THE ENGLISH MOOR Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE ENGLISH MOOR Of A CRITICAL OLD-SPELLING EDITION OF RICHARD BROME'S THE ENGLISH MOOR Sara Jayne Steen A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 1978 11 Sara Jayne Steen, 1978. ITT ABSTRACT Critical attention paid to Richard Brome has increased greatly in recent years as scholars have recognized him to be more than a disciple of Ben Jonson, to be a skillful playwright whose satiric love comedies bridge the gap between the comedies of Jonson and those of Etherege and Wycherly. Despite the existence of a manuscript of The English Moor presented by Brome to his patron William Seymour, scholars have had available to them only the text of the play as printed in the 1659 Five New Plages (reprinted 1873 and 1966). The text of the manuscript, a manuscript that may be in Brome's hand, differs substantially from the previously printed text. This edition provides the text of the manuscript, including a hitherto unprinted Brome prologue and song. Introductory materials for this edition include: a brief biography of the playwright, a critical discussion of the play and its sources, descriptions of the printed texts and the manuscript, and a statement of editorial policy. The text is given in a semi-diplomatic transcription, with notes on the manuscript and a list of the few emendations that have been made, generally because of the exigencies of typescript and margins, provided in a section titled Emendations and Manuscript Notes. Because the 1659 text is a relevant form of the text, thirty-one copies of The English Moor in Five New Plages were collated. The variants among these copies are included in the Collation for this edition, in which also are recorded all variants, both substantive and accidental, between the 1659 text and the manuscript text. Historical and explanatory notes are contained in a final section of the edition. IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the Dean and Chapter of Lichfield Cathedral for granting me access to, and publication rights for, the manuscript of The English Moor; Prebendary E.C.C. Hill, librarian at Lichfield Cathedral Library, for his generous assistance; and Godfrey P. Hives and Lewis Raybould, vergers of Lichfield Cathedral, for their kindness during my stay there. Financial assistance for materials and travel has been provided by F. L. Saelzler, the Research Services Office of Bowling Green State University, and the Bowling Green Graduate Student Senate. Thanks also are owed to librarians at numerous institutions in England and the United States for their cooperation. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION...................................................... vi A Brief Biographyo f the Playwright ........................... vi Date of Composition........................................... x Source....................................................... xii ♦ The Play.................................................... xiii Printed Texts.............................................. xvii Manuscript................................................... xix This Edition. ................................................ xxv Notes.................................................... xxxiii TEXT............................................................... 1 Act I......................................................... 7 Act II........................................................ 29 Act III...................................................... 54 Act IV.........................................................74 Act V....................................................... 105 EMENDATIONS AND MANUSCRIPT NOTES ................................ 127 COLLATION......................................................... 131 EXPLANATORY NOTES................................................. 212 LIST OF WORKS CITED 239 INTRODUCTION vi A Brief Biography of the Playwright^ Our knowledge of Richard Brome, one of the most popular Caroline playwrights, begins with the Stage-Keeper's line from the Induction to Ben Jonson's Bartholomew Fair (1614): "I am looking, lest the Poet 2 heare me, or his man, Master Broome, behind the Arras." Brome, then, was Jonson's "man" in 1614 and probably had been associated with the famous playwright long enough for his name to have meaning to regular playgoers. Of the years preceding and immediately following, there is little 4 information. His birth date generally is given as 1590, which would have made him about twenty-four at the time of Bartholomew Fair and fits what is known of his later career. His plays indicate a man of some education but not great erudition. In Epigram CI, "Inviting a Friend to Supper," Jonson wrote: "my man / Shall reade a piece of VIRGIL, TACITVS, / LIVIE, or of some better booke to vs,"^ which led Ronald Bayne to conjecture that Brome had a grammer school education and was "not so much a valet as a secretary and amanuensis."6 However, 7 the "man" of the undated epigram easily could have been someone else; g and later