DOCSLIB.ORG

Valuation of Generation Assets - a Real Option Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valuation of Generation Assets - a Real Option Approach Valuation of Generation Assets - a Real Option Approach by Frode Kjærland Doctoral thesis submitted to the Bodø Graduate School of Business For the deg ree of Ph.D. Høgskolen i Bodø 8049 Bodø Tlf: +47 75 51 72 00 Fax: +47 75 51 72 68 www.hhb.no ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank several people for helping me to write Ihis thesis: Y Professor Terje Vassdal (NCFS/UiT) as supervisor and Professor Frøystein Gjesdal (Nonvcgian School of Econom!cs and Business Administration) and Professor Goran Bergendahl (School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg) as co-supervisors for their out­ standing academic feedback regarding the material handled in the thesis. y Six anonymous referees in different journab for providing excellent feed­ back conceming h",o of the chapters. ,. The energy companies in the region, amongst them SKS and Bodø Energi, which have provided the financial foundation for my work as a PhD stu­ dent ,. Kjell Kriiger, NORSEC, and Stein Mørtsell, SKS, for willingly ans\vering my questiont> about the power generation industry, especially with respect to the first half of the project. ,. The administration at Bodø Graduate School of Business that has most willingly supported me in finding solutions at every stage of the project. y Several faculty staff at Bodø Graduate School of Business for being most helpful concerning various academic challenges during my \\/Ork. Associ­ ate professor Rolf Volden has been outstanding with regard to the econo­ metric assessments in Chapters 4 and 6, Associate professor Berner Larsen has at>t>isted with the MATLAB programming in Chapter 5, as well as sev­ eral issues in the model application used in chapter 6, inc\uding the R source code programming. Fellow PhD student Telje Andreas Mathisen deserves acknowledgment for patiently assisting in the use of STA T A for some ofthe econometric tests perfonned in Chapter 4 and 6. y All colleges at the Bodø Graduate School of Business, and especially those working in the "J-Iengmyra" corridor, for making this a good place for the work. Y Europower AS, the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool and Brønnøysund Register Centre for providing necessary data. -111- 'j.- Peter Glanfield and my brother Trond, for assisting in my severe difficul­ tie~ in writing this thesis in English. Bodø, Nonvay, January 2009 -IV- TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Motivation .................................................................. 1 1.1.1 The Advantages of a Real Option Approach in Valuation ....................... 2 1.1.2 Real Options and Accounting Disclosure ................................................ 4 1.2 The Research Problem of the Thesis .......................................................... 5 1.3 The Generation Industry of Norway ............................................................7 1.4 Thesis Structure and Outline ..................................................................... 12 1.4.1 Chapter 2: Theoretical Foundation and Methodology ........................... 13 1.4.2 Chapter 3 (paper 1): The Use, Abuse and Lack of Use of Real Options13 1.4.3 Chapter 4 (paper 2): Explaining the Value of Electric Utilities by Real Options - An Application to Norway ............................................................... 15 1.4.4 Chapter 5 (paper 3): A Real Option Analysis of Investments in Hydropower - The Case of Norway ............................................................... 15 1.4.5 Chapter 6 (paper 4): The Value of Operational Flexibility by Adding Thermal to Hydropower - a Real Option Approach ....................................... 16 1.5 Summary and Key Contributions .............................................................. 17 References .........................................................................................................19 CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL FOUNDATION AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ 23 2.1 Valuation ......................................................................................................23 2.2 Real Options ................................................................................................24 2.3 Valuation of Real Options ..........................................................................27 2.4 Methodology ................................................................................................29 2.5 Real Options and Philosophy of Science ................................................. 29 2.6 Research Design .........................................................................................32 2.6.1 Data ........................................................................................................35 2.6.2 Unit of Analysis ......................................................................................36 -v- References .........................................................................................................36 CHAPTER 3 (PAPER 1): THE USE, ABUSE AND LACK OF USE OF REAL OPTIONS ........................................................................ 41 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 42 3.2 Key Findings from Relevant Surveys on the Use of Capita I Budgeting Techniques ........................................................................................................ 