First Impressions: Presidents, Appointments, and the Transition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

First Impressions: Presidents, Appointments, and the Transition Stephen Hess The Brookings Institution September 18, 2000 2 The Presidential Appointee Initiative First Impressions: Presidents, Appointments, and the Transition A curious product of our presidential system is Thus the initial success and lingering impression that while the electorate casts its vote for only of each presidency will be largely determined by two individuals, it in effect chooses hundreds of the selection of about 30 people picked in haste individuals to govern. The president-elect must during the brief period between election and quickly build an administration of private citizens inauguration. These include the secretaries of the that reflects his or her vision. This act of admin- 14 executive departments: State, Treasury, Defense, istration-building has been called “a uniquely Justice, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, American enterprise.” In most democracies the Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban pieces of the incoming government are already Development, Transportation, Energy, Education, in place, as members of a shadow cabinet take and Veterans Affairs. their places alongside the new leader. It is the very “formlessness” in the United States, says the Congressional acts award Cabinet rank to the New York Times, that makes “a president-elect’s U.S. trade representative and the “drug czar.” task at once exciting and daunting.”1 The president fills out the rest of his Cabinet as he sees fit. For instance, President Clinton’s For those on the inside, noted Martin Anderson, second-term team includes the administrator of who has been there twice, it is a time of “deli- the Environmental Protection Agency, director cious chaos.”2 For those on the outside, bank- of the Office of Management and Budget, able information is hard to come by. “Those director of the Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. who know aren’t talking,” said insider Edwin representative to the United Nations, administra- Meese during the 1980 transition, “and those who tor of the Small Business Administration, director are talking don’t know.”3 It is a complicated of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, business, largely conducted behind closed doors. chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, and the White House chief of staff. Notable also are For the national press corps, the journalists who other top members of the White House staff, shape our collective judgment of what kind of such as the national security adviser, the White president we are about to get, covering the tran- House counsel, press secretary, and the primary sition mainly boils down to a simple story about economic and domestic policy aides. In assess- people. Who’s in? Who’s out? And who are the ing the ability of a president to get off to a fast ins? Why were they chosen? Who do they rep- and favorable start, these are the appointees who resent? Are they competent? Controversial? And put a face on the administration. why did it take so long to assemble the presi- dent’s White House team and Cabinet? 1 “Building an Administration,” New York Times, December 14, 1975. 2 Martin Anderson, Revolution: The Reagan Legacy (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1990), p. 196. 3 Edwin Meese III, With Reagan: The Inside Story (Washington: Regnery Gateway, 1992), p. 63. The Presidential Appointee Initiative 3 Paradoxically these high-profile appointments are In analyzing the transition periods of the last five the easiest a president will ever make. Most of presidents, eight essential lessons can be drawn. the men and women chosen are personally known They are: to him. Some are among his closest friends. Some have just finished running his campaign. # BE PREPARED. Pre-election transition planning All have reputations that are easy to check out. is essential. Moreover, the historical record (as opposed to the # ACT QUICKLY. Have your key White House anecdotal record) shows that the president is given staff in place by Thanksgiving and your considerable latitude by the public, the press, Cabinet secretaries announced by Christmas. and even the Senate. Yet personnel mistakes, # PUT THE WHITE HOUSE FIRST. Choose sometimes serious errors, have plagued chief your White House team before selecting executives even before they actually take office. your Cabinet. # THINK CLUSTERS. Choose appointees as This essay first summarizes the experiences in a team. this regard of the five most recent first-term tran- # SEND A MESSAGE. The appointments you sitions: Richard Nixon (1968-69), Jimmy Carter make send a message about the administra- (1976-77), Ronald Reagan (1980-81), George tion’s priorities. Bush (1988-89), and Bill Clinton (1992-93). The # CHOOSE YOUR DEMOGRAPHIC GOALS. mistakes and accomplishments of previous presi- Think about what you want your administra- dents give incoming administrations a roadmap tion to look like. to complete successful transitions. Lessons can # FEED THE BEAST. Give the press corps some- be drawn from prior events. These lessons thing to cover. should be heeded early in the transition if presi- # SMILE AND GROVEL. Handle senators with dents want to avoid the accusation of drifting care. They are the ones who must confirm and maintain control over their own messages. your picks. 