DOCSLIB.ORG

Applying Supervised Learning on Malware Authorship Attribution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applying Supervised Learning on Malware Authorship Attribution RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN MASTER THESIS Applying Supervised Learning on Malware Authorship Attribution Author: Supervisors: Coen BOOT Dr. Ir. Erik POLL Alexandru C. SERBAN A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Digital Security Group Institute for Computing and Information Sciences May 1, 2019 iii RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN Abstract Faculty of Science Institute for Computing and Information Sciences Master of Science Applying Supervised Learning on Malware Authorship Attribution by Coen BOOT Malware is a problem in current digital society, since it can cause economic or phys- ical damage and in the end disrupt society as a whole. In order to effectively fight cyber threats by coming up with (legal) consequences for the actor behind the mal- ware, it is important to be able to provide a certain degree of proof about who is responsible for the malware. The process of linking an author to an asset is called authorship attribution. In case of malware, attribution needs to be based on binary executables, since the source code is mostly unavailable. This thesis focusses on evaluating and comparing two promising approaches for performing authorship attribution on malware. These approaches are based on two supervised learning algorithms, namely a neural network and a random forest clas- sifier. Both approaches use automatically generated analysis reports from a sandbox solution as input data. Malware can be divided in two types with respect to the actors behind it: state- sponsored or criminal. This thesis focusses on the first type, since state-sponsored malware has a richer and clearer hierarchy of authorship (i.e. country-level and APT group-level) compared to criminal malware which is often attributed to a group of individuals which is not explicitly related to a nation-state. Since no suitable dataset containing state-sponsored malware is available yet, we collected a dataset using a newly devised method, based on indicators of com- promise found in threat intelligence reports. In this way we collected a dataset with 3,594 state-sponsored malware samples, which forms the first publicly avail- able dataset of its kind. Using the retrieved malware samples, we used 2 sandboxes to generate reports about the samples: Cuckoo and VMRay. Moreover, we downloaded the reports belonging to the samples from VirusTotal as well. All these reports were converted to a bag of words, after which they are used as input for the classification algorithms. We evaluated the two approaches on the dataset and found that both approaches perform well (with accuracy results up to 98.8%) and match the performance de- scribed in the original papers. The neural network-based approach tends to per- form slightly better compared to the approach based on a random forest classifier, whereas the latter uses considerably less time to finish training. A trained classification algorithms contains knowledge about the characteristics of the different classes, since it needs to decide to what class an unseen sample be- longs. We extracted this information, attempting to discover new insights and verify whether the classifier makes sensible decisions. v Contents Abstract iii 1 Introduction1 1.1 Research Questions..............................2 1.2 Structure of this Thesis............................2 2 Background and Related Work5 2.1 Legal Goals of Attribution..........................5 2.1.1 Distinctions in Types of Attribution................6 2.1.2 State-sponsored or not?.......................6 2.1.3 Legal Goals..............................7 2.2 Complications Inherent to Malware....................7 2.2.1 Unavailability of Source Code...................7 2.2.2 Hiding Intents.............................8 Static Methods............................8 Dynamic Methods..........................8 2.2.3 Fake Traces..............................9 2.3 Technical Means for Authorship Attribution and Family Classification9 2.3.1 Approaches Focused on Family Classification.......... 10 2.3.2 Approaches Focused on Authorship Attribution......... 11 2.3.3 Approaches Using Machine Learning............... 12 2.3.4 Selected Approaches......................... 12 3 Used Malware Classification Techniques 15 3.1 Classification Algorithms.......................... 15 3.1.1 Supervised Learning......................... 15 Methodology............................. 15 Overfitting and Underfitting.................... 16 3.1.2 Deep Artificial Neural Network.................. 16 Structure................................ 16 Basic Principles............................ 16 Peculiarities and Parameters.................... 17 3.1.3 Random Forest Classifier...................... 18 Structure................................ 18 Basic Principles............................ 18 Peculiarities and Parameters.................... 19 3.2 Classification Performance Metrics..................... 19 3.2.1 Recall / True Positive Rate (TPR).................. 