changes stand to have significant impact on the roles of local government. As more detail comes to hand staff will provide an impact assessment to Council.

14. The Iwi Leaders (freshwater) also presented at the RSG on their work to date with Government. As was indicated at Waitangi the conversation with Government is focusing very much on rights and interests.

15. Prior to the RSG meeting I attended a meeting together with two other sector chairs and chief executives with the Minister for Primary Industries. A copy of the briefing paper we prepared for that meeting is included as Annex C to this report.

16. The coastal module of LAWA was launched by the Minister for the Environment late last year. Since then the traffic to the site has doubled. In the very near future the Water Quantity module will be launched. LAWA is also attracting considerable international interest with invitations to Horizons to speak to a number of conferences. The Tindall Foundation has invested an additional sum of money into developing good quality river enhancement stories via video from across the

Page 17

Regional Council 24 March 2015

country. Every region will have a river success story profiled in this way. In our region the Oroua River has been chosen.

Attachments Annex A Council Update Annex B RSG, RCEO and CEEF meeting agendas Annex C LGNZ Briefing Paper to Hon Nathan Guy

Page 18

Regional Council 24 March 2015

COUNCIL UPDATE From 1 January 2015 to 24 February 2015

ACTIVITIES

Ruapehu Environmental Management 1. Attended Beef and Lamb Field day, Maitere, 18 February 2015. Strategy & Regulation 2. Staff met with Ngati Rangi on 17 February to discuss progress with implementation of the MOP.

Wanganui Operations 3. Work is nearing completion at Kowhai Park with Practical Completion expected before the end of February. Final grass seeding will take place in the autumn when growing conditions are more favourable. Strategy & Regulation 4. Staff met with Wanganui District Council to discuss consent requirements for the Wanganui Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Manawatu Environmental Management 5. Attended Karaka Grove meeting on 20 January. 6. The 10th quarterly report for the Manawatu Freshwater Clean-up Fund was completed. 7. A meeting with iwi was held regarding the Manawatu Freshwater Clean-up Fund. Operations 8. Public notification for Pohangina River and Oroua River aerial spraying as part of the scheme works has gone in the local papers as required in the consent conditions. Strategy & Regulation 9. A decision on the Feilding Wastewater Treatment Plant applications was received on 20 January 2015. The appeal period has closed and the decision has been appealed by eight parties.

Tararua Environmental Management 10. Presented at a Beef and Lamb LEF field Day in Pahiatua on 17 February. Operations 11. Staff are meeting with KiwiRail on 25 February to look at options to further protect the Ngawapurua Rail Bridge. 12. Staff have been working closely with TDC/Downer regarding gravel for roadworks. 13. Scheme Liaison meetings have been planned for the Mangatainoka, South Eastern Ruahine and Upper Manawatu Schemes for 23 and 24 February. Regional Services & Information 14. Police fatigue stop – Woodville – Friday, 16 January.

Page 19

Regional Council 24 March 2015

Strategy & Regulation 15. Staff met with TDC regarding the upcoming consents for Eketahuna and Woodville Wastewater Treatment Plants.

Palmerston North City Strategy & Regulation 16. The PNCC WWTP hearing closed on 30 January 2015, and we expect a hearing decision by 23 February 2015.

Horowhenua Environmental Management 17. The second quarterly report for the Lake Horowhenua Freshwater Clean-up Fund was completed. 18. A meeting of the Lake Domain Board was attended on 2 February.

Rangitikei Operations 19. Work is well underway upgrading a 800m section of Parewanui stopbank between 6.2km and 7.0km. 20. Public notification for aerial spraying as part of the scheme works has gone in the local papers as required in the consent conditions. Strategy & Regulation 21. The hearing for the Bonny Glen Landfill extension (Midwest Disposals Limited) commenced on 17 February 2015. It is scheduled to run until 27 February 2015. 22. Staff met with Nga Pae o Rangitikei on 5 February.

CORPORATE & GOVERNANCE UPDATE

23. Councillors‟ Workshop – Long-term Plan Workshop #17 held 27 January 2015. 24. World Wetlands Day held 1 February 2015. 25. Regional Land Transport Plan Submissions Hearing held 9 February 2015. 26. Councillors‟ Workshop – Long-term Plan Workshop #18 held 10 February 2015. 27. Council meeting held 10 February 2015. 28. Environment Committee meeting held 11 February 2015. 29. Regional Sector Group (RSG) meeting held 13 February 2015. 30. Open Day at CentrePort Ltd held 14 February 2015. 31. Public Official Opening of Burkes Pumpstation held 14 February 2015. 32. Both the Consulting Document and Supporting Document for the Long-term Plan 2015-25 have been approved and adopted by Council, subject to a few changes. Audit commenced their work on these documents on 16 February and are expected to be on site 16- 27 February 2015. 33. Passenger Transport Committee meeting held 17 February 2015. 34. Council meeting held 24 February 2015. 35. Audit, Risk and Investment Committee Financial Briefing held 24 February 2015.

Number of FTEs 36. The total number of FTEs is 220.

Page 20

Regional Council 24 March 2015

GENERAL

Environmental Management 37. Attended a Nature Central Steering Group meeting in Wellington on 13 February. 38. Staff attended a meeting of the Oroua Catchment Care Group on 9 February in Feilding. 39. The BioManagers group met in Wellington on 5 February. 40. Presented first lecture to a soils class at Massey University. 41. Staff attended Fertiliser and Lime Conference at Massey University. 42. Met with MPI subgroup regarding the Afforestation Grant Scheme. 43. Met with Food Farms and Freshwater group. Strategy & Regulation 44. Policy staff attended a Regional Planning Forum in Ohakune on 18 February.

UPCOMING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT EVENTS

Events and Activities Environmental Management 45. A SLUI Advisory Group meeting will be held on 17 March. 46. Allan Kirk‟s last day with the Land Group will be 27 February. 47. Land Managers will be meeting in Wellington 25-26 March. 48. Staff will attend a Fresh Start for Freshwater Clean-up Fund Workshop on 18 February. 49. A Ruahine River Care meeting will be held 20th February. 50. Staff will attending a meeting on the alignment of Regional Pest Management Plans on 24 February. 51. The next meeting of the Manawatu Freshwater Clean-up Fund Steering Group will be held 25 February. 52. A presentation on drones will be given in the HRC Boardroom on 25 February. Operations 53. The new large pumpstation alongside the Burkes Drain outlet to the Manawatu River was officially commissioned on Saturday with over 90 locals there to mark the occasion. 54. Meeting dates and times have now been confirmed for the upcoming Annual Ratepayer meetings which will see 26 meetings take place from end of March through to the beginning of May. Strategy & Regulation 55. Staff are meeting with dairy farmers in the Tararua region over five shed meetings on 19 and 20 February 2015 to talk through the One Plan consenting process and any other matters. 56. Staff are to meet with Rangitikei Farmers on 3 March 2015 to again talk through the One Plan consent process for those in the Rangitikei and Coastal Lake target catchments.

Page 21

Regional Council 24 March 2015

CHAIRMAN’S REPORT TO COUNCIL

Tuesday, 24 February 2015 Bruce Gordon – Chairman

Meeting Attendance

12 January  Executive Leadership Team

26 January  Executive Leadership Team

27 January  Councillors‟ Workshop

30 January  Commander Change of Command Parade, Ohakea Military Air Base

2 February  Hui re Manawatu Freshwater Clean-up Fund projects

4 February  Meeting with Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd‟s Chairman, John Wilson

9 February  Regional Land Transport Plan Hearing

10 February  Councillors‟ Workshop  Council Meeting

11 February  Environment Committee

13 February  Regional Sector Group Meeting

14 February  Burkes Pumpstation Ceremony

17 February  Passenger Transport Committee

24 February  Council Meeting  Audit, Risk & Investment Committee Financial Briefing

Upcoming meetings

3 March CDEM Joint Standing Committee Regional Land Transport Plan Workshop Regional Land Transport Committee

4 March Possible Councillors‟ Workshop

5 and 6 March Zone Three Meeting

9 March Manawatu Freshwater Clean-up Fund Governance Group Meeting

10 March Strategy & Policy Committee

11 March Catchment Operations Committee

12 March Ballance Environmental Farm Awards

12-14 March Central Districts Field Days

18-19 March Tour of Bay of Plenty Region

Page 22

2.5. 2.4. 2.3. 2.2. 2.1. 2. 1.1. 1. INFORMATIONFOR ADOP CONSIDERATION THE OF March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

i) was requested to: HorizonsDocument. Consultation the to changes key two were There consultation. public for adoption requires and audited successfully been now has Document Consultation The an 15 the for rates regions‟ the for Scheme) Whanganui Lower the and Project AHB the removingof impact the allowingfor once 3.6% (or increase audit The the with along Auditorto the Generalon February 10 2015. Strategy, Financial LTP the of 2015 summary su a a years, and three Strategy, next the Infrastructure over face to likely are ratepayers that 2015 (LTP) Long the for requirement legislativenew a is Document Consultation audited An EXECUTIVE Long the consultation document for Long the to relation in procedure consultative special Supporting and 2015 Document Consultation the of adoption the seek to is report this of purpose The PURPOSE iv) iii) ii) i) su the locating and reading of Horizonshave the kept SupportingDocumentation simplicityin separate four segments: for that noted be should It fo referral Auditorto so the and Strategy for approved and 2015 February details 10 on InfrastructureCouncil by adopted wasdocumentation supporting that policies, cover assumptions, separate under activities, created Horizons‟ been has Information Supporting Additional ii)

d 5.4% for2017 er. hs nldd ttn or er n rt cp t .% vn huh hr i a is there though even 3.6% not are that areas at the for confusion anyeliminates This cap overall. increase nil proposed rate one year our stating included This years. ahead (“Looking 2 page in Include Infrastructure Strategy Introducingthe Finances Introducingthe Activities Setting Scene the charges consent proposed the around 14 page from increase. information forward bring a Charges Quantity Water the on expand to asked was Horizons where decisions) 6 theProvide additionalto detail proposed the removalof AHB funding; comp the from savings by impacted - 25 budget at a glance. Council approved a draft Consultation Document for referral for Document Consultation draft a approved Council glance. a at budget 25

ed Consultation Document, attached at Annex A, proposes an average nil rate nil average an proposes A, Annex at attached Document, Consultation ed

- 25. The auditedConsultationTheissues 25.Documentcontains summaryakey the of

SUMMARY

nomto fr oslain ih h pbi udr etos 3 (s of (use 93A Sections under public the with consultation for Information

- 18. - General. has This been reviewedofas part audit the process.

TION CONSULTATION DOCUMEN CONSULTATION

- termPlan) of theLocal GovernmentAct (LGA)2002. th

Significant Issue on pages 8 and 9 (guiding land use(guiding9land and Significantpages8 on Issue

to 2025”) the proposed rate cap over the next ten ten next the over cap rate proposed the 2025”) to letion of the Lower Whanganui Flood Scheme and and Scheme Flood LowerWhanganui the of letion - 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25

Decision Required Required Decision Report No. - 16 financial year, 4.32% for 2016 for 4.32% year, financial 16 - T 2015 T em ln ad 3 (ups of (purpose 93B and Plan) term

- 25 AND25 SUPPORTING mr o te 0 year 30 the of mmary

prig information pporting

- t. The rth. term Planterm

Page Page 15

- 47 - - 17 25 nd 23

Item 9.1 Item 9.1 6.1. 6. 5.1. 5. 4.2. 4.1. 4. 3. 2.7. 2.6. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration 7.1. 7.

ups o te oslain ouet o te Long the media the relea for for process Document Consultation consultation special the 93A of Sectionpurpose new the undertaking be will Horizons a has Horizons COMMUNITYENGAGEMENT pages16 17to of Consultation the Documentcontained Annex in A. on provided ratepayersare Sample ratepayers.all over uniform be will not increases Rate 2012 2014 Plan Annual the in for which allowed beenaudit has the of cost the and consultation of cost the is Council to impact financial The FINANCIAL IMPACT c. b. a. isrecommendedIt that Council: RECOMMENDATION consultation. Consultat the to documents adoptInformation Supporting and amended Document the Consultation audited the adopt to opportunity the has now Council public the via website our during consultation the period. th all and Document Consultation audited The Consultation willoutcarriedbe as specifiedunder Sections and83 93Aof the LGA 2002. CONSULTATION General. through auditand consultation the documentthrough AuditNZ and the Office Auditor of the what and funded are theyinformati draft The activities. these how for proposing is it service do, of levels to proposing is Council activities the with dealt have which workshops 19 of programme a through worked have Councillors then Since goals. object vision, its considered Council when 2014 June in began journey LTP The BACKGROUND

      adopts Consultation the Documentpublic for consultation. amendments with Document resulting from Consultation the to Information Supporting the adopts receivesinformation the contained in       - 22 budgets.22 run newspaperrun advertising invite Councillorstoattend public events socialrun media andonline advertising highlight Long the sent allto households publishnumber articles a of March the in issue of “AcrossRegion” The which willbe send theConsultation Document via directmail out all to households

ses. In addition Horizons will:

communications plan for consultation which Council has already approved. already has Councilwhichconsultation for plan communications

the audit the process;

- termplan Chiein the

2015 -

ReportNo. 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25

- f Executive‟s f columnin the River City Press e supporting information will be available to to available be will information supporting e 15 and amen and 15

15 - em ln wt pbi ntcs and notices public with Plan, term -

47

andAnnex. dments to the Long the to dments

ion Document for public for Document ion

on has recently gone recently has on

- term Plan term ives and and ives Page Page 24

A ANNEXES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFI LeanneMacdonald 9.1. 9. 8.1. 8. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

Consultation Document 2015 Document Consultation a significantdecision as it remainsa proposal document. not is consultation for Document Consultation and Information Supporting this of Adoption SIGNIFICANCE and adoptthe plan final June30on 2015. 18 on submissions hear Friday, on public the to available 2 made and printed be will Document Consultation The TIMELINE/NEXT

Aprilsubmission 2015. The 5.00pmperiod endsMonday, at 4 May andCouncilwill2015

CER STEPS

- - submissions consider will Council 2015. May 20 25

GROUP MANAGERCORPOR Craig Grant -

25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25

ATE&GOVERNANCE

on 3 June 2015 June 3 on

Page Page

25

Item 9.1 Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

2015 - 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page 26

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

27

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

28

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

29

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

30

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

31

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

32

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

33

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

34

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

35

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

36

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

37

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

38

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

39

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

40

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

41

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

42

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

43

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

44

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 Document adoption Consultation the of Consideration

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

45

Annex A Item 9.1 Annex A Item 9.1 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil adoption Consideration

f h Cnutto Dcmn 2015 Document Consultation the of

- 25 and Supporting Information for for Information Supporting and 25 Page Page

46

5.2. 5.1. 5. 4.3. 4.2. 4.1. 4. 3.1. 3. 2. 1.1. 1. ADOPTIONTHE REGI OF March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

The Plan is a new document that combines elements of the operative Regional Land Land Regional operative the of elements combines that document new a is Plan The existsreason to so.do goodif time any at varied be can Plan However, the three. every it reviewyears, sixevery Transport Regional a outland the andset must priorities transport theRTC Region. for must The prepare Plan a Act), (the A) Annex at (attached Plan 2003 The council. regional Act a of behalf on Plan) (the Management Plan Transport Land Regional a prepare must Transport (RTC) Committee Land the Under BACKGROUND No financialimpact Horizonsto Regional Council as a FINANCIAL IMPACT b. a. isrecommendedIt that Council: RECOMMENDATION Toadopt the Regional Land TransportPlan 2015 PURPOSE  2014,During the RTC developed strategic the components of Plan the as follows: 2010. majo the that confirmed stakeholders these with Consultation stakeholders. targeted to document Issues an of release the with 2014 early in commenced Plan new the of development The PROCESSFOR DEVELOPMENT OF RLTP o transport land Region‟s the include must it priorities, Regions the out setting to addition In TransportStrategy (RLTS) and Regional Land TransportProgramme (RLTP).

 bjectives,policies and measures.

approvesRegional the Land TransportPlan 2015 receivesinformation the contained in

faci RTC 2014 June

iy f sus n h oeaie LS r sil s eeat oa a te wr in were they as today relevant as still are RLTS operative the in issues of rity ng theng transportsystem in our Region were confirmed.

ONAL LAND TRANSPORT

olwn te agtd oslain te e tasot issues transport key the consultation, targeted the Following

- 2025 ReportNo. 15

- 2025.

Decision Required Required Decision Report No. must cover a period of at least 10 years 10 least at of period a cover must PLAN 2015 - resultof this decision. 2025.

- 48

andAnnex.

- 2025

Page Page 15 - 48 47

Item 9.2 Item 9.2 6.4. 6.3. 6.2. 6.1. 6. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

publicinterest.” (sec 3,LTMA 2003). the of purpose LTMA, an which „contribute to isto the to contributing as well as GPS the with consistent be to has Plan The    Landon TransportFunding 2015/16 Statement Policy Government the through expressed as focus, current Government‟s The THEREGIONAL LANDTRANSPORT PLAN 2015     Authorities, New TransportAgency Authorities, Zealand and transport officers Horizons. of regional in roads New outsideNew Zealand (areas metropolitan Zealand). that Activities 2005. since existed 1 in June 2015. finalised are they once studies these in sought outcomes the to contribute they should of lifetime the over implemented be to activitiesnew for case business strong a is currentdirection by placinga strong emphasis on studiesthese which willensure that there The enablerkey of this economic development. a be will Transport 2025. by outputagribusiness Region‟s the double to aim willthat year) C subsequent financial and current the in to $50,000 Strategycontributing is Council the (which Strategy GrowthAgribusiness Regional current the of aware fully is Council The development. economic building on also is focus current Region‟s The 2

       h Rgoa Ipoeet Atvt Cas elcs h Rgoa „‟ ud alcto fr udn ta has that funding for allocation Funds „R‟ Regional the replaces Class Activity Improvements Regional The The RAG is the Regional Advisory Group. This consists of the roading asset managers from all Territorial all from managers asset roading the of consists This Group. Advisory Regional the is RAG The T hs nue ta te ln s osset ih h Gvrmn‟ ad Region‟s and Government‟s the with consistent is Plan the that ensured has RTC ak h poet ta te omte des infcn. h ls o prioritised of Decembe list The significant. deems committee projectsisincluded in Figure the 8 of the Plan. that projects the rank October2014workshopRTC programme the in forward put effect,In the hig Activities rank. to component of Plan the will according ranked be tostrategic the chosen priority addresses.it strategic has The RTC the identified. which previously issues transport ar land priorities the address that on Region willthe level focus hightheareas objectives RTC.Theare the by endorsed RTC 2014 September funding unlocking for case business from new the regional improvements activity class better a build would regions from approach collaborative a that advice to response in was This economically. region one than activitie identify to was collaboration this of mainpurpose The Manawatu. Arena at was held RTC‟s Horizons and BayHawkes cross RTC 2014 August Valuemoney for investment. Road safety;and Supportingeconomic growth andproductivity;

r2014RTC h pirte ta wl gie netet vr h lftm o h Plan, the of lifetime the over investment guide will that priorities the e

herthe priority the higher the ranking.

- qualify for funding are new state highway and local road improvements to improvements road local and highway state new are funding for qualify

theRTC confirmed the draft Plan public for consultation. – - boundary forum forum boundary h ojcie ad taei pirte o te ln were Plan the of priorities strategic and objectives The effective,efficient,and safe landtransport system in the

– –

2024/25 (GP A workshop wasAwithRAG and heldRTC the the - 2025

– s that, if completed, would benefit more benefit would completed, if that, s - S), is S), the following:

2025 frm nopsig h Taranaki, the encompassing forum A

1 .

nrl e Zealand New entral the Plan the Page Page 2 48 to

6.9 6.8. 6.7. 6.6. 6.5. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

description ofeach strategic priority: travel and roading of mix a encompass and RTC the by identified were Plan) the of 2.4 (section priorities strategic Six    establishingIn thepriorities theRTC has considered: the higherpriority will a higher get ranking the in Plan. over so network does transport It land Plan. the the in of lifetime investment the guide will priorities strategic The the in proposed improvementprojects throughout the lifetime of thePlan. concept r has hub RTC the transport Therefore the to further contribute PalmerstonNorth and further unlock development will issues these resolving economic that hoped is It area. study the within network evidence an developing are JTS RLTS operative the of influence North Palmerston major a and this, to Linked      

   a t rsle odn ise i te amrtn North Palmerston the in issues roading resolve to was Plan. the of development the thought identified objectives and issues transport land The and tear on theand road thana truck.conventional wear more no is there and further spread is load truck meaning vehicle tonne 44 conventional a than such for approved roads on and permit a with allowed 3 long effective Therefore planningwill importantbe ensureto the mostefficient ofuse thetransport resource. resources. transport of use inefficient to conflictsusealsoonrural land recognitionis that There communities. rural more Region‟s the for particularly secure, is services to access will it Plan the of lifetime is the During population urbanised. and more becoming smaller getting are households that show trends Demographic impactsof land usechange 3 Priority Strategic strategic Region‟s the given RTC positionas hub the of the lowerNorthcentral Island. the of priority a been long vehicles has routes 50Max strategic and (HPMV) vehicle‟s motor productivity high is fre of it movement sufficient efficient that capacitythe enable at and to are enough Plan network transport the land of the of focus arteries key the that a important is growth economic that recognises This StrategicPriority 2 current the that ensure to pressure roadingasset meets the community‟sexpectations nowandthe in future. increasing under are authorities controlling roading the on pressures and constraints, funding of number a are there that recognises This StrategicPriority 1 Existingregional Nationalpriorities

HPMV‟s are vehicles where divisible loads over 44 tonnes and longer than „as than longer and tonnes 44 over loads divisible where vehicles are HPMV‟s

- - Manawatusub Manawatu Joint Transport Study (JTS). The The (JTS). Study Transport Joint Manawatu asset from differing users throughout the land transport sector. All road Allroad sector.transportdifferingusersland throughout assetthe from - based 30 based priorities – – – econfirmed its support of the JTS and plans to advocate for for advocate to plans and JTS the of support its econfirmed

thepurpose of LTMA the and the GPS -

Im Efficientroad maintenance and delivery Plan for and proactively respond to demographic change and change demographic to respond proactively and for Plan ead aaeet esrs Te olwn i a brief a is following The measures. management demand provedconnectivity of strategickey routes - y akn h roiis o ciiis ht otiuet a to contribute that activities so priorities the ranking by area. – -

year strategy to deliver an integrated integrated an deliver to strategy year

the operative the RLTSand RLTP

- 2025

trucks. 50Max are vehicles with one more axle axle more one with vehicles are 50Max trucks.

ight, particularly with the advent of advent the with particularly ight,

- urbanboundaries lead may -

aaau sub Manawatu primary objective of the the of objective primary

h otoe o the of outcomes the 3 . Connectivity of of Connectivity . strategic transport strategic

be important that important be - of - - em ad use land term right‟ lengths are lengths right‟

- ra by area Page Page 49

Item 9.2 Item 9.2 8.1. 8. 7.1. 7. 6.10 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 8.2.

considers are the significant the are considers RTC the that activities the provides Plan) the of 4.1 (section activities of list prioritised The Afterconsidering thePlan the Council may either: Councilapproval. for 2015, March 3 of meeting its at place took which Plan, Plan. the approving for process the prescribes Act The LEGISLATIVEAPPROVALPROCESS FOR OF THERLTP 9 p took submissions verbal of Hearings received. were submission late a plus submissions 39 2015. 30January to 2014 December 15 from place took Consultation CONSULTATION As 6.9. paragraph in identified priorities strategic priorities highest strategic the address will list the the of top the address at projects those to previously explained order in Plan the

February,2015at Horizons Regional Council.           ylss cesn te ad rnpr ntok otiue t pstv transport positive to contributes network transport land the accessing cyclists and pedestrians of number the increasing that recognition increased now is There StrategicPriority 4 aspectsof more or one reconsiders RTC the that requesting RTC the to back Plan the Refer ApprovePlan the without modifications; or thatisplanned beto resolved lifetimeduring the of Plan. the t at issue an also is Trail Cycle Zealand New the to Access resolving. need that end Ashhurst / North Palmerston the from connecting cyclists and pedestrians for issues access are there However, emerge has which Gorge Manawatu the is tourism in growth the of example An RTC. the of priority a is routes tourist visible and defined clearly of network a through growth anticipated Tou StrategicPriority 6 Plan. the lifetimeofappropriateservicesovernewinvestigate services wherethe current and frequen the expanding 2015 on the eye during services an with network urban North Palmerston its of review principles‟ „first a undertaken recently has Horizons Plan. the of lifetime duringtheaffordable focus Providingpublictransportefficientand a serviceswill be StrategicPriority 5 the in projects cycling 2015 urban key progress to NLTF the of outside fund dedicated en is Government the and established firmly now is Trail Cycle National The outcomes.

with thoselower down list the addressing lower rankedstrategic priorities.

im s niiae t go oe te ore f h Pa s pann for planning so Plan the of course the over grow to anticipated is rism - orgn cmue ad erainl yln truh h itouto o a of introduction the through cycling recreational and commuter couraging 18 period.18

thePlan.

– – – a a ors dsiain f t on n h ls 1 years. 10 last the in own its of destination tourism a as d

Increased onfocus pedestrians and an appropriatenetwork of tourism routes Efficient,accessible andaffordable publictransport activities the Region needs to undertake in the first 6 first the in undertake to needs Region the activities - 18 period. Horizons will continue to regularly review its its review regularly to continue will Horizons period. 18 - he Wanganui end of the Mountains Sea cycle trail cycle Sea Mountains the of end Wanganui he 2025

it must be lodged with the Regional the with lodged be must it Once the RTC has approved the the approved has RTC the Once

cycling

lace on Monday, on lace networks -

years of years Page Page y of cy 50

A ANNEXES MANAGERTRANSPORT SE Phillip Hindrup 9.1. 9. 8.4. 8.3. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

Regional Land Transport Plan 2015 Plan Transport Land Regional hs s o a infcn dcso acrig t Engagement. according decision significant a not is This SIGNIFICANCE nothas adopted it. AgencyreasonsitTransportof statement the still to withbutit Plana forwardadopt the not t can Council RTC the the that to or it, forward of requested considerswill helpCouncil the and/or decision.with its has Council Policy); the that Significance information additional RTC‟s any after Council the may, under RTC significant the b deemed sought amendments were RTC, the if the needed only to is process back consultation (a repeated Plan Plan amended an Council the the to forward it, refer to back referred aspects to the reconsidering decide Council the Should

hen either adopt the amended Plan and forward to the Transport Agency, or Agency, Transport the to forward and Plan amended the adopt either hen

RVICES - 2025

&INFORMATION GROUP MANAGERREGION Shirley Ged - 2025

te oni‟ Plc o Sgiiac and Significance on Policy Council‟s the o

AL SERVICES te Council the y Page Page

51

Item 9.2 Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

- 2025

Page Page 52

Month and Y Month and 2015 Regional Land Transport Plan March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption - 2025

- 2025

Page Page 53

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

2015 - 2025

Page Page 54

Section 2:Strategic The Context Section 1:Context of theRegional Land TransportPlan Introduction fromthe Chairman Contents March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 2.2.7 2 2.2.5 2.2.4 2.2.3 2.2.2 2.2.1 2.1.8 2.1.7 2.1.6 2.1.5 2.1.4 2.1.3 2.1.2 2.1.1 1.3.3 1.3.2 1.3.1 1.2.2 1.2.1

.2.6 Objectives TheIssues Setting Scene the Process forthe Development of the Plan TheNational and Regional policy context Responsibilities of TransportOrganisations Purpose of Plan the

Mitigatingadverse environmental effects from the regionaltransport harvestingforest andagriculturalanduse potential increases intourism traffic Increasingpressure the on Regionsrural roading network,particularly with increased Theneed forcontinued improvements to road safetyin theRegion area,the impacts willthis have on distributionfreight Manawatu and North Palmerston the in growth economic and populationAnticipated developmentpurposes east as role increasing an playing are that links strategic secondary to improvements maintain to need The Taupo and Summit Road Desert thebetween border regional the of north the to and regions other to linkages Improved future anticipated freight growth accommodate to hierarchy roading structured more a provide to Integr RegionalEconomy and its Impact on TransportDemand Vehicle Kilometres Travelled Vehicle Ownership DwellingOccupancy Socio distributionAge Population Geography TheOne Plan New GovernmentPolicy Statement Landon Transport 2015 Regionaland Local Government Central Government ......

Zealand EnergyEfficiency and Conservation Strategy2011 - ated land use and transport planning to produce a more resilient network; and network; resilient more a produce to planning transport and use land ated

economic factors

......

......

......

– ......

......

The Manawatu ......

......

......

......

......

- ...... et ik ad lentv rue ad o touris for and routes alternative and links west ......

...... - Wanganui Region Wanganui ......

...... - 2025 ......

......

of importance links to the south of of south the to links importance of

......

......

......

......

...... - ...... 2016

...... system ......

...... m/economic ...... the Region the ......

......

12 11 11 11 31 29 26 25 24 22 20 20 16 15 15 14 13 13 . Page Page 28

9 9 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 5

55

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 Section 7:Appendices Section 6:Monitoring of thePlan Section 5:Inter Section 4:Regional Programme of TransportActivities Section 3:Funding Plan the March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan Transport Land the Regional of Adoption AppendixSignificance4: Policy AppendixLegislative3: Requirementsand Policy Framework AppendixKey2: findings of the 2010Joint TransportStud AppendixLegislative 1: alignmentwith theLTMA 4.2 4.1 3.1 2.5 2.4 3.2 3.1.4 3.1.3 3.1.2 3.1.1 2.4.6 2.4.5 2.4.4 impactsof land usechange 2.4.3 2.4.2 2.4.1

FullofList Activities Prioritised Listof Anticipatedrevenue sources Policies andMeasuresto achievePriorities the StrategicPriorities

Ten Other sourcesOther of revenue LocalRevenue sources policing road of Contribution Revenuethefrom National Land TransportFund StrategicPriority 6 networks transport public affordable and 37 accessible Efficient, 5 Priority Strategic StrategicPriority 4 Increased onfocus pedestrians andcycling proactively and for Plan 3 Priority Strategic StrategicPriority 2 Improvedconnectivity keyof strategic routes StrategicPriority 1 Efficient road maintenanceand delivery ...... - -

year forecastof revenueand expenditure regional Activities

...... Activities

......

......