44 3.3 Four Aspects regarding Why there is Limited Use of the Real Option Tool .....................................................................................................................47 3.4 The Use of Real Options: An Application to the Norwegian Generating Industry ..............................................................................................................51 3.4.1 Valuation reparts of Statkraft SF ............................................................ 52 3.4.2 Contact with financial managers in generating companies ................... 53 3.5 Conclusions and Implications ................................................................... 55 3.5.1 The answer to research question 1: ...................................................... 56 3.5.2 The answer to research question 2: ...................................................... 56 References .........................................................................................................58 CHAPTER 4 (PAPER 2): EXPLAINING THE VALUE OF ELECTRIC UTILITlES BY REAL OPTIONS - AN APPLlCATION TO NORWAY63 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 64 4.1.1 Real options, valuation and Norwegian electric utilities ........................ 67 4.1.2 The electricity market in Norway ........................................................... 68 4.2 The Residuallncome Model and Research Design ................................. 70 4.2.1 Research design .. _ .... _.... 73 4.2.2 "Real option" variables.. .... _.... 79 4.3 Data, empirical results and analysis ......................................................... 83 4.3.1 Empirical results and analysis ............................................................... 89 4.4 Conclusions, Implications and Limitations .............................................. 97 References .........................................................................................................99 Appendix 1 ....................................................................................................... 105 Appendix 2 ....................................................................................................... 107 -VI- Appendix 3a .....................................................................................................109 Appendix 3b .....................................................................................................110 CHAPTER 5 (PAPER 3): A REAL OPTION ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENTS IN HYDROPOWER - THE CASE OF NORWAY 111 5.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 112 5.2 Methodology ..............................................................................................115 5.3 The Application of the Dixit & Pindyck Modelon Norwegian Hydropower Investment Opportunities ........................................................ 119 5.3.1 Data for applying the model.. .. ............ 119 5.3.2 Analysis of option value and trigger price.. .. ............ 127 5.4 Conclusions and Implications ................................................................. 132 References .......................................................................................................135 Appendix 1: MATLAB programming ............................................................. 138 CHAPTER 6 (PAPER 4): THE VALUE OF OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILlTY BY ADDING THERMAL TO HYDROPOWER - A REAL OPTION APPROACH ......................................................... 142 6.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................143 6.1.1 Background and motivation . .. ............. 144 6.2 Operational Flexibility, the Alternative Cost of Hydro Generation and the Operational Cost of Thermal Generation ............................................... 148 6.2.1 Reservoir level, short term forward prices and the alternative cost of hydro generation ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Futures and Options Workbook
    EEXAMININGXAMINING FUTURES AND OPTIONS TABLE OF 130 Grain Exchange Building 400 South 4th Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 www.mgex.com [email protected] 800.827.4746 612.321.7101 Fax: 612.339.1155 Acknowledgements We express our appreciation to those who generously gave their time and effort in reviewing this publication. MGEX members and member firm personnel DePaul University Professor Jin Choi Southern Illinois University Associate Professor Dwight R. Sanders National Futures Association (Glossary of Terms) INTRODUCTION: THE POWER OF CHOICE 2 SECTION I: HISTORY History of MGEX 3 SECTION II: THE FUTURES MARKET Futures Contracts 4 The Participants 4 Exchange Services 5 TEST Sections I & II 6 Answers Sections I & II 7 SECTION III: HEDGING AND THE BASIS The Basis 8 Short Hedge Example 9 Long Hedge Example 9 TEST Section III 10 Answers Section III 12 SECTION IV: THE POWER OF OPTIONS Definitions 13 Options and Futures Comparison Diagram 14 Option Prices 15 Intrinsic Value 15 Time Value 15 Time Value Cap Diagram 15 Options Classifications 16 Options Exercise 16 F CONTENTS Deltas 16 Examples 16 TEST Section IV 18 Answers Section IV 20 SECTION V: OPTIONS STRATEGIES Option Use and Price 21 Hedging with Options 22 TEST Section V 23 Answers Section V 24 CONCLUSION 25 GLOSSARY 26 THE POWER OF CHOICE How do commercial buyers and sellers of volatile commodities protect themselves from the ever-changing and unpredictable nature of today’s business climate? They use a practice called hedging. This time-tested practice has become a stan- dard in many industries. Hedging can be defined as taking offsetting positions in related markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Valuation Courses
