DOCSLIB.ORG

BMSDC Economic Development <Bmsdceconomicdevelopment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BMSDC Economic Development <Bmsdceconomicdevelopment From: BMSDC Economic Development <[email protected]> Sent: 18 February 2019 12:51 To: BMSDC Planning Area Team Yellow <[email protected]> Cc: Bradly Heffer <[email protected]> Subject: RE: MSDC Planning Consultation Request - DC/19/00657 Good afternoon, Thank you for this consultation. Eye airfield is a significant provider of employment and commercial business space, the new buildings and use will be compatible with existing uses on the site and form an appropriate extension for the existing business. The 1Eye Airfield Planning position Statement identifies this area as appropriate for business use development. 1https://www.midsuffolk.gov.uk/assets/Strategic-Planning/Planning-Position-Statement/EyeAirfield- FINAL-PPS-28Nov2013.pdf Economic development support this application. Kind Regards Clare Economic Development Officer – Open for Business team Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils – Working Together t: 01449 724880 m: 07860827637 e: [email protected] w: www.babergh.gov.uk www.midsuffolk.gov.uk From: Jason Skilton <[email protected]> Sent: 04 April 2019 08:21 To: BMSDC Planning Area Team Yellow <[email protected]> Cc: Bradly Heffer <[email protected]> Subject: 2019-04-04 JS reply Land On Eye Airfield, Ipswich Road, Eye Ref DC/19/00657 Dear Bradly Heffer, Subject: Land On Eye Airfield, Ipswich Road, Eye Ref DC/19/00657 Suffolk County Council, Flood and Water Management have reviewed application ref DC/19/00657. The following submitted documents have been reviewed and we recommend maintaining our holding objection at this time: • Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Strategy Ref 22648 rev A Oct 2018 • Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Strategy Addendum dated 15 March 2019 • Proposed Site Plan ref 1771 9 B The reason why we are recommending a holding objection is because whilst we are satisfied with the flood risk element has been addressed and satisfied that the applicant has a viable method for the disposal of surface water. The proposed attenuation basin is still shown to have 1 in 3 side slopes and a max depth of water of 1.4m, Whilst the applicant has said this conforms to national guidance, it does not conform with local policy and as such the basin design detail need to be amended to allow for 1 in 4 side slopes and a max depth of water of 1.2m for the 1:100+CC rainfall event. Consideration should be given on the design of the basin to allow it to be maintained safely and also to all emergency escape if in the event of a person entering the basin when it may contain a depth of water. If the applicant wants to go against local policy a RoSPA risk assessment of the basin will need to be presented. The points below detail the action required in order to overcome our current objection:- 1. Re submit the attenuation basin with 1 in 4 side slopes and a max depth of water of 1.2m, details of emergency escape areas are to be clearly shown or a. Provide a designers risk assessment endorsed by RoSPA. 2. Submit a detailed landscape details for the site and the SuDs features However if the LPA is minded to approve this application, we would recommend the following conditions:- 1. No development shall commence until details of the strategy for the disposal of surface water on the site have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Reason: To ensure that the principles of sustainable drainage are incorporated into this proposal, to ensure that the proposed development can be adequately drained 2. No development shall commence until details of the implementation, maintenance and management of the strategy for the disposal of surface water on the site have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The strategy shall be implemented and thereafter managed and maintained in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure clear arrangements are in place for ongoing operation and maintenance of the disposal of surface water drainage. 