4 The Presidential Appointee Initiative Richard Nixon Elected November 5, 1968 Richard Nixon’s transition exemplified the impor- underemployed press corps. Nixon set up head- tance of choosing the White House staff before quarters in the elegant Hotel Pierre, a block the Cabinet. Sequencing of appointments is a south of his Fifth Avenue apartment. matter of considerable relevance in transitions.4 The order in which presidents-elect choose their The president-elect’s first substantive appoint- advisers has both symbolic and practical signifi- ment (after the gracious gesture of appointing his cance. The sequence that Nixon followed longtime personal secretary, Rose Mary Woods) reflected the attention that he was giving to was Bryce Harlow to be chief White House assis- organizing his White House staff and the impor- tant for congressional affairs. The Harlow tance of finding ways to reach out to the opposi- appointment indicated Nixon’s willingness to tion party. reach out to Democrats. A New York Times head- line declared, HARLOW IS LIKED BY BOTH Of the 25 presidential elections of the 20th cen- PARTIES. The article concluded, “He brings to tury, only four have been close and Nixon was his job a quality few men have achieved even involved in half of those, losing to John Kennedy after years of effort—he has the confidence of in 1960 and defeating Vice President Hubert both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.”5 Humphrey eight years later. Now facing the This initial turn to Harlow also demonstrated president-elect were the challenges of finding a Nixon’s willingness to give the White House pre- way to conclude a divisive war in Vietnam and eminence over the Cabinet, despite his previous of building bridges to an opposition Congress. belief that the White House staff should be sub- Indeed, Nixon was the first president in 120 servient to the Cabinet. years to enter office without his party controlling at least one chamber of the Congress. Some of Nixon’s earliest efforts were directed at finding “name” Democrats who might serve in his Every first-term transition is conducted in two administration. He asked Humphrey to be the cities, Washington and the winning candidate’s U.S. representative to the United Nations and home city. Nixon’s home was in New York. He was turned down. He asked Senator Henry moved there after losing the California guberna- Jackson of Washington to be secretary of Defense torial election in 1962. And New York was the and was turned down. Finally he considered ideal city for transition purposes, close enough to offering the U.N. post to Sargent Shriver, the capital for the convenience of commuting President Kennedy’s brother-in-law, who was politicians and big enough (unlike Plains, then ambassador to France. As Nixon tells the Georgia or Little Rock, Arkansas) to divert an story in his memoirs: 4 See Appendix A: Sequence of Presidential Appointments. 5 Felix Belair Jr., “Harlow is Liked by Both Parties,” New York Times, November 14, 1968. The Presidential Appointee Initiative 5 Shriver expressed great interest and sent me Herbert Klein, a California newspaper editor, a message stating the conditions for his who had served him loyally in four campaigns. acceptance. Among other things he required Klein expected to be press secretary. Nixon a pledge that the federal poverty programs thought he was too independent. He decided to would not be cut. It was intolerable to have downgrade the press job and give it to 29-year- a prospective ambassadorial appointee mak- old Ronald Ziegler, a Haldeman protégé. But ing demands relating to domestic policy, so I where did this leave Klein? Klein decided “I told Bill Rogers [Nixon’s choice for secretary could best bring the indecision on my role to a of State] to inform Shriver that I had decided head either way by making my own power play against him and to let him know why. on television.” Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, Rogers reported that Shriver realized that he Klein said he would like to “have a role with had overstepped himself and had tried to him [Nixon] if it were structured right. Otherwise, backpedal, claiming that he had not meant I would have to go back into private enterprise.” his message to set forth conditions but to The “structure” then agreed upon was a new make suggestions. I told Rogers to say that entity called the White House Office of my decision remained unchanged.6 Communications, directed by Klein, which would be given government-wide responsibility for The day after the Harlow announcement, Nixon coordinating media relations.8 Any revised gov- announced that H.R.
Recommended publications
  • Wanda Morris