20 3.2.2 False Positive Rate (FPR)....................... 20 3.2.3 Precision................................ 20 3.2.4 F1-Score................................ 21 3.2.5 ROC-Curve.............................. 21 3.2.6 Accuracy................................ 21 vi 4 Collecting a Dataset of State-Sponsored Malware 23 4.1 Collection Method.............................. 23 4.1.1 Collecting Samples.......................... 23 4.1.2 Collecting Sandbox Reports..................... 24 4.2 Data Preprocessing.............................. 24 4.2.1 Duplicate Detection......................... 25 4.2.2 Filtering Sandbox Reports...................... 25 4.2.3 Extracting API Calls......................... 25 4.2.4 Creating a Bag of Words....................... 26 4.3 Overview of the Collected Dataset..................... 26 4.4 Dealing with Imbalanced Datasets..................... 26 5 Experimental Data & Setup 29 5.1 Constructing Training and Test Sets..................... 29 5.2 Tested Scenarios................................ 30 5.3 Sandboxes Used................................ 30 5.3.1 Cuckoo................................. 30 5.3.2 VirusTotal............................... 31 5.3.3 VMRay................................. 31 5.4 Overview of Training and Test Sets..................... 32 5.4.1 Used Variants............................. 32 5.4.2 k-Fold Cross-Validation....................... 33 6 Evaluation of the Neural Network-based Approach (Ro18) 35 6.1 Configuration of the Neural Network................... 35 6.2 Results..................................... 35 6.2.1 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Unseen APT Groups 36 6.2.2 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Earlier Seen APT Groups................................. 37 6.2.3 APT Group-Level Authorship Attribution............ 38 6.3 Preliminary Conclusions........................... 40 7 Evaluation of the RFC-based Approach (Am17) 41 7.1 Configuration of the Random Forest Classifier.............. 41 7.2 Results..................................... 41 7.2.1 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Unseen APT Groups 41 7.2.2 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Earlier Seen APT Groups................................. 42 7.2.3 APT Group-Level Authorship Attribution............ 43 7.3 Preliminary Conclusions........................... 45 8 Comparing the Two Approaches 47 8.1 Comparison with Respect to Algorithm.................. 47 8.2 Comparison with Respect to Sampling................... 47 8.3 Comparison with Respect to Metrics.................... 48 8.4 Comparison with Respect to Sandboxes.................. 48 9 Extracting Human-Interpretable Characteristics 49 9.1 Knowledge Extraction on Random Forest Classifiers........... 49 9.1.1 Feature Importance.......................... 50 9.1.2 Manual Decision Tree Analysis................... 50 9.2 Knowledge Extraction on Neural Networks................ 52 vii 10 Complications Faced and Discussion 53 10.1 Complications Faced............................. 53 10.2 Discussion................................... 53 11 Conclusions and Future Work 55 11.1 Conclusions.................................. 55 11.2 Future Work.................................. 56 Bibliography 59 A Additional Results of the Neural Network-based Approach 67 A.1 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Unseen APT Groups... 67 A.2 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Earlier Seen APT Groups 68 A.3 APT Group-Level Authorship Attribution................. 68 B Additional Results of the RFC-based Approach 71 B.1 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Unseen APT Groups... 71 B.2 Country-Level Authorship Attribution with Earlier Seen APT Groups 72 B.3 APT Group-Level Authorship Attribution................. 72 C Most Important Features in a Trained RFC 75 D Extracted Decision Tree 77 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Malware is a problem in current digital society, since it can cause economic or physi- cal damage and in the end disrupt society as a whole. Although anti-virus solutions attempt to withstand the massive flows of malicious software, they fail in blocking every single piece of malware. This is caused by the fact that they often look for exact fingerprints, without being able to recognize characteristics similar to known malware. This makes it possible to create malware which is able to successfully infect a machine and perform its (illicit) tasks. Malware is not only used by cyber criminals. State-sponsored Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups make use of mal- ware as well to spy on their targets, contributing to an even more tumultuous cyber
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review Paper on Effective Behavioral Based Malware Detection and Prevention Techniques for Android Platform