...... An appropriatenetwork of tourism routes ......

......

......

......

......

......

......

2015

...... activity to the Horizons Regional Land Transport Plan Transport Land Regional Horizons the to activity - 2025 ......

......

......

......

...... epn t dmgahc hne and change demographic to respond y

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

51 50 50 49 49 49 39 38 36 36 34 33 33 79 78 73 71 71 70 66 59 55 54 52 Page Page

56

On behalf of the Committee, I would like to thank all of those individuals an individuals those of all thank to like would I Committee, the of behalf On Activitiesin identified Sectionof 4 thePlan seek to addressthese prioritiesin thenear future. works towardsits strategic vision for the future. policies andmeasureshave in beenidentified subsequentsections a to Objectives, challenges. and issues transport land Region‟s the identifies Plan the of 2.2 Section identifyingand prioritising thetransport issues identified in Plan.this a also have documents these in identified priorities and objectives Issues, documents. these with consistent is Plan this that satisfied is Committee The Council. Regional Horizons and 2010 Strategy Trans Transport the by undertaken Land Regional 2015 Funding the Transport Land on Statement as such level, accoun into takes and underpins Plan The more providing and efficient more safer, roads our making alternatives toaccess Region, the transportnetwork. our to important are that f of level the affect may This priorities. national to dollars roading of call first the directed has policy Government Central Programme Transport Land National TransportFund and subsequentlydelivered. the in include will it (NLTP) activities which decide will Agency Transport the Plan, the on Based priority. of order what in and pursue to want we activities which in developed been has document This and HorizonsRegional Council) are seeking national funding. Region the in councils district seven (the organisations approved and Agency Transport Zealand next the overactivities transport land ten next the for priorities regional the states Region; Horizons ten a is Plan The first the youplansuch forthe Region to present to pleased am I Committee, Transport Regional Horizons the of chair As regional 2013, Land TransportStrategy and RegionalLand TransportProgramme. in introduced 2003 new The with years. stakeholderssixevery andcommunity consultation their Act in plan, transport Managementland regional a develop Transport to required are Land committees transport the to changes Under Introductionfrom the March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption Chair,Horizons Regional TransportCommittee. CouncillorEB(Bruce) Gordon delivering in you with betterland transportoutcomesworking in the future. to forward look I document. this of preparation the to contributed Oc icue i te LP a atvt cn hn e udd rm h Ntoa Land National the from funded be then can activity an NLTP, the in included Once .

- er ouet Is es u te taei drcin o ln tasot n the in transport land for direction strategic the out sets Its document. year unding for our regional priorities but we will continue to focus on projects on focus to continue will we but priorities regional our for unding – port Agency, Manawatu District Council, Palmerston North City Council City North Palmerston Council, District Manawatu Agency, port

theHorizons Regional Land Trans Transport Plan 2015 Transport

Chairman

six partnership with our regional partners with agreement on agreement with partners regional our with partnership - years that seek to contribute to these, for which the New the which for these, to contribute to seek that years

t previous work undertaken at a national and regional and national a at undertaken work previous t

-

2025 and particularly the 2010 Joint Transport Study Transport Joint 2010 the particularly and 2025 -

2025

Plan replaces the operativeRegional the replaces Plan

portPlan 2015 - years; and outlines the proposed the outlines and years; - 00 te oenet Policy Government the 2040,

ddress themas Region the - 2025. d organisations that organisations d

ssisted in ssisted Page Page

57

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

- 2025

Page Page 58

   the Theseinclude: of sectors for responsibilities varied have that entities Crown transportsystem. of number a with interface th manages Ministry The Government Zealand. New Central in transport of for groupresponsibility have the which organisations head to Transport of Ministry the through works Minister The Transport,headed by its Minister. New in activities transport all for framework policy and legal The 1.2.1 1.2 in Horizons of behalf on statutoryrequirements transport underLTMA the as outlined in Appendix (RTC) 3. regional Committee key Transport with Regional collaboration Horizons the by developed been has Plan The programme. and strategy former the replaces requirements, LTMA new under Transport Land Regional and Strategy Transport Transport Land Land National the in inclusion for Regionalcombine the to plan first is the subsequentProgramme (NLTP)This forsubsidy. funding prioritise to wishes identifies Region which the Programme activities Transport transport Land Regional the incorporates also Plan The TransportManagement 2003Act (LTMA). Land the under required as interest public the systemin transport land safe and efficient effective, and system transport land the for achieve to seeking is Region our land for direction strategic the out Manawatu the in sets transport Plan) (the Plan Transport Land Regional Horizons The 1.1 Section March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption       

h Nw eln Riwy Croain taig s iial ru) s Sae Owned State a is Group) KiwiRail as (trading Enterprisethatis responsible Crown to the butoperates as a commercial entity. Corporation Railways Zealand for New The responsibility has Service) Security Aviation the regulating civilaviation New in Zealand (including Authority Aviation Civil securityand marineenvironment protection. marine and Maritime rail, aviation, significant investigates TAIC future. accidentsand incidents. in occurrences similar avoiding to view a and with incidents and accidents of causes and circumstances the determine safety transport (TA Commission Investigation land Accident Transport of promotion network; transport land sustainability;and allocation of Government fundingland for transport. the in, participation th managing for planning; responsibility transport has which land Agency), Transport (the Agency Transport Zealand New The CentralGovernment Responsibilitiesof Transport Organisations 1:Context ofthe Regional Land Transport Plan Purpose ofthe Plan Purpose

e Zaad Te epniiiis f hs raiain nld mrtm safety, maritime include organisation this of responsibilities The Zealand. New

- Wanganui (Horizons) Region over the next 10 years. It describes what describes It years. 10 next the over Region (Horizons) Wanganui Transport Plan 2015 Transport

ates n saeodr, n i acrac with accordance in and stakeholders, and partners . sae iha sse; euaig ces o and to access regulating system; highway state e

- 2025

C. h picpl ups o TI i to is TAIC of purpose principal The IC).

rgam it oe ouet which, document one into Programme

Zealand is set by the Ministry of Ministry the by set is Zealand

how this will contribute to an to contribute will this how

h land the Page Page 59 e

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2  term  long the and objectives transport land that: national out systemtransport land a seekobjectivesobjective. The each achieveunder sets to wishes Government also GPS The    land the transportsystem by focusingon three core priorities: land for direction strategic Government‟s The Land National the from funds transport of allocation TransportFund (NLTF). ThePlan mustbe consistentwith from the GPS. achieve to wishes Government the l strategic directionout for the sets GPS The transport land the from performance improved GPS. the through primarilyarticulatedis infrastructure. This transport newininvesting driving and system on focus strong a has Government The 1.3.1 and fast a including this, achieving to efficientroading network connectingour crucial regionaleconomies. is delivery and infrastructure investment, of level Busines „Government‟s the in articulated the as well as aseconomy,competitive productiveand more a buildingis Governmentthe of focus prioritykey A LTMA the in out set as requirements Land TransportFunding 2015/16 the is Plan the Government‟sobjectives shaping to key The 1.3 necessary. responsibilities planning transport identif the for responsible statutoryalso is council regional The has Plan. the of preparation council the for RTC the regional through the while networks, roading a localAt level,territorial the authorities of 1.2.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption           

appropriatelymitigates theeffects of land transporton environment. the isa safe system,increasingly fre isreliable andresilient providesappropriate transport choices addressescurrent and futuredemand value for money road safety economic growth andproductivity cto o esnil ulc rnpr srie ad h poiin f hs srie where services those of provision the and services transport public essential of ication The National and National The Regionalpolicy context Regionaland Local Government GovernmentPolicy Statement on La

and prioritiesas expressed the through GovernmentPolicy Statementon

2024/25(GPS). eof death and serious injury

s Growth Agenda Growth s

the Region the are responsible the management for of local

and and outlines the results the outlines andNew inZealandtransport and ndTransport 2015 - transport is to pursue improved performance from performance improved pursue to is transport 2025

Future Direction 2014‟. The right of right The 2014‟. Direction Future

eut the results Page Page 60

testthe issues identified throughthe ILM process. truth to organisations) interested various and sector, transport the agencies, government central and (local consultation targeted for 2014 April in released then was document Issues Transport A performanceindicators and measures aimedat addressing identified the issues. early Ma Logic Investment Agency‟s in Transport began Plan the preparing for process The Plan the still gives effect newto the legislation underpinningit. opera refinethe way to a in wasPlandone re should Plan are they the that or appropriate not is actioned it considers RTC The be timeline. delivery project to their of stages yet different have JTS the of recommendations the of number A periodthis as well. over unchanged remained largely has productivity and growth economic on the focus Government‟s of component R major a the formed and JTS The RLTS operative area. this for RLTS operative the informed an study this develop from recommendations The to years. recent was over organisations these study by promoted been the have of aim The Council. Districtevidence Manawatu and Council City North 2010 RLTS North operative Palmerston the the T Joint a producing commenced Region the to developed, being was went RLTS operative work of amount significant A 1.4 LTMArequires Plan the to takeinto a of preparationThe 1991. Act Management for Resource the under requirementsPlan Regional a and Statement thePolicy Regional combines managed Plan and One The for community. cared the and be Authorities will Region the of physical resources and natural the how defines that document policy guiding Regions the is Plan One The 1.3.3 plans. of requirement a is It achieved. be will targets these which by means technologies". the and targets energy out sets alternativealso strategy The and fuels of diversity greater a with system, transport efficient o transport. includingThe sectors, key six for objectivessix 2011 out sets NEECS energy. renewable and conservation Strategy energy efficiency, energy of promotion the Conservation and 2011 Strategy Energy Efficiency Zealand New the to strategy companion Energy Zealand New The 1.3.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption  Two iss 

netit aon ln ue n tasot lnig nerto mas t s increasingly is it means integration planning difficult transport to maintain the roadingasset; and and use land around Uncertainty

ThePlanOne NewZealand EnergyEfficiency and ConservationStrategy 2011 Process fortheDevelopmentProcess ofthe Plan ues affectingues the Horizonswere region identified in document: the - based network hierarchy for the area, tesarea, the hierarchyfor network based -

litigate the work of the JTS or the operative RLTS. Therefore development of the of development Therefore RLTS. operative the or JTS the of work the litigate the LTMA that NEECS is taken into account in developing regional land transport land regional developing in account into taken is NEECS that LTMA the

- Manawatu sub area, involving Horizons, the Transport Agency, Palmerston Agency, Transport the Horizons, involving area, sub Manawatu

Transport Plan 2015 Transport C osdr ta i i a rlvn tdy s t a i 21. The 2010. in was it as today relevant as is it that considers TC account the relevantregionalpolicy statements or plans. pping (ILM) process identifying regional issues, possible issues, regional identifying process (ILM) pping tive RLTS rather than re thanratherRLTStive - 2025

ting the validity of a number of proposalswhich of number a validityof the ting

- 04 ih w wrsos ht olwd the followed that workshops two with 2014

bjective for transport is "a more energymore "a is transportbjective for y h Rgoa Cucl Territorial Council, Regional the by

- 2021. It is specifically focused on focused specifically is It 2021. - write it, while making sure thatwhile making writeit,

ransport Study (JTS) of (JTS) Study ransport - - 2016 06 (NEECS) 2016 -

00 Wie the While 2040.

urnl at currently Page Page

s a is 61

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2      and Horizons) and Agency Transport the authorities, furthermeetings of RTC the have: territorial the from representatives of up adviso (an GroupAdvisory Regional the workshops of of number A through raised those the Transport Issuesdocument. as well as RLTS the operative the in of those reflect issues largely 2.2 the section in issues that reinforced feedback chang Other not have RLTS investment. operative future for framework clear a is land clear a through and growth, residential not further through confirmed north the in growth and North‟s Palmerston that is consultation, consultation, public targeted this through received feedback However, potential If lowerNorth Island could limited.be trips. transport freight of Nor efficiencyPalmerston addressed, not the are issues on North impact the to in likely activities is with which conflict Zone creating Industrial is City North Palmerston of boundary eastern North Palmerston the in occurring is growth economic and populationRegion‟s the of majority the that recognised issues two These  March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption       consideredlikely funding sourcesover life the of the Plan. outlined howPlan the wil transportissues and guidingdevelopment of the transportsystem forthe nextyears; ten addressingRegion‟s the means of Planas a policies setin refined measures out the the and developedof specifica set strategic priorities t refined Plan‟s the issues and objectives; d is it means network structuralinvestment around freight routes. the across planning Disjointed

limplemented;be and

d infcnl sne t a pbihd n 00 Teeoe the Therefore 2010. in published was it since significantly ed

-

Manawatu sub area. In particular, urban gro urban particular, In area. sub Manawatu th‟s efforts to become a central distribution hub for the for hub distribution central a become to efforts th‟s

- 2025 - use planning framework, including the JTS, there JTS, the including framework, planning use

hat Plan the will overon focus its lifetime;

ifficult to prioritise resilience and and resilience prioritise to ifficult - east is largely due to industrial, to due largely is east ry committee to the RTC madeRTC the to committeery wth on the north the on wth Page Page -

East 62 -

regionalboundaries. D with Waitomo Region, of the within portions contained completely small almost are that authorities local seven are There NewZealand, ofwith 8% New Zealand‟s land masscontained withinboundaries. its authority local largest second the is Region The 2.1.1 Agribusiness and Study Growth Regional the to Strategy. links strong having by growth this strengthen is there and Levin Estate, of Industrial Road Heads the on northAirportHorowhenua based whenWellingtonto the District the inhubbinggrowth future potential for centre hubbing growing a has also hubb the However, networks. air and Highway, rail State the via and Wellington Waikato Bay, central Hawkes Taranaki, of regions surrounding the in location its of because industry distribution North Palmerston The Studyand Strategy synthesise is tokey unlocking potential growth the and Plan the sure making so growth the of enabler key a is Transport years. 30 next the over distr all for opportunities growth economic investigate and investment willprioritise to Strategy ways the and Study the Both Strategy. Agribusiness Zealand New Central a comm has Government the mind in withthis andgrowth regionaleconomic is facilitating Region the of goal A the around and through transported are people and Region. goods which in way the to contribute that the of some of growth economic i Zealand, New in regions populateddensely and more population the experienced not has Region the Although Region. employment national of 4.9% and GDP national a only it population, Zealand‟s New of 5% around to home is Region the While land andair transportconnections to the restof New Zealand. population.liesIt lower the in North central Island becauseand,central of its location hasits good Manawatu The 2.1 2: The Context Strategic Section March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 2 1 Theseven main districts are:

rnpr pann rsosblte fr h prin f tafr Dsrc wih is n h Hrzn Rgo ae netkn by undertaken are Region Horizons the in lies which District Stratford TaranakiRegional Council. of portion the for responsibilities planning transport of Memorandum Undera RegionalEconomic ActivityReport 2014, Ministry of Business, Innovationand Employment. Setting the Scene Setting the Geography

Road of National Significance project is complete. A key outcome of the Plan will be to to be will Plan the of outcome key A complete. is project Significance National of Road

issioned a Regional Growth Study and the Region‟s Mayors and Chair have invested in invested have Chair and MayorsRegion‟s the and Study Growth Regional a issioned -

agni ein s peoiaty ua rgo wt a e main few a with region rural predominantly a is Region Wanganui

2

-

Understanding between Stratford District, Taranaki Regional Council and Horizons RegionalCouncil, UnderstandingHorizonsand RegionalCouncilDistrict, Taranaki betweenStratford Manawatu sub area is now recognised as the hu the as recognised now is area sub Manawatu

Transport Plan 2015 Transport –

TheManawatu src, tafr Dsrc ad ap Dsrc as icue within included also District Taupo and District Stratford istrict,

ing concept is not limited to Palmerston North. Wanganui North. Palmerston to limited not is concept ing - 2025 - 1

Wanganui Region . However, economic outcomes vary across the the across varyoutcomes economic However, . region in the North Island and the sixth largest in largest sixth the and Island North the in region t nevertheless has a number of unique featuresunique of number a has nevertheless t

- oe Nrh sad cnetn t the to connecting Island, North lower

b of the growing freight growing the of b icts within the Region the within icts ccounts for 4% of 4% for ccounts

etes of centre‟s Page Page 63

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 iue blw hw te siae eiet ouain f ah itit n pplto change population and district each of populationsince1996. resident estimate the shows below 1 Figure an was which 222,672, was Region increase ofless than 0.1% on the 2006population of 222,423. the of population resident usually the Census, 2013 the At rates by particularlyin theRuapehu and Horowhenua offset be will loss non population this from of contributions some However, projects. transport suc problems, fund transport to of base set own its about bring will Region the of commuter movementsbetween withinConversely, and population them. parts decline other in the l will NorthPalmerston the bycovered now area the increasingpopulation of The needs. ageing an of needstheir meet to family and friendsand taxis) (including transportpublic transport on reliant and disadvantaged The decline. as considered to be to have continue also will population sizes household average see will all and over and 65 aged population the of proportion the in increases large see to expected are All to expected are authorities territorial remaining The in experience population decline,with markedlosses Plan. the in Ruapehu increase the to of expected lifetime are the Districts during Horowhenua population and Manawatu City, North will Palmerston population The the Plan the of course the Over system. become more urbanised,olderand will transportlive smaller in household the of needs the shaping in role critical a will play live, they importantlyhow whereand more andRegion, the of people The 2.1.2 varies Region the of rest between the 1,000 mmand 2,000 mmper annum. through Rainfall the annum. below per mm is 960 Rainfall receiving North Palmerston days. cloudy of proportion greater a experiences which North Palmerston of exception the with average, national the with accordance in are hours Regio The length the of the Region. Both the TasmanSea and the Pacific Oceanborder Region. the bisectingRanges Tararua and Ruahine the and south the to ManawatuRiver the of plains alluvial is geography physical Region‟s The March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption a t pesrs n h tasot ytm o tee uhrte, atclry ih ead to regard with particularly authorities, these of systems transport the on pressures to ead

       

Population Horowhenua PalmerstonNorth City Manawatu Ruapehu n‟sclimate iscomparatively extremesmild with greater of temperature inland.Sunshine

- eiet aeaes wig eod n hldy oe i te Region, the in homes holiday and second owning ratepayers resident

relatively varied, with the volcanic plateau to the north, the north, the to plateau volcanic the with varied, relatively Districts

- many people over the age of 65 become transport become 65 of age the over people many 2025

     

Tararua Rangitikei Wanganui

s. s.

District forecast.

a a elnn ratepayer declining a as h

ainl vrg, with average, national -

Manawatu sub area Manawatusub

Page Page 64

2.1.4 more the becomes, population for need the less in results elderly This more needs. privatevehicles anda greaterneed forpublic tr transportation the their for others as on become population they s dependent a the have of to likely needs are structure transport demographic in changes Such a 2011. in years predicts 44.8 from up District 2031, by years Horowhenua51.5 of age median the a and population in for decrease marginal scenario projection population medium Zealand's New Statist example, For ages. median highest the have to likely are that districts the in noticeable the of population willmajor a influencehave on districts within Region, the with the greatesteffects 40.9 to rise willregionalmedian age the see and population ageing an of trend national the reflects This 2011. with compared when 2031, in Allauthoritiesterritorial number people withinof yearsRegion willover greater the have65 a aged 2.1.3 the in increase 4.4% overall expected an Region‟spopulation by2031 (medium growth scenario). indicate figures, Population Resident Usually than rather estimates population on based are which projections, population Zealand‟s New Statistics March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption District. Horowhenua in $21,800 to t District than lower been average. Manawatu always have Region in the in incomes $28,400 personal median Historically, from range Region the was The Census 2013$25,000, the travel.at Region to the of tend less) theyearn half more more, earn the (half earn, income personal people median more the as travel of determinant a is Income data,2013base) Figure

Socio Age d

1 which is lower than the national median income of $28,500. Medianwhich national$28,500.lowerincome the of personalthan median incomes is in :

- istribution economic factors Population change 1996 change Population

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

- 2013 (Statistics NZ estimated residential population residential estimated NZ (Statistics 2013 years by 2031 from 37.6 in 2011. This overall This 2011. in37.6 years ageing by 2031from - ansportsuch as buses or taxis. 2025

giiat mat n the on impact ignificant

e national he Page Page ics 65

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 still close enough to commute to. Ruapahu District has the lowest rates of home ownership at ownership home of rates lowest 55%. the has District Ruapahu to. commute to enough close still we but Feilding, in as cheaper be may prices householdwhere North regionally, Palmerston to Feilding of proximity to compared District, the in incomes median higher possibly the which 71.2%,reflects at Region the in rate ownership home highest the has District Manawatu affordablethe in Region nationally.than and marriage bearing. entry, childcareer as such factors other for ownership home deferring are generations younger that is this for reason likely most The Census,65.2%. to dropped had rate 2006 this Census, 2013 the the At Region. the trust family a in held across or occupants the by owned were Region the in households drop of 66.8% to continue ownership household of rates The Figure 2: greater to correlate to tend rates employment Higher traveldemand, as people generallyneedto travel between place their of andwork residence. 2013. the March than and lower 2004 March slightly between sh been below has graph Region The the in average. national rate participation force labour the Historically retiredpeople livingin Horowhenua on fixedincomes). District househo median Horowhenualowest the had $58,400. of income an with City North Palmerston was median income highest household the with authority territorial the data, income personal median national the the from Differing while $50,000 was income national household the median below medianlower a Onlyhad Northland was$63,800. median the well Census, are 2013 Region the the At in incomes median. household median this, to related Closely March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 4 3

CentreHousingfor Research (2008) Business, Innovationand Employment. M anawatu

Regionaland national trends inthe employment rate, March2004 - Wanganui Quarterly Regional Labour Market Update March 2013, pg 3, Ministry of Social Development and Ministry of of Ministry and Development Social of Ministry 3, pg 2013, March Update Market Labour RegionalQuarterly Wanganui

4

oee te einl ae s bv th above is rate regional the However

TheFalling Rate Home of Ownership Newin Zealand

ld income at $39,100. (This is unsurprising given the high rate of rate high the given unsurprising is (This $39,100. at income ld

w te einl rn cmae t te ainl trend national the to compared trend regional the ows - 2025

ntoa rt a huig s uh more much is housing as rate national e household income at the 2013 Census.2013thehousehold at income ,Research

Bulletin –

March 2013

ll as the close close the as ll no. 13.no.

whileat Page Page

3

66

as an aging population which has both an age an both has which population aging an as num a are There average 11,417km,while in 2013people drove 10,806km. just Regionondrovethe2006in people inshows 2006 Censuswith of2013years Comparing that the are people dointhat suggests which network, Highway State the on occurred has VKT in decline the of Most Region. the in travelled kilometres vehicle of rate declining a been has there 2006 Since 2.1.7 has too vehicle kilometre Asvehiclehavesodropped,vehicle.ownershiprates owndrive, a affordcannot or cannot they to because keys their As up hanging are drivers more and more that mean ownership. also may population ageing vehicle reduc of to rate begin declining may households the increase household in costs Region, factor vehicle the contributing in a appeared be have may trends age these and why incomes to as speculate to hard is it While of 7.9% of average national the above is This households withoutac of total Census. a 2013 vehicle, a the to at access households no (9.2%)has Region 7,602 the in households ten in one almost contrast, In a was This vehicles. more or slight two increase thefrom 2006Census where own households of 54.5% Nationally households). (40,917 households of 49.3% only to decline slight a (40,86 was there Census households 2013 the of at while 50.4% vehicles, more Census, 2006 a the At revealed Census Region. 2013 the in the However size. vehicles more householdor two owing now terms,percentage in households, fewer with of trend this in change rate declining the to counter runs vehicles more have to households for trend increasing an been has there years recent In 2.1.6 decline2.5 from 2.2to residentsper household by 2031. to decline to continue to expected is size household average City‟s North Palmerston environs. and city the around and in built dwellings new of number the on impact an had has This 2006. in 2.6 to 1991 that is Nort Palmerston sizeinalso householdaverage the note national Of the Census. 2006 than the since less changed not is have numbers this These dwelling; 2.7. of per average people 2.5 is size household average Region‟s The vehicleas new use areareas often not well planned public for private on dependence a to leads this Region, the of parts some in sprawl urban increase to tend dwellings new As demand. travel of indicator important an is dwelling per people of number The 2.1.5 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption bus andfares reduced air farecosts also mayhave contributed tothis. high sustained notably most costs, transport in trends and the travel; to as need people‟s reduced such has devices smart developments other and technologicalphones smart of driving; uptake rapid of outcomes environmental / health negative a increased or vehicles, private to attachment reduced as such trends economic ls long less g

DwellingOccupancy Vehicle KilometresVehicle Travelled (VKT) Vehicle Ownership 2.3 residents per household in 2031. Across the Region, household size is projected toprojected is householdRegion,size the Across 2031. in household residentsper 2.3

- ber of possible reasons for this declining trend in VKT: demographic trends such trends demographic VKT: in trend decliningthis for possiblereasons of ber itne rvn. s pr aia esr te rn i as gig down. going also is trend the measure capita per a As driving. distance

cessto a vehicle. s travelleds (VKT).

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

54.1%ofhouseholds owned two or morevehicles.

- - h has declined from 2.9 residents per householdin per residents2.9 from declined has h 2025 related and income and related

er fuel prices but also cheap long cheap also but prices fuel er

te ubr f eils hy w. An own. they vehicles of number the e

transportprovision. - related effect on travel; socio travel; on effect related 9 households) owned two or or two owned households) 9

wareness of the of wareness

- distance Page Page , which ,

67 -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 Region than theynationally.do the against Regionindus the for industry each fishing and forestryagriculture, the of of importance the is shows table importancethis What economy. national the of comparison a providing as well of contribution the shows 4 Figure NewZealand.Therefore isit critical to the economy of Region the that transportlinks are resilient. of parts other to redistributed be pr to or primaryoverseas export eitherRegion‟s for Region the the of of out way proportionits makes large A destination. its to origin of point its from producttransporting in network transport land the on reliant is economyRegion‟s the this, i economy regional The 2.1.8 Figure 3:Regional Vehicle Kilometers Travelled 2000 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption Transport, Postal and Warehousing Electricity, Gas, Waterand Waste Services Professional, Scientific and Technical Services Wholesale Trade Unallocated Retail Trade Education and Training Construction Health Care and Social Assistance PublicAdministration and Safety Manufacturing Agriculture,Forestry and Rental, Hiring and Real Estate Services Industry VKT (m)

tries to the Region‟s economy. These industries contribute around double the GDP to our to GDP the double around contribute industries These economy. Region‟s the to tries 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 500 RegionalEconomy its and Impact on Transport Demand 0

2000/01

2001/02

2002/03 2003/04 s largely based on the production of primary industries, and because of because and industries, primary of production the on based largely s Fishing 2004/05

Year 2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

each industry to the regional and New Zealand economy as as economy Zealand New and regional the to industry each 2008/09

2009/10

2010/11 - 3.48% 3.73% 4.37% 4.71% 6.38% 6.41% 6.62% 7.34% 7.40% 7.83% 8.94% 10.66% 11.38% GDP Regional 2025 2011/12

2012/13

- 2013 4.20% 3.02% 7.64% 5.23% 6.03% 4.54% 4.35% 6.43% 6.04% 4.27% 12.54% 5.49% 11.91% NZ GDP Total VKT Total Highways State Roads Local

- 0.71% - - 0.35% 1.87% 2.27% 0.92% 1.36% 3.57% - 5.17% - Difference 0.71% 3.27% 0.51% 3.60% 0.53%

oduct eventually oduct Page Page 68

the three most important destinations of freight in 2042 will be Taranaki w Taranaki be will 2042 in freight of destinations important most that estimated three has Study the The years. 30 next the over like look will it what of forecast a and task Nationa The and efficient roadingnetwork in orderto resilientmeet thedemands of time critical a transport. have to fortunate is Region the of part lower The network. roading the efficient on transported an is meet suppliers deadlines ensuring of critical component key time A distribution. freight in important is criticality Time sectorwith goodroad and railtransport routes to markets. freigh important an become also has Wanganui Recentexamples of thi flows: commodity important two of result a as is This center. distribution a as importance in Wellington North Palmerston The Figure 4:Estimated Regional and National Gross Domestic Product 2013(%) March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption efficientlyand effectively during the lifetime of this Plan. Tara (1.48m/tonnes)and 1.42 Wellington (m/tonnes). BayHawkes(2.40m/tonnes), Auckland be willRegion our for freight of originsimportant most The millionoftonnes freight, Wellington(1.81m/tonnes) and Hawkes Bay(1.20m/tonnes). Source: Infometrics Mining Artsand Recreation Services Information Media and Telecommunications Administrativeand SupportServices ServicesOther Accommodation and Food Services Financial and InsuranceServices     naki, Hawkes Bay and Wellington, therefore, are the key origin key the are therefore, Wellington, and Bay Hawkes naki,    

nutil oe hog is etoa Dsrc Pa rve poes o accommodate to process review Plan District Sectional its expectedgrowth in zone. the North through the of extension Zone hectare 126 Industrial a investigating Council City North Palmerston the as known zone industrial wider a Braeburn IndustrialArea thatisearmarked withinfor future expan is port inland This Icepak. and Napier, and Auckland of Ports the collaborationthroughof Longburna at port inland an creation of The export Zealand New produce NewPlymouth and or even Wellington, Auckland Napier,and Tauranga. in ports that the of out hinterlands these of export for point to staging the provides and access commodities good has North Palmerston domestic and freightbetween Aucklandimported and We value high for point staging key a become has North Palmerston

l Freight Demands Study 2014 provides a snapshot of New Zealand‟s current freight current Zealand‟s New of snapshot a provides 2014 Study Demands Freight l

s growth are: - Manawatu sub area is now a major major a now is area sub Manawatu

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

od rnpr ntok a ms tm ciia pout is product critical time most as network, transport road llingtonor between Auckland andthe South Island;and

- 0.54% 0.83% 1.09% 1.52% 1.56% 2.09% 3.11% 2025

t distribution center recently, providing the primary the providing recently,center distribution t

