Introduced Marine Organisms in New Zealand and Their Impact in the Waitemata Harbour, Auckland, by Bruce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduced Marine Organisms in New Zealand and Their Impact in the Waitemata Harbour, Auckland, by Bruce Tane 36: 197-223 (1997) INTRODUCED MARINE ORGANISMS IN NEW ZEALAND AND THEIR IMPACT IN THE WAITEMATA HARBOUR, AUCKLAND Bruce W. Hayward Auckland Museum, Private Bag 92018, Auckland SUMMARY Sixty-one exotic marine organisms are listed that appear to have arrived in New Zealand with human assistance in the last 150 years and have become established. Of these, four were deliberately introduced, 25 probably came in as fouling on vessels, 10 possibly in ships' ballast water, three probably as deck cargo and the remainder as either fouling or in ballast water. The majority have come in from Europe (11), east Asia (10), eastern North America (6), Australia (6) and western North America (5). At least 12 species are known to have been exported from New Zealand and become established in other countries. These numbers are conservative estimates of the real number of introductions. It is not possible to assess the risk posed by any exotic marine organism prior to its arrival and establishment in New Zealand. Two surveys of the fauna of the Waitemata Harbour made sixty years apart, provide an insight into some of the changes that have occurred as a result of the establishment of at least 39 introduced exotic species. Many live in relatively low numbers and seem to have had little significant impact on the original ecosystems. The largest diversity of introduced organisms (especially Bryozoa) are fouling species on hard substrates, but the greatest environmental changes can be attributed to four bivalves introduced in the last 30 years. The Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, is having a major impact on intertidal hard shore communities. Thickets of the small Asian mussel, Musculista senhousia, accumulate mud which temporarily smothers extensive areas of low tidal and shallow subtidal flats in the upper harbour. The small, fragile bivalve Theora lubrica, lives in billions in shallow-water muddy substrates around the harbour edges and is one of the few organisms that thrives in highly disturbed and polluted environments under the wharves and marinas. The file shell, Limaria orientalis, is now one of the dominant molluscs in the muddy shell gravels of the main harbour channels (10-30m deep) and has become a significant component of the diet of bottom-foraging fish, such as snapper. Keywords: Introduced marine organisms; marine invaders; ballast water; fouling organisms; New Zealand; Waitemata Harbour; Orakei Basin. 197 INTRODUCTION New Zealanders are aware of the numerous exotic terrestrial plants and animals that have been assisted immigrants to our country since the arrival of humans less than 1000 years ago. Some, such as sheep, cattle, pine trees and pasture grasses, are of great economic benefit to our country. Many others, such as possums, goats, rabbits, Old Man's beard and Kahili ginger, are an economic and environmental disaster. The enormous impact of these introduced pests and weeds on New Zealand's natural terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems is well documented. Many millions of dollars of public funding are spent each year trying to control or eradicate them. New Zealanders are far more aware of these exotic plants and animals on land and in our freshwater lakes and streams than they are about similar introductions in the marine realm. This is quite natural, as on land we can readily observe the arrival of strange organisms and monitor changes, but in the sea it is more difficult to notice new arrivals until they have become well established and have greatly multiplied in numbers. Thus it is particularly difficult to determine which of the widespread cosmopolitan marine species living around New Zealand today came here naturally and which were introduced with the assistance of human activities, such as shipping and have subsequently become well established. HOW FOREIGN MARINE ORGANISMS REACH NEW ZEALAND Natural transport methods 1. Currents In some years, the natural current patterns around northern New Zealand become favourable to carry juveniles and larval stages of a number of shallow warmer water fish, sea eggs, molluscs and other organisms from Norfolk or the Kermadec Islands to New Zealand (e.g. Powell 1976). These are carried southward along the east coast of northern New Zealand in the East Auckland Current, with new arrivals settling into suitable habitats they encounter. These are mostly around the offshore islands, such as the Poor Knights, Mokohinaus, Aldermen and White islands. Eddies in the current sometimes touch the mainland coast and warm water immigrants are known to have become established in places such as Cape Karikari, Cape Brett and Parengarenga (e.g. Powell 1976). Undoubtedly the vast majority of these warm water migrants do not survive the journey or do not encounter suitable habitats in which to settle. Of those that do find a suitable new homeland, a number, such as the swimming crab Scylla 198 serrata (Dell 1964), grow to maturity but find the conditions too cool to breed here and disappear after a few years. Only a few of these natural immigrants appear to find conditions suitable to establish viable breeding populations. The New Zealand fossil record documents thousands of natural immigration events of tropical and subtropical marine species reaching New Zealand and becoming established during warm periods since we split from Gondwana, 80-55 million years ago. It also documents the extinction of many of these warm water taxa during periods of cooler sea climate (Beu 1990). In the ten thousand years since the Last Ice Age, several thousand species may have been added to the modern New Zealand marine fauna by this method of introduction. Most are still restricted in their distribution to the northeast coast of the North Island. These range extensions and contractions occur continually in the marine environment. If climate warming eventuates we can expect many more species to naturally extend their ranges into northern New Zealand waters. Current transport will successfully introduce only those taxa that can survive the journey suspended in oceanic water for perhaps one to several weeks, ie. organisms that have long-lived, planktonic larval stages such as many sea eggs, crustaceans and some molluscs, or organisms that are free-swimming such as reef fish. 2. Attached to logs or organisms Barnacles, tube worms, algae and some nestling molluscs and crustaceans may be attach to free-swimming organisms, such as turtles or whales, or more frequently to floating logs which occasionally cross the oceans. Their chance of survival and successful establishment in New Zealand would be similar to organisms carried in by currents. Fossils document many successful introductions in the distant past and undoubtedly there have been a number since the Last Ice Age that are now part of our native marine biota. Australia is the most likely source of most successful immigrant species introduced attached to logs because of the current and storm patterns, availability of logs and similar climatic factors. Most tropical fouling species would find it too cold to become established in New Zealand. Temperate northern hemisphere fouling organisms are less likely to survive passage through the tropics during their long journey to New Zealand. 3. On feet of migrating seabirds Migrating seabirds are another mode of trans-oceanic transport that has probably been responsible for the natural introduction of a number of terrestrial and tidal flat animals and plants to New Zealand. This is particularly true for many microscopic organisms that live in brackish intertidal mud flats. They could 199 easily be transported in mud attached to the feathers or feet of one of the millions of wading birds that migrate to New Zealand along the east Asia flyway each season. This is the most plausible explanation for the observation that 19 of the 20 brackish species of foraminifera (Protozoa) living in New Zealand have a cosmopolitan temperate-subtropical distribution and also occur along north Atlantic coasts (Hayward & Hollis 1994). Human-assisted transport methods Despite the above-mentioned methods of natural transport and introduction of marine organisms to New Zealand, there are vast numbers of shallow water marine species living in other parts of the world that have not been able to cross the oceanic and climatic barriers. Recognition of introductions of marine species facilitated by some form of human assistance is often difficult. Strong suspicions are raised when coastal species that come from temperate and subtropical seas in the northern hemisphere are recorded suddenly appearing in New Zealand waters or are found living here in limited areas around one or more ports. There are several forms of deliberate and accidental human-assisted transport methods. 1. Deliberate introductions There have been numerous attempts to introduce foreign marine organisms to New Zealand waters especially prior to the 1920s. These have included Atlantic, sockeye and Quinnat salmon, European lobsters, Australian prawns, herrings, turbot and edible crabs. Most have failed, except for the salmon which are commercially farmed (Hine 1995). Three species of the intertidal cord grass, Spartina, were deliberately introduced from the UK and USA and planted here between 1913 and 1960 (Partridge 1987). They were introduced as a biological aid to reclamation of sheltered tidal flats, which in those days were not valued as ecosystems and important nurseries for marine life as they are today (Chapman & Ronaldson 1958). Spartina is now recognised as an environmental weed and thousands of dollars are spent each year around the country trying to control and eradicate it. 2. Aquarium releases Although freshwater is the preferred medium for aquaria, saltwater is reasonably common especially for colourful, tropical coral reef community imitations. A number of overseas marine organisms are imported live into New Zealand specifically to supply this market. There is every possibility that one or more of these species may be released by accident or on purpose into the New 200 Zealand marine environment.
