DOCSLIB.ORG

Samtrans Adaptation and Resilience Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Samtrans Adaptation and Resilience Plan SAMTRANS ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE PLAN February 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... vi Sea Level Rise Flooding and Inundation summary .................................................................. vii High Heat summary ................................................................................................................... ix 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE ......................................................... 2 1.2 SAMTRANS FACILITY AND ASSET DESCRIPTION ............................................... 2 1.2.1 Fleet........................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 South Base ................................................................................................................ 8 2 SEA LEVEL RISE .......................................................................................................... 12 2.1 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Exposure Analysis .................................................................................................. 16 2.1.3 Asset Sensitivity...................................................................................................... 34 2.1.4 Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability Summary ..................................................... 37 2.1.5 Limitations .............................................................................................................. 38 2.2 ACTION ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................... 38 2.2.1 North Base Action Alternatives .............................................................................. 40 2.2.2 South Base Action Alternatives .............................................................................. 43 2.2.3 Regional Adaptation Projects ................................................................................. 44 2.3 LIFECYCLE BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS ................................................................. 45 2.3.1 Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts ........................................................... 47 2.4 PORTFOLIO OF ACTION ALTERNATIVES ............................................................. 49 3 HEAT ............................................................................................................................... 51 3.1 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 51 3.1.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 51 3.1.2 Facility Vulnerability .............................................................................................. 56 3.1.3 Fleet Vulnerability .................................................................................................. 57 3.1.4 Passenger Vulnerability .......................................................................................... 59 3.1.5 Representative Bus Stops ........................................................................................ 64 3.2 ACTION ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................... 69 Page i 3.2.1 Facility Action Alternatives .................................................................................... 70 3.2.2 Fleet Action Alternatives ........................................................................................ 71 3.2.3 Passenger Action Alternatives ................................................................................ 72 3.3 PORTFOLIO OF ACTION ALTERNATIVES ............................................................. 74 4 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 78 4.1 SLR Flooding and inundation ........................................................................................ 78 4.2 High Heat ....................................................................................................................... 78 4.3 Programmatic Approach to Climate Resilience ............................................................. 79 5 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 80 APPENDICES APPENDIX A ACTION ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................... A-1 A.1 SLR Action Alternatives .............................................................................................. A-2 A.2 High Heat Action Alternatives ..................................................................................... A-7 APPENDIX B NORTH BASE LIFECYCLE BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS ................. B-1 B.1 Approach ...................................................................................................................... B-1 B.2 Results .......................................................................................................................... B-7 APPENDIX C SUMMARY OF NEXT STEPS FOR RETAINED ACTION ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................................................... C-1 C.1 North Base SLR Action Alternatives ........................................................................... C-1 C.2 South Base SLR Action Alternatives ........................................................................... C-6 C.3 High Heat ..................................................................................................................... C-8 C.3.1 Future Shelter Design/Advertising Contract Considerations .............................. C-10 C.3.2 Custom Shelter Design Considerations .............................................................. C-12 APPENDIX D HIGH HEAT FIGURES AND REPRESENTATIVE BUS STOPS ....... D-1 D.1 Heat vulnerability by indicator ..................................................................................... D-1 D.2 Representative Bus Stop Locations .............................................................................. D-7 D.3 Typical Bus Shelters ..................................................................................................... D-8 D.4 Selected Bus Stop Location details .............................................................................. D-9 Page ii TABLES Table 1. Retained Action Alternatives for North and South Base ............................................... viii Table 2. Projected Temperature Increase ....................................................................................... ix Table 3. North Base Asset Summary .............................................................................................. 4 Table 4. North Base Site Observations ........................................................................................... 5 Table 5. North Base Site HVAC Observations ............................................................................... 6 Table 6. South Base Asset Summary .............................................................................................. 