1.84% 1.25% 3.24% 2.21% 1.93% 2.12% 5.73%

rih hb n hs superseded has and hub freight sion;and ------destinations in moving freight moving in destinations 1.30% 0.41% 2.16% 0.69% 0.37% 0.03% 2.62%

ith an estimated 2.59 estimated an ith

Page Page - East 69

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 h Rgo‟ frsr ett rahs t hretbe g, lhuh hn t es avse will harvested gets it when although age, depend generally harvestable its reaches estate forestry Region‟s the 2020 between years the in economy the to more contribute to likely is Forestry Region the that goes for exportis transp within processed meat Most sidings. railway have plants processing meat many as Zealand New con that Region the around rail conveyedby is meat of 44% About country. inthe in movements stock volumeof largest facilities processing meat of number a are There toit be transported Hawera.to in produced milk Wellingtonwill powderto milk theat converted be Pahiatua facility,therefore negatingneed the the for All dryer. milkpowder new a with upgraded be to expected is facility processing milk Pahiatua Fonterra‟s 2015, In export Napier.from for sent thebeing product finished from with is Napier, conveyed of There Port milk the to Hawera.Hawera the from in flow counter to plant large Whareroa due the higher to Longburn is and this Oringi Region at facilities our processing in However, rail. by moved are tob Regionplants processing the throughout movement of degrees varying with complex, is chain supply dairy The growth. economic enable will that vehicles motor and people Ten both for designed environment of urban Masseyquality environment current speed to will high the This Key current merge the feel. campus‟ that to „one mean a future. place create to in the Centre Science are Fitzherbert into the Plans with growth campus University regional University. Massey of at enabler based key collaboration a be will economy regional the and of part growing a is innovation food through exports food to value Adding long have will land the of Regions tr intensive intensification more and This farming dairy increased production. to led livestock has which past the in than intensively most more Region‟s the 80% is about trapping) Around dairy and farming; enterprise. hunting important and livestock agriculture; and to beef services farming sheep, other growing; farming; fruit and horticulture (including: Agriculture th around ofuse these soils. growth further for potential is there and horticulture and agriculture for soils versatile most the be to considered are These Zealand. New in soils 2 Class all of 14% and soils 1 Class billi Region‟s $1.9 the from increase exports to agribusiness ways investigating is Strategy Agribusiness Zealand New Central The the of sectors key the of some are below discussed economy. and growth of enabler key a is Transport growth further unlock to ways investigate will Strategy, Agribusiness and Study Growth Regional The March24 2015 RegionalCouncil w Plan 2015 market, Transport Land the Regional of Adoption tourism domestic the on land the via Region reliant the enter will tourists largely Most Region. the is in seaports or airports industry international tourism regional The Napier, Taranakiand (CentrePort). Wellington of Ports the via exported get logs Most rail. by transported are instances some in but roads, local transport get will logs the of Most Region. the in pine radiata with planted area land total the of 75% than more for accounting Districts, Wanganui and Ruapehu Rangitikei,

ansportnetworks, with increasingnumbers of heavy vehicles servicingthese industries.

on its commodity price at the time. There are large plantations of forest in the in forest of plantations large are There time. the at price commodity its on

oth within and outside the Region. Nationally, around 50% of dairy products dairy of 50% around Nationally, Region. the outside and within oth

n o 38 ilo b 22. 2025. by billion $3.8 to on orted to either Ports the of Taurangaor Napier.

f h Rgo i frie rsln. amad s used is Farmland grassland. fertile is Region the of the eastern North Island from the Hawke‟s Bay to to Bay Hawke‟s the from Island North eastern the

- 2025

et rv my e elcd ih high a with replaced be may Drive nent h Rgo cnan 1% f all of 18% contains Region The - em mlctos o the for implications term ed via road, particularly road, via ed rbt t i hvn the having it to tribute

hs s h FoodHQ the is this over the next the over - 2030 as much of much as 2030

30 years. 30 Page Page

t no ith lo a also 70 e

NewZealand by cycle.All part ofor the followin of all explore to visitors international and locals enabling network, cycling nationwide a developing on of number a include to expanded been r cycle of network the years recent In network. the on rides „premier‟ the are trails trails. The cycle Sea to Rivers the and Trail Timber The Haeranga: Nga network, cycleways national Wan and Ruapehu major The are there where Districts, Wanganui and Ruapehu the recreationalattractions such as the to Tongariroand National Whanganui Parks. important more and are conference domestic visitors major a is it accou access, which of venue ease sporting and location central its tourism to regional Due all of 40% spend. about for accounting North, Palmerston is Region the in destination spe tourism of 4.3% for accounts Region tours.The organisedon than rather independenttravellers free as sea or airby rather networkthan transport March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption             Timber TrailConnection TheOTT Trail TheGentle Annie Tararua Traverse Mountain SeaConnection to ManawatuCycleway 5

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment / Infometrics Employment and Innovation Business, of Ministry

au Dsrcs lo ae w o te Get ie‟ ta cmrs the comprise that Rides‟, „Great the of two have also Districts ganui

Transport Plan 2015 Transport t fr lre mut f t dmsi tuim iis International visits. tourism domestic its of amount large a for nts

- od yl tuig ots wt te long the with routes, touring cycle road - 2025 g „cycle touring areroutes‟ the in Region:

nd 5

ihn e Zaad Te ao tourist major The Zealand. New within

- em i of aim term outes has outes

Page Page 71

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 aaau og (H) n Wiiio rsl (H) Tee r iprat o h Region the to important are These (SH1). Trestle Whirikino and (SH3) Gorge Manawatu rol the is importanceparticular Of occurs. growth traffic if years coming the overpressure increasing to subject become will which network, the of sections vulnerable of number a are there However, cent a distribution the of freight Northin the Island. as role important increasingly Region‟s the promotes and well function to continues p networkthis that ensure to vital is it supported, is Region the to ofdevelopment social and economic access with links, air and rail road, of network strategic a by served well is location, central its due largely Region, The 2.2.1        Theidentified issues in theHorizon‟s region are: aparta for number of reasons,including fundingconstraints and landowner negotiations. example, fro projectsFor roading resolve. to finish to start from years many take may They them. address to order multi be to tend issues The Plan. the of lifetime land regional current the that pressures the identify Issues 2.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption througha network ofother route detoura take to havesouth or north heading vehicles(HPMV) productivitymotor high allcurrently as important also is Trestle Whirikino The Region. the to access direct with port export important the to region our from link direct most the is Gorge the as economically        e of freight and its predicted growth. Two of the most vulnerable sections in the Region are theare Region the in vulnerablesections most the of Two growth.predicted its and freight of e

Mitigatingadverse environmental effects from the regionaltransport system harvesting andagriculturalanduse potential increases in tourism traffic;and netwo roading rural Regions the on pressure Increasing Theneed forcontinued improvements to road safetyin theRegion; impacts the this will haveon freightdistribution; an Anticipa playing are that links east strategic secondary developmentpurposes as to role improvements maintain increasing to need The north the of the r Regions other to linkages Improved a more structured roadinghierarchy accommodateto anticipated future freight growth; Integratedland useand transportpla

The Issues The futurefreight growth anticipatedaccommodate to hierarchyroading structured more a provide to and produce to planning transport and use land Integrated ted population and economic growth in the Palmerston North Palmerston the in growth economic and population ted

m the investigation and design phases to the construction phase can be years be can phase construction the to phases design and investigation the m

egional borderbetween theDesert Road Summitand Taupo;

rs n egbuig ein. n re t esr ta sustainable that ensure to order In regions. neighbouring in orts

- et ik ad lentv rue ad o tourism/economic for and routes alternative and links west s.

nning produceto a more resilientnetwork, and provideto –

of importance, links to the south of the Region and to and Region the of south the to links importance, of

- 2025 -

faceted and there are generally no „quick fixes‟ in in fixes‟ „quick generallynoare there and faceted

rnpr ntok s aig vr the over facing is network transport rk, particularly with increased forest increased with particularly rk,

a more resilient network; resilient more a

Port of Napier, the most the Napier, of Port -

Manawatu sub area, sub Manawatu

Page Page er for er 72

• • • • Anumber of proposals were developed to address these deficiencies. Theyare: urban areaof Palmerston North. the within AvenueTremaine across and along capacity additional for need the was identified Also • • • • as: identified were studyarea core the withinnetwork road rural existing the deficienciesof major The additionaleconomic opportuni effective and ar up opening improved strong greatly be will areas through efficiency freight identified, has development JTS the industrial which their links transport facilitating large By Two North. Palmerston of region. southwest entire the benefit will that opportunities development and growth economic unlocking to respect with questioned be not shouldimportance the its However region.geographical the of area small a onlycover does JTS The that ensure to is This beyond. investmen and Plan, the of North Palmerston lifetime the over improvements these of plan year 30 a is it that Given realised. be to yet still are proposals the of number a completed, been have projects some While road hierarchyover a 30 would that area sub ide North Palmerston the for hierarchy roading a confirm to was JTS the of intention The undertookthe Palmerston North the Council, District Manawatu Council, City NorthPalmerston Strategy, Transport Land Regional the developing as time same the at 2010, In Framework North Palmerston 2010 The KeyProject March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption that noted 2044period as it iscurrently economically not justified. be should It date. to progress Bridg Upstream the of have currently CouncilCity North Palmerston indication an give to updated been have 75 on page identified projects key The JTS. the of findings key the on detail further provides 2 Appendix •

ARural Ring Road aroundPalmerston North Abypass of Bunnythorpe An EasternCorridor between Bunnythorpeand the New Upstream Bridge ANew Upstream Bridge between Matai Te Road and StacesRoad Arural state highway betweenroute proposed easternresidential growth areaand theproposed New Upstream airport,thetheIndustrial Eastadjacent North(NEIZ)to Zone the accesstoprovidegood to t need the an for additional crossing of Manawatu the River; traffic useto two levelcrossingsof the North IslandMain (NIMT) Trunk railway line; this requires Bunnythorpe via North Palmerston and Feilding between route commuter the through passing Gorge Manawatu the PalmerstonNorth is and inefficient as an inter Sanson between route 3 Highway State the he lack of a clearly defined road hierarchy, particularly north and east of Palmerston NorthPalmerston of east particularlyandhierarchy, clearly road north a defined of lack he t.

-

Manawatu sub area, and the Region as a whole, realise the benefits from this from benefits the realise whole, a as Region the and area, sub Manawatu ntify improvements thentify andto developto works programme give of effect a - yearplanning horizon. Transport Plan 2015 Transport tiesacross the region. - aaau taei Tasot Study Transport Strategic Manawatu -

ManawatuStrategic TransportStudy (referred to as the JTS).

ok, t s motn ta te T cnius o doae for advocate to continues RTC the that important is it works,

MtStewart and the Manawatu Gorge via Bunnythorpe - rnpr Aec ad oios einl Council Regional Horizons and Agency Transport 2025 -

regionalroute;

lctd o h nrhat and northeast the to located e e being constructed in the 2038 the in constructed being e –

30 A

-

er Planning Year Bridge. - Manawatu

Page Page

73 -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 and earthquakes. There is also the very real threat of volcanic activity from the Central Plateau Central the and MtTaranaki, and climate change maybring from levelsea rise to some of coastalour communities. activity volcanic of threat real very the also is There earthquakes. and prisinterruptions. Region term The long and short withstand can network the well how of terms in determined be also can Resilience growingNorth be North,great CityPalmerstonNorthCouncilPalmerstonsees re the of above example The multi is there ensuring by development use land integrating in assist also can Rail passenger, movementsiscurrently under Plymouth New and North Palmerston tr land regional the Gisborne the line, rail Trunk Main of Island North the of crossroads resilience the at lies Region The the network. increase also will network rail the of of use Increased event the in restored rapidly or available, always disruption. be to expected be road should a classification) example For perform. they function the upon based service of level a provide willnationally, and Region, the across roads as movementsefficientfreight moreensuring in assist willalsoRoad ClassificationNetwork One The housing of development a future that areas identified between conflicts recognisesuse landpotential the consider to alsoneed will reviewsPlan District it However, operations. Wellington) of (Port Taran Centreport Port by for replaced terminus a as factory dairy Country Open the to access direct providing 2011, May in line rail branch Castlecliff the of reopening the was this of ord in that, notes and movement freight of effectiveness and efficiency the improve to is Strategy the of documentsStrategy majornumberincludingalignsDistrict the a of the of WDC themes Plan.One invest transportation future for direction the 2011,District the CouncilIn adopted (WDC)anUrbanWanganui Transportation Strategythatsets Region. the ininvestmentincreased encourage and networktransport Region‟s the of efficiencyresilience and long provides this th in confidence as more sector private the give willsituation sectorthis Improving sector. the for privatecertainty the for investment stimulate can sector public the that sector private with identified of hand protection The in development. hand goes network transport land the of planning as investment, for areas identifying in possible as efficiently as working andnot are public sectors two the the that is between concern The planning a transport is and there planning that use raised land concerns been of have mismatch there Plan the of development the during However, Change 50of Manawatu the DistrictPlan did likewise. o the with line the into Plan District the brought 7 Change Plan account City‟s North Palmerston into 2012, In takes Plan. which District City North 2) Palmerston the Appendix of hierarchy (see roading existing developed been has hierarchy roading rural A March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption the to crucial importance, is route, economic south national 1 Highway of State important is the particularly which it, from Region, and Wellington to access the to proximity Region‟s the RLTS. the iterations of of number a RTC for the to importance of been has issue This 2.2.2

er to be successful; the Strategy relies on other stakeholders to play their part. An example An part. their play to stakeholders other on reliesStrategy the successful; be to er

and Taupo Summit Road Desert the between border regional the of north the to and Region regions other to linkages Improved

- EastIndustrial Zone in order provideto relief to the road network.

nd heavynd vehicle routes. - pnn o te atelf su ln i Wnau i rlvn. In relevant. is Wanganui in line spur Castlecliff the of opening one to emergency events such as floods and slips, highslips,windsand emergency tosuchas floodsevents one

- Marton lines. It is generally agreed that rail for freight, and freight, for rail that agreed generally is It lines. Marton lsiid s Ntoa (ih oue ra (h highest (the road volume) (high National a as classified -

utilised. heavy freight routes is one of the most important ways important most the of one is routes freight heavy ment over the following 30 years in the District. The District. the in years 30 following the over ment - 2025

f motne ik t te ot o the of south the to links importance of

aki, which has subsequently been been subsequently has which aki, nefit in securing a rail spur into the into spur a rail securing innefit perative RLTS, and in 2014 Plan 2014 in and RLTS, perative

rvt sectors. private - modal access. modal

Because ofBecause Page Page ansport - term 74 e -

lsd Te non ivsmns n otn wr t ipoe h rslec o te an route main the of resilience the improve to work routine in investments ongoing The closed. of capable be to Road Saddle the productivityhighvehtakingmotor upgrade to project a closure the Since generated. volumes traffic additional the meet to standard lossto up being not economic as shown was DailyRoad Saddle The $63,000. closure. to 2011 route in (SH3) the Gorge of Manawatu the vulnerability route, road direct most the of closure The of passage the for secure be to HPMV‟s. needs Regions two the between links the Therefore increase. 2042 in tonnes million 1.48 to (2012) million0.68 tonnes increasefrom expectedto Port,are the proportiondirectlyfrom will come large flows Freight region. Horizons the directlyaccessibleto portexport important most theis Napier of Port The developmentpurposes. economic for crucial also are Bay Hawkes and Taranaki of regions neighbouring the to Linkages afte years five the in crashes serious finished. fewer 30% have to and 2031, by complete be to expected are improvements all when Levinand betweenWellington time journey of minutes i SH1/57 of four a for s individual haveprovisioncurrentproposaltoHorizonssection thisis eight The foris mostlythe Region. insection into up divided been has project The standards. Congestion, particularlyaround Otaki,beenhas a long standing issue. modern to route existing the upgrade to difficult very it make issues these and record) safety poor A bridges. c highway(which the onto accesshavenarrow properties and roads local ofnumber of large number a and alignment poor has Otaki as far as south route current The improve journeytime reliability. highway state the both on congestion severe relieve will this so doing In Airport. Wellington and Hospital Regional Wellington CBD, Wellington four Airport Wellington to Levin rout National the SignificanceBy (RoNS)upgrading a Road of be to incorridor 2009. of north the announced Government the when recognised was This c and Safety for aroundhalf (45%) of New account Zealand‟s freight movementsand population. that Waikato and Plenty of Bay Auckland, of regions Triangle‟ „Golden the to as well Region to this from link direct most the provides north 1 Highway State Plan. the of life the over increase to expected one importa increasingly is Region, and Waikato Waiouru the between in Road‟, Taupo „Desert the as known north 1 Highway State of part the Likewise, practicable of alternative routesto and fromthe Region. Wellington H State along Access Region. our vitalityof economic March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption Papatawa the yearsRealignmentrecent In HawkesRegions. HorizonsBay andthe connects that d to continue will and for, advocated long has RTC The howeverremains important and necessary. - - quarter of all vehicle movements on this road are by heavy commercial vehicles and this is is this and vehicles commercial heavy by are road this on movements vehicle all of quarter lane expressway it is hoped that access will improve to CentrePort (the Port of Wellington), of Port (the CentrePort to improve will access that hoped is it expressway lane

6

-

lane corridor, although another option is the upgrade of the existing route to the junction the to route existing the of upgrade the is option another although corridor, lane National Freight Demand Study, Ministry of Transport, 2014. Transport, of Ministry Study, Demand Freight National treto (ut ot o Lvn. h oeal oS rjc i epce t sv 40 save to expected is project RoNS overall The Levin). of south (just ntersection ongestion issues on State Highway 1 south have long been of concern to the RTC. the to concern of been long have south 1 Highway State on issues ongestion

the Port of Tauranga, New Zealand‟s largest port in terms of cargo volume, asvolume, cargo of terms in port largest Zealand‟sNew Tauranga, of Port the

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

icles has alleviated issues in the rare instances that the Gorge isinstancesGorgethe thatrare inalleviated the issueshas icles rmte aks a Rgo o oios ein o wih a which of region, Horizons to Region Bay Hawkes the from 6 . Freight going in the reverse direction is also anticipat also isdirection reverse the in going Freight .

- 2025 n cnetn lcl od, mrv sft, and safety, improve roads, local connecting and

tt h eooy fte ein Around Region. the of economy the to nt ighway 1 is heightened because of the lack the of because heightened is ighway1 cin ad h Oai o ot o Levin of north to Otaki the and ections o so, improvements to State Highway 2 Highway State to improvements so, o s o h Rgo wr etmtd at estimated were Region the to es

- ontributes to its to ontributes 12 showed the the showed 12 te ot is route the r e to a mostly a e to Page Page ed to to ed 75

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 evc ise ta hv js rcnl be rsle ad il ed o e anand uig the during maintained be to need will lifetime of Plan.this and resolved been an recently provide just have and that safe issues beservice to need therefore n when and service access of level tourist adequate for or closure road of event the in important become they However, traffic. of volumes low have routes these of Most purposes. strategically as identified been have Region, eastimportant the alternativeincludingto routes for roads local of number a Highways, State the to addition In 2.2.3 lessens theconflicts between vehicles, heavy private vehicles andcyclists. shif a Encouraging as such critical time not is forestry,pastoral agricultural that and dairy will a be keyof output Plan.this commodities from freight of share greater of Encouraging Plan. Region. the volume The of freightmove and ofsouth north importance the vitaleconomic to of also isline railMainNorth Trunk Island The Plan. cons potentially or constraining, are that thelifetime of the completedduring networkbe anticipated to projectsare these of Both growth.economic road the of parts important being as bridge Trestle Whirikino the and alternative Gorge Manawatu the on touched issue previous The highwayis In slips. through closure intermittent yearshave improverecent worksbeenundertaken to weather resilienceits relatedevents.The to to prone stretch windy and narrow a been traditionally has T closed. is north 1 Highway State that in times role important an plays It Regions. Horizons and Waikato the connects also 4 Highway State Region‟smost important destinationof freightover next the 30 years. at Tara upgrades the planned However with planned. change facility may Pahiatua Fonterra‟s this however Hawera, in facility dairy Wharearoa the to transportedbeing product dairy withmuch Taranaki to link key a been also time some for Railhas Bridgerepla efficient more and safer a provide TangahoerealignmentandNormanby Overbridge the being These to Regions. between the journey order in completed see to like would RTC the key that other Region s to outdated relative prior inprovements its safety to recent due many linkages seen has Taranaki to 3 Highway State haveHPMV full capability and ensuring thatisdoes isapriority. and H Committee the to the linkage the improved for have priority high been have projects replacement Bridge Whakaruatapu and March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 2011 during closed was Gorge Manawatu the When times. those at traffic east most the currently is Woodville, and Ashhurst connects which Road, Saddle The -

et ot we te aaau og (H) s lsd n cris prxmtl 6% of 60% approximately carries and closed is (SH3) Gorge Manawatu the when route west

7

National Freight Demand Study, Ministry of Transport 2014 Transport of Ministry Study, Demand Freight National n nraig r tourism/economicdevelopment purposes increasing an playing are that links strategic secondary to improvements maintain to need The alsoimportant an gateway theto and Whanganui TongariroNational Park‟s. cement.

o fegt rm od o al lo a pstv ra sft otoe a this as outcomes safety road positive has also rail to road from freight of t

l a east as ole ecessary. Many of these routes have had safety and level of level and safety had have routes these of Many ecessary. awkes Bay. However it is recognised that the route does not does route the that recognised is it However Bay. awkes adrs Hwvr hr ae w poet i te Taranaki the in projects two are there However tandards. d byrail isanticipated increaseto lifetimeduring the of the - et ik ad lentv rue ad for and routes alternative and links west - 2025 hat part of the highway known as the „Paraparas‟ the as known highway the of part hat

naki Region is still anticipated to be our be to anticipated still is Region naki - west

andnorth 7

- south linkstourismsouth for - 12, the Saddle Road Saddle the 12,

used alternative used

training, Page Page 76

einl cnm. oenet a hglgtd h iprac o Cucls olbrtn with collaborating Council‟s of importance each otherand with industryand iwi to facilitate growth. the highlighted has Government economy. regional id will study This 2015. April in completed be to Region the Region. collaboration the This GovernmentinvestGrowthseenRegionalhas central Studyinfor a for prosperity and growth economic facilitate to collaborating are region Horizons the in Councils Regional Growth Studyand CentralNew ZealandAgribusiness Strategy KeyProject forec years. still Region the in growth population projected anticipatedchange,withmost not to is population This Region‟s growth.recent the majority of the North Palmerston the that shows 2.1.2 section in 1 Figure to expected are Districts remaininglosepopulation with the exceptionHorowhenua of which isexpectedTheto increase sl years. coming the in increase to expected is area sub than less 2 of the increase on an 0.1% was which Census, 2013 the at 222,672 was population Region‟s The 2.2.4 2006 in However, since. road commencedand was in completed metal March a largely been had last early and constructed Cycl was century road Zealand The New Road. River the the utilising of Upokongaro and Rides Pipiriki between Great the of one Trail, Cycle the Sea between to Mountains route the of tourism part forms now potential It a Districts. Ruapehu as and Wanganui identified been also has Road River Whanganui The and tourist a as role emerging an freight played has and 2012 and 2007 between place took road the of Sealing sealed. be to route the for advocated RTC the this of result a as Largely floods. 2004 Napier The will width road the Widening cyclists. for route training a as increase safety the allto road users. used also is road the and turns m there mind, in its thisPlan. With this lifetime of duringmaintains the willalternative important an secondaryberoute as status Track the that Ensuring traffic. Gorge the of 40% approximately carrying closed, is alte secondary a as serves also It Wairarapa. the to and south the to west the for connection strategic a provides Track Pahiatua The such for service closure the road has of been upgradedto capablebe oftaking HPMV‟s. level inadequate an have to shown was March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption h Region the see Region the in strengthCouncils development.Collectively the and research and processors to through the on builds Strategy The and study puts theminto practice. growthThebase strategy will completedbe in June2015. the from identified opportunities takes that plan implementation an is Strategy Z New Central the in invested also have region the in Councils

route since. niiae pplto ad cnmc rwh n h Pleso Nrh and North Palmerston the in growth Manawatu area, economicthe impacts thishave will on freightdistribution and population Anticipated - Taihape Road also played an an played also Road Taihape

006 population of 222,423. The population in the Palmerston North Palmerston the in population The 222,423. of population 006

ay need to be some safety realignments as there are a number of tight hairpin tight of number a are there as realignments safety some be to need ay

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

2014. increased role as a alternative east alternative a as role increased - 2025

s n giuies rm rmr producers primary from agribusiness in as s fr hs to ra oe te et ten next the over areas two these for ast

rnative route when the Manawatu Gorge Manawatu the when route rnative - entify key opportunities for growing our growing for opportunities key entify Manawatu sub area has accounted for accounted has area sub Manawatu

ln pro o tm. ic this Since time. of period long a ealand Agribusiness Strategy. The Strategy. Agribusiness ealand Tal ots wt te section the with routes, Trail e

- 7 eln o ti route this of sealing 07

- - west link during the during link west – east of the Region the of east

Nga Ara Tuhono Ara Nga ightly. -

Manawatu

Page Page 77 -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 life lostlife in aroad fatalityin theRegion is$4.61 million T Region. the to cost economic and social huge a have crashes Road 2.2.5 TransportStrategy business case. the these addressissues: to 4) (section component programme the in projects two forward put have PNCC fi growth. the of growth future reviewinfluence also willStrategy Agribusiness urban and Study Growth the of findings PNCC The a projections. current the include from may emerge to and changes use strategy land for allow to JTS. the need of horizon will term longer This the to and 2021 to both demands, traffic identify future for cater to to undertakenplan be study traffic separate a thatoptions to optimise Palmerston the North urbanroad network and develoto is JTS the of recommendation Another Refer Appendixto 2 for detailfurther on JTS the actions. is of resolution theincluding commuter flows, in increases predicted for cater to need will North Palmerton and Feilding between connections improved Furthermore, Thi Island. North the of Palmerston planned increase in this zone rest highlightedin section2.1.8 to the locally access to good regionally providing and network road North efficient an via Industrial for East planned North the is of Zone growth future that ensuring is issue, this to importance of However, previousis discusseda havebeenin implicationsthis for The future. the into nowand this for effectively cater to need will city the around and in network strategic the and industry distribution fut the into adequately managed be to experiencingwillarterialcongestionofare andpeak times this numberneed keyroutesat some A the resolvingproposals identified earlier, a number have direct a relationship withissue. this for solutions of number JTS a the recommend of purpose to the was Again, authorities. territorial two the between and in links transport key the of some on pressure increased be will there that is growth population this of effect likely The identifiedare in theStudy are that not currentlyincluded in thePlan that projects includeany to enough flexible be can it that means Plan the of process variation The marketwill keybe unlockingto anticipated growth. is This o distribution the as prosperity. network transport land the Regions in investment further include to the likely growing Region‟sin invest to the continue to likely double are Councils to place, in put aim and base agribusiness 202 by the exports agribusiness on building in advantages significant March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption period2010 safety the over road Strategy, Safety Road National The

Thecontinuedneed for improvements to road safety thein Region

2013. 8

Social cost of road crashes and injuries 2013 2013 injuries and crashes road of cost Social

upgrade of strategic routes to HPMV standard, and implementation of the Integrated the of implementation and standard, HPMV to routes strategic of upgrade

5. As the results of the Growth Study and Agribusiness Strategy are Strategy Agribusiness and Study Growth the of results the As 5.

- 2020. Its aim is to create a safe road safeacreate aimisto Its 2020.

