Nome Roadside Fishing Guide Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nome River Water Control Structures
BLM LIBRARY 88049206 Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Open File Report 62 Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/ST-97/003+81 00+020 April 1997 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Nome River Water Control Structures Howard L. Smith JK 870 .L3 06 no. 62 ^&&£ *>v^ fe Nome River Water Control Structures Howard L. Smith U.S. Department of the Interior of Bureau Land Management 0pen Fi)e Report 62 Alaska State Office -| ^pr il 997 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Author Howard Smith is an archaeologist with the Northwest Management Team, Northern District, Bureau of Land Management, Fairbanks, Alaska. Open File Reports Open File Reports identify the results of inventories or other investigations that are made available to the public outside the formal BLM-Alaska technical publication series. These reports can include preliminary or incomplete data and are not published and distributed in quantity. The reports are available at BLM offices in Alaska, the USDI Resources Library in Anchorage, various libraries of the University of Alaska, and other selected locations. Copies are also available for inspection at the USDI Natural Resources Library in Washington, D.C. and at the BLM Service Center Library in Denver. Cover Photo: Headgate of the Miocene Ditch on the Nome River, Alaska. Photo by Howard L Smith Table of Contents Abstract 1 Background 1 Discovery of Gold 1 Events in 1899 2 Events in 1900 4 Events after 1900 5 Water Control Structures 6 The Miocene Ditch 7 The Seward Ditch 17 The Pioneer Ditch 18 The Campion Ditch 19 The -
Short Nosed Sturgeon
Connecticut River Coordinator's Office: Fish Facts - Shortnose Sturgeon Page 1 of 3 Skip navigation links Fish Facts - Shortnose Sturgeon z Description z Life History z Distribution z Status z Restoration Efforts Download a Fact Sheet (85 KB Adobe pdf file) You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader software to open the document above. If you do not have this software, you may obtain it free of charge by following this link. Description The shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) is one of two sturgeon species in the Connecticut River; the other is the Atlantic sturgeon. The shortnose is the smaller of the two, growing to be 2 to 3 feet in length and about 14 pounds in weight. Sturgeons are an ancient species with fossils dating back 65 million years. They are very distinctive, looking like a prehistoric cross between a shark and a catfish. Sturgeons lack teeth and scales but have a unique body armor of diamond-shaped bony plates called scutes. Some have been found to be over 60 years old. Life History Shortnose sturgeon are typically anadromous, migrating from the ocean to fresh water specifically to reproduce. However, of the two populations in the Connecticut River system (formed by the construction of dams), one is considered to be partially landlocked and the other is likely to be http://www.fws.gov/r5crc/Fish/zf_acbr.html 1/3/2007 Connecticut River Coordinator's Office: Fish Facts - Shortnose Sturgeon Page 2 of 3 amphidromous, moving between fresh and salt water. Shortnose reproduce in the spring. They broadcast their eggs in areas with rubble substrate. -
Fishery Management Plan for Arctic Grayling Sport Fisheries Along the Nome Road System, 2001–2004
Fishery Management Report No. 02-03 Fishery Management Plan for Arctic Grayling Sport Fisheries along the Nome Road System, 2001–2004 by Fred DeCicco April 2002 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used in Division of Sport Fish Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications without definition. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics, fisheries centimeter cm All commonly accepted e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA deciliter dL abbreviations. a.m., p.m., etc. base of natural e gram g All commonly accepted e.g., Dr., Ph.D., logarithm hectare ha professional titles. R.N., etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilogram kg and & coefficient of variation CV at @ 2 kilometer km common test statistics F, t, , etc. liter L Compass directions: confidence interval C.I. meter m east E correlation coefficient R (multiple) north N metric ton mt correlation coefficient r (simple) milliliter ml south S covariance cov millimeter mm west W degree (angular or ° Copyright temperature) Weights and measures (English) Corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df cubic feet per second ft3/s Company Co. divided by ÷ or / (in foot ft Corporation Corp. equations) gallon gal Incorporated Inc. equals = inch in Limited Ltd. expected value E mile mi et alii (and other et al. fork length FL ounce oz people) greater than > O pound lb et cetera (and so forth) etc. greater than or equal to quart qt exempli gratia (for e.g., harvest per unit effort HPUE example) yard yd less than < id est (that is) i.e., ? less than or equal to latitude or longitude lat. -
Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131
Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3 -
Nome River Fishery II
NOMERIVER FISHERY IT James S. Magdanz Charts and Graphs by Dora E. Punguk Technical Paper Number 5 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Nome, Alaska December 1981 ABSTRACT This report is a continuation of the Division of Subsistence's effort to document the Nome River Fishery for the Board of Fisheries. It describes the fishery and its users in greater detail than did earlier papers, using computer analysis of a permitee survey administered in 1980 and random sample interviews conducted in 1981. It evaluates the fishery in the context of recent Board of Fisheries decisions on subsistence. The survey data show two distinct groups of fishers: short-term residents with five or fewer years in Northwest Alaska and long-term residents with six or more years. The short-term residents constitute 32 percent of the fishery users; the long-term residents constitute 68 percent. Long-term residents show much greater dependence on the fishery, use traditional methods of processing, pass on skills and activities from generation to generation, and participate in a wide range of other subsistence activities. Short-term residents do not display these characteristics to the degree long-term resi- dents do, except for sharing, which is a common trait of both groups. To a certain extent, these two groups reflect subcommunities extant in the city of Nome. i , TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................. 1 History and Description of the Area. ................. 5 Methodology. ............................. 8 Findings...............................1 1 Long-term, stable, reliable pattern of use and dependency ... .14 Traditional modes of handling preparation and storage ..... .21 Intergenerational transmission of skills and activities ... -