3. The X building hereby permitted shall not be occupied until details of all Sustainable Urban Drainage System components and piped networks have been submitted, in an approved form, to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority for inclusion on the Lead Local Flood Authority’s Flood Risk Asset Register. Reason: To ensure all flood risk assets and their owners are recorded onto the LLFA’s statutory flood risk asset register as per s21 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 in order to enable the proper management of flood risk with the county of Suffolk. https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/flooding-and-drainage/flood-risk-asset- register/ 4. No development shall commence until details of a Construction Surface Water Management Plan (CSWMP) detailing how surface water and storm water will be managed on the site during construction (including demolition and site clearance operations) is submitted to and agreed in writing by the local planning authority. The CSWMP shall be implemented and thereafter managed and maintained in accordance with the approved plan for the duration of construction. The approved CSWMP and shall include: a. Method statements, scaled and dimensioned plans and drawings detailing surface water management proposals to include:- i. Temporary drainage systems ii. Measures for managing pollution / water quality and protecting controlled waters and watercourses iii. Measures for managing any on or offsite flood risk associated with construction Reason: To ensure the development does not cause increased flood risk, or pollution of watercourses or groundwater Informatives • Any works to a watercourse may require consent under section 23 of the Land Drainage Act 1991 • Any discharge to a watercourse or groundwater needs to comply with the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Regulations 2017 • Any discharge of surface water to a watercourse that drains into an Internal Drainage Board catchment is subject to payment of a surface water developer contribution • Any works to lay new surface water drainage pipes underneath the public highway will need a section 50 license under the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991 • Any works to a main river may require an environmental permit Kind Regards Jason Skilton Flood & Water Engineer The Archaeological Service _________________________________________________ Resource Management Bury Resource Centre Hollow Road Bury St Edmunds Suffolk IP32 7AY Philip Isbell Corporate Manager - Development Manager Planning Services Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils Endeavour House 8 Russell Road Ipswich IP1 2BX Enquiries to: Rachael Abraham Direct Line: 01284 741232 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.suffolk.gov.uk Our Ref: 2019_00657 Date: 19th February 2019 For the Attention of Alex Scott Dear Mr Isbell Planning Application DC/19/00657– Land on Eye Airfield, Ipswich Road, Eye: Archaeology This site lies in an area of high archaeological potential recorded in the County Historic Environment Record, within the extent of a former Second World War airfield (EYE 072). Recent archaeological investigations as part of the Eye Progress Power scheme and chicken factory development have identified an area of Roman settlement to the east of the proposed development area, as well as evidence of medieval occupation, plus the remains of prehistoric and Roman field systems immediately to the south of the current application site YAX 040, 041). In addition, this site is situated to the east of a former Roman Road (BRM 011 As a result, there is high potential for previously unidentified archaeological remains to be present at this location. The proposed development would cause significant ground disturbance that has potential to damage or destroy any below ground heritage assets that exist. There are no grounds to consider refusal of permission in order to achieve preservation in situ of any important heritage assets. However, in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (Paragraph 199), any permission granted should be the subject of a planning condition to record and advance understanding of the significance of any heritage asset before it is damaged or destroyed. In this case the following two conditions would be appropriate: 1. No development shall take place within the area indicated [the whole site] until the implementation of a programme of archaeological work has been secured, in accordance with a Written Scheme of Investigation which has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme of investigation shall include an assessment of