Safer Journeys 2020, Journeys Safer r. amrtn ot‟ sgiiat n goig freight growing and significant North‟s Palmerston ure. - 2025 dns f h JS bsd n urn ln use land current on based JTS, the of ndings

8 . update report, Ministry of Transport, November November Transport, of Ministry report, update

is a strategy to guide improvements in improvements guide to strategy a is hs en eonsd hog the through recognised been has s sus ht ee dniid O the Of identified. were that issues .

sues in the Bunnythorpearea. the in sues

he estimated value of each of value estimated he systemincreasinglyof free p an integratedp an roading

f product fromproduct f Page Page sue. 78

period, 1999 to 2010, the trend was for an increase in overall injury crashes. A total of 665 of total A crashes. injury overall in increase an for was trend the 2010, to 1999 period, the In 2010. since reversed be to started also has crashes injury overallincreasing for trend The Figure 5: M orderto reduce the amount of fatalitiesin andinjuries on Regions the roads. manner coordinated a in work to continue partners safety road all that important is it therefore 34 with below seen the of trends some reversed 2014 However Region. the in injuries serious and fatalities of number the to contributes all Region our Journeys. in do we work The considered is it made, thatwork isstill required to beenreach ultimate the goala of zero road toll. have improvements While fatalities. 254 at halved almost was this thei lost people 461 2003, In 1952. in was achieved was this time last the 2011, Before fatalities. 300 under was toll road national the 2013, and 2011 both In the Since ave Communitiesat Risk and than a higher with communities identifies that significantly register Risk” at “Communities the is focus, national this with Coupled focus. emerging and continued and concern, medium concern, high of areas into them performance current where areas 13 identifies Strategy The works that approach Systems Safe a acrossall using elements of the roadsystem: roads,speeds, vehicles andusers.describes Strategy the so, do To injury. and death March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption  Someof the main contributing factors to road crashesin theRegion are: crasheswere recorded in 2010and this beenhas reducedto 563 in 2013. 

early 1950‟s when the population was far smaller and there were far fewer cars on the roads. the on cars fewer far were there and smaller far was population the when 1950‟s early 100 120 140 and rural both on average national the than regionally rate higher a at occur crashes, Intersection 20 40 60 80 0 Safer Journeys Safer urbanroads. 2009 Since the operative RLTS was adopted, there have been some big improvements in improvements big some been have there adopted, was RLTS operative the Since anawatu

2010

-

Wanganui fatal/seriousinjury crashes 2009

was introduced the national road toll has dropped to totals not seen since seen not totals to dropped has toll road national the introduced was 2011 SaferJourneys Transport Plan 2015 Transport aaiis rm ttl f 0 aa cahs n h Rgos roads, Regions the on crashes fatal 30 of total a from fatalities ae ik f rse ivlig eti cua fcos The factors. causal certain involving crashes of risk rage 2012 2013

willinvestmentguide in roadsafety until at least 2020. 2014 - 2025

mrvn te ucms dniid in identified outcomes the improving Serious injury crashes injury Serious crashes Fatal

needs to be strengthened and ranks and strengthened be to needs r lives on the nations roads; in 2013 in roads; nations the on lives r -

2014

Page Page Safer injury

79

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 was that road controlling authorities should take a „one network‟ approa network‟ „one a take should authorities controlling road that was recommendations main Taskforce‟s the of One maintenance. road of effectiveness the increase 20 In of level and appropriate service willcriticalbe during lifetime the ofan the narrowPlan. to often roads these same maintaining Therefore the conflict. sharing cause trucks may roads logging winding large and roads regions the with unfamiliar ten next the in harvest for estatedue forest large a has also that District Ruapehu the in particularly issues, same these of some exacerbate may well as traffic tourist in Increases timethis period. o tonnes million 7.9 that anticipated is it District Wanganui the In 2030. to 2020 period the in occur to expected logging forestry of amount the to due particular ren hectares 128,000 over has Region The the from journey the of kilometre priority for the future investmentof theland transport last‟network in Region the nextfor the tenyears. and „first mainte important The market. the to goods the of producer provide often roads local The districts These increasing. associatedwith themaintenance incomes of routes maintain. that have morestrategic a inter fixed to on network those of road percentage of length significant a with the ratepayersfewer and fewer across spreadgetting is asset roading maintaining the of cost and base rating access. residential small Population for catering a as well have as they products, primary Often out bring to them use to needing mai to challenges increasing face roads these manage that authorities territorial seven The centers. service and areas forestry and farmingto providing accesssuccess, economicRegion‟s the to critical are networks roading Rural 2.2.6 road safetyoutcomes. thrtraditional theroad safetypartnersallacrossmeans providePlansfor a Action Regionally, Safety Roadlocal    March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption outcomes main the of One Agency. Transport the and authorities territorial from representatives was (REG) Group Efficiency Road the Taskforce, this of Out network the will provide significant opportunities forimproving efficiency. Collaborationbetween authorities shouldencouraged be and, in somecases, joint management of    wl ad h wl py o ti, il e n su fr h agni n Rahu itit in Districts Ruapheu and Wanganui the for issue an be will this, for pay will who and ewal, Fatigueisa particular problem Stateon Highway 1 two to threehours north of Wellington. nationally. i injured or killed be likelyto morealso Motorcyclistsare involving crashes from trauma serious national of percent alcoholand/or drugs. The Region 7.7accounts forjust5.2 percentof New Zealand‟s population. for accounts Region The

11, the Government established the Road Maintenance Taskforce to identify opportunities to opportunities identify to Taskforce MaintenanceRoad the established Government the 11, 9

National Freight Demands Study 2014, Ministry of Transport of Ministry 2014, Study Demands Freight National

nrae frs hretn ad giutrl s ad oeta inc potential and use with agricultural particularly tourism traffic and network, harvesting roading rural forest Regions increased the on pressure Increasing loss in these districts is leading to a declining, and ageing, rural ratepayer base. The base. ratepayer rural ageing, and declining, a to leading is districts these in loss ee „E‟s‟, engineering,„E‟s‟,enforcementee achieving cooperateandeducation,toon positive

ti ntok ta ae prpit fr h hay vehicles heavy the for appropriate are that networks ntain 9

of exotic tree plantations intended for harvest. Pavement harvest. for intended plantations tree exotic of nance of current levels of service is the number one number the is service of levels current of nance - 2025

n this Region than would be expectedRegionwouldbethan this n

formed in 2012 which is made up of up made is which 2012 in formed f forestry will be harvested during harvested be will forestry f

lo ae nraig costs increasing face also

ch to asset management. asset to ch - districtrole. - years. Tourist years.

ess in reases Page Page

80

s

improvementsare also planne Other Plan. the of lifetime the during implemented be will services these for improvements major public of its amount on the 2014 patronage in extensivelyreviewed were services bus urban increasing increase North Palmerston to through years and recent services in stridestransport significant made has Region The increase amount the of cyclist, and pedestrian, opportunities. of lifetime the During cycling. for conducive being North Palmerston The environmentaleffects of land the transportsystem. netw transport public and cycling and walking as such transport of modes alternative of promotion the via particularly efficiency, energy Promoting p system transport waterwayscanand dust airbornebecome notif mitigatedeffectively. of the effects. wear environmental adverse the that to lead and also can projects grease effects and oil negative pads, brake other constructionLarge land. and water air, Region‟s thein up tyres,end all can surfacesroad from bitumen vehicle of from those number as such a Contaminants also are There transportemissions that contributeonly 1 about being catchments Taihape and Taumarunui comprom the only with good generally is quality air Region‟s Zealand New in quality air poor to contributor largest the are emissions Transport alternative andenergyefficient one about of use the for in increase An time. over increase to anticipated are responsible these and emissions greenhouse is system transport The 2.2.7 Plan the in section4. of component programme the in included been have projects replacement bridge these of Some the of result a As ago. years 50 deteriorating over built were which of most bridges, many has Region The ONRCin the2015 the implementing to transitioning begin will authorities territorial that expected wais It affordable Zealand. and New consistent strategic, a in network road in, the invest operate plan, and authorities maintain territorial help will classification this that hoped is It network. roading ba roads of categorising the involves This (ONRC). Classification Roading Network One the of formation the was REG the of March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption impacts the lessening to from land the transportnetwork. contribute all Carpool‟, „Lets as such website, sharing ride established Ride -

hrn, e t noml apoig ewe fins n wr clege, r hog an through or colleagues, work and friends between carpooling informal it be sharing, 2012. Envir the for Ministry Transport, of Ministry Zealand, 10 sd vr itr yt hs s agl bcue f itr etn sucs ahr than rather sources heating winter of because largely is this yet winter, over ised

Mitigatingadverse environmentaleffects from the pae Hat ad i Pluin n e Zaad td: elh eerh oni o New of Council Research Health Study: Zealand New in Pollution Air and Health Updated

condition of the bridges, many of them are due for renewal in the 2015 the in renewal for due are them of many bridges, the of condition

- 18NLTP period.

- Manawatu sub area is relatively geographically flat which lends itself to be to itself lends which flat geographicallyrelatively is area sub Manawatu

Transport Plan 2015 Transport e o tefntos hy efr a pr f n nertd national integrated an of part as perform they functions the on sed

d to d to move commutersout of private vehicles onto public transport. transportmodes is needed combatto transportemissions.

- 2025 - 2%ofPM orks is a key contributor to mitigating the adverse the mitigating to contributor key a is orks

the Plan a number of projects are planned to to planned are projects of number a Plan the - it o Nw eln‟ ciae changing climate Zealand‟s New of fifth onment and New Zealand Transport Agency, Agency, Transport Zealand New and onment

10 Runoff from earthworks can end up in up end can earthworks from Runoff

particulatesin these catchments.

yl lns n ra aes The areas. urban in lanes cycle

regionaltransport system

- 15 and it is planned that planned is it and 15 10 . However the the However . - y throughout y 2025 period. 2025

roduces. Page Page

81

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 ulig e sbiiin wt n togt o multi for dependence thought no with subdivisions new Building network. transport the of effects the mitigate also can planning use land integrated and Effective newerofform hybrid a are vehicleshybrid in plug or electric fullywhereas roads the on place common now are vehicle hybrid electric / Fuel well. as contributor growing, yet small, a also is fuels alternative Promoting March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption , and , thus, more greenhouse gasemissions produced.

thatmay emerge during lifetime the ofPlan. this - 2025

- modal access or services can lead to car car to lead can services or access modal

Page Page 82

The obje The changing to adaptable be to system circumstancesand transport to respond to the needs of the Regionsvaried communities.the for need the recognises also It travel. car on need the acknowledges choicedegreearound.ofoptionsandhavelimitedIt flexibility,whilegetting others high for havea whomof some residents,Region‟s the of needs transportvaried the recognisesobjective fifth The personal and safety about concerns securi of because declining is cycling) and walking (i.e. transport othermodes of some use of the and Region the to cost socialeconomic and huge havea crashes objecti fourth the of focus The strategic the of part forms also network network.rail the as network, road the on solely not but network, vehi One to maximum uptonnes take 50 needa permit to on loading).focuses It the delivery efficient the of (heavy the as implementation such 50Max Plan, and draft HPMV the Classification, of Roading lifetime the Network over network road the of delivery the on impact third The LTMA the of purpose the with consistent and thecurrent GPS. also is and Region the for corridors. issue transport relevant a national still to is This connecting and growth economic supporting on heavily focused carried direction strategic the capture objectives two first The effective,efficient, and safe land transportsystem in public the interest. fewer objectiveschangeLTMA nowthe the in an becausethethat Plan of to requires contribute to In operative RLTS. the objectivesof the from greatly differ not objectivesdo These      are: They Funding. Transport Land on PolicyStatement Government draft the with consistent are and an either address to LTMA the by required is objective orpolicy theof Plan. TheRTC has chosen to link them toobjectives. component programme the in identified „opera project the in and Plan identified draft priorities the strategic of component The „strategy‟ Plan. draft the thebetween connection strong a is there so objectives of the to back link to required are element 2.4 section programme the in on to focus on focus to will Region the areas key out set address the already Issues andidentified lead directly thestrategicto These priorities that RTC the adopted. been have objectives key Five 2.3 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption these of purpose the to documents. contribute would objective each how analyses below matrix The do. to draft been have objectives identified The     

ty, whetherty, realor perceived. Aresilient and multi modal transport system. Asafe land transportsystem; and Bettertargeted investment fora strategic network; Enhance thestrategic advantage of the freighthub Enhanced efficiencyfreight across Region; the Objectives

ctives identified broadly align with the LTMA as well as the GPS, which they are required are they which GPS, the as well as LTMA the with align broadlyidentified ctives

objective focuses on a number of major work streams that are ongoing and will have an an have will and ongoing are that streams work major of number a on focuses objective

for increased choice of personal transport in order to reduce dependencereduce to order in transport personal of choice increased for Transport Plan 2015 Transport e aey hs las en fcs f rvos LS. Road RLTSs. previous of focus a been always has safety, ve

ed so that they contribute to the purpose of the LTMA the of purpose the to contribute they that so ed - 2025

ie pr o te ln Frhroe each Furthermore, Plan. the of part tive‟

for centralfor the North Island; over from the operative RLTS that RLTS operative the from over

ls ht o not do that cles fact, there are there fact,

Page Page

wants 83

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 modal system transport and multi resilient land A safe system transport A network strategic a for targeted investment North Better Island central the for hub freight the the for advantage strategic Enhance the Region across efficiency freight Enhanced Objectives March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

Contributes to to Contributes purpose LTMA √ √ √ √ public √ the interest in land system transport safe and efficient effective,

√ √ √ √ √ productivity and growth Economic GPS outcomes

- 2025

√ √ √ √ money Value for √

√ √ √ √ Road safety √

Page Page 84

basedon the functionthey perform roads of classification a is which ONRC, ONRC the implementing begin will authorities the territorial all and produced the 2015 the government this From maintenance. ofroad of delivery result the local in efficiencies direct a and As Agency Zealand. New Transport throughout output of degrees varying were there that perception a to response a in country, the throughout renewals and operations maintenance, perf improve and money for value drive to order in 2012 in established was REG The used roadsto metal roads. lightly some return the to having of position real very the sustain in now are rura authorities Territorial ratepayers. Regions to the that of means many bases for service rating of rural level current declining Furthermore, thinly. more spread be to than Less hadhas dollar maintenance road the about. that meant hasroads Regionsincr the renewing and maintaining the come and haveRoNS the constraints to commitment funding capital large these revenue,the NLTF why anticipated reasons of number a are There land the throughout constraints roadingasset provided meetsthe community‟s funding expectations. of increasing under Becauseare authorities controlling road all sector, Plan. transport the of deliverable important most Mainta 2.4.1 establishingIn thepriorities theRTC has considered: themes runningthrough previousof iterations of RLTS. the extensions are priorities identified the of number contribut A and 2.3. and 2.2 issues chapters in transportidentified land the address must priorities The wishes to the Transport Agencywhen compiles it theNLTP. Regions the of picture clear a provide should then This years. ten next the over invest to wishes clearer providesa this as priorities the rank to chosen has RTC The a given be will priorities strategic the addressing projects higherranking thanthose do that not. as Plan, the of aspect transport „operational‟ land the priori in these is investment It Plan. guide the of will duration the priorities for network strategic identified The Plan. ten the first of the for years priorities transport of statement a include must Plan the that requires LTMA The 2.4 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption be can logs safely outcomesare metin Plan.this and safety road and growth economic efficiently ensure will tourists and howforestry by used roads of onmaintenance how bearing and significant market to a transported have will districts the of some Regions in traffic tourism and forestry increasing of pressure the explained 2.2.6 Section As

     

nn te xsig odn ast t t cret ee o srie a be pirtsd s the as prioritised been has service of level current its at asset roading existing the ining Strategic Strategic Priorities Strategic Priority1 Theissues and objectives identifiedin thePlan ExistingRegional priorities Nationalprioritie

s -

thepurpose of LTMA the and existing the and draft GPS

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

Efficientroad maintenance delivery and

aey orss a taes ioae rrl od. Appropriate roads. rural isolated traverse can tourists safely – inthe overall national picture.

the operative the RLTS and RLTProgramme

- 2025

ties that link the „strategic‟ element with the the with element „strategic‟ the link that ties

ras te pn i sra ars fewer across spread is spend the roads, l

- 18 NLTP, the Transport Agency Transport the NLTP, 18

direction of where the Regionwhere the of direction o drs ad implement and address to

t te betvs already objectives the to e pressure to ensure that the that ensure to pressure

easing cost of cost easing ormance in ormance Page Page 85

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 recent years works have been undertaken to improve its safety and resilience to weather related weather to resilience and safety its improve to undertaken been c have works intermittentyears recent to prone stretch windy and „Paraparas‟ narrow the a as known been highway traditionally the has of part That closed. is north 1 Highway State that times the taking of H State capable is Trestle Whirikino the that Ensuring freight. overweightvehicles willbe tokey unlocking the routes economicpotential. of carriage the to cost overweigh means Trestle Whirikino the of state current the as route HPMV a not is south 1 Highway State Currently two the are that Auckland and portslargest by volume in thecountry. Tauranga of Ports the to Region the for connector key a is north Hig State date. to proceeded have projects these of few priority, higher a having Waikato inprojects other to Howeverdue Region. Waikato the inimprovements of number a advocatedfor Waikato and Region Horizons the in highway the of part the between north 1 Highway State of standard differing The Howe 1. Highway State the Otakito Levin section is2019 of part of completion for timeframe this current The away. years on of number a variabilitystill is RoNS the time in of completion addressed travel be and will safety issues improve alignment to and safety order major RoNS, the of announcement the With it Plan, capable of carryingHPMV‟s. the of lifetime the during road on carried economic enable to andeast south enough sufficient capacity a at are g network transport land the of arteries the that Region the to importance vital of is it Strategy, Agribusiness and Study Growth Regional Region and Government‟s the With north of standard The 2.4.2   Linksto objectives: of lowering a as safety road in part important an roadingstandards becan contributing a factorin road crashes. plays maintenance Road trend. downward en to be will challenge The years. preceding ten past over markedly the improved have priority outcomes this safety Road of system. component transport land key the a of deliverables also is safety mind in this With March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption and concerns these of some alleviated has standard HPMV to Road Saddle this the However, of upgrade Region‟s. both between The (SH3), flows Regions. Gorge the freight Manawatu between route of HPMV a lot of absence the a by constrained for largely is destination connectivity / origin key a is is 3 and 2 SHsvia BayHawkes the Connectivity to events,and any ongoing measuresarising thatuphold this resilience are supported.   rowth. This is even more important for our Region as it serves as the crossroadsthenorthasservesit formuch importantRegion even moreouras is for This rowth.

Asafe land transportsystem Bettertargeted investment Strategic Priority2 ighway 4 also connects the Waikato and Horizons Regions. It plays an important role in role important an plays It Regions. Horizons and Waikato the connects also 4 ighway - er, oee 21 rvre mn o te oiie an eprecd n the in experienced gains positive the of many reversed 2014 however years, -

westmajoritytraffic Asthe lowerof isstillin Island.freightbeNorth the to forecast t HPMV‟s have to take a detour via Foxton viadetour a take to haveHPMV‟s t

ein hs lo og en cnen fte ein Hrzn hs long has Horizons Region. the of concern a been long also has Regions - south and east and south

n h rr isac ta i i coe i o cnen hwvr recent a however concern, of is closed is it that instance rare the in

Improvedconnectivity keyof strategicroutes fora strategic network - 20.

‟s current focus on economic growth, in particular through the through particular in growth, economic on focus current ‟s

- west connectors has long been a concern to the Region. the to concern a been long has connectors west sure that 2014 was a blip on an otherwise positive otherwise an on blip a was 2014 that sure - 2025 important to both Regions. The Port of NapierofPort The Regions. both to important s motn ta te e srtgc ots are routes strategic key the that important is

- Shannon Road, adding distance and distance adding Road, Shannon

s hs om oe f h key the of one forms this as losure through slips. In slips. through losure

Page Page hway 1 1 hway ver 86 -

willimportantbe ens to rail onto critical time not are that commodities of use theEncouraging relevant. and reliable more become to times travel for and lines, existing its fromrevenue and tonnage the increase now to is Newclosureofin the thePlymouth of eventlink alternativerail Stratford the of KiwiR the on Iwi KaiNew Plymouth at and Gorge Manawatu the on tunnels lighting day on work years ten past the In lines. rail important Islandthree of North crossroads the the as lines: lies region the 2.2.1, Northsection lower in central highlighted the As in location Island. strategic its given Region the to important also are links Rail unsealed. remains route this of of these two Districts. 12km However, e the therefore and tourism, for boost a provide would route this of sealing Districts. of Completion Ruapehu and Stratford between Highwa State east the on produced milk coast. the of most process the to when upgraded reduced is be facility processing will milk movements Pahiatiua these milk of is some th although west Hawera from in to plant rail east dairy Whareroa from by product transported the is of that and Much Bridge product Tangahoe the projects. 5); Section realignment (refer Plan Overbridge this Normanby in supported are this address to Region standard. HPMV at not currently is Taranaki southern in Hawera and Waitotara between route the although standard, appropriate an of largely is Taranaki to SH3 2 Highway Programme2012 State on Hill Manawatu and Ha Whakaruatapu connecting as such connectivity, safer and better ensure to aim that projects Other SH3. to roads local these designating and upgrading ultimately road local of network a through city the bypasses informally currently traffic and North Palmerston through passes also 3 Highway State movementand are supportedin thisPlan. fully are Taranaki and proje outlines 5 Section Bay Hawkes of Plan‟s be the to and work Plan, proposed this of Examplessupported. of lifetime function. the their in to appropriate included standards the to time, t over 3, and 2 SHs of importance strategic the of Because increased the resilience connection. of the March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption   Linksto objectives see to wishes Region the projects what highlights further advancedthatwill improve connectivity these on strategic routes. activities) regional (Inter 5 Section  

ail‟s recent focus on reviewing the viability of under of viability the reviewing on focus recent ail‟s Enhance thestrategic advantage forthe freighthub centralfor the North Island Enhanced efficiencyfreight across Region the

4 (h Frotn iha) s o fntoig s n mrig ors route tourist emerging an as functioning now is Highway) Forgotten (The 43 y - ks a, ae en doae truh h oeaie einl ad Transport Land Regional operative the through advocated been have Bay, wkes Martonline enabledhas Hi

- khkr Ln i rcn yas Ti hs en te os f n important an of loss the meant has This years. recent in Line Okahukura - 15.

:

uring thatrail connectivity improved is over lifetime the of Plan. the

cts that are identified as inter as identified are that cts an rn, h Gisborne the Trunk, Main Transport Plan 2015 Transport s. The outcomes of the JTS aim to address this through this address to aim JTS the of outcomes The s.

-

Cube containersto pass on the lines. Oig ad ogun rcsig aiiis o the to facilities processing Longburn and Oringi e - 2025 - amrtn ot ad e Plymouth New and North Palmerston

- regionally significant that will support HPMV support will that significant regionally e T spot ogig improvements ongoing supports RTC he - utlised lines has meant the mothballing the meant has lines utlised - Marto

w poet i te Taranaki the in projects Two n line. The focus for KiwiRailThe forfocus line. n

conomy, - Page Page Marton 87

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 2.4.3 motn rl wlig n ccig a hv i pstv eooi, oil n environmental and social economic, positive in have can cycling and walking role important low Lifestyl apparent. been has Horizons and Zealand New throughout years 20 past the over cycling and walking in decline The 2.4.4   Linksto objectives: are Strategy Agribusiness and aligned. Study Growth Regional the Plan, the that important is It change. long onimpacts some have may which land the outputsfrom of value the maximiseinve will Strategy Agribusiness and Study Growth Regional the of outcomes The use land that sure inefficientuse of transportresources thatis difficult and expensive to mitigate ata later date. Making growth. planning, or fut considers experiencing,planning are Region the in areas rural the urban on conflicts particular also are there con and network have transport as will trends important demographic more Changing become will North Palmerston in Health services, PalmerstonNorth Hospitalassumes the MidCentralresponsibility morespecialisedof services. bus at commuter of services form health the in a for Even be shuttles. may health or vehicles services community These communities. smaller these of vibrancy the retaining to key be will services transport public appropriate is there that Ensuring keyservices, such as health, postaland banking, urbanisedhave been graduallyreduced an more becomes population the As communities. rural Region‟s the for particularly im be will It less with habits driving car in change vehiclea ownership and fewerdrivenVKT person.per be also may There urban. more becoming and ageing demographic Current trendsshowinghouseholdsare that gettingsmaller are population and the is   March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 5 il norg pors o ipoig ra ccig ewrs o cmue cycling. commuter or networks, cycling Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption urban improving on progress encourage will 25 2015 GPS the tourism, cycle and recreational on is network cycle national the of focus the While been since has This compleme that Rides‟. Routes‟ Touring „Great „Cycle of flagship„Great Rides‟. of series series a a include of to constructionexpanded the through benefits these some ofreap to order 2009inHaerenga, in Nga was created NationalCycle The Trail, outcomes.     -

cost vehicles have contributed to this decline. However, the Government has recognised the recognised has Government the However, decline. this to contributed have vehicles cost

Asafe land transportsystem Aresilient, multi Asafe land transportsystem Bettertargeted investment fora strategic network impacts of land usechange Strategic Priority3 Strategic Priority4

otn drn te ieie f h Pa t esr ta acs t srie i secure, is services to access that ensure to Plan the of lifetime the during portant

ure transport needs is important to ensure that the Region is not locked into locked not is Region the that ensure to important is needs transport ure modalland transport network

e changes have played a part, and the convenience and availabilityof convenienceand the and part, a played have changes e Increased focusonpedestrians and cycling and change demographic to respond proactively and for Plan

- ieal ipcs n o pol ue h land the use people how on impacts siderable 2025

community the size of Wanganui, access to access Wanganui, of size the community

- ra prpey hr the where periphery urban t n epn o the on expand and nt

d centralised. stigate ways to to ways stigate

- term land useland term Page Page

88 -

2.4.5 access will become more acute as populations decline and age, and services are centralised in centralised are largerlocalities. services and age, and decline populations as acute more become will access rural of issue The communities. these for justified be tr may solutions transport innovative public However scheduled traditional justify to between difficult is servicing It services commuter the net and bus years urban few Wanganui‟s last PalmerstonNorth andFeilding, Levin andMarton areall experiencing varying degrees of growth. the availability. over funding growth to experienced subject introduced be will improvements complete, is review the once and, layout network future the determine will 2014 in in to commuters peak Increased organisations. past the these of over staff and studentsservices for transport accessto “free” SchemegivingUnlimited Access networks transport public its had have North in Palmerston in Services decade. growth significant experienced has Region The the mobility, of loss duringthe lifetime of this Plan. related the and population the of ac agingof provision projected a With towns. of those in impacts the resident remain to communities these reducing of residents enabling communities, isolated more Region‟s‟ as p wellalso transport Public made. as being trips vehicle network through roading services the transport private fewer from realisedbe environmental alsobenefitsto are There times. peak at congestion public on of improvements network capital can its networks costlier transport grow public Growing to affordable. priority are that a improvements it considers Region The   Linksto objectives: ongoingan programme infrastructure of improvements in orderto facilitate growth. trips as well as trips, short for methods healthy and convenient as cycling and walking promote to continue to plans Region The projects, to pressuretake other off transport networks. from earmarked beennow 2012 Programme Transport Land Regional operative the in deferred previouslyprojects that hoped is It and employment markets, to amou access better of provision businessareas. alsoIt improves capacityexistingon the roads through mode shiftlessensand so the through productivity and growth cyc and walking Encouraging March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption Linksto objectives: Regions the residents. servi its all review regularly to continue will Horizons provided. be will service of levels what and services transportpublic provide will Region the how detail in out sets (RPTP) Plan Transport Public Regional The  

- ntof maintenance and renewalneeded. 15 can be implemented in this timeframe. A further $100 million from outside the NLTF has NLTF the outside from million$100 further A timeframe. this inimplemented be can 15 Asafe land transportsystem Aresilient, multi modalland transport network Strategic Priority5 cessible and affordable public transport networks will become even more important more even become willnetworks transport public affordable and cessible

crease their use of public transport in Palmerston North. A review of the network the of review A North. Palmerston in transport public of use their crease Thisis discussedSection in 2.4.3. ces to ensure they are providing efficient, accessible and affordable services for servicesfor affordable andaccessible efficient, providing are they ensure to ces

the Future Investment Fund to kick Investmentto Future Fund the

Transport Plan 2015 Transport Efficient,accessible and affordablepublic transport networks

ig n ra, n bten ra, etr cn upr economic support can centers urban, between and urban, in ling connecting main urban centres, over the life of the Plan, including Plan, the of life the over centres, urban main connecting - ie evcs nrdcd n 00 a as poie a art for carrot a provided also has 2010 in introduced services time

- 2025

rovides vital social connections for some of the of some for connections social vital rovides significant growth due to the Massey and UCOL UCOL and Massey the to due growth significant

npr srie wti salr settlements. smaller within services ansport

- start a number of key urban cycling urban key of number a start eue rsue for pressure reduce

ok a also has work Page Page

89

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2    Links River to Mountains the linking project A demand. projected Cycleway thefrom River Whanganui Road to City Wanganui isprioritised in Section 4of the Plan. the support to adequate is trails Trai Cycle Zealand New the form that expected increases indemandof completioncycle in the Asa result from touring routes tourism of clipwalkway on particularlycycleway / isprioritised in Sectionof 4 Plan. the vehicles, between conflicts in increase the heavywestvehicles / and pedestrian east heading is visitors in increase this with Coupled recreational of number a to Due inwalks NewZealand bythe NZ Automobile Association. Gorge. T recorded. were Manawatuvisitors 15,000 just 2006, the is tourism ten past the over developments of area emerging An run which of both 40, Route and 43 Highway State between Ruapehu Dist are benefits tourism reap could that Plan this of course extensions the sealover completionthroughof upgraded be could that routes Other of form of reputation popular Regionthe the as a d enhance only increasingly can routes these an of sealing the is and Region, users, the in activity campervan tourist particularly camping, Freedom to expected Napier are Region. the roads and these Road of River Both Whanganui sealed. the years, few past the In Region‟ssmaller communities that relytourists.on tour of network appropriate an providing so years coming the in grow to expected are Region the in tourists of numbers The RuapehuDistricts, with domestictourism being touri moreimportant Palmerstonto North. International routes. tourist visible and economic provides thereforedefined clearly of and network a Region, through movement the their encourages and visit opportunities, development to visitors encourages it as priority a is This 2.4.6   March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption     

Aresilient, multi modalland transport network Asafe land transportsystem Bettertargeted investment fora strategic network Asafe land transportsystem Aresilient, multi modalland transport toobjectives: Strategic Priority6

estination for this ofform tourist activity.

rictand the TaranakiRegion.

s rue i iprat n otrn eooi got i sm o the of some in growth economic fostering in important is routes ism Anappropriate network of - years the Gorge now attracts almost 100,000 annual visitors. In visitors. annual 100,000 almost attracts now Gorge the years

l, the Region should ensure that access to and from these from and to access that ensure should Region the l,

he Gorge walk is now regarded as one of the top ten top the of one as regarded now is walk Gorge he m s atclry motn fr h Wnau and Wanganui the for important particularly is sm - 2025 ly n nraig oe s ors rue i the in routes tourist as role increasing an play

s / cyclists using the Gorge. A project to buildto cyclistsAprojectGorge. a / the s using

tourismroutes

- ahp ras ae been have roads Taihape

Page Page 90

2. 1. Measures: 1.1.5 1.1.4 1.1.3 1.1.2 1.1.1 BY and social educational, business, to access recreationalservices forthe Region’s residents andbusinesses suitable provides network road the Ensure Policy1.1 2.5.1 planmonitoring to gaugethe Plans effectiveness. the with assist will This achieved. being are priorities and objectives the well how measure to us to occur to needs that planning the and achiev decisions direct and guide will that policies out set will and priorities strategic thein out set has it what achieve will RTC the howon sectionfocuses This issu the outlined have Plan the of chapters Previous 2.5 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 3.

practices. in costs Reduced Completion ofrenewals and maintenance programmesachieved within budget. Programmetimeframe. 2015 the in Classification Roading Network One the Implement e the principles. It will also set out measures, or key performance indicators, that will allow allow will that indicators, performance key or measures, out set also will It principles. the e Strategic Priority1 MeasuresPolicies and toachievePriorities the

upr claoain ewe ra cnrlig uhrte i odr o maximise to order in authorities controlling road investment (TerritorialAuthorit between collaboration Support (where and maintain Plan, the (TransportAgency and TerritorialAuthorities). through authorities, controlling ne road that Ensuring Authorities). (Territorial appropriate where traffic road local and arterial of separation the Encouraging and communities(Territorial Authorities). Transport Providingandlocal maintaining roads the thatcaterappropriately needs the bus of for and Authorities (Territorial Classification Roading Agency). Network One the and Maintaining

cessary) improve existing transport links into rural areas to facilitate economic growth economic facilitate to areas rural into links transport existing improve cessary)

renewing roads in a manner consistent with their function as identified in identified as functiontheir with consistent manner a in roads renewing od aneac atvte truh mrvd se management asset improved through activities maintenance road

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

Efficientroad maintenance delivery and iesand the TransportAgency). - 2025

es, the objectives and the strategic priorities. strategic the and objectives the es,

-

18 National Land Transport Land National 18

Page Page inesses 91

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 BY intra efficientsafe, ensure networktostrategic transport the improvenecessary as and Maintain Policy2.1 2.5.2 3. 2. 1. Measures: 1.2.5 1.2.4 1.2.3 1.2.2 1.2.1 BY Ensure continuous improvementin regional road safety Policy1.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 2.1.2 2.1.1

