G OU IN R 3 AT 0 R tth R B Y E E L L A
E R R
C C
1987-2017
April 2017 Volume 30 Number 4 www.chromatographyonline.com
Characterizing Complex Polymer Formulations The benefi ts of coupling SEC with MS to investigate polyether polyol formulations
LC TROUBLESHOOTING PERSPECTIVES IN COLUMN WATCH Increasing resolution by MODERN HPLC New chromatography columns increasing retention New HPLC systems and and accessories for 2017 related products
G OU IN R 3 AT 0 R tth R B Y E E L L A
E R R
C C
1987-2017
April 2017 Volume 30 Number 4 www.chromatographyonline.com
Characterizing Complex Polymer Formulations The benefi ts of coupling SEC with MS to investigate polyether polyol formulations
LC TROUBLESHOOTING PERSPECTIVES IN COLUMN WATCH Increasing resolution by MODERN HPLC New chromatography columns increasing retention New HPLC systems and and accessories for 2017 related products All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. WHOSE TRIPLE QUAD CAN GIVE YOU 15% MORE TIME? Copyright © 2016 PerkinElmer, Inc. 400358A_03. All rights reserved. PerkinElmer® is a registered trademark of SIMPLE: PERKINELMER.
Whether you’re performing environmental, food, or industrial testing, your lab needs to analyze more and increasingly complex samples under tighter regulatory standards. Because our new QSight™ triple-quad LC/MS/MS needs no routine cleaning and maintenance, you get up to 15% more uptime (that’s up to 35 more days per year) to take on your increased testing workload. Plus, our patented technology delivers exceptional sensitivity and reliability along with all that productivity. QSight: A triple quad that simply knows the value of time.
Learn more at www.perkinelmer.com/QSight Published by UBM Americas Editorial Advisory Board
Daniel W. Armstrong Hian Kee Lee University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, USA National University of Singapore, Vice President/Group Digital Production Manager Günther K. Bonn Singapore Publisher Sabina Advani Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Wolfgang Lindner Radiochemistry, University of Innsbruck, Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Mike Tessalone [email protected] Austria University of Vienna, Austria [email protected] Deirdre Cabooter Henk Lingeman Managing Editor Special Department of Pharmaceutical and Faculteit der Scheikunde, Free University, Editorial Director Projects Pharmacological Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Leuven, Belgium Tom Lynch Laura Bush Kaylynn Chiarello-Ebner Peter Carr BP Technology Centre, Pangbourne, UK [email protected] kaylynn.chiarello.ebner@ Department of Chemistry, University Ronald E. Majors of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA ubm.com Analytical consultant, West Chester, Editor-in-Chief Jean-Pierre Chervet Pennsylvania, USA Antec Leyden, Zoeterwoude, The Alasdair Matheson Art Director Debby Mangelings Netherlands Department of Analytical Chemistry [email protected] Dan Ward Jan H. Christensen and Pharmaceutical Technology, Vrije [email protected] Department of Plant and Environmental Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium Managing Editor Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Phillip Marriot Kate Mosford Senior Director of Copenhagen, Denmark Monash University, School of Chemistry, Danilo Corradini Victoria, Australia [email protected] Marketing and Audience Istituto di Cromatografia del CNR, Rome, David McCalley Data Italy Department of Applied Sciences, Assistant Editor Ronda Hughes-Stovern Hernan J. Cortes University of West of England, Bristol, UK Lewis Botcherby H.J. Cortes Consulting, Robert D. McDowall ronda.hughes-stovern@ubm. Midland, Michigan, USA [email protected] McDowall Consulting, Bromley, Kent, UK com Gert Desmet Mary Ellen McNally Transport Modelling and Analytical Sales Manager DuPont Crop Protection,Newark, Separation Science, Vrije Universiteit, Delaware, USA Oliver Waters Brussels, Belgium Imre Molnár Subscriber Customer Service [email protected] John W. Dolan Molnar Research Institute, Berlin, Germany Visit (chromatographyonline.com) LC Resources, McMinnville, Oregon, Luigi Mondello USA Sales Executive to request or change a Dipartimento Farmaco-chimico, Facoltà Anthony F. Fell di Farmacia, Università di Messina, Liz Mclean subscription or call our customer Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Messina, Italy University of Bradford, Bradford, UK [email protected] service department on Peter Myers Attila Felinger Department of Chemistry, Senior Director, Digital +001 218 740 6877 Professor of Chemistry, Department of University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Janusz Pawliszyn Media University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary Hinderton Point, Department of Chemistry, University of Michael Kushner Francesco Gasparrini Waterloo, Ontario, Canada [email protected] Lloyd Drive, Dipartimento di Studi di Chimica Colin Poole Cheshire Oaks, e Tecnologia delle Sostanze Wayne State University, Detroit, Biologicamente Attive, Università “La Michigan, USA Webcast Operations Cheshire, Sapienza”, Rome, Italy Fred E. Regnier Manager CH65 9HQ, UK Joseph L. Glajch Department of Biochemistry, Purdue Kristen Moore Tel. +44 (0)151 353 3500 Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA [email protected] Massachusetts, USA Harald Ritchie Fax +44 (0)151 353 3601 Jun Haginaka Trajan Scientific and Medical, Milton Project Manager School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Keynes, UK Sciences, Mukogawa Women’s Koen Sandra Vania Oliveira University, Nishinomiya, Japan Research Institute for Chromatography, [email protected] Javier Hernández-Borges Kortrijk, Belgium Department of Analytical Chemistry, Pat Sandra Nutrition and Food Science University of Research Institute for Chromatography, Subscribe on-line at Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain Kortrijk, Belgium www.chromatographyonline.com John V. Hinshaw Peter Schoenmakers Serveron Corp., Hillsboro, Oregon, USA Department of Chemical Engineering, Tuulia Hyötyläinen Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, VVT Technical Research of Finland, The Netherlands Finland Robert Shellie 46#4$3*15*0/4-$r($&VSPQFJTGSFFUPRVBMJàFESFBEFSTJO&VSPQF Hans-Gerd Janssen Trajan Scientific and Medical, To apply for a free subscription, or to change your name or address, go to Van’t Hoff Institute for the Molecular Ringwood, Victoria, Australia www.chromatographyonline.com, click on Subscribe, and follow the prompts. Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Yvan Vander Heyden To cancel your subscription or to order back issues, please email your request to Kiyokatsu Jinno Vrije Universiteit Brussel, [email protected], putting LCE in the subject line. School of Materials Sciences, Toyohasi Brussels, Belgium Please quote your subscription number if you have it. University of Technology, Japan MANUSCRIPTS: For manuscript preparation guidelines, visit www.chromatographyonline.com or call the Editor, +44 (0)151 353 3500. All submissions will be handled with reasonable care, but Huba Kalász the publisher assumes no responsibility for safety of artwork, photographs or manuscripts. Every Semmelweis University of Medicine, precaution is taken to ensure accuracy, but the publisher cannot accept responsibility for the Budapest, Hungary accuracy of information supplied herein or for any opinion expressed. DIRECT MAIL LIST: Telephone: +44 (0)151 353 3500. Reprints: Reprints of all articles in this issue and past issues of this publication are available (250 minimum). Contact Brian Kolb at Wright’s Media, 2407 Timberloch Place, The Woodlands, TX 77380. Telephone: 877-652-5295 ext. 121. Email: [email protected]. © 2017 Advanstar Communications (UK) Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing it in any Follow us @ LC_GC ‘Like’ our page LCGC Join the LCGC LinkedIn group medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright owner except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 5IF1VCMJTIFSTPG-$t($&VSPQFXPVMEMJLFUPUIBOLUIFNFNCFSTPGUIF&EJUPSJBM"EWJTPSZ#PBSE (UK) 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing for their continuing support and expert advice. The high standards and editorial quality associ- Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP, UK. Applications for the