Social Monitoring Report
Semiannual Report September 2018
People’s Republic of China: Comprehensive Agricultural Development Project
Prepared by Ms. Xuemei Zhang for the State Office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development and the Asian Development Bank.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 15 September 2018)
Currency unit – Chinese Yuan (CNY) CNY1.00 = $6.8705 $1.00 = CNY0.1455
ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CAD – Comprehensive Agricultural Development COCAD – County office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development EA – Executing agency EMDP – Ethnic minority development plan EMPF – Ethnic minority planning framework FPA – Farmer professional association and/or cooperatives GAP – Gender action plan IA – Implementing agency IPM – Integrated pest management LAR – Land acquisition and resettlement PMO – Project management office POCAD – Provincial office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development PRC – The People’s Republic of China RF – Resettlement framework RP – Resettlement plan SOCAD – The State Office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development WUA – Water users association
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES km – kilometer m2 – square meter ha – hectare mu – a Chinese unit of measurement 1 ha – 15 mu
NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.
This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Comprehensive Agricultural Development Project
Project Number: 43049
Loan 2943-PRC
Consolidated External Social Monitoring Report (January-June 2018)
Prepared by Xuemei Zhang, the Independent Social Monitoring Specialist, for the State Office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development (SOCAD) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) September 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Loan for the Comprehensive Agricultural Development (CAD) Project (the project) in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) was approved by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) on 20 November 2012, has been implemented since 2013.
The impact of the project will be enhanced food security in the PRC. The outcome will be increased agricultural productivity in the project area. The project has three outputs: (i) improved irrigation and drainage infrastructure; (ii) improved agricultural support; and (iii) improved project management.
The project area includes 466 administrative villages in 68 participating counties of the 6 participating provinces. As of 30 June 2016, the project directly benefits 1,013,471 people, including 1,010,638 farmers and 2,833 management staff. Of the total beneficiaries, 66,290 were newly added between January and June 2018. The farmers got benefits by cultivating the improved low-and-medium-yield farmland, and/or the demonstration agriculture, and/or engaged in the trainings and project created jobs etc. The management staff has participated in the project supported domestic and international trainings and/or study tours.
The resettlement framework has been followed by all the participating counties. The Involuntary Resettlement policy of ADB has not been triggered, because no land acquisition and resettlement occurred during the project implementation stage. The project permanent land occupation has been minimized by updating the canals and field roads in their original locations as much as possible, and cutting off curves of the canals. All permanent occupied land was still collectively owned by the communities, and no need to be transferred to state-owned land. As of 30 June 2018, a total of 794.1 mu (equivalent to 52.9 ha) of land have been occupied permanently. Of which, 4 mu were occupied between January to June 2018. Permanently occupied land of each affected household was small, and land loss rate of all affected households was less than 1%. Main reasons of the land occupation were newly constructed irrigation canals/ditches and widened field roads. Compensation for most of the land-occupation affected households was reallocation of same amount of collectively-held farmland in their villages, and the other affected households donated their land and did not ask for compensation. Temporary land occupation has been minimized by conducting the construction work during non-farming seasons, and using ready-mix concrete for improving the canal structures and roads. All temporarily occupied land has been restored immediately after completion of the construction work. Few crops were affected by temporary land occupation in Anhui and Yunnan, which were compensated by the project contractors.
Ethnic minority people equitably participated in the project activities and benefited from the project. Four EMDPs prepared in the beginning of the project implementation have been implemented as planned except that the actual jobs created were less than the targets because more machines instead of manpower were used.
Gender action plan has been implemented as planned except that women’s shares in the
management bodies of the project supported water user associations (WUA) and farmer professional cooperatives/associations (FPAs) were less than the targets. It needs more attention.
Poverty households equitably participated and received benefits from the project. Of the project beneficiaries, 3.9% were the poor, which are 0.3 percentage-points higher than the poverty incidence in the project area in the same period of time.
The project updated irrigation systems and agricultural support were mainly managed and maintained by village committees, the WUAs and/or the FPAs. Management capacities of these agencies should be further strengthened, because sustainable function of the irrigation systems, the field roads and the agricultural facilities largely depend on management capacities of these agencies.
ABBREVIATION
ADB Asian Development Bank CAD Comprehensive Agricultural Development COCAD County office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development EA Executing agency EMDP Ethnic minority development plan EMPF Ethnic minority planning framework FPA Farmer professional association and/or cooperatives GAP Gender action plan IA Implementing agency IPM Integrated pest management LAR Land acquisition and resettlement PMO Project management office POCAD Provincial office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development PRC The People’s Republic of China RF Resettlement framework RP Resettlement plan SOCAD The State Office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development WUA Water users association
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II
ABBREVIATION IV
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. The Project 1 B. Participating Provinces and Counties 1 C. The Project Management Organization 1 D. Social Safeguards Assessment 2 E. Individual External Social Monitoring 2 F. This Report: Consolidated External Social Monitoring 3
II. PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 3
A. Output 1: Improvement of Irrigation & Drainage Infrastructure 3 B. Output 2: Improvement of Agricultural Support 4 C. Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 4
III. MAJOR FINDINGS 5
A. Project Area 5 B. Summary Project Activities Completed in Total 5 C. Project Direct Beneficiaries 6 D. Consultation and Participation 8 E. Grievance Redress Mechanism 8 F. Situation of Land Occupation 8 G. Implementation Progress of the EMDPs 10 H. Progress of the GAP Implementation 11 I. Socioeconomic Development of the Project Area 12 J. Poverty Reduction 13 K. O&M of Project Supported Infrastructure and Facilities 13 L. Other Social Concerns 13
IV. KEY ISSUES 14
V. RECOMMENDATIONS 14
VI. FOCUSES OF NEXT MONITORING REPORT 14
VII. APPENDIXES 15
A. Project Area by Province 15 B. Summary Activities Completed 18 C. Beneficiaries by Province 29 D. Land Occupation by Province 33 E. Progress of the EMDPs Implementation by Province 36
F. Progress of the GAP Implementation by Province 54 G. Socioeconomic Development by Province 65 H. Operation of the Project 66
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: The Project Participating Provinces and Counties As of 30/06/2018 ...... 1 Table 2: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure by the Project ...... 4 Table 3: Improved Agricultural Support by the Project ...... 4 Table 4: Project Area and Population (As of 30/06/2018) ...... 5 Table 5: Summary Project Activities Completed ...... 5 Table 6: Project Direct Beneficiaries-Farmers (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 7 Table 7: Project Direct Beneficiaries- CAD Officials (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 7 Table 8: Farmer Trainings and Study Tours (as 30/06/2018) ...... 8 Table 9: Permanent Land Occupation (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 9 Table 10: Key Socioeconomic Indicators in the project Area ...... 12
A-table 1: Project Area and the Population in Anhui Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 15 A-table 2: Project Area and the Population in Heilongjiang Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 15 A-table 3: Project Area and the Population in Henan Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 16 A-table 4: Project Area and the Population in Jilin Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 16 A-table 5: Project Area and the Population in Ningxia (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 17 A-table 6: Project Area and the Population in Yunnan Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 18 A-table 7: Summary Activities completed in Total ...... 18 A-table 8: Summary Activities completed in Anhui Province ...... 20 A-table 9: Summary Activities completed in Heilongjiang Province ...... 22 A-table 10: Summary Activities completed in Henan Province ...... 23 A-table 11: Summary Activities completed in Jilin Province ...... 24 A-table 12: Summary Activities completed in Ningxia ...... 26 A-table 13: Summary Activities completed in Yunnan Province ...... 27 A-table 14: Beneficiaries of the subprojects in Anhui Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 29 A-table 15: Beneficiaries of the subprojects in Heilongjiang Province (as of 30/06/2018) .... 30 A-table 16: Beneficiaries of the subprojects in Henan Province (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 30 A-table 17: Project direct beneficiaries in Jilin (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 31 A-table 18: Project direct beneficiaries in Ningxia (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 32 A-table 19: Project direct beneficiaries in Yunnan (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 32 A-table 20: Permanent Land Occupation in Yunnan (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 36 A-table 21: Summary Activities Completed in Dumeng County, Heilongjiang Province ...... 37 A-table 22: Progress of EMDP Implementation in Dumeng County of Heilongjiang Province 37 A-table 23: Summary Activities Conducted in Hailin City, Heilongjiang Province ...... 39 A-table 24: Progress of EMDP* Implementation in Hailin City of Heilongjiang Province ...... 40 A-table 25: Summary Activities Conducted in Helong City, Jilin Province ...... 41 A-table 26: Progress of EMDP Implementation in Helong City of Jilin Province ...... 42 A-table 27: Summary Activities Completed out in Dunhua City, Jilin Province ...... 43 A-table 28: Progress of EMDP Implementation in Dunhua City of Jilin Province ...... 44
A-table 29: Ethnic minority People in the Subproject Areas in Ningxia (as of 30/06/2018) ... 46 A-table 30: Summary Activities Completed in Lingwu County, Ningxia ...... 46 A-table 31: Ethnic minority Participation in Lingwu in Ningxia (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 47 A-table 32: Summary Activities Completed in Wuzhong-Shizhi, Ningxia ...... 47 A-table 33: Ethnic minority Participation in Wuzhong in Ningxia (as of 30/06/2018) ...... 48 A-table 34: Participation of Ethnic Minorities (as of 30/06/2018 ...... 49 A-table 35: Summary Activity Completed in Changning County, Yunnan Province ...... 49 A-table 36: Summary Activity Completed in Eryuan County, Yunnan Province ...... 50 A-table 37:Summary Activity Completed in Heqing County, Yunnan Province ...... 51 A-table 38: Summary Activity Completed in Mangshi County, Yunnan Province ...... 51 A-table 39: Summary Activity Completed in Shiping County, Yunnan Province ...... 52 A-table 40: Summary Activity Completed in Yulong County, Yunnan Province ...... 53 A-table 41: Progress of the GAP Implementation ...... 54 A-table 42: Progress of the GAP Implementation in Anhui, Heilongjiang and Henan (as of 30/06/2018)...... 58 A-table 43: Progress of the GAP Implementation in Jilin, Ningxia and Yunnan (as of 30/06/2018)...... 61 A-table 44: Key Socioeconomic Indicators in the Project Area in as of 30 June 2018 ...... 65
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES km – kilometer m2 – square meter ha – hectare mu – a Chinese unit of measurement 1 ha = 15 mu
I. INTRODUCTION
A. The Project
1. The Loan for the Comprehensive Agricultural Development (CAD) Project (the project) in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) was approved by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) on 20 November 2012. The Loan and the Project Agreements were signed on 5 December 2012 and the Loan became effective on 14 March 2013. The project has been implemented since 2013.
