DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1505.00123V1 [Quant-Ph] 1 May 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1505.00123V1 [Quant-Ph] 1 May 2015 POVM construction: a simple recipe with applications to symmetric states 1 2 1,3 Swarnamala Sirsi , Karthik Bharath ,∗ and S. P. Shilpashree 1Yuvaraja’s College, University of Mysore, Mysore 2 University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K. and 3K. S. School of Engineering and Management, Bangalore, India (Dated: May 4, 2015) We propose a simple method for constructing POVMs using any set of matrices which form an orthonormal basis for the space of complex matrices. Considering the orthonormal set of irreducible spherical tensors, we examine the properties of the construction on the N + 1-dimensional subspace of the 2N -dimensional Hilbert space of N qubits comprising the permutationally symmetric states. Similar in spirit to Neumark’s result on realization of a POVM as a projective measurement, we present a method to physically realize the constructed POVMs for symmetric states using the Clebsch–Gordan decomposition of the tensor product of irreducible representations of the rotation group. We illustrate the proposed construction on a spin-1 system, and show that it is possible to generate entangled states from separable ones. PACS numbers: 03.65.Aa, 03.65.Ta, 03.67.-a, 03.67.Bg Introduction.—Positive Operator-Valued Measures ever, it will be seen that the vector space structure of (POVMs) are used frequently in quantum information the space of complex matrices suffices for constructing processing tasks including quantum filtering [1, 2], POVMs. The nature of the construction ensures that the realization of quantum communication protocols [3–6], POVMs project states to specific subspaces spanned by a entanglement verification [7], Remote State Preparation subset of the orthonormal bases matrices used; the basis (RSP) [8] and conclusive teleportation [9, 10]. Their matrices need not be generators of SU(N), as is usu- construction and physical realization are of particular ally assumed in linear representations of the density ma- interest in quantum information theory[11–13] with trix. Using the representation of the density matrix with emphasis on optimal measurements through Symmetric the orthonormal set of irreducible spherical tensors by Informationally-Complete (SIC) POVMs [14, 15] and Fano [25], we present a novel method to physically real- fidelity measures [16]. Their importance lies in the ize the POVMs based on the Clebsch–Gordan decomposi- fact that they can be used to achieve certain tasks tion of tensor products into irreducible representations of N which are outside the scope of projective measurements; SU(2)⊗ , which include symmetric and anti-symmetric for example, a set of non-orthogonal states cannot be states. In the current context, such a procedure is similar distinguished using projective measurements, but can be in spirit to the construction of projective measurements discriminated unambiguously using POVMs [17, 18]. A from POVMs through Neumark’s theorem. However, the general construction mechanism for POVMs is therefore POVMs dilated to the 2N -dimensional Hilbert space are of considerable importance. not projective measurements, and generally not repeat- For N qubits residing in the 2N -dimensional Hilbert able. Nevertheless, repeatability can be viewed in the space, the N + 1-dimensional subspace of permutation- sense that the dilated POVM always projects onto the ally symmetric states corresponds to an experimentally subspace of symmetric states. We demonstrate the phys- developed and rich class [19, 20] in quantum information ical implementation of the POVMs in a 4-dimensional processing; the class includes Bell states, Greenberger– 2-qubit Hilbert space, and additionally, demonstrate a arXiv:1505.00123v1 [quant-ph] 1 May 2015 Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states, W states, and N-qubit mechanism to generate entangled states from initial sep- Dicke states, and POVMs on this class are crucial in char- arable states. acterization of nonlocality [21] and multipartite entangle- General POVM construction.