BUFEXJUI-$t($&VSPQFBSFNBJOUBJOFEMBSHFMZUISPVHIUIFUJSFMFTTFGGPSUTPGUIFTFJOEJWJEVBMT copyright owner’s permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be LCGC Europe provides troubleshooting information and application solutions on all aspects of forwarded in writing to Permissions Dept, Hinderton Point, Lloyd Drive, Ellesmere separation science so that laboratory-based analytical chemists can enhance their practical Port, Cheshire, CH65 9HQ. Warning: The doing of an unauthorized act in relation to a 10% Post knowledge to gain competitive advantage. Our scientific quality and commercial objectivity copyright work may result in both a civil claim for damages and criminal prosecution. Consumer provide readers with the tools necessary to deal with real-world analysis issues, thereby Waste increasing their efficiency, productivity and value to their employer. www.chromatographyonline.com 175 April | 2017 COVER STORY Volume 30 Number 4 178 Coupling Size-Exclusion Chromatography to Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Low-Molecular-Weight Polymers: A Versatile Tool to Study Complex Polyether Polyol Formulations Marcel C. van Engelen, Ron A. Salome, Hamed Eghbali, Melissa N. Dunkle, John R. Stutzman, and Edwin P.C. Mes Complete characterization of low-molecular-weight polyether polyol formulations that are often simultaneously heterogeneous in composition, molecular weight, and architecture can be a daunting task. This article describes the hyphenation of size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) to mass spectrometry (MS) as a promising approach to characterize complex polyether polyol formulated systems.
Columns 190 LC TROUBLESHOOTING Count the Cost, Part 2: Increasing Resolution by Increasing Retention John W. Dolan We will discover how to fi nd the “sweet spot” in terms of retention for a liquid chromatographic separation as well as how much retention change is to be expected for a selected change in organic mobile-phase percentage or column temperature.
196 COLUMN WATCH New Chromatography Columns and Accessories for 2017 David S. Bell Our annual review of new liquid chromatography columns and accessories, introduced at Pittcon and other events.
208 PERSPECTIVES IN MODERN HPLC New HPLC Systems and Related Products: A Brief Review Michael W. Dong This instalment highlights some of the new HPLC systems, modules, accessories, and related technology introduced at Pittcon this year.
Departments 219 Products 222 Events Editorial Policy: All articles submitted to -$t($&VSPQF are subject to a peer-review process in association with the magazine’s Editorial Advisory Board.
Cover: Original materials courtesy: Timofey_123/ Shutterstock.com
176 -$r($&VSPQF April 2017
178 techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance magnetic resonance asnuclear techniques such investigation. To formulations, investigate polyol polyether are under the sample followedschemes on depending Typical tools. ofanalytical deformulations combination and theproper selection formulated systems on depends of analysis markets. Successful profileand competitor provestudy failure analysis, mode patent infringement, developtune product newapplications, performance, weight and composition molecular ofdifferent a blend frequently usedinformulated systems, where they exist as ofthepolyether polyol. Polyether are polyols composition ( asethylene oxideethers such cyclic are sucrose. Oxides typically or assorbitol such pentaerythritol or Polyether PolyolPolyether Formulations A Versatile Tool to Study Complex Polymers: Low-Molecular-Weight Spectrometry for the Analysis of Mass to Chromatography Coupling Size-Exclusion SEC separation and reduction of multiple charging effects. charging ofmultiple reduction and separation SEC efficient and tofast given willbe Attention routines. processing todata approaches best and optimization, method techniques, the interfacing including methods, ofSEC–MS development the with made advances and considerations experimental ofthe some details work This mixtures. complex tounravel these able signifi techniques these Hyphenating systems. polyol formulated polyether complex tocharacterize approach as apromising chromatography ofsize-exclusion hyphenation the describes article This task. adaunting be can architecture and weight, molecular incomposition, heterogeneous simultaneously often are that polyol formulations polyether oflow-molecular-weight characterization Complete Engelen van C. Marcel R f weight. Typical includewater initiators in thepresence ofacatalyst to thedesired molecular active hydrogen one organic atleast oxide an bearing with arePolyether by polyols produced reacting initiator an grow average atan rate annual of4% during2014–2019. will polyols ofpolyether projected thattheconsumption fluids.Itis functional and lubricants include synthetic polyols ofpolyether applications important Other plastics. of consumption oftheglobal 6% makeand upabout blocks for polyurethanes. Polyurethanes are widespread high industrialrelevance. usedasbuilding are They mostly with polyols arePolyether polyols ofpolymeric aclass Mes PO) = & Knowledge of the exact composition is required oftheexact to composition Knowledge D – Analytical Sciences, Midland, Michigan, USA Michigan, Midland, Sciences, D –Analytical 2) or polyols such asglycerin 2) such polyols or 1 , (
Figure 1). are by influenced the properties Product 1 Dow Benelux B.V.–Core Benelux Dow R ( f cantly reduces ion overlap in MS spectra and results in a versatile and powerful tool better better tool powerful and in aversatile results and spectra inMS overlap ion reduces cantly = 4), initiators functional higher or 1 , Ron A. Salome A. , Ron ( EO) propylene and oxide & D – Analytical Sciences, Terneuzen, Sciences, Netherlands, D –Analytical The ( trifunctional, f trifunctional, ( difunctional, 1 , Hamed Eghbali , Hamed = ( NMR), 3) ( 1). 1 , Melissa N. Dunkle N. , Melissa ( ( spectrometry mass time-of-flight desorption–ionization liquid chromatography structure of the formulation structure oftheformulation regarding providecan quantitative information theoxide weight weight ofnumber-average thedetermination allows SEC molecular by may analyses from SEC. beobtained weight information Conversely, remains unknown. the formulation molecular the oxide structure within polyols oftheindividualpolyether weights andHowever, molecular on information detailed type the on information SEC) are often used. When setupcorrectly,SEC) used. are When often MALDI-TOF-MS), and size-exclusion chromatography size-exclusion and MALDI-TOF-MS), • By installing a installing By • results was exploited FastSEC to UHPSEC–MS obtain • was MS to high-resolution SEC nonaqueous Coupling • KEY POINTS experiment would take more than 40 min. 40 take than more would experiment than in less systems. formulated toestablished characterize polyol polyether complex over 1000 Da. for simplifiedspectra polyols for polyether allowing charging ofmultiple was reduced, effect problematic ( M n ) and weight-average molecular weight weight-average) and molecular 1 5 , John R. Stutzman R. , John min, whereas a conventional SEC min,whereas SEC aconventional 210 ( SEC) to mass spectrometry spectrometry SEC) tomass Po source chamber, intheESI the 2 ( ( s) ofinitiators. amount and The Dow Chemical Company–Core Company–Core Chemical Dow The LC), matrix-assisted laser ( 2), to inaddition obtaining 2 , and Edwin P.C. Edwin , and LC•GC Europe LC•GC 13 C NMR C NMR ( April 2017 M w ( MS) )
Photo Credit: Timofey_123/Shutterstock.com Combined forces Nexera MX and LCMS-8060: ultra-fast multiplexing UHPLC meets ultra-trace level detection
The Nexera MX ultra-fast multiplexed UHPLC system combined with Unmatched speed the LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer provides routine with fastest sample injection, data acquisition and polarity switching high performance LC-MS/MS analysis that makes a real difference in time increasing laboratory efficiency. Nexera MX features two analytical flow lines in a single UHPLC system; this doubles sample processing Dedicated software packages capability when compared to the conventional single channel approach. for automated method and batch creation as well as simplified data The LCMS-8060 adds ultra-fast polarity switching and scanning speed, evaluation highest sensitivity and robustness to push the limits of LC-MS/MS quantitation.