2. The impact of the project will be enhanced food security in the PRC. The outcome will be increased agricultural productivity in the project area. The project has three outputs: (i) improved irrigation and drainage infrastructure; (ii) improved agricultural support; and (iii) improved project management.
B. Participating Provinces and Counties
3. As of 30 June 2018, the project supports the government’s CAD program in 681 counties or cities or districts (collectively the project counties) in six participating provinces and Autonomous Region (collectively the participating provinces) to improve agricultural productivity and enhance the nation’s food security. Table 1 presents the participating provinces and the number of the participating counties.
Table 1: The Project Participating Provinces and Counties As of 30/06/2018 Participating Province/Autonomous Region No. of participating Counties Anhui 8 Heilongjiang 16 Henan 9 Jilin 15 Ningxia 8 Yunnan 12 Total 68
C. The Project Management Organization
4. The State Office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development (SOCAD) in the Ministry of Finance is the executing agency (EA), responsible for the overall planning, coordination, and management of the project. A national project management office (PMO) has been set up within SOCAD to take care of the daily project coordination and management. The six provincial Comprehensive Agricultural Developments (POCADs) are the implementing agencies (IAs) at provincial level, responsible for planning, coordination, and management of the subproject in their provinces. A provincial PMO has been established in each of the six participating provincial office for Comprehensive Agricultural Development (POCAD). The participating county offices for Comprehensive Agricultural Development (COCADs) are implementing agencies at county level.
1 It was 69 participating counties before the midterm adjustment.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 1
Within each of the COCADs, a county PMO has been set up, which are responsible for the daily implementation of project activities in their jurisdiction.
D. Social Safeguards Assessment
1. Social Safeguards Assessment during the Project Preparation Stage
5. The project was classified as category B for both involuntary resettlement and indigenous peoples, and as category II, effective gender mainstreaming, in the project preparatory technical assistance (PPTA) stage in 2012.
6. Detailed design of the project components could only be prepared when the county PMOs get ready for implementation. Subprojects would be prepared after Board approval. Therefore, an ethnic minority planning framework (EMPF), instead of ethnic minority development plans (EMDPs), and a resettlement framework (RF), instead of resettlement plan (RP), have been prepared for the entire project by the SOCAD in 2012, and approved by ADB. The EMPF and RF provide guides for screening each subproject before its implementation, and preparing EMDPs and/or RP if necessary. A gender action plan (GAP) was developed in the PPTA stage in 2012.
7. The POCADs and COCADs are responsible for screening their subprojects, and preparing EMDP(s) and RP(s) if required. They are also responsible for implementing the GAP in their project areas.
2. Social Safeguards Assessment before the Project Implementation
8. In 2013, before the project implementation, an individual resettlement specialist recruited by ADB advised the POCADs and the COCADs in screening impacts of the project resettlement. The conclusion was that the project just involves some internal voluntary land use and land adjustment, and no land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) would be required in all participating provinces during the project implementation. Therefore, no RP was required for all the six participating provinces.2
9. In 2013, after detailed screening and analysis, four EMDPs had been prepared for four subprojects by the POCADs: two in Heilongjiang and two in Jilin. No EMDP was for the other four participating provinces.3
E. Individual External Social Monitoring
10. External monitoring agencies: Each of the six POCADs has recruited their own external monitoring agency during 2013 and 20144, responsible for monitoring the entire subprojects in their provinces, including implementation of the subprojects, implementation of the environmental plans, and implementation of the social plans.
2 Consolidated External Monitoring Report for Implementation of the Ethnic Minority Development Plans (Q1-Q2 as of 30 June 2018) 3 Consolidated External Monitoring Report for Implementation of the Ethnic Minority Development Plans (Q1-Q2 as of 30 June 2018) 4 External monitoring agencies were recruited for Ningxia in August 2013, Jinlin in Dec 2014 respectively.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 2
11. Methodology and Methods used by the external monitories agencies include (i) developed social monitoring information system which is included in the project performance management system (PPMS). The responsible people of the subprojects were trained on use of the PPMS. Implementation progress of the social plans is recorded and reported from COCAD to POCAD and further to SOCAD using the PPMS, which enables the monitors to easily track the differences between what was planned and what is actually happened, and to identify any deviation in a timely manner; (ii) site visit. The external monitoring agencies visited almost all the sites of the subprojects. Implementation of the social plans were checked and emphasized during communication between the agencies and the implementers; and (iii) key informant interview, questionnaire survey on affected households, case study, and other relevant methods The interview and survey focused on the results and effects of the project, such as land occupation and restoration, employment opportunities, participation of different social groups, productivities of the relevant crops, income of the affected people, and any other potential risks. The surveys collected an amount of information on the social aspects which also crosscheck the information reported in the PPMS and ensured the veracity of the data.
12. Individual External Social Monitoring Reports: Each of the six external monitoring agencies has prepared its semi-year external social monitoring reports since 2016. The reports were submitted to ADB by the six participating provinces. A Consolidated External Monitoring Report for Implementation of the Ethnic Minority Development Plans (Q1-Q2 as of 30 June 2018) has been prepared by an ADB-recruited consultant in December as of 30 June 2018.
F. This Report: Consolidated External Social Monitoring
13. This report is a consolidated external social monitoring report for the period January to June 2018. The report covers the entire project. It presents implementation situation of the EMDPs, the project land occupations and the GAP. Based on the project progress, the report also assesses the project benefits and beneficiaries, public consultation and participation, operation and maintenance (O&M) of the project supported infrastructure, and socioeconomic development of the project areas, and other social risks.
II. PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
14. The following sections summarize the project implementation progress by output, aiming to understand benefits that the project has already generated for especially local farmers, problems and issues needing be addressed timely and adequately, and risks should be paid close attention.
A. Output 1: Improvement of Irrigation & Drainage Infrastructure
15. Table 2 presents achievement of the output 1. As of 30 June 2018, the project improved irrigation conditions of 109,870 ha of farmland, which should benefit farmers, men and women, non-poor and poor, by increasing agricultural productivities, reducing possibility of drought and/or flooding. Water-saving technology is introduced in 67,031 ha of farmland, which should benefit farmers by reducing production costs and increasing productivities.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 3
Table 2: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure by the Project
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018
Target Completed Completed Completed Completion rate (%) Improved Irrigation and drainage ha 117,000 109,760 110 109,870 93.9 infrastructure Surface water irrigation system ha 56,588 69,859 110 69,969 123.6 completed and/or upgraded Tube well (groundwater) irrigation ha 41,183 34,221 34,221 83.1 systems developed and/or improved Water-saving technology promoted ha 74,495 66,651 380 67,031 90.0 WUAs supported No. 68 28 5 33 48.5 Sources: the project PAM, RRP, PPMS and communications with the PMOs during September 2018.
