Chapter 02: Sensor Array Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 02: Sensor Array Systems Chapter Two Sensor Array Systems An array of sensors, distributed over a horizontal plane surface, is used to receive a propagating wavefield with the following objectives: 1) To localize a source. 2) To receive a message from a distant source. 3) To image a medium through which the wavefield is propagating. In this chapter we shall study the basic structure of a sensor array system and in the sequel learn how the above objectives are achieved. The most commonly used array geometries are uniform linear array (ULA) and uniform circular array (UCA). A uniform planar array (UPA) where sensors are placed on an equispaced rectangular grid is more common in large military phased array systems. A wavefront which propagates across the array of sensors is picked up by all sensors. Thus, we have not one but many outputs which constitute an array signal. In the simplest case, all components of the array signals are simply delayed replicas of a basic signal waveform. In the worst case, individual sensor outputs are strongly corrupted with noise and other interference, leaving a very little resemblance among them. Array processing now involves combining all sensor outputs in some optimal manner so that the coherent signal emitted by the source is received and all other inputs are maximally discarded. The aperture of an array, that is, the spatial extent of the sensor distribution, is a limiting factor on resolution. However, the aperture can be synthetically increased by moving a source or sensor. The synthetic aperture concepts are extensively used in mapping radars and sonars. In this chapter we concentrate on sensor array systems which will form the basic material for the subsequent chapters. §2.1 Uniform Linear Array (ULA): 2.1.1 Array Response: Consider a plane wavefront, having a temporal waveform f(t) incident on a uniform linear array (ULA) of sensors (see fig. 2.1) at an angle θ. In signal processing literature the angle of incidence is also known as direction of arrival (DOA). Note that the DOA is always measured with respect to the normal to array aperture, while another related quantity azimuth, which was introduced in chapter 1, is measured with respect to the x- axis, independent of array orientation. In this work θ stands for DOA and ϕ stands for azimuth. We shall assume that a source emits a stationary stochastic signal f(t). Let f m (t), m=0, 1, 2,..., M-1 be the outputs of the sensors. The signal arrives at successive sensors with an incremental delay. The output of the Broadside f(t) θ wave vector ULA 7 2 1 0 Reference sensor Figure 2.1: Uniform linear array of sensors. Note the convention of sensor indexing. The left most sensor is the reference sensor with respect to which all time delays are measured. = = −∆ first sensor is f 0 (t) f (t), the output of the second sensor is f 1 (t) f (t t) th = − ∆ and so on. Thus, the output of the m sensor is f m (t) f (t m t). Some times it is convenient to represent the sensor output in the frequency domain ∞ md 1 jω(t − sin θ) f (t) = dF(ω)e c (2.1) m π ∫ 2 −∞ where we have used the spectral representation of a stationary stochastic process [1]. The simplest form of array signal processing is to sum all sensor outputs without any delay. ∞ M −1 M −1 − ω md θ 1 1 ω 1 j sin g(t) = ∑ f (t) = dF(ω)e j t ∑e c m π ∫ M m=0 2 −∞ M m=0 ∞ 1 ω = dF(ω)H(ωτ)e j t (2.2) π ∫ 2 −∞ d where H(ωτ) is the array response function, τ= sin θ, and d is sensor c spacing. The array response function for a ULA is given by M M −1 md sin( ωτ) M −1 1 jω sin θ j ωτ ωτ = c = 2 2 H( ) ∑e ωτ e (2.3a) M m=0 M sin 2 When the sensor output is weighted with complex coefficients, am , m=0,1,...,M-1, the array response becomes − md 1 M 1 jω sin θ ωτ = c H( ) ∑ame (2.3b) M m=0 A few samples of the frequency response function (magnitude only) are shown in fig. 2.2 for different values of M, that is, array size. The response function is periodic with a period 2π . The maximum occurs at ωτ = 2nπ. The peak at n=0 is known as the main lobe and other peaks at n =±1, ±2,... are known as grating