Boosted operating efficiency through multiplexing technology
www.shimadzu.eu/nexera-mx Nexera MX and LCMS-8060 van Engelen et al.
based on an external calibration curve. In addition, the dispersity and the overall functionality (in cases where Figure 1: Reaction of an initiator, where R could be a di, tri, or higher functional species with propylene oxide or the -OH number has been determined separately) can be ethylene oxide to form a polyether polyol. obtained (3). Detailed structural information on the nature of the formulation, however, is limited. Off-line coupling of Catalyst LC or SEC with MALDI-TOF-MS may provide more detailed R OH n m O O OOR O H information regarding the distributions observed. However, T m this is labour intensive because off-line coupling is not n Initiator Propylene oxide Ethylene oxide Polyether straightforward because of the need for spotting the SEC (PO) (EO) Polyol eluent on the MALDI plate, evaporating the solvent, and derivatizing the spots prior to laser ablation (4). Figure 2: Schematic layout of the analytical system with LC coupled to MS is a well-established tool in structure post-column addition of organic modifi er to enhance elucidation. Conversely, SEC directly coupled to MS is ionization and parallel UV-RI and MS detection. less common as is clear from the number of publications 1 mL/min SEC System DAD RID available. Whereas nearly 6000 publications are available 0.6 mL/min
on the topic of LC–MS (2016), a Scifinder search lists a 0.4 mL/min Post column 0.1 mL/min total of less than 50 publications on the topic of SEC–MS MS ADC Data Modifier 0.5 mL/min (2001–YTD). Although practiced since the early 1990s (5), today one of the most active groups in SEC–MS is the Barner-Kowollik group (6). Figure 3: Example of a SEC–RI–MS chromatogram of = = A workflow was established that benefits from both the a polyether polyol mixture (Red TIC; Blue RI). The spectra at the top of the distributions are shown as (a), separation power of SEC and the identification strength (b) (Homopolymer M <2500 Da) and (c), (d) (Copolymer of high-resolution mass spectrometry. A regular SEC w M > 4000 Da). system coupled to an ultraviolet refractive index detector w (UV-RI) setup was extended by introducing MS detection parallel to the optical detectors. As such, MS offered the possibility of identification next to the quantitation by RI. As the optical cell of an RI detector is pressure sensitive (d) (c) (b) (a) while MS is a destructive technique, both detectors need to be the last in line of the detection scheme. To have two
final detectors, the flow after the columns was split and 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 one part was directed towards the UV and RI detector in Response Units (%) vs. Acquisition Time (min)
series (Figure 2) and the other part was directed towards z=1 (a)z=5 (c) 1096.7927 821.5844 z=3 z=3 the MS. Although other modifiers exist, ammonium 557.4137 z=4 1371.9578 1022.4728 formate was chosen because polyether polyols easily form z=2 z=2 2012.3968 ammonium adducts. As ammonium formate is not soluble in tetrahydrofuran (THF, typical solvent for polyether polyol 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 SEC) and the polystyrene/divinylbenzene columns used Counts (%) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) Counts (%) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)
are not compatible with water, the modifier was added z=2 (b)z=7 (d) 1014.2348 836.4928 post-column before entering the source of the mass z=2 682.1690 z=1 spectrometer. As the RI detector is not supported by the 2009.4691 z=6z=5 z=4 z=8 1344.9768 z=3 software version used, the RI data was acquired via an AD 2175.9084 Converter (ADC). 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 Counts (%) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) Counts (%) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) Experimental Chemicals: Samples were prepared at an approximate with two optical detectors in series; a diode array detector concentration of 1 mg/mL in THF. Prior to separation, the scanning from 190 nm to 400 nm followed by a differential samples were filtered over a PTFE 0.45 μm Millex LCR refractive index detector set at 35 °C. syringe-driven filter unit (EMD Millipore). SEC separation The LC–MS and LC–charge reduction–MS (LC–CR–MS) was performed in THF (J.T. Baker; non-stabilized, HPLC experiments were performed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity grade). Ammonium formate (Fluka; LC–MS grade) was II LC system. PEG3800 analyzed under reversed-phase used as 0.2% solution in water (Millipore Milli-Q grade). separation conditions was used to demonstrate the The MS tuning solution was obtained from Agilent (ESI-L technique. The LC–MS and LC–CR–MS conditions and Low concentration tuning mix G1969). experimental design have been previously described (7). Chromatographic System: All SEC–UV-RI–MS Columns: Injections ranging from 1 to 20 μL were made separations were performed on an Agilent Technologies on four 7.5 mm × 30 cm, 5-μm PS/DVB packed columns 1260 infinity system. The system consisted of an (Agilent) connected in series. The columns were coupled autosampler, a binary pump delivering 1 mL/min of THF, in decreasing porosity: 103 Å, 500 Å, 100 Å, and 50 Å. For and an isocratic pump set at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/min to the ultrahigh-performance size-exclusion chromatography introduce the organic modifier. Solvents were degassed (UHPSEC) experiments, two 4.6 mm × 15 cm, 1.7-μm using a degasser. Columns were placed in a thermostatic Acquity APC XT 45 columns (Waters) were connected column compartment at 35 °C. The system was equipped in series. These specific type of columns display a
180 LC•GC Europe April 2017 Thinking Forward. GPC/SEC Theory or practice? PSS are world worldld lead lleaders ders ini mmacromolecularacromolellhcular chcharacteri-aractet rii- zation and have the expertise to help you with your analysis requirements. We offer a range of products and services from instruction courses and training If there is one thru contract analysis, consulting, method develop- ment and qualifi cation services all the way up to thing we can supplying turnkey GPC/SEC and LC/2D systems. do, it’s both. All this comes with the personal and direct support of our dedicated team of innovative and pioneering specialists. Is there any better way of achieving your analysis goals?