—We begin with a simple ment [22–24]. Given their utility in such tasks, construc- observation motivating the construction. Let x1,...,xk tion of POVMs whose action always lead to symmetric be an orthonormal basis of a k-dimensional subspace S post-measurement states can be particularly useful. of a vector space V of dimension N, and let X denote the The purpose then of this Letter is two-fold: to first N k matrix whose columns are x1,...,xk. Then XX† present a simple recipe for construction of POVMs based is Hermitian,× non-negative, idempotent, and an orthog- on any orthonormal set of basis matrices on the vector onal projection operator onto S, spanned by a subset of space of complex matrices; secondly, use the construction the orthonormal basis x ,...,xN of V . Given any N N 1 × to obtain and physically realize POVMs for the permu- matrix A expressed in the basis x1,...,xN , XX†A repre- tationally symmetric N + 1-dimensional subspace of the sents the projection of A onto S. This presents us with a 2N -dimensional Hilbert space in which N qubits reside. potential POVM construction mechanism for projection The space of density matrices and POVMs is a non-linear onto subspaces of the space of density matrices coordina- manifold since they are required to be non-negative; how- tized by an orthonormal basis. In order to extend this to 2 matrix spaces, we equip the manifold of density matri- We have thus shown how any orthonormal basis matri- ces with basis matrices for the space of N N complex ces for N can be constructed from the elementary basis × M matrices; while this ignores the manifold structure of the Eij . Note that for any complex matrix A, not necessarily density matrix space, it provides us with a convenient square, AA† is always non-negative and Hermitian. From mechanism for constructing POVMs. Potential matrix (1) and the fact that UU † = IN 2 , it is now straightfor- bases include, the generalised Gell-Mann basis, Weyl op- ward to verify that erator basis, spherical tensor basis etc. Such an approach T T † = αI , for the Bloch vector characterization of the density ma- X ij ij N trix was adopted in [29], wherein realization of an entan- i,j glement witness was considered. where α is a constant not depending on i and j. We Let denote the vector space of N N matrices N can formalize the preceding discussion with the following of dimensionM N 2 over the field of complex× numbers C. Theorem. Define a linear map : N N , V M →M 2 T T T T Theorem 1 Let Tj : j =1,...,N be an orthonormal (X)= x1 , x2 , , xN , { } V ··· set of basis matrices for N . Then the set αTjTj† where xi is the ith row of X containing N elements, satisfies the conditions of aM POVM, where α is a{ constant} T and v denotes the transpose of a vector v; the map not depending on j. transforms an N N matrix into a column vector of N 2 elements by stacking× rows into a column, providing an It is important to recognize that the subspace onto which equivalent representation of elements of N . The in- the POVMs project a state is a vector space and is the 1 M verse map − : N N is then the map which ambient space in which the submanifold of density ma- uniquely constructsV M an →N MN complex matrix by tak- trices reside. ing the first N elements of× (X) and setting that as Spherical tensor representation of density matrix.—A V the first row of X, and so on. Since N is a vector density matrix for an N-qubit system can be represented space over C, we can choose the elementaryM matrix set as Ei, : i, j = 1,...,N of N N matrices with 1 in the { } × 2j k (i, j)th position and 0 everywhere else as an orthonormal 1 k k† ρ = tq τq , (2) ′ ′ ′ ′ (2j + 1) X X basis; indeed, TrEij Ei j = δii δjj and Eij forms an k=0 q= k { } − orthonormal set of basis matrices for N . Any element M of N can be expressed as a linear combination, with where j = N/2 and τ k are irreducible tensor operators of M q complex coefficients, of the Eij s. It is easy to verify that rank k in the N+1 dimensional spin space with projection Eij Eij† is Hermitian, non-negative, and satisfies q along the axis of quantization in the real 3-dimensional 0 I space; here τ0 = N , the N N identity operator. Here E E† = NI . (1) × X ij ij N and elsewhere, orthogonality in the matrix space is al- i,j ways defined with respect to Trace norm or the square of k Let us denote by Tij : i, j = 1,...,N another set of the Hilbert–Schmidt norm. The τq satisfy orthogonality { } orthonormal basis matrices for N . Now, using the and symmetry relations, M map we can express the orthonormal basis Eij as ′ V { } k† k k† q k 2 2 ′ ′ (Eij ): i, j = 1,...,N . If U is an N N unitary Tr(τq τq′ )=(2j + 1) δkk δqq , τq = ( 1) τ q, {V } × − − matrix with UU † = IN 2 , then it is possible to obtain a new orthonormal basis Tij , where Tij = U (Eij ): where the normalization has been chosen so as to be in i, j =1,...,N . Explicitly,{V } {V V agreement with Madison convention [27]. The Fano sta- } k T tistical tensors [25] or the spherical tensor parameters tq (1) (2) (N) Tij = U (Eij )= uij ,uij , ,uij , parametrise the density matrix ρ as expectation values V V ··· k k k 2 of τq : Tr(ρτq ) = tq . In other words, the N 1 spher- (k) k − where the N-dimensional uij is the kth sub-column vec- ical tensor operators τq , in conjunction with the iden- 2 tor of the N -dimensional complex vector Tij.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS 1. Banach and Hilbert Spaces in What