significance and research questions; and: a. The programme and methodology of site investigation and recording b. The programme for post investigation assessment c. Provision to be made for analysis of the site investigation and recording d. Provision to be made for publication and dissemination of the analysis and records of the site investigation e. Provision to be made for archive deposition of the analysis and records of the site investigation f. Nomination of a competent person or persons/organisation to undertake the works set out within the Written Scheme of Investigation. g. The site investigation shall be completed prior to development, or in such other phased arrangement, as agreed and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 2. No building shall
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DC/17/03920 Church Farm, Nicks Lane, Brome and Oakley, IP23
    Consultee Comments for Planning Application DC/17/03920 Application Summary Application Number: DC/17/03920 Address: Church Farm Nicks Lane Brome And Oakley IP23 8AN Proposal: Planning Application - Erection of straw barn and biomass building Case Officer: Sian Bunbury Consultee Details Name: Mrs Wendy Alcock Address: 20 Broad Street, Eye, Suffolk IP23 7AF Email: [email protected] On Behalf Of: Eye Town Clerk Comments Please note this application is from the parish of Brome and Oakley not Eye. No comment From:Nathan Pittam Sent:18 Sep 2017 14:34:03 +0100 To:BMSDC Planning Mailbox Subject:DC/17/03920, EH, Land Contamination. EP Reference : 200402 DC/17/03920, EH, Land Contamination. Church Farm, Rectory Road, Brome And Oakley, EYE, Suffolk, IP23 8AH. Planning Application - Erection of straw barn and biomass building Many thanks for your request for comments in relation to the above application. Having reviewed the application I can confirm that I have no objection to the proposed development from the perspective of land contamination. Kind regards Nathan Nathan Pittam BSc. (Hons.) PhD Senior Environmental Management Officer Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils – Working Together Email: [email protected] Work: 01449 724715 Mobile:: 07769 566988 websites: www.babergh.gov.uk www.midsuffolk.gov.uk From:ALLEN, Sarah J Sent:19 Sep 2017 13:44:03 +0100 To:BMSDC Planning Area Team Yellow Subject:Your Ref: DC/17/03920 (Our Ref: SG25124) The proposed development has been examined from a technical safeguarding aspect and does not conflict with our safeguarding criteria. Accordingly, NATS (En Route) Public Limited Company ("NERL") has no safeguarding objection to the proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Suffolk District Council
    APPENDIX D MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSULTATION LIST FOR LICENSING ACT 2003 & GAMBLING ACT 2005 POLICY REVISIONS 1. All existing premises/club licence holders 2. Debenham Library 3. Elmswell Library 4. Eye Library 5. Needham Market Library 6. Stowmarket Library 7. Stradbroke Library 8. Thurston Library 9. Akenham Parish Meeting 10. Ashbocking Parish Council 11. Ashfield Cum Thorpe Parish Council 12. Bacton Parish Council 13. Badley Parish Meeting 14. Badwell Ash Parish Council 15. Barham Parish Council 16. Barking Parish Council 17. Battisford Parish Council 18. Baylham Parish Meeting 19. Bedfield Parish Council 20. Bedingfield Parish Council 21. Beyton Parish Council 22. Botesdale Parish Council 23. Braiseworth Parish Meeting 24. Bramford Parish Council 25. Brome and Oakley Parish Council 26. Brundish Parish Council 27. Buxhall Parish Council 28. Claydon and Whitton Parish Council 29. Coddenham Parish Council 30. Combs Parish Council 31. Cotton Parish Council 32. Creeting St Mary Parish Council 33. Creeting St Peter Parish Council 34. Crowfield Parish Council 35. Darmsden Parish Meeting 36. Debenham Parish Council 37. Denham Parish Council 38. Drinkstone Parish Council 39. Earl Stonham Parish Council 40. Elmswell Parish Council 41. Eye Town Council 42. Felsham Parish Council 43. Finningham Parish Council 44. Flowton Parish Meeting 45. Framsden Parish Council 46. Fressingfield Parish Council 47. Gedding Parish Meeting 48. Gislingham Parish Council 49. Gosbeck Parish Council 50. Great Ashfield Parish Council 51. Great Blakenham Parish Council 52. Great Bricett Parish Council 53. Great Finborough Parish Council 54. Harleston Parish Meeting 55. Haughley Parish Council 56. Helmingham Parish Council 57. Hemingstone Parish Council 58. Henley Parish Council 59.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Writing
    MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL To: Council Report Number: C/63/14 From: Corporate Manager – Elections and Date of meeting: 17 December 2014 Electoral Management REVIEW OF POLLING DISTRICTS, POLLING PLACES AND POLLING STATIONS 1. Purpose of Report 1.1 In accordance with the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013, every council in England and Wales must undertake and complete a review of all of the polling districts and polling places in its area. 1.2 Guidance produced by the Electoral Commission sets out the process for a review, and this has been followed. 1.3 The appendix to this report provides a list of the recommended polling districts, polling places and polling stations, showing the changes which have been made since the last review. 2. Recommendations 2.1 That the Council adopts the Polling Districts, Polling Places and Polling Stations as listed in Appendix A to this report. 2.2 That the Council notes the Polling Stations proposed by the Returning Officer as listed in Appendix A to this report. 3. Financial Implications 3.1 There are none. 4. Risk Management 4.1 This report is not linked with any of the Council’s Corporate / Significant Business Risks. 5. Consultations 5.1 Consultation has taken place with Parish and Town Councils, District and County councillors, the Acting Returning Officer and other interested parties. 6. Equality and Diversity Impact 6.1 Access to polling stations is a factor that is taken into account when deciding on a suitable location. 44 7. Shared Service / Partnership Implications 7.1 There are none. 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Tna Prob 11/30/155
    THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/30/155 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the Prerogative Court of Canterbury copy of the will, dated 10 April 1544 and proved 9 July 1544, of Sir John Cornwallis (c.1491 - 23 April 1544), Steward of the Household of Prince Edward from 1538 to 1544, whose grandson, Sir William Cornwallis, purchased Oxford’s interest in the mansion of Fisher’s Folly. FAMILY BACKGROUND For the Cornwallis pedigree, see The Private Correspondence of Jane Lady Cornwallis, 1613-1644, (London: S. & J. Bentley, 1842), p. xxxii at: https://archive.org/stream/privatecorrespon00baco#page/n41/mode/2up The testator was a descendant of Sir Richard Sergeaux (d.1393) and his wife Philippa Arundel (d.1399) through their daughter, Philippa Sergeaux. Oxford was descended from Sir Richard Sergeaux (d.1393) and Philippa Arundel (d.1599) through their daughter, Alice Sergeaux (d.1452). This family connection may offer a partial explanation for Oxford’s sale of his interest in Fisher’s Folly to the testator’s grandson, Sir William Cornwallis (c.1549 – 13 November 1611). See Richardson, Douglas, Plantagenet Ancestry, 2nd ed., 2011, Vol. I, pp. 410-13, 615. Testator’s parents The testator was the eldest son and heir of William Cornwallis (d. 20 November 1519), esquire, and Elizabeth Stanford (d. 1 April 1537). See Plantagenet Ancestry, supra, Vol. I, p. 616. Testator’s siblings According to the Cornwallis pedigree, supra, the testator had five brothers and six sisters, of whom only three brothers (Edward, Francis and William) are mentioned in the will below: -Thomas Cornwallis, Archdeacon of Norwich.
    [Show full text]
  • HROME HALL. the Scat Ul 1,A Mv BATEMAN, 1911
    HROME HALL. The Scat ul 1,A mv BATEMAN, 1911. 227 BROME HALL. BY THE HON. A. ROSAMUND BATEMAN-HANBURY. • As it stands to-day it is difficult in the present Brome Hall to trace the position of the Great Hall, or Dining Room, which seems to have been one of the features of the original House. The curiously orna- mented chimneys, the linen-fold panelling, the old foundations, the octagonal Tower, the 34.by 2 English Bond of Brick Work, and in particular, the old Bricks, although they may have been greatly re-arranged, are practically all the direct connection left with the mansion depicted in the Kyp Print, or in the earlier pictures of a Tudor House, of which a few sketches only, are in the possession of private individuals. But, as the home of the Cornwallis's, Brome will always remain of historical and distinguished interest. The first member we know of