N° 1 telescope 06/2020
THE WIMPY DOLLAR As the only global currency, the dollar may remain attractive in times of crisis. But it is facing long-term depreciation. telescope
3 EDITORIAL: The wimpy dollar
4 Five reasons why the dollar will weaken
8 WORKSHOP REPORT: What is a purchasing power parity?
10 How the US President is affecting the dollar
13 THE LOCATION: Fort Knox – Where the US keeps the gold portion of their currency reserves
14 FACTS & FIGURES: All about the dollar
16 EXPERT INTERVIEW WITH ECONOMIST GEORGE MAGNUS: “The renminbi won't rival the dollar anytime soon.”
18 MY BEST AND WORST INVESTMENT: Dominique Gisin, ski racer and Olympic gold medallist
20 A DIFFERENT VIEW: The great power of the dollar
22 IDEAS FOR INVESTORS: What should investors do if the Dollar weakens?
23 Why the dollar is the only world currency
25 OUTLOOK: Fear of a repeat w
EDITORIAL
THE WIMPY DOLLAR
Dear Reader
Welcome to the first edition of our newest publication, Telescope. The magazine will be published twice a year, and will take the place of Investment Views.
Why did we decide to name it Telescope? It’s simple, really. Our goal with this new magazine is to do what you do with a telescope: to see objects that are far away. We want to zoom in on topics that are not yet on everyone’s radar. Every edition is focussed around one central topic that has been chosen by our research team. The magazine will not only offer concrete investment ideas, but will also include expert interviews, background reports and a feature where a prominent person discusses their best and worst investments. In this edition, we asked an Olympic gold medallist – ski racer Dominique Gisin.
The first edition of Telescope is all about the US dollar and why we have good reason to believe that it is poised to mutate into a “weakling”. This may seem surprising at first, since it is still strong due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, we feel that this is simply the final surge at the end of a multi-year dollar cycle. Just because it is poised to enter a weak phase does not necessarily mean that the greenback will lose its status as the most important world currency – a claim we also address in this issue. And if you’re wondering what James Bond has to do with the US dollar, well, we have an answer for that too.
I hope you find the first edition of Telescope both stimulating and enjoyable.
Dr Felix Brill Chief Investment Officer
telescope ∙ N° 1 06/2020 3 FIVE REASONS WHY THE DOLLAR WILL WEAKEN The US dollar is the most important currency. However, this doesn’t mean that it is strong. There are good reasons why it will lose value over the coming years.
Felix Brill
4 N° 1 06/2020 ∙ telescope The US dollar is too kind correct themselves over time. Empirical expensive relative evidence is clear in this regard. to other currencies. Interestingly, despite being undervalued #1 against the US dollar by 15%, the euro is by This is according to the theory of far not the weakest of the industrial nations’ purchasing power parity. 10 main currencies at this time. After the Swiss franc, the Australian dollar and the New Zea- The greenback has not only increased in value land dollar, the euro has the fourth lowest during the coronavirus crisis. Essentially speak- valuation against the greenback ( see valua- ing, a period of appreciation started as far back tion graph below). The Swedish krona brings as the euro crisis and has continued until now. up the rear by a considerable margin with an Due to the recent surge in appreciation against undervaluation of more than 30%. the backdrop of the coronavirus crisis, the situa- tion with respect to the US dollar’s valuation Overall, the picture is clear: the US dollar is too has even been accentuated. As a yardstick for expensive across the board. There is reason this statement, we are applying the so-called to fear that the surge in the dollar triggered by theory of purchasing power parity ( see the COVID-19 merely was the last hurrah ( see #4). workshop report on page 8). According to this If purchasing power parity is used as a yardstick, theory, under the conditions of free competi- the probability of a normalisation and thus a tion and provided that the transaction costs are depreciation of the US dollar clearly outweighs negligible, identical products in two countries the scenario that the appreciation trend of with different currencies will sell for the same recent years will continue. This assessment price. refers to a time horizon of two to three years. In the short term, purchasing power parity At present, the US dollar is overvalued against does not provide any reliable signals. the euro by around 15% ( see PPP graph on page 6). This means that the EUR/USD exchange rate is also just outside the neutral zone, which marks the historically “normal” The United States range of deviation around purchasing power have a higher rate of parity. When this is the case, the deviation is deemed to be “significant”. The US dollar is #2 inflation than Europe therefore currently significantly overvalued. and Japan. Structurally, the dollar is As the graphic shows, a significant deviation therefore weakening against these can of course become even more extreme. Typically, however, marked deviations of this currencies over time.
