railse no.110 December 2010 railfuture in and the South East quarterly Branch Newsletter

campaigning by the Railway Development Society in London and the Home Counties , , , south Hertfordshire, south Essex, Bedfordshire, and Greater London

the independent campaign for a better passenger and freight rail network

Welcome to the third re-branded newsletter for our regional Branch.

Notice of Branch AGM 2011

The next Annual General Meeting of the widening the opportunity for participation. This London and South East Branch of railfuture provision will not prevent the acceptance of [the Railway Development Society Ltd.] will be emergency Motions by those present at the held in London in April 2011. It will be held AGM and at the discretion of the Chairman in before the Easter weekend, at a venue and on circumstances judged not reasonably one of the first three Saturdays to be confirmed foreseeable at the time of the deadline for the in the next Branch newsletter no.111, receipt of normal Motions, which is also commencing at 14.00. A Branch members’ Saturday 22nd January 2011. Motions, on meeting with a speaker is planned for the Branch organisation, policy or strategy, should morning. be brief and to the point, must indicate clearly to whom each is addressed for action, and Nominations are now invited for Branch must be duly proposed, seconded and signed Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Hon. Secretary and by both, who must be paid-up members of Hon. Treasurer, and up to 6 other Branch railfuture , [again quoting membership Committee members. Nomination forms are numbers] and sent to Branch Chairman Keith available from Branch Secretary Ian McDonald. Dyall. Candidates must be duly proposed and seconded with their nominations signed by The next issue of the Branch newsletter no.111 both, and sent together with signed will in the event of a ballot include a numbered confirmation of acceptance by the nominee; all ballot paper together with voting instructions three who must be paid-up railfuture members [which will include provision for supplying must state their membership numbers. membership number as well as postcode, Nominations must be accompanied by a which only the Electoral Returning Officer will candidate CV and Election Statement, each of see], together with the candidate CVs and their no more than 100 words, and sent to Branch Election Statements. The ballot paper must Electoral Returning Officer Paul Krebs at 24 then be returned to the Electoral Returning Bartok House, 30 Lansdowne Walk, London, Officer, to be received by him no later than a W11 3LT, to arrive no later than Saturday 22nd stipulated date, likely to be in late-March/early- January 2011. When accepting nomination for April 2011. The next Branch newsletter will any of the four Branch Officer posts, all also include details of submitted Motions duly candidates must declare, in case they are not proposed and seconded. Any proposed successful in a subsequent ballot for that amendments should then be notified to Branch Officer post, whether or not they would accept a Chairman Keith Dyall no later than ten working non-Officer position on the Branch Committee. days before the AGM.

In accordance with an amended Motion passed In accordance with Standing Order 16, the at the 2007 Branch AGM, Motions for debate Branch Committee hereby gives notice that it and possible amendment at the 2011 Branch proposes the adoption of the revisions to AGM are also now invited. This arrangement is Standing Order 10 which were proposed to the intended to enable the whole Branch inquorate EGM held on 18 th September 2010. membership to be aware of Motions for debate at their AGM in advance of the meeting, so Rail Users’ Groups

After the previous issue’s brief look at this, let’s proposed closure of Marylebone station in the focus in a bit more detail on those which are early ‘70s! How things change. affiliated to our Society; most have websites, and some straddle our boundaries with neighbouring Tonbridge & District Railway Travellers’ Thames Valley and Wessex Branches. Association - http://www.tonbridgecommuters.org.uk/ - Alton Line Users Association [also Wessex inaugurated in 1959 and still representing the Branch] - http://www.altonlineusers.com/ - travelling public in Tonbridge, Hildenborough and founded in 1974 to promote the interests of Paddock Wood. passengers using stations between Alton and Ash Vale inclusive. Watford Rail Users’ Group - email [email protected] - link in to the Abbey Line Association of Public Transport Users Community Rail Partnership and London (Bedford-London Line Committee) - Overground’s Passenger Board, for example. http://www.aptu.org.uk/ - the local travellers’ group representing the interests of First Capital A reminder that ‘Rail User Express’ is Connect’s Thameslink passengers at stations available from Tony Smale, railfuture ’s Rail User between Harlington and West Hampstead Group Liaison Officer. inclusive. Postal address: 63 Church Lane, Wool, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 6DD. Email address: Bedford Commuters’ Association - [email protected] http://www.bedfordcommuters.org.uk/ - established in 1973, representing commuters at Bedford and Flitwick. and now on to Network Rail .. Bedford to Bletchley Rail Users’ Association [also Thames Valley Branch] - whose London and South East Route http://www.tauruspr.co.uk/bbrua/ - formed in 1980 to help promote and thus help secure a future for Utilisation Strategy is expected to be published the often-threatened rail service through the for consultation very soon. It is one of their Marston Vale. ‘second-generation’ RUSs, taking a longer term view [up to 30 years] and not being Cambridge Heath & London Fields Rail Users’ geographically defined. For guidance see the Scoping Document under ‘Generation2’ on the Group - http://www.railwatch.org.uk/chlfug.html - Network Rail website at formed in the mid-‘90s to champion the cause of http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/4449.aspx The these then ‘limited service’ [ie weekday peaks Branch will take the lead in framing a response only] inner-London stations. on behalf of the Society and our four