And Brackish Water Environments What Is Brackish Water Brackish Water Is Water Which Contains More Sea Salts Than Freshwater but Less Than the Open Sea
http://www.unaab.edu.ng COURSE CODE: FIS316 COURSE TITLE: Marine and Brackishwater Economic Resources NUMBER OF UNITS: 2 Units COURSE DURATION: Two hours per week COURSECOURSE DETAILS:DETAILS: Course Coordinator: Prof. Yemi Akegbejo‐Samsons Email: [email protected] Office Location: Room D210, COLERM Other Lecturers: Dr. D.O. Odulate COURSE CONTENT: Study of major marine and brackish water fin and shell fish species in relation to their development for culture, food and industrial uses. Methods of harvesting e.g. electro‐ fishing. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: This is a compulsory course for all students in Department of Aquaculture & Fisheries Management. In view of this, students are expected to participate in all the course activities and have minimum of 75% attendance to be eligible to write the final examination. READING LIST: E LECTURE NOTES 1. Study of major marine and brackish water fin and shell fish species in relation to their development for culture, food and industrial uses. 2. Methods of harvesting e.g. electro-fishing. This course is taught by Prof Yemi Akegbejo-Samsons and Dr D O Odulate. The venue for the interaction with students is on the ground floor of the College of Environmental Resources Management. Topic 1 Marine and Brackish water environments What is Brackish Water Brackish water is water which contains more sea salts than freshwater but less than the open sea. http://www.unaab.edu.ng Moreover, brackish water environments are also fluctuating environments. The salinity is variable depending on the tide, the amount of freshwater entering from rivers or as rain, and the rate of evaporation. -
Alaska Range
Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range. -
Port of Nome Modification Feasibility Study Nome, Alaska
Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Supplemental Environmental Assessment Port of Nome Modification Feasibility Study Nome, Alaska December 2019 This page left blank intentionally. Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Supplemental Environmental Assessment Port of Nome Modification Feasibility Study Nome, Alaska Prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District December 2019 This page left blank intentionally. Port of Nome Modification Feasibility Study Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Supplemental Environmental Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This General Investigations study is being conducted under authority granted by Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, which authorizes a study of the feasibility for development of navigation improvements in various harbors and rivers in Alaska. This study is also utilizing the authority of Section 2006 of WRDA, 2007, Remote and Subsistence Harbors, as modified by Section 2104 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA 2014) and further modified by Section 1105 of WRDA 2016. Section 2006 states that the Secretary may recommend a project without demonstrating that the improvements are justified solely by National Economic Development (NED) benefits, if the Secretary determines that the improvements meet specific criteria detailed in the authority. Additionally, Section 1202(c)(3) of WRDA 2016 “Additional Studies, Arctic Deep Draft Port Development Partnerships” allows for the consideration of transportation cost savings benefits to national security. The proposed port modifications intend to improve navigation efficiency to reduce the costs of commodities critical to the viability of communities in the region. This study has been cost-shared, with 50 % of the study funding provided by the non-Federal sponsor, which is the City of Nome, per the Federal Cost Share Agreement. -
Caspian Sea, Estuarine, Zooplankton, Diversity, Physicochemical
Advances in Life Sciences 2014, 4(3): 135-139 DOI: 10.5923/j.als.20140403.07 The Influence of Salinity Variations on Zooplankton Community Structure in South Caspian Sea Basin Estuary Maryam Shapoori1,*, Mansoure Gholami2 1Department of Fishery, College of Natural resources, Savadkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Savadkooh, Iran 2Department of Fishery, College of Natural resources, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran Abstract In order to better understanding the impact of changes in salinity on zooplankton community structure, investigations on the physicochemical characteristics, phytoplankton, and zooplankton component of an estuarine zone in South-Eastern Caspian Sea was carried out for one year between March, 2011 and July, 2012. The study showed notable seasonal variation in the components investigated. Salinity and water flow rate regime seemed a major determinant of the composition, abundance and seasonal variation of encountered estuarine biota. Rain events associated with reducing salinities and inflow associated with decreasing salinities may be key hydro-meteorological forcing operating in the estuary. The collection of juvenile forms (Zooplankton) recorded probably points to the suitability of the estuary characteristics to serve as breeding ground and place of refuge for diverse aquatic species. Keywords Caspian Sea, Estuarine, Zooplankton, Diversity, Physicochemical levels within coastal aquatic ecosystems in south Caspian 1. Introduction Sea region. Salinity is amongst the most important environmental factors with the potential to significantly River mouths are common hydrological features of South- influence estuarine communities [11]. Therefore, Eastern features of Caspian Sea and form part of the fluctuations in salinity and other environmental factors (e.g. numerous ecological niches associated with the Caspian temperature, pH, nutrients and pigments) on both spatial and coastal environment. -