The theory of purchasing power parity also pro- vides a second reason as to why the US dollar is likely to lose value over the coming years. Purchasing power parity is not stable over time
The dollar is overvalued against many currencies ( see PPP graph on page 6). Since the intro- duction of the euro in 2002, purchasing power CHFAUD NZD EURCAD GBPJPY SEK 0 parity has increased from around 1.15 euros to the US dollar to 1.27 euros to the US dollar. –5 In terms of purchasing power parity, the euro
–10 has thus gained 10% against the US dollar. This can be explained by the fact that the United –15 States have recorded structurally higher infla- tion during this time. –20 Structural differences in inflation are typically –25 persistent. Even if we do not know precisely
–30 how inflation will develop in different countries over the coming years, it is very likely that the –35 differences in inflation between countries will Undervaluation against the dollar in purchasing power parity terms in % remain relatively stable. This allows for us to anticipate the development of purchasing power parity over the coming years. Here too,
telescope ∙ N° 1 06/2020 5 the picture is clear: the purchasing power of the US dollar is likely to decrease in the next few years due to the country’s higher rate of inflation. This would make the current significant over The higher rate valuation of the greenback even greater over the coming years, even if the actual exchange of inflation reduces rate doesn’t move. The “gravitational force” and therefore the likelihood of a depreciation the purchasing power thus becomes ever greater over time. of the Dollar.
“Big spending” has not been a blessing #3 for the greenback to date. But this is exactly the order This is especially the case when the debt threatens to get out of control. Many emerging of the day in the United States. markets can tell you a thing or two about this. However, the same can also be said for Europe History has shown that no direct link can be during the euro crisis. identified between a country’s debt and the strength of its own currency. This can be seen In addition, there is a further potentially difficult based on the example of the Japanese yen. constellation for a currency. This is the case With government debt well in excess of 200% when a significant deficit in the state budget of national income, the Land of the Rising Sun coincides with a deficit in the country’s current even puts Greece in the shade. In truth, how account. Where this combination arises, we ever, the yen is by no means a weak currency. talk of a so-called twin deficit. Due to it being In fact, the opposite is true. The reason why the most notorious, it is the twin deficit of the the yen has tended to appreciate rather than United States that is most likely the best known. depreciate in recent years can be explained The mere existence of a twin deficit need not by the theory of purchasing power parity: be a great burden on the currency. In most over all these years, Japan has had little to cases, things only get difficult when either one no inflation ( see #2). or both components deteriorate significantly.
Debt development can, however, have an This is the case in the United States when the important impact on the value of a currency. White House changes colour, i.e. when a Demo-
Purchasing power parity for EUR/USD
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
EURUSD 0.60 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
EUR/USDPurchasing power parity (PPP) and neutral range
6 N° 1 06/2020 ∙ telescope cratic President follows a Republican. The rea- If the pattern observed during the financial crisis son for this is fiscal policy ( see “How the US is repeated, things will not look so good for the President is affecting the dollar” on page 10). US dollar in the period following the coronavirus But watch out: public perception is deceptive. crisis. In any case, the high point recorded by the It is not the Democrats who typically engage US dollar in March 2009 was followed by a period in “big spending”, but rather the supposedly of weakness lasting more than two years. Within fiscally sensible Republicans. Especially against 24 months, the US dollar lost almost 20% on a the background of the economic impact of the trade-weighted basis. And who knows how things coronavirus crisis, an expansion of new debt would have materialised going forward if the and the re-election of Donald Trump would euro crisis had not reared its head at this time. probably pave the way for a weak phase in the US dollar’s development. There is no longer talk of divergent monetary The coronavirus policy. US dollar fans crisis has given the #5 are therefore lacking a popular nar- US dollar a massive #4 rative of recent years. boost. With the end of the crisis, it is in danger of running out of steam. Psychology has not been discussed so far. Exaggerations and herd behaviour are well Periods of crisis are good for the US dollar. In known phenomena on the financial markets. such phases, demand for US dollar liquidity These also include so-called narratives. These typically increases. This was the case during the are explanation patterns that become ever global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009. And more established over time and increasingly this phenomenon was once again seen at the take on a life of their own. beginning of the coronavirus crisis, especially “Divergent monetary policy” was an important at the beginning of March 2020 when concerns market narrative of recent years. This referred about the spread of the coronavirus hit the to the fact that the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) financial markets with full force. was able to tighten its monetary policy thanks to an advanced economic cycle, while many other The US dollar rose across the board. Measured regions, and particularly Europe, continued to according to the trade-weighted US dollar have to make do with zero or even negative inter- index in which currency performance is weighed est rates. This interest rate advantage made the according to trade flows, the increase between US dollar more attractive to a certain extent. 3 and 23 March 2020 was more than 8%. Since then, the US dollar has weakened somewhat, Empirically, the interest rate differential does but it is still well above the levels seen at the not help in reliably predicting how an exchange outset of the year. This picture is especially rate will develop. And yet, at some point, this pronounced against the so-called commodity narrative gained so much momentum that it was currencies, which suffered all the more due to no longer really scrutinised by many investors. the lower oil price. For example, the Canadian dollar has fallen by around 8% since the begin- ning of 2020. The Norwegian krone has lost 16% against the dollar, while the Russian rouble has even weakened by 20% relative to the greenback. Periods of dollar The comparison with the global financial crisis is revealing. Between July and October 2008, weakness have been the US dollar rose by almost 20% on a trade- weighted basis. While it initially fell by 4% up good for the global to the end of 2008, it then surged by 8% by March 2009. Should there indeed be a second economy. wave of coronavirus infections, the US dollar is likely to be boosted once more. But what will things look like subsequently?