neighbouring Branches – East Anglia, East Edenbridge & District Rail Travellers’ Midlands, Thames Valley, and Wessex – with Association - whom your Committee will liaise, and in close http://www.edenbridgetown.com/local/clubs/rail_tr collaboration with our own Branch Divisions. avellers.shtml - their objectives include electrification and double-tracking of the Uckfield line, and reinstatement of the railway line between Uckfield, Lewes and the South Coast. .. and Network railfuture ..

Marsh Link Action Group - With the spread of electronic communication http://www.mlag.org.uk/ - formed in 2002 to comes the opportunity to e-communicate with maximise the use of the train service across fellow members. The Society has a national Romney Marsh between Ashford and , ‘bulletin board’ to ease dialogue amongst serving the local communities around the stations members. To learn more about the group and for at Ham Street, Appledore, Rye, Winchelsea, general member-to-member postings please visit Three Oaks, and Doleham. http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/railfuture to join. Marylebone Travellers’ Association [also Thames Valley Branch] - http://www.bucksinfo.net/mta/ - set up to fight the Nuneaton Rail Upgrade’ being the only other and .. Network railfuture explicitly rail scheme. London & South East .. Meanwhile the Highways Agency has 18 other This newsgroup exists to facilitate the dispersal of major road schemes in development, on 14 of topical news to members of the London & South which work will continue including the A21 East Branch of railfuture . Meetings, current Tonbridge-Pembury and an M25 junction; the consultations and local campaigning are our other 4, which include junctions on the M3, M4 priorities. Please visit and M20, are being reviewed to ensure best http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Railfuture possible design and better ways to sequence the _LondonandSE/ and join in. work.