references by Brome to himself as an "old serving-creature" 9 and by others to his early lowly status suggest that he held, at least when he began with Jonson, a more menial role. Whatever his duties, Brome was intelligent enough to use the opportunity provided by his employment with Jonson to learn about the theatrical world and, eventually, to enter it. In 1623, A Fault in VIT Friendship (lost), written by "Young Johnson and Broome," was licensed for Prince Charles's company.1*1 The identity of "Young Johnson" is unknown. A "Richard Broome" was listed among the Queen of Bohemia's Players in a 1628 warrant,11 which has been interpreted to mean that 12 he was an actor, but it seems equally possible that he had been writing in some capacity for them and that his name was included as a 13 form of protection. On 9 February 1629, The Lovesick Maid (lost) was licensed for the King's Men. The play was "acted with extraordinary applause," so much that the company presented two pounds to the 14 licenser. By this time, Brome was almost certainly no longer in Jonson's employ. Nor, for a short time, was he in Jonson's favor. The older playwright, stung by the failure of The New Inn only a few weeks before the success of Brome's The Lovesick Maid in the same theater, wrote in an early version of "Ode to Himself" that "Broomes sweeping(s) doe as well /Thear as his Masters Meale."1^ He reconsidered, how­ ever, for the reference to Brome was dropped when he published the poem in 1631; and the commendatory verses prefixed to Brome's The Northern Lass (1632) are warmly dedicated "To my old Faithfull Seruant: and (by his continu'd Vertue) my louing Friend: the Author of this Work, M. RICH. BROME." The verses praise Brome's skill: Now, you are got into a nearer roome, Of Fellowship, professing my old Arts. And you doe doe them well, with good applause, Which you haue iustly gained from the Stage. If Brome was hurt by Jonson's sneer, which had circulated, his loyalty Vili to Jonson seems not to have wavered: his references to Jonson are uniformly grateful and admiring. In the years after The Lovesick Maid, Brome became well-known as a dramatist, and his plays were in demand. He wrote for the fashionable Blackfriars, for the Red Bull, whose company was highly reputed at the time, and beginning in 1635, for Salisbury Court. A Requests Proceeding Bill of Complaint by Salisbury Court against Brome and his response to it, both filed in 1640, provide first-hand knowledge of Brome and of the 17 relationship between a Caroline playhouse and its playwright. According to these documents, after Brome's The Sparagus Garden had played at Salisbury Court in 1635 and, Brome noted, made a profit of over a thousand pounds, he signed a three-year contract to write three plays yearly in return for fifteen shillings weekly and receipt of one day's profit from each play. All was well until the plague intervened, closing the theaters 12 May 1636. Playwrights and companies alike suffered; Brome's salary was discontinued. And "put to his shifts in that hard sadd and dangerous tyme of the sicknes boeth for 18 himselfe and his famyly," Brome went in August to William Beeston of the Cockpit. Beeston lent him six pounds, for which Brome agreed to write a play (The Antipodes'). Salisbury Court's management, disturbed by the possible defection of their playwright, then paid Brome ten pounds—after he turned over a new play—and promised to give Beeston satisfaction. Again, however, Salisbury Court fell behind in payment, and, because Brome had turned once more to Beeston, took the case to Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels. Herbert awarded Brome six IX shillings weekly and five pounds for every new play brought to the company until the plague abated enough for the theaters to reopen, which they did 2 October 1637. Brome's plays must have been extremely profitable for Salisbury Court, because, despite continued arguments, they offered him a new contract in 1638. Verbally, at least, he agreed. The seven-year contract called for Brome to write three plays yearly, in addition to making up the plays he was in arrears from the previous contract, and to be paid twenty shillings weekly, plus one day's profit from each play. He was not to publish plays without the consent of the company. By 1639, however, he was writing for Beeston. He explained that he had been badly treated at Salisbury Court, had never signed the second agreement, and had gone with Beeston's company, "as hee hopeth 19 was and is lawful! for him so to doe." Salisbury Court claimed to have been paying him; he denied, it. In any case, Salisbury Court protested his loss and filed the Bill of Proceedings. The disposition of the case is unknown, but Brome continued to write for Beeston at the Cockpit. The years after the closing of the theaters in 1642, during which he was deprived of his livelihood, must have been difficult ones for Brome. They are nearly bare of records. He may have written "Juno in 2C Arcadia," an entertainment, for the Queen's arrival at Oxford in 1643.