    The specialist in highly technical, market-driven bankingmergers and corporate & acquisitions finance trainingtraining BusinessMergers & ValuationAcquisitions Courses Courses web: redliffetraining.co.uk email: [email protected] phone: +44 (0)20 7387 4484 Advanced Negotiation Issues in M&A Date: BrochureLocation: London Content Standard Price: £*** + VAT Membership Price: £*** + VAT BOOK NOW PUBLIC COURSES Course Overview • Advanced Equity Valuation • Advanced Negotiation Issues in Financial Covenants • Advanced Negotiation Issues in M&A • Advanced Private Equity & Leverage Buy-Outs: A 5 Day Masterclass • Advanced Private Equity & LBOs Training • Advanced Takeover Code - Current Strategies & Tactics • Bank Valuation • Corporate Finance Masterclass • Corporate Finance Transactions • Equity & Debt Capital Markets • Effective Business Writing for Corporate Finance • European Term Loan “B” • How to Buy A Business • How to Sell A Business • Introduction to The Takeover Code • Joint Ventures - Key Negotiating and Structuring Issues Coursewith Content Sample Documents • Leveraged Loans in Private Equity and Corporate Transactions • Negotiating Heads of Terms (LOI/MOU) & Related Issues To book this course or find out more, please click the “Book” button Advanced Negotiation Issues in M&A Date: BrochureLocation: London Content Standard Price: £*** + VAT Membership Price: £*** + VAT BOOK NOW PUBLIC COURSES Course Overview • Tax Issues in M&A • The M&A Course • Modelling for M&A Course • Private Equity & MBO • The SPA Course - Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Banking
    NIRMA UNIVERSITY Institute of Management Master of Business Administration (Full Time) Programme/ Integrated Bachelor of Business Administration-Master of Business Administration Programme/ Master of Business Administration (Family Business & Entrepreneurship) Programme L T PW C 3 - - 3 Course Code MFT5SEEF17 MBM5SEEF17 MFB5SEEF18 Course Title Investment Banking Course Learning Outcomes (CLO): At the end of the course, students will be able to: 1. Interpret the managing aspects and regulations affecting of Investment Banks. 2. Develop appropriate instruments keeping in view the terms of issue of security. 3. Assess the valuation aspect and issue of various kind securities. 4. Plan the restructuring including capital restructuring of a company. Syllabus Teaching Hours Unit I: Overview of Investment Banking 04 • Basic Concepts and Definitions • Role of Investment Banking as Financial Intermediaries • Business of Investment Banking • American and Indian Investment Banks Unit II: Domestic Issue Management 06 • Dynamics of primary market • Listing requirements and procedure • Raising funds through IPO • Methods of bringing out an IPO, and IPO Pricing • Due diligence process Unit III: Restructuring, Underwriting and Ancillary Services 09 • Structured products and risk management advisory • Financial Restructuring Services • Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) • Underwriting Services, Business Model of Underwriting, Underwriting Commissions, Devolvement and Green Shoe Option • Issuing ADR, GDR and IDRs • Arranging for Buyback and Delisting of Shares Unit IV: Investment Banking and Business Valuation 07 • Various valuation models applied in estimating value of the firm and value of equity • Merits and Limitations of each models/methods of valuation • Valuing Private Equity and Venture Finance Unit V: Issues facing Investment Banks 04 • Designing new financial instruments • Adoption of Blockchain in Investment Banks • Data Security • Other Issues Suggested Readings: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Options Valuation As a Way to More Accurately Estimate the Required Inputs to DCF
    Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate School of Management Finance 924-A Professor Petersen Real Options Spring 2001 Valuation is at the foundation of almost all finance courses and the intellectual foundation of most valuation methods which we will examine is discounted cashflow. In Finance I you used DCF to value securities and in Finance II you used DCF to value projects. The valuation approach in Futures and Options appeared to be different, but was conceptually very similar. This course is meant to expand your knowledge of valuation – both the intuition of how it should be done as well as the practice of how it is done. Understanding when the two are the same and when they are not can be very valuable. Prerequisites: The prerequisite for this course is Finance II (441)/Turbo (440) and Futures and Options (465). Given the structure of the course, no auditors will be allowed. Course Readings: Course Packet for Finance 924 - Petersen Warning: This is a relatively new course. Thus you should expect that the content and organization of the course will be fluid and may change in real time. I reserve the right to add and alter the course materials during the term. I understand that this makes organization challenging. You need to keep on top of where we are and what requirements are coming. If you are ever unsure, ASK. I will keep you informed of the schedule via the course web page. You should check it each week to see what we will cover the next week and what assignments are due.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Performance of the WTI