Driving GPC/SEC forward
Phone + 49 6131 962390 You‘ll fi nd the ideal GPC/SEC solution at PSS under: www.pss-polymer.com [email protected] van Engelen et al.
Figure 4: Overlay of a typical SEC–MS chromatogram Figure 5: van Deemter plot (H vs. u0) obtained with a with a heat map of the observed m/z values. The heat single APC XT 45 column for benzene as test component map shows a clear separation of the oxide structure with THF as the mobile phase. Each data point was where the x-axis shows an increase in EO and the y-axis measured in triplicate and averaged (RSD <3%) (black visualizes the increase in PO. circles). Pressure vs. u0 plot where the pressure values were corrected for the system pressure (empty squares).
1200 25 600 1100
1000 500 20 900
800 400 2 15 700
Mass (Da) 1 600 300 H (μm) 10
500 (bar) Pressure 200 400
300 5 100 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Retention Time (min) 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 u (mm/s) linear separation range between 200 Da and 5000 Da 0 (polystyrene-based). Mass Spectrometer: Parallel to the optical detectors Figure 6: BPC and TIC showing the analysis of a typical an Agilent accurate-mass quadrupole time-of-flight polyether polyol. Two APC XT 45 (L = 15 cm) columns (QTOF) mass spectrometer was used for detection. The were coupled in series in combination with QTOF-MS TOF-MS was tuned to 12k resolution over the m/z range detection. 50–3000 in positive electrospray. Stable spray conditions were obtained at a nebulizer pressure of 50 psi and a drying gas at 10 L/min at 350 °C. The capillary voltage 1.4 was set to 4500 V with the fragmentor and skimmer at 150 V and 65 V, respectively. Mass correction was 1.2 BPC
performed against THF (m/z 73.06479; eluent) and HP-921 1 DEG
(m/z 922.009798; hexakis[1H,1H,3H-tetrafluoropropoxy] 2 (mw = 106) 0.8 phosphazine delivered by the instrument calibrant delivery x10 system). 0.6 For the LC–MS and LC–CR–MS measurements the 0.4 H20 + 27 EO = chromatographic system was coupled to a G6538 UHD 0.2 (mw 1206) accurate mass QTOF mass spectrometer (Agilent) (7). 0 Data System: Both LC and MS instrumentation were 1.4 1.6 1.82 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 33.23.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 controlled by Mass Hunter software (Agilent). The RI Counts (%) vs. Acquisition Time (min) detector was controlled by a 1200 instant pilot (Agilent) and the RI analog signal was fed into the Mass Hunter acquisition system via an AD converter. suggesting the polymer is based on propylene oxide 6 = + ( 58 Da). The charge adduct in this series is NH4 . The Results and Discussion monoisotopic mass of 1096.7927 Da suggests a formula Homopolymer: Figure 3 displays a typical SEC–RI– of C54H110O20 (error 0.16 ppm). Calculation of the residual MS chromatogram. The figure shows an overlay of mass results in a residual mass of 34, suggesting the the RI and the total ion count (TIC), blue and red line polyether polyol is a glycerin-initiated PO polyether polyol respectively, for an artificial mixture of polyether polyols. (Table 1). The accompanying mass spectra are shown below the chromatogram. MOD(Neutral mass,mass repeating unit) = Spectrum A is a typical spectrum for a homopolymer. MOD(1096.7927-18.03383,58.04186) = 34 [1] Identification of a homopolymer is straightforward because the oxide structure follows from the spacing of the Similarly, Figure 3(b) exhibits a spacing of 58, which individual oligomers (EO: 44 Da; PO: 58 Da). The initiator suggests the distribution centred around m/z 2009.4691 is can easily be determined from the residual mass of the most likely a water-initiated PO polyether polyol. polymer, that is, the mass remaining after subtraction of the As seen from Table 1, the residual mass can provide maximum integer number of monomers. The residual mass an indication on the initiator of the homopolymer. It can be determined by using the simple Excel function is, however, not a unique number and in some cases “MOD”. additional information—from, for example, NMR—may be For example, Figure 3(a) shows a typical spectrum for required to fully establish the polyether polyol structure. In a homopolymer, with the spacing of the isotope clusters the m/z 2009 example, an alternate suggestion may have
182 LC•GC Europe April 2017 van Engelen et al.
Figure 7: Diagram of the 210Po α-particle source in the ESI source of the MS. The α-particle source is positioned within a few millimetres on the electrospray ionization capillary. Emitted α-particles interact with ambient gases and solvent molecules, forming bipolar reagent ions that undergo further reactions with the analyte ions. These reactions result in charged particle transfer from the analyte + ions to the reagent ions (that is, NH4 transfer), generating charged-reduced analyte ions prior to entering the mass spectrometer. World leaders in
LC thermal desorption for environmental air monitoring
Ion source
MS
Tailor your TD system to your requirements – canisters, 210Po source on-line and sorbent tubes been a trimethylolpropane-initiated often leads to overlapping isotope polyether polyol because that would clusters (Figure 3[c] and [d]) and other result in the same m/z and residual measures need to be taken (vide infra). mass. Copolymer: The identity of Once the initiator and the oxide copolymers by SEC–RI–MS is more structure are established, a formula difficult and additional information database can be created, which from other sources may be needed. allows a targeted approach to fully Whereas the oxide structure can assign the polymer distribution. readily be determined by the spacing When assuming the response of of the isotope clusters, for example, the individual oligomers within the in the case of an EO–PO mixture, 6 = 6 = distribution being equal over the PO-PO 58, EO-EO 44, and 6 = distribution, a series of extracted ion EO-PO 14, the identity of the chromatograms or single oligomer initiator can be obtained from NMR. ɵ Maximise efficiency by running profiles can be generated and Alternatively, if the number of potential VVOC to SVOC on one platform integrated to determine the M and initiators is small, its identity may n ɵ Sample splitting and re-collection Mw of the polymer using the formula be calculated using the molecular below (8): formulas obtained from the accurate for easier validation and method masses. compliance N M 2 = i i NiMi Based on the calculated formula Mn Mw= [2] ɵ Reduce your costs – avoiding Ni NiMi the EO–PO ratio per peak can use of liquid cryogen Ni is the ion count of the single readily be calculated and assigned. oligomer profile as determined from For example, in Figure 4 a SEC– the total ion chromatogram and Mi MS chromatogram is shown where the molecular weight of that oligomer. the dotted overlay is a graphical Identification of the distributions representation of the observed Find out more becomes more cumbersome when masses versus retention time forming http://chem.markes.com/XR moving to higher molecular weights a heat map. As is clear from the and copolymers. Once the molecular figure, there is a distinct ordering in weight starts to be higher than the observed masses. For example, 1000 Da, multiple charging starts to when looking at the blue dot assigned occur. For homopolymers this still “1” a m/z 673 was observed. Accurate results in reasonably well interpretable mass calculations revealed an spectra, but for copolymers this elemental composition C33H68O13, www.chromatographyonline.com 183 van Engelen et al.