Recommended publications
  • Mapping and Distribution of Sabella Spallanzanii in Port Phillip Bay Final
    Mapping and distribution of Sabellaspallanzanii in Port Phillip Bay Final Report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC Project 94/164) G..D. Parry, M.M. Lockett, D.P. Crookes, N. Coleman and M.A. Sinclair May 1996 Mapping and distribution of Sabellaspallanzanii in Port Phillip Bay Final Report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC Project 94/164) G.D. Parry1, M. Lockett1, D. P. Crookes1, N. Coleman1 and M. Sinclair2 May 1996 1Victorian Fisheries Research Institute Departmentof Conservation and Natural Resources PO Box 114, Queenscliff,Victoria 3225 2Departmentof Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Monash University Clayton Victoria 3068 Contents Page Technical and non-technical summary 2 Introduction 3 Background 3 Need 4 Objectives 4 Methods 5 Results 5 Benefits 5 Intellectual Property 6 Further Development 6 Staff 6 Final cost 7 Distribution 7 Acknow ledgments 8 References 8 Technical and Non-technical Summary • The sabellid polychaete Sabella spallanzanii, a native to the Mediterranean, established in Port Phillip Bay in the late 1980s. Initially it was found only in Corio Bay, but during the past fiveyears it has spread so that it now occurs throughout the western half of Port Phillip Bay. • Densities of Sabella in many parts of the bay remain low but densities are usually higher (up to 13/m2 ) in deeper water and they extend into shallower depths in calmer regions. • Sabella larvae probably require a 'hard' surface (shell fragment, rock, seaweed, mollusc or sea squirt) for initial attachment, but subsequently they may use their own tube as an anchor in soft sediment . • Changes to fish communities following the establishment of Sabella were analysed using multidimensional scaling and BACI (Before, After, Control, Impact) design analyses of variance.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 Relationships Within the Ellobiidae
    Origin atld evoltctiorzai-y radiatiotz of the Mollrisca (ed. J. Taylor) pp. 285-294, Oxford University Press. O The Malacological Sociery of London 1996 R. Clarke. 24 paleozoic .ine sna~ls. RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE ELLOBIIDAE ANTONIO M. DE FRIAS MARTINS Departamento de Biologia, Universidade dos Aqores, P-9502 Porzta Delgada, S6o Miguel, Agores, Portugal ssification , MusCum r Curie. INTRODUCTION complex, and an assessment is made of its relevance in :eny and phylogenetic relationships. 'ulmonata: The Ellobiidae are a group of primitive pulmonate gastropods, Although not treated in this paper, conchological features (apertural dentition, inner whorl resorption and protoconch) . in press. predominantly tropical. Mostly halophilic, they live above the 28s rRNA high-tide mark on mangrove regions, salt-marshes and rolled- and radular morphology were studied also and reference to ~t limpets stone shores. One subfamily, the Carychiinae, is terrestrial, them will be made in the Discussion. inhabiting the forest leaf-litter on mountains throughout ago1 from the world. MATERIAL AND METHODS 'finities of The Ellobiidae were elevated to family rank by Lamarck (1809) under the vernacular name "Les AuriculacCes", The anatomy of 35 species representing 19 genera was ~Ctiquedu properly latinized to Auriculidae by Gray (1840). Odhner studied (Table 24.1). )llusques). (1925), in a revision of the systematics of the family, preferred For the most part the animals were immersed directly in sciences, H. and A. Adarns' name Ellobiidae (in Pfeiffer, 1854). which 70% ethanol. Some were relaxed overnight in isotonic MgCl, ochemical has been in general use since that time. and then preserved in 70% ethanol. A reduced number of Grouping of the increasingly growing number of genera in specimens of most species was fixed in Bouin's, serially Gebriider the family was based mostly on conchological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Rumahlatu D., Leiwakabessy F., 2017 Biodiversity of Gastropoda in the Coastal Waters of Ambon Island, Indonesia
    Biodiversity of gastropoda in the coastal waters of Ambon Island, Indonesia Dominggus Rumahlatu, Fredy Leiwakabessy Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Science, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia. Corresponding author: D. Rumahlatu, [email protected] Abstract. Gastropods belonging to the mollusk phylum are widespread in various ecosystems. Ecologically, the spread of gastropoda is influenced by environmental factors, such as temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen. This research was conducted to determine the correlation between the factors of physico-chemical environment and the diversity of gastropoda in coastal water of Ambon Island, Indonesia. This research was conducted at two research stations, namely Station 1 at Ujung Tanjung Latuhalat Beach and Station 2 at coastal water of Waitatiri Passo. The results of a survey revealed that the average temperature on station 1 was 31.14°C while the average temperature of ° station 2 was 29.90 C. The average salinity at Station 1 was 32.02%o whereas the salinity average at Station 2 was 30.31%o. The average pH in station 1 and 2 was 7.03, while the dissolved oxygen at station 1 was 7.68 ppm which was not far different from that in station 2 with the dissolved oxygen of 7.63 ppm. The total number of species found in both research stations was 65 species, with the types of gastropoda were found scattered in 48 genera, 19 families and 7 orders. The most commonly found gastropods were from the genus of Nerita and Conus. 