B. Output 2: Improvement of Agricultural Support
16. Achievement of the output 2 is presented in Table 3. As of 30 June 2018, the project enhanced 42,602 ha of soil quality by leveling land, deep plowing and applying balanced fertilizer; updated 1,950 km of agricultural service roads by repairing field roads; improved agricultural practices in 10,572 ha of farmland by introducing integrated pest management (IPM), and agricultural machines, and took control and prevention measures of land degradation in more than 16,365 ha of farmland including planting farm shelter belt and environmental protection forest and/or returning straw to farmland; established or supported 54 farmer professional association and/or cooperatives (FPA); demonstrated modern agricultural technologies including greenhouses, pollution-free and organic agriculture in 18,328 ha of farmland; and provided more than 4,995 person-months trainings to local farmers. Inputs and activities under output 2 were synergized with those under the output 1.
Table 3: Improved Agricultural Support by the Project
Completion As 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018
Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Soil quality improved ha 67,138 40,926 1,676 42,602 63.5 Service roads improved km 1,752 1,893 57 1,950 111.3 Agricultural practices improved by ha 9,725 10,439 133 10,572 108.7 introduction IPM Land degradation reduced by returning straw ha 34,861 16,365 16,365 46.9 to Farmer capacity improved by FPA established and/or strengthened No. 66 39 15 54 81.8 Farmer training pm 16,903 4,647 348 4,995 29.5 Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha 17,634 18,328 0 18,328 103.9 *pm: person month Sources: the project PPMS, the external social monitoring report (Jan-Jun 2018), and communications with the PMOs and external monitoring agencies during September 2018.
C. Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management
17. As of 30 June 2018, the project provided a total of 560 person months of trainings and 175
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 4
person-months study tour to the project management staff.
III. MAJOR FINDINGS
A. Project Area
18. The project area includes 466 administrative villages in the 68 participating counties of the six participating provinces. As of the end of June 2018, there were 1.025 million people in the project villages.6 Of which, 48.8% are female, 0.9% are ethnic minority, and 3.6% were in poverty (Table 4).
Table 4: Project Area and Population (As of 30/06/2018) Participating Participating Project Population province county (#) village (#) Total (persons) Female (%) EM (%) Poverty (%) Anhui 8 61 235,240 47.9 0.0 5.0 Heilongjiang 16 45 70,992 44.8 1.4 4.7 Henan 9 143 219,955 50.6 0.0 4.8 Jilin 15 106 164,157 47.9 6.2 2.9 Ningxia 8 36 63,579 48.7 18.7 0.02 Yunnan 12 76 267,403 49.6 26.8 2.5 Total 68 466 1,021,326 48.8 0.9 3.6 Sources: PMOs of the participating provinces, participating counties and the external social monitoring agencies in September 2018.
B. Summary Project Activities Completed in Total
19. Summary project activities conducted are presented in Table 5. Completion of these activities could benefit local people by providing employment opportunities, access to improved irrigation and agricultural conditions, enhancement of the irrigation water management, while the construction work might also have negative impact such as land occupation. The benefits and possible negative impacts are assessed in the later sections.
Table 5: Summary Project Activities Completed
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion
Rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1. Surface water irrigation system completed ha 56,588 69,969 69,969 123.6 and/or upgraded * Incremental areas ha 8,650 4,538 4,538 52.5 Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 3,852 3,218 63 3,282 85.2 Canal system structures built No. 29,371 122,162 3680 125,842 428.5 Irrigation pumping stations newly constructed No. 78 42 42 53.8 and/or improved 2. Tube well (groundwater) irrigation systems ha 41,183 34,221 34,221 83.1 developed and/or improved * Incremental areas ha 30,019 24,246 24,246 80.8
5 Registered population. 6 The figures will be updated in the first half of 2019.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 5
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion
Rate (%) New tube wells constructed No. 7,512 6,924 23 6,947 92.5 Existing tube wells improved No. 799 685 685 85.7 Rural electric cables and accessories installed 1,781 2,960 6 2,966 166.5 Transformers installed 921 414 7 421 45.7 3. Water-saving technology promoted ha 74,854 66,651 380 67,031 89.5 Canals lined km 1,665 1,903 41 1,944 116.8 Low-pressure pipelines installed km 1,326 1,283 6 1,289 97.2 Sprinkler irrigation installed ha 2,824 2,808 0 2,808 99.4 Micro-irrigation ha 4 24 24 592.5 Small water storage structures developed No. 19 81 81 426.3 4. WUAs supported No. 85 28 5 33 38.8
Output 2: Improved Agricultural Support 5. Soil quality improved ha 67,138 40,926 1676 42,602 63.5 6. Service roads improved km 1,752 1,893 57 1,950 111.3
7. Agricultural practices improved through Quality seed storage warehouse constructed m2 7,510 3,200 3,200 42.6 Quality seed production increased Ton 4,414 1,313 1,313 29.7 Agricultural machine provided 742 928 8 936 126.1 IPM program introduced on ha 9,725 10,439 133 10,572 108.7 8. Land degradation reduced through Farm shelter belts planted ha 2,580 3,057 41 3,098 120.1 Environmental protection forests planted ha 275 183 183 66.6 Straw returned to farmland ha 34,861 16,365 16,365 46.9 9. FPA established and/or strengthened No. 66 39 15 54 81.8 10. Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha 17,636 18,328 18,328 103.9 Demonstration greenhouses constructed ha 201 33 33 16.5 Pollution-free and/or safe agriculture ha 15,088 17,850 17,850 118.3 demonstrated Organic and/or green agriculture ha 2,345 445 445 19.0 demonstrated Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 11 Domestic training pm 3,263 462 9 471 14.4 Oversea training pm 36 53 53 148.1 12 Domestic study tour pm 1,666 153 16 169 10.1 Oversea study tour pm 201 7 7 3.4 Sources: The project PPMS, and the external social monitoring reports (Jan-Jun 2018).
C. Project Direct Beneficiaries
20. As of 30 June 2018, the project benefited a cumulative total of 1,013,471 people directly, comprising 1,010,638 farmers in the project area and 2,833 management staff. The newly added beneficiaries include 65,123 farmers and 167 management staff, who are mainly beneficiaries of newly built roads and updated canals in Yunnan during the period of Jan-Jun 2018.
1. Direct Beneficiary Farmers
21. Farmers have benefited from improved low-and-medium-yield farmlands; demonstrated
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 6
greenhouses, pollution-free and/or safe agriculture, and organic and/or green agriculture, project provided trainings, project supported WUAs and FPAs, and project created employment opportunities. Some farmers have benefited from more than one area. For example, some farmers planted crops in the improved low-and-medium-yield farmland. They also earned more income as workers for the project construction, etc. The project direct farmer beneficiaries are presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Project Direct Beneficiaries-Farmers (as of 30/06/2018) Beneficiary Beneficiaries HH (No.) Total Women EM Poverty (persons) (%) (%) (%) A. Farmers: cultivators/contractors of the improved 253,699 988,903 50.7 11.5 3.8 low-and-medium-yield farmland B. Managers and cultivators of demonstration greenhouses 12,294 49,074 53.1 2.2 5.5 C. Cultivators of the pollution-free and/or safe agriculture 15,503 60,553 52.9 4.5 4 D. Cultivators of the organic and/or green agriculture 387 1,757 53.6 100 1.2
E. Pilot solar insect killer lamp 3,390 10,172 50 0 F. Farmer trainees and/or involved in publicity 115,734 44.1 7.7 23.5 G. WUA member (33 WUAs) 24,092 74,973 49.8 24.4 0.1 H. FPA members (54 FPAs) 5,625 19,867 49.8 9.6 0.9 I. Project employment 6,424 6,424 (i) Project construction workers 18,442 18,500 50.8 26.3 8.9 (ii) Employees for project operation 2,270 2,270 42.7 1.4 0.1 As of 30/06/2018 263,279 1,010,638 51.5 11.6 3.9 As of 31/12/2017 246,377 944,515 51.5 10.6 3.9 Jan-Jun 2018 16,902 65,123 51.8 5.8 4.2 Sources: the project PPMS, the six participating provinces’ external monitoring reports (Jan-Jun 2018), communications with the six external monitoring agencies, PMOs of the participating provinces, and some PMOs of the participating counties during September 2018.
2. Direct Beneficiary Management Staff
22. As of 30 June 2018, a total of 2,833 management staff have participated in the project supported trainings and study tours domestically or overseas. Of the total, 35.5% are women (Table 7).
Table 7: Project Direct Beneficiaries- CAD Officials (as of 30/06/2018) Total trainees (persons) Of which, women (%) Anhui 781 40.5 Heilongjiang 483 40.2 Henan 794 28.5 Jilin 389 40.0 Ningxia 215 24.7 Yunnan 171 36.3 As of 30/06/2018 2,833 35.5 As of 31/12/2017 2,666 34.9 Jan-Jun 2018 167 45.7
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 7
Sources: the project PPMS, and the external social monitoring reports of the six participating provinces in Sept. 2018.
D. Consultation and Participation
23. During the project implementation, the participating counties and provinces conducted a large number of inclusive consultations in forms of publicity on the project, assessment farmer training needs for development of training details, consultation with farmers for making annual work plans, survey of individual households for deeply understanding the project results, and so on.