while from NMR it was known that no specific initiators Figure 8: (a) Total ion chromatogram obtained under besides H2O were present. Therefore: positive ionization from the LC–MS analysis of PEG3800. C33 H68 O13 = H2O + n C2H4O + m C3H6O (b) Summed spectra of the peak eluting from 10–12.5 min. (c) Summed CR spectra from 11–12.5 min. (d) Summed C : n 2 + m * 3 = 33 * [3] CR spectra from 10–11 min front shoulder. O : n + m = 12 = = n 3; m 9 1.1 (a) 1 0.9 When moving up along the blue dots, an increase of m/z 0.8 0.7 H O with spacing of 44 can be observed indicating an increase in 2 0.6 O H
x10 0.5 0.4 EO. The entire “blue” distribution as such can be assigned as 0.3 0.2 a water-initiated (PO)9 with 3–15 EO. Similarly, the “red” series, 0.1 0 starting with 2, can be assigned as series based on 10 PO -0.1 1234567891011121314 and 3–14 EO. As such, only a few of the oligomers have to be Counts (%) vs. Acquisition Time (min) assigned to identify the entire distribution because one can (b) 1.8 6+ observe an increase in EO loading along the y-axis, while the 1.6 5+ 1.4 + n+ 7 [M+nNH4] x-axis shows an increase in PO. These plots can be generated 1.2 3 1 4+ without difficulty using commercial software or open source x10 0.8 tools such as MZMine or OpenChrom (9,10). When moving 0.6 0.4 3+ from left to right through the chromatogram the PO loading 0.2 2+ 0 increases observed by a 58 Da spacing, whereas the y 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 25000 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 direction sees an increase in EO with a 44 Da spacing. So Counts (%) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) once a few peaks have been identified, one is able to “walk” (c) 3 + + through the distribution. 2.5 [M NH4] Ultrahigh-Performance SEC–MS for Fast Identifi cation: 2 1
Over the last couple of years there has been a trend towards x10 1.5 miniaturization in SEC. Columns with smaller inner diameter 1 0.5 (i.d. = 4.6 mm) and particle sizes ( x10 3 time can be obtained at the cost of higher back pressures. 2.5 2 1.5 This miniaturization trend is analogous to the trend that 1 0.5 adsorption chromatography has undergone already with 0 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 25000 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 the introduction of ultrahigh-performance chromatography Counts (%) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) (UHPLC), which is in a more mature stage. Various manufacturers have recently started the commercialization of products following the aforementioned miniaturization separation window of the analytical method because of the trend (14,15). A recent system for polymer analysis that was pronounced polydispersity of certain samples. Ultimately, introduced allows sized-based separations with high resolution all of the above indicates that advanced instrumentation to be achieved in very short analysis times (14). The column allowing high pressures (>1000 bar) with minimized external stationary phase used is based on sub-3-μm ethylene-bridged band broadening is required to run these columns at hybrid (BEH) silica particle technology, which reportedly optimal conditions. Since the application of these columns provides an increased mechanical strength (16). can shorten the analysis time significantly with respect Figure 5 shows a typical van Deemter plot obtained to conventional SEC, the combination with MS detection with such a sub-3-μm particle column where the flow rate was investigated to explore the possibility of fast polymer was varied between 0.1 mL/min and 1.7 mL/min. It can identification. be observed that the shape of the curve is very flat in the Figure 6 shows a UHPSEC–MS chromatogram (BPC high-velocity region (C-term region) where plate height values and TIC) of a typical polyether polyol. A fast separation = as low as Hmin 3.9 μm are reached. It clearly illustrates that was achieved in less than 5 min, which is in contrast to this type of column can be operated at high flow rates without conventional SEC where a separation run can easily take sacrificing column efficiency. To operate at the optimum more than 40 min. The BPC signal shows that the sample conditions (best performance [Hmin] and shortest analysis contains multiple components with different molecular weights. = time) one should work at a linear velocity of u0 2.5 mm/s, Despite the fact that some external band broadening in the which corresponds with a column pressure close to 500 bar. MS source is inevitable, the good separation resolution of this Extrapolating the van Deemter plot in Figure 5 towards higher type of stationary phase is still reflected. Identification with mobile phase velocities even projects that working at higher MS revealed that the various separated components were pressures could bring additional gain in separation speed polyether oligomers formed by polymerization of EO where without affecting the efficiency. In SEC it is also very common water served as initiator. Oligomers with a Mw up to 1200 Da to couple different columns in series to extend the overall could be identified. 184 LC•GC Europe April 2017 ® Valves, fittings, detectors, and more for chromatography and liquid handling Generation of Calibration Gas Standards Dynacalibrator® Model 505 s 4OUCH SCREEN CONTROL s 4WO CHAMBERS WITH INDEPENDENT temperature control s %XTREMELY STABLE TEMPERATURE CONTROL n deviation of <0.002°C at set point / 1°C change in ambient temperature s 5TILIZES SAFE CONVENIENT $YNACAL® permeation devices Dynacal® 0ERMEATION 4UBES s 00" TO HIGH 00- RANGE s !CCURATE STABLE CONCENTRATIONS s %CONOMICAL mEXIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO BULKY BOTTLED MIXTURES s .)34 TRACEABLE North America, South America, and Australia/Oceania contact: Europe, Asia, and Africa contact: ® Valco Instruments Co. Inc. ® VICI AG International tel: 800 367-8424 tel: Int + 41 41 925-6200 fax: 713 688-8106 fax: Int + 41 41 925-6201 [email protected] [email protected] van Engelen et al. carriers superimposed on each other). The multiple charging Table 1: Examples of residual masses. The residual mass phenomenon can easily be observed in Figure 3(c) and (d); as is obtained by subtracting the maximum integer number the molecular weight of the polymer increases, an increase in monomer units from the observed neutral mass. For example, glycerin (M = 92) would give a residual mass of multiple charging occurs. 