Community Rail Awards 2010 .. which lead to a Regional RUGs

Gathering proposed for Spring 2011 ACoRP – the Association of Community Rail Partnerships – held its Gala Dinner at the end of London & South East Branch plan to hold this September at Westcliff-on-Sea. The 2010 event as part of the regional consultations on Awards were presented by railfuture member Network Rail’s London & South East RUS. It will Chris Austin OBE, and featured many projects not be confined to railfuture affiliates. Please around our region. register your initial interest with Branch Chairman Keith Dyall and/or Branch Secretary Ian The only Awards which did NOT feature London McDonald. and South East region were the Best Station Garden or Floral Display, Best Community Rail Image, and Local Station Environment Award! Comprehensive Spending Involving Young People sponsored by Network Review – but spending on what? Rail saw the Abbey Line CRP shortlisted for their Garston Community Art Project. In our Branch area outside London, not a lot, it Community Art Schemes sponsored by Grand would seem. Inside the capital most headline Central saw the Kent CRP and Holmesdale attention went to the commitment to Crossrail, Technology College Snodland shortlisted for their now planned to be open in 2018. By the time you Snodland Station Artwork, and Abbey Line CRP read this there should have been a further DfT again. announcement about Thameslink Programme, Local Transport Integration sponsored by Lanacashire County Council saw South West electrification, Inter-City Express Project, and rd additional . Trains and Brompton Bikes take 3 prize for the Brompton Bike Hire Scheme [based at London Elsewhere, the Spending Review gave the green Waterloo], with Southern Railway and West light to 24 schemes. Of those, 14 are major road Sussex County Council shortlisted for their Arun schemes across the country, including in our Valley Cycle Racks Project. region the A23 Handcross to Warninglid and two Best Station or Train Retail Outlet sponsored by First TransPennine Express saw Wrexham & M25 ‘hard shoulder running’ schemes. Of the st other 10 schemes, in the ‘supported group’, just 4 Shropshire Railway’s on-train buffet take 1 prize, and Seeta Rajani [working with Southern Railway are public transport related, and none of them are nd closer to us than Ipswich. and Bioregional] take 2 prize for the Hackbridge Veg Van! In the ‘development group’ of 22 local authority Station Development sponsored by Railway Heritage Trust and Network Rail saw projects competing for a share of a £600 million nd fund, with about half a dozen with a public Southeastern/Network Rail/Kent CRP take 2 prize for Refurbishment of West, and transport element, there’s just one scheme in our rd region - the Bexhill-Hastings Link Road! Nice Uckfield Station Development take 3 prize. though to see mention of ‘Leeds Rail Growth Best Marketing Publication sponsored by First Package’ and ‘Sheffield Supertram additional Great Western saw Sussex CRP and Southern vehicles’. Then in the ‘pre-qualification group’ of Railway shortlisted for Station Adoption 34 schemes, let’s hear it for our Croxley Rail Link, promotion material, and Kent CRP for Station one of just 4 in our region, with ‘Coventry- Information leaflets. Best Community Rail Event sponsored by Go- For Winchelsea: 0618 Mondays-Fridays/06.32 Ahead saw Southern Railway shortlisted for Saturdays then 0832 ex- to Ashford Billingshurst School Sponsored Walk trains, and International alternate hours to 1832: 0732 Marston Vale CRP for Marston Vale Line Santa Saturdays-only then 0932 ex-Ashford Specials. International to Brighton then alternate hours to Department for Transport ‘Passengers Matter’ 2132. Award was won by Kirsty Monk for the Southern Railway Priority Seat Project, and saw Wrexham These service restorations come exactly five & Shropshire Railways shortlisted for the London- years after the introduction of the through Wrexham service. Brighton-Ashford service but at the price of Best Station Adoption Group sponsored by dramatic service cuts for these intermediate Northern Rail saw Liz Shoebridge and Sarah stations. Forty years since the Marsh Link line Ross of adopt a Station based at The won a reprieve from the threat of complete Aldingbourne Trust take 2 nd prize for their floral closure [by a certain Richard Marsh, no less!], the displays at 22 Southern stations. remaining legacies still to reverse are the 30- Outstanding Volunteer Contribution sponsored year-old singling of the line between Appledore by First Great Western was won by a volunteer and Ore [except through Rye station], and the 25- with Wrexham & Shropshire Railways, with one year-long abandonment of plans to electrify this from Essex and South Suffolk CRP in 3 rd place. diesel ‘island’. See http://www.mlag.org.uk/ for Outstanding Staff Contribution sponsored by further background; their Annual General Meeting Network Rail was won by Southern Railway’s is usually held in Rye early in the New Year. East Coastway manager, nominated by Sussex CRP, with 2 nd place also going to Southern for their station manager in the Streatham Hill area .. through East Anglia .. of south London.

Community Rail – Special Recognition Award where the December 2010 timetable sees the went to two people, one being Network Rail’s demise of diesel trains under the wires to and Community Rail Executive Mike Franklin who set from Street. The 3-car Class 170 trains up and runs Network Rail’s Community Scheme cascaded to the Norwich-Cambridge route from and is known for example to the Friends of the through services for Lowestoft and Homerton Station on the North London Line for Peterborough have their paths taken by multiples help with their wildflower meadow on the station of 4-car Class 321 trains, cascaded from London embankments. Midland. The 2-car Class 170 trains serving the two university cities transfer to strengthen Ipswich-Cambridge services. Now from East Coastway ..... Meanwhile a 3-month consultation on the May and December 2011 timetables for the West where, ‘in response to passenger requests’ [and Anglia routes runs to mid-February, prompted by no mean amount of lobbying from railfuture - the introduction during next year of 30 new 4-car affiliated Marsh Link Action Group, the Branch’s Class 379 Stansted Express trains. Some of Coastway Division, the Winchelsea Station them could also serve Cambridge. The released Adoption Group, the Sussex Community Rail Class 317 units will be used mainly to lengthen Partnership, and many others] Southern’s existing West Anglia trains. The Branch’s MarshLink services now call at Three Oaks and Eastern Division will lead our response, in close Winchelsea stations alternately every two hours liaison with East Anglia Branch. Mondays-Saturdays from the mid-December

timetable change. This translates to a standard

seven additional services at each station in each direction on each of the six days, plus a few .. to East Coast extras. where a recent consultation on capacity issues For Three Oaks: 0618 ex-Brighton Mondays- prompted this response from railfuture Fridays/0553 ex- Saturdays then 0732 ex-Brighton to Ashford International alternate hours to 1932; 0832 ex-Ashford International to Brighton then alternate hours to 2032.