-

Reduced the of good lifetime the during Plan. year on ensuring year declining crashes road Plans fatal and serous of Number Action Safety Road District implement coordinationbetween districtson common road safety issues. and review Regularly andinter

KiwiRail). projects transport identifiedaddress causes of road TransportAgency, Horizons Regional Council, ACC, District Health Boards). ACC,District Health Boards). safety road for statistics) crash road interventions in identified (as risk highest of areas the Targeting eintos n aporae lnig rcse (rnpr Aec, Territorial Agency, (Transport processes planning through network appropriate transport Authorities,KiwiRail). strategic the and of functions designations future and current the Protecting Agency, (Transport Study Transport Joint 2010 the TerritorialAuthorities). of option strategic preferred the to Undertakinga programme maintain anddevelopstrategic to road network the to give effect Authorities, TransportAgency, Horizons, ACC, District Health Boards). road safer i approach systems safe a Utilising Strategic Priority2 implementing when considered fully are security personal and safety that Ensuring which activities enforcement and education engineering, Plan the through Prioritising r a of development the Promoting

annualsocial cost ofcrashes. - regionalaccessibility and

sr, ae vhce, ae ras n sfr pes Plc, Territorial (Police, speeds safer and roads safer vehicles, safer users, (Police, Territorial Authorities, Transport Agency, Horizons Regional Council, Regional Horizons Agency, Transport Authorities, Territorial (Police, Tasot gny Trioil uhrte, oios einl Council, Regional Horizons Authorities, Territorial Agency, (Transport

Improvedconnectivity keyof strategicroutes

crashesin the Region(Regional TransportCommittee). vlig cmie pcae f esrs targeting measures of package combined a nvolving

linkswith national transport corridors

a sft culture safety oad - 2025

Plc, ertra Authorities, Territorial (Police,

Page Page 92

Support the provision of effective connections to the Region’s principal economic growth economic principal Region’s the to connections effective of provision the Support Policy2.2 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. Measures: 2.1.7 2.1.6 2.1.5 2.1.4 2.1.3 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 2.2.1 BY and productivity areas

Increasedtonnage movedby rail. existingand future networksare avoided or on development effectsof ensure to proposals use land reviewsand Plan District on Submit inter having as identified activities on improvementssignificance. for advocate and Identify through order priority identified inPlan. routes strategic on realignments safety Implement scheme to subject Study, growth and facilitateseconomic development. North Palmerston Transport the in network Joint transport strategic the affected with consultation of further and reports assessment recommendations the Implement and implement identified the improvements. investi Complete

te hzrs ad ht hr ae vial atraie o aporae tnad o this for standard appropriate of alternatives function (TransportAgency, Territorial Authorities, availableKiwiRail). are there that and hazards, other is networktransport strategic the Ensuring prdn rrl od ad rde a ncsay o ae fr commercial, for cater to necessary as forestryand tourism traffic( TransportAgency, TerritorialAuthorities). bridges and roads rural Upgrading (TransportAgency, TerritorialAuthorities and KiwiRail). inter effective and efficient most ensure the to possible, where modes, transport other and rail of integration the Encouraging strate management techniques(Transport Agency, TerritorialAuthorities). the of capacity existing the Maximising (TransportAgency, Regional Councils, Territorial Authorities). inter strengthen and identify to implementation and development Workin (TransportAgency, TerritorialAuthorities). network roading strategic the on intensification use land of effects negative the Minimising

wt nihorn Rgos hog ter einl ad rnpr Plan Transport Land Regional their through Regions neighbouring with g

gations of necessary improvements to the RoNS between Levin and Otaki and Levin between RoNS the to improvements necessary of gations

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

-

n intra and - 2025

mitigated. resilient to disruption from adverse weather and weatheradverse disruptionfrom to resilient

i tasot ewr b efcet network efficient by network transport gic - einl oeet f rih ad people and freight of movement regional -

aaau u ae ctr fr future for caters area sub Manawatu

communities, to ensure that the that ensure to communities,

- regional links and routes and links regional

agricultural, - regional Page Page the 93

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 2.3.6 2.3.5 2.3.4 2.3.3 2.3.2 2.3.1 BY Support Policy2.3 Measures: 2.2.3 2.2.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption Measures: 2.3.7

2. 1.

nuig h aalblt o sial ln t fcltt ti ( this facilitate to land suitable of availability the ensuring and documents,planning regional and local in distribution freight of needs the Considering Authorities,KiwiRail). inter effective Z and efficient most the New encourage to possible, where modes, throughout of integration the Supporting freight of distribution efficient the in ( role major Region‟s of Council,Territorial (Ministry Region Regional Horizons the Industries, Primary infor Ministry Employment, and development Innovation Business, economic further encourage to actions identify Regional the Undertake Agency, TerritorialAuthorities). (Transport appropriate where traffic road local and arterial of separation the Encouraging rmtn ad rvdn ifatutr ta mtgts des evrnetl effects environmental adverse mitigates that infrastructure resulting from the transportsystem, suc providing and Promoting alterna available disruptionof freight flows( are there that other and and weather hazards, adverse from disruption to resilient are corridors freight that Ensuring where appropriate network safe a protecting and Establishing KiwiRail). ( appropriate as modes, transport between freight of transfer the for facilities provisionof the Supporting Authorities,Horizons Regional mlmn te eomnain o te einl rwh taey n Central and Strategy Growth Regional the of recommendations AgribusinessStrategy, where appropriate. the Implement Increased GDPper capita the in Region. Planning, maintaining and developing transport corridors to support and encourage the the encourage and support to corridors transport developing and maintaining Planning, TransportAgency

the efficientthe and effective movement freightof within andthrough theRegion

rnpr Agency Transport -

n intra and

, , TerritorialAuthorities, KiwiRail). ( Authorities) TransportAgency

Growth Study and Central New Zealand Agribusiness Strategy to Strategy Agribusiness Zealand New Central and Study Growth - TransportAgency einl oeet f rih ( freight of movement regional

Council). Trioil uhrte, oios einl Council, Regional Horizons Authorities, Territorial , , , TerritorialAuthorities). - h asstock truck effluent disposal sites.

2025

, TerritorialAuthorities, KiwiRail). vehicles‟, motor productivity „high for routes of

ie o aporae tnad o minimise to standard appropriate of tives

rnpr Agency Transport

rnpr Agency Transport

Territorial , Territorial ,

Page Page ealand

94

3.2.3 3.2.2 3.2.1 BY Region Encourage Policy3.2 3.1. 3.1.3 3.1.2 3.1.1 BY Toensure landuse planningrecognises potential impacton existing transport systems Policy of land usechange impacts and change demographic to respond proactively and for Plan 3 Priority Strategic 4. 3. 2. 1. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 1. Measures:

Regional the Land TransportPlan. Contribute to the reviewdistrict of and regional planning documents ensureto alignment with ofNumber newbusinesses locatingin the freight hub. Increasing Increasedpayload vehicle per tonnes, in by mode. North the in identified Island Stock TruckEffluent Strategy. facilities effluent truck stock proposed of implementation Complete 3.1 nuig rih ad ors flows ( tourist and freight Ensuring and strategies ( plans use land with consistent are which services and projects transport Developing documents ( in protected and identified are corridorstransport future and current that Ensuring

doaig o te eiw f iiu prig eurmns n itit ln ad the and plans of cost district true TransportCommittee). the in reflect requirements to pricing parking parking minimum of implementation of review the for Advocating to reduce need the to travel(TerritorialAuthorities). community of establishment the Promoting severaltransport modes, assuch along bus routes(Territorial Authorities). via accessibility high with corridors or areas in density housing urban increased Promoting public and cycling walking, for provision transportservices, consistent with relevantbest practice includesguidance development use land new Ensuring

TransportAgency

effective integration of transport and land use planning in growth areas of the of areas growth in planning use land and transport of integration effective

numberof high productivity vehicles high on productivity vehiclemotor routes. TransportAgency

TransportAgency

, , TerritorialAuthorities). Transport Plan 2015 Transport

, Territorial , Authorities). , , TerritorialAuthorities).

r tkn no con drn pann processes planning during account into taken are - 2025

facilities in new areas of development in order in development of areas new in facilities

akn poiin (Regional provision parking (TerritorialAuthorities).

planning Page Page

95

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 1. Measures: 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 BY Encouragethe uptake of walkingand cycling transportas modes and forrecreation Policy4 Strategic Priority4 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 4. 3. 2.

Decrease in tonnesof CO Increasedpopulation densityin PalmerstonNorth and Wanganui. and urban growth. withCollaborationte Advocatingon District Plan reviews plan changes/ landon use proposals. Maintain percentagereduce / ofhousehold consumption expenditureon transport. Reduction in Increaselevel investmentof in walkingand cycling facilities. Increaseduptake ofwalking and cycling counts. education safety locations. cycling and pedestrian Undertake and thePureora Ruapehu the of construction Complete

Council,Territorial Authorities). (Horizons Region the in recreation and tourism in cycling of role the Promoting appropriate where cycleways and walkways ( recreational promoting and Developing bus at parks bike as such modes, terminalsand cycle carrierson buses between transfer enable which facilities Providing RegionalCouncil, District Health Boards). and programmes, change behaviour travel ed and promotional through cycling and walking Encouraging ( standards appropriate to facilities Agency cycling and walking current Maintaining ( appropriate where cycling, and walking safe for caters that infrastructure new Providing TransportAgency TransportAgency

, , TerritorialAuthorities).

5

- yearvehicle kilometres travelledrolling average in urbanareas. Increased focusonpedestrians and cycling -

Ongarue CentralNorth Island RailTrail. rritorial authorities on walking and cycling strategies, newdevelopmentscyclingstrategies, and walking rritorial on authorities , , TerritorialAuthorities). , ucational activitiesucational TerritorialAuthorities). 2

emitted domesticfrom transport per capita.

- (Horizons Re - Whanganui Pathways Whanganui ( 2025 Transport Agency Transport

gionalCouncil, TerritorialAuthorities). rgams n eetd high selected in programmes

, Territorial Authorities, HorizonsAuthorities, Territorial ,

-

Ngā Ara Tūhono cycleway Tūhono Ara Ngā

Transport Regional

Page Page - risk 96

2. 1. Measures: 5.1.8 5.1.7 5.1.6 5.1.5 5.1.4 5.1.3 5.1.2 5.1.1 BY Promotethe increased use ofpublic transport Policy5.1 Strategic Priority5 5. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 5. 4. 3.

mrv acs ad oiiy o rsdns n ml tws n rrl ra (Horizons areas rural and towns small in residents for RegionalCouncil and Transp mobility and access cost improve and innovative developing and Investigating servic of level high a maintain to necessary and appropriate where measures priority bus Providing (HorizonsRegional Council, TerritorialAuthorities and TransportAgency). Developin Agency). including all, for affordable Transport and and Authorities Territorial Council, Regional accessible(Horizons options limited with those is system transport public the that Ensuring Agency). users, car current for commuters(HorizonsparticularlyCouncil,Territor Regionalfor choice of mode the as centres urban in transport public Promoting urban areasand wherebetween centres (HorizonsRegional Council and TransportAgency). services transport public effective cost reliable, frequent, Providing commuter on and areas urban in buses on carriers serv cycle of provision the Investigate services between centres. pro the Investigate and North Maintain existingrural services, and where Palmerston feasible,introduce new services. in improvements terminal bus Wanganui. into investigations Complete Completea first transportcomponent of the Plan. publicthe implement to (RPTP) Plan Transport PublicRegional the implement Reviewand th services rail passenger current investigating opportunitiesimproved for services (HorizonsRegional Council) of retention the Supporting and majornew facilities (TerritorialAuthorities and TransportAgency). subdivisions residential in facilities and routes transport public for providing and Planning

ices between centres.

e (TerritorialAuthorities and TransportAgency).

hg qaiy asne tasot nrsrcue n prpit locations appropriate in infrastructure transport passenger quality high g

Efficient,accessible and affordablepublic transport networks principles review Palmerston the of North urban services. iin f yl crir o bss n ra aes n o commuter on and areas urban in buses on carriers cycle of vision Transport Plan 2015 Transport

ortAgency).

- 2025

- fetv pbi tasot ouin to solutions transport public effective

ial Authorities and Transportand Authorities ial og te ein and Region the rough

prpit in appropriate

Page Page

97

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 6.1 BY Cater for theprovision clearlyof defined tourism routes Policy6 Strategic Priority6 3. 2. 1. Measures: 5.2.3 5.2.2 5.2.1 BY transport public the in for providedsystem are needs transport special with people that Ensure Policy5.2 9. 8. 7. 6. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 6.3 6.2

Increasedlevel investmentof accessibilityon infrastructure. cateredwhere for feasi are impairments audio and visual that ensure to systems information timetable bus Review newserviceswhere feasible (HorizonsRegional Council). Continue Increasing fareboxrecovery theon regional public transport network. Increasepublic transport trips percapita. Palmer between services commuter current the improving or retaining of feasibility the Investigate Provideimproved servicebus informationwhere necessary.

iue ri crios o ohr rnpr ue, uh s ors (iial n Regional and (KiwiRail tourism as such uses, Tourism O transport other for corridors rail disused ofretention the including Region, the in network rail current the of retention the Encourage Agency, (Transport Region the in recreation and T tourism cycling of role the Promoting improved, to facilitate tourism growth (TransportAgency and TerritorialAuthorities). that Ensuring users (HorizonsRegional Council, Territorial Authorities). all of needs the meet etc) systems announcement public (timetables, systems information Ensuring Providingwheelchair accessible buseswhere viable (HorizonsRegional Council). as possible (HorizonsRegional Council). Region the of parts many as in services transport specialised and Mobility Total Providing

erritorialAuthorities and Regional TourismOrganisations).

stonNorth and Wellington.

to provide the Total Mobility service including investigating the establishment of of establishment the investigating including service Mobility Total the provide to

that public transport infrastructure (such as terminals and bus shelters) and bus and shelters) bus and terminals as (such infrastructure transport public that rganisations).

existing transport links in rural areas are maintained, and where necessary where and maintained, are areas rural in links transport existing Anappropriate network oftourism routes ble (HorizonsRegional Council).

- 2025

Page Page 98

Measures: March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 3. 2. 1.

Workingwith thetourism industry to Highway43. Napier Road, River Whanganui the on counts vehicle Increased yearYearon growth in theofuse National the Cycle routes Trail in theRegion.

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

raise awareness ofthe Regions tourist routes. - 2025

- Taihape Road and State and Road Taihape

Page Page 99

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2      land for priorities government's current the reflect to amended istransport. Theten activity classes of the GPS 2015 are shown below. and basis yearly three a on establis classes activity to allocated is NLTF the in Funding of sale or rental the as such sources statehighway land,and interest from invested.cash from contributions modest excise also are fuel There fees. charges, licencing is user funding This road Agency. Transport from the by sourced supported projects for source funding a is NLTF The 3.1.1 isoutlined below.This in activities transport land regional for funding of sources anticipated and known the of description A 3.1 and objectives the to effect amountof public funding. give to s plan, required the are in NLTF Plan. priorities the the in outside identified activities funding the of of all fund sources to Other able be not will and limitless not is NLTF The programme) from NLTF the will give effect to the strategicpri plan (the this in sought funding The activitiessources. other through funded be to are of that activities as well as programme regional NLTF, and Programme Transport The Land National the through sought is funding which for activities LTMA. the of requirement legislative a is Plan the of chapters two next the in outlined activities of programme regional The 3: FundingtheSection Plan March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption         

Regionalimprovements Walkingand cycling improvements Publictransport (services andinfrastructure) Localroad maintenance (includingoperation and renewals) Localroad improvements highwayState maintenanc highwayState improvements Revenue Nationalfrom the Land Transport Fund Anticipatedsources revenue

c a psegr eeu fo pbi tasot evcs o fst the offset to services transport public from revenue passenger as uch cludes funding throughthe NLTF and other sources of funding.

e (includingoperation and renewals)

- 2025 oritiesoutlined as section in 2.4. uy ad rm oo vhce eitain and registration vehicle motor from and duty,

hed in the GPS. The GPS is prepared is GPS The GPS. the in hed

Page Page outlines 100

increasingly system road safe a Journeys‟Safer visionof achieve agencies the to withpartner Policework The i safety road for asRTC advisoryan member. direction political the the on sits Police the from representative setting A Plan. the through policy regional level high providing for responsible is RTC The the implement to interventions agency multiple Government'sSafer Journeys Strategy. of delivery coordinated the for framework a set Re the Within community. our for trauma road in reduction a and offenders fewer victims, fewer in result will which first, prevention on is focus The protectto people the in ourcommunities deathfrom andserious injury. offe risk high and repeat targeting lives, saving harm, preventing aligned is 2015 to with Safer JourneysStrategy Policing Road The safer. communities our making about is Policing 3.1.2 However, level. activities national plan. to the Thisassessment isbelow. a as an at include to Police required are NZ plans transport the land other regional to the directly with occurs allocated it are as Funds Plan the classes. through activity coordinated not is class activity policing road The this from funding seek cannot RoNS, a of part activitycla or RoNS, a have that organisations Approved transport legitimate benefits. their meet national than activity rather to regional deliver will thisconsiders Agency Transport the that for areas projects to allocated funds provincial of Allocation for available needs. is investment funding that Regions the toprovidecertaintyintended to is It GPS. the within newclassactivity a improvements Regional is the in forward put activities Planwill allreceive sought the funding fromthe NLTF. Not allocated. fully is class activity each to available funding the until priority national of basis the on is and GPS, the with consistent manner a in occurs Funding partners. transport from input with Agency Transport the by undertaken is activities across funds of distribution The GPS. the in given is range funding lower and upper an class, activity each For    March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption day). the of hours and week the of (days times particular at areas speed geographic driving,risk high drugged and restraints, andand alcohol behaviour, driving and drivers) young (e.g. drivers risk high act enforcement and deterrence prevention, to resources targeting includes intelligencean using andevidence and identifybased approach to maximiserisk deployment. This   

Road policing Investment management(transport planning) Road safetypromotion Contributionof road policing activity theto Horizons Regional Land Transport Plan

ss.

free of death and serious injury. The Police contribute to the safe system approach system safe the to contribute Police The injury. serious and death of free

-

theNew Zealand RoadSafety Strategy. TheRoad PolicingStrategy isabout Transport Plan 2015 Transport

- 2025

gion, local Road Safety Action Plans (RSAP‟s) Plans Action Safety Road local gion,

class will occur nationally, and will be be will and nationally, occur will class sessment of the relationship of police of relationship the of sessment nders, and working with partners with working and nders,

ivities which focus on focus which ivities te ein and Region the n Page Page 101

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2    million $212 The Fund. Investment Future the on fundingpackage is madeofup threeparts: drawing projects, highway state important the 2014 June In AcceleratedRegional Roading Programme   funds supplementary of Examples include: funding'. 'supplementary termed are sources revenue local from or NLTF the through provided those outside funding of sources additional level, local the At Supplementaryfunding transportactivities, as outlined this in section. There 3.1.4 affectwhich activities get fundedand level the of funding. will that changes ongoing to subject be will plan this in outlined as local programme the of Consequently amounts actual The figure. this in up th to contributionssubject are funding picked get not do that seal areas and rural work in footpath extensions renewal urban as such activities unsubsidised out carry also authorities Assist Funding the as to referred is and authorities local between varies subsidy of amount The contributions. development and debt relevant), (where services transport byauth local the appliedcontribution local a provisionof the on contingentis NLTF the Subsidythrough NLTF. the through subsidised are authorities territorial and regional by undertaken activities transport Many 3.1.3 in priorities and objectiveplan. safety road the in captured are approach, system safeas activities,the Police of part achieved. be can Journeys Safer and RSAP‟s the to related outcomes and encouraging and Educating March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption been has project This years. the over structure givena Priority 1 by the inRTC programme the component. this on crashes fatal and serious of number a been have there as considerationssafety for important also is project The south. or north journey their on detour a take to have currently HPMV‟s for impediment major a is bridge The 1. Highway Stateon bridge Trestle the Whirikino is funds of groupsecond the in identifiedprojects the of One     

$12 million accto $115million hasfunding beenset aside to fund the constructionof these projects;and to up and projects, six processesfor consenting and investigation finalise to million $5 to up $80 million accelerateto construction the community to agencies government other or groups programmes. community from contributions o required fora subsidised activity as such developmentcontributions. authorities territorial from contributions additional

are a range of other known sources of revenue at both national and local levels for regional for levelslocal andnational both at revenueof sources otherknown of range a are LocalRevenue sources Othersources of revenue

ority. Localority. revenue typicallylocalsources are publicderivedfares rates, for from

Government announced a $212 million funding package to accelerate regionallyaccelerate to package funding million$212 a announced Government

elerate investigation anddesign of threelarge projects.

road users to behave more safely will help ensure identified targets identified ensure help will safely more behave to users road

e long term plan and annual plan processes of each council.each of processes plan annual and planterm long e

- of five criticallyimportant regionalprojects; 2025

piae ate byn ta usually that beyond parties private r

ance Rate (FAR). Local (FAR). Rate ance

Page Page

this 102

document for KiwiRail investment. Subject to business cases, investment follows the the follows investment cases, business Ministry the of Transport regardinga proposed futurestrategic plan forrail in NewZealand. to o Subject an than rather assets business‟s the in investment. 10 Government‟s KiwiRail for document Tu KiwiRail The occurs network. transport planning the of rest and the to separately funding KiwiRail Enterprise, Owned State a As Zealand. New within ships and rail by people and freight of movement the on focusing Enterprise Owned State a is KiwiRail KiwiRailfundin million $8 further a announced Government worth of funding the formaintaining the cycleway the over following years, four via contestable a fund. 2014 February In Project. Cycleway National t in million $50 announced Government the 2009 In million$8 additional funds forNational Cycleway Nga / Haerenga will organisations consideration,should aproject(s) be included in thePlan. other and government network. local cycling and the improve and expand would that cycleways central urban in invest to opportunities investigate of representatives of consisting and and Fund capital Consolidated Crown's between the from divided allocated infrastructure, cycling urban following for the years over million four $100 of investment extra announced Government the 2014 August In $10 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption 0 millionfor urban cyclewayimprovements

Cycling projects in the urban centres of the Horizons Region may be eligible for for eligible be may Region Horizons the of centres urban the in projects Cycling

g -

year turnaround plan to turn around the rail industry and focuses on investment on focuses and industry rail the around turn to plan turnaround year

Transport Plan 2015 Transport

prtoa epniue A Ubn yln Ivsmn Panel, Investment Cycling Urban An expenditure. operational perating subsidy. KiwiRail is currently in discussion with discussion in currently is KiwiRail subsidy. perating - 2025

he budget for the following three years for the for years three following the for budget he

rnaround Plan 2010 is the guiding guiding the is 2010 Plan rnaround

Page Page

103

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 Figure 6: Forecast anticipated expenditure and revenue2015 theon best information available this at time. ten the However, values. and o and values, the affect will processes plan ten ten The the with along years, ten anticipated next the over class activity each in expenditure anticipated the shows to revenue plansand expenditure activitieson the ten for transport land regional requires LTMA The 3.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption TransportPlanning Road Safetypromotion Walkingand Cycling facilities PublicTransport services PublicTransport improvedinfrastructure Highways State infrastructure Roads Local HighwaysState LocalRoads operations Highways State operations Roads Local ActivityClasses

- years. The NLTF share of this expenditure is around $992 million. Long term plan and annual and plan term Long million. $992 around is expenditure this of share NLTF The years. Ten - year forecast for the Horizons Region has a total cost of almost $1.4 billion over the next the over billion $1.4 almost of cost total a has Region Horizons the for forecast year -

revenuesource. yearofforecast revenueand expenditure

-

-

Renewals

-

e ad improved and New - -

infrastructure

aneac and Maintenance Renewals Maintenance and Maintenance

-

New and and New

-

year forecast does give an indicative forecast of expenditure based expenditure of forecast indicative an give does forecast year

24,174,479 354,090,149 2025($) 2015 Expenditure Forecast

2,266,000 8,363,562 67,167,419 678,050 268,587,075 56,878,789 53,329,500 378,040,119 163,911,760 ngoing reviews will also affect the activities proposed activities the affect also will reviews ngoing

-

2025

- financialyears the start from of Plan. Figurethe 5

nld a iaca frcs o anticipated of forecast financial a include

- National($) FundingSources 33,583,709 212,533,887 200,497,034 1,507,720 5,514,933 14,534,823 339,025 268,587,075 38,273,450 53,329,500 163,911,760 - 25

153,593,115 Local ($) 758,280 2,848,629 9,639,656 339,025 18,605,339 165,506,232 0 33,583,709 0 0

Page Page

104

or suspended varied, be activity an that proposed abandoned. is it if action proposed the of explanation an include to LTMA) the of 16(6)(d) section (under required is Committee the Plan, the preparing In next the sixyears. Thisincludes thoseactivities RTC the that considers do notneed road overundertake anticipate to organisations approvedall all activities that of list full shows the 9 Figure priority, strategic highest the as Region. delivery and gi been have operations maintenance and maintenance road efficient placed hasRTC the Because 1. Priority a givenbeen havealso investment future willinform that studies progr the of yearssix the duringRegion the activitiesinunderway of picture complete a present to order in included been have These projects. 1 Priority as included Proje strategicpriorities. lower addressing those than ranking higher a given are priorities strategic higher the address that projects Those regionally. ranks project each how is process prioritisation the of part second The of criteria funding Agency‟s Transport Mediumor Low fit. This gives eachprojecta Transport A the High, a either to as assessed is criteria contributes three the of Each project efficiency. and effectiveness each fit, strategic how is stage first The Theprioritised listin inFigure 8. projects The have beenprioritised in two stages. Significance the Policy(in appendix have4) thereforebeenprioritised by theRTC. all to the that priorityactivities of order an assign to RTC the requires 2003 Act Management Transport Land The 4: Regional Section ofTransportProgramme Activities March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Land the Regional of Adoption t aray ne cntuto, r hr fnig a be peiul cmitd r also are committed previously been has funding where or construction, under already cts

No known activities proposed are

RTC considers to be significant. Any proposed activities that meet the criteriain the meet that activities proposed Any significant. be to considersRTC

Transport Plan 2015 Transport ven a Priority 1 as well to signal its importance to the to importance its signal to well as 1 Priority a ven - 2025 tovaried,be suspended orabandoned.

gencyassessment profile.

amme component. Transport component. amme

prioritising.