40 species were found in station 1 and 40 species were found in station 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedipedinae (Gastropoda: Ellobiidae) from Hong Kong
    The marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and southern China III (ed. B. Morton). Proceedings of the Fourth International Marine Biological Workshop: The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China, Hong Kong, 11-29 April 1989. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1992. PEDIPEDINAE (GASTROPODA: ELLOBIIDAE) FROM HONG KONG Ant6nio M. de Frias Martins Departamento de Biologia, Universidade dos A~ores,P-9502 Ponta Delgada, Siio Miguel, A~ores,Portugal ABSTRACT Two species of Pedipedinae are recorded for the first time from Hong Kong and are here provisionally referred to as Pedipes jouani Montrouzier, 1862 and Microtralia alba (Gassies, 1865), described from New Caledonia. A descriptive study of the reproductive and nervous systems was conducted and confirms previous studies that both genera are consubfamilial. The distribution and dispersal of the species is discussed. INTRODUCTION The Indo-Pacific Ellobiidae are particularly well represented by conspicuous, mangrove- dwelling, macroscopic species, relatively few of which have been studied anatomically. Koslowsky (1933) presented a detailed description of Melampus boholensis 'H. and A. Adams' Pfeiffer, 1856. Morton (1955) described the anatomy of Pythia Roding, 1798, Ellobium Roding, 1798 [E.aurisjudae (L. 1758)l and of the small pedipedinian Marinula King, 1832 [M.filholi Hutton, 18781. Knipper and Meyer (1956) provided good illus- trations of the nervous systems of Ellobium (Auriculodes) gaziensis (Preston, 1913), Cassidula labrella (Deshayes, 1830) and Melampus semisulcatus Mousson, 1869. Cassidula Fhssac, 1821, Ellobium and Pythia were discussed by Beny et al. (1967) and Sumikawa and Miura (1978) studied in detail the reproductive system of Ellobium chinense (Pfeiffer, 1854).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Species Survey
    ISSN: 1328-5548 Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute Report No. 4 Exotic Marine Pests in the Port of Hastings, Victoria. D. R. Currie and D. P. Crookes December 1997 Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute PO Box 114 Queenscliff 3225 CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1. BACKGROUND 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PORT OF HASTINGS 3 2.1 Shipping movements 3 2.2 Port development and maintenance activities 4 2.21 Dredge and spoil dumping 4 2.22 Pile construction and cleaning 5 3. EXISTING BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION 5 4. SURVEY METHODS 6 4.1 Phytoplankton 6 4.11 Sediment sampling for cyst-forming species 6 4.12 Phytoplankton sampling 6 4.2 Trapping 7 4.3 Zooplankton 7 4.4 Diver observations and collections on wharf piles 7 4.5 Visual searches 7 4.6 Epibenthos 8 4.7 Benthic infauna 8 4.8 Seine netting 8 4.9 Sediment analysis 8 5. SURVEY RESULTS 9 5.1 Port environment 9 5.2 Introduced species in port 9 5.21 ABWMAC target introduced species 9 5.22 Other target species 11 5.23 Additional exotic species detected 12 5.24 Adequacy of survey intensity 13 6. IMPACT OF EXOTIC SPECIES 13 7. ORIGIN AND POSSIBLE VECTORS FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF EXOTIC SPECIES FOUND IN THE PORT. 14 8. INFLUENCES OF THE PORT ENVIRONMENT ON THE SURVIVAL OF INTRODUCED SPECIES. 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 16 REFERENCES 17 TABLES 1-6 21 FIGURES 1-5 25 APPENDICES 1 & 2 36 SUMMARY The Port of Hastings in Westernport Bay was surveyed for introduced species between 4th and 15th of March 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Marine Biota in Western Australian Waters
