Congressional Record-House. April 23
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3760 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. APRIL 23, called the Montello. The cotirt decided that that river was not navi in Tennessee, known as the Forked Deer River. The commerce of the gable. North Fork to its junction with the South Fork is greater than the Mr. BLANCHARD. I desire to stn.te the case to which I suppose commerce of the Son th Fork above th~t junction. A survey was made the gentleman from North Carolina refers. The case of the Montello in 1874 and appropriations were recommended by the engineers. An is in 20 Wallace, page 430. The decision in that case referred to the other survey was made in 1880 and appropriations were recommended Fox River,.Wisconsin, and not to the French Broad River. The French by the engineers and estimates given for this stream for which I now Broad was included in the report of the Secretary of War, that under ask an appropriation of $10,000. By some means the appropriation the decision of 11 Wallace the French Broad was not a n::~.vigable water was made for the South Fork and not made for the North Fork. I can way of the United States. not understand why this difference should he made, beca_use the busi Mr. JOHNSTON', of North Carolina. If the French Broad River is ness done on the North Fork for the last forty years has been consider· not a navigable water way why do the committee report an appropri able, and for many years past bas been larger than the business donG ation to improve it in Tennessee and n~t in North Carolina? on the South Fork. I ask now, in view of the importance of this stream, The question being taken on the amendment, there were-ayes 42, which is very deep in high water and is now navigable for five months noes 60. of the year, with a business on it amounting in the aggregate to more So ( furlilcr count not being C!l.lled for) the amendment was not agreed th:m one and a half million dollars, that this appropriation shall be to. m~e~~ • Mr. JOHNSTON, of North C::~.rolina. I move to strike out the last I see no reason, sir, why a discrimination should be made against this word. The gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. BLANCHARD] referred, as fork of the river while provision is made for the improvement of the I understood him, to a decision in 20 Wallace. The Montello decision South Fork, and for that 1·eason I ask this appropriation. - is in 11 Wallace, page414. Tlierivertherereferred toistheFoxRiver; l\Ir. HAMMOND. As this is a forked stream I move to give them and in this bill is included the Fox River to which the committee-give one-half-$5,000 instead of$10,000. ' an appropriation. Why should the French Broad River be excluded Mr. WILLIS. The only difficulty here is that this river has not when there is nothing to show that this river is not navigable? been surveyed, nor bas an estimate been made for it in the present re Mr. GIBSON, ofWestVirginia. I makethcpointoforderthatthere port. It is a stream, as the gentlemen from Tennessee says, of co:iisid is nothing before the committee. emble importance; there- is a large al\lount of business done upon it, The CHAIRMAN. A formal amendment is pending. · in fact it is a much more impo~ut stream than gentlemen would im Mr. JOHNSTON, of North Carolina. I am not surprised at the point agine without an examination, but not hr.viug been surveyed, and no of order being made by the gentleman from West Virginia, who has got recommendation having been made for it, the committee has not felt two or three rivers in his cowrtry-exactly like mine and for which ap warranted in proposing an appropriation. propriations are made. · One of his rivers is the Buckhannon, which is Mr. BROWNE, of Indiana. Will the gentleman from Kentucky give. used for no other purpose than to raft lumber down. There is the New the date of discovery of this river? I notice· the Committee on Rivers River, belonging to the same class, and several other rivers exactly like and Harbors are constantly discovering new rivers unknown before. the French Broad River, except that on the French Broad there are many :Mr. WILLIS. .Our telescope has not yet reached that point. products which can not be han1ed out and it can be made a navigable Mr. ANDERSON, of Kansas. If this river is so important; if it has river, while the Buckhannon can not be made ser\'iceable except for the a considemble amount of commerce upon it, as gentlemen seem to con purpose of rafting logs. cede and as the gentleman from Tennessee has stated, I