    An Evaluation of the Performance of Oil Price Benchmarks During the Financial Crisis Craig Pirrong Professor of Finance Energy Markets Director, Global Energy Management Institute Bauer College of Business University of Houston I. IntroDuction The events of late‐summer, 2008 through the spring of 2009 have attracted considerable attention to the performance of oil price benchmarks, most notably the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s West Texas Intermediate crude oil contract (“WTI” or “CL” hereafter) and ICE Futures’ Brent crude oil contract (“Brent futures” or “CB” hereafter). In particular, the behavior of spreads between the prices of futures contracts of different maturities, and between futures prices and cash prices during the period following the Lehman Brothers collapse has sparked allegations that futures prices have become disconnected from the underlying cash market fundamentals. The WTI contract has been the subject of particular criticisms alleging the unrepresentativeness of the Midcontinent market as a global price benchmark. I have analyzed extensive data from the crude oil cash and futures markets to evaluate the performance of the WTI and Brent futures contracts during the LH2008‐FH2009 period. Although the analysis focuses on this period, it relies on data extending back to 1990 in order to put the performance in historical context. I have also incorporated some data on physical crude market fundamentals, most 1 notably stocks, as these are essential in providing an evaluation of contract performance and the relation between pricing and fundamentals. My conclusions are as follows: 1. The October, 2008‐March 2009 period was one of historically unprecedented volatility. By a variety of measures, volatility in this period was extremely high, even compared to the months surrounding the First Gulf War, previously the highest volatility period in the modern oil trading era.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Corporate Valuation
    Fundamentals of Corporate Valuation Debt free cash free company valuations: what are they? Imagine a typical company which has some amount of net debt (where net debt equals debt less cash that could be applied to refinancing that debt). Imagine too that those net liabilities could magically be removed, perhaps by a magnificent benefactor or a fairy godmother – someone who could work a wonder over the company and take away its net debt. Without those net liabilities, magically the company’s value would increase. That’s the debt free cash free valuation: the value of the company imagining it had no net debt. Shares/ equity valuation vs. debt free cash free How does debt free cash free valuation compare to shares or equity value? Let’s imagine a company that has shares/ equity with a valuation of 70 million. You can see that 70 million on the right hand side of the chart below. Let’s imagine that same company had debt less cash (= net debt) of 30 million. The debt free cash free valuation would be 100 million. That’s the value on the left hand side. Equity valuation vs. DFCF 1 Equity valuations are usually higher than DFCF values For a company that has net debt (that is, where debt is greater than cash) the debt free cash free value is higher than the shares/ equity valuation for the business. You can see that in the chart above: the 100 million on the left is higher than the 70 million on the right. Working from left to right, if the owner of a company had received a debt free cash free offer of 100 million, and if net debt was 30 million, the owner would expect to receive 70 million for the shares/ equity in the business.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Testing of Real Option in the Real Estate Market
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Economics and Finance 24 ( 2015 ) 50 – 59 International Conference on Applied Economics, ICOAE 2015, 2-4 July 2015, Kazan, Russia Empirical Testing of Real Option in the Real Estate Market Andrejs Čirjevskisa*, Ernests Tatevosjansb a RISEBA, Meza street 3, Riga LV 1048, Latvia, bRISEBA, Meza street 3, Riga LV 1048, Latvia Abstract Existing researches have used real options valuation (ROV) theory to study investment in energy, oil and gas, and pharmaceutical sectors, yet little works have empirically examined ROV theory to study investment in a real estate market of EU countries that undergone severe economic crisis and now recovering. The aim of this paper is to test empirically ROV application for real estate development project with significant volatility in terms of price and cost and under strict legislation’s constraints. Paper illustrates empirical testing of ROV application of the investment project “Sun Village” developed by the ABC Project Ltd Company in Latvia in 2014. We apply three ROV methods: option space matrix “Tomato Garden”, Black-Scholes option pricing model and binominal option pricing model before we presented final research result. The flow chart of ROV application in real estate development projects presented in our research can serve as a “road map” for many similar projects in EU suffering real estate market bubble burst and present uncertainty. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license © 2015 The Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • PSU Disinvestment Valuation Guidelines