    Wanda Morris

    Bridgewater College BC Digital Commons Bridgewater Magazine Journals and Campus Publications 3-1982 Vol. 57, No. 3 | March 1982 Bridgewater College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bridgewater.edu/bridgewater_magazine BRIDGEWATER__ March, l982 Terrel Bell To Speak Founders Day Terrel H. Bell, U.S. Secretary of Education, is to be the featured speaker for the 1982 Bridgewater College Founders Day activities April 2. Dr. Bell will speak at a special 3 p. m. academic convocation and at the Founders Day dinner that evening in the Kline Campus Center dining room. Dr. Bell will be honored with a Doctor of Laws degree to be conferred during the academic convocation program. Dr. Bell was sworn in as Secretary of Education in January 1981, following his appointment by President Reagan and confirmation by the U.S. Senate. Prior to his cabinet appointment, Bell had been Utah's Commissioner of Higher Education and Chief Executive Officer of the Board of Regents since 1976, following two years of service in Washington, D.C. as the 21st Commis­ sioner of Education. Dr. Bell holds a B.A. degree from Southern Idaho College of Education and an M.S. from the University of Idaho. He earned his doctorate in educational administration from the University of Utah. Bell has classroom teaching experience on both the second­ ary and college levels. Dr. Bell is known for his advocation of increased community Terrel H. Bell, Secretar_J' of Education Continued on page /3 Dr. Ben F. Wade Named College Provost Dr. Wayne F. Geisert, President of away from campus.
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
  • Lloyd Cutler

    Lloyd Cutler

    White House Interview Program DATE: July 8, 1999 INTERVIEWEE: LLOYD CUTLER INTERVIEWER: Martha Kumar With Nancy Kassop MK: May we tape? LC: Yes, but I’d like to have one understanding. I have been misquoted on more than one occasion. I’ll be happy to talk to you about what I think about the transition but I don’t want my name attached to any of it. MK: Okay. So we’ll come back to you for any quotes. We’re going to look at both aspects: the transition itself and then the operations of the office. Working on the theory that one of the things that would be important for people is to understand how an effective operation works, what should they be aiming toward? For example, what is a smooth-running counsel’s office? What are the kinds of relationships that should be established and that sort of thing? So, in addition to looking at the transition, we’re just hoping they’re looking toward effective governance. In your time in Washington, observing many administrations from various distances, you have a good sense of transitions, what works and what doesn’t work. One of the things we want to do is isolate what are the elements of success—just take a number, six elements, five elements—that you think are common to successful transitions. What makes them work? LC: Well, the most important thing to grasp first is how much a White House itself, especially as it starts off after a change in the party occupying the White House, resembles a city hall.
  • CHAPTER 8 FLORIDA Florida First Emerged on the Presidential

    CHAPTER 8 FLORIDA Florida First Emerged on the Presidential

    CHAPTER 8 FLORIDA Florida first emerged on the presidential primary scene in 1988, when it was one of the southern states that participated in the first-ever Super Tuesday. Four years later, in 1992, Florida was propelled to the front rank of important primary states when the news media selected it for the final showdown between Governor Bill Clinton of Arkansas and former- U.S. Senator Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts. In the 1992 race for the Democratic nomination for president, Paul Tsongas got off to a fast start by winning the New Hampshire primary. Tsongas next won the Maryland primary, but that same day Bill Clinton swept to victory in the southern state of Georgia. The two candidates thus were running neck and neck when they faced off against one another in Florida on the second Tuesday in March. Although located in the South and one of the states that seceded from the Union during the American Civil War, Florida is not considered a typical southern state by voting-behavior analysts. The major reason for this is the large number of former northern voters who have moved to South Florida, either to retire or to enjoy the outdoor lifestyle of one of the fastest-growing states in the nation. These former northerners were viewed as ripe targets for the Paul Tsongas campaign. His heavy Massachusetts accent would not sound quite so strange to them, and his New Hampshire and Maryland primary victories already had demonstrated his strong appeal to people from the northern part of the nation. Furthermore, in the 1988 presidential elec- tion, Florida had voted for Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis, like Tsongas a Greek from Massachusetts.
  • Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup

    Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup

    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Fall 12-2013 Direct Responsibility: Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup Robert Howard Wieland University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the American Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wieland, Robert Howard, "Direct Responsibility: Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup" (2013). Dissertations. 218. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/218 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY: CASPAR WEINBERGER AND THE REAGAN DEFENSE BUILDUP by Robert Howard Wieland Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School Of The University of Southern Mississippi In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 ABSTRACT DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY: CASPAR WEINBERGER AND THE REAGAN DEFENSE BUILDUP by Robert Howard Wieland December 2013 This dissertation explores the life of Caspar Weinberger and explains why President Reagan chose him for Secretary of Defense. Weinberger, not a defense technocrat, managed a massive defense buildup of 1.5 trillion dollars over a four year period. A biographical approach to Weinberger illuminates Reagan’s selection, for in many ways Weinberger harkens back to an earlier type of defense manager more akin to Elihu Root than Robert McNamara; more a man of letters than technocrat.
  • Peter Conti-Brown*