the ancient family is Thomas Cornwallis, the Merchant Sheriff of London, 1378-1389. He waS born in Ireland, " from whence his surname cometh." His descendants were most honourably settled in Suffolk for more than four generations, and produced men illustrious alike in the camp, the court, the cloister, and the senate. His son, John, added to his patrimony the Lordship of Brome and Oakley, with other lands in the County by his marriage with Phillippe, daughter and co-heir of Robert Bucton (Buckton or Buxton) of Oakley, who died in 1408,and is_buriedin that parish Church. This John COrnwallis represented the County of Suffolk in Parliament in the reign of Richard II.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites Less Than 10 Dwellings in Size
    Sites Less than 10 Dwellings in Size PP Reference Development Parish Site Address Date of Approval Expiry Major or New Dwellings No of Units Total in 5 Year Net Gain Status Years 1-5 Beyond 2023 Status Minor Dwellings Lost Completed at 1st Period DC/17/03178/OUT OUT permission Palgrave Land to East of Priory Road 31/01/2018 31/01/2021 Minor 9 0 9 Not Yet Started 9 9 0 M /4933/16/OUT OUT permission Barking Land to the north of 1 Tye Green 24/01/2018 24/01/2021 Minor 9 0 9 Not Yet Started 9 9 0 DC/17/03201/OUT OUT permission Needham Market Land adjacent to 96 Stowmarket Road 19/01/2018 19/01/2021 Minor 9 0 9 Not Yet Started 9 9 0 DC/17/04520/FUL FUL permission Land Adjacent To The Old School The Street Wattisfield 05/07/2018 05/07/2021 Minor 8 0 8 Not Yet Started 8 8 0 Wattisfield IP22 1NT DC/17/05065/FUL FUL permission Stowmarket Land off Chilton Way 20/12/2017 Minor 8 0 8 Under Construction 8 8 0 DC/18/01748/OUT OUT permission Brome Triangle, Norwich Road Brome and Oakley 28/06/2018 28/06/2021 Minor 7 0 7 Not Yet Started 7 7 0 Brome And Oakley, Suffolk DC/17/04943/OUT OUT permission Land opposite Manor Park and fronting Horham 29/03/2018 29/03/2021 Minor 7 0 7 Not Yet Started 7 7 0 Worlingworth Road DC/17/06203/FUL FUL permission Land Formally Known As Mark Peacock Landrover, Stradbroke Neaves Lane, Stradbroke 18/05/2018 18/05/2021 Minor 6 0 6 Not Yet Started 6 6 0 IP21 5JE DC/17/04072/FUL FUL permission Hogs Kiss Debenham 08/02/2018 08/02/2021 Minor 6 0 6 Not Yet Started 6 6 0 Priory Lane M /1867/17/OUT OUT permission Chilton Leys Onehouse
    [Show full text]
  • Precept Per Parish 2020-21
    Mid Suffolk District Council - Precept per Parish 2020-21 Parish 2019/20 Tax Council 2020/21 Tax Base Council Increase / Parish Base £ Tax Parish £ Tax Decrease Precept £ Band D £ Precept £ Band D £ (-) £ Akenham - 22.48 0.00 0.00 23.61 1,735.15 4.79% Ashbocking 1,950.00 143.70 0.11 1,950.00 139.70 1,749.11 -2.86% Ashfield-cum-Thorpe 2,926.58 96.07 1.68 2,982.19 99.57 1,765.10 3.52% Aspall - 27.81 0.00 0.00 29.24 1,735.15 4.89% Athelington 421.84 19.96 6.89 421.87 19.96 1,756.29 0.00% Bacton 22,671.38 450.84 1.43 23,724.35 461.24 1,786.59 2.25% Badley - 34.55 0.00 0.00 34.41 1,735.15 -0.41% Badwell Ash 19,500.00 313.63 13.66 22,425.00 316.07 1,806.10 0.77% Barham 27,290.00 532.03 4.51 28,108.70 531.95 1,787.99 -0.02% Barking 9,000.00 169.24 0.02 10,381.00 175.73 1,794.22 3.69% Battisford 10,725.00 246.47 -0.33 10,725.00 254.36 1,777.31 3.10% Baylham - 115.17 0.00 0.00 112.98 1,735.15 -1.94% Bedfield 3,600.00 156.55 3.97 4,100.00 159.82 1,760.80 2.05% Bedingfield 1,620.00 99.93 -0.19 1,620.00 101.34 1,751.14 1.39% Beyton 16,622.00 310.97 11.65 16,622.00 312.20 1,788.39 0.39% Botesdale 29,500.00 277.30 2.10 30,700.00 277.62 1,845.73 0.12% Braiseworth - 30.54 0.00 0.00 29.85 1,735.15 -2.31% Bramford 67,500.00 862.93 -1.58 68,850.00 871.08 1,814.19 0.94% Brome and Oakley 6,630.00 193.72 0.26 6,630.00 195.03 1,769.14 0.67% Brundish 3,860.69 74.72 1.19 3,976.51 76.84 1,786.90 2.76% Burgate 2,915.48 67.87 1.63 3,017.41 68.94 1,778.92 1.55% Buxhall 4,119.21 158.48 0.77 4,617.70 163.72 1,763.35 3.20% Claydon 39,728.44 755.95 -3.67 39,902.52 758.91
    [Show full text]
  • Little Thatch, Upper Street, Oakley