24. As of 30 June 2018, a total of 745 trainings/publicity/study tours in 5,168 person-months were provided to 115,110 farmers. Of the participants, 51.1% are women, and 5.5% were farmers from poverty households (Table 8). Of the total trainings, 358 were provided between January-June 2018.
Table 8: Farmer Trainings and Study Tours (as 30/06/2018) Training Training inputs (person-months) Participants No. Total Publicity Technical WUA FPA Total Women Poverty training (person) (%) (%) Anhui 72 654.4 415.3 232.2 6.9 9,727 56.5 6.5 Heilongjiang 129 1,064.0 712.0 342.0 10.0 32,984 53.4 4.8 Henan 85 276.0 102.8 173.2 7,242 50.7 4.2 Jilin 196 1,015.9 325.3 675.6 15.0 28,583 48.3 4.6 Ningxia 168 1,233.4 693.7 515.5 10.7 13.5 17,445 42.0 3.1 Yunnan 95 924.3 373.0 432.0 28.0 91.3 19,753 41.2 10.0 As of 30/06/2018 745 5,168.1 2,622.1 2,370.6 48.7 126.7 115,734 48.4 6.4 As of 31/12/2017 696 4,809.6 2,378.8 2,266.3 44.3 102.2 111,867 48.2 5.5 Jan-Jun 2018 49 358.4 243.4 104.2 4.3 24.5 3,867 55.6 34.0 Sources: the project PPMS, and the external social monitoring reports of the six participating provinces in Sept 2018.
E. Grievance Redress Mechanism
25. The six participating provinces have established their own grievance redress mechanisms during the project implementation. Project related information boards including contact details were set up in the project area. People can complain and ask for solutions using the four-layer mechanism: from village management committees, up to the project county PMOs, further to municipality PMOs, and at last to the Provincial PMOs. Farmers can also directly complain to county or provincial PMO. As of 30 June 2018, no complain was from the villagers.
F. Actual Impacts of Land Occupation
1. Permanent Land Occupation
26. The resettlement framework has been followed by all the participating counties. The Involuntary Resettlement policy of ADB was not triggered, because no land acquisition and resettlement occurred during the project implementation stage. The project permanent land occupation has been minimized by updating the canals and field roads in their original locations as
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 8
much as possible, and cutting off curves of the canals. All permanent occupied land was still collectively owned by the communities, and no need to transferred to state-owned land. As of 30 June 2018, a total of 794.1 mu (equivalent to 52.9 ha) of land have been occupied permanently (Table 9). Of which, 4 mu were occupied between January to June 2018. Land loss area of each affected household was small, and land loss rate of all affected households was less than 1%. Main reasons of the land occupation were newly constructed irrigation canals/ditches and widened field roads. Compensation for most of the land-occupation affected households was reallocation of same amount of collectively-held farmland in their villages, and the other affected households donated their land and did not ask for compensation.
Table 9: Permanent Land Occupation (as of 30/06/2018) Land occupied (mu) Affected Affected Affected Land Land villages HH people occupied occupied Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 (No.) (No.) (persons) (mu/HH) (mu/person) Anhui 0.2 17.3 55 1,993 7,329 0.009 0.001 Heilongjiang 0.0 0.5 45 0 0 0 0 Henan 0.0 9.4 115 3,130 12,725 0.003 0.001 Jilin 0.0 3.2 3 8 22 0.4 0.145
Ningxia 0.0 1.0 36 Yunnan 3.8 762.7 38 12,380 48,614 0.06 0.015 Total 4.0 794.1 293 17,250 68,485 0.044 0.011 Sources: the project PPMS, the six participating provinces’ external social monitoring reports (Jan-Jun 2018), and communications with the external monitoring agencies and PMOs at provincial and county levels during Sept 2018.
27. The main reasons for permanent land occupation in Yunnan include construction of new service roads, new canals and drainage ditches, and widening the old field roads. For example, in Qilin subproject area, construction of a new canal of 36 km long and 1 m wide occupied 55.3 mu of farmland, and widening and lengthening a old service road from 2.1 km long and 2.2 m wide to 13.8 km long and 4.5 m wide permanently occupied 86.3 mu of farmland. Permanent land occupation in the other is little. Main reasons are construction of the new tube wells, irrigation pumping stations, and cutting off curves of the irrigation canals. Actually, cutting off the curves of the irrigation canals saved more farmland than newly occupied. Detailed information on the permanent land occupation by the participating provinces is presented in section D of the appendixes.
28. The compensation measures vary across the provinces and from one subproject to another. In Anhui, Heilongjiang, Henan, and Jilin, the permanently occupied land was mainly due to construction of the new tube wells and the irrigation pumping stations. Each well occupied 2 m2 of farmland in Henan and Heilongjiang, 0.5 m2 in Anhui, and 0.5 m2 to 8 m2 in Jilin. The new tube wells were constructed in the zone between field roads and the farmland in Heilongjiang, occupied the collectively held land, and did not occupied individual farmer’s land. The total occupied land area was small and land loss of the households was little. The affected households were offered priorities to use the irrigation water and to be employed in maintenance of the irrigation systems. The affected households did not ask for other compensation.
29. In Ningxia, only cutting-off the irrigation curves led to a little amount of permanently
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 9
occupied farmland. The affected households were compensated with either reduction of compulsory labour contribution or getting same amount of the collectively-held farmland.
30. In Yunnan, most of the permanently occupied farmland was compensated with reallocation of pieces of collectively-held farmland. In some subproject areas, the affected households donated the land and did not ask for any compensation. For example, construction of field roads in Yiliang subproject area permanently occupied 0.1 mu farmland of Mr. Hongbin’s family. His family has more than 5 mu of farmland and donated the occupied farmland.
31. As of 30 June 2018, no households complain about the land occupation and the compensation.
2. Temporary Land Occupation
32. Impact of temporary land occupation was minimized by conducting the project construction work in non-growing seasons, occupying non-farmland, using ready-mix concrete, etc. All the temporary occupied land has been restored immediately after completion of the project construction work. As of 30 June 2018, no villagers complain about the temporarily occupied land.
33. Compensation measures to the temporarily occupied land vary from one place to another. In Heilongjiang, Henan, Jilin and Ningxia, almost all construction work was conducted during off-farming seasons, and restored immediately after completion of the construction. No crops were affected. Affected households did not ask for any compensation.
34. In Anhui and Yunnan, some crops were cleared and some trees were cut down for the project construction work in some project villages. The trees cut down were given to the affected households. The project replanted saplings free of charge as compensations to the affected households. The crop-clearance affected households were compensated with cash by the project contractors.
G. Implementation Progress of the EMDPs
1. Progress of the four EMDPs’ implementation
35. As far as the project activities completed, most actions in the four EMDPs have been implemented as planned. The project information was disclosed to both Han and ethnic minority people during the implementation phase. Ethnic minority people were equitably and culturally appropriately consulted in their villages in both Standard Chinese and ethnic minority people’s languages including Mongolian and Korean. Potential negative impact such as land occupation and construction disturbance was avoided, minimized, or mitigated by taking technical and management measures. For example, the project improved the canals by cutting off their curves, and upgraded bridges, culverts, and other irrigation system structures in their original locations. Detailed implementation progresses of the four subprojects are presented in A-table 22 to A-table 28.
36. The only target which has not yet been met is related to the project created employment opportunities. It is stated in the EMDPs for Dumeng and Hailin subprojects in Heilongjiang
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 10
Province that the project would create 390 unskilled employment opportunities for local farmers, with 270 being taken by women and ethnic minority. However, the subproject created only 30 unskilled jobs in Dumeng and 140 unskilled jobs in Hailin, because most of the activities were taken over by machines. Moreover, most of the Korean farmers moved away from their villages to South Korea for better jobs. Employment opportunities taken by ethnic minority people are less than the targets.
2. Participation of the Ethnic Minority People in Ningxia and Yunnan
37. Although no EMDP has been prepared for Ningxia and Yunnan subprojects, this report also assessed participation of ethnic minority people in these two subprojects, because in general, more ethnic minority people are living in Ningxia and Yunnan than in most provinces in China. This report assesses ethnic minorities’ participation in the subproject areas where ethnic minority people accounts for more than 10% of the total population. In total, ethnic minorities’ participation in two participating counties in Ningxia and six participating counties in Yunnan are assessed.
38. In Ningxia, rural ethnic minority people accounts for 18.7% of the total rural population in the project area. Of the ethnic minority people, 93% are Hui people (A-table 5). The ethnic minority people concentrated in Wuzhong and Linwu subproject areas, accounting for 44.2% and 75.1% of the total people respectively. Hui villagers can well speak Mandarin. No much difference is between the Hui people and Han people in terms of land contracted and cropping system. In these subprojects, the ethnic minorities equitably participated in and benefit from the project. Detailed information is presented in section E of the Appendixes.