    International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 10, Number 1 (2017) © International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Review Paper on Effective Behavioral Based Malware Detection and Prevention Techniques for Android Platform Mr. Sagar Vitthal Shinde1 M.Tech Comp. Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. Email id: [email protected] Ms. Amrita A. Manjrekar2 Assistant Professor, Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. Email Id: [email protected] Abstract late). It has been recently reported that almost 60% of Android is most popular platform for mobile devices. existing malware send stealthy premium rate SMS messages. Smartphone’s and mobile tablets are rapidly indispensable in Most of these behaviors are exhibited by a category of apps daily life. Android has been the most popular open sources called Trojanized that can be found in online marketplaces mobile operating system. On the one side android users are not controlled by Google. However, also Google Play, the increasing, but other side malicious activity also official market for Android apps, has hosted apps which have simultaneously increasing. The risk of malware (Malicious been found to be malicious [1] [21]. apps) is sharply increasing in Android platform, Android Existing system consist of some limited features of android mobile malware detection and prevention has become an app, malware detection is based on behavioral base. The important research topic. Some malware attacks can make the malware detection and prevention process is also static which phone partially or fully unusable, cause unwanted SMS/MMS create some problems such as it increase false positive rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for Improving the Quality of Software Obfuscation for Android Applications
    Methods for Improving the Quality of Software Obfuscation for Android Applications Methoden zur Verbesserung der Qualit¨atvon Softwareverschleierung f¨urAndroid-Applikationen Der Technischen Fakult¨atder Friedrich-Alexander-Universit¨at Erlangen-N¨urnberg zur Erlangung des Grades DOKTOR-INGENIEUR vorgelegt von Yan Zhuang aus Henan, VR China Als Dissertation genehmigt von der Technischen Fakult¨atder Friedrich-Alexander-Universit¨at Erlangen-N¨urnberg Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 26. September 2017 Vorsitzende des Promotionsorgans: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Reinhard Lerch Gutachter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix C. Freiling Prof. Dr. Jingqiang Lin Dedicated to my dear parents. Abstract Obfuscation technique provides the semantically identical but syntactically distinguished transformation, so that to obscure the source code to hide the critical information while preserving the functionality. In that way software authors are able to prevail the re- sources e.g. computing power, time, toolset, detection algorithms, or experience etc., the revere engineer could afford. Because the Android bytecode is practically easier to decompile, and therefore to reverse engineer, than native machine code, obfuscation is a prominent criteria for Android software copyright protection. However, due to the lim- ited computing resources of the mobile platform, different degree of obfuscation will lead to different level of performance penalty, which might not be tolerable for the end-user. In this thesis, we optimize the Android obfuscation transformation process that brings in as much “difficulty" as possible meanwhile constrains the performance loss to a tolerable level. We implement software complexity metrics to automatically and quantitatively evaluate the “difficulty" of the obfuscation results. We firstly investigate the properties of the 7 obfuscation methods from the obfuscation engine Pandora.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Kernel-Mode Rootkits?
    www.it-ebooks.info Hacking Exposed™ Malware & Rootkits Reviews “Accessible but not dumbed-down, this latest addition to the Hacking Exposed series is a stellar example of why this series remains one of the best-selling security franchises out there. System administrators and Average Joe computer users alike need to come to grips with the sophistication and stealth of modern malware, and this book calmly and clearly explains the threat.” —Brian Krebs, Reporter for The Washington Post and author of the Security Fix Blog “A harrowing guide to where the bad guys hide, and how you can find them.” —Dan Kaminsky, Director of Penetration Testing, IOActive, Inc. “The authors tackle malware, a deep and diverse issue in computer security, with common terms and relevant examples. Malware is a cold deadly tool in hacking; the authors address it openly, showing its capabilities with direct technical insight. The result is a good read that moves quickly, filling in the gaps even for the knowledgeable reader.” —Christopher Jordan, VP, Threat Intelligence, McAfee; Principal Investigator to DHS Botnet Research “Remember the end-of-semester review sessions where the instructor would go over everything from the whole term in just enough detail so you would understand all the key points, but also leave you with enough references to dig deeper where you wanted? Hacking Exposed Malware & Rootkits resembles this! A top-notch reference for novices and security professionals alike, this book provides just enough detail to explain the topics being presented, but not too much to dissuade those new to security.” —LTC Ron Dodge, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Classification of Malicious Processes Using System