34 on a propylene oxide structure (92 – 58 = 34) whereas Different strategies exist for overcoming the challenges sucrose: 342 – 5*58 = 52. of multiple charging. Charge reduction mass spectrometry (CRMS) is a chemical approach to minimize the complexity of Initiator EO PO mass spectra by stripping or removing charge from gaseous H2O 18 18 ions (18). In the current study, CRMS was performed to reduce the multiple charging of poly(ethylene) glycol. This technique Glycerin 434 has been widely studied for the direct infusion of biopolymers TMP 218 (19–22); however, the coupling of liquid chromatography to Pentaerythritol 420charge reduction mass spectrometry (LC–CRMS) has only Sucrose 34 52 recently been applied (7). Stutzman and coauthors were able Sorbitol 68to accomplish the coupling of LC to charge reduction MS by introducing a polonium-210 α-particle source into the ESI UHPSEC with MS Detection: When coupling with MS, source (Figure 7). Briefly, the α-particle source is positioned one needs to take into account that a regular electrospray within a few millimetres of the electrospray ionization capillary. source cannot handle more than 1 mL/min of column effluent Emitted α-particles interact with ambient gases and solvent without compromising instrument performance. When setting molecules, forming bipolar reagent ions that undergo further up UHPSEC in combination with MS detection, several reactions with the analyte ions. These reactions result in considerations related to data acquisition need to be taken charged particle transfer from the analyte ions to the reagent + into account. In a regular SEC separation, where peaks of the ions (NH4 transfer), generating charge-reduced analyte ions individual oligomers can easily be a half a minute (FWHM) prior to entering the mass spectrometer. wide, an acquisition rate of 1 spectrum per second is typically In Figure 8 the charge reduction effect is clearly used with RI and UV detectors and even a triple quad may demonstrated for the LC–CRMS analysis of a relatively simple be used. With such an aquisition rate, sufficient points are 3800 molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG3800) collected to properly describe the chromatographic peak and sample. Figure 8(a) shows first the positive mode total to allow for integration. In the example shown in Figure 6, a ion chromatogram (TIC) from the reversed-phase LC–MS single oligomer elutes in a peak only 2 s wide. Using a typical analysis of the PEG standard. Ion signal was observed from acquisition rate would be far too slow to properly analyze approximately 10–12.5 min. Mass analysis of the PEG3800 such a sample. Fortunately, the acquisition rate of a TOF response generated an ion signal consistent with multiply + 2+ instrument can be readily adjusted because each individual ammoniated PEG cations (Figure 8[b]), that is, [M 2NH4] + 7+ 210 mass spectrum is composed of thousands of transients over through [M 7NH4] . With the introduction of the Po the entire mass range. By decreasing the number of transients α-particle emitter into the ion source of the mass spectrometer, for each spectrum, the acquisition rate of the instrument can be CRMS was performed following liquid separation. Mass increased. The increased acquisition rate, however, invariably analysis of the PEG3800 response generated a distribution leads to a decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) because of singly charged ions centred at approximately m/z 4000, less transients are used to build the spectrum. Depending which was consistent with the water-initiated PEG3800 on the mass range of interest, the loss in S/N can (partly) be standard (Figure 8[c]). Notably, on the front shoulder of the compensated by changing the pusher frequency and limiting PEG TIC response, a distribution ranging from approximately the acquired mass range. With the decreased mass range the m/z 1200 to 2800 was also observed, likely arising from an number of transients per spectrum is increased (typically 14 k impurity (Figure 8[d]). The ion signal from the lower molecular per second for m/z 20–1700). One has to be aware that species weight PEG distribution was later identified and confirmed beyond the set mass range may appear as low-molecular-weight in the multiply-charged mass spectrum; however, the low artefacts in the spectrum because the pusher may operate faster relative abundance compared to PEG3800 and overlapping than the time required to “empty” the flight tube of the instrument. distributions initially limited its identification. Overall, LC–CRMS Multiple Charging: Multiple charging is a phenomenon of PEG3800 exhibited simplified mass spectra and enabled of electrospray ionization that occurs when molecules enhanced characterization of the complex polyether polyol containing several charge-carrying functional groups ionize mixture. By combining LC–MS with LC–CRMS data, one has (17). Multiple charging of polyether polyols typically occurs an additional powerful method to decipher complex polyether starting from a molecular weight of approximately 1000 Da polyol formulations containing material > 1000 Da. and ultimately adds to the complexity of the spectrum. An interesting observation is that the multiple charging occurs Conclusions by the presence of different combinations of charge carriers Detailed analysis of polyether polyol formulations was + + + + + (n*H , n*NH4 , and n*NH4 (m-n)*H ). Multiple charging achieved by coupling SEC to RI–MS. The oligomer is useful in the identification of proteins because it shifts the distributions (in terms of molecular weight and oxide structure) charge state distribution to lower values, thereby allowing as well as initiator type could be determined. Homopolymer the detection of higher molecular weight species. However, systems can sometimes be fully unravelled by SEC–RI–MS, for polydisperse samples such as polyether polyols, it is whereas more complex copolymer polyether polyol systems detrimental for the identification because several occurrences often require additional data from other techniques, such as overlap (different oligomers, charge states, and charge NMR. UHPSEC coupled to RI–MS can significantly increase 186 LC•GC Europe April 2017 van Engelen et al. resolution and simultaneously reduce the analysis time by a factor of 5 to 6. Multiple charging of higher Mw species significantly hampers the correct deformulation of complex polyether polyol systems. Installation of a 210Po source close to the ESI spray in the MS source reduces the average charge Brighter state to singly charged species and thereby significantly Separations simplifies the spectra. We have shown that LC–CRMS technology is particularly useful for the characterization of State-of-the-art HPLC complex polyether polyols containing material > 1000 Da. Columns for small mole- References cules bringing you reliable, (1) M.F. Sonnenschein, Polyurethanes: Science, Technology, Markets and Trends (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2015). brilliant results (2) ASTM, D4875 - 11: Standard Test Methods of Polyurethane Raw Materials: Determination of the Polymerized Ethylene Oxide Content of Polyether Polyols. 2011, ASTM International. (3) ASTM, D4274 - 16: Standard Test Methods for Testing Polyurethane Raw Materials: Determination of Hydroxyl Numbers of Polyols. 