39. Although no EMDP was submitted to ADB, the subprojects, especially Wuzhong and Lingwu, have developed key principles to maximize benefits to the ethnic minority people while minimize the possible negative impact: (i) equal consultation with ethnic minority people; (ii) equal access to the provided trainings; (iii) equal access to the project created opportunities; (iv) equal participation in the project supported WUAs; and (v) equal participation in the project supported FPAs. All these principles have been followed during the project implementation except the ethnic minorities’ participation in the project supported trainings. (A-table 31 and A-table 33)
40. Similar situation is in Yunnan. In the subproject areas, ethnic minority farmers equitably participated in the project trainings. The trainings were provided in both Mandarin and/or ethnic minority languages whenever necessary. Detailed information is presented in the section E of the appendixes.
H. Progress of the GAP Implementation
41. Generally speaking, the GPA has been implemented as planned. The project information was equitably disclosed to both men and women during the project implementation phase. Women and men were equitably involved in the publicity campaigns, equitably engaged in the farmer training needs assessment for development of training details, and equitably consulted for making the annual work plans. As of 30 June 2018, a total of 791 trainings/publicity/study tours in 5,198 person-months were provided to 113,474 farmers. Of the participants, about half (48.4%) are women. Of the farmer trainings, 76.6% were organized in villages. Of the 26,352
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 11
employment opportunities created by the project, 50.8% were taken by women.
42. The project supported and strengthened 33 WUAs with 24,096 members and 153 managers. Of the total members, 37.3% are women. Of the total managers, 28.1% are women. The project supported 54 FPAs with 5,625 members and 276 managers. Among the members, 34.6% are women. Among the managers, 28.5% are women. Women’s share in the WUA management bodies has not yet met the target.
43. More than 30% of the people engaged in the project consultation and participation for the project decision making are women. Trainings on gender awareness and the GAP implementation provided to the project management staff. The six provincial ACWFs’ capacities in thematic skills related to community empowerment and gender issues was improved by participating in provincial level project meetings, workshops, and trainings. Capacities of county and village women federations have also enhanced by participating in the county level project meetings for the project designs, implementation, monitoring, workshops, and trainings related to leadership and thematic skills.
44. Detailed information on the GAP implementation is presented in A-table 41 in the section F in the appendix. GAP implementation by each of the six participating province is presented in A-table 42 and A-table 43.
I. Socioeconomic Development of the Project Area
45. Socioeconomic data for 2018 are not available so far. The data for 2017 is used here, and will be updated next time.
46. With support of the project, the irrigation and agricultural conditions have been improved, and the farmer’s capacity was enhanced, the grain production has increased by 20% in as of 30 June 2018 over that in 2009, the yield of grain, cash crops and vegetable also increased a lot over those in 2010 (Table 10). .
Table 10: Key Socioeconomic Indicators in the project Area Targets* 30/06/20187 Completion rate (%) Grain production Anhui, Heilongjiang, Henan, and Jilin ton 662,700 713,784 107.7 Ningxia and Yunnan ton 211,300 239,608 113.4 Yields Grain crop Ton/ha 7.31 8.69 118.9 Cash crop Ton/ha 2.41 10.87 451.0 Vegetable Ton/ha 32.0 35.47 110.8 Rural net income8 CNY/person 4,012 9,476 *: targets of yields are for 2018, and production and rural net income are for 2020. Sources: the project PPMS, the six participating provinces’ external social monitoring reports (Jan-Jun 2018), and communications with the external monitoring agencies and PMOs at provincial and county levels during September 2018.
47. Major grain crops in the project area include wheat, maize, rice, potato, and bean. Major
7 Socioeconomic indicators for 2018 are not available so far and can only be available in the first half of 2019. 8 The rural incomes are at current prices of the years
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 12
cash crops include tobacco, rapeseed, cotton, water melon, and apple. The figures of outputs and yields of the crops were mainly got from survey of the county and township agricultural departments.
J. Poverty Reduction
48. Poverty data for 2018 are not available so far. The data for as of 30 June 2018 is still be used here, and will be updated next time.
49. Rural poverty reduced rapidly over the past years in the project area and in China. Although the poverty incidence in the project area as a whole decreased to 3.6% in as of 30 June 2018, in some subproject areas, such as Linquan in Anhui, Fuyu in Heilongjiang, Xiangfu in Henan, Helong in Heilongjiang, and Zhaoyang in Yunnan, there were still a lot of people living in poverty as of 30 June 20189. The project paid much attention to the poor’s participation during the period January-June 2018.
K. O&M of Project Supported Infrastructure and Facilities
50. Use rights of the project supported irrigation systems, service roads, agricultural machines, demonstration greenhouses belong to the local residents in the project area. The ownerships vary to some degree across the participating counties. In general, after completion of the construction work, ownership of the project supported canal structures and irrigation systems will be transferred to township governments and/or village committees, who are responsible for managing and maintaining the systems. The project village committees will also take care of the project supported service roads. The project provided agricultural machines are used and managed either by farmer cooperatives, or individual households, or the village as a whole, while ownership of some machines belongs to the township government. For example, 6 tractors provided by the project are used and managed by 6 villages in Woyang County, and owed by the township government. The tractors services for planting and harvest for poor households are free of charge and for non-poor are at market prices. Income generated from the tractor services was shared by the villages and the township government. The township governments utilize the income for poverty reduction in the project area.
51. The project supported farm shelterbelts and environment protection forests either belong to and cared by individual farm households if planted in the individual cultivated land or belong to and cared by villages if planted in the village collectively held land.
52. During January to June 2018, Anhui, Jinli and Ningxia made efforts to support development of WUAs and FPAs. Some new WUAs and FPAs have been established. Management mechanisms of these organizations need to be highly strengthened.
L. Other Social Concerns
As of 30 June 2018, no other social risk has been identified.
9 Poverty incidence in 2018 can only be available in the first half of 2019.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 13
IV. KEY ISSUES
53. The following issues are identified and need be appropriately and adequately addressed: (i) operation and maintenance mechanism of the project upgraded irrigation systems and supported agriculture facilities need be further strengthened; (ii) management systems of the WUAs and FPAs are not perfect and needs be further improved; and (iii) women’s participation especially in the management bodies of the WUAs and FPAs are lower than the targets in the GAP, and needs be promoted.
V. RECOMMENDATIONS
54. The following recommendations are for the Project
1. Further strengthening management capacity of the WUAs
55. Some WUAs are just established and some WUAs’ have extended their responsible irrigation areas. The WUAs are responsible for sustainable irrigation of a large amount of farmland. Their management capacity needs be further strengthened. The capacity building will focus on establishing and improving rules and regulations of the WUAs’ operation.
2. Building management capacity of the project villages
56. The project improved irrigation systems and service roads are taken care by the project villages together with water resources administrative departments at township or county levels. Management capacity of the villages is crucial for sustainable function of the above mentioned items. It is better that the project further enhance the villages’ management capacity technically and/or financially. Not every project village has their WUAs. Without WUA, the project supported irrigation systems are and will be managed and maintained by the project villages. Their capacity needs be enhanced.
3. Promoting women’s participation in the WUA&FPAs management
57. In the management bodies of some WUAs and FPAs, women account for less than 35% of the total, which has not yet achieved the GAP targets. To encourage and facilitate more women to participate in the WUAs and the FPAs management, and play more roles.
VI. FOCUSES OF NEXT MONITORING REPORT
58. The next external social monitoring report will focus on the following areas: management situation of the WUAs and the FPAs; (ii) management mechanisms of the project supported irrigation systems, the service roads, the project provided agricultural machines; and (iii) women’s participation in the management bodies of the WUAs and the FPAs.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 14
VII. APPENDIXES
A. Project Area by Province
59. Socioeconomic information for 2018 is not available so far and can only be available in the first half of 2019. Therefore, socioeconomic information for as of 30 June 2018 is still used in the section.
1. In Anhui
60. The project area in Anhui includes 61 villages in the 8 participating counties, with a total population of 235,240 people as of 30 June 2018. Of which, 47.9% are female, and 5.0% were in poverty. Poverty incidence in Linquan, Yingquan, Yingzhou and Jieshou was over 5% as of 30 June 2018 (A-table 1).
A-table 1: Project Area and the Population in Anhui Province (as of 30/06/2018) Participating county Administrative Population Villages (#) Total (persons) Female (%) Poverty (%) Mengcheng 4 27,200 47.2 4.3 Woyang 8 26,000 47.1 1.8 Funan 8 28,300 47.9 4.7 Jieshou 11 36,400 47.8 5.0 Linquan 6 32,100 48.2 9.0 Taihe 7 21,430 47.3 2.0 Yingquan 7 31,670 48.3 6.0 Yingzhou 10 32,140 49.1 5.2 Total (8) 61 235,240 47.9 5.0 Source: Anhui Provincial PMO and the external monitoring agency in September 2018.
2. In Heilongjiang
61. Heilongjiang subproject area includes 44 villages in the 16 participating counties, with a total population of 70,992 people from 21,330 households as of 30 June 2018. Of which, 44.8% are female, and 4.7% were in poverty. As of 31 December as of 30 June 2018, poverty incidence in Fuyu subproject area was as high as 16.2%, and in Ning’an, Qing’an and Raohe was all higher than 5% (A-table 2).