lobes. Since the magnitude of the array response is plotted, the period becomes π as seen in fig. 2.2. The grating lobes can be avoided if we restrict the range of ωτ to ±π, that is, at a fixed frequency the direction of arrival d 1 π must satisfy the relation sin θ≤ . For θ in the interval ± this λ 2 2 d 1 requirement is satisfied if ≤ . If the range of θ is reduced it is possible to λ 2 π π increase the sensor spacing, for example, for − ≤θ+ the sensor spacing 4 4 d 1 need satisfies the constraint ≤ . The phase of the frequency response is a λ 2 linear function of ωτ. This useful property of a ULA is lost when the sensors are nonuniformly spaced (see p. 94). The array response is a function of the product of frequency ω and d delay τ or, more explicitly, ω sin θ . The implication of this dependence is λ that two wavefronts whose waveform is a simple sinusoid but with different ω ω θ θ frequencies ( 1, 2 )arriving at different angles ( 1, 2 ) will produce identical ω θ =ω θ array response if 1 sin 1 2 sin 2 . We shall discuss later such ambiguity issues when we look into the broadband beamformation. The response function has a main lobe which is surrounded by many sidelobes of decreasing magnitude just as we find in spectral windows. The first zero is at 1 M=8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 M=64 0.6 0.4 0.2 Response (magnitude) 0 1 0.8 M=128 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Radians Figure 2.2: Array response function (magnitude) for different values of M. Notice that the main lobe becomes sharper as the array size is increased. − λ θ = sin 1 (2.4) zero Md which, for large M, becomes inversely proportional to the array length expressed in terms of wavelength. The first sidelobe is 13.5 dB below the main lobe. It is well known that both width of the main lobe and magnitude of the sidelobes can be controlled by using a suitable weight function as in spectrum analysis [1]. 2.1.2 Array Steering: We have seen that the array response is maximum when the direction of arrival (DOA) is on broad side ( θ=0). The maximum, however, can be changed to any direction through a simple act of introducing a time delay to each sensor output before summation. This is known as array steering. Let an incremental delay of τ per channel be introduced. The sum output of the array is now given by M −1 = 1 + τ g(t) ∑ f m (t m ) M m=0 ∞ M −1 τ−d θ ω 1 ω 1 j( sin 0 ) m = dF(ω)e j t ∑e c (2.5) π ∫ 2 −∞ M m=0 ∞ 1 d ω = dF(ω)H((τ− sinθ )ω)e j t π ∫ 0 2 −∞ c d where we have assumed that the DOA is θ . Let τ= sin θ. Then the array 0 c θ=θ response is maximum whenever 0 . We say that the array is steered in the θ direction 0 , that is, in the direction of arrival of the incident wavefront. The array response is now a function of DOA. This is demonstrated in fig. 2.3. It is interesting to note that the width of the main lobe increases with increasing DOA. To further understand this broadening effect we shall study the array d response function around its maximum, that is, at τ= sin θ . The first zero c 0 will occur at M d d ω sinθ −ω sin(θ −∆θ) =π (2.6a) 2 c 0 c 0 Upon simplifying (2.6a) we get an equation λ sinθ − sin(θ −∆θ) = (2.6b) 0 0 Md whose solution is given by λ ∆θ = θ − −1 θ − 0 sin sin 0 (2.6c) Md The dependence of ∆θ on the DOA for different array sizes is illustrated in fig. 2.4. The broadening of the main lobe is due to reduction in the array aperture for a wavefront which is incident away from the broadside. The response is maximum whenever d ω (sinθ − sinθ) = 2πn c 0 or d (sinθ − sinθ) = n λ 0 d 1 d 1 For ≤ , the acceptable solution is θ=θ for which n=0. For > there λ 2 0 λ 2 d is more than one solution, one for each grating lobe. For example, let = 1; a λ θ= −1 θ − ± solution of sin (sin 0 n) exists only for n=0 and 1. d k Now, let τ= . The array response function can be written as a c M 2πd discrete Fourier transform of a complex sinusoid, exp(− j sin θ m), λ 0 π π M −1 − 2 d θ 2 km d 1 j sin 0 m j H(k) = ∑e λ e M λ (2.7) M m=0 Now H(k) is the kth discrete Fourier transform coefficient which should − k correspond to the array response at a steering angle, sin 1 ( ).