Page Page 105

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil the Regional of Adoption 4.1

locat the shows 7 Figure NLTF. the from funding prioritisedactivities. for prioritised has RTC the that projects of list the contains section This

Prioritised List of Activities of List Prioritised

Figure 7:Location map of key activitiesprioritised

Land Transport Plan 2015 Transport Land

- 2025

ion of the key the of ion Page Page 106

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption RangDC PNCC NZTA MDC HDC DOC Horizons Horizons Horizons Figure 8:Prioritised ActivitiesListof Key Organisationsto NZTA MDC HRC HDC DoC

Organisation

aneac, prtos n Renewals and Operations Maintenance, Renewals Programme and Operations Maintenance, Renewals Programme 2015 and Operations Maintenance, Renewals Programme 2015 and Operations Maintenance, Renewals Programme 2015 and Operations Maintenance, Renewals Programme 2015 and Operations Planning Maintenance, Transport SafetyRoad Promotion 2015 Land Management 2015 Regional PublicTransport Programme2015 NewZealand Transport Agency ManawatuDistrict Council HorizonsRegional Council HorowhenuaCouncil District Departmentof Conservation

2015 - - - - - 2021 2021 2021 2021 18 - 18 Project

Name -

18

- - 2025

18

WDC TDC RuaDC RanDC PNCC 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015

Start year RangitikeiDistrict Council PalmerstonNorth CityCouncil WanganuiDistrict Council Tararua RuapehuDistrict Council 98,697,485 89,433,425 289,780,480 100,903,101 58,998,266 1,691,060 1,034,782 1,676,632 15,166,060

Total Cost DistrictCouncil for All Years

9,061,713 8,090,697 25,302,820 10,096,055 5,668,743 172,106 338,120 209,002 4,966,910

Cost 2015

10,123,723 8,860,163 25,747,680 10,025,867 5,743,386 166,106 344,882 146,763 5,056,354

Cost 2016

9,830,193 8,159,152 26,868,410 10,136,055 5,766,903 325,481 351,780 146,763 5,142,796

Cost 2017

29,015,629 25,110,012 77,918,910 30,257,977 17,179,032 663,693 1,034,782 502,528 15,166,060

Total Cost

for 3 Years

58,945,746 51,337,057 162,580,660 60,799,633 34,879,532 1,321,386 1,034,782 942,817 15,166,060

Total Cost

for 6 Years

HH HH MHH

Page Page

- - NZTA

Assessment 107 Profile

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

RLTP Priority Annex A Item 9.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Overall Ranking Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption NZTA WDC WDC WDC HDC PNCC PNCC NZTA NZTA WDC RuaDC RangDC PNCC MDC HDC WDC TDC RuaDC RuaDC

Improvements Wanganui Review Dublin Street Technology WDC LED Lighting Conversion City wide streetlighting upgradeto LED Transport Strategy Implementation BusinessCase Integrated North Palmerston Whirokino TrestleBridge Replacement Wellington RoNS integration Plan Management Asset AMP Development Transport Planning 2015 Plan addendum Management Activity Transport Planning 2015 Activity Management Plan Improvement Renewals Programme 2015 and Operations Maintenance, Renewals and Programme 2015 and Operations Operations Maintenance, Maintenance, Renewals Programme 2015 SPR Programme 2015 Operations Maintenance, Programme 2015

-

-

tet ihig prd t LED to Upgrade lighting Street Effects Forestryof Rural on Roads -

hnah Safety Whangaehu

Bridge

- - - - - 2021 2021 2021 2021

9. Otaki9. to Levin

-

StrategyStudy

- - 2026 2025 - 2021 n Renewals and Update/ONRC

- - 2025

ONRC

2015 2016 2015 2017 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015

111,233,140 636,508 20,000 100,000 2,777,500 460,125 2,700,000 400,000 41,340,000 76,970,419 30,000 100,000 720,000 30,000 690,000 90,000 115,380,303 109,380,255 9,156,773

9,730,469 0 20,000 0 555,500 51,125 2,700,000 300,000 500,000 13,103,641 30,000 0 180,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 10,571,903 10,454,792 920,336

9,936,272 313,676 0 0 555,500 51,125 0 0 5,200,000 16,455,598 0 100000 50,000 0 150,000 30,000 10,250,353 10,559,341 947,945

322,832 0 100,000 555,500 51,125 0 0 35,000,000 16,990,424 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 30,000 10,271,347 10,664,933 976,383 10,352,016

636,508 20,000 100,000 1,666,500 153,375 2,700,000 300,000 40,700,000 46,549,663 30,000 100,000 310,000 30,000 280,000 90,000 31,093,603 31,679,066 2,844,664 30,018,757

636,508 20,000 100,000 2,777,500 460,125 2,700,000 300,000 40,700,000 76,970,419 30,000 100,000 490,000 30,000 460,000 90,000 65,978,876 64,318,037 5,279,117 63,186,750

HMH HH HM HHH HH MMH MM HHH HHL HH MH MH MM LL HH

Page Page -

------

- -

108

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption NZTA NZTA WDC MDC PNCC NZTA PNCC WDC PNCC PNCC PNCC WDC NZTA NZTA PNCC NZTA NZTA NZTA

Whanganui River Cycleway Ashhurst SH3 BridgeCycle/Walkway River Manawatu Walking and Cycling Improvements Walking and cycling Cycling package and Walking Improvement Intersection Ave Tremaine Line Rangitikei Cycle/Pedestrian Bridgeimplementation Crash Reduction Study Mangaone Stream bridge renewal MDC Jacks Road Stream BridgeReplacement Bunnythorpe Kairanga MDC BridgeReplacement Overbridge Stream Mangaone Road Rail Campbells MDC St Wakefield Replacement 74 Br Facilties Whanganui Right Weight HPMV Manawatu Hill Realignment Passing to routes Foxton standard strategic to Upgraded Safety Waiouru Improvements Shannon SH1 to Waiouru SE Disposal facility SH1 Improvements SH57:

arna untop Road Bunnythorpe Kairanga

-

Manawatu/ -

2025

2015 2016 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 2020 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2017 2017

325,388 8,053,323 810,000 2,500,000 4,543,800 1,200,000 18,370,679 2,710,000 7,027,516 50,000 550,000 550,000 722,814 1,800,000 6,018,804 11,673,500 5,361,347 12,207,564

325,388 0 810,000 0 408,000 0 2,105,224 1,000,000 850,000 0 0 264,000 722,814 100,000 79,431 356,000 0 0

0 353,323 810,000 0 418,000 0 2,364,304 0 3,000,000 50,000 0 0 0 200,000 1,463,164 96,000 0 0

0 0 427,000 1,200,000 2,746,155 0 3,046,516 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 2,657,903 11,221,500 1,421,784 272,864 0 7,700,000

810,000 0 1,253,000 1,200,000 7,215,683 1,000,000 6,896,516 50,000 0 264,000 722,814 1,800,000 4,200,498 11,673,500 1,421,784 272,864 325,388 8,053,323

810000 2,500,000 2,595,000 1,200,000 11,965,751 1,000,000 7,027,516 50,000 50,000 264,000 722,814 1,800,000 6,018,804 11,673,500 4,613,613 12,207,564 325,388 8,053,323

MMH MML MMH MMH MMH MMH HMM MM MMM MMM MMM MHL HML MMM HHM HML MMH HMM Page Page -

109

4 4 4 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1

Annex A Item 9.2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2

Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA PreviouslyActivities Committed WDC

& Realignment& ReplacementBridge Stream Whakaruatapu Wellington RoNS Shannon S/W North Otamaraho Curve P/L Extension HPMV Whanganui River Cycleway

-

SH3 Heads Rd to SH1 Bulls

-

9. Otaki9. to Levin

-

2025

2014 2015 2014 2013 2013 2014

605,000 1,675,000 7,987,000 27,900,000 4,680,000 4,989,000

280,000 100,000 3,673,600 3,200,000 919,980 3,900,000

0 725,000 1,313,400 8,376,000 0 489,000

670,000 0 8,369,000 0 0 0

4,987,000 19,945,000 919,980 4,389,000 100,000 1,675,000

1,675,000 4,987,000 26,886,000 919,980 4,389,000 100,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MMH Page Page

110

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4

be reflectedbe when thePlan isadopted. moderated. been not have these profil these of and some Therefore appropriate, where project, approved each relevant the given that has profile organisation the is Profile‟ „Assessment titled column the that note Please      the provides 9 either Figure assessmentthis inagainst objectives the column against final The assessed to. are contribute will activity activities each that proposedpolicy the or all objective that requires in LTMA detailed The are Plan the organisation. in inclusion for proposed activities Transport All 4.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption     

Aresilien Asafe land transportsystem; Bettertargeted investment fora strategic network; Enhance thestrategic advantage of the freighthub centralfor the North Island; Enhanced efficiencyfreight across Region; the Full List of Activities ofList Full

t and t multi modal transport system

es are likely to change over time. If they do change, changes will changes change, do they If time. over change to likely are es

of Plan. the are:These - 2025

iue , rue by grouped 9, Figure

Page Page 111

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption MDC HDC HDC HDC HDC Horizons Horizons Horizons Horizons DOC DOC Figure

Organisation 9:Full Activitiesoflist

iial crossing improvement Kiwirail LED Lighting Conversion improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Maintenance, Improvement Plan Management Activity Promotion 2015 Safety Road Management 2015 Transport Planning Transport Land Regional Programme 2015 Public minor improvements transport Public improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Maintenance, ------18 18 18 2021 18 2021

Project

Name - 18

2016 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 - 2025

Start year

102,250 460,125 1,846,022 2 34,879,53 90,000 1,034,782 942,817 0 15,166,06 668,000 56,700 1,321,386

Total cost for

6 years

51,125 652,355 5,668,743 30,000 338,120 209,002 4,966,910 100,000 18900 172,106

Cost 2015

102,250 51,125 621,067 5,743,386 30,000 344,882 146,763 5,056,354 290,000 18900 166,106

Cost 2016

51,125 572,600 5,766,903 30,000 351,780 146,763 5,142,796 278,000 18900 325,481

Cost 2017

LL HH HH HH HH MHH

- Assessment

- - - -

Profile NA 1 NA 1 1 1 1 1 NA NA 1

RLTP Assessment NA 2 NA 1 1 1 1 1 NA NA 1 Priority

Safety Safety StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork Safety multi modal and Resilient multi modal and Resilient StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork

Contribution

Page Page to Objective

112 - -

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Adoption NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA NZTA MDC MDC MDC MDC

of the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of

Replacement Bridge Trestle Whirokino to Levin RoNS Wellington Manawatu/ Whanganui Facilties Right Weight ImprovementsSafety Disposal Wanganui SE facility Waiouru Shannon to ImprovementsSafety SH1 SH57: Foxton Passing Improvements to Waiouru SH1 Improvement Ave Tremaine Line Rangitikei improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Programme Renewals and Maintenance, Walking and cycling 2025 2015 Planning Transport improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Maintenance,

- - - - 18 2021 18 2021

-

Whangaehu

Intersection Operations -

9. Otaki 9.

- -

2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017 2015 2015 2015 2017 2015 2015 - 2025

3 60,799,63 0 40,700,00 9 76,970,41 6,018,804 636,508 325,388 8,053,323 4 12,207,56 1,000,000 4,387,075 60 162,580,6 1,200,000 460,000 1,548,480

10,096,055 500,000 13,103,641 79,431 0 325,388 0 0 1,000,000 1,364,868 25,302,820 0 50,000 516,160

10,025,867 5,200,000 16,455,598 1,463,164 313,676 0 353,323 0 0 1,462,358 25,747,680 0 150,000 516,160

35,000,000 16,990,424 2,657,903 322,832 0 7,700,000 272,864 0 1,559,849 26,868,410 1,200,000 80,000 516,160 10,136,055

HHH HHL HML HMH H MM M HM HML H MM H MM LL

-

1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 NA 1 2 1 NA 1

1 1 3 2 2 2 2 4 NA 1 4 1 NA 1

FreightEfficiency FreightEfficiency FreightEfficiency Safety Safety Safety StrategicNetwork FreightEfficiency StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork multi modal and Resilient StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork

Page Page

113 -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC NZTA NZTA

tem Bridge Kairanga Replacement Stream Jacks Road Bunnythorpe MDC Replacement Road Bridge Stream Mangaone Campbells MDC Creek Road safety upgrade Stoney Road Grove Kelvin Improvements Safety Road Grove Kelvin James Line Upgrade Pedestrian Facilities Street Grey (Linton to Pitt ) Widening Street Ferguson implementation Bridge Cycle/Pedestrian streetlighting upgrade to LED wide Walding City Signalisation Upgrade Intersection Ashhurst Bourke - Management Activity Hill Cycle/Walkway Bridge SH3 River Manawatu Realignment Manawatu

ONRC addendum

yl and Cycle

Plan -

2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2015 2015 2017 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 - 2025

0 11,673,50 264,000 722,814 450,000 1,366,750 2,970,492 350,000 1,708,000 7,027,516 2,700,000 894,230 30,000 2,500,000

356,000 264,000 722,814 450,000 0 2,247,000 350,000 0 850,000 2,700,000 894,230 30,000 0

96,000 0 0 0 0 723,492 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1,708,000 3,046,516 0 0 0 0 11,221,500

M MM M MM M HM M MM M MM MLL M MH M HM H MM M MM MM MML M MM

-

2 2 NA NA NA NA NA 3 1 NA 1 4 2

3 3 NA NA NA NA NA 4 2 NA 1 4 2

StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork Safety Safety Safety multi modal and Resilient StrategicNetwork multi modal and Resilient Safety Safety StrategicNetwork Safety Safety

Page Page

114 - -

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Adoption RangDC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC PNCC

of the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of

2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Cycling Maintenance, and Improvements package Walking HPMVto standard routes Drive strategic cycle Upgraded and activities Pedestrian Summerhill upgrade safety School Whakarongo Safety Stoney Improvements St Intersection Line Cook 1 No Road Rongotea Rd Intersection Upgrade Park Transport North BusinessCase Implementation Strategy Integrated Palmerston improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Kairanga Maintenance, Road renewal bridge Stream Mangaone Bunnythorpe MDC - - - 18 2021 2021

re Road Creek

2015 2015 2017 2019 2017 2017 2018 2015 2015 2015 2020 - 2025

6 58,945,74 1 11,965,75 4,613,613 297,825 1,300,000 2,215,250 513,603 300,000 2,100,000 7 51,337,05 50,000

9,061,713 2,105,224 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 700,000 8,090,697 0

10,123,723 2,364,304 0 0 0 0 0 0 700,000 8,860,163 0

9,830,193 2,746,155 1,421,784 0 1,300,000 600,000 0 0 700,000 8,159,152 0

H MM HHM M MM M HM M MM H MM MM M MM

-

1 4 2 NA NA NA NA 1 NA 1 2

1 4 2 NA NA NA NA 1 NA 1 3

StrategicNetwork multi modal and Resilient FreightEfficiency multi modal and Resilient Safety Safety Safety multi modal and Resilient StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork

Page Page

115 - - -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption WDC TDC TDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RuaDC RangDC RangDC

Update/ONRC integration Plan Management Asset improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Rail Programme Renewals and Operations Maintenance, Overbridge Renewal Waitewhena Renewal Culvert Stream Upokonui BridgeRenewal Over Rail Road Ruapehu 2015 improvements Minor SPR improvements 2015 Minor Rail Overbridge Renewal Road Mangateitei Maintenance, Programme 2015 and Operations SPR 2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Maintenance, AMP Development 2026 2015 Planning Transport improvements 2015 Minor

------19 18 2021 18 18 2021

- Renewals 2021

- 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2017 2015 2015 2017 2015 2015 2016 2015 - 2025

3,154,062 30,000 1,820,484 7 64,318,03 325,879 450,063 450,000 682,946 2,787,839 394,770 5,279,117 0 63,186,75 100000 490,000

525,677 30,000 600,800 10,454,792 325,879 450,063 0 219,099 902,466 0 920,336 9,730,469 0 180,000

525,677 0 606,808 10,559,341 0 0 0 228,452 923,510 0 947,945 9,936,272 100000 50,000

0 612,876 10,664,933 0 0 450,000 235,395 961,863 394,770 976,383 10,352,016 0 80,000 525,677

HH HHM HHM M HM HHM MH MH

- - -

1 NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 1 1 NA

1 NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 1 1 NA

Strategic StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork Strategic StrategicNetwork

Network Network Page Page

116

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Adoption WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC WDC

of the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of

agni Central Transport Hub Wanganui LED Walking and Cycling to Technology Upgrade WDC Forestry Ruralon Roads Review improvements 2015 Minor 2015 Programme Renewals and Operations Maintenance, / Rd StPrince Intersection Beach / Rd Heads Avenue construction Extension Fitzherbert Bridge Strategy Study Street Dublin Crash Reduction Study Armco Culverts Replacement Bridge Rail St Overbridge Replacement Wakefield 74 Br Bridge Replacement Matarawa 37 Br Road BridgeReplacement Kauarapaoa 15 Br - - 2021 18 -

-

tet lighting Street

-

fet of Effects e Road New

- -

2019 2019 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2018 2018 2017 2016 2018 2015 2018 - 2025

100,000 250,000 2,595,000 2,777,500 20,000 2,384,491 6 65,978,87 1,300,000 1,993,000 100,000 50,000 330,000 1,800,000 500,000

0 0 408,000 555,500 20,000 810,733 10,571,903 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0

0 0 418,000 555,500 0 786,074 10,250,353 0 0 0 50,000 0 200,000 0

0 427,000 555,500 0 787,684 10,271,347 0 0 100,000 0 0 1,500,000 0 0

MLL H MM HHH HH H MM LMH HM MM LLL MHL MML LLL

-

-

-

NA 4 1 1 NA 1 NA NA 1 2 NA 1 NA NA

NA 4 2 1 NA 1 NA NA 2 4 NA 3 NA NA

eiin ad multi modal and Resilient multi modal and Resilient Safety StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork FreightEfficiency FreightEfficiency StrategicNetwork Safety StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork StrategicNetwork

Page Page

117 - -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption WDC NZTA

Whanganui River Cycleway Whanganui River Cycleway

2015 2015 - 2025

810,000 1,675,000

810,000 280,000

0 725,000

670,000 0

H MM H MM

4 4

4 4

eiin ad multi modal and Resilient multi modal and Resilient

Page Page 118 - -

ot o Lvn oS n KwRi‟ Traon Plan Turnaround KiwiRail‟s and RoNS Levin of north the Airport Wellington the to of commencement links the With of Region. our reliability of south and and west east, efficiency north, safety, improved identified already RLTS operative The Region,in our neighbouring regionsand New Zealand a whole. as meet to ability the on impacts economicand social outcomes, mostcritically affecting doing travel of andthetimes business cost corridors these of resilience and safety efficiency, lower effectiveness, the and Region the through inter These regional or national of be to considered be therefore can corridors significance. either following are The that highways state Region. those identified has RTC the classifie section this of purposes the For the to according Zealand andform New function theyperfom. in highways state of hierarchy a identified has ONRC The lines. A corridors. rail criss and highways roading state significant of nationally number of number a for crossroads a is Region The significance. of 16(2) section Under 5: Section Inter March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption „golden called the on so on emphasis improvements (the seeing priority regions advocating Plenty still a is of has RTC Bay north the and However, the Auckland triangle‟). to the region to Waikato connections the its improving that recognises also RTC The reliability southto the of Regionour will largelybe mitigatedwhen complete.         11 Inter Inter Inter Inter

d as nationally or regionally significant under the ONRC, as well as all rail corridors in the in corridors rail all as well as ONRC, the under significant regionally or nationallyas d

KiwiRailTurnaround Plan, 2010 o o o o o o o o o o o - - - - - regional corridors play a crucial role in facilitating the movement of people and freight and people of movement the facilitating in role crucial a play corridors regional

regionalcorridors to Wellington regionalcorridors to Hawkes Bay regionalcorridors to Taranaki: regionalcorridors to Waikato: North railline HighwayState 2 HighwayState 1 PalmerstonNorth HighwayState 3 HighwayState 2 Marton HighwayState 3 North Island Main Trunk railline HighwayState 4 HighwayState

-

regional Activitiesregional - NewPlymouth railline the LTMA, the Plan must identify activities (if any) that have inter regional inter have that any) (if activities identify must Plan the LTMA, the

- 1 2020

- - rs ter a truhte Region the through way their cross Gisbornerai

ot Iln, s el s o h upr ot Iln. The Island. North upper the to as well as Island, North

lline

- 2025

11 , the issues of safety, efficiency and and efficiency safety, of issues the ,

swl a a ubr f rail of number a as well as

eto o State of section Page Page 119 to

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 Road.Indicative BusinessCase Meeanee to Road Kennedy Expressway HB Vehicle Motor HorizonsRegion) the and Napier of Port Productivity ImprovementsSH2 Tranche( between 2 the High Intersection Road Links and Pakowhai Expressway HB Activity SignificantInter Figureprovides10 a location mapof all inter Zealanda whole. as so projects same the for advocate corridors critical inter be to these deemed on are that identified been inhave projects of number a that opportunities is discussions met these of result The a Taranaki investmenteconomic of and improvement the future facilitate Bay to order Hawkes in the regions, Horizons, these between discuss of RTC‟s to the North 2014 August Palmerston in mind in this With added given also thatregions considerwill improve outcomes. has projects key for funding class, of pool limited this access activity to order in Improvementscollaboration regional on emphasis Regional the fund, contestable nationally (R funding regional the of replacement The to bottleneck a efficient the flow of as freightand cars throughthe centre of the North recognised Island. is which summit Road Desert the and Taupo between 1 Highway March24 2015 Regional Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

- Council regionallyisanticipated significant. It that both the andTaranaki Hawkes BaywillPlan‟s

Improvement

-

regionalactivities between Horizons and Hawkes Bay

boundary with the the with boundary

ht hy r rcgie a big f infcne o New to significance of being as recognised are they that - regionalactivities. - udn) ehns fo th from mechanism funding) - ic pit n h ky taei link strategic key the on point pinch and safety a is intersection This Reason forInter n tnae o fegt ewe th Region between Bay increasing.are Hawkes freight the and of Manawatu tonnages hub, and freight a as functioning increasingly Region. Horizons North Palmerston the and Region link strategic concern. capacity are its reached Region of section This Bay thison strategiclink. Hawke‟s HPMV strengthened, the in the use can Manawa vehicles 50MAX while use, HPMV for suitable is Gorge) Manawatu the to alternative (an Road Saddle The area. freight of hubs remove the particular o in Region, use Horizons the will and Region Bay the Hawkes the between to improvements impediments These Region Bay freight increasing. Hawkes the a and Manawatu as hub, functioning increasingly North Palmerston The (Manawatu Horizons the and Region Bay Hawkes the between 2025

n tnae of tonnages and

the Palmerston North North Palmerston the u og. Once Gorge. tu

This section forms part of the key the part of section forms This

ewe te aks Bay Hawkes the between

tt Hgwy 0 has 50A Highway State - regionals -

Manawatu sub area is is area sub Manawatu

s wl b possible be will use -

agni region. Wanganui) rih bten the between freight - aaau ra is area Manawatu n sft i of is safety and

rde structures bridge

ignificance NT wt te new the with NLTP e – nd social outcomes. social nd

HPMV‟s f Manawatu

efficiency

The

e Page Page 120

SH1 Hatepe Hill to Turangi Activity SignificantInter HPMV for Routes capabilityHorizonsin the region. Strategic Upgraded SH3 Normanby Overbridge SH43(Forgotten Highway) SH3 TangahoeRiver Bridge Activity SignificantInter SH2 ManawatuHill Realignment HPMV for Routes capabilityHorizonsin the region. Strategic Upgraded March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption SH1Sisters Three SH1 Pueketarata Manawatuto Boundary

- - regionalactivities between Horizons and Taranaki regionalactivities between Horizons and Waikato

12km of this increasingly used tourist route tourist used increasingly this of 12km regions. two the between route HPMV the complete will and capable HPMV is it that so bridge will improvements These Reason forInter h suhr Nrh sad a be can Island North maximised. southern across HPMV the of benefits the that ensure will capability entrance HPMV and Island, logi and hub freight a as acts area Horizons lower The regions. HPMV will to project two the between route HPMV up this the complete Roading of not Completion is standard. and Regional issues significan safety has overbridge This Accelerated Package. the by the through funding identified receiving as been Government has project The between growth, Stratfordand Ruapehu Districts. im economic to and barrier tourism, significant a is This unsealed. remains regions two the between e elsd rm improvemensections ofState Highway 1. from realised be road. significant to benefits safety significant nationallyalso of are There out a are for that context corners speed low tight, of number a have all projects three These Reason for - Horizons region and Hawkes BayRegion t for allow will Realignment directions. both in lane passing a with alignment Improved crashes. of history a with spot black Safety maximised. be can Region Bay Hawkes the from and en will capability entrance HPMV and Island, Northlower the for centre logistics and hub freight a as acts area Horizons lower The ae tm svns o fegt between freight for savings time ravel 2025 sure that the benefits of HPMV routes to routes HPMV of benefits the that sure

Inter stics centre for the lower North lower the for centre stics

- - RegionalSignificance RegionalSignificance

teghn the strengthen s o these to ts

proving

Page Page t 121

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 SH1 Otakito Levin RoNS Activity SignificantInter March24 2015 Regional Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

Council

- regionalactivities between Horizons and Wellington

ra t te ot ad at sc as such east, also provideenduring safety improvements. and will It north Bay. Hawke‟s and North Palmerston the to with Island) areas South the (and Wellington of hubs freight main the between connections The Reason forInter - 2025

prd wl miti efficient maintain will upgrade - RegionalSignificance

Page Page 122

March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

Figure 10:Location map ofInter

- regional Activitiesregional - 2025

Page Page 123

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 2. 1. be will Themonitoring of plan the willundertakenbe at two levels. monitoring how of description “a measures include "the and thatwill be Plan” to Transport Land Regional required the of is implementation assess to Plan undertaken the LTMA, the Under 6: MonitoringSection ofthe Plan March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

o o the be willandRTC will include the following: this ann of reported be component will This Plan. key the in activities A of performance the Plan. of monitoring the of component programme the in included Mon three a on 6 yearlybasis to the RTC. reported be the will Results during Plan. the undertaken of year be third the to of LTMAexpiry before the immediately by required is which Plan, the of yearly three a on measures these monitor will Plan The policy. each for measures identifies plan the of component priorities strategic The

itoring will also be undertaken annually on progress against the programme of activities of programme the against progress on annually undertaken be also will itoring

used to monitorperformance the of the activities". to activities;to inclusion of newactivities;and deletion ofcurrent activities. variationsincludingplanyearthenumber approvedduring of The actual the against year preceding the for requested fundingapproved and the expenditure actual for thatyear. funding the of comparison A

- 2025

basis, one year prior to undertaking a review a undertaking to prior year one basis,

: scope/costchanges :

- ot period month ually to the the to ually Page Page 124

ulnd n h tbe eo ae h ky eurmns f h LM ta rlt t re to relate that LTMA the of requirements key transportplans, and a description ofhow planthis has metthose requirements. the are below table the in Outlined Legislative Appendix the 1: LTMA alignment with Appendices 7: Section March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption s14(b)(i)and (ii) (a)(ii)s14 (a)(i)s14 LTMAreferencesection

those alternativethose objectives. the of affordability and the feasibility to and Act, this that of purpose contribute land objectives would regional transport consi has alternative RTC The the with landGPSon consistent is Plan Transport Land Regional The publicinterest. the in system transport safe land and efficient, an to effective, contribute to is LTMA which the Land of purpose the Regional to contributes Plan Transport the satisfied that be must RTC The Provision

- 2025

transport.

dered

-

eto 1 ecie the describes 1 Section full give effect LTMA'sto the purpose. to designed been has framework, plan, the of component policy programme the with together This objectives, implementation measures. plan, polic priorities, the including for framework policy the provides 2 Section statutory requirements the the meets how Plan on Description eeomn process, th development went it, to prior developed one and the Strategy, this to that important note Transport is previous It Strategy. Land the direction Regional in policy outlined solid the off built been has Plan This priorities andaspirations. to as w objectives effect GPS give national closely and that reflect 2.3 section in has RTC objectives of set a developed alternative the (particularly objectives), of affordability and feasibility the regarding provision this Agen of intention the Transport detailing or and/ Transport of Ministry the from guidelines of absence the also In 2.3 aligns with theGPS. objective Sectioneach how describes plan. a this through to effect given is includes GPS the how on discussion and context policy regional and national l a rfetn regional reflecting as ell og a robust a rough

e, n key and ies, inl land gional

Page Page

125 cy

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption s14(c)(iii) s14(c)(i)

h RC a tkn into from anysource. funding taken likely has account RTC The conservation strategy. and efficiency energy ta national the has account RTC The

- 2025

e into ken context, including the the Strategy Conservation Efficiency and including Energy National context, policy the regional and describes national 1.3 Section for basis Plan.this Strategy's the as objectives transport of range broad and approach policy foundational the operative reconfirmed have stakeholders,who transport key the buy good in resulted to framework policy robust This in relate objectives in Plan)this change outcomes closely these the legislation (With the the of based.were Strategy existing which outcomes detailed strategic resulting upon of options the examination including Section 3.2 includes an an sources. includes revenueanticipated of outline 3.2 Section sets whichstrategicpriorities 4 and 5. 2.4.5 and 2.4.4 sections through principally plan intothe havebuilt been considerati NEECS how description of a (NEECS) and

Page Page - n from in .

ons 126

-

2. 1. The studyrecommendations are: KeyAppendix 2: ofthe 2010 findings Joint Study Transport March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption Amap of the proposed roading hierarchy in thestudy area District Theseincluded: Manawatu and Council City North Palmerston Agency, Council. Transport the by promoted evidence North an develop to was study the of aim The Council strategic transportnetwork in Palmerston the Regional North Horizons and Council District Manawatu mid in completed was JTS The

      b. recogniseb. retaina. threearterial routes between Feildingand PalmerstonNorth via: hierarchy the of the rural road networkwithin thestudy area should: required through still Roadis consultation) (including proposal Road/Campbellsbypass western the of Waughsassessment scheme detailed use to continue would traffic of How area. study the within network road the planning of purpose the for adopted being projects these warrant to economic sufficiently are Bridge Upstream New the and Bunnythorpe of bypass western a -

the concept for strategicconcept the for acrossaccessgenerally the Palmerston side of northern North as h cnet f rrl ig od rud amrtn ot, noprtn a upstream an incorporating North, Palmerston around road bridgecrossing of the Manawatu ringRiver. rural a of concept the for commu cater to North Palmerston and Feilding between connections improved for proposals PalmerstonNorth; of area urban the within from route highway state the removingthereby Gorge, Manawatu National the in suggested aaau u ae b tsig h vldt o a ubr f pr of number a of validity the testing by area sub Manawatu Bunnythor Road, Waughs iii. ii. i.