A-table 2: Project Area and the Population in Heilongjiang Province (as of 30/06/2018) Participating Administrative Households Population county Villages (No.) (No.) Total (persons) Female (%) Poverty (%) Binxian 4 3,578 15,382 35.0 1.0 Yufu 5 5,034 13,193 47.2 16.2 Hailin 1 264 629 44.4 0.3 Ning’an 3 1,030 3,600 48.0 5.0 Fujin 5 883 2,842 48.5 0 Huachuan 3 2,136 6,211 61.3 2.0 Huanan 1 340 1,057 51.0 1.5 Qing’an 2 843 3,628 45.7 5.3 Wangkui 1 750 3,000 40.0 3.0 Dumeng 1 1,278 3,240 48.4 3.0
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 15
Participating Administrative Households Population county Villages (No.) (No.) Total (persons) Female (%) Poverty (%) Luobei 4 1,216 4,041 46.6 2.3 Suibin 6 734 2,232 47.0 3.0 Baoqing 2 1,425 5,700 40.0 0.5 Raohe 2 263 1,057 40.0 6.0 Hulin 3 844 2,833 53.7 2.0 Neijiang 1 712 2,347 37.5 2.6 Total (16) 44 21,330 70,992 44.8 4.7 Source: Heilongjiang Provincial PMO and the external monitoring agency in September 2018.
3. In Henan
62. Henan subproject area covers 143 administrative villages in the 9 participating counties. Total population in the project area was 219,955. Among the total population, 50.6% are female. Subproject areas of Xiangfu and Qixian had more poverty people, who need more attention. (A-table 3)
A-table 3: Project Area and the Population in Henan Province (as of 30/06/2018) Participating county Administrative Population Village (#) Total (person) Female (%) Poverty (%) Zhongmou 5 6,100 49.5 0.4 Changyuan 30 30,012 60.0 1.2 Lankao 12 19,133 49.1 1.1 Mengzhou 5 10,951 50.0 0.5 Qinyang 34 52,906 50.0 2.4 Xiangfu 20 34,425 49.3 16.5 Qixian 25 41,530 50.0 7.0 Yanjin 8 17,816 50.1 0 Xinzheng 4 7,082 33.3 0 Total (9) 143 219,955 50.6 4.8 Source: Henan Provincial PMO and the external monitoring agency in September 2018.
4. In Jilin
63. Subproject area in Jilin Province scatters over 106 administrative villages in the 15 participating counties. There were 164,157 people in the project area as of 30 June 2018. Of which, 47.9% are female. Over 10% of the total population in Helong and Taobei subprojects were in poverty in as of 30 June 2018. Those people need more attention. Attention also need be paid to 5% of the poor in Dongliao subproject area. (A-table 4).
A-table 4: Project Area and the Population in Jilin Province (as of 30/06/2018) Participating county Administrative Population Village (#) Total (person) Female (%) Poverty (%) Taobei 19 21,000 49 10.0 Jiutai 9 7,365 49.7 0.4 Shuangyang 7 11,900 45 2.5 Dehui 3 9,597 46 2.0 Nong’an 6 13,846 46 0.0 Yushu 7 18,200 45 0.5 Lishu 3 6,540 49 1.4 Dongliao 8 12,050 49 5.0 Dongfeng 3 3,427 49 0.0 Changyi 12 21,832 56 0.1
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 16
Participating county Administrative Population Village (#) Total (person) Female (%) Poverty (%) Liuhe 7 11,825 49.7 0.0 Meihekou 7 8,116 47 1.1 Huinan 7 8,230 45 0.0 Dunhua 4 5,050 48 2.8 Helong 4 5,179 48 19.9 Total (15) 106 164,157 47.9 2.9 Source: Jilin Provincial PMO and the external monitoring agency in September 2018.
5. In Ningxia
64. Subproject area in Ningxia consists of 36 administrative villages in the 8 participating counties. Of the total 63,579 people in the project areas as of 30 June 2018, 48.7% are female, 18.7% were ethnic minority people, and 17.4% were Hui Ethnicity. That is, 93% of the ethnic minority people were Hui Ethnicity. Poverty incidences in the project villages were all less than 1% (A-table 5). Poverty incidences in the project villages are much lower than that in the other part of Ningxia for two major reasons. One is that the project area is flat and historically has less poverty incidence than the other part.10 Second is that the villagers benefited a lot from the project. With introduction and improvement of the irrigation systems, the dryland in the project villages has changed to irrigated land. With the irrigated farmland, some households shifted cropping system from grain crop-focused to cash-crop focused, which generated more income. Some households transferred use rights of the irrigated land to others and moved outside the village for wage work. Before the project, the dryland could not be transferred. The households got income from both transferring the land at CNY 10,500-CNY 12,000 per hectare, and wage income from non-farm jobs.
A-table 5: Project Area and the Population in Ningxia (as of 30/06/2018) Population Participating Administrative Total Female Ethnic Minority Hui ethnic Poverty county Village (#) (person) (%) (%) group (%) (%) Helan 3 5,051 48.9 6.0 5.1 0 Lingwu 4 4,180 48.5 75.1 70.1 0.26 Nongken 2 3,164 48.9 7.4 6.9 0 Yongning 2 9,043 48.2 1.9 1.5 0 Qingtongxia 6 5,751 46.45 8.2 7.1 0.04 Wuzhong-Shizhi 7 16,788 49.2 44.2 40.2 0 Pingluo 5 2,013 48.8 5.0 4 0.45 Zhongwei 7 17,589 49.2 0.3 0.3 0.08 Total (8) 36 63,579 48.7 18.7 17.4 0.02 Source: Ningxia PMO and the external monitoring agency in September 2018.
6. In Yunnan
65. Yunnan subproject area includes 76 administrative villages in the 12 participating counties,
10 Poverty population in Ningxia are mainly concentrated in the southern part of the Region, that is, Liupan Mountain area. The project area is located in the northern part of Ningxia
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 17
with a total 74,320 people as of 30 June 2018. Of the total population, 49.7% were female, and 26.2% were ethnic minority people. The minority population involves 9 ethnic minority groups. Ethnic minority people of Dai, Naxi, Bai, Yi, Lisu, and Miao in some of the subproject villages account for over 10% of the total population (A-table 6). Equitable participation of the ethnic minority people in those participating counties needs more attention. Participation of the poor should also be paid adequate attention.
A-table 6: Project Area and the Population in Yunnan Province (as of 30/06/2018) Participating Village Rural HH Population county (#) (#) Total Women Poverty EM Dai Naxi Bai Yi Lisu Miao Hui Tibetan Pumi (persons) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Changning 7 2,358 8,252 47.4 4 14.4 6.9 7.5 Tengchong 10 5,080 25,400 51.2 0.7 0.3 0.4 Yaoan 6 7,407 29,867 46.7 5.0 3.2 1.6 1.6 Eryuan 13 7,109 21,326 49.9 2.0 78.0 77.3 0.7 Heqing 9 7,953 25,256 50.2 0.92 80.5 0.2 80.1 0.2 Mangshi 1 1,719 8,239 50.0 1.89 95.0 95.0 Shiping 5 9,241 25,226 54.2 40.1 40 .1 Yiliang 6 16,725 54,799 50.1 0.1 0 Songming 2 1,390 5,659 48.8 0 Yulong 8 5,176 22,000 46.9 5.0 63.9 37.8 4.2 19.6 1.3 1 Qilin 5 6,460 24,575 49.6 0 Zhaoyang 4 4,739 16,804 47.9 10.0 0.5 0.5 Total (12) 76 75,357 267,403 49.6 2.5 26.8 3.3 3.1 14.1 4.0 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 Source: Yunnan county PMOs and the external monitoring agency in September 2018.