    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS PIOTR HAJLASZ 1. Banach and Hilbert spaces In what follows K will denote R of C. Definition. A normed space is a pair (X, k · k), where X is a linear space over K and k · k : X → [0, ∞) is a function, called a norm, such that (1) kx + yk ≤ kxk + kyk for all x, y ∈ X; (2) kαxk = |α|kxk for all x ∈ X and α ∈ K; (3) kxk = 0 if and only if x = 0. Since kx − yk ≤ kx − zk + kz − yk for all x, y, z ∈ X, d(x, y) = kx − yk defines a metric in a normed space. In what follows normed paces will always be regarded as metric spaces with respect to the metric d. A normed space is called a Banach space if it is complete with respect to the metric d. Definition. Let X be a linear space over K (=R or C). The inner product (scalar product) is a function h·, ·i : X × X → K such that (1) hx, xi ≥ 0; (2) hx, xi = 0 if and only if x = 0; (3) hαx, yi = αhx, yi; (4) hx1 + x2, yi = hx1, yi + hx2, yi; (5) hx, yi = hy, xi, for all x, x1, x2, y ∈ X and all α ∈ K. As an obvious corollary we obtain hx, y1 + y2i = hx, y1i + hx, y2i, hx, αyi = αhx, yi , Date: February 12, 2009. 1 2 PIOTR HAJLASZ for all x, y1, y2 ∈ X and α ∈ K. For a space with an inner product we define kxk = phx, xi . Lemma 1.1 (Schwarz inequality).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Functional Analysis and Sobolev Spaces to Solve Poisson’S Equation
    USING FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND SOBOLEV SPACES TO SOLVE POISSON'S EQUATION YI WANG Abstract. We study Banach and Hilbert spaces with an eye to- wards defining weak solutions to elliptic PDE. Using Lax-Milgram we prove that weak solutions to Poisson's equation exist under certain conditions. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Banach spaces 2 3. Weak topology, weak star topology and reflexivity 6 4. Lower semicontinuity 11 5. Hilbert spaces 13 6. Sobolev spaces 19 References 21 1. Introduction We will discuss the following problem in this paper: let Ω be an open and connected subset in R and f be an L2 function on Ω, is there a solution to Poisson's equation (1) −∆u = f? From elementary partial differential equations class, we know if Ω = R, we can solve Poisson's equation using the fundamental solution to Laplace's equation. However, if we just take Ω to be an open and connected set, the above method is no longer useful. In addition, for arbitrary Ω and f, a C2 solution does not always exist. Therefore, instead of finding a strong solution, i.e., a C2 function which satisfies (1), we integrate (1) against a test function φ (a test function is a Date: September 28, 2016. 1 2 YI WANG smooth function compactly supported in Ω), integrate by parts, and arrive at the equation Z Z 1 (2) rurφ = fφ, 8φ 2 Cc (Ω): Ω Ω So intuitively we want to find a function which satisfies (2) for all test functions and this is the place where Hilbert spaces come into play.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilbert Space Methods for Partial Differential Equations
    Hilbert Space Methods for Partial Differential Equations R. E. Showalter Electronic Journal of Differential Equations Monograph 01, 1994. i Preface This book is an outgrowth of a course which we have given almost pe- riodically over the last eight years. It is addressed to beginning graduate students of mathematics, engineering, and the physical sciences. Thus, we have attempted to present it while presupposing a minimal background: the reader is assumed to have some prior acquaintance with the concepts of “lin- ear” and “continuous” and also to believe L2 is complete. An undergraduate mathematics training through Lebesgue integration is an ideal background but we dare not assume it without turning away many of our best students. The formal prerequisite consists of a good advanced calculus course and a motivation to study partial differential equations. A problem is called well-posed if for each set of data there exists exactly one solution and this dependence of the solution on the data is continuous. To make this precise we must indicate the space from which the solution is obtained, the space from which the data may come, and the correspond- ing notion of continuity. Our goal in this book is to show that various types of problems are well-posed. These include boundary value problems for (stationary) elliptic partial differential equations and initial-boundary value problems for (time-dependent) equations of parabolic, hyperbolic, and pseudo-parabolic types. Also, we consider some nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems, variational or uni-lateral problems, and some methods of numerical approximation of solutions. We briefly describe the contents of the various chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Hilbert Spaces