Network Rail East Coast Main Line 2016 Capacity Review Draft for Consultation

Question 1 Key issues remain the operator chosen to Does the approach used provide an provide the Edinburgh/Motherwell/Glasgow understanding of the demand for paths after extensions to the ECML service and the 2016? confirmation by ORR of the track access requirements for the East Coast plan to 1 The study initiative to enhance the capacity of operate a Kings Cross/Newark service. the route to meet the aspirations of o The InterCity Express Programme (IEP) stakeholders to increase service provision and has been put on hold and any new train serve new destinations from 2016 onwards is programme seems unlikely to match the a welcome reflection of the need to grow the originally intended IEP provision (Footnote national rail network. Page 7). 2 Whilst ‘London’ may numerically dominate 7 It is commonly observed that in continental passenger and freight traffic flows, there is an Europe, major stations seem to have more established need to enhance the provision for platform capacity, less intensively used, with a services to Scotland from stations across the resultant predictability of platform availability national rail network, and between and reduction in delays. Paradoxically, intermediate places. sweating the railway assets in Britain in the 3 Capacity enhancements are needed now and interests of efficiency has resulted in reduced progressively in the future to meet the demand flexibility, poorer performance and apparently forecasts for passenger and freight traffic higher costs. nationally and across the North of England, for 8 It should be a key facet of any decisions example, in the Consultation Draft of the ultimately taken about the delivery of capacity Northern Route Utilisation Strategy (Northern for the 2016 timetable, that it will provide a RUS). ‘platform’ to facilitate future enhancements to 4 Whilst the need to preserve some commercial meet the long-term need identified in the confidentiality is appreciated, it is not clear that Northern RUS and implicit in the High Speed the aspirations considered in Section 2 Rail 2 proposals. (Paragraph 1.2.3 identifies the aspirants) are 9 The Scenario approach is considered to be the same as those considered in Section 3 helpful, albeit there are no doubt strongly (Paragraph 3.4.1). Specifically, it is not known divergent views on the acceptability of some of whether the constraints identified in Section 2 the trade-offs identified, such as LDHS journey have been influenced by Network Rail’s time penalties to accommodate increased imaginary aspirations included in Section 3 capacity. That said, rail future agrees that (Paragraph 3.4.1) and hence whether the Scenarios C & D are the best identified to form conclusions of the respective Sections are the basis for further economic study and the consistent and compatible. preparation of business cases. However, we 5 Capacity enhancements such as the retain some concern to ensure that the reopening of the Leamside Line would deliver findings have not been unduly influenced by new business as well as expanding the the introduction of Network Rail’s imaginary capacity of the ECML route and providing for aspirations (Paragraph 3.4.1). increased freight traffic. Equally, in-fill electrification between York and Leeds is likely Question 2 to release suppressed demand; this link will be Does the methodology for assessing the capacity of particular importance as preparations for of the route provide a clear understanding of how High Speed Rail 2 and its impact on the the aspirations can be accommodated on the conventional rail network are developed. route and the necessary trade-offs or capacity 6 There are some new uncertainties that may enhancements that would be required to affect the conclusions drawn in the document: accommodate them? o The impact of the emerging consequences of the government spending review on the 10 The train paths identified must accommodate CP4 programme. passenger and freight growth on the scale o Much of the work is based on increments to indicated in the Northern RUS as well as the ECML timetable proposed for growth further south along the route (we have introduction in May 2011. However, the yet to assess the implications in the soon to be iteration of the timetable used in the study published London & South East RUS). The is not stated; the service patterns most programme of enhancements to meet the recently indicated appear to differ from needs of 2016 should be developed to those stated in the consultation document. facilitate progressive improvements in the longer term. Plans should recognise the need 2.5). The service from Tweedbank is not to achieve a significant shift in passenger properly described as ‘aspirational’; it will be travel mode choice from car to train and freight operational before 2016. The current morning traffic from heavy goods vehicle to rail freight, and evening stopping train service from in order to reduce carbon emissions and Newcastle extending beyond Morpeth to contribute significantly to the Climate Change Chathill, whilst not an off-peak service, Act targets. illustrates the need for capacity to be 11 In building capacity to facilitate future preserved for local trains. enhancements to meet the long-term need 16 The provision of capacity for an inter-regional identified in the Northern RUS, the opportunity service between Newcastle and Edinburgh is should be taken to work towards an effective, supported, subject to the findings of the electrified four-track railway north of current study commissioned by Transport Doncaster. Capacity enhancement schemes Scotland and Scot rail. This service may in this context would include: contribute strongly to the optimisation of o Temple Hurst Junction/Hambleton North service provision at the intermediate stations Junction via Selby, particularly for freight and may also promote the opening of an services. additional station(s) in Scotland. o Northallerton/Ferryhill via the 17 The role of the ‘Hertford Loop’ may require Stockton/Stillington route. further evaluation. The desirable option to o The Leamside route from Ferryhill to facilitate extra LDHS services may require an Newcastle via Washington and Pelaw. upgrade to eliminate journey time penalties, Such routes would not only enhance capacity for but calls at e.g. Hertford may generate new passenger and freight traffic but would also business from those travelling further north. provide disruption diversion routes and Similarly, enhancement of the GN/GE Joint significantly increase the ability to deliver a 7-Day Line as well as benefiting rail freight would railway, all of which should be given full generate new business in travel to the north consideration in the development of business and Scotland. cases. 