Recommended publications
  • M a K in G a N D U N M a K in Gin Early Modern English Drama
    Porter MAKING AND Chloe Porter UNMAKING IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA Why are early modern English dramatists preoccupied with unfinished processes of ‘making’ and ‘unmaking’? And what did ‘finished’ or ‘incomplete’ mean for spectators of plays and visual works in this period? Making and unmaking in early IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA IN EARLY UNMAKING AND MAKING modern English drama is about the prevalence and significance of visual things that are ‘under construction’ in early modern plays. Contributing to challenges to the well-worn narrative of ‘iconophobic’ early modern English culture, it explores the drama as a part of a lively post-Reformation visual world. Interrogating the centrality of concepts of ‘fragmentation’ and ‘wholeness’ in critical approaches to this period, it opens up new interpretations of the place of aesthetic form in early modern culture. An interdisciplinary study, this book argues that the idea of ‘finish’ had transgressive associations in the early modern imagination. It centres on the depiction of incomplete visual practices in works by playwrights including Shakespeare, John Lyly, and Robert Greene. The first book of its kind to connect dramatists’ attitudes to the visual with questions of materiality, Making and Unmaking in Early Modern English Drama draws on a rich range of illustrated examples. Plays are discussed alongside contexts and themes, including iconoclasm, painting, sculpture, clothing and jewellery, automata, and invisibility. Asking what it meant for Shakespeare and his contemporaries to ‘begin’ or ‘end’ a literary or visual work, this book is invaluable for scholars and students of early modern English literature, drama, visual culture, material culture, theatre history, history and aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • English Renaissance
    1 ENGLISH RENAISSANCE Unit Structure: 1.0 Objectives 1.1 The Historical Overview 1.2 The Elizabethan and Jacobean Ages 1.2.1 Political Peace and Stability 1.2.2 Social Development 1.2.3 Religious Tolerance 1.2.4 Sense and Feeling of Patriotism 1.2.5 Discovery, Exploration and Expansion 1.2.6 Influence of Foreign Fashions 1.2.7 Contradictions and Set of Oppositions 1.3 The Literary Tendencies of the Age 1.3.1 Foreign Influences 1.3.2 Influence of Reformation 1.3.3 Ardent Spirit of Adventure 1.3.4 Abundance of Output 1.4 Elizabethan Poetry 1.4.1 Love Poetry 1.4.2 Patriotic Poetry 1.4.3 Philosophical Poetry 1.4.4 Satirical Poetry 1.4.5 Poets of the Age 1.4.6 Songs and Lyrics in Elizabethan Poetry 1.4.7 Elizabethan Sonnets and Sonneteers 1.5 Elizabethan Prose 1.5.1 Prose in Early Renaissance 1.5.2 The Essay 1.5.3 Character Writers 1.5.4 Religious Prose 1.5.5 Prose Romances 2 1.6 Elizabethan Drama 1.6.1 The University Wits 1.6.2 Dramatic Activity of Shakespeare 1.6.3 Other Playwrights 1.7. Let‘s Sum up 1.8 Important Questions 1.0. OBJECTIVES This unit will make the students aware with: The historical and socio-political knowledge of Elizabethan and Jacobean Ages. Features of the ages. Literary tendencies, literary contributions to the different of genres like poetry, prose and drama. The important writers are introduced with their major works. With this knowledge the students will be able to locate the particular works in the tradition of literature, and again they will study the prescribed texts in the historical background.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Richard Brome Online
    This is a repository copy of Bringing Richard Brome Online. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/105805/ Version: Published Version Article: Hirsch, BD orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-2080 (2010) Bringing Richard Brome Online. Early Theatre, 13 (1). pp. 137-153. ISSN 1206-9078 10.12745/et.13.1.837 This article is protected by copyright. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Early Theatre Volume 13, Issue 1 2010 Article 7 Bringing Richard Brome Online Brett D. Hirsch∗ ∗University of Western Australia, [email protected] Copyright c 2010 by Early Theatre. Early Theatre is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/earlytheatre Bringing Richard Brome Online Brett D. Hirsch Abstract This review essay assesses Richard Brome Online, an online edition of the collected works of Richard Brome, in terms of the design, functionality, and usability of its features.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4 2014