    3. Hilbert spaces In this section we examine a special type of Banach spaces. We start with some algebraic preliminaries. Definition. Let K be either R or C, and let Let X and Y be vector spaces over K. A map φ : X × Y → K is said to be K-sesquilinear, if • for every x ∈ X, then map φx : Y 3 y 7−→ φ(x, y) ∈ K is linear; • for every y ∈ Y, then map φy : X 3 y 7−→ φ(x, y) ∈ K is conjugate linear, i.e. the map X 3 x 7−→ φy(x) ∈ K is linear. In the case K = R the above properties are equivalent to the fact that φ is bilinear. Remark 3.1. Let X be a vector space over C, and let φ : X × X → C be a C-sesquilinear map. Then φ is completely determined by the map Qφ : X 3 x 7−→ φ(x, x) ∈ C. This can be see by computing, for k ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3} the quantity k k k k k k k Qφ(x + i y) = φ(x + i y, x + i y) = φ(x, x) + φ(x, i y) + φ(i y, x) + φ(i y, i y) = = φ(x, x) + ikφ(x, y) + i−kφ(y, x) + φ(y, y), which then gives 3 1 X (1) φ(x, y) = i−kQ (x + iky), ∀ x, y ∈ X. 4 φ k=0 The map Qφ : X → C is called the quadratic form determined by φ. The identity (1) is referred to as the Polarization Identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Functional Analysis
    Notes for Functional Analysis Wang Zuoqin (typed by Xiyu Zhai) November 13, 2015 1 Lecture 18 1.1 Characterizations of reflexive spaces Recall that a Banach space X is reflexive if the inclusion X ⊂ X∗∗ is a Banach space isomorphism. The following theorem of Kakatani give us a very useful creteria of reflexive spaces: Theorem 1.1. A Banach space X is reflexive iff the closed unit ball B = fx 2 X : kxk ≤ 1g is weakly compact. Proof. First assume X is reflexive. Then B is the closed unit ball in X∗∗. By the Banach- Alaoglu theorem, B is compact with respect to the weak-∗ topology of X∗∗. But by definition, in this case the weak-∗ topology on X∗∗ coincides with the weak topology on X (since both are the weakest topology on X = X∗∗ making elements in X∗ continuous). So B is compact with respect to the weak topology on X. Conversly suppose B is weakly compact. Let ι : X,! X∗∗ be the canonical inclusion map that sends x to evx. Then we've seen that ι preserves the norm, and thus is continuous (with respect to the norm topologies). By PSet 8-1 Problem 3, ∗∗ ι : X(weak) ,! X(weak) is continuous. Since the weak-∗ topology on X∗∗ is weaker than the weak topology on X∗∗ (since X∗∗∗ = (X∗)∗∗ ⊃ X∗. OH MY GOD!) we thus conclude that ∗∗ ι : X(weak) ,! X(weak-∗) is continuous. But by assumption B ⊂ X(weak) is compact, so the image ι(B) is compact in ∗∗ X(weak-∗). In particular, ι(B) is weak-∗ closed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riesz Representation Theorem
    The Riesz Representation Theorem MA 466 Kurt Bryan Let H be a Hilbert space over lR or Cl, and T a bounded linear functional on H (a bounded operator from H to the field, lR or Cl, over which H is defined). The following is called the Riesz Representation Theorem: Theorem 1 If T is a bounded linear functional on a Hilbert space H then there exists some g 2 H such that for every f 2 H we have T (f) =< f; g > : Moreover, kT k = kgk (here kT k denotes the operator norm of T , while kgk is the Hilbert space norm of g. Proof: Let's assume that H is separable for now. It's not really much harder to prove for any Hilbert space, but the separable case makes nice use of the ideas we developed regarding Fourier analysis. Also, let's just work over lR. Since H is separable we can choose an orthonormal basis ϕj, j ≥ 1, for 2 H. Let T be a bounded linear functionalP and set aj = T (ϕj). Choose f H, n let cj =< f; ϕj >, and define fn = j=1 cjϕj. Since the ϕj form a basis we know that kf − fnk ! 0 as n ! 1. Since T is linear we have Xn T (fn) = ajcj: (1) j=1 Since T is bounded, say with norm kT k < 1, we have jT (f) − T (fn)j ≤ kT kkf − fnk: (2) Because kf − fnk ! 0 as n ! 1 we conclude from equations (1) and (2) that X1 T (f) = lim T (fn) = ajcj: (3) n!1 j=1 In fact, the sequence aj must itself be square-summable.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Quantum Observables 3