Recommended publications
  • Design and Simulation of Smart Antenna Array Using Adaptive Beam Forming Method R
    ISSN: 2319-5967 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT) Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2014 Design and Simulation of Smart Antenna Array Using Adaptive Beam forming Method R. Evangilin Beulah, N.Aneera Vigneshwari M.E., Department of ECE, Francis Xavier Engineering College, Tamilnadu (India) Abstract— This paper presents design of a smart antenna system based on direction-of-arrival estimation and adaptive beam forming. In order to obtain the antenna pattern synthesis for a ULA (uniform linear array) we use Dolph Chebyshev method. For the estimation of Direction-of-arrival (DOA) MUSIC algorithm (Multiple User Signal Classification) is used in order to identify the directions of the source signals incident on the antenna array comprising the smart antenna system. LMS algorithm is used for adaptive beam forming in order to direct the main beam towards the desired source signals and to adaptively move the nulls towards the unwanted interference in the radiation pattern. Thereby increasing the channel capacity to accommodate a higher number of users. The implementation of LMS algorithm helps in improving the following parameters in terms of signal to noise ration, convergence rate, increased channel capacity, average bit error rate. In this paper, we will discuss and analyze about the DolphChebyshev method for antenna pattern synthesis, MUSIC algorithm for DOA (Direction of Arrival) estimation and least mean squares algorithm for Beam forming. Index Terms—Uniform Linear Array (ULA), Direction of Arrival (DOA), Multiple User Signal Classification (MUSIC), Least Mean Square (LMS). I. INTRODUCTION A smart antenna has the ability to diminish noise, increase signal to noise ratio and enhance system competence [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Sensor Positioning on the Array Manifold Adham Sleiman, Student Member, IEEE, and Athanassios Manikas, Senior Member, IEEE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 51, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2003 2227 The Impact of Sensor Positioning on the Array Manifold Adham Sleiman, Student Member, IEEE, and Athanassios Manikas, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—A framework is presented in this study which the importance or relevance of a sensor’s position in the array analyzes the importance of each sensor in an antenna array for an application-specific criterion in the area of detection and based on its location in the overall geometry. Moving away from resolution capabilities of the array have been investigated in [1], the conventional methods of measuring sensor importance by means of application-specific criteria, a new approach, based [2]. Other criteria have lead to the design of arrays with the aim on the array manifold and its differential geometry, is used to of maximizing the mainlobe to sidelobe ratio while minimizing measure the significance of each sensor’s position in an array. By the 3 dB range of the mainlobe through Fourier, Dolph–Cheby- considering two-dimensional manifolds (function of azimuth and shev, Taylor and other synthesis techniques [3]–[8]. elevation angles) of planar arrays of isotropic sensors, and by using previously established results on the differential geometry By realising that the performance of an array system under a of such manifolds, a sensitivity analysis is performed which specific application is closely related to the manifold subtended leads to characterization and quantification of sensor location by this array, it becomes apparent that the importance of a sensor importance in an array geometry. Based on this framework, a criterion is developed for assessing an overall geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI _____________ , 20 _____ I,______________________________________________, hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: ________________________________________________ in: ________________________________________________ It is entitled: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Approved by: ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Digital Direction Finding System Design and Analysis A thesis submitted to the Division of Graduate Studies and Research of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE (M.S.) in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science of the College of Engineering 2003 by Huazhou Liu B.E., Xi’an Jiaotong University P. R. China, 2000 Committee Chair: Professor Howard Fan ABSTRACT Direction Finding (DF) system is used in many military and civilian operations such as surveillance, reconnaissance, and rescue, etc. In the past years, direction finding system is implemented usually using analog RF techniques such as Butler matrix and analog beamforming. Analog direction finding systems have drawbacks inherent from their analog properties such as expensive implementation, inflexibility to adjust or change functionality, intensive calibration procedures and
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Smart Antenna and a Survey on Direction of Arrival Estimation Algorithms for Smart Antenna
    IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE) ISSN : 2278-2834, ISBN : 2278-8735, PP : 01-06 www.iosrjournals.org An Overview Of Smart Antenna And A Survey On Direction Of Arrival Estimation Algorithms For Smart Antenna 1 2 Mrs. Mane Sunita Vijay , Prof. Dr. Bombale U.L. 1(Assist. Prof., Electronics Department, KBP College of Engineering, Satara/ Shivaji University,India) 2(Associate Prof., Technology Department, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India) ABSTRACT : Smart Antenna Systems is one of the most rapidly developing areas of communication. With effective direction of arrival (DOA) and Beam forming techniques Smart Antenna Systems prove to be most efficient in terms of quality of signals in wireless communication. In this paper a brief overview of Smart Antenna along with a survey on high resolution direction of arrival estimation algorithms for array antenna systems is presented and compared for different parameters. It can help one understand the effectiveness of the DOA algorithms over others under certain parametric conditions. Keywords - Antenna array, DOA estimation, ESPRIT, MUSIC ,Smart antenna. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Smart Antenna System: A smart antenna system combines multiple antenna elements with a signal processing capability to optimize its radiation and/or reception pattern automatically in response to the signal environment. Smart Antenna systems are classified on the basis of their transmit strategy, into the following three types (“levels of intelligence”): • Switched Beam Antennas • Dynamically-Phased Arrays • Adaptive Antenna Arrays 1.1.1 Switched Beam Antennas: Switched beam or switched lobe antennas are directional antennas deployed at base stations of a cell. They have only a basic switching function between separate directive antennas or predefined beams of an array.