9 Table 7. South Base Site Observations ......................................................................................... 10 Table 8. South Base HVAC Observations .................................................................................... 11 Table 9. SLR Hazard Definitions .................................................................................................. 12 Table 10. SLR Scenarios ............................................................................................................... 15 Table 11. North Base Extent of Flooding in 2050 ........................................................................ 21 Table 12. North Base Extent of Flooding in 2100 ........................................................................ 22 Table 13. South Base Extent of Flooding in 2050 ........................................................................ 26 Table 14. South Base Extent of Flooding in 2100 ........................................................................ 30 Table 15. North Base Depth of Permanent Flooding in Tidal Range in 2050 .............................. 35 Table 16. North Base Depth of Permanent Flooding in Tidal Range in 2100 .............................. 35 Table 17. South Base Depth of Permanent Flooding in Tidal Range in 2100 .............................. 36 Table 18. Adaptation Approaches for SLR ................................................................................... 39 Table 19. Retained North Base Action Alternatives ..................................................................... 40 Table 20. Retained South Base Action Alternatives ..................................................................... 43 Table 21. Present Discounted Cost Savings (Loss) Compared to Baseline (No Action) Alternative....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caltrain Business Plan
    Caltrain Business Plan PROJECT UPDATE – SPRING 2019 What Addresses the future potential of the railroad over the next 20-30 years. It will assess the benefits, impacts, and costs of different What is service visions, building the case for investment and a plan for the Caltrain implementation. Business Plan? Why Allows the community and stakeholders to engage in developing a more certain, achievable, financially feasible future for the railroad based on local, regional, and statewide needs. 2 What Will the Business Plan Cover? Technical Tracks Service Business Case Community Interface Organization • Number of trains • Value from • Benefits and impacts to • Organizational structure • Frequency of service investments (past, surrounding communities of Caltrain including • Number of people present, and future) • Corridor management governance and delivery riding the trains • Infrastructure and strategies and approaches • Infrastructure needs operating costs consensus building • Funding mechanisms to to support different • Potential sources of • Equity considerations support future service service levels revenue 3 Where Are We in the Process? Board Adoption Stanford Partnership and Board Adoption of Board Adoption of of Scope Technical Team Contracting 2040 Service Vision Final Business Plan Initial Scoping Technical Approach Part 1: Service Vision Development Part 2: Business Implementation and Stakeholder Refinement, Partnering, Plan Completion Outreach and Contracting We Are Here 4 Electrification is the Foundation for Growth with Plans for
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan
    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson
    [Show full text]
  • SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020
    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE as of 12-11-2020 December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Samtrans Fast Facts
    SamTrans Fast Facts Administration The San Mateo County Transit District is the administrative body for the principal public transit and transportation pro- grams in San Mateo County, SamTrans bus service including Redi-Wheels and RediCoast paratransit service, Caltrain commuter rail and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. Caltrain and the TA have contracted with the District to serve as their managing agency, under the direction of their independent board of directors. The Board of Directors consists of nine members from various leadership positions in the community with the following composition: two members from the county Board of Supervisors; one transportation expert appointed by the Board of Supervisors; three city councilpersons, appointed by the City Selection Committee; and three public members, one of whom must reside on the coastside, appointed by the above six members. SamTrans Strategic Plan In December 2014, SamTrans approved its five-year Strategic Plan, a blueprint that will guide the policy decisions of the bus agency from 2015 to 2019. The plan focuses on five main goals: increasing bus ridership by 15 percent, growing passenger fare revenue by 20 percent, reducing annual debt service by $1.5 million, improving organizational perfor- mance and managing workforce change. SamTrans has already successfully pursued several of those goals. Due in large part to the changes implemented as a result of the SamTrans Service Plan—the most extensive reworking of bus operations along the Peninsula in a genera- tion—bus ridership is stabilizing, reversing years of stagnant growth. The bus agency also approved changes to its fare policy, aimed at restoring the agency’s fiscal health and achieving the goal of 20 percent fare revenue growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information South San Francisco Station
    BASE Schedules & Fares Horario y precios del tránsito 時刻表與車費 Transit Holy Cross N Cemetery Treasure Island Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E RVservice, Park please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Stops ISABELLE CIR South San San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective January 1, 2020 LAWNDALE BLVD Transit (BART) rail service connects Colma Creek Francisco the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices are for riders using M I S S I O N R D Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. Clipper®. There is a a 50¢ sur- Map Key Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and A quick reference guide to service hours from this charge per trip for using magnetic Station other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. stripe tickets. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from South San Francisco Station From South San Francisco to: (stations listed in alphabetical order) El Camino 5-Minute Walk 1000ft/305m Weekday Saturday Sunday Costco Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip First Last First Last First Last High School Radius Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 4.70 9.40 South San Antioch 5:18a 12:01a 6:14a 12:01a 8:24a 12:03aWinston16th St. Mission 4.05 8.10 Children 4 and under ride free.