    Detection and Classification of Malicious Processes Using System Call Analysis A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Raymond J. Canzanese, Jr. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2015 c Copyright 2015 Raymond J. Canzanese, Jr. ii Dedications To Madison, without whose support and companionship this would have been a far less rewarding and enjoyable experience. iii Acknowledgments Throughout the course of writing this thesis, I was surrounded by an outstanding community who provided the support, inspiration, encouragement, and distraction necessary for its completion. To my advisers, Moshe Kam and Spiros Mancoridis, and committee, Naga Kandasamy, Ko Nishino, Harish Sethu, and Steven Weber, I am most thankful. It was their insights, guidance, feedback, and support that made this thesis possible. I cannot overstate the depth and breadth of the lessons I have learned from them, which have shaped not only this thesis, but my general approach to problem solving, my outlook on life, and my ambitions. That my advisers managed to find the time, energy, and patience to meet with me regularly to discuss my successes and failures confounds me. Watching them advance in their careers while remaining so humble and grounded has been truly inspiring. I also had the great fortune to learn from a number of other faculty members here at Drexel who have helped shape and inspire this work, including Kapil Dandekar, John Walsh, Tom Chmielewski, Ali Shokoufandeh, and Marcello Balduccini. My friends and colleagues here at Drexel, especially those members of the Data Fusion Lab and Software Engineering Research Group, have also served to educate, motivate, and inspire me.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Briefing Schedule
    WED. JULY 31 07:00-17:00 REGISTRATION 08:00-08:50 BREAKFAST Sponsored by / Forum Ballroom ROOM Roman II Roman IV Roman I / III Palace II Palace III Augustus V / VI Palace I Augustus I / II Augustus III / IV 08:50-09:00 Welcome & Introduction to Black Hat USA 2013 / Augustus Ballroom 09:00-10:00 Keynote Speaker: General Keith B. Alexander / Augustus Ballroom 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-11:15 Mainframes: The Past Will BlackberryOS 10 From a Security With BIGDATA comes BIG New Trends in FastFlux Networks Lessons from Surviving a Combating the Insider Threat Beyond the Application: Cellular Java Every-Days: Exploiting How to Build a SpyPhone Come to Haunt You Perspective responsibility: Practical (Wei Xu + Xinran Wang) 300Gbps Denial of at the FBI: Real-world Lessons Privacy Regulatory Space Software Running on Three (Kevin McNamee) (Philip Young) (Ralf-Philipp Weinmann) exploiting of MDX injections Service Attack Learned (Christie Dudley) Billion Devices (Dmitry Chastuhin) (Matthew Prince) (Patrick Reidy) (Brian Gorenc + CrowdSource: An Open Source, Jasiel Spelman) Crowd Trained Machine Learning Legal Considerations for Model for Malware Detection Cellular Research (Joshua Saxe) (Marcia Hofmann) TM 11:15-11:45 Coffee Service Sponsored by / Octavius Ballroom 11:45-12:45 Black-box Assessment of Shattering Illusions in Lock-Free Power Analysis Attacks for Denying Service to DDoS What Security Researchers Just-In-Time Code Reuse: The A Tale of One Software Bypass TLS 'Secrets' Million Browser Botnet Pseudorandom Algorithms Worlds: Compiler/Hardware
    [Show full text]
  • Malware Detection and Classification Based on Extraction of API Sequences
    Downloaded from http://iranpaper.ir http://translate68.ir Malware Detection and Classification Based on Extraction of API Sequences Dolly Uppal, Rakhi Sinha, Vishakha Mehra and Vinesh Jain Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology Government Engineering College Ajmer, India [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— With the substantial growth of IT sector in the the concept of pattern (byte code-signature) recognition. Anti- 21st century, the need for system security has also become Virus Scanners (AVS) follow traditional signature based inevitable. While the developments in the IT sector have detection method to identify malware. Signatures are the innumerable advantages but attacks on websites and computer sequences of bytes existent in the database. Although systems are also increasing relatively. One such attack is zero day signature based examination can discern malware by yielding malware attack which poses a great challenge for the security low false positive rates but this technique turns out to be testers. The malware pen testers can use bypass techniques like inefficient for malware whose signature are not listed in the Compression, Code obfuscation and Encryption techniques to database. Also, once should be well versed with the minutiae easily deceive present day Antivirus Scanners. This paper of software for static analysis, which is not usually possible. elucidates a novel malware identification approach based on Malware detection using static analysis can be easily extracting unique aspects of API sequences. The proposed feature selection method based on N grams and odds ratio circumvented by malware writers by making use of the selection, capture unique and distinct API sequences from the obfuscation techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of AUUG Inc. Volume 23 ¯ Number 4 December 2002