    Little Thatch, Upper Street, Oakley A Grade II Listed semi detached cottage set in a lovely setting at the historic heart of Brome & Oakley villages and the renowned country estate. Owned for many years by a village stalwart, this delightful cottage has two bedrooms and large garden a little over a quarter acre (subject to survey). • Semi detached • Outbuildings • Modernisation required • 2 Bedrooms • Approx 0.25 Acre (0.10 Hectare) • Period features Location mainline rail station at Diss for commuting to the character doors. Modernisation and improvement The villages of Brome and Oakley form an City. The journey time to Liverpool Street station will benefit the cottage and result in a superb historic setting principally around Brome Hall is around 90 minutes. The neighbouring market country home. which until the early 1950's was a significant town of Eye provides an excellent range of shops Estate covering many hundreds of acres and including deli, cafes and restaurants. Whilst a Entrance Porch much property in the immediate vicinity number of surrounding villages have a Primary With ledged outer door with stained glass pane including the neighbouring town of Eye. Little School, Eye is renowned for the excellent High and side window. Pamment floor. An internal Thatch, found at the point where Brome meets School with Sixth Form that has achieved an period door has four glazed panels and opens Oakley enjoys a picturesque setting and can be OFSTED Outstanding award. through to... found on the approach to the village centre. The Description Sitting Room 3.91m x 3.81m (12'10 x 12'6) Parishes of Brome & Oakley cover a wide area Featuring a chimneybreast with brick hearth, yet have a delightful heart comprising much of This delightfully pretty village cottage, Listed as being of Architectural and Historic Interest fireplace and sealed chimney flue.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Table 7 1 ~ Pond density in the East Anglian Plain Natural Area. In alphabetical order of pkename. number area of ponds District or Natural Area Parish of ponds parish [ha) per sq krn Borough Acton 50 1370.1 4.3 Babergh East Angiian Plain Ake nh a m 14 432.9 3.2 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Aidharn 49 667.2 7.3 Baberg h East Anglian Plain All Saints and St Nicholas South Elmham 94 664.5 14.1 Waveney East Anglian Plain Afpheton 22 493.9 4.5 Babergh East Angkan Plain Ash bocking 64 571.7 11.2 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Ashfietd curn Thorpe 57 639.4 8.9 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Aspatl 34 341.3 10.0 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Assi ngton 44 1120.0 3.9 Babergh East Anglian Plain At helington 25 200.0 12.5 Mid Suffotk East Anglian Plain Bacton i08 923.4 1I .I Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Badingham I67 1299.8 $2.8 Suffolk Coastal East Anglian Pfairr Badley 27 436.7 6.2 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Badwell Ash 78 151.5 10.4 Mid Suffotk East Anglian Plain 8ardwell 41 997.4 4.1 St Edmundsbury East Angliafl Piain Barham 46 729.3 6.3 Raid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Barking 89 1275.1 7.0 Mid Suffolk East Angtian Plain Barnardiston 14 50&9 2.8 St Edmundsbury East Anglian Pfain Barningharn 44 532.5 8.3 St Edrnundsbury East Anglian Plain Barrow 43 1085.0 3.8 St Edrnundsbury East Anglian Plain €3att isfo rd 43 539.9 6.7 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Baylham 35 549.3 6.4 Mid Suffolk East Anglian Plain Bedfield 85 51 3.9 $6.5 Mid Suffolk East Angkian Plain Bedingfield 66 730.7 9.0 Mid Suffotk East Angiian Plain Betstead I3 305.8 4.3 Babergh
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Parish: Brome
    1. Parish: Brome Meaning: Broom (used collectively) (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Hartismere Deanery: Hartismere (17th cent. – 1897), Hartismere (North) (1897 – 1931), N. Hartismere (1931 – 1972), Hartismere (1972) Union: Hartismere RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Hartismere RD ( - 1974), Mid Suffolk DC (1974 - ) Other administrative details: Abolished as ecclesiastical parish (17th cent.) to create Brome and Oakley Hartismere Petty Sessional Division Eye County Court District 3. Area: 908 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a) Fine loam over clay soil, subject to seasonal waterlogging b) Deep well drained coarse loam over clay, some gravel c) Some deep sandy soils affected by groundwater 5. Types of farming: 1086 1 cob, 10 pigs, 40 sheep 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region, mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some pig-keeping, horse breeding and poultry. Crops mainly barley with some wheat, rye, oats, peas, vetches, hops and occasionally hemp 1818 