    [Show full text]
  • Verification Letter for the Climate Bonds Standard – Low Carbon Land Transport
    CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTER VERIFICATION LETTER FOR THE CLIMATE BONDS STANDARD – LOW CARBON LAND TRANSPORT Issuing entity: City and County of San Francisco – for its City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) Type of engagement: Assurance Engagement Period engagement was carried out: May 23, 2017 – June 8, 2017 Approved verifier: Sustainalytics US Inc., Contact address for engagement: 24 School Street, Suite 803, Boston, MA, 02108, U.S.A. Engagement team leader: Ankita Shukla, [email protected], (+1)416-861-0403 Scope and Objectives: The City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) established City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) to provide financing for a transportation-related program called the “Transbay Transit Center Program”, as described below. Sustainalytics was engaged to review and verify that the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2017B (Federally Taxable - Green Bonds) (the “Green Bonds”), meet the requirements under the Low Carbon Land Transport criteria of the Climate Bonds Standard. Transbay Transit Center Program The Transbay Transit Center Program (the “Program”) is expected to increase transit use through intermodal connections for eight Bay Area counties and the State of California through eleven transportation systems1. The Program will consist of three Phases: Phase 1: construction of a new one million square foot Transbay Transit Center which will replace the former Transbay Terminal in downtown San Francisco. The Transbay Center will include a 5.4 acre Rooftop Park which doubles as a green roof and the Train Box described in Schedule 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transbay Transit Center
    Transbay Transit Center Building the First Modern Multi-Modal Transportation Station in the United States The Transbay Transit Center Project will centralize the region’s transportation network by making transit connections between all points in the Bay Area fast and convenient for more than 100,000 passengers per day. The Project will replace the current bus terminal with a new multi-modal transportation center—the “Grand Central Station of the West”— and house eleven transit systems under one roof. The new Transit Center will make public transit a convenient option as it is in other world-class cities and return San Francisco to a culture of mass transit. As the northern terminus for high speed rail in California and the first modern high speed rail station to be constructed in the United States, the $4.2 billion project will create a modern regional transit hub and: • Stimulate the economy by creating more than • Serve as the San Francisco terminus for California 125,000 jobs High Speed Rail Service which will reduce California CO2 emissions by 1.4 percent statewide • Generate more than $87 billion in Gross Regional Product and $52 billion in personal income • Serve up to 45 million passengers per year through 2030 • Use cutting edge designs and technologies to • Create a demand in transit use through intermodal achieve LEED certification connections for eight Bay Area counties and • Feature a fully accessible city park and utilize Southern California natural light to conserve water and energy • Reduce carbon dioxide emissions by more than 36,000 tons each year from the Caltrain commuter rail extension alone The Transbay Project is the Largest Transit Project Under Construction in the Western United States www.transbaycenter.org 1.11 Transbay Transit Center TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTER The Transbay Transit Center in downtown San Francisco will transform transportation in California and stimulate the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building Bacciocco Auditorium - Second Floor 1250 San Carlos Ave., San Carlos, CA
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2011 KARYL MATSUMOTO, CHAIR JERRY DEAL, VICE CHAIR JEFF GEE CAROLE GROOM ROSE GUILBAULT SHIRLEY HARRIS ZOE KERSTEEN-TUCKER ARTHUR L. LLOYD ADRIENNE TISSIER A G E N D A MICHAEL J. SCANLON GENERAL MANAGER/CEO COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Accessibility, Senior Services, and Community Issues) San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building Bacciocco Auditorium - Second Floor 1250 San Carlos Ave., San Carlos, CA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2011 – 2:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance ACTION 2. Approval of Minutes of Community Relations Committee Meeting of November 9, 2011 INFORMATIONAL 3. Accessibility Update - Tina DuBost 4. Paratransit Coordinating Council (PCC) Update - Nancy Keegan 5. Citizens Advisory Committee Liaison Report - Peter Ratto 6. Mobility Management Report – Fixed-route Bus Service 7. Multimodal Ridership Report - October 2011 Committee Members: Rose Guilbault, Carole Groom, Shirley Harris NOTE: • This Committee meeting may be attended by Board Members who do not sit on this Committee. In the event that a quorum of the entire Board is present, this Committee shall act as a Committee of the Whole. In either case, any item acted upon by the Committee or the Committee of the Whole will require consideration and action by the full Board of Directors as a prerequisite to its legal enactment. • All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board. Staff recommendations are subject to change by the Board. SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1250 SAN CARLOS AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Committee Members Present: R.