    The Journal of AUUG Inc. Volume 23 ¯ Number 4 December 2002 Features: This Issues CD: Knoppix Bootable CD 4 Using ODS to move a file system on the fly 7 Handling Power Status using snmptrapd 9 Process Tracing us ptrace - Part 2 11 Viruses: a concern for all of us 13 Viruses and System Security 21 Why Success for Open Source is great for Windows Users 22 Root-kits and Integrity 24 Installing and LAMP System 32 Exploring Perl Modules - Part 2: Creating Charts with GD:: Graph 38 DVD Authoring 41 Review: Compaq Presario 1510US 43 Athlon XP 2400 vs Intel Pentium 4 2.4Ghz and 2.8Ghz 46 Creating Makefiles 52 The Story of Andy’s Computer 54 News: Public Notices 5 AUUG: Corporate Members 9 AUUG: Chapter Meetings and Contact Details 61 Regulars: President’s Column 3 /var/spool/mail/auugn 3 My Home Network 5 AUUGN Book Reviews 7 ISSN 1035-7521 Print post approved by Australia Post - PP2391500002 AUUG Membership and General Correspondence The AUUG Secretary AUUG Inc Editorial PO Box 7071 Con Zymaris [email protected] Baulkham Hills BC NSW 2153 Telephone: 02 8824 95tl or 1800 625 655 (Toll-Free) I remember how exhilarating my first few brushes Facsimile: 02 8824 9522 with computerswere. It was the late ’70s. We had just Email: [email protected] experienced two massive waves of pop-technology AUUG Management Committee which swept through the public consciousness like a Email: au ugexec@au u.q.org.au flaring Tesla-coil: Star Wars had become the most successful film of all time, playing in cinemas (and President drive-ins.., remember those?) for over two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hat USA 2012 Program Guide
    SUSTAINING SPONSORS Black Hat AD FINAL.pdf 1 6/30/12 8:12 PM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Black Hat AD FINAL.pdf 1 6/30/12 8:12 PM SCHEDULE WELCOME TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule . 4-7 Welcome to Las Vegas, and thank you for your participation in the growing Black Hat community. As we celebrate our 15th anniversary, we believe that the event Briefi ngs . 8-24 continues to bring you timely and action packed briefi ngs from some of the top Workshops . 21 security researchers in the world. Security saw action on almost every imaginable front in 2012. The year started Turbo Talks . 23 with a massive online protest that beat back US-based Internet blacklist legislation Speakers . 25-39 including SOPA and PIPA, echoed by worldwide protests against adopting ACTA in the European Union. Attackers showed no signs of slowing as Flame Keynote Bio . 25 replaced Stuxnet and Duqu as the most sophisticated malware yet detected. The Floorplan . 40-41 Web Hacking Incident Database (WHID) has added LinkedIn, Global Payments, eHarmony and Zappos.com while Anonymous and other politically motivated groups Arsenal . 42-51 have made their presence known in dozens of attacks. Special Events . 52-53 No matter which incidents you examine—or which ones your enterprise must C respond to—one thing is clear: security is not getting easier. The industry relies upon Stay Connected + More . 54 M the Black Hat community to continue our research and education, and seeks our Sponsors . 55 guidance in developing solutions to manage these threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Linux Malware
    Understanding Linux Malware Emanuele Cozzi Mariano Graziano Yanick Fratantonio Davide Balzarotti Eurecom Cisco Systems, Inc. Eurecom Eurecom Abstract—For the past two decades, the security community on a short time-to-market combined with innovative features has been fighting malicious programs for Windows-based operat- to attract new users. Too often, this results in postponing ing systems. However, the recent surge in adoption of embedded (if not simply ignoring) any security and privacy concerns. devices and the IoT revolution are rapidly changing the malware landscape. Embedded devices are profoundly different than tradi- With these premises, it does not come as a surprise that tional personal computers. In fact, while personal computers run the vast majority of these newly interconnected devices are predominantly on x86-flavored architectures, embedded systems routinely found vulnerable to critical security issues, ranging rely on a variety of different architectures. In turn, this aspect from Internet-facing insecure logins (e.g., easy-to-guess hard- causes a large number of these systems to run some variants coded passwords, exposed telnet services, or accessible debug of the Linux operating system, pushing malicious actors to give birth to “Linux malware.” interfaces), to unsafe default configurations and unpatched To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no comprehen- software containing well-known security vulnerabilities. sive study attempting to characterize, analyze, and understand Embedded devices are profoundly different
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for Detecting Kernel Rootkits