B. Summary Activities Completed
66. The project activities conducted in total and by province are presented in the following sections. Based on the activities, the project beneficiaries, land occupation situation, implementation of the EMDPs and the GAPs, and other related issues are assessed.
a. Summary Activities Completed in Total
67. Summary activities completed by the project are presented in A-table 7.
A-table 7: Summary Activities completed in Total
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018
Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1. Surface water irrigation system completed ha 56,588 69,969 110 70,079 123.8 and/or upgraded * Incremental areas ha 8,650 4,538 4,538 52.5 Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 3,852 3,218 63 3,282 85.2 Canal system structures built 122,162 3,680 125,842 * Bridges No. 9,566 7,518 141 7,659 80.1 * Weirs No. 226 6 6 2.7 * Culverts No. 6,838 4,778 140 4,918 71.9 * Gates No. 2,580 3,839 13 3,852 149.3 * Aqueducts No. 399 169 169 42.4 * Drop structures No. 98 491 11 502 512.2 * Inverted siphons No. 15 3 3 20.0 * Overflow weirs No. 2 0.0
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 18
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018
Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) * Outlet structures No. 7,161 3,741 49 3,790 52.9 * Tail water No. 2,486 1,155 15 1,170 47.1 Irrigation pumping stations newly constructed No. 78 42 42 53.8 and/or improved * Newly constructed No. 9 9 9 100.0 * improved No. 69 33 33 47.8 2. Tube well (groundwater) irrigation systems ha 34,221 41,183 34,221 83.1 developed and/or improved * Incremental areas ha 30,019 24,246 24,246 80.8 New tube wells constructed No. 7,512 6,924 23 6,947 92.5 Existing tube wells improved No. 799 685 685 85.7 Rural electric cables and accessories installed km 1,781 2,960 6 2,966 166.5 Transformers installed No. 921 414 7 421 45.7 3. Water-saving technology promoted ha 74,854 66,651 380 67,031 89.5 Canals lined km 1,665 1,903 41 1,944 116.8 Low-pressure pipelines installed km 1,326 1,283 6 1,289 97.2 Sprinkler irrigation installed ha 2,824 2,808 2,808 99.4 Micro-irrigation ha 4 24 24 592.5 Small irrigation storage structures developed No. 19 81 81 426.3 * newly constructed No. 11 59 59 536.4 * improved No. 8 22 22 275.0 4. WUAs supported No. 85 28 5 33 38.8 Start-up (CNY10,000) 106 4 4 3.8 Buildings m2 244 0.0 Training and study pm 929 40 4 44 4.8 Water-measuring equipment set 54 0.0 Equipment set 106 45 151 Output 2: Improved Agricultural Support 5. Soil quality improved ha 67,138 40,926 1,676 42,602 63.5 Field leveled ha 19,540 10,355 435 10,790 55.2 Land deep plowed ha 25,846 14,308 435 14,743 57.0 Balanced fertilizer application introduced ha 27,546 16,262 806 17,068 62.0 6. Service roads improved km 1,752 1,893 57 1,950 111.3 7. Agricultural practices improved through Quality seed production area expanded ha 1,226 3,200 3,200 261.0 Quality seed storage warehouse constructed m2 7,510 0.0 Quality seed drying areas constructed m2 56,400 0.0 Quality seed production increased tons 4,414 1,313 1,313 29.7 Agricultural machine provided set 742 928 8 936 126.1 IPM program introduced on ha 9,725 10,439 133 10,572 108.7 * equipment set 555 2,204 202 2,406 433.5 * vehicle No. 9 0.0 8. Land degradation reduced through Farm shelter belts planted ha 2,580 3,057 41 3,098 120.1 Environmental protection forests planted ha 275 183 183 66.5 Straw returned to farmland ha 34,861 16,365 16,365 46.9 9. Farmer capacity improved through FPA established and/or strengthened No. 66 39 15 54 81.8 training and study tours organized pm 1,534 87 7 94 6.1 instruments and equipment financed set 412 153 49 202 49.0 Farmer training pm 16,903 4,572 4,572 27.0 publicity and start up 6,382 2,349 243 2,593 40.6
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 19
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018
Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%)
technical training 10,521 2,298 104 2,402 22.8 10. Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha 17,634 18,328 18,328 103.9 Demonstration greenhouses constructed ha 201 33 33 16.4 greenhouse equipment provided set 16,971 319 319 1.9 civil work constructed m2 686,110 686,110 Pollution-free and/or safe agriculture ha 15,088 17,850 118.3 demonstrated, including 17,850 Equipment provided set 911 669 669 73.4 Declarations supported No. 16 1 1 2 12.5 Organic and/or green agriculture demonstrated ha 2,345 445 445 19.0 Equipment provided set 273 0.0 Declarations supported No. 12 0.0 Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 11. Training of project management staff Domestic training pm 3,262 462 9 471 14.4 Oversea training pm 36 53 53 148.1 12. Study tour of project management staff Domestic study tour pm 1,666 153 16 169 10.1 Oversea study tour pm 201 7 7 3.4 Sources: the project PPMS and the external monitoring reports for Jan-Jun 2018.
b. Summary Activities Completed in Anhui Province
A-table 8: Summary Activities completed in Anhui Province Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1. Surface water irrigation system completed ha 600 8,907 0 8,907 1,484.5 and/or upgraded Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 1,058 495 0 495 46.8
Canal system structures built * Bridges No. 2,675 1,115 33 1,148 42.9 * Culverts No. 2,639 2,258 140 2,398 90.9 * Gates No. 61 9 1 10 16.4 Irrigation pumping stations constructed No. 7 1 1 14.3 * Newly constructed No. 4 1 1 25.0 * improved No. 3 2. Tube well (groundwater) irrigation systems ha 17,083 10,707 10,707 developed and/or improved 0 62.7
New tube wells constructed No. 3,746 3,082 23 3,105 82.9
Rural electric cables and accessories installed km 16 0.0 Transformers installed No. 59 39 7 46 78.0
3 Water-saving technology promoted ha 16,626 0.0
Canals lined km 8 0.0 Low-pressure pipelines installed km 103 93 6 99 96.0 Sprinkler irrigation installed ha
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 20
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion rate (%) Micro-irrigation ha 30 0.0 4 WUAs supported No. 59 8 2 10 16.9
Start-up (CNY10,000) 100 2 2 2.0 Buildings m2 292 0.0 Training and study pm Equipment set 4 4 Output 2: Improved Agricultural Support 5. Soil quality improved ha 9,675 550 550 5.7
Field leveled ha 1,200 0.0 Land deep plowed ha 2,620 200 200 7.6 Balanced fertilizer application introduced ha 350 350 6. Service roads improved km 274 270 36 306 111.8
7 Agricultural practices improved through
Quality seed production area expanded ha 6
Quality seed storage warehouse constructed m2 450
Quality seed drying areas constructed m2 1,200
Quality seed production increased tons 16
Agricultural machine provided set 144 47 191 IPM program introduced on ha 480 480 including equipment and vehicle set 240 240 8. Land degradation reduced through
Farm shelter belts planted ha 336 178 16 194 57.6 Straw returned to farmland ha 10,970 320 320 2.9 9. Farmer capacity improved through
FPA established and/or strengthened no. 24 6 8 14 58.3 training and study tours organized pm 13 5 3 8 63.2
instruments and equipment financed set 3 0.0
Farmer training pm * publicity and start up pm 291 249 166 415 142.6 * technical training pm 1,164 196 36 232 19.9 10 Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha
Demonstration greenhouses constructed ha 19 2 2 12.1
greenhouse equipment provided set 61 61 civil work constructed m2 1,000 1,000 Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 11 Training of project management staff pm
Domestic training pm 1,827 63 1 64 3.5 Oversea training pm 4 0.0 12 Study tour of project management staff pm
Domestic study tour pm 251 16 1 17 6.8 Oversea study tour pm 35 Sources: the project PPMS and the Anhui monitoring reports for Jan-Jun 2018.
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 21
c. Summary Activities Completed in Heilongjiang Province
A-table 9: Summary Activities completed in Heilongjiang Province Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/ 2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1. Surface water irrigation system completed ha 13,986 11,859 11,859 84.8 and/or upgraded
Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 507 248 248 49.0 Irrigation system structure built
* Bridges No. 66 24 24 36.4 * Culverts No. 603 793 793 131.5 * Gates No. 133 64 64 48.1 * Aqueducts No. 15 8 8 53.3 * Drop structures No. 16 16 16 100.0 Outlet structures No. 2,599 58 58 2.2 Irrigation pumping stations constructed 2 1 1 50.0 * Newly constructed 1 0.0 * improved 1 1 1 100.0 2 Tube well (groundwater) irrigation systems ha 4,330 3,211 3,211 74.2 developed and/or improved *New tube wells constructed No. 249 193 193 77.5 *Existing tube wells improved 0 Rural electric cables and accessories installed km 36 36 36 100.0 Transformers installed No. 16 17 17 106.3 3 Water-saving technology promoted ha 12,220 10,635 10,635 87.0 Canals lined km 201 136 136 67.8 Sprinkler irrigation installed ha 1,150 1,802 1,802 156.7 4 WUAs supported No. 6 3 3 50.0 Buildings m2 4 10 10 250.0 Training and study pm 16 0.0 Water-mearing equipment set 10 0.0 Output 2: Improved Agricultural Support 5. Soil quality improved ha 7,495 7,229 7,229 96.4 Field leveled ha 5,329 3,063 3,063 57.5 Land deep plowed ha 4,960 2,353 2,353 47.4 Balanced fertilizer application introduced ha 4,564 1,813 1,813 39.7 6. Service roads improved km 264 277 277 105.1
7 Agricultural practices improved through
Quality seed storage warehouse constructed m2 3,900 3,200 3,200 82.1
Quality seed drying areas constructed m2 17,600 0.0 Quality seed production increased tons 1,313 1,313 Agricultural machine provided set 137 150 150 109.5 IPM program introduced on ha 1,000 2,225 2,225 222.5 including equipment and vehicle set 27 31 31 114.8
8. Land degradation reduced through Farm shelter belts planted ha 243 642 642 264.2 Straw returned to farmland ha 1,370 1,185 1,185 86.5 9. Farmer capacity improved through
FPA established and/or strengthened no. 2 2 2 100.0 * training and study tours organized pm 100 0.0 * instruments and equipment financed set 24 5 5 20.8
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 22
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/ 2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Farmer training pm 2,059 0.0 * publicity and start up pm 254 712 712 280.3 * technical training pm 1,805 342 342 18.9 10. Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha
Demonstration greenhouses constructed ha 5 1 1 11.1 * greenhouse equipment provided set 36 114 114 316.7 * civil work constructed m2 352,900 352,900 Pollution-free and/or sage agriculture ha 2,140 14,844 14,844 693.6 demonstrated * Equipment provided set 124 1 1 0.8 Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 11 Training of project management staff pm Domestic training pm 75 125 15 140 186.7 Oversea training pm 4 30 30 750.0 12 Study tour of project management staff pm
Domestic study tour pm 92 20 20 22.2 Oversea study tour pm 16 5 5 31.3 Sources: the project PPMS and the Heilongjiang monitoring reports for Jan-Jun 2018.