Marshall: Course crops varies usually including summer fallow as preparation for corn products 1937 Main crops: 4 course system.: wheat, barley, clover, roots 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. Enclosure: 1808 Brome Common enclosed, Enclosure Act (1808): yearly payment of £15 charged on an allotment in Brome 1 1812 243 acres in Brome, Oakley, Thrandeston, Yaxley and Eye enclosed under Private Lands Act (1808) 7. Settlement: Dispersed parish with three main centres of habitation: a) the church, b) Brome street and c) Brome Hall Eye airfield is situated in SW corner of parish and could have influenced development in this area, Brome Park passes through eastern boundary and the course of the Roman road which marks the western boundary passes from NE-SW.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Suffolk District Council Consultation List for Licensing Act 2003
    APPENDIX C MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSULTATION LIST FOR LICENSING ACT 2003 1. All existing licensed premises/clubs 2. Eye Library 3. Stradbroke Library 4. Debenham Resource Centre 5. Thurston Library 6. Elmswell Library 7. Stowmarket Library 8. Needham Market Library 9. BECTU 10. UK Hospitality 11. The Portman Group 12. Arts Development UK 13. Federation of Licensed Victuallers Association 14. Independent Street Arts Network 15. Equity 16. UK Cinema Association 17. British Retail Consortium 18. British Board of Film Classification 19. Association of Town Centre Managers 20. Association of Convenience Stores 21. British Transport Police 22. Suffolk Trading Standards 23. Health and Safety Executive 24. Police and Crime Commissioner 25. British Beer and Pub Association 26. Campaign for Real Ale 27. British Institute of Innkeeping 28. Greene King Retailing Limited 29. Punch Taverns 30. J D Wetherspoon Plc 31. Admiral Taverns Ltd 32. Finborough School 33. Hartismere School 34. Stradbroke High School 35. Debenham Church of England High School 36. Thurston Community College 37. Stowupland High School 38. Stowmarket High School 39. Claydon High School 40. Akenham Parish Meeting 41. Ashbocking Parish Council 42. Ashfield cum Thorpe Parish Council 43. Bacton Parish Council 44. Badley Parish Meeting 45. Badwell Ash Parish Council 46. Barham Parish Council 47. Barking Parish Council 48. Battisford Parish Council 49. Baylham Parish Meeting 50. Bedfield Parish Council 51. Bedingfield Parish Council 52. Beyton Parish Council 53. Botesdale Parish Council 54. Braiseworth Parish Meeting 55. Bramford Parish Council 56. Brome and Oakley Parish Council 57. Brundish Parish Council 58. Buxhall Parish Council 59. Claydon and Whitton Parish Council 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2018, East of England
    East of England Register 2018 HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents The Register III Norwich 46 South Norfolk 47 Content and criteria III Peterborough, City of (UA) 50 Criteria for inclusion on the Register V Southend-on-Sea (UA) 54 Reducing the risks VII Suffolk 54 Key statistics XI Babergh 54 Publications and guidance XII Forest Heath 55 Ipswich 56 Key to the entries XIV Mid Suffolk 56 Entries on the Register by local planning XVI St Edmundsbury 59 authority Suffolk Coastal 61 Bedford (UA) 1 Waveney 64 Cambridgeshire 2 Thurrock (UA) 66 Cambridge 2 East Cambridgeshire 3 Fenland 5 Huntingdonshire 7 South Cambridgeshire 8 Central Bedfordshire (UA) 12 Essex 14 Braintree 14 Brentwood 15 Chelmsford 16 Colchester 16 Epping Forest 18 Harlow 19 Maldon 19 Tendring 20 Uttlesford 23 Hertfordshire 24 Broxbourne 24 Dacorum 24 East Hertfordshire 25 North Hertfordshire 26 St Albans 28 Stevenage 29 Three Rivers 29 Watford 29 Welwyn Hatfield 30 Luton (UA) 30 Norfolk 30 Breckland 30 Broadland 35 Great Yarmouth 36 King's Lynn and West Norfolk 39 Norfolk Broads (NP) 43 North Norfolk 43 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / EAST OF ENGLAND LISTED BUILDINGS THE REGISTER Listing is the most commonly encountered type of statutory protection of heritage assets. A listed building Content and criteria (or structure) is one that has been granted protection as being of special architectural or historic interest. The LISTING older and rarer a building is, the more likely it is to be listed. Buildings less than 30 years old are listed only if Definition they are of very high quality and under threat.
    [Show full text]