    2101 EAST COLISEUM BOULEVARD FORT WAYNE, IN 46805-1499 Volume 4 2014 Volume Volume 4 2014 Volume 4 2014 EDITORS at Indiana University– at Mount St. Mary’s University Purdue University Fort Wayne Emmitsburg, Maryland M. L. Stapleton, Editor Sarah K. Scott, Associate Editor Cathleen M. Carosella, Managing Editor Jessica Neuenschwander, Pub. Assistant BOARD OF ADVISORS Hardin Aasand, Indiana University–Purdue University, Fort Wayne; David Bevington, University of Chicago; Douglas Bruster, University of Texas, Austin; Dympna Callaghan, Syracuse University; Patrick Cheney, Pennsylvania State University; Sara Deats, University of South Florida; J. A. Downie, Goldsmiths College, University of London; Lisa M. Hopkins, Sheffield Hallam University; Heather James, University of Southern California; Roslyn L. Knutson, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Robert A. Logan, University of Hartford; Ruth Lunney, University of Newcastle (Australia); Laurie Maguire, Magdalen College, Oxford University; Lawrence Manley, Yale University; Kirk Melnikoff, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Paul Menzer, Mary Baldwin College; John Parker, University of Virginia; Eric Rasmussen, University of Nevada, Reno; David Riggs, Stanford University; John P. Rumrich, University of Texas, Austin; Carol Chillington Rutter, University of Warwick; Paul Werstine, King's College, University of Western Ontario; Charles Whitney, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Marlowe Studies: An Annual is a journal devoted to studying Christopher Marlowe and his role in the literary culture of his time, including but not limited to studies of his plays and poetry; their sources; relations to genre; lines of influence; classical, medieval, and continental contexts; performance and theater history; textual studies; the author’s professional milieu and place in early modern English poetry, drama, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • An A2 Timeline of the London Stage Between 1660 and 1737
    1660-61 1659-60 1661-62 1662-63 1663-64 1664-65 1665-66 1666-67 William Beeston The United Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company @ Salisbury Court Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company & Thomas Killigrew @ Salisbury Court @Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Rhodes’s Company @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Red Bull Theatre @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields George Jolly John Rhodes @ Salisbury Court @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane The King’s Company The King’s Company PLAGUE The King’s Company The King’s Company The King’s Company Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew June 1665-October 1666 Anthony Turner Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew @ Vere Street Theatre @ Vere Street Theatre & Edward Shatterell @ Red Bull Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Bridges Street Theatre, GREAT FIRE @ Red Bull Theatre Drury Lane (from 7/5/1663) The Red Bull Players The Nursery @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane September 1666 @ Red Bull Theatre George Jolly @ Hatton Garden 1676-77 1675-76 1674-75 1673-74 1672-73 1671-72 1670-71 1669-70 1668-69 1667-68 The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company Thomas Betterton & William Henry Harrison and Thomas Henry Harrison & Thomas Sir William Davenant Smith for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’
    Early Theatre 11.2 (2008) Christopher Matusiak Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’ The decision in February 1637 to appoint Christopher Beeston (alias Hut- chinson) ‘Gouuernor of the new Company of the Kings & Queenes boyes’ crowned one of the busiest and most innovative careers in seventeenth-cen- tury commercial theatre.1 Beeston had emerged in the 1590s as a young per- former in the Chamberlain’s Men, notably acting with Richard Burbage, Wil- liam Kempe, and William Shakespeare in the first production of Ben Jonson’s Every Man in His Humour. For the better part of the next two decades, he managed the financial affairs of Queen Anne’s Men at the Red Bull and with that company’s assets at his disposal, particularly its valuable wardrobe, he oversaw the building of west London’s first playhouse in 1616 — the Cock- pit (or Phoenix) in Drury Lane. By 1636, Beeston had established himself as London’s pre-eminent theatrical entrepreneur, having led Queen Henri- etta Maria’s fashionable company for ten years and amassed an unpreced- ented personal treasury of playbooks, acting apparel, and other tiring house materials. However, in May of that year the worst outbreak of plague in three decades closed the theatres and suppressed business until the following October 1637. Under the stress of eighteenth months of enforced idleness, acting companies buckled, setting patents and personnel adrift. Among the casualties was Beeston’s relationship with the Queen’s Men. From his van- tage point at the competing Salisbury