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.25(1).2008.001-044 Records of the Western Australian ;\Iuseum 25: 1 44 (2008), Introduced marine biota in Western Australian waters 2 2 John M. Huisman', Diana S. Jones , Fred E. Wells" and Timothy Burton I Western Australian Ilcrbarium, l)epartnwnt of Fnvironnwnt and Conservation, Locked Bag 11).1, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia, and School of Biological Sciences and Biotl'chnology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia, Department of Aquatic Zoology, vVestern Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 69R6, Australia, ' Western Australian Department of Fisheries, Level 3,I6R St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia, Abstract - An annotated compendium is presented of 102 species of marine algae and animals that have been reported as introduced into Western Australian marine and estuarine waters, four of which arc on the Australian national list of targeted marine pest species, For each species the authority, distribution (both in Western Australia and elsewhere), voucher specimen(s) and remarks are given, Sixty species are considered to have been introduced through human activity, including three on the list of Australian declared marine pests, The most invasive groups are: bryozoans (15 species), crustaceans (13 species) and molluscs (9 species), Seven of these introduced species, including four natural introductions, have not been found recently and are not presently considered to be living in Western Australia,
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species
    13th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species HOSTED BY September 20 to 24, 2004 Lynch West County Hotel Ennis, County Clare, Ireland Conference Host Institute of Technology, Sligo, Ballinode, Sligo, Ireland Honourary Conference Co-Chairs Pat the Cope Gallagher, Minister of State, Department of Environment and Local Government, Ireland Timothy R.E. Keeney, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, USA John Cooley, Regional Director General, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Canada Technical Programme Committee Chair: Frances Lucy, Institute of Technology, Sligo Past Chair: Beth MacKay, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Renata Claudi, RNT Consulting Inc., Emeritus Dan Minchin, Marine Organism Investigations Charles Boylen, Darrin Fresh Water Institute Robert Hester, Ontario Power Generation Ron Pierce, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Dennis Wright, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Francine MacDonald, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Sharon Gross, US Geological Survey Bivan Patnaik, US Coast Guard Stephen McElvany, US Office of Naval Research Margaret Dochoda, Great Lakes Fishery Commission Glenn Rhett, US Army Engineer Research & Development Center David F. Reid, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Pam Thibodeaux, US Fish & Wildlife Service Contents Conference Program . i MONDAY SEPTEMBER 20 International Cooperation Towards Science, Policy and Information Exchange Vectors, Detectors and Inspectors . 1 Dan Minchin, Marine Organism Investigations, Ireland Managing the Global Invasive Species Problem – Some Lessons Learned From Experience with National, Regional and Global Programmes . 2 Greg Sherley, Principal Regional Scientist, New Zealand Department of Conservation, New Zealand Invasive Aquatic Species and Ships Across the Sea – the IMO Response, Reflections and Direction. 3 Jean-Claude Sainlos, Director, Marine Environment Division, International Maritime Organization, England Two Nations, One Ecosystem, Working Together on Aquatic Invasive Species Management and Control .
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Recorder Report 2020 V3
    Marine Recorder’s Report 2020 Simon Taylor The pandemic significantly limited marine recording activity during 2020 as for long periods of the year, including the best low tides in the spring, non-local travel was prohibited and only those residing near the shore could reasonably travel there for exercise. Recreational diving was also prohibited for much of the year. The Society was able to run a single one-day field visit (to Bembridge on the Isle of Wight, led by Bas Payne) although the Marine Recorder was able to conduct a week’s intensive surveying on Benbecula and the Uists in the Outer Hebrides during autumn spring lows. For those fortunate enough to be within “daily exercise” distance of the shore, lockdown presented the opportunity to conduct some relatively intensive fieldwork over a small area. David Notton, in Edinburgh, was able to make regular excursions in the Granton area where he recorded a variety of molluscs including an intriguing LWB (little white bivalve) which was identified as the first Scottish observation of Theora lubrica Gould, 1861 (Notton, 2020). This non-indigenous species was mentioned in last year’s report (Taylor, 2020) following its first UK discovery in Lowestoft Harbour as publicly reported last year in the Society’s Journal (Worsfold et al., 2020). It has followed the increasingly familiar pattern of colonisation of continental Europe (in this case the Mediterranean first, before spreading around into the NE Atlantic) and then the UK, as well as establishing populations elsewhere around the globe. Although David’s find was of a single valve it seemed relatively fresh; an establishing population in the vicinity of a busy harbour would come as no huge surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base
    WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base Family: ELLOBIIDAE Author: Claudio Galli - [email protected] (updated 07/set/2015) Class: GASTROPODA --- Clade: HETEROBRANCHIA-PULMONATA-EUPULMONATA-ELLOBIOIDEA ------ Family: ELLOBIIDAE L. Pfeiffer, 1854 (Land) - Alphabetic order - when first name is in bold the species has images Taxa=681, Genus=34, Subgenus=13, Species=287, Subspecies=12, Synonyms=334, Images=187 acteocinoides , Microtralia acteocinoides J.T. Kuroda & T. Habe, 1961 acuminata , Ovatella acuminata P.M.A. Morelet, 1889 - syn of: Myosotella myosotis (J.P.R. Draparnaud, 1801) acuta , Marinula acuta (D'Orbigny, 1835) acuta , Pythia acuta J.B. Hombron & C.H. Jacquinot, 1847 acutispira , Melampus acutispira W.H. Turton, 1932 - syn of: Melampus parvulus L. Pfeiffer, 1856 adamsianus , Melampus adamsianus L. Pfeiffer, 1855 adansonii , Pedipes adansonii H.M.D. de Blainville, 1824 - syn of: Pedipes pedipes (J.G. Bruguière, 1789) adriatica , Ovatella adriatica H.C. Küster, 1844 - syn of: Myosotella myosotis (J.P.R. Draparnaud, 1801) aegiatilis, Pythia pachyodon aegiatilis H.A. Pilsbry & Y. Hirase, 1908 aequalis , Ovatella aequalis (R.T. Lowe, 1832) afer , Pedipes afer J.F. Gmelin, 1791 - syn of: Pedipes pedipes (J.G. Bruguière, 1789) affinis , Marinula affinis A.E.J. Férussac, 1821 - syn of: Pedipes affinis A.E.J. Férussac, 1821 affinis , Laemodonta affinis A.E.J. Férussac, 1821 - syn of: Pedipes affinis A.E.J. Férussac, 1821 affinis , Pedipes affinis A.E.J. Férussac, 1821 alba , Microtralia alba (J. Gassies, 1865) albescens , Ovatella albescens T.V. Wollaston, 1878 - syn of: Ovatella aequalis (R.T. Lowe, 1832) albovaricosa, Pythia albovaricosa L. Pfeiffer, 1853 albus , Melampus albus C.A. Davis, 1904 - syn of: Melampus monile (J.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Traffic Effects on Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea Volume 1 - Review of Impacts, Priority Areas and Mitigation Measures
    Maritime traffic effects on biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea Volume 1 - Review of impacts, priority areas and mitigation measures Edited by Ameer Abdulla, PhD and Olof Linden, PhD IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation / IUCN Global Marine Programme cover.indd 2 16/9/08 13:35:23 Maritime traffic effects on biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea Volume 1 - Review of impacts, priority areas and mitigation measures Edited by Ameer Abdulla, PhD and Olof Linden, PhD portada.indd 1 16/9/08 13:24:04 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea, or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea or IUCN. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea. This review is a contribution of the Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Science Group of the IUCN Global and Mediterranean Marine Programme. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Malaga, Spain. Copyright: © 2008 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT 1998 REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM Vol
    Benthic Macrofauna SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT 1998 REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM Vol . VII Descriptions and Sources of Photographs on the Cover Clockwise from bottom right: (1) Benthic sediment sampling with a Van Veen grab; City of Los Angeles Environmental Monitoring Division. (2) Bight'98 taxonomist M. Lily identifying and counting macrobenthic invertebrates; City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department. (3) The phyllodocid polychaete worm Phyllodoce groenlandica (Orsted, 1843); L. Harris, Los Angeles County Natural History Museum. (4) The arcoid bivalve clam Anadara multicostata (G.B. Sowerby I, 1833); City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department. (5) The gammarid amphipod crustacean Ampelisca indentata (J.L. Barnard, 1954); City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department. Center: (6) Macrobenthic invertebrates and debris on a 1.0 mm sieve screen; www.scamit.org. Southern California Bight 1998 Regional Monitoring Program: VII. Benthic Macrofauna J. Ananda Ranasinghe1, David E. Montagne2, Robert W. Smith3, Tim K. Mikel4, Stephen B. Weisberg1, Donald B. Cadien2, Ronald G. Velarde5, and Ann Dalkey6 1Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Westminster, CA 2County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA 3P.O. Box 1537, Ojai, CA 4Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Laboratories, Ventura, CA 5City of San Diego, Metropolitan Wastewater Department, San Diego, CA 6City of Los Angeles, Environmental Monitoring Division March 2003 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, CA 92683-5218 Phone: (714) 894-2222 · FAX: (714) 894-9699 http://www.sccwrp.org Benthic Macrofauna Committee Members Donald B. Cadien County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Ann Dalkey City of Los Angeles, Environmental Monitoring Division Tim K.
    [Show full text]