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Environmental Setting and Consequences
    CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES This chapter presents information on the environmental setting in the project area as well as the environmental consequences of the No-Electrification and Electrification Program Alternatives. Environmental issue categories are organized in alphabetical order, consistent with the CEQA checklist presented in Appendix A. The project study area encompasses the geographic area potentially most affected by the project. For most issues involving physical effects this is the project “footprint,” or the area that would be disturbed for or replaced by the new project facilities. This area focuses on the Caltrain corridor from the San Francisco Fourth and King Station in the City and County of San Francisco to the Gilroy Station in downtown Gilroy in Santa Clara County and also includes the various locations proposed for traction power facilities and power connections. Air quality effects may be felt over a wider area. 3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 VISUAL OR AESTHETIC SETTING The visual or aesthetic environment in the Caltrain corridor is described to establish the baseline against which to compare changes resulting from construction of project facilities and the demolition or alteration of existing structures. This discussion focuses on representative locations along the railroad corridor, including existing stations (both modern and historic), tunnel portals, railroad overpasses, locations of the proposed traction power facilities and other areas where the Electrification Program would physically change above-ground features, affecting the visual appearance of the area and views enjoyed by area residents and users. For purposes of this analysis, sensitive visual receptors are defined as corridor residents and business occupants, recreational users of parks and preserved natural areas, and students of schools in the vicinity of the proposed project.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet Is Available for Download at Sanfranciscobayferry.Com/Weta
    Members of the Board BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING Jody Breckenridge, Chair Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. Jeffrey DelBono San Francisco Bay Area Timothy Donovan Water Emergency Transportation Authority Anthony J. Intintoli, Jr 9 Pier, Suite 111; San Francisco The full agenda packet is available for download at sanfranciscobayferry.com/weta. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER – BOARD CHAIR 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ROLL CALL 3. REPORT OF BOARD CHAIR Information 4. REPORTS OF DIRECTORS Information 5. REPORTS OF STAFF Information a. Executive Director’s Report b. Monthly Review of Financial Statements c. Legislative Update 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Action a. Board Meeting Minutes - April 2, 2015 b. Authorize Filing Applications with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for FY 2015/16 Regional Measure 2 Operating Funds c. Authorize the Filing of an Application with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for $12,000,000 Regional Measure 2 Capital Funds d. Approve Amendment to Agreement with GHD for Engineering and Construction Support Services for the North Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility 7. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED BALLPARK FARE CHANGES Timed Item 1:00 p.m. 8. APPROVE BALLPARK FERRY SERVICE FARE CHANGES Action 9. APPROVE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Action 10. AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE Action A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DOWNTOWN SAN FRANCISCO FERRY TERMINAL EXPANSION PROJECT 11. APPROVE FY 2015-2018 TITLE VI PROGRAM Action 12. AUTHORIZE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A Action LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES NAVY FOR THE WATERSIDE PHASE OF THE NORTH BAY MAINTENANCE FACILITY Water Emergency Transportation Authority May 7, 2015 Meeting of the Board of Directors PROJECT 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]