    [Show full text]
  • Scripted Improvisation in the Antipodes
    ISSUES IN REVIEW 129 ‘Now mark that fellow; he speaks Extempore’: Scripted Improvisation in The Antipodes Concluding his near-paraphrase of Hamlet’s famous advice to the players, Letoy in Richard Brome’s The Antipodes chastises Byplay, an actor with a penchant for improvisation, with the following lines: But you, sir, are incorrigible, and Take license to yourself to add unto Your parts your own free fancy, and sometimes To alter or diminish what the writer With care and skill compos’d; and when you are To speak to your coactors in the scene, You hold interlocutions with the audients— (2.1.93–9)1 Unlike the silent company Hamlet addresses, whose leader assents to Hamlet’s presumptuous lessons with only ‘I warrant your honour’ and a slightly more defensive ‘I hope we have reformed that indifferently with us, sir’ (3.2.13, 30),2 Byplay argues back saying, ‘That is a way, my lord, has been allowed / On elder stages to move mirth and laughter.’ ‘Yes’, Letoy replies, ‘in the days of Tarlton and Kemp, / Before the stage was purged from barbarism, / And brought to the perfection it now shines with’ (2.1.100–4) . Scholars often acknowledge, like Letoy, that improvisation played a signifi- cant role in early English theatre. Actors playing Vice characters in Tudor the- atre improvised before and after the plays in which they performed.3 Renais- sance texts contain stage directions instructing actors to improvise—Greene’s Tu Quoque (1611), for example, includes a direction for characters to ‘talk and rail what they list’ and The Trial of Chivalry (1601) contains the remark- able direction, ‘speaks anything, and Exit’.4 Elizabethan clowns, and in par- ticular Richard Tarlton and William Kemp, were famous for their ability to improvise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protectorate Playhouse: William Davenant's Cockpit in the 1650S
    The protectorate playhouse: William Davenant's cockpit in the 1650s Item Type Article Authors Watkins, Stephen Citation Watkins, S. (2019) 'The protectorate playhouse: William Davenant's cockpit in the 1650s', Shakespeare Bulletin, 37(1), pp.89-109. DOI: 10.1353/shb.2019.0004. DOI 10.1353/shb.2019.0004 Publisher John Hopkins University Press Journal Shakespeare Bulletin Download date 30/09/2021 15:44:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10545/624483 1 The Protectorate Playhouse: William Davenant’s Cockpit in the 1650s STEPHEN WATKINS University of Southampton Recent work on the history of the theater during the decade of republican experiment in England (1649–59) has revealed a modest but sophisticated performance culture, centering on the entrepreneurial and politically wily figure of Sir William Davenant. Despite the ban on stage plays enforced in various forms from 1642, by the mid-1650s Davenant, poet laureate to Charles I and Royalist aid during the civil wars, succeeded in gaining the Protectorate’s approval to produce a series of “Heroick Representations” (Davenant, Proposition 2) for public audiences, first at his private residence of Rutland House and later at the Cockpit theater in Drury Lane. These “Representations” embody a unique corpus in the history of English theater. They were radically innovative productions, introducing the proscenium arch, painted, perspectival scenery, and recitative music to London audiences. The Siege of Rhodes even boasted the first English female performer to appear on a professional public stage. Davenant’s 1650s works were not strictly plays in the usual sense—what John Dryden would later term “just drama” (sig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dramatic Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels, 1623-1673
    ill "iil! !!;i;i;i; K tftkrmiti THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/dramaticrecordsoOOgreaiala CORNELL STUDIES IN ENGLISH EDITED BY JOSEPH QUINCY ADAMS LANE COOPER CLARK SUTHERLAND NORTHUP THE DRAMATIC RECORDS OF SIR HENRY HERBERT MASTER OF THE REVELS, 1623-1673 EDITED BY JOSEPH QUINCY ADAMS CORNELL UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN: VALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILKORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MDCCCCXVII 7 7 Copyright, 191 By Yale University Press First published, October, 191 PRESS OF THE NEW ERA PRINTING COMPANY LANCASTER, PA. College Library TO CLARK SUTHERLAND NORTHUP AS A TOKEN OF ESTEEM 1092850 PREFACE The dramatic records of the