Street(as a major arterial) airport the runway of as extension an far from arising as Line Milson section of closure southern any to remaining response in the Line, Flygers in collector a to and Road KB to section t downgraded be then functionwould this that CameronsLine, Milson Line,connecting Ruahineto Street(as a arterial),notingminor connecting Rangitikeito Street(as a major arterial) Line, Camerons .This willdetermine whatform, if any, a western bypassof Bunnythorpe may take.

ter flows,including the resolution of issues in theBunnythorpe area;

threeinter

ever, as modelling and investigation indicates that a significant volume significant a that indicates investigation and modelling as ever, - Milson Line, Kairanga Bunnythorpe (KB) Road and Rangitikei Line Line Rangitikei and Road (KB) Bunnythorpe Kairanga Line, Milson regionalroutes:

-

2010 by the Transport Agency, Palmerston North City Council, City North Palmerston Agency, Transport the by 2010 tt Hgwy taey 20) ewe M Seat n the and Stewart Mt between (2007) Strategy Highway State pe Western Bypass and Railway Road connecting to Vogel to connectingRoad Railway Bypassand Western pe

-

2025

- -

ae ntok irrh frte Palmerston the for hierarchy network based - Manawatusub o a local road in the remaining northernremaining the in road local a o isincluded below.

n st ot faeok o the for framework a out sets and

-

area over next the years.30 psl wih ae been have which oposals

untop, a Bunnythorpe,

Page Page 127

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 4. 3. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption 5.

untop Wsen yas sbet o eald cee seset ad h New the and assessment) scheme detailed to UpstreamBridge comprise: (subject Bypass Western Bunnythorpe the to addition in hierarchy, road proposed the to effect give to required improvements road b. intersectionb. improvements likely in theform of roundaboutsat: wideninga. KB Road d. c. c. b. a. structureplans to manage localroad and property access should beprepared for: d. c. b. a planningprovision, with a viewto later construction, should be made fornew links: e. d. c CreekRoad

iv. iv. iii. ii. i. ii. i. including North Palmerston around Road Ring Rural a for provide and whenthe NewUpstream Bridge place isin certainbecomemorearea urban city‟seastern the for strategiespatternsand growth the UpstreamNew Bridge, the al to but recognise iii. ii. i.

shrt od n h eet ht eeomn pesrs mre n H7 through SH57 on emerge pressures development Aokautere that event the in Road Ashhurst Stoney CreekRoad KairangaBunnythorpe Road detailedscheme ass Ashhurst, in Napierat Road/Stoney Creek Road, possibly in the formof a roundabout upgrade intersection an including Drive Riverside and Road Creek Stoney connecting southto the ofBunnythorpe between KB Road and Ashhurst Road achieveto the Bunnythorpe WesternBypass (subject detailed to scheme assessment) improvementsminor in Ashhurstto improve safetyand and alignment the to sealwidening improvements 8.5mto some including Road, Creek Stoney upgrading wideningAshhurst Road 8.5mto

betweenAshhurst and south ofLevin via SH57 1 Lineand Tiakitahuna Road and (Feilding) SH54 between AshhurstRoad ewe M Seat n te aaau og va agtki ie K Ra and Road KB Line, Rangitikei via Gorge Manawatu the and Stewart Mt between CampbellRoad/Ashhurst Road/Stoney Creek Road Bunnythorpe WesternBypass/KB Ro MilsonLine/KB Road RangitikeiLine/KB Road MilsonLine and Bunnythorpe 8.5mto RangitikeiLine and Milson Line to 10m

Stoney Creek Road as a minor arterial road in an eastern corridor connecting corridor eastern an in road arterial minor a as Road Creek Stoney

o onc Ahus Bnyhre od ih air od sbet to (subject Road Napier with Road Bunnythorpe Ashhurst connect to

between:

essment)

SH56 via Bunnythorpe, KB Road, Rongotea Road, No Road, Rongotea Road, KB Bunnythorpe, via SH56

so recognising that its function shouldfunctionso recognisingitsas reviewed be that - 2025 ad

efficiency

KB Road and Stoney and Road KB

Page Page 128

forinvestment in current the Plan: as JTS the to contribute inthat projects other identified as well projects key those for progress on update an provides below table The includingeasternan bypass ofLevin. is and road existing network the in road deficiencies rural the the addresses particularly North Palmerston area, and study Feilding the between in network network road the of development the for plan This 6. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

a reviewof the findingsof studythis the for allow include may to which and strategyneed growth urban currentwill the from emerge which to changes use study, land this of horizon term longer the to and 2021 to both plan urban roading integrated North an Palmerstondevelop to the and network optimise road to options of undertaken be study traffic separate a d.

and theapproaches of the NewUpstream Bridge l new proposed the

niey optbe ih h RN poet o te ei t Wligo corridor, Wellington to Levin the for project RoNS the with compatible entirely

inks involving the western and southern bypasses of Bunnythorpe of bypasses southern and western the involving inks

the outcomes sought in the JTS that have been identified been have that JTS the in sought outcomes the

whichare based presenton land use projections. - 2025

to cater for future traffic demands, traffic future for cater to Page Page

129

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 ManawatuRiver Upstream Bridge StoneyCreekRoad Upgrade AshhurstRoad Upgrade Road IntersectionUpgrade Bunnythorpe Bypass/KB Western assessment ) (subjectto detailed scheme Bunnythorpe Bypass Western assessment) (subjectto detailed scheme BunnythorpeSouthern Bypass Seal Widening KBRoad:Milson Line to Bunnythorpe Upgrade MilsonLine/KB Road Intersection LineSeal widening KBRoad:Rangitikei Line to Milson (KB) Road Intersection Upgrade RangitikeiLine/Kairanga Bunnythorpe Projectidentified in JTS March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption MangaoneStream Replacement Kairanga StreamBridge Replacement Kairanga StreamBridge Replacement CampbellsRoad Managaone support roadinghierarchy Projects notincluded in JTSbut

(such as the GPS or the RLTP) to position the outcomes sought against wider nat wider against district outcomes. and sought outcomes the position documents to RLTP) strategic the or underlying GPS the and as (such objectives organisations the future, the about assumptions 13 money. for value best represents of works a programme in invest to decision 12 - -

BunnythorpeRoad BunnythorpeRoad Jacks h piay ups o a of purpose primary The An

Indicative Business Case takes account of the strategic context accounting for the the for accounting context strategic the of account takes Case Business Indicative

rgamd uies ae s o rvd rbs eiec ta a that evidence robust provide to is Case Business Programmed cost of$5.36cost million. Scheduledconstruction for between 2017 willat thelook best possible options forinvestment. 2015in the AProgrammed Business Case of $0.55m of Scheduleconstruction for during2020 $0.55m of Scheduledconstruction for during 2015 $0.72m Scheduledconstruction for in 2015 2038 Constructionof bridge is currentlyatbetweenset Currentlydoes not meet investmentcriteria. capabilities. Upgradesare subject investigationto ofHPMV investment. NLTP21 to An Indicative BusinessCase is timed forthe 2018 - - 2044. 2025

-

13

16 year16 for these threeprojects. This providethe strategic context for

Progress Progress 12

isbeing developed - 16at a costof

- 21 at21 a cost - 16 at16 a cost - 21at a ional, regional regional ional, Page Page -

130

furtherwork will take intoconsideration the effects localon communities and facilities. and Plan the of scope the outside are network proposed the of management detailed of aspects and improvements Specific years. nextstrategicthirtytheovernetwork broad the for a planoutrecommendations setThe ofJTS the 2044. perio construction estimated and million $82.9 of cost estimated an Theseimprovements are in addition proposedto the Upstream Bridge of the ManawatuRiver, with March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption

are still subject to detailed investigation and assessment. This assessment. and investigation detailed to subject still are - 2025

d commencing between 2038 between commencing d

Page Page 131 -

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption Figure 10:Proposed Road Hierarchy2010 from

- 2025 JointTransport Study

Page Page 132

growth and economic and strategies. strategies cycling and walking plans, transport authorities‟ Territorial     documentsOther which have informedthe development of the draft RLTPlan inc      The followingdocuments mustbe considered in developing ThePlan. Thelegislative full requirements for thepreparation of Plan areThe setout in Ap anto effective, efficient, and safeland transportsystem in public the interest. LTMA The reviewedevery three years. yearsleastonce every producedbeandsix at Plan must The years.least10 at and measures for objectives,policiesRegion‟stransport land the out set Council Regionalto eachenables Plan The statutory whose (RTC) Committee Transport Regional a have functionsinclude thepreparation of ThePlan for approvalby th must Council Regional Each L Regional operative the of 2010 elements combines that requirement new a is Plan The produce to requirement The (LTMA). 2003 Act Management Transport Land the in out set requirement legislative a is Plan) (The Plan Transport Land Regional a of preparation The LegislativeAppendix Policy 3: and Requirements Framework March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption          - 2040 (RLTS)and operative RegionalLand TransportProgramme (RLTP) 2012 TheRegional Public Transport 2020Safer Journeys Region; Long ThePalmerston North DistrictPlans of all territorial authorities. TheProposed One Plan as Amendedby Environment Court Decisions (Mayand 2013); TheNew Zealand EnergyEffic Thedraft Government Policy StatementLandon TransportFunding 2015 TheGovernment Policy Statement Landon TransportFunding 201

- also requires The Plan to give effect to the purpose of the LTMA, which is to contribute to whichLTMA, is the of purpose the to effect give to Plan The requires also term Council Community Plans (and amendments) of all local authorities in the the in authorities local all of amendments) (and Plans Community Council term

-

ManawatuJoint Transport Study2010; theNational Road Safety Strategy (2010);

iencyand Conservation Strategy(NZEECS, 2007); Plan Manawatufor the

- 2025

- Wanganui Region Wanganui (2011); e RegionalCouncil.

- 2022 n Tasot Strategy Transport and

- 2025; pendix1. lude:

-

15.

Page Page

133

Annex A Item 9.2 Annex A Item 9.2 SignificantVariations    excludes:project purp the For   approvedorganisation that:is the For SignificantActivities the by affected those and benefits decision. and costs relative options, the variation, the for reasons on the information consider will RTC consultation the matter, a any of significance the to of as decision a making benefitsWhen and costs the to given be shouldprocesses or procedure and theextent towhich consultation has consideration and RTC) the be bydetermined will be to(to variationproposed the approach of significance consultation of level The the reflect will consultation the However, significant. is variation the if time. Act the any of 18 at section with varied accordance in required be can Plan Transport Land Regional The Application b) a) 2003 Act Management TransportCommittee (RTC) to adopt Transporta policy determines that significance in respectof Land the of 106(2) Section Purpose Significance Policy Appendix 4: March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption section 18Dof theAct,consultation willrequiredbe aon variation if variation the issignificant. with accordance In operative. once time any at varied be can Plan Transport Land Regional The     

o o o activitiesOther costingless than $5 million example: for o o o Businessas usual activities: Committedactivities (existingcommitments arising approvedfrom activities) isa large new improvement project. greater $5than million in totalvalue, including property purchase; and activities the are that included in theregio variationsmade to regionalland transportplans sectionunder 18D ofthe Act;and

purpose of section 16(3)(d) of the Act, a significantsectionanbypurposeofAct,activitya the 16(3)(d)of forward anyactivity put is

Transportstudies. Minorroad safetyprojects and Newwalkingminor and cycling projects; Existingpublic transport services; Localroad and state highway capitalminor works (<$5 million); Localroad and state highway maintenance

ose of identifying what is a large new improvement project, a large new improvement new large a project, improvement new large a is what identifying of ose

programmes;

- nalland transport plan undersection of16 Act. the 2025

andrenewals;

alreadytaken place. te c) eurs h Regional the requires Act) (the

Page Page

134

      oth Plan considered beto significant forthe purposes of consultation: Transport Land Regional the to variations of amendments All RegionalLand TransportPlan issignificant and must thereforeundergo consultation. by a on determined be will Plan Transport Land Regional the to variations of significance The Generaldetermination significanceof     organisation approved an by proposed activities are These relating to: Act. the of 18E and in 18D identified as section Plan, Transport Land Regional the to variation a require not do activities Certain Certainactivities that do notrequire a variation March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Plan 2015 Transport Land the Regional of Adoption           - case basis. The RTC has adopted the following definition to determine when a variation to the to variation a whendetermine to definition following the adopted has RTC The basis. case cag t h drto ado odr fpirt o h atvt ta de nt substantially not does that activity the changethe balance of of the programme; priority of order and/or duration the to change A Replacingone determined bythe RTC; or project the of objectives original the alter significantly not does that change scope A accordancewith sectionsand18 of20 theAct;or been newactivityhas The Newpreventative maintenance andemergencyreinstatement activities; or Activitiesare that in the urgentinterest ofpublic orsafety; Existingpublic transport services. Localroad minorcapital works;and Localroad renewals; Localroad maintenance;

projectwith anotherproject within a groupof genericprojects; or

previously consulted on and meets funding approval funding inprovisions meets and previouslyon consulted

- 2025

r hn h floig are following the than er

Page Page –

case to be to 135 -

Annex A Item 9.2

5.3. 5.2. 5.1. 5. 4.1. 4. 3.1. 3. 2. 1.1. 1. CAPITAL R CONNECTION March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Service Rail Connection Capital 5.5. 5.4.

COMMUNITYENGAGEMENT over five yearscommencing in 2015 the alloca the be will decision this of impact The FINANCIAL IMPACT c. b. a. isrecommendedIt that Council: RECOMMENDATION the subsidise to reserves from funding seek to and continuedoperation of the service nextfor the five years. service rail Connection Capital update to is report this of purpose The PURPOSE GR) sbitd bsns cs t te e Zaad rnpr Atoiy (NZTA) Authority Transport Zealand New the to case business o a impacting submitted Council costs Regional(GWRC), Wellington maintenance Greater with heavy conjunction in the Council, and performance. financial to up trains Wellington the electrification of of result a was This cancelled. be to was service the ago years Three determined tocancel the service maint 30from June 2015. to required expenditure of maintenance because and heavy years, of significant number a for loss operational an at running service the to Due centralor governmentsubsidy. serviceoperat is The Otaki, Levin, Shannon, at made are Waikanae,and , Stops before itarrives in Wellington. Wellington. in work to travelling commuters The service at Wellington departs train train The pm,5.15 arriving in PalmerstonNorth am. at 7.15 pm. 8.20 commuterat Wellington in arriving and a am 6.20 at North is CC) (the PalmerstonNorth and ThisserviceWellington. atpeak operates times,leaving Palmerston Connection Capital The BACKGROUND No communityengagement is required.

cnwegs ht oios udn i cnign o scrn fnig rm Greater from WellingtonRegional Council and the Ministry funding Transport.of securing on contingent is funding amount Horizons that the acknowledges to up both, of combination a or referredto in the2012 rates,Busine targeted 2015 starting or years reserves five via for either service Connection Capital the subsidise to agrees receivesinformation the contained in CCcommenced service and1991, in operates Monday Friday,to primarily focusing on

ed by KiwiRail. The servicelocal commercially,operates The receivingno KiwiRail. byed

AIL SERVICE

ss Casess (HorizonsShare of andOpex);

- 16 financialyear. Council on recent developments concerning the the concerning developments recent on Council ReportNo. 15 tion of $550,000 of Transport reserves spread reserves Transport of $550,000 of tion

Decision Required Required Decision Report No.

-

46

.

i te se, iial has KiwiRail asset, the ain

prtn between operating

Page Page

15 - its n 46 - 137 16,

Item 9.3 Item 9.3 7.2. 7.1. 7. 6.3. 6.2. 6.1. 6. 5.6. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Service Rail Connection Capital 7.4. 7.3.

assis toprovide could they whatfunding at look to meetingGWRC and Horizons both invitedMinister the the At March. 11 on held was meeting That decision. his making in considered Minister the follow a requested quicklyChair The required. subsidyoperational the of Informationthen surfaced an OIAfrom request toMinistry the which truecost questions the is maintenance nothas yet place.taken heavy of million $1.3 14 the that during scheduled showed also information The 15 $700,000.00. the for deficit operational forecast the that stated information The Airp Wellington to LevinNationalfromSignificance of Road the until years 30 on Transport of Minister the to sent was case business 2012 the KiwiRail. with along from information This information financial and with fare numbers, case patronage updated business obtained Staff 2012 the of copy a requested updated financialinformation. Transport of Minister the Bridges meeting service Simon the last of Honorable December retention in discuss Otaki) the for to (MP with year Guy Nathan met Honorable the Officer and Transport) Executive of (Minister Chief and Chair Horizons‟ LATESTDEVELOPMENTS the made Transport need the a for Horiz negating of thereby years Minster two additional an then for service the the of operation case, continue to business decision Horizons the submitting of GWRC. back the and On Horizons by evenly split be would pr remainder the and 59%), (then Rate Assistance Funding the on based be would share NZTA‟s NZTA. and GWRC pro funding a Horizons, by funded included be would $500,000) approximately case(then deficit operational the where business The service. the of continuation requesting which benefit from the service being Palmerston North, Horowhenua North, Palmerstonservice being the from benefit which 2012 the per as be should it case. funding, business contribute to agrees Council if that submitted is It additional fu contribute to commitment no be would there forecasted, than greater was loss the If making. is service the loss operational the offsetting with assist would subsidy The G and Horizons If community the for the retentionof the service. in support strong is There Plan region. Transport Wellington the Landwith connections Regionalrail existing draftsupported the to submissions recent of number a Additionally, the jeopardise would and blow, significant aforementionedlinkages. a be would service the of loss that considers RTC The regions. both from passengers by utilised well is and regions, two the between ser The Districts. Horowhenua next the over importance in 10 increasing regions two the between connections social and five next the for Nationa of Roads especially the while years public, commuting our maintaining for to regions fundamental both as between connectivity CC the views (RTC) Committee Transport Regional The DISCUSSION nding. oportionamounted to approximately$110,000 year.per - 0 er ad eod a mr pol tk u rsdne n h Kpt Cat and Coast Kapiti the in residence up take people more as beyond, and years 20 t with t retentionof the service.

January 2015 with the request that the service is retained for at least the next five next the least at for retained is service the that request the with 2015 January

o ute dsus h ise t esr te orc ifrain s being is information correct the ensure to issue, the discuss further to

Funding could be sourced from Transport reserves, from the communities the from reserves, Transport from sourced be could Funding WRC subsidise the service it would continue to be operated by KiwiRail. by operated be to continue would it service the subsidise WRC ons and GWRCsubsidy.

- 15 and 15 and 15

l Significance project is completed. It sees the economic the sees It completed. is project Significance l ie rvds mrvd oiiy n tasot choices transport and mobility improved provides vice

- 16 financial years. Kiwi years. financial 16

eod h 3 Jn 21 cut 2015 June 30 the beyond

Rail confirmed that this work this that confirmed Rail and Manawatu, or via or Manawatu, and - 16 financial year is is year financial 16 - f dt. t the At date. off - ort is completed. is ort up meeting with meeting up Page Page posal 138

There are no attachments for this report. this report. for attachments are no There ANNEXES MANAGERTRANSPORT SE Phillip Hindrup 9.1. 9. 8.2. 8.1. 8. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Service Rail Connection Capital

Engagement. a decision significant a not is This SIGNIFICANCE and funding discuss to meeting a seek to retentionof the service. and GWRC and contribution, Minister the proposed to write the will Chair confirming the funding, the approve to is decision the If Theservice isdueto cease operationin lessthan fourmonths time. TIMELINE/NEXT STEPS 2012 the business case. with consistent amount on the to up years service the subsidise three to reserves next transport sufficient are the over used be to to balanc proposeda leaving districts, those amount in trials service additional is districts $589,000 three this, the Of for million. reserves $1.26 scheme Transport Currently rates. targeted

RVICES

crig o h Cucls oiy n infcne and Significance on Policy Council‟s the to ccording

MANAGERREGIONAL SER Shirley Ged e of $671,000. This shows thereshows This $671,000. of e

VICES Page Page 139

Item 9.3

6.1. 6. 5.1. 5. 4.1. 4. 3.1. 3. 2. 1.1. 1. ONLOCALSUBMISSION March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Funding Government Local on Submission

expressed a desire to lodge a submission, and to meet with LGNZ representatives for for representatives LGNZ with meet to and submission, a lodge to desire key a outlining expressed paper Governme Local a on received document discussion Committee LGNZ Policy a of and points Strategy the 2015 March 10 On BACKGROUND No communityengagement has been conducted. COMMUNITYENGAGEMENT decision This has FINANCIAL IMPACT b. a. isrecommendedIt that Council: RECOMMENDATION Zealand‟s New Government Local on (LGNZ)Local Government makesFunding Council submission the seeks paper This PURPOSE We haveWe drafteda submissionCouncil‟s for consideration: DISCUSSION furtherdiscussion. Submissions are due by 27 March2015.

confirms submission the wishesit to make toLocal Government New Zealand. receivesinformation the contained in ag o otos n atraie ehnss r apid n te jurisdictions, other which inmay alsousefu be applied are mechanisms alternative and options of range a that notes also Council year. this later due legislation reporting environmental funding of Nationa challenge a also the is direction and policy factor Government Central districts fund to many Pressure infrastructure. in bases population declining rates current the of sustainability and appropriateness the to challenges significant be to there considers Council The the finallocal government fundingreview document isdeveloped. Horizons paper. the in raised issues the about Government Central with and sector the within discussion ongoing of supportivevery HorizonsFunding.is GovernmentLocal on discussiondocument Horizons

Plc Saeet ad ainl niomna Sadrs a wl as well as Standards, Environmental National and Statements Policy l for example, increased expectations on councils through greater use of use greater through councils on expectations increased example, for

einl oni (oios nts ih neet GZs recent LGNZ‟s interest with notes (Horizons) Council Regional

nodirect financialimpact.

GOVERNMENT FUNDING GOVERNMENT linNew a Zealand context.

discussiondocument. - ReportNo. 15 based funding system, especia system, fundingbased welcome the opportunity to participate as participate to opportunity the welcome

Decision Required Required Decision Report No.

- 49

.

t udn. h Committee The Funding. nt

lly in view of view in lly Page Page

15 - 49 141

Item 9.4 Item 9.4 There are no attachments for this report. this report. for attachments are no There ANNEXES MANAGERPOLICY&STR BowenTom 9.1. 9. 8.2. 8.1. 8. 7.1. 7. 6.2. March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Funding Government Local on Submission

and Significance on Policy Council‟s the to Engagement. according decision significant a not is This SIGNIFICANCE for discussion.further fo arrange separatelyExecutivewill Chief The deadline. March 27 the by confirmed be to need will words of form a submit, to wish Council Should TIMELINE/NEXT STEPS No consultationbeenhas conductedon this subject. CONSULTATION with meeting proposed the to themselves Three lend example, LGNZ representatives topics (for these that responsibilities suggest council We of range Waters). the and models funding between q raisedCouncillors have

be inbe touch discussto this further. will Localand continue subject the on dialogue a see to keen Horizons is Government. for models funding sustainable of investigation further supports Horizons

ATEGY

.

uestions about details of possible funding models, and interactionand possible models, funding of details uestions about

ANDREGULATION GROUP MANAGERSTRATE NicPeet r Council to meet with LGNZ representativesLGNZ with meet Council to r

GY

Page Page 142

A ANNEXES GROUP MANAGERCORPOR Craig Grant 3.1. 3. 2. 1.1. 1. TO DECEMBER2014 1 4 COUNCILLORS' WORKSHO March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 4 Attendance Councillors' Workshop

December 2014 to 18 March 2015 March 18 to 2014 December

Councillors' Workshop Attendance Councillors' Workshop hs s o a infcn dcso acrig o h Cucls oiy n infcne and Significance on Policy Council‟s the to Engagement. according decision significant a not is This SIGNIFICANCE a. isrecommendedIt that Council: RECOMMENDATION to 2014 December 4 from Attendance Workshop Councillors‟ the18 note to is item This PURPOSE

March2015. receivesinformation the contained in

8 MARCH8 2015

ATE&GOVERNANCE - P ATTENDANCE P

ReportNo. 15 -

Information Only Information Report No. - 51

andAnnex.

-

No Decision Required No Decision

Page Page

15

-

51 143

Item 9.5 Annex A Item 9.5 February10 15 January27 15 Date March24 2015 RegionalCouncil 2015 March 18 to 2014 4 December Attendance Councillors' Workshop

Details LTP# 18 LTP# 17 LTP# COUNCILLORS’WORKSHOP ATTENDANCE

4 December2014 18to March2015

HORIZONSREGIONAL COUNCIL -

(for the

period)

Cr RPearceCr GCrMcKellar PKellyCr RKeedwellCr MCr Guy EBCr Gordon L BurnellCr BarrowJ Cr Present: AttendanceCouncillor Cr CSheldonCr BRollinsonCr PRiegerCr RPearceCr GCrMcKellar PKellyCr RKeedwellCr MCr Guy EBCr Gordon DCottonCr L BurnellCr BarrowJ Cr Present: DCottonCr Apology: CCr BRollinsonCr PRiegerCr

Sheldon

Page Page 144

There wereno requests forpublic speaking rights. PUBLIC SPEAKINGRIGHTS RT 15 APOLOGIES TheChairman welcomed everyone to the meeting. ALSOPRESENT ATTENDANCEIN PRESENT 11 10.30am Report March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Committee Transport Recommendations Regional of Report Planpriority listof projects. Thishad been emailed out to Members prior to the meeting. Chairman The a tablednoted whichspreadsheet outlined the changes Regional to LandTransport There wereno suppleme SUPPLEMENTARYITEMS - 15

- Victoria Avenue,Palmerston North

42 of the the of

on

usa 3 ac 2015 March 3 Tuesday sixth

Atv TasotPbi Tasot, npco Wie Nw eln Police), Zealand (New White Ms Inspector Transport), Transport/Public (Active Council), District (Horowhenua Duffy Mayor from apologies receives ThatCommittee: the Moved CARRIED -

3 March 2015 March 3

etn o h nnhtinim fte einl rnpr Committee Transport Regional the of triennium ninth the of meeting

Bleakley (NewZealand Transport Agency). aiu trioil uhrt ast aaes ad mme o the of member a and press. managers, asset authority Agency, territorial Transport (Road various Zealand (New Monks Myers D D Mrs Ms Coordinator), Officer), Safety (Transport Webber D Mrs Planner), Information), and Services Mr Regional Manager (Group Shirley G Mr thevarious times At during meeting: CommitteeSecretary Manager TransportServices ChiefExecutive Councillors Users), MrS (Road (RoadWalker Tr Christiansen E Mr Agency), Transport Zealand (New A Mayor Council), Mayor Deputy Council), District (Rangitikei (Ruapehu Cameron Watson A Mayor Council), District (Tararua Ellis R Mayor Keedwell, RJ (Chair), Gordon EB Crs

ntaryitems beto considered.

W

alc (eir rnpr Panr, r A ulvr (Transport Gulliver A Mrs Planner), Transport (Senior Wallace

, in the the in ,

. an (Wanganui Main

-

Distri ansportAssociation), Mr C Lowcay(KiwiRail). Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and and Resolutions Adopt and Endorse Kouvelis/Main t Council ct

aau Ro, oios einl Council, Regional Horizons Room, Tararua

MrsJAKennedy MrPHindrup MrMMcCartney Guy,Kelly, Rieger

J

efre (amrtn ot City North (Palmerston Jefferies , ao M ovls (Manawatu Kouvelis M Mayor ), itit Council District

itit Council District

, Mr ),

L ), Mayor D D Mayor ),

Hammond Ms

Page Page

Cheyne ed at held 145

Item 10.1 Regional Council 24 March 2015

MEMBERS’ CONFLICTS OF INTEREST There were no conflicts of interest declared.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES RT 15-43 Moved Kouvelis/Watson That the Committee: confirms the minutes of the Regional Transport Committee meeting held on 2 December 2014 as a correct record, and notes that the recommendations were adopted by the Council on 16 December 2014. CARRIED

REGIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PLAN 2015-25 Report No 15-23 The purpose of this item was to make decisions on submissions received to the draft RLTP, and approve the proposed Regional Land Transport Plan (the Plan) 2015-2025 so that it was ready for adoption by Council. Mr Wallace (Senior Transport Planner) introduced the item and took Members through the process to date. In addition to the recommendations in Annex B, he referred to a number of common themes that arose out of the submissions process which were highlighted at paragraph 8. In discussing and commenting on the officer recommendations and the Plan content, Members believed that more robust acknowledgement and emphasis was required around the Regional Growth Study, and the Regional Agri-Business Strategy. Members believed that the Joint Transport Study (JTS) was not incorporated adequately into the Plan and discussion ensued around the best way to support the JTS projects in the Plan. Comment was also made around the choice of consultation period which was from 15 December 2014 to 30 January 2015. Mr Wallace explained the recommendations proposed for each of the common themes that arose from the submissions process. Members fully discussed the themes and recommendations and provided their suggestions and comment to enhance and/or change wording in the recommendations. Members were also offered the opportunity to consider and comment on the submission points and officer recommendations in the Annex B tables. During the discussion, suggestions for several amendments to provide clarity and to strengthen the commentary were recommended and ultimately approved for inclusion. Transport Team officers, Mr Shirley (Group Manager Regional Services and Information), the Chairman, and New Zealand Transport Agency representatives provided clarification to Members‟ questions and suggestions as they arose. Accordingly, Members‟ suggestions were reflected in the amended recommendations as required.

Strategic Roading Network RT 15-44 Moved Kouvelis/Gordon That the Committee recommends that Council: 1. Where support for the Regional Transport Committee‟s focus on the strategic roading network has been received, that support is to be noted and thanked.

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 146 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

2. That the committee in its responses to submitters confirms that the Joint Transport Study is a core component of the Plan, and that the committee continues to advocate for projects that will give effect to the Joint Transport Study. The Committee also determines to clearly identify those projects that have not been put forward for funding and those which have been completed.

3. To advise submitters that although projects cannot be included in the programme component of the Plan where these are not endorsed by the respective approved organisation, the Committee will continue to advocate for funding of those projects over the lifetime of the Plan.

4. That the Plan be amended to include additional commentary in Section 2.2.2 “Improved linkages to other regions”, recognising the economic importance of connections via SH‟s 2 and 3 CARRIED

Increased Recognition of alternative Transport Modes RT 15-45 Moved Jefferies/Kouvelis That the Committee recommends that Council: 1. The committee in its responses to submitters acknowledges to submitters the importance of the walking, cycling and public transport activities to achieving the objectives of the Plan.

2. Reassures submitters that the committee continues to advocate for increased funding in these activity class areas in order to progress planned improvements in the programme component of the Plan.

3. That the Plan be amended to include commentary in Section 2.2.7 “Mitigating the adverse environmental effects from the regional transport system”.

4. To advise submitters that although projects cannot be included in the programme component of the Plan where these are not endorsed by the respective approved organisation, the Committee will continue to advocate for funding of those projects over the lifetime of the Plan. CARRIED

Long Distance Passenger Rail Services RT 15-46 Moved Cameron/Ellis That the Committee recommends that Council: 1. No change to the Plan.

2. The committee highlights to submitters the current priority stance to retain the Capital Connection service between Palmerston North and Wellington beyond the proposed cut off date of 30 June 2015.

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 147 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

3. Acknowledges that no new rail services are proposed, however highlights that should demand warrant additional services, this will be investigated by the committee.

4. The RTC write to KiwiRail seeking the reinstatement of the Marton, Taihape, Taumarunui and Levin train stops to the long-distance train service. CARRIED

Impacts of Forestry on Roading Network RT 15-47 Moved Kouvelis/Cameron That the Committee recommends that Council: 1. That the Plan be amended to include additional commentary in Sections 2.2.6 “increasing pressure on the regions rural roading network” and 2.4.1 “Efficient road maintenance and delivery” about the potential impacts of increased forestry harvesting on the Region‟s roads during the lifetime of the Plan. CARRIED

Importance of Rail Freight RT 15-48 Moved Kouvelis/Main That the Committee recommends that Council: 1. That the Plan be amended to include more commentary about the importance of the rail network for the transportation of freight and increasing the resilience of the network (Section 2.2.1 and 2.2.2).

2. The Plan be amended to recognise that increased amounts of freight will be transported via rail during the lifetime of the Plan (Section 2.4.2 and Measure 6 added to Policy 2.1). CARRIED

Economic Development and the Regional Agribusiness Strategy and Growth Strategy During discussion of this activity there was a suggestion to highlight in the commentary, the significance of, and raise the awareness of, the Inland Port to the Region. There was a suggestion to strengthen the commentary around the Palmerston North City Council submission in regard to State Highway 3 Ashhurst Bridge Cycle Pathway and to acknowledge the New Zealand Transport Agency‟s response in that regard.

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 148 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

RT 15-49 Moved Kouvelis/Watson That the Committee recommends that Council: 1. No changes to the Plan.

2. Highlights to submitters that the Plan does acknowledge the work being undertaken on the Regional Growth Study and subsequent Central New Zealand Agri-Business Strategies, and that these have strong synergies with the Plan, with respect to the importance of resilient, well planned transport systems. CARRIED

The Chairman noted a request from Councillor Guy who wished to make a comment. Cr Guy expanded on a key point from his submission which questioned whether the Regional Land Transport Plan should have a 30 year approach. He suggested that a 10 year Plan did not adequately protect the integrity of the Joint Transport Study. Ultimately Members agreed that a further recommendation be included to adopt a 30 year approach for the Plan going forward. The Chairman suggested that Members could work with Transport Officers around any minor changes or amendments to wording they wished to see included in the Plan.