    [Show full text]
  • Beam Forming in Smart Antenna with Improved Gain and Suppressed Interference Using Genetic Algorithm
    Cent. Eur. J. Comp. Sci. • 2(1) • 2012 • 1-14 DOI: 10.2478/s13537-012-0001-0 Central European Journal of Computer Science Beam forming in smart antenna with improved gain and suppressed interference using genetic algorithm Research Article T. S. Ghouse Basha1∗, M. N. Giri Prasad2, P.V. Sridevi3 1 K.O.R.M.College of Engineering, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India 2 J.N.T.U.College of Engineering, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India 3 Department of ECE, AU College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakha Patnam, Andhra Pradesh, India Received 21 September 2011; accepted 18 November 2011 Abstract: The most imperative process in smart antenna system is beam forming, which changes the beam pattern of an antenna for a particular angle. If the antenna does not change the position for the specified angle, then the signal loss will be very high. By considering the aforesaid drawback, here a new genetic algorithm based technique for beam forming in smart antenna system is proposed. In the proposed technique, if the angle is given as input, the maximum signal gain in the beam pattern of the antenna with corresponding position and phase angle is obtained as output. The length of the beam, interference, phase angle, and the number of patterns are the factors that are considered in our proposed technique. By using this technique, the gain of the system gets increased as well as the interference is reduced considerably. The implementation result exhibits the efficiency of the system in beam forming. Keywords: smart antenna • beam forming • genetic algorithm (GA) • phase angle • main beam © Versita Sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontmatter: SENSOR ARRAY SIGNAL PROCESSING
    SENSOR ARRAY SIGNAL PROCESSING SENSOR ARRAY SIGNAL PROCESSING Prabhakar S. Naidu CRC Press Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. 1195/Disclaimer Page 1 Monday, June 5, 2000 3:20 PM Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Naidu, Prabhakar S. Sensor array signal processing / Prabhakar S. Naidu. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8493-1195-0 (alk. paper) 1. Singal processing–Digital techniques. 2. Multisensor data fusion. I. Title. TK5102.9.N35 2000 621.382'2—dc21 00-030409 CIP This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use. Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press LLC for such copying. Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC, 2000 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, Florida 33431. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation, without intent to infringe.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrasonic Phased Array Device for Acoustic Imaging in Air Sevan Harput
    Ultrasonic Phased Array Device For Acoustic Imaging In Air by Sevan Harput Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Natural Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Sabancı University August 2007 Ultrasonic Phased Array Device For Acoustic Imaging In Air APPROVED BY Assist. Prof. Dr. AYHAN BOZKURT .............................................. (Thesis Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Dr. AHMET ONAT .............................................. Assist. Prof. Dr. HAKAN ERDOGAN˘ .............................................. Assoc. Prof. Dr. IBRAH˙ IM˙ TEKIN˙ .............................................. Assoc. Prof. Dr. MERIC¸˙ OZCAN¨ .............................................. DATE OF APPROVAL: .............................................. c Sevan Harput 2007 ° All Rights Reserved to all Electrical and Electronics Engineers & who interested in Acoustics Acknowledgments I have been studying in Sabancı University since 2000. I have learnt a lot within these seven years and gained many experience as a microelectronic engineer. The professors of microelectronics group in Sabancı University deserve a special thank. I want to thank all of my professors for their support and teachings. First, I would like to express my appreciation to my thesis supervisor Assist. Prof. Ayhan Bozkurt for advising me in this thesis work. He guided me both as a mentor and as an academician. Moreover, I am very grateful to my professors Meri¸c Ozcan¨ and Ibrahim˙ Tekin for their useful comments and eagerness to help. They provided very necessary feedback on this work and broadened my perspective with their constructive ideas. Additionally, I would like to thank Prof. Mustafa Karaman form I¸sıkUniversity, for sharing his ultrasound knowledge with me. He also helped me while choosing my thesis topic. I am thankful to my thesis defense committee members; Assist.