    OPTIMAL QUANTUM OBSERVABLES ERKKA THEODOR HAAPASALO AND JUHA-PEKKA PELLONPA¨A¨ Abstract. Various forms of optimality for quantum observables described as normalized pos- itive operator valued measures (POVMs) are studied in this paper. We give characterizations for observables that determine the values of the measured quantity with probabilistic certainty or a state of the system before or after the measurement. We investigate observables which are free from noise caused by classical post-processing, mixing, or pre-processing of quantum nature. Especially, a complete characterization of pre-processing and post-processing clean observables is given, and necessary and sufficient conditions are imposed on informationally complete POVMs within the set of pure states. We also discuss joint and sequential measure- ments of optimal quantum observables. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ta, 03.67.–a 1. Introduction A normalized positive operator valued measure (POVM) describes the statistics of the out- comes of a quantum measurement and thus we call them as observables of a quantum system. However, some observables can be considered better than the others according to different cri- teria: The observable may be powerful enough to differentiate between any given initial states of the system or it may be decisive enough to completely determine the state after the mea- surement no matter how we measure this observable. The observable may also be free from different types of noise either of classical or quantum nature or its measurement cannot be reduced to a measurement of a more informational observable from the measurement of which it can be obtained by modifying either the initial state or the outcome statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Discrimination of Quantum States on a Two-Dimensional Hilbert
    Optimal Discrimination of Quantum States on a Two-Dimensional Hilbert Space by Local Operations and Classical Communication Kenji Nakahira1, 3 and Tsuyoshi Sasaki Usuda2, 3 1Yokohama Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama, Kanagawa 244-0817, Japan 2School of Information Science and Technology, Aichi Prefectural University, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1198, Japan 3Quantum Information Science Research Center, Quantum ICT Research Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo 194-8610, Japan (Dated: August 15, 2018) We study the discrimination of multipartite quantum states by local operations and classical communication. We derive that any optimal discrimination of quantum states spanning a two- dimensional Hilbert space in which each party’s space is finite dimensional is possible by local operations and one-way classical communication, regardless of the optimality criterion used and how entangled the states are. I. INTRODUCTION mation theory [11]. We denote a measurement on a 2D Hilbert space as a 2D measurement. Some important examples of 2D non-projective measurements are a mea- If two or more physically separated parties cannot surement maximizing the success rate for more than two communicate quantum information, their possibilities of states on a 2D Hilbert space and a measurement giving measuring quantum states are severely restricted. Intu- the result “don’t know” with non-zero probability, such itively, product states seem to be able to be optimally as an inconclusive measurement [12–14]. distinguished using only local operations and classical communication (LOCC), while entangled states seem to Let ex be a composite Hilbert space and sub be H H be indistinguishable. However, Bennett et al. found a subspace of ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization in Infinite-Dimensional Hilbert Spaces
    Optimization in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces Alen Alexanderian* Abstract We consider the minimization of convex functionals on a real Hilbert space. The req- uisite theory is reviewed, and concise proofs of the relevant results are given. 1 Introduction We are concerned here with the classical results on optimization of convex function- als in infinite-dimensional real Hilbert spaces. When working with infinite-dimensional spaces, a basic difficulty is that, unlike the case in finite-dimension, being closed and bounded does not imply that a set is compact. In reflexive Banach spaces, this prob- lem is mitigated by working in weak topologies and using the result that the closed unit ball is weakly compact. This in turn enables mimicking some of the same ideas in finite-dimensional spaces when working on unconstrained optimization problems. It is the goal of these note to provide a concise coverage of the problem of minimiza- tion of a convex function on a Hilbert space. The focus is on real Hilbert spaces, where there is further structure that makes some of the arguments simpler. Namely, proving that a closed and convex set is also weakly sequentially closed can be done with an ele- mentary argument, whereas to get the same result in a general Banach space we need to invoke Mazur’s Theorem. The ideas discussed in this brief note are of great utility in theory of PDEs, where weak solutions of problems are sought in appropriate Sobolev spaces. After a brief review of the requisite preliminaries in Sections 2– 4, we develop the main results we are concerned with in Section 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilbert Spaces