telescope ∙ N° 1 06/2020 7 WORKSHOP REPORT
This has now become superfluous. The Fed has reduced key interest rates to zero in the wake of WHAT IS A the coronavirus crisis. The painstakingly built- up interest rate cushion is therefore a thing of the past. And, considering the consequences of PURCHAS- the coronavirus, it does not look as though it could come back any time soon. Many US dollar fans will therefore be unable to call on their ING POWER popular narrative of divergent monetary policy over the next few years.
Perhaps a different, US-dollar-boosting narra- PARITY? tive will establish itself. What if the coronavirus pandemic and its consequences reignite the euro crisis? What if the recession in the industri- The purchasing power alised nations sees the emerging markets fall parity is an established into a new crisis? Such concerns could become established and make the US dollar look as method of assessing solid as a rock. While these are possible scenar- ios, they are by no means the most likely. exchange rates. It allows us to identify Conclusion long-term exchange
The US dollar is a weakling and is likely to come rate trends and over- under pressure in the coming years due to the five aforementioned reasons. Despite its impor- valuation or under- tance for the global economy and the financial valuation of different markets, the past has shown that the US dollar has repeatedly experienced periods of weakness. currencies.
The next one is coming, and because the US dollar plays an important role in the portfolios Felix Brill of most investors, they cannot be blasé about this ( corresponding investment ideas can be found on page 22). However, periods of US dol- lar weakness also have their positive sides: they have typically been good phases for the global economy and the financial markets. Given all the uncertainty caused by the coronavirus, this would be no bad thing.
What if the coronavirus pandemic and its consequences reignite the euro crisis?
8 N° 1 06/2020 ∙ telescope WORKSHOP REPORT
The purchasing power parity in the long run
3.5
= 0) 3.0 00 2.5 19
2.0 basis 1.5
1.0 ogarithmic, 0.5 x (l
nde 0.0 I 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 –0.5
Producer price index USAProducer price index UK (in USD)
This graph shows the producer price indices of the USA and UK since 1791 on a logarithmic scale. The UK time series has been converted to USD, the base has been set at zero in 1900.
The purchasing power parity Empirical evidence Practical use (PPP) is based on the “law of Purchasing power parity has We update our estimates one price”, which says that, been addressed by countless of purchasing power parity under the conditions of free economists. “The Purchasing in the main currencies on a competition and provided Power Parity Debate” by monthly basis using producer that the transaction costs are Alan und Mark Taylor, pub- price indices and nominal negligible, identical products lished in 2004 (“The Journal exchange rates. It is important in two countries with different of Economic Perspectives”), to note, however, that PPP currencies will sell for the offers a good overview of estimates are subject to some same price. The ideas behind the literature on the topic. uncertainty. The starting point purchasing power parity Purchasing power parity can and length of the observation can be traced all the way back be very clearly demonstrated period both play an important to famed British economist if the observation period is role. David Ricardo (1772–1823). long enough. To account for this uncertainty, A distinction is typically made Moreover, producer price we include not only the devel- between absolute and relative indices (PPI) should be used opment of the exchange rate purchasing power parity. to assess purchasing power and our estimate of the PPP We use relative PPP ( see parity because these indices in our illustrations, but also for example page 6). This primarily cover goods that are what is referred to as a “neutral assumes that product prices highly tradable. The graphic range” around the PPP. This will change symmetrically, demonstrates how close the neutral range is defined as a taking into account exchange relationship between relative standard deviation of the rates, but that price levels price trends and exchange percentage deviation of the may differ. One well-known rate trends has been over the exchange rate from PPP. The example used to illustrate past two centuries. neutral range allows us to absolute purchasing power determine whether a deviation parity is the Big Mac Index, Producer prices in the US and from PPP is “significant” while which was invented by the the UK have developed in an taking into account the neces- British weekly newspaper extremely similar manner in sary degree of uncertainty. “The Economist”. As well- both countries over the entire The greater the deviation from known as McDonald’s famous time period. However, the PPP, the more interesting it double-decker hamburger graphic also clearly shows that could be to bank on the resolu- is, and even though it is iden there have been some periods tion of this incorrect valuation. tical from one country to the of major divergence. This is next, it is extremely difficult also confirmed by the results to trade – a key prerequisite. of Taylor and Taylor’s study.