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2007 Methods for detecting kernel rootkits. Douglas Ray Wampler University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wampler, Douglas Ray, "Methods for detecting kernel rootkits." (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1507. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1507 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. METHODS FOR DETECTING KERNEL ROOTKITS By Douglas Ray Wampler B.S., Indiana State University, 1994 M.S. Ball State University, 2003 A Dissertation Submited to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philsophy Department of Computer Engineering and Computer Science University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2007 Copyright 2007 by Douglas Ray Wampler All rights reserved METHODS FOR DETECTING KERNEL ROOTKTIS By Douglas Ray Wampler B.S. Indiana State University, 1994 M.S., Ball State University, 2003 A Dissertation Approved on November 12, 2007 By the following Dissertation Committee: ________________________________________ James H. Graham, Dissertation Director ________________________________________ DarJen Chang ________________________________________ Gail W. Depuy ________________________________________ Adel S. Elmaghraby ________________________________________ Mehmed M. Kantardzic ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Annual Cyber Resilience for National Security DC/VA, USA 17 September - 19 September 2013 41
    As much as I like going to industry conferences, enjoying their energy and frenzy, and getting together with old friends, sometimes company events like the BalaBit IT Security one I recently attended in Budapest inspire me even more. Getting to meet so many dedicated security experts and a peek into their everyday work really makes you conscious of the fact that we are all doing our best to "fight the good fight." With that in mind, this is our latest contribution to it, and we hope you'll enjoy it. Mirko Zorz Editor in Chief Visit the magazine website at www.insecuremag.com (IN)SECURE Magazine contacts Feedback and contributions: Mirko Zorz, Editor in Chief - [email protected] News: Zeljka Zorz, Managing Editor - [email protected] Marketing: Berislav Kucan, Director of Operations - [email protected] Distribution (IN)SECURE Magazine can be freely distributed in the form of the original, non-modified PDF document. Distribution of modified versions of (IN)SECURE Magazine content is prohibited without the explicit permission from the editor. Copyright (IN)SECURE Magazine 2013. www.insecuremag.com Researches test resilience of P2P Amsterdam, and tech companies Dell botnets SecureWorks and Crowdstrike has decided to test botnets' resilience to new attacks. While acknowledging that estimating a P2P botnet’s size is difficult and that there is currently no systematic way to analyze their resilience against takedown attempts, they have nevertheless managed to apply their methods to real-world P2P botnets and come up with quality information. They used crawling and sensor injection to detect the size of the botnets and discovered Following increased efforts by a number of two things: that some botnets number over a companies and organizations, the takedown million of bots, and that sensor injection offers on botnet C&C servers is now a pretty regular more accurate results.
    [Show full text]
  • RNNIDS: Enhancing Network Intrusion Detection Systems Through Deep Learning
    1 RNNIDS: Enhancing Network Intrusion Detection Systems through Deep Learning SOROUSH M. SOHI, Security in Telecommunications Technische Universität Berlin JEAN-PIERRE SEIFERT, Security in Telecommunications Technische Universität Berlin, and Fraunhofer-Institut für Sichere Informationstechnologie FATEMEH GANJI, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute Security of information passing through the Internet is threatened by today’s most advanced malware ranging from orchestrated botnets to simpler polymorphic worms. These threats, as examples of zero-day attacks, are able to change their behavior several times in the early phases of their existence to bypass the network intrusion detection systems (NIDS). In fact, even well-designed, and frequently-updated signature- based NIDS cannot detect the zero-day treats due to the lack of an adequate signature database, adaptive to intelligent attacks on the Internet. More importantly, having an NIDS, it should be tested on malicious traffic dataset that not only represents known attacks, but also can to some extent reflect the characteristics of unknown, zero-day attacks. Generating such traffic is identified in the literature as one of the main obstacles for evaluating the effectiveness of NIDS. To address these issues, we introduce RNNIDS that applies Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to find complex patterns in attacks and generate similar ones. In this regard, for the first time, we demonstrate that RNNs are helpful to generate new, unseen mutants of attacks aswell synthetic signatures from the most advanced malware to improve the intrusion detection rate. Besides, to further enhance the design of an NIDS, RNNs can be employed to generate malicious datasets containing, e.g., unseen mutants of a malware.
    [Show full text]