    Hilbert Spaces Definition. A complex inner product space (or pre-Hilbert space) is a complex vector space X together with an inner product: a function from X × X into C (denoted by hy, xi) satisfying: (1) (∀ x ∈ X) hx, xi ≥ 0 and hx, xi =0 iff x = 0. (2) (∀ α, β ∈ C) (∀ x, y, z ∈ X), hz,αx + βyi = αhz, xi + βhz,yi. (3) (∀ x, y ∈ X) hy, xi = hx, yi Remarks. (2) says the inner product is linear in the second variable; (3) says the inner product is sesquilinear; (2) and (3) imply hαx + βy,zi =α ¯hx, zi + β¯hy, zi, so the inner product is conjugate linear in the first variable. Definition. For x ∈ X, let kxk = hx, xi. p Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality. (∀ x, y ∈ X) |hy, xi| ≤ kxk·kyk, with equality iff x and y are linearly dependent. Proof. The result is obvious if hy, xi = 0. Suppose γ ≡ hy, xi= 6 0. Then x =6 0, y =6 0. Let z = γ|γ|−1y. Then hz, xi =γ ¯|γ|−1hy, xi = |γ| > 0. Let v = xkxk−1, w = zkzk−1. Then kvk = kwk = 1 and hw, vi > 0. Since 0 ≤kv − wk2 = hv, vi − 2Rehw, vi + hw,wi, it follows that hw, vi ≤ 1 (with equality iff v = w, which happens iff x and y are linearly dependent). So |hy, xi| = hz, xi = kxk·kzkhw, vi≤kxk·kzk = kxk·kyk. Facts. (1′) (∀ x ∈ X)kxk ≥ 0; kxk =0 iff x = 0. (2′) (∀ α ∈ C)(∀ x ∈ X) kαxk = |α|·kxk. (3′) (∀ x, y ∈ X) kx + yk≤kxk + kyk.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Introduction to Quantum Information Processing
    Mathematical Introduction to Quantum Information Processing (growing lecture notes, SS2019) Michael M. Wolf June 22, 2019 Contents 1 Mathematical framework 5 1.1 Hilbert spaces . .5 1.2 Bounded Operators . .8 Ideals of operators . 10 Convergence of operators . 11 Functional calculus . 12 1.3 Probabilistic structure of Quantum Theory . 14 Preparation . 15 Measurements . 17 Probabilities . 18 Observables and expectation values . 20 1.4 Convexity . 22 Convex sets and extreme points . 22 Mixtures of states . 23 Majorization . 24 Convex functionals . 26 Entropy . 28 1.5 Composite systems and tensor products . 29 Direct sums . 29 Tensor products . 29 Partial trace . 34 Composite and reduced systems . 35 Entropic quantities . 37 1.6 Quantum channels and operations . 38 Schrödinger & Heisenberg picture . 38 Kraus representation and environment . 42 Choi-matrices . 45 Instruments . 47 Commuting dilations . 48 1.7 Unbounded operators and spectral measures . 51 2 Basic trade-offs 53 2.1 Uncertainty relations . 53 Variance-based preparation uncertainty relations . 54 Joint measurability . 55 2 CONTENTS 3 2.2 Information-disturbance . 56 No information without disturbance . 56 2.3 Time-energy . 58 Mandelstam-Tamm inequalities . 58 Evolution to orthogonal states . 59 These are (incomplete but hopefully growing) lecture notes of a course taught in summer 2019 at the department of mathematics at the Technical University of Munich. 4 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Mathematical framework 1.1 Hilbert spaces This section will briefly summarize relevant concepts and properties of Hilbert spaces. A complex Hilbert space is a vector space over the complex numbers, equipped with an inner product h·; ·i : H × H ! C and an induced norm k k := h ; i1=2 w.r.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics
    qitd114 Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics Robert B. Griffiths Version of 16 January 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hilbertspace .................................... ......... 1 1.2 Qubit ........................................... ...... 2 1.3 Intuitivepicture ................................ ........... 2 1.4 General d ............................................... 3 1.5 Ketsasphysicalproperties . ............. 4 2 Operators 5 2.1 Definition ....................................... ........ 5 2.2 Dyadsandcompleteness . ........... 5 2.3 Matrices........................................ ........ 6 2.4 Daggeroradjoint................................. .......... 7 2.5 Normaloperators................................. .......... 7 2.6 Hermitianoperators .............................. ........... 8 2.7 Projectors...................................... ......... 8 2.8 Positiveoperators............................... ............ 9 2.9 Unitaryoperators................................ ........... 9 3 Bloch sphere 10 4 Composite systems and tensor products 11 4.1 Definition ....................................... ........ 11 4.2 Productandentangledstates . ............. 11 4.3 Operatorsontensorproducts . ............. 12 4.4 Exampleoftwoqubits .............................. .......... 12 4.5 Multiplesystems. Identicalparticles . .................. 13 References: CQT = Consistent Quantum Theory by Griffiths (Cambridge, 2002), Ch. 2; Ch. 3; Ch. 4 except for Sec. 4.3; Ch. 6. QCQI = Quantum Computation and Quantum Information by Nielsen and Chuang (Cambridge,
    [Show full text]