RT 15-50 Moved Keedwell/Kouvelis That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-23 and Annexes. b. receives and confirms the minutes of the Regional Transport Committee meeting held on 9 February 2015 on the Draft Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025, as a correct record; c. approves the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 with agreed amendments; d. lodges the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 to the Horizons Regional Council for approval on 24 March 2015; e. recommends that a 30 year approach be adopted for future Regional Land Transport Plans;. f. approves, with amendments, the changes to Regional Land Transport Plan priority list of projects. CARRIED

Mr Wallace spoke to a tabled spreadsheet which outlined changes to the Regional Land Transport Plan priority list of projects. He elaborated further on the highlighted projects which had been added or amended since the draft Plan had been put together. Members discussed the projects, provided comment, and Mr Wallace responded to questions as they arose. A further recommendation was included to approve, with amendments, the changes to the Regional Land Transport Plan priority list of projects.

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 149 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

ROAD SAFETY UPDATE Report No 15-24 This report advised the Committee of the road safety education activities undertaken in the Region for the six months from 1 July 2014 to 31 December 2014, and provided an update on regional road safety trends. Mr Hindrup (Manager Transport Services) introduced the report and highlighted the efforts undertaken by road safety coordinators with the introduction of the new Blood Alcohol Content law change from 1 December 2014. He noted the disappointing results and issues associated with child restraint checks carried out by road safety coordinators. The Chairman referred Members to the proposal to „Exit the Road Safety Activity‟ which was contained in the Summary Document of Horizons Regional Council‟s Long-term Plan 2015-25. He encouraged Members to read the proposal and make a submission on their thoughts around the Horizons Regional Council road safety function. He explained that the New Zealand Transport Agency had confirmed the Funding Assistance Rate for the Manawatu-Wanganui Road Safety Programme for the 2015-2018 National Land Transport Programme at 65%.

RT 15-51 Moved Keedwell/Cameron That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-24 and Annex. CARRIED

GOVERNMENT POLICY STATEMENT ON LAND TRANSPORT 2015/16 - 2024/25 Report No 15-25 This item updated Members on the release of the Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport 2015-16 to 2024-25. Mrs Gulliver (Transport Officer) introduced the item and took Members through the key points submitted by the Committee on the draft GPS, and highlighted the notable changes to the final GPS. RT 15-52 Moved Kouvelis/Main That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-25. CARRIED

SUBMISSIONS ON ADJOINING REGIONS' RLTPS Report No 15-26 This report informed Members of the submissions made on the Committee‟s behalf to adjoining regions‟ Regional Land Transport Plans. Mrs Gulliver (Transport Officer) introduced the item and referred to the key points raised in the submissions. RT 15-53 Moved Kouvelis/Keedwell That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-26 and Annexes. CARRIED

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 150 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

CAPITAL CONNECTION PROGRESS REPORT Report No 15-27 This report updated Members on recent developments concerning the Capital Connection rail service. Mr Hindrup (Manager Transport Services) spoke to the item. Following a meeting held with the Honourable Simon Bridges (Minister for Transport) and the Honourable Nathan Guy (MP for Otaki), a copy of the 2012 business case with updated financial information was requested and subsequently forward to the Minister for Transport. Mr Hindrup referred to the updated patronage numbers, fare and financial information which was requested and obtained from KiwiRail. He said the new information raised questions about the actual operational deficit of the service, and of the subsidy needed to continue the service. A further meeting with the Minister of Transport to discuss the matter had been requested. Mayor Kouvelis congratulated those involved for their efforts in that regard. RT 15-54 Moved Kouvelis/Ellis That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-27 and Annexes. CARRIED

APPROVED ORGANISATION QUARTERLY UPDATE Report No 15-28 This report updated Members on significant regional roading, public transport, road safety and planning activities within the Horizons Region. Representatives from the Territorial Authorities present at the meeting spoke to their reports, highlighted activities of note, and responded to Members‟ questions as they arose. RT 15-55 Moved Gordon/Kouvelis That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-28 and Annex. CARRIED

NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY DIRECTORS REPORT Report No 15-29 This report provided Members with an update on the New Zealand Transport Agency‟s regional and national activities. Mr Hammond (New Zealand Transport Agency) took Members through the report and responded to questions as they arose. In response to a query about the application to NZTA for consideration of a cycle/pedestrian clip-on at Ashhurst Bridge, Ms Myers said NZTA was awaiting the outcome of a business case from OPUS. Mayor Cameron commented on the consultation process with iwi around the Stock Effluent Facility at Manunui. NZTA had decided not to pursue the project on cultural and spiritual grounds. RT 15-56 Moved Kouvelis/Watson That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-29 and Annex. CARRIED

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 151 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

MEMBERS’ QUESTIONS There were no Members‟ questions.

Mr Hindrup (Manager Transport Services) noted that a paper copy of the draft Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) (including track changes) was available for Members to peruse and consider whether they wished to see any minor changes or amendments to wording. Mayor Kouvelis thanked staff for their valued efforts in producing the draft RLTP.

The meeting closed at 12.46pm.

Confirmed

______MANAGER TRANSPORT SERVICES CHAIRMAN

Report of Regional Transport Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 152 Recommendations - 3 March 2015

on TheChairman thanked MrJuddattending for and speaking Members.to commented He waterways. referredto hisconversations with severalMinisters over the years about thisissue. the up cleaning contin address would the Act to changes Management proposed the whether Resource questioned He 1991. in intended was it as applied been J BERT MR speakto Members.to Report15 to No. in regard speakingrightspublic been granted, and requested,had Judd Bert Mr thatadvised Chairman The PUBLIC SPEAKINGRIGHTS There were APOLOGIES TheChairman welcomed everyone to the meeting. ALSOPRESENT ATTENDANCEIN PRESENT 11 10.00am Report March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Meeting Recommendations Committee Policy & Strategy of Report the attended Sheldon and Kelly Keedwell, Crs and Executive, previousweek,where several Chief remitshad been put forward for consideration. the LGNZ the he, on commented which Chairman meeting The Local information. their from for Memorandum Members to was a Process distributed Remit however Meeting General considered,Annual 2015 the be about (LGNZ) Zealand to New Government items supplementary no were There SUPPLEMENTARYI - 15

e pluin f aewy ad usind o ti cud otne o apn H also He happen. to continue could this how questioned and waterways of pollution ued Victoria Avenue,Palmerston North

of the of

on

no apologies.no UDD

twelfth usa 1 Mrh 2015 March 10 Tuesday

-

10 March 2015 March 10

spoke about his concern that the Resource Management Act (RMA) had not had (RMA) Act Management Resource the that concern his about spoke

meeting of the ninth the of meeting TEMS

evcs Ifrain, r Bwn Mngr Stra Manager), (Manager Communications Council), District (Rangitikei Bowen & Executive) (Chief McNeill (Media R Mr T Ritani Watson, Regional A Mayor K Manager Mr Mrs (Group Information), Regulation), Shirley & G Services Mr (Group Operations), Cook A Manager Mitchell Mr C Management), Mr Environmental Regulation), Manager & (Group Strategy Manager (Group Peet N Dr variousAt CommitteeSecretary Corporateand Governance QSM, Burnell GroupManager LR ChiefExecutive Barrow, JJ DRPearce, PWRieger QSOJP, BE Rollinson, (Chairman), Sheldon. CI MC Cotton, Gordon DB EB Crs

- 41 „Proposed41 Chairman 2015RMA Amendments‟.invited The Mr Judd

times the during meeting:

and MrB Judd (memberof the public).

u, J edel P Kly P G McKellar, GM JP, Kelly PJ Keedwell, RJ Guy, . i the in ,

triennium of the Strategy and Policy Committee Policy and Strategy the of triennium

-

Endorse

aau Ro, oios einl Council, Regional Horizons Room, Tararua

MsKBooth MrCGrant MrMJ McCartney

and Adopt Resolutions and and Resolutions Adopt and

ey & tegy Page Page

oe 3 Zone held at held

153

Item 10.2 Regional Council 24 March 2015

MEMBERS’ CONFLICTS OF INTEREST There were no conflicts of interest declared.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES SP 15-99 Moved Keedwell/Sheldon That the Committee: confirms the minutes of the Strategy and Policy Committee meeting held on 9 December 2014 as a correct record as amended below, and notes that the recommendations were adopted by the Council on 16 December 2014:  Pg 3, Presentation on Reducing Nitrogen Emissions from Cattle, amend first line to say that Mr Burr and Dr Lester were from Quantum Laboratories, not Vita Power Ltd;  Pg 4, Resolution SP 14-91, Against the Motion – record the name of Cr Keedwell;  Pg 4, Update on Climate Change, 3rd paragraph 2nd line, change carbon „saving‟ to „storage’. CARRIED

The Chairman welcomed Mayor Andy Watson and the Chief Executive, Ross McNeill from Rangitikei District Council, to the meeting

RANGITIKEI STRATEGIC WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT UPDATE Report No 15-43 A presentation was made by Mr Ross McNeil, Chief Executive of Rangitikei District Council and Rangitikei Mayor Andy Watson on the findings from the Rangitikei Strategic Water Assessment project. They thanked Members for the opportunity to present on the project. Mr McNeil explained the background to the project and its purpose and scope. He mentioned that although the population of the Rangitikei district was 0.3% of the New Zealand population, it provided 0.7% NZ export value. They talked about water use and water availability in regard to the Rangitikei River and Rangikitei groundwater, about barriers to irrigation, opportunities for irrigation and stockwater schemes, the Hunterville Rural Water Supply Scheme, irrigation efficiency and they mentioned several case studies. Mr McNeil and Mayor Watson provided responses around sustainability of schemes, availability of new technologies, costs, and funding opportunities. There was discussion around assistance that Horizons could provide by way of knowledge and information. The Chairman thanked them for the presentation and Mayor Watson expressed appreciation for the assistance already provided by Horizons. SP 15-100 Moved Guy/McKellar That the Committee: a. receives the presentation from Ross McNeil, Chief Executive of Rangitikei District Council; and Rangitikei Mayor Andy Watson. CARRIED

Report of Strategy & Policy Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 154 Recommendations - 10 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

PROPOSED 2015 RMA AMENDMENTS Report No 15-41 This paper informed Members of proposed changes to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) outlined by Environment Minister Hon Dr Nick Smith on 21 January 2015 in a speech to Nelson Rotary. A copy of the speech was attached at Annex A. Mr Bowen (Manager Policy and Strategy) introduced the report and invited questions from Members. There was discussion around the Minister‟s comments on property rights and housing development, and the importance of good infrastructure in the RMA. Members also discussed possible implications for the One Plan, and the Minister‟s undertaking to have dairy cows out of streams by July 2017 and whether it should refer to all cattle. It was noted that the opportunity for feedback would probably be during the Select Committee process. The recommendations were discussed and a new (b) was put forward asking for a draft copy of the amendments to be brought back to Council. SP 15-101 Moved Sheldon/Kelly That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-41 and Annex. b. requests a draft copy of the amendments to be brought back to Council. CARRIED

LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING REVIEW Report No 15-42 This report provided Members with an overview of the discussion paper released by Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) on local government funding. Mr Bowen (Manager Policy and Strategy) spoke to the report and noted that this discussion paper would ultimately be followed by another paper on policy recommendations. He commented on a suggestion in the report that rates were a reasonable mechanism to provide infrastructure, however some councils that provided greater social services might require different funding models. The report also commented that costs imposed on local government were not adequately funded by central government. Members commented that councils might need to widen their revenue base by, for instance, receiving a share of royalties from mining, and/or a share of excise tax on fuel, and that passing costs for infrastructure upgrades onto larger landowners was untenable into the future. Members discussed funding models, and also concerns expressed by ratepayers in the region, following which it was suggested that a submission be sent to LGNZ. The recommendations were therefore amended to allow for a draft submission to be emailed to Members following the meeting for their comment, with a submission to be agreed by Council at its March meeting. It was also suggested that the President and Chief Executive of LGNZ be invited to present to Council. SP 15-102 Moved Kelly/McKellar That the Committee recommends that: a. Council receives the information contained in Report No. 15-42. b. A draft submission based on conversation around the table at the meeting is emailed to Councillors for comment, so a submission can be adopted by Council on 24 March 2015. c. Council invites the President and Chief Executive of Local Government New Zealand to present to Council. CARRIED

Report of Strategy & Policy Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 155 Recommendations - 10 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

PROCEDURAL MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC SP 15-103 Moved Gordon/Sheldon THAT the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows. This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 and section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:

General subject of each matter Reason for passing this Ground(s) under section 48(1) to be considered resolution for the passing of this resolution PX1 Confirmation of Public s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Excluded Meeting held on information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of 9 December 2014 enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists under section 7.

PX2 Selection of Provider for s7(2)(a) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Chief Executive information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of Performance Review protect the privacy of natural the meeting would be likely to Process persons, including that of a result in the disclosure of deceased person. information for which good This report is confidential due to reason for withholding exists the potential for discussion of under section 7. confidential employment terms and conditions of an identifiable individual; AND the commercially sensitive nature of commercial proposals included in this report. PX3 Council / Committee to consider whether any item in the Public Excluded minutes can be moved into the public domain and define the extent of the release. PX4 Members‟ Questions CARRIED

The meeting adjourned to the Public Excluded part of the meeting at 11.55am and resumed at 1.35pm.

Report of Strategy & Policy Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 156 Recommendations - 10 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

The Chairman advised that due to the length of the Strategy and Policy Committee meeting, and Members‟ other commitments, a workshop would not be held that day. He clarified that in response to previous requests from Members he had undertaken to provide Members with a workshop or presentation or similar, should a meeting close before 2.00pm or 3.00pm.

The Chief Executive provided Members with a verbal update on the Economic Growth Study. He said an update had been given to the Regional Chief‟s meeting on 6 March (prior to the Zone 3 meeting). There would be ministerial involvement in the Study‟s implementation after a presentation was made on the results of the Study. He suggested that Members could think about the role of Horizons Regional Council, and about opportunities. He also noted that Members would receive a presentation on economic growth on their tour of the Bay of Plenty region. Members commented on the Study.

MEMBERS’ QUESTIONS Cr McKellar asked for information on the number of rural roadside fires in the region over the summer period, and whether there was any common cause. Cr McKellar referred to the follow up on One Plan nutrient management. He commented on farmers‟ concerns about compliance monitoring when they were using OVERSEER. Dr Peet (Group Manager Strategy and Regulation) advised that a paper would be brought to a future meeting about how the compliance framework should work and he outlined the general principle.

The meeting closed at 2.04pm.

Confirmed

______CHIEF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

Report of Strategy & Policy Committee Meeting - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 157 Recommendations - 10 March 2015

The Chair noted the followup sheet from the December 2014 Catchments Operations Committee Operations Catchments 2014 December the from sheet followup the noted Chair The There wereno supplementaryitems beto considered. SUPPLEMENTARYITEMS Cr There wereno requests forpublic speaking PUBLIC SPEAKINGRIGHTS 11.00am, at early, meeting the leave would they advised Sheldon 12.00pmand 1.30pm respectively. and Cotton Burnell, Crs There wereapologies.no APOLOGIES TheChairman welcomed ALSOPRESENT ATTENDANCEIN PRESENT 11 at Report March24 2015 RegionalCouncil Committee Recommendations Operations Catchment of Report Drainage and River 6, Item to regard in interest of conflict possible EngineeringReport in whichproperty her was mentioned. a noted Sheldon Cr MEMBERS’CONFLICTS OF meeting. s - 9.00am 15

Gordonand Kelly

Victoria Avenue,Palmerston North

of the the of

on

eighth ensa 1 March 11 Wednesday

-

11 March 2015 March 11

meeting of the ninth triennium of the Catchment Operations Committee Operations Catchment the of triennium ninth the of meeting

Poet nier, r Td (niomna Monitoring (Environmental Todd M (SLUI Hyslop N Students). Ms and Winters, Mr J Ms Mitchell, C Ms Coordinator), Engineer), (Project Bell J McKee D Mr Coordinator), Programme (Environmental Harrison Mr D Mr Engineer), Design (Senior Rita K Doull MrsEngineer), (Design G Mr Land), Manager (Environmental Cooper G Mr Management), Environmental Manager (Group Mitchell C Mr Manager), Information (Corporate Craig S Mrs thevarious times At during meeting: CommitteeSecretary GroupManager Operations ChiefExecutive 1.45pm) (to DR Burnell LR RJ Barrow, JJ (Chair), DB Guy MC Crs joined themeeting at 9.0

everyone to the meeting. edel P Kly JP Kelly PJ Keedwell, Cotton ere P Ree QO JP QSO Rieger PW Pearce,

INTEREST

t 12.05am) (to

2015 .

rights. - in ,

Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and and Resolutions Adopt and Endorse , 1am the

EB

(fro

ni (Media & Communications Manager),Communications & (Media ni aau Ro, oios einl Council, Regional Horizons Room, Tararua

9.01am) m

Gordon MrsJAKennedy MrAD Cook MrMMcCartney

, E olno, n C Sheldon CI and Rollinson, BE

GM , e officio) (ex

McKellar

(from 9.06am) (from QSM fo 9.01am) (from fo 9.02am) (from t 10.50am) (to

Page Page , , ,

held 159

Item 10.3 Regional Council 24 March 2015

Cr McKellar joined the meeting at 9.02am

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES COP 15-70 Moved Keedwell/Pearce That the Committee: confirms the minutes of the Catchment Operations Committee meeting held on 10 December 2014 as a correct record, and notes that the recommendations were adopted by the Council on 16 December 2014. CARRIED

Matters Arising: Mr Cook advised that the Makerua Scheme Liaison Committee meeting scheduled for February 2015 and mentioned in the minutes under Report No 14-268, Makerua Scheme-Linton Main Drain Investigations, did not take place.

RIVER AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING REPORT (PRD 01 02) Report No 15-33 The purpose of this item was to report on progress with river and drainage activities for the period 1 December 2014 to 28 February 2015. Mr Cook (Group Manager Operations) took Members through the item. He provided updates on various activities as required and responded to Members‟ questions of clarification. A range of photographs and a video were shown in support of several of the activities. Mr Cook and the Chief Executive responded to questions about the emergency works provision invoked by Horowhenua District Council to undertake work to alleviate the health and safety issues which had been experienced by the community as a result of a restricted outlet to the Hokio Stream. Mr Cook drew Members‟ attention to the meeting proposed for the Hokio Drainage Scheme on Friday 10 April 2015. He said although the meeting would be to primarily discuss scheme issues, including proposed capital works in regard to drainage improvements, and the impact of that to ratepayers, those attending were also likely to want to discuss the wider Lake Horowhenua Accord issues, including the proposed weed harvester operation. He explained the likely impact of revising the Indirect Benefit and Contributor rates in the Koputaroa Scheme and noted that a paper would be presented to the Committee at its May meeting on that topic. Mr Cook said the findings of the five-yearly audit/review of the Lower Manawatu Scheme HF rating category had been completed and the findings would be discussed with the Catchment Operations Committee before any changes were implemented. Mr Cook responded to questions of clarification about a video clip depicting the practice of „beach raking‟, and the consenting process and conditions associated with that. Mr Cook showed pictures of the water filled temporary flood barriers as part of the Flood Action Plan at Kowhai Park and explained their operation. Mr Cook commented on progress with the Kowhai Park stopbank upgrade works. He noted they would be completed within budget and was duly congratulated. There was discussion about the issues experienced by landowners in the vicinity of Burkes Pumpstation due to a fault of an on-site transformer. Mr Cook explained that staff had met with Powerco managers to discuss the issue. Mr Cook said that affected landowners had been advised by Powerco to lodge a claim through their energy retailer which would then be referred to Powerco for their consideration. The Chair referred Members to the list of River and Drainage Annual Scheme Ratepayer Meetings 2015 at Annex A. He drew the Palmerston North City representatives‟ attention to the City Reach Meeting to be held on 30 April 2015.

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 160 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

COP 15-71 Moved Gordon/Cotton That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-33 and annexes. CARRIED

FINAL REPORT ON ISSUES ARISING FROM ANNUAL RATEPAYER MEETINGS APRIL / MAY 2014 (PRD 05 00) Report No 15-30 The purpose of this item was to inform the Committee of progress made in addressing the more significant issues raised at Annual meetings for river and drainage schemes held during March/April 2014, or at subsequent Liaison Committee meetings. Mr Cook (Group Manager Operations) reported that overall, almost all scheduled issues had been satisfactorily attended to. Mr Cook provided clarification to Members‟ questions as required. COP 15-72 Moved McKellar/Kelly That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-30 and annex A. CARRIED

LOWER MANAWATU SCHEME COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN REPORT (PRD 05 35) Report No 15-31 This item presented to the Committee information on a comprehensive design collation report on the Lower Manawatu Scheme. Mr Cook (Group Manager Operations) introduced the item and commented on the major task undertaken by staff over the past 20 months to compile the comprehensive report. He said it formed a very valuable and technical design guide for future LMS engineers. Mr Cook congratulated Mr Doull (Senior Design Engineer) for his efforts in producing the document. Mr Doull responded to Members‟ questions. There was discussion about the earthquake probability and possible scenarios relating to the Manawatu Gorge. Mr Doulll explained his calculations for the level of sedimentation build-up in the reach of the Manawatu River between Opiki Bridge and the Moutoa Sluicegates with suggestions on methods to help reduce the rate of siltation. COP 15-73 Moved Burnell/Pearce That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-31. CARRIED

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 161 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

LOWER MANAWATU SCHEME - CITY REACH PROJECT MANGAONE STREAM STOPBANK UPGRADES (PRD 05 12) Report No 15-34 The purpose of this report was to inform the Committee of the scope of proposed works to upgrade sections of the Mangaone Stream stopbanks within Palmerston North City. Mr Cook (Group Manager Operations) introduced the report. COP 15-74 Moved Guy/Burnell That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-34 and annex. CARRIED

BURKES FLOODGATE STABILISATION REPORT (PRD 4 09/ PRD 5 08) Report No 15-32 The purpose of this item was to inform the Committee of proposed improvements to the Burkes floodgates structure. Mr Cook (Group Manager Operations) explained the initial findings from the structural checks of the floodgates and the subsequent improvement works which had been designed to raise the Factor of Safety to the recommended standard. In response to Members‟ questions, Mr Cook explained there was no immediate risk to the stability of the structure. He identified, by way of a diagram, the area at risk of a sliding failure. He said it was proposed, subject to the tender assessment process, that a contract be awarded for the completion of the works during the current financial year. This would be funded from savings made within the approved budget for the Burkes Pumpstation construction and from funds freed up within the Lower Manawatu Scheme as a consequence of deferral of proposed rock lining works at the Esplanade. COP 15-75 Moved Rieger/Barrow That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-32. CARRIED

Members’ Questions In response to a question about whether soil moisture would be a problem as a result of more intensive irrigation methods, the Chief Executive and Mr Cook said as a result of the changed land use due to the irrigation, there could be an expectation for increased flood protection and drainage services.

The Chair referred to the followups from the December 2014 Catchment Operations Committee meeting and asked if there were any questions. There were no questions.

The meeting adjourned at 10.50am Cr Burnell left the meeting at 10.50am The meeting reconvened at 11.00am

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 162 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

PROCEDURAL MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC COP 15-76 Moved Guy/Sheldon THAT the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows. This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 and section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:

General subject of each matter Reason for passing this Ground(s) under section 48(1) to be considered resolution for the passing of this resolution PX1 Confirmation of Public s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Excluded Meeting held on information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of 10 December 2014 enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists under section 7.

PX2 Lower Manawatu Scheme s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) - City Reach Project - information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of Channel Realignment at enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to Anzac Cliffs (PRD 05 35) carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists under section 7.

PX3 Council / Committee to consider whether any item in the Public Excluded minutes can be moved into the public domain and define the extent of the release PX4 Members‟ Questions

CARRIED

The meeting adjourned to the Public Excluded part of the meeting at 11.01am and resumed at 11.27am.

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 163 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

VERBAL UPDATE ON WHOLE FARM PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Report No 15-40 Mr Mitchell provided a powerpoint presentation in response to Members‟ questions about the implementation of Whole Farm Plans (WFP)and progress on Sustainable Land Use Initiative (SLUI) targets. He took Members through the slides, explained the data and its meaning in each graph, identified the size of the Sustainable Land Use Initiative challenge, and spoke of the farmer activity and implementation of their WFP. Mr Cooper (Environmental Manager Land), and Mr Harrison (Environmental Programme Coordinator), provided clarification around the objectives and benefits of riparian planting, commented on the work being undertaken by farmers outside of SLUI, and commented on farmers views and educational opportunities in regard to SLUI.

Cr Cotton left the meeting at 12.05pm

Members fully considered the data in the graphs, provided their comment, and asked questions of clarification.

The meeting adjourned at 12.23pm The meeting reconvened at 1.00pm

COP 15-77 Moved Gordon/Rollinson That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the verbal update on the implementation of Whole Farm Plans and progress on Sustainable Land Use Initiative targets. CARRIED

VERBAL UPDATE ON SUSTAINABLE LAND USE INITIATIVE IN-FIELD AUDIT Report No 15-39 A powerpoint presentation was provided on the Summer Audit Programme for the Sustainable Land Use Initiative (SLUI) works implementation, as requested by Council. Mr Cooper (Environmental Manager Land) said the aim of the audit was to primarily answer questions about the integrity of the works that have been claimed under SLUI programme to date. Mr Todd (Environmental Monitoring Coordinator) said his role was to monitor the SLUI programme. He said three SLUI Students had been engaged over the summer months to undertake the audit. He explained the audit design and elaborated on the range of activities covered in the audit. The SLUI Students presented and spoke to their findings. Ms Mitchell reported on the interim results of the survey, Ms Winters reported on the farmer feedback results, and Ms Hyslop reported on the findings. Mr Cooper said a report on the findings for each farm would be provided firstly to the Environmental Management Officers, then to the farmers, with a final report to be provided to Council. Members fully discussed the audit process and results, asked questions of clarification, and provided comment.

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 164 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

COP 15-78 Moved Sheldon/Kelly That the Committee recommends that Council: : a. receives the verbal update on the Summer Audit Programme for the Sustainable Land Use Initiative works implementation. CARRIED

Cr Sheldon left the meeting at 1.45pm.

SUSTAINABLE LAND USE INITIATIVE (SLUI) Report No 15-36 This report updated Members of the progress on Council‟s Sustainable Land Use Initiative (SLUI) for the period 1 December 2015 to 28 February 2015. Mr Cooper (Environmental Manager Land) explained the data provided in the tables and graphs and responded to Members‟ questions of clarification. Mr Cooper referred to the SLUI Advisory Group meeting to be held at a SLUI property at Ohingaiti on 17 March 2015. Members were advised to liaise with Mr Cooper around transport arrangements if they wished to attend. Mr Cooper explained that an interim decision on the outcome of the SLUI application funding to the Ministry of Primary Industries should be known before the end of March 2015. The Chair asked that the term „priority catchment‟ be substituted with the term „focus catchment‟. COP 15-79 Moved McKellar/Keedwell That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-36 and Annexes. CARRIED

REGIONAL COAST AND LAND Report No 15-37 This report updated Members of the progress on Council‟s Regional Land and Coast activities from 1 December 2014 to 28 February 2015. Mr Cooper (Environmental Manager Land) took Members through the item. He spoke to the Outputs at paragraph 6, and referred to paragraph 6.10 which provided a response from Ballance Farm Environment Awards around the value and ability to report progress from sponsored programmes. Mr Cooper highlighted the work undertaken by staff around One Plan Implementation. In regard to the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans presented to Council, feedback on how staff were coping with that aspect was requested. Mr Cooper undertook to provide more detail in that regard. Mr Cooper responded to Members‟ questions of clarification and there was comment and discussion about „change of land use‟ activity and issues associated with that. COP 15-80 Moved Gordon/Barrow That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-37 and Annexes. CARRIED

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 165 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

WHANGANUI CATCHMENT STRATEGY Report No 15-38 This report updated Members of the progress on the Whanganui Catchment Strategy for the period 1 December 2014 to 28 February 2015. Mr Cooper (Environmental Manager Land) commented on the staff coverage to manage day to day activities with the resignation of Mr Allan Kirk (Environmental Programme Coordinator). COP 15-81 Moved McKellar/Rollinson That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-38. CARRIED

RESPONSE TO MEMBERS' QUESTIONS Report No 15-45 This report provided a response to Members‟ questions and/or queries raised at previous meetings. Mr Mitchell (Group Manager Environmental Management) introduced the item. Mr Cooper (Environmental Manager Land) responded to Members‟ questions about Hill Country Soil Management as part of the Sustainable Land Use Initiative and Soil Health programmes. There was discussion around the monitoring of water quality data in catchments where water quality monitoring was undertaken, and discussion about the function of handling erosion and sediment control. Mr Mitchell undertook to provide information in that regard to the next Catchment Operations Committee meeting. COP 15-82 Moved Keedwell/Rollinson That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 15-45. CARRIED

The meeting closed at 2.24pm.

Confirmed

______GROUP MANAGER OPERATIONS CHAIRMAN

Report of Catchment Operations Committee - Endorse and Adopt Resolutions and Page 166 Recommendations - 11 March 2015

Regional Council 24 March 2015

Public Excluded Section

RECOMMENDATION That the public be excluded from the remainder of the Council meeting as the general subject matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48 (1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows. This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:

General subject of each matter Reason for passing this Ground(s) under section 48(1) to be considered resolution for the passing of this resolution PX1 Confirmation of Public s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Excluded Meeting held on information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of 24 February 2015 enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists under section 7.

PX2 Report of Public Excluded s7(2)(a) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Strategy & Policy information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of Committee Meeting - protect the privacy of natural the meeting would be likely to Endorse and Adopt persons, including that of a result in the disclosure of Resolutions and deceased person. information for which good Recommendations - s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the reason for withholding exists 10 March 2015 information is necessary to under section 7. enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities.

PX3 Report of Public Excluded s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Catchment Operations information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of Committee Meeting - enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to Endorse and Adopt carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of Resolutions and disadvantage, commercial information for which good Recommendations - activities. reason for withholding exists 11 March 2015 under section 7.

PX4 MWRC Holdings Draft s7(2)(h) - the withholding of the s48(1)(a) Statement of Intent 2015- information is necessary to The public conduct of the part of 16 to 2017-18 enable the local authority to the meeting would be likely to carry out, without prejudice or result in the disclosure of disadvantage, commercial information for which good activities. reason for withholding exists under section 7.

Public Excluded Page 167

Regional Council 24 March 2015

This report deals with the MWRC Holdings Limited Draft Statement of Intent which is commercially sensitive. PX5 Council / Committee to consider whether any item in the Public Excluded minutes can be moved into the public domain and define the extent of the release PX6 Members‟ Questions

Public Excluded Page 168