2016, ASTM International. (4) S.M. Weidner, J. Falkenhagen, and I. Bressler, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 213, 2404–2411 (2012). (5) W.J. Simonsick and L. Prokai, Adv. Chem. Ser. 247, 41–56 (2009). (6) T. Gruendling, S. Weidner, J. Falkenhagen, and C. Barner-Kowollik, Polym. Chem. 1, 599–617 (2010). (7) J.R. Stutzman, M.C. Crowe, J.N. Alexander, B.M. Bell, and M.N. Dunkle, Anal. Chem. 88, 4130–4139 (2016). (8) Agilent, Polymer Molecular Weight Distribution and Definitions of MW Averages, 5990-7890EN (2015). (9) T. Pluskal, S. Castillo, A. Villar-Briones, and M. Orešic , BMC Bioinformatics 11, 1–11 (2010). (10) M. Sturm, A. Bertsch, C. Gröpl, A. Hildebrandt, R. Hussong, E. Lange, N. Pfeifer, O. Schulz-Trieglaff, A. Zerck, K. Reinert, and O. Kohlbacher, BMC Bioinformatics 9, 1–11 (2008). (11) M. Janco, J.N. Alexander, E.S.P. Bouvier, and D. Morrison, J. Sep. Sci. 36, 2718–2727 (2013). (12) E. Uliyanchenko, P.J. Schoenmakers, and S. van der Wal, J. Chrom. A 1218, 1509–1518 (2011). (13) E.S.P. Bouvier and S.M. Koza, TrAC Trend. Anal. Chem. 63, 85–94 (2014). (14) Waters, ACQUITY Advanced Polymer Chromatography System, LITR134729285 (2015). (15) S. Luke, P. Cooke, and G. Cleaver, GPC/SEC miniaturization delivers lower solvent costs, higher throughput, and excellent separations. Access Agilent eNewsletter, (2015). (16) Waters, ACQUITY APC Columns, LITR134729585 (2014). (17) J. Pitt, Clin. Biochem. Rev. 30, 19–34 (2009). • Monolithic - Chromolith® (18) L. Gong and J.S.O. McCullagh, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 28, 339–350 (2014). Low backpressure – Long lifetime - (19) D.D. Ebeling, M.S. Westphall, M. Scalf, and L.M. Smith, Anal. Chem. Suitable for dirty samples – Available 72, 5158–5161 (2000). in micro format (20) W.J. Herror, D.E. Groeringer, and S.A. McLuckey, Anal. Chem. 68, ® 257–262 (1996). • Fused core particles - Ascentis (21) M. Scalf, M.S. Westphall, J. Krause, S.L. Kaufman, and L.M. Smith, Express – Efficiency – Peak symme- Science 283, 194–197 (1999). try – Wide range of phases (22) J.L. Stephenson and S.A. McLuckey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 7390–7397 (1996). • Fully porous particles - Purospher® STAR – 100% aqu- Marcel van Engelen is a research scientist focusing on NMR ous phase compatibility – pH stability 1.5 – 10.5 – Column/batch reproduc- and MS techniques. ibility – High loadability Ron Salome is a senior chemist and is an expert in liquid chromatography. sigma-aldrich.com/hplc-columns Hamed Eghbali is a senior chemist specialized in advanced LC separation and detection techniques. Melissa Dunkle is a senior chemist focusing on UHPLC–MS and advanced GC techniques. Edwin P.C. Mes is a senior R&D manager of Core R&D specialized in advanced separation and detection techniques. Marcel, Ron, Hamed, Melissa, and Edwin are all members The life science business of Merck operates of Core R&D - Analytical Sciences at Dow Benelux B.V. in as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada. Terneuzen, The Netherlands. Copyright © 2017 Merck KGaA. All Rights Reserved. Merck and the vibrant M are trademarks and Chromolith and Purospher are registered trademarks of Merck. Ascentis is a registered trademark of Sigma-Aldrich John Stutzman is a senior chemist focused on advanced Co. LLC. or its affiliates. MS techniques. He is a member of Core R&D - Analytical Sciences at The Dow Chemical Company in Midland, USA. www.chromatographyonline.com 187 MarvelXACT: A Worry-Free Fitting System for Liquid A Q&A Chromatography hromatographers need and want We also wanted to create a fitting that is Crepeatable, reproducible results. A highly re-usable. Ultra high-performance key aspect of ensuring such repro- liquid chromatography (UHPLC) is typically ducibility is avoiding guess-work when tight- run at very high pressures, and there’s very ening fittings. To learn more about a recent few tubing material and fitting technology innovation in liquid chromatography con- out there that lends itself to such pressure. If nections called MarvelXACT, LCGC recently fittings are highly re-usable, labs don’t have Eric Beemer spoke with Eric Beemer, senior development to discard items every time they change Senior Development Engineer engineer at IDEX Health & Science. columns or connections, thereby increasing and Inventor of MarvelXACT IDEX Health & Science the value of our new technology. LCGC: Why did IDEX develop MarvelXACT and what kind of field feedback led to it? Ease of use is also important. Although we have some existing finger-tight con- Beemer: At IDEX, we’ve done a lot of nections that don’t require tools, concerns Voice of the Customer (VOC) analysis in about whether they are properly assembled the field and have had close communica- still exist. With MarvelXACT, the connection tion with customers to understand the pain is not a concern anymore because it enables points of chromatography users and to de- an exact, proper connection every time. velop a set of criteria from which to work. We also have significant chromatography LCGC: What are the key features of experience from our internal lab work MarvelXACT? and incorporated that knowledge into the MarvelXACT specifications. Beemer: One key feature is its torque- limiting mechanism. Torque is important We wanted to develop a “worry-free” fit- because if you don’t have enough torque, ting. By “worry-free,” I mean no carryover, no leaks can develop—and with leaks come peak broadening, or any kind of tailing—just bad chromatography. repeatable chromatography. I think that’s what all chromatographers want. The leaks By applying enough torque, you maximize that we tend to see with fittings currently the fitting’s sealing potential. If you have available on the market have a big impact too much torque, you can damage the on troubleshooting time and chromatogra- port or the tubing itself. Once the tubing phy results. is damaged, an increase in back pressure usually occurs, which can be detrimental for achieving the flow rates that might be required by the analysis. SPONSORED BY MARVELXACT: A WORRY-FREE FITTING SYSTEM FOR LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY With MarvelXACT, by having a torque-limiting “click” element, but MarvelXACT builds upon MarvelX by adding mechanism, the proper amount of torque is provided to the torque-limiting mechanism to make it easier to use. maximize the seal while preventing too much torque, which Nonetheless, much of the mechanism for creating a seal can limit the tubing’s re-usability and the functionality. The and the resulting chromatographic results are the same as click also provides good feedback; you know it has been those previously obtained on the proven MarvelX technology. properly assembled. It’s like your automobile’s gas cap. MarvelXACT has been extensively tested to verify a superior When you hear the click, you know that you’ve assembled product incorporating these new elements. it properly and that it will seal every time. LCGC: Is MarvelXACT a patented technology? Another key feature is face-sealing. Face-sealing is basi- cally how the end of the tubing seals at the bottom of the Beemer: Yes; both the torque mechanism and the fitting port. No cones, ferrules, or other components are needed. have been granted patents. The tubing itself and the face A load is applied to the back of the seal to create the seal sealing element is patent pending. on the front end. MarvelXACT connections are available in either stainless steel or all PEEK flow path options, the latter LCGC: What is IDEX’s vision on MarvelX technology? providing a flow path that is smooth and very inert, which is What should users expect for the near future? important for “sticky” applications like protein separations. Beemer: IDEX Health & Science is committed to the growth LCGC: IDEX launched a new connection about a year of the MarvelX product family as evidenced by the expansion ago called MarvelX. What are the similarities and dif- of the face-sealing MarvelX technology used in MarvelXACT. ferences between MarvelXACT and