would like to Mr. SKINNER. I move to strike out lines 809 and 810. I do so be ask if this House is precluded from· making an appropriation for it cause I think that an invidious distinction has been made between North simply .because the engineers have not made any estimate? In other Carolina and Tennessee. This is exactly the same river that the COm words, a.re we hedged· in by the reports of the engineers, and have we mittee on Rivers and Harbors and this Committee of the Whole refused no power to go beyond them? · ' to appropri&_te for inNorth Carolina. I want this appropriation stricken 11-Ir. GLASS. Estimates for this improvement were made in 1880, out, unless the Committee on Rivers and Harbors can give a good reason but no action was taken upon them at that time. for that invidious distinction. Mr. .ANDERSON, of Kansas. I favor the amendment of the gentle Mr. WILLIS. I desire simply to say in all kindness to the gentle man so far as I am concerned; and I do not think it is a valid reason man from North Carolina [Mr. SKINNER] that French Broad River ill to oppose it that there has been no report upon it from the engineers divided by a fall, which is not navigable, and in a decision of the Su if the necessities of commerce demand its impro-rement. I do not see preme Court, to which the Secretary ofWar calls attention in EXecutive why we should wait upon the engineers. Document 142, no river is improvable by the United States that is cut ·· Mr. WILLIS. Mr. Chairman, one ofthe conditions upon which the off by a fall. The lower part of the river is navigable up to the fall. House-consented to take a recess was on a promise that I would move That is the whole of it. - that the committee rise for the purpose of adjourning and beginning a. Mr. BRECKINRIDGE, of Arkansas. I wish to ask the gentleman new legislative day on Friday. I therefore move that the committee from ·Kentucky a question. Is no part of the river above the falls an now rise. interstate river? The motion was agreed to. 1tir. WILLIS. It is not. The committee accOrdingly rose; and the Speaker having res\Imed ' Mr. SKINNER. I desire also to ask the chairman of the committee the chair, Mr. WELLBORN reported that the Committee of the Whole n question. Is there no river appropriated for in this bill that is not House on the state of the Union, having had under consideration the an interstate river? Is there no river appropriated for that does not river and harbor bill, had come to no resolution thereon. run through more than.one State? · And then, on motion of Mr. WILus (at 11 o'clock and 58 minutes Mr. WILLIS. Ifthereisiwilljoin thegentlemaninstrikingitout. a.m., Friday), the House ~jonrned. Mr. SKINNER. I con1d point out a hundred. There is the Osage ru ver in Missouri. The question being taken on Mr. SKINNER's amendment, it was re jected. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. The Clerk read the following paragraph: . Improving Hiawassee River, Tennessee: Continuing improvement, $2,500. FRIDAY, .Ap·ril 23, 1886. 1 Mr. JOHNSTON, ofNorth Carolina. I wish to ask the gentleman The House met at 12 o'clock m. Prayer by the Chaplain, Rov. W .. II. from Kentucky if the appropriation for the French Broad River does MILBuRN, D. D. - not apply to the portion of the river above the navigable falls? The Journal ofycsterday's proceedings was read andapprove<1. l Mr. WILLIS. Notadollarofit. Iwillstatetothegentlemanthat LABOR .ARBITRATION. :n. river may be navigable in a State and not navigab~e in the United . States. This river passes out of North Carolina, goes into Tennesse~, The SPEAKER 1-l.id before the House the following message from the nnd below the falls becomes an interstate river. President of the United States· Mr. JOHNSTON, of North Carolina. Below what falls? To tlte Senate and HOU8e of .Representative$: The Constitution imposes upon the President the duty of recommending to . Mr. WILLIS. Below the falls you represent. the consideration of Congress from time to time such measures a.s he shall judge . Mr. JOHNSTONz. of North Carolina. I do not represent any falls necessary and expedient. ' there. [Laughter. J I am so deeply impressed with the importance of immediately and thought The Clerk read the following paragraph: fully meeting the problem which recent events and a. present condition have . thrust upon us, involving the settlement of disputes arising between our labor Improving South Fork of Forked Deer River, Tennessee: Conti~uing im ing men and their employers, that I a.m constrained to recommend to Congress Iprovement, $5,000• .