18 Tables 2.1 to 2.5 provide a valuable summary of the situation in the route sections 12 The scenarios developed, of course, concerned, albeit, there are no doubt strongly recognise the benefits of the Stillington route, divergent views on the acceptability of some of the need for various enhancements at the trade-offs identified. The missing link is Darlington and the re-opening of the Leamside perhaps the presentation of a strategy overall, Line in isolation. These proposed showing how work undertaken in the shorter enhancements are strongly supported. term (2016) will contribute to the development 13 In developing capacity, it is of particular of an effective four-track ECML in the longer concern that the benefits of a regular interval term. Such a strategy would recognise the passenger service pattern should be synergistic benefits of the improvements for recognised. This is of particular importance long distance, inter-regional and local north of Doncaster where other interCity passengers, freight, charter trains, disruption services (Cross Country, Transpennine management and the 7-Day railway. Express) serve stations along the ECML. 19 In summary, rail future supports the From Doncaster to Edinburgh the ECML timetable as a whole must deliver an development of business cases for Scenarios essentially regular service for passengers, C & D, which should be mutually supportive, regardless of the operating company involved. not exclusive; Scenario D, Table 2.9 includes This requirement should take precedence over unspecified improvements at Darlington and a capacity gains achieved for example, by re-opened Leamside Line among its capacity grouping together trains of similar operating enhancing solutions. However, we suggest characteristics. that capacity should not be enhanced at the 14 Capacity increases achieved at the expense of cost of LDHS journey time or the development current or potential crossing and connecting of an ECML timetable providing an essentially services are unlikely to prove acceptable. regular service for passengers, regardless of Transpennine services, Durham Coast to Tyne the operating company involved. Work Valley line and the future passenger services undertaken to provide capacity for the 2016 planned for the Ashington, Blyth and Tyne timetable should deliver a ‘platform’ to facilitate services would be examples. future enhancements to meet the long-term 15 The local train services to stations on the need identified in the Northern RUS (and ECML north of Newcastle not only provide presumably in the London & South East RUS) important connecting services but also are key and contribute to the development of an parts of the local transport network (Table effective four-track ECML in the longer term. Question 3 to the pressing need to develop a 7-Day How well does the economic assessment help you railway. o understand how stakeholders can increase the The benefit to rail freight services from the value of the ECML through alternative uses of provision of a terminal at Tursdale at the potential additional capacity? southern end to a link to the new Nissan electric car plant at the northern end. o 20 The inclusion of socio-economic benefits in the The impact of local services on the Line in economic assessment is a welcome step, reducing significantly the excessive traffic although Paragraph 3.4.2 tends to read as volumes on the essentially parallel though it is work in progress. The generalised Gateshead/Newcastle Western Bypass (A1 conclusion that aspirations with the largest road). o number of additional services tend to have the The establishment of a rail service for highest estimated socio-economic value and Washington (Population 53,400) as its corollary that the lowest estimated socio recommended in ATOC document economic value tends to have the lowest Connecting Communities in June 2009. number of additional services may seem to be Such an approach allows for the differing statements of the obvious but do serve to socio-economic benefits of freight and reinforce the need to provide a service as passenger services to be recognised and for against an occasional train. account to be taken of the wider economic 21 The need to preserve commercial benefits of the schemes, for example in confidentiality is stated in Section 3 although reducing carbon emissions and congestion on the operators concerned are identified in the road network. Section 2. There is a need to ensure that the 26 The business cases developed should take economic analysis has not been unduly note of the need to provide capacity for charter influenced by the introduction of Network trains; such trains bring important commercial Rail’s imaginary aspirations (Paragraph 3.4.1). benefit to the places served and might 22 As noted in paragraph 7 above, it is perhaps be best included within the open paradoxical that sweating the railway assets in access category. Equally, the benefits should Britain in the interests of efficiency has reflect a freight policy of path allocation as resulted in reduced flexibility, poorer required, rather than block booking, to ensure performance and in a railway apparently more that best use is made of the capacity provided. costly than those in Europe. It is 27 It is noted that there is some uncertainty recommended that an attempt be made in the generated by the implication (Paragraph 3.5) economic analysis to reflect this position. that Scenario D would not require additional 23 It is noted that the King’s Cross-Newark North infrastructure, in contrast to Table 2.9, which Gate services are likely to generate less value appears to suggest Scenario D to include per train than the majority of aspirations improvements at Darlington and a re-opened (Paragraph 3.4.2/6). Leamside Line among its capacity enhancing 24 The finding that increasing capacity (Page 37) solutions. Hence, it is considered important by spreading the intermediate calls between for the business cases for both Scenarios C & the services on the route, thereby reducing D to be developed in a complementary way, to journey opportunities between these stations ensure that the best value for money is Figure 3.6 illustrates the economic penalty that obtained from making best use of existing this loss of shorter distance connectivity would facilities together with the selective incur is of equal importance to the services implementation of infrastructure north of York and Newcastle. In judging the enhancements. Such an approach is more trade-off between extra LDHS services and likely to ensure that the synergistic benefits of improved shorter distance connectivity, there developing a four-track ECML in the long term is a clear case for taking into account the are realised. views of the stakeholders in the communities 28 railfuture looks forward to further information concerned. and consultation, when the results of the 25 It is of particular importance to ensure that the business case studies, including the wider business cases developed take a holistic view economic benefits are available. of the railway. For example, the business case for re-opening the Leamside line should This consolidated national response has been include: prepared after consultations with the following o The benefit of the Line to the operational railfuture branches: Scotland, North East, railway as a diversionary route for Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, East Midlands and, disruption management and its contribution London & South East. The railfuture national Passenger Committee was also consulted.