    Peter Conti-Brown*

    CONTI-BROWN 64 STAN. L. REV. 409 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/2012 3:58 PM ELECTIVE SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY Peter Conti-Brown* Government bailouts are expensive, unjust, and unpopular, and they usually represent dramatic deviations from the rule of law. They are also, in some cases, necessary. The problem that bailouts pose, then, is that they are almost always inimical to the interests of society, except when they are not. This complexity is ignored under the recent Dodd-Frank Act, which improbably guarantees an end to taxpayer bailouts. Indeed, much of the Act makes bailouts more likely, not less, by making the wrong kind of bailouts available far too often. This Article proposes to solve the problem of bailouts by retaining governmental ability to make the right kinds of bailouts possible through forcing the bailed-out firms to internalize the bailout costs. The proposal—called “elective shareholder liability”—allows bank shareholders two options. They must either change their bank’s capital structure to include dramatically less debt, consistent with the consensus recommendation of leading economists; or alternatively, they must add a bailout exception to their bank’s limited- shareholder-liability status, thus requiring shareholders—not taxpayers—to cover the ultimate costs of the bank’s failure. This liability would be structured as a governmental collection, similar to a tax assessment, for the recoupment of all bailout costs against the shareholders on a pro rata basis. It would also include an up-front stay on collections to ensure that there are, in fact, taxpayer losses to be recouped and to mitigate government incentives for overbailout, political manipulation, and crisis exacerbation.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 143 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 No. 9 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 4, 1997, at 12:30 p.m. Senate WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was schedule for today's session. This PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR called to order by the President pro morning, the Senate will be proceeding Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. to executive session to begin 30 min- unanimous consent that Melody Fennel utes of debate on the nomination of and David Hardiman be permitted PRAYER Andrew Cuomo to be Secretary of privileges of the floor during consider- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Housing and Urban Development. All ation of the pending nomination. Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: Senators should expect the rollcall The PRESIDENT pro tempore. With- Almighty Lord, the same yesterday, vote to begin on that nomination at out objection, it is so ordered. today, and forever, You have been our approximately 10 a.m. this morning. Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I rise help in ages past and are our hope for Following that vote, the Senate will today to support a native New Yorker, years to come. The sure sign of an au- begin a period of morning business to a fellow New Yorker, Andrew Cuomo, thentic relationship with You is that allow Senators to introduce legislation to be Secretary of the Department of we believe in the future more than the and make statements.
  • Presidential Handwriting File, 1981-1989

    Presidential Handwriting File, 1981-1989

    PRESIDENTIAL HANDWRITING FILE: PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS: 1981-1989 – REAGAN LIBRARY COLLECTIONS This collection is available in whole for research use. Some folders may still have withdrawn material due to Freedom of Information Act restrictions. Most frequent withdrawn material is national security classified material, personal privacy, protection of the President, etc. PRESIDENTIAL HANDWRITING FILE: PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS: 1981-1989 The Presidential Handwriting File is an artificial collection created by the White House Office of Records Management (WHORM). The Presidential Handwriting File consists of a variety of documents that Ronald Reagan either annotated, edited, or wrote in his own hand. When documents containing the president's handwriting were received at WHORM for filing, the original was placed in the Presidential Handwriting File and arranged by the order received. A photocopy of the document was placed in the appropriate category of the WHORM: Subject File. The first page of the casefile was stamped Handwriting File, indicating the location of the original documents. However, WHORM often failed to indicate on the original documents the original location (i.e. the six digit tracking number, Subject Category Code). The Presidential Handwriting File, as created by the White House, did not contain handwriting found in staff and office files. The Library will be creating a further series of handwriting material from staff and office files. In order to provide better access to the Presidential Handwriting File, the collection has been arranged into six series. Each series is arranged chronologically by the date of the document. Each document has been marked with the appropriate WHORM: Subject File category and a six digit tracking number.
  • The Impact of High Stakes Testing on School Leadership Permit Several