telescope ∙ N° 1 06/2020 9 HOW THE US PRESIDENT IS AFFECTING THE DOLLAR
The president of the United States holds enormous power. But he does not have the power to directly influence the value of the US dollar. However, with considerable budget deficits, he may manage to do just that.
Thomas Gitzel
Seven is a very special number – sometimes it’s a Some suspect that these cycles are related to lucky number, sometimes it’s an unlucky one. the length of time that any US president can According to the Bible, God created the world hold office. Since each president can only serve in seven days, and there were Seven Wonders for a maximum of eight years, it may be that for- of the Ancient World. The number also has a eign exchange markets start looking towards significance in the fairy tale “Snow White”, the future before the election of a new presi- where the mirror on the wall knew that Snow dent. In fact, since the mid-1980s, the peaks and White, with her seven dwarfs, was the “fairest valleys of the US dollar’s value have moved in of them all” – much to the chagrin of the evil sync with which political party held the office of queen. In libraries, the number seven appears the president ( see graph on the next page). much more frequently in book titles than the We can see, therefore, that whether a Republi- numbers six or eight. The same applies in can or Democrat is in office has an impact on dictionaries in terms of words that start with the value of the dollar. numbers.
The two parties’ reputations in terms of economic policy can be deceptive Since the Second World War, most US presi- dents have been elected to two consecutive terms in office. And, with a few exceptions, the parties have switched back and forth from 1945 The dollar is moving to the present: a Republican president followed by a Democrat and vice versa. Since the two in a roughly camps differ in terms of their economic policy agenda, the dollar cycles may actually be seven-year cycle. affected by the ruling political party.
After all, Republicans allegedly favour a more conservative – and even restrictive – fiscal poli- cy, while Democrats are associated with a more liberal approach to government spending. However, upon closer inspection, the opposite appears to be true. A study by the economists When we look at the historical development of Fabrizio Zilibotti and Andreas Müller and the the US dollar, we see a roughly seven-year cycle economic researcher Kjetil Storesletten demon- on average, even if it has not adhered as closely strated that, compared to Democratic adminis- to this average in recent years. Is it magic, or is trations, Republican administrations have con- there something more behind this trend? sistently increased government debt since the
10 N° 1 06/2020 ∙ telescope Second World War. In any case, the widely held view that Republicans pursue a fiscally conservative agenda in terms of debt policy cannot be confirmed. The US is The deficit also impacts the dollar notorious for its deficits. The economists’ analysis shows that switching from a Republican to a Democratic administra- With one exception only, tion is associated with an annual reduction of the government debt (in relation to the gross it has not had a domestic product, GDP) of 1.8% on average. Democratic presidents tend to raise taxes. The budget surplus since resulting revenues increased relative to GDP over the course of Democratic administrations the 1980s. by an average of 0.8%.
This means that when the White House is in Democratic hands, the debt level falls, whereas it rises during Republication administrations. This is not without consequences for the curren- cy. A significant federal budget deficit coupled Because trade makes up the greatest portion of with a current account deficit in terms of trade the current account, a deficit generally means with foreign countries – a phenomenon known that a national economy is importing more than as twin deficits – can act as a burden on the it is exporting, and that it is not earning enough currency. The current account is the difference to pay for all these imports. Greatly simplified, between the export and import of goods, ser- this means that countries with a current account vices, and certain capital gains and transfers. deficit are incurring debt abroad. The US is
US Presidents since and the dollar
180
160
1 0
120
100
80
60