Branch Divisions’ members’ meetings – our three sub-regional Divisions’ meetings are open to all Branch members. In alphabetical order they are:

Coastway – usually meet monthly in Lewes on the first Thursday at 18.00 – the next one on 2nd December will be followed by 20 th January and 3 rd March, in the Lewes Arms. Contact Dick Tyler at [email protected] or 27 Windsor Road, Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, TN39 3PB or phone 01424 211500.

Eastern – usually meet bi-monthly in Stratford on the second Wednesday at 18.30 – the next one will be on 12 th January and then 9 th March. Contact Howard Thomas at [email protected] or 24 South Primrose Hill, Chelmsford, CM1 2RG or phone 01245 496439, before 21.00.

Kent – usually meet quarterly on a Saturday afternoon in a different venue around Kent – the next one will be at 14.00 on 19 th February, at the United Reformed Church near the Angel Centre in Tonbridge. Divisional Organiser is Peter Collingborn at 82 Burnham Walk, Parkwood, Rainham, Kent, ME8 8RX or phone 01634 364744; email contact is Chris Fribbins at [email protected]

National events – the next national AGM will be held on Saturday 7 th May 2011, in our regional Branch area at the Brighthelm Centre in Brighton. See railwatch and www.railfuture.org.uk for further details.

BRANCH CHAIRMAN: Keith Dyall, 26 Millway, Mill Hill, London NW7 3RB; tel: 020 8959 7147; [email protected]

BRANCH SECRETARY: Ian McDonald, 10 Douglas Road, Maidstone, Kent ME16 8ES; tel: 01622 203751; [email protected]

This Branch Newsletter is published quarterly and is usually distributed with each edition of railwatch . The copy deadline for issue 111 will be 13 th February 2011. Please submit material through Branch Chairman Keith Dyall.

The railfuture mission: to be the number one advocate for the railway and rail users

Websites: www.railfuture.org.uk and www.railwatch.org.uk

The Railway Development Society Limited is a (not for profit) Company Limited by Guarantee. Registered in England and Wales No. 5011634. Registered Office:- 24 Chedworth Place, Tattingstone, Suffolk IP9 2ND