    The Impact of High Stakes Testing on School Leadership Permit Several

    HIGH STAKES TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY MANDATES: IMPACT ON CENTRAL OFFICE LEADERSHIP A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy by Susan D. Carver December, 2008 © Copyright by Susan D. Carver 2008 All Rights Reserved A dissertation written by Susan D. Carver B.A., John Carroll University, 1994 M.Ed., Cleveland State University, 1996 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Anita M. Varrati, Ed.D. Dissertation Committee _________________________, Member, Doctoral Catherine E. Hackney Ph.D. Dissertation Committee _________________________, Member, Doctoral Diane L. Schnelker, Ph.D. Dissertation Committee Accepted by _________________________, Chairperson, Department of Teaching J. David Keller, Ph.D. Leadership and Curriculum Studies _________________________, Dean, College and Graduate School of Daniel F. Mahony, Ph.D. Education, Health, and Humans Services iii Carver, Susan D. Ph.D., December, 2008 K-12 Educational Administration HIGH STAKES TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY MANDATES: IMPACT ON CENTRAL OFFICE LEADERSHIP (252 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Anita M. Varrati, Ed.D. This qualitative study examined the ways in which K-12 central office administrators resolve the philosophical dilemma of maintaining democratic leadership strategies when federal mandates induce a more autocratic environment. Responses to two central research questions - how central office administrators are affected by the accountability and testing demands, and how they manage them - provided insight into efforts to resolve this dilemma. Interviews were conducted with four central office administrators from one school district in Ohio with a K-12 enrollment of 5,500 students.
  • The Future of Work of Future The

    The Future of Work of Future The

    Communications and Society Program Bollier THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments THE FUTURE OF WORK By David Bollier Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, MD 21658 11-003 THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments By David Bollier Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, D.C. 2011 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2011 by The Aspen Institute This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2010 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-543-9 11/004 Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone .............................................................vii THE FUTURE OF WORK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, MARKETS AND GOVERNMENTS, David Bollier Introduction ...............................................................................................
  • One Hundred Third Congress January 3, 1993 to January 3, 1995

    One Hundred Third Congress January 3, 1993 to January 3, 1995

    ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1993 TO JANUARY 3, 1995 FIRST SESSION—January 5, 1993, 1 to November 26, 1993 SECOND SESSION—January 25, 1994, 2 to December 1, 1994 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—J. DANFORTH QUAYLE, 3 of Indiana; ALBERT A. GORE, JR., 4 of Tennessee PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—ROBERT C. BYRD, of West Virginia SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—WALTER J. STEWART, 5 of Washington, D.C.; MARTHA S. POPE, 6 of Connecticut SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MARTHA S. POPE, 7 of Connecticut; ROBERT L. BENOIT, 6 of Maine SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—THOMAS S. FOLEY, 8 of Washington CLERK OF THE HOUSE—DONNALD K. ANDERSON, 8 of California SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—WERNER W. BRANDT, 8 of New York DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—JAMES T. MALLOY, 8 of New York DIRECTOR OF NON-LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES—LEONARD P. WISHART III, 9 of New Jersey ALABAMA Ed Pastor, Phoenix Lynn Woolsey, Petaluma SENATORS Bob Stump, Tolleson George Miller, Martinez Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco Howell T. Heflin, Tuscumbia Jon Kyl, Phoenix Ronald V. Dellums, Oakland Richard C. Shelby, Tuscaloosa Jim Kolbe, Tucson Karen English, Flagstaff Bill Baker, Walnut Creek REPRESENTATIVES Richard W. Pombo, Tracy Sonny Callahan, Mobile ARKANSAS Tom Lantos, San Mateo Terry Everett, Enterprise SENATORS Fortney Pete Stark, Hayward Glen Browder, Jacksonville Anna G. Eshoo, Atherton Tom Bevill, Jasper Dale Bumpers, Charleston Norman Y. Mineta, San Jose Bud Cramer, Huntsville David H. Pryor, Little Rock Don Edwards, San Jose Spencer Bachus, Birmingham REPRESENTATIVES Leon E. Panetta, 12 Carmel Valley Earl F.
  • White House Staffs: a Study

    White House Staffs: a Study

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.