d. Summary Activities Completed in Henan Province
A-table 10: Summary Activities completed in Henan Province
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1. Surface water irrigation system completed and/or ha 500 1,467 1,467 293.4 upgraded Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 514 542 542 105.4 Irrigation system structure built
* Bridges No. 855 974 974 113.9 * Culverts No. 1,603 253 253 15.8 * Gates No. 20 2 2 10.0 Irrigation pumping stations constructed No. 15 10 10 66.7 2. Tube well (groundwater) irrigation systems ha 16,813 18,490 18,490 110.0 developed and/or improved New tube wells constructed No. 3,215 3,410 3,410 106.1 Existing tube wells improved No. 788 685 685 86.9 Rural electric cables and accessories installed km 1,694 2,689 2,689 158.7 Transformers installed No. 823 320 320 38.9 3 Water-saving technology promoted ha 13,510 15,003 15,003 111.1 Canals lined km 26 33 33 126.8 Low-pressure pipelines installed km 1,171 1,190 1,190 101.6 Sprinkler irrigation installed ha 3 Micro-irrigation ha 222 4 WUAs supported No. 1 1 1 100.0 Start-up (CNY10,000) 2 2 Buildings m2 60 0.0
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 23
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Training and study pm 2 0.0 Output 2: Improved Agricultural Support 5. Soil quality improved ha 18,193 10,962 10,962 60.3 Field leveled ha 2,826 900 900 31.8 Land deep plowed ha 5,620 5,687 5,687 101.2 Balanced fertilizer application introduced ha 6,837 4,375 4,375 64.0 6. Service roads improved km 628 648 648 103.2 7 Agricultural practices improved through IPM program introduced on ha 606 3,343 133 3,476 573.6 including equipment and vehicle set 1,160 200 1,360 8. Land degradation reduced through 9 0.0
Farm shelter belts planted ha 578 2,160 25 2,185 378.1 Straw returned to farmland ha 12,864 9,917 9,917 77.1 9. Farmer capacity improved through
FPA established and/or strengthened no. 7 6 6 85.7 * training and study tours organized pm 177 0.0 * instruments and equipment financed set 65 60 60 92.3 Farmer training pm 2,290 251 251 11.0 * publicity and start up pm 711 80 23 103 14.5 * technical training pm 1,579 171 2 173 11.0 10 Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha 672 118 118 17.6 Demonstration greenhouses constructed ha 72 18 18 25.1 * greenhouse equipment provided set 1,499 0.0 * civil work constructed m2 0 184,550 184,550 * declarations supported 3 0.0 Pollution-free and/or safe agriculture 600 100 16.7 demonstrated, including 100 * Equipment provided 300 125 125 41.7 Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 11 Training of project management staff pm
Domestic training pm 868 167 8 175 20.1 Oversea training pm 4 12 12 305.0 12 Study tour of project management staff pm
Domestic study tour pm 733 35 6 42 5.7 Oversea study tour pm 12 2 2 15.0 Sources: the project PPMS and the Henan monitoring reports for Jan-Jun 2018.
e. Summary Activities Completed in Jilin Province
A-table 11: Summary Activities completed in Jilin Province Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1 Surface water irrigation system completed and/or ha 14,484 17,687 93 17,780 122.8 upgraded Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 449 1,813 1,813 403.9 Irrigation system structure built Bridges No. 159 418 47 465 292.5
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 24
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Culverts No. 141 359 359 254.6 Gates No. 155 381 5 386 249.0 Aqueducts No. 26 9 9 34.6 Drop structures No. 4 8 8 200.0 Inverted siphons No. 14 2 2 14.3 Overflow weirs No. 2 0.0 Outlet structures No. 916 385 385 42.0 Irrigation pumping stations constructed no. 17 16 16 94.1 Newly constructed no. 1 5 5 500.0 improved no. 16 11 11 68.8 2 Tube well (groundwater) irrigation systems developed ha 2,508 1,813 1,813 72.3 and/or improved * Of which, incremental area ha 2,300 1,472 1,472 64.0 New tube wells constructed No. 302 236 236 78.1 Transformers installed No. 31 31 Rural electric cables and accessories installed km 62 62 3 Water-saving technology promoted ha 11,446 7,614 7,614 66.5 Canals lined km 201 125 6 131 65.2 Low-pressure pipelines installed km Sprinkler irrigation installed ha 992 992 992 100.0 Micro-irrigation ha 1 0.0 Movable flexible pipes supplied km 20 0.0 Small water storage structure improved No. 8 19 19 237.5 4 WUAs supported No. 10 3 3 6 60.0 Start-up (CNY10,000) 9 0.0 Buildings m2 80 0.0 Training and study pm 619 0.0 Equipment set 36 10 46 Water-mearing equipment set 44 2 2 4.5 Output 2: Improved Agricultural Support 5 Soil quality improved ha 7,665 5,489 5,489 71.6 Field leveled ha 4,525 1,847 1,847 40.8 Land deep plowed ha 1,400 1,857 1,857 132.6 Balanced fertilizer application introduced ha 1,786 1,786 1,786 100.0 6 Service roads improved km 155 303 10 314 202.5 7 Agricultural practices improved through Quality seed storage warehouse constructed m2 1,700 0.0 Quality seed drying areas constructed m2 11,600 0.0 Quality seed production increased tons 25 0.0 Agricultural machine provided set 208 113 5 118 56.7 IPM program introduced on ha * including equipment and vehicle set 20 298 2 300 1,500.0 8 Land degradation reduced through Farm shelter belts planted ha 673 30 30 4.5 Environmental protection forests planted ha 65 175 175 269.2 Straw returned to farmland ha 2,540 950 950 37.4 9 Farmer capacity improved through FPA established and/or strengthened no. 30 11 6 17 56.7 * training and study tours organized pm 804 15 15 1.9 * instruments and equipment financed set 131 72 24 96 73.3 Farmer training pm 3,431 1,001 1,001 29.2 * publicity and start up pm 1,751 325 325 18.6
CAD-Consolidated external social monitoring report for Loan 2943-PRC 25
Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) * technical training pm 1,680 676 676 40.2 10 Modern agri. technologies demonstrated ha Demonstration greenhouses constructed ha 6 3 3 59.3 * greenhouse equipment provided set 337 144 144 42.7 Pollution-free and/or sage agriculture demonstrated, ha 2,989 20 0.7 including 20 * Equipment provided set 83 21 21 25.3 Declarations supported no. 6 0.0 Organic and/or green agriculture demonstrated ha 1,575 0.0 Equipment provided set 133 0.0 Declarations supported no. 7 0.0 Output 3: Improvement of the Project Management 11 Training of project management staff pm Domestic training pm 270 32 32 11.9 Oversea training pm 4 0.0 12 Study tour of project management staff pm Domestic study tour pm 235 0.0 Oversea study tour pm 30 0.0 Sources: the project PPMS and the Jilin monitoring reports for Jan-Jun 2018.
f. Summary Activities Completed in Ningxia
A-table 12: Summary Activities completed in Ningxia Completion As of 31/12/2017 Jan-Jun 2018 As of 30/06/2018 Target Completed Completed Completed Completion Rate (%) Output 1: Improved Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure 1. Surface water irrigation system completed and/or ha 10,696 13,780 13,780 128.8 upgraded Irrigation and/or drainage canals dredged km 1,183 1,684 63 1,747 147.7 Irrigation system structure built Bridges No. 2,861 2,211 54 2,265 79.2 Weirs No. 226 0.0 Culverts No. 174 319 319 183.3 Gates No. 536 521 7 528 98.5 Aqueducts No. 357 147 147 41.2 Drop structures No. 78 467 11 478 612.8 Inverted siphons No. 1 0.0 Outlet structures No. 3,646 521 521 14.3