    Valuation Methodology CONTENTS CHAPTER I Introduction CHAPTER II Disinvestment Commission's Recommendations CHAPTER III Valuation Methodologies being followed Standardizing the valuation approach & CHAPTER IV methodologies CHAPTER - 1 Introduction 1.1 In any sale process, the sale will materialize only when the seller is satisfied that the price given by the buyer is not less than the value of the object being sold. Determination of that threshold amount, which the seller considers adequate, therefore, is the first pre-requisite for conducting any sale. This threshold amount is called the Reserve Price. Thus Reserve Price is the threshold amount below which the seller generally perceives any offer or bid inadequate. Reserve Price in case of sale of a company is determined by carrying out valuation of the company. In companies which are listed on the Stock Exchanges, market price of the shares serves as a good benchmark for assessing the fair value of the company, though the market price is usually characterized with significant short-term variance due to investor sentiments being influenced by short-term events and environmental aspects. More importantly, most of the PSUs are either not listed on the Stock Exchanges or command extremely limited traded float. They are, therefore, not correctly valued. Thus, deciding the worth of a PSU is indeed a challenging task. 1.2 Another point worth mentioning is that valuation of a PSU is different from establishing the price for which it can be sold. Experts are of the opinion that valuation must be differentiated from price. While the fair value of an asset is based on the assessment of intrinsic value accruing from fundamentals on a stand-alone basis, varying return expectation and underlying strategic aspects for different bidders could influence the price.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Option Valuation Real Option Valuation in High-Tech Firm Tech Firm
    Gothenburg University Schoool of Economics and Commercial Law Industrial and Financial Program Real Option Valuation in High-Tech Firm Supervisor: Wilhborg Clas Authors: Hu Pengfei Hua Yimin Real Option Valuation in High-Tech Firm Abstract In traditional financial theory, the discounted cash flow model (or NPV) operates as the basic framework for most analyses. In doing valuation analysis, the conventional view is that the net present value (NPV) of a project is the measure of the value that is the present value of expected cash flows added to the initial cost. Thus, investing in a positive (negative) net present value project will increase (decrease) value. Recently, this framework has come under some fire for failing to consider the options which are the managerial flexibilities, which are the collection of opportunities. A real-option model (Option-based strategic NPV model) is estimated and solved to yield the value of the project as well as the option value that is associated with managerial flexibilities. Most previous empirical researchers have considered the initial-investment decision (based on NPV model) but have neglected the possibility of flexible operation thereafter. Now the NPV must be compared with the strategic option value, by which investment is optimal while the NPV is negative. This leads investors to losing the chances to expand themselves. In the paper we modify the NPV by taking into account real options— theme of this paper, or strategic interactions. R&D, Equity and Joint Ventures will be viewed as real options in practice of case studies of this paper. Keywords: Discount rate, Net present value (NPV), Option(s) and valuation i Hu/Hua Real Option Valuation in High-Tech Firm Acknowledgments Those persons who have inspired us, helped us, or corrected us in the course of time are too numerous to be named.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Value of a Business
    Determining the Value of a Business August 15, 2017 @ 11 a.m. Eastern For technical assistance, contact the AT&T Helpdesk at 888-796-6118 - Thank you! We would like to thank Neal for his time and providing information regarding his experience on SBA lending programs from his perspective. All opinions, conclusions, and/or recommendations expressed herein are those of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect the views of the SBA. Advanced Business Acquisition / Appraisal Topics Presented by: Neal Patel, CBA, CVA Neal Patel, CBA, CVA Neal Patel, CBA, CVA is the Principal of Reliant Business Valuation, a business valuation and equipment appraisal firm specialized in SBA related valuations nationwide. Our firm currently works with over 150 SBA lenders around the nation. Certified Business Appraiser through the Institute of Business Appraisers (IBA) (Chair of the Board of Governors) Certified Valuation Analyst through the National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts (NACVA). SBA/Structure Valuation Related Related Intangible Assets Cash Flow Analysis: Liquor Store Partner Buyouts Valuation Methods Stock vs. Asset Valuation Rules of Sales Thumb Other SBA Rules Price / Revenues When is a Third Party Appraisal Required? (Non Special Purpose Property) If the amount being financed (including any 7(a), 504, seller or other financing) minus the appraised value of real estate and/or equipment is greater than $250,000, or.. Note: no mention of goodwill! If there is a close relationship between the buyer and seller (for example, transactions between family members or business partners), or.. Note: employee / employer also included! If the lender’s internal policies and procedures require an independent business appraisal from a qualified source Note: every change of ownership loan requires a business appraisal ! Intangible Assets: SOP Definition SOP 50 10 5(I) pg.