MarvelX? We’re looking at ways we can use different tubing internal diameters and are experimenting with different materials Beemer: MarvelXACT is really just the advanced version such as a new fused silica flow path to try and open up other of MarvelX. It still utilizes the same tubing and face-sealing applications of the technology. IDEX Health & Science is the global authority in fluidics and optics, bringing life to advanced optofluidic technologies with products, people, and engineering expertise. The company is respected worldwide for solving complex problems and de- livering complete path innovation for analytical, diagnostic, and biotechnology applications for the life sciences market. As a genuine and trustworthy partner, IDEX Health & Science solves its customers’ most demanding challenges with the industry’s most extensive portfolio of state-of-the-art components and capabilities that are unrivaled in breadth, quality, performance, and design. IDEX’s vision of the complete path goes far beyond just meeting its customers’ needs—it anticipates them, with intelligent solutions for life. Product offerings include: connections, valves, pumps, degassers, column hardware, manifolds, flow cells, microfluidics consumables, sensors, integrated fluidic systems, optical filters, lenses, shutters, laser & light engines, and integrated optical systems. For more information, visit: www.idex-hs.com LC TROUBLESHOOTING Count the Cost, Part 2: Increasing Resolution by Increasing Retention John W. Dolan, LC Troubleshooting Editor We will discover how to fi nd the “sweet spot” in terms of retention for a liquid chromatographic separation as well as how much retention change can be expected for a selected change in organic mobile-phase percentage or column temperature. R = N0.5 α k + k k This is the second instalment s ¼ ( -1)( /[1 ]) [1] some increase in , the cost of i ii iii k R in a series about how to use ( ) ( ) ( ) an increase in to increase s, and chromatography fundamentals the stability of the separation as it to estimate the impact of various where α is the selectivity between relates to k. k k k parameter changes on liquid two peaks with -values of 1 and 2: The Advantages of Increased chromatography (LC) separations. k-Values: The plot of Figure 1 α = k k k In the first discussion (1) we looked 2/ 1 [2] shows us that for small values of , R at the influence of the column s increases rapidly with increased plate number (N) and saw that for Although we could use retention k. For example, a change of k from t most situations, starting method time ( R), it is usually simpler to use 0.5 to 1.0 (black dots in Figure 1) development with a 10,000-plate the retention factor in discussions increases the relative resolution by column makes the most sense. This like the present one. Recall that the 50% from 0.35 to 0.53. A further t k is a good compromise between retention factor is calculated from R doubling of from 1.0 to 2.0 gives t separation power, pressure, and and from the column dead time ( 0 or only a 33% increase in resolution. t k run time. The effect of further M) as: A fivefold increase of from 2 to 10 changes in column length (L) or increases resolution by another third, d k = t t t k particle diameter ( p) can be easily ( R – 0)/ 0 [3] but a change of from 10 to 20 only estimated without doing the actual changes resolution by 5%. This tells experiments. From equation 1, we can see that us that if we want to use k as a lever k + k R This month, we’ll continue the resolution is a function of /(1 ) to improve s, it will be most effective iii R k k discussion with an emphasis on the (term ). Thus, s will increase with , at small values of . influence of the retention factor (k) but not linearly. For example, if k = 1, The Cost of Increased k-Values: on the separation, expressed as k/(1 + k) = 0.5, whereas if k = 100, Another way to look at the data of R k + k resolution ( s). We’ll consider the /(1 ) ≈ 1.0. I find that this Figure 1 is to consider how much general case, specific cases, and relationship is easier to understand in it costs for an increase in k and how to estimate the influence of a a graphic representation, such as in compare this to the gain in resolution change in mobile phase percent Figure 1, where retention, expressed we might get for that cost. Because organic (%B) or temperature on as k, is plotted against resolution, most LC methods are run in an retention. As with the prior instalment expressed as k/(1 + k). Initially automated mode, the cost of analysis of this series, we’ll limit ourselves resolution increases rapidly with time is usually not significant as to isocratic separations and increases in k, then flattens out as k long as a batch of samples can be reversed-phase conditions to simplify exceeds ~5. run in a reasonable time, such as a the discussion, but much of this 14-h (840-min) overnight run. As an instalment will apply to gradients and Target Ranges for k example, let’s consider a method other separation modes. The relationship between k and run on a 150 mm × 4.6 mm column R s shown in Figure 1 can help us at 2.0 mL/min and a sample batch The Influence of Retention on to decide in advance what is the size (comprising both samples and Resolution desired range of k-values we would calibration standards) of 100 injections. t Once again, we’ll use the like to aim for in a separation. Let’s Under these conditions, 0 ≈ 0.75 min; fundamental resolution equation to look at three different aspects of this: we can rearrange equation 3 and R guide the discussion: the improvement in s we get for solve for retention time: 190 LC•GC Europe April 2017 magentablackcyanyellow ES913817_LCE0417_190.pgs 04.06.2017 20:54 ADV LC5306#-&4)005*/( 'JHVSF Plot of retention factor versus resolution (expressed as k/[1 + k]) based on equation 1. Black dots represent results for k = 0.5, 1, 2, 10, and 20. 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Relative resolution 0.2 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Retention (k/[1+k]) above with k = 0.5, 1, 2, 10, and 16 min, respectively. (I’ve rounded = + tR t0(1 k) [4] 20 (black dots on Figure 1), we can my numbers here, so your results use equation 4 to calculate retention may vary a bit if you repeat these If we use the same examples as times of 1.3, 1.5, 2.3, 8.3, and calculations.) These translate to GO WITH A HIGH FLOW INTRODUCING THE ALL NEW HIGH DEGASI PREP+ FLOW RATE 75 ml/min Per channel The world’s first high flow rate, in-line degasser, for organic solvents Biotech in co-operation with IDEX H&S are proud to announce the world’s first in-line, membrane degasser ready to use with aggressive media and organic solvents, while maintaining flow-rates up to 150ml/min and above.* Available configura- tions: Stand alone, OEM open frame and 1-4 channels. * 150ml/min is only a guideline value, the degasser will in many application work with flow rates well above this guideline. The degasser comes with 2-channels, where each channels recom- mended flow rate is 75 ml/min, connecting these chambers in a series will allow for a combined flow rate of 150 ml/min. INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS FOR FLUIDIC SYSTEMS HEADQUARTER ° BIOTECH AB ° SWEDEN ° TEL +46 (0)300-56 91 80 ° [email protected]