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Array Processing: Autocalibration and Fast High-Resolution Methods for Automotive Radar
    Antenna Array Processing: Autocalibration and Fast High-Resolution Methods for Automotive Radar Vom Fachbereich 18 Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik der Technischen Universit¨at Darmstadt zur Erlangung der W¨urde eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl.-Ing. Philipp Heidenreich geboren am 27.12.1980 in R¨usselsheim Referent: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Abdelhak M. Zoubir Korreferent: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Bin Yang Tag der Einreichung: 29.02.2012 Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 06.06.2012 D 17 Darmstadt, 2012 I Danksagung Die vorliegende Arbeit entstand im Rahmen meiner T¨atigkeit als wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Fachgebiet Signalverarbeitung des Instituts f¨ur Nachrichtentechnik der Technischen Universit¨at Darmstadt. An dieser Stelle gilt mein Dank allen, die das Entstehen der Arbeit direkt oder indirekt erm¨oglicht haben. Besonders m¨ochte ich mich bei Prof. Dr.-Ing. Abdelhak Zoubir f¨ur die wissenschaftliche Betreuung der Arbeit bedanken. Seine stete Bereitschaft zur Diskussion und die F¨orderung von Publikationen und Projekten, sowie das Erm¨oglichen von Konferenz- reisen, haben maßgeblich zum Gelingen der Arbeit beigetragen. Des Weiteren bedanke ich mich bei Prof. Dr.-Ing Bin Yang f¨ur die freundliche Ubernahme¨ des Korreferats und sein Interesse an meiner Arbeit. Ebenso gilt mein Dank Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Hofmann, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rolf Jakoby und Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Tran Quoc Khanh f¨ur ihre Mitwirkung in der Pr¨ufungskommission. F¨ur die Kooperation und F¨orderung meiner Promotion m¨ochte ich mich bei der A.D.C. GmbH der Continental AG bedanken. Mein besonderer Dank gilt Florian Engels, Dr. Alexander Kaps, Dr. Peter Seydel und Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Over-The-H Orizon Radar Array Calibration
    q'q" Over-the-H orizon Radar Array Calibration by IsHnN Savrrsvn DRNrpr SorovroN B.ENc.(HoNs), B.Sc. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of Adelaide Adelaide, South Australia April 1998 Contents Abstract vl Declaration viii Acknowledgments ix List of Figures x List of Tâbles xvi Glossary xvii Publications xxt 1 Introduction 1 1.1 ProblemDescription I 1.2 Outline of Thesis and Main Contributions 4 2 Background Array Processing and Array Calibration 6 2.1 Array Processing Background . 6 2.1.1 MaximumLikelihoodMethod 10 2.1.2 Beamformers l1 2.1.3 Subspace Methods l3 2.2 Array Calibration Application Areas 15 2.2.1 Telescope Images l5 2.2.2 General Antenna Arrays t6 2.2.3 Airborne Radar l6 2.2.4 Synthetic Aperture Radar l7 2.2.5 Passive Sonar Towed Arrays I7 CONTENTS ll 2.2.6 Sonar Imaging Systems l8 2.2.7 Synthetic Aperture Sonar Imaging Systems l8 2.2.8 Computer Vision l8 2.2.9 UltrasoundArrays l9 2.2.10 Microphone Arrays l9 2.3 Previous Array Calibration Methods 19 2.3.1 Methods for Estimating Sensor Positions 20 2.3.2 Methods forEstimating Mutual Coupling 24 2.3.3 Methods for Estimating Sensor Positions and Mutual Coupling 25 2.3.4 Other Methods 26 2.4 Discussion 27 3 Effect of Model Errors on Radar Array Processing 28 3.1 Literature 29 3.2 Description 31 3.3 Performance Measures 32 3.3.1 Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Array Gain JJ 3.3.2 BeampointingError JJ 3.3.3 Sidelobe Levels 34 3.4 Non-stationary Interferer Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • SMART ANTENNA -Karisma Panda (611736) Desired Signal 2
    NIT ANDHRA PRADESH VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9 STAY HOME STAY SAFE STAY INFORMED STOP THE SPREAD SAVE LIVES The Official ECE Newsletter Issue date: 5th April, 2020 SMART ANTENNA -Karisma Panda (611736) Desired signal 2. Adaptive Array Antenna: Smart Antennas, chiefly known as multiple antennas or adaptive array antennas, Adaptive arrays allow the antenna enhance the efficiency in digital wireless communication systems as they utilize to steer the beam to any direction the diversity effect at the transceiver of the wireless system i.e. the source and Signal of interest while simultaneously the destination. Diversity effect refers to the transmission and reception of output nulling interfering signals. Both of them do provide multiple radio frequencies which helps to ensure error-free data communication interference directivity but vary with respect and increases the speed of data