Technical Memorandum Moonlight Wells Protection Area
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM MOONLIGHT WELLS PROTECTION AREA NOME, ALASKA BEESC Project No. 25071 June 2005 Prepared for: City of Nome Nome Joint Utility System P.O. Box 281 P.O. Box 70 Nome, Alaska 99762 Nome, Alaska 99762 2000 W. International Airport Road, #C‐1 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Phone (907) 563‐0013 Fax (907) 563‐6713 Final Technical Memorandum Moonlight Wells Protection Area BEESC Project No. 25071 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................... i TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM.................................................................................................1 REFERENCE................................................................................................................................4 TABLE Table 1 Moonlight Wells Information ...................................................................................2 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Proposed Moonlight Wells Protection Area Figure 3 B-B’ Crosssection Figure 4 A-A’ Crosssection Figure 5 Moonlight Wells Protection Area and Land Status APPENDICES Appendix A Geology and Geophysics of the Moonlight Wells Area Appendix B Well Logs ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BEESC Bristol Environmental & Engineering Services Corporation bgs below ground surface June 2005 i Revision 3 Final Technical Memorandum Moonlight Wells Protection Area BEESC Project No. 25071 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM The City of Nome obtains drinking water from a groundwater source located at Moonlight Springs. Moonlight Springs is located approximately 3 miles north of the Nome airport (see Figure 1). The City of Nome currently obtains water from three wells located in a fractured marble formation. The purpose of this technical memorandum is to define the protection area of the marble aquifer associated with the three drinking water wells and to identify potential activities that could impact the aquifer within the protection area. Prior to 2001, Nome obtained drinking water from a collection gallery located at Moonlight Springs. -
Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2013-3
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seasonal Migrations and Essential Habitats of Broad Whitefish, Humpback Whitefish, and Least Cisco in the Selawik River Delta, as Inferred from Radiotelemetry Data, 2004–2006 Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2013-3 Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Fairbanks, Alaska April 2013 The Alaska Region Fisheries Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts fisheries monitoring and population assessment studies throughout many areas of Alaska. Dedicated professional staff located in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kenai Fish and Wildlife Offices and the Anchorage Conservation Genetics Laboratory serve as the core of the Program’s fisheries management study efforts. Administrative and technical support is provided by staff in the Anchorage Regional Office. Our program works closely with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other partners to conserve and restore Alaska’s fish populations and aquatic habitats. Our fisheries studies occur throughout the 16 National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska as well as off- Refuges to address issues of interjurisdictional fisheries and aquatic habitat conservation. Additional information about the Fisheries Program and work conducted by our field offices can be obtained at: http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/index.htm The Alaska Region Fisheries Program reports its study findings through the Alaska Fisheries Data Series (AFDS) or in recognized peer-reviewed journals. The AFDS was established to provide timely dissemination of data to fishery managers and other technically oriented professionals, for inclusion in agency databases, and to archive detailed study designs and results for the benefit of future investigations. Publication in the AFDS does not preclude further reporting of study results through recognized peer-reviewed journals. -
Shortnose Sturgeon Fact Sheet
Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum Description: Facts: olive-yellow to gray or bluish on the back listed as endangered, it is unlawful to kill or possess this fish milky white to dark yellow on the belly long lived, like most sturgeon 5 rows of pale bony plates, called scutes males spawn every other year, females spawn every (one on the back, two on the belly and one on each third year side) semi anadromous (migrates from salt water to spawn scutes are pale and contrast with background in fresh water) 4 barbels in front of its large underslung mouth eat sludge worms, insect larvae, plants, snails, shrimp and crayfish short blunt conical snout use barbels to locate food Size: rarely exceeds 3.5 feet and 14 pounds SHORTNOSE STURGEON CATCH TOTALS Year Total 2004 1 Range: Grand Total 1 Atlantic seaboard in North America, from the St. *shortnose sturgeon were only caught during the John’s River in New Brunswick to the St. John River years shown in Florida NJ Department of Environmental Protection Division of Fish and Wildlife Bureau of Marine Fisheries www.NJFishandWildlife.com Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum Historically, the Delaware Estuary has been an important habitat for two species of sturgeon: the shortnose sturgeon, and its cousin, the Atlantic sturgeon. Atlantic sturgeon primarily live in the ocean, and migrate through the estuary to spawn in freshwater. Shortnose sturgeon spend most of their time in the brackish water of the estuary, moving upstream to fresher water to spawn. Over the duration of the Delaware River seine survey, only one sturgeon has ever been caught.