Office of the Revels during the reigns of Edward VI, Mar>', and Elizabeth have been admirably edited with full indexes and notes by Professor Albert Feuillerat; but the records of the Office during the reigns of James I, Charles I, and Charles TI remain either unedited or scattered in mis- cellaneous volumes, none of which is indexed. Every scholar working in the field of the Tudor-Stuart drama must have felt the desirability of having these later records printed in a more accessible form. In the present volume I have attempted to bring together the dramatic records of Sir Henry Herbert, during whose long administration the Office of the Revels attained the height of its power and importance. These records, most of them preserved through Herbert's own care, consist of his office-book, covering the period of 1 622-1 642, a few documents relating to the same period, and miscellaneous documents relating to the management of the Office after the Restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 7 Agriculture Parts 900 to 999
    Title 7 Agriculture Parts 900 to 999 Revised as of January 1, 2011 Containing a codification of documents of general applicability and future effect As of January 1, 2011 Published by the Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration as a Special Edition of the Federal Register VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:06 Mar 10, 2011 Jkt 223019 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8091 Sfmt 8091 Y:\SGML\223019.XXX 223019 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with CFR U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) authenticates the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as the official codification of Federal regulations established under the Federal Register Act. Under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 1507, the contents of the CFR, a special edition of the Federal Register, shall be judicially noticed. The CFR is prima facie evidence of the origi- nal documents published in the Federal Register (44 U.S.C. 1510). It is prohibited to use NARA’s official seal and the stylized Code of Federal Regulations logo on any republication of this material without the express, written permission of the Archivist of the United States or the Archivist’s designee. Any person using NARA’s official seals and logos in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of 36 CFR part 1200 is subject to the penalties specified in 18 U.S.C. 506, 701, and 1017. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beestons and the Art of Theatrical Management in Seventeenth-Century London
    THE BEESTONS AND THE ART OF THEATRICAL MANAGEMENT IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY LONDON by Christopher M. Matusiak A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Christopher M. Matusiak (2009) Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-61029-9 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-61029-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 01/08 (Nr
    ISSN 1610-2606 ISSN 1610-2606 newsletterDIGITAL EDITION Nr. 221 - 01/08Januar 2008 Michael J. Fox Christopher Lloyd LASER HOTLINE - Inh. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Wolfram Hannemann, MBKS - Talstr. 3 - 70825 K o r n t a l Fon: 0711-832188 - Fax: 0711-8380518 - E-Mail: [email protected] - Web: www.laserhotline.de Newsletter 01/08 (Nr. 221) Januar 2008 editorial Hallo Laserdisc- und DVD-Fans, liebe Filmfreunde! Herzlich willkommen zu unserem ersten Newsletter im Jahre 2008. Nach einer kurzen Pause melden wir uns wieder zurück und prä- sentieren Ihnen das Neueste aus Deutschland und den USA. Die große Menge an Neu- veröffentlichungen in diesen beiden Regionen hat dazu geführt, dass wir in der vorliegenden Ausgabe auf die Japan-Releases verzichtet haben. Das holen wir aber selbstverständlich im nächsten Newsletter nach. Für uns Filmsammler fing das neue Jahr bereits mit einer grandiosen Neuigkeit an: die Welt wird blau! Der schon viel zu lange anhaltende Konkurrenzkampf zwischen den beiden High Definition Lagern ”Blu-ray Disc” und ”HD DVD” scheint beige- legt zu sein. Anstoß dazu gab Warner Home Video mit der Ankündigung, ab Mitte 2008 High Definition Versionen nur noch im ”Blu- ray”-Format anzubieten und auf ”HD DVD” zu verzichten. Das löste eine gewaltige Lawine in der DVD-Branche aus und führte zu strahlen- den Gesichtern bei den Fans. Denn damit dürfte die ”HD DVD” auf lange Sicht gesehen vom Markt verschwinden. Logisch dass Toshiba als ”HD DVD”-Verfechter nun alles erdenkliche tut, um sein System am Leben zu erhalten. Immerhin hat man zumindest mit Paramount derzeit noch einen der Großen mit im Boot.
    [Show full text]