    [Show full text]
  • SBA Procedural Notice
    SBA Procedural Notice TO: All SBA Employees and 7(a) Lenders CONTROL NO.: 5000-808534 SUBJECT: Second Extension of Notice Providing EFFECTIVE: April 14, 2021 Guidance on Underwriting 7(a) Loans during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Miscellaneous Related Matters On December 16, 2020, SBA issued SBA Procedural Notice 5000-20071,Updated Guidance on Underwriting 7(a) Loans (including Community Advantage (CA) Pilot Program loans) during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Miscellaneous Related Matters, extending through March 31, 2021 the guidance on the additional credit analysis that a 7(a) Lender should conduct and include in its credit memorandum during the COVID-19 emergency previously provided in SBA Procedural Notice 5000-20042, and extending through March 31, 2021 the guidance for certain miscellaneous matters related to 7(a) loans during the COVID-19 emergency as discussed in SBA Procedural Notice 5000-20042. Given the continuing adverse economic effects of the COVID-19 emergency, the purpose of this Notice is to extend and update the underwriting guidance and the guidance on certain miscellaneous related matters through June 30, 2021 and provide additional updates as described below as a result of the enactment of the Economic Aid Act on December 27, 2020. A. Updated Underwriting Criteria for New 7(a) Loans Made During the COVID-19 Emergency: Lenders must analyze each application in a commercially reasonable manner, consistent with prudent lending standards, and must demonstrate that the cash flow of the applicant is the primary source of repayment, not any expected recovery from the liquidation of collateral. Further, SOP 50 10 6, Part 1, Section A, Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Process of Valuation – Placing Value on Your Business
    Article: Placing value on your business The process of valuation – Placing value on your business On a regular basis, business owners, investors and experienced bankers look for a simple way to determine business value: a rule of thumb or formula. Hoping to avoid the expense and trouble of hiring a professional valuator, a value formula common to the business type is used; thereby assuming determination of a company’s value can’t be complicated. While using a rule of thumb may be a considered alterative in developing a rough test price, it provides a weak form of market comparison for business value; relying solely on this approach poses inherent problems. However, the rule of thumb approach typically employs a multiple of cash flow (or EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) and/or a multiple of revenues. Business valuation is the act or process of determining value of a business enterprise or ownership interest therein. Valuation of a security interest in a closely held business is a difficult process due to the lack of an active free trading market. Because of the absence of such a market, an underling notion in valuing closely held businesses is found in the investment value principle. The principle suggests the purchase of an equity interest in a closely held business should be viewed like any other investment. In essence, the “investor” not only expects to receive the initial investment back, but also receive a fair return on the investment commensurate to the risk incurred. The investment value principle can be express as a formula, illustrated as follows: Investment Value Principle Benefit Value = Risk Hodges & Hart, LLC Page 1 Certified Public Accountants Article: Placing value on your business Where, Value = the investment value of the business (present value).
    [Show full text]