transmission. Their usage is widely seen in Beamformer weights locating wireless targets using signal processing algorithms. Moreover, they are to cost, complexity and performance requirements. used for calculating beamforming vectors and the direction of arrival [DOA] of Based on the number of inputs and outputs used in the device, Smart Antenna is the signal. classified as Difference between Conventional Antenna and Smart Antenna 1. SIMO (Single Input – Multiple Output): Here, one antenna is used at the The striking difference between both the systems is, they deal with multipath source and multiple antennas at the destination. wave propagation differently. When we send a signal in a wireless system, it 2. MISO (Multiple Input – Single Output): Here, multiple antennas are used passes through many barriers which leads to scattering of wavefronts.
    [Show full text]
  • DSP(Digital Signal Processing ) in ARRAY
    © 2014 IJIRT | Volume 1 Issue 6 | ISSN : 2349-6002 DSP(Digital Signal Processing ) IN ARRAY Isha Batra, Divya Raheja I.T. Department Dronacharya College Of Engineering to solve by using array processing technique(s) is Abstract- This paper deals with the continuous to: development of digital signal processing in the field of Determine number and locations of energy- test and measurement .Digital signal processing (DSP) is radiating sources (emitters). concerned with the representation of signals by a Enhance the signal to noise ratio SNR sequence of numbers or symbols and the processing of these signals. DSP includes subfields "signal to interface plus noise ratio”. like: audio and speech signal processing, sonar and Track multiple moving sources. Array processing radar signal processing, sensor array processing, emerged in the last few decades as an active area and spectral estimation, statistical signal processing, digital was centered on the ability of using and combining image processing, signal processing for data from different sensors (antennas) in order to deal communications, control of systems, biomedical signal with specific estimation task (spatial and temporal processing, seismic data processing, etc. The goal of processing). In addition to the information that can be DSP is usually to measure, filter and/or compress extracted from the collected data the framework uses continuous real-world analog signals. Today there are the advantage prior knowledge about the geometry of additional technologies used for digital signal processing including more powerful general the sensor array to perform the estimation task. Array purpose microprocessors, field-programmable gate processing is used in radar, sonar, seismic arrays (FPGAs), digital signal controllers (mostly for exploration, anti-jamming and wireless industrial apps such as motor control), and stream communications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial-Temporal Approach Based on Antenna Array for GNSS Anti-Spoofing
    sensors Article A Spatial-Temporal Approach Based on Antenna Array for GNSS Anti-Spoofing Yuqing Zhao 1, Feng Shen 1, Guanghui Xu 2 and Guochen Wang 1,* 1 School of Instrumentation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (F.S.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Satellite Navigation System and Equipment Technology, Shijiazhuang 050081, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-189-4511-5991 Abstract: The presence of spoofing signals poses a significant threat to global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-based positioning applications, as it could cause a malfunction of the positioning service. Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to present a spatial-temporal technique that enables GNSS receivers to reliably detect and suppress spoofing. The technique, which is based on antenna array, can be divided into two consecutive stages. In the first stage, an improved eigen space spectrum is constructed for direction of arrival (DOA) estimation. To this end, a signal preprocessing scheme is provided to solve the signal model mismatch in the DOA estimation for navigation signals. In the second stage, we design an optimization problem for power estimation with the estimated DOA as support information. After that, the spoofing detection is achieved by combining power comparison and cross-correlation monitoring. Finally, we enhance the genuine signals by beamforming while the subspace oblique projection is used to suppress spoofing. The proposed technique does not depend on external hardware and can be readily implemented on raw digital baseband signal before the despreading of GNSS receivers.
    [Show full text]